Page 2 :
Plant Physiology, 3rd ed, by Lincoln Taiz and Eduardo Zeiger, Hardcover: 690 pages, Publisher: Sinauer Associates; 3 edition (Aug 30 2002), Language: English, ISBN: 0878938230, , Book Description, With this Third Edition, the authors and contributors set a new, standard for textbooks in the field by tailoring the study of plant, physiology to virtually every student—providing the basics for, introductory courses without sacrificing the more challenging, material sought by upper-division and graduate-level students., Key pedagogical changes to the text will result in a shorter book., Material typically considered prerequisite for plant physiology, courses, as well as advanced material from the Second Edition,, will be removed and posted at an affiliated Web site, while many, new or revised figures and photographs (now in full color), study, questions, and a glossary of key terms will be added. Despite the, streamlining of the text, the new edition incorporates all the, important new developments in plant physiology, especially in cell,, molecular, and developmental biology., The Third Edition's interactive Web component is keyed to, textbook chapters and referenced from the book. It includes, WebTopics (elaborating on selected topics discussed in the text),, WebEssays (discussions of cutting-edge research topics, written by, those who did the work), additional study questions (by chapter),, additional references, and suggestions for further reading., , Book Info, Plant Physiology textbook covers the transport and translocation of, water and solutes, biochemistry and metabolism, and growth and, development. Twenty-three scientists contributed to the text.
Page 3 :
doi:10.1093/aob/mcg079, , Plant physiology. 3rd edn., L. Taiz and E. Zeiger., Sunderland: Sinauer, Associates. $104´95. 690 pp., , Plant physiology is part of the, essential core curriculum, every botanist has to master., As usually non-motile organisms that are, in most cases,, ®xed to a single locality for, their entire lifetime, plants, have special needs to cope, with widely disparate, and, often highly changeable environmental conditions., Physiological adaptations play as great a role in the, evolutionary struggle for life of a plant as morphological, ones., Plant physiology by Taiz and Zeiger (and a plethora of, contributing expert authors) is a well-received, established, textbook aimed at students taking introductory courses in, the ®eld. One's ®rst impression of the book is one of, excellent craftsmanship: from the eye-catching cover, to the, quality of the paper and print, this third edition of Plant, physiology is not only comprehensive, it is attractive. A, single encounter will turn the ®rst-time user into a potential, buyer. The book is subdivided into 25 chapters, grouped into, three larger sections (water, metabolism and development), that cover the major topics of modern plant physiology. All, topics are treated in a very balanced way, with approximately equal weight being lent to each. Starting with the, basics of each subject, the reader is taken to the very, forefront of current knowledge. The writing style is succinct, and lucid throughout, and the text is arranged in a twocolumn format that is very reader-friendly. Speci®c topics, are easy to ®nd using the detailed table of contents or, index., In the light of the explosive growth of our understanding, of physiological processes in plants resulting from technological advances in the ®eld of molecular biology, it is an, amazing achievement to ®nd that the authors have managed, to keep the book's length to a `mere' 690 pages. That this, has not been achieved at the expense of including recent, literature is borne out throughout the book: ®gures 19±41,, for example, have been adopted from a 2001 publication., The extensive reference lists that conclude each chapter also, demonstrate how up-to-date this third edition is, with a large, proportion of the references dating from the last 5 years. The, transfer of the apprentice from the textbook to the forefront, , research literature is greatly facilitated in this way. A, glossary giving a brief explanation of many technical terms, reinforces this impression., An outstanding feature of this textbook is the large, number of crisp ®gures, most of them in full colour., Although also rendering the ®gures aesthetically pleasing,, the use of colour usually serves a didactic purpose (which, may well be its primary cause). I found none of the ®gures to, be overladen with detail nor of inappropriate (microscopically small or in¯ated) size. Full marks for this!, Plant Physiology is a modern textbook with a refreshing, style and layout. The overall impression is one of a wellthought-out teaching aid. The authors/editors have achieved, a remarkable feat in bringing it up-to-date without allowing, any dead wood to accumulate (a symptom of ageing that, unfortunately befalls the majority of textbooks as they, advance through numerous editions). Let's hope they will, be able to retain this phoenix-like rejuvenating potential in, future editions. In its third edition, Plant physiology, successfully defends its position in the top league of, botanical textbooks. It is excellently produced, attractive, and fun to use. It can even make an aged botanist wish he, were an undergraduate student again!, Thomas Lazar, , Annals of Botany 91: 750-751, 2003, © 2003 Annals of Botany Company
Page 5 :
Chapter, , 1, , Plant Cells, , THE TERM CELL IS DERIVED from the Latin cella, meaning storeroom, or chamber. It was first used in biology in 1665 by the English botanist, Robert Hooke to describe the individual units of the honeycomb-like, structure he observed in cork under a compound microscope. The, “cells” Hooke observed were actually the empty lumens of dead cells, surrounded by cell walls, but the term is an apt one because cells are the, basic building blocks that define plant structure., This book will emphasize the physiological and biochemical functions of plants, but it is important to recognize that these functions, depend on structures, whether the process is gas exchange in the leaf,, water conduction in the xylem, photosynthesis in the chloroplast, or ion, transport across the plasma membrane. At every level, structure and, function represent different frames of reference of a biological unity., This chapter provides an overview of the basic anatomy of plants,, from the organ level down to the ultrastructure of cellular organelles. In, subsequent chapters we will treat these structures in greater detail from, the perspective of their physiological functions in the plant life cycle., , PLANT LIFE: UNIFYING PRINCIPLES, The spectacular diversity of plant size and form is familiar to everyone., Plants range in size from less than 1 cm tall to greater than 100 m. Plant, morphology, or shape, is also surprisingly diverse. At first glance, the, tiny plant duckweed (Lemna) seems to have little in common with a, giant saguaro cactus or a redwood tree. Yet regardless of their specific, adaptations, all plants carry out fundamentally similar processes and are, based on the same architectural plan. We can summarize the major, design elements of plants as follows:, • As Earth’s primary producers, green plants are the ultimate solar, collectors. They harvest the energy of sunlight by converting light, energy to chemical energy, which they store in bonds formed when, they synthesize carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water.
Page 6 :
2, , Chapter 1, FIGURE 1.1 Schematic representation of the body of a typical dicot. Cross sections of (A) the leaf, (B) the stem, and (C), the root are also shown. Inserts show longitudinal sections, of a shoot tip and a root tip from flax (Linum usitatissimum), showing the apical meristems. (Photos © J. Robert, Waaland/Biological Photo Service.), , • Terrestrial plants are structurally reinforced to support their mass as they grow toward sunlight against, the pull of gravity., • Terrestrial plants lose water continuously by evaporation and have evolved mechanisms for avoiding, desiccation., • Terrestrial plants have mechanisms for moving water, and minerals from the soil to the sites of photosynthesis and growth, as well as mechanisms for moving, the products of photosynthesis to nonphotosynthetic, organs and tissues., , OVERVIEW OF PLANT STRUCTURE, Despite their apparent diversity, all seed plants (see Web, Topic 1.1) have the same basic body plan (Figure 1.1). The, vegetative body is composed of three organs: leaf, stem,, and root. The primary function of a leaf is photosynthesis,, that of the stem is support, and that of the root is anchorage, and absorption of water and minerals. Leaves are attached, to the stem at nodes, and the region of the stem between, two nodes is termed the internode. The stem together with, its leaves is commonly referred to as the shoot., There are two categories of seed plants: gymnosperms, (from the Greek for “naked seed”) and angiosperms (based, on the Greek for “vessel seed,” or seeds contained in a vessel). Gymnosperms are the less advanced type; about 700, species are known. The largest group of gymnosperms is the, conifers (“cone-bearers”), which include such commercially, important forest trees as pine, fir, spruce, and redwood., Angiosperms, the more advanced type of seed plant,, first became abundant during the Cretaceous period, about, 100 million years ago. Today, they dominate the landscape,, easily outcompeting the gymnosperms. About 250,000, species are known, but many more remain to be characterized. The major innovation of the angiosperms is the, flower; hence they are referred to as flowering plants (see, Web Topic 1.2)., , Plant Cells Are Surrounded by Rigid Cell Walls, A fundamental difference between plants and animals is, that each plant cell is surrounded by a rigid cell wall. In, animals, embryonic cells can migrate from one location to, another, resulting in the development of tissues and organs, containing cells that originated in different parts of the, organism., In plants, such cell migrations are prevented because, each walled cell and its neighbor are cemented together by, a middle lamella. As a consequence, plant development,, , unlike animal development, depends solely on patterns of, cell division and cell enlargement., Plant cells have two types of walls: primary and secondary (Figure 1.2). Primary cell walls are typically thin, (less than 1 µm) and are characteristic of young, growing, cells. Secondary cell walls are thicker and stronger than, primary walls and are deposited when most cell enlargement has ended. Secondary cell walls owe their strength, and toughness to lignin, a brittle, gluelike material (see, Chapter 13)., The evolution of lignified secondary cell walls provided, plants with the structural reinforcement necessary to grow, vertically above the soil and to colonize the land., Bryophytes, which lack lignified cell walls, are unable to, grow more than a few centimeters above the ground., , New Cells Are Produced by Dividing Tissues, Called Meristems, Plant growth is concentrated in localized regions of cell, division called meristems. Nearly all nuclear divisions, (mitosis) and cell divisions (cytokinesis) occur in these, meristematic regions. In a young plant, the most active, meristems are called apical meristems; they are located at, the tips of the stem and the root (see Figure 1.1). At the, nodes, axillary buds contain the apical meristems for, branch shoots. Lateral roots arise from the pericycle, an, internal meristematic tissue (see Figure 1.1C). Proximal to, (i.e., next to) and overlapping the meristematic regions are, zones of cell elongation in which cells increase dramatically, in length and width. Cells usually differentiate into specialized types after they elongate., The phase of plant development that gives rise to new, organs and to the basic plant form is called primary, growth. Primary growth results from the activity of apical, meristems, in which cell division is followed by progressive cell enlargement, typically elongation. After elongation in a given region is complete, secondary growth may, occur. Secondary growth involves two lateral meristems:, the vascular cambium (plural cambia) and the cork cambium. The vascular cambium gives rise to secondary xylem, (wood) and secondary phloem. The cork cambium produces the periderm, consisting mainly of cork cells., , Three Major Tissue Systems, Make Up the Plant Body, Three major tissue systems are found in all plant organs:, dermal tissue, ground tissue, and vascular tissue. These tis-, , ▲, , • Other than certain reproductive cells, plants are nonmotile. As a substitute for motility, they have evolved, the ability to grow toward essential resources, such, as light, water, and mineral nutrients, throughout, their life span.
Page 7 :
(A) Leaf, , Upper epidermis, (dermal tissue), , Leaf primordia, Cuticle, , Shoot apex and, apical meristem, , Palisade, parenchyma, (ground tissue), Bundle sheath, parenchyma, , Axillary bud, with meristem, , Xylem, Phloem, , Mesophyll, Leaf, , Vascular, tissues, , Lower epidermis, (dermal tissue), , Node, , Guard cell, , Internode, , Stomata, Spongy mesophyll, (ground tissue), Lower epidermis, Cuticle, Soil line, , Vascular, tissue, , (B) Stem, Epidermis, (dermal tissue), Cortex, Pith, , Ground, tissues, , Xylem, , Vascular, Phloem tissues, , Lateral, root, , Vascular, cambium, , Taproot, Root hairs, , Epidermis, (dermal tissue), , (C) Root, , Root apex with, apical meristem, , Cortex, Root cap, , Pericycle, (internal, meristem), , Ground, tissues, , Endodermis, Phloem Vascular, tissues, Xylem, , Primary wall Middle lamella Simple pit, , Vascular, cambium, , Root hair, (dermal tissue), , Primary wall, Secondary wall, Plasma membrane, , FIGURE 1.2 Schematic representation of primary, and secondary cell walls and their relationship to, the rest of the cell.
Page 8 :
(B) Ground tissue: parenchyma cells, , (A) Dermal tissue: epidermal cells, , Primary cell wall, , Middle lamella, (C) Ground tissue: collenchyma cells, , (D) Ground tissue: sclerenchyma cells, , Primary cell wall, , Sclereids, Nucleus, , Fibers, , (E) Vascular tisssue: xylem and phloem, , Bordered pits, , Secondary, walls, , Simple, pits, , Sieve plate, , Nucleus, , Sieve, areas, , Companion, cell, , Sieve plate, , Primary walls, End wall perforation, Tracheids, , Vessel elements, Xylem, , Sieve cell, (gymnosperms), , Sieve tube element, (angiosperms), Phloem
Page 9 :
▲, , Plant Cells, , FIGURE 1.3 (A) The outer epidermis (dermal tissue) of a, , leaf of welwischia mirabilis (120×). Diagrammatic representations of three types of ground tissue: (B) parenchyma, (C), collenchyma, (D) sclerenchyma cells, and (E) conducting, cells of the xylem and phloem. (A © Meckes/Ottawa/Photo, Researchers, Inc.), , sues are illustrated and briefly chacterized in Figure 1.3., For further details and characterizations of these plant tissues, see Web Topic 1.3., , Vacuole, , 5, , THE PLANT CELL, Plants are multicellular organisms composed of millions of, cells with specialized functions. At maturity, such specialized cells may differ greatly from one another in their structures. However, all plant cells have the same basic eukaryotic organization: They contain a nucleus, a cytoplasm, and, subcellular organelles, and they are enclosed in a membrane that defines their boundaries (Figure 1.4). Certain, structures, including the nucleus, can be lost during cell, maturation, but all plant cells begin with a similar complement of organelles., , Nucleus, , Tonoplast, , Nuclear, envelope Nucleolus Chromatin, , Peroxisome, , Ribosomes, Rough, endoplasmic, reticulum, , Compound, middle, lamella, , Smooth, endoplasmic, reticulum, , Mitochondrion, Primary cell wall, Plasma membrane, , Cell wall, , Middle lamella, , Golgi body, , Primary cell wall, , Chloroplast, , Intercellular, air space, , Diagrammatic representation of a plant cell. Various intracellular compartments are defined by their respective membranes, such as the tonoplast, the, nuclear envelope, and the membranes of the other organelles. The two adjacent primary walls, along with the middle lamella, form a composite structure called the, compound middle lamella., , FIGURE 1.4
Page 10 :
6, , Chapter 1, , An additional characteristic feature of plant cells is that, they are surrounded by a cellulosic cell wall. The following, sections provide an overview of the membranes and, organelles of plant cells. The structure and function of the, cell wall will be treated in detail in Chapter 15., , Biological Membranes Are Phospholipid Bilayers, That Contain Proteins, All cells are enclosed in a membrane that serves as their, outer boundary, separating the cytoplasm from the external environment. This plasma membrane (also called plasmalemma) allows the cell to take up and retain certain substances while excluding others. Various transport proteins, embedded in the plasma membrane are responsible for this, selective traffic of solutes across the membrane. The accumulation of ions or molecules in the cytosol through the, action of transport proteins consumes metabolic energy., Membranes also delimit the boundaries of the specialized, internal organelles of the cell and regulate the fluxes of ions, and metabolites into and out of these compartments., According to the fluid-mosaic model, all biological, membranes have the same basic molecular organization., They consist of a double layer (bilayer) of either phospholipids or, in the case of chloroplasts, glycosylglycerides, in, which proteins are embedded (Figure 1.5A and B). In most, membranes, proteins make up about half of the membrane’s mass. However, the composition of the lipid components and the properties of the proteins vary from membrane to membrane, conferring on each membrane its, unique functional characteristics., , Phospholipids., , Phospholipids are a class of lipids in, which two fatty acids are covalently linked to glycerol,, which is covalently linked to a phosphate group. Also, attached to this phosphate group is a variable component,, called the head group, such as serine, choline, glycerol, or, inositol (Figure 1.5C). In contrast to the fatty acids, the head, groups are highly polar; consequently, phospholipid molecules display both hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties (i.e., they are amphipathic). The nonpolar hydrocarbon, chains of the fatty acids form a region that is exclusively, hydrophobic—that is, that excludes water., Plastid membranes are unique in that their lipid component consists almost entirely of glycosylglycerides, rather than phospholipids. In glycosylglycerides, the polar, head group consists of galactose, digalactose, or sulfated, galactose, without a phosphate group (see Web Topic 1.4)., The fatty acid chains of phospholipids and glycosylglycerides are variable in length, but they usually consist, of 14 to 24 carbons. One of the fatty acids is typically saturated (i.e., it contains no double bonds); the other fatty acid, chain usually has one or more cis double bonds (i.e., it is, unsaturated)., The presence of cis double bonds creates a kink in the, chain that prevents tight packing of the phospholipids in, , the bilayer. As a result, the fluidity of the membrane is, increased. The fluidity of the membrane, in turn, plays a, critical role in many membrane functions. Membrane fluidity is also strongly influenced by temperature. Because, plants generally cannot regulate their body temperatures,, they are often faced with the problem of maintaining membrane fluidity under conditions of low temperature, which, tends to decrease membrane fluidity. Thus, plant phospholipids have a high percentage of unsaturated fatty, acids, such as oleic acid (one double bond), linoleic acid, (two double bonds) and α-linolenic acid (three double, bonds), which increase the fluidity of their membranes., , Proteins. The proteins associated with the lipid bilayer, are of three types: integral, peripheral, and anchored. Integral proteins are embedded in the lipid bilayer. Most integral proteins span the entire width of the phospholipid, bilayer, so one part of the protein interacts with the outside, of the cell, another part interacts with the hydrophobic core, of the membrane, and a third part interacts with the interior of the cell, the cytosol. Proteins that serve as ion channels (see Chapter 6) are always integral membrane proteins, as are certain receptors that participate in signal, transduction pathways (see Chapter 14). Some receptor-like, proteins on the outer surface of the plasma membrane recognize and bind tightly to cell wall consituents, effectively, cross-linking the membrane to the cell wall., Peripheral proteins are bound to the membrane surface, by noncovalent bonds, such as ionic bonds or hydrogen, bonds, and can be dissociated from the membrane with, high salt solutions or chaotropic agents, which break ionic, and hydrogen bonds, respectively. Peripheral proteins, serve a variety of functions in the cell. For example, some, are involved in interactions between the plasma membrane, and components of the cytoskeleton, such as microtubules, and actin microfilaments, which are discussed later in this, chapter., Anchored proteins are bound to the membrane surface, via lipid molecules, to which they are covalently attached., These lipids include fatty acids (myristic acid and palmitic, acid), prenyl groups derived from the isoprenoid pathway, (farnesyl and geranylgeranyl groups), and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins (Figure 1.6), (Buchanan et al. 2000)., , The Nucleus Contains Most of the Genetic, Material of the Cell, The nucleus (plural nuclei) is the organelle that contains the, genetic information primarily responsible for regulating the, metabolism, growth, and differentiation of the cell. Collectively, these genes and their intervening sequences are, referred to as the nuclear genome. The size of the nuclear, genome in plants is highly variable, ranging from about 1.2, × 108 base pairs for the diminutive dicot Arabidopsis thaliana, to 1 × 1011 base pairs for the lily Fritillaria assyriaca. The
Page 11 :
Plant Cells, (A), , (C), , H3C, N+, , H, , H3C C, H, , Hydrophilic, region, , Cell wall, , C, , C, , Choline, H, O, , Phosphate, , O, , H, , 7, , P, , O, , O, H, , Glycerol, , H, , C, , H, C H, C, O, O, C, C O, , H, , Plasma, membrane, , H, C, H, , H, C, H, , Carbohydrates, , H, C, H, , Outside of cell, , H, C, H, , Hydrophobic, region, Hydrophilic, region, , H, C, H, , Phospholipid, bilayer, , H, C, H, , Hydrophobic, region, , H, C, H, , H, H, , C, , H, H, , C, , H, H, , C, , H, H, , C, , H, H, , C, , H, H, , H C, H H, , Hydrophilic, region, , H, C, H, H, C, H, H, C, H, H, C, H, H, C, H, H, C, H, H, C, H, H, H C H, H, C C H, H, H, H C C H, H, H, H C C H, H, H C H, H, , H, C, H, C, , O, , Phosphatidylcholine, , Cytoplasm, Integral, protein, , Peripheral, protein, , Choline, , (B), , O, –O, , P, , Plasma, membranes, , O, , H2C, , Adjoining, primary, walls, , CH2, , CH2, , CH, , O, C, , Galactose, , O, , O, O, , C, , O, H 2C, O, , O, , CH2, , C, CH2, , CH2, , CH, O, O, , C, , O, , CH2, , 1 mm, , (A) The plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, and other endomembranes of plant cells consist of, proteins embedded in a phospholipid bilayer. (B) This transmission electron micrograph shows plasma membranes in, cells from the meristematic region of a root tip of cress, (Lepidium sativum). The overall thickness of the plasma membrane, viewed as two dense lines and an intervening space, is, 8 nm. (C) Chemical structures and space-filling models of, typical phospholipids: phosphatidylcholine and galactosylglyceride. (B from Gunning and Steer 1996.), , FIGURE 1.5, , Phosphatidylcholine, , Galactosylglyceride
Page 12 :
8, , Chapter 1, , OUTSIDE OF CELL, Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)–, anchored protein, , Ethanolamine, Galactose, , P, , Glucosamine, Mannose, Inositol, P, Lipid bilayer, , Myristic acid (C14), , Palmitic acid (C16), , O, , C, Amide, bond, , NH, O, OH, , HO, , HN, , Geranylgeranyl (C20), , S, , S, , S, , CH2, , CH2, , CH2, , H, , Cys, , Gly, , Farnesyl (C15), , C, , C, , C, , N, , O, , O, , CH3, , H, , C, , C, , N, , O, , O, , Ceramide, , CH3, , N, C, Fatty acid–anchored proteins, N, , N, , Prenyl lipid–anchored proteins, CYTOPLASM, , FIGURE 1.6 Different types of anchored membrane proteins that are attached to the, membrane via fatty acids, prenyl groups, or phosphatidylinositol. (From Buchanan, et al. 2000.), , remainder of the genetic information of the cell is contained, in the two semiautonomous organelles—the chloroplasts, and mitochondria—which we will discuss a little later in, this chapter., The nucleus is surrounded by a double membrane, called the nuclear envelope (Figure 1.7A). The space, between the two membranes of the nuclear envelope is, called the perinuclear space, and the two membranes of, the nuclear envelope join at sites called nuclear pores (Figure 1.7B). The nuclear “pore” is actually an elaborate structure composed of more than a hundred different proteins, arranged octagonally to form a nuclear pore complex (Fig-, , ure 1.8). There can be very few to many thousands of, nuclear pore complexes on an individual nuclear envelope., The central “plug” of the complex acts as an active (ATPdriven) transporter that facilitates the movement of macromolecules and ribosomal subunits both into and out of the, nucleus. (Active transport will be discussed in detail in, Chapter 6.) A specific amino acid sequence called the, nuclear localization signal is required for a protein to gain, entry into the nucleus., The nucleus is the site of storage and replication of the, chromosomes, composed of DNA and its associated proteins. Collectively, this DNA–protein complex is known as
Page 13 :
Plant Cells, (A), , 9, , (B), , Nuclear, envelope, , Nucleolus, , Chromatin, , (A) Transmission electron micrograph of a plant cell, showing, the nucleolus and the nuclear envelope. (B) Freeze-etched preparation of, nuclear pores from a cell of an onion root. (A courtesy of R. Evert; B courtesy of D. Branton.), , FIGURE 1.7, , chromatin. The linear length of all the DNA within any, plant genome is usually millions of times greater than the, diameter of the nucleus in which it is found. To solve the, problem of packaging this chromosomal DNA within the, , CYTOPLASM, , Nuclear pore complex, 120 nm, , Cytoplasmic, filament, , Cytoplasmic ring, Outer nuclear, membrane, , Spoke-ring, assembly, , Nuclear, ring, Nuclear, basket, , Inner nuclear, membrane, Central, transporter, , NUCLEOPLASM, , FIGURE 1.8 Schematic model of the structure of the nuclear, pore complex. Parallel rings composed of eight subunits, each are arranged octagonally near the inner and outer, membranes of the nuclear envelope. Various proteins form, the other structures, such as the nuclear ring, the spokering assembly, the central transporter, the cytoplasmic filaments, and the nuclear basket., , nucleus, segments of the linear double helix of DNA are, coiled twice around a solid cylinder of eight histone protein molecules, forming a nucleosome. Nucleosomes are, arranged like beads on a string along the length of each, chromosome., During mitosis, the chromatin condenses, first by coiling tightly into a 30 nm chromatin fiber, with six nucleosomes per turn, followed by further folding and packing, processes that depend on interactions between proteins, and nucleic acids (Figure 1.9). At interphase, two types of, chromatin are visible: heterochromatin and euchromatin., About 10% of the DNA consists of heterochromatin, a, highly compact and transcriptionally inactive form of chromatin. The rest of the DNA consists of euchromatin, the, dispersed, transcriptionally active form. Only about 10% of, the euchromatin is transcriptionally active at any given, time. The remainder exists in an intermediate state of condensation, between heterochromatin and transcriptionally, active euchromatin., Nuclei contain a densely granular region, called the, nucleolus (plural nucleoli), that is the site of ribosome synthesis (see Figure 1.7A). The nucleolus includes portions of, one or more chromosomes where ribosomal RNA (rRNA), genes are clustered to form a structure called the nucleolar, organizer. Typical cells have one or more nucleoli per, nucleus. Each 80S ribosome is made of a large and a small, subunit, and each subunit is a complex aggregate of rRNA, and specific proteins. The two subunits exit the nucleus, separately, through the nuclear pore, and then unite in the, cytoplasm to form a complete ribosome (Figure 1.10A)., Ribosomes are the sites of protein synthesis., , Protein Synthesis Involves, Transcription and Translation, The complex process of protein synthesis starts with transcription—the synthesis of an RNA polymer bearing a base
Page 14 :
10, , Chapter 1, , 2 nm, DNA double helix, , Linker, DNA, , Histones, , 11 nm, , Nucleosome, , Nucleosomes ( “beads on a string”), , FIGURE 1.9 Packaging of DNA in a metaphase chromosome. The DNA is first aggregated into nucleosomes and, then wound to form the 30 nm chromatin fibers. Further, coiling leads to the condensed metaphase chromosome., (After Alberts et al. 2002.), , Translation is the process whereby a specific protein is, synthesized from amino acids, according to the sequence, information encoded by the mRNA. The ribosome travels, the entire length of the mRNA and serves as the site for the, sequential bonding of amino acids as specified by the base, sequence of the mRNA (Figure 1.10B)., , The Endoplasmic Reticulum Is a, Network of Internal Membranes, , 30 nm, , Nucleosome, 30 nm chromatin fiber, , 300 nm, Looped domains, , 700 nm, , Condensed chromatin, , Cells have an elaborate network of internal membranes, called the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The membranes of, the ER are typical lipid bilayers with interspersed integral, and peripheral proteins. These membranes form flattened, or tubular sacs known as cisternae (singular cisterna)., Ultrastructural studies have shown that the ER is continuous with the outer membrane of the nuclear envelope., There are two types of ER—smooth and rough (Figure, 1.11)—and the two types are interconnected. Rough ER, (RER) differs from smooth ER in that it is covered with, ribosomes that are actively engaged in protein synthesis; in, addition, rough ER tends to be lamellar (a flat sheet composed of two unit membranes), while smooth ER tends to, be tubular, although a gradation for each type can be, observed in almost any cell., The structural differences between the two forms of ER, are accompanied by functional differences. Smooth ER, functions as a major site of lipid synthesis and membrane, assembly. Rough ER is the site of synthesis of membrane, proteins and proteins to be secreted outside the cell or into, the vacuoles., , Secretion of Proteins from Cells Begins with the, Rough ER, , Chromatids, , Proteins destined for secretion cross the RER membrane, and enter the lumen of the ER. This is the first step in the, 1400 nm, , sequence that is complementary to a specific gene. The, RNA transcript is processed to become messenger RNA, (mRNA), which moves from the nucleus to the cytoplasm., The mRNA in the cytoplasm attaches first to the small ribosomal subunit and then to the large subunit to initiate, translation., , FIGURE 1.10 (A) Basic steps in gene expression, including, transcription, processing, export to the cytoplasm, and, translation. Proteins may be synthesized on free or bound, ribosomes. Secretory proteins containing a hydrophobic, signal sequence bind to the signal recognition particle (SRP), in the cytosol. The SRP–ribosome complex then moves to, the endoplasmic reticulum, where it attaches to the SRP, receptor. Translation proceeds, and the elongating polypeptide is inserted into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. The signal peptide is cleaved off, sugars are added,, and the glycoprotein is transported via vesicles to the, Golgi. (B) Amino acids are polymerized on the ribosome,, with the help of tRNA, to form the elongating polypeptide, chain., , ▲, , Highly condensed, duplicated, metaphase chromosome, of a dividing cell
Page 16 :
12, , Chapter 1, , Polyribosome, , Ribosomes, (C) Smooth ER, , (A) Rough ER (surface view), , The endoplasmic reticulum. (A) Rough, ER can be seen in surface view in this micrograph, from the alga Bulbochaete. The polyribosomes (strings, of ribosomes attached to messenger RNA) in the, rough ER are clearly visible. Polyribosomes are also, present on the outer surface of the nuclear envelope, (N-nucleus). (75,000×) (B) Stacks of regularly, arranged rough endoplasmic reticulum (white arrow), in glandular trichomes of Coleus blumei. The plasma, membrane is indicated by the black arrow, and the, material outside the plasma membrane is the cell, wall. (75,000×) (C) Smooth ER often forms a tubular, network, as shown in this transmission electron, micrograph from a young petal of Primula kewensis., (45,000×) (Photos from Gunning and Steer 1996.), , FIGURE 1.11, , (B) Rough ER (cross section), , secretion pathway that involves the Golgi body and vesicles that fuse with the plasma membrane., The mechanism of transport across the membrane is, complex, involving the ribosomes, the mRNA that codes, for the secretory protein, and a special receptor in the ER, membrane. All secretory proteins and most integral membrane proteins have been shown to have a hydrophobic, sequence of 18 to 30 amino acid residues at the amino-terminal end of the chain. During translation, this hydrophobic leader, called the signal peptide sequence, is recognized, by a signal recognition particle (SRP), made up of protein, and RNA, which facilitates binding of the free ribosome to, SRP receptor proteins (or “docking proteins”) on the ER, (see Figure 1.10A). The signal peptide then mediates the, , transfer of the elongating polypeptide across the ER membrane into the lumen. (In the case of integral membrane, proteins, a portion of the completed polypeptide remains, embedded in the membrane.), Once inside the lumen of the ER, the signal sequence is, cleaved off by a signal peptidase. In some cases, a branched, oligosaccharide chain made up of N-acetylglucosamine, (GlcNac), mannose (Man), and glucose (Glc), having the, stoichiometry GlcNac2Man9Glc3, is attached to the free, amino group of a specific asparagine side chain. This carbohydrate assembly is called an N-linked glycan (Faye et al., 1992). The three terminal glucose residues are then, removed by specific glucosidases, and the processed glycoprotein (i.e., a protein with covalently attached sugars), is ready for transport to the Golgi apparatus. The so-called, N-linked glycoproteins are then transported to the Golgi, apparatus via small vesicles. The vesicles move through the, cytosol and fuse with cisternae on the cis face of the Golgi, apparatus (Figure 1.12).
Page 17 :
Plant Cells, , 13, , be no direct membrane continuity, between successive cisternae, the contents of one cisterna are transferred to, trans Golgi, the next cisterna via small vesicles, network (TGN), budding off from the margins, as, occurs in the Golgi apparatus of animals. In some cases, however, entire, trans cisternae, cisternae may progress through the, Golgi body and emerge from the, medial, cisternae, trans face., Within the lumens of the Golgi ciscis cisternae, ternae, the glycoproteins are enzymatically modified. Certain sugars,, such as mannose, are removed from, the oligosaccharide chains, and other, sugars are added. In addition to these, modifications, glycosylation of the, FIGURE 1.12 Electron micrograph of a Golgi apparatus in a tobacco (Nicotiana, —OH groups of hydroxyproline, sertabacum) root cap cell. The cis, medial, and trans cisternae are indicated. The trans, ine, threonine, and tyrosine residues, Golgi network is associated with the trans cisterna. (60,000×) (From Gunning and, Steer 1996.), (O-linked oligosaccharides) also, occurs in the Golgi. After being, processed within the Golgi, the glyProteins and Polysaccharides for Secretion Are, coproteins leave the organelle in other vesicles, usually, Processed in the Golgi Apparatus, from the trans side of the stack. All of this processing, The Golgi apparatus (also called Golgi complex) of plant, appears to confer on each protein a specific tag or marker, cells is a dynamic structure consisting of one or more stacks, that specifies the ultimate destination of that protein inside, of three to ten flattened membrane sacs, or cisternae, and, or outside the cell., an irregular network of tubules and vesicles called the, In plant cells, the Golgi body plays an important role in, trans Golgi network (TGN) (see Figure 1.12). Each indicell wall formation (see Chapter 15). Noncellulosic cell wall, vidual stack is called a Golgi body or dictyosome., polysaccharides (hemicellulose and pectin) are synthesized,, As Figure 1.12 shows, the Golgi body has distinct funcand a variety of glycoproteins, including hydroxyprolinetional regions: The cisternae closest to the plasma membrane, rich glycoproteins, are processed within the Golgi., are called the trans face, and the cisternae closest to the cenSecretory vesicles derived from the Golgi carry the polyter of the cell are called the cis face. The medial cisternae are, saccharides and glycoproteins to the plasma membrane,, between the trans and cis cisternae. The trans Golgi network, where the vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane and, is located on the trans face. The entire structure is stabilized, empty their contents into the region of the cell wall. Secreby the presence of intercisternal elements, protein crosstory vesicles may either be smooth or have a protein coat., links that hold the cisternae together. Whereas in animal cells, Vesicles budding from the ER are generally smooth. Most, Golgi bodies tend to be clustered in one part of the cell and, vesicles budding from the Golgi have protein coats of some, are interconnected via tubules, plant cells contain up to sevtype. These proteins aid in the budding process during vesieral hundred apparently separate Golgi bodies dispersed, cle formation. Vesicles involved in traffic from the ER to the, throughout the cytoplasm (Driouich et al. 1994)., Golgi, between Golgi compartments, and from the Golgi to, The Golgi apparatus plays a key role in the synthesis and, the TGN have protein coats. Clathrin-coated vesicles (Figsecretion of complex polysaccharides (polymers composed, ure 1.13) are involved in the transport of storage proteins, of different types of sugars) and in the assembly of the, from the Golgi to specialized protein-storing vacuoles. They, oligosaccharide side chains of glycoproteins (Driouich et al., also participate in endocytosis, the process that brings sol1994). As noted already, the polypeptide chains of future glyuble and membrane-bound proteins into the cell., coproteins are first synthesized on the rough ER, then transThe Central Vacuole Contains Water and Solutes, ferred across the ER membrane, and glycosylated on the, Mature living plant cells contain large, water-filled central, —NH2 groups of asparagine residues. Further modifications, of, and additions to, the oligosaccharide side chains are carvacuoles that can occupy 80 to 90% of the total volume of, ried out in the Golgi. Glycoproteins destined for secretion, the cell (see Figure 1.4). Each vacuole is surrounded by a, reach the Golgi via vesicles that bud off from the RER., vacuolar membrane, or tonoplast. Many cells also have, The exact pathway of glycoproteins through the plant, cytoplasmic strands that run through the vacuole, but each, Golgi apparatus is not yet known. Since there appears to, transvacuolar strand is surrounded by the tonoplast.
Page 18 :
14, , Chapter 1, , Protein body, , FIGURE 1.13 Preparation of clathrin-coated vesicles isolated, from bean leaves. (102,000×) (Photo courtesy of D. G., Robinson.), , In meristematic tissue, vacuoles are less prominent,, though they are always present as small provacuoles., Provacuoles are produced by the trans Golgi network (see, Figure 1.12). As the cell begins to mature, the provacuoles, fuse to produce the large central vacuoles that are characteristic of most mature plant cells. In such cells, the cytoplasm is restricted to a thin layer surrounding the vacuole., The vacuole contains water and dissolved inorganic ions,, organic acids, sugars, enzymes, and a variety of secondary, metabolites (see Chapter 13), which often play roles in plant, defense. Active solute accumulation provides the osmotic, driving force for water uptake by the vacuole, which is, required for plant cell enlargement. The turgor pressure, generated by this water uptake provides the structural, rigidity needed to keep herbaceous plants upright, since, they lack the lignified support tissues of woody plants., Like animal lysosomes, plant vacuoles contain hydrolytic enzymes, including proteases, ribonucleases, and glycosidases. Unlike animal lysosomes, however, plant vacuoles do not participate in the turnover of macromolecules, throughout the life of the cell. Instead, their degradative, enzymes leak out into the cytosol as the cell undergoes, senescence, thereby helping to recycle valuable nutrients, to the living portion of the plant., Specialized protein-storing vacuoles, called protein bodies, are abundant in seeds. During germination the storage, proteins in the protein bodies are hydrolyzed to amino, acids and exported to the cytosol for use in protein synthesis. The hydrolytic enzymes are stored in specialized, lytic vacuoles, which fuse with the protein bodies to initiate the breakdown process (Figure 1.14)., , Mitochondria and Chloroplasts Are Sites of Energy, Conversion, A typical plant cell has two types of energy-producing, organelles: mitochondria and chloroplasts. Both types are, separated from the cytosol by a double membrane (an, , Lytic vacuole, , FIGURE 1.14 Light micrograph of a protoplast prepared, from the aleurone layer of seeds. The fluorescent stain, reveals two types of vacuoles: the larger protein bodies (V1), and the smaller lytic vacuoles (V2). (Photo courtesy of P., Bethke and R. L. Jones.), , outer and an inner membrane). Mitochondria (singular, mitochondrion) are the cellular sites of respiration, a process, in which the energy released from sugar metabolism is, used for the synthesis of ATP (adenosine triphosphate), from ADP (adenosine diphosphate) and inorganic phosphate (Pi) (see Chapter 11)., Mitochondria can vary in shape from spherical to tubular, but they all have a smooth outer membrane and a highly, convoluted inner membrane (Figure 1.15). The infoldings, of the inner membrane are called cristae (singular crista)., The compartment enclosed by the inner membrane, the, mitochondrial matrix, contains the enzymes of the pathway of intermediary metabolism called the Krebs cycle., In contrast to the mitochondrial outer membrane and all, other membranes in the cell, the inner membrane of a mitochondrion is almost 70% protein and contains some phospholipids that are unique to the organelle (e.g., cardiolipin)., The proteins in and on the inner membrane have special, enzymatic and transport capacities., The inner membrane is highly impermeable to the passage of H+; that is, it serves as a barrier to the movement of, protons. This important feature allows the formation of, electrochemical gradients. Dissipation of such gradients by, the controlled movement of H+ ions through the transmembrane enzyme ATP synthase is coupled to the phosphorylation of ADP to produce ATP. ATP can then be, released to other cellular sites where energy is needed to, drive specific reactions.
Page 19 :
Plant Cells, , 15, , (B), , (A), , H+, , H+, , Intermembrane space, , H+, H+, , H+, , Outer membrane, Inner membrane, , ADP, +, Pi, , ATP, H+, , Matrix, , Cristae, , FIGURE 1.15 (A) Diagrammatic representation of a mitochondrion, including the location of the H+-ATPases, involved in ATP synthesis on the inner membrane., (B) An electron micrograph of mitochondria from a leaf cell, of Bermuda grass, Cynodon dactylon. (26,000×) (Photo by S., E. Frederick, courtesy of E. H. Newcomb.), , Chloroplasts (Figure 1.16A) belong to another group of, double membrane–enclosed organelles called plastids., Chloroplast membranes are rich in glycosylglycerides (see, Web Topic 1.4). Chloroplast membranes contain chlorophyll, and its associated proteins and are the sites of photosynthesis. In addition to their inner and outer envelope membranes, chloroplasts possess a third system of membranes, called thylakoids. A stack of thylakoids forms a granum, (plural grana) (Figure 1.16B). Proteins and pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids) that function in the photochemical, events of photosynthesis are embedded in the thylakoid, membrane. The fluid compartment surrounding the thylakoids, called the stroma, is analogous to the matrix of the, mitochondrion. Adjacent grana are connected by unstacked, membranes called stroma lamellae (singular lamella)., The different components of the photosynthetic apparatus are localized in different areas of the grana and the, stroma lamellae. The ATP synthases of the chloroplast are, located on the thylakoid membranes (Figure 1.16C). During photosynthesis, light-driven electron transfer reactions, , result in a proton gradient across the thylakoid membrane., As in the mitochondria, ATP is synthesized when the proton gradient is dissipated via the ATP synthase., Plastids that contain high concentrations of carotenoid, pigments rather than chlorophyll are called chromoplasts., They are one of the causes of the yellow, orange, or red colors of many fruits and flowers, as well as of autumn leaves, (Figure 1.17)., Nonpigmented plastids are called leucoplasts. The most, important type of leucoplast is the amyloplast, a starchstoring plastid. Amyloplasts are abundant in storage tissues of the shoot and root, and in seeds. Specialized amyloplasts in the root cap also serve as gravity sensors that, direct root growth downward into the soil (see Chapter 19)., , Mitochondria and Chloroplasts Are, Semiautonomous Organelles, Both mitochondria and chloroplasts contain their own, DNA and protein-synthesizing machinery (ribosomes,, transfer RNAs, and other components) and are believed to, have evolved from endosymbiotic bacteria. Both plastids, and mitochondria divide by fission, and mitochondria can, also undergo extensive fusion to form elongated structures, or networks.
Page 21 :
Plant Cells, Vacuole, , Tonoplast, , Grana stack, , 17, , FIGURE 1.17 Electron micrograph of a chromoplast from, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) fruit at an early stage in, the transition from chloroplast, to chromoplast. Small grana, stacks are still visible. Crystals, of the carotenoid lycopene are, indicated by the stars., (27,000×) (From Gunning and, Steer 1996.), , Lycopene crystals, , The DNA of these organelles is in the form of circular, chromosomes, similar to those of bacteria and very different from the linear chromosomes in the nucleus. These DNA, circles are localized in specific regions of the mitochondrial, matrix or plastid stroma called nucleoids. DNA replication, in both mitochondria and chloroplasts is independent of, DNA replication in the nucleus. On the other hand, the numbers of these organelles within a given cell type remain, approximately constant, suggesting that some aspects of, organelle replication are under cellular regulation., The mitochondrial genome of plants consists of about, 200 kilobase pairs (200,000 base pairs), a size considerably, larger than that of most animal mitochondria. The mitochondria of meristematic cells are typically polyploid; that, is, they contain multiple copies of the circular chromosome., However, the number of copies per mitochondrion gradually decreases as cells mature because the mitochondria, continue to divide in the absence of DNA synthesis., Most of the proteins encoded by the mitochondrial, genome are prokaryotic-type 70S ribosomal proteins and, components of the electron transfer system. The majority of, mitochondrial proteins, including Krebs cycle enzymes, are, encoded by nuclear genes and are imported from the cytosol., The chloroplast genome is smaller than the mitochondrial genome, about 145 kilobase pairs (145,000 base pairs)., Whereas mitochondria are polyploid only in the meristems, chloroplasts become polyploid during cell maturation. Thus the average amount of DNA per chloroplast in, the plant is much greater than that of the mitochondria., The total amount of DNA from the mitochondria and plastids combined is about one-third of the nuclear genome, (Gunning and Steer 1996)., Chloroplast DNA encodes rRNA; transfer RNA (tRNA);, the large subunit of the enzyme that fixes CO2, ribulose-1,5bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco); and sev-, , eral of the proteins that participate in photosynthesis. Nevertheless, the majority of chloroplast proteins, like those of, mitochondria, are encoded by nuclear genes, synthesized, in the cytosol, and transported to the organelle. Although, mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own genomes, and can divide independently of the cell, they are characterized as semiautonomous organelles because they depend, on the nucleus for the majority of their proteins., , Different Plastid Types Are Interconvertible, Meristem cells contain proplastids, which have few or no, internal membranes, no chlorophyll, and an incomplete complement of the enzymes necessary to carry out photosynthesis (Figure 1.18A). In angiosperms and some gymnosperms,, chloroplast development from proplastids is triggered by, light. Upon illumination, enzymes are formed inside the proplastid or imported from the cytosol, light-absorbing pigments are produced, and membranes proliferate rapidly, giving rise to stroma lamellae and grana stacks (Figure 1.18B)., Seeds usually germinate in the soil away from light, and, chloroplasts develop only when the young shoot is, exposed to light. If seeds are germinated in the dark, the, proplastids differentiate into etioplasts, which contain, semicrystalline tubular arrays of membrane known as prolamellar bodies (Figure 1.18C). Instead of chlorophyll, the, etioplast contains a pale yellow green precursor pigment,, protochlorophyllide., ., Within minutes after exposure to light, the etioplast differentiates, converting the prolamellar body into thylakoids, and stroma lamellae, and the protochlorophyll into chlorophyll. The maintenance of chloroplast structure depends, on the presence of light, and mature chloroplasts can revert, to etioplasts during extended periods of darkness., Chloroplasts can be converted to chromoplasts, as in the, case of autumn leaves and ripening fruit, and in some cases
Page 22 :
18, , Chapter 1, , (A), , (B), , (C), , Plastids, Etioplasts, , Prolamellar, bodies, , FIGURE 1.18 Electron micrographs illustrating several, stages of plastid development. (A) A higher-magnification, view of a proplastid from the root apical meristem of the, broad bean (Vicia faba). The internal membrane system is, rudimentary, and grana are absent. (47,000×) (B) A mesophyll cell of a young oat leaf at an early stage of differentiation in the light. The plastids are developing grana stacks., (C) A cell from a young oat leaf from a seedling grown in, the dark. The plastids have developed as etioplasts, with, elaborate semicrystalline lattices of membrane tubules, called prolamellar bodies. When exposed to light, the etioplast can convert to a chloroplast by the disassembly of the, prolamellar body and the formation of grana stacks., (7,200×) (From Gunning and Steer 1996.), , Crystalline, core, , Microbody, , Mitochondrion, , this process is reversible. And amyloplasts can be converted to chloroplasts, which explains why exposure of, roots to light often results in greening of the roots., , Microbodies Play Specialized Metabolic Roles in, Leaves and Seeds, Plant cells also contain microbodies, a class of spherical, organelles surrounded by a single membrane and specialized for one of several metabolic functions. The two main, types of microbodies are peroxisomes and glyoxysomes., Peroxisomes are found in all eukaryotic organisms, and, in plants they are present in photosynthetic cells (Figure, 1.19). Peroxisomes function both in the removal of hydrogens from organic substrates, consuming O2 in the process,, according to the following reaction:, RH2 + O2 → R + H2O2, , where R is the organic substrate. The potentially harmful, peroxide produced in these reactions is broken down in, peroxisomes by the enzyme catalase, according to the following reaction:, H2O2 → H2O + 1⁄ 2O2, , Although some oxygen is regenerated during the catalase, reaction, there is a net consumption of oxygen overall., , FIGURE 1.19 Electron micrograph of a peroxisome from a, mesophyll cell, showing a crystalline core. (27,000×) This, peroxisome is seen in close association with two chloroplasts and a mitochondrion, probably reflecting the cooperative role of these three organelles in photorespiration., (From Huang 1987.)
Page 23 :
Plant Cells, , 19, , Another type of microbody, the glyoxysome, is present, in oil-storing seeds. Glyoxysomes contain the glyoxylate, cycle enzymes, which help convert stored fatty acids into, sugars that can be translocated throughout the young, plant to provide energy for growth (see Chapter 11)., Because both types of microbodies carry out oxidative, reactions, it has been suggested they may have evolved, from primitive respiratory organelles that were superseded by mitochondria., , preventing fusion. Oleosins may also help other proteins, bind to the organelle surface. As noted earlier, during seed, germination the lipids in the oleosomes are broken down, and converted to sucrose with the help of the glyoxysome., The first step in the process is the hydrolysis of the fatty acid, chains from the glycerol backbone by the enzyme lipase., Lipase is tightly associated with the surface of the half–unit, membrane and may be attached to the oleosins., , Oleosomes Are Lipid-Storing Organelles, , THE CYTOSKELETON, , In addition to starch and protein, many plants synthesize, and store large quantities of triacylglycerol in the form of, oil during seed development. These oils accumulate in, organelles called oleosomes, also referred to as lipid bodies or spherosomes (Figure 1.20A)., Oleosomes are unique among the organelles in that they, are surrounded by a “half–unit membrane”—that is, a, phospholipid monolayer—derived from the ER (Harwood, 1997). The phospholipids in the half–unit membrane are, oriented with their polar head groups toward the aqueous, phase and their hydrophobic fatty acid tails facing the, lumen, dissolved in the stored lipid. Oleosomes are, thought to arise from the deposition of lipids within the, bilayer itself (Figure 1.20B)., Proteins called oleosins are present in the half–unit membrane (see Figure 1.20B). One of the functions of the oleosins, may be to maintain each oleosome as a discrete organelle by, , The cytosol is organized into a three-dimensional network, of filamentous proteins called the cytoskeleton. This network provides the spatial organization for the organelles, and serves as a scaffolding for the movements of organelles, and other cytoskeletal components. It also plays fundamental roles in mitosis, meiosis, cytokinesis, wall deposition, the maintenance of cell shape, and cell differentiation., , (A), , Plant Cells Contain Microtubules, Microfilaments,, and Intermediate Filaments, Three types of cytoskeletal elements have been demonstrated in plant cells: microtubules, microfilaments, and, intermediate filament–like structures. Each type is filamentous, having a fixed diameter and a variable length, up, to many micrometers., Microtubules and microfilaments are macromolecular, assemblies of globular proteins. Microtubules are hollow, , (B), Oleosome, , Peroxisome, , Smooth endoplasmic, reticulum, , Oil, , FIGURE 1.20 (A) Electron micrograph of an oleosome, beside a peroxisome. (B) Diagram showing the formation of, oleosomes by the synthesis and deposition of oil within the, phospholipid bilayer of the ER. After budding off from the, ER, the oleosome is surrounded by a phospholipid monolayer containing the protein oleosin. (A from Huang 1987; B, after Buchanan et al. 2000.), , Oil body, , Oleosin
Page 24 :
20, , Chapter 1, , cylinders with an outer diameter of 25 nm; they are composed of polymers of the protein tubulin. The tubulin, monomer of microtubules is a heterodimer composed of, two similar polypeptide chains (α- and β-tubulin), each, having an apparent molecular mass of 55,000 daltons (Figure 1.21A). A single microtubule consists of hundreds of, thousands of tubulin monomers arranged in 13 columns, called protofilaments., Microfilaments are solid, with a diameter of 7 nm; they, are composed of a special form of the protein found in, muscle: globular actin, or G-actin. Each actin molecule is, composed of a single polypeptide with a molecular mass, of approximately 42,000 daltons. A microfilament consists, of two chains of polymerized actin subunits that intertwine, in a helical fashion (Figure 1.21B)., Intermediate filaments are a diverse group of helically, wound fibrous elements, 10 nm in diameter. Intermediate, filaments are composed of linear polypeptide monomers, of various types. In animal cells, for example, the nuclear, lamins are composed of a specific polypeptide monomer,, while the keratins, a type of intermediate filament found, in the cytoplasm, are composed of a different polypeptide, monomer., In animal intermediate filaments, pairs of parallel, monomers (i.e., aligned with their —NH2 groups at the, same ends) are helically wound around each other in a, coiled coil. Two coiled-coil dimers then align in an antiparallel fashion (i.e., with their —NH2 groups at opposite, ends) to form a tetrameric unit. The tetrameric units then, assemble into the final intermediate filament (Figure 1.22)., Although nuclear lamins appear to be present in plant, cells, there is as yet no convincing evidence for plant keratin intermediate filaments in the cytosol. As noted earlier,, integral proteins cross-link the plasma membrane of plant, cells to the rigid cell wall. Such connections to the wall, (A), , (B), , a, , Tubulin, subunits, (a and b), , b, a, , G-actin, subunit, , Protofilament, , b, a, , 25 nm, , COOH, , NH2, , NH2, (B) Tetramer, NH2, COOH, NH2, COOH, , COOH, , COOH, NH2, COOH, NH2, , (C) Protofilament, , (D) Filament, , FIGURE 1.22 The current model for the assembly of intermediate filaments from protein monomers. (A) Coiled-coil, dimer in parallel orientation (i.e., with amino and carboxyl, termini at the same ends). (B) A tetramer of two dimers., Note that the dimers are arranged in an antiparallel fashion, and that one is slightly offset from the other. (C) Two, tetramers. (D) Tetramers packed together to form the 10 nm, intermediate filament. (After Alberts et al. 2002.), , undoubtedly stabilize the protoplast and help maintain cell, shape. The plant cell wall thus serves as a kind of cellular, exoskeleton, perhaps obviating the need for keratin-type, intermediate filaments for structural support., , Microtubules and Microfilaments Can Assemble, and Disassemble, , b, a, , b, a, , (A) Dimer, , 8 nm, , 7 nm, , FIGURE 1.21 (A) Drawing of a microtubule in longitudinal, view. Each microtubule is composed of 13 protofilaments., The organization of the α and β subunits is shown. (B), Diagrammatic representation of a microfilament, showing, two strands of G-actin subunits., , In the cell, actin and tubulin monomers exist as pools of, free proteins that are in dynamic equilibrium with the polymerized forms. Polymerization requires energy: ATP is, required for microfilament polymerization, GTP (guanosine triphosphate) for microtubule polymerization. The, attachments between subunits in the polymer are noncovalent, but they are strong enough to render the structure, stable under cellular conditions., Both microtubules and microfilaments are polarized;, that is, the two ends are different. In microtubules, the, polarity arises from the polarity of the α- and β-tubulin heterodimer; in microfilaments, the polarity arises from the, polarity of the actin monomer itself. The opposite ends of, microtubules and microfilaments are termed plus and, minus, and polymerization is more rapid at the positive end.
Page 25 :
Plant Cells, Once formed, microtubules and microfilaments can disassemble. The overall rate of assembly and disassembly of, these structures is affected by the relative concentrations of, free or assembled subunits. In general, microtubules are, more unstable than microfilaments. In animal cells, the, half-life of an individual microtubule is about 10 minutes., Thus microtubules are said to exist in a state of dynamic, instability., In contrast to microtubules and microfilaments, intermediate filaments lack polarity because of the antiparallel, orientation of the dimers that make up the tetramers. In, addition, intermediate filaments appear to be much more, stable than either microtubules or microfilaments. Although, very little is known about intermediate filament–like structures in plant cells, in animal cells nearly all of the intermediate-filament protein exists in the polymerized state., , will form after the completion of mitosis, and it is thought, to be involved in regulating the plane of cell division., During prophase, microtubules begin to assemble at, two foci on opposite sides of the nucleus, forming the, prophase spindle (Figure 1.24). Although not associated, with any specific structure, these foci serve the same function as animal cell centrosomes in organizing and assembling microtubules., In early metaphase the nuclear envelope breaks down,, the PPB disassembles, and new microtubules polymerize, to form the mitotic spindle. In animal cells the spindle, microtubules radiate toward each other from two discrete, foci at the poles (the centrosomes), resulting in an ellipsoidal, or football-shaped, array of microtubules. The, mitotic spindle of plant cells, which lack centrosomes, is, more boxlike in shape because the spindle microtubules, arise from a diffuse zone consisting of multiple foci at, opposite ends of the cell and extend toward the middle in, nearly parallel arrays (see Figure 1.24)., Some of the microtubules of the spindle apparatus, become attached to the chromosomes at their kinetochores,, while others remain unattached. The kinetochores are located, in the centromeric regions of the chromosomes. Some of the, unattached microtubules overlap with microtubules from the, opposite polar region in the spindle midzone., Cytokinesis is the process whereby a cell is partitioned, into two progeny cells. Cytokinesis usually begins late in, mitosis. The precursor of the new wall, the cell plate that, , Microtubules Function in Mitosis and Cytokinesis, Mitosis is the process by which previously replicated chromosomes are aligned, separated, and distributed in an, orderly fashion to daughter cells (Figure 1.23). Microtubules are an integral part of mitosis. Before mitosis, begins, microtubules in the cortical (outer) cytoplasm, depolymerize, breaking down into their constituent subunits. The subunits then repolymerize before the start of, prophase to form the preprophase band (PPB), a ring of, microtubules encircling the nucleus (see Figure 1.23C–F)., The PPB appears in the region where the future cell wall, , (A), , (F), , (B), , (G), , (C), , (H), , (D), , (I), , 21, , (E), , (J), , (K), , FIGURE 1.23 Fluorescence micrograph taken with a confocal microscope showing, changes in microtubule arrangements at different stages in the cell cycle of wheat, root meristem cells. Microtubules stain green and yellow; DNA is blue. (A–D), Cortical microtubules disappear and the preprophase band is formed around the, nucleus at the site of the future cell plate. (E–H) The prophase spindle forms from, foci of microtubules at the poles. (G, H) The preprophase band disappears in late, prophase. (I–K) The nuclear membrane breaks down, and the two poles become, more diffuse. The mitotic spindle forms in parallel arrays and the kinetochores bind, to spindle microtubules. (From Gunning and Steer 1996.)
Page 26 :
Prophase, Cell wall, , Prometaphase, , Condensing, chromosomes, (sister chromatids, held together, at centromere), , Plasma, membrane, Nucleus, (nucleolus, disappears), , Chromosomes, align at, metaphase, plate, , Preprophase, band, disappears, , Cytoplasm, Prophase, spindle, , Kinetochore, microtubules, Polar, microtubules, , Nuclear, envelope, fragment, , Spindle pole, develops, , Anaphase, , Metaphase, Diffuse, spindle, pole, , Telophase, , Kinetochore, microtubules, shorten, , Decondensing, chromosomes, , Separated, chromatids, are pulled, toward, poles, , Cell plate, grows, , Nuclear, envelope, re-forms, , Endoplasmic, reticulum, , Cytokinesis, , Two cells, formed, , Phragmoplast, Nucleolus, , FIGURE 1.24 Diagram of mitosis in plants., , forms between incipient daughter cells, is rich in pectins, (Figure 1.25). Cell plate formation in higher plants is a multistep process (see Web Topic 1.5). Vesicle aggregation in the, spindle midzone is organized by the phragmoplast, a complex of microtubules and ER that forms during late anaphase, or early telophase from dissociated spindle subunits., , Microfilaments Are Involved in Cytoplasmic, Streaming and in Tip Growth, Cytoplasmic streaming is the coordinated movement of particles and organelles through the cytosol in a helical path, down one side of a cell and up the other side. Cytoplasmic, streaming occurs in most plant cells and has been studied, extensively in the giant cells of the green algae Chara and, Nitella, in which speeds up to 75 µm s–1 have been measured., The mechanism of cytoplasmic streaming involves bundles of microfilaments that are arranged parallel to the longitudinal direction of particle movement. The forces necessary for movement may be generated by an interaction, of the microfilament protein actin with the protein myosin, in a fashion comparable to that of the protein interaction, that occurs during muscle contraction in animals., , Myosins are proteins that have the ability to hydrolyze, ATP to ADP and Pi when activated by binding to an actin, microfilament. The energy released by ATP hydrolysis propels myosin molecules along the actin microfilament from, the minus end to the plus end. Thus, myosins belong to the, general class of motor proteins that drive cytoplasmic, streaming and the movements of organelles within the cell., Examples of other motor proteins include the kinesins and, dyneins, which drive movements of organelles and other, cytoskeletal components along the surfaces of microtubules., Actin microfilaments also participate in the growth of, the pollen tube. Upon germination, a pollen grain forms a, tubular extension that grows down the style toward the, embryo sac. As the tip of the pollen tube extends, new cell, wall material is continually deposited to maintain the, integrity of the wall., A network of microfilaments appears to guide vesicles, containing wall precursors from their site of formation in, the Golgi through the cytosol to the site of new wall formation at the tip. Fusion of these vesicles with the plasma, membrane deposits wall precursors outside the cell, where, they are assembled into wall material.
Page 27 :
Plant Cells, , 23, , FIGURE 1.25 Electron micrograph of a cell plate forming in a, maple seedling (10,000×). (© E. H. Newcomb and B. A., Palevitz/Biological Photo Service.), , Nuclear, envelope, , the two chromatids of each replicated chromosome,, which were held together at their kinetochores, are, separated and the daughter chromosomes are, Microtubule, pulled to opposite poles by spindle fibers., At a key regulatory point early in G1 of the cell, cycle, the cell becomes committed to the initiation, of DNA synthesis. In yeasts, this point is called, START. Once a cell has passed START, it is irreversibly committed to initiating DNA synthesis and, completing the cell cycle through mitosis and, Nucleus, cytokinesis. After the cell has completed mitosis, it, may initiate another complete cycle (G1 through, mitosis), or it may leave the cell cycle and differentiate. This choice is made at the critical G1 point,, before the cell begins to replicate its DNA., Intermediate Filaments Occur in the Cytosol and, DNA replication and mitosis are linked in mammalian, Nucleus of Plant Cells, cells. Often mammalian cells that have stopped dividing, Relatively little is known about plant intermediate filacan be stimulated to reenter the cell cycle by a variety of, ments. Intermediate filament–like structures have been, hormones and growth factors. When they do so, they reenidentified in the cytoplasm of plant cells (Yang et al. 1995),, ter the cell cycle at the critical point in early G1. In contrast,, plant cells can leave the cell division cycle either before or, but these may not be based on keratin, as in animal cells,, after replicating their DNA (i.e., during G1 or G2). As a consince as yet no plant keratin genes have been found., sequence, whereas most animal cells are diploid (having, Nuclear lamins, intermediate filaments of another type that, two sets of chromosomes), plant cells frequently are, form a dense network on the inner surface of the nuclear, tetraploid (having four sets of chromosomes), or even polymembrane, have also been identified in plant cells (Fredploid (having many sets of chromosomes), after going, erick et al. 1992), and genes encoding laminlike proteins are, through additional cycles of nuclear DNA replication withpresent in the Arabidopsis genome. Presumably, plant, out mitosis., lamins perform functions similar to those in animal cells as, a structural component of the nuclear envelope., Vesicles, , The Cell Cycle Is Regulated by Protein Kinases, , CELL CYCLE REGULATION, The cell division cycle, or cell cycle, is the process by which, cells reproduce themselves and their genetic material, the, nuclear DNA. The four phases of the cell cycle are designated G1, S, G2, and M (Figure 1.26A)., , Each Phase of the Cell Cycle Has a Specific Set of, Biochemical and Cellular Activities, Nuclear DNA is prepared for replication in G1 by the, assembly of a prereplication complex at the origins of replication along the chromatin. DNA is replicated during the, S phase, and G2 cells prepare for mitosis., The whole architecture of the cell is altered as cells enter, mitosis: The nuclear envelope breaks down, chromatin condenses to form recognizable chromosomes, the mitotic, spindle forms, and the replicated chromosomes attach to, the spindle fibers. The transition from metaphase to, anaphase of mitosis marks a major transition point when, , The mechanism regulating the progression of cells through, their division cycle is highly conserved in evolution, and, plants have retained the basic components of this mechanism (Renaudin et al. 1996). The key enzymes that control, the transitions between the different states of the cell cycle,, and the entry of nondividing cells into the cell cycle, are the, cyclin-dependent protein kinases, or CDKs (Figure 1.26B)., Protein kinases are enzymes that phosphorylate proteins, using ATP. Most multicellular eukaryotes use several protein kinases that are active in different phases of the cell, cycle. All depend on regulatory subunits called cyclins for, their activities. The regulated activity of CDKs is essential, for the transitions from G1 to S and from G2 to M, and for, the entry of nondividing cells into the cell cycle., CDK activity can be regulated in various ways, but two, of the most important mechanisms are (1) cyclin synthesis and destruction and (2) the phosphorylation and, dephosphorylation of key amino acid residues within the, CDK protein. CDKs are inactive unless they are associated
Page 28 :
Chapter 1, , (A), , (B), , Active CDK, stimulates mitosis, , Mitosis, , ha, , se, , se, , phase, , lop, , es, , P, , n, ki, , CDK, , to, , Inactive, CDK, G1, P, , M, , CDK, P, , CDK, G2, , S, , E, ERPHAS, , Mitotic, cyclin (CM), , Inactive, CDK, , ATP, , 2 ADP, INT, , M cyclin, degradation, , Cy, , M, , G2, , P, , P, is, , Te, , Meta, , p, Pro, , ha, , se, , Mitotic p, has, e, Anapha, , 24, , G1, ADP, , 2 ATP, , S, , FIGURE 1.26 (A) Diagram of the cell cycle. (B), Diagram of the regulation of the cell cycle by, CDK, cyclin-dependent protein kinase (CDK). During, Inactive CDK, G1 cyclin (CG1), G1, CDK is in its inactive form. CDK becomes, activated by binding to G1 cyclin (CG1) and by, CDK, being phosphorylated (P) at the activation site. The activated, P, P, CDK–cyclin complex allows the transition to the S phase. At, Activation, Inhibitory, the end of the S phase, the G1 cyclin is degraded and the, site, site, CDK is dephosphorylated, resulting in an inactive CDK., G1 cyclin, degradation, The cell enters G2. During G2, the inactive CDK binds to the, Active CDK, mitotic cyclin (CM), or M cyclin. At the same time, the, stimulates DNA, CDK–cyclin complex becomes phosphorylated at both its, synthesis, activation and its inhibitory sites. The CDK–cyclin complex, is still inactive because the inhibitory site is phosphorylated. The inactive complex becomes activated when the, phosphate is removed from the inhibitory site by a protein, phosphatase. The activated CDK then stimulates the transition from G2 to mitosis. At the end of mitosis, the mitotic, Similarly, protein phosphatases can remove phosphate, cyclin is degraded and the remaining phosphate at the activation site is removed by the phosphatase, and the cell, from CDKs, either stimulating or inhibiting their activity,, enters G1 again., depending on the position of the phosphate. The addition, , with a cyclin. Most cyclins turn over rapidly. They are synthesized and then actively degraded (using ATP) at specific, points in the cell cycle. Cyclins are degraded in the cytosol, by a large proteolytic complex called the proteasome., Before being degraded by the proteasome, the cyclins are, marked for destruction by the attachment of a small protein called ubiquitin, a process that requires ATP. Ubiquitination is a general mechanism for tagging cellular proteins, destined for turnover (see Chapter 14)., The transition from G1 to S requires a set of cyclins, (known as G1 cyclins) different from those required in the, transition from G2 to mitosis, where mitotic cyclins activate the CDKs (see Figure 1.26B). CDKs possess two tyrosine phosphorylation sites: One causes activation of the, enzyme; the other causes inactivation. Specific kinases, carry out both the stimulatory and the inhibitory phosphorylations., , or removal of phosphate groups from CDKs is highly regulated and an important mechanism for the control of cell, cycle progression (see Figure 1.26B). Cyclin inhibitors play, an important role in regulating the cell cycle in animals,, and probably in plants as well, although little is known, about plant cyclin inhibitors., Finally, as we will see later in the book, certain plant, hormones are able to regulate the cell cycle by regulating, the synthesis of key enzymes in the regulatory pathway., , PLASMODESMATA, Plasmodesmata (singular plasmodesma) are tubular extensions of the plasma membrane, 40 to 50 nm in diameter,, that traverse the cell wall and connect the cytoplasms of, adjacent cells. Because most plant cells are interconnected, in this way, their cytoplasms form a continuum referred to, as the symplast. Intercellular transport of solutes through, plasmodesmata is thus called symplastic transport (see, Chapters 4 and 6).
Page 29 :
Plant Cells, , 25, , There Are Two Types of Plasmodesmata:, Primary and Secondary, , Plasmodesmata Have a Complex, Internal Structure, , Primary plasmodesmata form during cytokinesis when, Golgi-derived vesicles containing cell wall precursors fuse, to form the cell plate (the future middle lamella). Rather, than forming a continuous uninterrupted sheet, the newly, deposited cell plate is penetrated by numerous pores (Figure 1.27A), where remnants of the spindle apparatus, consisting of ER and microtubules, disrupt vesicle fusion. Further deposition of wall polymers increases the thickness of, the two primary cell walls on either side of the middle, lamella, generating linear membrane-lined channels (Figure 1.27B). Development of primary plasmodesmata thus, provides direct continuity and communication between, cells that are clonally related (i.e., derived from the same, mother cell)., Secondary plasmodesmata form between cells after, their cell walls have been deposited. They arise either by, evagination of the plasma membrane at the cell surface, or, by branching from a primary plasmodesma (Lucas and, Wolf 1993). In addition to increasing the communication, between cells that are clonally related, secondary plasmodesmata allow symplastic continuity between cells that, are not clonally related., , Like nuclear pores, plasmodesmata have a complex internal structure that functions in regulating macromolecular, traffic from cell to cell. Each plasmodesma contains a narrow tubule of ER called a desmotubule (see Figure 1.27)., The desmotubule is continuous with the ER of the adjacent, cells. Thus the symplast joins not only the cytosol of neighboring cells, but the contents of the ER lumens as well., However, it is not clear that the desmotubule actually represents a passage, since there does not appear to be a space, between the membranes, which are tightly appressed., Globular proteins are associated with both the desmotubule membrane and the plasma membrane within the, pore (see Figure 1.27B). These globular proteins appear to, be interconnected by spokelike extensions, dividing the, pore into eight to ten microchannels (Ding et al. 1992)., Some molecules can pass from cell to cell through plasmodesmata, probably by flowing through the microchannels, although the exact pathway of communication has not, been established., By following the movement of fluorescent dye molecules of different sizes through plasmodesmata connecting, leaf epidermal cells, Robards and Lucas (1990) determined, , (A), , ER, , Plasma membrane, , (B), Cytoplasm, , Endoplasmic reticulum, Desmotubule, , Neck, , Central rod, Desmotubule, , Cell wall, Plasma, membrane, Middle, lamella, , Cell wall, , Central cavity, Cytoplasmic, sleeve, ER, , FIGURE 1.27 Plasmodesmata between cells. (A) Electron, micrograph of a wall separating two adjacent cells, showing, the plasmodesmata. (B) Schematic view of a cell wall with, two plasmodesmata with different shapes. The desmotubule, is continuous with the ER of the adjoining cells. Proteins line, the outer surface of the desmotubule and the inner surface of, the plasma membrane; the two surfaces are thought to be, connected by filamentous proteins. The gap between the proteins lining the two membranes apparently controls the molecular sieving properties of plasmodesmata. (A from Tilney, et al. 1991; B after Buchanan et al. 2000.), , Cross, sections, Central cavity, Central rod, Cytoplasmic, sleeve, , Spokelike, filamentous, proteins
Page 30 :
26, , Chapter 1, , the limiting molecular mass for transport to be about 700, to 1000 daltons, equivalent to a molecular size of about 1.5, to 2.0 nm. This is the size exclusion limit, or SEL, of plasmodesmata., If the width of the cytoplasmic sleeve is approximately, 5 to 6 nm, how are molecules larger than 2.0 nm excluded?, The proteins attached to the plasma membrane and the ER, within the plasmodesmata appear to act to restrict the size, of molecules that can pass through the pore. As we’ll see in, Chapter 16, the SELs of plasmodesmata can be regulated., The mechanism for regulating the SEL is poorly understood, but the localization of both actin and myosin within, plasmodesmata, possibly forming the “spoke” extensions, (see Figure 1.27B), suggests that they may participate in the, process (White et al. 1994; Radford and White 1996). Recent, studies have also implicated calcium-dependent protein, kinases in the regulation of plasmodesmatal SEL., , SUMMARY, Despite their great diversity in form and size, all plants, carry out similar physiological processes. As primary producers, plants convert solar energy to chemical energy., Being nonmotile, plants must grow toward light, and they, must have efficient vascular systems for movement of, water, mineral nutrients, and photosynthetic products, throughout the plant body. Green land plants must also, have mechanisms for avoiding desiccation., The major vegetative organ systems of seed plants are, the shoot and the root. The shoot consists of two types of, organs: stems and leaves. Unlike animal development,, plant growth is indeterminate because of the presence of, permanent meristem tissue at the shoot and root apices,, which gives rise to new tissues and organs during the, entire vegetative phase of the life cycle. Lateral meristems, (the vascular cambium and the cork cambium) produce, growth in girth, or secondary growth., Three major tissue systems are recognized: dermal,, ground, and vascular. Each of these tissues contains a variety of cell types specialized for different functions., Plants are eukaryotes and have the typical eukaryotic, cell organization, consisting of nucleus and cytoplasm. The, nuclear genome directs the growth and development of, the organism. The cytoplasm is enclosed by a plasma, membrane and contains numerous membrane-enclosed, organelles, including plastids, mitochondria, microbodies,, oleosomes, and a large central vacuole. Chloroplasts and, mitochondria are semiautonomous organelles that contain, their own DNA. Nevertheless, most of their proteins are, encoded by nuclear DNA and are imported from the, cytosol., The cytoskeletal components—microtubules, microfilaments, and intermediate filaments—participate in a variety of processes involving intracellular movements, such, as mitosis, cytoplasmic streaming, secretory vesicle trans-, , port, cell plate formation, and cellulose microfibril deposition. The process by which cells reproduce is called the cell, cycle. The cell cycle consists of the G1, S, G2, and M phases., The transition from one phase to another is regulated by, cyclin-dependent protein kinases. The activity of the CDKs, is regulated by cyclins and by protein phosphorylation., During cytokinesis, the phragmoplast gives rise to the cell, plate in a multistep process that involves vesicle fusion. After, cytokinesis, primary cell walls are deposited. The cytosol of, adjacent cells is continuous through the cell walls because of, the presence of membrane-lined channels called plasmodesmata, which play a role in cell–cell communication., , Web Material, Web Topics, 1.1 The Plant Kingdom, The major groups of the plant kingdom are, surveyed and described., , 1.2 Flower Structure and the Angiosperm Life Cycle, The steps in the reproductive style of angiosperms are discussed and illustrated., , 1.3 Plant Tissue Systems: Dermal, Ground, and, Vascular, A more detailed treatment of plant anatomy, is given., , 1.4 The Structures of Chloroplast Glycosylglycerides, The chemical structures of the chloroplast lipids, are illustrated., , 1.5 The Multiple Steps in Construction of the Cell, Plate Following Mitosis, Details of the production of the cell plate during, cytokinesis in plants are described., , Chapter References, Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Walter,, P. (2002) Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th ed. Garland, New York., Buchanan, B. B., Gruissem, W., and Jones, R. L. (eds.) (2000) Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. Amer. Soc. Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD., Ding, B., Turgeon, R., and Parthasarathy, M. V. (1992) Substructure, of freeze substituted plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 169: 28–41., Driouich, A., Levy, S., Staehelin, L. A., and Faye, L. (1994) Structural, and functional organization of the Golgi apparatus in plant cells., Plant Physiol. Biochem. 32: 731–749., Esau, K. (1960) Anatomy of Seed Plants. Wiley, New York., Esau, K. (1977) Anatomy of Seed Plants, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York., Faye, L., Fitchette-Lainé, A. C., Gomord, V., Chekkafi, A., Delaunay,, A. M., and Driouich, A. (1992) Detection, biosynthesis and some, functions of glycans N-linked to plant secreted proteins. In Posttranslational Modifications in Plants (SEB Seminar Series, no. 53),, N. H. Battey, H. G. Dickinson, and A. M. Heatherington, eds.,, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 213–242.
Page 31 :
Plant Cells, Frederick, S. E., Mangan, M. E., Carey, J. B., and Gruber, P. J. (1992), Intermediate filament antigens of 60 and 65 kDa in the nuclear, matrix of plants: Their detection and localization. Exp. Cell Res., 199: 213–222., Gunning, B. E. S., and Steer, M. W. (1996) Plant Cell Biology: Structure, and Function of Plant Cells. Jones and Bartlett, Boston., Harwood, J. L. (1997) Plant lipid metabolism. In Plant Biochemistry,, P. M. Dey and J. B. Harborne, eds., Academic Press, San Diego,, CA, pp. 237–272., Huang, A. H. C. (1987) Lipases in The Biochemistry of Plants: A Comprehensive Treatise. In Vol. 9, Lipids: Structure and Function, P. K., Stumpf, ed. Academic Press, New York, pp. 91–119., Lucas, W. J., and Wolf, S. (1993) Plasmodesmata: The intercellular, organelles of green plants. Trends Cell Biol. 3: 308–315., O’Brien, T. P., and McCully, M. E. (1969) Plant Structure and Development: A Pictorial and Physiological Approach. Macmillan, New, York., Radford, J., and White, R. G. (1996) Preliminary localization of, myosin to plasmodesmata. Third International Workshop on, , 27, , Basic and Applied Research in Plasmodesmal Biology, ZichronTakov, Israel, March 10–16, 1996, pp. 37–38., Renaudin, J.-P., Doonan, J. H., Freeman, D., Hashimoto, J., Hirt, H.,, Inze, D., Jacobs, T., Kouchi, H., Rouze, P., Sauter, M., et al. (1996), Plant cyclins: A unified nomenclature for plant A-, B- and D-type, cyclins based on sequence organization. Plant Mol. Biol. 32:, 1003–1018., Robards, A. W., and Lucas, W. J. (1990) Plasmodesmata. Annu. Rev., Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41: 369–420., Tilney, L. G., Cooke, T. J., Connelly, P. S., and Tilney, M. S. (1991) The, structure of plasmodesmata as revealed by plasmolysis, detergent extraction, and protease digestion. J. Cell Biol. 112: 739–748., White, R. G., Badelt, K., Overall, R. L., and Vesk, M. (1994) Actin, associated with plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 180: 169–184., Yang, C., Min, G. W., Tong, X. J., Luo, Z., Liu, Z. F., and Zhai, Z. H., (1995) The assembly of keratins from higher plant cells. Protoplasma 188: 128–132.
Page 33 :
2, , Energy and Enzymes, , The force that through the green fuse drives the flower, Drives my green age; that blasts the roots of trees, Is my destroyer., And I am dumb to tell the crooked rose, My youth is bent by the same wintry fever., The force that drives the water through the rocks, Drives my red blood; that dries the mouthing streams, Turns mine to wax., And I am dumb to mouth unto my veins, How at the mountain spring the same mouth sucks., Dylan Thomas, Collected Poems (1952), , In these opening stanzas from Dylan Thomas’s famous poem, the, poet proclaims the essential unity of the forces that propel animate, and inanimate objects alike, from their beginnings to their ultimate, decay. Scientists call this force energy. Energy transformations play, a key role in all the physical and chemical processes that occur in, living systems. But energy alone is insufficient to drive the growth, and development of organisms. Protein catalysts called enzymes, are required to ensure that the rates of biochemical reactions are, rapid enough to support life. In this chapter we will examine basic, concepts about energy, the way in which cells transform energy to, perform useful work (bioenergetics), and the structure and function of enzymes., , Energy Flow through Living Systems, The flow of matter through individual organisms and biological, communities is part of everyday experience; the flow of energy is, not, even though it is central to the very existence of living things., , 1
Page 34 :
2, , CHAPTER 2, , What makes concepts such as energy, work, and order, so elusive is their insubstantial nature: We find it far easier to visualize the dance of atoms and molecules than, the forces and fluxes that determine the direction and, extent of natural processes. The branch of physical science that deals with such matters is thermodynamics,, an abstract and demanding discipline that most biologists are content to skim over lightly. Yet bioenergetics, is so shot through with concepts and quantitative relationships derived from thermodynamics that it is, scarcely possible to discuss the subject without frequent, reference to free energy, potential, entropy, and the second law., The purpose of this chapter is to collect and explain,, as simply as possible, the fundamental thermodynamic, concepts and relationships that recur throughout this, book. Readers who prefer a more extensive treatment of, the subject should consult either the introductory texts, by Klotz (1967) and by Nicholls and Ferguson (1992) or, the advanced texts by Morowitz (1978) and by Edsall, and Gutfreund (1983)., Thermodynamics evolved during the nineteenth century out of efforts to understand how a steam engine, works and why heat is produced when one bores a cannon. The very name “thermodynamics,” and much of, the language of this science, recall these historical roots,, but it would be more appropriate to speak of energetics,, for the principles involved are universal. Living plants,, like all other natural phenomena, are constrained by the, laws of thermodynamics. By the same token, thermodynamics supplies an indispensable framework for the, quantitative description of biological vitality., , uct of the force and the distance displaced, as expressed, in the following equation:*, W = f ∆l, , Mechanical work appears in chemistry because, whenever the final volume of a reaction mixture exceeds, the initial volume, work must be done against the pressure of the atmosphere; conversely, the atmosphere performs work when a system contracts. This work is calculated by the expression P∆V (where P stands for, pressure and V for volume), a term that appears frequently in thermodynamic formulas. In biology, work is, employed in a broader sense to describe displacement against, any of the forces that living things encounter or generate:, mechanical, electric, osmotic, or even chemical potential., A familiar mechanical illustration may help clarify the, relationship of energy to work. The spring in Figure 2.1, can be extended if force is applied to it over a particular, distance—that is, if work is done on the spring. This, work can be recovered by an appropriate arrangement, of pulleys and used to lift a weight onto the table. The, extended spring can thus be said to possess energy that, is numerically equal to the work it can do on the weight, (neglecting friction). The weight on the table, in turn, can, be said to possess energy by virtue of its position in, Earth’s gravitational field, which can be utilized to do, other work, such as turning a crank. The weight thus, illustrates the concept of potential energy, a capacity to, do work that arises from the position of an object in a, field of force, and the sequence as a whole illustrates the, conversion of one kind of energy into another, or energy, transduction., The First Law: The Total Energy Is Always Conserved, It is common experience that mechanical devices, involve both the performance of work and the produc-, , Energy and Work, Let us begin with the meanings of “energy” and, “work.” Energy is defined in elementary physics, as in, daily life, as the capacity to do work. The meaning of, work is harder to come by and more narrow. Work, in, the mechanical sense, is the displacement of any body, against an opposing force. The work done is the prod-, , (A), , (B), , (2.1), , * We may note in passing that the dimensions of work are, complex— ml 2t–2 —where m denotes mass, l distance, and, t time, and that work is a scalar quantity, that is, the product of two vectorial terms., , (C), , Figure 2.1 Energy and work in a mechanical system. (A) A weight resting on the floor is, attached to a spring via a string. (B) Pulling on the spring places the spring under tension., (C) The potential energy stored in the extended spring performs the work of raising the, weight when the spring contracts.
Page 35 :
Energy and Enzymes, tion or absorption of heat. We are at liberty to vary the, amount of work done by the spring, up to a particular, maximum, by using different weights, and the amount, of heat produced will also vary. But much experimental, work has shown that, under ideal circumstances, the, sum of the work done and of the heat evolved is constant and depends only on the initial and final extensions of the spring. We can thus envisage a property, the, internal energy of the spring, with the characteristic, described by the following equation:, ∆U = ∆Q + ∆W, , (2.2), , Here Q is the amount of heat absorbed by the system,, and W is the amount of work done on the system.* In, Figure 2.1 the work is mechanical, but it could just as, well be electrical, chemical, or any other kind of work., Thus ∆U is the net amount of energy put into the system, either as heat or as work; conversely, both the performance of work and the evolution of heat entail a, decrease in the internal energy. We cannot specify an, absolute value for the energy content; only changes in, internal energy can be measured. Note that Equation 2.2, assumes that heat and work are equivalent; its purpose, is to stress that, under ideal circumstances, ∆U depends, only on the initial and final states of the system, not on, how heat and work are partitioned., Equation 2.2 is a statement of the first law of thermodynamics, which is the principle of energy conservation. If a particular system exchanges no energy with, its surroundings, its energy content remains constant; if, energy is exchanged, the change in internal energy will, be given by the difference between the energy gained, from the surroundings and that lost to the surroundings., The change in internal energy depends only on the initial and final states of the system, not on the pathway or, mechanism of energy exchange. Energy and work are, interconvertible; even heat is a measure of the kinetic, energy of the molecular constituents of the system. To, put it as simply as possible, Equation 2.2 states that no, machine, including the chemical machines that we recognize as living, can do work without an energy source., An example of the application of the first law to a, biological phenomenon is the energy budget of a leaf., Leaves absorb energy from their surroundings in two, ways: as direct incident irradiation from the sun and as, infrared irradiation from the surroundings. Some of the, energy absorbed by the leaf is radiated back to the surroundings as infrared irradiation and heat, while a frac* Equation 2.2 is more commonly encountered in the form, ∆U = ∆Q – ∆W, which results from the convention that Q is, the amount of heat absorbed by the system from the surroundings and W is the amount of work done by the system on the surroundings. This convention affects the sign, of W but does not alter the meaning of the equation., , 3, , tion of the absorbed energy is stored, as either photosynthetic products or leaf temperature changes. Thus, we can write the following equation:, Total energy absorbed by leaf = energy emitted, from leaf + energy stored by leaf, Note that although the energy absorbed by the leaf has, been transformed, the total energy remains the same, in, accordance with the first law., The Change in the Internal Energy of a System, Represents the Maximum Work It Can Do, We must qualify the equivalence of energy and work by, invoking “ideal conditions”—that is, by requiring that, the process be carried out reversibly. The meaning of, “reversible” in thermodynamics is a special one: The, term describes conditions under which the opposing, forces are so nearly balanced that an infinitesimal, change in one or the other would reverse the direction, of the process.† Under these circumstances the process, yields the maximum possible amount of work., Reversibility in this sense does not often hold in nature,, as in the example of the leaf. Ideal conditions differ so, little from a state of equilibrium that any process or reaction would require infinite time and would therefore not, take place at all. Nonetheless, the concept of thermodynamic reversibility is useful: If we measure the change, in internal energy that a process entails, we have an, upper limit to the work that it can do; for any real, process the maximum work will be less., In the study of plant biology we encounter several, sources of energy—notably light and chemical transformations—as well as a variety of work functions, including mechanical, osmotic, electrical, and chemical work., The meaning of the first law in biology stems from the, certainty, painstakingly achieved by nineteenth-century, physicists, that the various kinds of energy and work, are measurable, equivalent, and, within limits, interconvertible. Energy is to biology what money is to economics: the means by which living things purchase useful goods and services., Each Type of Energy Is Characterized by a Capacity, Factor and a Potential Factor, The amount of work that can be done by a system,, whether mechanical or chemical, is a function of the size, of the system. Work can always be defined as the product of two factors—force and distance, for example. One, is a potential or intensity factor, which is independent of, the size of the system; the other is a capacity factor and, is directly proportional to the size (Table 2.1)., †, , In biochemistry, reversibility has a different meaning:, Usually the term refers to a reaction whose pathway can be, reversed, often with an input of energy.
Page 36 :
4, , CHAPTER 2, , Table 2.1, Potential and capacity factors in energetics, Type of energy, , Potential factor, , Capacity factor, , Mechanical, Electrical, Chemical, Osmotic, Thermal, , Pressure, Electric potential, Chemical potential, Concentration, Temperature, , Volume, Charge, Mass, Mass, Entropy, , In biochemistry, energy and work have traditionally, been expressed in calories; 1 calorie is the amount of, heat required to raise the temperature of 1 g of water by, 1ºC, specifically, from 15.0 to 16.0°C . In principle, one, can carry out the same process by doing the work, mechanically with a paddle; such experiments led to the, establishment of the mechanical equivalent of heat as, 4.186 joules per calorie (J cal–1).* We will also have occasion to use the equivalent electrical units, based on the, volt: A volt is the potential difference between two, points when 1 J of work is involved in the transfer of a, coulomb of charge from one point to another. (A, coulomb is the amount of charge carried by a current of, 1 ampere [A] flowing for 1 s. Transfer of 1 mole [mol] of, charge across a potential of 1 volt [V] involves 96,500 J, of energy or work.) The difference between energy and, work is often a matter of the sign. Work must be done to, bring a positive charge closer to another positive charge,, but the charges thereby acquire potential energy, which, in turn can do work., , The Direction of Spontaneous Processes, Left to themselves, events in the real world take a predictable course. The apple falls from the branch. A mixture of hydrogen and oxygen gases is converted into, water. The fly trapped in a bottle is doomed to perish,, the pyramids to crumble into sand; things fall apart. But, there is nothing in the principle of energy conservation, that forbids the apple to return to its branch with, absorption of heat from the surroundings or that prevents water from dissociating into its constituent elements in a like manner. The search for the reason that, neither of these things ever happens led to profound, philosophical insights and generated useful quantitative, statements about the energetics of chemical reactions, and the amount of work that can be done by them. Since, living things are in many respects chemical machines,, we must examine these matters in some detail., * In current standard usage based on the meter, kilogram,, and second, the fundamental unit of energy is the joule, (1 J = 0.24 cal) or the kilojoule (1 kJ = 1000 J)., , The Second Law: The Total Entropy Always, Increases, From daily experience with weights falling and warm, bodies growing cold, one might expect spontaneous, processes to proceed in the direction that lowers the, internal energy—that is, the direction in which ∆U is, negative. But there are too many exceptions for this to, be a general rule. The melting of ice is one exception: An, ice cube placed in water at 1°C will melt, yet measurements show that liquid water (at any temperature above, 0°C) is in a state of higher energy than ice; evidently,, some spontaneous processes are accompanied by an, increase in internal energy. Our melting ice cube does, not violate the first law, for heat is absorbed as it melts., This suggests that there is a relationship between the, capacity for spontaneous heat absorption and the criterion determining the direction of spontaneous processes,, and that is the case. The thermodynamic function we, seek is called entropy, the amount of energy in a system, not available for doing work, corresponding to the, degree of randomness of a system. Mathematically,, entropy is the capacity factor corresponding to temperature, Q/T. We may state the answer to our question, as, well as the second law of thermodynamics, thus: The, direction of all spontaneous processes is to increase the, entropy of a system plus its surroundings., Few concepts are so basic to a comprehension of the, world we live in, yet so opaque, as entropy—presumably because entropy is not intuitively related to our, sense perceptions, as mass and temperature are. The, explanation given here follows the particularly lucid, exposition by Atkinson (1977), who states the second, law in a form bearing, at first sight, little resemblance to, that given above:, We shall take [the second law] as the concept, that any system not at absolute zero has an irreducible minimum amount of energy that is an, inevitable property of that system at that temperature. That is, a system requires a certain amount, of energy just to be at any specified temperature., The molecular constitution of matter supplies a ready, explanation: Some energy is stored in the thermal, motions of the molecules and in the vibrations and oscillations of their constituent atoms. We can speak of it as, isothermally unavailable energy, since the system cannot give up any of it without a drop in temperature, (assuming that there is no physical or chemical change)., The isothermally unavailable energy of any system, increases with temperature, since the energy of molecular and atomic motions increases with temperature., Quantitatively, the isothermally unavailable energy for, a particular system is given by ST, where T is the, absolute temperature and S is the entropy.
Page 37 :
Energy and Enzymes, But what is this thing, entropy? Reflection on the, nature of the isothermally unavailable energy suggests, that, for any particular temperature, the amount of such, energy will be greater the more atoms and molecules are, free to move and to vibrate—that is, the more chaotic is, the system. By contrast, the orderly array of atoms in a, crystal, with a place for each and each in its place, corresponds to a state of low entropy. At absolute zero,, when all motion ceases, the entropy of a pure substance, is likewise zero; this statement is sometimes called the, third law of thermodynamics., A large molecule, a protein for example, within, which many kinds of motion can take place, will have, considerable amounts of energy stored in this fashion—, more than would, say, an amino acid molecule. But the, entropy of the protein molecule will be less than that of, the constituent amino acids into which it can dissociate,, because of the constraints placed on the motions of, those amino acids as long as they are part of the larger, structure. Any process leading to the release of these, constraints increases freedom of movement, and hence, entropy., This is the universal tendency of spontaneous, processes as expressed in the second law; it is why the, costly enzymes stored in the refrigerator tend to decay, and why ice melts into water. The increase in entropy as, ice melts into water is “paid for” by the absorption of, heat from the surroundings. As long as the net change, in entropy of the system plus its surroundings is positive, the process can take place spontaneously. That does, not necessarily mean that the process will take place:, The rate is usually determined by kinetic factors separate from the entropy change. All the second law mandates is that the fate of the pyramids is to crumble into, sand, while the sand will never reassemble itself into a, pyramid; the law does not tell how quickly this must, come about., A Process Is Spontaneous If DS for the System and, Its Surroundings Is Positive, There is nothing mystical about entropy; it is a thermodynamic quantity like any other, measurable by experiment and expressed in entropy units. One method of, quantifying it is through the heat capacity of a system,, the amount of energy required to raise the temperature, by 1°C. In some cases the entropy can even be calculated, from theoretical principles, though only for simple molecules. For our purposes, what matters is the sign of the, entropy change, ∆S: A process can take place spontaneously when ∆S for the system and its surroundings is, positive; a process for which ∆S is negative cannot take, place spontaneously, but the opposite process can; and, for a system at equilibrium, the entropy of the system, plus its surroundings is maximal and ∆S is zero., , 5, , “Equilibrium” is another of those familiar words that, is easier to use than to define. Its everyday meaning, implies that the forces acting on a system are equally, balanced, such that there is no net tendency to change;, this is the sense in which the term “equilibrium” will be, used here. A mixture of chemicals may be in the midst, of rapid interconversion, but if the rates of the forward, reaction and the backward reaction are equal, there will, be no net change in composition, and equilibrium will, prevail., The second law has been stated in many versions., One version forbids perpetual-motion machines:, Because energy is, by the second law, perpetually, degraded into heat and rendered isothermally unavailable (∆S > 0), continued motion requires an input of, energy from the outside. The most celebrated yet perplexing version of the second law was provided by R. J., Clausius (1879): “The energy of the universe is constant;, the entropy of the universe tends towards a maximum.”, How can entropy increase forever, created out of, nothing? The root of the difficulty is verbal, as Klotz, (1967) neatly explains. Had Clausius defined entropy, with the opposite sign (corresponding to order rather, than to chaos), its universal tendency would be to, diminish; it would then be obvious that spontaneous, changes proceed in the direction that decreases the, capacity for further spontaneous change. Solutes diffuse, from a region of higher concentration to one of lower, concentration; heat flows from a warm body to a cold, one. Sometimes these changes can be reversed by an, outside agent to reduce the entropy of the system under, consideration, but then that external agent must change, in such a way as to reduce its own capacity for further, change. In sum, “entropy is an index of exhaustion; the, more a system has lost its capacity for spontaneous, change, the more this capacity has been exhausted, the, greater is the entropy” (Klotz 1967). Conversely, the farther a system is from equilibrium, the greater is its, capacity for change and the less its entropy. Living, things fall into the latter category: A cell is the epitome of, a state that is remote from equilibrium., , Free Energy and Chemical Potential, Many energy transactions that take place in living, organisms are chemical; we therefore need a quantitative expression for the amount of work a chemical reaction can do. For this purpose, relationships that involve, the entropy change in the system plus its surroundings, are unsuitable. We need a function that does not depend, on the surroundings but that, like ∆S, attains a minimum under conditions of equilibrium and so can serve, both as a criterion of the feasibility of a reaction and as, a measure of the energy available from it for the perfor-
Page 38 :
6, , CHAPTER 2, , mance of work. The function universally employed for, this purpose is free energy, abbreviated G in honor of the, nineteenth-century physical chemist J. Willard Gibbs,, who first introduced it., DG Is Negative for a Spontaneous Process at, Constant Temperature and Pressure, Earlier we spoke of the isothermally unavailable energy,, ST. Free energy is defined as the energy that is available, under isothermal conditions, and by the following relationship:, ∆H = ∆G + T∆S, , (2.3), , The term H, enthalpy or heat content, is not quite equivalent to U, the internal energy (see Equation 2.2). To be, exact, ∆H is a measure of the total energy change,, including work that may result from changes in volume, during the reaction, whereas ∆U excludes this work., (We will return to the concept of enthalpy a little later.), However, in the biological context we are usually concerned with reactions in solution, for which volume, changes are negligible. For most purposes, then,, and, , ∆U ≅ ∆G + T∆S, , (2.4), , ∆G ≅ ∆U – T∆S, , (2.5), , What makes this a useful relationship is the demonstration that for all spontaneous processes at constant temperature and pressure, ∆G is negative. The change in free, energy is thus a criterion of feasibility. Any chemical reaction that proceeds with a negative ∆G can take place, spontaneously; a process for which ∆G is positive cannot, take place, but the reaction can go in the opposite direction; and a reaction for which ∆G is zero is at equilibrium,, and no net change will occur. For a given temperature, and pressure, ∆G depends only on the composition of the, reaction mixture; hence the alternative term “chemical, potential” is particularly apt. Again, nothing is said about, rate, only about direction. Whether a reaction having a, given ∆G will proceed, and at what rate, is determined by, kinetic rather than thermodynamic factors., There is a close and simple relationship between the, change in free energy of a chemical reaction and the, work that the reaction can do. Provided the reaction is, carried out reversibly,, ∆G = ∆Wmax, , (2.6), , That is, for a reaction taking place at constant temperature, and pressure, –∆G is a measure of the maximum work the, process can perform. More precisely, –∆G is the maximum, work possible, exclusive of pressure–volume work, and, thus is a quantity of great importance in bioenergetics., Any process going toward equilibrium can, in principle,, do work. We can therefore describe processes for which, ∆G is negative as “energy-releasing,” or exergonic. Conversely, for any process moving away from equilibrium,, , ∆G is positive, and we speak of an “energy-consuming,”, or endergonic, reaction. Of course, an endergonic reaction cannot occur: All real processes go toward equilibrium, with a negative ∆G. The concept of endergonic, reactions is nevertheless a useful abstraction, for many, biological reactions appear to move away from equilibrium. A prime example is the synthesis of ATP during, oxidative phosphorylation, whose apparent ∆G is as high, as 67 kJ mol–1 (16 kcal mol–1). Clearly, the cell must do, work to render the reaction exergonic overall. The occurrence of an endergonic process in nature thus implies that, it is coupled to a second, exergonic process. Much of cellular and molecular bioenergetics is concerned with the, mechanisms by which energy coupling is effected., The Standard Free-Energy Change, DG0, Is the, Change in Free Energy When the Concentration of, Reactants and Products Is 1 M, Changes in free energy can be measured experimentally, by calorimetric methods. They have been tabulated in, two forms: as the free energy of formation of a compound from its elements, and as ∆G for a particular reaction. It is of the utmost importance to remember that, by, convention, the numerical values refer to a particular set, of conditions. The standard free-energy change, ∆G0, refers, to conditions such that all reactants and products are present, at a concentration of 1 M; in biochemistry it is more convenient to employ ∆G0′, which is defined in the same, way except that the pH is taken to be 7. The conditions, obtained in the real world are likely to be very different, from these, particularly with respect to the concentrations of the participants. To take a familiar example, ∆G0′, for the hydrolysis of ATP is about –33 kJ mol–1 (–8 kcal, mol–1). In the cytoplasm, however, the actual nucleotide, concentrations are approximately 3 mM ATP, 1 mM, ADP, and 10 mM Pi. As we will see, changes in free, energy depend strongly on concentrations, and ∆G for, ATP hydrolysis under physiological conditions thus is, much more negative than ∆G0′, about –50 to –65 kJ, mol –1 (–12 to –15 kcal mol –1). Thus, whereas values of ∆G0 ′, for many reactions are easily accessible, they must not be used, uncritically as guides to what happens in cells., The Value of ∆G Is a Function of the Displacement, of the Reaction from Equilibrium, The preceding discussion of free energy shows that, there must be a relationship between ∆G and the equilibrium constant of a reaction: At equilibrium, ∆G is, zero, and the farther a reaction is from equilibrium, the, larger ∆G is and the more work the reaction can do. The, quantitative statement of this relationship is, ∆G0 = –RT ln K = –2.3RT log K, , (2.7), , where R is the gas constant, T the absolute temperature,, and K the equilibrium constant of the reaction. This, equation is one of the most useful links between ther-
Page 39 :
Energy and Enzymes, modynamics and biochemistry and has a host of applications. For example, the equation is easily modified to, allow computation of the change in free energy for concentrations other than the standard ones. For the reactions shown in the equation, A + B ⇔ C+D, , (2.8), , the actual change in free energy, ∆G, is given by the, equation, [C][D], [A][B], , ∆G = ∆G 0 + RT ln, , (2.9), , where the terms in brackets refer to the concentrations, at the time of the reaction. Strictly speaking, one should, use activities, but these are usually not known for cellular conditions, so concentrations must do., Equation 2.9 can be rewritten to make its import a little plainer. Let q stand for the mass:action ratio,, [C][D]/[A][B]. Substitution of Equation 2.7 into Equation 2.9, followed by rearrangement, then yields the following equation:, ∆G = −2.3 RT log, , K, q, , (2.10), , In other words, the value of ∆G is a function of the displacement of the reaction from equilibrium. In order to, displace a system from equilibrium, work must be done, on it and ∆G must be positive. Conversely, a system displaced from equilibrium can do work on another system, provided that the kinetic parameters allow the, , Free energy, , A, , B, , Pure A, , 0.001K 0.01K, , Pure B, , 0.1K, , K, , 10K, , 100K 1000K, , Figure 2.2 Free energy of a chemical reaction as a function, of displacement from equilibrium. Imagine a closed system, containing components A and B at concentrations [A] and, [B]. The two components can be interconverted by the reaction A ↔ B, which is at equilibrium when the mass:action, ratio, [B]/[A], equals unity. The curve shows qualitatively, how the free energy, G, of the system varies when the total, [A] + [B] is held constant but the mass:action ratio is displaced from equilibrium. The arrows represent schematically the change in free energy, ∆G, for a small conversion, of [A] into [B] occurring at different mass:action ratios., (After Nicholls and Ferguson 1992.), , 7, , reaction to proceed and a mechanism exists that couples, the two systems. Quantitatively, a reaction mixture at, 25°C whose composition is one order of magnitude, away from equilibrium (log K/q = 1) corresponds to a, free-energy change of 5.7 kJ mol–1 (1.36 kcal mol–1). The, value of ∆G is negative if the actual mass:action ratio is, less than the equilibrium ratio and positive if the, mass:action ratio is greater., The point that ∆G is a function of the displacement of, a reaction (indeed, of any thermodynamic system) from, equilibrium is central to an understanding of bioenergetics. Figure 2.2 illustrates this relationship diagrammatically for the chemical interconversion of substances, A and B, and the relationship will reappear shortly in, other guises., The Enthalpy Change Measures the Energy, Transferred as Heat, Chemical and physical processes are almost invariably, accompanied by the generation or absorption of heat,, which reflects the change in the internal energy of the, system. The amount of heat transferred and the sign of, the reaction are related to the change in free energy, as, set out in Equation 2.3. The energy absorbed or evolved, as heat under conditions of constant pressure is designated as the change in heat content or enthalpy, ∆H., Processes that generate heat, such as combustion, are, said to be exothermic; those in which heat is absorbed,, such as melting or evaporation, are referred to as, endothermic. The oxidation of glucose to CO2 and water, is an exergonic reaction (∆G0 = –2858 kJ mol–1 [–686 kcal, mol–1] ); when this reaction takes place during respiration, part of the free energy is conserved through coupled reactions that generate ATP. The combustion of glucose dissipates the free energy of reaction, releasing most, of it as heat (∆H = –2804 kJ mol–1 [–673 kcal mol–1])., Bioenergetics is preoccupied with energy transduction, and therefore gives pride of place to free-energy transactions, but at times heat transfer may also carry biological significance. For example, water has a high heat of, vaporization, 44 kJ mol–1 (10.5 kcal mol–1) at 25°C, which, plays an important role in the regulation of leaf temperature. During the day, the evaporation of water from the, leaf surface (transpiration) dissipates heat to the surroundings and helps cool the leaf. Conversely, the condensation of water vapor as dew heats the leaf, since, water condensation is the reverse of evaporation, is, exothermic. The abstract enthalpy function is a direct, measure of the energy exchanged in the form of heat., , Redox Reactions, Oxidation and reduction refer to the transfer of one or, more electrons from a donor to an acceptor, usually to, another chemical species; an example is the oxidation of, ferrous iron by oxygen, which forms ferric iron and
Page 40 :
8, , CHAPTER 2, , water. Reactions of this kind require special consideration, for they play a central role in both respiration and, photosynthesis., The Free-Energy Change of an Oxidation–, Reduction Reaction Is Expressed as the Standard, Redox Potential in Electrochemical Units, Redox reactions can be quite properly described in, terms of their change in free energy. However, the participation of electrons makes it convenient to follow the, course of the reaction with electrical instrumentation, and encourages the use of an electrochemical notation., It also permits dissection of the chemical process into, separate oxidative and reductive half-reactions. For the, oxidation of iron, we can write, 2Fe 2+ ⇔ 2Fe 3+ + 2e ±, , (2.11), , + 2 H+ + 2 E ± ⇔ H 2 O, , (2.12), , 2Fe 2+ + 1 2 O 2 + 2H+ ⇔ 2Fe 3+ + H 2 O, , (2.13), , 1, , 2 O2, , The tendency of a substance to donate electrons, its, “electron pressure,” is measured by its standard reduction (or redox) potential, E0 , with all components present at a concentration of 1 M. In biochemistry, it is more, convenient to employ E′0 , which is defined in the same, way except that the pH is 7. By definition, then, E′0 is the, electromotive force given by a half cell in which the, reduced and oxidized species are both present at 1 M,, 25°C, and pH 7, in equilibrium with an electrode that, can reversibly accept electrons from the reduced species., By convention, the reaction is written as a reduction., The standard reduction potential of the hydrogen electrode* serves as reference: at pH 7, it equals –0.42 V. The, standard redox potential as defined here is often, referred to in the bioenergetics literature as the midpoint potential, Em. A negative midpoint potential, marks a good reducing agent; oxidants have positive, midpoint potentials., The redox potential for the reduction of oxygen to, water is +0.82 V; for the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe 2+ (the, direction opposite to that of Equation 2.11), +0.77 V. We, can therefore predict that, under standard conditions,, the Fe 2+–Fe3+ couple will tend to reduce oxygen to, water rather than the reverse. A mixture containing Fe 2+,, Fe3+, and oxygen will probably not be at equilibrium,, and the extent of its displacement from equilibrium can, be expressed in terms of either the change in free energy, for Equation 2.13 or the difference in redox potential,, * The standard hydrogen electrode consists of platinum, over, which hydrogen gas is bubbled at a pressure of 1 atm. The, electrode is immersed in a solution containing hydrogen, ions. When the activity of hydrogen ions is 1, approximately, 1 M H+, the potential of the electrode is taken to be 0., , ∆E′0 , between the oxidant and the reductant couples, (+0.05 V in the case of iron oxidation). In general,, ∆G0′ = –nF ∆E′0, , (2.14), where n is the number of electrons transferred and F is, Faraday’s constant (23.06 kcal V–1 mol–1). In other, words, the standard redox potential is a measure, in, electrochemical units, of the change in free energy of an, oxidation–reduction process., As with free-energy changes, the redox potential, measured under conditions other than the standard, ones depends on the concentrations of the oxidized and, reduced species, according to the following equation, (note the similarity in form to Equation 2.9):, Eh = E ′0 +, , 2.3 RT, [oxidant], log, nF, [reductant], , (2.15), , Here Eh is the measured potential in volts, and the other, symbols have their usual meanings. It follows that the, redox potential under biological conditions may differ, substantially from the standard reduction potential., , The Electrochemical Potential, In the preceding section we introduced the concept that, a mixture of substances whose composition diverges, from the equilibrium state represents a potential source, of free energy (see Figure 2.2). Conversely, a similar, amount of work must be done on an equilibrium mixture in order to displace its composition from equilibrium. In this section, we will examine the free-energy, changes associated with another kind of displacement, from equilibrium—namely, gradients of concentration, and of electric potential., Transport of an Uncharged Solute against Its, Concentration Gradient Decreases the Entropy of, the System, Consider a vessel divided by a membrane into two, compartments that contain solutions of an uncharged, solute at concentrations C1 and C2, respectively. The, work required to transfer 1 mol of solute from the first, compartment to the second is given by the following, equation:, C, ∆G = 2.3 RT log 2, (2.16), C, 1, , This expression is analogous to the expression for a, chemical reaction (Equation 2.10) and has the same, meaning. If C2 is greater than C1, ∆G is positive, and, work must be done to transfer the solute. Again, the, free-energy change for the transport of 1 mol of solute, against a tenfold gradient of concentration is 5.7 kJ, or, 1.36 kcal., The reason that work must be done to move a substance from a region of lower concentration to one of
Page 41 :
9, , Energy and Enzymes, higher concentration is that the process entails a change, to a less probable state and therefore a decrease in the, entropy of the system. Conversely, diffusion of the, solute from the region of higher concentration to that of, lower concentration takes place in the direction of, greater probability; it results in an increase in the, entropy of the system and can proceed spontaneously., The sign of ∆G becomes negative, and the process can, do the amount of work specified by Equation 2.16, provided a mechanism exists that couples the exergonic diffusion process to the work function., , potential difference is said to be 1 V. The absolute electric potential of any single phase cannot be measured,, but the potential difference between two phases can be., By convention, the membrane potential is always given, in reference to the movement of a positive charge. It, states the intracellular potential relative to the extracellular one, which is defined as zero., The work that must be done to move 1 mol of an ion, against a membrane potential of ∆E volts is given by the, following equation:, , The Membrane Potential Is the Work That Must, Be Done to Move an Ion from One Side of the, Membrane to the Other, Matters become a little more complex if the solute in, question bears an electric charge. Transfer of positively, charged solute from compartment 1 to compartment 2, will then cause a difference in charge to develop across, the membrane, the second compartment becoming electropositive relative to the first. Since like charges repel, one another, the work done by the agent that moves the, solute from compartment 1 to compartment 2 is a function of the charge difference; more precisely, it depends, on the difference in electric potential across the membrane. This difference, called membrane potential for, short, will appear again in later pages., The membrane potential, ∆E,* is defined as the work, that must be done by an agent to move a test charge, from one side of the membrane to the other. When 1 J of, work must be done to move 1 coulomb of charge, the, , where z is the valence of the ion and F is Faraday’s constant. The value of ∆G for the transfer of cations into a, positive compartment is positive and so calls for work., Conversely, the value of ∆G is negative when cations, move into the negative compartment, so work can be, done. The electric potential is negative across the plasma, membrane of the great majority of cells; therefore cations tend, to leak in but have to be “pumped” out., , * Many texts use the term ∆Y for the membrane potential, difference. However, to avoid confusion with the use of ∆Y, to indicate water potential (see Chapter 3), the term ∆E will, be used here and throughout the text., , 1, , 2, +, , +, +, , – +, – +, – +, , +, , +, , +, , +, , +, , +, +, , +, +, +, , +, , +, +, , +, , +, +, +, , +, , +, +, , Figure 2.3 Transport against an electrochemical-potential, gradient. The agent that moves the charged solute (from compartment 1 to compartment 2) must do work to overcome, both the electrochemical-potential gradient and the concentration gradient. As a result, cations in compartment 2 have, been raised to a higher electrochemical potential than those, in compartment 1. Neutralizing anions have been omitted., , ∆G = zF ∆E, , (2.17), , ~, , The Electrochemical-Potential Difference, ,, Includes Both Concentration and Electric Potentials, In general, ions moving across a membrane are subject, to gradients of both concentration and electric potential., Consider, for example, the situation depicted in Figure, 2.3, which corresponds to a major event in energy transduction during photosynthesis. A cation of valence z, moves from compartment 1 to compartment 2, against, both a concentration gradient (C2 > C1) and a gradient, of membrane electric potential (compartment 2 is electropositive relative to compartment 1). The free-energy, change involved in this transfer is given by the following equation:, ∆G = zF∆E + 2.3 RT log, , C2, C1, , (2.18), , ∆G is positive, and the transfer can proceed only if coupled to a source of energy, in this instance the absorption of light. As a result of this transfer, cations in compartment 2 can be said to be at a higher electrochemical, potential than the same ions in compartment 1., The electrochemical potential for a particular ion is, ~, designated mion. Ions tend to flow from a region of high, electrochemical potential to one of low potential and in, so doing can in principle do work. The maximum, amount of this work, neglecting friction, is given by the, change in free energy of the ions that flow from compartment 2 to compartment 1 (see Equation 2.6) and is, numerically equal to the electrochemical-potential dif~, ference, ∆m ion. This principle underlies much of biological energy transduction., ~, The electrochemical-potential difference, ∆mion, is, properly expressed in kilojoules per mole or kilocalories, per mole. However, it is frequently convenient to
Page 42 :
10, , CHAPTER 2, , express the driving force for ion movement in electrical, terms, with the dimensions of volts or millivolts. To con~, vert ∆m ion into millivolts (mV), divide all the terms in, Equation 2.18 by F:, 2.3 RT, C, ∆˜ ion, = z∆E +, log 2, F, F, C1, , (2.19), , An important case in point is the proton motive force,, which will be considered at length in Chapter 6., Equations 2.18 and 2.19 have proved to be of central, importance in bioenergetics. First, they measure the, amount of energy that must be expended on the active, transport of ions and metabolites, a major function of, biological membranes. Second, since the free energy of, chemical reactions is often transduced into other forms, via the intermediate generation of electrochemical-potential gradients, these gradients play a major role in, descriptions of biological energy coupling. It should be, emphasized that the electrical and concentration terms, may be either added, as in Equation 2.18, or subtracted,, and that the application of the equations to particular, cases requires careful attention to the sign of the gradients. We should also note that free-energy changes in, chemical reactions (see Equation 2.10) are scalar, whereas, transport reactions have direction; this is a subtle but critical aspect of the biological role of ion gradients., Ion distribution at equilibrium is an important special, case of the general electrochemical equation (Equation, 2.18). Figure 2.4 shows a membrane-bound vesicle (compartment 2) that contains a high concentration of the salt, K2SO4, surrounded by a medium (compartment 1) containing a lower concentration of the same salt; the membrane is impermeable to anions but allows the free passage of cations. Potassium ions will therefore tend to, , 1, , 2, +, +, , + –, + –, + –, , +, , +, +, , +, , +, +, , +, +, , +, , +, +, , +, +, , +, +, , +, , +, , +, , +, , +, , +, , Figure 2.4 Generation of an electric potential by ion diffusion. Compartment 2 has a higher salt concentration than, compartment 1 (anions are not shown). If the membrane is, permeable to the cations but not to the anions, the cations, will tend to diffuse out of compartment 2 into compartment 1, generating a membrane potential in which compartment 2 is negative., , diffuse out of the vesicle into the solution, whereas the, sulfate anions are retained. Diffusion of the cations generates a membrane potential, with the vesicle interior, negative, which restrains further diffusion. At equilib~, rium, ∆G and ∆mK+ equal zero (by definition). Equation, 2.18 can then be arranged to give the following equation:, ∆E =, , −2.3 RT, C, log 2, zF, C1, , (2.20), , where C2 and C1 are the concentrations of K+ ions in the, two compartments; z, the valence, is unity; and ∆E is the, membrane potential in equilibrium with the potassium, concentration gradient., This is one form of the celebrated Nernst equation. It, states that at equilibrium, a permeant ion will be so distributed across the membrane that the chemical driving, force (outward in this instance) will be balanced by the, electric driving force (inward). For a univalent cation at, 25°C, each tenfold increase in concentration factor corresponds to a membrane potential of 59 mV; for a divalent ion the value is 29.5 mV., The preceding discussion of the energetic and electrical consequences of ion translocation illustrates a, point that must be clearly understood—namely, that an, electric potential across a membrane may arise by two, distinct mechanisms. The first mechanism, illustrated in, Figure 2.4, is the diffusion of charged particles down a, preexisting concentration gradient, an exergonic, process. A potential generated by such a process is, described as a diffusion potential or as a Donnan, potential. (Donnan potential is defined as the diffusion, potential that occurs in the limiting case where the counterion is completely impermeant or fixed, as in Figure, 2.4.) Many ions are unequally distributed across biological membranes and differ widely in their rates of diffusion across the barrier; therefore diffusion potentials, always contribute to the observed membrane potential., But in most biological systems the measured electric, potential differs from the value that would be expected, on the basis of passive ion diffusion. In these cases one, must invoke electrogenic ion pumps, transport systems, that carry out the exergonic process indicated in Figure, 2.3 at the expense of an external energy source. Transport systems of this kind transduce the free energy of a, chemical reaction into the electrochemical potential of, an ion gradient and play a leading role in biological, energy coupling., , Enzymes: The Catalysts of Life, Proteins constitute about 30% of the total dry weight of, typical plant cells. If we exclude inert materials, such as, the cell wall and starch, which can account for up to, 90% of the dry weight of some cells, proteins and amino
Page 43 :
Energy and Enzymes, acids represent about 60 to 70% of the dry weight of the, living cell. As we saw in Chapter 1, cytoskeletal structures such as microtubules and microfilaments are composed of protein. Proteins can also occur as storage, forms, particularly in seeds. But the major function of, proteins in metabolism is to serve as enzymes, biological catalysts that greatly increase the rates of biochemical reactions, making life possible. Enzymes participate, in these reactions but are not themselves fundamentally, changed in the process (Mathews and Van Holde 1996)., Enzymes have been called the “agents of life”—a, very apt term, since they control almost all life, processes. A typical cell has several thousand different, enzymes, which carry out a wide variety of actions. The, most important features of enzymes are their specificity,, which permits them to distinguish among very similar, molecules, and their catalytic efficiency, which is far, greater than that of ordinary catalysts. The stereospecificity of enzymes is remarkable, allowing them to distinguish not only between enantiomers (mirror-image, stereoisomers), for example, but between apparently, identical atoms or groups of atoms (Creighton 1983)., This ability to discriminate between similar molecules results from the fact that the first step in enzyme, catalysis is the formation of a tightly bound, noncovalent complex between the enzyme and the substrate(s):, the enzyme–substrate complex. Enzyme-catalyzed reactions exhibit unusual kinetic properties that are also, related to the formation of these very specific complexes. Another distinguishing feature of enzymes is, that they are subject to various kinds of regulatory control, ranging from subtle effects on the catalytic activity, by effector molecules (inhibitors or activators) to regulation of enzyme synthesis and destruction by the control of gene expression and protein turnover., Enzymes are unique in the large rate enhancements, they bring about, orders of magnitude greater than, those effected by other catalysts. Typical orders of rate, enhancements of enzyme-catalyzed reactions over the, corresponding uncatalyzed reactions are 108 to 1012., Many enzymes will convert about a thousand molecules, of substrate to product in 1 s. Some will convert as many, as a million!, Unlike most other catalysts, enzymes function at, ambient temperature and atmospheric pressure and, usually in a narrow pH range near neutrality (there are, exceptions; for instance, vacuolar proteases and ribonucleases are most active at pH 4 to 5). A few enzymes are, able to function under extremely harsh conditions;, examples are pepsin, the protein-degrading enzyme of, the stomach, which has a pH optimum around 2.0, and, the hydrogenase of the hyperthermophilic (“extreme, heat–loving”) archaebacterium Pyrococcus furiosus,, which oxidizes H2 at a temperature optimum greater, , 11, , than 95°C (Bryant and Adams 1989). The presence of, such remarkably heat-stable enzymes enables Pyrococcus to grow optimally at 100°C., Enzymes are usually named after their substrates by, the addition of the suffix “-ase”—for example, α-amylase, malate dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, horseradish peroxidase., Many thousands of enzymes have already been discovered, and new ones are being found all the time. Each, enzyme has been named in a systematic fashion, on the, basis of the reaction it catalyzes, by the International, Union of Biochemistry. In addition, many enzymes have, common, or trivial, names. Thus the common name, rubisco refers to D-ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (EC 4.1.1.39*)., The versatility of enzymes reflects their properties as, proteins. The nature of proteins permits both the exquisite recognition by an enzyme of its substrate and the, catalytic apparatus necessary to carry out diverse and, rapid chemical reactions (Stryer 1995)., Proteins Are Chains of Amino Acids Joined by, Peptide Bonds, Proteins are composed of long chains of amino acids, (Figure 2.5) linked by amide bonds, known as peptide, bonds (Figure 2.6). The 20 different amino acid side, chains endow proteins with a large variety of groups, that have different chemical and physical properties,, including hydrophilic (polar, water-loving) and hydrophobic (nonpolar, water-avoiding) groups, charged and, neutral polar groups, and acidic and basic groups. This, diversity, in conjunction with the relative flexibility of, the peptide bond, allows for the tremendous variation, in protein properties, ranging from the rigidity and, inertness of structural proteins to the reactivity of hormones, catalysts, and receptors. The three-dimensional, aspect of protein structure provides for precise discrimination in the recognition of ligands, the molecules that, interact with proteins, as shown by the ability of, enzymes to recognize their substrates and of antibodies, to recognize antigens, for example., All molecules of a particular protein have the same, sequence of amino acid residues, determined by the, sequence of nucleotides in the gene that codes for that, protein. Although the protein is synthesized as a linear, chain on the ribosome, upon release it folds spontaneously into a specific three-dimensional shape, the, native state. The chain of amino acids is called a, polypeptide. The three-dimensional arrangement of the, atoms in the molecule is referred to as the conformation., * The Enzyme Commission (EC) number indicates the class, (4 = lyase) and subclasses (4.1 = carbon–carbon cleavage;, 4.1.1 = cleavage of C—COO– bond).
Page 45 :
Energy and Enzymes, (A), +, H3N, , R1, , O, , C, , C, , R2, , H, , N, , C, , H, , H, , covalent interactions include hydrogen bonds; electrostatic interactions (also known as ionic bonds or salt, bridges); van der Waals interactions (dispersion forces),, which are transient dipoles between spatially close, atoms; and hydrophobic “bonds”—the tendency of nonpolar groups to avoid contact with water and thus to, associate with themselves. In addition, covalent disulfide bonds are found in many proteins. Although each, of these types of noncovalent interaction is weak, there, are so many noncovalent interactions in proteins that in, total they contribute a large amount of free energy to, stabilizing the native structure., , O, C, O–, , Peptide bond, ψ, , (B), H, , H, , O, , ...N, , C, , C, , R1, , φ, H, , O, , N, , Cα, , C, , H, , R2, , H, , O, , N, , C, , C ..., , H, , R3, , Rigid unit, , Figure 2.6 (A) The peptide (amide) bond links two amino, acids. (B) Sites of free rotation, within the limits of steric, hindrance, about the N—Cα and Cα—C bonds (ψ and φ);, there is no rotation about the peptide bond, because of its, double-bond character., , Changes in conformation do not involve breaking of, covalent bonds. Denaturation involves the loss of this, unique three-dimensional shape and results in the loss, of catalytic activity., The forces that are responsible for the shape of a protein molecule are noncovalent (Figure 2.7). These non-, , HYDROGEN BONDS, , H, , C, , R, , N, , H, , O, , C, , H, , C, , H, , C, , R, , N, , H, , O, , C, , H, , C, , CH2, , COO–, , Serine, , CH2, , CH2, , CH2, , CH2, , VAN DER WAALS INTERACTIONS, –, , NH2, OH, , +, H3N, , R, , R, , Between, side chains, CH2, , Protein Structure Is Hierarchical, Proteins are built up with increasingly complex organizational units. The primary structure of a protein refers, to the sequence of amino acid residues. The secondary, structure refers to regular, local structural units, usually, held together by hydrogen bonding. The most common, of these units are the α helix and β strands forming parallel and antiparallel β pleated sheets and turns (Figure, 2.8). The tertiary structure—the final three-dimensional, structure of the polypeptide—results from the packing, together of the secondary structure units and the exclusion of solvent. The quaternary structure refers to the, association of two or more separate three-dimensional, polypeptides to form complexes. When associated in this, manner, the individual polypeptides are called subunits., , ELECTROSTATIC ATTRACTIONS, , Between elements of, peptide linkage, , O, , C, , CH2, , Asparagine, , 13, , +, , +, , –, –, , –, , +, , +, , +, , –, –, , +, , Figure 2.7 Examples of noncovalent interactions in proteins. Hydrogen bonds are weak, electrostatic interactions involving a hydrogen atom between two electronegative atoms., In proteins the most important hydrogen bonds are those between the peptide bonds., Electrostatic interactions are ionic bonds between positively and negatively charged, groups. The van der Waals interactions are short-range transient dipole interactions., Hydrophobic interactions (not shown) involve restructuring of the solvent water around, nonpolar groups, minimizing the exposure of nonpolar surface area to polar solvent;, these interactions are driven by entropy.
Page 46 :
14, , CHAPTER 2, , Figure 2.8 Hierarchy of protein structure. (A) Primary structure:, peptide bond. (B and C) Secondary structure: α helix (B) and, antiparallel β pleated sheet (C). (D) Tertiary structure: α helices, β, pleated sheets, and random coils. (E) Quaternary structure: four, subunits., , H, N, , R, , H, , C, , H, , N, C, , H, C, , H, N, , C, , N, , C, H, N, , O, C, , C, , C, O, , N, , C, H, N, , O, , (A) Primary structure, , N, C, , C, O, , C, , N, , H, C N, , C, C, , N, , O, , C C, , C, , N, H, , O, , O, , H, C, N, H, , O, , O, , C C, H, , O, H, C, C, , C, , N, , CC, , O, , C N, , H, C N, , C, , H, , O, , C, C, , N, , CC, , O, , C N, , H, C N, , C, , H, , H, C, C, , C, , N, , O, O, , C, , H, C N, , C, , H, , N, , H, C, , O, , C, , H, C, , O, H, , O, , C, , O, , C, , N, , H, , C, , H, , H, , C, , C, , C, , H, , O, , N, , R, , N, , O, , C, C, , C, O, H, , N, H, , O, , C N, O, , H, , O, , C, C, , C, , N, H, , C N, O, , C, , O, O, , (B) Secondary structure (α helix), (R groups not shown), , (D) Tertiary structure, , A protein molecule consisting of a large single polypeptide chain is composed of several independently folding, units known as domains. Typically, domains have a molecular mass of about 104 daltons. The active site of an, enzyme—that is, the region where the substrate binds and, the catalytic reaction occurs—is often located at the inter-, , (C) Secondary structure (β pleated sheet), (R groups not shown), , (E) Quaternary structure, , face between two domains. For example, in the enzyme, papain (a vacuolar protease that is found in papaya and, is representative of a large class of plant thiol proteases),, the active site lies at the junction of two domains (Figure, 2.9). Helices, turns, and β sheets contribute to the unique, three-dimensional shape of this enzyme.
Page 47 :
Energy and Enzymes, Active-site, cleft, , Domain 1, , Domain 2, , Figure 2.9 The backbone structure of papain, showing the, two domains and the active-site cleft between them., , Determinations of the conformation of proteins have, revealed that there are families of proteins that have, common three-dimensional folds, as well as common, patterns of supersecondary structure, such as β-α-β., Enzymes Are Highly Specific Protein Catalysts, All enzymes are proteins, although recently some small, ribonucleic acids and protein–RNA complexes have been, found to exhibit enzymelike behavior in the processing, of RNA. Proteins have molecular masses ranging from, 104 to 106 daltons, and they may be a single folded, polypeptide chain (subunit, or protomer) or oligomers, of several subunits (oligomers are usually dimers or, tetramers). Normally, enzymes have only one type of catalytic activity associated with the same protein; isoenzymes, or isozymes, are enzymes with similar catalytic, function that have different structures and catalytic parameters and are encoded by different genes. For example,, various different isozymes have been found for peroxidase, an enzyme in plant cell walls that is involved in the, synthesis of lignin. An isozyme of peroxidase has also, been localized in vacuoles. Isozymes may exhibit tissue, specificity and show developmental regulation., Enzymes frequently contain a nonprotein prosthetic, group or cofactor that is necessary for biological activity. The association of a cofactor with an enzyme, depends on the three-dimensional structure of the protein. Once bound to the enzyme, the cofactor contributes, to the specificity of catalysis. Typical examples of cofactors are metal ions (e.g., zinc, iron, molybdenum), heme, groups or iron–sulfur clusters (especially in oxidation–reduction enzymes), and coenzymes (e.g., nicoti-, , 15, , namide adenine dinucleotide [NAD+/NADH], flavin, adenine dinucleotide [FAD/FADH2], flavin mononucleotide [FMN], and pyridoxal phosphate [PLP]). Coenzymes are usually vitamins or are derived from vitamins and act as carriers. For example, NAD+ and FAD, carry hydrogens and electrons in redox reactions, biotin, carries CO2, and tetrahydrofolate carries one-carbon, fragments. Peroxidase has both heme and Ca2+ prosthetic groups and is glycosylated; that is, it contains carbohydrates covalently added to asparagine, serine, or, threonine side chains. Such proteins are called glycoproteins., A particular enzyme will catalyze only one type of, chemical reaction for only one class of molecule—in, some cases, for only one particular compound. Enzymes, are also very stereospecific and produce no by-products., For example, β-glucosidase catalyzes the hydrolysis of, β-glucosides, compounds formed by a glycosidic bond, to D-glucose. The substrate must have the correct, anomeric configuration: it must be β-, not α-. Furthermore, it must have the glucose structure; no other carbohydrates, such as xylose or mannose, can act as substrates for β-glucosidase. Finally, the substrate must, have the correct stereochemistry, in this case the D, absolute configuration. Rubisco (D-ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) catalyzes the addition of, carbon dioxide to D-ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate to form, two molecules of 3-phospho-D-glycerate, the initial step, in the C3 photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle, and is, the world’s most abundant enzyme. Rubisco has very, strict specificity for the carbohydrate substrate, but it, also catalyzes an oxygenase reaction in which O2, replaces CO2, as will be discussed further in Chapter 8., Enzymes Lower the Free-Energy Barrier between, Substrates and Products, Catalysts speed the rate of a reaction by lowering the, energy barrier between substrates (reactants) and products and are not themselves used up in the reaction, but, are regenerated. Thus a catalyst increases the rate of a, reaction but does not affect the equilibrium ratio of reactants and products, because the rates of the reaction in, both directions are increased to the same extent. It is, important to realize that enzymes cannot make a nonspontaneous (energetically uphill) reaction occur. However, many energetically unfavorable reactions in cells, proceed because they are coupled to an energetically, more favorable reaction usually involving ATP hydrolysis (Figure 2.10)., Enzymes act as catalysts because they lower the free, energy of activation for a reaction. They do this by a, combination of raising the ground state ∆G of the substrate and lowering the ∆G of the transition state of the, reaction, thereby decreasing the barrier against the reaction (Figure 2.11). The presence of the enzyme leads to
Page 48 :
16, , CHAPTER 2, , A+B, ATP + H2O, A + B + ATP + H2O, , A + ATP, A – P + B + H2O, A + B + ATP + H2O, , ∆G = +4.0 kcal mol–1, , C, ADP + Pi +, , ∆G = –7.3 kcal mol–1, , H+, , C + ADP + Pi + H+ ∆G = –3.3 kcal mol–1, , A – P + ADP, C + H+ + Pi, C + ADP + Pi + H+, , Figure 2.10 Coupling of the hydrolysis of ATP to drive an, energetically unfavorable reaction. The reaction A + B → C is, thermodynamically unfavorable, whereas the hydrolysis of, ATP to form ADP and inorganic phosphate (Pi) is thermodynamically very favorable (it has a large negative ∆G). Through, appropriate intermediates, such as A–P, the two reactions are, coupled, yielding an overall reaction that is the sum of the, individual reactions and has a favorable free-energy change., , a new reaction pathway that is different from that of the, uncatalyzed reaction., Catalysis Occurs at the Active Site, The active site of an enzyme molecule is usually a cleft, or pocket on or near the surface of the enzyme that takes, up only a small fraction of the enzyme surface. It is con-, , Transition state, Uncatalyzed, , Free energy, , Enzyme catalyzed, , Free energy, of activation, Substrate, , Product, Progress of reaction, , Figure 2.11 Free-energy curves for the same reaction,, either uncatalyzed or enzyme catalyzed. As a catalyst, an, enzyme lowers the free energy of activation of the transition state between substrates and products compared with, the uncatalyzed reaction. It does this by forming various, complexes and intermediates, such as enzyme–substrate and, enzyme–product complexes. The ground state free energy, of the enzyme–substrate complex in the enzyme-catalyzed, reaction may be higher than that of the substrate in the, uncatalyzed reaction, and the transition state free energy of, the enzyme-bound substrate will be signficantly less than, that in the corresponding uncatalyzed reaction., , venient to consider the active site as consisting of two, components: the binding site for the substrate (which, attracts and positions the substrate) and the catalytic, groups (the reactive side chains of amino acids or cofactors, which carry out the bond-breaking and bond-forming reactions involved)., Binding of substrate at the active site initially, involves noncovalent interactions between the substrate, and either side chains or peptide bonds of the protein., The rest of the protein structure provides a means of, positioning the substrate and catalytic groups, flexibility for conformational changes, and regulatory control., The shape and polarity of the binding site account for, much of the specificity of enzymes, and there is complementarity between the shape and the polarity of the, substrate and those of the active site. In some cases,, binding of the substrate induces a conformational, change in the active site of the enzyme. Conformational, change is particularly common where there are two substrates. Binding of the first substrate sets up a conformational change of the enzyme that results in formation, of the binding site for the second substrate. Hexokinase, is a good example of an enzyme that exhibits this type, of conformational change (Figure 2.12)., The catalytic groups are usually the amino acid side, chains and/or cofactors that can function as catalysts., Common examples of catalytic groups are acids (—, COOH from the side chains of aspartic acid or glutamic, acid, imidazole from the side chain of histidine), bases, (—NH2 from lysine, imidazole from histidine, —S– from, cysteine), nucleophiles (imidazole from histidine, —S–, from cysteine, —OH from serine), and electrophiles, (often metal ions, such as Zn2+). The acidic catalytic, groups function by donating a proton, the basic ones by, accepting a proton. Nucleophilic catalytic groups form, a transient covalent bond to the substrate., The decisive factor in catalysis is the direct interaction between the enzyme and the substrate. In many, cases, there is an intermediate that contains a covalent, bond between the enzyme and the substrate. Although, the details of the catalytic mechanism differ from one, type of enzyme to another, a limited number of features, are involved in all enzyme catalysis. These features, include acid–base catalysis, electrophilic or nucleophilic, catalysis, and ground state distortion through electrostatic or mechanical strains on the substrate., A Simple Kinetic Equation Describes an EnzymeCatalyzed Reaction, Enzyme-catalyzed systems often exhibit a special form, of kinetics, called Michaelis–Menten kinetics, which are, characterized by a hyperbolic relationship between, reaction velocity, v, and substrate concentration, [S], (Figure 2.13). This type of plot is known as a saturation, plot because when the enzyme becomes saturated with
Page 49 :
Energy and Enzymes, (A), , 17, , (B), D-Glucose, , Active site, , Figure 2.12 Conformational change in hexokinase, induced by the first substrate of the, enzyme, D-glucose. (A) Before glucose binding. (B) After glucose binding. The binding of, glucose to hexokinase induces a conformational change in which the two major domains, come together to close the cleft that contains the active site. This change sets up the, binding site for the second substrate, ATP. In this manner the enzyme prevents the unproductive hydrolysis of ATP by shielding the substrates from the aqueous solvent. The overall reaction is the phosphorylation of glucose and the formation of ADP., , substrate (i.e., each enzyme molecule has a substrate, molecule associated with it), the rate becomes independent of substrate concentration. Saturation kinetics, implies that an equilibrium process precedes the ratelimiting step:, , Initial velocity (v), , Vmax, , v=, , 1/2V, max, , Vmax [S], Km + [S], , Km, Substrate concentration [S], , Figure 2.13 Plot of initial velocity, v, versus substrate concentration, [S], for an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The curve, is hyperbolic. The maximal rate, Vmax, occurs when all the, enzyme molecules are fully occupied by substrate. The value, of Km, defined as the substrate concentration at 1⁄2Vmax, is a, reflection of the affinity of the enzyme for the substrate., The smaller the value of Km, the tighter the binding., , fast, , slow, , E + S ←, → ES → E + P, , where E represents the enzyme, S the substrate, P the, product, and ES the enzyme–substrate complex. Thus,, as the substrate concentration is increased, a point will, be reached at which all the enzyme molecules are in the, form of the ES complex, and the enzyme is saturated, with substrate. Since the rate of the reaction depends on, the concentration of ES, the rate will not increase further,, because there can be no higher concentration of ES., When an enzyme is mixed with a large excess of substrate, there will be an initial very short time period (usually milliseconds) during which the concentrations of, enzyme–substrate complexes and intermediates build up, to certain levels; this is known as the pre–steady-state, period. Once the intermediate levels have been built up,, they remain relatively constant until the substrate is, depleted; this period is known as the steady state., Normally enzyme kinetic values are measured under, steady-state conditions, and such conditions usually prevail in the cell. For many enzyme-catalyzed reactions the, kinetics under steady-state conditions can be described, by a simple expression known as the Michaelis–Menten, equation:, v=, , Vmax [S], Km + [ S ], , (2.21), , where v is the observed rate or velocity (in units such as, moles per liter per second), Vmax is the maximum velocity (at infinite substrate concentration), and Km (usually
Page 50 :
18, , CHAPTER 2, , measured in units of molarity) is a constant that is characteristic of the particular enzyme–substrate system and, is related to the association constant of the enzyme for, the substrate (see Figure 2.13). Km represents the concentration of substrate required to half-saturate the, enzyme and thus is the substrate concentration at, Vmax/2. In many cellular systems the usual substrate, concentration is in the vicinity of Km. The smaller the, value of Km, the more strongly the enzyme binds the, substrate. Typical values for Km are in the range of 10–6, to 10–3 M., We can readily obtain the parameters Vmax and Km by, fitting experimental data to the Michaelis–Menten equation, either by computerized curve fitting or by a linearized form of the equation. An example of a linearized, form of the equation is the Lineweaver–Burk doublereciprocal plot shown in Figure 2.14A. When divided by, the concentration of enzyme, the value of Vmax gives the, turnover number, the number of molecules of substrate, converted to product per unit of time per molecule of, enzyme. Typical turnover number values range from 102, to 103 s–1., Enzymes Are Subject to Various Kinds of, Inhibition, Any agent that decreases the velocity of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction is called an inhibitor. Inhibitors may, exert their effects in many different ways. Generally, if, inhibition is irreversible the compound is called an inactivator. Other agents can increase the efficiency of an, enzyme; they are called activators. Inhibitors and activators are very important in the cellular regulation of, enzymes. Many agriculturally important insecticides, and herbicides are enzyme inhibitors. The study of, enzyme inhibition can provide useful information about, kinetic mechanisms, the nature of enzyme–substrate, intermediates and complexes, the chemical mechanism, , of catalytic action, and the regulation and control of, metabolic enzymes. In addition, the study of inhibitors, of potential target enzymes is essential to the rational, design of herbicides., Inhibitors can be classified as reversible or irreversible. Irreversible inhibitors form covalent bonds, with an enzyme or they denature it. For example,, iodoacetate (ICH2COOH) irreversibly inhibits thiol proteases such as papain by alkylating the active-site —SH, group. One class of irreversible inhibitors is called affinity labels, or active site–directed modifying agents,, because their structure directs them to the active site. An, example is tosyl-lysine chloromethyl ketone (TLCK),, which irreversibly inactivates papain. The tosyl-lysine, part of the inhibitor resembles the substrate structure, and so binds in the active site. The chloromethyl ketone, part of the bound inhibitor reacts with the active-site, histidine side chain. Such compounds are very useful in, mechanistic studies of enzymes, but they have limited, practical use as herbicides because of their chemical, reactivity, which can be harmful to the plant., Reversible inhibitors form weak, noncovalent, bonds with the enzyme, and their effects may be competitive, noncompetitive, or mixed. For example, the, widely used broad-spectrum herbicide glyphosate, (Roundup®) works by competitively inhibiting a key, enzyme in the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids, 5enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase, (see Chapter 13). Resistance to glyphosate has recently, been achieved by genetic engineering of plants so that, they are capable of overproducing EPSP synthase (Donahue et al. 1995)., Competitive inhibition. Competitive inhibition is the, simplest and most common form of reversible inhibition. It usually arises from binding of the inhibitor to, the active site with an affinity similar to or stronger, , Inhibited, , Inhibited, , 1/v, , Km, , Slope =, x-Intercept = –, , y-Intercept = –, 1/[S], (A) Uninhibited enzyme-catalyzed reaction, , 1/v, , Vmax, , 1, Km, , 1/v, , 1, , Uninhibited, , Uninhibited, , Vmax, 1/[S], (B) Competitive inhibition, , Figure 2.14 Lineweaver–Burk double-reciprocal plots. A plot of 1/v versus 1/[S] yields a, straight line. (A) Uninhibited enzyme-catalyzed reaction showing the calculation of Km, from the x-intercept and of Vmax from the y-intercept. (B) The effect of a competitive, inhibitor on the parameters Km and Vmax. The apparent Km is increased, but the Vmax is, unchanged. (C) A noncompetitive inhibitor reduces Vmax but has no effect on Km., , 1/[S], (C) Noncompetitive inhibition
Page 51 :
Energy and Enzymes, than that of the substrate. Thus the effective concentration of the enzyme is decreased by the presence of, the inhibitor, and the catalytic reaction will be slower, than if the inhibitor were absent. Competitive inhibition is usually based on the fact that the structure of, the inhibitor resembles that of the substrate; hence the, strong affinity of the inhibitor for the active site., Competitive inhibition may also occur in allosteric, enzymes, where the inhibitor binds to a distant site on, the enzyme, causing a conformational change that, alters the active site and prevents normal substrate, binding. Such a binding site is called an allosteric site., In this case, the competition between substrate and, inhibitor is indirect., Competitive inhibition results in an apparent increase, in Km and has no effect on Vmax (see Figure 2.14B). By, measuring the apparent Km as a function of inhibitor, concentration, one can calculate Ki, the inhibitor constant,, which reflects the affinity of the enzyme for the inhibitor., , 19, , activity as a result of disruption of the active site., The temperature dependence of most chemical reactions also applies to enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Thus,, most enzyme-catalyzed reactions show an exponential, increase in rate with increasing temperature. However,, because the enzymes are proteins, another major factor, comes in to play—namely, denaturation. After a certain, temperature is reached, enzymes show a very rapid, decrease in activity as a result of the onset of denaturation (Figure 2.15B). The temperature at which denaturation begins, and hence at which catalytic activity is lost,, varies with the particular protein as well as the environmental conditions, such as pH. Frequently, denaturation begins at about 40 to 50°C and is complete over a, range of about 10°C., , (A), , Noncompetitive inhibition. In noncompetitive inhibi-, , pH and Temperature Affect the Rate of EnzymeCatalyzed Reactions, Enzyme catalysis is very sensitive to pH. This sensitivity, is easily understood when one considers that the essential catalytic groups are usually ionizable ones (imidazole, carboxyl, amino) and that they are catalytically, active in only one of their ionization states. For example,, imidazole acting as a base will be functional only at pH, values above 7. Plots of the rates of enzyme-catalyzed, reactions versus pH are usually bell-shaped, corresponding to two sigmoidal curves, one for an ionizable, group acting as an acid and the other for the group acting as a base (Figure 2.15A). Although the effects of pH, on enzyme catalysis usually reflect the ionization of the, catalytic group, they may also reflect a pH-dependent, conformational change in the protein that leads to loss of, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , 40, , 50, , 60, , pH, (B), , Initial velocity, , Mixed inhibition is characterized by, effects on both Vmax (which decreases) and Km (which, increases). Mixed inhibition is very common and, results from the formation of a complex consisting of, the enzyme, the substrate, and the inhibitor that does, not break down to products., Mixed inhibition., , Initial velocity, , tion, the inhibitor does not compete with the substrate, for binding to the active site. Instead, it may bind to, another site on the protein and obstruct the substrate’s, access to the active site, thereby changing the catalytic, properties of the enzyme, or it may bind to the enzyme–, substrate complex and thus alter catalysis. Noncompetitive inhibition is frequently observed in the regulation of metabolic enzymes. The diagnostic property of, this type of inhibition is that Km is unaffected, whereas, Vmax decreases in the presence of increasing amounts of, inhibitor (see Figure 2.14C)., , 0, , 10, , 20, , 30, , Temperature (°C), , Figure 2.15 pH and temperature curves for typical enzyme, reactions. (A) Many enzyme-catalyzed reactions show bellshaped profiles of rate versus pH. The inflection point on, each shoulder corresponds to the pKa of an ionizing group, (that is, the pH at which the ionizing group is 50% dissociated) in the active site. (B) Temperature causes an exponential increase in the reaction rate until the optimum is, reached. Beyond the optimum, thermal denaturation dramatically decreases the rate.
Page 52 :
20, , CHAPTER 2, , Cooperative Systems Increase the Sensitivity to, Substrates and Are Usually Allosteric, Cells control the concentrations of most metabolites very, closely. To keep such tight control, the enzymes that control metabolite interconversion must be very sensitive., From the plot of velocity versus substrate concentration, (see Figure 2.13), we can see that the velocity of an, enzyme-catalyzed reaction increases with increasing, substrate concentration up to Vmax. However, we can, calculate from the Michaelis–Menten equation (Equation 2.21) that raising the velocity of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction from 0.1 Vmax to 0.9 Vmax requires an, enormous (81-fold) increase in the substrate concentration:, 0.1Vmax =, , Vmax [S], V [S]′, , 0.9Vmax = max, K m +[ S ], Km + [S]′, 0.9 Km = 0.1[S ]′, , 0.1Km = 0.9[S] ,, , 0.1 0.9 [S], =, ×, 0.9 0.1 [S]′, [S] 0.1 2 0.01, =, =, 0.81, [S]′ 0.9 , , This calculation shows that reaction velocity is insensitive to small changes in substrate concentration. The, same factor applies in the case of inhibitors and inhibition. In cooperative systems, on the other hand, a small, change in one parameter, such as inhibitor concentration, brings about a large change in velocity. A consequence of a cooperative system is that the plot of v versus [S] is no longer hyperbolic, but becomes sigmoidal, (Figure 2.16 ). The advantage of cooperative systems is, that a small change in the concentration of the critical, effector (substrate, inhibitor, or activator) will bring, about a large change in the rate. In other words, the system behaves like a switch., , Activator, added, , v, Inhibitor added, , Cooperativity is typically observed in allosteric, enzymes that contain multiple active sites located on, multiple subunits. Such oligomeric enzymes usually, exist in two major conformational states, one active and, one inactive (or relatively inactive). Binding of ligands, (substrates, activators, or inhibitors) to the enzyme perturbs the position of the equilibrium between the two, conformations. For example, an inhibitor will favor the, inactive form; an activator will favor the active form., The cooperative aspect comes in as follows: A positive, cooperative event is one in which binding of the first ligand makes binding of the next one easier. Similarly, negative cooperativity means that the second ligand will, bind less readily than the first., Cooperativity in substrate binding (homoallostery), occurs when the binding of substrate to a catalytic site, on one subunit increases the substrate affinity of an, identical catalytic site located on a different subunit., Effector ligands (inhibitors or activators), in contrast,, bind to sites other than the catalytic site (heteroallostery). This relationship fits nicely with the fact that, the end products of metabolic pathways, which frequently serve as feedback inhibitors, usually bear no, structural resemblance to the substrates of the first step., The Kinetics of Some Membrane Transport, Processes Can Be Described by the, Michaelis–Menten Equation, Membranes contain proteins that speed up the movement of specific ions or organic molecules across the, lipid bilayer. Some membrane transport proteins are, enzymes, such as ATPases, that use the energy from the, hydrolysis of ATP to pump ions across the membrane., When these reactions run in the reverse direction, the, ATPases of mitochondria and chloroplasts can synthesize ATP. Other types of membrane proteins function as, carriers, binding their substrate on one side of the membrane and releasing it on the other side., The kinetics of carrier-mediated transport can be, described by the Michaelis–Menten equation in the, same manner as the kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions are (see Chapter 6). Instead of a biochemical reaction with a substrate and product, however, the carrier, binds to the solute and transfers it from one side of a, membrane to the other. Letting X be the solute, we can, write the following equation:, Xout + carrier → [X-carrier] → Xin + carrier, , [S], , Figure 2.16 Allosteric systems exhibit sigmoidal plots of, rate versus substrate concentration. The addition of an activator shifts the curve to the left; the addition of an, inhibitor shifts it to the right., , Since the carrier can bind to the solute more rapidly, than it can transport the solute to the other side of the, membrane, solute transport exhibits saturation kinetics., That is, a concentration is reached beyond which adding, more solute does not result in a more rapid rate of transport (Figure 2.17). Vmax is the maximum rate of transport, of X across the membrane; Km is equivalent to the bind-
Page 53 :
Energy and Enzymes, , such as mitochondria and cytosol. Similarly, enzymes, associated with special tasks are often compartmentalized; for example, the enzymes involved in photosynthesis are found in chloroplasts. Vacuoles contain many, hydrolytic enzymes, such as proteases, ribonucleases,, glycosidases, and phosphatases, as well as peroxidases., The cell walls contain glycosidases and peroxidases., The mitochondria are the main location of the enzymes, involved in oxidative phosphorylation and energy, metabolism, including the enzymes of the tricarboxylic, acid (TCA) cycle., , Vmax, Transport velocity, , 21, , Vmax, 2, , Km, External concentration of solute, , Figure 2.17 The kinetics of carrier-mediated transport of a, solute across a membrane are analogous to those of, enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Thus, plots of transport velocity, versus solute concentration are hyperbolic, becoming asymptotic to the maximal velocity at high solute concentration., , ing constant of the solute for the carrier. Like enzymecatalyzed reactions, carrier-mediated transport requires, a high degree of structural specificity of the protein. The, actual transport of the solute across the membrane, apparently involves conformational changes, also similar to those in enzyme-catalyzed reactions., , Covalent modification. Control by covalent modification of enzymes is common and usually involves their, phosphorylation or adenylylation*, such that the phosphorylated form, for example, is active and the nonphosphorylated form is inactive. These control mechanisms are normally energy dependent and usually, involve ATP., Proteases are normally synthesized as inactive precursors known as zymogens or proenzymes. For example, papain is synthesized as an inactive precursor called, propapain and becomes activated later by cleavage, (hydrolysis) of a peptide bond. This type of covalent, modification avoids premature proteolytic degradation, of cellular constituents by the newly synthesized enzyme., , Consider a typical metabolic, pathway with two or more end products such as that, shown in Figure 2.18. Control of the system requires, that if the end products build up too much, their rate, of formation is decreased. Similarly, if too much reactant A builds up, the rate of conversion of A to products should be increased. The process is usually regulated by control of the flux at the first step of the pathway and at each branch point. The final products, G, and J, which might bear no resemblance to the substrate A, inhibit the enzymes at A → B and at the, branch point., By having two enzymes at A → B, each inhibited by, one of the end metabolites but not by the other, it is possible to exert finer control than with just one enzyme., The first step in a metabolic pathway is usually called, Feedback inhibition., , Enzyme Activity Is Often Regulated, Cells can control the flux of metabolites by regulating, the concentration of enzymes and their catalytic activity. By using allosteric activators or inhibitors, cells can, modulate enzymatic activity and obtain very carefully, controlled expression of catalysis., The amount of, enzyme in a cell is determined by the relative rates of, synthesis and degradation of the enzyme. The rate of, synthesis is regulated at the genetic level by a variety, of mechanisms, which are discussed in greater detail, in the last section of this chapter., , Control of enzyme concentration., , Compartmentalization. Different enzymes or isozymes, with different catalytic properties (e.g., substrate affinity) may be localized in different regions of the cell,, , A, , B, , C, , E, , F, , G, , H, , I, , J, , D, , * Although some texts refer to the conjugation of a compound with adenylic acid (AMP) as “adenylation,” the, chemically correct term is “adenylylation.”, , Figure 2.18 Feedback inhibition in a hypothetical metabolic pathway. The letters (A–J) represent metabolites, and each arrow represents an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The boldface arrow for the first reaction indicates that two different enzymes with different inhibitor susceptibilities are involved. Broken lines, indicate metabolites that inhibit particular enzymes. The first step in the metabolic pathway and the branch points are particularly important sites for feedback control.
Page 54 :
22, , CHAPTER 2, , the committed step. At this step enzymes are subject to, major control., Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate plays a central role in the, regulation of carbon metabolism in plants. It functions, as an activator in glycolysis (the breakdown of sugars to, generate energy) and an inhibitor in gluconeogenesis, (the synthesis of sugars). Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate is, synthesized from fructose-6-phosphate in a reaction, requiring ATP and catalyzed by the enzyme fructose-6phosphate 2-kinase. It is degraded in the reverse reaction catalyzed by fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase, which, releases inorganic phosphate (Pi). Both of these enzymes, are subject to metabolic control by fructose-2,6-bisphosphate, as well as ATP, Pi, fructose-6-phosphate, dihydroxyacetone phosphate, and 3-phosphoglycerate. The, role of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate in plant metabolism, will be discussed further in Chapters 8 and 11., , Summary, Living organisms, including green plants, are governed, by the same physical laws of energy flow that apply, everywhere in the universe. These laws of energy flow, have been encapsulated in the laws of thermodynamics., Energy is defined as the capacity to do work, which, may be mechanical, electrical, osmotic, or chemical, work. The first law of thermodynamics states the principle of energy conservation: Energy can be converted, from one form to another, but the total energy of the, universe remains the same. The second law of thermodynamics describes the direction of spontaneous, processes: A spontaneous process is one that results in a, net increase in the total entropy (∆S), or randomness, of, the system plus its surroundings. Processes involving, heat transfer, such as the cooling due to water evaporation from leaves, are best described in terms of the, change in heat content, or enthalpy (∆H), defined as the, amount of energy absorbed or evolved as heat under, constant pressure., The free-energy change, ∆G, is a convenient parameter for determining the direction of spontaneous, processes in chemical or biological systems without reference to their surroundings. The value of ∆G is negative for all spontaneous processes at constant temperature and pressure. The ∆G of a reaction is a function of, its displacement from equilibrium. The greater the displacement from equilibrium, the more work the reaction, can do. Living systems have evolved to maintain their, biochemical reactions as far from equilibrium as possible., The redox potential represents the free-energy change, of an oxidation–reduction reaction expressed in electrochemical units. As with changes in free energy, the redox, potential of a system depends on the concentrations of, the oxidized and reduced species., , The establishment of ion gradients across membranes, is an important aspect of the work carried out by living, systems. The membrane potential is a measure of the, work required to transport an ion across a membrane., The electrochemical-potential difference includes both, concentration and electric potentials., The laws of thermodynamics predict whether and in, which direction a reaction can occur, but they say nothing about the speed of a reaction. Life depends on, highly specific protein catalysts called enzymes to speed, up the rates of reactions. All proteins are composed of, amino acids linked together by peptide bonds. Protein, structure is hierarchical; it can be classified into primary,, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary levels. The forces, responsible for the shape of a protein molecule are noncovalent and are easily disrupted by heat, chemicals, or, pH, leading to loss of conformation, or denaturation., Enzymes function by lowering the free-energy barrier between the substrates and products of a reaction., Catalysis occurs at the active site of the enzyme., Enzyme-mediated reactions exhibit saturation kinetics, and can be described by the Michaelis–Menten equation, which relates the velocity of an enzyme-catalyzed, reaction to the substrate concentration. The substrate, concentration is inversely related to the affinity of an, enzyme for its substrate. Since reaction velocity is relatively insensitive to small changes in substrate concentration, many enzymes exhibit cooperativity. Typically,, such enzymes are allosteric, containing two or more, active sites that interact with each other and that may be, located on different subunits., Enzymes are subject to reversible and irreversible, inhibition. Irreversible inhibitors typically form covalent, bonds with the enzyme; reversible inhibitors form noncovalent bonds with the enzyme and may have competitive, noncompetitive, or mixed effects., Enzyme activity is often regulated in cells. Regulation, may be accomplished by compartmentalization of, enzymes and/or substrates; covalent modification; feedback inhibition, in which the end products of metabolic, pathways inhibit the enzymes involved in earlier steps;, and control of the enzyme concentration in the cell by, gene expression and protein degradation., General Reading, Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Watson, J. D., (1994) Molecular Biology of the Cell, 3rd ed. Garland, New York., Atchison, M. L. (1988) Enhancers: Mechanisms of action and cell, specificity. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 4: 127–153., *Atkinson, D. E. (1977) Cellular Energy Metabolism and Its Regulation., Academic Press, New York., *Creighton, T. E. (1983) Proteins: Structures and Molecular Principles., W. H. Freeman, New York., Darnell, J., Lodish, H., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Molecular Cell Biology, 3rd ed. Scientific American Books, W. H. Freeman, New, York., *Edsall, J. T., and Gutfreund, H. (1983) Biothermodynamics: The Study, of Biochemical Processes at Equilibrium. Wiley, New York.
Page 55 :
Energy and Enzymes, Fersht, A. (1985) Enzyme Structure and Mechanism, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York., *Klotz, I. M. (1967) Energy Changes in Biochemical Reactions. Academic Press, New York., *Morowitz, H. J. (1978) Foundations of Bioenergetics. Academic Press,, New York., Walsh, C. T. (1979) Enzymatic Reaction Mechanisms. W. H. Freeman,, New York., Webb, E. ( 1984) Enzyme Nomenclature. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., * Indicates a reference that is general reading in the field and is also, cited in this chapter., , 23, , Chapter References, Bryant, F. O., and Adams, M. W. W. (1989) Characterization of hydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic archaebacterium? Pyrococcus, furiosus. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 5070–5079., Clausius, R. (1879) The Mechanical Theory of Heat. Tr. by Walter R., Browne. Macmillan, London., Donahue, R. A., Davis, T. D., Michler, C. H., Riemenschneider, D. E.,, Carter, D. R., Marquardt, P. E., Sankhla, N., Sahkhla, D. Haissig,, B. E., and Isebrands, J. G. (1995) Growth, photosynthesis, and, herbicide tolerance of genetically modified hybrid poplar. Can. J., Forest Res. 24: 2377–2383., Mathews, C. K., and Van Holde, K. E. (1996) Biochemistry, 2nd ed., Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA., Nicholls, D. G., and Ferguson, S. J. (1992) Bioenergetics 2. Academic, Press, San Diego., Stryer, L. (1995) Biochemistry, 4th ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.
Page 56 :
U N I T, , I, , Transport and Translocation, of Water and Solutes
Page 58 :
Chapter, , 3, , Water and Plant Cells, , WATER PLAYS A CRUCIAL ROLE in the life of the plant. For every, gram of organic matter made by the plant, approximately 500 g of water, is absorbed by the roots, transported through the plant body and lost to, the atmosphere. Even slight imbalances in this flow of water can cause, water deficits and severe malfunctioning of many cellular processes., Thus, every plant must delicately balance its uptake and loss of water., This balancing is a serious challenge for land plants. To carry on photosynthesis, they need to draw carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, but, doing so exposes them to water loss and the threat of dehydration., A major difference between plant and animal cells that affects virtually, all aspects of their relation with water is the existence in plants of the cell, wall. Cell walls allow plant cells to build up large internal hydrostatic, pressures, called turgor pressure, which are a result of their normal water, balance. Turgor pressure is essential for many physiological processes,, including cell enlargement, gas exchange in the leaves, transport in the, phloem, and various transport processes across membranes. Turgor pressure also contributes to the rigidity and mechanical stability of nonlignified plant tissues. In this chapter we will consider how water moves into, and out of plant cells, emphasizing the molecular properties of water and, the physical forces that influence water movement at the cell level. But, first we will describe the major functions of water in plant life., , WATER IN PLANT LIFE, Water makes up most of the mass of plant cells, as we can readily appreciate if we look at microscopic sections of mature plant cells: Each cell, contains a large water-filled vacuole. In such cells the cytoplasm makes, up only 5 to 10% of the cell volume; the remainder is vacuole. Water typically constitutes 80 to 95% of the mass of growing plant tissues. Common vegetables such as carrots and lettuce may contain 85 to 95% water., Wood, which is composed mostly of dead cells, has a lower water content; sapwood, which functions in transport in the xylem, contains 35 to
Page 59 :
34, , Chapter 3, 1500, , Productivity (dry g m–2 yr–1), , 10.0, , Corn yield (m3 ha–1), , 8.0, , 6.0, , 4.0, , 2.0, , 0, , 10, , 20, , 30, , 40, , 50, , 60, , Water availability (number of days with, optimum water during growing period), , Corn yield as a function of water availability., The data plotted here were gathered at an Iowa farm over a, 4-year period. Water availability was assessed as the number of days without water stress during a 9-week growing, period. (Data from Weather and Our Food Supply 1964.), FIGURE 3.1, , 75% water; and heartwood has a slightly lower water content. Seeds, with a water content of 5 to 15%, are among the, driest of plant tissues, yet before germinating they must, absorb a considerable amount of water., Water is the most abundant and arguably the best solvent known. As a solvent, it makes up the medium for the, movement of molecules within and between cells and, greatly influences the structure of proteins, nucleic acids,, polysaccharides, and other cell constituents. Water forms, the environment in which most of the biochemical reactions of the cell occur, and it directly participates in many, essential chemical reactions., Plants continuously absorb and lose water. Most of the, water lost by the plant evaporates from the leaf as the CO2, needed for photosynthesis is absorbed from the atmosphere. On a warm, dry, sunny day a leaf will exchange up, to 100% of its water in a single hour. During the plant’s lifetime, water equivalent to 100 times the fresh weight of the, plant may be lost through the leaf surfaces. Such water loss, is called transpiration., Transpiration is an important means of dissipating the, heat input from sunlight. Heat dissipates because the water, molecules that escape into the atmosphere have higherthan-average energy, which breaks the bonds holding them, in the liquid. When these molecules escape, they leave, behind a mass of molecules with lower-than-average, energy and thus a cooler body of water. For a typical leaf,, nearly half of the net heat input from sunlight is dissipated, by transpiration. In addition, the stream of water taken up, by the roots is an important means of bringing dissolved, soil minerals to the root surface for absorption., , 1000, , 500, , 0, , 0.5, , 1.0, , 1.5, , 2.0, , Annual precipitation (m), , FIGURE 3.2 Productivity of various ecosystems as a function of annual precipitation. Productivity was estimated as, net aboveground accumulation of organic matter through, growth and reproduction. (After Whittaker 1970.), , Of all the resources that plants need to grow and function, water is the most abundant and at the same time the, most limiting for agricultural productivity (Figure 3.1). The, fact that water is limiting is the reason for the practice of, crop irrigation. Water availability likewise limits the productivity of natural ecosystems (Figure 3.2). Thus an, understanding of the uptake and loss of water by plants is, very important., We will begin our study of water by considering how its, structure gives rise to some of its unique physical properties. We will then examine the physical basis for water, movement, the concept of water potential, and the application of this concept to cell–water relations., , THE STRUCTURE AND, PROPERTIES OF WATER, Water has special properties that enable it to act as a solvent and to be readily transported through the body of the, plant. These properties derive primarily from the polar, structure of the water molecule. In this section we will, examine how the formation of hydrogen bonds contributes, to the properties of water that are necessary for life., , The Polarity of Water Molecules Gives Rise to, Hydrogen Bonds, The water molecule consists of an oxygen atom covalently, bonded to two hydrogen atoms. The two O—H bonds, form an angle of 105° (Figure 3.3). Because the oxygen, atom is more electronegative than hydrogen, it tends to, attract the electrons of the covalent bond. This attraction, results in a partial negative charge at the oxygen end of the, molecule and a partial positive charge at each hydrogen.
Page 60 :
Water and Plant Cells, Net negative charge, d–, , O, , H, d+, , 105°, , Net positive charge, , 35, , The Polarity of Water Makes It an Excellent Solvent, Attraction of bonding, electrons to the oxygen, creates local negative, and positive partial charges, , H, d+, , FIGURE 3.3 Diagram of the water molecule. The two, intramolecular hydrogen–oxygen bonds form an angle of, 105°. The opposite partial charges (δ– and δ+) on the water, molecule lead to the formation of intermolecular hydrogen, bonds with other water molecules. Oxygen has six electrons in the outer orbitals; each hydrogen has one., , These partial charges are equal, so the water molecule carries no net charge., This separation of partial charges, together with the, shape of the water molecule, makes water a polar molecule,, and the opposite partial charges between neighboring, water molecules tend to attract each other. The weak electrostatic attraction between water molecules, known as a, hydrogen bond, is responsible for many of the unusual, physical properties of water., Hydrogen bonds can also form between water and other, molecules that contain electronegative atoms (O or N). In, aqueous solutions, hydrogen bonding between water molecules leads to local, ordered clusters of water that, because, of the continuous thermal agitation of the water molecules,, continually form, break up, and re-form (Figure 3.4)., , Water is an excellent solvent: It dissolves greater amounts, of a wider variety of substances than do other related solvents. This versatility as a solvent is due in part to the small, size of the water molecule and in part to its polar nature., The latter makes water a particularly good solvent for ionic, substances and for molecules such as sugars and proteins, that contain polar —OH or —NH2 groups., Hydrogen bonding between water molecules and ions,, and between water and polar solutes, in solution effectively, decreases the electrostatic interaction between the charged, substances and thereby increases their solubility. Furthermore, the polar ends of water molecules can orient themselves next to charged or partially charged groups in, macromolecules, forming shells of hydration. Hydrogen, bonding between macromolecules and water reduces the, interaction between the macromolecules and helps draw, them into solution., , The Thermal Properties of Water Result from, Hydrogen Bonding, , The extensive hydrogen bonding between water molecules, results in unusual thermal properties, such as high specific, heat and high latent heat of vaporization. Specific heat is, the heat energy required to raise the temperature of a substance by a specific amount., When the temperature of water is raised, the molecules, vibrate faster and with greater amplitude. To allow for this, motion, energy must be added to the system to break the, hydrogen bonds between water molecules. Thus, compared with other liquids, water requires a relatively large, energy input to raise its temperature. This large energy, input requirement is important for plants because it helps, buffer temperature fluctuations., Latent heat of vaporization is, the, energy needed to separate, (A) Correlated configuration, (B) Random configuration, molecules from the liquid phase, and move them into the gas phase, H, H, at constant temperature—a process, H, H, O, H, O, O, that occurs during transpiration., H, O, O, H, H, H, H, For water at 25°C, the heat of, H, H, O, H, vaporization is 44 kJ mol–1—the, H, O, H, highest value known for any liqO, H, H, O, H, H, H, uid. Most of this energy is used to, O, H, O, O, H, H, break hydrogen bonds between, H, H, H, O, H, O, water molecules., O, H H, O, H, H, The high latent heat of vaporH, O, H, H, H, O, ization of water enables plants to, O, H, O, H, H, cool themselves by evaporating, H, H, H, O, H, water from leaf surfaces, which, O, H, are prone to heat up because of, H, the radiant input from the sun., FIGURE 3.4 (A) Hydrogen bonding between water molecules results in local aggreTranspiration is an important, gations of water molecules. (B) Because of the continuous thermal agitation of the, component of temperature reguwater molecules, these aggregations are very short-lived; they break up rapidly to, lation in plants., form much more random configurations.
Page 61 :
36, , Chapter 3, , The Cohesive and Adhesive Properties of Water, Are Due to Hydrogen Bonding, Water molecules at an air–water interface are more strongly, attracted to neighboring water molecules than to the gas, phase in contact with the water surface. As a consequence of, this unequal attraction, an air–water interface minimizes its, surface area. To increase the area of an air–water interface,, hydrogen bonds must be broken, which requires an input of, energy. The energy required to increase the surface area is, known as surface tension. Surface tension not only influences the shape of the surface but also may create a pressure, in the rest of the liquid. As we will see later, surface tension, at the evaporative surfaces of leaves generates the physical, forces that pull water through the plant’s vascular system., The extensive hydrogen bonding in water also gives rise, to the property known as cohesion, the mutual attraction, between molecules. A related property, called adhesion, is, the attraction of water to a solid phase such as a cell wall, or glass surface. Cohesion, adhesion, and surface tension, give rise to a phenomenon known as capillarity, the movement of water along a capillary tube., In a vertically oriented glass capillary tube, the upward, movement of water is due to (1) the attraction of water to, the polar surface of the glass tube (adhesion) and (2) the, surface tension of water, which tends to minimize the area, of the air–water interface. Together, adhesion and surface, tension pull on the water molecules, causing them to move, up the tube until the upward force is balanced by the, weight of the water column. The smaller the tube, the, higher the capillary rise. For calculations related to capillary rise, see Web Topic 3.1., , Water Has a High Tensile Strength, Cohesion gives water a high tensile strength, defined as, the maximum force per unit area that a continuous column, of water can withstand before breaking. We do not usually, think of liquids as having tensile strength; however, such a, property must exist for a water column to be pulled up a, capillary tube., We can demonstrate the tensile strength of water by placing it in a capped syringe (Figure 3.5). When we push on the, plunger, the water is compressed and a positive hydrostatic pressure builds up. Pressure is measured in units called, pascals (Pa) or, more conveniently, megapascals (MPa). One, MPa equals approximately 9.9 atmospheres. Pressure is, equivalent to a force per unit area (1 Pa = 1 N m–2) and to, an energy per unit volume (1 Pa = 1 J m–3). A newton (N) =, 1 kg m s–1. Table 3.1 compares units of pressure., If instead of pushing on the plunger we pull on it, a tension, or negative hydrostatic pressure, develops in the water, to resist the pull. How hard must we pull on the plunger, before the water molecules are torn away from each other, and the water column breaks? Breaking the water column, requires sufficient energy to break the hydrogen bonds that, attract water molecules to one another., , Water, , Cap, , Plunger, , Force, , FIGURE 3.5 A sealed syringe can be used to create positive, and negative pressures in a fluid like water. Pushing on the, plunger compresses the fluid, and a positive pressure, builds up. If a small air bubble is trapped within the, syringe, it shrinks as the pressure increases. Pulling on the, plunger causes the fluid to develop a tension, or negative, pressure. Any air bubbles in the syringe will expand as the, pressure is reduced., , Careful studies have demonstrated that water in small, capillaries can resist tensions more negative than –30 MPa, (the negative sign indicates tension, as opposed to compression). This value is only a fraction of the theoretical tensile strength of water computed on the basis of the strength, of hydrogen bonds. Nevertheless, it is quite substantial., The presence of gas bubbles reduces the tensile strength, of a water column. For example, in the syringe shown in, Figure 3.5, expansion of microscopic bubbles often interferes with the ability of the water to resist the pull exerted, by the plunger. If a tiny gas bubble forms in a column of, water under tension, the gas bubble may expand indefinitely, with the result that the tension in the liquid phase, collapses, a phenomenon known as cavitation. As we will, see in Chapter 4, cavitation can have a devastating effect, on water transport through the xylem., , WATER TRANSPORT PROCESSES, When water moves from the soil through the plant to the, atmosphere, it travels through a widely variable medium, (cell wall, cytoplasm, membrane, air spaces), and the mechanisms of water transport also vary with the type of, medium. For many years there has been much uncertainty, , TABLE 3.1, Comparison of units of pressure, 1 atmosphere = 14.7 pounds per square inch, = 760 mm Hg (at sea level, 45° latitude), = 1.013 bar, = 0.1013 Mpa, = 1.013 × 105 Pa, A car tire is typically inflated to about 0.2 MPa., The water pressure in home plumbing is typically 0.2–0.3 MPa., The water pressure under 15 feet (5 m) of water is about, 0.05 MPa.
Page 62 :
Water and Plant Cells, about how water moves across plant membranes. Specifically it was unclear whether water movement into plant, cells was limited to the diffusion of water molecules across, the plasma membrane’s lipid bilayer or also involved diffusion through protein-lined pores (Figure 3.6)., Some studies indicated that diffusion directly across the, lipid bilayer was not sufficient to account for observed, rates of water movement across membranes, but the evidence in support of microscopic pores was not compelling., This uncertainty was put to rest with the recent discovery, of aquaporins (see Figure 3.6). Aquaporins are integral, membrane proteins that form water-selective channels, across the membrane. Because water diffuses faster, through such channels than through a lipid bilayer, aquaporins facilitate water movement into plant cells (Weig et, al. 1997; Schäffner 1998; Tyerman et al. 1999). Note that, although the presence of aquaporins may alter the rate of, water movement across the membrane, they do not change, the direction of transport or the driving force for water, movement. The mode of action of aquaporins is being, acitvely investigated (Tajkhorshid et al. 2002)., We will now consider the two major processes in water, transport: molecular diffusion and bulk flow., , Diffusion Is the Movement of Molecules by, Random Thermal Agitation, Water molecules in a solution are not static; they are in continuous motion, colliding with one another and exchanging kinetic energy. The molecules intermingle as a result of, , OUTSIDE OF CELL, , their random thermal agitation. This random motion is, called diffusion. As long as other forces are not acting on, the molecules, diffusion causes the net movement of molecules from regions of high concentration to regions of low, concentration—that is, down a concentration gradient, (Figure 3.7)., In the 1880s the German scientist Adolf Fick discovered, that the rate of diffusion is directly proportional to the concentration gradient (∆cs/∆x)—that is, to the difference in, concentration of substance s (∆cs) between two points separated by the distance ∆x. In symbols, we write this relation as Fick’s first law:, Js = − Ds, , ∆cs, ∆x, , (3.1), , The rate of transport, or the flux density (Js), is the, amount of substance s crossing a unit area per unit time, (e.g., Js may have units of moles per square meter per second [mol m–2 s–1]). The diffusion coefficient (Ds) is a proportionality constant that measures how easily substance, s moves through a particular medium. The diffusion coefficient is a characteristic of the substance (larger molecules, have smaller diffusion coefficients) and depends on the, medium (diffusion in air is much faster than diffusion in a, liquid, for example). The negative sign in the equation indicates that the flux moves down a concentration gradient., Fick’s first law says that a substance will diffuse faster, when the concentration gradient becomes steeper (∆cs is, large) or when the diffusion coefficient is increased. This, equation accounts only for movement in response to a concentration gradient, and not for movement in response to, other forces (e.g., pressure, electric fields, and so on)., , Diffusion Is Rapid over Short Distances but, Extremely Slow over Long Distances, , Water molecules, , Water-selective, pore (aquaporin), , Membrane, bilayer, , CYTOPLASM, , FIGURE 3.6 Water can cross plant membranes by diffusion, of individual water molecules through the membrane, bilayer, as shown on the left, and by microscopic bulk flow, of water molecules through a water-selective pore formed, by integral membrane proteins such as aquaporins., , fpo, , 37, , From Fick’s first law, one can derive an expression for the, time it takes for a substance to diffuse a particular distance., If the initial conditions are such that all the solute molecules are concentrated at the starting position (Figure, 3.8A), then the concentration front moves away from the, starting position, as shown for a later time point in Figure, 3.8B. As the substance diffuses away from the starting, point, the concentration gradient becomes less steep (∆cs, decreases), and thus net movement becomes slower., The average time needed for a particle to diffuse a distance L is equal to L2/Ds, where Ds is the diffusion coefficient, which depends on both the identity of the particle, and the medium in which it is diffusing. Thus the average, time required for a substance to diffuse a given distance, increases in proportion to the square of that distance. The, diffusion coefficient for glucose in water is about 10–9 m2, s–1. Thus the average time required for a glucose molecule, to diffuse across a cell with a diameter of 50 µm is 2.5 s., However, the average time needed for the same glucose, molecule to diffuse a distance of 1 m in water is approxi-
Page 63 :
38, , Chapter 3, Initial, , Intermediate, , Equilibrium, , Concentration, , Concentration profiles, , Position in container, , FIGURE 3.7 Thermal motion of molecules leads to diffusion—the gradual mixing of, molecules and eventual dissipation of concentration differences. Initially, two materials containing different molecules are brought into contact. The materials may be, gas, liquid, or solid. Diffusion is fastest in gases, slower in liquids, and slowest in, solids. The initial separation of the molecules is depicted graphically in the upper, panels, and the corresponding concentration profiles are shown in the lower panels, as a function of position. With time, the mixing and randomization of the molecules, diminishes net movement. At equilibrium the two types of molecules are randomly, (evenly) distributed., , (B), , (A), , 0, , Time, , Dcs, , Distance Dx, , Concentration, , Concentration, , 0, , Dcs, , Distance Dx, , FIGURE 3.8 Graphical representation of the concentration gradient of a solute that is, diffusing according to Fick’s law. The solute molecules were initially located in the, plane indicated on the x-axis. (A) The distribution of solute molecules shortly after, placement at the plane of origin. Note how sharply the concentration drops off as, the distance, x, from the origin increases. (B) The solute distribution at a later time, point. The average distance of the diffusing molecules from the origin has increased,, and the slope of the gradient has flattened out. (After Nobel 1999.)
Page 64 :
39, , Water and Plant Cells, mately 32 years. These values show that diffusion in solutions can be effective within cellular dimensions but is far, too slow for mass transport over long distances. For additional calculations on diffusion times, see Web Topic 3.2., , Pressure-Driven Bulk Flow Drives Long-Distance, Water Transport, A second process by which water moves is known as bulk, flow or mass flow. Bulk flow is the concerted movement, of groups of molecules en masse, most often in response to, a pressure gradient. Among many common examples of, bulk flow are water moving through a garden hose, a river, flowing, and rain falling., If we consider bulk flow through a tube, the rate of volume flow depends on the radius (r) of the tube, the viscosity (h) of the liquid, and the pressure gradient (∆Yp /∆x), that drives the flow. Jean-Léonard-Marie Poiseuille, (1797–1869) was a French physician and physiologist, and, the relation just described is given by one form of, Poiseuille’s equation:, 4 ∆Y p , Volume flow rate = pr , , 8h ∆x , , (3.2), , expressed in cubic meters per second (m3 s–1). This equation tells us that pressure-driven bulk flow is very sensitive, to the radius of the tube. If the radius is doubled, the volume flow rate increases by a factor of 16 (24)., Pressure-driven bulk flow of water is the predominant, mechanism responsible for long-distance transport of water, in the xylem. It also accounts for much of the water flow, through the soil and through the cell walls of plant tissues., In contrast to diffusion, pressure-driven bulk flow is independent of solute concentration gradients, as long as viscosity changes are negligible., , Osmosis Is Driven by a Water Potential Gradient, Membranes of plant cells are selectively permeable; that, is, they allow the movement of water and other small, uncharged substances across them more readily than the, movement of larger solutes and charged substances (Stein, 1986)., Like molecular diffusion and pressure-driven bulk flow,, osmosis occurs spontaneously in response to a driving, force. In simple diffusion, substances move down a concentration gradient; in pressure-driven bulk flow, substances move down a pressure gradient; in osmosis, both, types of gradients influence transport (Finkelstein 1987)., The direction and rate of water flow across a membrane are, determined not solely by the concentration gradient of water or, by the pressure gradient, but by the sum of these two driving, forces., We will soon see how osmosis drives the movement of, water across membranes. First, however, let’s discuss the, concept of a composite or total driving force, representing, the free-energy gradient of water., , The Chemical Potential of Water Represents the, Free-Energy Status of Water, All living things, including plants, require a continuous, input of free energy to maintain and repair their highly, organized structures, as well as to grow and reproduce., Processes such as biochemical reactions, solute accumulation, and long-distance transport are all driven by an input, of free energy into the plant. (For a detailed discussion of, the thermodynamic concept of free energy, see Chapter 2, on the web site.), The chemical potential of water is a quantitative expression of the free energy associated with water. In thermodynamics, free energy represents the potential for performing work. Note that chemical potential is a relative, quantity: It is expressed as the difference between the, potential of a substance in a given state and the potential, of the same substance in a standard state. The unit of chemical potential is energy per mole of substance (J mol–1)., For historical reasons, plant physiologists have most, often used a related parameter called water potential,, defined as the chemical potential of water divided by the, partial molal volume of water (the volume of 1 mol of, water): 18 × 10–6 m3 mol–1. Water potential is a measure of, the free energy of water per unit volume (J m–3). These, units are equivalent to pressure units such as the pascal,, which is the common measurement unit for water potential. Let’s look more closely at the important concept of, water potential., , Three Major Factors Contribute to Cell Water, Potential, The major factors influencing the water potential in plants, are concentration, pressure, and gravity. Water potential is, symbolized by Yw (the Greek letter psi), and the water, potential of solutions may be dissected into individual, components, usually written as the following sum:, Yw = Y s + Y p + Y g, , (3.3), , The terms Ys, Yp, and Yg denote the effects of solutes, pressure, and gravity, respectively, on the free energy of water., (Alternative conventions for components of water potential are discussed in Web Topic 3.3.) The reference state, used to define water potential is pure water at ambient, pressure and temperature. Let’s consider each of the terms, on the right-hand side of Equation 3.3., , Solutes., , The term Ys, called the solute potential or the, osmotic potential, represents the effect of dissolved solutes, on water potential. Solutes reduce the free energy of water, by diluting the water. This is primarily an entropy effect;, that is, the mixing of solutes and water increases the disorder of the system and thereby lowers free energy. This, means that the osmotic potential is independent of the specific nature of the solute. For dilute solutions of nondisso-
Page 65 :
40, , Chapter 3, , ciating substances, like sucrose, the osmotic potential may, be estimated by the van’t Hoff equation:, Ys = −RTcs, , (3.4), , where R is the gas constant (8.32 J mol–1 K–1), T is the, absolute temperature (in degrees Kelvin, or K), and cs is the, solute concentration of the solution, expressed as osmolality (moles of total dissolved solutes per liter of water [mol, L–1]). The minus sign indicates that dissolved solutes, reduce the water potential of a solution relative to the reference state of pure water., Table 3.2 shows the values of RT at various temperatures, and the Ys values of solutions of different solute concentrations. For ionic solutes that dissociate into two or more, particles, cs must be multiplied by the number of dissociated particles to account for the increased number of dissolved particles., Equation 3.4 is valid for “ideal” solutions at dilute concentration. Real solutions frequently deviate from the ideal,, especially at high concentrations—for example, greater, than 0.1 mol L–1. In our treatment of water potential, we, will assume that we are dealing with ideal solutions (Friedman 1986; Nobel 1999)., , Pressure. The term Yp is the hydrostatic pressure of the, solution. Positive pressures raise the water potential; negative pressures reduce it. Sometimes Yp is called pressure, potential. The positive hydrostatic pressure within cells is, the pressure referred to as turgor pressure. The value of Yp, can also be negative, as is the case in the xylem and in the, walls between cells, where a tension, or negative hydrostatic, pressure, can develop. As we will see, negative pressures, outside cells are very important in moving water long distances through the plant., Hydrostatic pressure is measured as the deviation from, ambient pressure (for details, see Web Topic 3.5). Remember that water in the reference state is at ambient pressure,, so by this definition Yp = 0 MPa for water in the standard, state. Thus the value of Yp for pure water in an open, beaker is 0 MPa, even though its absolute pressure is, approximately 0.1 MPa (1 atmosphere)., , Gravity. Gravity causes water to move downward, unless the force of gravity is opposed by an equal and, opposite force. The term Yg depends on the height (h) of, the water above the reference-state water, the density of, water (rw), and the acceleration due to gravity (g). In symbols, we write the following:, Yg = rw gh, , where rw g has a value of 0.01 MPa m–1. Thus a vertical distance of 10 m translates into a 0.1 MPa change in water, potential., When dealing with water transport at the cell level, the, gravitational component (Yg) is generally omitted because, it is negligible compared to the osmotic potential and the, hydrostatic pressure. Thus, in these cases Equation 3.3 can, be simplified as follows:, Y w = Ys + Yp, , Water potential in the plant. Cell growth, photosynthesis, and crop productivity are all strongly influenced by, water potential and its components. Like the body temperature of humans, water potential is a good overall indicator of plant health. Plant scientists have thus expended, considerable effort in devising accurate and reliable methods for evaluating the water status of plants. Some of the, instruments that have been used to measure Yw, Ys, and, Yp are described in Web Topic 3.5., , Water Enters the Cell along a Water Potential, Gradient, In this section we will illustrate the osmotic behavior of plant, cells with some numerical examples. First imagine an open, beaker full of pure water at 20°C (Figure 3.9A). Because the, water is open to the atmosphere, the hydrostatic pressure of, the water is the same as atmospheric pressure (Yp = 0 MPa)., There are no solutes in the water, so Ys = 0 MPa; therefore, the water potential is 0 MPa (Yw = Ys + Yp)., , Osmotic potential (MPa) of solution, with solute concentration, in mol L–1 water, RTa, (L MPa mol–1), , 0, 20, 25, 30, , 2.271, 2.436, 2.478, 2.519, , aR, , = 0.0083143 L MPa mol–1 K–1., , (3.6), , In discussions of dry soils, seeds, and cell walls, one often, finds reference to another component of Yw, the matric, potential, which is discussed in Web Topic 3.4., , TABLE 3.2, Values of RT and osmotic potential of solutions at various temperatures, , Temperature, (°C), , (3.5), , 0.01, , 0.10, , 1.00, , −0.0227, −0.0244, −0.0248, −0.0252, , −0.227, −0.244, −0.248, −0.252, , −2.27, −2.44, −2.48, −2.52, , Osmotic potential, of seawater (MPa), , −2.6, −2.8, −2.8, −2.9
Page 66 :
Water and Plant Cells, (A) Pure water, , 41, , (B) Solution containing 0.1 M sucrose, , 0.1 M Sucrose solution, Pure water, , Yp = 0 MPa, Ys = –0.244 MPa, Yw = Yp + Ys, = 0 – 0.244 MPa, = –0.244 MPa, , Yp = 0 MPa, Ys = 0 MPa, Yw = Yp + Ys, = 0 MPa, , (C) Flaccid cell dropped into sucrose solution, , (D) Concentration of sucrose increased, Turgid cell, , Flaccid cell, Yp = 0 MPa, Ys = –0.732 MPa, Yw = –0.732 MPa, , Yp = 0.488 MPa, Ys = –0.732 MPa, Yw = –0.244 MPa, , 0.3 M Sucrose, solution, , Cell after equilibrium, , Cell after equilibrium, , Yp = 0 MPa, Ys = –0.732 MPa, Yw = –0.732 MPa, , Yw = –0.732 MPa, Ys = –0.732 MPa, Yp = Yw – Ys = 0 MPa, , Yw = –0.244 MPa, Ys = –0.732 MPa, Yp = Yw – Ys = 0.488 MPa, , (E) Pressure applied to cell, Applied pressure squeezes, out half the water, thus doubling, Ys from –0.732 to –1.464 MPa, 0.1 M Sucrose solution, , Cell in initial state, Yw = –0.244 MPa, Ys = –0.732 MPa, Yp = Yw – Ys = 0.488 MPa, , Cell in final state, Yw = –0.244 MPa, Ys = –1.464 MPa, Yp = Yw – Ys = 1.22 MPa, , FIGURE 3.9 Five examples illustrating the concept of water potential and its components. (A) Pure water. (B) A solution containing 0.1 M sucrose. (C) A flaccid cell, (in air) is dropped in the 0.1 M sucrose solution. Because the starting water potential of the cell is less than the water potential of the solution, the cell takes up water., After equilibration, the water potential of the cell rises to equal the water potential, of the solution, and the result is a cell with a positive turgor pressure. (D), Increasing the concentration of sucrose in the solution makes the cell lose water., The increased sucrose concentration lowers the solution water potential, draws, water out from the cell, and thereby reduces the cell’s turgor pressure. In this case, the protoplast is able to pull away from the cell wall (i.e, the cell plasmolyzes), because sucrose molecules are able to pass through the relatively large pores of the, cell walls. In contrast, when a cell desiccates in air (e.g., the flaccid cell in panel C), plasmolysis does not occur because the water held by capillary forces in the cell, walls prevents air from infiltrating into any void between the plasma membrane, and the cell wall. (E) Another way to make the cell lose water is to press it slowly, between two plates. In this case, half of the cell water is removed, so cell osmotic, potential increases by a factor of 2.
Page 67 :
42, , Chapter 3, , Now imagine dissolving sucrose in the water to a concentration of 0.1 M (Figure 3.9B). This addition lowers the, osmotic potential (Ys) to –0.244 MPa (see Table 3.2) and, decreases the water potential (Yw) to –0.244 MPa., Next consider a flaccid, or limp, plant cell (i.e., a cell, with no turgor pressure) that has a total internal solute concentration of 0.3 M (Figure 3.9C). This solute concentration, gives an osmotic potential (Ys) of –0.732 MPa. Because the, cell is flaccid, the internal pressure is the same as ambient, pressure, so the hydrostatic pressure (Yp) is 0 MPa and the, water potential of the cell is –0.732 MPa., What happens if this cell is placed in the beaker containing 0.1 M sucrose (see Figure 3.9C)? Because the water, potential of the sucrose solution (Yw = –0.244 MPa; see Figure 3.9B) is greater than the water potential of the cell (Yw, = –0.732 MPa), water will move from the sucrose solution, to the cell (from high to low water potential)., Because plant cells are surrounded by relatively rigid, cell walls, even a slight increase in cell volume causes a, large increase in the hydrostatic pressure within the cell., As water enters the cell, the cell wall is stretched by the, contents of the enlarging protoplast. The wall resists such, stretching by pushing back on the cell. This phenomenon, is analogous to inflating a basketball with air, except that, air is compressible, whereas water is nearly incompressible., As water moves into the cell, the hydrostatic pressure,, or turgor pressure (Yp), of the cell increases. Consequently,, the cell water potential (Yw) increases, and the difference, between inside and outside water potentials (∆Yw) is, reduced. Eventually, cell Yp increases enough to raise the, cell Yw to the same value as the Yw of the sucrose solution., At this point, equilibrium is reached (∆Yw = 0 MPa), and, net water transport ceases., Because the volume of the beaker is much larger than, that of the cell, the tiny amount of water taken up by the, cell does not significantly affect the solute concentration of, the sucrose solution. Hence Ys, Yp, and Yw of the sucrose, solution are not altered. Therefore, at equilibrium, Yw(cell), = Yw(solution) = –0.244 MPa., The exact calculation of cell Yp and Ys requires knowledge of the change in cell volume. However, if we assume, that the cell has a very rigid cell wall, then the increase in, cell volume will be small. Thus we can assume to a first, approximation that Ys(cell) is unchanged during the equilibration process and that Ys(solution) remains at –0.732 MPa., We can obtain cell hydrostatic pressure by rearranging, Equation 3.6 as follows: Yp = Yw – Ys = (–0.244) – (–0.732), = 0.488 MPa., , Water Can Also Leave the Cell in Response to a, Water Potential Gradient, Water can also leave the cell by osmosis. If, in the previous, example, we remove our plant cell from the 0.1 M sucrose, solution and place it in a 0.3 M sucrose solution (Figure, 3.9D), Yw(solution) (–0.732 MPa) is more negative than, , Yw(cell) (–0.244 MPa), and water will move from the turgid, cell to the solution., As water leaves the cell, the cell volume decreases. As the, cell volume decreases, cell Yp and Yw decrease also until, Yw(cell) = Yw(solution) = –0.732 MPa. From the water potential, equation (Equation 3.6) we can calculate that at equilibrium,, Yp = 0 MPa. As before, we assume that the change in cell, volume is small, so we can ignore the change in Ys., If we then slowly squeeze the turgid cell by pressing it, between two plates (Figure 3.9E), we effectively raise the, cell Yp, consequently raising the cell Yw and creating a, ∆Yw such that water now flows out of the cell. If we continue squeezing until half the cell water is removed and, then hold the cell in this condition, the cell will reach a new, equilibrium. As in the previous example, at equilibrium,, ∆Yw = 0 MPa, and the amount of water added to the external solution is so small that it can be ignored. The cell will, thus return to the Yw value that it had before the squeezing procedure. However, the components of the cell Yw, will be quite different., Because half of the water was squeezed out of the cell, while the solutes remained inside the cell (the plasma, membrane is selectively permeable), the cell solution is, concentrated twofold, and thus Ys is lower (–0.732 × 2 =, –1.464 MPa). Knowing the final values for Yw and Ys, we, can calculate the turgor pressure, using Equation 3.6, as Yp, = Yw – Ys = (–0.244) – (–1.464) = 1.22 MPa. In our example, we used an external force to change cell volume without a, change in water potential. In nature, it is typically the water, potential of the cell’s environment that changes, and the, cell gains or loses water until its Yw matches that of its surroundings., One point common to all these examples deserves, emphasis: Water flow is a passive process. That is, water moves, in response to physical forces, toward regions of low water potential or low free energy. There are no metabolic “pumps” (reactions driven by ATP hydrolysis) that push water from one, place to another. This rule is valid as long as water is the, only substance being transported. When solutes are transported, however, as occurs for short distances across membranes (see Chapter 6) and for long distances in the phloem, (see Chapter 10), then water transport may be coupled to, solute transport and this coupling may move water against, a water potential gradient., For example, the transport of sugars, amino acids, or, other small molecules by various membrane proteins can, “drag” up to 260 water molecules across the membrane per, molecule of solute transported (Loo et al. 1996). Such transport of water can occur even when the movement is, against the usual water potential gradient (i.e., toward a, larger water potential) because the loss of free energy by, the solute more than compensates for the gain of free, energy by the water. The net change in free energy remains, negative. In the phloem, the bulk flow of solutes and water, within sieve tubes occurs along gradients in hydrostatic
Page 68 :
43, , Water and Plant Cells, (turgor) pressure rather than by osmosis. Thus, within the, phloem, water can be transported from regions with lower, water potentials (e.g., leaves) to regions with higher water, potentials (e.g., roots). These situations notwithstanding, in the, vast majority of cases water in plants moves from higher to lower, water potentials., , Cell walls provide plant cells with a substantial degree of, volume homeostasis relative to the large changes in water, potential that they experience as the everyday consequence, of the transpirational water losses associated with photosynthesis (see Chapter 4). Because plant cells have fairly, rigid walls, a change in cell Yw is generally accompanied, by a large change in Yp, with relatively little change in cell, (protoplast) volume., This phenomenon is illustrated in plots of Yw, Yp, and, Ys as a function of relative cell volume. In the example of, a hypothetical cell shown in Figure 3.10, as Yw decreases, from 0 to about –2 MPa, the cell volume is reduced by only, 5%. Most of this decrease is due to a reduction in Yp (by, about 1.2 MPa); Ys decreases by about 0.3 MPa as a result, of water loss by the cell and consequent increased concentration of cell solutes. Contrast this with the volume, changes of a cell lacking a wall., Measurements of cell water potential and cell volume, (see Figure 3.10) can be used to quantify how cell walls, influence the water status of plant cells., 1. Turgor pressure (Yp > 0) exists only when cells are, relatively well hydrated. Turgor pressure in most cells, approaches zero as the relative cell volume decreases, by 10 to 15%. However, for cells with very rigid cell, walls (e.g., mesophyll cells in the leaves of many, palm trees), the volume change associated with turgor, loss can be much smaller, whereas in cells with, extremely elastic walls, such as the water-storing cells, in the stems of many cacti, this volume change may, be substantially larger., 2. The Yp curve of Figure 3.10 provides a way to measure, the relative rigidity of the cell wall, symbolized by e, (the Greek letter epsilon): e = ∆Yp/∆(relative volume). e, is the slope of the Yp curve. e is not constant but, decreases as turgor pressure is lowered because nonlignified plant cell walls usually are rigid only when turgor pressure puts them under tension. Such cells act, like a basketball: The wall is stiff (has high e) when the, ball is inflated but becomes soft and collapsible (e = 0), when the ball loses pressure., 3. When e and Yp are low, changes in water potential, are dominated by changes in Ys (note how Yw and, Ys curves converge as the relative cell volume, approaches 85%)., , 2, , Cell water potential (MPa), , Small Changes in Plant Cell Volume Cause Large, Changes in Turgor Pressure, , Full turgor, pressure, Slope = e =, , DYp, DV/V, , 1, Zero turgor, , Yp, 0, , –1, , Yw = Ys + Yp, , –2, Ys, –3, , 1.0, , 0.95, , 0.9, , 0.85, , 0.8, , Relative cell volume (DV/V), , Relation between cell water potential (Yw), and its components (Yp and Ys), and relative cell volume, (∆V/V). The plots show that turgor pressure (Yp) decreases, steeply with the initial 5% decrease in cell volume. In comparison, osmotic potential (Ys) changes very little. As cell, volume decreases below 0.9 in this example, the situation, reverses: Most of the change in water potential is due to a, drop in cell Ys accompanied by relatively little change in, turgor pressure. The slope of the curve that illustrates Yp, versus volume relationship is a measure of the cell’s elastic, modulus (e) (a measurement of wall rigidity). Note that e is, not constant but decreases as the cell loses turgor. (After, Tyree and Jarvis 1982, based on a shoot of Sitka spruce.), FIGURE 3.10, , Water Transport Rates Depend on Driving Force, and Hydraulic Conductivity, So far, we have seen that water moves across a membrane, in response to a water potential gradient. The direction of, flow is determined by the direction of the Yw gradient, and, the rate of water movement is proportional to the magnitude of the driving gradient. However, for a cell that experiences a change in the water potential of its surroundings, (e.g., see Figure 3.9), the movement of water across the cell, membrane will decrease with time as the internal and, external water potentials converge (Figure 3.11). The rate, approaches zero in an exponential manner (see Dainty, 1976), with a half-time (half-times conveniently characterize processes that change exponentially with time) given, by the following equation:, , , , t 1 2 = 0.693 V , ( A)(Lp) e − Y s , , (3.7), , where V and A are, respectively, the volume and surface of
Page 69 :
44, , Chapter 3, The rate of water transport into a cell depends on the, water potential difference (∆Yw) and the hydraulic conductivity of the, cell membranes (Lp). In this example, (A) the initial water potential, difference is 0.2 MPa and Lp is 10–6 m s–1 MPa–1. These values give an, initial transport rate (Jv) of 0.2 × 10–6 m s–1. (B) As water is taken up, by the cell, the water potential difference decreases with time, leading, to a slowing in the rate of water uptake. This effect follows an exponentially decaying time course with a half-time (t1/2) that depends on, the following cell parameters: volume (V), surface area (A), Lp, volumetric elastic modulus (e), and cell osmotic potential (Ys)., FIGURE 3.11, , (A), Yw = – 0 .2 MPa, Yw = 0 MPa, DYw = 0.2 MPa, Water flow, Initial Jv = Lp (DYw), = 10–6 m s –1 MPa–1, × 0.2 MPa, = 0.2 × 10–6 m s–1, , hydraulic conductivity, and stiff cell walls (large e) will, come rapidly into equilibrium with their surroundings., Cell half-times typically range from 1 to 10 s, although, some are much shorter (Steudle 1989). These low half-times, mean that single cells come to water potential equilibrium, with their surroundings in less than 1 minute. For multicellular tissues, the half-times may be much larger., , (B), Transport rate (Jv) slows, as Yw increases, Yw (MPa), , 0, DYw =, 0.1 MPa, , DΨ w =, 0.2 MPa, , –0.2, , The Water Potential Concept Helps Us Evaluate, the Water Status of a Plant, , 0.693V, t1/2 =, (A)(Lp)(e –Ys), 0, , Time, , the cell, and Lp is the hydraulic conductivity of the cell, membrane. Hydraulic conductivity describes how readily, water can move across a membrane and has units of volume of water per unit area of membrane per unit time per, unit driving force (i.e., m3 m–2 s–1 MPa–1). For additional, discussion on hydraulic conductivity, see Web Topic 3.6., A short half-time means fast equilibration. Thus, cells, with large surface-to-volume ratios, high membrane, , The concept of water potential has two principal uses: First,, water potential governs transport across cell membranes,, as we have described. Second, water potential is often used, as a measure of the water status of a plant. Because of transpirational water loss to the atmosphere, plants are seldom, fully hydrated. They suffer from water deficits that lead to, inhibition of plant growth and photosynthesis, as well as, to other detrimental effects. Figure 3.12 lists some of the, physiological changes that plants experience as they, become dry., The process that is most affected by water deficit is cell, growth. More severe water stress leads to inhibition of cell, division, inhibition of wall and protein synthesis, accumu-, , Physiological changes, due to dehydration:, Abscisic acid accumulation, Solute accumulation, Photosynthesis, Stomatal conductance, , Wall synthesis, Cell expansion, –0, , –1, , –2, , –3, , Water potential (MPa), Pure water, , Water potential of plants, under various growing conditions,, and sensitivity of various physiological processes to water potential. The, intensity of the bar color corresponds, to the magnitude of the process. For, example, cell expansion decreases as, water potential falls (becomes more, negative). Abscisic acid is a hormone, that induces stomatal closure during, water stress (see Chapter 23). (After, Hsiao 1979.), , FIGURE 3.12, , Protein synthesis, , Well-watered, plants, , Plants under, mild water, stress, , Plants in arid,, desert climates, , –4
Page 70 :
Water and Plant Cells, lation of solutes, closing of stomata, and inhibition of photosynthesis. Water potential is one measure of how, hydrated a plant is and thus provides a relative index of, the water stress the plant is experiencing (see Chapter 25)., Figure 3.12 also shows representative values for Yw at, various stages of water stress. In leaves of well-watered, plants, Yw ranges from –0.2 to about –1.0 MPa, but the, leaves of plants in arid climates can have much lower values, perhaps –2 to –5 MPa under extreme conditions., Because water transport is a passive process, plants can, take up water only when the plant Yw is less than the soil, Yw. As the soil becomes drier, the plant similarly becomes, less hydrated (attains a lower Yw). If this were not the case,, the soil would begin to extract water from the plant., , The Components of Water Potential Vary with, Growth Conditions and Location within the Plant, Just as Yw values depend on the growing conditions and, the type of plant, so too, the values of Ys can vary considerably. Within cells of well-watered garden plants (examples include lettuce, cucumber seedlings, and bean leaves),, Ys may be as high as –0.5 MPa, although values of –0.8 to, –1.2 MPa are more typical. The upper limit for cell Ys is set, probably by the minimum concentration of dissolved ions,, metabolites, and proteins in the cytoplasm of living cells., At the other extreme, plants under drought conditions, sometimes attain a much lower Ys. For instance, water, stress typically leads to an accumulation of solutes in the, cytoplasm and vacuole, thus allowing the plant to maintain turgor pressure despite low water potentials., Plant tissues that store high concentrations of sucrose or, other sugars, such as sugar beet roots, sugarcane stems, or, grape berries, also attain low values of Ys. Values as low as, –2.5 MPa are not unusual. Plants that grow in saline environments, called halophytes, typically have very low values of Ys. A low Ys lowers cell Yw enough to extract water, from salt water, without allowing excessive levels of salts, to enter at the same time. Most crop plants cannot survive, in seawater, which, because of the dissolved salts, has a, lower water potential than the plant tissues can attain, while maintaining their functional competence., Although Ys within cells may be quite negative, the, apoplastic solution surrounding the cells—that is, in the, cell walls and in the xylem—may contain only low concentrations of solutes. Thus, Ys of this phase of the plant is, typically much higher—for example, –0.1 to 0 MPa. Negative water potentials in the xylem and cell walls are usually, due to negative Yp. Values for Yp within cells of wellwatered garden plants may range from 0.1 to perhaps 1, MPa, depending on the value of Ys inside the cell., A positive turgor pressure (Yp) is important for two principal reasons. First, growth of plant cells requires turgor, pressure to stretch the cell walls. The loss of Yp under water, deficits can explain in part why cell growth is so sensitive to, water stress (see Chapter 25). The second reason positive, , 45, , turgor is important is that turgor pressure increases the, mechanical rigidity of cells and tissues. This function of cell, turgor pressure is particularly important for young, nonlignified tissues, which cannot support themselves mechanically without a high internal pressure. A plant wilts, (becomes flaccid) when the turgor pressure inside the cells, of such tissues falls toward zero. Web Topic 3.7 discusses, plasmolysis, the shrinking of the protoplast away from the, cell wall, which occurs when cells in solution lose water., Whereas the solution inside cells may have a positive and, large Yp, the water outside the cell may have negative values for Yp. In the xylem of rapidly transpiring plants, Yp, is negative and may attain values of –1 MPa or lower. The, magnitude of Yp in the cell walls and xylem varies considerably, depending on the rate of transpiration and the height, of the plant. During the middle of the day, when transpiration is maximal, xylem Yp reaches its lowest, most negative, values. At night, when transpiration is low and the plant, rehydrates, it tends to increase., , SUMMARY, Water is important in the life of plants because it makes up, the matrix and medium in which most biochemical, processes essential for life take place. The structure and, properties of water strongly influence the structure and, properties of proteins, membranes, nucleic acids, and other, cell constituents., In most land plants, water is continually lost to the, atmosphere and taken up from the soil. The movement of, water is driven by a reduction in free energy, and water, may move by diffusion, by bulk flow, or by a combination, of these fundamental transport mechanisms. Water diffuses, because molecules are in constant thermal agitation, which, tends to even out concentration differences. Water moves, by bulk flow in response to a pressure difference, whenever, there is a suitable pathway for bulk movement of water., Osmosis, the movement of water across membranes,, depends on a gradient in free energy of water across the, membrane—a gradient commonly measured as a difference in water potential., Solute concentration and hydrostatic pressure are the two, major factors that affect water potential, although when large, vertical distances are involved, gravity is also important., These components of the water potential may be summed as, follows: Yw = Ys + Yp + Yg. Plant cells come into water, potential equilibrium with their local environment by absorbing or losing water. Usually this change in cell volume results, in a change in cell Yp, accompanied by minor changes in cell, Ys. The rate of water transport across a membrane depends, on the water potential difference across the membrane and, the hydraulic conductivity of the membrane., In addition to its importance in transport, water potential is a useful measure of the water status of plants. As we, will see in Chapter 4, diffusion, bulk flow, and osmosis all
Page 71 :
46, , Chapter 3, , help move water from the soil through the plant to the, atmosphere., , Web Material, Web Topics, 3.1 Calculating Capillary Rise, Quantification of capillary rise allows us to assess, the functional role of capillary rise in water movement of plants., , 3.2 Calculating Half-Times of Diffusion, The assessment of the time needed for a molecule like glucose to diffuse across cells, tissues,, and organs shows that diffusion has physiological significance only over short distances., , 3.3 Alternative Conventions for Components of, Water Potential, Plant physiologists have developed several conventions to define water potential of plants. A, comparison of key definitions in some of these, convention systems provides us with a better, understanding of the water relations literature., , 3.4 The Matric Potential, A brief discussion of the concept of matric potential, used to quantify the chemical potential of, water in soils, seeds, and cell walls., , 3.5 Measuring Water Potential, A detailed description of available methods to, measure water potential in plant cells and tissues., , 3.6 Understanding Hydraulic Conductivity, Hydraulic conductivity, a measurement of the, membrane permeability to water, is one of the, factors determining the velocity of water movements in plants., , 3.7 Wilting and Plasmolysis, Plasmolysis is a major structural change resulting, from major water loss by osmosis., , Chapter References, Dainty, J. (1976) Water relations of plant cells. In Transport in Plants,, Vol. 2, Part A: Cells (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New, Series, Vol. 2.), U. Lüttge and M. G. Pitman, eds., Springer, Berlin,, pp. 12–35., Finkelstein, A. (1987) Water Movement through Lipid Bilayers, Pores,, and Plasma Membranes: Theory and Reality. Wiley, New York., Friedman, M. H. (1986) Principles and Models of Biological Transport., Springer Verlag, Berlin., Hsiao, T. C. (1979) Plant responses to water deficits, efficiency, and, drought resistance. Agricult. Meteorol. 14: 59–84., Loo, D. D. F., Zeuthen, T., Chandy, G., and Wright, E. M. (1996), Cotransport of water by the Na+/glucose cotransporter. Proc., Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 13367–13370., Nobel, P. S. (1999) Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology,, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA., Schäffner, A. R. (1998) Aquaporin function, structure, and expression: Are there more surprises to surface in water relations?, Planta 204: 131–139., Stein, W. D. (1986) Transport and Diffusion across Cell Membranes. Academic Press, Orlando, FL., Steudle, E. (1989) Water flow in plants and its coupling to other, processes: An overview. Methods Enzymol. 174: 183–225., Tajkhorshid, E., Nollert, P., Jensen, M. Ø., Miercke, L. H. W., O’Connell, J., Stroud, R. M., and Schulten, K. (2002) Control of the selectivity of the aquaporin water channel family by global orientation tuning. Science 296: 525–530., Tyerman, S. D., Bohnert, H. J., Maurel, C., Steudle, E., and Smith, J., A. C. (1999) Plant aquaporins: Their molecular biology, biophysics and significance for plant–water relations. J. Exp. Bot. 50:, 1055–1071., Tyree, M. T., and Jarvis, P. G. (1982) Water in tissues and cells. In, Physiological Plant Ecology, Vol. 2: Water Relations and Carbon, Assimilation (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol., 12B), O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond, and H. Ziegler, eds.,, Springer, Berlin, pp. 35–77., Weather and Our Food Supply (CAED Report 20). (1964) Center for, Agricultural and Economic Development, Iowa State University, of Science and Technology, Ames, IA., Weig, A., Deswarte, C., and Chrispeels, M. J. (1997) The major intrinsic protein family of Arabidopsis has 23 members that form three, distinct groups with functional aquaporins in each group. Plant, Physiol. 114: 1347–1357., Whittaker R. H. (1970) Communities and Ecosystems. Macmillan,, New York.
Page 72 :
Chapter, , 4, , Water Balance of Plants, , LIFE IN EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE presents a formidable challenge to, land plants. On the one hand, the atmosphere is the source of carbon, dioxide, which is needed for photosynthesis. Plants therefore need ready, access to the atmosphere. On the other hand, the atmosphere is relatively, dry and can dehydrate the plant. To meet the contradictory demands of, maximizing carbon dioxide uptake while limiting water loss, plants have, evolved adaptations to control water loss from leaves, and to replace the, water lost to the atmosphere., In this chapter we will examine the mechanisms and driving forces, operating on water transport within the plant and between the plant and, its environment. Transpirational water loss from the leaf is driven by a, gradient in water vapor concentration. Long-distance transport in the, xylem is driven by pressure gradients, as is water movement in the soil., Water transport through cell layers such as the root cortex is complex,, but it responds to water potential gradients across the tissue., Throughout this journey water transport is passive in the sense that, the free energy of water decreases as it moves. Despite its passive nature,, water transport is finely regulated by the plant to minimize dehydration, largely by regulating transpiration to the atmosphere. We will begin, our examination of water transport by focusing on water in the soil., , WATER IN THE SOIL, The water content and the rate of water movement in soils depend to, a large extent on soil type and soil structure. Table 4.1 shows that the, physical characteristics of different soils can vary greatly. At one extreme, is sand, in which the soil particles may be 1 mm or more in diameter., Sandy soils have a relatively low surface area per gram of soil and have, large spaces or channels between particles., At the other extreme is clay, in which particles are smaller than 2 µm, in diameter. Clay soils have much greater surface areas and smaller
Page 73 :
48, , Chapter 4, FIGURE 4.1 Main driving forces for water flow from the, Leaf air spaces, (Dcwv), , Xylem, (DYp), Soil line, Across root, (DYw), , soil through the plant to the atmosphere: differences in, water vapor concentration (∆cwv), hydrostatic pressure, (∆Yp), and water potential (∆Yw)., , When a soil is heavily watered by rain or by irrigation,, the water percolates downward by gravity through the, spaces between soil particles, partly displacing, and in, some cases trapping, air in these channels. Water in the soil, may exist as a film adhering to the surface of soil particles,, or it may fill the entire channel between particles., In sandy soils, the spaces between particles are so large, that water tends to drain from them and remain only on, the particle surfaces and at interstices between particles. In, clay soils, the channels are small enough that water does, not freely drain from them; it is held more tightly (see Web, Topic 4.1). The moisture-holding capacity of soils is called, the field capacity. Field capacity is the water content of a, soil after it has been saturated with water and excess water, has been allowed to drain away. Clay soils or soils with a, high humus content have a large field capacity. A few days, after being saturated, they might retain 40% water by volume. In contrast, sandy soils typically retain 3% water by, volume after saturation., In the following sections we will examine how the negative pressure in soil water alters soil water potential, how, water moves in the soil, and how roots absorb the water, needed by the plant., , A Negative Hydrostatic Pressure in Soil Water, Lowers Soil Water Potential, , Soil, (DYp ), , channels between particles. With the aid of organic substances such as humus (decomposing organic matter), clay, particles may aggregate into “crumbs” that help improve, soil aeration and infiltration of water., , TABLE 4.1, Physical characteristics of different soils, Soil, , Coarse sand, Fine sand, Silt, Clay, , Particle, diameter (µm), , 2000 –200, 200 –20, 20 –2, <2, , Surface area, per gram (m2), , <1 –10, 10 –100, 100 –1000, , Like the water potential of plant cells, the water potential, of soils may be dissected into two components, the osmotic, potential and the hydrostatic pressure. The osmotic potential (Ys; see Chapter 3) of soil water is generally negligible, because solute concentrations are low; a typical value, might be –0.02 MPa. For soils that contain a substantial, concentration of salts, however, Ys is significant, perhaps, –0.2 MPa or lower., The second component of soil water potential is hydrostatic pressure (Yp) (Figure 4.1). For wet soils, Yp is very, close to zero. As a soil dries out, Yp decreases and can, become quite negative. Where does the negative pressure, in soil water come from?, Recall from our discussion of capillarity in Chapter 3, that water has a high surface tension that tends to minimize air–water interfaces. As a soil dries out, water is first, removed from the center of the largest spaces between particles. Because of adhesive forces, water tends to cling to, the surfaces of soil particles, so a large surface area between, soil water and soil air develops (Figure 4.2)., As the water content of the soil decreases, the water, recedes into the interstices between soil particles, and the, air–water surface develops curved air–water interfaces.
Page 74 :
Water Balance of Plants, Root, , Root, hair, , Water, , Sand, particle, , Clay, Air, particle, , 49, , FIGURE 4.2 Root hairs make intimate contact with soil particles and, , greatly amplify the surface area that can be used for water absorption by, the plant. The soil is a mixture of particles (sand, clay, silt, and organic, material), water, dissolved solutes, and air. Water is adsorbed to the surface of the soil particles. As water is absorbed by the plant, the soil solution recedes into smaller pockets, channels, and crevices between the soil, particles. At the air–water interfaces, this recession causes the surface of, the soil solution to develop concave menisci (curved interfaces between, air and water marked in the figure by arrows), and brings the solution, into tension (negative pressure) by surface tension. As more water is, removed from the soil, more acute menisci are formed, resulting in, greater tensions (more negative pressures)., , Water under these curved surfaces develops a negative, pressure that may be estimated by the following formula:, Yp = −2T, r, , (4.1), , where T is the surface tension of water (7.28 × 10–8 MPa m), and r is the radius of curvature of the air–water interface., The value of Yp in soil water can become quite negative, because the radius of curvature of air–water surfaces may, become very small in drying soils. For instance, a curvature, r = 1 µm (about the size of the largest clay particles) corresponds to a Yp value of –0.15 MPa. The value of Yp may, easily reach –1 to –2 MPa as the air–water interface recedes, into the smaller cracks between clay particles., Soil scientists often describe soil water potential in terms, of a matric potential (Jensen et al. 1998). For a discussion of, the relation between matric potential and water potential, see Web Topic 3.3., , As the water content (and hence the water potential) of, a soil decreases, the hydraulic conductivity decreases drastically (see Web Topic 4.2). This decrease in soil hydraulic, conductivity is due primarily to the replacement of water, in the soil spaces by air. When air moves into a soil channel previously filled with water, water movement through, that channel is restricted to the periphery of the channel., As more of the soil spaces become filled with air, water can, flow through fewer and narrower channels, and the, hydraulic conductivity falls., In very dry soils, the water potential (Yw) may fall, below what is called the permanent wilting point. At this, point the water potential of the soil is so low that plants, cannot regain turgor pressure even if all water loss through, transpiration ceases. This means that the water potential of, the soil (Yw) is less than or equal to the osmotic potential, (Ys) of the plant. Because cell Ys varies with plant species,, the permanent wilting point is clearly not a unique property of the soil; it depends on the plant species as well., , Water Moves through the Soil by Bulk Flow, , WATER ABSORPTION BY ROOTS, , Water moves through soils predominantly by bulk flow, driven by a pressure gradient. In addition, diffusion of, water vapor accounts for some water movement. As plants, absorb water from the soil, they deplete the soil of water, near the surface of the roots. This depletion reduces Yp in, the water near the root surface and establishes a pressure, gradient with respect to neighboring regions of soil that, have higher Yp values. Because the water-filled pore spaces in, the soil are interconnected, water moves to the root surface by, bulk flow through these channels down the pressure gradient., The rate of water flow in soils depends on two factors:, the size of the pressure gradient through the soil, and the, hydraulic conductivity of the soil. Soil hydraulic conductivity is a measure of the ease with which water moves, through the soil, and it varies with the type of soil and, water content. Sandy soils, with their large spaces between, particles, have a large hydraulic conductivity, whereas clay, soils, with the minute spaces between their particles, have, an appreciably smaller hydraulic conductivity., , Intimate contact between the surface of the root and the soil, is essential for effective water absorption by the root. This, contact provides the surface area needed for water uptake, and is maximized by the growth of the root and of root, hairs into the soil. Root hairs are microscopic extensions of, root epidermal cells that greatly increase the surface area, of the root, thus providing greater capacity for absorption, of ions and water from the soil. When 4-month-old rye, (Secale) plants were examined, their root hairs were found, to constitute more than 60% of the surface area of the roots, (see Figure 5.6)., Water enters the root most readily in the apical part of the, root that includes the root hair zone. More mature regions of, the root often have an outer layer of protective tissue, called, an exodermis or hypodermis, that contains hydrophobic materials in its walls and is relatively impermeable to water., The intimate contact between the soil and the root surface is easily ruptured when the soil is disturbed. It is for, this reason that newly transplanted seedlings and plants
Page 75 :
Endodermis, Casparian, strip, , Symplastic and, transmembrane, pathways, , Pericycle, , Xylem, , Phloem, , Cortex, , Epidermis, Apoplast pathway, , FIGURE 4.3 Pathways for water uptake by the root. Through the cortex, water may, , travel via the apoplast pathway, the transmembrane pathway, and the symplast, pathway. In the symplast pathway, water flows between cells through the plasmodesmata without crossing the plasma membrane. In the transmembrane pathway,, water moves across the plasma membranes, with a short visit to the cell wall space., At the endodermis, the apoplast pathway is blocked by the Casparian strip., , need to be protected from water loss for the first few days, after transplantation. Thereafter, new root growth into the, soil reestablishes soil–root contact, and the plant can better, withstand water stress., Let’s consider how water moves within the root, and the, factors that determine the rate of water uptake into the root., , Water Moves in the Root via the Apoplast,, Transmembrane, and Symplast Pathways, In the soil, water is transported predominantly by bulk flow., However, when water comes in contact with the root surface, the nature of water transport becomes more complex., From the epidermis to the endodermis of the root, there are, three pathways through which water can flow (Figure 4.3):, the apoplast, transmembrane, and symplast pathways., 1. In the apoplast pathway, water moves exclusively, through the cell wall without crossing any membranes. The apoplast is the continuous system of cell, walls and intercellular air spaces in plant tissues., , 2. The transmembrane pathway is the route followed, by water that sequentially enters a cell on one side,, exits the cell on the other side, enters the next in the, series, and so on. In this pathway, water crosses at, least two membranes for each cell in its path (the, plasma membrane on entering and on exiting)., Transport across the tonoplast may also be involved., 3. In the symplast pathway, water travels from one cell, to the next via the plasmodesmata (see Chapter 1)., The symplast consists of the entire network of cell, cytoplasm interconnected by plasmodesmata., Although the relative importance of the apoplast, transmembrane, and symplast pathways has not yet been clearly, established, experiments with the pressure probe technique, (see Web Topic 3.6) indicate that the apoplast pathway is, particularly important for water uptake by young corn roots, (Frensch et al. 1996; Steudle and Frensch 1996)., At the endodermis, water movement through the, apoplast pathway is obstructed by the Casparian strip (see, Figure 4.3). The Casparian strip is a band of radial cell
Page 76 :
Water Balance of Plants, , Rate of water uptake per segment, (10–6 L h–1), , walls in the endodermis that is impregnated with the waxlike, hydrophobic substance suberin. Suberin acts as a barrier to water and solute movement. The endodermis, becomes suberized in the nongrowing part of the root, several millimeters behind the root tip, at about the same time, that the first protoxylem elements mature (Esau 1953). The, Casparian strip breaks the continuity of the apoplast pathway, and forces water and solutes to cross the endodermis, by passing through the plasma membrane. Thus, despite, the importance of the apoplast pathway in the root cortex, and the stele, water movement across the endodermis, occurs through the symplast., Another way to understand water movement through, the root is to consider the root as a single pathway having, a single hydraulic conductance. Such an approach has led, to the development of the concept of root hydraulic conductance (see Web Topic 4.3 for details)., The apical region of the root is most permeable to water., Beyond this point, the exodermis becomes suberized, limiting water uptake (Figure 4.4). However, some water, absorption may take place through older roots, perhaps, through breaks in the cortex associated with the outgrowth, of secondary roots., Water uptake decreases when roots are subjected to low, temperature or anaerobic conditions, or treated with respiratory inhibitors (such as cyanide). These treatments inhibit, root respiration, and the roots transport less water. The exact, explanation for this effect is not yet clear. On the other hand,, the decrease in water transport in the roots provides an explanation for the wilting of plants in waterlogged soils: Submerged roots soon run out of oxygen, which is normally provided by diffusion through the air spaces in the soil (diffusion, through gas is 104 times faster than diffusion through water)., The anaerobic roots transport less water to the shoots, which, consequently suffer net water loss and begin to wilt., , Less suberized, 1.6, , 51, , Solute Accumulation in the Xylem, Can Generate “Root Pressure”, Plants sometimes exhibit a phenomenon referred to as root, pressure. For example, if the stem of a young seedling is, cut off just above the soil, the stump will often exude sap, from the cut xylem for many hours. If a manometer is, sealed over the stump, positive pressures can be measured., These pressures can be as high as 0.05 to 0.5 MPa., Roots generate positive hydrostatic pressure by absorbing ions from the dilute soil solution and transporting them, into the xylem. The buildup of solutes in the xylem sap, leads to a decrease in the xylem osmotic potential (Ys) and, thus a decrease in the xylem water potential (Yw). This, lowering of the xylem Yw provides a driving force for, water absorption, which in turn leads to a positive hydrostatic pressure in the xylem. In effect, the whole root acts, like an osmotic cell; the multicellular root tissue behaves as, an osmotic membrane does, building up a positive hydrostatic pressure in the xylem in response to the accumulation of solutes., Root pressure is most likely to occur when soil water, potentials are high and transpiration rates are low. When, transpiration rates are high, water is taken up so rapidly, into the leaves and lost to the atmosphere that a positive, pressure never develops in the xylem., Plants that develop root pressure frequently produce liquid droplets on the edges of their leaves, a phenomenon, known as guttation (Figure 4.5). Positive xylem pressure, , More suberized, , Growing tip, , 1.2, , Nongrowing, regions of root, , 0.8, , 0.4, , 0, , 40, , 80, 120, 160, 200, 240, Distance from root tip (mm), , 500, , FIGURE 4.4 Rate of water uptake at various positions along, , a pumpkin root. (After Kramer and Boyer 1995.), , FIGURE 4.5 Guttation in leaves from strawberry (Fragaria, , grandiflora). In the early morning, leaves secrete water, droplets through the hydathodes, located at the margins of, the leaves. Young flowers may also show guttation., (Photograph courtesy of R. Aloni.)
Page 77 :
52, , Chapter 4, , causes exudation of xylem sap through, specialized pores called hydathodes that, are associated with vein endings at the, leaf margin. The “dewdrops” that can, be seen on the tips of grass leaves in, the morning are actually guttation, droplets exuded from such specialized, pores. Guttation is most noticeable, when transpiration is suppressed and, the relative humidity is high, such as, during the night., , (A), , (B), , WATER TRANSPORT, THROUGH THE XYLEM, In most plants, the xylem constitutes, the longest part of the pathway of, water transport. In a plant 1 m tall,, more than 99.5% of the water transport pathway through the plant is, within the xylem, and in tall trees the, xylem represents an even greater fraction of the pathway. Compared with, the complex pathway across the root, tissue, the xylem is a simple pathway, of low resistance. In the following sections we will examine how water, movement through the xylem is optimally suited to carry water from the, roots to the leaves, and how negative, hydrostatic pressure generated by leaf, transpiration pulls water through the, xylem., , Perforation plate (compound), Perforation plate, (simple), , The Xylem Consists of Two Types, of Tracheary Elements, The conducting cells in the xylem, have a specialized anatomy that, enables them to transport large quantities of water with great efficiency., There are two important types of tracheary elements in the xylem: tracheids and vessel elements (Figure, 4.6). Vessel elements are found only in, angiosperms, a small group of gymnosperms called the Gnetales, and, perhaps some ferns. Tracheids are present in both angiosperms and gymnosperms, as well as in ferns and, other groups of vascular plants., The maturation of both tracheids, and vessel elements involves the, “death” of the cell. Thus, functional, water-conducting cells have no membranes and no organelles. What re-, , Pits, Tracheids, , (C), , Vessel elements, , Pit pair, , Secondary, cell walls, , Pit membrane, Torus, Pit cavity, , Primary, cell walls
Page 78 :
▲, , Water Balance of Plants, FIGURE 4.6 Tracheary elements and their interconnections., , (A) Structural comparison of tracheids and vessel elements,, two classes of tracheary elements involved in xylem water, transport. Tracheids are elongate, hollow, dead cells with, highly lignified walls. The walls contain numerous pits—, regions where secondary wall is absent but primary wall, remains. The shape and pattern of wall pitting vary with, species and organ type. Tracheids are present in all vascular, plants. Vessels consist of a stack of two or more vessel elements. Like tracheids, vessel elements are dead cells and, are connected to one another through perforation plates—, regions of the wall where pores or holes have developed., Vessels are connected to other vessels and to tracheids, through pits. Vessels are found in most angiosperms and, are lacking in most gymnosperms. (B) Scanning electron, micrograph of oak wood showing two vessel elements that, make up a portion of a vessel. Large pits are visible on the, side walls, and the end walls are open at the perforation, plate. (420×) (C) Diagram of a bordered pit with a torus, either centered in the pit cavity or lodged to one side of the, cavity, thereby blocking flow. (B © G. Shih-R. Kessel/Visuals, Unlimited; C after Zimmermann 1983.), , mains are the thick, lignified cell walls, which form hollow, tubes through which water can flow with relatively little resistance., Tracheids are elongated, spindle-shaped cells (Figure, 4.6A) that are arranged in overlapping vertical files. Water, flows between tracheids by means of the numerous pits in, their lateral walls (Figure 4.6B). Pits are microscopic regions, where the secondary wall is absent and the primary wall is, thin and porous (Figure 4.6C). Pits of one tracheid are typically located opposite pits of an adjoining tracheid, forming pit pairs. Pit pairs constitute a low-resistance path for, water movement between tracheids. The porous layer, between pit pairs, consisting of two primary walls and a, middle lamella, is called the pit membrane., Pit membranes in tracheids of some species of conifers, have a central thickening, called a torus (pl. tori) (see Figure 4.6C). The torus acts like a valve to close the pit by, lodging itself in the circular or oval wall thickenings bordering these pits. Such lodging of the torus is an effective, way of preventing dangerous gas bubbles from invading, neighboring tracheids (we will discuss this formation of, bubbles, a process called cavitation, shortly)., Vessel elements tend to be shorter and wider than tracheids and have perforated end walls that form a perforation plate at each end of the cell. Like tracheids, vessel elements have pits on their lateral walls (see Figure 4.6B)., Unlike tracheids, the perforated end walls allow vessel, members to be stacked end to end to form a larger conduit, called a vessel (again, see Figure 4.6B). Vessels vary in, length both within and between species. Maximum vessel, lengths range from 10 cm to many meters. Because of their, open end walls, vessels provide a very efficient low-resistance pathway for water movement. The vessel members, found at the extreme ends of a vessel lack perforations at, , 53, , the end walls and communicate with neighboring vessels, via pit pairs., , Water Movement through the Xylem, Requires Less Pressure Than Movement, through Living Cells, The xylem provides a low-resistance pathway for water, movement, thus reducing the pressure gradients needed to, transport water from the soil to the leaves. Some numerical values will help us appreciate the extraordinary efficiency of the xylem. We will calculate the driving force, required to move water through the xylem at a typical, velocity and compare it with the driving force that would, be needed to move water through a cell-to-cell pathway., For the purposes of this comparison, we will use a figure, of 4 mm s–1 for the xylem transport velocity and 40 µm as, the vessel radius. This is a high velocity for such a narrow, vessel, so it will tend to exaggerate the pressure gradient, required to support water flow in the xylem. Using a version of Poiseuille’s equation (see Equation 3.2), we can calculate the pressure gradient needed to move water at a, velocity of 4 mm s–1 through an ideal tube with a uniform, inner radius of 40 µm. The calculation gives a value of 0.02, MPa m–1. Elaboration of the assumptions, equations, and, calculations can be found in Web Topic 4.4., Of course, real xylem conduits have irregular inner wall, surfaces, and water flow through perforation plates and, pits adds additional resistance. Such deviations from an, ideal tube will increase the frictional drag above that calculated from Poiseuille’s equation. However, measurements show that the actual resistance is greater by approximately a factor of 2 (Nobel 1999). Thus our estimate of 0.02, MPa m–1 is in the correct range for pressure gradients, found in real trees., Let’s now compare this value (0.02 MPa m–1) with the, driving force that would be necessary to move water at the, same velocity from cell to cell, crossing the plasma membrane each time. Using Poiseuille’s equation, as described, in Web Topic 4.4, the driving force needed to move water, through a layer of cells at 4 mm s–1 is calculated to be 2 ×, 108 MPa m–1. This is ten orders of magnitude greater than, the driving force needed to move water through our 40µm-radius xylem vessel. Our calculation clearly shows that, water flow through the xylem is vastly more efficient than, water flow across the membranes of living cells., , What Pressure Difference Is Needed to Lift Water, 100 Meters to a Treetop?, With the foregoing example in mind, let’s see how large of, a pressure gradient is needed to move water up to the top, of a very tall tree. The tallest trees in the world are the coast, redwoods (Sequoia sempervirens) of North America and, Eucalyptus regnans of Australia. Individuals of both species, can exceed 100 m. If we think of the stem of a tree as a long, pipe, we can estimate the pressure difference that is needed
Page 79 :
54, , Chapter 4, , to overcome the frictional drag of moving water from the, soil to the top of the tree by multiplying our pressure gradient of 0.02 MPa m–1 by the height of the tree (0.02 MPa, m–1 × 100 m = 2 MPa)., In addition to frictional resistance, we must consider, gravity. The weight of a standing column of water 100 m, tall creates a pressure of 1 MPa at the bottom of the water, column (100 m × 0.01 MPa m–1). This pressure gradient due, to gravity must be added to that required to cause water, movement through the xylem. Thus we calculate that a, pressure difference of roughly 3 MPa, from the base to the, top branches, is needed to carry water up the tallest trees., , The Cohesion–Tension Theory Explains Water, Transport in the Xylem, In theory, the pressure gradients needed to move water, through the xylem could result from the generation of positive pressures at the base of the plant or negative pressures, at the top of the plant. We mentioned previously that some, roots can develop positive hydrostatic pressure in their, xylem—the so-called root pressure. However, root pressure, is typically less than 0.1 MPa and disappears when the, transpiration rate is high, so it is clearly inadequate to, move water up a tall tree., Instead, the water at the top of a tree develops a large, tension (a negative hydrostatic pressure), and this tension, pulls water through the xylem. This mechanism, first proposed toward the end of the nineteenth century, is called, the cohesion–tension theory of sap ascent because it, requires the cohesive properties of water to sustain large, tensions in the xylem water columns (for details on the, history of the research on water movement, see Web Essay, 4.1)., Despite its attractiveness, the cohesion–tension theory, has been a controversial subject for more than a century, and continues to generate lively debate. The main controversy surrounds the question of whether water columns in, the xylem can sustain the large tensions (negative pressures) necessary to pull water up tall trees., The most recent debate began when researchers modified the cell pressure probe technique to be able to measure, directly the tension in xylem vessels (Balling and Zimmermann 1990). Prior to this development, estimates of xylem, pressures were based primarily on pressure chamber measurements of leaves (for a description of the pressure chamber method, see Web Topic 3.6)., Initially, measurements with the xylem pressure probe, failed to find the expected large negative pressures, probably because of cavitation produced by tiny gas bubbles, introduced when the xylem walls are punctured with the, glass capillary of the pressure probe (Tyree 1997). However,, careful refinements of the technique eventually demonstrated good agreement between pressure probe measurements and the tensions estimated by the pressure chamber, (Melcher et al. 1998; Wei et al. 1999). In addition, independent studies demonstrated that water in the xylem can sus-, , tain large negative tensions (Pockman et al. 1995) and that, pressure chamber measurements of nontranspiring leaves, do reflect tensions in the xylem (Holbrook et al. 1995)., Most researchers have thus concluded that the basic, cohesion–tension theory is sound (Steudle 2001) (for alternative hypotheses, see Canny (1998), and Web Essays 4.1, and 4.2). One can readily demonstrate xylem tensions by, puncturing intact xylem through a drop of ink on the surface of a stem from a transpiring plant. When the tension, in the xylem is relieved, the ink is drawn instantly into the, xylem, resulting in visible streaks along the stem., , Xylem Transport of Water in Trees Faces Physical, Challenges, The large tensions that develop in the xylem of trees (see, Web Essay 4.3) and other plants can create some problems., First, the water under tension transmits an inward force to, the walls of the xylem. If the cell walls were weak or pliant,, they would collapse under the influence of this tension., The secondary wall thickenings and lignification of tracheids and vessels are adaptations that offset this tendency, to collapse., A second problem is that water under such tensions is, in a physically metastable state. We mentioned in Chapter 3, that the experimentally determined breaking strength of, degassed water (water that has been boiled to remove, gases) is greater than 30 MPa. This value is much larger, than the estimated tension of 3 MPa needed to pull water, up the tallest trees, so water within the xylem would not, normally reach tensions that would destabilize it., However, as the tension in water increases, there is an, increased tendency for air to be pulled through microscopic, pores in the xylem cell walls. This phenomenon is called air, seeding. A second mode by which bubbles can form in, xylem conduits is due to the reduced solubility of gases in, ice (Davis et al. 1999): The freezing of xylem conduits can, lead to bubble formation. Once a gas bubble has formed, within the water column under tension, it will expand, because gases cannot resist tensile forces. This phenomenon of bubble formation is known as cavitation or, embolism. It is similar to vapor lock in the fuel line of an, automobile or embolism in a blood vessel. Cavitation, breaks the continuity of the water column and prevents, water transport in the xylem (Tyree and Sperry 1989; Hacke, et al. 2001)., Such breaks in the water columns in plants are not, unusual. With the proper equipment, one can “hear” the, water columns break (Jackson et al. 1999). When plants are, deprived of water, sound pulses can be detected. The pulses, or clicks are presumed to correspond to the formation and, rapid expansion of air bubbles in the xylem, resulting in, high-frequency acoustic shock waves through the rest of the, plant. These breaks in xylem water continuity, if not, repaired, would be disastrous to the plant. By blocking the, main transport pathway of water, such embolisms would, cause the dehydration and death of the leaves.
Page 80 :
Water Balance of Plants, , Plants Minimize the Consequences of Xylem, Cavitation, The impact of xylem cavitation on the plant is minimized, by several means. Because the tracheary elements in the, xylem are interconnected, one gas bubble might, in principle, expand to fill the whole network. In practice, gas bubbles do not spread far because the expanding gas bubble, cannot easily pass through the small pores of the pit mem-, , End wall, of vessel, element, with, bordered pits, , Water, vapor, bubble, Gas-filled, cavitated, vessel, Scalariform, perforation, plate, , Pit, , Gas-filled, cavitated, tracheid, , 55, , branes. Since the capillaries in the xylem are interconnected,, one gas bubble does not completely stop water flow., Instead, water can detour around the blocked point by traveling through neighboring, connected conduits (Figure 4.7)., Thus the finite length of the tracheid and vessel conduits of, the xylem, while resulting in an increased resistance to, water flow, also provides a way to restrict cavitation., Gas bubbles can also be eliminated from the xylem. At, night, when transpiration is low, xylem Yp increases and, the water vapor and gases may simply dissolve back into, the solution of the xylem. Moreover, as we have seen, some, plants develop positive pressures (root pressures) in the, xylem. Such pressures shrink the gas bubble and cause the, gases to dissolve. Recent studies indicate that cavitation, may be repaired even when the water in the xylem is, under tension (Holbrook et al. 2001). A mechanism for such, repair is not yet known and remains the subject of active, research (see Web Essay 4.4). Finally, many plants have secondary growth in which new xylem forms each year. The, new xylem becomes functional before the old xylem ceases, to function, because of occlusion by gas bubbles or by substances secreted by the plant., , Water Evaporation in the Leaf Generates a, Negative Pressure in the Xylem, The tensions needed to pull water through the xylem are the, result of evaporation of water from leaves. In the intact plant,, water is brought to the leaves via the xylem of the leaf vascular bundle(see Figure 4.1), which branches into a very fine, and sometimes intricate network of veins throughout the leaf, (Figure 4.8). This venation pattern becomes so finely, , Liquid, water, , FIGURE 4.7 Tracheids (right) and vessels (left) form a series of parallel,, , interconnected pathways for water movement. Cavitation blocks water, movement because of the formation of gas-filled (embolized) conduits., Because xylem conduits are interconnected through openings (“bordered pits”) in their thick secondary walls, water can detour around the, blocked vessel by moving through adjacent tracheary elements. The, very small pores in the pit membranes help prevent embolisms from, spreading between xylem conduits. Thus, in the diagram on the right, the gas is contained within a single cavitated tracheid. In the diagram on, the left, gas has filled the entire cavitated vessel, shown here as being, made up of three vessel elements, each separated by scalariform perforation plates. In nature vessels can be very long (up to several meters in, length) and thus made up of many vessel elements., , fpo, , FIGURE 4.8 Venation of a tobacco leaf,, , showing ramification of the midrib into, finer lateral veins. This venation pattern, brings xylem water close to every cell in, the leaf. (After Kramer and Boyer 1995.)
Page 81 :
56, , Chapter 4, , branched that most cells in a typical leaf are within 0.5 mm, of a minor vein. From the xylem, water is drawn into the cells, of the leaf and along the cell walls., The negative pressure that causes water to move up, through the xylem develops at the surface of the cell walls in, the leaf. The situation is analogous to that in the soil. The cell, wall acts like a very fine capillary wick soaked with water., Water adheres to the cellulose microfibrils and other hydrophilic components of the wall. The mesophyll cells within the, , leaf are in direct contact with the atmosphere through an, extensive system of intercellular air spaces., Initially water evaporates from a thin film lining these air, spaces. As water is lost to the air, the surface of the remaining water is drawn into the interstices of the cell wall (Figure, 4.9), where it forms curved air–water interfaces. Because of, the high surface tension of water, the curvature of these interfaces induces a tension, or negative pressure, in the water. As, more water is removed from the wall, the radius of curvature, , FIGURE 4.9 Tensions or negative pressures originate, , in leaves. As water evaporates from the surface film, that covers the cell walls of the mesophyll, water, withdraws farther into the interstices of the cell wall,, and surface tension causes a negative pressure in the, liquid phase. As the radius of curvature decreases,, the pressure decreases (becomes more negative), as, calculated from Equation 4.1., , Vacuole, , Cell, wall, , Plasma, membrane, , Water film, , Air, evaporation, , Chloroplast, Cytoplasm, , Radius of, curvature (µm), , Hydrostatic, pressure (MPa), , (A), , 0.5, , –0.3, , (B), , 0.05, , –3, , (C), , 0.01, , –15, , (A), , (B), , Air, , (C), Plasma, membrane, , Evaporation, , Evaporation, , Cellulose, microfibrils, in cross, section, , Evaporation, , Air–water interface, Cytoplasm, Water in wall, Cell wall
Page 82 :
Water Balance of Plants, of the air–water interfaces decreases and the pressure of the, water becomes more negative (see Equation 4.1). Thus the, motive force for xylem transport is generated at the air–, water interfaces within the leaf., , 4.10). The water vapor then exits the leaf through the stomatal pore. Water moves along this pathway predominantly by diffusion, so this water movement is controlled, by the concentration gradient of water vapor., We will now examine the driving force for leaf transpiration, the main resistances in the diffusion pathway from, the leaf to the atmosphere, and the anatomical features of, the leaf that regulate transpiration., , WATER MOVEMENT FROM THE LEAF TO, THE ATMOSPHERE, After water has evaporated from the cell surface into the, intercellular air space, diffusion is the primary means of, any further movement of the water out of the leaf. The, waxy cuticle that covers the leaf surface is a very effective, barrier to water movement. It has been estimated that only, about 5% of the water lost from leaves escapes through the, cuticle. Almost all of the water lost from typical leaves is, lost by diffusion of water vapor through the tiny pores of, the stomatal apparatus, which are usually most abundant, on the lower surface of the leaf., On its way from the leaf to the atmosphere, water is, pulled from the xylem into the cell walls of the mesophyll,, where it evaporates into the air spaces of the leaf (Figure, , Palisade, parenchyma, , Substomatal, cavity, , Water Vapor Diffuses Quickly in Air, We saw in Chapter 3 that diffusion in liquids is slow and,, thus, effective only within cellular dimensions. How long, would it take for a water molecule to diffuse from the cell, wall surfaces inside the leaf to the outside atmosphere? In, Chapter 3 we saw that the average time needed for a molecule to diffuse a distance L is equal to L2/Ds, where Ds is, the diffusion coefficient. The distance through which a, water molecule must diffuse from the site of evaporation, inside the leaf to the outside air is approximately 1 mm, (10–3 m), and the diffusion coefficient of water in air is 2.4, × 10–5 m2 s–1. Thus the average time needed for a water, , Xylem, Air boundary, layer, , Cuticle, Upper, epidermis, , Mesophyll, cells, Low CO2, , High water, vapor, content, Lower, epidermis, Cuticle, Boundary layer, resistance (rb), Water, vapor, , Leaf stomatal, resistance (rs), Low water, vapor content, , 57, , Guard cell, , CO2, High CO2, , Stomatal pore, , FIGURE 4.10 Water pathway through the leaf. Water is pulled from the xylem into, the cell walls of the mesophyll, where it evaporates into the air spaces within the, leaf. Water vapor then diffuses through the leaf air space, through the stomatal, pore, and across the boundary layer of still air found next to the leaf surface. CO2, diffuses in the opposite direction along its concentration gradient (low inside,, higher outside)., , Air boundary, layer
Page 83 :
Chapter 4, , molecule to escape the leaf is approximately 0.042 s. Thus, we see that diffusion is adequate to move water vapor, through the gas phase of the leaf. The reason that this time, is so much shorter than the 2.5 s calculated in Chapter 3 for, a glucose molecule to diffuse across a 50 µm cell, is that diffusion is much more rapid in a gas than in a liquid., Transpiration from the leaf depends on two major factors: (1) the difference in water vapor concentration, between the leaf air spaces and the external air and (2) the, diffusional resistance (r) of this pathway. We will first discuss how the difference in water vapor concentration controls transpiration rates., , The Driving Force for Water Loss Is the Difference, in Water Vapor Concentration, , 5, , Saturation water vapor concentration,, cwv(sat.) (mol m–3), , 58, , 4, , 3, , 2, , 1, , Temperature, (°C), , cwv, (mol m–3 ), , 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, , 0.269, 0.378, 0.522, 0.713, 0.961, 1.28, 1.687, 2.201, 2.842, 3.637, , The difference in water vapor concentration is expressed as, cwv(leaf) – cwv(air). The water vapor concentration of bulk air, (cwv(air)) can be readily measured, but that of the leaf, (cwv(leaf)) is more difficult to assess., –10, 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, Whereas the volume of air space inside the leaf is small,, Air temperature (°C), the wet surface from which water evaporates is comparaFIGURE 4.11 Concentration of water vapor in saturated air, tively large. (Air space volume is about 5% of the total leaf, as, a function of air temperature., volume for pine needles, 10% for corn leaves, 30% for barley, and 40% for tobacco leaves.) In contrast to the volume, of the air space, the internal surface area from which water, m–3), and (2) that this difference depends on leaf temperaevaporates may be from 7 to 30 times the external leaf area., ture, as shown in Figure 4.11., This high ratio of surface area to volume makes for rapid, vapor equilibration inside the leaf. Thus we can assume, Water Loss Is Also Regulated by the, that the air space in the leaf is close to water potential equiPathway Resistances, librium with the cell wall surfaces from which liquid water, The second important factor governing water loss from the, is evaporating., leaf is the diffusional resistance of the transpiration pathAn important point from this relationship is that within, way, which consists of two varying components:, the range of water potentials experienced by transpiring, leaves (generally <2.0 MPa) the equilibrium water vapor, 1. The resistance associated with diffusion through the, concentration is within a few percentage points of the satstomatal pore, the leaf stomatal resistance (rs)., uration water vapor concentration. This allows one to estimate the water vapor concentration within a leaf from its, 2. The resistance due to the layer of unstirred air next, temperature, which is easy to measure. (Web Topic 4.5, to the leaf surface through which water vapor must, shows how we can calculate the water vapor concentration, in the leaf air spaces and discusses other aspects of the, TABLE 4.2, water relations within a leaf.), Representative values for relative humidity, absolute water vapor concentration,, The concentration of water, and water potential for four points in the pathway of water loss from a leaf, vapor, cwv, changes at various, points along the transpiration, Water vapor, pathway. We see from Table, Relative, Concentration, Potential, 4.2 that cwv decreases at each, Location, humidity, (mol m–3), (MPa)a, step of the pathway from the, Inner air spaces (25°C), 0.99, 1.27, −1.38, cell wall surface to the bulk air, Just inside stomatal pore (25°C), 0.95, 1.21, −7.04, outside the leaf. The imporJust outside stomatal pore (25°C), 0.47, 0.60, −103.7, tant points to remember are, Bulk air (20°C), 0.50, 0.50, −93.6, (1) that the driving force for, Source: Adapted from Nobel 1999., water loss from the leaf is the, Note: See Figure 4.10., _, absolute concentration differaCalculated using Equation 4.5.2 in Web Topic 4.5; with values for RT/V of 135 MPa at 20°C and 137.3, w, ence (difference in cwv, in mol, MPa at 25°C.
Page 84 :
Water Balance of Plants, diffuse to reach the turbulent air of the atmosphere, (see Figure 4.10). This second resistance, rb, is called, the leaf boundary layer resistance. We will discuss, this type of resistance before considering stomatal, resistance., The thickness of the boundary layer is determined primarily by wind speed. When the air surrounding the leaf, is very still, the layer of unstirred air on the surface of the, leaf may be so thick that it is the primary deterrent to water, vapor loss from the leaf. Increases in stomatal apertures, under such conditions have little effect on transpiration, rate (Figure 4.12) (although closing the stomata completely, will still reduce transpiration)., When wind velocity is high, the moving air reduces the, thickness of the boundary layer at the leaf surface, reducing, the resistance of this layer. Under such conditions, the stomatal resistance will largely control water loss from the leaf., Various anatomical and morphological aspects of the, leaf can influence the thickness of the boundary layer., Hairs on the surface of leaves can serve as microscopic, windbreaks. Some plants have sunken stomata that pro-, , Transpirational flux (mg water vapor m–2 leaf surface s–1), , 300, , Moving, air, , 250, , 200, , 150, , 100, Still, air, 50, , Flux limited by, boundary layer, resistance, , 0, , 5, , 10, 15, Stomatal aperture (mm), , 20, , FIGURE 4.12 Dependence of transpiration flux on the stomatal aperture of zebra plant (Zebrina pendula) in still air, and in moving air. The boundary layer is larger and more, rate limiting in still air than in moving air. As a result, the, stomatal aperture has less control over transpiration in still, air. (From Bange 1953.), , 59, , vide a sheltered region outside the stomatal pore. The size, and shape of leaves also influence the way the wind, sweeps across the leaf surface. Although these and other, factors may influence the boundary layer, they are not characteristics that can be altered on an hour-to-hour or even, day-to-day basis. For short-term regulation, control of, stomatal apertures by the guard cells plays a crucial role in, the regulation of leaf transpiration., , Stomatal Control Couples Leaf Transpiration to, Leaf Photosynthesis, Because the cuticle covering the leaf is nearly impermeable, to water, most leaf transpiration results from the diffusion, of water vapor through the stomatal pore (see Figure 4.10)., The microscopic stomatal pores provide a low-resistance, pathway for diffusional movement of gases across the epidermis and cuticle. That is, the stomatal pores lower the, diffusional resistance for water loss from leaves. Changes, in stomatal resistance are important for the regulation of, water loss by the plant and for controlling the rate of carbon dioxide uptake necessary for sustained CO2 fixation, during photosynthesis., All land plants are faced with competing demands of taking up CO2 from the atmosphere while limiting water loss., The cuticle that covers exposed plant surfaces serves as an, effective barrier to water loss and thus protects the plant, from desiccation. However, plants cannot prevent outward, diffusion of water without simultaneously excluding CO2, from the leaf. This problem is compounded because the concentration gradient for CO2 uptake is much, much smaller, than the concentration gradient that drives water loss., When water is abundant, the functional solution to this, dilemma is the temporal regulation of stomatal apertures—, open during the day, closed at night. At night, when there, is no photosynthesis and thus no demand for CO2 inside, the leaf, stomatal apertures are kept small, preventing, unnecessary loss of water. On a sunny morning when the, supply of water is abundant and the solar radiation incident on the leaf favors high photosynthetic activity, the, demand for CO2 inside the leaf is large, and the stomatal, pores are wide open, decreasing the stomatal resistance to, CO2 diffusion. Water loss by transpiration is also substantial under these conditions, but since the water supply is, plentiful, it is advantageous for the plant to trade water for, the products of photosynthesis, which are essential for, growth and reproduction., On the other hand, when soil water is less abundant, the, stomata will open less or even remain closed on a sunny, morning. By keeping its stomata closed in dry conditions,, the plant avoids dehydration. The values for (cwv(leaf) –, cwv(air)) and for rb are not readily amenable to biological control. However, stomatal resistance (rs) can be regulated by, opening and closing of the stomatal pore. This biological, control is exerted by a pair of specialized epidermal cells, the, guard cells, which surround the stomatal pore (Figure 4.13).
Page 85 :
60, , Chapter 4, , The Cell Walls of Guard Cells Have Specialized, Features, , of grasses and a few other monocots, such as palms; the, other is found in all dicots, in many monocots, and in, mosses, ferns, and gymnosperms., In grasses (see Figure 4.13A), guard cells have a characteristic dumbbell shape, with bulbous ends. The pore, proper is a long slit located between the two “handles” of, the dumbbells. These guard cells are always flanked by a, , Guard cells can be found in leaves of all vascular plants,, and they are also present in organs from more primitive, plants, such as the liverworts and the mosses (Ziegler, 1987). Guard cells show considerable morphological diversity, but we can distinguish two main types: One is typical, , (A), , (C), , Cytosol and vacuole, , Pore, , Heavily thickened, guard cell wall, , Stomatal pore, , Guard cell, , (B), , Guard cells, , Subsidiary cell, , Epidermal cell, , FIGURE 4.13 Electron micrographs of stomata. (A) A stoma, from a grass. The bulbous ends of each guard cell show, their cytosolic content and are joined by the heavily thickened walls. The stomatal pore separates the two midportions of the guard cells. (2560×) (B) Stomatal complexes of, the sedge, Carex, viewed with differential interference contrast light microscopy. Each complex consists of two guard, cells surrounding a pore and two flanking subsidiary cells., (550×) (C) Scanning electron micrographs of onion epidermis. The top panel shows the outside surface of the leaf,, with a stomatal pore inserted in the cuticle. The bottom, panel shows a pair of guard cells facing the stomatal cavity,, toward the inside of the leaf. (1640×) (A from Palevitz 1981,, B from Jarvis and Mansfield 1981, A and B courtesy of B., Palevitz; micrographs in C from Zeiger and Hepler 1976, [top] and E. Zeiger and N. Burnstein [bottom].)
Page 86 :
Water Balance of Plants, pair of differentiated epidermal cells called subsidiary, cells, which help the guard cells control the stomatal pores, (see Figure 4.13B). The guard cells, subsidiary cells, and, pore are collectively called the stomatal complex., In dicot plants and nongrass monocots, kidney-shaped, guard cells have an elliptical contour with the pore at its, center (see Figure 4.13C). Although subsidiary cells are not, uncommon in species with kidney-shaped stomata, they, are often absent, in which case the guard cells are surrounded by ordinary epidermal cells., A distinctive feature of the guard cells is the specialized, structure of their walls. Portions of these walls are substantially thickened (Figure 4.14) and may be up to 5 µm, across, in contrast to the 1 to 2 µm typical of epidermal, cells. In kidney-shaped guard cells, a differential thickening pattern results in very thick inner and outer (lateral), walls, a thin dorsal wall (the wall in contact with epidermal cells), and a somewhat thickened ventral (pore) wall, (see Figure 4.14). The portions of the wall that face the, atmosphere extend into well-developed ledges, which form, the pore proper., The alignment of cellulose microfibrils, which reinforce, all plant cell walls and are an important determinant of cell, , shape (see Chapter 15), plays an essential role in the opening and closing of the stomatal pore. In ordinary cells having a cylindrical shape, cellulose microfibrils are oriented, transversely to the long axis of the cell. As a result, the cell, expands in the direction of its long axis because the cellulose reinforcement offers the least resistance at right angles, to its orientation., In guard cells the microfibril organization is different., Kidney-shaped guard cells have cellulose microfibrils fanning out radially from the pore (Figure 4.15A). Thus the cell, girth is reinforced like a steel-belted radial tire, and the, guard cells curve outward during stomatal opening, (Sharpe et al. 1987). In grasses, the dumbbell-shaped guard, cells function like beams with inflatable ends. As the bulbous ends of the cells increase in volume and swell, the, beams are separated from each other and the slit between, them widens (Figure 4.15B)., , An Increase in Guard Cell Turgor Pressure, Opens the Stomata, Guard cells function as multisensory hydraulic valves. Environmental factors such as light intensity and quality, temperature, relative humidity, and intracellular CO2 concentra-, , FIGURE 4.14 Electron micrograph showing a pair of guard cells from the dicot, Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco). The section was made perpendicular to the main surface of the leaf. The pore faces the atmosphere; the bottom faces the substomatal, cavity inside the leaf. Note the uneven thickening pattern of the walls, which determines the asymmetric deformation of the guard cells when their volume increases, during stomatal opening. (From Sack 1987, courtesy of F. Sack.), , Atmosphere, , Interior of leaf, , ATMOSPHERE, Pore, , Plastid, Vacuole, Nucleus, , Inner cell wall, 2 µm, SUBSTOMATAL CAVITY, , 61
Page 87 :
62, , Chapter 4, (A), , Epidermal cells, , Radially arranged, cellulose microfibrils, , Guard cells, (B), , Epidermal cells, , Pore, Radially arranged, cellulose microfibrils, , The Transpiration Ratio Measures the Relationship, between Water Loss and Carbon Gain, The effectiveness of plants in moderating water loss while, allowing sufficient CO2 uptake for photosynthesis can be, assessed by a parameter called the transpiration ratio. This, value is defined as the amount of water transpired by the, plant, divided by the amount of carbon dioxide assimilated, by photosynthesis., For typical plants in which the first stable product of, carbon fixation is a three-carbon compound (such plants, are called C3 plants; see Chapter 8), about 500 molecules of, water are lost for every molecule of CO2 fixed by photosynthesis, giving a transpiration ratio of 500. (Sometimes, the reciprocal of the transpiration ratio, called the water use, efficiency, is cited. Plants with a transpiration ratio of 500, have a water use efficiency of 1/500, or 0.002.), The large ratio of H2O efflux to CO2 influx results from, three factors:, 1. The concentration gradient driving water loss is about, 50 times larger than that driving the influx of CO2. In, large part, this difference is due to the low concentration of CO2 in air (about 0.03%) and the relatively, high concentration of water vapor within the leaf., , Guard cells, , Pore, , Subsidiary cell, , Stomatal complex, , FIGURE 4.15 The radial alignment of the cellulose microfibrils in guard cells and epidermal cells of (A) a kidneyshaped stoma and (B) a grasslike stoma. (From Meidner, and Mansfield 1968.), , tions are sensed by guard cells, and these signals are integrated into well-defined stomatal responses. If leaves kept in, the dark are illuminated, the light stimulus is perceived by, the guard cells as an opening signal, triggering a series of, responses that result in opening of the stomatal pore., The early aspects of this process are ion uptake and, other metabolic changes in the guard cells, which will be, discussed in detail in Chapter 18. Here we will note the, effect of decreases in osmotic potential (Ys) resulting from, ion uptake and from biosynthesis of organic molecules in, the guard cells. Water relations in guard cells follow the, same rules as in other cells. As Ys decreases, the water, potential decreases and water consequently moves into the, guard cells. As water enters the cell, turgor pressure, increases. Because of the elastic properties of their walls,, guard cells can reversibly increase their volume by 40 to, 100%, depending on the species. Because of the differential, thickening of guard cell walls, such changes in cell volume, lead to opening or closing of the stomatal pore., , 2. CO2 diffuses about 1.6 times more slowly through air, than water does (the CO2 molecule is larger than, H2O and has a smaller diffusion coefficient)., 3. CO2 uptake must cross the plasma membrane, the, cytoplasm, and the chloroplast envelope before it is, assimilated in the chloroplast. These membranes add, to the resistance of the CO2 diffusion pathway., Some plants are adapted for life in particularly dry environments or seasons of the year. These plants, designated, the C4 and CAM plants, utilize variations in the usual photosynthetic pathway for fixation of carbon dioxide. Plants, with C4 photosynthesis (in which a four-carbon compound, is the first stable product of photosynthesis; see Chapter 8), generally transpire less water per molecule of CO2 fixed; a, typical transpiration ratio for C4 plants is about 250. Desertadapted plants with CAM (crassulacean acid metabolism), photosynthesis, in which CO2 is initially fixed into four-carbon organic acids at night, have even lower transpiration, ratios; values of about 50 are not unusual., , OVERVIEW: THE, SOIL–PLANT–ATMOSPHERE CONTINUUM, We have seen that movement of water from the soil through, the plant to the atmosphere involves different mechanisms, of transport:, • In the soil and the xylem, water moves by bulk flow, in response to a pressure gradient (∆Yp).
Page 88 :
Water Balance of Plants, • In the vapor phase, water moves primarily by diffusion, at least until it reaches the outside air, where, convection (a form of bulk flow) becomes dominant., • When water is transported across membranes, the, driving force is the water potential difference across, the membrane. Such osmotic flow occurs when cells, absorb water and when roots transport water from, the soil to the xylem., In all of these situations, water moves toward regions of low, water potential or free energy. This phenomenon is illustrated, in Figure 4.16, which shows representative values for water, potential and its components at various points along the, water transport pathway., Water potential decreases continuously from the soil to, the leaves. However, the components of water potential, can be quite different at different parts of the pathway. For, example, inside the leaf cells, such as in the mesophyll, the, water potential is approximately the same as in the neigh-, , 63, , boring xylem, yet the components of Yw are quite different. The dominant component of Yw in the xylem is the, negative pressure (Yp), whereas in the leaf cell Yp is generally positive. This large difference in Yp occurs across the, plasma membrane of the leaf cells. Within the leaf cells,, water potential is reduced by a high concentration of dissolved solutes (low Ys)., , SUMMARY, Water is the essential medium of life. Land plants are faced, with potentially lethal desiccation by water loss to the, atmosphere. This problem is aggravated by the large surface area of leaves, their high radiant-energy gain, and their, need to have an open pathway for CO2 uptake. Thus there, is a conflict between the need for water conservation and, the need for CO2 assimilation., The need to resolve this vital conflict determines much, of the structure of land plants: (1) an extensive root system, , Water potential and its components (in MPa), , Location, Outside air, (relative humidity = 50%), , 20 m, , Water, potential Pressure, (Yp), (Yw), , Osmotic, potential Gravity, (Ys), (Yg), , Water potential, in gas phase, , (VRTw ln [RH](, , –95.2, , –95.2, , Leaf internal air space, , –0.8, , –0.8, , Cell wall of mesophyll, (at 10 m), , –0.8, , –0.7, , –0.2, , 0.1, , Vacuole of mesophyll, (at 10 m), , –0.8, , 0.2, , –1.1, , 0.1, , Leaf xylem, (at 10 m), , –0.8, , –0.8, , –0.1, , 0.1, , Root xylem, (near surface), , –0.6, , –0.5, , –0.1, , 0.0, , Root cell vacuole, (near surface), , –0.6, , 0.5, , –1.1, , 0.0, , Soil adjacent to root, , –0.5, , –0.4, , –0.1, , 0.0, , Soil 10 mm from root, , –0.3, , –0.2, , –0.1, , 0.0, , FIGURE 4.16 Representative overview of water potential and its components at various points in the transport pathway from the soil through the plant to the atmosphere. Water potential (Yw) can be measured through this continuum, but the, components vary. In the liquid part of the pathway, pressure (Yp), osmotic potential, –, (Ys), and gravity (Yg), determine Yw. In the air, only the relative humidity (RT/Vw ×, ln[RH]) is important. Note that although the water potential is the same in the vacuole of the mesophyll cell and in the surrounding cell wall, the components of Yw, can differ greatly (e.g., in this case Yp is 0.2 MPa inside the mesophyll cell and –0.7, MPa outside). (After Nobel 1999.)
Page 89 :
64, , Chapter 4, , to extract water from the soil; (2) a low-resistance pathway, through the xylem vessel elements and tracheids to bring, water to the leaves; (3) a hydrophobic cuticle covering the, surfaces of the plant to reduce evaporation; (4) microscopic, stomata on the leaf surface to allow gas exchange; and (5), guard cells to regulate the diameter (and diffusional resistance) of the stomatal aperture., The result is an organism that transports water from the, soil to the atmosphere purely in response to physical forces., No energy is expended directly by the plant to translocate, water, although development and maintenance of the, structures needed for efficient and controlled water transport require considerable energy input., The mechanisms of water transport from the soil, through the plant body to the atmosphere include diffusion, bulk flow, and osmosis. Each of these processes is coupled to different driving forces., Water in the plant can be considered a continuous, hydraulic system, connecting the water in the soil with the, water vapor in the atmosphere. Transpiration is regulated, principally by the guard cells, which regulate the stomatal, pore size to meet the photosynthetic demand for CO2, uptake while minimizing water loss to the atmosphere., Water evaporation from the cell walls of the leaf mesophyll, cells generates large negative pressures (or tensions) in the, apoplastic water. These negative pressures are transmitted, to the xylem, and they pull water through the long xylem, conduits., Although aspects of the cohesion–tension theory of sap, ascent are intermittently debated, an overwhelming body, of evidence supports the idea that water transport in the, xylem is driven by pressure gradients. When transpiration, is high, negative pressures in the xylem water may cause, cavitation (embolisms) in the xylem. Such embolisms can, block water transport and lead to severe water deficits in, the leaf. Water deficits are commonplace in plants, necessitating a host of adaptive responses that modify the physiology and development of plants., , Web Material, Web Topics, 4.1 Irrigation, A discussion of some widely used irrigation, methods and their impact on crop yield and soil, salinity., , 4.2 Soil Hydraulic Conductivity and Water, Potential, Soil hydraulic conductivity determines the ease, with which water moves through the soil, and it, is closely related to soil water potential., , 4.3 Root Hydraulic Conductance, A discussion of root hydraulic conductance and, an example of its quantification., , 4.4 Calculating Velocities of Water Movement in, the Xylem and in Living Cells, Calculations of velocities of water movement, through the xylem, up a tree trunk, and across, cell membranes in a tissue, and their implications, for water transport mechanism., , 4.5 Leaf Transpiration and Water Vapor Gradients, An analysis of leaf transpiration and stomatal, conductance, and their relationship with leaf and, air water vapor concentrations., , Web Essays, 4.1 A Brief History of the Study of Water, Movement in the Xylem, The history of our understanding of sap ascent in, plants, especially in trees, is a beautiful example, of how knowledge about plant is acquired., , 4.2 The Cohesion–Tension Theory at Work, A detailed discussion of the Cohesion–Tension, theory on sap ascent in plants, and some alternative explanations., , 4.3 How Water Climbs to the Top of a 112-MeterTall Tree, Measurements of photosynthesis and transpiration in 112-meter tall trees show that some of the, conditions experienced by the top foliage compares to that of extreme deserts., , 4.4 Cavitation and Refilling, A possible mechanism for cavitation repair is, under active investigation., , Chapter References, Balling, A., and Zimmermann, U. (1990) Comparative measurements of the xylem pressure of Nicotiana plants by means of the, pressure bomb and pressure probe. Planta 182: 325–338., Bange, G. G. J. (1953) On the quantitative explanation of stomatal, transpiration. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 2: 255–296., Canny, M. J. (1998) Transporting water in plants. Am. Sci. 86: 152–159., Davis, S. D., Sperry, J. S., and Hacke, U. G. (1999) The relationship, between xylem conduit diameter and cavitation caused by freezing. Am. J. Bot. 86: 1367–1372., Esau, K. (1953) Plant Anatomy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York., Frensch, J., Hsiao, T. C., and Steudle, E. (1996) Water and solute, transport along developing maize roots. Planta 198: 348–355., Hacke, U. G., Stiller, V., Sperry, J. S., Pittermann, J., and McCulloh, K., A. (2001) Cavitation fatigue: Embolism and refilling cycles can, weaken the cavitation resistance of xylem. Plant Physiol. 125:, 779–786.
Page 90 :
Water Balance of Plants, Holbrook, N. M., Ahrens, E. T., Burns, M. J., and Zwieniecki, M. A., (2001) In vivo observation of cavitation and embolism repair, using magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiol. 126: 27–31., Holbrook, N. M., Burns, M. J., and Field, C. B. (1995) Negative xylem, pressures in plants: A test of the balancing pressure technique., Science 270: 1193–1194., Jackson, G. E., Irvine, J., and Grace, J. (1999) Xylem acoustic emissions and water relations of Calluna vulgaris L. at two climatological regions of Britain. Plant Ecol. 140: 3–14., Jarvis, P. G., and Mansfield, T. A. (1981) Stomatal Physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge., Jensen, C. R., Mogensen, V. O., Poulsen, H.-H., Henson, I. E., Aagot,, S., Hansen, E., Ali, M., and Wollenweber, B. (1998) Soil water, matric potential rather than water content determines drought, responses in field-grown lupin (Lupinus angustifolius). Aust. J., Plant Physiol. 25: 353–363., Kramer, P. J., and Boyer, J. S. (1995) Water Relations of Plants and Soils., Academic Press, San Diego, CA., Meidner, H., and Mansfield, D. (1968) Stomatal Physiology. McGrawHill, London., Melcher, P. J., Meinzer, F. C., Yount, D. E., Goldstein, G., and Zimmermann, U. (1998) Comparative measurements of xylem pressure in transpiring and non-transpiring leaves by means of the, pressure chamber and the xylem pressure probe. J. Exp. Bot. 49:, 1757–1760., Nobel, P. S. (1999) Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology,, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA., Palevitz, B. A. (1981) The structure and development of guard cells., In Stomatal Physiology, P. G. Jarvis and T. A. Mansfield, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–23., , 65, , Pockman, W. T., Sperry, J. S., and O’Leary, J. W. (1995) Sustained and, significant negative water pressure in xylem. Nature 378: 715–716., Sack, F. D. (1987) The development and structure of stomata. In, Stomatal Function, E. Zeiger, G. Farquhar, and I. Cowan, eds.,, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 59–90., Sharpe, P. J. H., Wu, H.-I., and Spence, R. D. (1987) Stomatal mechanics. In Stomatal Function, E. Zeiger, G. Farquhar, and I. Cowan,, eds., Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 91–114., Steudle, E. (2001) The cohesion-tension mechanism and the acquisition of water by plant roots. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol., Biol. 52: 847–875., Steudle, E., and Frensch, J. (1996) Water transport in plants: Role of, the apoplast. Plant and Soil 187: 67–79., Tyree, M. T. (1997) The cohesion-tension theory of sap ascent: Current controversies. J. Exp. Bot. 48: 1753–1765., Tyree, M. T., and Sperry, J. S. (1989) Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40:, 19–38., Wei, C., Tyree, M. T., and Steudle, E. (1999) Direct measurement of, xylem pressure in leaves of intact maize plants: A test of the cohesion-tension theory taking hydraulic architecture into consideration. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 121: 1191–1205., Zeiger, E., and Hepler, P. K. (1976) Production of guard cell protoplasts from onion and tobacco. Plant Physiol. 58: 492–498., Ziegler, H. (1987) The evolution of stomata. In Stomatal Function, E., Zeiger, G. Farquhar, and I. Cowan, eds., Stanford University, Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 29–58., Zimmermann, M. H. (1983) Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap., Springer, Berlin.
Page 92 :
Chapter, , 5, , Mineral Nutrition, , MINERAL NUTRIENTS ARE ELEMENTS acquired primarily in the, form of inorganic ions from the soil. Although mineral nutrients continually cycle through all organisms, they enter the biosphere predominantly, through the root systems of plants, so in a sense plants act as the “miners”, of Earth’s crust (Epstein 1999). The large surface area of roots and their, ability to absorb inorganic ions at low concentrations from the soil solution make mineral absorption by plants a very effective process. After, being absorbed by the roots, the mineral elements are translocated to the, various parts of the plant, where they are utilized in numerous biological, functions. Other organisms, such as mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, often participate with roots in the acquisition of nutrients., The study of how plants obtain and use mineral nutrients is called, mineral nutrition. This area of research is central to modern agriculture, and environmental protection. High agricultural yields depend strongly, on fertilization with mineral nutrients. In fact, yields of most crop plants, increase linearly with the amount of fertilizer that they absorb (Loomis, and Conner 1992). To meet increased demand for food, world consumption of the primary fertilizer mineral elements—nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium—rose steadily from 112 million metric tons in, 1980 to 143 million metric tons in 1990 and has remained constant, through the last decade., Crop plants, however, typically use less than half of the fertilizer, applied (Loomis and Conner 1992). The remaining minerals may leach, into surface waters or groundwater, become attached to soil particles, or, contribute to air pollution. As a consequence of fertilizer leaching, many, water wells in the United States no longer meet federal standards for, nitrate concentrations in drinking water (Nolan and Stoner 2000). On a, brighter note, plants are the traditional means for recycling animal, wastes and are proving useful for removing deleterious minerals from, toxic-waste dumps (Macek et al. 2000). Because of the complex nature, of plant–soil–atmosphere relationships, studies in the area of mineral, nutrition involve atmospheric chemists, soil scientists, hydrologists,, microbiologists, and ecologists, as well as plant physiologists.
Page 93 :
68, , Chapter 5, , In this chapter we will discuss first the nutritional needs, of plants, the symptoms of specific nutritional deficiencies,, and the use of fertilizers to ensure proper plant nutrition., Then we will examine how soil and root structure influence, the transfer of inorganic nutrients from the environment, into a plant. Finally, we will introduce the topic of mycorrhizal associations. Chapters 6 and 12 address additional, aspects of solute transport and nutrient assimilation,, respectively., , ESSENTIAL NUTRIENTS, DEFICIENCIES,, AND PLANT DISORDERS, , bon) compounds of the plant. Plants assimilate these, nutrients via biochemical reactions involving oxidation and reduction., 2. The second group is important in energy storage, reactions or in maintaining structural integrity., Elements in this group are often present in plant tissues as phosphate, borate, and silicate esters in which, the elemental group is bound to the hydroxyl group, of an organic molecule (i.e., sugar–phosphate)., 3. The third group is present in plant tissue as either, free ions or ions bound to substances such as the pectic acids present in the plant cell wall. Of particular, importance are their roles as enzyme cofactors and in, the regulation of osmotic potentials., , Only certain elements have been determined to be essential for plant growth. An essential element is defined as, 4. The fourth group has important roles in reactions, one whose absence prevents a plant from completing its, involving electron transfer., life cycle (Arnon and Stout 1939) or one that has a clear, physiological role (Epstein 1999). If plants are given these, Naturally occurring elements, other than those listed in, essential elements, as well as energy from sunlight, they, Table 5.1, can also accumulate in plant tissues. For examcan synthesize all the compounds they need for normal, ple, aluminum is not considered to be an essential element,, growth. Table 5.1 lists the elements that are considered to, but plants commonly contain from 0.1 to 500 ppm alube essential for most, if not all, higher plants. The first three, minum, and addition of low levels of aluminum to a nutrielements—hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen—are not conent solution may stimulate plant growth (Marschner 1995)., sidered mineral nutrients because, they are obtained primarily from, TABLE 5.1, water or carbon dioxide., Adequate tissue levels of elements that may be required by plants, Essential mineral elements are, Concentration, Relative number of, usually classified as macronutrients, Chemical, in, dry, matter, atoms, with respect, or micronutrients, according to, Element, symbol, (% or ppm)a, to molybdenum, their relative concentration in plant, Obtained from water or carbon dioxide, tissue. In some cases, the differHydrogen, H, 6, 60,000,000, ences in tissue content of macronuCarbon, C, 45, 40,000,000, trients and micronutrients are not, Oxygen, O, 45, 30,000,000, as great as those indicated in Table, Obtained from the soil, 5.1. For example, some plant tissues, such as the leaf mesophyll,, Macronutrients, have almost as much iron or manNitrogen, N, 1.5, 1,000,000, ganese as they do sulfur or magnePotassium, K, 1.0, 250,000, Calcium, Ca, 0.5, 125,000, sium. Many elements often are preMagnesium, Mg, 0.2, 80,000, sent in concentrations greater than, Phosphorus, P, 0.2, 60,000, the plant’s minimum requirements., Sulfur, S, 0.1, 30,000, Some researchers have argued, Silicon, Si, 0.1, 30,000, that a classification into macroMicronutrients, nutrients and micronutrients is, Chlorine, Cl, 100, 3,000, difficult to justify physiologically., Iron, Fe, 100, 2,000, Mengel and Kirkby (1987) have, Boron, B, 20, 2,000, proposed that the essential eleManganese, Mn, 50, 1,000, ments be classified instead accordSodium, Na, 10, 400, ing to their biochemical role and, Zinc, Zn, 20, 300, physiological function. Table 5.2, Copper, Cu, 6, 100, shows such a classification, in, Nickel, Ni, 0.1, 2, which plant nutrients have been, Molybdenum, Mo, 0.1, 1, divided into four basic groups:, Source: Epstein 1972, 1999., 1. The first group of essential elea The values for the nonmineral elements (H, C, O) and the macronutrients are percentages. The, values for micronutrients are expressed in parts per million., ments forms the organic (car-
Page 94 :
Mineral Nutrition, , 69, , TABLE 5.2, Classification of plant mineral nutrients according to biochemical function, Mineral nutrient, , Group 1, N, S, Group 2, P, , Functions, , Nutrients that are part of carbon compounds, Constituent of amino acids, amides, proteins, nucleic acids, nucleotides, coenzymes, hexoamines, etc., Component of cysteine, cystine, methionine, and proteins. Constituent of lipoic acid, coenzyme A, thiamine, pyrophosphate, glutathione, biotin, adenosine-5′-phosphosulfate, and 3-phosphoadenosine., Nutrients that are important in energy storage or structural integrity, Component of sugar phosphates, nucleic acids, nucleotides, coenzymes, phospholipids, phytic acid, etc. Has a, key role in reactions that involve ATP., , Si, , Deposited as amorphous silica in cell walls. Contributes to cell wall mechanical properties, including rigidity, and elasticity., , B, , Complexes with mannitol, mannan, polymannuronic acid, and other constituents of cell walls. Involved in cell, elongation and nucleic acid metabolism., , Group 3, K, , Nutrients that remain in ionic form, Required as a cofactor for more than 40 enzymes. Principal cation in establishing cell turgor and maintaining, cell electroneutrality., , Ca, , Constituent of the middle lamella of cell walls. Required as a cofactor by some enzymes involved in the, hydrolysis of ATP and phospholipids. Acts as a second messenger in metabolic regulation., , Mg, , Required by many enzymes involved in phosphate transfer. Constituent of the chlorophyll molecule., , Cl, , Required for the photosynthetic reactions involved in O2 evolution., , Mn, , Required for activity of some dehydrogenases, decarboxylases, kinases, oxidases, and peroxidases. Involved, with other cation-activated enzymes and photosynthetic O2 evolution., , Na, , Involved with the regeneration of phosphoenolpyruvate in C4 and CAM plants. Substitutes for potassium in, some functions., , Group 4, Fe, , Nutrients that are involved in redox reactions, Constituent of cytochromes and nonheme iron proteins involved in photosynthesis, N2 fixation, and respiration., , Zn, , Constituent of alcohol dehydrogenase, glutamic dehydrogenase, carbonic anhydrase, etc., , Cu, , Component of ascorbic acid oxidase, tyrosinase, monoamine oxidase, uricase, cytochrome oxidase, phenolase,, laccase, and plastocyanin., , Ni, Mo, , Constituent of urease. In N2-fixing bacteria, constituent of hydrogenases., Constituent of nitrogenase, nitrate reductase, and xanthine dehydrogenase., , Source: After Evans and Sorger 1966 and Mengel and Kirkby 1987., , Many species in the genera Astragalus, Xylorhiza, and Stanleya accumulate selenium, although plants have not been, shown to have a specific requirement for this element., Cobalt is part of cobalamin (vitamin B12 and its derivatives), a component of several enzymes in nitrogen-fixing, microorganisms. Thus cobalt deficiency blocks the development and function of nitrogen-fixing nodules. Nonetheless, plants that do not fix nitrogen, as well as nitrogen-fixing plants that are supplied with ammonium or nitrate, do, not require cobalt. Crop plants normally contain only relatively small amounts of nonessential elements., , Special Techniques Are Used in Nutritional Studies, To demonstrate that an element is essential requires that, plants be grown under experimental conditions in which, only the element under investigation is absent. Such conditions are extremely difficult to achieve with plants grown in, , a complex medium such as soil. In the nineteenth century,, several researchers, including Nicolas-Théodore de Saussure, Julius von Sachs, Jean-Baptiste-Joseph-Dieudonné, Boussingault, and Wilhelm Knop, approached this problem, by growing plants with their roots immersed in a nutrient, solution containing only inorganic salts. Their demonstration that plants could grow normally with no soil or organic, matter proved unequivocally that plants can fulfill all their, needs from only inorganic elements and sunlight., The technique of growing plants with their roots, immersed in nutrient solution without soil is called solution culture or hydroponics (Gericke 1937). Successful, hydroponic culture (Figure 5.1A) requires a large volume, of nutrient solution or frequent adjustment of the nutrient, solution to prevent nutrient uptake by roots from producing radical changes in nutrient concentrations and pH of, the medium. A sufficient supply of oxygen to the root sys-
Page 95 :
70, , Chapter 5, , (A) Hydroponic growth system, , Plant, support, system, Air, Nutrient, solution, , Air bubbles, , (B) Nutrient film growth system, Nutrient solution, , Nutrient, recovery, chamber, , Pump, , (C) Aeroponic growth system, , Nutrient, mist, chamber, , Nutrient, solution, , Plant holdings, cover seals chamber, , ponic culture, plants are grown in a, supporting material such as sand,, gravel, vermiculite, or expanded, clay (i.e., kitty litter). Nutrient solutions are then flushed through the, supporting material, and old solutions are removed by leaching. In, another form of hydroponic culture,, plant roots lie on the surface of a, trough, and nutrient solutions flow, in a thin layer along the trough over, the roots (Cooper 1979, Asher and, Edwards 1983). This nutrient film, growth system ensures that the, roots receive an ample supply of, oxygen (Figure 5.1B)., Another alternative, which has, sometimes been heralded as the, medium of the future, is to grow the, plants aeroponically (Weathers and, Zobel 1992). In this technique, plants, are grown with their roots suspended in air while being sprayed, continuously with a nutrient solution (Figure 5.1C). This approach, provides easy manipulation of the, gaseous environment around the, root, but it requires higher levels of, nutrients than hydroponic culture, does to sustain rapid plant growth., For this reason and other technical, difficulties, the use of aeroponics is, not widespread., , Nutrient Solutions Can, Sustain Rapid Plant Growth, , Over the years, many formulations, have been used for nutrient solutions. Early formulations developed, by Knop in Germany included only, FIGURE 5.1 Hydroponic and aeroponic systems for growing plants in nutrient soluKNO3, Ca(NO3)2, KH2PO4, MgSO4,, tions in which composition and pH can be automatically controlled. (A) In a hydroponic system, the roots are immersed in the nutrient solution, and air is bubbled, and an iron salt. At the time this, through the solution. (B) An alternative hydroponic system, often used in commernutrient solution was believed to, cial production, is the nutrient film growth system, in which the nutrient solution is, contain all the minerals required by, pumped as a thin film down a shallow trough surrounding the plant roots. In this, the plant, but these experiments, system the composition and pH of the nutrient solution can be controlled automatiwere carried out with chemicals that, cally. (C) In the aeroponic system, the roots are suspended over the nutrient solution, which is whipped into a mist by a motor-driven rotor. (C after Weathers and, were contaminated with other eleZobel 1992.), ments that are now known to be, essential (such as boron or molybdenum). Table 5.3 shows a more, modern formulation for a nutrient, tem—also critical—may be achieved by vigorous bubbling, solution. This formulation is called a modified Hoagland, of air through the medium., solution, named after Dennis R. Hoagland, a researcher who, Hydroponics is used in the commercial production of, was prominent in the development of modern mineral nutrimany greenhouse crops. In one form of commercial hydrotion research in the United States., Motor-driven rotor, generates mist
Page 96 :
Mineral Nutrition, , 71, , TABLE 5.3, Composition of a modified Hoagland nutrient solution for growing plants, , Compound, , Molecular, weight, g mol–1, , Concentration, of stock, solution, , Concentration, of stock, solution, , Volume of stock, solution per liter, of final solution, , mM, , g L–1, , mL, , Element, , Final, concentration, of element, mM, , ppm, , Macronutrients, KNO3, , 101.10, , 1,000, , 101.10, , 6.0, , N, , 16,000, , 224, , Ca(NO3)2⋅ 4H2O, , 236.16, , 1,000, , 236.16, , 4.0, , K, , 6,000, , 235, , NH4H2PO4, , 115.08, , 1,000, , 115.08, , 2.0, , Ca, , 4,000, , 160, , MgSO4⋅7H2O, , 246.48, , 1,000, , 246.49, , 1.0, , P, , 2,000, , 62, , S, , 1,000, , 32, , Mg, , 1,000, , 24, , Micronutrients, KCl, H3BO3, , 74.55, , 25, , 1.864, , Cl, , 50, , 1.77, , 25, , 0.27, , 61.83, , 12.5, , 0.773, , B, , MnSO4⋅H2O, , 169.01, , 1.0, , 0.169, , Mn, , 2.0, , 0.11, , ZnSO4⋅7H2O, , 287.54, , 1.0, , 0.288, , Zn, , 2.0, , 0.13, , CuSO4⋅5H2O, , 249.68, , 0.25, , 0.062, , Cu, , 0.5, , 0.03, , 0.5, , 0.05, , H2MoO4 (85% MoO3) 161.97, NaFeDTPA (10% Fe), , 468.20, , Optionala, NiSO4⋅6H2O, , 262.86, , Na2SiO3⋅9H2O, , 284.20, , 0.25, 64, 0.25, 1,000, , 2.0, , 0.040, 30.0, 0.066, 284.20, , Mo, 0.3–1.0, , Fe, , 2.0, , Ni, , 1.0, , Si, , 16.1–53.7 1.00–3.00, 0.5, 1,000, , 0.03, 28, , Source: After Epstein 1972., Note: The macronutrients are added separately from stock solutions to prevent precipitation during preparation of the nutrient solution. A combined stock solution is made up containing all micronutrients except iron. Iron is added as sodium ferric diethylenetriaminepentaacetate, (NaFeDTPA, trade name Ciba-Geigy Sequestrene 330 Fe; see Figure 5.2); some plants, such as maize, require the higher level of iron shown in the, table., a Nickel is usually present as a contaminant of the other chemicals, so it may not need to be added explicitly. Silicon, if included, should be added, first and the pH adjusted with HCl to prevent precipitation of the other nutrients., , A modified Hoagland solution contains all of the known, mineral elements needed for rapid plant growth. The concentrations of these elements are set at the highest possible, levels without producing toxicity symptoms or salinity stress, and thus may be several orders of magnitude higher than, those found in the soil around plant roots. For example,, whereas phosphorus is present in the soil solution at concentrations normally less than 0.06 ppm, here it is offered at, 62 ppm (Epstein 1972). Such high initial levels permit plants, to be grown in a medium for extended periods without, replenishment of the nutrients. Many researchers, however,, dilute their nutrient solutions severalfold and replenish them, frequently to minimize fluctuations of nutrient concentration in the medium and in plant tissue., Another important property of the modified Hoagland, formulation is that nitrogen is supplied as both ammonium, (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3–). Supplying nitrogen in a balanced, mixture of cations and anions tends to reduce the rapid rise, , in the pH of the medium that is commonly observed when, the nitrogen is supplied solely as nitrate anion (Asher and, Edwards 1983). Even when the pH of the medium is kept, neutral, most plants grow better if they have access to both, NH4+ and NO3– because absorption and assimilation of the, two nitrogen forms promotes cation–anion balance within, the plant (Raven and Smith 1976; Bloom 1994)., A significant problem with nutrient solutions is maintaining the availability of iron. When supplied as an inorganic salt such as FeSO4 or Fe(NO3)2, iron can precipitate, out of solution as iron hydroxide. If phosphate salts are, present, insoluble iron phosphate will also form. Precipitation of the iron out of solution makes it physically, unavailable to the plant, unless iron salts are added at frequent intervals. Earlier researchers approached this problem by adding iron together with citric acid or tartaric acid., Compounds such as these are called chelators because they, form soluble complexes with cations such as iron and cal-
Page 97 :
72, , Chapter 5, , cium in which the cation is held by ionic forces, rather than, by covalent bonds. Chelated cations thus are physically, more available to a plant., More modern nutrient solutions use the chemicals ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA, or pentetic acid) as chelating agents (Sievers and Bailar 1962). Figure 5.2 shows the, structure of DTPA. The fate of the chelation complex during iron uptake by the root cells is not clear; iron may be, released from the chelator when it is reduced from Fe3+ to, Fe2+ at the root surface. The chelator may then diffuse back, into the nutrient (or soil) solution and react with another, Fe3+ ion or other metal ions. After uptake, iron is kept soluble by chelation with organic compounds present in plant, cells. Citric acid may play a major role in iron chelation and, its long-distance transport in the xylem., , Mineral Deficiencies Disrupt Plant Metabolism, and Function, Inadequate supply of an essential element results in a, nutritional disorder manifested by characteristic deficiency, symptoms. In hydroponic culture, withholding of an essential element can be readily correlated with a given set of, symptoms for acute deficiencies. Diagnosis of soil-grown, plants can be more complex, for the following reasons:, , O, , (A), –, , O, , C, , O, CH2, , O, –, , O, , C, , O, O–, CH2, , C, , CH2, , NCH2CH2NCH2CH2N, CH2, , O–, , C, O, , CH2, , O–, , C, , O, , (B), , C, , O–, , CH2, CH2CH2, , O, –, , O, , C, , CH2CH2, Fe3+, , N, , N, O–, , CH2, , CH2, , C, , O–, , CH2, C, , O, C, , • Deficiencies or excessive amounts of one element, may induce deficiencies or excessive accumulations, of another., • Some virus-induced plant diseases may produce, symptoms similar to those of nutrient deficiencies., Nutrient deficiency symptoms in a plant are the expression of metabolic disorders resulting from the insufficient, supply of an essential element. These disorders are related, to the roles played by essential elements in normal plant, metabolism and function. Table 5.2 lists some of the roles, of essential elements., Even though each essential element participates in many, different metabolic reactions, some general statements, about the functions of essential elements in plant metabolism are possible. In general, the essential elements function, in plant structure, metabolic function, and osmoregulation, of plant cells. More specific roles may be related to the ability of divalent cations such as calcium or magnesium to, modify the permeability of plant membranes. In addition,, research continues to reveal specific roles of these elements, in plant metabolism; for example, calcium acts as a signal, to regulate key enzymes in the cytosol (Hepler and Wayne, 1985; Sanders et al. 1999). Thus, most essential elements, have multiple roles in plant metabolism., When relating acute deficiency symptoms to a particular essential element, an important clue is the extent to, which an element can be recycled from older to younger, leaves. Some elements, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and, potassium, can readily move from leaf to leaf; others, such, as boron, iron, and calcium, are relatively immobile in most, plant species (Table 5.4). If an essential element is mobile,, deficiency symptoms tend to appear first in older leaves., Deficiency of an immobile essential element will become, evident first in younger leaves. Although the precise mechanisms of nutrient mobilization are not well understood,, , O, , N, CH2, , • Both chronic and acute deficiencies of several elements may occur simultaneously., , TABLE 5.4, Mineral elements classified on the basis of their, mobility within a plant and their tendency to, retranslocate during deficiencies, , O–, , O, , FIGURE 5.2 Chemical structure of the chelator DTPA by, , itself (A) and chelated to an Fe3+ ion (B). Iron binds to, DTPA through interaction with three nitrogen atoms and, the three ionized oxygen atoms of the carboxylate groups, (Sievers and Bailar 1962). The resulting ring structure, clamps the metallic ion and effectively neutralizes its reactivity in solution. During the uptake of iron at the root surface, Fe3+ appears to be reduced to Fe2+, which is released, from the DTPA–iron complex. The chelator can then bind to, other available Fe3+ ions., , Mobile, , Immobile, , Nitrogen, Potassium, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Chlorine, Sodium, Zinc, Molybdenum, , Calcium, Sulfur, Iron, Boron, Copper, , Note: Elements are listed in the order of their abundance in the, plant.
Page 98 :
Mineral Nutrition, plant hormones such as cytokinins appear to be involved, (see Chapter 21). In the discussion that follows, we will, describe the specific deficiency symptoms and functional, roles for the mineral essential elements as they are grouped, in Table 5.2., , Group 1: Deficiencies in mineral nutrients that are part, of carbon compounds. This first group consists of nitrogen and sulfur. Nitrogen availability in soils limits plant, productivity in most natural and agricultural ecosystems., By contrast, soils generally contain sulfur in excess., Nonetheless, nitrogen and sulfur share the property that, their oxidation–reduction states range widely (see Chapter, 12). Some of the most energy-intensive reactions in life convert the highly oxidized, inorganic forms absorbed from, the soil into the highly reduced forms found in organic, compounds such as amino acids., NITROGEN., , Nitrogen is the mineral element that plants, require in greatest amounts. It serves as a constituent of, many plant cell components, including amino acids and, nucleic acids. Therefore, nitrogen deficiency rapidly inhibits, plant growth. If such a deficiency persists, most species, show chlorosis (yellowing of the leaves), especially in the, older leaves near the base of the plant (for pictures of nitrogen deficiency and the other mineral deficiencies described, in this chapter, see Web Topic 5.1). Under severe nitrogen, deficiency, these leaves become completely yellow (or tan), and fall off the plant. Younger leaves may not show these, symptoms initially because nitrogen can be mobilized from, older leaves. Thus a nitrogen-deficient plant may have light, green upper leaves and yellow or tan lower leaves., When nitrogen deficiency develops slowly, plants may, have markedly slender and often woody stems. This woodiness may be due to a buildup of excess carbohydrates that, cannot be used in the synthesis of amino acids or other, nitrogen compounds. Carbohydrates not used in nitrogen, metabolism may also be used in anthocyanin synthesis,, leading to accumulation of that pigment. This condition is, revealed as a purple coloration in leaves, petioles, and, stems of some nitrogen-deficient plants, such as tomato, and certain varieties of corn., SULFUR., , Sulfur is found in two amino acids and is a constituent of several coenzymes and vitamins essential for, metabolism. Many of the symptoms of sulfur deficiency are, similar to those of nitrogen deficiency, including chlorosis,, stunting of growth, and anthocyanin accumulation. This, similarity is not surprising, since sulfur and nitrogen are, both constituents of proteins. However, the chlorosis, caused by sulfur deficiency generally arises initially in, mature and young leaves, rather than in the old leaves as, in nitrogen deficiency, because unlike nitrogen, sulfur is not, easily remobilized to the younger leaves in most species., Nonetheless, in many plant species sulfur chlorosis may, , 73, , occur simultaneously in all leaves or even initially in the, older leaves., , Group 2: Deficiencies in mineral nutrients that are important in energy storage or structural integrity. This group, consists of phosphorus, silicon, and boron. Phosphorus and, silicon are found at concentrations within plant tissue that, warrant their classification as macronutrients, whereas, boron is much less abundant and considered a micronutrient. These elements are usually present in plants as ester, linkages to a carbon molecule., Phosphorus (as phosphate, PO43–) is an integral component of important compounds of plant cells,, including the sugar–phosphate intermediates of respiration, and photosynthesis, and the phospholipids that make up, plant membranes. It is also a component of nucleotides, used in plant energy metabolism (such as ATP) and in, DNA and RNA. Characteristic symptoms of phosphorus, deficiency include stunted growth in young plants and a, dark green coloration of the leaves, which may be malformed and contain small spots of dead tissue called, necrotic spots (for a picture, see Web Topic 5.1)., As in nitrogen deficiency, some species may produce, excess anthocyanins, giving the leaves a slight purple coloration. In contrast to nitrogen deficiency, the purple coloration of phosphorus deficiency is not associated with, chlorosis. In fact, the leaves may be a dark greenish purple., Additional symptoms of phosphorus deficiency include, the production of slender (but not woody) stems and the, death of older leaves. Maturation of the plant may also be, delayed., PHOSPHORUS., , SILICON., , Only members of the family Equisetaceae—called, scouring rushes because at one time their ash, rich in gritty, silica, was used to scour pots—require silicon to complete, their life cycle. Nonetheless, many other species accumulate substantial amounts of silicon within their tissues and, show enhanced growth and fertility when supplied with, adequate amounts of silicon (Epstein 1999)., Plants deficient in silicon are more susceptible to lodging (falling over) and fungal infection. Silicon is deposited, primarily in the endoplasmic reticulum, cell walls, and, intercellular spaces as hydrated, amorphous silica, (SiO2·nH2O). It also forms complexes with polyphenols and, thus serves as an alternative to lignin in the reinforcement, of cell walls. In addition, silicon can ameliorate the toxicity, of many heavy metals., , BORON., , Although the precise function of boron in plant, metabolism is unclear, evidence suggests that it plays roles, in cell elongation, nucleic acid synthesis, hormone, responses, and membrane function (Shelp 1993). Borondeficient plants may exhibit a wide variety of symptoms,, depending on the species and the age of the plant.
Page 99 :
74, , Chapter 5, , A characteristic symptom is black necrosis of the young, leaves and terminal buds. The necrosis of the young leaves, occurs primarily at the base of the leaf blade. Stems may be, unusually stiff and brittle. Apical dominance may also be, lost, causing the plant to become highly branched; however, the terminal apices of the branches soon become, necrotic because of inhibition of cell division. Structures, such as the fruit, fleshy roots, and tubers may exhibit necrosis or abnormalities related to the breakdown of internal, tissues., , Group 3: Deficiencies in mineral nutrients that remain, in ionic form. This group includes some of the most, familiar mineral elements: The macronutrients potassium,, calcium, and magnesium, and the micronutrients chlorine,, manganese, and sodium. They may be found in solution in, the cytosol or vacuoles, or they may be bound electrostatically or as ligands to larger carbon-containing compounds., POTASSIUM. Potassium, present within plants as the cation, K+, plays an important role in regulation of the osmotic, potential of plant cells (see Chapters 3 and 6). It also activates many enzymes involved in respiration and photosynthesis. The first observable symptom of potassium deficiency is mottled or marginal chlorosis, which then, develops into necrosis primarily at the leaf tips, at the margins, and between veins. In many monocots, these necrotic, lesions may initially form at the leaf tips and margins and, then extend toward the leaf base., Because potassium can be mobilized to the younger, leaves, these symptoms appear initially on the more, mature leaves toward the base of the plant. The leaves may, also curl and crinkle. The stems of potassium-deficient, plants may be slender and weak, with abnormally short, internodal regions. In potassium-deficient corn, the roots, may have an increased susceptibility to root-rotting fungi, present in the soil, and this susceptibility, together with, effects on the stem, results in an increased tendency for the, plant to be easily bent to the ground (lodging)., , be preceded by a general chlorosis and downward hooking of the young leaves. Young leaves may also appear, deformed. The root system of a calcium-deficient plant, may appear brownish, short, and highly branched. Severe, stunting may result if the meristematic regions of the plant, die prematurely., In plant cells, magnesium ions (Mg2+) have a, specific role in the activation of enzymes involved in respiration, photosynthesis, and the synthesis of DNA and RNA., Magnesium is also a part of the ring structure of the chlorophyll molecule (see Figure 7.6A). A characteristic symptom, of magnesium deficiency is chlorosis between the leaf veins,, occurring first in the older leaves because of the mobility of, this element. This pattern of chlorosis results because the, chlorophyll in the vascular bundles remains unaffected for, longer periods than the chlorophyll in the cells between the, bundles does. If the deficiency is extensive, the leaves may, become yellow or white. An additional symptom of magnesium deficiency may be premature leaf abscission., MAGNESIUM., , CHLORINE., , The element chlorine is found in plants as the, chloride ion (Cl–). It is required for the water-splitting reaction of photosynthesis through which oxygen is produced, (see Chapter 7) (Clarke and Eaton-Rye 2000). In addition,, chlorine may be required for cell division in both leaves, and roots (Harling et al. 1997). Plants deficient in chlorine, develop wilting of the leaf tips followed by general leaf, chlorosis and necrosis. The leaves may also exhibit reduced, growth. Eventually, the leaves may take on a bronzelike, color (“bronzing”). Roots of chlorine-deficient plants may, appear stunted and thickened near the root tips., Chloride ions are very soluble and generally available, in soils because seawater is swept into the air by wind and, is delivered to soil when it rains. Therefore, chlorine deficiency is unknown in plants grown in native or agricultural, habitats. Most plants generally absorb chlorine at levels, much higher than those required for normal functioning., Manganese ions (Mn2+) activate several, enzymes in plant cells. In particular, decarboxylases and, dehydrogenases involved in the tricarboxylic acid (Krebs), cycle are specifically activated by manganese. The bestdefined function of manganese is in the photosynthetic, reaction through which oxygen is produced from water, (Marschner 1995). The major symptom of manganese deficiency is intervenous chlorosis associated with the development of small necrotic spots. This chlorosis may occur, on younger or older leaves, depending on plant species, and growth rate., MANGANESE., , (Ca2+), , CALCIUM. Calcium ions, are used in the synthesis of, new cell walls, particularly the middle lamellae that separate newly divided cells. Calcium is also used in the mitotic, spindle during cell division. It is required for the normal, functioning of plant membranes and has been implicated, as a second messenger for various plant responses to both, environmental and hormonal signals (Sanders et al. 1999)., In its function as a second messenger, calcium may bind to, calmodulin, a protein found in the cytosol of plant cells., The calmodulin–calcium complex regulates many metabolic processes., Characteristic symptoms of calcium deficiency include, necrosis of young meristematic regions, such as the tips of, roots or young leaves, where cell division and wall formation are most rapid. Necrosis in slowly growing plants may, , SODIUM. Most species utilizing the C4 and CAM pathways, of carbon fixation (see Chapter 8) require sodium ions, (Na+). In these plants, sodium appears vital for regenerating phosphoenolpyruvate, the substrate for the first car-
Page 100 :
Mineral Nutrition, boxylation in the C4 and CAM pathways (Johnstone et al., 1988). Under sodium deficiency, these plants exhibit chlorosis and necrosis, or even fail to form flowers. Many C3, species also benefit from exposure to low levels of sodium, ions. Sodium stimulates growth through enhanced cell, expansion, and it can partly substitute for potassium as an, osmotically active solute., , Group 4: Deficiencies in mineral nutrients that are, involved in redox reactions. This group of five micronutrients includes the metals iron, zinc, copper, nickel, and, molybdenum. All of these can undergo reversible oxidations, and reductions (e.g., Fe2+ ~ Fe3+) and have important roles, in electron transfer and energy transformation. They are usually found in association with larger molecules such as, cytochromes, chlorophyll, and proteins (usually enzymes)., IRON., , Iron has an important role as a component of, enzymes involved in the transfer of electrons (redox reactions), such as cytochromes. In this role, it is reversibly oxidized from Fe2+ to Fe3+ during electron transfer. As in magnesium deficiency, a characteristic symptom of iron, deficiency is intervenous chlorosis. In contrast to magnesium deficiency symptoms, these symptoms appear initially on the younger leaves because iron cannot be readily, mobilized from older leaves. Under conditions of extreme, or prolonged deficiency, the veins may also become, chlorotic, causing the whole leaf to turn white., The leaves become chlorotic because iron is required for, the synthesis of some of the chlorophyll–protein complexes, in the chloroplast. The low mobility of iron is probably due, to its precipitation in the older leaves as insoluble oxides or, phosphates or to the formation of complexes with phytoferritin, an iron-binding protein found in the leaf and other, plant parts (Oh et al. 1996). The precipitation of iron diminishes subsequent mobilization of the metal into the phloem, for long-distance translocation., Many enzymes require zinc ions (Zn2+) for their, activity, and zinc may be required for chlorophyll biosynthesis in some plants. Zinc deficiency is characterized by a, reduction in internodal growth, and as a result plants display a rosette habit of growth in which the leaves form a, circular cluster radiating at or close to the ground. The, leaves may also be small and distorted, with leaf margins, having a puckered appearance. These symptoms may, result from loss of the capacity to produce sufficient, amounts of the auxin indoleacetic acid. In some species, (corn, sorghum, beans), the older leaves may become intervenously chlorotic and then develop white necrotic spots., This chlorosis may be an expression of a zinc requirement, for chlorophyll biosynthesis., ZINC., , COPPER., , Like iron, copper is associated with enzymes, involved in redox reactions being reversibly oxidized from, , 75, , Cu+ to Cu2+. An example of such an enzyme is plastocyanin, which is involved in electron transfer during the, light reactions of photosynthesis (Haehnel 1984). The initial symptom of copper deficiency is the production of dark, green leaves, which may contain necrotic spots. The, necrotic spots appear first at the tips of the young leaves, and then extend toward the leaf base along the margins., The leaves may also be twisted or malformed. Under, extreme copper deficiency, leaves may abscise prematurely., NICKEL., , Urease is the only known nickel-containing, enzyme in higher plants, although nitrogen-fixing microorganisms require nickel for the enzyme that reprocesses, some of the hydrogen gas generated during fixation, (hydrogen uptake hydrogenase) (see Chapter 12). Nickeldeficient plants accumulate urea in their leaves and, consequently, show leaf tip necrosis. Plants grown in soil seldom, if ever, show signs of nickel deficiency because the, amounts of nickel required are minuscule., , Molybdenum ions (Mo4+ through Mo6+), are components of several enzymes, including nitrate, reductase and nitrogenase. Nitrate reductase catalyzes the, reduction of nitrate to nitrite during its assimilation by the, plant cell; nitrogenase converts nitrogen gas to ammonia in, nitrogen-fixing microorganisms (see Chapter 12). The first, indication of a molybdenum deficiency is general chlorosis between veins and necrosis of the older leaves. In some, plants, such as cauliflower or broccoli, the leaves may not, become necrotic but instead may appear twisted and subsequently die (whiptail disease). Flower formation may be, prevented, or the flowers may abscise prematurely., Because molybdenum is involved with both nitrate, assimilation and nitrogen fixation, a molybdenum deficiency may bring about a nitrogen deficiency if the nitrogen, source is primarily nitrate or if the plant depends on symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Although plants require only small, amounts of molybdenum, some soils supply inadequate, levels. Small additions of molybdenum to such soils can, greatly enhance crop or forage growth at negligible cost., MOLYBDENUM., , Analysis of Plant Tissues Reveals, Mineral Deficiencies, Requirements for mineral elements change during the, growth and development of a plant. In crop plants, nutrient levels at certain stages of growth influence the yield of, the economically important tissues (tuber, grain, and so, on). To optimize yields, farmers use analyses of nutrient, levels in soil and in plant tissue to determine fertilizer, schedules., Soil analysis is the chemical determination of the nutrient content in a soil sample from the root zone. As discussed later in the chapter, both the chemistry and the biology of soils are complex, and the results of soil analyses, vary with sampling methods, storage conditions for the
Page 101 :
76, , Chapter 5, , Growth or yield, (percent of maximum), , samples, and nutrient extraction techniques. Perhaps more, important is that a particular soil analysis reflects the levels of nutrients potentially available to the plant roots from, the soil, but soil analysis does not tell us how much of a, particular mineral nutrient the plant actually needs or is, able to absorb. This additional information is best determined by plant tissue analysis., Proper use of plant tissue analysis requires an understanding of the relationship between plant growth (or, yield) and the mineral concentration of plant tissue samples (Bouma 1983). As the data plot in Figure 5.3 shows,, when the nutrient concentration in a tissue sample is low,, growth is reduced. In this deficiency zone of the curve, an, increase in nutrient availability is directly related to an, increase in growth or yield. As the nutrient availability continues to increase, a point is reached at which further addition of nutrients is no longer related to increases in growth, or yield but is reflected in increased tissue concentrations., This region of the curve is often called the adequate zone., The transition between the deficiency and adequate, zones of the curve reveals the critical concentration of the, nutrient (see Figure 5.3), which may be defined as the minimum tissue content of the nutrient that is correlated with, maximal growth or yield. As the nutrient concentration of, the tissue increases beyond the adequate zone, growth or, yield declines because of toxicity (this is the toxic zone)., To evaluate the relationship between growth and tissue, nutrient concentration, researchers grow plants in soil or, nutrient solution in which all the nutrients are present in, , Deficiency, zone, , Adequate zone, , Toxic, zone, , 100, , 50, , 0, , adequate amounts except the nutrient under consideration., At the start of the experiment, the limiting nutrient is, added in increasing concentrations to different sets of, plants, and the concentrations of the nutrient in specific tissues are correlated with a particular measure of growth or, yield. Several curves are established for each element, one, for each tissue and tissue age., Because agricultural soils are often limited in the elements nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, many farmers routinely use, at a minimum, curves for these elements., If a nutrient deficiency is suspected, steps are taken to correct the deficiency before it reduces growth or yield. Plant, analysis has proven useful in establishing fertilizer schedules that sustain yields and ensure the food quality of, many crops., , TREATING NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCIES, Many traditional and subsistence farming practices promote the recycling of mineral elements. Crop plants absorb, the nutrients from the soil, humans and animals consume, locally grown crops, and crop residues and manure from, humans and animals return the nutrients to the soil. The, main losses of nutrients from such agricultural systems, ensue from leaching that carries dissolved ions away with, drainage water. In acid soils, leaching may be decreased by, the addition of lime—a mix of CaO, CaCO3, and, Ca(OH)2—to make the soil more alkaline because many, mineral elements form less soluble compounds when the, pH is higher than 6 (Figure 5.4)., In the high-production agricultural systems of industrial, countries, the unidirectional removal of nutrients from the, soil to the crop can become significant because a large portion of crop biomass leaves the area of cultivation. Plants, synthesize all their components from basic inorganic substances and sunlight, so it is important to restore these lost, nutrients to the soil through the addition of fertilizers., , Crop Yields Can Be Improved by, Addition of Fertilizers, Critical concentration, Concentration of nutrient in tissue, (mmol/g dry weight), , FIGURE 5.3 Relationship between yield (or growth) and the, nutrient content of the plant tissue. The yield parameter, may be expressed in terms of shoot dry weight or height., Three zones—deficiency, adequate, and toxic—are indicated on the graph. To yield data of this type, plants are, grown under conditions in which the concentration of one, essential nutrient is varied while all others are in adequate, supply. The effect of varying the concentration of this nutrient during plant growth is reflected in the growth or yield., The critical concentration for that nutrient is the concentration below which yield or growth is reduced., , Most chemical fertilizers contain inorganic salts of the, macronutrients nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (see, Table 5.1). Fertilizers that contain only one of these three, nutrients are termed straight fertilizers. Some examples of, straight fertilizers are superphosphate, ammonium nitrate,, and muriate of potash (a source of potassium). Fertilizers, that contain two or more mineral nutrients are called compound fertilizers or mixed fertilizers, and the numbers on, the package label, such as 10-14-10, refer to the effective percentages of N, P2O5, and K2O, respectively, in the fertilizer., With long-term agricultural production, consumption, of micronutrients can reach a point at which they, too, must, be added to the soil as fertilizers. Adding micronutrients to, the soil may also be necessary to correct a preexisting deficiency. For example, some soils in the United States are
Page 102 :
Mineral Nutrition, , water and oxygen availability, and the type and number of, microorganisms present in the soil., As a consequence, the rate of mineralization is highly, variable, and nutrients from organic residues become available to plants over periods that range from days to months, to years. The slow rate of mineralization hinders efficient, fertilizer use, so farms that rely solely on organic fertilizers, may require the addition of substantially more nitrogen or, phosphorus and suffer even higher nutrient losses than, farms that use chemical fertilizers. Residues from organic, fertilizers do improve the physical structure of most soils,, enhancing water retention during drought and increasing, drainage in wet weather., , Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sulfur, Calcium, Magnesium, Iron, , Some Mineral Nutrients Can Be, Absorbed by Leaves, , Manganese, Boron, Copper, Zinc, Molybdenum, 4.0, , 4.5, , 5.0, Acid, , 5.5, , 6.0, , 77, , 6.5 7.0, pH, Neutral, , 7.5, , 8.0, , 8.5, , 9.0, , Alkaline, , FIGURE 5.4 Influence of soil pH on the availability of nutrient elements in organic soils. The width of the shaded areas, indicates the degree of nutrient availability to the plant, root. All of these nutrients are available in the pH range of, 5.5 to 6.5. (From Lucas and Davis 1961.), , deficient in boron, copper, zinc, manganese, molybdenum,, or iron (Mengel and Kirkby 1987) and can benefit from, nutrient supplementation., Chemicals may also be applied to the soil to modify soil, pH. As Figure 5.4 shows, soil pH affects the availability of all, mineral nutrients. Addition of lime, as mentioned previously, can raise the pH of acidic soils; addition of elemental, sulfur can lower the pH of alkaline soils. In the latter case,, microorganisms absorb the sulfur and subsequently release, sulfate and hydrogen ions that acidify the soil., Organic fertilizers, in contrast to chemical fertilizers,, originate from the residues of plant or animal life or from, natural rock deposits. Plant and animal residues contain, many of the nutrient elements in the form of organic compounds. Before crop plants can acquire the nutrient elements from these residues, the organic compounds must, be broken down, usually by the action of soil microorganisms through a process called mineralization. Mineralization depends on many factors, including temperature,, , In addition to nutrients being added to the soil as fertilizers, some mineral nutrients can be applied to the leaves as, sprays, in a process known as foliar application, and the, leaves can absorb the applied nutrients. In some cases, this, method can have agronomic advantages over the application of nutrients to the soil. Foliar application can reduce, the lag time between application and uptake by the plant,, which could be important during a phase of rapid growth., It can also circumvent the problem of restricted uptake of, a nutrient from the soil. For example, foliar application of, mineral nutrients such as iron, manganese, and copper, may be more efficient than application through the soil,, where they are adsorbed on soil particles and hence are less, available to the root system., Nutrient uptake by plant leaves is most effective when, the nutrient solution remains on the leaf as a thin film, (Mengel and Kirkby 1987). Production of a thin film often, requires that the nutrient solutions be supplemented with, surfactant chemicals, such as the detergent Tween 80, that, reduce surface tension. Nutrient movement into the plant, seems to involve diffusion through the cuticle and uptake, by leaf cells. Although uptake through the stomatal pore, could provide a pathway into the leaf, the architecture of, the pore (see Figures 4.13 and 4.14) largely prevents liquid, penetration (Ziegler 1987)., For foliar nutrient application to be successful, damage, to the leaves must be minimized. If foliar sprays are, applied on a hot day, when evaporation is high, salts may, accumulate on the leaf surface and cause burning or, scorching. Spraying on cool days or in the evening helps to, alleviate this problem. Addition of lime to the spray diminishes the solubility of many nutrients and limits toxicity., Foliar application has proved economically successful, mainly with tree crops and vines such as grapes, but it is, also used with cereals. Nutrients applied to the leaves, could save an orchard or vineyard when soil-applied nutrients would be too slow to correct a deficiency. In wheat,, nitrogen applied to the leaves during the later stages of, growth enhances the protein content of seeds.
Page 103 :
78, , Chapter 5, , SOIL, ROOTS, AND MICROBES, The soil is a complex physical, chemical, and biological, substrate. It is a heterogeneous material containing solid,, liquid, and gaseous phases (see Chapter 4). All of these, phases interact with mineral elements. The inorganic particles of the solid phase provide a reservoir of potassium,, calcium, magnesium, and iron. Also associated with this, solid phase are organic compounds containing nitrogen,, phosphorus, and sulfur, among other elements. The liquid, phase of the soil constitutes the soil solution, which contains dissolved mineral ions and serves as the medium for, ion movement to the root surface. Gases such as oxygen,, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen are dissolved in the soil solution, but in roots gases are exchanged predominantly, through the air gaps between soil particles., From a biological perspective, soil constitutes a diverse, ecosystem in which plant roots and microorganisms compete strongly for mineral nutrients. In spite of this competition, roots and microorganisms can form alliances for, their mutual benefit (symbioses, singular symbiosis). In this, section we will discuss the importance of soil properties,, root structure, and mycorrhizal symbiotic relationships to, plant mineral nutrition. Chapter 12 addresses symbiotic, relationships with nitrogen-fixing bacteria., , Negatively Charged Soil Particles Affect the, Adsorption of Mineral Nutrients, , • Silt has particles between 0.002 and 0.02 mm., • Clay has particles smaller than 0.002 mm (see Table, 4.1)., The silicate-containing clay materials are further divided, into three major groups—kaolinite, illite, and montmorillonite—based on differences in their structure and physical properties (Table 5.5). The kaolinite group is generally, found in well-weathered soils; the montmorillonite and, illite groups are found in less weathered soils., Mineral cations such as ammonium (NH4+) and potassium (K+) adsorb to the negative surface charges of inorganic and organic soil particles. This cation adsorption is, an important factor in soil fertility. Mineral cations, adsorbed on the surface of soil particles are not easily lost, when the soil is leached by water, and they provide a nutrient reserve available to plant roots. Mineral nutrients, adsorbed in this way can be replaced by other cations in a, process known as cation exchange (Figure 5.5). The degree, to which a soil can adsorb and exchange ions is termed its, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and is highly dependent on, the soil type. A soil with higher cation exchange capacity, generally has a larger reserve of mineral nutrients., Mineral anions such as nitrate (NO3–) and chloride (Cl–), tend to be repelled by the negative charge on the surface of, soil particles and remain dissolved in the soil solution., Thus the anion exchange capacity of most agricultural soils, is small compared to the cation exchange capacity. Among, anions, nitrate remains mobile in the soil solution, where it, is susceptible to leaching by water moving through the soil., Phosphate ions (H2PO2–) may bind to soil particles containing aluminum or iron because the positively charged, iron and aluminum ions (Fe2+, Fe3+, and Al3+) have, hydroxyl (OH–) groups that exchange with phosphate. As, a result, phosphate can be tightly bound, and its mobility, and availability in soil can limit plant growth., Sulfate (SO42–) in the presence of calcium (Ca2+) forms, gypsum (CaSO4). Gypsum is only slightly soluble, but it, releases sufficient sulfate to support plant growth. Most, , Soil particles, both inorganic and organic, have predominantly negative charges on their surfaces. Many inorganic, soil particles are crystal lattices that are tetrahedral arrangements of the cationic forms of aluminum and silicon (Al3+, and Si4+) bound to oxygen atoms, thus forming aluminates, and silicates. When cations of lesser charge replace Al3+ and, Si4+, inorganic soil particles become negatively charged., Organic soil particles originate from the products of the, microbial decomposition of dead plants, animals, and, microorganisms. The negative surface charges of organic, particles result from the dissociation of hydrogen ions from, the carboxylic acid and phenolic groups present in this, TABLE 5.5, component of the soil. Most, Comparison of properties of three major types of silicate clays found in the soil, of the world’s soil particles,, however, are inorganic., Type of clay, Inorganic soils are categoProperty, Montmorillonite, Illite, Kaolinite, rized by particle size:, • Gravel has particles, larger than 2 mm., , Size (µm), , 0.01–1.0, , 0.1–2.0, , 0.1–5.0, , Shape, , Irregular flakes, , Irregular flakes, , Hexagonal crystals, , • Coarse sand has particles, between 0.2 and 2 mm., , Cohesion, , High, , Medium, , Low, , Water-swelling capacity, , High, , Medium, , Low, , • Fine sand has particles, between 0.02 and, 0.2 mm., , Cation exchange capacity, (milliequivalents 100 g−1), , 80–100, , 15–40, , 3–15, , Source: After Brady 1974.
Page 104 :
Mineral Nutrition, , K+, , K+, Soil particle, , K+, , K+, K+, , H+, , –, –, Ca2+, –, , Ca2+, , K+, , H+, Ca2+ –, , Mg2+, , –, , –, , –, –, , Ca2+, , Ca2+, Ca2+, , FIGURE 5.5 The principle of cation exchange on the surface, of a soil particle. Cations are bound to the surface of soil, particles because the surface is negatively charged., Addition of a cation such as potassium (K+) can displace, another cation such as calcium (Ca2+) from its binding on, the surface of the soil particle and make it available for, uptake by the root., , nonacid soils contain substantial amounts of calcium; consequently, sulfate mobility in these soils is low, so sulfate is, not highly susceptible to leaching., , Soil pH Affects Nutrient Availability, Soil Microbes,, and Root Growth, Hydrogen ion concentration (pH) is an important property, of soils because it affects the growth of plant roots and soil, microorganisms. Root growth is generally favored in, slightly acidic soils, at pH values between 5.5 and 6.5., Fungi generally predominate in acidic soils; bacteria, become more prevalent in alkaline soils. Soil pH determines the availability of soil nutrients (see Figure 5.4)., Acidity promotes the weathering of rocks that releases K+,, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Mn2+ and increases the solubility of carbonates, sulfates, and phosphates. Increasing the solubility, of nutrients facilitates their availability to roots., Major factors that lower the soil pH are the decomposition of organic matter and the amount of rainfall. Carbon, dioxide is produced as a result of the decomposition of, organic material and equilibrates with soil water in the following reaction:, CO2 + H2O ~, , H+, , exchange complex in a soil. Leaching then may remove, these ions from the upper soil layers, leaving a more acid, soil. By contrast, the weathering of rock in arid regions, releases K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Mn2+ to the soil, but because, of the low rainfall, these ions do not leach from the upper, soil layers, and the soil remains alkaline., , Excess Minerals in the Soil Limit Plant Growth, , K+, , –, , 79, , –, , + HCO3, , This reaction releases hydrogen ions (H+), lowering the pH, of the soil. Microbial decomposition of organic material, also produces ammonia and hydrogen sulfide that can be, oxidized in the soil to form the strong acids nitric acid, (HNO3) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4), respectively. Hydrogen, ions also displace K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Mn2+ from the cation, , When excess minerals are present in the soil, the soil is said, to be saline, and plant growth may be restricted if these mineral ions reach levels that limit water availability or exceed, the adequate zone for a particular nutrient (see Chapter 25)., Sodium chloride and sodium sulfate are the most common, salts in saline soils. Excess minerals in soils can be a major, problem in arid and semiarid regions because rainfall is, insufficient to leach the mineral ions from the soil layers near, the surface. Irrigated agriculture fosters soil salinization if, insufficient water is applied to leach the salt below the rooting zone. Irrigation water can contain 100 to 1000 g of minerals per cubic meter. An average crop requires about 4000, m3 of water per acre. Consequently, 400 to 4000 kg of minerals may be added to the soil per crop (Marschner 1995)., In saline soil, plants encounter salt stress. Whereas, many plants are affected adversely by the presence of relatively low levels of salt, other plants can survive high levels (salt-tolerant plants) or even thrive (halophytes) under, such conditions. The mechanisms by which plants tolerate, salinity are complex (see Chapter 25), involving molecular, synthesis, enzyme induction, and membrane transport. In, some species, excess minerals are not taken up; in others,, minerals are taken up but excreted from the plant by salt, glands associated with the leaves. To prevent toxic buildup, of mineral ions in the cytosol, many plants may sequester, them in the vacuole (Stewart and Ahmad 1983). Efforts are, under way to bestow salt tolerance on salt-sensitive crop, species using both classic plant breeding and molecular, biology (Hasegawa et al. 2000)., Another important problem with excess minerals is the, accumulation of heavy metals in the soil, which can cause, severe toxicity in plants as well as humans (see Web Essay, 5.1). Heavy metals include zinc, copper, cobalt, nickel, mercury, lead, cadmium, silver, and chromium (Berry and Wallace 1981)., , Plants Develop Extensive Root Systems, The ability of plants to obtain both water and mineral, nutrients from the soil is related to their capacity to develop, an extensive root system. In the late 1930s, H. J. Dittmer, examined the root system of a single winter rye plant after, 16 weeks of growth and estimated that the plant had 13 ×, 106 primary and lateral root axes, extending more than 500, km in length and providing 200 m2 of surface area (Dittmer, 1937). This plant also had more than 1010 root hairs, providing another 300 m2 of surface area.
Page 105 :
80, , Chapter 5, , In the desert, the roots of mesquite (genus Prosopis) may, extend down more than 50 m to reach groundwater. Annual, crop plants have roots that usually grow between 0.1 and, 2.0 m in depth and extend laterally to distances of 0.3 to 1.0, m. In orchards, the major root systems of trees planted 1 m, apart reach a total length of 12 to 18 km per tree. The annual, production of roots in natural ecosystems may easily surpass that of shoots, so in many respects, the aboveground, portions of a plant represent only “the tip of an iceberg.”, Plant roots may grow continuously throughout the year., Their proliferation, however, depends on the availability of, water and minerals in the immediate microenvironment, surrounding the root, the so-called rhizosphere. If the rhizosphere is poor in nutrients or too dry, root growth is, slow. As rhizosphere conditions improve, root growth, increases. If fertilization and irrigation provide abundant, nutrients and water, root growth may not keep pace with, shoot growth. Plant growth under such conditions, becomes carbohydrate limited, and a relatively small root, system meets the nutrient needs of the whole plant (Bloom, et al. 1993). Roots growing below the soil surface are studied by special techniques (see Web Topic 5.2)., , (A) Dry soil, , (B) Irrigated soil, , 30 cm, , FIGURE 5.6 Fibrous root systems of wheat (a monocot). (A), , Root Systems Differ in Form but Are Based on, Common Structures, , The root system of a mature (3-month-old) wheat plant, growing in dry soil. (B) The root system of a wheat plant, growing in irrigated soil. It is apparent that the morphology of the root system is affected by the amount of water, present in the soil. In a fibrous root system, the primary, root axes are no longer distinguishable. (After Weaver, 1926.), , The form of the root system differs greatly among plant, species. In monocots, root development starts with the, emergence of three to six primary (or seminal) root axes, from the germinating seed. With further growth, the plant, extends new adventitious roots, called nodal roots or brace, roots. Over time, the primary and nodal root axes grow and, branch extensively to form a complex fibrous root system, (Figure 5.6). In fibrous root systems, all the roots generally, have the same diameter (except where environmental conditions or pathogenic interactions modify the root structure), so it is difficult to distinguish a main root axis., In contrast to monocots, dicots develop root systems, with a main single root axis, called a taproot, which may, thicken as a result of secondary cambial activity. From this, main root axis, lateral roots develop to form an extensively, branched root system (Figure 5.7)., The development of the root system in both monocots, and dicots depends on the activity of the root apical meristem and the production of lateral root meristems. Figure, 5.8 shows a generalized diagram of the apical region of a, plant root and identifies the three zones of activity: meristematic, elongation, and maturation., In the meristematic zone, cells divide both in the direction of the root base to form cells that will differentiate into, the tissues of the functional root and in the direction of the, root apex to form the root cap. The root cap protects the, delicate meristematic cells as the root moves through the, soil. It also secretes a gelatinous material called mucigel,, which commonly surrounds the root tip. The precise function of the mucigel is uncertain, but it has been suggested, , that it lubricates the penetration of the root through the, soil, protects the root apex from desiccation, promotes the, transfer of nutrients to the root, or affects the interaction, between roots and soil microorganisms (Russell 1977). The, root cap is central to the perception of gravity, the signal, that directs the growth of roots downward. This process is, termed the gravitropic response (see Chapter 19)., Cell division at the root apex proper is relatively slow;, thus this region is called the quiescent center. After a few, generations of slow cell divisions, root cells displaced from, the apex by about 0.1 mm begin to divide more rapidly., Cell division again tapers off at about 0.4 mm from the, apex, and the cells expand equally in all directions., The elongation zone begins 0.7 to 1.5 mm from the apex, (see Figure 5.8). In this zone, cells elongate rapidly and, undergo a final round of divisions to produce a central ring, of cells called the endodermis. The walls of this endodermal cell layer become thickened, and suberin (see Chapter, 13) deposited on the radial walls forms the Casparian strip,, a hydrophobic structure that prevents the apoplastic movement of water or solutes across the root (see Figure 4.3)., The endodermis divides the root into two regions: the cortex toward the outside and the stele toward the inside. The, stele contains the vascular elements of the root: the, phloem, which transports metabolites from the shoot to the, root, and the xylem, which transports water and solutes to, the shoot.
Page 106 :
Mineral Nutrition, , 81, , (Bret-Harte and Silk 1994). The low rates of cell division in, the quiescent center may result from the fact that insufficient carbohydrates reach this centrally located region or, that this area is kept in an oxidized state (see Web Essay, 5.2)., Root hairs, with their large surface area for absorption, of water and solutes, first appear in the maturation zone, (see Figure 5.8), and it is here that the xylem develops the, capacity to translocate substantial quantities of water and, solutes to the shoot., , Maturation zone, , Root hair, , Cortex, Xylem, Stele, Phloem, , FIGURE 5.7 Taproot system of two adequately watered, dicots: sugar beet and alfalfa. The sugar beet root system is, typical of 5 months of growth; the alfalfa root system is typical of 2 years of growth. In both dicots, the root system, shows a major vertical root axis. In the case of sugar beet,, the upper portion of the taproot system is thickened, because of its function as storage tissue. (After Weaver, 1926.), , Elongation zone, , Alfalfa, , Epidermis, , Region of, rapid cell, division, , Meristematic, zone, , 30 cm, Sugar beet, , Endodermis, with Casparian, strip, , Quiescent, center (few, cell divisions), Root cap, , Phloem develops more rapidly than xylem, attesting to, the fact that phloem function is critical near the root apex., Large quantities of carbohydrates must flow through the, phloem to the growing apical zones in order to support cell, division and elongation. Carbohydrates provide rapidly, growing cells with an energy source and with the carbon, skeletons required to synthesize organic compounds. Sixcarbon sugars (hexoses) also function as osmotically active, solutes in the root tissue. At the root apex, where the, phloem is not yet developed, carbohydrate movement, depends on symplastic diffusion and is relatively slow, , Mucigel, sheath, , Apex, , FIGURE 5.8 Diagrammatic longitudinal section of the apical, , region of the root. The meristematic cells are located near, the tip of the root. These cells generate the root cap and the, upper tissues of the root. In the elongation zone, cells differentiate to produce xylem, phloem, and cortex. Root, hairs, formed in epidermal cells, first appear in the maturation zone.
Page 107 :
Chapter 5, , Different Areas of the Root Absorb, Different Mineral Ions, The precise point of entry of minerals into the root system, has been a topic of considerable interest. Some researchers, have claimed that nutrients are absorbed only at the apical, regions of the root axes or branches (Bar-Yosef et al. 1972);, others claim that nutrients are absorbed over the entire root, surface (Nye and Tinker 1977). Experimental evidence supports both possibilities, depending on the plant species and, the nutrient being investigated:, • Root absorption of calcium in barley appears to be, restricted to the apical region., • Iron may be taken up either at the apical region, as in, barley (Clarkson 1985), or over the entire root surface, as in corn (Kashirad et al. 1973)., • Potassium, nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate can, be absorbed freely at all locations of the root surface, (Clarkson 1985), but in corn the elongation zone has, the maximum rates of potassium accumulation, (Sharp et al. 1990) and nitrate absorption (Taylor and, Bloom 1998)., • In corn and rice, the root apex absorbs ammonium, more rapidly than the elongation zone does (Colmer, and Bloom 1998)., • In several species, root hairs are the most active in, phosphate absorption (Fohse et al. 1991)., The high rates of nutrient absorption in the apical root, zones result from the strong demand for nutrients in these, tissues and the relatively high nutrient availability in the, soil surrounding them. For example, cell elongation, depends on the accumulation of solutes such as potassium,, chloride, and nitrate to increase the osmotic pressure, within the cell (see Chapter 15). Ammonium is the preferred nitrogen source to support cell division in the meristem because meristematic tissues are often carbohydrate, limited, and the assimilation of ammonium consumes less, energy than that of nitrate (see Chapter 12). The root apex, and root hairs grow into fresh soil, where nutrients have, not yet been depleted., Within the soil, nutrients can move to the root surface, both by bulk flow and by diffusion (see Chapter 3). In bulk, flow, nutrients are carried by water moving through the, soil toward the root. The amount of nutrient provided to, the root by bulk flow depends on the rate of water flow, through the soil toward the plant, which depends on transpiration rates and on nutrient levels in the soil solution., When both the rate of water flow and the concentrations of, nutrients in the soil solution are high, bulk flow can play, an important role in nutrient supply., In diffusion, mineral nutrients move from a region of, higher concentration to a region of lower concentration., Nutrient uptake by the roots lowers the concentration of, nutrients at the root surface, generating concentration gradients in the soil solution surrounding the root. Diffusion, , of nutrients down their concentration gradient and bulk, flow resulting from transpiration can increase nutrient, availability at the root surface., When absorption of nutrients by the roots is high and, the nutrient concentration in the soil is low, bulk flow can, supply only a small fraction of the total nutrient requirement (Mengel and Kirkby 1987). Under these conditions,, diffusion rates limit the movement of nutrients to the root, surface. When diffusion is too slow to maintain high nutrient concentrations near the root, a nutrient depletion zone, forms adjacent to the root surface (Figure 5.9). This zone, extends from about 0.2 to 2.0 mm from the root surface,, depending on the mobility of the nutrient in the soil., The formation of a depletion zone tells us something, important about mineral nutrition: Because roots deplete, the mineral supply in the rhizosphere, their effectiveness, in mining minerals from the soil is determined not only by, the rate at which they can remove nutrients from the soil, solution, but by their continuous growth. Without growth,, roots would rapidly deplete the soil adjacent to their surface., Optimal nutrient acquisition therefore depends both on the capacity for nutrient uptake and on the ability of the root system to, grow into fresh soil., , Mycorrhizal Fungi Facilitate Nutrient, Uptake by Roots, Our discussion thus far has centered on the direct acquisition of mineral elements by the root, but this process may, be modified by the association of mycorrhizal fungi with, the root system. Mycorrhizae (singular mycorrhiza, from the, Greek words for “fungus” and “root”) are not unusual; in, fact, they are widespread under natural conditions. Much, of the world’s vegetation appears to have roots associated, , High nutrient level, Nutrient concentration, in the soil solution, , 82, , Depletion, zones, Low nutrient level, , Distance from the root surface, , FIGURE 5.9 Formation of a nutrient depletion zone in the, , region of the soil adjacent to the plant root. A nutrient, depletion zone forms when the rate of nutrient uptake by, the cells of the root exceeds the rate of replacement of the, nutrient by diffusion in the soil solution. This depletion, causes a localized decrease in the nutrient concentration in, the area adjacent to the root surface. (After Mengel and, Kirkby 1987.)
Page 108 :
Mineral Nutrition, with mycorrhizal fungi: 83% of dicots, 79% of monocots,, and all gymnosperms regularly form mycorrhizal associations (Wilcox 1991)., On the other hand, plants from the families Cruciferae, (cabbage), Chenopodiaceae (spinach), and Proteaceae, (macadamia nuts), as well as aquatic plants, rarely if ever, have mycorrhizae. Mycorrhizae are absent from roots in, very dry, saline, or flooded soils, or where soil fertility is, extreme, either high or low. In particular, plants grown, under hydroponics and young, rapidly growing crop, plants seldom have mycorrhizae., Mycorrhizal fungi are composed of fine, tubular filaments called hyphae (singular hypha). The mass of hyphae, that forms the body of the fungus is called the mycelium, (plural mycelia). There are two major classes of mycorrhizal, fungi: ectotrophic mycorrhizae and vesicular-arbuscular, mycorrhizae (Smith et al. 1997). Minor classes of mycorrhizal fungi include the ericaceous and orchidaceous mycorrhizae, which may have limited importance in terms of, mineral nutrient uptake., Ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi typically show a thick, sheath, or “mantle,” of fungal mycelium around the roots,, and some of the mycelium penetrates between the cortical, cells (Figure 5.10). The cortical cells themselves are not penetrated by the fungal hyphae but instead are surrounded, by a network of hyphae called the Hartig net. Often the, amount of fungal mycelium is so extensive that its total, , 83, , mass is comparable to that of the roots themselves. The, fungal mycelium also extends into the soil, away from this, compact mantle, where it forms individual hyphae or, strands containing fruiting bodies., The capacity of the root system to absorb nutrients is, improved by the presence of external fungal hyphae that, are much finer than plant roots and can reach beyond the, areas of nutrient-depleted soil near the roots (Clarkson, 1985). Ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi infect exclusively tree, species, including gymnosperms and woody angiosperms., Unlike the ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi, vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal fungi do not produce a compact, mantle of fungal mycelium around the root. Instead, the, hyphae grow in a less dense arrangement, both within the, root itself and extending outward from the root into the, surrounding soil (Figure 5.11). After entering the root, through either the epidermis or a root hair, the hyphae not, only extend through the regions between cells but also penetrate individual cells of the cortex. Within the cells, the, hyphae can form oval structures called vesicles and, branched structures called arbuscules. The arbuscules, appear to be sites of nutrient transfer between the fungus, and the host plant., , Reproductive, chlamydospore, Epidermis, , Epidermis, , Xylem, Arbuscule, Phloem, Cortex, , Endodermis, , Hartig net, Vesicle, , Root hair, , Fungal, sheath, , External, mycelium, , Cortex, Root, , 100 mm, , FIGURE 5.10 Root infected with ectotrophic mycorrhizal, , fungi. In the infected root, the fungal hyphae surround the, root to produce a dense fungal sheath and penetrate the, intercellular spaces of the cortex to form the Hartig net. The, total mass of fungal hyphae may be comparable to the root, mass itself. (From Rovira et al. 1983.), , FIGURE 5.11 Association of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with a section of a plant root. The fungal, hyphae grow into the intercellular wall spaces of the cortex, and penetrate individual cortical cells. As they extend into, the cell, they do not break the plasma membrane or the, tonoplast of the host cell. Instead, the hypha is surrounded, by these membranes and forms structures known as arbuscules, which participate in nutrient ion exchange between, the host plant and the fungus. (From Mauseth 1988.)
Page 109 :
84, , Chapter 5, , Outside the root, the external mycelium can extend several centimeters away from the root and may contain, spore-bearing structures. Unlike the ectotrophic mycorrhizae, vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae make up only a, small mass of fungal material, which is unlikely to exceed, 10% of the root weight. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae, are found in association with the roots of most species of, herbaceous angiosperms (Smith et al. 1997)., The association of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae, with plant roots facilitates the uptake of phosphorus and, trace metals such as zinc and copper. By extending beyond, the depletion zone for phosphorus around the root, the, external mycelium improves phosphorus absorption. Calculations show that a root associated with mycorrhizal, fungi can transport phosphate at a rate more than four, times higher than that of a root not associated with mycorrhizae (Nye and Tinker 1977). The external mycelium of, the ectotrophic mycorrhizae can also absorb phosphate and, make it available to the plant. In addition, it has been suggested that ectotrophic mycorrhizae proliferate in the, organic litter of the soil and hydrolyze organic phosphorus, for transfer to the root (Smith et al. 1997)., , Nutrients Move from the Mycorrhizal Fungi, to the Root Cells, Little is known about the mechanism by which the mineral, nutrients absorbed by mycorrhizal fungi are transferred to, the cells of plant roots. With ectotrophic mycorrhizae, inorganic phosphate may simply diffuse from the hyphae in, the Hartig net and be absorbed by the root cortical cells., With vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae, the situation may, be more complex. Nutrients may diffuse from intact arbuscules to root cortical cells. Alternatively, because some root, arbuscules are continually degenerating while new ones, are forming, degenerating arbuscules may release their, internal contents to the host root cells., A key factor in the extent of mycorrhizal association, with the plant root is the nutritional status of the host plant., Moderate deficiency of a nutrient such as phosphorus, tends to promote infection, whereas plants with abundant, nutrients tend to suppress mycorrhizal infection., Mycorrhizal association in well-fertilized soils may shift, from a symbiotic relationship to a parasitic one in that the, fungus still obtains carbohydrates from the host plant, but, the host plant no longer benefits from improved nutrient, uptake efficiency. Under such conditions, the host plant, may treat mycorrhizal fungi as it does other pathogens, (Brundrett 1991; Marschner 1995)., , SUMMARY, Plants are autotrophic organisms capable of using the, energy from sunlight to synthesize all their components, , from carbon dioxide, water, and mineral elements. Studies, of plant nutrition have shown that specific mineral elements are essential for plant life. These elements are classified as macronutrients or micronutrients, depending on, the relative amounts found in plant tissue., Certain visual symptoms are diagnostic for deficiencies, in specific nutrients in higher plants. Nutritional disorders, occur because nutrients have key roles in plant metabolism., They serve as components of organic compounds, in, energy storage, in plant structures, as enzyme cofactors,, and in electron transfer reactions. Mineral nutrition can be, studied through the use of hydroponics or aeroponics,, which allow the characterization of specific nutrient, requirements. Soil and plant tissue analysis can provide, information on the nutritional status of the plant–soil system and can suggest corrective actions to avoid deficiencies or toxicities., When crop plants are grown under modern high-production conditions, substantial amounts of nutrients are, removed from the soil. To prevent the development of deficiencies, nutrients can be added back to the soil in the form, of fertilizers. Fertilizers that provide nutrients in inorganic, forms are called chemical fertilizers; those that derive from, plant or animal residues are considered organic fertilizers., In both cases, plants absorb the nutrients primarily as inorganic ions. Most fertilizers are applied to the soil, but some, are sprayed on leaves., The soil is a complex substrate—physically, chemically,, and biologically. The size of soil particles and the cation, exchange capacity of the soil determine the extent to which, a soil provides a reservoir for water and nutrients. Soil pH, also has a large influence on the availability of mineral elements to plants., If mineral elements, especially sodium or heavy metals,, are present in excess in the soil, plant growth may be, adversely affected. Certain plants are able to tolerate excess, mineral elements, and a few species—for example, halophytes in the case of sodium—grow under these extreme, conditions., To obtain nutrients from the soil, plants develop extensive root systems. Roots have a relatively simple structure, with radial symmetry and few differentiated cell types., Roots continually deplete the nutrients from the immediate soil around them, and such a simple structure may permit rapid growth into fresh soil., Plant roots often form associations with mycorrhizal, fungi. The fine hyphae of mycorrhizae extend the reach of, roots into the surrounding soil and facilitate the acquisition, of mineral elements, particularly those like phosphorus, that are relatively immobile in the soil. In return, plants, provide carbohydrates to the mycorrhizae. Plants tend to, suppress mycorrhizal associations under conditions of high, nutrient availability.
Page 110 :
Mineral Nutrition, , Web Material, Web Topics, 5.1 Symptoms of Deficiency in Essential Minerals, Defficiency symptoms are characteristic of each, essential element and can be used as diagnostic, for the defficiency. These color pictures illustrate, defficiency symptoms for each essential element, in a tomato., , 5.2 Observing Roots below Ground, The study of roots growing under natural conditions requires means to observe roots below, ground. State-of-the-art techniques are described, in this essay., , Web Essays, 5.1 From Meals to Metals and Back, Heavy metal accumulation by plants is toxic., Understanding of the involved molecular, process is helping to develop better phytoremediation crops., , 5.2 Redox Control of the Root Quiescent Center, The redox status of the quiescent center seems, to control the cell cycle of these cells., , Chapter References, Arnon, D. I., and Stout, P. R. (1939) The essentiality of certain elements in minute quantity for plants with special reference to copper. Plant Physiol. 14: 371–375., Asher, C. J., and Edwards, D. G. (1983) Modern solution culture techniques. In Inorganic Plant Nutrition (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 15B), A. Läuchli and R. L. Bieleski, eds.,, Springer, Berlin, pp. 94–119., Bar-Yosef, B., Kafkafi, U., and Bresler, E. (1972) Uptake of phosphorus by plants growing under field conditions. I. Theoretical, model and experimental determination of its parameters. Soil Sci., 36: 783–800., Berry, W. L., and Wallace, A. (1981) Toxicity: The concept and relationship to the dose response curve. J. Plant Nutr. 3: 13–19., Bloom, A. J. (1994) Crop acquisition of ammonium and nitrate. In, Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield, K. J. Boote, J. M. Bennett, T. R. Sinclair, and G. M. Paulsen, eds., Soil Science Society of, America, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Madison,, WI, pp. 303–309., Bloom, A. J., Jackson, L. E., and Smart, D. R. (1993) Root growth as a, function of ammonium and nitrate in the root zone. Plant Cell, Environ. 16: 199–206., Bouma, D. (1983) Diagnosis of mineral deficiencies using plant tests., In Inorganic Plant Nutrition (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology,, New Series, Vol. 15B), A. Läuchli and R. L. Bieleski, eds., Springer,, Berlin, pp. 120–146., Brady, N. C. (1974) The Nature and Properties of Soils, 8th ed. Macmillan, New York., , 85, , Bret-Harte, M. S., and Silk, W. K. (1994) Nonvascular, symplasmic, diffusion of sucrose cannot satisfy the carbon demands of growth, in the primary root tip of Zea mays L. Plant Physiol. 105: 19–33., Brundrett, M. C. (1991) Mycorrhizas in natural ecosystems. Adv. Ecol., Res. 21: 171–313., Clarke, S. M., and Eaton-Rye, J. J. (2000) Amino acid deletions in loop, C of the chlorophyll a-binding protein CP47 alter the chloride, requirement and/or prevent the assembly of photosystem II., Plant Mol. Biol. 44: 591–601., Clarkson, D. T. (1985) Factors affecting mineral nutrient acquisition, by plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36: 77–116., Colmer, T. D., and Bloom, A. J. (1998) A comparison of net NH4+ and, NO3– fluxes along roots of rice and maize. Plant Cell Environ. 21:, 240–246., Cooper, A. (1979) The ABC of NFT: Nutrient Film Technique: The, World’s First Method of Crop Production without a Solid Rooting, Medium. Grower Books, London., Dittmer, H. J. (1937) A quantitative study of the roots and root hairs, of a winter rye plant (Secale cereale). Am. J. Bot. 24: 417–420., Epstein, E. (1972) Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives. Wiley, New York., Epstein, E. (1999) Silicon. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50:, 641–664., Evans, H. J., and Sorger, G. J. (1966) Role of mineral elements with, emphasis on the univalent cations. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 17:, 47–76., Foehse, D., Claassen, N., and Jungk, A. (1991) Phosphorus efficiency, of plants. II. Significance of root radius, root hairs and cationanion balance for phosphorus influx in seven plant species. Plant, Soil 132: 261–272., Gericke, W. F. (1937) Hydroponics—Crop production in liquid culture media. Science 85: 177–178., Haehnel, W. (1984) Photosynthetic electron transport in higher, plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35: 659–693., Harling, H., Czaja, I., Schell, J., and Walden, R. (1997) A plant cationchloride co-transporter promoting auxin-independent tobacco, protoplast division. EMBO J. 16: 5855–5866., Hasegawa, P. M., Bressan, R. A., Zhu, J.-K., and Bohnert, H. J. (2000), Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev., Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51: 463–499., Hepler, P. K., and Wayne, R. O. (1985) Calcium and plant development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36: 397–440., Johnstone, M., Grof, C. P. L., and Brownell, P. F. (1988) The effect of, sodium nutrition on the pool sizes of intermediates of the C4 photosynthetic pathway. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15: 749–760., Kashirad, A., Marschner, H., and Richter, C. H. (1973) Absorption, and translocation of 59Fe from various parts of the corn plant. Z., Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 134: 136–147., Loomis, R. S., and Connor, D. J. (1992) Crop Ecology: Productivity and, Management in Agricultural Systems. Cambridge University Press,, Cambridge., Lucas, R. E., and Davis, J. F. (1961) Relationships between pH values, of organic soils and availabilities of 12 plant nutrients. Soil Sci. 92:, 177–182., Macek, T., Mackova, M., and Kas, J. (2000) Exploitation of plants for, the removal of organics in environmental remediation. Biotech., Adv. 18: 23–34., Marschner, H. (1995) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London., Mauseth, J. D. (1988) Plant Anatomy. Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co.,, Menlo Park, CA., Mengel, K., and Kirkby, E. A. (1987) Principles of Plant Nutrition. International Potash Institute, Worblaufen-Bern, Switzerland., Nolan, B. T. and Stoner, J. D. (2000) Nutrients in groundwater of the, center conterminous United States 1992-1995. Environ. Sci. Tech., 34: 1156–1165.
Page 111 :
86, , Chapter 5, , Nye, P. H., and Tinker, P. B. (1977) Solute Movement in the Soil-Root, System. University of California Press, Berkeley., Oh, S.-H., Cho, S.-W., Kwon, T.-H., and Yang, M.-S. (1996) Purification and characterization of phytoferritin. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29:, 540–544., Raven, J. A., and Smith, F. A. (1976) Nitrogen assimilation and transport in vascular land plants in relation to intracellular pH regulation. New Phytol. 76: 415–431., Rovira, A. D., Bowen, C. D., and Foster, R. C. (1983) The significance, of rhizosphere microflora and mycorrhizas in plant nutrition. In, Inorganic Plant Nutrition (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New, Series, Vol. 15B) A. Läuchli and R. L. Bieleskis, eds., Springer,, Berlin, pp. 61–93., Russell, R. S. (1977) Plant Root Systems: Their Function and Interaction, with the Soil. McGraw-Hill, London., Sanders, D., Brownlee, C., and Harper J. F. (1999) Communicating, with calcium. Plant Cell 11: 691–706., Sharp, R. E., Hsiao, T. C., and Silk, W. K. (1990) Growth of the maize, primary root at low water potentials. 2. Role of growth and deposition of hexose and potassium in osmotic adjustment. Plant, Physiol. 93: 1337–1346., Shelp, B. J. (1993) Physiology and biochemistry of boron in plants., In Boron and Its Role in Crop Production, U. C. Gupta, ed., CRC, Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 53–85., , Sievers, R. E., and Bailar, J. C., Jr. (1962) Some metal chelates of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid,, and triethylenetriaminehexaacetic acid. Inorganic Chem. 1:, 174–182., Smith, S. E., Read, D. J., and Harley, J. L. (1997) Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA., Stewart, G. R., and Ahmad, I. (1983) Adaptation to salinity in, angiosperm halophytes. In Metals and Micronutrients: Uptake and, Utilization by Plants, D. A. Robb and W. S. Pierpoint, eds., Academic Press, New York, pp. 33–50., Taylor, A. R., and Bloom, A. J. (1998) Ammonium, nitrate and proton fluxes along the maize root. Plant Cell Environ. 21: 1255–1263., Weathers, P. J., and Zobel, R. W. (1992) Aeroponics for the culture of, organisms, tissues, and cells. Biotech. Adv. 10: 93–115., Weaver, J. E. (1926) Root Development of Field Crops. McGraw-Hill,, New York., Wilcox, H. E. (1991) Mycorrhizae. In Plant Roots: The Hidden Half, Y., Waisel, A. Eshel, and U. Kafkafi, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York,, pp. 731–765., Ziegler, H. (1987) The evolution of stomata. In Stomatal Function, E., Zeiger, G. Farquhar, and I. Cowan, eds., Stanford University, Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 29–57.
Page 112 :
Chapter, , 6, , Solute Transport, , PLANT CELLS ARE SEPARATED from their environment by a plasma, membrane that is only two lipid molecules thick. This thin layer separates a relatively constant internal environment from highly variable, external surroundings. In addition to forming a hydrophobic barrier to, diffusion, the membrane must facilitate and continuously regulate the, inward and outward traffic of selected molecules and ions as the cell, takes up nutrients, exports wastes, and regulates its turgor pressure. The, same is true of the internal membranes that separate the various compartments within each cell., As the cell’s only contact with its surroundings, the plasma membrane must also relay information about its physical environment, about, molecular signals from other cells, and about the presence of invading, pathogens. Often these signal transduction processes are mediated by, changes in ion fluxes across the membrane., Molecular and ionic movement from one location to another is known, as transport. Local transport of solutes into or within cells is regulated, mainly by membranes. Larger-scale transport between plant and environment, or between leaves and roots, is also controlled by membrane, transport at the cellular level. For example, the transport of sucrose from, leaf to root through the phloem, referred to as translocation, is driven and, regulated by membrane transport into the phloem cells of the leaf, and, from the phloem to the storage cells of the root (see Chapter 10)., In this chapter we will consider first the physical and chemical principles that govern the movements of molecules in solution. Then we will, show how these principles apply to membranes and to biological systems. We will also discuss the molecular mechanisms of transport in living cells and the great variety of membrane transport proteins that are, responsible for the particular transport properties of plant cells. Finally,, we will examine the pathway that ions take when they enter the root, as, well as the mechanism of xylem loading, the process whereby ions are, released into the vessel elements and tracheids of the stele.
Page 113 :
88, , Chapter 6, , PASSIVE AND ACTIVE TRANSPORT, According to Fick’s first law (see Equation 3.1), the movement of molecules by diffusion always proceeds spontaneously, down a gradient of concentration or chemical, potential (see Chapter 2 on the web site), until equilibrium, is reached. The spontaneous “downhill” movement of molecules is termed passive transport. At equilibrium, no further net movements of solute can occur without the application of a driving force., The movement of substances against or up a gradient, of chemical potential (e.g., to a higher concentration) is, termed active transport. It is not spontaneous, and it, requires that work be done on the system by the application of cellular energy. One way (but not the only way) of, accomplishing this task is to couple transport to the hydrolysis of ATP., Recall from Chapter 3 that we can calculate the driving, force for diffusion, or, conversely, the energy input necessary to move substances against a gradient, by measuring, the potential-energy gradient, which is often a simple function of the difference in concentration. Biological transport, can be driven by four major forces: concentration, hydrostatic pressure, gravity, and electric fields. (However, recall, from Chapter 3 that in biological systems, gravity seldom, contributes substantially to the force that drives transport.), The chemical potential for any solute is defined as the, sum of the concentration, electric, and hydrostatic potentials (and the chemical potential under standard conditions):, µ~ j, , =, , Chemical, potential, for a given, solute, j, +, , µ j*, +, Chemical, potential, of j under, standard, conditions, , z j FE, Electricpotential, component, , +, , RT ln Cj, Concentration, (activity), component, (6.1), , of j. (The partial molal volume of j is the change in volume, per mole of substance j added to the system, for an infinitesimal addition.), –, This final term, VjP, makes a much smaller contribution, ~, to mj than do the concentration and electrical terms, except, in the very important case of osmotic water movements. As, discussed in Chapter 3, the chemical potential of water (i.e.,, the water potential) depends on the concentration of dissolved solutes and the hydrostatic pressure on the system., The importance of the concept of chemical potential is that it, sums all the forces that may act on a molecule to drive net transport (Nobel 1991)., In general, diffusion (or passive transport) always, moves molecules from areas of higher chemical potential, downhill to areas of lower chemical potential. Movement, against a chemical-potential gradient is indicative of active, transport (Figure 6.1)., If we take the diffusion of sucrose across a permeable, membrane as an example, we can accurately approximate, the chemical potential of sucrose in any compartment by, the concentration term alone (unless a solution is very concentrated, causing hydrostatic pressure to build up). From, Equation 6.1, the chemical potential of sucrose inside a cell, can be described as follows (in the next three equations, the, subscript s stands for sucrose, and the superscripts i and, o stand for inside and outside, respectively):, µ~si, , =, , µs*, , Chemical, potential, of sucrose, solution, inside the, cell, , Chemical, potential, of sucrose, solution, under, standard, conditions, , Here m~j is the chemical potential of the solute species j in, joules per mole (J mol–1), mj* is its chemical potential under, standard conditions (a correction factor that will cancel out, in future equations and so can be ignored), R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, and Cj is, the concentration (more accurately the activity) of j., The electrical term, zjFE, applies only to ions; z is the, electrostatic charge of the ion (+1 for monovalent cations,, –1 for monovalent anions, +2 for divalent cations, and so, on), F is Faraday’s constant (equivalent to the electric, charge on 1 mol of protons), and E is the overall electric, potential of the solution (with respect to ground). The final, –, term, VjP, expresses the contribution of the partial molal, –, volume of j (Vj) and pressure (P) to the chemical potential, , RT ln Csi, Concentration, component, , (6.2), , The chemical potential of sucrose outside the cell is calculated as follows:, , –, Vj P, Hydrostaticpressure, component, , +, , m~so = ms*+ RT ln Cso, , (6.3), , We can calculate the difference in the chemical potential, of sucrose between the solutions inside and outside the cell,, ∆m~s, regardless of the mechanism of transport. To get the, signs right, remember that for inward transport, sucrose is, being removed (–) from outside the cell and added (+) to, the inside, so the change in free energy in joules per mole, of sucrose transported will be as follows:, ∆m˜ σ = m˜ σι − m˜ σο, , (6.4), , Substituting the terms from Equations 6.2 and 6.3 into, Equation 6.4, we get the following:, , (, , ) (, − ln C ), , *, i, *, o, ∆ m˜ s = m s + RT ln Cs − m s + RT ln Cs, , (, , = RT ln Cs, = RT ln, , i, , i, , Cs, Cs o, , s, , o, , ), (6.5)
Page 114 :
Solute Transport, FIGURE 6.1 Relationship, between the chemical potential, m~, and the transport of, molecules across a permeability barrier. The net movement, of molecular species j, between compartments A and, B depends on the relative, magnitude of the chemical, potential of j in each compartment, represented here, by the size of the boxes., Movement down a chemical, gradient occurs spontaneously and is called passive, transport; movement against, or up a gradient requires, energy and is called active, transport., , 89, , Semipermeable, membrane, Chemical potential, in compartment A, , Chemical potential, in compartment B, , m˜ jA, , m˜ jB, , Description, , Passive transport (diffusion) occurs, spontaneously down a chemicalpotential gradient., m˜ jA > m˜ jB, , m˜ jB, , m˜ jA, , At equilibrium, m˜ jA = m˜ jB . If there, is no active transport, steady, state occurs., , Active transport occurs against a, chemical potential gradient., m˜ jB, , m˜ jA, , ∆G per mole for movement of j from, A to B is equal to m˜ jB – m˜ jA . For an, overall negative ∆G, the reaction, must be coupled to a process that has, a ∆G more negative than –( m˜ jB – m˜ jA )., , If this difference in chemical potential is negative, sucrose, could diffuse inward spontaneously (provided the membrane had a finite permeability to sucrose; see the next section). In other words, the driving force (∆m~s) for solute diffusion is related to the magnitude of the concentration, gradient (Csi/Cso)., If the solute carries an electric charge (as does the potassium ion), the electrical component of the chemical potential must also be considered. Suppose the membrane is permeable to K+ and Cl– rather than to sucrose. Because the, ionic species (K+ and Cl–) diffuse independently, each has, its own chemical potential. Thus for inward K+ diffusion,, ∆ m˜ Κ = m˜ Κ ι − m˜ Κ ο, , (6.6), , Substituting the appropriate terms from Equation 6.1 into, Equation 6.6, we get, ∆m~s = (RT ln [K+]i + zFEi) – (RT ln [K+]o + zFEo), , (6.7), , and because the electrostatic charge of K+ is +1, z = +1 and, ~ = RT ln, ∆µ, K, , [K+]i, + F(Ei – Eo), [K+]o, , m˜ jA < m˜ jB, , (6.8), , The magnitude and sign of this expression will indicate the, driving force for K+ diffusion across the membrane, and its, direction. A similar expression can be written for Cl– (but, remember that for Cl–, z = –1)., , Equation 6.8 shows that ions, such as K+, diffuse in rei, +]o), sponse to both their concentration gradients ([K+]/[K, and any electric-potential difference between the two, compartments (Ei – Eo). One very important implication, of this equation is that ions can be driven passively, against their concentration gradients if an appropriate, voltage (electric field) is applied between the two compartments. Because of the importance of electric fields in, biological transport, m~ is often called the electrochemical, potential, and ∆m~ is the difference in electrochemical, potential between two compartments., , TRANSPORT OF IONS ACROSS A, MEMBRANE BARRIER, If the two KCl solutions in the previous example are separated by a biological membrane, diffusion is complicated, by the fact that the ions must move through the membrane, as well as across the open solutions. The extent to which, a membrane permits the movement of a substance is called, membrane permeability. As will be discussed later, permeability depends on the composition of the membrane, as, well as on the chemical nature of the solute. In a loose, sense, permeability can be expressed in terms of a diffusion, coefficient for the solute in the membrane. However, permeability is influenced by several additional factors, such
Page 115 :
90, , Chapter 6, , as the ability of a substance to enter the membrane, that are, difficult to measure., Despite its theoretical complexity, we can readily measure permeability by determining the rate at which a solute, passes through a membrane under a specific set of conditions. Generally the membrane will hinder diffusion and, thus reduce the speed with which equilibrium is reached., The permeability or resistance of the membrane itself, however, cannot alter the final equilibrium conditions. Equilibrium occurs when ∆m~j = 0., In the sections that follow we will discuss the factors, that influence the passive distribution of ions across a, membrane. These parameters can be used to predict the, relationship between the electrical gradient and the concentration gradient of an ion., , Diffusion Potentials Develop When Oppositely, Charged Ions Move across a Membrane at, Different Rates, When salts diffuse across a membrane, an electric membrane potential (voltage) can develop. Consider the two, KCl solutions separated by a membrane in Figure 6.2. The, K+ and Cl– ions will permeate the membrane independently as they diffuse down their respective gradients of, , Compartment A, , Compartment B, K+ Cl–, , Membrane, Initial conditions:, [KCl]A > [KCl]B, , Diffusion potential exists, until chemical equilibrium, is reached., , –, , +, , Equilibrium conditions:, [KCl]A = [KCl]B, At chemical equilibrium,, diffusion potential equals, zero., , FIGURE 6.2 Development of a diffusion potential and a, , charge separation between two compartments separated by, a membrane that is preferentially permeable to potassium., If the concentration of potassium chloride is higher in compartment A ([KCl]A > [KCl]B), potassium and chloride ions, will diffuse at a higher rate into compartment B, and a diffusion potential will be established. When membranes are, more permeable to potassium than to chloride, potassium, ions will diffuse faster than chloride ions, and charge separation (+ and –) will develop., , electrochemical potential. And unless the membrane is, very porous, its permeability for the two ions will differ., As a consequence of these different permeabilities, K+, and Cl– initially will diffuse across the membrane at different rates. The result will be a slight separation of charge,, which instantly creates an electric potential across the, membrane. In biological systems, membranes are usually, more permeable to K+ than to Cl–. Therefore, K+ will diffuse out of the cell (compartment A in Figure 6.2) faster, than Cl–, causing the cell to develop a negative electric, charge with respect to the medium. A potential that develops as a result of diffusion is called a diffusion potential., An important principle that must always be kept in, mind when the movement of ions across membranes is, considered is the principle of electrical neutrality. Bulk, solutions always contain equal numbers of anions and, cations. The existence of a membrane potential implies that, the distribution of charges across the membrane is uneven;, however, the actual number of unbalanced ions is negligible in chemical terms. For example, a membrane potential, of –100 mV (millivolts), like that found across the plasma, membranes of many plant cells, results from the presence, of only one extra anion out of every 100,000 within the, cell—a concentration difference of only 0.001%!, As Figure 6.2 shows, all of these extra anions are found, immediately adjacent to the surface of the membrane; there, is no charge imbalance throughout the bulk of the cell. In, our example of KCl diffusion across a membrane, electrical neutrality is preserved because as K+ moves ahead of, Cl– in the membrane, the resulting diffusion potential, retards the movement of K+ and speeds that of Cl–. Ultimately, both ions diffuse at the same rate, but the diffusion, potential persists and can be measured. As the system, moves toward equilibrium and the concentration gradient, collapses, the diffusion potential also collapses., , The Nernst Equation Relates the Membrane, Potential to the Distribution of an Ion at, Equilibrium, Because the membrane is permeable to both K+ and Cl–, ions, equilibrium in the preceding example will not be, reached for either ion until the concentration gradients, decrease to zero. However, if the membrane were permeable to only K+, diffusion of K+ would carry charges across, the membrane until the membrane potential balanced the, concentration gradient. Because a change in potential, requires very few ions, this balance would be reached, instantly. Transport would then be at equilibrium, even, though the concentration gradients were unchanged., When the distribution of any solute across a membrane, reaches equilibrium, the passive flux, J (i.e., the amount of, solute crossing a unit area of membrane per unit time), is, the same in the two directions—outside to inside and, inside to outside:, Jo→i = Ji→o
Page 116 :
Solute Transport, Fluxes are related to ∆m~ (for a discussion on fluxes and, ∆m, see Chapter 2 on the web site); thus at equilibrium,, the electrochemical potentials will be the same:, ~, , m~jo = m~ji, , Ag/AgCl junctions to, permit reversible, electric current, , + RT ln, , Cjo, , +, , zjFEo, , =, , m j*+, , Glass, pipette, , Voltmeter, , and for any given ion (the ion is symbolized here by the, subscript j):, m j*, , 91, , Cji, , RT ln, , +, , zjFEi, , Salt, solution, Cell wall, , (6.9), , –, , By rearranging Equation 6.9, we can obtain the difference, in electric potential between the two compartments at equilibrium (Ei – Eo):, , +, , Open tip, (<1 mm, diameter), , Plasma, membrane, seals to, glass, , Cj o , Ei − Eo = RT ln i , zj F, Cj , , This electric-potential difference is known as the Nernst, potential (∆Ej) for that ion:, ∆Ej = Ei – Eo, , and, Cϕ ο , ∆Eϕ = RT ln ι, zϕ F C , ϕ, , or, , , Cϕ, ∆Eϕ = 2.3 RT log ι , zϕ F , Cϕ , , This relationship, known as the Nernst equation, states, that at equilibrium the difference in concentration of an ion, between two compartments is balanced by the voltage difference between the compartments. The Nernst equation, can be further simplified for a univalent cation at 25°C:, Cϕ ο, Cϕ ι, , Conducting, nutrient, solution, Plant tissue, , ο, , ∆ Eϕ = 59µς log, , Microelectrode, , (6.11), , Note that a tenfold difference in concentration corresponds, to a Nernst potential of 59 mV (Co/Ci = 10/1; log 10 = 1)., That is, a membrane potential of 59 mV would maintain a, tenfold concentration gradient of an ion that is transported, by passive diffusion. Similarly, if a tenfold concentration, gradient of an ion existed across the membrane, passive, diffusion of that ion down its concentration gradient (if it, were allowed to come to equilibrium) would result in a difference of 59 mV across the membrane., All living cells exhibit a membrane potential that is due, to the asymmetric ion distribution between the inside and, outside of the cell. We can readily determine these membrane potentials by inserting a microelectrode into the cell, and measuring the voltage difference between the inside of, the cell and the external bathing medium (Figure 6.3)., The Nernst equation can be used at any time to determine, whether a given ion is at equilibrium across a membrane., However, a distinction must be made between equilibrium, and steady state. Steady state is the condition in which influx, and efflux of a given solute are equal and therefore the ion, , FIGURE 6.3 Diagram of a pair of microelectrodes used to, measure membrane potentials across cell membranes. One, of the glass micropipette electrodes is inserted into the cell, compartment under study (usually the vacuole or the cytoplasm), while the other is kept in an electrolytic solution, that serves as a reference. The microelectrodes are connected to a voltmeter, which records the electric-potential, difference between the cell compartment and the solution., Typical membrane potentials across plant cell membranes, range from –60 to –240 mV. The insert shows how electrical, contact with the interior of the cell is made through the, open tip of the glass micropipette, which contains an electrically conducting salt solution., , concentrations are constant with respect to time. Steady state, is not the same as equilibrium (see Figure 6.1); in steady state,, the existence of active transport across the membrane prevents many diffusive fluxes from ever reaching equilibrium., , The Nernst Equation Can Be Used to Distinguish, between Active and Passive Transport, Table 6.1 shows how the experimentally measured ion concentrations at steady state for pea root cells compare with, predicted values calculated from the Nernst equation (Higinbotham et al. 1967). In this example, the external concentration of each ion in the solution bathing the tissue, and, the measured membrane potential, were substituted into, the Nernst equation, and a predicted internal concentration, was calculated for that ion., Notice that, of all the ions shown in Table 6.1, only K+ is, at or near equilibrium. The anions NO3–, Cl–, H2PO4–, and, SO42– all have higher internal concentrations than predicted, indicating that their uptake is active. The cations
Page 117 :
92, , Chapter 6, , TABLE 6.1, Comparison of observed and predicted ion concentrations in, pea root tissue, , Ion, , K+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, NO3–, Cl–, H2PO4–, SO42–, , Concentration, in external, medium, (mmol L–1), , 1, 1, 0.25, 1, 2, 1, 1, 0.25, , Internal concentration (mmol L–1), Predicted, Observed, , 74, 74, 1340, 5360, 0.0272, 0.0136, 0.0136, 0.00005, , 75, 8, 3, 2, 28, 7, 21, 19, , Proton Transport Is a Major, Determinant of the Membrane, Potential, , Source: Data from Higinbotham et al. 1967., Note: The membrane potential was measured as –110 mV., , Na+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ have lower internal concentrations, than predicted; therefore, these ions enter the cell by diffusion down their electrochemical-potential gradients and, then are actively exported., The example shown in Table 6.1 is an oversimplification:, Plant cells have several internal compartments, each of, which can differ in its ionic composition. The cytosol and, the vacuole are the most important intracellular compartments that determine the ionic relations of plant cells. In, mature plant cells, the central vacuole often occupies 90%, or more of the cell’s volume, and the cytosol is restricted to, a thin layer around the periphery of the cell., Because of its small volume, the cytosol of most, angiosperm cells is difficult to assay chemically. For this reason, much of the early work on the ionic relations of plants, focused on certain green algae, such as Chara and Nitella,, whose cells are several inches long and can contain an appreciable volume of cytosol. Figure 6.4 diagrams the conclusions, from these studies and from related work with higher plants., • Potassium is accumulated passively by both the, cytosol and the vacuole, except when extracellular K+, concentrations are very low, in which case it is taken, up actively., • Sodium is pumped actively out of the cytosol into the, extracellular spaces and vacuole., • Excess protons, generated by intermediary metabolism, are also actively extruded from the cytosol. This, process helps maintain the cytosolic pH near neutrality, while the vacuole and the extracellular medium, are generally more acidic by one or two pH units., • All the anions are taken up actively into the cytosol., • Calcium is actively transported out of the cytosol at, both the cell membrane and the vacuolar membrane,, which is called the tonoplast (see Figure 6.4)., , Many different ions permeate the, membranes of living cells simultaneously, but K+, Na+, and Cl– have the highest concentrations and largest permeabilities in plant cells. A modified version of, the Nernst equation, the Goldman equation, includes all three of these ions and, therefore gives a more accurate value for, the diffusion potential in these cells. The, diffusion potential calculated from the, Goldman equation is termed the Goldman, diffusion potential (for a detailed discussion of the Goldman equation, see Web, Topic 6.1)., , When permeabilities and ion gradients are known, it is, possible to calculate a diffusion potential for the membrane, from the Goldman equation. In most cells, K+ has both the, greatest internal concentration and the highest membrane, permeability, so the diffusion potential may approach EK,, the Nernst potential for K+., In some organisms, or in tissues such as nerves, the normal resting potential of the cell may be close to EK. This is not, , Plasma membrane, Tonoplast, , Vacuole, , Cell wall, Cytosol, K+, , K+, , K+, Cl–, , Na+, , Na+, , Cl–, Na+, , NO3–, Ca2+, , Ca2+, , H+, , NO3–, , NO3–, , H2PO4–, , H2PO4–, , Ca2+, H2PO4–, , H+, , Cl–, , H+, , FIGURE 6.4 Ion concentrations in the cytosol and the vacuole are controlled by passive (dashed arrows) and active, (solid arrows) transport processes. In most plant cells the, vacuole occupies up to 90% of the cell’s volume and contains the bulk of the cell solutes. Control of the ion concentrations in the cytosol is important for the regulation of, metabolic enzymes. The cell wall surrounding the plasma, membrane does not represent a permeability barrier and, hence is not a factor in solute transport.
Page 118 :
Solute Transport, , NH2, , C, , O, P, O–, , O, , P, O–, , O, , P, , N, , N, , O, , O, , O, , CH2, , O–, H, , CH, , C, , HC, , –O, , N, , C, , N, , H, , O, H, , H, , OH OH, , Adenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP 4– ), , The energy required for active transport is often provided by the hydrolysis of ATP. In plants we can study the, dependence of the membrane potential on ATP by observing the effect of cyanide (CN–) on the membrane potential, (Figure 6.5). Cyanide rapidly poisons the mitochondria,, and the cell’s ATP consequently becomes depleted. As ATP, synthesis is inhibited, the membrane potential falls to the, level of the Goldman diffusion potential, which, as discussed in the previous section, is due primarily to the passive movements of K+, Cl–, and Na+ (see Web Topic 6.1)., Thus the membrane potentials of plant cells have two, components: a diffusion potential and a component resulting from electrogenic ion transport (transport that results, in the generation of a membrane potential) (Spanswick, 1981). When cyanide inhibits electrogenic ion transport, the, pH of the external medium increases while the cytosol, becomes acidic because H+ remains inside the cell. This is, one piece of evidence that it is the active transport of H+, out of the cell that is electrogenic., As discussed earlier, a change in the membrane potential caused by an electrogenic pump will change the driving forces for diffusion of all ions that cross the membrane., For example, the outward transport of H+ can create a driving force for the passive diffusion of K+ into the cell. H+ is, transported electrogenically across the plasma membrane, not only in plants but also in bacteria, algae, fungi, and, some animal cells, such as those of the kidney epithelia., , ATP synthesis in mitochondria and chloroplasts also, depends on a H+-ATPase. In these organelles, this transport, protein is sometimes called ATP synthase because it forms, ATP rather than hydrolyzing it (see Chapter 11). The structure and function of membrane proteins involved in active, and passive transport in plant cells will be discussed later., , MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROCESSES, Artificial membranes made of pure phospholipids have, been used extensively to study membrane permeability., When the permeability of artificial phospholipid bilayers, for ions and molecules is compared with that of biological, membranes, important similarities and differences become, evident (Figure 6.6)., Both biological and artificial membranes have similar, permeabilities for nonpolar molecules and many small, polar molecules. On the other hand, biological membranes, are much more permeable to ions and some large polar, molecules, such as sugars, than artificial bilayers are. The, reason is that, unlike artificial bilayers, biological membranes contain transport proteins that facilitate the passage, of selected ions and other polar molecules., Transport proteins exhibit specificity for the solutes they, transport, hence their great diversity in cells. The simple, prokaryote Haemophilus influenzae, the first organism for, which the complete genome was sequenced, has only 1743, genes, yet more than 200 of these genes (greater than 10%, of the genome) encode various proteins involved in mem-, , –150, 0.1 mM CN– added, Cell membrane potential (mV), , the case with plants and fungi, which may show experimentally measured membrane potentials (often –200 to –100 mV), that are much more negative than those calculated from the, Goldman equation, which are usually only –80 to –50 mV., Thus, in addition to the diffusion potential, the membrane, potential has a second component. The excess voltage is provided by the plasma membrane electrogenic H+-ATPase., Whenever an ion moves into or out of a cell without, being balanced by countermovement of an ion of opposite, charge, a voltage is created across the membrane. Any, active transport mechanism that results in the movement, of a net electric charge will tend to move the membrane, potential away from the value predicted by the Goldman, equation. Such a transport mechanism is called an electrogenic pump and is common in living cells., , 93, , –130, –110, CN– removed, , –90, –70, –50, –30, 0, , 20, , 40, Time (minutes), , 60, , 80, , FIGURE 6.5 The membrane potential of a pea cell collapses, when cyanide (CN–) is added to the bathing solution., Cyanide blocks ATP production in the cells by poisoning, the mitochondria. The collapse of the membrane potential, upon addition of cyanide indicates that an ATP supply is, necessary for maintenance of the potential. Washing the, cyanide out of the tissue results in a slow recovery of ATP, production and restoration of the membrane potential., (From Higinbotham et al. 1970.)
Page 119 :
Chapter 6, Permeability of biological membrane (cm s–1), , 94, , FIGURE 6.6 Typical values for the permeability, P, of a biological membrane to various substances, compared with, those for an artificial phospholipid bilayer. For nonpolar, molecules such as O2 and CO2, and for some small, uncharged molecules such as glycerol, P values are similar, in both systems. For ions and selected polar molecules,, including water, the permeability of biological membranes, is increased by one or more orders of magnitude, because, of the presence of transport proteins. Note the logarithmic, scale., , 102, O2, , 1, H2O, , 10–2, , CO2, , 10–4, 10–6, 10–8, , K+, Na+, , Glycerol, , Cl–, , 10–10, , 10–10 10–8 10–6 10–4 10–2, , 1, , Permeability of lipid bilayer (cm, , 102, s–1), , brane transport. In Arabidopsis, 849 genes, or 4.8% of all, genes, code for proteins involved in membrane transport., Although a particular transport protein is usually highly, specific for the kinds of substances it will transport, its, specificity is not absolute: It generally also transports a, small family of related substances. For example, in plants a, K+ transporter on the plasma membrane may transport Rb+, and Na+ in addition to K+, but K+ is usually preferred. On, the other hand, the K+ transporter is completely ineffective, in transporting anions such as Cl– or uncharged solutes, such as sucrose. Similarly, a protein involved in the trans-, , port of neutral amino acids may move glycine, alanine, and, valine with equal ease but not accept aspartic acid or lysine., In the next several pages we will consider the structures,, functions, and physiological roles of the various membrane, transporters found in plant cells, especially on the plasma, membrane and tonoplast. We begin with a discussion of, the role of certain transporters (channels and carriers) in, promoting the diffusion of solutes across membranes. We, then distinguish between primary and secondary active, transport, and we discuss the roles of the electrogenic H+ATPase and various symporters (proteins that transport, two substances in the same direction simultaneously) in, driving proton-coupled secondary active transport., , Channel Transporters Enhance Ion and Water, Diffusion across Membranes, Three types of membrane transporters enhance the movement of solutes across membranes: channels, carriers, and, pumps (Figure 6.7). Channels are transmembrane proteins, , Transported molecule, Channel, protein, , Carrier, protein, , Pump, Plasma, membrane, , Energy, , Low, Electrochemical, potential gradient, , Simple diffusion, Passive transport, (in the direction of, electrochemical gradient), , High, , Primary active transport, (against the direction, of electrochemical gradient), , FIGURE 6.7 Three classes of membrane transport proteins: channels, carriers, and, pumps. Channels and carriers can mediate the passive transport of solutes across, membranes (by simple diffusion or facilitated diffusion), down the solute’s gradient, of electrochemical potential. Channel proteins act as membrane pores, and their, specificity is determined primarily by the biophysical properties of the channel., Carrier proteins bind the transported molecule on one side of the membrane and, release it on the other side. Primary active transport is carried out by pumps and, uses energy directly, usually from ATP hydrolysis, to pump solutes against their, gradient of electrochemical potential.
Page 120 :
Solute Transport, , 95, , (B), , (A), , OUTSIDE OF CELL, , Voltagesensing, region, , Pore-forming, region (P-domain, or H5), , Plasma, membrane, , +, +, +, +, +, , K+, , S1, , S2, , N, , S3, , S4, , S5, , S6, , C, , CYTOPLASM, , Models of K+ channels in plants. (A) Top view of channel, looking through the pore of, the protein. Membrane-spanning helices of four subunits come together in an inverted teepee with, the pore at the center. The pore-forming regions of the four subunits dip into the membrane, with a, K+ selectivity finger region formed at the outer (near) part of the pore (more details on the structure of this channel can be found in Web Essay 6.1). (B) Side view of the inward rectifying K+ channel, showing a polypeptide chain of one subunit, with six membrane-spanning helices. The fourth, helix contains positively-charged amino acids and acts as a voltage-sensor. The pore-forming, region is a loop between helices 5 and 6. (A after Leng et al. 2002; B after Buchanan et al. 2000.), FIGURE 6.8, , that function as selective pores, through which molecules, or ions can diffuse across the membrane. The size of a pore, and the density of surface charges on its interior lining, determine its transport specificity. Transport through channels is always passive, and because the specificity of transport depends on pore size and electric charge more than on, selective binding, channel transport is limited mainly to, ions or water (Figure 6.8)., Transport through a channel may or may not involve, transient binding of the solute to the channel protein. In, any case, as long as the channel pore is open, solutes that, can penetrate the pore diffuse through it extremely rapidly:, about 108 ions per second through each channel protein., Channels are not open all the time: Channel proteins have, structures called gates that open and close the pore in, response to external signals (see Figure 6.8B). Signals that, can open or close gates include voltage changes, hormone, binding, or light. For example, voltage-gated channels open, or close in response to changes in the membrane potential., Individual ion channels can be studied in detail by the, technique of patch clamp electrophysiology (see Web Topic, 6.2), which can detect the electric current carried by ions, diffusing through a single channel. Patch clamp studies, reveal that, for a given ion, such as potassium, a given, membrane has a variety of different channels. These channels may open in different voltage ranges, or in response to, different signals, which may include K+ or Ca2+ concentrations, pH, protein kinases and phosphatases, and so on., This specificity enables the transport of each ion to be fine-, , tuned to the prevailing conditions. Thus the ion permeability of a membrane is a variable that depends on the mix, of ion channels that are open at a particular time., As we saw in the experiment of Table 6.1, the distribution of most ions is not close to equilibrium across the, membrane. Anion channels will always function to allow, anions to diffuse out of the cell, and other mechanisms are, needed for anion uptake. Similarly, calcium channels can, function only in the direction of calcium release into the, cytosol, and calcium must be expelled by active transport., The exception is potassium, which can diffuse either, inward or outward, depending on whether the membrane, potential is more negative or more positive than EK, the, potassium equilibrium potential., K+ channels that open only at more negative potentials, are specialized for inward diffusion of K+ and are known, as inward-rectifying, or simply inward, K+ channels. Conversely, K+ channels that open only at more positive potentials are outward-rectifying, or outward, K+ channels (see, Web Essay 6.1). Whereas inward K+ channels function in, the accumulation of K+ from the environment, or in the, opening of stomata, various outward K+ channels function, in the closing of stomata, in the release of K+ into the xylem, or in regulation of the membrane potential., , Carriers Bind and Transport Specific Substances, Unlike channels, carrier proteins do not have pores that, extend completely across the membrane. In transport, mediated by a carrier, the substance being transported is
Page 121 :
96, , Chapter 6, , initially bound to a specific site on the carrier protein. This, requirement for binding allows carriers to be highly selective for a particular substrate to be transported. Carriers, therefore specialize in the transport of specific organic, metabolites. Binding causes a conformational change in the, protein, which exposes the substance to the solution on the, other side of the membrane. Transport is complete when, the substance dissociates from the carrier’s binding site., Because a conformational change in the protein is, required to transport individual molecules or ions, the rate, of transport by a carrier is many orders of magnitude, slower than through a channel. Typically, carriers may, transport 100 to 1000 ions or molecules per second, which, is about 106 times slower than transport through a channel., The binding and release of a molecule at a specific site on, a protein that occur in carrier-mediated transport are similar to the binding and release of molecules from an, enzyme in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. As will be discussed later in the chapter, enzyme kinetics has been used, to characterize transport carrier proteins (for a detailed discussion on kinetics, see Chapter 2 on the web site)., Carrier-mediated transport (unlike transport through, channels) can be either passive or active, and it can transport, a much wider range of possible substrates. Passive transport, on a carrier is sometimes called facilitated diffusion,, although it resembles diffusion only in that it transports substances down their gradient of electrochemical potential,, without an additional input of energy. (This term might, seem more appropriately applied to transport through channels, but historically it has not been used in this way.), , Primary Active Transport Is Directly Coupled to, Metabolic or Light Energy, To carry out active transport, a carrier must couple the, uphill transport of the solute with another, energy-releasing, event so that the overall free-energy change is negative., Primary active transport is coupled directly to a source of, energy other than ∆m~j, such as ATP hydrolysis, an oxidation–reduction reaction (the electron transport chain of, mitochondria and chloroplasts), or the absorption of light, by the carrier protein (in halobacteria, bacteriorhodopsin)., The membrane proteins that carry out primary active, transport are called pumps (see Figure 6.7). Most pumps, transport ions, such as H+ or Ca2+. However, as we will, see later in the chapter, pumps belonging to the “ATPbinding cassette” family of transporters can carry large, organic molecules., Ion pumps can be further characterized as either electrogenic or electroneutral. In general, electrogenic transport refers to ion transport involving the net movement of, charge across the membrane. In contrast, electroneutral, transport, as the name implies, involves no net movement, of charge. For example, the Na+/K+-ATPase of animal cells, pumps three Na+ ions out for every two K+ ions in, resulting in a net outward movement of one positive charge. The, Na+/K+-ATPase is therefore an electrogenic ion pump. In, , contrast, the H+/K+-ATPase of the animal gastric mucosa, pumps one H+ out of the cell for every one K+ in, so there, is no net movement of charge across the membrane. Therefore, the H+/K+-ATPase is an electroneutral pump., In the plasma membranes of plants, fungi, and bacteria,, as well as in plant tonoplasts and other plant and animal, endomembranes, H+ is the principal ion that is electrogenically pumped across the membrane. The plasma membrane H+-ATPase generates the gradient of electrochemical potentials of H+ across the plasma membranes, while, the vacuolar H+-ATPase and the H+-pyrophosphatase, (H+-PPase) electrogenically pump protons into the lumen, of the vacuole and the Golgi cisternae., In plant plasma membranes, the most prominent pumps, are for H+ and Ca2+, and the direction of pumping is outward. Therefore another mechanism is needed to drive the, active uptake of most mineral nutrients. The other important way that solutes can be actively transported across a, membrane against their gradient of electrochemical potential is by coupling of the uphill transport of one solute to, the downhill transport of another. This type of carriermediated cotransport is termed secondary active transport,, and it is driven indirectly by pumps., , Secondary Active Transport Uses the Energy, Stored in Electrochemical-Potential Gradients, Protons are extruded from the cytosol by electrogenic H+ATPases operating in the plasma membrane and at the vacuole membrane. Consequently, a membrane potential and, a pH gradient are created at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. This gradient of electrochemical potential for H+, ∆m~ H+,, or (when expressed in other units) the proton motive force, (PMF), or ∆p, represents stored free energy in the form of, the H+ gradient (see Web Topic 6.3)., The proton motive force generated by electrogenic H+, transport is used in secondary active transport to drive the, transport of many other substances against their gradient, of electrochemical potentials. Figure 6.9 shows how secondary transport may involve the binding of a substrate (S), and an ion (usually H+) to a carrier protein, and a conformational change in that protein., There are two types of secondary transport: symport, and antiport. The example shown in Figure 6.9 is called, symport (and the protein involved is called a symporter), because the two substances are moving in the same direction through the membrane (see also Figure 6.10A)., Antiport (facilitated by a protein called an antiporter) refers, to coupled transport in which the downhill movement of, protons drives the active (uphill) transport of a solute in the, opposite direction (Figure 6.10B)., In both types of secondary transport, the ion or solute, being transported simultaneously with the protons is moving against its gradient of electrochemical potential, so its, transport is active. However, the energy driving this transport is provided by the proton motive force rather than, directly by ATP hydrolysis.
Page 122 :
Solute Transport, (A), , (B), , OUTSIDE OF CELL, S, S, , S, , H+, , H+, , H+, , H+, , H+, , (C), , +, H+ H, , H+, , H+, S, , H+, H+, , H+, , H+, , (D), , H+, , H+, +, H+ H, , H+, , S, , S, , H+, , H+, S, , H+, , H+, , 97, , +, H+ H, , H+, , S, , S, , H+, , H+, , H+, , H+, , H+, S, , H+, H+, , H+, , S, , S, , H+, , H+, , H+, +, H+ H, , H+, , H+, H+, , S, H+, H+, , S, , S, , S, , S, , S, S, , S, , S, , S, , S, , H+, S, , S, , S, , H+, S, , S, , S, , S, , S, , H+, S, , S, , S, , H+, S, , S, , S, , S, , S, , S, , H+, S, , Plasma, membrane, , H+, , S, , H+, , S, , S, , S, , Concentration, gradients, for S and H+, , S, , H+, S, , S, , S, S, , S, , S, , S, H+, , S, , S, , S, , H+, , S, , H+, S, , H+, H+, , S, , CYTOPLASM, , FIGURE 6.9 Hypothetical model for secondary active transport. The energy that, drives the process has been stored in a ∆m~ H+ (symbolized by the red arrow on the, right in A) and is being used to take up a substrate (S) against its concentration gradient (left-hand red arrow). (A) In the initial conformation, the binding sites on the, protein are exposed to the outside environment and can bind a proton. (B) This, binding results in a conformational change that permits a molecule of S to be, bound. (C) The binding of S causes another conformational change that exposes the, binding sites and their substrates to the inside of the cell. (D) Release of a proton, and a molecule of S to the cell’s interior restores the original conformation of the, carrier and allows a new pumping cycle to begin., , (A) Symport, , (B) Antiport, , OUTSIDE OF CELL, H+ A, , H+ B, High, , Low, , Electrochemical, potential, gradient, , Low, , High, Electrochemical, potential gradient, of substrate A, , H+ A, CYTOPLASM, , H+ B, , Two examples of secondary, active transport coupled to a primary proton gradient. (A) In a symport, the energy, dissipated by a proton moving back into, the cell is coupled to the uptake of one, molecule of a substrate (e.g., a sugar) into, the cell. (B) In an antiport, the energy dissipated by a proton moving back into the, cell is coupled to the active transport of a, substrate (for example, a sodium ion) out, of the cell. In both cases, the substrate, under consideration is moving against its, gradient of electrochemical potential. Both, neutral and charged substrates can be, transported by such secondary active, transport processes., , FIGURE 6.10, High, , Low, Electrochemical, potential gradient, of substrate B
Page 123 :
98, , Chapter 6, , Symporters, , H+,Na+, , H+, , Sucrose, , Amino, acid, , K+, , H+, , H+, Antiporter, , PO43–, H+, , H+, , CYTOSOL, , NO3–, , Na+, , pH 7.2, ∆E = –120 mV, Plasma, membrane, Antiporters, , ATP, , H+, , Sucrose, , Mg2+, , Hexose, , Cd2+, ADP + Pi, H+, , H+, pumps, , Sucrose, , Ca2+, , H+, , ATP, , H+, H+, , 3 H+, H+, , Na+, , ADP + Pi, , ATP, , H+, pumps, , GS, ATP, , ABC, Anions,, cations, , 2 Pi, , ADP + Pi, Anthocyanin, , Tonoplast, , PPi, , ADP + Pi, , ABC, , VACUOLE, , 2H+, ADP + Pi, , H+, , PC-Cd2+, ATP, , H+, , pH 5.5, ∆E = –90 mV, , ATP, pH 5.5, , Efflux, carrier, , ABC, transporters, , ADP + Pi, , ATP, , Ca2+, , H+, , ADP + Pi, , Fast vacuolar, (FV) channel, IP3, , Anions, (malate2–,, Cl–, NO3–), , Slow vacuolar, (SV) channel, , Ca2+, pump, Ca2+, , Channels, , OUTSIDE OF CELL, Inward, rectifying, K+, , Outward, rectifying, , Outward, rectifying, , Channels, , Overview of the various transport processes on the plasma, membrane and tonoplast of plant cells., , FIGURE 6.11, , Inward, rectifying, , Cl–, , K+, , Ca2+
Page 124 :
Solute Transport, Typically, transport across a biological membrane is, energized by one primary active transport system coupled, to ATP hydrolysis. The transport of that ion—for example,, H+—generates an ion gradient and an electrochemical, potential. Many other ions or organic substrates can then, be transported by a variety of secondary active-transport, proteins, which energize the transport of their respective, substrates by simultaneously carrying one or two H+ ions, down their energy gradient. Thus H+ ions circulate across, the membrane, outward through the primary active transport proteins, and back into the cell through the secondary, transport proteins. In plants and fungi, sugars and amino, acids are taken up by symport with protons., Most of the ionic gradients across membranes of higher, plants are generated and maintained by electrochemicalpotential gradients of H+ (Tazawa et al. 1987). In turn, these, H+ gradients are generated by the electrogenic proton, pumps. Evidence suggests that in plants, Na+ is transported out of the cell by a Na+–H+ antiporter and that Cl–,, NO3–, H2PO4–, sucrose, amino acids, and other substances, enter the cell via specific proton symporters., What about K+? At very low external concentrations, K+, can be taken up by active symport proteins, but at higher, concentrations it can enter the cell by diffusion through specific K+ channels. However, even influx through channels is, driven by the H+-ATPase, in the sense that K+ diffusion is, driven by the membrane potential, which is maintained at, a value more negative than the K+ equilibrium potential by, the action of the electrogenic H+ pump. Conversely, K+, efflux requires the membrane potential to be maintained at, a value more positive than EK, which can be achieved if, efflux of Cl– through Cl– channels is allowed. Several representative transport processes located on the plasma membrane and the tonoplast are illustrated in Figure 6.11., , 99, , the binding and dissociation of molecules at active sites on, transport proteins. One advantage of the kinetic approach, is that it gives new insights into the regulation of transport., In kinetic experiments the effects of external ion (or, other solute) concentrations on transport rates are measured. The kinetic characteristics of the transport rates can, then be used to distinguish between different transporters., The maximum rate (Vmax) of carrier-mediated transport,, and often channel transport as well, cannot be exceeded,, regardless of the concentration of substrate (Figure 6.12)., Vmax is approached when the substrate-binding site on the, carrier is always occupied. The concentration of carrier, not, the concentration of solute, becomes rate limiting. Thus, Vmax is a measure of the number of molecules of the specific carrier protein that are functioning in the membrane., The constant Km (which is numerically equal to the, solute concentration that yields half the maximal rate of, transport) tends to reflect the properties of the particular, binding site (for a detailed discussion on Km and Vmax see, Chapter 2 on the web site). Low Km values indicate high, affinity of the transport site for the transported substance., Such values usually imply the operation of a carrier system. Higher values of Km indicate a lower affinity of the, transport site for the solute. The affinity is often so low that, in practice Vmax is never reached. In such cases, kinetics, alone cannot distinguish between carriers and channels., Usually transport displays both high-affinity and lowaffinity components when a wide range of solute concentrations are studied. Figure 6.13 shows sucrose uptake by, soybean cotyledon protoplasts as a function of the external, , Vmax, , MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROTEINS, , Kinetic Analyses Can Elucidate Transport, Mechanisms, Thus far, we have described cellular transport in terms of, its energetics. However, cellular transport can also be studied by use of enzyme kinetics because transport involves, , Carrier, transport, , Rate, , We have seen in preceding sections that some transmembrane proteins operate as channels for the controlled diffusion of ions. Other membrane proteins act as carriers for, other substances (mostly molecules and ions). Active transport utilizes carrier-type proteins that are energized directly, by ATP hydrolysis or indirectly as symporters and, antiporters. The latter systems use the energy of ion gradients (often a H+ gradient) to drive the uphill transport of, another ion or molecule. In the pages that follow we will, examine in more detail the molecular properties, cellular, locations, and genetic manipulations of some of these, transport proteins., , 1/2, , Simple, diffusion, , Vmax, , (Km), External concentration of, transported molecule, , Carrier transport often shows saturation, kinetics (Vmax) (see Chapter 2 on the web site), because of, saturation of a binding site. Ideally, diffusion through channels is directly proportional to the concentration of the, transported solute, or for an ion, to the difference in electrochemical potential across the membrane., , FIGURE 6.12
Page 125 :
100, , Chapter 6, , Rate of sucrose uptake, (nmol per 106 cells per hour), , 125, Observed, , 100, 75, 50, , Predicted by, Michaelis–Menten kinetics, , 25, 0, 0, , 10, , 20, 30, 40, Sucrose concentration (mM), , 50, , The transport properties of a solute can, change at different solute concentrations. For example, at, low concentrations (1 to 10 mM), the rate of uptake of, sucrose by soybean cells shows saturation kinetics typical, of carriers. A curve fit-ted to these data is predicted to, approach a maximal rate (Vmax) of 57 nmol per 106 cells per, hour. Instead, at higher sucrose concentrations the uptake, rate continues to increase linearly over a broad range of, concentrations, suggesting the existence of other sucrose, transporters, which might be carriers with very low affinity, for the substrate. (From Lin et al. 1984.), FIGURE 6.13, , sucrose concentration (Lin et al. 1984). Uptake increases, sharply with concentration and begins to saturate at about, 10 mM. At concentrations above 10 mM, uptake becomes, linear and nonsaturable. Inhibition of ATP synthesis with, metabolic poisons blocks the saturable component but not, the linear one. The interpretation is that sucrose uptake at, low concentrations is an active carrier-mediated process, (sucrose–H+ symport). At higher concentrations, sucrose, enters the cells by diffusion down its concentration gradient and is therefore insensitive to metabolic poisons. However, additional information is needed to investigate, whether the nonsaturating component represents uptake, by a carrier with very low affinity, or by a channel. (Transport by a carrier is more likely in the case of a molecular, solute such as sucrose.), , The Genes for Many Transporters Have Been, Cloned, Transporter gene identification, isolation, and cloning have, greatly aided in the elucidation of the molecular properties, of transporter proteins. Nitrate transport is an example that, is of interest not only because of its nutritional importance,, but also because of its complexity. Kinetic analysis shows, that nitrate transport, like the sucrose transport shown in, Figure 6.13, has both high-affinity (low Km) and low-affinity, (high Km) components. In contrast with sucrose, nitrate is, negatively charged, and such an electric charge imposes an, energy requirement for the transport of the nitrate ion at all, concentrations. The energy is provided by symport with H+., , Nitrate transport is also strongly regulated according to, nitrate availability: The enzymes required for nitrate transport, as well as nitrate assimilation (see Chapter 12), are, induced in the presence of nitrate in the environment, and, uptake can also be repressed if nitrate accumulates in the, cells., Mutants in nitrate transport or nitrate reduction can be, selected by growth in the presence of chlorate (ClO3–)., Chlorate is a nitrate analog that is taken up and reduced in, wild-type plants to the toxic product chlorite. If plants, resistant to chlorate are selected, they are likely to show, mutations that block nitrate transport or reduction., Several such mutations have been identified in Arabidopsis, a small crucifer that is ideal for genetic studies. The, first transport gene identified in this way encodes a lowaffinity inducible nitrate–proton symporter. As more genes, for nitrate transport have been identified and characterized, the picture has become more complex. Each component of transport may involve more than one gene product,, and at least one gene encodes a dual-affinity carrier that, contributes to both high-affinity and low-affinity transport, (Chrispeels et al. 1999)., The emerging picture of plant transporter genes shows, that a family of genes, rather than an individual gene,, exists in the plant genome for each transport function., Within a gene family, variations in transport characteristics, such as Km, in mode of regulation, and in differential tissue, expression give plants a remarkable plasticity to acclimate, to a broad range of environmental conditions., The identification of regions of sequence similarity, between plant transport genes and the transport genes of, other organisms, such as yeast, has enabled the cloning of, plant transport genes (Kochian 2000). In some cases, it has, been possible to identify the gene after purifying the transport protein, but often sequence similarity is limited, and, individual transport proteins represent too small a fraction, of total protein. Another way to identify transport genes is, to screen plant cDNA (complementary DNA) libraries for, genes that complement (i.e., compensate for) transport deficiencies in yeast. Many yeast transport mutants are known, and have been used to identify corresponding plant genes, by complementation., In the case of genes for ion channels, researchers have, studied the behavior of the channel proteins by expressing the genes in oocytes of the toad Xenopus, which,, because of their large size, are convenient for electrophysiological studies. Genes for both inward- and outward-rectifying K+ channels have been cloned and studied in this way. Of the inward K+ channel genes identified, so far, one is expressed strongly in stomatal guard cells,, another in roots, and a third in leaves. These channels are, considered to be responsible for low-affinity K+ uptake, into plant cells., An outward K+ channel responsible for K+ flux from, root stelar cells into the dead xylem vessels has been
Page 126 :
Solute Transport, , The Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase Has Several, Functional Domains, , cloned, and several genes for high-affinity K+ carriers have, been identified. Further research is needed to determine to, what extent they each contribute to K+ uptake, and how, they obtain their energy (see Web Topic 6.4). Genes for, plant vacuolar H+–Ca2+ antiporters and genes for the proton symport of several amino acids and sugars have also, been identified through various genetic techniques (Hirshi, et al. 1996; Tanner and Caspari 1996; Kuehn et al. 1999)., , The outward, active transport of H+ across the plasma, membrane creates gradients of pH and electric potential, that drive the transport of many other substances (ions and, molecules) through the various secondary active-transport, proteins. Figure 6.14 illustrates how a membrane H+ATPase might work., Plant and fungal plasma membrane H+-ATPases and, 2+, Ca -ATPases are members of a class known as P-type, ATPases, which are phosphorylated as part of the catalytic, cycle that hydrolyzes ATP. Because of this phosphorylation, step, the plasma membrane ATPases are strongly inhibited, by orthovanadate (HVO42–), a phosphate (HPO42–) analog, that competes with phosphate from ATP for the aspartic, acid phosphorylation site on the enzyme. The high affinity, of the enzyme for vanadate is attributed to the fact that, vanadate can mimic the transitional structure of phosphate, during hydrolysis., Plasma membrane H+-ATPases are encoded by a family, of about ten genes. Each gene encodes an isoform of the, enzyme (Sussman 1994). The isoforms are tissue specific,, and they are preferentially expressed in the root, the seed,, the phloem, and so on. The functional specificity of each, isoform is not yet understood; it may alter the pH optimum, of some isoforms and allow transport to be regulated in different ways for each tissue., , Genes for Specific Water Channels Have Been, Identified, Aquaporins are a class of proteins that is relatively abundant in plant membranes (see Chapter 3). Aquaporins, reveal no ion currents when expressed in oocytes, but when, the osmolarity of the external medium is reduced, expression of these proteins results in swelling and bursting of the, oocytes. The bursting results from rapid influx of water, across the oocyte plasma membrane, which normally has a, very low water permeability. These results show that aquaporins form water channels in membranes (see Figure 3.6)., The existence of aquaporins was a surprise at first, because it was thought that the lipid bilayer is itself sufficiently permeable to water. Nevertheless, aquaporins are, common in plant and animal membranes, and their expression and activity appear to be regulated, possibly by protein phosphorylation, in response to water availability, (Tyerman et al. 2002)., , (A), , (B), , OUTSIDE OF CELL, M+, M+, M+, , M+, M+, , M+, , M+, , M+, , (C), , M+, M+, , M+, , M+, , M+, M+, , M+, , M+, , (D), , M+, , M+, , M+, , 101, , M+, , M+, , M+, M+, , M+, , M+, M+, , M+, , M+, M+, , M+, , M+, , M+, , M+, , M+, , P, , P, , P, ADP, , M+, , CYTOPLASM, , ATP, , FIGURE 6.14 Hypothetical steps in the transport of a cation (the hypothetical M+), against its chemical gradient by an electrogenic pump. The protein, embedded in the, membrane, binds the cation on the inside of the cell (A) and is phosphorylated by ATP, (B). This phosphorylation leads to a conformational change that exposes the cation to, the outside of the cell and makes it possible for the cation to diffuse away (C). Release, of the phosphate ion (P) from the protein into the cytosol (D) restores the initial configuration of the membrane protein and allows a new pumping cycle to begin., , Pi
Page 127 :
Two-dimensional representation of the plasma membrane, H+-ATPase. The H+-ATPase has 10, transmembrane segments. The regulatory domain is the autoinhibitory, domain. (From Palmgren 2001.), , FIGURE 6.15, , OUTSIDE OF CELL, Plasma membrane, , Figure 6.15 shows a model of the, functional domains of the plasma, membrane H+-ATPase of yeast,, which is similar to that of plants., The protein has ten membranespanning domains that cause it to, loop back and forth across the membrane. Some of the membrane-spanning domains make up the pathway, through which protons are pumped., The catalytic domain, including the, aspartic acid residue that becomes, phosphorylated during the catalytic, cycle, is on the cytosolic face of the, membrane., Like other enzymes, the plasma, membrane ATPase is regulated by, the concentration of substrate (ATP),, pH, temperature, and other factors., In addition, H+-ATPase molecules, can be reversibly activated or deacCYTOPLASM, tivated by specific signals, such as, light, hormones, pathogen attack,, and the like. This type of regulation, is mediated by a specialized autoinhibitory domain at the C-terminal end of the polypeptide, chain, which acts to regulate the activity of the proton, pump (see Figure 6.15). If the autoinhibitory domain is, removed through the action of a protease, the enzyme, becomes irreversibly activated (Palmgren 2001)., The autoinhibitory effect of the C-terminal domain can, also be regulated through the action of protein kinases and, phosphatases that add or remove phosphate groups to serine or threonine residues on the autoinhibitory domain of the, enzyme. For example, one mechanism of response to, pathogens in tomato involves the activation of protein phosphatases that dephosphorylate residues on the plasma, membrane H+-ATPase, thereby activating it (Vera-Estrella, et al. 1994). This is one step in a cascade of responses that, activate plant defenses., , The Vacuolar H+-ATPase Drives Solute, Accumulation into Vacuoles, Because plant cells increase their size primarily by taking, up water into large, central vacuoles, the osmotic pressure, of the vacuole must be maintained sufficiently high for, water to enter from the cytoplasm. The tonoplast regulates, the traffic of ions and metabolites between the cytosol and, , Transmembrane, domains, , Regulatory, domain, , COOH, , the vacuole, just as the plasma membrane regulates uptake, into the cell. Tonoplast transport became a vigorous area of, research following the development of methods for the isolation of intact vacuoles and tonoplast vesicles (see Web, Topic 6.5). These studies led to the discovery of a new type, of proton-pumping ATPase, which transports protons into, the vacuole (see Figure 6.11)., The vacuolar H+-ATPase (also called V-ATPase) differs, both structurally and functionally from the plasma membrane H+-ATPase. The vacuolar ATPase is more closely, related to the F-ATPases of mitochondria and chloroplasts, (see Chapter 11). Because the hydrolysis of ATP by the vacuolar ATPase does not involve the formation of a phosphorylated intermediate, vacuolar ATPases are insensitive, to vanadate, the inhibitor of plasma membrane ATPases, discussed earlier. Vacuolar ATPases are specifically inhibited by the antibiotic bafilomycin, as well as by high concentrations of nitrate, neither of which inhibit plasma membrane ATPases. Use of these selective inhibitors makes it, possible to identify different types of ATPases, and to assay, their activity., Vacuolar ATPases belong to a general class of ATPases, that are present on the endomembrane systems of all
Page 128 :
Solute Transport, , Model of the V-ATPase rotary motor. Many polypeptide subunits come together to make this complex enzyme. The V1, catalytic complex is easily dissociated from the membrane, and, contains the nucleotide-binding and catalytic sites. Components of, V1 are designated by uppercase letters. The intrinsic membrane, complex mediating H+ transport is designated V0, and its subunits, are given lowercase letters. It is proposed that ATPase reactions, catalyzed by each of the A subunits, acting in sequence, drive the, rotation of the shaft D and the six c subunits. The rotation of the c, subunits relative to subunit a is thought to drive the transport of, H+ across the membrane. (Based on an illustration courtesy of M., F. Manolson.), FIGURE 6.16, , CYTOPLASM, , A, , B A B, B, , A, , C, H+, , 103, , E, , a, , V1, , H, , Tonoplast, , a, , G, , D, , F, , d, c, , V0, , H+, LUMEN OF VACUOLE, , Although the pH of most plant vacuoles is mildly acidic, (about 5.5), the pH of the vacuoles of some species is much, lower—a phenomenon termed hyperacidification. Vacuolar, hyperacidification is the cause of the sour taste of certain, fruits (lemons) and vegetables (rhubarb). Some extreme, examples are listed in Table 6.2. Biochemical studies with, lemon fruits have suggested that the low pH of the lemon, fruit vacuoles (specifically, those of the juice sac cells) is, due to a combination of factors:, • The low permeability of the vacuolar membrane to, protons permits a steeper pH gradient to build up., , eukaryotes. They are large enzyme complexes, about 750, kDa, composed of at least ten different subunits (Lüttge, and Ratajczak 1997). These subunits are organized into a, peripheral catalytic complex, V1, and an integral membrane, channel complex, V0 (Figure 6.16). Because of their similarities to F-ATPases, vacuolar ATPases are assumed to, operate like tiny rotary motors (see Chapter 11)., Vacuolar ATPases are electrogenic proton pumps that transport protons from the cytoplasm to the vacuole and generate, a proton motive force across the tonoplast. The electrogenic, proton pumping accounts for the fact that the vacuole is typically 20 to 30 mV more positive than the cytoplasm, although, it is still negative relative to the external medium. To maintain, bulk electrical neutrality, anions such as Cl– or malate2– are, transported from the cytoplasm into the vacuole through, channels in the membrane (Barkla and Pantoja 1996). Without, the simultaneous movement of anions along with the pumped, protons, the charge buildup across the tonoplast would make, the pumping of additional protons energetically impossible., The conservation of bulk electrical neutrality by anion, transport makes it possible for the vacuolar H+-ATPase to, generate a large concentration (pH) gradient of protons, across the tonoplast. This gradient accounts for the fact that, the pH of the vacuolar sap is typically about 5.5, while the, cytoplasmic pH is 7.0 to 7.5. Whereas the electrical component of the proton motive force drives the uptake of anions, into the vacuole, the electrochemical-potential gradient for, m~H+) is harnessed to drive the uptake of cations and, H+ (∆m, sugars into the vacuole via secondary transport (antiporter), systems (see Figure 6.11)., , • A specialized vacuolar ATPase is able to pump protons more efficiently (with less wasted energy) than, normal vacuolar ATPases can (Müller et al. 1997)., , TABLE 6.2, The vacuolar pH of some hyperacidifying plant, species, Tissue, , Species, , pHa, , Lime (Citrus aurantifolia), Lemon (Citrus limonia), Cherry (Prunus cerasus), Grapefruit (Citrus paradisi), , 1.7, 2.5, 2.5, 3.0, , Rosette oxalis (Oxalis deppei), Wax begonia, (Begonia semperflorens), Begonia ‘Lucerna’, Oxalis sp., Sorrel (Rumex sp.), Prickly Pear, (Opuntia phaeacantha)b, , 1.3, 1.5, , Fruits, , Leaves, , 0.9 – 1.4, 1.9 – 2.6, 2.6, 1.4 (6:45 A.M.), 5.5 (4:00 P.M.), , Source: Data from Small 1946., a The values represent the pH of the juice or expressed sap of each, tissue, usually a good indicator of vacuolar pH., b The vacuolar pH of the cactus Opuntia phaeacantha varies with the, time of day. As will be discussed in Chapter 8, many desert succulents have a specialized type of photosynthesis, called crassulacean, acid metabolism (CAM), that causes the pH of the vacuoles to, decrease during the night.
Page 129 :
104, , Chapter 6, , • The accumulation of organic acids such as citric,, malic, and oxalic acids helps maintain the low pH of, the vacuole by acting as buffers., , Plant Vacuoles Are Energized by a Second Proton, Pump, the H+-Pyrophosphatase, Another type of proton pump, an H+-pyrophosphatase, (H+-PPase) (Rea et al. 1998), appears to work in parallel, with the vacuolar ATPase to create a proton gradient across, the tonoplast (see Figure 6.11). This enzyme consists of a, single polypeptide that has a molecular mass of 80 kDa., The H+-PPase harnesses its energy from the hydrolysis of, inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi)., The free energy released by PPi hydrolysis is less than that, from ATP hydrolysis. However, the vacuolar H+-PPase transports only one H+ ion per PPi molecule hydrolyzed, whereas, the vacuolar ATPase appears to transport two H+ ions per, ATP hydrolyzed. Thus the energy available per H+ ion transported appears to be the same, and the two enzymes appear, to be able to generate comparable H+ gradients., In some plants the synthesis of the vacuolar H+-PPase is, induced by low O2 levels (hypoxia) or by chilling. This, indicates that the vacuolar H+-PPase might function as a, backup system to maintain essential cell metabolism under, conditions in which ATP supply is depleted because of the, inhibition of respiration by hypoxia or chilling. It is of interest that the plant vacuolar H+-PPase is not found in animals or yeast, although a similar enzyme is present in some, bacteria and protists., Large metabolites such as flavonoids, anthocyanins and, secondary products of metabolism are sequestered in the, vacuole. These large molecules are transported into vacuoles by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. Transport processes by the ABC transporters consume ATP and, do not depend on a primary electrochemical gradient (see, Web Topic 6.6). Recent studies have shown that ABC transporters can also be found at the plasma membrane and in, mitochondria (Theodoulou 2000)., , Calcium Pumps, Antiports, and Channels Regulate, Intracellular Calcium, Calcium is another important ion whose concentration is, strongly regulated. Calcium concentrations in the cell wall, and the apoplastic (extracellular) spaces are usually in the, millimolar range; free cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations are, maintained at the micromolar (10–6 M) range, against the, large electrochemical-potential gradient that drives Ca2+, diffusion into the cell., Small fluctuations in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration drastically alter the activities of many enzymes, making calcium an important second messenger in signal transduction. Most of the calcium in the cell is stored in the central, vacuole, where it is taken up via Ca2+–H+ antiporters,, which use the electrochemical potential of the proton gradient to energize the accumulation of calcium into the vac-, , uole (Bush 1995). Mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum also store calcium within the cells., Calcium efflux from the vacuole into the cytosol may in, some cells be triggered by inositol trisphosphate (IP3). IP3,, which appears to act as a “second messenger” in certain signal transduction pathways, induces the opening of IP3-gated, calcium channels on the tonoplast and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). (For a more detailed description of these sensory, transduction pathways see Chapter 14 on the web site.), Calcium ATPases are found at the plasma membrane, (Chung et al. 2000) and in some endomembranes of plant, cells (see Figure 6.11). Plant cells regulate cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations by controlling the opening of Ca2+ channels that, allow calcium to diffuse in, as well as by modulating the, activity of pumps that drive Ca2+ out of the cytoplasm back, into the extracellular spaces. Whereas the plasma membrane, calcium pumps move calcium out of the cell, the calcium, pumps on the ER transport calcium into the ER lumen., , ION TRANSPORT IN ROOTS, Mineral nutrients absorbed by the root are carried to the, shoot by the transpiration stream moving through the, xylem (see Chapter 4). Both the initial uptake of nutrients, and the subsequent movement of mineral ions from the, root surface across the cortex and into the xylem are highly, specific, well-regulated processes., Ion transport across the root obeys the same biophysical laws that govern cellular transport. However, as we, have seen in the case of water movement (see Chapter 4),, the anatomy of roots imposes some special constraints on, the pathway of ion movement. In this section we will discuss the pathways and mechanisms involved in the radial, movement of ions from the root surface to the tracheary, elements of the xylem., , Solutes Move through Both Apoplast and, Symplast, Thus far, our discussion of cellular ion transport has not, included the cell wall. In terms of the transport of small, molecules, the cell wall is an open lattice of polysaccharides, through which mineral nutrients diffuse readily. Because, all plant cells are separated by cell walls, ions can diffuse, across a tissue (or be carried passively by water flow), entirely through the cell wall space without ever entering, a living cell. This continuum of cell walls is called the extracellular space, or apoplast (see Figure 4.3)., We can determine the apoplastic volume of a slice of, plant tissue by comparing the uptake of 3H-labeled water, and 14C-labeled mannitol. Mannitol is a nonpermeating, sugar alcohol that diffuses within the extracellular space, but cannot enter the cells. Water, on the other hand, freely, penetrates both the cells and the cell walls. Measurements, of this type usually show that 5 to 20% of the plant tissue, volume is occupied by cell walls.
Page 130 :
Solute Transport, , 105, , Middle lamella, Protein particles on, outer leaflet of ER, , Plasma membrane, Cell wall, , Tonoplast, Endoplasmic, reticulum, , Cytoplasm, , Vacuole, Plasmodesma, Protein particles on, inner leaflet of ER, , Diagram illustrating how plasmodesmata connect the cytoplasms of neighboring cells. Plasmodesmata, are about 40 nm in diameter and allow diffusion of water, and small molecules from one cell to the next. In addition,, the size of the opening can be regulated by rearrangements of the internal proteins to allow the passage of, larger molecules., , Desmotubule, with appressed ER, , Protein particles on, inner leaflet of, plasma membrane, , FIGURE 6.17, , Just as the cell walls form a continuous phase, so do the, cytoplasms of neighboring cells, collectively referred to as, the symplast. Plant cells are interconnected by cytoplasmic, bridges called plasmodesmata (see Chapter 1), cylindrical, pores 20 to 60 nm in diameter (see Figure 1.27). Each plasmodesma is lined with a plasma membrane and contains a, narrow tubule, the desmotubule, that is a continuation of, the endoplasmic reticulum., In tissues where significant amounts of intercellular, transport occur, neighboring cells contain large numbers of, plasmodesmata, up to 15 per square micrometer of cell surface (Figure 6.17). Specialized secretory cells, such as floral, nectaries and leaf salt glands, appear to have high densities of plasmodesmata; so do the cells near root tips, where, most nutrient absorption occurs., By injecting dyes or by making electrical-resistance measurements on cells containing large numbers of plasmodesmata, investigators have shown that ions, water, and, small solutes can move from cell to cell through these, pores. Because each plasmodesma is partly occluded by the, desmotubule and associated proteins (see Chapter 1), the, movement of large molecules such as proteins through the, plasmodesmata requires special mechanisms (Ghoshroy et, al. 1997). Ions, on the other hand, appear to move from cell, to cell through the entire plant by simple diffusion through, the symplast (see Chapter 4)., , Ions Moving through the Root Cross Both, Symplastic and Apoplastic Spaces, Ion absorption by the roots (see Chapter 5) is more pronounced in the root hair zone than in the meristem and, , elongation zones. Cells in the root hair zone have completed their elongation but have not yet begun secondary, growth. The root hairs are simply extensions of specific epidermal cells that greatly increase the surface area available, for ion absorption., An ion that enters a root may immediately enter the, symplast by crossing the plasma membrane of an epidermal cell, or it may enter the apoplast and diffuse between, the epidermal cells through the cell walls. From the apoplast, of the cortex, an ion may either cross the plasma membrane, of a cortical cell, thus entering the symplast, or diffuse radially all the way to the endodermis via the apoplast. In all, cases, ions must enter the symplast before they can enter the, stele, because of the presence of the Casparian strip., The apoplast forms a continuous phase from the root, surface through the cortex. At the boundary between the, vascular cylinder (the stele) and the cortex is a layer of specialized cells, the endodermis. As discussed in Chapters 4, and 5, a suberized cell layer in the endodermis, known as, the Casparian strip, effectively blocks the entry of water, and mineral ions into the stele via the apoplast., Once an ion has entered the stele through the symplastic connections across the endodermis, it continues to diffuse from cell to cell into the xylem. Finally, the ion reenters the apoplast as it diffuses into a xylem tracheid or, vessel element. Again, the Casparian strip prevents the ion, from diffusing back out of the root through the apoplast., The presence of the Casparian strip allows the plant to, maintain a higher ionic concentration in the xylem than, exists in the soil water surrounding the roots., , Xylem Parenchyma Cells Participate in Xylem, Loading, Once ions have been taken up into the symplast of the root, at the epidermis or cortex, they must be loaded into the tracheids or vessel elements of the stele to be translocated to, the shoot. The stele consists of dead tracheary elements and
Page 131 :
106, , Chapter 6, , the living xylem parenchyma. Because the xylem tracheary, elements are dead cells, they lack cytoplasmic continuity, with surrounding xylem parenchyma. To enter the tracheary elements, the ions must exit the symplast by crossing a plasma membrane a second time., The process whereby ions exit the symplast and enter, the conducting cells of the xylem is called xylem loading., The mechanism of xylem loading has long baffled scientists. Ions could enter the tracheids and vessel elements of, the xylem by simple passive diffusion. In this case, the, movement of ions from the root surface to the xylem, would take only a single step requiring metabolic energy., The site of this single-step, energy-dependent uptake, would be the plasma membrane surfaces of the root epidermal, cortical, or endodermal cells. According to the passive-diffusion model, ions move passively into the stele via, the symplast down a gradient of electrochemical potential,, and then leak out of the living cells of the stele (possibly, because of lower oxygen availability in the interior of the, root) into the nonliving conducting cells of the xylem., Support for the passive-diffusion model was provided, by use of ion-specific microelectrodes to measure the electrochemical potentials of various ions across maize roots, (Figure 6.18) (Dunlop and Bowling 1971). Data from this, and other studies indicate that K+, Cl–, Na+, SO42–, and, , High, , NO3– are all taken up actively by the epidermal and cortical cells and are maintained in the xylem against a gradient of electrochemical potential when compared with the, external medium (Lüttge and Higinbotham 1979). However, none of these ions is at a higher electrochemical, potential in the xylem than in the cortex or living portions, of the stele. Therefore, the final movement of ions into the, xylem could be due to passive diffusion., However, other observations have led to the view that, this final step of xylem loading may also involve active, processes within the stele (Lüttge and Higinbotham 1979)., With the type of apparatus shown in Figure 6.19, it is possible to make simultaneous measurements of ion uptake, into the epidermal or cortical cytoplasm and of ion loading, into the xylem., By using treatments with inhibitors and plant hormones,, investigators have shown that ion uptake by the cortex and, ion loading into the xylem operate independently. For, example, treatment with the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide or with the cytokinin benzyladenine inhibits, xylem loading without affecting uptake by the cortex. This, result indicates that efflux from the stelar cells is regulated, independently from uptake by the cortical cells., Recent biochemical studies have supported a role for, the xylem parenchyma cells in xylem loading. The plasma, , Electrochemical, potential, , Chloride (Cl–), , Potassium (K+), Low, Outside, solution, , Epidermis, , Cortex, , Xylem, Endodermis parenchyma, , Xylem, tracheary, , Stele, Casparian strip, , Diagram showing electrochemical potentials, of K+ and Cl– across a maize root. To determine the electrochemical potentials, the root was bathed in a solution containing 1 mM KCl and 0.1 mM CaCl2. A reference electrode, was positioned in the bathing solution, and an ion-sensitive, measuring electrode was inserted in different cells of the, root. The horizontal axis shows the different tissues found, in a root cross section. The substantial increase in electroFIGURE 6.18, , chemical potential for both K+ and Cl– between the bathing, medium and the epidermis indicates that ions are taken up, into the root by an active transport process. In contrast, the, potentials decrease at the xylem vessels, suggesting that, ions are transported into the xylem by passive diffusion, down the gradient of electrochemical potential. (After, Dunlop and Bowling 1971.)
Page 132 :
Solute Transport, Compartment A, , Compartment B, , Root, segment, Radioactive, tracer added, , Ion uptake, measurement, , Xylem-loading, measurement, , membranes of xylem parenchyma cells contain proton, pumps, water channels, and a variety of ion channels specialized for influx or efflux (Maathuis et al. 1997). In barley, xylem parenchyma, two types of cation efflux channels, have been identified: K+-specific efflux channels and nonselective cation efflux channels. These channels are regulated by both the membrane potential and the cytosolic calcium concentration (De Boer and Wegner 1997). This, finding suggests that the flux of ions from the xylem, parenchyma cells into the xylem tracheary elements, rather, than being due to simple leakage, is under tight metabolic, control through regulation of the plasma membrane H+ATPase and ion efflux channels., , SUMMARY, The movement of molecules and ions from one location to, another is known as transport. Plants exchange solutes and, water with their environment and among their tissues and, organs. Both local and long-distance transport processes in, plants are controlled largely by cellular membranes., Forces that drive biological transport, which include, concentration gradients, electric-potential gradients, and, hydrostatic pressures, are integrated by an expression, called the electrochemical potential. Transport of solutes, down a chemical gradient (e.g., by diffusion) is known as, passive transport. Movement of solutes against a chemicalpotential gradient is known as active transport and, requires energy input., The extent to which a membrane permits or restricts the, movement of a substance is called membrane permeability. The permeability depends on the chemical properties, of the particular solute and on the lipid composition of the, membrane, as well as on the membrane proteins that facilitate the transport of specific substances., When cations and anions move passively across a membrane at different rates, the electric potential that develops, is called the diffusion potential. For each ion, the relationship between the voltage difference across the membrane, and the distribution of the ion at equilibrium is described, by the Nernst equation. The Nernst equation shows that at, equilibrium the difference in concentration of an ion, , 107, , We can measure the relationship between ion, uptake into the root and xylem loading by placing a root segment across two compartments and adding a radioactive tracer, to one of them (in this case compartment A). The rate of disappearance of the tracer from compartment A gives a measure of, ion uptake, and the rate of appearance in compartment B provides a measurement of xylem loading. (From Lüttge and, Higinbotham 1979.), , FIGURE 6.19, , between two compartments is balanced by the voltage difference between the compartments. That voltage difference,, or membrane potential, is seen in all living cells because of, the asymmetric ion distributions between the inside and, outside of the cells., The electrical effects of different ions diffusing simultaneously across a cell membrane are summed by the, Goldman equation. Electrogenic pumps, which carry out, active transport and carry a net charge, change the membrane potential from the value created by diffusion., Membranes contain specialized proteins—channels, carriers, and pumps—that facilitate solute transport. Channels, are transport proteins that span the membrane, forming, pores through which solutes diffuse down their gradient, of electrochemical potentials. Carriers bind a solute on one, side of the membrane and release it on the other side., Transport specificity is determined largely by the properties of channels and carriers., A family of H+-pumping ATPases provides the primary, driving force for transport across the plasma membrane of, plant cells. Two other kinds of electrogenic proton pumps, serve this purpose at the tonoplast. Plant cells also have calcium-pumping ATPases that participate in the regulation, of intracellular calcium concentrations, as well as ATPbinding cassette transporters that use the energy of ATP to, transport large anionic molecules. The gradient of electrochemical potential generated by H+ pumping is used to, drive the transport of other substances in a process called, secondary transport., Genetic studies have revealed many genes, and their, corresponding transport proteins, that account for the versatility of plant transport. Patch clamp electrophysiology, provides unique information on ion channels, and it, enables measurement of the permeability and gating of, individual channel proteins., Solutes move between cells either through the extracellular spaces (the apoplast) or from cytoplasm to cytoplasm (via the symplast). Cytoplasms of neighboring cells, are connected by plasmodesmata, which facilitate symplastic transport. When an ion enters the root, it may be, taken up into the cytoplasm of an epidermal cell, or it may, diffuse through the apoplast into the root cortex and enter, the symplast through a cortical cell. From the symplast,, the ion is loaded into the xylem and transported to the, shoot.
Page 133 :
108, , Chapter 6, , Web Material, Web Topics, 6.1 Relating the Membrane Potential to the, Distribution of Several Ions across the, Membrane: The Goldman Equation, A brief explanation of the use of the Goldman, equation to calculate the membrane permeability of more than one ion., , 6.2 Patch Clamp Studies in Plant Cells, The electrophysiological method of patch, clamping as applied to plant cells is described,, with some specific examples., , 6.3 Chemiosmosis in Action, The chemiosmotic theory explains how electrical, and concentration gradients are used to perform, cellular work., , 6.4 Kinetic Analysis of Multiple Transporter Systems, Application of principles on enzyme kinetics to, transport systems provides an effective way to, characterize different carriers., , 6.5 Transport Studies with Isolated Vacuoles and, Membrane Vesicles, Certain experimental techniques enable the isolation of tonoplasts and plasma membranes for, study., , 6.6 ABC Transporters in Plants, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are a, large family of active transport proteins energized directly by ATP., , Web Essay, 6.1 Potassium Channels, Several plant K+ channels have been characterized., , Chapter References, Barkla, B. J., and Pantoja, O. (1996) Physiology of ion transport across, the tonoplast of higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol., Biol. 47: 159–184., Buchanan, B. B., Gruissem, W., and Jones, R. L., eds. (2000) Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. Amer. Soc. Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD., Bush, D. S. (1995) Calcium regulation in plant cells and its role in, signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 95–122., Chrispeels, M. J., Crawford, N. M., and Schroeder, J. I. (1999) Proteins for transport of water and mineral nutrients across the, membranes of plant cells. Plant Cell 11: 661–675., Chung, W. S., Lee, S. H., Kim, J. C., Heo, W. D., Kim, M. C., Park, C., Y., Park, H. C., Lim, C. O., Kim, W. B., Harper, J. F., and Cho, M., J. (2000) Identification of a calmodulin-regulated soybean Ca2+ATPase (SCA1) that is located in the plasma membrane. Plant Cell, 12: 1393–1407., , De Boer, A. H., and Wegner, L. H. (1997) Regulatory mechanisms of, ion channels in xylem parenchyma cells. J. Exp. Bot. 48: 441–449., Dunlop, J., and Bowling, D. J. F. (1971) The movement of ions to the, xylem exudate of maize roots. J. Exp. Bot. 22: 453–464., Ghoshroy, S., Lartey, R., Sheng, J., and Citovsky, V. (1997) Transport, of proteins and nucleic acids through plasmodesmata. Annu. Rev., Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 27–50., Higinbotham, N., Etherton, B., and Foster, R. J. (1967) Mineral ion, contents and cell transmembrane electropotentials of pea and oat, seedling tissue. Plant Physiol. 42: 37–46., Higinbotham, N., Graves, J. S., and Davis, R. F. (1970) Evidence for, an electrogenic ion transport pump in cells of higher plants. J., Membr. Biol. 3: 210–222., Hirshi, K. D., Zhen, R.-G., Rea, P. A., and Fink, G. R. (1996) CAX1, an, H+/Ca2+ antiporter from Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93:, 8782–8786., Kochian, L. V. (2000) Molecular physiology of mineral nutrient, acquisition, transport and utilization. In Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, B. Buchanan, W. Gruissem, and R. Jones,, eds., American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, pp., 1204–1249., Kuehn, C., Barker, L., Buerkle, L., and Frommer, W. B. (1999) Update, on sucrose transport in higher plants. J. Exp. Bot. 50: 935–953., Leng, Q., Mercier, R. W., Hua, B-G., Fromm, H., and Berkowitz, G., A. (2002) Electrophysical analysis of cloned cyclic nucleotidegated ion channels. Plant Physiol. 128: 400–410., Lin, W., Schmitt, M. R., Hitz, W. D., and Giaquinta, R. T. (1984) Sugar, transport into protoplasts isolated from developing soybean, cotyledons. Plant Physiol. 75: 936–940., Lüttge, U., and Higinbotham, N. (1979) Transport in Plants. SpringerVerlag, New York., Lüttge, U., and Ratajczak, R. (1997) The physiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology of the plant vacuolar ATPase. Adv. Bot., Res. 25: 253–296., Maathuis, F. J. M., Ichida, A. M., Sanders, D., and Schroeder, J. I., (1997) Roles of higher plant K+ channels. Plant Physiol. 114:, 1141–1149., Müller, M., Irkens-Kiesecker, U., Kramer, D., and Taiz, L. (1997), Purification and reconstitution of the vacuolar H+-ATPases from, lemon fruits and epicotyls. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 12762–12770., Nobel, P. (1991) Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology., Academic Press, San Diego, CA., Palmgren, M. G. (2001) Plant plasma membrane H+-ATPases: Powerhouses for nutrient uptake. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol., Biol. 52: 817–845., Rea, P. A., Li, Z-S., Lu, Y-P., and Drozdowicz, Y. M.(1998) From vacuolar Gs-X pumps to multispecific ABC transporters. Annu. Rev., Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49: 727–760., Small, J. (1946) pH and Plants, an Introduction to Beginners. D. Van, Nostrand, New York., Spanswick, R. M. (1981) Electrogenic ion pumps. Annu. Rev. Plant, Physiol. 32: 267–289., Sussman, M. R. (1994) Molecular analysis of proteins in the plant, plasma membrane. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 45:, 211–234., Tanner, W., and Caspari, T. (1996) Membrane transport carriers., Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 595–626., Tazawa, M., Shimmen, T., and Mimura, T. (1987) Membrane control, in the Characeae. Annu. Rev. Plant Phsyiol. 38: 95–117., Theodoulou, F. L. (2000) Plant ABC transporters. Biochim. Biophys., Acta 1465: 79–103., Tyerman, S. D., Niemietz, C. M., and Bramley, H. (2002) Plant aquaporins: Multifunctional water and solute channels with expanding roles. Plant Cell Envir. 25: 173–194., Vera-Estrella, R., Barkla, B. J., Higgins, V. J., and Blumwald, E. (1994), Plant defense response to fungal pathogens. Activation of hostplasma-membrane H+-ATPase by elicitor-induced enzyme, dephosphorylation. Plant Physiol. 104: 209–215.
Page 134 :
U N I T, , II, , Biochemistry and, Metabolism
Page 136 :
Chapter, , 7, , Photosynthesis:, The Light Reactions, , LIFE ON EARTH ULTIMATELY DEPENDS ON ENERGY derived from, the sun. Photosynthesis is the only process of biological importance that, can harvest this energy. In addition, a large fraction of the planet’s, energy resources results from photosynthetic activity in either recent or, ancient times (fossil fuels). This chapter introduces the basic physical, principles that underlie photosynthetic energy storage and the current, understanding of the structure and function of the photosynthetic apparatus (Blankenship 2002)., The term photosynthesis means literally “synthesis using light.” As we, will see in this chapter, photosynthetic organisms use solar energy to, synthesize carbon compounds that cannot be formed without the input, of energy. More specifically, light energy drives the synthesis of carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water with the generation of oxygen:, 6 CO2 + 6 H2O →, , Carbon, dioxide, , Water, , C6H12O6, , Carbohydrate, , + 6 O2, , Oxygen, , Energy stored in these molecules can be used later to power cellular, processes in the plant and can serve as the energy source for all forms, of life., This chapter deals with the role of light in photosynthesis, the structure of the photosynthetic apparatus, and the processes that begin with, the excitation of chlorophyll by light and culminate in the synthesis of, ATP and NADPH., , PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN HIGHER PLANTS, The most active photosynthetic tissue in higher plants is the mesophyll, of leaves. Mesophyll cells have many chloroplasts, which contain the, specialized light-absorbing green pigments, the chlorophylls. In photosynthesis, the plant uses solar energy to oxidize water, thereby releasing, oxygen, and to reduce carbon dioxide, thereby forming large carbon, compounds, primarily sugars. The complex series of reactions that cul-
Page 137 :
112, , Chapter 7, , minate in the reduction of CO2 include the thylakoid reactions and the carbon fixation reactions., The thylakoid reactions of photosynthesis take place in, the specialized internal membranes of the chloroplast, called thylakoids (see Chapter 1). The end products of, these thylakoid reactions are the high-energy compounds, ATP and NADPH, which are used for the synthesis of sugars in the carbon fixation reactions. These synthetic, processes take place in the stroma of the chloroplasts, the, aqueous region that surrounds the thylakoids. The thylakoid reactions of photosynthesis are the subject of this, chapter; the carbon fixation reactions are discussed in, Chapter 8., In the chloroplast, light energy is converted into chemical energy by two different functional units called photosystems. The absorbed light energy is used to power the, transfer of electrons through a series of compounds that act, as electron donors and electron acceptors. The majority of, electrons ultimately reduce NADP+ to NADPH and oxidize H2O to O2. Light energy is also used to generate a proton motive force (see Chapter 6) across the thylakoid membrane, which is used to synthesize ATP., , GENERAL CONCEPTS, In this section we will explore the essential concepts that, provide a foundation for an understanding of photosynthesis. These concepts include the nature of light, the properties of pigments, and the various roles of pigments., , Light Has Characteristics of Both, a Particle and a Wave, , Electric-field, component, , Direction of, propagation, Magnetic-field, component, , (7.1), , where c is the speed of the, wave—in the present case,, the speed of light (3.0 × 108 m, s–1). The light wave is a transverse (side-to-side) electromagnetic wave, in which, , th (l), , FIGURE 7.1 Light is a transverse electromagnetic wave,, consisting of oscillating electric and magnetic fields that are, perpendicular to each other and to the direction of propagation of the light. Light moves at a speed of 3 × 10 8 m s–1., The wavelength (l) is the distance between successive, crests of the wave., , both electric and magnetic fields oscillate perpendicularly, to the direction of propagation of the wave and at 90° with, respect to each other., Light is also a particle, which we call a photon. Each, photon contains an amount of energy that is called a quantum (plural quanta). The energy content of light is not continuous but rather is delivered in these discrete packets, the, quanta. The energy (E) of a photon depends on the frequency of the light according to a relation known as, Planck’s law:, E = hn, , (7.2), , where h is Planck’s constant (6.626 × 10–34 J s)., Sunlight is like a rain of photons of different frequencies., Our eyes are sensitive to only a small range of frequencies—the visible-light region of the electromagnetic spectrum (Figure 7.2). Light of slightly higher frequencies (or, , A triumph of physics in the early twentieth century was the, realization that light has properties of both particles and, waves. A wave (Figure 7.1) is, characterized by a wavelength, denoted by the Greek, letter lambda (l), which is the, Wavelength, l (nm), 10–3 10–1, 10, distance between successive, Frequency,, n, (Hz), wave crests. The frequency,, 1020 1018 1016, represented by the Greek letter nu (n), is the number of, Gamma, Ultrawave crests that pass an, Type of radiation, ray, X-ray, violet, observer in a given time. A, simple equation relates the, wavelength, the frequency,, and the speed of any wave:, c = ln, , Wavele, ng, , 400, High energy, , 103, , 105, , 107, , 109, , 1011, , 1013, , 1015, , 1014, , 1012, , 1010, , 108, , 106, , 104, , 102, , Radio, Infrared Microwave wave, , Visible spectrum, , 700, Low energy, , FIGURE 7.2 Electromagnetic spectrum. Wavelength (λ) and frequency (ν) are, inversely related. Our eyes are sensitive to only a narrow range of wavelengths of, radiation, the visible region, which extends from about 400 nm (violet) to about 700, nm (red). Short-wavelength (high-frequency) light has a high energy content; longwavelength (low-frequency) light has a low energy content.
Page 138 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, , 113, , Transmitted, shorter wavelengths) is in the ultraviMonochromator, Recorder, light, Sample, Photodetector, Light, Prism, or computer, olet region of the spectrum, and light, of slightly lower frequencies (or longer, wavelengths) is in the infrared region., The output of the sun is shown in FigA, I0, I, ure 7.3, along with the energy density, that strikes the surface of Earth. The, l(nm), absorption spectrum of chlorophyll a, Monochromatic incident light, (curve C in Figure 7.3) indicates approximately the portion of the solar, FIGURE 7.4 Schematic diagram of a spectrophotometer. The instrument consists, of a light source, a monochromator that contains a wavelength selection device, output that is utilized by plants., such as a prism, a sample holder, a photodetector, and a recorder or computer., An absorption spectrum (plural, The output wavelength of the monochromator can be changed by rotation of the, spectra) displays the amount of light, prism; the graph of absorbance (A) versus wavelength (λ) is called a spectrum., energy taken up or absorbed by a molecule or substance as a function of the, wavelength of the light. The absorpWhen Molecules Absorb or Emit Light, They, tion spectrum for a particular substance in a nonabsorbing, Change Their Electronic State, solvent can be determined by a spectrophotometer as illusChlorophyll appears green to our eyes because it absorbs, trated in Figure 7.4. Spectrophotometry, the technique used, light mainly in the red and blue parts of the spectrum, so, to measure the absorption of light by a sample, is more, only some of the light enriched in green wavelengths, completely discussed in Web Topic 7.1., (about 550 nm) is reflected into our eyes (see Figure 7.3)., The absorption of light is represented by Equation 7.3,, in, which, chlorophyll (Chl) in its lowest-energy, or ground,, 2.0, state absorbs a photon (represented by hn) and makes a, transition to a higher-energy, or excited, state (Chl*):, , Chl + hn → Chl*, , Irradiance W m–2 nm–1, , Solar output, 1.5, , Energy at Earth‘s surface, 1.0, , Absorption of, chlorophyll, 0.5, , 400, , 800, , 1200, Wavelength, l, , 1600, , 2000, , Visible, spectrum, , The solar spectrum and its relation to the, absorption spectrum of chlorophyll. Curve A is the energy, output of the sun as a function of wavelength. Curve B is, the energy that strikes the surface of Earth. The sharp valleys in the infrared region beyond 700 nm represent the, absorption of solar energy by molecules in the atmosphere,, chiefly water vapor. Curve C is the absorption spectrum of, chlorophyll, which absorbs strongly in the blue (about 430, nm) and the red (about 660 nm) portions of the spectrum., Because the green light in the middle of the visible region is, not efficiently absorbed, most of it is reflected into our eyes, and gives plants their characteristic green color., FIGURE 7.3, , (7.3), , The distribution of electrons in the excited molecule is, somewhat different from the distribution in the groundstate molecule (Figure 7.5) Absorption of blue light excites, the chlorophyll to a higher energy state than absorption of, red light because the energy of photons is higher when, their wavelength is shorter. In the higher excited state,, chlorophyll is extremely unstable, very rapidly gives up, some of its energy to the surroundings as heat, and enters, the lowest excited state, where it can be stable for a maximum of several nanoseconds (10–9 s). Because of this inherent instability of the excited state, any process that captures, its energy must be extremely rapid., In the lowest excited state, the excited chlorophyll has, four alternative pathways for disposing of its available, energy., 1. Excited chlorophyll can re-emit a photon and thereby, return to its ground state—a process known as fluorescence. When it does so, the wavelength of fluorescence is slightly longer (and of lower energy) than the, wavelength of absorption because a portion of the, excitation energy is converted into heat before the fluorescent photon is emitted. Chlorophylls fluoresce in, the red region of the spectrum., 2. The excited chlorophyll can return to its ground state, by directly converting its excitation energy into heat,, with no emission of a photon.
Page 139 :
Chapter 7, (A), , (B), Higher excited state, 400, Blue, 500, , Absorption of blue light, , Heat loss, , 600, , Lowest excited state, Red, Absorption of, red light, , 700, Fluorescence, (loss of energy by, emission of light, of longer l), , Fluorescence, Absorption, , 800, , 900, Ground state (lowest energy state), , (A) Chlorophylls, CH2, , H, C, , A, , H3C, , B, N, , H3C, , N, , C2H5, , A, , H3C, , Chlorophyll b, , COOCH3, , H, C2H5, , CH2, , HC, , CH, HC, CH3, , (CH2)3, CH3, , (CH2)3, CH, CH3 CH3, , Chlorophyll a, , HC, H3C, , HC, HC, , H3C, , HC, , C, , H3C, , CH, H, , CH3, , H3C, , CH, C, , O, NH, , CH, , HC, , CH3, , H, H3C, , CH3, CH3, , (CH2)3, , (C) Bilin pigments, , CH3, , O, , HC, , HC, , N, , Bacteriochlorophyll a, , O, , HC, , B, N, , (B) Carotenoids, , E, , C, , C, , H H3C H, , CH3, , C, , CH2, , B, , C, , N, , CH2 H, H, , O, , H, , D, , H, , CHO, , C2H5, , N, Mg, , H, , O, , CH3, CH3, , H, , NH, CH3, , CH, , HOOC, , CH2, , CH2, , HOOC, , CH2, , CH2, , H, N, , CH, , H3C, , CH, , H, H, , H3C, , NH, , CH, H3C, , CH, , HC, H3C, H3C, , β-Carotene, , CH3, , CH, O, , Phycoerythrobilin, , Wavelength, l, , FIGURE 7.5 Light absorption and emission by chlorophyll. (A) Energy level, diagram. Absorption or emission of light, is indicated by vertical lines that connect, the ground state with excited electron, states. The blue and red absorption, bands of chlorophyll (which absorb blue, and red photons, respectively) correspond to the upward vertical arrows,, signifying that energy absorbed from, light causes the molecule to change from, the ground state to an excited state. The, downward-pointing arrow indicates, fluorescence, in which the molecule goes, from the lowest excited state to the, ground state while re-emitting energy as, a photon. (B) Spectra of absorption and, fluorescence. The long-wavelength (red), absorption band of chlorophyll corresponds to light that has the energy, required to cause the transition from the, ground state to the first excited state., The short-wavelength (blue) absorption, band corresponds to a transition to a, higher excited state., , Energy, , 114
Page 140 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, 3. Chlorophyll may participate in energy transfer, during which an excited chlorophyll transfers its energy, to another molecule., , 3, , Absorption, , 4. A fourth process is photochemistry, in which the, energy of the excited state causes chemical reactions, to occur. The photochemical reactions of photosynthesis are among the fastest known chemical reactions. This extreme speed is necessary for photochemistry to compete with the three other possible, reactions of the excited state just described., , 2, 1, , ▲, , The energy of sunlight is first absorbed by the pigments of, the plant. All pigments active in photosynthesis are found, in the chloroplast. Structures and absorption spectra of several photosynthetic pigments are shown in Figures 7.6 and, 7.7, respectively. The chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls (pigments found in certain bacteria) are the typical, pigments of photosynthetic organisms, but all organisms, contain a mixture of more than one kind of pigment, each, serving a specific function., Chlorophylls a and b are abundant in green plants, and, c and d are found in some protists and cyanobacteria. A, number of different types of bacteriochlorophyll have been, found; type a is the most widely distributed. Web Topic 7.2, shows the distribution of pigments in different types of, photosynthetic organisms., All chlorophylls have a complex ring structure that is, chemically related to the porphyrin-like groups found in, hemoglobin and cytochromes (see Figure 7.6A). In addition,, a long hydrocarbon tail is almost always attached to the ring, structure. The tail anchors the chlorophyll to the hydrophobic portion of its environment. The ring structure contains, some loosely bound electrons and is the part of the molecule, involved in electron transitions and redox reactions., The different types of carotenoids found in photosynthetic organisms are all linear molecules with multiple conjugated double bonds (see Figure 7.6B). Absorption bands, in the 400 to 500 nm region give carotenoids their characteristic orange color. The color of carrots, for example, is due, to the carotenoid β-carotene, whose structure and absorp-, , 4, 5, , 400, , Photosynthetic Pigments Absorb the Light That, Powers Photosynthesis, , 115, , 500, , 600, 700, Wavelength (nm), , Visible spectrum, , 800, , Infrared, , FIGURE 7.7 Absorption spectra of some photosynthetic, pigments. Curve 1, bacteriochlorophyll a; curve 2, chlorophyll, a; curve 3, chlorophyll b; curve 4, phycoerythrobilin; curve 5,, β-carotene. The absorption spectra shown are for pure pigments dissolved in nonpolar solvents, except for curve 4,, which represents an aqueous buffer of phycoerythrin, a protein from cyanobacteria that contains a phycoerythrobilin, chromophore covalently attached to the peptide chain. In, many cases the spectra of photosynthetic pigments in vivo, are substantially affected by the environment of the pigments, in the photosynthetic membrane. (After Avers 1985.), , tion spectrum are shown in Figures 7.6 and 7.7, respectively., Carotenoids are found in all photosynthetic organisms,, except for mutants incapable of living outside the laboratory. Carotenoids are integral constituents of the thylakoid, membrane and are usually associated intimately with both, antenna and reaction center pigment proteins. The light, absorbed by the carotenoids is transferred to chlorophyll, for photosynthesis; because of this role they are called, accessory pigments., , KEY EXPERIMENTS IN UNDERSTANDING, PHOTOSYNTHESIS, , Establishing the overall chemical equation of photosynthesis required several hundred years and contributions by, many scientists (literature references for, historical developments can be found on, the web site). In 1771, Joseph Priestley, FIGURE 7.6 Molecular structure of some photosynthetic pigments. (A) The, observed that a sprig of mint growing in, chlorophylls have a porphyrin-like ring structure with a magnesium atom, air in which a candle had burned out, (Mg) coordinated in the center and a long hydrophobic hydrocarbon tail, improved the air so that another candle, that anchors them in the photosynthetic membrane. The porphyrin-like ring, could burn. He had discovered oxygen, is the site of the electron rearrangements that occur when the chlorophyll is, excited and of the unpaired electrons when it is either oxidized or reduced., evolution by plants. A Dutchman, Jan, Various chlorophylls differ chiefly in the substituents around the rings and, Ingenhousz, documented the essential role, the pattern of double bonds. (B) Carotenoids are linear polyenes that serve, of light in photosynthesis in 1779., as both antenna pigments and photoprotective agents. (C) Bilin pigments, Other scientists established the roles of, are open-chain tetrapyrroles found in antenna structures known as phycoCO2 and H2O and showed that organic, bilisomes that occur in cyanobacteria and red algae.
Page 141 :
matter, specifically carbohydrate, is a product of photosynthesis along with oxygen. By the end of the nineteenth, century, the balanced overall chemical reaction for photosynthesis could be written as follows:, Light, plant, , 6 CO 2 + 6 H 2 O , → C6 H12 O 6 + 6 O 2, , (7.4), , where C6H12O6 represents a simple sugar such as glucose., As will be discussed in Chapter 8, glucose is not the actual, product of the carbon fixation reactions. However, the energetics for the actual products is approximately the same, so, the representation of glucose in Equation 7.4 should be, regarded as a convenience but not taken literally., The chemical reactions of photosynthesis are complex. In, fact, at least 50 intermediate reaction steps have now been, identified, and undoubtedly additional steps will be discovered. An early clue to the chemical nature of the essential, chemical process of photosynthesis came in the 1920s from, investigations of photosynthetic bacteria that did not produce, oxygen as an end product. From his studies on these bacteria, C. B. van Niel concluded that photosynthesis is a redox, (reduction–oxidation) process. This conclusion has been confirmed, and it has served as a fundamental concept on which, all subsequent research on photosynthesis has been based., We now turn to the relationship between photosynthetic, activity and the spectrum of absorbed light. We will discuss, some of the critical experiments that have contributed to, our present understanding of photosynthesis, and we will, consider equations for essential chemical reactions of photosynthesis., , ), , Chapter 7, , Absorbance (, ) or, O2 evolution rate (, , 116, , Absorption spectrum, Action spectrum, , 400, , 500, , 600, 700, Wavelength (nm), , 800, , Infrared, , Visible spectrum, , FIGURE 7.8 Action spectrum compared with an absorption, spectrum. The absorption spectrum is measured as shown, in Figure 7.4. An action spectrum is measured by plotting a, response to light such as oxygen evolution, as a function of, wavelength. If the pigment used to obtain the absorption, spectrum is the same as those that cause the response, the, absorption and action spectra will match. In the example, shown here, the action spectrum for oxygen evolution, matches the absorption spectrum of intact chloroplasts quite, well, indicating that light absorption by the chlorophylls, mediates oxygen evolution. Discrepancies are found in the, region of carotenoid absorption, from 450 to 550 nm, indicating that energy transfer from carotenoids to chlorophylls, is not as effective as energy transfer between chlorophylls., , Action Spectra Relate Light Absorption to, Photosynthetic Activity, The use of action spectra has been central to the development of our current understanding of photosynthesis. An, action spectrum depicts the magnitude of a response of a, biological system to light, as a function of wavelength. For, example, an action spectrum for photosynthesis can be constructed from measurements of oxygen evolution at different wavelengths (Figure 7.8). Often an action spectrum, can identify the chromophore (pigment) responsible for a, particular light-induced phenomenon., Some of the first action spectra were measured by T. W., Engelmann in the late 1800s (Figure 7.9). Engelmann used, a prism to disperse sunlight into a rainbow that was, allowed to fall on an aquatic algal filament. A population, of O2-seeking bacteria was introduced into the system. The, , Wavelength of light (nm), 400, , 500, , 600, , Aerotactic bacteria, Spiral, chloroplast, , Prism, , Schematic diagram of the action spectrum measurements by T. W., Engelmann. Engelmann projected a spectrum of light onto the spiral chloroplast, of the filamentous green alga Spirogyra and observed that oxygen-seeking bacteria, introduced into the system collected in the region of the spectrum where chlorophyll pigments absorb. This action spectrum gave the first indication of the effectiveness of light absorbed by accessory pigments in driving photosynthesis., FIGURE 7.9, , Light, , Spirogyra, cell, , 700
Page 142 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, bacteria congregated in the regions of the filaments that, evolved the most O2. These were the regions illuminated, by blue light and red light, which are strongly absorbed by, chlorophyll. Today, action spectra can be measured in, room-sized spectrographs in which a huge monochromator bathes the experimental samples in monochromatic, light. But the principle of the experiment is the same as that, of Engelmann’s experiments., Action spectra were very important for the discovery of, two distinct photosystems operating in O2-evolving photosynthetic organisms. Before we introduce the two photosystems, however, we need to describe the light-gathering antennas and the energy needs of photosynthesis., , Photosynthesis Takes Place in Complexes, Containing Light-Harvesting Antennas and, Photochemical Reaction Centers, A portion of the light energy absorbed by chlorophylls and, carotenoids is eventually stored as chemical energy via the, formation of chemical bonds. This conversion of energy, from one form to another is a complex process that, depends on cooperation between many pigment molecules, and a group of electron transfer proteins., The majority of the pigments serve as an antenna complex, collecting light and transferring the energy to the, reaction center complex, where the chemical oxidation and, reduction reactions leading to long-term energy storage, take place (Figure 7.10). Molecular structures of some of the, antenna and reaction center complexes are discussed later, in the chapter., , Energy transfer, , 117, , How does the plant benefit from this division of labor, between antenna and reaction center pigments? Even in, bright sunlight, a chlorophyll molecule absorbs only a few, photons each second. If every chlorophyll had a complete, reaction center associated with it, the enzymes that make, up this system would be idle most of the time, only occasionally being activated by photon absorption. However, if, many pigments can send energy into a common reaction, center, the system is kept active a large fraction of the time., In 1932, Robert Emerson and William Arnold performed, a key experiment that provided the first evidence for the, cooperation of many chlorophyll molecules in energy conversion during photosynthesis. They delivered very brief, (10–5 s) flashes of light to a suspension of the green alga, Chlorella pyrenoidosa and measured the amount of oxygen, produced. The flashes were spaced about 0.1 s apart, a time, that Emerson and Arnold had determined in earlier work, was long enough for the enzymatic steps of the process to, be completed before the arrival of the next flash. The investigators varied the energy of the flashes and found that at, high energies the oxygen production did not increase when, a more intense flash was given: The photosynthetic system, was saturated with light (Figure 7.11)., In their measurement of the relationship of oxygen production to flash energy, Emerson and Arnold were surprised to find that under saturating conditions, only one, molecule of oxygen was produced for each 2500 chlorophyll molecules in the sample. We know now that several, hundred pigments are associated with each reaction center and that each reaction center must operate four times, , Electron transfer, Maximum yield = 1 O2 / 2500 chlorophyll molecules, , Light, Pigment molecules, , Reaction, center, , O2 produced per flash, , Acceptor, e–, , Initial slope = quantum yield, 1 O2 / 9 –10 absorbed quanta, , e–, Antenna complex, , Donor, , Basic concept of energy transfer during photosynthesis. Many pigments together serve as an antenna,, collecting light and transferring its energy to the reaction, center, where chemical reactions store some of the energy, by transferring electrons from a chlorophyll pigment to an, electron acceptor molecule. An electron donor then reduces, the chlorophyll again. The transfer of energy in the antenna, is a purely physical phenomenon and involves no chemical, changes., , FIGURE 7.10, , Low intensity, , High intensity, Flash energy (number of photons), , Relationship of oxygen production to flash, energy, the first evidence for the interaction between the, antenna pigments and the reaction center. At saturating, energies, the maximum amount of O2 produced is 1 molecule per 2500 chlorophyll molecules., , FIGURE 7.11
Page 143 :
118, , Chapter 7, , to produce one molecule of oxygen—hence the value of, 2500 chlorophylls per O2., The reaction centers and most of the antenna complexes, are integral components of the photosynthetic membrane., In eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms, these membranes, are found within the chloroplast; in photosynthetic, prokaryotes, the site of photosynthesis is the plasma membrane or membranes derived from it., The graph shown in Figure 7.11 permits us to calculate, another important parameter of the light reactions of photosynthesis, the quantum yield. The quantum yield of photosynthesis (F)is defined as follows:, F=, , Number of photochemical products, Total number of quanta absorbed, , (7.5), , In the linear portion (low light intensity) of the curve, an, increase in the number of photons stimulates a proportional increase in oxygen evolution. Thus the slope of the, curve measures the quantum yield for oxygen production., The quantum yield for a particular process can range from, 0 (if that process does not respond to light) to 1.0 (if every, photon absorbed contributes to the process). A more, detailed discussion of quantum yields can be found in Web, Topic 7.3., In functional chloroplasts kept in dim light, the quantum yield of photochemistry is approximately 0.95, the, quantum yield of fluorescence is 0.05 or lower, and the, quantum yields of other processes are negligible. The vast, majority of excited chlorophyll molecules therefore lead to, photochemistry., , The Chemical Reaction of Photosynthesis Is, Driven by Light, It is important to realize that equilibrium for the chemical, reaction shown in Equation 7.4 lies very far in the direction, of the reactants. The equilibrium constant for Equation 7.4,, calculated from tabulated free energies of formation for, each of the compounds involved, is about 10–500. This number is so close to zero that one can be quite confident that, in the entire history of the universe no molecule of glucose, has formed spontaneously from H2O and CO2 without, external energy being provided. The energy needed to, drive the photosynthetic reaction comes from light. Here’s, a simpler form of Equation 7.4:, CO 2 + H 2 O →(CH 2 O) + O 2, Light, plant, , (7.6), , where (CH2O) is one-sixth of a glucose molecule. About, nine or ten photons of light are required to drive the reaction of Equation 7.6., Although the photochemical quantum yield under, optimum conditions is nearly 100%, the efficiency of the, conversion of light into chemical energy is much less. If red, , light of wavelength 680 nm is absorbed, the total energy, input (see Equation 7.2) is 1760 kJ per mole of oxygen, formed. This amount of energy is more than enough to, drive the reaction in Equation 7.6, which has a standardstate free-energy change of +467 kJ mol–1. The efficiency of, conversion of light energy at the optimal wavelength into, chemical energy is therefore about 27%, which is remarkably high for an energy conversion system. Most of this, stored energy is used for cellular maintenance processes;, the amount diverted to the formation of biomass is much, less (see Figure 9.2)., There is no conflict between the fact that the photochemical quantum efficiency (quantum yield) is nearly 1, (100%) and the energy conversion efficiency is only 27%., The quantum efficiency is a measure of the fraction of, absorbed photons that engage in photochemistry; the, energy efficiency is a measure of how much energy in the, absorbed photons is stored as chemical products. The, numbers indicate that almost all the absorbed photons, engage in photochemistry, but only about a fourth of the, energy in each photon is stored, the remainder being converted to heat., , Light Drives the Reduction of NADP and the, Formation of ATP, The overall process of photosynthesis is a redox chemical, reaction, in which electrons are removed from one chemical species, thereby oxidizing it, and added to another, species, thereby reducing it. In 1937, Robert Hill found that, in the light, isolated chloroplast thylakoids reduce a variety of compounds, such as iron salts. These compounds, serve as oxidants in place of CO2, as the following equation, shows:, 4 Fe3+ + 2 H2O → 4 Fe2+ + O2 + 4 H+, , (7.7), , Many compounds have since been shown to act as artificial electron acceptors in what has come to be known as the, Hill reaction. Their use has been invaluable in elucidating, the reactions that precede carbon reduction., We now know that during the normal functioning of the, photosynthetic system, light reduces nicotinamide adenine, dinucleotide phosphate (NADP), which in turn serves as, the reducing agent for carbon fixation in the Calvin cycle, (see Chapter 8). ATP is also formed during the electron, flow from water to NADP, and it, too, is used in carbon, reduction., The chemical reactions in which water is oxidized to, oxygen, NADP is reduced, and ATP is formed are known, as the thylakoid reactions because almost all the reactions up, to NADP reduction take place within the thylakoids. The, carbon fixation and reduction reactions are called the, stroma reactions because the carbon reduction reactions take, place in the aqueous region of the chloroplast, the stroma.
Page 144 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, , 119, , Absorption, spectrum, , 0.05, , 0, 400, , Relative rate of, photosynthesis, , Quantum yield of, photosynthesis, , Quantum yield, 0.1, , 500, , 600, Wavelength (nm), , 700, Far-red, light on, , Visible spectrum, , Off, , Red light, on, , Off, , Both, lights on, , Off, , Time, , Enhancement effect. The rate of photosynthesis when red and far-red light are given together is greater, than the sum of the rates when they are given apart. The, enhancement effect provided essential evidence in favor of, the concept that photosynthesis is carried out by two photochemical systems working in tandem but with slightly, different wavelength optima., , FIGURE 7.12, , Red drop effect. The quantum yield of photosynthesis (black curve) falls off drastically for far-red light of, wavelengths greater than 680 nm, indicating that far-red, light alone is inefficient in driving photosynthesis. The slight, dip near 500 nm reflects the somewhat lower efficiency of, photosynthesis using light absorbed by accessory pigments,, carotenoids., , FIGURE 7.13, , Although this division is somewhat arbitrary, it is conceptually useful., , These observations were eventually explained by experiments performed in the 1960s (see Web Topic 7.4) that led, to the discovery that two photochemical complexes, now, known as photosystems I and II (PSI and PSII), operate in, series to carry out the early energy storage reactions of photosynthesis., Photosystem I preferentially absorbs far-red light of, wavelengths greater than 680 nm; photosystem II preferentially absorbs red light of 680 nm and is driven very, poorly by far-red light. This wavelength dependence, explains the enhancement effect and the red drop effect., Another difference between the photosystems is that, , Oxygen-Evolving Organisms Have Two, Photosystems That Operate in Series, By the late 1950s, several experiments were puzzling the, scientists who studied photosynthesis. One of these experiments carried out by Emerson, measured the quantum, yield of photosynthesis as a function of wavelength and, revealed an effect known as the red drop (Figure 7.12)., If the quantum yield is measured for the wavelengths at, which chlorophyll absorbs light, the values found throughout most of the range are fairly constant, indicating that, any photon absorbed by chlorophyll or other pigments is, as effective as any other photon in driving photosynthesis., However, the yield drops dramatically in the far-red region, of chlorophyll absorption (greater than 680 nm)., This drop cannot be caused by a decrease in chlorophyll, absorption because the quantum yield measures only light, that has actually been absorbed. Thus, light with a wavelength greater than 680 nm is much less efficient than light, of shorter wavelengths., Another puzzling experimental result was the enhancement effect, also discovered by Emerson. He measured the, rate of photosynthesis separately with light of two different wavelengths and then used the two beams simultaneously (Figure 7.13). When red and far-red light were given, together, the rate of photosynthesis was greater than the, sum of the individual rates. This was a startling and surprising observation., , • Photosystem I produces a strong reductant, capable of, reducing NADP+, and a weak oxidant., • Photosystem II produces a very strong oxidant, capable of oxidizing water, and a weaker reductant than, the one produced by photosystem I., The reductant produced by photosystem II re-reduces the, oxidant produced by photosystem I. These properties of, the two photosystems are shown schematically in Figure, 7.14., The scheme of photosynthesis depicted in Figure 7.14,, called the Z (for zigzag) scheme, has become the basis for, understanding O2-evolving (oxygenic) photosynthetic, organisms. It accounts for the operation of two physically, and chemically distinct photosystems (I and II), each with, its own antenna pigments and photochemical reaction center. The two photosystems are linked by an electron transport chain.
Page 145 :
Chapter 7, , Strong, reductant, , Reducing, , 120, , Redox potential, , Weak, reductant, , H2O, , P680*, , NADP+, , e–, , Electron, transport, chain, , e–, , Far-red, light, , e–, , P700, , e–, , Oxidizing, , P700*, , NADPH, , e–, , Red light, , O2 + H+, , e–, , Weak, oxidant, , P680, Strong, oxidant, , Photosystem I, , Z scheme of photosynthesis. Red light, absorbed by photosystem II (PSII) produces a strong, oxidant and a weak reductant. Far-red light, absorbed by photosystem I (PSI) produces a weak, oxidant and a strong reductant. The strong oxidant, generated by PSII oxidizes water, while the strong, reductant produced by PSI reduces NADP+. This, scheme is basic to an understanding of photosynthetic electron transport. P680 and P700 refer to the, wavelengths of maximum absorption of the reaction, center chlorophylls in PSII and PSI, respectively., , FIGURE 7.14, Photosystem II, , ORGANIZATION OF THE, PHOTOSYNTHETIC APPARATUS, The previous section explained some of the physical principles underlying photosynthesis, some aspects of the functional roles of various pigments, and some of the chemical, reactions carried out by photosynthetic organisms. We now, turn to the architecture of the photosynthetic apparatus, and the structure of its components., , The Chloroplast Is the Site of Photosynthesis, In photosynthetic eukaryotes, photosynthesis takes place, in the subcellular organelle known as the chloroplast. Figure 7.15 shows a transmission electron micrograph of a thin, section from a pea chloroplast. The most striking aspect of, the structure of the chloroplast is the extensive system of, internal membranes known as thylakoids. All the chlorophyll is contained within this membrane system, which is, the site of the light reactions of photosynthesis., The carbon reduction reactions, which are catalyzed by, water-soluble enzymes, take place in the stroma (plural, stromata), the region of the chloroplast outside the thylakoids. Most of the thylakoids appear to be very closely, associated with each other. These stacked membranes are, known as grana lamellae (singular lamella; each stack is, called a granum), and the exposed membranes in which, stacking is absent are known as stroma lamellae., Two separate membranes, each composed of a lipid, bilayer and together known as the envelope, surround most, types of chloroplasts (Figure 7.16). This double-membrane, system contains a variety of metabolite transport systems., , Stroma, lamellae, (not, stacked), Outer and, inner, membranes, Thylakoid, , Grana, lamellae, (stacked), , Stroma, , Transmission electron micrograph of a chloroplast from pea (Pisum sativum), fixed in glutaraldehyde, and OsO4 , embedded in plastic resin, and thin-sectioned, with an ultramicrotome. (14,500×) (Courtesy of J. Swafford.), FIGURE 7.15
Page 146 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, Stroma, lamellae, (site of PSI), , Intermembrane space, , Thylakoid, , Outer, envelope, , Grana lamellae, (stack of, thylakoids and, site of PSII), Thylakoid, Stroma, Inner, envelope, , Thylakoid, lumen, Granum, (stack of thylakoids), , Stroma, lamella, , 121, , The chloroplast also contains its, own DNA, RNA, and ribosomes., Many of the chloroplast proteins, are products of transcription and, translation within the chloroplast, itself, whereas others are encoded, by nuclear DNA, synthesized on, cytoplasmic ribosomes, and then, imported into the chloroplast. This, remarkable division of labor,, extending in many cases to different subunits of the same enzyme, complex, will be discussed in more, detail later in this chapter. For some, dynamic structures of chloroplasts, see Web Essay 7.1., , Thylakoids Contain Integral, Membrane Proteins, Schematic picture of the overall organization of the membranes in the chloroplast. The chloroplast of higher plants is surrounded, by the inner and outer membranes (envelope). The region of the chloroplast that is inside the inner membrane and surrounds the thylakoid, membranes is known as the stroma. It contains the enzymes that catalyze carbon fixation and other biosynthetic pathways. The thylakoid, membranes are highly folded and appear in many pictures to be stacked, like coins, although in reality they form one or a few large interconnected membrane systems, with a well-defined interior and exterior with, respect to the stroma. The inner space within a thylakoid is known as the, lumen. (After Becker 1986.), , FIGURE 7.16, , A wide variety of proteins essential to photosynthesis are embedded in the thylakoid, membranes. In many cases, portions of these, proteins extend into the aqueous regions on, both sides of the thylakoids. These integral, membrane proteins contain a large proportion of hydrophobic amino acids and are, therefore much more stable in a nonaqueous, medium such as the hydrocarbon portion of, the membrane (see Figure 1.5A)., The reaction centers, the antenna pigment–protein complexes, and most of the electron transport enzymes are all integral membrane proteins. In all, known cases, integral membrane proteins of the chloroplast have a unique orientation within the membrane. Thylakoid membrane proteins have one region pointing, toward the stromal side of the membrane and the other oriented toward the interior portion of the thylakoid, known, as the lumen (see Figures 7.16 and 7.17)., The chlorophylls and accessory light-gathering pigments in the thylakoid membrane are always associated in, a noncovalent but highly specific way with proteins. Both, antenna and reaction center chlorophylls are associated, with proteins that are organized within the membrane so, as to optimize energy transfer in antenna complexes and, electron transfer in reaction centers, while at the same time, minimizing wasteful processes., , Thylakoid, , Thylakoid, lumen, , Stroma, , Thylakoid, membrane, , Amino, terminus, (NH2), , Predicted folding pattern of the D1 protein of, the PSII reaction center. The hydrophobic portion of the, membrane is traversed five times by the peptide chain rich, in hydrophobic amino acid residues. The protein is asymmetrically arranged in the thylakoid membrane, with the, amino (NH2) terminus on the stromal side of the membrane, and the carboxyl (COOH) terminus on the lumen side., (After Trebst 1986.), , FIGURE 7.17, , Thylakoid, lumen, , Carboxyl, terminus, (COOH)
Page 147 :
122, , Chapter 7, , STROMA, , Thylakoid, membrane, , LUMEN, , Organization of the protein complexes of the thylakoid membrane. Photosystem II is located predominantly in the, stacked regions of the thylakoid membrane; photosystem I and, ATP synthase are found in the unstacked regions protruding into, the stroma. Cytochrome b6 f complexes are evenly distributed. This, lateral separation of the two photosystems requires that electrons, and protons produced by photosystem II be transported a considerable distance before they can be acted on by photosystem I and, the ATP-coupling enzyme. (After Allen and Forsberg 2001.), FIGURE 7.18, , LHCII, trimer, , PSII Cytochrome, b6f dimer, , PSI, , ATP synthase, , Photosystems I and II Are Spatially Separated in, the Thylakoid Membrane, The PSII reaction center, along with its antenna chlorophylls and associated electron transport proteins, is located, predominantly in the grana lamellae (Figure 7.18) (Allen, and Forsberg 2001)., The PSI reaction center and its associated antenna pigments and electron transfer proteins, as well as the coupling-factor enzyme that catalyzes the formation of ATP,, are found almost exclusively in the stroma lamellae and at, the edges of the grana lamellae. The cytochrome b6 f complex of the electron transport chain that connects the, two photosystems (see Figure 7.21) is evenly distributed, between stroma and grana., Thus the two photochemical events that take place in, O2-evolving photosynthesis are spatially separated. This, separation implies that one or more of the electron carriers, that function between the photosystems diffuses from the, grana region of the membrane to the stroma region, where, electrons are delivered to photosystem I., In PSII, the oxidation of two water molecules produces, four electrons, four protons, and a single O2 (see Equation, 7.8). The protons produced by this oxidation of water must, also be able to diffuse to the stroma region, where ATP is, synthesized. The functional role of this large separation, (many tens of nanometers) between photosystems I and II, is not entirely clear but is thought to improve the efficiency, of energy distribution between the two photosystems, (Trissl and Wilhelm 1993; Allen and Forsberg 2001)., , The spatial separation between photosystems I and II, indicates that a strict one-to-one stoichiometry between the, two photosystems is not required. Instead, PSII reaction, centers feed reducing equivalents into a common intermediate pool of soluble electron carriers (plastoquinone),, which will be described in detail later in the chapter. The, PSI reaction centers remove the reducing equivalents from, the common pool, rather than from any specific PSII reaction center complex., Most measurements of the relative quantities of photosystems I and II have shown that there is an excess of photosystem II in chloroplasts. Most commonly, the ratio of, PSII to PSI is about 1.5:1, but it can change when plants are, grown in different light conditions., , Anoxygenic Photosynthetic Bacteria Have a, Reaction Center Similar to That of Photosystem II, Non-O2-evolving (anoxygenic) organisms, such as the purple photosynthetic bacteria of the genera Rhodobacter and, Rhodopseudomonas, contain only a single photosystem., These simpler organisms have been very useful for detailed, structural and functional studies that have contributed to, a better understanding of oxygenic photosynthesis., Hartmut Michel, Johann Deisenhofer, Robert Huber, and, coworkers in Munich resolved the three-dimensional structure of the reaction center from the purple photosynthetic, bacterium Rhodopseudomonas viridis (Deisenhofer and, Michel 1989). This landmark achievement, for which a, Nobel Prize was awarded in 1988, was the first high-reso-
Page 148 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, lution, X-ray structural determination for an integral membrane protein, and the first structural determination for a, reaction center complex (see Figures 7.5.A and 7.5.B in Web, Topic 7.5). Detailed analysis of these structures, along with, the characterization of numerous mutants, has revealed, many of the principles involved in the energy storage, processes carried out by all reaction centers., The structure of the bacterial reaction center is thought, to be similar in many ways to that found in photosystem II, from oxygen-evolving organisms, especially in the electron, acceptor portion of the chain. The proteins that make up, the core of the bacterial reaction center are relatively similar in sequence to their photosystem II counterparts, implying an evolutionary relatedness., , ORGANIZATION OF LIGHT-ABSORBING, ANTENNA SYSTEMS, The antenna systems of different classes of photosynthetic, organisms are remarkably varied, in contrast to the reaction, centers, which appear to be similar in even distantly related, organisms. The variety of antenna complexes reflects evolutionary adaptation to the diverse environments in which, different organisms live, as well as the need in some organisms to balance energy input to the two photosystems, (Grossman et al. 1995; Green and Durnford 1996)., Antenna systems function to deliver energy efficiently, to the reaction centers with which they are associated (van, Grondelle et al. 1994; Pullerits and Sundström 1996). The, size of the antenna system varies considerably in different, organisms, ranging from a low of 20 to 30 bacteriochlorophylls per reaction center in some photosynthetic bacteria,, to generally 200 to 300 chlorophylls per reaction center in, higher plants, to a few thousand pigments per reaction center in some types of algae and bacteria. The molecular, structures of antenna pigments are also quite diverse,, although all of them are associated in some way with the, photosynthetic membrane., The physical mechanism by which excitation energy is, conveyed from the chlorophyll that absorbs the light to the, reaction center is thought to be resonance transfer. By this, mechanism the excitation energy is transferred from one, molecule to another by a nonradiative process., A useful analogy for resonance transfer is the transfer of, energy between two tuning forks. If one tuning fork is struck, and properly placed near another, the second tuning fork, receives some energy from the first and begins to vibrate. As, in resonance energy transfer in antenna complexes, the efficiency of energy transfer between the two tuning forks, depends on their distance from each other and their relative, orientation, as well as their pitches or vibrational frequencies., Energy transfer in antenna complexes is very efficient:, Approximately 95 to 99% of the photons absorbed by the, antenna pigments have their energy transferred to the reaction center, where it can be used for photochemistry. There, is an important difference between energy transfer among, , 123, , pigments in the antenna and the electron transfer that, occurs in the reaction center: Whereas energy transfer is a, purely physical phenomenon, electron transfer involves, chemical changes in molecules., , The Antenna Funnels Energy to the, Reaction Center, The sequence of pigments within the antenna that funnel, absorbed energy toward the reaction center has absorption, maxima that are progressively shifted toward longer red, wavelengths (Figure 7.19). This red shift in absorption maximum means that the energy of the excited state is somewhat lower nearer the reaction center than in the more, peripheral portions of the antenna system., As a result of this arrangement, when excitation is transferred, for example, from a chlorophyll b molecule absorbing, maximally at 650 nm to a chlorophyll a molecule absorbing, maximally at 670 nm, the difference in energy between these, two excited chlorophylls is lost to the environment as heat., For the excitation to be transferred back to the chlorophyll b, the energy lost as heat would have to be resupplied. The probability of reverse transfer is therefore, smaller simply because thermal energy is not sufficient to, make up the deficit between the lower-energy and higherenergy pigments. This effect gives the energy-trapping, process a degree of directionality or irreversibility and, makes the delivery of excitation to the reaction center more, efficient. In essence, the system sacrifices some energy from, each quantum so that nearly all of the quanta can be, trapped by the reaction center., , Many Antenna Complexes Have a Common, Structural Motif, In all eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms that contain both, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b, the most abundant antenna, proteins are members of a large family of structurally, related proteins. Some of these proteins are associated primarily with photosystem II and are called light-harvesting, complex II (LHCII) proteins; others are associated with, photosystem I and are called LHCI proteins. These antenna, complexes are also known as chlorophyll a/b antenna proteins (Paulsen 1995; Green and Durnford 1996)., The structure of one of the LHCII proteins has been, determined by a combination of electron microscopy and, electron crystallography (Figure 7.20) (Kühlbrandt et al., 1994). The protein contains three α-helical regions and, binds about 15 chlorophyll a and b molecules, as well as a, few carotenoids. Only some of these pigments are visible, in the resolved structure. The structure of the LHCI proteins has not yet been determined but is probably similar, to that of the LHCII proteins. All of these proteins have significant sequence similarity and are almost certainly, descendants of a common ancestral protein (Grossman et, al. 1995; Green and Durnford 1996)., Light absorbed by carotenoids or chlorophyll b in the, LHC proteins is rapidly transferred to chlorophyll a and
Page 149 :
124, , Chapter 7, , (A), , (B), , High, , Light, , Carotenoids*, , Chlorophyll b, , Chlorophyll b*, Antenna, complexes, , Energy, , Chlorophyll a, , P680, , Photon absorption, , Energy gradient, , Carotenoids, , Reaction, center, , Chlorophyll a*, , Energy lost, as heat, during, excitation, transfer, , P680*, Energy of, reaction, center, excited, state, available, for storage, Ground-state energy, , Low, , Funneling of excitation from the antenna system toward the reaction center. (A) The excited-state energy, of pigments increases with distance from the reaction center; that is, pigments closer to the reaction center are lower, in energy than those farther from the reaction center. This, energy gradient ensures that excitation transfer toward the, reaction center is energetically favorable and that excitation, transfer back out to the peripheral portions of the antenna, is energetically unfavorable. (B) Some energy is lost as heat, to the environment by this process, but under optimal conditions almost all the excitations absorbed in the antenna, complexes can be delivered to the reaction center. The, asterisks denote an excited state., , FIGURE 7.19, , STROMA, , Thylakoid, membrane, , then to other antenna pigments that are intimately associated with the reaction center. The LHCII complex is also, involved in regulatory processes, which are discussed later, in the chapter., , MECHANISMS OF ELECTRON TRANSPORT, Some of the evidence that led to the idea of two photochemical reactions operating in series was discussed earlier in this, Chlorophyll a, Carotenoid, chapter. Here we will consider in detail the chemical reacChlorophyll b, tions involved in electron transfer during photosynthesis. We, LUMEN, will discuss the excitation of chlorophyll, by light and the reduction of the first, FIGURE 7.20 Two-dimensional view of the structure of the LHCII antenna, electron acceptor, the flow of electrons, complex from higher plants, determined by a combination of electron, through photosystems II and I, the oximicroscopy and electron crystallography. Like X-ray crystallography, electron, dation of water as the primary source of, crystallography uses the diffraction patterns of soft-energy electrons to resolve, electrons, and the reduction of the final, macromolecule structures. The antenna complex is a transmembrane pigment, protein, with three helical regions that cross the nonpolar part of the memelectron acceptor (NADP+). The chemiosbrane. Approximately 15 chlorophyll a and b molecules are associated with the, motic mechanism that mediates ATP syncomplex, as well as several carotenoids. The positions of several of the chlorothesis will be discussed in detail later in, phylls are shown, and two of the carotenoids form an X in the middle of the, the chapter (see “Proton Transport and, complex. In the membrane, the complex is trimeric and aggregates around the, ATP Synthesis in the Chloroplast”)., periphery of the PSII reaction center complex. (After Kühlbrandt et al. 1994.)
Page 150 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, , Electrons Ejected from Chlorophyll Travel Through, a Series of Electron Carriers Organized in the “Z, Scheme”, , 125, , Almost all the chemical processes that make up the light, reactions of photosynthesis are carried out by four major, protein complexes: photosystem II, the cytochrome b6 f complex, photosystem I, and the ATP synthase. These four integral membrane complexes are vectorially oriented in the, thylakoid membrane to function as follows (Figure 7.22):, , Figure 7.21 shows a current version of the Z scheme, in, which all the electron carriers known to function in electron flow from H2O to NADP+ are arranged vertically at, their midpoint redox potentials (see Web Topic 7.6 for further detail). Components known to react with each other, are connected by arrows, so the Z scheme is really a synthesis of both kinetic and thermodynamic information. The, large vertical arrows represent the input of light energy, into the system., Photons excite the specialized chlorophyll of the reaction centers (P680 for PSII, and P700 for PSI), and an electron is ejected. The electron then passes through a series of, electron carriers and eventually reduces P700 (for electrons, from PSII) or NADP+ (for electrons from PSI). Much of the, following discussion describes the journeys of these electrons and the nature of their carriers., , • Photosystem II oxidizes water to O2 in the thylakoid, lumen and in the process releases protons into the, lumen., • Cytochrome b6 f receives electrons from PSII and, delivers them to PSI. It also transports additional, protons into the lumen from the stroma., • Photosystem I reduces NADP+ to NADPH in the, stroma by the action of ferredoxin (Fd) and the flavoprotein ferredoxin–NADP reductase (FNR)., • ATP synthase produces ATP as protons diffuse back, through it from the lumen into the stroma., , –2.0, , P700*, , 5, A0, , A1, FeSX, , –1.5, , FeSA, FeSB, Fd, , –1.0, 1, , P680*, , 6, FNR, , NADP+, , –0.5, Pheo, m, , QB, , 0, 1, H2O, , 0.5, , Cyt b, Q, FeSR, , Cyt b, Cyt f, 4, , Oxygenevolving, complex, , 1.0, , NADPH, , Cytochrome, b6f complex, , 3, QA, , PC, , P700, , Light, , 2, Yz, , P680, , Light, , O2 + H+, 1.5, Photosystem II, , Detailed Z scheme for O2-evolving photosynthetic organisms. The redox carriers are placed at their midpoint redox potentials (at pH 7). (1) The vertical arrows represent photon absorption by the reaction center chlorophylls: P680 for photosystem II (PSII) and P700 for photosystem I (PSI). The excited PSII reaction center chlorophyll,, P680*, transfers an electron to pheophytin (Pheo). (2) On, the oxidizing side of PSII (to the left of the arrow joining, P680 with P680*), P680 oxidized by light is re-reduced by, Yz , that has received electrons from oxidation of water. (3), On the reducing side of PSII (to the right of the arrow joining P680 with P680*), pheophytin transfers electrons to the, , FIGURE 7.21, , Photosystem I, , acceptors QA and QB, which are plastoquinones. (4) The, cytochrome b6 f complex transfers electrons to plastocyanin, (PC), a soluble protein, which in turn reduces P700+ (oxidized P700). (5) The acceptor of electrons from P700* (A0) is, thought to be a chlorophyll, and the next acceptor (A1) is a, quinone. A series of membrane-bound iron–sulfur proteins, (FeSX, FeSA, and FeSB) transfers electrons to soluble ferredoxin (Fd). (6) The soluble flavoprotein ferredoxin–NADP, reductase (FNR) reduces NADP+ to NADPH, which is used, in the Calvin cycle to reduce CO2 (see Chapter 8). The, dashed line indicates cyclic electron flow around PSI. (After, Blankenship and Prince 1985.)
Page 151 :
126, , Chapter 7, , STROMA (low H+), , H+, ATP, , ADP + Pi, , NADP+ + H+, NADPH, Light, , Light, H+, , ATP, synthase, , FNR, Fd, P680, , P700, , PSII, , PQ, , e–, , Cytochrome, b6f, , PQH2, , PSI, e–, , e–, , Plastoquinone, H2O, , Low, , O2 + H+, , PC, H+, , High, Electrochemical, potential, gradient, , H+, , Plastocyanin, , Oxidation, of water, LUMEN (high H+), , FIGURE 7.22 The transfer of electrons and protons in the, thylakoid membrane is carried out vectorially by four protein complexes. Water is oxidized and protons are released, in the lumen by PSII. PSI reduces NADP+ to NADPH in the, stroma, via the action of ferredoxin (Fd) and the flavoprotein ferredoxin–NADP reductase (FNR). Protons are also, transported into the lumen by the action of the cytochrome, b6 f complex and contribute to the electrochemical proton, , gradient. These protons must then diffuse to the ATP synthase enzyme, where their diffusion down the electrochemical potential gradient is used to synthesize ATP in the, stroma. Reduced plastoquinone (PQH2) and plastocyanin, transfer electrons to cytochrome b6 f and to PSI, respectively. Dashed lines represent electron transfer; solid lines, represent proton movement., , Redox properties of ground and excited, states of reaction center chlorophyll, , Energy Is Captured When an Excited Chlorophyll, Reduces an Electron Acceptor Molecule, As discussed earlier, the function of light is to excite a specialized chlorophyll in the reaction center, either by direct, absorption or, more frequently, via energy transfer from an, antenna pigment. This excitation process can be envisioned, as the promotion of an electron from the highest-energy, filled orbital of the chlorophyll to the lowest-energy, unfilled orbital (Figure 7.23). The electron in the upper, orbital is only loosely bound to the chlorophyll and is easily lost if a molecule that can accept the electron is nearby., The first reaction that converts electron energy into, chemical energy—that is, the primary photochemical, event—is the transfer of an electron from the excited state, of a chlorophyll in the reaction center to an acceptor molecule. An equivalent way to view this process is that the, absorbed photon causes an electron rearrangement in the, reaction center chlorophyll, followed by an electron transfer process in which part of the energy in the photon is captured in the form of redox energy., Immediately after the photochemical event, the reaction, center chlorophyll is in an oxidized state (electron deficient,, or positively charged) and the nearby electron acceptor mol-, , Poor, oxidizing, agent, , Acceptor, orbital, , Donor, orbital, , Good, reducing, agent, , Light, Poor, reducing, agent, , Donor, orbital, , Ground-state, chlorophyll, , Acceptor, orbital, , Good, oxidizing, agent, , Excited-state, chlorophyll, , FIGURE 7.23 Orbital occupation diagram for the ground and, , excited states of reaction center chlorophyll. In the ground, state the molecule is a poor reducing agent (loses electrons, from a low-energy orbital) and a poor oxidizing agent, (accepts electrons only into a high-energy orbital). In the, excited state the situation is reversed, and an electron can, be lost from the high-energy orbital, making the molecule, an extremely powerful reducing agent. This is the reason, for the extremely negative excited-state redox potential, shown by P680* and P700* in Figure 7.21. The excited state, can also act as a strong oxidant by accepting an electron, into the lower-energy orbital, although this pathway is not, significant in reaction centers. (After Blankenship and, Prince 1985.)
Page 152 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, ecule is reduced (electron rich, or negatively charged). The, system is now at a critical juncture. The lower-energy orbital, of the positively charged oxidized reaction center chlorophyll shown in Figure 7.23 has a vacancy and can accept an, electron. If the acceptor molecule donates its electron back, to the reaction center chlorophyll, the system will be, returned to the state that existed before the light excitation,, and all the absorbed energy will be converted into heat., This wasteful recombination process, however, does not, appear to occur to any substantial degree in functioning, reaction centers. Instead, the acceptor transfers its extra, electron to a secondary acceptor and so on down the electron transport chain. The oxidized reaction center of the, chlorophyll that had donated an electron is re-reduced by, a secondary donor, which in turn is reduced by a tertiary, donor. In plants, the ultimate electron donor is H2O, and, the ultimate electron acceptor is NADP+ (see Figure 7.21)., The essence of photosynthetic energy storage is thus the, initial transfer of an electron from an excited chlorophyll to, an acceptor molecule, followed by a very rapid series of, secondary chemical reactions that separate the positive and, negative charges. These secondary reactions separate the, charges to opposite sides of the thylakoid membrane in, approximately 200 picoseconds (1 picosecond = 10–12 s)., With the charges thus separated, the reversal reaction is, many orders of magnitude slower, and the energy has been, captured. Each of the secondary electron transfers is accompanied by a loss of some energy, thus making the process, effectively irreversible. The quantum yield for the production of stable products in purified reaction centers from, photosynthetic bacteria has been measured as 1.0; that is,, every photon produces stable products, and no reversal, reactions occur., Although these types of measurements have not been, made on purified reaction centers from higher plants, the, measured quantum requirements for O2 production under, optimal conditions (low-intensity light) indicate that the, values for the primary photochemical events are very close, to 1.0. The structure of the reaction center appears to be, extremely fine-tuned for maximal rates of productive reactions and minimal rates of energy-wasting reactions., , The Reaction Center Chlorophylls of the Two, Photosystems Absorb at Different Wavelengths, As discussed earlier in the chapter, PSI and PSII have distinct absorption characteristics. Precise measurements of, absorption maxima were made possible by optical changes, in the reaction center chlorophylls in the reduced and oxidized states. The reaction center chlorophyll is transiently, in an oxidized state after losing an electron and before, being re-reduced by its electron donor., In the oxidized state, the strong light absorbance in the, red region of the spectrum that is characteristic of chlorophylls is lost, or bleached. It is therefore possible to monitor the redox state of these chlorophylls by time-resolved, , 127, , optical absorbance measurements in which this bleaching, is monitored directly (see Web Topic 7.1)., Using such techniques, Bessel Kok found that the reaction center chlorophyll of photosystem I absorbs maximally, at 700 nm in its reduced state. Accordingly, this chlorophyll, is named P700 (the P stands for pigment). H. T. Witt and, coworkers found the analogous optical transient of photosystem II at 680 nm, so its reaction center chlorophyll is, known as P680. Earlier, Louis Duysens had identified the, reaction center bacteriochlorophyll from purple photosynthetic bacteria as P870., The X-ray structure of the bacterial reaction center (see, Figures 7.5.A and 7.5.B in Web Topic 7.5) clearly indicates, that P870 is a closely coupled pair or dimer of bacteriochlorophylls, rather than a single molecule. The primary, donor of photosystem I, P700, is a dimer of chlorophyll a, molecules. Photosystem II also contains a dimer of chlorophylls, although the primary donor, P680, may not reside, entirely on these pigments. In the oxidized state, reaction, center chlorophylls contain an unpaired electron. Molecules with unpaired electrons often can be detected by a, magnetic-resonance technique known as electron spin resonance (ESR). ESR studies, along with the spectroscopic, measurements already described, have led to the discovery of many intermediate electron carriers in the photosynthetic electron transport system., , The Photosystem II Reaction Center Is a, Multisubunit Pigment–Protein Complex, Photosystem II is contained in a multisubunit protein, supercomplex (Figure 7.24) (Barber et al. 1999). In higher, plants, the multisubunit protein supercomplex has two, complete reaction centers and some antenna complexes., The core of the reaction center consists of two membrane, proteins known as D1 and D2, as well as other proteins, as, shown in Figure 7.25 (Zouni et al. 2001)., The primary donor chlorophyll (P680), additional chlorophylls, carotenoids, pheophytins, and plastoquinones (two, electron acceptors described in the following section) are, bound to the membrane proteins D1 and D2. These proteins, have some sequence similarity to the L and M peptides of, purple bacteria. Other proteins serve as antenna complexes, or are involved in oxygen evolution. Some, such as, cytochrome b559, have no known function but may be, involved in a protective cycle around photosystem II., , Water Is Oxidized to Oxygen by Photosystem II, Water is oxidized according to the following chemical reaction (Hoganson and Babcock 1997):, 2 H2O → O2 + 4 H+ + 4 e–, , (7.8), , This equation indicates that four electrons are removed from, two water molecules, generating an oxygen molecule and, four hydrogen ions. (For more on oxidation–reduction reactions, see Chapter 2 on the web site and Web Topic 7.6.)
Page 153 :
128, , Chapter 7, (B), , (A), , (C), , CP26, , CP43, , LHCII, , CP29, , CP43, , D1, , 23, , D1, , D2, , CP47, , CP47, , D2, , D2, , CP47, , D2, , CP47, D1, , D1, , CP43, , 33, , CP29, , CP43, , LHCII, , CP26, , FIGURE 7.24, , Structure of dimeric multisubunit protein, supercomplex of photosystem II from higher plants, as determined by electron microscopy. The figure shows two complete reaction centers, each of which is a dimeric complex., (A) Helical arrangement of the D1 and D2 (red) and CP43, and CP47 (green) core subunits. (B) View from the lumenal, , side of the supercomplex, including additional antenna complexes, LHCII, CP26 and CP29, and extrinsic oxygen-evolving complex, shown as orange and yellow circles., Unassigned helices are shown in gray. (C) Side view of the, complex illustrating the arrangement of the extrinsic proteins, of the oxygen-evolving complex. (After Barber et al. 1999.), , Water is a very stable molecule. Oxidation of water to, form molecular oxygen is very difficult, and the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving complex is the only known biochemical system that carries out this reaction. Photosynthetic oxygen evolution is also the source of almost all the, oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere., The chemical mechanism of photosynthetic water oxidation is not yet known, although many studies have provided a substantial amount of information about the, process (see Web Topic 7.7 and Figure 7.26). The protons, produced by water oxidation are released into the lumen, of the thylakoid, not directly into the stromal compartment, (see Figure 7.22). They are released into the lumen because, of the vectorial nature of the membrane and the fact that, the oxygen-evolving complex is localized on the interior, , surface of the thylakoid. These protons are eventually, transferred from the lumen to the stroma by translocation, through ATP synthase. In this way the protons released, during water oxidation contribute to the electrochemical, potential driving ATP formation., It has been known for many years that manganese (Mn), is an essential cofactor in the water-oxidizing process (see, Chapter 5), and a classic hypothesis in photosynthesis, research postulates that Mn ions undergo a series of oxidations—which are known as S states, and are labeled S0, S1, S2,, S3, and S4 (see Web Topic 7.7)—that are perhaps linked to, H2O oxidation and the generation of O2 (see Figure 7.26)., This hypothesis has received strong support from a variety, of experiments, most notably X-ray absorption and ESR studies, both of which detect the manganese directly (Yachandra
Page 155 :
130, , Chapter 7, , et al. 1996). Analytical experiments indicate that four Mn ions, are associated with each oxygen-evolving complex. Other, experiments have shown that Cl– and Ca2+ ions are essential, for O2 evolution (see Figure 7.26 and Web Topic 7.7)., One electron carrier, generally identified as Yz , functions, between the oxygen-evolving complex and P680 (see Figures 7.21 and 7.26). To function in this region, Yz needs to, have a very strong tendency to retain its electrons. This, species has been identified as a radical formed from a tyrosine residue in the D1 protein of the PSII reaction center., , Pheophytin and Two Quinones Accept Electrons, from Photosystem II, Evidence from spectral and ESR studies indicates that pheophytin acts as an early acceptor in photosystem II, followed, by a complex of two plastoquinones in close proximity to, an iron atom. Pheophytin is a chlorophyll in which the central magnesium atom has been replaced by two hydrogen, atoms. This chemical change gives pheophytin chemical, and spectral properties that are slightly different from those, of chlorophyll. The precise arrangement of the carriers in, the electron acceptor complex is not known, but it is probably very similar to that of the reaction center of purple bacteria (for details, see Figure 7.5.B in Web Topic 7.5)., Two plastoquinones (QA and QB ) are bound to the reaction center and receive electrons from pheophytin in a, sequential fashion (Okamura et al. 2000). Transfer of the two, electrons to Q B reduces it to Q B2–, and the reduced Q B2–, takes two protons from the stroma side of the medium,, yielding a fully reduced plastohydroquinone (QH2) (Figure, 7.27). The plastohydroquinone then dissociates from the, reaction center complex and enters the hydrocarbon portion, of the membrane, where it in turn transfers its electrons to, , (A), O, , CH3, , H3C, , (CH2, , C, , CH, , CH2)9, , H, , H3C, , the cytochrome b6 f complex. Unlike the large protein complexes of the thylakoid membrane, hydroquinone is a small,, nonpolar molecule that diffuses readily in the nonpolar core, of the membrane bilayer., , Electron Flow through the Cytochrome b6f, Complex Also Transports Protons, The cytochrome b6 f complex is a large multisubunit protein with several prosthetic groups (Cramer et al. 1996;, Berry et al. 2000). It contains two b-type hemes and one ctype heme (cytochrome f ). In c-type cytochromes the heme, is covalently attached to the peptide; in b-type cytochromes, the chemically similar protoheme group is not covalently, attached (Figure 7.28). In addition, the complex contains, a Rieske iron–sulfur protein (named for the scientist who, discovered it), in which two iron atoms are bridged by two, sulfur atoms., The structures of cytochrome f and the related cytochrome bc1 complex have been determined and suggest a, mechanism for electron and proton flow. The precise way, by which electrons and protons flow through the, cytochrome b6 f complex is not yet fully understood, but a, mechanism known as the Q cycle accounts for most of the, observations. In this mechanism, plastohydroquinone, (QH2) is oxidized, and one of the two electrons is passed, along a linear electron transport chain toward photosystem, I, while the other electron goes through a cyclic process that, increases the number of protons pumped across the membrane (Figure 7.29)., In the linear electron transport chain, the oxidized Rieske, protein (FeSR) accepts an electron from plastohydroquinone, (QH2) and transfers it to cytochrome f (see Figure 7.29A)., Cytochrome f then transfers an electron to the blue-colored, copper protein plastocyanin (PC), which in turn reduces, oxidized P700 of PSI. In the cyclic part of the process (see, Figure 7.29B), the plastosemiquinone (see Figure 7.27) transfers its other electron to one of the b-type hemes, releasing, both of its protons to the lumenal side of the membrane., The b-type heme transfers its electron through the second b-type heme to an oxidized quinone molecule, reducing it to the semiquinone form near the stromal surface of, , O, , Plastoquinone, , Structure and, reactions of plastoquinone that, operate in photosystem II. (A), The plastoquinone consists of a, OH, quinoid head and a long nonpolar tail that anchors it in the, R, H3C, membrane. (B) Redox reactions, of plastoquinone. The fully oxiH3C, dized quinone (Q), anionic, semiquinone (Q•−), and reduced, OH, hydroquinone (QH2) forms are, Plastohydroquinone shown; R represents the side, (QH2), chain., FIGURE 7.27, , (B), _, O•, , O, R, , H3C, , +, H3C, , e–, , R, , H3C, , +, H3C, , O, , Quinone, (Q), , O–, , Plastosemiquinone, (Q–• ), , 1 e–, , +, , 2 H+
Page 157 :
132, , Chapter 7, , the complex. Another similar sequence of electron flow, fully reduces the plastoquinone, which picks up protons, from the stromal side of the membrane and is released, from the b6 f complex as plastohydroquinone., The net result of two turnovers of the complex is that, two electrons are transferred to P700, two plastohydroquinones are oxidized to the quinone form, and one oxidized plastoquinone is reduced to the hydroquinone form., In addition, four protons are transferred from the stromal, to the lumenal side of the membrane., By this mechanism, electron flow connecting the acceptor, side of the PSII reaction center to the donor side of the PSI, reaction center also gives rise to an electrochemical potential, across the membrane, due in part to H+ concentration differences on the two sides of the membrane. This electrochemical potential is used to power the synthesis of ATP. The cyclic, electron flow through the cytochrome b and plastoquinone, increases the number of protons pumped per electron, beyond what could be achieved in a strictly linear sequence., , (A), , Stroma, , D, , E, , FeSB, FeSA, PsaA, , K, , C, PsaB, , e–, FeSX, , L I, , A1, A0, J, , e–, H G, , P700, e–, N, –, , PC, , Plastoquinone and Plastocyanin Carry Electrons, between Photosystems II and I, The location of the two photosystems at different sites on, the thylakoid membranes (see Figure 7.18) requires that at, least one component be capable of moving along or within, the membrane in order to deliver electrons produced by, photosystem II to photosystem I. The cytochrome b6 f complex is distributed equally between the grana and the, stroma regions of the membranes, but its large size makes, it unlikely that it is the mobile carrier. Instead, plastoquinone or plastocyanin or possibly both are thought to, serve as mobile carriers to connect the two photosystems., Plastocyanin is a small (10.5 kDa), water-soluble, copper-containing protein that transfers electrons between the, cytochrome b6 f complex and P700. This protein is found in, the lumenal space (see Figure 7.29). In certain green algae, and cyanobacteria, a c-type cytochrome is sometimes found, instead of plastocyanin; which of these two proteins is synthesized depends on the amount of copper available to the, organism., , Fd–, , –, Fd, + ––, +, –– –, +, e– + + +, , +, +, – +, – +, –, , F, Light, , PC–, Lumen, , (B), , PsaC, , Stroma, PsaE, PsaD, , The Photosystem I Reaction Center, Reduces NADP+, The PSI reaction center complex is a large, multisubunit complex (Figure 7.30) (Jordan, et al. 2001). In contrast to PSII, a core, antenna consisting of about 100 chlorophylls, is a part of the PSI reaction center, P700. The, core antenna and P700 are bound to two, proteins, PsaA and PsaB, with molecular, masses in the range of 66 to 70 kDa (Brettel, 1997; Chitnis 2001; see also Web Topic 7.8)., The antenna pigments form a bowl surrounding the electron transfer cofactors,, which are in the center of the complex. In, , Lumen, , Structure of photosystem I. (A) Structural model of the PSI, reaction center. Components of the PSI reaction center are organized, around two major proteins, PsaA and PsaB. Minor proteins PsaC to PsaN, are labelled C to N. Electrons are transferred from plastocyanin (PC) to, P700 (see Figures 7.21 and 7.22) and then to a chlorophyll molecule, A0, to, phylloquinone, A1, to the FeSX, FeSA, and FeSB Fe–S centers, and finally to, the soluble iron–sulfur protein, ferrodoxin (Fd). (B) Side view of one, monomer of PSI from the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus, at 2.5 Å, resolution. The stromal side of the membrane is at the top, and the lumenal, side is at the bottom of the figure. Transmembrane α-helices of PsaA and, PsaB are shown as blue and red cylinders, respectively. (A after Buchanan, et al. 2000; B from Jordan et al. 2001.), , FIGURE 7.30
Page 158 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, their reduced form, the electron carriers that function in the, acceptor region of photosystem I are all extremely strong, reducing agents. These reduced species are very unstable and, thus difficult to identify. Evidence indicates that one of these, early acceptors is a chlorophyll molecule, and another is a, quinone species, phylloquinone, also known as vitamin K1., Additional electron acceptors include a series of three, membrane-associated iron–sulfur proteins, or bound ferredoxins, also known as Fe–S centers FeSX, FeSA, and FeSB, (see Figure 7.30). Fe–S center X is part of the P700-binding, protein; centers A and B reside on an 8 kDa protein that is, part of the PSI reaction center complex. Electrons are transferred through centers A and B to ferredoxin (Fd), a small,, water-soluble iron–sulfur protein (see Figures 7.21 and 7.30)., The membrane-associated flavoprotein ferredoxin–NADP, reductase (FNR) reduces NADP+ to NADPH, thus completing the sequence of noncyclic electron transport that, begins with the oxidation of water (Karplus et al. 1991)., In addition to the reduction of NADP+, reduced ferredoxin produced by photosystem I has several other functions in the chloroplast, such as the supply of reductants to, reduce nitrate and the regulation of some of the carbon fixation enzymes (see Chapter 8)., , Cyclic Electron Flow Generates ATP but no NADPH, Some of the cytochrome b6 f complexes are found in the, stroma region of the membrane, where photosystem I is, located. Under certain conditions cyclic electron flow from, the reducing side of photosystem I, through the b6 f complex and back to P700, is known to occur. This cyclic electron flow is coupled to proton pumping into the lumen,, which can be utilized for ATP synthesis but does not oxidize water or reduce NADP+. Cyclic electron flow is especially important as an ATP source in the bundle sheath, chloroplasts of some plants that carry out C4 carbon fixation (see Chapter 8)., , Some Herbicides Block Electron Flow, The use of herbicides to kill unwanted plants is widespread, in modern agriculture. Many different classes of herbicides, have been developed, and they act by blocking amino acid,, carotenoid, or lipid biosynthesis or by disrupting cell division. Other herbicides, such as DCMU (dichlorophenyldimethylurea) and paraquat, block photosynthetic electron, flow (Figure 7.31). DCMU is also known as diuron., Paraquat has acquired public notoriety because of its use, on marijuana crops., Many herbicides, DCMU among them, act by blocking, electron flow at the quinone acceptors of photosystem II,, by competing for the binding site of plastoquinone that is, normally occupied by QB. Other herbicides, such as, paraquat, act by accepting electrons from the early acceptors of photosystem I and then reacting with oxygen to, form superoxide, O2–, a species that is very damaging to, chloroplast components, especially lipids., , 133, , (A), Cl, Cl, , N, C, O, , H, , CH3, , N+, , N+, , Cl–, , CH3, , Cl–, , Paraquat, (methyl viologen), , N(CH3)2, , DCMU (diuron), (dichlorophenyl-dimethylurea), , (B), , P700*, , P680*, , Paraquat, NADP+, , DCMU, QA, QB, , NADPH, , H2O, P700, O2, , P680, , Chemical structure and mechanism of action, of two important herbicides. (A) Chemical structure of, dichlorophenyl-dimethylurea (DCMU) and methyl viologen (paraquat), two herbicides that block photosynthetic, electron flow. DCMU is also known as diuron. (B) Sites of, action of the two herbicides. DCMU blocks electron flow at, the quinone acceptors of photosystem II, by competing for, the binding site of plastoquinone. Paraquat acts by accepting electrons from the early acceptors of photosystem I., , FIGURE 7.31, , PROTON TRANSPORT AND ATP, SYNTHESIS IN THE CHLOROPLAST, In the preceding sections we learned how captured light, energy is used to reduce NADP+ to NADPH. Another fraction of the captured light energy is used for light-dependent, ATP synthesis, which is known as photophosphorylation., This process was discovered by Daniel Arnon and his, coworkers in the 1950s. In normal cellular conditions, photophosphorylation requires electron flow, although under, some conditions electron flow and photophosphorylation can, take place independently of each other. Electron flow without accompanying phosphorylation is said to be uncoupled., It is now widely accepted that photophosphorylation, works via the chemiosmotic mechanism, first proposed in, the 1960s by Peter Mitchell. The same general mechanism, drives phosphorylation during aerobic respiration in bacteria and mitochondria (see Chapter 11), as well as the, transfer of many ions and metabolites across membranes, (see Chapter 6). Chemiosmosis appears to be a unifying, aspect of membrane processes in all forms of life.
Page 159 :
134, , Chapter 7, , In the dark, , ADP + Pi, , Chloroplast, thylakoids, , Thylakoids, transferred, , Equilibration, , Buffered, medium, pH 4, , pH 4, , pH 8, , ADP, +, Pi, , ATP, pH8, , FIGURE 7.32, , Summary of the experiment carried out by, Jagendorf and coworkers. Isolated chloroplast thylakoids, kept previously at pH 8 were equilibrated in an acid, medium at pH 4. The thylakoids were then transferred to a, buffer at pH 8 that contained ADP and Pi. The proton gra-, , dient generated by this manipulation provided a driving, force for ATP synthesis in the absence of light. This experiment verified a prediction of the chemiosmotic theory stating that a chemical potential across a membrane can provide energy for ATP synthesis., , In Chapter 6 we discussed the role of ATPases in, chemiosmosis and ion transport at the cell’s plasma membrane. The ATP used by the plasma membrane ATPase is, synthesized by photophosphorylation in the chloroplast, and oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondrion. Here, we are concerned with chemiosmosis and transmembrane, proton concentration differences used to make ATP in the, chloroplast., The basic principle of chemiosmosis is that ion concentration differences and electric-potential differences across, membranes are a source of free energy that can be utilized, by the cell. As described by the second law of thermodynamics (see Chapter 2 on the web site for a detailed discussion), any nonuniform distribution of matter or energy, represents a source of energy. Differences in chemical, potential of any molecular species whose concentrations, are not the same on opposite sides of a membrane provide, such a source of energy., The asymmetric nature of the photosynthetic membrane, and the fact that proton flow from one side of the membrane to the other accompanies electron flow were discussed earlier. The direction of proton translocation is such, that the stroma becomes more alkaline (fewer H+ ions) and, the lumen becomes more acidic (more H+ ions) as a result, of electron transport (see Figures 7.22 and 7.29)., Some of the early evidence supporting a chemiosmotic, mechanism of photosynthetic ATP formation was provided, by an elegant experiment carried out by André Jagendorf, and coworkers (Figure 7.32). They suspended chloroplast, thylakoids in a pH 4 buffer, and the buffer diffused across, the membrane, causing the interior, as well as the exterior,, of the thylakoid to equilibrate at this acidic pH. They then, rapidly transferred the thylakoids to a pH 8 buffer, thereby, , creating a pH difference of 4 units across the thylakoid, membrane, with the inside acidic relative to the outside., They found that large amounts of ATP were formed, from ADP and Pi by this process, with no light input or, electron transport. This result supports the predictions of, the chemiosmotic hypothesis, described in the paragraphs, that follow., Mitchell proposed that the total energy available for, ATP synthesis, which he called the proton motive force, (∆p), is the sum of a proton chemical potential and a transmembrane electric potential. These two components of the, proton motive force from the outside of the membrane to, the inside are given by the following equation:, ∆p = ∆E − 59(pΗi − pΗο), , (7.9), , where ∆E is the transmembrane electric potential, and pHi, – pHo (or ∆pH) is the pH difference across the membrane., The constant of proportionality (at 25°C) is 59 mV per pH, unit, so a transmembrane pH difference of 1 pH unit is, equivalent to a membrane potential of 59 mV., Under conditions of steady-state electron transport in, chloroplasts, the membrane electric potential is quite small, because of ion movement across the membrane, so ∆p, is built almost entirely by ∆pH. The stoichiometry of protons translocated per ATP synthesized has recently, been found to be four H+ ions per ATP (Haraux and De, Kouchkovsky 1998)., In addition to the need for mobile electron carriers discussed earlier, the uneven distribution of photosystems II, and I, and of ATP synthase at the thylakoid membrane (see, Figure 7.18), poses some challenges for the formation of, ATP. ATP synthase is found only in the stroma lamellae, and at the edges of the grana stacks. Protons pumped
Page 160 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, across the membrane by the cytochrome b6 f complex or, protons produced by water oxidation in the middle of the, grana must move laterally up to several tens of nanometers, to reach ATP synthase., The ATP is synthesized by a large (400 kDa) enzyme complex known by several names: ATP synthase, ATPase (after, the reverse reaction of ATP hydrolysis), and CFo–CF1 (Boyer, 1997). This enzyme consists of two parts: a hydrophobic, membrane-bound portion called CFo and a portion that, sticks out into the stroma called CF1 (Figure 7.33)., CFo appears to form a channel across the membrane, through which protons can pass. CF1 is made up of several, peptides, including three copies of each of the α and β peptides arranged alternately much like the sections of an, orange. Whereas the catalytic sites are located largely on, the β polypeptide, many of the other peptides are thought, to have primarily regulatory functions. CF1 is the portion, of the complex that synthesizes ATP., The molecular structure of the mitochondrial ATP synthase has been determined by X-ray crystallography (Stock, et al. 1999). Although there are significant differences, between the chloroplast and mitochondrial enzymes, they, , STROMA, , H+, ATP, , ADP + Pi, α, , β α β, α, β, , 135, , have the same overall architecture and probably nearly, identical catalytic sites. In fact, there are remarkable similarities in the way electron flow is coupled to proton, translocation in chloroplasts, mitochondria, and purple, bacteria (Figure 7.34). Another remarkable aspect of the, mechanism of the ATP synthase is that the internal stalk, and probably much of the CFo portion of the enzyme rotate, during catalysis (Yasuda et al. 2001). The enzyme is actually a tiny molecular motor (see Web Topics 7.9 and 11.4)., , REPAIR AND REGULATION OF THE, PHOTOSYNTHETIC MACHINERY, Photosynthetic systems face a special challenge. They are, designed to absorb large amounts of light energy and, process it into chemical energy. At the molecular level, the, energy in a photon can be damaging, particularly under, unfavorable conditions. In excess, light energy can lead to, the production of toxic species, such as superoxide, singlet, oxygen, and peroxide, and damage can occur if the light, energy is not dissipated safely (Horton et al. 1996; Asada, 1999; Müller et al. 2001). Photosynthetic organisms therefore contain complex regulatory and repair mechanisms., Some of these mechanisms regulate energy flow in the, antenna system, to avoid excess excitation of the reaction, centers and ensure that the two photosystems are equally, driven. Although very effective, these processes are not, entirely fail-safe, and sometimes toxic compounds are produced. Additional mechanisms are needed to dissipate, these compounds—in particular, toxic oxygen species., Despite these protective and scavenging mechanisms,, damage can occur, and additional mechanisms are required, to repair the system. Figure 7.35 provides an overview of, the several levels of the regulation and repair systems., , CF1, , Carotenoids Serve as Photoprotective Agents, b, Thylakoid, membrane, δ γ ε, , CFo, , a, c, , LUMEN, , H+, , Structure of ATP synthase. This enzyme consists of a large multisubunit complex, CF1, attached on the, stromal side of the membrane to an integral membrane portion, known as CFo. CF1 consists of five different polypeptides, with a stoichiometry of α3, β3, γ, δ, ε. CFo contains, probably four different polypeptides, with a stoichiometry, of a, b, b′, c12., FIGURE 7.33, , In addition to their role as accessory pigments, carotenoids, play an essential role in photoprotection. The photosynthetic membrane can easily be damaged by the large, amounts of energy absorbed by the pigments if this energy, cannot be stored by photochemistry; this is why a protection mechanism is needed. The photoprotection mechanism can be thought of as a safety valve, venting excess, energy before it can damage the organism. When the, energy stored in chlorophylls in the excited state is rapidly, dissipated by excitation transfer or photochemistry, the, excited state is said to be quenched., If the excited state of chlorophyll is not rapidly quenched, by excitation transfer or photochemistry, it can react with, molecular oxygen to form an excited state of oxygen known, as singlet oxygen (1O2*). The extremely reactive singlet oxygen goes on to react with and damage many cellular components, especially lipids. Carotenoids exert their photoprotective action by rapidly quenching the excited state of, chlorophyll. The excited state of carotenoids does not have
Page 161 :
136, , Chapter 7, , H+, , CYTOSOL, , ADP + Pi, , Light, F1, Reaction, center, , Q, , Cyt bc1, , Cyt, c, PERIPLASM, , ATP, , Fo, , complex, , H+, , H+, , ATP, synthase, , (B) Chloroplasts, H+, , STROMA, Light, , Light, , NADP+, NADPH, , PSII, Reaction, center, , Q, , PSI, Reaction, center, , Cyt b6f, complex, , CF1, , O2 + H+, , H+, , H+, , ADP + Pi, ATP, , CFo, , PC, H2O, LUMEN, , Similarities of, photosynthetic and respiratory electron flow in bacteria,, chloroplasts, and mitochondria. In all three, electron flow, is coupled to proton translocation, creating a transmembrane proton motive force, (∆p). The energy in the proton, motive force is then used for, the synthesis of ATP by ATP, synthase. (A) A reaction center, (RC) in purple photosynthetic, bacteria carries out cyclic electron flow, generating a proton, potential by the action of the, cytochrome bc1 complex. (B), Chloroplasts carry out noncyclic electron flow, oxidizing, water and reducing NADP+., Protons are produced by the, oxidation of water and by the, oxidation of PQH2 (Q) by the, cytochrome b6 f complex. (C), Mitochondria oxidize NADH, to NAD+ and reduce oxygen, to water. Protons are pumped, by the enzyme NADH dehydrogenase, the cytochrome bc1, complex, and cytochrome oxidase. The ATP synthases in, the three systems are very, similar in structure., FIGURE 7.34, , (A) Purple bacteria, , ATP, synthase, , (C) Mitochondria, MATRIX, , H+, NAD+, , NADH, , O2, , NADH, Q, dehydrogenase, , H+, , Cyt bc1, complex, , H+, , H2O, , Cytochrome, oxidase, Cyt, c, , H+, , F1, , ADP + Pi, ATP, , Fo, , H+, , ATP, synthase, , INTERMEMBRANE, SPACE, , sufficient energy to form singlet oxygen, so it decays back, to its ground state while losing its energy as heat., Mutant organisms that lack carotenoids cannot live in, the presence of both light and molecular oxygen—a rather, difficult situation for an O2-evolving photosynthetic organism. For non-O2-evolving photosynthetic bacteria, mutants, that lack carotenoids can be maintained under laboratory conditions if oxygen is excluded from the growth, medium., , Recently carotenoids were found to play a role in nonphotochemical quenching, which is a second protective, and regulatory mechanism., , Some Xanthophylls Also Participate in, Energy Dissipation, Nonphotochemical quenching, a major process regulating, the delivery of excitation energy to the reaction center, can, be thought of as a “volume knob” that adjusts the flow of
Page 162 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, Overall picture of the regulation of photon, capture and the protection and repair of photodamage., Protection against photodamage is a multilevel process., The first line of defense is suppression of damage by, quenching of excess excitation as heat. If this defense is not, sufficient and toxic photoproducts form, a variety of scavenging systems eliminate the reactive photoproducts. If this, second line of defense also fails, the photoproducts can, damage the D1 protein of photosystem II. This damage, leads to photoinhibition. The D1 protein is then excised, from the PSII reaction center and degraded. A newly synthesized D1 is reinserted into the PSII reaction center to, form a functional unit. (After Asada 1999.), , FIGURE 7.35, , excitations to the PSII reaction center to a manageable level,, depending on the light intensity and other conditions. The, process appears to be an essential part of the regulation of, antenna systems in most algae and plants., Nonphotochemical quenching is the quenching of, chlorophyll fluorescence (see Figure 7.5) by processes other, than photochemistry. As a result of nonphotochemical, quenching, a large fraction of the excitations in the antenna, system caused by intense illumination are quenched by, conversion into heat (Krause and Weis 1991). Nonphotochemical quenching is thought to be involved in protecting, the photosynthetic machinery against overexcitation and, subsequent damage., The molecular mechanism of nonphotochemical, quenching is not well understood, although it, is clear that the pH of the thylakoid lumen and, the state of aggregation of the antenna complexes are important factors. Three carotenoids,, called xanthophylls, are involved in nonphotochemical quenching: violaxanthin, antheraxLow, anthin, and zeaxanthin (Figure 7.36)., light, In high light, violaxanthin is converted into, zeaxanthin, via the intermediate antheraxanthin, by the enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase., When light intensity decreases, the process is, reversed. Binding of protons and zeaxanthin to, light-harvesting antenna proteins is thought to, cause conformational changes that lead to, quenching and heat dissipation (Demmig-, , Photon, intensity, , First line, of defense:, Suppression, mechanisms, , Photon used for, photosynthesis, , Excess photons, , Heat, Second line, of defense:, Scavenging, systems (e.g.,, carotenoids,, superoxide, dismutase,, ascorbate), , 137, , Triplet state of Chl (3Chl*), Superoxide (O2−), Singlet oxygen (1O2*), Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), Hydroxyl radical (•OH), , Toxic, photoproducts, , Damage to D1, of PSII, Repair, de novo synthesis, Oxidized D1, , Photoinhibition, , OH, O, O, , Violaxanthin, , HO, , H2O, , 2H, , NADPH, , Ascorbate, , 2 H + O2, , H2O, , OH, , O, HO, , Chemical structure of violaxanthin, antheraxanthin, and zeaxanthin. The, highly quenched state of photosystem II is associated with zeaxanthin, the unquenched state, with violaxanthin. Enzymes interconvert these, two carotenoids, with antheraxanthin as the, intermediate, in response to changing conditions, especially changes in light intensity., Zeaxanthin formation uses ascorbate as a cofactor, and violaxanthin formation requires, NADPH. (After Pfündel and Bilger 1994.), , Antheraxanthin, , FIGURE 7.36, , H2O, , 2H, , NADPH, , Ascorbate, , 2 H + O2, , H2O, , High, light, HO, , Zeaxanthin, , OH
Page 163 :
138, , Chapter 7, , Adams and Adams 1992; Horton et al. 1996). Nonphotochemical quenching appears to be preferentially associated, with a peripheral antenna complex of photosystem II, the, PsbS protein (Li et al. 2000)., , The Photosystem II Reaction Center Is, Easily Damaged, Another effect that appears to be a major factor in the stability of the photosynthetic apparatus is photoinhibition,, which occurs when excess excitation arriving at the PSII, reaction center leads to its inactivation and damage (Long, et al. 1994). Photoinhibition is a complex set of molecular, processes, defined as the inhibition of photosynthesis by, excess light., As will be discussed in detail in Chapter 9, photoinhibition is reversible in early stages. Prolongued inhibition,, however, results in damage to the system such that the PSII, reaction center must be disassembled and repaired (Melis, 1999). The main target of this damage is the D1 protein that, makes up part of the PSII reaction center complex (see Figure 7.24). When D1 is damaged by excess light, it must be, removed from the membrane and replaced with a newly, synthesized molecule. The other components of the PSII, reaction center are not damaged by excess excitation and, are thought to be recycled, so the D1 protein is the only, component that needs to be synthesized., , Photosystem I Is Protected from Active, Oxygen Species, Photosystem I is particularly vulnerable to damage from, active oxygen species. The ferredoxin acceptor of PSI is a very, strong reductant that can easily reduce molecular oxygen to, form superoxide (O2–). This reduction competes with the normal channeling of electrons to the reduction of NADP+ and, other processes. Superoxide is one of a series of active oxygen species that can be very damaging to biological membranes. Superoxide formed in this way can be eliminated by, the action of a series of enzymes, including superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase (Asada 1999)., , Thylakoid Stacking Permits Energy, Partitioning between the Photosystems, The fact that photosynthesis in higher plants is driven by, two photosystems with different light-absorbing properties, poses a special problem. If the rate of delivery of energy to, PSI and PSII is not precisely matched and conditions are, such that the rate of photosynthesis is limited by the available light (low light intensity), the rate of electron flow will, be limited by the photosystem that is receiving less energy., In the most efficient situation, the input of energy would be, the same to both photosystems. However, no single, arrangement of pigments would satisfy this requirement, because at different times of day the light intensity and, spectral distribution tend to favor one photosystem or the, other (Trissl and Wilhelm 1993; Allen and Forsberg 2001)., , This problem can be solved by a mechanism that shifts, energy from one photosystem to the other in response to, different conditions. Such a regulating mechanism has been, shown to operate in different experimental conditions. The, observation that the overall quantum yield of photosynthesis is nearly independent of wavelength (see Figure, 7.12) strongly suggests that such a mechanism exists., Thylakoid membranes contain a protein kinase that can, phosphorylate a specific threonine residue on the surface of, LHCII, one of the membrane-bound antenna pigment proteins described earlier in the chapter (see Figure 7.20). When, LHCII is not phosphorylated, it delivers more energy to, photosystem II, and when it is phosphorylated, it delivers, more energy to photosystem I (Haldrup et al. 2001)., The kinase is activated when plastoquinone, one of the, electron carriers between PSI and PSII, accumulates in the, reduced state. Reduced plastoquinone accumulates when, PSII is being activated more frequently than PSI. The phosphorylated LHCII then migrates out of the stacked regions, of the membrane into the unstacked regions (see Figure, 7.18), probably because of repulsive interactions with negative charges on adjacent membranes., The lateral migration of LHCII shifts the energy balance, toward photosystem I, which is located in the stroma, lamellae, and away from photosystem II, which is located, in the stacked membranes of the grana. This situation is, called state 2. If plastoquinone becomes more oxidized, because of excess excitation of photosystem I, the kinase is, deactivated and the level of phosphorylation of LHCII is, decreased by the action of a membrane-bound phosphatase. LHCII then moves back to the grana, and the system is in state 1. The net result is a very precise control of, the energy distribution between the photosystems, allowing the most efficient use of the available energy., , GENETICS, ASSEMBLY, AND EVOLUTION, OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC SYSTEMS, Chloroplasts have their own DNA, mRNA, and protein, synthesis machinery, but some chloroplast proteins are, encoded by nuclear genes and imported into the chloroplast. In this section we will consider the genetics, assembly, and evolution of the main chloroplast components., , Chloroplast, Cyanobacterial, and Nuclear, Genomes Have Been Sequenced, The complete chloroplast genomes of several organisms, have been sequenced. Chloroplast DNA is circular and, ranges in size from 120 to 160 kilobases. The chloroplast, genome contains coding sequences for approximately 120, proteins. Some of these DNA sequences code for proteins, that are yet to be characterized. It is uncertain whether all, these genes are transcribed into mRNA and translated into, protein, but it seems likely that some chloroplast proteins, remain to be identified.
Page 164 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, The complete genome of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis (strain PCC 6803) and the higher plant Arabidopsis, have been sequenced, and genomes of important crop, plants such as rice and maize have been completed (Kotani, and Tabata 1998; Arabidopsis Genome Initiative 2000)., Genomic data for both chloroplast and nuclear DNA will, provide new insights into the mechanism of photosynthesis, as well as many other plant processes., , Chloroplast Genes Exhibit Non-Mendelian, Patterns of Inheritance, Chloroplasts and mitochondria reproduce by division, rather than by de novo synthesis. This mode of reproduction is not surprising, since these organelles contain genetic, information that is not present in the nucleus. During cell, division, chloroplasts are divided between the two daughter cells. In most sexual plants, however, only the maternal, plant contributes chloroplasts to the zygote. In these plants, the normal Mendelian pattern of inheritance does not, apply to chloroplast-encoded genes because the offspring, receive chloroplasts from only one parent. The result is, non-Mendelian, or maternal, inheritance. Numerous traits, are inherited in this way; one example is the herbicide, resistance trait discussed in Web Topic 7.10., , Many Chloroplast Proteins Are Imported from the, Cytoplasm, Chloroplast proteins can be encoded by either chloroplastic or nuclear DNA. The chloroplast-encoded proteins are, synthesized on chloroplast ribosomes; the nucleus-encoded, proteins are synthesized on cytoplasmic ribosomes and, then transported into the chloroplast. Many nuclear genes, contain introns—that is, base sequences that do not code, for protein. The mRNA is processed to remove the introns,, and the proteins are then synthesized in the cytoplasm., The genes needed for chloroplast function are distributed in the nucleus and in the chloroplast genome with no, evident pattern, but both sets are essential for the viability, of the chloroplast. Some chloroplast genes are necessary for, other cellular functions, such as heme and lipid synthesis., Control of the expression of the nuclear genes that code for, chloroplast proteins is complex, involving light-dependent, regulation mediated by both phytochrome (see Chapter 17), and blue light (see Chapter 18), as well as other factors, (Bruick and Mayfield 1999; Wollman et al. 1999)., The transport of chloroplast proteins that are synthesized in the cytoplasm is a tightly regulated process (Chen, and Schnell 1999). For example, the enzyme rubisco (see, Chapter 8), which functions in carbon fixation, has two, types of subunits, a chloroplast-encoded large subunit and, a nucleus-encoded small subunit. Small subunits of rubisco, are synthesized in the cytoplasm and transported into the, chloroplast, where the enzyme is assembled., In this and other known cases, the nucleus-encoded, chloroplast proteins are synthesized as precursor proteins, , 139, , containing an N-terminal amino acid sequence known as a, transit peptide. This terminal sequence directs the precursor protein to the chloroplast, facilitates its passage through, both the outer and the inner envelope membranes, and is, then clipped off. The electron carrier plastocyanin is a, water-soluble protein that is encoded in the nucleus but, functions in the lumen of the chloroplast. It therefore must, cross three membranes to reach its destination in the, lumen. The transit peptide of plastocyanin is very large and, is processed in more than one step., , The Biosynthesis and Breakdown of, Chlorophyll Are Complex Pathways, Chlorophylls are complex molecules exquisitely suited to, the light absorption, energy transfer, and electron transfer, functions that they carry out in photosynthesis (see Figure, 7.6). Like all other biomolecules, chlorophylls are made by, a biosynthetic pathway in which simple molecules are used, as building blocks to assemble more complex molecules, (Porra 1997; Beale 1999). Each step in the biosynthetic pathway is enzymatically catalyzed., The chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway consists of more, than a dozen steps (see Web Topic 7.11). The process can, be divided into several phases (Figure 7.37), each of which, can be considered separately, but which in the cell are, highly coordinated and regulated. This regulation is essential because free chlorophyll and many of the biosynthetic, intermediates are damaging to cellular components. The, damage results largely because chlorophylls absorb light, efficiently, but in the absence of accompanying proteins,, they lack a pathway for disposing of the energy, with the, result that toxic singlet oxygen is formed., The breakdown pathway of chlorophyll in senescent, leaves is quite different from the biosynthetic pathway, (Matile et al. 1996). The first step is removal of the phytol, tail by an enzyme known as chlorophyllase, followed by, removal of the magnesium by magnesium de-chelatase., Next the porphyrin structure is opened by an oxygendependent oxygenase enzyme to form an open-chain, tetrapyrrole., The tetrapyrrole is further modified to form water-soluble, colorless products. These colorless metabolites are, then exported from the senescent chloroplast and transported to the vacuole, where they are permanently stored., The chlorophyll metabolites are not further processed or, recycled, although the proteins associated with them in the, chloroplast are subsequently recycled into new proteins., The recycling of proteins is thought to be important for the, nitrogen economy of the plant., , Complex Photosynthetic Organisms Have Evolved, from Simpler Forms, The complicated photosynthetic apparatus found in plants, and algae is the end product of a long evolutionary, sequence. Much can be learned about this evolutionary
Page 166 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, process from analysis of simpler prokaryotic photosynthetic organisms, including the anoxygenic photosynthetic, bacteria and the cyanobacteria., The chloroplast is a semiautonomous cell organelle, with, its own DNA and a complete protein synthesis apparatus., Many of the proteins that make up the photosynthetic apparatus, as well as all the chlorophylls and lipids, are synthesized in the chloroplast. Other proteins are imported from, the cytoplasm and are encoded by nuclear genes. How did, this curious division of labor come about? Most experts, now agree that the chloroplast is the descendant of a symbiotic relationship between a cyanobacterium and a simple, nonphotosynthetic eukaryotic cell. This type of relationship, is called endosymbiosis (Cavalier-Smith 2000)., Originally the cyanobacterium was capable of independent life, but over time much of its genetic information, needed for normal cellular functions was lost, and a substantial amount of information needed to synthesize the, photosynthetic apparatus was transferred to the nucleus., So the chloroplast was no longer capable of life outside its, host and eventually became an integral part of the cell., In some types of algae, chloroplasts are thought to have, arisen by endosymbiosis of eukaryotic photosynthetic, organisms (Palmer and Delwiche 1996). In these organisms, the chloroplast is surrounded by three and in some cases, four membranes, which are thought to be remnants of the, plasma membranes of the earlier organisms. Mitochondria, are also thought to have originated by endosymbiosis in, a separate event much earlier than chloroplast formation., The answers to other questions related to the evolution, of photosynthesis are less clear. These include the nature of, the earliest photosynthetic systems, how the two photosystems became linked, and the evolutionary origin of the, oxygen evolution complex (Blankenship and Hartman, 1998; Xiong et al. 2000)., , SUMMARY, Photosynthesis is the storage of solar energy carried out by, plants, algae, and photosynthetic bacteria. Absorbed photons excite chlorophyll molecules, and these excited chlorophylls can dispose of this energy as heat, fluorescence,, energy transfer, or photochemistry. Light is absorbed, mainly in the antenna complexes, which comprise chlorophylls, accessory pigments, and proteins and are located at, the thylakoid membranes of the chloroplast., Photosynthetic antenna pigments transfer the energy to, a specialized chlorophyll–protein complex known as a, reaction center. The reaction center contains multisubunit, protein complexes and hundreds or, in some organisms,, thousands of chlorophylls. The antenna complexes and the, reaction centers are integral components of the thylakoid, membrane. The reaction center initiates a complex series of, chemical reactions that capture energy in the form of chemical bonds., , 141, , The relationship between the amount of absorbed, quanta and the yield of a photochemical product made in, a light-dependent reaction is given by the quantum yield., The quantum yield of the early steps of photosynthesis is, approximately 0.95, indicating that nearly every photon, that is absorbed yields a charge separation at the reaction, center., Plants and some photosynthetic prokaryotes have two, reaction centers, photosystem I and photosystem II, that, function in series. The two photosystems are spatially separated: PSI is found exclusively in the nonstacked stroma, membranes, PSII largely in the stacked grana membranes., The reaction center chlorophylls of PSI absorb maximally, at 700 nm, those of PSII at 680 nm. Photosystems II and I, carry out noncyclic electron transport, oxidize water to, molecular oxygen, and reduce NADP+ to NADPH. It is, energetically very difficult to oxidize water to form molecular oxygen, and the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving system is the only known biochemical system that can oxidize, water, thus providing almost all the oxygen in Earth’s, atmosphere. The photooxidation of water is modeled by, the five-step S state mechanism. Manganese is an essential, cofactor in the water-oxidizing process, and the five S states, appear to represent successive oxidized states of a manganese-containing enzyme., A tyrosine residue of the D1 protein of the PSII reaction, center functions as an electron carrier between the oxygenevolving complex and P680. Pheophytin and two plastoquinones are electron carriers between P680 and the large, cytochrome b6 f complex. Plastocyanin is the electron carrier between cytochrome b6 f and P700. The electron carriers that accept electrons from P700 are very strong reducing agents, and they include a quinone and three, membrane-bound iron–sulfur proteins known as bound, ferredoxins. The electron flow ends with the reduction, of NADP+ to NADPH by a membrane-bound, ferrodoxin–NADP reductase., A portion of the energy of photons is also initially stored, as chemical-potential energy, largely in the form of a pH, difference across the thylakoid membrane. This energy is, quickly converted into chemical energy during ATP formation by action of an enzyme complex known as the ATP, synthase. The photophosphorylation of ADP by the ATP, synthase is driven by a chemiosmotic mechanism. Photosynthetic electron flow is coupled to proton translocation, across the thylakoid membrane, and the stroma becomes, more alkaline and the lumen more acidic. This proton gradient drives ATP synthesis with a stoichiometry of four H+, ions per ATP. NADPH and ATP formed by the light reactions provide the energy for carbon reduction., Excess light energy can damage photosynthetic systems,, and several mechanisms minimize such damage., Carotenoids work as photoprotective agents by rapidly, quenching the excited state of chlorophyll. Changes in the, phosphorylated state of antenna pigment proteins can
Page 167 :
142, , Chapter 7, , change the energy distribution between photosystems I, and II when there is an imbalance between the energy, absorbed by each photosystem. The xanthophyll cycle also, contributes to the dissipation of excess energy by nonphotochemical quenching., Chloroplasts contain DNA and encode and synthesize, some of the proteins that are essential for photosynthesis., Additional proteins are encoded by nuclear DNA, synthesized in the cytosol, and imported into the chloroplast., Chlorophylls are synthesized in a biosynthetic pathway, involving more than a dozen steps, each of which is very, carefully regulated. Once synthesized, proteins and pigments are assembled into the thylakoid membrane., , Web Material, Web Topics, 7.1, , Principles of Spectrophotometry, Spectroscopy is a key technique to study light, reactions., , 7.2, , The Distribution of Chlorophylls and Other, Photosynthetic Pigments, The content of chlorophylls and other photosynthetic pigments varies among plant kingdoms., , 7.3, , Quantum Yield, Quantum yields measure how effectively light, drives a photobiological process., , 7.4, , Antagonistic Effects of Light on Cytochrome, Oxidation, Photosystems I and II were discovered in some, ingenious experiments., , 7.5, , Structures of Two Bacterial Reaction Centers, X-ray diffraction studies resolved the atomic, structure of the reaction center of photosystem, II., , 7.6, , Midpoint Potentials and Redox Reactions, The measurement of midpoint potentials is, useful for analyzing electron flow through photosystem II., , 7.7, , Oxygen Evolution, The S state mechanism is a valuable model for, water splitting in PSII., , 7.8, , Photosystem I, The PSI reaction is a multiprotein complex., , 7.9, , ATP Synthase, The ATP synthase functions as a molecular, motor., , 7.10 Mode of Action of Some Herbicides, Some herbicides kill plants by blocking photosynthetic electron flow., , 7.11 Chlorophyll Biosynthesis, Chlorophyll and heme share early steps of their, biosynthetic pathways., , Web Essay, 7.1, , A novel view of chloroplast structure, Stromules extend the reach of the chloroplasts., , Chapter References, Allen, J. F., and Forsberg, J. (2001) Molecular recognition in thylakoid, structure and function. Trends Plant Sci. 6: 317–326., Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. (2000) Analysis of the genome, sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:, 796–815., Asada, K. (1999) The water–water cycle in chloroplasts: Scavenging, of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu. Rev., Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 601–639., Avers, C. J. (1985) Molecular Cell Biology. Addison-Wesley, Reading,, MA., Barber, J., Nield, N., Morris, E. P., and Hankamer, B. (1999) Subunit, positioning in photosystem II revisited. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:, 43–45., Beale, S. I. (1999) Enzymes of chlorophyll biosynthesis. Photosynth., Res. 60: 43–73., Becker, W. M. (1986) The World of the Cell. Benjamin/Cummings,, Menlo Park, CA., Berry, E. A., Guergova-Kuras, M., Huang, L.-S., and Crofts, A. R., (2000) Structure and function of cytochrome bc complexes. Annu., Rev. Biochem. 69: 1005–1075., Blankenship, R. E. (2002) Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis., Blackwell Science, Oxford., Blankenship, R. E., and Hartman, H. (1998) The origin and evolution, of oxygenic photosynthesis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 94–97., Blankenship, R. E., and Prince, R. C. (1985) Excited-state redox, potentials and the Z scheme of photosynthesis. Trends Biochem., Sci. 10: 382–383., Boyer, P. D. (1997) The ATP synthase: A splendid molecular machine., Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66: 717–749., Brettel, K. (1997) Electron transfer and arrangement of the redox, cofactors in photosystem I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1318: 322–373., Bruick, R. K., and Mayfield, S. P. (1999) Light-activated translation, of chloroplast mRNAs. Trends Plant Sci. 4: 190–195., Buchanan, B. B., Gruissem., W., and Jones, R. L., eds. (2000) Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. Amer. Soc. Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD., Cavalier-Smith, T. (2000) Membrane heredity and early chloroplast, evolution. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 174–182., Chen, X., and Schnell, D. J. (1999) Protein import into chloroplasts., Trends Cell Biol. 9: 222–227., Chitnis, P. R. (2001) Photosystem I: Function and physiology. Annu., Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 593–626., Cramer, W. A., Soriano, G. M., Ponomarev, M., Huang, D., Zhang,, H., Martinez, S. E., and Smith, J. L. (1996) Some new structural, aspects and old controversies concerning the cytochrome b6 f, complex of oxygenic photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 477–508.
Page 168 :
Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions, Deisenhofer, J., and Michel, H. (1989) The photosynthetic reaction, center from the purple bacterium Rhodopseudomonas viridis., Science 245: 1463–1473., Demmig-Adams, B., and Adams, W. W., III. (1992) Photoprotection, and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annu. Rev. Plant, Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 43: 599–626., Green, B. R., and Durnford, D. G. (1996) The chlorophyll-carotenoid, proteins of oxygenic photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 685–714., Grossman, A. R., Bhaya, D., Apt, K. E., and Kehoe, D. M. (1995), Light-harvesting complexes in oxygenic photosynthesis: Diversity, control, and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29: 231–288., Haldrup, A., Jensen, P. E., Lunde, C., and Scheller, H. V. (2001) Balance of power: A view of the mechanism of photosynthetic state, transitions. Trends Plant Sci. 6: 301–305., Haraux, F., and De Kouchkovsky, Y. (1998) Energy coupling and ATP, synthase. Photosynth. Res. 57: 231–251., Hoganson, C. W., and Babcock, G. T. (1997) A metalloradical mechanism for the generation of oxygen from water in photosynthesis. Science 277: 1953–1956., Horton, P., Ruban, A. V., and Walters, R. G. (1996) Regulation of light, harvesting in green plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol., Biol. 47: 655–684., Jordan, P., Fromme, P., Witt, H. T., Klukas, O., Saenger, W., and, Krauss, N. (2001) Three-dimensional structure of cyanobacterial, photosystem I at 2.5 Å resolution. Nature 411: 909–917., Karplus, P. A., Daniels, M. J., and Herriott, J. R. (1991) Atomic structure of ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase: Prototype for a structurally, novel flavoenzyme family. Science 251: 60–66., Kotani, H., and Tabata, S. (1998) Lessons from sequencing of the, genome of a unicellular cyanobacterium, Synechocystis sp., PCC6803. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49: 151–171., Krause, G. H., and Weis, E. (1991) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 42: 313–350., Kühlbrandt, W., Wang, D. N., and Fujiyoshi, Y. (1994) Atomic model, of plant light-harvesting complex by electron crystallography., Nature 367: 614–621., Li, X. P., Bjorkman, O., Shih, C., Grossman, A. R., Rosenquist, M.,, Jansson, S., and Niyogi, K. K. (2000) A pigment-binding protein, essential for regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. Nature, 403: 391–395., Long, S. P., Humphries, S., and Falkowski, P. G. (1994) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant, Mol. Biol. 45: 633–662., Matile, P., Hörtensteiner, S., Thomas, H., and Kräutler, B. (1996), Chlorophyll breakdown in senescent leaves. Plant Physiol. 112:, 1403–1409., Melis, A. (1999) Photosystem-II damage and repair cycle in chloroplasts: What modulates the rate of photodamage in vivo? Trends, Plant Sci. 4: 130–135., , 143, , Müller, P., Li, X.-P., and Niyogi, K. K. (2001) Non-photochemical, quenching: A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol. 125:, 1558–1566., Okamura, M. Y., Paddock, M. L., Graige, M. S., and Feher, G. (2000), Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers. Biochim., Biophys. Acta 1458: 148–163., Palmer, J. D., and Delwiche, C. F. (1996) Second-hand chloroplasts, and the case of the disappearing nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 93: 7432–7435., Paulsen, H. (1995) Chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins. Photochem. Photobiol. 62: 367–382., Pfündel, E., and Bilger, W. (1994) Regulation and the possible function of the violaxanthin cycle. Photosynth. Res. 42: 89–109., Porra, R. J. (1997) Recent progress in porphyrin and chlorophyll, biosynthesis. Photochem. Photobiol. 65: 492–516., Pullerits, T., and Sundström, V. (1996) Photosynthetic light-harvesting pigment-protein complexes: Toward understanding how and, why. Acc. Chem. Res. 29: 381–389., Stock, D., Leslie, A. G. W., and Walker, J. E. (1999) Molecular architecture of the rotary motor in ATP synthase. Science 286:, 1700–1705., Tommos, C., and Babcock, G. T. (1999) Oxygen production in nature:, A light-driven metalloradical enzyme process. Acc. Chem. Res. 37:, 18–25., Trebst, A. (1986) The topology of the plastoquinone and herbicide, binding peptides of photosystem II in the thylakoid membrane., Z. Naturforsch. Teil C. 240–245., Trissl, H.-W., and Wilhelm, C. (1993) Why do thylakoid membranes, from higher plants form grana stacks? Trends Biochem. Sci. 18:, 415–419., van Grondelle, R., Dekker, J. P., Gillbro, T., and Sundström, V. (1994), Energy transfer and trapping in photosynthesis. Biochim. Biophys., Acta 1187: 1–65., Wollman, F.-A., Minai, L., and Nechushtai, R. (1999) The biogenesis, and assembly of photosynthetic proteins in thylakoid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1411: 21–85., Xiong, J., Fisher, W., Inoue, K., Nakahara, M., and Bauer, C. E. (2000), Molecular evidence for the early evolution of photosynthesis. Science 289: 1724–1730., Yachandra, V. K., Sauer, K., and Klein, M. P. (1996) Manganese cluster in photosynthesis: Where plants oxidize water to dioxygen., Chem. Rev. 96: 2927–2950., Yasuda, R., Noji, H., Yoshida, M., Kinosita, K., and Itoh, H. (2001), Resolution of distinct rotational substeps by submillisecond, kinetic analysis of F 1-ATPase. Nature 410: 898–904., Zouni, A., Witt, H.-T., Kern, J., Fromme, P., Krauss, N., Saenger, W.,, and Orth, P. (2001) Crystal structure of photosystem II from Synechococcus elongatus at 3.8 Å resolution. Nature 409: 739–743.
Page 170 :
Chapter, , 8, , Photosynthesis:, Carbon Reactions, , IN CHAPTER 5 WE DISCUSSED plants’ requirements for mineral nutrients and light in order to grow and complete their life cycle. Because living organisms interact with one another and their environment, mineral, nutrients cycle through the biosphere. These cycles involve complex, interactions, and each cycle is critical in its own right. Because the, amount of matter in the biosphere remains constant, energy must be, supplied to keep the cycles operational. Otherwise increasing entropy, dictates that the flow of matter would ultimately stop., Autotrophic organisms have the ability to convert physical and, chemical sources of energy into carbohydrates in the absence of organic, substrates. Most of the external energy is consumed in transforming, CO2 to a reduced state that is compatible with the needs of the cell, (—CHOH—)., Recent estimates indicate that about 200 billion tons of CO2 are converted to biomass each year. About 40% of this mass originates from the, activities of marine phytoplankton. The bulk of the carbon is incorporated into organic compounds by the carbon reduction reactions associated with photosynthesis., In Chapter 7 we saw how the photochemical oxidation of water to, molecular oxygen is coupled to the generation of ATP and reduced pyridine nucleotide (NADPH) by reactions taking place in the chloroplast, thylakoid membrane. The reactions catalyzing the reduction of CO2 to, carbohydrate are coupled to the consumption of NADPH and ATP by, enzymes found in the stroma, the soluble phase of chloroplasts., These stroma reactions were long thought to be independent of light, and, as a consequence, were referred to as the dark reactions. However,, because these stroma-localized reactions depend on the products of the, photochemical processes, and are also directly regulated by light, they, are more properly referred to as the carbon reactions of photosynthesis., In this chapter we will examine the cyclic reactions that accomplish, fixation and reduction of CO2, then consider how the phenomenon of, photorespiration catalyzed by the carboxylating enzyme alters the effi-
Page 171 :
146, , Chapter 8, , H2O, , ADP + Pi, , NADP+, , (CH2O)n, , Light, Triose, phosphates, , Chlorophyll, , O2, , ATP, , Light reactions, , + NADPH, , CO2 + H2O, Carbon reactions, , FIGURE 8.1 The light and carbon reactions of photosynthe-, , sis. Light is required for the generation of ATP and, NADPH. The ATP and NADPH are consumed by the carbon reactions, which reduce CO2 to carbohydrate (triose, phosphates)., , ciency of photosynthesis. This chapter will also describe, biochemical mechanisms for concentrating carbon dioxide, that allow plants to mitigate the impact of photorespiration: CO2 pumps, C4 metabolism, and crassulacean acid, metabolism (CAM). We will close the chapter with a consideration of the synthesis of sucrose and starch., , The Calvin cycle proceeds in three stages (Figure 8.2):, 1. Carboxylation of the CO2 acceptor ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, forming two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate,, the first stable intermediate of the Calvin cycle, 2. Reduction of 3-phosphoglycerate, forming gyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, a carbohydrate, 3. Regeneration of the CO2 acceptor ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate from glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, The carbon in CO2 is the most oxidized form found in, nature (+4). The carbon of the first stable intermediate, 3phosphoglycerate, is more reduced (+3), and it is further, reduced in the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate product (+1)., Overall, the early reactions of the Calvin cycle complete the, reduction of atmospheric carbon and, in so doing, facilitate, its incorporation into organic compounds., , The Carboxylation of Ribulose Bisphosphate Is, Catalyzed by the Enzyme Rubisco, CO2 enters the Calvin cycle by reacting with ribulose-1,5bisphosphate to yield two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate, (Figure 8.3 and Table 8.1), a reaction catalyzed by the chloroplast enzyme ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, referred to as rubisco (see Web Topic 8.2). As indi-, , THE CALVIN CYCLE, All photosynthetic eukaryotes, from the most primitive alga, to the most advanced angiosperm, reduce CO2 to carbohydrate via the same basic mechanism: the photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle originally described for C3 species (the, Calvin cycle, or reductive pentose phosphate [RPP] cycle)., Other metabolic pathways associated with the photosynthetic fixation of CO2, such as the C4 photosynthetic carbon, assimilation cycle and the photorespiratory carbon oxidation cycle, are either auxiliary to or dependent on the basic, Calvin cycle., In this section we will examine how CO2 is fixed by the, Calvin cycle through the use of ATP and NADPH generated, by the light reactions (Figure 8.1), and how the Calvin cycle, is regulated., , Start of cycle, Ribulose-1,5bisphosphate, , CO2 + H2O, , Carboxylation, , ADP, , Regeneration, , 3-phosphoglycerate, , ATP, , ATP, , The Calvin Cycle Has Three Stages: Carboxylation,, Reduction, and Regeneration, The Calvin cycle was elucidated as a result of a series of, elegant experiments by Melvin Calvin and his colleagues, in the 1950s, for which a Nobel Prize was awarded in 1961, (see Web Topic 8.1). In the Calvin cycle, CO2 and water, from the environment are enzymatically combined with a, five-carbon acceptor molecule to generate two molecules, of a three-carbon intermediate. This intermediate (3-phosphoglycerate) is reduced to carbohydrate by use of the ATP, and NADPH generated photochemically. The cycle is completed by regeneration of the five-carbon acceptor (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, abbreviated RuBP)., , Glyceraldehyde-3phosphate, , Reduction, , ADP + Pi, , +, NADPH, , NADP+, , Sucrose, starch, , FIGURE 8.2 The Calvin cycle proceeds in three stages: (1), , carboxylation, during which CO2 is covalently linked to a, carbon skeleton; (2) reduction, during which carbohydrate, is formed at the expense of the photochemically derived, ATP and reducing equivalents in the form of NADPH; and, (3) regeneration, during which the CO2 acceptor ribulose1,5-bisphosphate re-forms.
Page 173 :
148, , Chapter 8, , TABLE 8.1, Reactions of the Calvin cycle, Enzyme, , Reaction, , 1. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, , 6 Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate + 6 CO2 + 6 H2O →, 12 (3-phosphoglycerate) + 12 H+, , 2. 3-Phosphoglycerate kinase, , 12 (3-Phosphoglycerate) + 12 ATP →, 12 (1,3-bisphosphoglycerate) + 12 ADP, , 3. NADP:glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, , 12 (1,3-Bisphosphoglycerate) + 12 NADPH + 12 H+ →, 12 glyceraldehye-3-phosphate + 12 NADP+ + 12 Pi, , 4. Triose phosphate isomerase, , 5 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate →, 5 dihydroxyacetone-3-phosphate, , 5. Aldolase, , 3 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate + 3 dihydroxyacetone3-phosphate → 3 fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, , 6. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, , 3 Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate + 3 H2O → 3 fructose6-phosphate + 3 Pi, , 7. Transketolase, , 2 Fructose-6-phosphate + 2 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate →, 2 erythrose-4-phosphate + 2 xylulose-5-phosphate, , 8. Aldolase, , 2 Erythrose-4-phosphate + 2 dihydroxyacetone-3-phosphate →, 2 sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate, , 9. Sedoheptulose-1,7,bisphosphatase, , 2 Sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate + 2 H2O → 2 sedoheptulose7-phosphate + 2 Pi, , 10. Transketolase, , 2 Sedoheptulose-7-phosphate + 2 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate →, 2 ribose-5-phosphate + 2 xylulose-5-phosphate, , 11a. Ribulose-5-phosphate epimerase, , 4 Xylulose-5-phosphate → 4 ribulose-5-phosphate, , 11b. Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase, , 2 Ribose-5-phosphate → 2 ribulose-5-phosphate, , 12. Ribulose-5-phosphate kinase, , 6 Ribulose-5-phosphate + 6 ATP → 6 ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate +, 6 ADP + 6 H+, , Net: 6 CO2 + 11 H2O + 12 NADPH + 18 ATP → Fructose-6-phosphate + 12 NADP+ + 6 H+ + 18 ADP + 17 Pi, Note: Pi stands for inorganic phosphate., , cated by the full name, the enzyme also has an oxygenase, activity in which O2 competes with CO2 for the common, substrate ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (Lorimer 1983). As we, will discuss later, this property limits net CO2 fixation., As shown in Figure 8.4, CO2 is added to carbon 2 of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, yielding an unstable, enzyme-bound, intermediate, which is hydrolyzed to yield two molecules of, the stable product 3-phosphoglycerate (see Table 8.1, reaction 1). The two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate—labeled, “upper” and “lower” on the figure—are distinguished by, the fact that the upper molecule contains the newly incorporated carbon dioxide, designated here as *CO2., Two properties of the carboxylase reaction are especially, important:, 1. The negative change in free energy (see Chapter 2 on, the web site for a discussion of free energy) associated, with the carboxylation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate is, large; thus the forward reaction is strongly favored., 2. The affinity of rubisco for CO2 is sufficiently high to, ensure rapid carboxylation at the low concentrations, of CO2 found in photosynthetic cells., , Rubisco is very abundant, representing up to 40% of the, total soluble protein of most leaves. The concentration of, rubisco active sites within the chloroplast stroma is calculated to be about 4 mM, or about 500 times greater than the, concentration of its CO2 substrate (see Web Topic 8.3)., , Triose Phosphates Are Formed in the Reduction, Step of the Calvin Cycle, Next in the Calvin cycle (Figure 8.3 and Table 8.1), the 3phosphoglycerate formed in the carboxylation stage undergoes two modifications:, 1. It is first phosphorylated via 3-phosphoglycerate, kinase to 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate through use of the, ATP generated in the light reactions (Table 8.1, reaction 2)., 2. Then it is reduced to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, through use of the NADPH generated by the light, reactions (Table 8.1, reaction 3). The chloroplast, enzyme NADP:glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase catalyzes this step. Note that the enzyme, is similar to that of glycolysis (which will be dis-
Page 174 :
Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions, FIGURE 8.4 The carboxyla-, , tion of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate by rubisco., , Carboxylation, CH2OPO32–, , 1, , 2, , C, , H, , 3, , H, , 4, , C, C, , O, , CH2OPO32–, , 1, , HO, , OH, OH, , CH2OPO32–, , 5, , Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, , cussed in Chapter 11), except that NADP rather than, NAD is the coenzyme. An NADP-linked form of the, enzyme is synthesized during chloroplast development (greening), and this form is preferentially used, in biosynthetic reactions., , Operation of the Calvin Cycle Requires the, Regeneration of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate, The continued uptake of CO2 requires that the CO2 acceptor, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, be constantly regenerated., To prevent depletion of Calvin cycle intermediates, three, molecules of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (15 carbons total), are formed by reactions that reshuffle the carbons from the, five molecules of triose phosphate (5 × 3 = 15 carbons). This, reshuffling consists of reactions 4 through 12 in Table 8.1, (see also Figure 8.3):, 1. One molecule of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate is converted via triose phosphate isomerase to dihydroxyacetone-3-phosphate in an isomerization reaction, (reaction 4)., 2. Dihydroxyacetone-3-phosphate then undergoes aldol, condensation with a second molecule of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, a reaction catalyzed by aldolase to, give fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (reaction 5)., 3. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate occupies a key position in, the cycle and is hydrolyzed to fructose-6-phosphate, (reaction 6), which then reacts with the enzyme transketolase., 4. A two-carbon unit (C-1 and C-2 of fructose-6-phosphate) is transferred via transketolase to a third molecule of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate to give erythrose-4-phosphate (from C-3 to C-6 of the fructose), and xylulose-5-phosphate (from C-2 of the fructose, and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate) (reaction 7)., 5. Erythrose-4-phosphate then combines via aldolase, with a fourth molecule of triose phosphate (dihydroxyacetone-3-phosphate) to yield the seven-carbon, sugar sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate (reaction 8)., , 1, , CH2OPO32–, , Hydrolysis, , *CO2, , 2, , *CO2, , 3, , O, , C, C, , H, , 4, , C, , H2O, , H, , –, , OH, , 149, , 2, , C, , *CO2–, , “Upper”, , OH, +, CO2–, , 3, , H, , CH2OPO32–, , 4, , C, , OH, , “Lower”, , 5, , 2-Carboxy-3-ketoarabinitol1,5-bisphosphate, (a transient, unstable,, enzyme-bound intermediate), , CH2OPO32–, , 5, , 3-Phosphoglycerate, , 6. This seven-carbon bisphosphate is then hydrolyzed, by way of a specific phosphatase to give sedoheptulose-7-phosphate (reaction 9)., 7. Sedoheptulose-7-phosphate donates a two-carbon, unit to the fifth (and last) molecule of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate via transketolase and produces, ribose-5-phosphate (from C-3 to C-7 of sedoheptulose) and xylulose-5-phosphate (from C-2 of the sedoheptulose and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate), (reaction 10)., 8. The two molecules of xylulose-5-phosphate are converted to two molecules of ribulose-5-phosphate sugars by a ribulose-5-phosphate epimerase (reaction, 11a). The third molecule of ribulose-5-phosphate is, formed from ribose-5-phosphate by ribose-5-phosphate isomerase (reaction 11b)., 9. Finally, ribulose-5-phosphate kinase catalyzes the phosphorylation of ribulose-5-phosphate with ATP, thus, regenerating the three needed molecules of the initial, CO2 acceptor, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (reaction 12)., , The Calvin Cycle Regenerates Its, Own Biochemical Components, The Calvin cycle reactions regenerate the biochemical intermediates that are necessary to maintain the operation of the, cycle. But more importantly, the rate of operation of the, Calvin cycle can be enhanced by increases in the concentration of its intermediates; that is, the cycle is autocatalytic. As, a consequence, the Calvin cycle has the metabolically desirable feature of producing more substrate than is consumed,, as long as triose phosphate is not being diverted elsewhere:, 5 RuBP4– + 5 CO2 + 9 H2O + 16 ATP4– + 10 NADPH →, 6 RuBP4– + 14 Pi + 6 H+ + 16 ADP3– + 10 NADP+, , The importance of this autocatalytic property is shown, by experiments in which previously darkened leaves or, isolated chloroplasts are illuminated. In such experiments,, CO2 fixation starts only after a lag, called the induction, period, and the rate of photosynthesis increases with time, in the first few minutes after the onset of illumination. The
Page 175 :
150, , Chapter 8, , increase in the rate of photosynthesis during the induction, period is due in part to the activation of enzymes by light, (discussed later), and in part to an increase in the concentration of intermediates of the Calvin cycle., , Calvin Cycle Stoichiometry Shows That Only, One-Sixth of the Triose Phosphate Is Used, for Sucrose or Starch, The synthesis of carbohydrates (starch, sucrose) provides, a sink ensuring an adequate flow of carbon atoms through, the Calvin cycle under conditions of continuous CO2, uptake. An important feature of the cycle is its overall stoichiometry. At the onset of illumination, most of the triose, phosphates are drawn back into the cycle to facilitate the, buildup of an adequate concentration of metabolites. When, photosynthesis reaches a steady state, however, five-sixths, of the triose phosphate contributes to regeneration of the, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, and one-sixth is exported to the, cytosol for the synthesis of sucrose or other metabolites that, are converted to starch in the chloroplast., An input of energy, provided by ATP and NADPH, is, required in order to keep the cycle functioning in the fixation of CO2. The calculation at the end of Table 8.1 shows, that in order to synthesize the equivalent of 1 molecule of, hexose, 6 molecules of CO2 are fixed at the expense of 18, ATP and 12 NADPH. In other words, the Calvin cycle consumes two molecules of NADPH and three molecules of, ATP for every molecule of CO2 fixed into carbohydrate., We can compute the maximal overall thermodynamic, efficiency of photosynthesis if we know the energy content, of the light, the minimum quantum requirement (moles of, quanta absorbed per mole of CO2 fixed; see Chapter 7), and, the energy stored in a mole of carbohydrate (hexose)., Red light at 680 nm contains 175 kJ (42 kcal) per quantum mole of photons. The minimum quantum requirement, is usually calculated to be 8 photons per molecule of CO2, fixed, although the number obtained experimentally is 9 to, 10 (see Chapter 7). Therefore, the minimum light energy, needed to reduce 6 moles of CO2 to a mole of hexose is, approximately 6 × 8 × 175 kJ = 8400 kJ (2016 kcal). However, a mole of a hexose such as fructose yields only 2804, kJ (673 kcal) when totally oxidized., Comparing 8400 and 2804 kJ, we see that the maximum, overall thermodynamic efficiency of photosynthesis is, about 33%. However, most of the unused light energy is, lost in the generation of ATP and NADPH by the light reactions (see Chapter 7) rather than during operation of the, Calvin cycle., We can calculate the efficiency of the Calvin cycle more, directly by computing the changes in free energy associated, with the hydrolysis of ATP and the oxidation of NADPH,, which are 29 and 217 kJ (7 and 52 kcal) per mole, respectively. We saw in the list summarizing the Calvin cycle reactions that the synthesis of 1 molecule of fructose-6-phosphate from 6 molecules of CO2 uses 12 NADPH and 18 ATP, , molecules. Therefore the Calvin cycle consumes (12 × 217), + (18 × 29) = 3126 kJ (750 kcal) in the form of NADPH and, ATP, resulting in a thermodynamic efficiency close to 90%., An examination of these calculations shows that the, bulk of the energy required for the conversion of CO2 to, carbohydrate comes from NADPH. That is, 2 mol NADPH, × 52 kcal mol–1 = 104 kcal, but 3 mol ATP × 7 kcal mol–1 =, 21 kcal. Thus, 83% (104 of 125 kcal) of the energy stored, comes from the reductant NADPH., The Calvin cycle does not occur in all autotrophic cells., Some anaerobic bacteria use other pathways for autotrophic growth:, • The ferredoxin-mediated synthesis of organic acids, from acetyl– and succinyl– CoA derivatives via a, reversal of the citric acid cycle (the reductive carboxylic acid cycle of green sulfur bacteria), • The glyoxylate-producing cycle (the hydroxypropionate pathway of green nonsulfur bacteria), • The linear route (acetyl-CoA pathway) of acetogenic,, methanogenic bacteria, Thus although the Calvin cycle is quantitatively the most, important pathway of autotrophic CO2 fixation, others, have been described., , REGULATION OF THE CALVIN CYCLE, The high energy efficiency of the Calvin cycle indicates that, some form of regulation ensures that all intermediates in, the cycle are present at adequate concentrations and that, the cycle is turned off when it is not needed in the dark. In, general, variation in the concentration or in the specific, activity of enzymes modulates catalytic rates, thereby, adjusting the level of metabolites in the cycle., Changes in gene expression and protein biosynthesis, regulate enzyme concentration. Posttranslational modification of proteins contributes to the regulation of enzyme, activity. At the genetic level the amount of each enzyme, present in the chloroplast stroma is regulated by mechanisms that control expression of the nuclear and chloroplast, genomes (Maier et al. 1995; Purton 1995)., Short-term regulation of the Calvin cycle is achieved by, several mechanisms that optimize the concentration of, intermediates. These mechanisms minimize reactions operating in opposing directions, which would waste resources, (Wolosiuk et al. 1993). Two general mechanisms can change, the kinetic properties of enzymes:, 1. The transformation of covalent bonds such as the, reduction of disulfides and the carbamylation of, amino groups, which generate a chemically modified, enzyme., 2. The modification of noncovalent interactions, such as, the binding of metabolites or changes in the composi-
Page 176 :
Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions, tion of the cellular milieu (e.g., pH). In addition, the, binding of the enzymes to the thylakoid membranes, enhances the efficiency of the Calvin cycle, thereby, achieving a higher level of organization that favors, the channeling and protection of substrates., , Light-Dependent Enzyme Activation Regulates, the Calvin Cycle, , Light, , Photosystem I, , Ferredoxin, , 4. Sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase, , (reduced), Ferredoxin:, thioredoxin, reductase, , 1. Rubisco, , 3. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, , Ferredoxin, , (oxidized), , Five light-regulated enzymes operate in the Calvin cycle:, , 2. NADP:glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, , 151, , H+, , (reduced), , (oxidized), , Thioredoxin, , Thioredoxin, , SH, , HS, , S, , S, , 5. Ribulose-5-phosphate kinase, The last four enzymes contain one or more disulfide, (—S—S—) groups. Light controls the activity of these four, enzymes via the ferredoxin–thioredoxin system, a covalent thiol-based oxidation–reduction mechanism identified, by Bob Buchanan and colleagues (Buchanan 1980; Wolosiuk et al. 1993; Besse and Buchanan 1997; Schürmann and, Jacquot 2000). In the dark these residues exist in the oxidized state (—S—S—), which renders the enzyme inactive, or subactive. In the light the —S—S— group is reduced to, the sulfhydryl state (—SH HS—). This redox change leads, to activation of the enzyme (Figure 8.5). The resolution of, the crystal structure of each member of the ferredoxin–, thioredoxin system and of the target enzymes fructose-1,6bisphosphatase and NADP:malate dehydrogenase (Dai et, al. 2000) have provided valuable information about the, mechanisms involved., This sulfhydryl (also called dithiol) signal of the regulatory protein thioredoxin is transmitted to specific target, enzymes, resulting in their activation (see Web Topic 8.4)., In some cases (such as fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase), the, thioredoxin-linked activation is enhanced by an effector, (e.g., fructose-1,6-bisphosphate substrate)., Inactivation of the target enzymes observed upon, darkening appears to take place by a reversal of the reduction (activation) pathway. That is, oxygen converts the, thioredoxin and target enzyme from the reduced state, (—SH HS—) to the oxidized state (—S—S—) and, in so, doing, leads to inactivation of the enzyme (see Figure 8.5;, see also Web Topic 8.4). The last four of the enzymes listed, here are regulated directly by thioredoxin; the first, rubisco,, is regulated indirectly by a thioredoxin accessory enzyme,, rubisco activase (see the next section)., , Rubisco Activity Increases in the Light, The activity of rubisco is also regulated by light, but the, enzyme itself does not respond to thioredoxin. George, Lorimer and colleagues found that rubisco is activated, when activator CO2 (a different molecule from the sub-, , (oxidized), , (reduced), , Target enzyme, , Target enzyme, , S, , S, , Inactive, , SH, , HS, , Active, , FIGURE 8.5 The ferredoxin–thioredoxin system reduces, , specific enzymes in the light. Upon reduction, biosynthetic, enzymes are converted from an inactive to an active state., The activation process starts in the light by a reduction of, ferredoxin by photosystem I (see Chapter 7). The reduced, ferredoxin plus two protons are used to reduce a catalytically active disulfide (—S—S—) group of the iron–sulfur, enzyme ferredoxin:thioredoxin reductase, which in turn, reduces the highly specific disulfide (—S—S—) bond of the, small regulatory protein thioredoxin (see Web Topic 8.4 for, details). The reduced form (—SH HS—) of thioredoxin then, reduces the critical disulfide bond (converts —S—S— to, —SH HS—) of a target enzyme and thereby leads to activation of that enzyme. The light signal is thus converted to a, sulfhydryl, or —SH, signal via ferredoxin and the enzyme, ferredoxin:thioredoxin reductase., , strate CO2 that becomes fixed) reacts slowly with an, uncharged ε-NH2 group of lysine within the active site of, the enzyme. The resulting carbamate derivative (a new, anionic site) then rapidly binds Mg2+ to yield the activated, complex (Figure 8.6)., Two protons are released during the formation of the, ternary complex rubisco–CO2–Mg2+, so activation is promoted by an increase in both pH and Mg2+ concentration., Thus, light-dependent stromal changes in pH and Mg2+, (see the next section) appear to facilitate the observed activation of rubisco by light., In the active state, rubisco binds another molecule, of CO2, which reacts with the 2,3-enediol form of ribulose— COH—CHOH—, 1,5-bisphosphate (P—O—CH2—COH—, CH2O—P) yielding 2-carboxy-3-ketoribitol 1,5-bisphos-
Page 177 :
152, , Chapter 8, , Rubisco, , Rubisco, H+, , CO2 H+, , Lys, NH3+, , Rubisco, , Lys, H+, , Lys, H+, , NH2, , Carbamylation, , NH, COO–, , Rubisco, Mg2+, Mg2+, , Lys, NH, COO–, Mg2+, , Inactive, , Active, , FIGURE 8.6 One way in which rubisco is activated involves the formation of a car-, , bamate–Mg2+ complex on the ε-amino group of a lysine within the active site of the, enzyme. Two protons are released. Activation is enhanced by the increase in Mg2+, concentration and higher pH (low H+ concentration) that result from illumination., The CO2 involved in the carbamate–Mg2+ reaction is not the same as the CO2, involved in the carboxylation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate., , phate. The extreme instability of the latter intermediate, leads to the cleavage of the bond that links carbons 2 and 3, of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, and as a consequence, rubisco, releases two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate., The binding of sugar phosphates, such as ribulose-1,5bisphosphate, to rubisco prevents carbamylation. The, sugar phosphates can be removed by the enzyme rubisco, activase, in a reaction that requires ATP. The primary role, of rubisco activase is to accelerate the release of bound, sugar phosphates, thus preparing rubisco for carbamylation (Salvucci and Ogren 1996, see also Web Topic 8.5)., Rubisco is also regulated by a natural sugar phosphate,, carboxyarabinitol-1-phosphate, that closely resembles the, six-carbon transition intermediate of the carboxylation, reaction. This inhibitor is present at low concentrations in, leaves of many species and at high concentrations in leaves, of legumes such as soybean and bean. Carboxyarabinitol1-phosphate binds to rubisco at night, and it is removed by, the action of rubisco activase in the morning, when photon, flux density increases., Recent work has shown that in some plants rubisco activase is regulated by the ferredoxin–thioredoxin system, (Zhang and Portis 1999). In addition to connecting thioredoxin to all five regulatory enzymes of the Calvin cycle,, this finding provides a new mechanism for linking light to, the regulation of enzyme activity., , Light-Dependent Ion Movements, Regulate Calvin Cycle Enzymes, Light causes reversible ion changes in the stroma that influence the activity of rubisco and other chloroplast enzymes., Upon illumination, protons are pumped from the stroma, into the lumen of the thylakoids. The proton efflux is coupled to Mg2+ uptake into the stroma. These ion fluxes, decrease the stromal concentration of H+ (pH 7 → 8) and, increase that of Mg2+. These changes in the ionic composi-, , tion of the chloroplast stroma, are reversed upon darkening., Several Calvin cycle enzymes (rubisco, fructose-1,6bisphosphatase, sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase, and, ribulose-5-phosphate kinase), are more active at pH 8 than, at pH 7 and require Mg2+ as a, cofactor for catalysis. Hence, these light-dependent ion, fluxes enhance the activity of, key enzymes of the Calvin, cycle (Heldt 1979)., , Light-Dependent Membrane, Transport Regulates the, Calvin Cycle, , The rate at which carbon is exported from the chloroplast plays, a role in regulation of the Calvin cycle. Carbon is exported, as triose phosphates in exchange for orthophosphate via, the phosphate translocator in the inner membrane of the, chloroplast envelope (Flügge and Heldt 1991). To ensure, continued operation of the Calvin cycle, at least five-sixths, of the triose phosphate must be recycled (see Table 8.1 and, Figure 8.3). Thus, at most one-sixth can be exported for, sucrose synthesis in the cytosol or diverted to starch synthesis within the chloroplast. The regulation of this aspect, of photosynthetic carbon metabolism will be discussed further when the syntheses of sucrose and starch are considered in detail later in this chapter., , THE C2 OXIDATIVE PHOTOSYNTHETIC, CARBON CYCLE, An important property of rubisco is its ability to catalyze, both the carboxylation and the oxygenation of RuBP. Oxygenation is the primary reaction in a process known as, photorespiration. Because photosynthesis and photorespiration work in diametrically opposite directions, photorespiration results in loss of CO2 from cells that are simultaneously fixing CO2 by the Calvin cycle (Ogren 1984;, Leegood et al. 1995)., In this section we will describe the C2 oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle—the reactions that result in the partial recovery of carbon lost through oxidation., , Photosynthetic CO2 Fixation and Photorespiratory, Oxygenation Are Competing Reactions, The incorporation of one molecule of O2 into the 2,3-enediol isomer of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate generates an, unstable intermediate that rapidly splits into 2-phosphoglycolate and 3-phosphoglycerate (Figure 8.7 and Table 8.2,, reaction 1). The ability to catalyze the oxygenation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate is a property of all rubiscos, regard-
Page 180 :
Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions, A malate-oxaloacetate shuttle transfers NADH from the, cytoplasm into the peroxisome, thus maintaining an adequate concentration of NADH for this reaction. Finally,, glycerate reenters the chloroplast, where it is phosphorylated to yield 3-phosphoglycerate (Table 8.2, reaction 10)., In photorespiration, various compounds are circulated, in concert through two cycles. In one of the cycles, carbon, exits the chloroplast in two molecules of glycolate and, returns in one molecule of glycerate. In the other cycle,, nitrogen exits the chloroplast in one molecule of glutamate, and returns in one molecule of ammonia (together with, one molecule of α-ketoglutarate) (see Figure 8.7)., Thus overall, two molecules of phosphoglycolate (four, carbon atoms), lost from the Calvin cycle by the oxygenation, of RuBP, are converted into one molecule of 3-phosphoglycerate (three carbon atoms) and one CO2. In other words,, 75% of the carbon lost by the oxygenation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate is recovered by the C2 oxidative photosynthetic, carbon cycle and returned to the Calvin cycle (Lorimer 1981)., On the other hand, the total organic nitrogen remains, unchanged because the formation of inorganic nitrogen, (NH4+) in the mitochondrion is balanced by the synthesis, of glutamine in the chloroplast. Similarly, the use of NADH, in the peroxisome (by hydroxypyruvate reductase) is balanced by the reduction of NAD+ in the mitochondrion (by, glycine decarboxylase)., , Competition between Carboxylation and, Oxygenation Decreases the Efficiency of, Photosynthesis, , 155, , Carboxylation and Oxygenation Are Closely, Interlocked in the Intact Leaf, Photosynthetic carbon metabolism in the intact leaf reflects, the integrated balance between two mutually opposing, and interlocking cycles (Figure 8.8). The Calvin cycle can, operate independently, but the C2 oxidative photosynthetic, carbon cycle depends on the Calvin cycle for a supply of, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate. The balance between the two, cycles is determined by three factors: the kinetic properties, of rubisco, the concentrations of the substrates CO2 and O2,, and temperature., As the temperature increases, the concentration of CO2, in a solution in equilibrium with air decreases more than, the concentration of O2 does (see Web Topic 8.3). Consequently, the concentration ratio of CO2 to O2 decreases as, the temperature rises. As a result of this property, photorespiration (oxygenation) increases relative to photosynthesis (carboxylation) as the temperature rises. This effect, is enhanced by the kinetic properties of rubisco, which also, result in a relative increase in oxygenation at higher temperatures (Ku and Edwards 1978). Overall, then, increasing temperatures progressively tilt the balance away from, the Calvin cycle and toward the oxidative photosynthetic, carbon cycle (see Chapter 9)., , The Biological Function of Photorespiration, Is Unknown, Although the C2 oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle, recovers 75% of the carbon originally lost from the Calvin, cycle as 2-phosphoglycolate, why does 2-phosphoglycolate, form at all? One possible explanation is that the formation, , Because photorespiration is concurrent with photosynthesis, it is difficult to measure the rate of photorespiration in intact cells. Two molecules of 2phosphoglycolate (four carbon atoms) are, needed to make one molecule of 3-phospho2-Phosphoglycolate, glycerate, with the release of one molecule of, O2, CO2; so theoretically one-fourth of the carbon, O2, entering the C2 oxidative photosynthetic carbon, cycle is released as CO2., Ribulose, Measurements of CO2 release by sunflower, 1,5-bisphosphate, leaves support this calculated value. This result, CO2, CO2, indicates that the actual rate of photosynthesis is, (Net, (Net, carbon, approximately 120 to 125% of the measured rate., carbon, gain), 3-Phosphoglycerate, The ratio of carboxylation to oxygenation in air, loss), at 25°C is computed to be between 2.5 and 3., Further calculations indicate that photorespiration lowers the efficiency of photosynthetic carElectron transport, C2 oxidative photosynthetic, bon fixation from 90% to approximately 50%., and the Calvin cycle, carbon cycle, This decreased efficiency can be measured as, FIGURE 8.8 The flow of carbon in the leaf is determined by the balance, an increase in the quantum requirement for CO2, between two mutually opposing cycles. Whereas the Calvin cycle is, fixation under photorespiratory conditions (air, capable of independent operation in the presence of adequate subwith high O2 and low CO2) as opposed to nonstrates generated by photosynthetic electron transport, the C2 oxidative, photorespiratory conditions (low O2 and high, photosynthetic carbon cycle requires continued operation of the Calvin, CO2)., cycle to regenerate its starting material, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate.
Page 181 :
156, , Chapter 8, , of 2-phosphoglycolate is a consequence of the chemistry of, the carboxylation reaction, which requires an intermediate, that can react with both CO2 and O2., Such a reaction would have had little consequence in, early evolutionary times if the ratio of CO2 to O2 in air were, higher than it is today. However, the low CO2:O2 ratios, prevalent in modern times are conducive to photorespiration, with no other function than the recovery of some of, the carbon present in 2-phosphoglycolate., Another possible explanation is that photorespiration is, important, especially under conditions of high light intensity and low intercellular CO2 concentration (e.g., when, stomata are closed because of water stress), to dissipate, excess ATP and reducing power from the light reactions,, thus preventing damage to the photosynthetic apparatus., Arabidopsis mutants that are unable to photorespire grow, normally under 2% CO2, but they die rapidly if transferred, to normal air. There is evidence from work with transgenic, plants that photorespiration protects C3 plants from photooxidation and photoinhibition (Kozaki and Takeba 1996)., Further work is needed to improve our understanding of, the function of photorespiration., , CO2-CONCENTRATING MECHANISMS I:, ALGAL AND CYANOBACTERIAL PUMPS, Many plants either do not photorespire at all, or they do so, to only a limited extent. These plants have normal rubiscos, and their lack of photorespiration is a consequence of, mechanisms that concentrate CO2 in the rubisco environment and thereby suppress the oxygenation reaction., In this and the two following sections we will discuss, three mechanisms for concentrating CO2 at the site of carboxylation:, 1. C4 photosynthetic carbon fixation (C4), 2. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), 3. CO2 pumps at the plasma membrane, The first two of these CO2-concentrating mechanisms are, found in some angiosperms and involve “add-ons” to the, Calvin cycle. Plants with C4 metabolism are often found in, hot environments; CAM plants are typical of desert environments. We will examine each of these two systems after, we consider the third mechanism: a CO2 pump found in, aquatic plants that has been studied extensively in unicellular cyanobacteria and algae., When algal and cyanobacterial cells are grown in air, enriched with 5% CO2 and then transferred to a low-CO2, medium, they display symptoms typical of photorespiration (O2 inhibition of photosynthesis at low concentration, of CO2). But if the cells are grown in air containing 0.03%, CO2, they rapidly develop the ability to concentrate inorganic carbon (CO2 plus HCO3–) internally. Under these, low-CO2 conditions, the cells no longer photorespire., , At the concentrations of CO2 found in aquatic environments, rubisco operates far below its maximal specific, activity. Marine and freshwater organisms overcome this, drawback by accumulating inorganic carbon by the use of, CO2 and HCO3– pumps at the plasma membrane. ATP, derived from the light reactions provides the energy necessary for the active uptake of CO2 and HCO3–. Total inorganic carbon inside some cyanobacterial cells can reach, concentrations of 50 mM (Ogawa and Kaplan 1987). Recent, work indicates that a single gene encoding a transcription, factor can regulate the expression of genes that encode the, components of the CO2-concentrating mechanism in algae, (Xiang et al. 2001)., The proteins that function as CO2–HCO3– pumps are not, present in cells grown in high concentrations of CO2 but are, induced upon exposure to low concentrations of CO2. The, accumulated HCO3– is converted to CO2 by the enzyme carbonic anhydrase, and the CO2 enters the Calvin cycle., The metabolic consequence of this CO2 enrichment is, suppression of the oxygenation of ribulose bisphosphate, and hence also suppression of photorespiration. The energetic cost of this adaptation is the additional ATP needed, for concentrating the CO2., , CO2-CONCENTRATING MECHANISMS II:, THE C4 CARBON CYCLE, There are differences in leaf anatomy between plants that, have a C4 carbon cycle (called C4 plants) and those that photosynthesize solely via the Calvin photosynthetic cycle (C3, plants). A cross section of a typical C3 leaf reveals one major, cell type that has chloroplasts, the mesophyll. In contrast,, a typical C4 leaf has two distinct chloroplast-containing cell, types: mesophyll and bundle sheath (or Kranz, German for, “wreath”) cells (Figure 8.9)., There is considerable anatomic variation in the arrangement of the bundle sheath cells with respect to the mesophyll and vascular tissue. In all cases, however, operation, of the C4 cycle requires the cooperative effort of both cell, types. No mesophyll cell of a C4 plant is more than two or, three cells away from the nearest bundle sheath cell (see, Figure 8.9A). In addition, an extensive network of plasmodesmata (see Figure 1.27) connects mesophyll and bundle sheath cells, thus providing a pathway for the flow of, metabolites between the cell types., , Malate and Aspartate Are Carboxylation Products, of the C4 Cycle, Early labeling of C4 acids was first observed in 14CO2 labeling studies of sugarcane by H. P. Kortschack and colleagues, and of maize by Y. Karpilov and coworkers. When leaves, were exposed for a few seconds to 14CO2 in the light, 70 to, 80% of the label was found in the C4 acids malate and, aspartate—a pattern very different from the one observed, in leaves that photosynthesize solely via the Calvin cycle.
Page 182 :
Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions, (A), , 157, , (B), , (C), , (D), , (E), , Mesophyll cells, , Plasmodesmata, , Bundle sheath cells, , FIGURE 8.9 Cross-sections of leaves, showing the anatomic, differences between C3 and C4 plants. (A) A C4 monocot,, saccharum officinarum (sugarcane). (135×) (B) A C3 monocot,, Poa sp. (a grass). (240×) (C) A C4 dicot, Flaveria australasica, (Asteraceae). (740×) The bundle sheath cells are large in C4, leaves (A and C), and no mesophyll cell is more than two, or three cells away from the nearest bundle sheath cell., These anatomic features are absent in the C3 leaf (B). (D), Three-dimensional model of a C4 leaf. (A and B © David, Webb; C courtesy of Athena McKown; D after Lüttge and, Higinbotham; E from Craig and Goodchild 1977.), (E) Scanning electon micrograph of a C 4 leaf from Triodia, irritans, showing the plasmodesmata pits in the bundle sheath, heath cell walls through which metabolites of the C 4 carbon, cycle are thought to be transported.
Page 184 :
Atmospheric CO2, , Mesophyll cell, , COO¯, , NADP+, , Carbonic, anhydrase, NADPH, , CH2, H, , C, , COO¯, , Pi, , CH2, OH, , CO2–, , C, Malate, dehydrogenase, , Malate, , 2 ADP, , Adenylate, kinase, , 2 Pi, , AMP, , HCO3–, , + PPi, , ATP, , + Pi, , CH2, OPO32–, , C, , O, PEP carboxylase, , CO2–, , COO¯, , Oxaloacetate, , ATP, , Phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), , Pyruvatephosphate, dikinase, , CH3, Malic enzyme, C, , O, , COO¯, NADP+, , Bundle sheath cell, , NADPH + CO2, , Pyruvate, , Calvin cycle, , FIGURE 8.11 The C4 photosynthetic pathway. The hydrolysis of two ATP drives the, cycle in the direction of the arrows, thus pumping CO2 from the atmosphere to the, Calvin cycle of the chloroplasts from bundle sheath cells., , 4. Transport of the C3 acid (pyruvate or alanine) that is, formed by the decarboxylation step back to the mesophyll cell and regeneration of the CO2 acceptor phosphoenolpyruvate, One interesting feature of the cycle is that regeneration, of the primary acceptor—phosphoenolpyruvate—consumes two “high-energy” phosphate bonds: one in the, reaction catalyzed by pyruvate–orthophosphate dikinase, (Table 8.3, reaction 8) and another in the conversion of PPi, to 2Pi catalyzed by pyrophosphatase (reaction 9; see also, Figure 8.11)., Shuttling of metabolites between mesophyll and bundle, sheath cells is driven by diffusion gradients along numerous plasmodesmata, and transport within the cells is regulated by concentration gradients and the operation of specialized translocators at the chloroplast envelope. The cycle, thus effectively shuttles CO2 from the atmosphere into the, bundle sheath cells. This transport process generates a, much higher concentration of CO2 in the bundle sheath cells, than would occur in equilibrium with the external atmosphere. This elevated concentration of CO2 at the carboxylation site of rubisco results in suppression of the oxygenation, of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate and hence of photorespiration., Discovered in the tropical grasses, sugarcane, and, maize, the C4 cycle is now known to occur in 16 families of, , both monocotyledons and dicotyledons, and it is particularly prominent in Gramineae (corn, millet, sorghum,, sugarcane), Chenopodiaceae (Atriplex), and Cyperaceae, (sedges). About 1% of all known species have C4 metabolism (Edwards and Walker 1983)., There are three variations of the basic C4 pathway that, occur in different species (see Web Topic 8.7). The variations differ principally in the C4 acid (malate or aspartate), transported into the bundle sheath cells and in the manner, of decarboxylation., , The Concentration of CO2 in Bundle Sheath Cells, Has an Energy Cost, The net effect of the C4 cycle is to convert a dilute solution, of CO2 in the mesophyll cells into a concentrated CO2 solution in cells of the bundle sheath. Studies of a PEP carboxylase–deficient mutant of Amaranthus edulis clearly, showed that the lack of an effective mechanism for concentrating CO2 in the bundle sheath markedly enhances, photorespiration in a C4 plant (Dever et al. 1996)., Thermodynamics tells us that work must be done to, establish and maintain the CO2 concentration gradient in, the bundle sheath (for a detailed discussion of theomodynamics, see Chapter 2 on the web site). This principle also, applies to the operation of the C4 cycle. From a summation
Page 185 :
160, , Chapter 8, , TABLE 8.4, Energetics of the C4 photosynthetic carbon cycle, Phosphoenolpyruvate + H2O + NADPH + CO2 (mesophyll), , →, , malate + NADP+ + Pi (mesophyll), , Malate + NADP+, , →, , pyruvate + NADPH + CO2 (bundle sheath), , Pyruvate + Pi+ ATP, , →, , phosphoenolpyruvate + AMP + PPi (mesophyll), , PPi + H2O, , →, , 2 Pi (mesophyll), , AMP + ATP, , →, , 2ADP, , Net: CO2 (mesophyll) + ATP + 2 H2O, , →, , CO2 (bundle sheath) + 2ADP + 2 Pi, , Cost of concentrating CO2 within the bundle sheath cell = 2 ATP per CO2, Note: As shown in reaction 1 of Table 8.3, the H2O and CO2 shown in the first line of this table actually react with phosphoenolpyruvate as HCO3–., Pi and PPi stand for inorganic phosphate and pyrophosphate, respectively., , of the reactions involved, we can calculate the energy cost, to the plant (Table 8.4). The calculation shows that the CO2concentrating process consumes two ATP equivalents (2, “high-energy” bonds) per CO2 molecule transported. Thus, the total energy requirement for fixing CO2 by the combined C4 and Calvin cycles (calculated in Tables 8.4 and 8.1,, respectively) is five ATP plus two NADPH per CO2 fixed., Because of this higher energy demand, C4 plants photosynthesizing under nonphotorespiratory conditions (high, CO2 and low O2) require more quanta of light per CO2 than, C3 leaves do. In normal air, the quantum requirement of C3, plants changes with factors that affect the balance between, photosynthesis and photorespiration, such as temperature., By contrast, owing to the mechanisms built in to avoid, photorespiration, the quantum requirement of C4 plants, remains relatively constant under different environmental, conditions (see Figure 9.23)., , Light Regulates the Activity of Key C4 Enzymes, Light is essential for the operation of the C4 cycle because, it regulates several specific enzymes. For example, the, activities of PEP carboxylase, NADP:malate dehydrogenase, and pyruvate–orthophosphate dikinase (see Table 8.3), are regulated in response to variations in photon flux density by two different processes: reduction–oxidation of thiol, groups and phosphorylation–dephosphorylation., NADP:malate dehydrogenase is regulated via the thioredoxin system of the chloroplast (see Figure 8.5). The enzyme, is reduced (activated) upon illumination of leaves and is, oxidized (inactivated) upon darkening. PEP carboxylase is, activated by a light-dependent phosphorylation–dephosphorylation mechanism yet to be characterized., The third regulatory member of the C4 pathway, pyruvate–orthophosphate dikinase, is rapidly inactivated by an, unusual ADP-dependent phosphorylation of the enzyme, when the photon flux density drops (Burnell and Hatch, 1985). Activation is accomplished by phosphorolytic cleavage of this phosphate group. Both reactions, phosphory-, , lation and dephosphorylation, appear to be catalyzed by a, single regulatory protein., , In Hot, Dry Climates, the C4 Cycle Reduces, Photorespiration and Water Loss, Two features of the C4 cycle in C4 plants overcome the deleterious effects of higher temperature on photosynthesis that, were noted earlier. First, the affinity of PEP carboxylase for, its substrate, HCO3–, is sufficiently high that the enzyme is, saturated by HCO3– in equlibrium with air levels of CO2., Furthermore, because the substrate is HCO3–, oxygen is not, a competitor in the reaction. This high activity of PEP carboxylase enables C4 plants to reduce the stomatal aperture, and thereby conserve water while fixing CO2 at rates equal, to or greater than those of C3 plants. The second beneficial, feature is the suppression of photorespiration resulting, from the concentration of CO2 in bundle sheath cells, (Marocco et al. 1998)., These features enable C4 plants to photosynthesize more, efficiently at high temperatures than C3 plants, and they are, probably the reason for the relative abundance of C4 plants, in drier, hotter climates. Depending on their natural environment, some plants show properties intermediate, between strictly C3 and C4 species., , CO2-CONCENTRATING MECHANISMS III:, CRASSULACEAN ACID METABOLISM, A third mechanism for concentrating CO2 at the site of, rubisco is found in crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)., Despite its name, CAM is not restricted to the family Crassulaceae (Crassula, Kalanchoe, Sedum); it is found in numerous angiosperm families. Cacti and euphorbias are CAM, plants, as well as pineapple, vanilla, and agave., The CAM mechanism enables plants to improve water, use efficiency. Typically, a CAM plant loses 50 to 100 g of, water for every gram of CO2 gained, compared with values of 250 to 300 g and 400 to 500 g for C4 and C3 plants,
Page 186 :
Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions, respectively (see Chapter 4). Thus, CAM plants have a, competitive advantage in dry environments., The CAM mechanism is similar in many respects to the, C4 cycle. In C4 plants, formation of the C4 acids in the mesophyll is spatially separated from decarboxylation of the, C4 acids and from refixation of the resulting CO2 by the, Calvin cycle in the bundle sheath. In CAM plants, formation of the C4 acids is both temporally and spatially separated. At night, CO2 is captured by PEP carboxylase in the, cytosol, and the malate that forms from the oxaloacetate, product is stored in the vacuole (Figure 8.12). During the, day, the stored malate is transported to the chloroplast and, decarboxylated by NADP-malic enzyme, the released CO2, is fixed by the Calvin cycle, and the NADPH is used for, converting the decarboxylated triose phosphate product to, starch., , The Stomata of CAM Plants Open at Night and, Close during the Day, CAM plants such as cacti achieve their high water use efficiency by opening their stomata during the cool, desert, , Dark: Stomata opened, , CO2 uptake and, fixation: leaf, acidification, , nights and closing them during the hot, dry days. Closing, the stomata during the day minimizes water loss, but, because H2O and CO2 share the same diffusion pathway,, CO2 must then be taken up at night., CO2 is incorporated via carboxylation of phosphoenolpyruvate to oxaloacetate, which is then reduced to, malate. The malate accumulates and is stored in the large, vacuoles that are a typical, but not obligatory, anatomic feature of the leaf cells of CAM plants (see Figure 8.12). The, accumulation of substantial amounts of malic acid, equivalent to the amount of CO2 assimilated at night, has long, been recognized as a nocturnal acidification of the leaf, (Bonner and Bonner 1948)., With the onset of day, the stomata close, preventing loss, of water and further uptake of CO2. The leaf cells deacidify as the reserves of vacuolar malic acid are consumed., Decarboxylation is usually achieved by the action of, NADP-malic enzyme on malate (Drincovich et al. 2001)., Because the stomata are closed, the internally released CO2, cannot escape from the leaf and instead is fixed and converted to carbohydrate by the Calvin cycle., , Light: Stomata closed, , Atmospheric, CO2, , Open stoma permits, entry of CO2 and, loss of H2O, , Decarboxylation of stored, malate and refixation of internal, CO2: deacidification, , Closed stoma, prevents H2O loss, and CO2 uptake, , Pi, , HCO3–, PEP carboxylase, , Oxaloacetate, , Phosphoenolpyruvate, NADH, NAD+, Triose, phosphate, , NAD+ malic, dehydrogenase, Malate, , Starch, Chloroplast, , Malic acid, , 161, , CO2, , NADP+ malic, enzyme, Malate, , Malic acid, , Pyruvate, Calvin, cycle, Starch, Chloroplast, , Vacuole, , FIGURE 8.12 Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM). Temporal separation of CO2 uptake, from photosynthetic reactions: CO2 uptake and fixation take place at night, and decarboxylation and refixation of the internally released CO2 occur during the day. The adaptive advantage of CAM is the reduction of water loss by transpiration, achieved by the, stomatal opening during the night., , Vacuole
Page 187 :
162, , Chapter 8, , The elevated internal concentration of CO2 effectively, suppresses the photorespiratory oxygenation of ribulose, bisphosphate and favors carboxylation. The C3 acid resulting from the decarboxylation is thought to be converted, first to triose phosphate and then to starch or sucrose, thus, regenerating the source of the original carbon acceptor., , Phosphorylation Regulates the Activity of PEP, Carboxylase in C4 and CAM Plants, The CAM mechanism that we have outlined in this discussion requires separation of the initial carboxylation from the, subsequent decarboxylation, to avoid a futile cycle. In addition to the spatial and temporal separation exhibited by C4, and CAM plants, respectively, a futile cycle is avoided by, the regulation of PEP carboxylase (Figure 8.13). In C4 plants, the carboxylase is “switched on,” or active, during the day, and in CAM plants during the night. In both C4 and CAM, plants, PEP carboxylase is inhibited by malate and activated, by glucose-6-phosphate (see Web Essay 8.1 for a detailed, discussion of the regulation of PEP carboxylase)., Phosphorylation of a single serine residue of the CAM, enzyme diminishes the malate inhibition and enhances the, action of glucose-6-phosphate so that the enzyme becomes, catalytically more active (Chollet et al. 1996; Vidal and, Chollet 1997) (see Figure 8.13). The phosphorylation is catalyzed by a PEP carboxylase-kinase. The synthesis of this, kinase is stimulated by the efflux of Ca2+ from the vacuole, to the cytosol and the resulting activation of a, Ca2+/calmodulin protein kinase (Giglioli-Guivarc’h et al., 1996; Coursol et al. 2000; Nimmo 2000; Bakrim et al. 2001)., , Some Plants Adjust Their Pattern of CO2 Uptake to, Environmental Conditions, Plants have many mechanisms that maximize water and, CO2 supply during development and reproduction. C3, plants regulate the stomatal aperture of their leaves during, , ADP, , ATP, Kinase, , OH, PEP carboxylase, Inactive day form, , Ser, , Inhibited, by malate, , O P, PEP carboxylase, Active night form, , Insensitive, to malate, , Phosphatase, , Pi, , Ser, , H2O, , FIGURE 8.13 Diurnal regulation of CAM phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase. Phosphorylation of the serine, residue (Ser-OP) yields a form of the enzyme which is, active during the night and relatively insensitive to malate., During the day, dephosphorylation of the serine (Ser-OH), gives a form of the enzyme which is inhibited by malate., , the day, and stomata close during the night. C4 and CAM, plants utilize PEP carboxylase to fix CO2, and they separate, that enzyme from rubisco either spatially (C4 plants) or, temporally (CAM plants)., Some CAM plants show longer-term regulation and are, able to adjust their pattern of CO2 uptake to environmental, conditions. Facultative CAM plants such as the ice plant, (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum) carry on C3 metabolism, under unstressed conditions, and they shift to CAM in, response to heat, water, or salt stress. This form of regulation, requires the expression of numerous CAM genes in response, to stress signals (Adams et al. 1998; Cushman 2001)., In aquatic environments, cyanobacteria and green algae, have abundant water but find low CO2 concentrations in, their surroundings and actively concentrate inorganic CO2, intracellularly. In diatoms, which abound in the phytoplankton, a CO2-concentrating mechanism operates simultaneously with a C4 pathway (Reinfelder et al. 2000)., Diatoms are a fine example of photosynthetic organisms, that have the capacity to use different CO2-concentrating, mechanisms in response to environmental fluctuations., , SYNTHESIS OF STARCH AND SUCROSE, In most species, sucrose is the principal form of carbohydrate, translocated throughout the plant by the phloem. Starch is an, insoluble stable carbohydrate reserve that is present in almost, all plants. Both starch and sucrose are synthesized from the, triose phosphate that is generated by the Calvin cycle (see, Table 8.1) (Beck and Ziegler 1989). The pathways for the synthesis of starch and sucrose are shown in Figure 8.14., , Starch Is Synthesized in the Chloroplast, Electron micrographs showing prominent starch deposits,, as well as enzyme localization studies, leave no doubt that, the chloroplast is the site of starch synthesis in leaves (Figure 8.15). Starch is synthesized from triose phosphate via, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (Table 8.5 and Figure 8.14). The, glucose-1-phosphate intermediate is converted to ADP-glucose via ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (Figure 8.14 and, Table 8.5, reaction 5) in a reaction that requires ATP and, generates pyrophosphate (PPi, or H2P2O72–)., As in many biosynthetic reactions, the pyrophosphate, is hydrolyzed via a specific inorganic pyrophosphatase to, two orthophosphate (Pi) molecules (Table 8.5, reaction 6),, thereby driving reaction 5 toward ADP-glucose synthesis., Finally, the glucose moiety of ADP-glucose is transferred, to the nonreducing end (carbon 4) of the terminal glucose, of a growing starch chain (Table 8.5, reaction 7), thus completing the reaction sequence., , Sucrose Is Synthesized in the Cytosol, The site of sucrose synthesis has been studied by cell fractionation, in which the organelles are isolated and separated from one another. Enzyme analyses have shown that, sucrose is synthesized in the cytosol from triose phosphates
Page 188 :
CHLOROPLAST, , Glucose-1phosphate, , ADP-glucose, Starch, synthase, (5-7), , PPi, , Starch, , ADP glucose, pyrophosphorylase, (5-5), , Phosphoglucomutase, (5-4), Glucose-6phosphate, , Hexose, phosphate, isomerase, (5-3), , ATP, Fructose-6-phosphate, Pi, , Pyrophosphatase, (5-6), , Fructose-1, 6biphosphatase, (5-2), , Calvin cycle, H2O, , Pi, , Triose phosphates, Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, Aldolase, (5-1), , CYTOSOL, , Pi translocator, (6-1), , Sucrose, Sucrose phosphate, phosphatase, (6-10), , Triose phosphates, Pi, , Aldolase, (6-3), , Pi, , Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, , Sucrose, phosphate, Sucrose phosphate, synthase, UDP-glucose, (6-9), , PPi, Fructose-6-phosphate, , UTP, UDP-glucose, pyrophosphorylase, (6-7), , Fructose-1, 6bisphosphatase, (6-4a), , Pi, , Pi, , Glucose-1phosphate, , Glucose-6phosphate, Phosphoglucomutase, (6-6), , Hexose phosphate, isomerase, (6-5), , FIGURE 8.14 The syntheses of starch and sucrose are competing processes that occur in the chloroplast and the cytosol,, respectively. When the cytosolic Pi concentration is high,, chloroplast triose phosphate is exported to the cytosol via the, , Pi in exchange for Pi, and sucrose is synthesized. When the, cytosolic Pi concentration is low, triose phosphate is retained, within the chloroplast, and starch is synthesized. The numbers facing the arrows are keyed to Tables 8.5 and 8.6., , by a pathway similar to that of starch—that is, by way of, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate and glucose-1-phosphate (Figure 8.14 and Table 8.6, reactions 2–6)., In sucrose synthesis, the glucose-1-phosphate is converted to UDP-glucose via a specific UDP-glucose, pyrophosphorylase (Table 8.6, reaction 7) that is analogous, to the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase of chloroplasts. At, this stage, two consecutive reactions complete the synthesis of sucrose (Huber and Huber 1996). First, sucrose-6phosphate synthase catalyzes the reaction of UDP-glucose, with fructose-6-phosphate to yield sucrose-6-phosphate, and UDP (Table 8.6, reaction 9). Second, the sucrose-6phosphate phosphatase (phosphohydrolase) cleaves the, phosphate from sucrose-6-phosphate, yielding sucrose, (Table 8.6, reaction 10). The latter reaction, which is essen-, , tially irreversible, pulls the former in the direction of, sucrose synthesis., As in starch synthesis, the pyrophosphate formed in the, reaction catalyzed by UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, (Table 8.6, reaction 7) is hydrolyzed, but not immediately, as in the chloroplasts. Because of the absence of an inorganic pyrophosphatase, the pyrophosphate can be used by, other enzymes, in transphosphorylation reactions. One, example is fructose-6-phosphate phosphotransferase, an, enzyme that catalyzes a reaction like the one catalyzed by, phosphofructokinase (Table 8.6, reaction 4a) except that, pyrophosphate replaces ATP as the phosphoryl donor., A comparison of the reactions in Tables 8.5 and 8.6 (as, illustrated in Figure 8.14) reveals that the conversion of, triose phosphates to glucose-1-phosphate in the pathways
Page 189 :
164, , Chapter 8, , Starch grain, Thylakoid, , The Syntheses of Sucrose and, Starch Are Competing, Reactions, , The relative concentrations of orthophosphate and triose phosphate are, major factors that control whether, photosynthetically fixed carbon is, partitioned as starch in the chloroplast or as sucrose in the cytosol., The two compartments communicate with one another via the phosphate/triose phosphate translocator,, also called the phosphate translocator (see Table 8.6, reaction 1), a strict, stoichiometric antiporter., The phosphate translocator catalyzes the movement of orthophosphate and triose phosphate in opposite directions between chloroplast, FIGURE 8.15 Electron micrograph of a bundle sheath cell from maize, showing the, and cytosol. A low concentration of, starch grains in the chloroplasts. (15,800×) (Photo by S. E. Frederick, courtesy of E., orthophosphate in the cytosol limits, H. Newcomb.), the export of triose phosphate from, the chloroplast through the transloleading to the synthesis of starch and sucrose have several, cator, thereby promoting the synthesis of starch. Consteps in common. However, these pathways utilize, versely, an abundance of orthophosphate in the cytosol, isozymes (different forms of enzymes catalyzing the same, inhibits starch synthesis within the chloroplast and proreaction) that are unique to the chloroplast or cytosol., motes the export of triose phosphate into the cytosol,, The isozymes show markedly different properties. For, where it is converted to sucrose., example, the chloroplastic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase is, Orthophosphate and triose phosphate control the activregulated by the thioredoxin system but not by fructoseity of several regulatory enzymes in the sucrose and starch, 2,6-bisphosphate and AMP. Conversely, the cytosolic form, biosynthetic pathways. The chloroplast enzyme ADP-gluof the enzyme is regulated by fructose-2,6-bisphosphate, cose pyrophosphorylase (see Table 8.5, reaction 5) is the key, (see the next section), is sensitive to AMP especially in the, enzyme that regulates the synthesis of starch from glucosepresence of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate, and is unaffected by, 1-phosphate. This enzyme is stimulated by 3-phosphothioredoxin., glycerate and inhibited by orthophosphate. A high conAside from the cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase,, centration ratio of 3-phosphoglycerate to orthophosphate, sucrose synthesis is regulated at the level of sucrose phosis typically found in illuminated chloroplasts that are, phate synthase, an allosteric enzyme that is activated by, actively synthesizing starch. Reciprocal conditions prevail, glucose-6-phosphate and inhibited by orthophosphate. The, in the dark., enzyme is inactivated in the dark by phosphorylation of, Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate is a key control molecule that, a specific serine residue via a protein kinase and activated, allows increased synthesis of sucrose in the light and, in the light by dephosphorylation via a protein phosdecreased synthesis in the dark. It is found in the cytosol in, phatase. Glucose-6-phosphate inhibits the kinase, and Pi, minute concentrations, and it exerts a regulatory effect on, inhibits the phosphatase., the cytosolic interconversion of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, The recent purification and cloning of sucrose-6-phosand fructose-6-phosphate (Huber 1986; Stitt 1990):, phate phosphatase from rice leaves (Lund et al. 2000) is, providing new information on the molecular and functional properties of this enzyme. These studies indicate that, –2O POCH, –2O POCH, 3, 2 O, 3, 2 O, OH, OPO32–, sucrose-6-phosphate synthase and sucrose-6-phosphatase, exist as a supramolecular complex showing an enzymatic, H HO, H HO, CH2OPO32–, CH2OH, H, H, activity that is higher than that of the isolated constituent, OH H, OH H, enzymes (Salerno et al. 1996). This noncovalent interaction, of the two enzymes involved in the last two steps of, Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate, Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, sucrose synthesis points to a novel regulatory feature of, (a regulatory metabolite), (an intermediary metabolite), carbohydrate metabolism in plants.
Page 190 :
Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions, , TABLE 8.5, Reactions of starch synthesis from triose phosphate in chloroplasts, 1. Fructose-1,6,bisphosphate aldolase, Dihydroxyacetone-3-phosphate + glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate→ fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, , C, , 2–O, , CH2OPO32–, , CH2OH, O, , C, , HO, , CH2OPO32–, , POH2C, , H, , H, , C, O, , O, , 3, , OH, , H HO, HO, , CH2OPO32–, , H, , H, , 2. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate + H2O → fructose-6-phosphate + Pi, 2–O, , POH2C, , O, , 3, , H HO, , H, , HO, , 2–O, , OH, , POH2C, , O, , 3, , CH2OPO32–, , H, , H, , OH, , H HO, HO, , CH2OH, , H, , 3. Hexose phosphate isomerase, Fructose-6-phosphate → glucose-6-phosphate, 2–O, , POH2C, , O, , 3, , H, , CH2OPO32–, , OH, , H HO, HO, , H, , CH2OH, , H, , HO, , O, H, OH H, H, , H, OH, , OH, , 4. Phosphoglucomutase, Glucose-6-phosphate → glucose-1-phosphate, CH2OPO32–, O, , H, HO, , CH2OH, H, , H, , H, OH H, , OH, , HO, , H, OPO32–, , H HO, , OH, , H, , O, H, OH H, , 5. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, Glucose-1-phosphate + ATP → ADP-glucose + PPi, CH2OH, , CH2OH, H, HO, , O, H, OH H, , H, , H, , OPO32–, , HO, , H HO, , O, OH H, , H, , O, , O, , P, , H HO, , O, O, , O–, , P, , O, , Adenosine, , O–, , 6. Pyrophosphatase, PPi + H2O → 2 Pi + 2H+, 7. Starch synthase, ADP-glucose + (1,4-α-D-glucosyl)n → ADP + (1,4-α-D-glucosyl)n+1, CH2OH, H, HO, , O, OH H, H HO, , CH2OH, H, O, , O, P, O–, , O, O, , P, O–, , O, , H, O, , Adenosine, , OH, , CH2OH, H, , H, OH H, H, , O, , OH, , Nonreducing end of a, starch chain with, n residues, , Note: Reaction 6 is irreversible and “pulls” the preceding reaction to the right., Pi and PPi stand for inorganic phosphate and pyrophosphate, respectively., , O, , H, O, , H, OH H, H, , OH, , CH2OH, H, , H, O, , O, H, OH H, H, , Elongated starch with, n + 1 residues, , OH, , O, , 165
Page 192 :
Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions, , 167, , TABLE 8.6 (continued), Reactions of sucrose synthesis from triose phosphate in the cytosol, 8. Pyrophosphatase, PPi +H2O → 2 Pi + 2 H+, 9. Sucrose phosphate synthase, UDP-glucose, +, CH2OH, O H, H, H, OH H, HO, H, , 2–O, , O, O, , P, O–, , OH, , →, , fructose-6-phosphate, PO, , 3, , CH2 O, , OH, , O, O, , P, , O, , Uridine, , H, , H HO, HO, , O–, , UDP + sucrose-6-phosphate, , H, , CH2OH, , HO, , H, , H, 2–O, , 10. Sucrose phosphate phosphatase, Sucrose-6-phosphate + H2O → sucrose + Pi, CH2OH, O H, H, H, OH H, HO, H, 2–O, , PO, , 3, , OH, , CH2 O, H, , H HO, HO, , H, , CH2OH, , HOH2C, H, , O, , O, , O, , H HO, HO, , CH2OH, , H, , O, , H HO, HO, , CH2, , OH, , OH, , H, O, , PO, , 3, , H, , CH2OH, O H, H, H, OH H, HO, , CH2OH, O H, H, OH H, , CH2OH, , H, , Note: Reaction 1 takes place on the chloroplast inner envelope membrane. Reactions 2 through 10 take place in the cytosol. Reaction 8 is irreversible and “pulls” the preceding reaction to the right., Pi and PPi stand for inorganic phosphate and pyrophosphate, respectively ., , Increased cytosolic fructose-2,6-bisphosphate is associated, with decreased rates of sucrose synthesis because fructose2,6-bisphosphate is a powerful inhibitor of cytosolic fructose1,6-bisphosphatase (see Table 8.6, reaction 4a) and an activator of the pyrophosphate-dependent (PPi-linked) phosphofructokinase (reaction 4b). But what, in turn, controls the, cytosolic concentration of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate?, Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate is synthesized from fructose6-phosphate by a special fructose-6-phosphate 2-kinase, (not to be confused with the fructose-6-phosphate 1-kinase, of glycolysis) and is degraded specifically by fructose-2,6bisphosphatase (not to be confused with fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase of the Calvin cycle). Recent evidence suggests, that, as in animal cells, both plant activities reside on a single polypeptide chain., The kinase and phosphatase activities are controlled by, orthophosphate and triose phosphate. Orthophosphate, stimulates fructose-6-phosphate 2-kinase and inhibits fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase; triose phosphate inhibits the 2kinase (Figure 8.16). Consequently, a low cytosolic ratio of, triose phosphate to orthophosphate promotes the formation of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate, which in turn inhibits, , the hydrolysis of cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphate and, slows the rate of sucrose synthesis. A high cytosolic ratio, of triose phosphate to orthophosphate has the opposite, effect., Light regulates the concentration of these activators and, inhibitors through the reactions associated with photosynthesis and thereby controls the concentration of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate in the cytosol. The glycolytic, enzyme phosphofructokinase also functions in the conversion of fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, but in plants it is not appreciably affected by fructose-2,6-bisphosphate., The activity of phosphofructokinase in plants appears, to be regulated by the relative concentrations of ATP, ADP,, and AMP. The remarkable plasticity of plants was once, again illustrated by recent gene deletion experiments with, transformed tobacco plants. This experiment shows that, the transformed plants can grow without a functional, pyrophosphate-dependent fructose-6-phosphate kinase, enzyme. In this case the conversion of fructose-6-phosphate, to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate is apparently catalyzed exclusively by phosphofructokinase (Paul et al. 1995).
Page 193 :
168, , Chapter 8, , (A), , (B), Activated by:, ATP, , Glycolysis, , Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, Activates, , Pi, PP-Fructose6-phosphate, kinase, , Fructose-1,6bisphosphatase, Pi, , PP, , Inhibits, , ADP, , Inhibited by:, , Fructose-6phosphate 2kinase, , Fructose-2, 6bisphosphate, , Orthophosphate (Pi), Fructose-6-phosphate, , Dihydroxyacetone, phosphate, 3-phosphoglycerate, , Fructose-6phosphate, Inhibited by:, , Fructose-2,6bisphosphatase, , Orthophosphate (Pi), Fructose-6-phosphate, , Fructose-6-phosphate, Pi, Sucrose synthesis, , FIGURE 8.16 Regulation of the cytosolic interconversion of fructose-6-phosphate and, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. (A) The key metabolites in the allocation between glycolysis, and sucrose synthesis. The regulatory metabolite fructose 2,6-bisphosphate regulates, the interconversion by inhibiting the phosphatase and activating the kinase, as shown., (B) The synthesis of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate itself is under strict regulation by the, activators and inhibitors shown in the figure., , SUMMARY, The reduction of CO2 to carbohydrate via the carbon-linked, reactions of photosynthesis is coupled to the consumption of, NADPH and ATP synthesized by the light reactions of thylakoid membranes. Photosynthetic eukaryotes reduce CO2, via the Calvin cycle that takes place in the stroma, or soluble, phase, of chloroplasts. Here, CO2 and water are combined, with ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate to form two molecules of 3phosphoglycerate, which are reduced and converted to carbohydrate. The continued operation of the cycle is ensured, by the regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate. The Calvin, cycle consumes two molecules of NADPH and three molecules of ATP for every CO2 fixed and, provided these substrates, has a thermodynamic efficiency close to 90%., Several light-dependent systems act jointly to regulate, the Calvin cycle: changes in ions (Mg2+ and H+), effector, metabolites (enzyme substrates), and protein-mediated systems (rubisco activase, ferredoxin–thioredoxin system)., The ferredoxin–thioredoxin control system plays a versatile role by linking light to the regulation of other chloroplast processes, such as carbohydrate breakdown, photophosphorylation, fatty acid biosynthesis, and mRNA, translation. Control of these reactions by light separates, opposing biosynthetic from degradative processes and, thereby minimizes the waste of resources that would occur, if the processes operated concurrently., Rubisco, the enzyme that catalyzes the carboxylation of, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, also acts as an oxygenase. In, both cases the enzyme must be carbamylated to be fully, , active. The carboxylation and oxygenation reactions take, place at the active site of rubisco. When reacting with oxygen, rubisco produces 2-phosphoglycolate and 3-phosphoglycerate from ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate rather than, two 3-phosphoglycerates as with CO2, thereby decreasing, the efficiency of photosynthesis., The C2 oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle rescues, the carbon lost as 2-phosphoglycolate by rubisco oxygenase activity. The dissipative effects of photorespiration are, avoided in some plants by mechanisms that concentrate, CO2 at the carboxylation sites in the chloroplast. These, mechanisms include a C4 photosynthetic carbon cycle,, CAM metabolism, and “CO2 pumps” of algae and, cyanobacteria., The carbohydrates synthesized by the Calvin cycle are, converted into storage forms of energy and carbon: sucrose, and starch. Sucrose, the transportable form of carbon and, energy in most plants, is synthesized in the cytosol, and its, synthesis is regulated by phosphorylation of sucrose phosphate synthase. Starch is synthesized in the chloroplast., The balance between the biosynthetic pathways for sucrose, and starch is determined by the relative concentrations of, metabolite effectors (orthophosphate, fructose-6-phosphate,, 3-phosphoglycerate, and dihydroxyacetone phosphate)., These metabolite effectors function in the cytosol by way, of the enzymes synthesizing and degrading fructose-2,6-bisphosphate, the regulatory metabolite that plays a primary, role in controlling the partitioning of photosynthetically, fixed carbon between sucrose and starch. Two of these effectors, 3-phosphoglycerate and orthophosphate, also act on
Page 194 :
Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions, starch synthesis in the chloroplast by allosterically regulating the activity of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. In this, way the synthesis of starch from triose phosphates during, the day can be separated from its breakdown, which is, required to provide energy to the plant at night., , Web Material, Web Topics, 8.1 How the Calvin Cycle Was Elucidated, Experiments carried out in the 1950s led to the, discovery of the path of CO2 fixation., , 8.2 Rubisco: A Model Enzyme for Studying Structure and Function, As the most abundant enzyme on Earth, rubisco, was obtained in quantities sufficient for elucidating its structure and catalytic properties., , 8.3 Carbon Dioxide: Some Important Physicochemical Properties, Plants have adapted to the properties of CO2 by, altering the reactions catalyzing its fixation., , 8.4 Thioredoxins, First found to regulate chloroplast enzymes,, thioredoxins are now known to play a regulatory, role in all types of cells., , 8.5 Rubisco Activase, Rubisco is unique among Calvin cycle enzymes, in its regulation by a specific protein, rubisco, activase., , 8.6 Operation of the C2 Oxidative Photosynthetic, , Carbon Cycle, The enzymes of the C2 oxidative photosynthetic, carbon cycle are localized in three different, organelles., , 8.7 Three Variations of C4 Metabolism, Certain reactions of the C4 photosynthetic pathway differ among plant species., , Web Essay, 8.1 Modulation of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase in C4 and CAM Plants, The CO2-fixing enzyme, phosphoenolpyruvate, carboxylase is regulated differently in C4 and, CAM species., , Chapter References, Adams, P., Nelson, D. E., Yamada, S., Chmara, W., Jensen, R. G.,, Bohnert, H. J., and Griffiths, H. (1998) Tansley Review No. 97;, Growth and development of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum., New Phytol. 138:171–190., , 169, , Bakrim, N., Brulfert, J., Vidal, J., and Chollet, R. (2001) Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase is controlled by a similar signaling cascade in CAM and C4 plants. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 286: 1158–1162., Beck, E., and Ziegler, P. (1989) Biosynthesis and degradation of starch, in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40:, 95–118., Besse, I., and Buchanan, B. B. (1997) Thioredoxin-linked plant and animal processes: The new generation. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica 38: 1–11., Bonner, W., and Bonner, J. (1948) The role of carbon dioxide in acid, formation by succulent plants. Am. J. Bot. 35: 113–117., Buchanan, B. B. (1980) Role of light in the regulation of chloroplast, enzymes. Annu. Rev. Plant Phsyiol. 31: 341–394., Burnell, J. N., and Hatch, M. D. (1985) Light–dark modulation of leaf, pyruvate, Pi dikinase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 10: 288–291., Chollet, R., Vidal, J., and O’Leary, M. H. (1996) Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase: A ubiquitous, highly regulated enzyme in, plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 273–298., Coursol, S., Giglioli-Guivarc’h, N., Vidal, J., and Pierre J.-N. (2000), An increase in the phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C, activity precedes induction of C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase phosphorylation in illuminated and NH4Cl-treated protoplasts from Digitaria sanguinalis. Plant J. 23: 497–506., Craig, S., and Goodchild, D. J. (1977) Leaf ultrastructure of Triodia, irritans: A C4 grass possessing an unusual arrangement of photosynthetic tissues. Aust. J. Bot. 25: 277–290., Cushman, J. C. (2001) Crassulacean acid metabolism: A plastic, photosynthetic adaptation to arid environments. Plant Physiol., 127: 1439–1448., Dai, S., Schwendtmayer, C., Schürmann, P., Ramaswamy, S., and, Eklund, H. (2000) Redox signaling in chloroplasts: Cleavage of, disulfides by an iron-sulfur cluster. Science 287: 655–658., Dever, L. V., Bailey, K. J., Lacuesta, M., Leegood, R. C., and Lea P. J., (1996) The isolation and characterization of mutants of the C4, plant Amaranthus edulis. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci., III. 919–959., Drincovich, M. F., Casati, P., and Andreo, C. S. (2001) NADP-malic, enzyme from plants: A ubiquitous enzyme involved in different, metabolic pathways. FEBS Lett. 490: 1–6., Edwards, G. E., and Walker, D. (1983) C3, C4: Mechanisms and Cellular and Environmental Regulation of Photosynthesis. University of, California Press, Berkeley., Flügge, U. I., and Heldt,. H. W. (1991) Metabolite translocators of the, chloroplast envelope. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:, 129–144., Frederick, S. E., and Newcomb, E. H. (1969) Cytochemical localization of catalase in leaf microbodies (peroxisomes). J. Cell Biol. 43:, 343–353., Giglioli-Guivarc’h, N., Pierre, J.-N., Brown, S., Chollet, R., Vidal, J.,, and Gadal, P. (1996) The light-dependent transduction pathway, controlling the regulatory phosphorylation of C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in protoplasts from Digitaria sanguinalis. Plant Cell 8: 573–586., Hatch, M. D., and Slack, C. R. (1966) Photosynthesis by sugarcane, leaves. A new carboxylation reaction and the pathway of sugar, formation. Biochem. J. 101: 103–111., Heldt, H. W. (1979) Light-dependent changes of stromal H+ and, Mg2+ concentrations controlling CO2 fixation. In Photosynthesis II, (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, vol. 6) M. Gibbs and, E. Latzko, eds. Springer, Berlin, pp. 202–207., Huber, S. C. (1986) Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate as a regulatory, metabolite in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37: 233–246., Huber, S. C., and Huber, J. L. (1996) Role and regulation of sucrosephosphate synthase in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 431–444., Kozaki, A., and Takeba, G. (1996) Photorespiration protects C3 plants, from photooxidation. Nature 384: 557–560.
Page 196 :
Chapter, , 9, , Photosynthesis:, Physiological and, Ecological Considerations, , THE CONVERSION OF SOLAR ENERGY to the chemical energy of, organic compounds is a complex process that includes electron transport and photosynthetic carbon metabolism (see Chapters 7 and 8). Earlier discussions of the photochemical and biochemical reactions of photosynthesis should not overshadow the fact that, under natural, conditions, the photosynthetic process takes place in intact organisms, that are continuously responding to internal and external changes. This, chapter addresses some of the photosynthetic responses of the intact leaf, to its environment. Additional photosynthetic responses to different, types of stress are covered in Chapter 25., The impact of the environment on photosynthesis is of interest to, both plant physiologists and agronomists. From a physiological standpoint, we wish to understand how photosynthesis responds to environmental factors such as light, ambient CO2 concentrations, and temperature. The dependence of photosynthetic processes on environment, is also important to agronomists because plant productivity, and hence, crop yield, depends strongly on prevailing photosynthetic rates in a, dynamic environment., In studying the environmental dependence of photosynthesis, a central question arises: How many environmental factors can limit photosynthesis at one time? The British plant physiologist F. F. Blackman, hypothesized in 1905 that, under any particular conditions, the rate of, photosynthesis is limited by the slowest step, the so-called limiting factor., The implication of this hypothesis is that at any given time, photosynthesis can be limited either by light or by CO2 concentration, but not, by both factors. This hypothesis has had a marked influence on the, approach used by plant physiologists to study photosynthesis—that is,, varying one factor and keeping all other environmental conditions constant.
Page 197 :
172, , Chapter 9, , TABLE 9.1, Some characteristics of limitations to the rate of photosynthesis, Conditions that, lead to this limitation, , Response of photosynthesis, under this limitation to, , Limiting factor, , CO2, , Light, , CO2, , O2, , Light, , Rubisco activity, RuBP regeneration, , Low, High, , High, Low, , Strong, Moderate, , Strong, Moderate, , Absent, Strong, , In the intact leaf, three major metabolic steps have been, identified as important for optimal photosynthetic performance:, 1. Rubisco activity, 2. Regeneration of ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP), 3. Metabolism of the triose phosphates, The first two steps are the most prevalent under natural, conditions. Table 9.1 provides some examples of how light, and CO2 can affect these key metabolic steps. In the following sections, biophysical, biochemical, and environmental aspects of photosynthesis in leaves are discussed, in detail., , Both the amount of light and the amount of CO2 determine the photosynthetic response of leaves. In some situations, photosynthesis is limited by an inadequate supply of, light or CO2. In other situations, absorption of too much, light can cause severe problems, and special mechanisms, protect the photosynthetic system from excessive light., Multiple levels of control over photosynthesis allow plants, to grow successfully in a constantly changing environment, and different habitats., , CONCEPTS AND UNITS IN THE, MEASUREMENT OF LIGHT, , Three light parameters are especially important in the measurement of light: (1) spectral quality, (2) amount, and (3), direction. Spectral quality was discussed in Chapter 7 (see, LIGHT, LEAVES, AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS, Figures 7.2 and 7.3, and Web Topic 7.1). A discussion of the, Scaling up from the chloroplast (the focus of Chapters 7 and, amount and direction of light reaching the plant requires, 8) to the leaf adds new levels of complexity to photosynconsideration of the geometry of the part of the plant that, thesis. At the same time, the structural and functional propreceives the light: Is the plant organ flat or cylindrical?, erties of the leaf make possible other levels of regulation., Flat, or planar, light sensors are best suited for flat, We will start by examining how leaf anatomy, and, leaves. The light reaching the plant can be measured as, movements by chloroplasts and leaves, control the absorpenergy, and the amount of energy that falls on a flat sensor, tion of light for photosynthesis. Then we will describe how, of known area per unit time is quantified as irradiance (see, chloroplasts and leaves adapt to their light environment, Table 9.2). Units can be expressed in terms of energy, such, and how the photosynthetic response of leaves grown, as watts per square meter (W m–2). Time (seconds) is contained within the term watt: 1 W = 1 joule (J) s–1., under low light reflects their adaptation to a low-light enviLight can also be measured as the number of incident, ronment. Leaves also adapt to high light conditions, illusquanta (singular quantum). In this case, units can be, trating that plants are physiologically flexible and that they, expressed in moles per square meter per second (mol m–2, adapt to their immediate environment., s–1), where moles refers to the number of photons (1 mol of light = 6.02, × 1023 photons, Avogadro’s number)., TABLE 9.2, This measure is called photon irraConcepts and units for the quantification of light, diance. Quanta and energy units can, Energy measurements, Photon measurements, be interconverted relatively easily,, –2, –2, –1, (W m ), (mol m s ), provided that the wavelength of the, Irradiance, Photon irradiance, Flat light sensor, light, l, is known. The energy of a, Photosynthetically, PAR (quantum units), photon is related to its wavelength, active radiation, as follows:, (PAR, 400-700 nm,, energy units), —, Spherical light sensor, , Fluence rate (energy units), Scalar irradiance, , Photosynthetic photon, flux density (PPFD), Fluence rate (quantum units), Quantum scalar irradiance, , E = hc, l, , where c is the speed of light (3 ×, 108 m s–1), h is Planck’s constant (6.63, × 10–34 J s), and l is the wavelength
Page 198 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, (A), , (B), Light, , Equal irradiance, values, , Light, , Sensor, Sensor, , (C), , (D), a, , Sensor, Irradiance = (A) × cosine a, , Sensor, , FIGURE 9.1 Flat and spherical light sensors. Equivalent, , amounts of collimated light strike a flat irradiance-type sensor (A) and a spherical sensor (B) that measure fluence rate., With collimated light, A and B will give the same light readings. When the light direction is changed 45°, the spherical, sensor (D) will measure the same quantity as in B. In contrast, the flat irradiance sensor (C) will measure an amount, equivalent to the irradiance in A multiplied by the cosine of, the angle α in C. (After Björn and Vogelmann 1994.), , of light, usually expressed in nm (1 nm = 10–9 m). From this, equation it can be shown that a photon at 400 nm has twice, the energy of a photon at 800 nm (see Web Topic 9.1)., Now let’s turn our attention to the direction of light., Light can strike a flat surface directly from above or, obliquely. When light deviates from perpendicular, irradiance is proportional to the cosine of the angle at which the, light rays hit the sensor (Figure 9.1)., There are many examples in nature in which the lightintercepting object is not flat (e.g., complex shoots, whole, plants, chloroplasts). In addition, in some situations light, can come from many directions simultaneously (e.g., direct, light from the sun plus the light that is reflected upward, from sand, soil, or snow). In these situations it makes more, sense to measure light with a spherical sensor that takes, measurements omnidirectionally (from all directions)., The term for this omnidirectional measurement is fluence rate (see Table 9.2) (Rupert and Letarjet 1978), and this, quantity can be expressed in watts per square meter (W, m–2) or moles per square meter per second (mol m–2 s–1)., The units clearly indicate whether light is being measured, as energy (W) or as photons (mol)., In contrast to a flat sensor’s sensitivity, the sensitivity to, light of a spherical sensor is independent of direction (see, Figure 9.1). Depending on whether the light is collimated, , 173, , (rays are parallel) or diffuse (rays travel in random directions), values for fluence rate versus irradiance measured, with a flat or a spherical sensor can provide different values (see Figure 9.1) (for a detailed discussion, see Björn and, Vogelmann 1994)., Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 400–700 nm), may also be expressed in terms of energy (W m–2) or, quanta (mol m–2 s–1) (McCree 1981). Note that PAR is an, irradiance-type measurement. In research on photosynthesis, when PAR is expressed on a quantum basis, it is, given the special term photosynthetic photon flux density, (PPFD). However, it has been suggested that the term density be discontinued because within the International System of Units (SI units, where SI stands for Système International), density can mean area or volume., In summary, when choosing how to quantify light, it is, important to match sensor geometry and spectral response, with that of the plant. Flat, cosine-corrected sensors are ideally suited to measure the amount of light that strikes the, surface of a leaf; spherical sensors are more appropriate in, other situations, such as in studies of a chloroplast suspension or a branch from a tree (see Table 9.2)., How much light is there on a sunny day, and what is the, relationship between PAR irradiance and PAR fluence rate?, Under direct sunlight, PAR irradiance and fluence rate are, both about 2000 µmol m–2 s–1, though higher values can be, measured at high altitudes. The corresponding value in, energy units is about 400 W m–2., , Leaf Anatomy Maximizes Light Absorption, Roughly 1.3 kW m–2 of radiant energy from the sun reaches, Earth, but only about 5% of this energy can be converted, into carbohydrates by a photosynthesizing leaf (Figure 9.2)., The reason this percentage is so low is that a major fraction, of the incident light is of a wavelength either too short or, too long to be absorbed by the photosynthetic pigments, (see Figure 7.3). Of the absorbed light energy, a significant, fraction is lost as heat, and a smaller amount is lost as fluorescence (see Chapter 7)., Recall from Chapter 7 that radiant energy from the sun, consists of many different wavelengths of light. Only photons of wavelengths from 400 to 700 nm are utilized in photosynthesis, and about 85 to 90% of this PAR is absorbed by, the leaf; the remainder is either reflected at the leaf surface, or transmitted through the leaf (Figure 9.3). Because chlorophyll absorbs very strongly in the blue and the red regions, of the spectrum (see Figure 7.3), the transmitted and, reflected light are vastly enriched in green—hence the, green color of vegetation., The anatomy of the leaf is highly specialized for light, absorption (Terashima and Hikosaka 1995). The outermost, cell layer, the epidermis, is typically transparent to visible, light, and the individual cells are often convex. Convex, epidermal cells can act as lenses and can focus light so that, the amount reaching some of the chloroplasts can be many, times greater than the amount of ambient light (Vogel-
Page 199 :
174, , Chapter 9, , Total solar energy, (100%), , Nonabsorbed wavelengths, (60% loss), , 40%, Reflection and transmission (8% loss), 32%, Heat dissipation (8% loss), 24%, , Metabolism (19% loss), 5%, Carbohydrate, , FIGURE 9.2 Conversion of solar energy into carbohydrates, , by a leaf. Of the total incident energy, only 5% is converted, into carbohydrates., , Photosynthetically, active radiation, 0, , 80, Reflected light, 60, , 20, 40, , Absorbed light, 40, , 60, Transmitted light, , 20, 0, 400, , 80, , 500, , 600, Wavelength (nm), , Visible spectrum, , 700, , 100, 800, , Percentage of reflected light, , Percentage of transmitted light, , 100, , mann et al. 1996). Epidermal focusing is common among, herbaceous plants and is especially prominent among, tropical plants that grow in the forest understory, where, light levels are very low., Below the epidermis, the top layers of photosynthetic, cells are called palisade cells; they are shaped like pillars, that stand in parallel columns one to three layers deep (Figure 9.4). Some leaves have several layers of columnar palisade cells, and we may wonder how efficient it is for a, plant to invest energy in the development of multiple cell, layers when the high chlorophyll content of the first layer, would appear to allow little transmission of the incident, light to the leaf interior. In fact, more light than might be, expected penetrates the first layer of palisade cells because, of the sieve effect and light channeling., The sieve effect is due to the fact that chlorophyll is not, uniformly distributed throughout cells but instead is confined to the chloroplasts. This packaging of chlorophyll, results in shading between the chlorophyll molecules and, creates gaps between the chloroplasts, where light is not, absorbed—hence the reference to a sieve. Because of the, sieve effect, the total absorption of light by a given amount, of chlorophyll in a palisade cell is less than the light, absorbed by the same amount of chlorophyll in a solution., Light channeling occurs when some of the incident, light is propagated through the central vacuole of the palisade cells and through the air spaces between the cells, an, arrangement that facilitates the transmission of light into, the leaf interior (Vogelmann 1993)., Below the palisade layers is the spongy mesophyll,, where the cells are very irregular in shape and are surrounded by large air spaces (see Figure 9.4). The large air, spaces generate many interfaces between air and water that, reflect and refract the light, thereby randomizing its direction of travel. This phenomenon is called light scattering., Light scattering is especially important in leaves because, the multiple reflections between cell–air interfaces greatly, increase the length of the path over which photons travel,, thereby increasing the probability for absorption. In fact,, photon path lengths within leaves are commonly four, times or more longer than the thickness of the leaf (Richter, and Fukshansky 1996). Thus the palisade cell properties, that allow light to pass through, and the spongy mesophyll, cell properties that are conducive to light scattering, result, in more uniform light absorption throughout the leaf., Some environments, such as deserts, have so much light, that it is potentially harmful to leaves. In these environments leaves often have special anatomic features, such as, , FIGURE 9.3 Optical properties of a bean leaf. Shown here are, , the percentages of light absorbed, reflected, and transmitted,, as a function of wavelength. The transmitted and reflected, green light in the wave band at 500 to 600 nm gives leaves, their green color. Note that most of the light above 700 nm is, not absorbed by the leaf. (From Smith 1986.)
Page 200 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, (A), , Epidermis, , Palisade cells, , 175, , (B), , Guard cells, 100 mm, Leaf grown in shade, Spongy, mesophyll, Epidermis, Leaf grown in sun, , FIGURE 9.4 Scanning electron micrographs of the leaf anatomy, , from a legume (Thermopsis montana) grown in different light, environments. Note that the sun leaf (A) is much thicker than, the shade leaf (B) and that the palisade (columnlike) cells are, much longer in the leaves grown in sunlight. Layers of spongy, mesophyll cells can be seen below the palisade cells., (Micrographs courtesy of T. Vogelmann.), , hairs, salt glands, and epicuticular wax that increase the, reflection of light from the leaf surface, thereby reducing, light absorption (Ehleringer et al. 1976). Such adaptations, can decrease light absorption by as much as 40%, minimizing heating and other problems associated with the, absorption of too much light., , Chloroplast Movement and Leaf Movement, Can Control Light Absorption, Chloroplast movement is widespread among algae,, mosses, and leaves of higher plants (Haupt and Scheuerlein 1990). If chloroplast orientation and location are con-, , (A) Darkness, , (B) Weak blue light, , FIGURE 9.5 Chloroplast distribution in photosynthesizing, , cells of the duckweed Lemna. These surface views show the, same cells under three conditions: (A) darkness, (B) weak, blue light, and (C) strong blue light. In A and B, chloroplasts are positioned near the upper surface of the cells,, , trolled, leaves can regulate how much of the incident light, is absorbed. Under low light (Figure 9.5B), chloroplasts, gather at the cell surfaces parallel to the plane of the leaf so, that they are aligned perpendicularly to the incident light—, a position that maximizes absorption of light., Under high light (Figure 9.5C), the chloroplasts move to, the cell surfaces that are parallel to the incident light, thus, avoiding excess absorption of light. Such chloroplast, rearrangement can decrease the amount of light absorbed, by the leaf by about 15% (Gorton et al. 1999). Chloroplast, movement in leaves is a typical blue-light response (see, Chapter 18). Blue light also controls chloroplast orientation, , (C) Strong blue light, , where they can absorb maximum amounts of light. When, the cells were irradiated with strong blue light (C), the, chloroplasts move to the side walls, where they shade each, other, thus minimizing the absorption of excess light., (Micrographs courtesy of M. Tlalka and M. D. Fricker.)
Page 201 :
176, , Chapter 9, , in many of the lower plants, but in some algae, chloroplast, movement is controlled by phytochrome (Haupt and, Scheuerlein 1990). In leaves, chloroplasts move along actin, microfilaments in the cytoplasm, and calcium regulates, their movement (Tlalka and Fricker 1999)., Leaves have the highest light absorption when the leaf, blade, or lamina, is perpendicular to the incident light., Some plants control light absorption by solar tracking, (Koller 2000); that is, their leaves continuously adjust the, orientation of their laminae such that they remain perpendicular to the sun’s rays (Figure 9.6). Alfalfa, cotton, soybean, bean, lupine, and some wild species of the mallow, family (Malvaceae) are examples of the numerous plant, species that are capable of solar tracking., Solar-tracking leaves keep a nearly vertical position at, sunrise, facing the eastern horizon, where the sun will rise., The leaf blades then lock on to the rising sun and follow its, movement across the sky with an accuracy of ±15° until, sunset, when the laminae are nearly vertical, facing the, west, where the sun will set. During the night the leaf takes, a horizontal position and reorients just before dawn so that, it faces the eastern horizon in anticipation of another sunrise. Leaves track the sun only on clear days, and they stop, when a cloud obscures the sun. In the case of intermittent, cloud cover, some leaves can reorient as rapidly as 90° per, hour and thus can catch up to the new solar position when, the sun emerges from behind a cloud (Koller 1990)., Solar tracking is another blue-light response, and the, sensing of blue light in solar-tracking leaves occurs in specialized regions. In species of Lavatera (Malvaceae), the photosensitive region is located in or near the major leaf veins, (Koller 1990). In lupines, (Lupinus, Fabaceae), leaves consist of five or more leaflets, and the photosensitive region, is located in the basal part of each leaflet lamina., , (A), , In many cases, leaf orientation is controlled by a specialized organ called the pulvinus (plural pulvini), found, at the junction between the blade and petiole. The pulvinus, contains motor cells that change their osmotic potential and, generate mechanical forces that determine laminar orientation. In other plants, leaf orientation is controlled by, small mechanical changes along the length of the petiole, and by movements of the younger parts of the stem., Some solar-tracking plants can also move their leaves, such that they avoid full exposure to sunlight, thus minimizing heating and water loss. Building on the term, heliotropism (bending toward the sun), which is often, used to describe sun-induced leaf movements, these sunavoiding leaves are called paraheliotropic, and leaves that, maximize light interception by solar tracking are called diaheliotropic. Some plant species can display diaheliotropic, movements when they are well watered and paraheliotropic movements when they experience water stress., Since full sunlight usually exceeds the amount of light, that can be utilized for photosynthesis, what advantage is, gained by solar tracking? By keeping leaves perpendicular, to the sun, solar-tracking plants maintain maximum photosynthetic rates throughout the day, including early morning and late afternoon. Moreover, air temperature is lower, during the early morning and late afternoon, so water, stress is lower. Solar tracking therefore gives an advantage, to plants that grow in arid regions., , Plants Adapt to Sun and Shade, Some plants have enough developmental plasticity to, adapt to a range of light regimes, growing as sun plants in, sunny areas and as shade plants in shady habitats. Some, shady habitats receive less than 1% of the PAR available in, an exposed habitat. Leaves that are adapted to very sunny, , (B), , FIGURE 9.6 Leaf movement in sun-tracking plants. (A) Initial leaf orientation in the, , lupine Lupinus succulentus. (B) Leaf orientation 4 hours after exposure to oblique, light. The direction of the light beam is indicated by the arrows. Movement is generated by asymmetric swelling of a pulvinus, found at the junction between the, lamina and the petiole. In natural conditions, the leaves track the sun’s trajectory in, the sky. (From Vogelmann and Björn 1983, courtesy of T. Vogelmann.)
Page 202 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, , • Sun leaves have more rubisco, and a larger pool of, xanthophyll cycle components than shade leaves (see, Chapter 7)., Contrasting anatomic characteristics can also be found, in leaves of the same plant that are exposed to different, light regimes. Figure 9.4 shows some anatomic differences, between a leaf grown in the sun and a leaf grown in the, shade. Sun-grown leaves are thicker and have longer palisade cells than leaves growing in the shade. Even different, parts of a single leaf show adaptations to their light, microenvironment. Cells in the upper surface of the leaf,, which are exposed to the highest prevailing photon flux,, have characteristics of cells from leaves grown in full sunlight; cells in the lower surface of the leaf have characteristics of cells found in shade-grown leaves (Terashima 1992)., These morphological and biochemical modifications are, associated with specific functions. Far-red light is absorbed, primarily by PSI, and altering the ratio of PSI to PSII or, changing the light-harvesting antennae associated with the, photosystems makes it possible to maintain a better balance of energy flow through the two photosystems (Melis, 1996). These adaptations are found in nature; some shade, plants show a 3:1 ratio of photosystem II to photosystem, I reaction centers, compared with the 2:1 ratio found in sun, plants (Anderson 1986). Other shade plants, rather than, altering the ratio of PSI to PSII, add more antennae chlorophyll to PSII. These adaptations appear to enhance light, absorption and energy transfer in shady environments,, where far-red light is more abundant., Sun and shade plants also differ in their respiration, rates, and these differences alter the relationship between, respiration and photosynthesis, as we’ll see a little later in, this chapter., , Plants Compete for Sunlight, Plants normally compete for sunlight. Held upright by stems, and trunks, leaves configure a canopy that absorbs light and, influences photosynthetic rates and growth beneath them., Leaves that are shaded by other leaves have much lower, photosynthetic rates. Some plants have very thick leaves, that transmit little, if any, light. Other plants, such as those, of the dandelion (Taraxacum sp.), have a rosette growth, habit, in which leaves grow radially very close to each, other and to the stem, thus preventing the growth of any, leaves below them., Trees represent an outstanding adaptation for light interception. The elaborate branching structure of trees vastly, increases the interception of sunlight. Very little PAR pen-, , 6, Spectral irradiance, sun (µmol m–2 s–1 nm–1), , • Shade leaves have more total chlorophyll per reaction, center, have a higher ratio of chlorophyll b to chlorophyll a, and are usually thinner than sun leaves., , Far red, and, infrared, , 5, , 0.25, , 0.20, , 4, 0.15, , In sun at, top of canopy, 3, , 0.10, 2, In shade, beneath canopy, , 0.05, , 1, , 0, 400, , 500, , 600, , 700, , 0.00, 800, , Spectral irradiance, shade (µmol m–2 s–1 nm–1), , or very shady environments are often unable to survive in, the other type of habitat (see Figure 9.10). Sun and shade, leaves have some contrasting characteristics:, , 177, , Wavelength (nm), , Visible spectrum, , FIGURE 9.7 The spectral distribution of sunlight at the top of, a canopy and under the canopy. For unfiltered sunlight, the, total irradiance was 1900 µmol m–2 s–1; for shade, 17.7 µmol, m–2 s–1. Most of the photosynthetically active radiation was, absorbed by leaves in the canopy. (From Smith 1994.), , etrates the canopy of many forests; almost all of it is, absorbed by leaves (Figure 9.7)., Another feature of the shady habitat is sunflecks,, patches of sunlight that pass through small gaps in the leaf, canopy and move across shaded leaves as the sun moves., In a dense forest, sunflecks can change the photon flux, impinging on a leaf in the forest floor more than tenfold, within seconds. For some of these leaves, a sunfleck contains nearly 50% of the total light energy available during, the day, but this critical energy is available for only a few, minutes in a very high dose., Sunflecks also play a role in the carbon metabolism of, lower leaves in dense crops that are shaded by the upper, leaves of the plant. Rapid responses of both the photosynthetic apparatus and the stomata to sunflecks have been of, substantial interest to plant physiologists and ecologists, (Pearcy et al. 1997) because they represent unique physiological responses specialized for capturing a short burst of, sunlight., , PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSES TO LIGHT, BY THE INTACT LEAF, Light is a critical resource for plants that can often limit, growth and reproduction. The photosynthetic properties
Page 203 :
178, , Chapter 9, , of the leaf provide valuable information about plant adaptations to their light environment., In this section we describe typical photosynthetic, responses to light as measured in light-response curves. We, also consider how an important feature of light-response, curves, the light compensation point, explains contrasting, physiological properties of sun and shade plants. We then, describe quantum yields of photosynthesis in the intact, leaf, and the differences in quantum yields between C3 and, C4 plants. The section closes with descriptions of leaf adaptations to excess light, and the different pathways of heat, dissipation in the leaf., , Light-Response Curves Reveal Photosynthetic, Properties, Measuring CO2 fixation in intact leaves at increasing photon flux allows us to construct light-response curves (Figure 9.8) that provide useful information about the photosynthetic properties of leaves. In the dark there is no, photosynthetic carbon assimilation, and CO2 is given off, by the plant because of respiration (see Chapter 11). By con-, , vention, CO2 assimilation is negative in this part of the, light-response curve. As the photon flux increases, photosynthetic CO2 assimilation increases until it equals CO2, release by mitochondrial respiration. The point at which, CO2 uptake exactly balances CO2 release is called the light, compensation point., The photon flux at which different leaves reach the light, compensation point varies with species and developmental conditions. One of the more interesting differences is, found between plants grown in full sunlight and those, grown in the shade (Figure 9.9). Light compensation points, of sun plants range from 10 to 20 µmol m–2 s–1; corresponding values for shade plants are 1 to 5 µmol m–2 s–1., The values for shade plants are lower because respiration rates in shade plants are very low, so little net photosynthesis suffices to bring the net rates of CO2 exchange to, zero. Low respiratory rates seem to represent a basic adaptation that allows shade plants to survive in light-limited, environments., Increasing photon flux above the light compensation, point results in a proportional increase in photosynthetic, rate (see Figure 9.8), yielding a linear relationship between, photon flux and photosynthetic rate. Such a linear rela-, , Light, limited, , CO2 limited, , 32, , 20, , 15, , 10, , 5, , Light compensation point, (CO2 uptake = CO2 evolution), , 0, Dark respiration rate, –5, , 0, , 200, , 600, 800, 400, Absorbed light (µmol m–2 s–1), , FIGURE 9.8 Response of photosynthesis to light in a C3, , 1000, , plant. In darkness, respiration causes a net efflux of CO2, from the plant. The light compensation point is reached, when photosynthetic CO2 assimilation equals the amount, of CO2 evolved by respiration. Increasing light above the, light compensation point proportionally increases photosynthesis indicating that photosynthesis is limited by the, rate of electron transport, which in turn is limited by the, amount of available light. This portion of the curve is, referred to as light-limited. Further increases in photosynthesis are eventually limited by the carboxylation capacity, of rubisco or the metabolism of triose phosphates. This part, of the curve is referred to as CO2 limited., , Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (µmol m–2 s–1), , Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (µmol m–2 s–1), , 25, , 28, Atriplex triangularis, (sun plant), , 24, 20, 16, 12, , Asarum caudatum, (shade plant), , 8, 4, 0, –4, 0, , 400, 800, 1200, 1600, Photosynthetically active radiation, , 2000, , Irradiance (µmol m–2 s–1), , FIGURE 9.9 Light–response curves of photosynthetic car-, , bon fixation in sun and shade plants. Atriplex triangularis, (triangle orache) is a sun plant, and Asarum caudatum (a, wild ginger) is a shade plant. Typically, shade plants have a, low light compensation point and have lower maximal, photosynthetic rates than sun plants. The dashed line has, been extrapolated from the measured part of the curve., (From Harvey 1979.)
Page 204 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, 40, Atriplex triangularis, (sun plant), Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (µmol m–2 s–1), , tionship comes about because photosynthesis is light limited at those levels of incident light, so more light stimulates, more photosynthesis., In this linear portion of the curve, the slope of the line, reveals the maximum quantum yield of photosynthesis for, the leaf. Recall that quantum yield is the relation between a, given light-dependent product (in this case CO2 assimilation), and the number of absorbed photons (see Equation 7.5)., Quantum yields vary from 0, where none of the light, energy is used in photosynthesis, to 1, where all the, absorbed light is used. Recall from Chapter 7 that the quantum yield of photochemistry is about 0.95, and the quantum yield of oxygen evolution by isolated chloroplasts is, about 0.1 (10 photons per molecule of O2)., In the intact leaf, measured quantum yields for CO2 fixation vary between 0.04 and 0.06. Healthy leaves from, many species of C3 plants, kept under low O2 concentrations that inhibit photorespiration, usually show a quantum yield of 0.1. In normal air, the quantum yield of C3, plants is lower, typically 0.05., Quantum yield varies with temperature and CO2 concentration because of their effect on the ratio of the carboxylase and oxygenase reactions of rubisco (see Chapter 8)., Below 30°C, quantum yields of C3 plants are generally higher, than those of C4 plants; above 30°C, the situation is usually, reversed (see Figure 9.23). Despite their different growth, habitats, sun and shade plants show similar quantum yields., At higher photon fluxes, the photosynthetic response to, light starts to level off (see Figure 9.8) and reaches saturation., Once the saturation point is reached, further increases in, photon flux no longer affect photosynthetic rates, indicating that factors other than incident light, such as electron, transport rate, rubisco activity, or the metabolism of triose, phosphates, have become limiting to photosynthesis., After the saturation point, photosynthesis is commonly, referred to as CO2 limited, reflecting the inability of the, Calvin cycle enzymes to keep pace with the absorbed light, energy. Light saturation levels for shade plants are substantially lower than those for sun plants (see Figure 9.9)., These levels usually reflect the maximal photon flux to, which the leaf was exposed during growth (Figure 9.10)., The light-response curve of most leaves saturates, between 500 and 1000 µmol m–2 s–1, photon fluxes well, below full sunlight (which is about 2000 µmol m–2 s–1)., Although individual leaves are rarely able to utilize full, sunlight, whole plants usually consist of many leaves that, shade each other. For example, only a small fraction of a, tree’s leaves are exposed to full sun at any given time of the, day. The rest of the leaves receive subsaturating photon, fluxes in the form of small patches of light that pass, through gaps in the leaf canopy or in the form of light, transmitted through other leaves. Because the photosynthetic response of the intact plant is the sum of the photosynthetic activity of all the leaves, only rarely is photosynthesis saturated at the level of the whole plant., , 179, , 30, Grown at 920 µmol m–2 s–1, irradiance (sun), , 20, , 10, , Grown at 92 µmol m–2 s–1, irradiance (shade), , 0, , 0, , 500, , 1000, , 1500, , 2000, , 2500, , Photosynthetically active radiation, Irradiance (µmol m–2 s–1), , FIGURE 9.10 Light–response of photosynthesis of a sun, plant gown under sun or shade conditions. The upper, curve represents an Atriplex triangularis leaf grown at an, irradiance ten times higher than that of the lower curve. In, the leaf grown at the lower light levels, photosynthesis saturates at a substantially lower irradiance, indicating that, the photosynthetic properties of a leaf depend on its growing conditions. The dashed line has been extrapolated from, the measured part of the curve. (From Björkman 1981.), , Light-response curves of individual trees and of the forest canopy show that photosynthetic rate increases with, photon flux and photosynthesis usually does not saturate,, even in full sunlight (Figure 9.11). Along these lines, crop, productivity is related to the total amount of light received, during the growing season, and given enough water and, nutrients, the more light a crop receives, the higher the biomass (Ort and Baker 1988)., , Leaves Must Dissipate Excess Light Energy, When exposed to excess light, leaves must dissipate the, surplus absorbed light energy so that it does not harm the, photosynthetic apparatus (Figure 9.12). There are several, routes for energy dissipation involving nonphotochemical, quenching (see Chapter 7), which is the quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence by mechanisms other than photochemistry. The most important example involves the transfer of, absorbed light energy away from electron transport toward, heat production. Although the molecular mechanisms are, not yet fully understood, the xanthophyll cycle appears to, be an important avenue for dissipation of excess light, energy (see Web Essay 9.1).
Page 205 :
180, , Chapter 9, dissipation, and antheraxanthin is only half as effective., Whereas the levels of antheraxanthin remain relatively constant throughout the day, the zeaxanthin content increases, at high irradiances and decreases at low irradiances., In leaves growing under full sunlight, zeaxanthin and, antheraxanthin can make up 60% of the total xanthophyll, cycle pool at maximal irradiance levels attained at midday, (Figure 9.13). In these conditions a substantial amount of, excess light energy absorbed by the thylakoid membranes, can be dissipated as heat, thus preventing damage to the, photosynthetic machinery of the chloroplast (see Chapter 7)., The fraction of light energy that is dissipated depends on, irradiance, species, growth conditions, nutrient status, and, ambient temperature (Demmig-Adams and Adams 1996)., , 30, Forest canopy, , 20, Shoot, 10, Individual, needles, , The xanthophyll cycle in sun and shade leaves. Leaves, 0, , 0, , 500, 1000, Photosynthetically active radiation, , 1500, , Irradiance (µmol m–2 s–1), , FIGURE 9.11 Changes in photosynthesis (expressed on a, per-square-meter basis) in individual needles, a complex, shoot, and a forest canopy of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), as a function of irradiance. Complex shoots consist of, groupings of needles that often shade each other, similar to, the situation in a canopy where branches often shade other, branches. As a result of shading, much higher irradiance, levels are needed to saturate photosynthesis. The dashed, line has been extrapolated from the measured part of the, curve. (From Jarvis and Leverenz 1983.), , The xanthophyll cycle. Recall from Chapter 7 that the, xanthophyll cycle, which comprises the three carotenoids, violaxanthin, antheraxanthin, and zeaxanthin, is involved, in the dissipation of excess light energy in the leaf (see Figure 7.36). Under high light, violaxanthin is converted to, antheraxanthin and then to zeaxanthin. Note that the two, aromatic rings of violaxanthin have a bound oxygen atom, in them, antheraxanthin has one, and zeaxanthin has none, (again, see Figure 7.36). Experiments have shown that zeaxanthin is the most effective of the three xanthophylls in heat, , FIGURE 9.12 Excess light energy in relation to a, , light–response curve of photosynthetic evolution. The broken line shows theoretical oxygen evolution in the absence of, any rate limitation to photosynthesis. At levels of photon, flux up to 150 µmol m–2 s–1, a shade plant is able to utilize, the absorbed light. Above 150 µmol m–2 s–1, however, photosynthesis saturates, and an increasingly larger amount of the, absorbed light energy must be dissipated. At higher irradiances there is a large difference between the fraction of light, used by photosynthesis versus that which must be dissipated (excess light energy). The differences are much higher, in a shade plant than in a sun plant. (After Osmond 1994.), , that grow in full sunlight contain a substantially larger xanthophyll pool than shade leaves, so they can dissipate, higher amounts of excess light energy. Nevertheless, the, xanthophyll cycle also operates in plants that grow in the, low light of the forest understory, where they are only, occasionally exposed to high light when sunlight passes, through gaps in the overlying leaf canopy, forming sunflecks (which were described earlier in the chapter). Exposure to one sunfleck results in the conversion of much of, the violaxanthin in the leaf to zeaxanthin. In contrast to, typical leaves, in which violaxanthin levels increase again, when irradiances drop, the zeaxanthin formed in shade, leaves of the forest understory is retained and protects the, leaf against exposure to subsequent sunflecks., The xanthophyll cycle is also found in species such as, conifers, the leaves of which remain green during winter,, when photosynthetic rates are very low yet light absorption remains high. Contrary to the diurnal cycling of the, xanthophyll pool observed in the summer, zeaxanthin lev-, , 70, Photosynthetic O2 evolution (µmol m–2 s–1), , Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (µmol m–2 s–1), , 40, , 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, , 0, , Excess, light, energy, , Photosynthetic, oxygen evolution, 200, 400, 600, Absorbed light (µmol m–2 s–1)
Page 206 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, , from a leaf, it withdraws heat from the leaf and cools, it. The human body is cooled by the same principle,, through perspiration., , 100, , 2000, , Light, , 1500, , 60, , 1000, , 40, , 20, , 500, , Zeaxanthin, +, Antheraxanthin, , Irradiance, PAR (µmol m–2 s–1), , Xanthophylls (mmol [mol Chl a + b]–1), , Violaxanthin, 80, , 0, , 0, 6:00, , 12:00, , 181, , 18:00, , Time of day, , FIGURE 9.13 Diurnal changes in xanthophyll content as a, function of irradiance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus). As, the amount of light incident to a leaf increases, a greater, proportion of violaxanthin is converted to antheraxanthin, and zeaxanthin, thereby dissipating excess excitation, energy and protecting the photosynthetic apparatus. (After, Demmig-Adams and Adams 1996.), , els remain high all day during the winter. Presumably this, mechanism maximizes dissipation of light energy, thereby, protecting the leaves against photooxidation during winter (Adams et al. 2001)., In addition to protecting the photosynthetic system, against high light, the xanthophyll cycle may help protect, against high temperatures. Chloroplasts are more tolerant, of heat when they accumulate zeaxanthin (Havaux et al., 1996). Thus, plants may employ more than one biochemical mechanism to guard against the deleterious effect of, excess heat., , Leaves Must Dissipate Vast Quantities of Heat, The heat load on a leaf exposed to full sunlight is very high., In fact, a leaf with an effective thickness of water of 300 µm, would warm up by 100°C every minute if all available solar, energy were absorbed and no heat were lost. However, this, enormous heat load is dissipated by the emission of longwave radiation, by sensible (i.e., perceptible) heat loss, and, by evaporative (or latent) heat loss (Figure 9.14):, • Air circulation around the leaf removes heat from the, leaf surfaces if the temperature of the leaf is higher, than that of the air; this phenomenon is called sensible heat loss., • Evaporative heat loss occurs because the evaporation, of water requires energy. Thus as water evaporates, , Sensible heat loss and evaporative heat loss are the most, important processes in the regulation of leaf temperature,, and the ratio of the two is called the Bowen ratio (Campbell 1977):, Bowen ratio =, , Sensible heat loss, Evaporative heat loss, , In well-watered crops, transpiration (see Chapter 4), and, hence water evaporation from the leaf, is high, so the, Bowen ratio is low (see Web Topic 9.2). On the other hand,, when evaporative cooling is limited, the Bowen ratio is, large. For example, in some cacti, stomata closure prevents, evaporative cooling; all the heat is dissipated by sensible, heat loss, and the Bowen ratio is infinite., Plants with very high Bowen ratios conserve water but, have to endure very high leaf temperatures in order to, maintain a sufficient temperature gradient between the leaf, and the air. Slow growth is usually correlated with these, adaptations., , Isoprene Synthesis Helps Leaves Cope with Heat, We have seen how the xanthophyll cycle can protect, against high light, but how do chloroplasts cope with the, , Energy input, Sunlight, absorbed, by leaf, , Heat dissipation, Long-wavelength, radiation, , Conduction, and convection, to cool air, (sensible heat, loss), , Evaporative, cooling from, water loss, , FIGURE 9.14 The absorption and dissipation of energy from, sunlight by the leaf. The imposed heat load must be dissipated in order to avoid damage to the leaf. The heat load is, dissipated by emission of long-wavelength radiation, by, sensible heat loss to the air surrounding the leaf, and by the, evaporative cooling caused by transpiration.
Page 207 :
Chapter 9, , high leaf temperatures that usually accompany high light?, Isoprene synthesis appears to confer stability to photosynthetic membranes at high light and temperatures. Many, plants, including American oak (Quercus sp.), aspen (Populus sp.), and kudzu (Pueraria lobata) emit gaseous five-carbon molecules such as isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene;, see Chapter 13)., On a global scale, these emissions amount to 5 × 1014 g, released to the atmosphere each year. These gaseous hydrocarbons are responsible for the pine scent (α- and β-pinene), in coniferous forests and can form a blue haze above forests, on hot days. Because isoprene and related hydrocarbons, play an important role in atmospheric chemistry, they have, attracted much attention from atmospheric scientists., Isoprene emission from leaves can constitute a significant fraction of the carbon assimilated in photosynthesis., For example, up to 2% of the carbon fixed by photosynthesis in aspen and oak leaves at 30°C is released as isoprene (Sharkey 1996). Sun leaves synthesize more isoprene, than shade leaves, and synthesis is proportional to leaf, temperature and water stress., Evidence that isoprene confers stability to photosynthetic membranes under high temperatures comes from, three types of experimental results:, 1. Whereas preventing isoprene emission with an, inhibitor increases susceptibility to damage by heat,, adding isoprene to plants that do not produce isoprene confers heat stability (Sharkey et al. 2001)., 2. Mutant plants unable to emit isoprene are more easily damaged by high temperatures than are wild-type, plants (Sharkey and Singsaas 1995)., , 25, , Optimal photosynthesis, Photosynthetic O2 evolution (µmol m–2 s–1), , 182, , 20, , 15, , Dynamic photoinhibition, (moderate excess light), , 10, , 5, , 0, , Chronic photoinhibition, (high excess light), , 500, 1000, Absorbed light (µmol m–2 s–1), , 1500, , FIGURE 9.15 Changes in the light–response curves of photosynthesis caused by photoinhibition. Exposure to moderate levels of excess light can decrease quantum efficiency, (reduced slope of curve) without reducing maximum photosynthetic rate, a condition called dynamic photoinhibition. Exposure to high levels of excess light leads to chronic, photoinhibition, where damage to the chloroplast decreases, both quantum efficiency and maximum photosynthetic, rate. (After Osmond 1994.), , 3. Isoprene is rapidly synthesized enzymatically in, response to elevated leaf temperatures., , Absorption of Too Much Light Can Lead to, Photoinhibition, Recall from Chapter 7 that when leaves are exposed to, more light than they can utilize (see Figure 9.12), the reaction center of PSII is inactivated and damaged, in a phenomenon called photoinhibition. The characteristics of, photoinhibition in the intact leaf depend on the amount of, light to which the plant is exposed (Figure 9.15), and two, types of photoinhibition are identified: dynamic photoinhibition and chronic photoinhibition (Osmond 1994)., Under moderate excess light, dynamic photoinhibition, is observed. Quantum efficiency decreases (contrast the, slopes of the curves in Figure 9.15), but the maximum photosynthetic rate remains unchanged. Dynamic photoinhibition is caused by the diversion of absorbed light energy, toward heat dissipation—hence the decrease in quantum, efficiency. This decrease is often temporary, and quantum, efficiency can return to its initial higher value when photon flux decreases below saturation levels., , Chronic photoinhibition results from exposure to high, levels of excess light that damage the photosynthetic system and decrease both quantum efficiency and maximum, photosynthetic rate (see Figure 9.15). Chronic photoinhibition is associated with damage and replacement of the D1, protein from the reaction center of PSII (see Chapter 7). In, contrast to dynamic photoinhibition, these effects are relatively long-lasting, persisting for weeks or months., Early researchers of photoinhibition interpreted all, decreases in quantum efficiency as damage to the photosynthetic apparatus. It is now recognized that short-term, decreases in quantum efficiency seem to reflect protective, mechanisms (see Chapter 7), whereas chronic photoinhibition represents actual damage to the chloroplast resulting, from excess light, or a failure of the protective mechanisms., How significant is photoinhibition in nature? Dynamic, photoinhibition appears to occur normally at midday, when, leaves are exposed to maximum amounts of light and there, is a corresponding reduction in carbon fixation. Photoinhibition is more pronounced at low temperatures, and it, becomes chronic under more extreme climatic conditions.
Page 208 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, Studies of natural willow populations, and crops of, Brassica napus (oilseed rape) and Zea mays (maize), have, shown that the cumulative effects of a daily depression in, photosynthetic rates caused by photoinhibition decrease, biomass by 10% at the end of the growing season (Long et, al. 1994). This may not seem a particularly large effect, but, it could be significant in natural plant populations competing for limited resources—conditions under which any, reduction in carbon allocated to reproduction can adversely, affect reproductive success and survival., , PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSES TO, CARBON DIOXIDE, We have discussed how plant growth and leaf anatomy are, influenced by light. Now we turn our attention to how CO2, concentration affects photosynthesis. CO2 diffuses from the, atmosphere into leaves—first through stomata, then, through the intercellular air spaces, and ultimately into, cells and chloroplasts. In the presence of adequate amounts, of light, higher CO2 concentrations support higher photosynthetic rates. The reverse is also true; that is, low CO2, concentration can limit the amount of photosynthesis., In this section we will discuss the concentration of, atmospheric CO2 in recent history, and its availability for, carbon-fixing processes. Then we’ll consider the limitations, that CO2 places on photosynthesis and the impact of the, CO2-concentrating mechanisms of C4 plants., , 183, , Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Keeps Rising, Carbon dioxide is a trace gas in the atmosphere, presently, accounting for about 0.037%, or 370 parts per million, (ppm), of air. The partial pressure of ambient CO2 (Ca), varies with atmospheric pressure and is approximately 36, pascals (Pa) at sea level (see Web Topic 9.3). Water vapor, usually accounts for up to 2% of the atmosphere and O2 for, about 20%. The bulk of the atmosphere, nearly 80%, is, nitrogen., The current atmospheric concentration of CO2 is almost, twice the concentration that has prevailed during most of, the last 160,00 years, as measured from air bubbles trapped, in glacial ice in Antarctica (Figure 9.16A). Except for the last, 200 years, CO2 concentrations during the recent geological, past have been low, fluctuating between 180 and 260 ppm., These low concentrations were typical of times extending, back to the Cretaceous, when Earth was much warmer and, the CO2 concentration may have been as high as 1200 to, 2800 ppm (Ehleringer et al. 1991)., The current CO2 concentration of the atmosphere is, increasing by about 1 ppm each year, primarily because of, the burning of fossil fuels (see Figure 9.16C). Since 1958,, when systematic measurements of CO2 began at Mauna Loa,, Hawaii, atmospheric CO2 concentrations have increased by, more than 17% (Keeling et al. 1995), and by 2020 the atmospheric CO2 concentration could reach 600 ppm., , (C), 380, , CO2 concentration (ppm), , (A), , 370, , (B), , 360, , 360, , 320, , 340, , 280, , 320, , 240, , 300, , 330, , 200, , 280, , 320, , 160, , 150,000, , 100,000, , 50,000, , 0, , 260, , 360, 350, 340, , 310, 1000, , Years ago, , FIGURE 9.16 Concentration of atmospheric CO2 from the, , present to 160,000 years ago. (A) Past atmospheric CO2 concentrations, determined from bubbles trapped in glacial ice, in Antarctica, were much lower than current levels. (B) In, the last 1000 years, the rise in CO2 concentration coincides, with the Industrial Revolution and the increased burning of, fossil fuels. (C) Current atmospheric concentrations of CO2, measured at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, continue to rise. The wavy, , 1500, Year, , 2000, , 1960, , 1970, , 1980, , 1990, , 2000, , Year, , nature of the trace is caused by change in atmospheric CO2, concentrations associated with the growth of agricultural, crops. Each year the highest CO2 concentration is observed, in May, just before the Northern Hemisphere growing season, and the lowest concentration is observed in October., (After Barnola et al. 1994, Keeling and Whorf 1994, Neftel et, al. 1994, and Keeling et al. 1995.)
Page 209 :
184, , Chapter 9, , The greenhouse effect. The consequences of this increase, in atmospheric CO2 are under intense scrutiny by scientists, and government agencies, particularly because of predictions that the greenhouse effect is altering the world’s climate. The term greenhouse effect refers to the resulting warming of Earth’s climate, which is caused by the trapping of, long-wavelength radiation by the atmosphere., A greenhouse roof transmits visible light, which is, absorbed by plants and other surfaces inside the greenhouse. The absorbed light energy is converted to heat, and, part of it is re-emitted as long-wavelength radiation., Because glass transmits long-wavelength radiation very, poorly, this radiation cannot leave the greenhouse through, the glass roof, and the greenhouse heats up., Certain gases in the atmosphere, particularly CO2 and, methane, play the same role as the glass roof in a greenhouse., The increased CO2 concentration and temperature associated, with the greenhouse effect can influence photosynthesis. At, current atmospheric CO2 concentrations, photosynthesis in, C3 plants is CO2 limited (as we will discuss later in the chapter), but this situation could change as atmospheric CO2 concentrations continue to rise. Under laboratory conditions,, most C3 plants grow 30 to 60% faster when CO2 concentration is doubled (to 600–700 ppm), and the growth rate, changes depend on nutrient status (Bowes 1993). In some, plants the enhanced growth is only temporary., For many crops, such as tomatoes, lettuce, cucumbers,, and roses growing in greenhouses under optimal nutrition,, carbon dioxide enrichment in the greenhouse environment, results in increased productivity. The photosynthetic performance of C3 plants under elevated CO2 is enhanced, because photorespiration decreases (see Chapter 8)., , Diffusion of CO2 to the Chloroplast Is Essential to, Photosynthesis, For photosynthesis to occur, carbon dioxide must diffuse, from the atmosphere into the leaf and into the carboxylation site of rubisco. Because diffusion rates depend on concentration gradients (see Chapters 3 and 6), appropriate, gradients are needed to ensure adequate diffusion of CO2, from the leaf surface to the chloroplast., The cuticle that covers the leaf is nearly impermeable to, CO2, so the main port of entry of CO2 into the leaf is the, stomatal pore. CO2 diffuses through the pore into the substomatal cavity and into the intercellular air spaces, between the mesophyll cells. This portion of the diffusion, path of CO2 into the chloroplast is a gaseous phase. The, remainder of the diffusion path to the chloroplast is a liquid phase, which begins at the water layer that wets the, walls of the mesophyll cells and continues through the, plasma membrane, the cytosol, and the chloroplast. (For, the properties of CO2 in solution, see Web Topic 8.3.), Each portion of this diffusion pathway imposes a resistance to CO2 diffusion, so the supply of CO2 for photosynthesis meets a series of different points of resistance (Figure 9.17). An evaluation of the magnitude of each point of, , Liquid phase, resistance, Intercellular, air space, resistance, , Stoma, , Stomatal, resistance, , Stomatal pore, Boundary layer, resistance, , Boundary layer, , CO2, , FIGURE 9.17 Points of resistance to the diffusion of CO2, , from outside the leaf to the chloroplasts. The stomatal pore, is the major point of resistance to CO2 diffusion., , resistance is helpful for understanding CO2 limitations to, photosynthesis., Carbon dioxide enters the intercellular air spaces of the, leaf through the stomatal pores. From the air spaces it dissolves in the water of wet cell walls and diffuses into the, cell and chloroplast. The same path is traveled in the, reverse direction by H2O., The sharing of this pathway by CO2 and water presents, the plant with a functional dilemma. In air of high relative, humidity, the diffusion gradient that drives water loss is, about 50 times larger than the gradient that drives CO2, uptake. In drier air, this gradient can be even larger. Therefore, a decrease in stomatal resistance through the opening, of stomata facilitates higher CO2 uptake but is unavoidably, accompanied by substantial water loss., Recall from Chapter 4 that the gas phase of CO2 diffusion into the leaf can be divided into three components—, the boundary layer, the stomata, and the intercellular, spaces of the leaf—each of which imposes a resistance to, CO2 diffusion (see Figure 9.17)., The boundary layer consists of relatively unstirred air at, the leaf surface, and its resistance to diffusion is called the, boundary layer resistance. The magnitude of the boundary layer resistance decreases with leaf size and wind, speed. The boundary layer resistance to water and CO2 diffusion is physically related to the boundary layer resistance, to sensible heat loss discussed earlier., Smaller leaves have a lower boundary layer resistance to, CO2 and water diffusion, and to sensible heat loss. Leaves
Page 210 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, , Patterns of Light Absorption Generate Gradients, of CO2 Fixation within the Leaf, We have discussed how leaf anatomy is specialized for capturing light and how it also facilitates the internal diffusion, of CO2, but where in the leaf do maximum rates of photosynthesis occur? In most leaves, light is preferentially, absorbed at the upper surface, whereas CO2 enters through, the lower surface. Given that light and CO2 enter from, opposing sides of the leaf, does photosynthesis occur uni-, , formly within the leaf tissues, or is there a gradient in photosynthesis across the leaf? The photosynthetic properties, of a leaf are determined by the following:, • Profiles of light absorption across the mesophyll, • Photosynthetic capacity of those tissues, • Internal CO2 supply, For most leaves, internal CO2 diffusion is rapid, so limitations on photosynthetic performance within the leaf are, imposed by factors other than CO2 supply. When white, light enters the upper surface of a leaf, blue and red photons are preferentially absorbed by chloroplasts near the, irradiated surface (Figure 9.18), owing to the strong absorption bands of chlorophyll in the blue and red regions of the, spectrum (see Figure 7.5). Green light, on the other hand,, penetrates deeper into the leaf. Compared to blue and red,, , Light, , Tissue depth, , Spinach leaf cross-section, 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, , Epidermis, Palisade, cells, Mesophyll, cells, Epidermis, , 100, Chlorophyll, 80, , Absorbed light (%), , of desert plants are usually small, facilitating sensible heat, loss. The large leaves often found in the humid Tropics can, have large boundary layer resistances, but these leaves can, dissipate the radiation heat load by evaporative cooling, because of the high transpiration rates made possible by the, abundant water supply in these habitats., After diffusing through the boundary layer, CO2 enters, the leaf through the stomatal pores, which impose the next, type of resistance in the diffusion pathway, the stomatal, resistance. Under most conditions in nature, in which the, air around a leaf is seldom completely still, the boundary, layer resistance is much smaller than the stomatal resistance, and the main limitation to CO2 diffusion is imposed, by the stomatal resistance., There is also a resistance to CO2 diffusion in the air, spaces that separate the substomatal cavity from the walls, of the mesophyll cells, called the intercellular air space, resistance. This resistance is also usually small—causing a, drop of 0.5 Pa or less in partial pressure of CO2, compared, with the 36 Pa outside the leaf., The resistance to CO2 diffusion of the liquid phase—the, liquid phase resistance, also called mesophyll resistance—, encompasses diffusion from the intercellular leaf spaces to, the carboxylation sites in the chloroplast. This point of resistance to CO2 diffusion has been calculated as approximately, one-tenth of the combined boundary layer resistance and, stomatal resistance when the stomata are fully open. This low, resistance value can be attributed in part to the large surface, area of mesophyll cells exposed to the intercellular air spaces,, which can be as much as 10 to 30 times the projected leaf area, (Syvertsen et al. 1995). In addition, the localization of chloroplasts near the cell periphery minimizes the distance that CO2, diffuses to carboxylation sites within the chloroplast., The positioning of chloroplasts and the relatively large, percentage of intercellular air space (about 20–40%) are, special anatomic features that facilitate the internal diffusion and uptake of CO2 by leaves (Evans 1999). Because the, stomatal pores usually impose the largest resistance to CO2, uptake and water loss in the diffusion pathway, this regulation provides the plant with an effective way to control, gas exchange between the leaf and the atmosphere. In, experimental measurements of gas exchange from leaves,, the boundary layer resistance and the intercellular air space, resistance are usually ignored, and the stomatal resistance, is used as the single parameter describing the gas phase, resistance to CO2 (see Web Topic 9.4)., , 185, , 60, , 40, , Blue, (450 nm), , Red, (650 nm), , Green, (550 nm), , 20, , 0, 0, , 20, , 40, , 60, , 80, , 100, , Tissue depth (%), , FIGURE 9.18 Distribution of absorbed light in spinach sun, leaves. Irradiation with blue, green or red light results in, different profiles of absorbed light in the leaf. The micrograph above the graph shows a cross-section of a spinach, leaf, with rows of palisade cells occupying nearly half of, the leaf thickness. The shapes of the curves are in part a, result of the unequal distribution of chlorophyll within the, leaf tissues. (From Nishio et al. 1993 and Vogelmann and, Han 2000; micrograph courtesy of T. Vogelmann.)
Page 211 :
Chapter 9, , chlorophyll absorbs poorly in the green (again, see Figure, 7.5), yet green light is very effective in supplying energy for, photosynthesis in the tissues within the leaf depleted from, blue and red photons., The capacity of the leaf tissue for photosynthetic CO2, assimilation depends to a large extent on its rubisco content. In spinach and the faba bean (Vicia faba), rubisco content starts out low at the top of the leaf, increases toward, the middle, and then decreases again toward the bottom., As a result, the distribution of carbon fixation within the, leaf is bell shaped (Figure 9.19). The spongy mesophyll (see, Figure 9.4) fixes about 40% of the total carbon in spinach., The functional significance of the rubisco distribution and, the profiles of carbon assimilation within leaves is not yet, known, although it is likely that photosynthesis profiles, vary in leaves with different anatomy and in leaves, adapted to different environments., , CO2 Imposes Limitations on Photosynthesis, Expressing photosynthetic rate as a function of the partial, pressure of CO2 in the intercellular air space (Ci) within the, leaf (see Web Topic 9.4) makes it possible to evaluate limitations to photosynthesis imposed by CO2 supply. At very, low intercellular CO2 concentrations, photosynthesis is, strongly limited by the low CO2, while respiratory rates are, unaffected. As a result, there is a negative balance between, , CO2 fixed by photosynthesis and CO2 produced by respiration, and a net efflux of CO2 from the plant., Increasing intercellular CO2 to the concentration at, which these two processes balance each other defines the, CO2 compensation point, at which the net efflux of CO2, from the plant is zero (Figure 9.20A). This concept is analogous to that of the light compensation point discussed, earlier in the chapter: The CO2 compensation point reflects the, balance between photosynthesis and respiration as a function of, CO2 concentration, and the light compensation point reflects that, balance as a function of photon flux., In C3 plants, increasing CO2 above the compensation, point stimulates photosynthesis over a wide concentration, , (A), 60, CO2 assimilation (µmol m–2 s–1), , 186, , C4 plant, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 0, , 100, , CO2 compensation points, 20, 40, 60, 80, Ambient CO2 concentration, Ca (Pa), , 100, , (B), , Vicia faba, , 60, CO2 assimilation (µmol m–2 s–1), , 80, Carbon fixation (%), , C3 plant, , Rubisco, 60, , 40, , Spinacia oleracea, , 20, , C4 plant, 50, , C3 plant, , 40, 30, 20, 10, 0, , 20, 40, 60, 80, Intercellular CO2 partial pressure, Ci (Pa), , 100, , 0, 0, , 20, , 40, , 60, , 80, , 100, , Tissue depth (%), , FIGURE 9.19 Distribution of rubisco and carbon fixation, within leaves. Carbon fixation (solid line) within spinach, leaves closely follows the internal distribution of rubisco, (dashed line). Carbon fixation profiles are similar between, Vicia and spinach. (From Nishio et al. 1993 and Jeje and, Zimmermann 1983.), , FIGURE 9.20 Changes in photosynthesis as a function of, ambient intercellular CO2 concentrations in Tidestromia, oblongifolia (Arizona honeysweet), a C4 plant, and Larrea, divaricata (creosote bush), a C3 plant. Photosynthetic rate is, plotted against (A) partial pressure of CO2 in ambient air, and (B) calculated intercellular partial pressure of CO2, inside the leaf (see Equation 5 in Web Topic 9.4). The partial, pressure at which CO2 assimilation is zero defines the CO2, compensation point. (From Berry and Downton 1982.)
Page 212 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, , These results indicate that C3 plants may benefit more, from ongoing increases in atmospheric CO2 concentrations, (see Figure 9.16). In contrast, photosynthesis in C4 plants is, CO2 saturated at low concentrations, and as a result C4, plants do not benefit from increases in atmospheric CO2, concentrations. Figure 9.20 also shows that plants with C4, metabolism have a CO2 compensation point of zero or, nearly zero, reflecting their very low levels of photorespiration (see Chapter 8). This difference between C3 and C4, plants is not seen when the experiments are conducted at, low oxygen concentrations because oxygenation is also, suppressed in C3 plants., , CO2-Concentrating Mechanisms Affect, Photosynthetic Responses of Leaves, Because of the operating CO2-concentrating mechanisms in, C4 plants, CO2 concentration at the carboxylation sites, within C4 chloroplasts is often saturating for rubisco activity. As a result, plants with C4 metabolism need less rubisco, than C3 plants need to achieve a given rate of photosynthesis, and require less nitrogen to grow (von Caemmerer 2000)., In addition, the CO2-concentrating mechanism allows, the leaf to maintain high photosynthetic rates at lower Ci, values, which require lower rates of stomatal conductance, for a given rate of photosynthesis. Thus, C4 plants can use, water and nitrogen more efficiently than C3 plants can. On, the other hand, the additional energy cost of the concentrating mechanism (see Chapter 8) makes C4 plants less, efficient in their utilization of light. This is probably one of, the reasons that most shade-adapted plants are C3 plants., Many cacti and other succulent plants with CAM, metabolism open their stomata at night and close them, , CO2 assimilation (µmol m–2 s–1), , • In C3 plants, increasing Ci levels continue to stimulate, photosynthesis over a much broader range., , (A), , (B), H2O evaporation, (mmol m–2 s–1), , • In C4 plants, photosynthetic rates saturate at Ci values, of about 15 Pa, reflecting the effective CO2-concentrating mechanisms operating in these plants (see, Chapter 8)., , during the day (Figure 9.21). The CO2 taken up during the, night is fixed into malate (see Chapter 8). Because air temperatures are much lower at night than during the day,, water loss is low and a significant amount of water is saved, relative to the amount of CO2 fixed., The main constraint on CAM metabolism is that the, capacity to store malic acid is limited, and this limitation, restricts the amount of CO2 uptake. However, many CAM, plants can fix CO2 via the Calvin cycle at the end of the day,, when temperature gradients are less extreme., Cladodes (flattened stems) of cacti can survive after, detachment from the plant for several months without, , (C), , 12, , 8, , 4, Dark, , Light, , Dark, , 0, –2, , 0, , 6, , 12, , 18, , 24, , 0, , 6, , 12, , 18, , 24, , 0, , 6, , 12, Time (hours), , 18, , 24, , 0.6, 0.4, 0.2, 0.0, , 100, , Stomatal conductance, (mmol m–2 s–1), , range (see Figure 9.20A). At low to intermediate CO2 concentrations, photosynthesis is limited by the carboxylation, capacity of rubisco. At high CO2 concentrations, photosynthesis is limited by the capacity of Calvin cycle to regenerate the acceptor molecule ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, which, depends on electron transport rates. By regulating stomatal, conductance, most leaves appear to regulate their Ci (internal partial pressure for CO2) such that it is intermediate, between limitations imposed by carboxylation capacity and, the capacity to regenerate ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate., A plot of CO2 assimilation as a function intercellular, partial pressures of CO2 tells us how photosynthesis is regulated by CO2, independent of the functioning of stomata, (Figure 9.20B). Inspection of such a plot for C3 and C4, plants reveals interesting differences between the two types, of carbon metabolism:, , 187, , 80, 60, 40, 20, 0, , FIGURE 9.21 Photosynthetic carbon assimilation, evapora-, , tion, and stomatal conductance of a CAM plant, the cactus, Opuntia ficus-indica, during a 24-hour period. The whole, plant was kept in a gas exchange chamber in the laboratory., The dark period is indicated by shaded areas. In contrast to, plants with C3 or C4 metabolism, CAM plants open their, stomata and fix CO2 at night. (From Gibson and Nobel 1986.)
Page 213 :
188, , Chapter 9, , water. Their stomata are closed all the time, and the CO2, released by respiration is refixed into malate. This process,, which has been called CAM idling, allows the plant to survive for prolonged periods of time while losing remarkably, little water., , Discrimination of Carbon Isotopes Reveals, Different Photosynthetic Pathways, Atmospheric CO2 contains the naturally occurring carbon, isotopes 12C, 13C, and 14C in the proportions 98.9%, 1.1%,, and 10–10%, respectively. 14CO2 is present in such small, quantities that it has no physiological relevance, but 13CO2, is different. The chemical properties of 13CO2 are identical, to those of 12CO2, but because of the slight difference in, mass (2.3%), most plants assimilate less 13CO2 than 12CO2., In other words, plants discriminate against the heavier isotope of carbon, and they have smaller ratios of 13C to 12C, than are found in atmospheric CO2. How effective are, plants at distinguishing between the two carbon isotopes?, Although discrimination against 13C is subtle, the isotope, composition of plants reveals a wealth of information., Carbon isotope composition is measured by use of a, mass spectrometer, which yields the following ratio:, R=, , 13, 12, , CO 2, CO 2, , (9.1), , The isotope composition of plants, δ13C, is quantified on a, per mil (–‰) basis:, R sample, , d 13 C 0 00 = , − 1 × 1000, R, standard , , (9.2), , where the standard represents the carbon isotopes contained in a fossil belemnite from the Pee Dee limestone formation of South Carolina. The δ13C of atmospheric CO2 has, a value of –8 ‰, meaning that there is less 13C in the atmospheric CO2 than is found in the carbonate of the belemnite, standard. What are some typical values for carbon isotope, ratios of plants? C3 plants have a δ13C of about –28 ‰; C4, plants have an average value of –14 ‰ (Farquhar et al., 1989). Both C3 and C4 plants have less 13C than the isotope, standard, which means that there has been a discrimination, against 13C during the photosynthetic process., Because the per mil calculation involves multiplying by, 1000, the actual isotope discrimination is small. Nonetheless, differences in carbon isotope discrimination are easily, detectable with mass spectrometers. For example, measuring the δ13C of table sugar (sucrose) makes it possible to, determine if the sucrose came from sugar beet (a C3 plant), or sugarcane (a C4 plant)., What is the physiological basis for 13C depletion in, plants? One reason in both C3 and C4 plants is diffusion., CO2 diffuses from air outside of the leaf to the carboxylation sites within leaves. Because 12CO2 is lighter than 13CO2,, it diffuses slightly faster toward the carboxylation site, creating an effective diffusion discrimination of –4.4 ‰. How-, , ever, the largest isotope discrimination step is the carboxylation reaction catalyzed by rubisco (Farquhar et al. 1989)., Rubisco has an intrinsic discrimination value against 13C, of –30 ‰. By contrast, PEP carboxylase, the primary CO2, fixation enzyme of C4 plants, has a much smaller isotope, discrimination effect (about –2 to –6 ‰). Thus the inherent, difference between the discrimination effects of the two carboxylating enzymes causes the different isotope compositions observed in C3 and C4 plants (Farquhar et al. 1989)., Other physiological characteristics of plants affect isotope, composition. One factor is the partial pressure of CO2 in the, intercellular air spaces of leaves (Ci). In C3 plants the potential discrimination by rubisco of –30 ‰ is not fully expressed, because the availability of CO2 at the carboxylation site, becomes a limiting factor restricting the discrimination by, rubisco. More discrimination occurs when Ci is high, as, when stomata are open. Open stomata also facilitate water, loss. Thus, lower water use efficiency is correlated with, greater discrimination against 13C (Farquhar et al. 1989)., Fossil fuels have a δ13C of about –26 ‰ because the carbon in these deposits came from organisms that had a C3, carbon fixation pathway. Furthermore, measuring δ13C in, fossil, carbonate-containing soils and fossil teeth makes it, possible to determine that C4 photosynthesis developed and, became prevalent relatively recently (see Web Topic 9.5)., CAM plants can have δ13C values that are intermediate, between those of C3 and C4 plants. In CAM plants that fix, CO2 at night via PEP carboxylase, δ13C is similar to that of, C4 plants. However, when some CAM plants are well, watered, they switch to C3 mode by opening their stomata, and fixing CO2 during the day via rubisco. Under these, conditions the isotope composition shifts more toward that, of C3 plants. Thus the 13C/12C values of CAM plants reflect, how much carbon is fixed via the C3 pathway versus the, C4 pathway (see Web Topic 9.5)., Plants also fractionate other isotopes, such as 18O/16O, and 15N/14N, and the various patterns of isotope enrichment or depletion can be used as indicators of particular, metabolic pathways or features., , PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSES, TO TEMPERATURE, When photosynthetic rate is plotted as a function of temperature, the curve has a characteristic bell shape (Figure, 9.22). The ascending arm of the curve represents a temperature-dependent stimulation of photosynthesis up to an optimum; the descending arm is associated with deleterious, effects, some of which are reversible while others are not., Temperature affects all biochemical reactions of photosynthesis, so it is not surprising that the responses to temperature are complex. We can gain insight into the underlying mechanisms by comparing photosynthetic rates in air, at normal and at high CO2 concentrations. At high CO2 (see, Figure 9.22A), there is an ample supply of CO2 at the car-
Page 214 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, , (A), , CO2 assimilation (µmol m–2 s–1), , 40, Saturating CO2, concentrations, 30, , 20, , (B), Ambient CO2, concentrations, , 10, , 0, 10, , 20, , 30, Temperature (°C), , 40, , 50, , FIGURE 9.22 Changes in photosynthesis as a function of, temperature at CO2 concentrations that saturate photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (A) and at normal atmospheric CO2, concentrations (B). Photosynthesis depends strongly on, temperature at saturating CO2 concentrations. Note the significantly higher photosynthetic rates at saturating CO2, concentrations. (Redrawn from Berry and Björkman 1980.), , boxylation sites, and the rate of photosynthesis is limited, primarily by biochemical reactions connected with electron, transport (see Chapter 7). In these conditions, temperature, changes have large effects on fixation rates., At ambient CO2 concentrations (see Figure 9.22B), photosynthesis is limited by the activity of rubisco, and the, response reflects two conflicting processes: an increase in, carboxylation rate with temperature and a decrease in the, affinity of rubisco for CO2 as the temperature rises (see, Chapter 8). These opposing effects dampen the temperature, response of photosynthesis at ambient CO2 concentrations., Respiration rates also increase as a function of temperature, and the interaction between photorespiration and, photosynthesis becomes apparent in temperature responses. Figure 9.23 shows changes in quantum yield as, a function of temperature in a C3 plant and in a C4 plant. In, the C4 plant the quantum yield remains constant with temperature, reflecting typical low rates of photorespiration., In the C3 plant the quantum yield decreases with temperature, reflecting a stimulation of photorespiration by temperature and an ensuing higher energy demand per net, CO2 fixed., At low temperatures, photosynthesis is often limited by, phosphate availability at the chloroplast (Sage and Sharkey, , 1987). When triose phosphates are exported from the, chloroplast to the cytosol, an equimolar amount of inorganic phosphate is taken up via translocators in the chloroplast membrane., If the rate of triose phosphate utilization in the cytosol, decreases, phosphate uptake into the chloroplast is inhibited and photosynthesis becomes phosphate limited, (Geiger and Servaites 1994). Starch synthesis and sucrose, synthesis decrease rapidly with temperature, reducing the, demand for triose phosphates and causing the phosphate, limitation observed at low temperatures., The highest photosynthetic rates seen in temperature, responses represent the so-called optimal temperature, response. When these temperatures are exceeded, photosynthetic rates decrease again. It has been argued that this, optimal temperature is the point at which the capacities of, the various steps of photosynthesis are optimally balanced,, with some of the steps becoming limiting as the temperature decreases or increases., Optimal temperatures have strong genetic and physiological components. Plants of different species growing in, habitats with different temperatures have different optimal, temperatures for photosynthesis, and plants of the same, , Quantum yield (mol CO2 per absorbed quantum), , 50, , 189, , 0.10, , 0.08, Encelia californica (C3 plant), 0.06, Atriplex rosea (C4 plant), 0.04, , 0.02, , 0.00, 10, , 15, , 20, 25, 30, Leaf temperature (°C), , 35, , 40, , FIGURE 9.23 The quantum yield of photosynthetic carbon, fixation in a C3 plant and in a C4 plant as a function of leaf, temperature. In normal air, photorespiration increases with, temperature in C3 plants, and the energy cost of net CO2, fixation increases accordingly. This higher energy cost is, expressed in lower quantum yields at higher temperatures., Because of the CO2 concentrating mechanisms of C4 plants,, photorespiration is low in these plants, and the quantum, yield does not show a temperature dependence. Note that, at lower temperatures the quantum yield of C3 plants is, higher than that of C4 plants, indicating that photosynthesis, in C3 plants is more efficient at lower temperatures. (From, Ehleringer and Björkman 1977.)
Page 215 :
190, , Chapter 9, , species, grown at different temperatures and then tested, for their photosynthetic responses, show temperature, optima that correlate with the temperature at which they, were grown. Plants growing at low temperatures maintain, higher photosynthetic rates at low temperatures than, plants grown at high temperatures., These changes in photosynthetic properties in response, to temperature play an important role in plant adaptations, to different environments. Plants are remarkably plastic in, their adaptations to temperature. In the lower temperature, range, plants growing in alpine areas are capable of net CO2, uptake at temperatures close to 0°C; at the other extreme,, plants living in Death Valley, California, have optimal rates, of photosynthesis at temperatures approaching 50°C., , SUMMARY, Photosynthetic activity in the intact leaf is an integral, process that depends on many biochemical reactions. Different environmental factors can limit photosynthetic rates., Leaf anatomy is highly specialized for light absorption,, and the properties of palisade and mesophyll cells ensure, uniform light absorption throughout the leaf. In addition, to the anatomic features of the leaf, chloroplast movements, within cells and solar tracking by the leaf blade help maximize light absorption. Light transmitted through upper, leaves is absorbed by leaves growing beneath them., Many properties of the photosynthetic apparatus, change as a function of the available light, including the, light compensation point, which is higher in sun leaves, than in shade leaves. The linear portion of the lightresponse curve for photosynthesis provides a measure of, the quantum yield of photosynthesis in the intact leaf. In, temperate areas, quantum yields of C3 plants are generally, higher than those of C4 plants., Sunlight imposes a substantial heat load on the leaf,, which is dissipated back into the air by long-wavelength, radiation, by sensible heat loss, or by evaporative heat loss., Increasing CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are increasing the heat load on the biosphere. This process could cause, damaging changes in the world’s climate, but it could also, reduce the CO2 limitations on photosynthesis. At high photon flux, photosynthesis in most plants is CO2 limited, but, the limitation is substantially lower in C4 and CAM plants, because of their CO2-concentrating mechanisms., Diffusion of CO2 into the leaf is constrained by a series, of different points of resistance. The largest resistance is, usually that imposed by the stomata, so modulation of, stomatal apertures provides the plant with an effective, means of controlling water loss and CO2 uptake. Both, stomatal and nonstomatal factors affect CO2 limitations on, photosynthesis., Temperature responses of photosynthesis reflect the, temperature sensitivity of the biochemical reactions of photosynthesis and are most pronounced at high CO2 concen-, , trations. Because of the role of photorespiration, the quantum yield is strongly dependent on temperature in C3, plants but is nearly independent of temperature in C4, plants., Leaves growing in cold climates can maintain higher, photosynthetic rates at low temperatures than leaves growing in warmer climates. Leaves grown at high temperatures perform better at high temperatures than leaves, grown at low temperatures do. Functional changes in the, photosynthetic apparatus in response to prevailing temperatures in their environment have an important effect on, the capacity of plants to live in diverse habitats., , Web Material, Web Topics, 9.1 Working with Light, Amount, direction, and spectral quality are, important parameters for the measurement of, light., , 9.2 Heat Dissipation from Leaves: The Bowen Ratio, Sensible heat loss and evaporative heat loss are, the most important processes in the regulation, of leaf temperature., , 9.3 Working with Gases, This web topic explains how to work with mole, fractions and other physical parameters of gases., , 9.4 Calculating Important Parameters in Leaf Gas, Exchange, Gas exchange methods allow us to measure photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in the, intact leaf., , 9.5 Isotope Discrimination, The carbon isotope composition of plants, reveals a wealth of information., , Web Essay, 9.1 The Xanthophyll Cycle, Molecular and biophysical studies are revealing, the role of the xanthophyll cycle on the photoprotection of leaves., , Chapter References, Adams, W. W., Demmig-Adams, B., Rosenstiel, T. N., and Ebbert, V., (2001) Dependence of photosynthesis and energy dissipation, activity upon growth form and light environment during the, winter. Photosynth. Res. 67: 51–62., Anderson, J. M. (1986) Photoregulation of the composition, function,, and structure of thylakoid membranes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37: 93–136.
Page 216 :
Photosynthesis: Physiological and Ecological Considerations, Barnola, J. M., Raynaud, D., Lorius, C., and Korothevich, Y. S. (1994), Historical CO2 record from the Vostok ice core. In Trends ‘93: A, Compendium of Data on Global Change (ORNL/CDIAC-65), T. A., Boden, D. P. Kaiser, R. J. Sepanski, and F. W. Stoss, eds., Carbon, Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory,, Oak Ridge, TN, pp. 7–10., Berry, J., and Björkman, O. (1980) Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 31: 491–543., Berry, J. A., and Downton, J. S. (1982) Environmental regulation of, photosynthesis. In Photosynthesis: Development, Carbon Metabolism, and Plant Productivity, Vol. II, Govindjee, ed., Academic Press,, New York, pp. 263–343., Björkman, O. (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities., In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 12A, O. L., Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond, and H. Zeigler, eds., Springer,, Berlin, pp. 57–107., Björn, L. O., and Vogelmann, T. C. (1994) Quantification of light. In, Photomorphogenesis in Plants, 2nd ed., R. E. Kendrick and G. H., M. Kronenberg, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 17–25., Bowes, G. (1993) Facing the inevitable: Plants and increasing atmospheric CO2. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44: 309–332., Campbell, G. S. (1977) An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics., Springer-Verlag, New York., Demmig-Adams, B., and Adams, W. (1996) The role of xanthophyll, cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis. Trends Plant, Sci. 1: 21–26., Ehleringer, J. R., Björkman, O., and Mooney, H. A. (1976) Leaf pubescence: Effects on absorptance and photosynthesis in a desert, shrub. Science 192: 376–377., Ehleringer, J. R., and Björkman, O. (1977) Quantum yields for CO2, uptake in C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiol. 59: 86–90., Ehleringer, J. R., Sage, R. F., Flanagan, L. B., and Pearcy, R. W. (1991), Climate change and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Trends, Ecol. Evol. 6: 95–99., Evans, J. R. (1999) Leaf anatomy enables more equal access to light, and CO2 between chloroplasts. New Phytol. 143: 93–104., Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., and Hubick, K. T. (1989) Carbon, isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 503–538., Geiger, D. R., and Servaites, J. C. (1994) Diurnal regulation of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in C3 plants. Annu. Rev. Plant, Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 45: 235–256., Gibson, A. C., and Nobel, P. S. (1986) The Cactus Primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA., Gorton, H. L., Williams, W. E., and Vogelmann, T. C. (1999) Chloroplast movement in Alocasia macrorrhiza. Physiol. Plant. 106:, 421–428., Harvey, G. W. (1979) Photosynthetic performance of isolated leaf, cells from sun and shade plants. Carnegie Inst. Washington Yearbook 79: 161–164., Haupt, W., and Scheuerlein, R. (1990) Chloroplast movement. Plant, Cell Environ. 13: 595–614., Havaux, M., Tardy, F., Ravenel, J., Chanu, D., and Parot, P. (1996), Thylakoid membrane stability to heat stress studied by flash, spectroscopic measurements of the electrochromic shift in intact, potato leaves: Influence of the xanthophyll content. Plant Cell, Environ. 19: 1359–1368., Jarvis, P. G., and Leverenz, J. W. (1983) Productivity of temperate,, deciduous and evergreen forests. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 12D, O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond,, and H. Zeigler, eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 233–280., Jeje, A., and Zimmermann, M. (1983) The anisotropy of the mesophyll and CO2 capture sites in Vicia faba L. leaves at low light, intensities. J. Exp. Bot. 34: 1676–1694., Keeling, C. D., and Whorf, T. P. (1994) Atmospheric CO2 records, from sites in the SIO air sampling network. In Trends ‘93: A Com-, , 191, , pendium of Data on Global Change (ORNL/CDIAC-65), T. A., Boden, D. P. Kaiser, R. J. Sepanski, and F. W. Stoss, eds., Carbon, Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory,, Oak Ridge, TN, pp. 16–26., Keeling, C. D., Whorf, T. P., Wahlen, M., and Van der Plicht, J. (1995), Interannual extremes in the rate of rise of atmospheric carbon, dioxide since 1980. Nature 375: 666–670., Koller, D. (1990) Light-driven leaf movements. Plant Cell Environ. 13:, 615–632., Koller, D. (2000) Plants in search of sunlight. Adv. Bot. Res. 33: 35–131., Long, S. P., Humphries, S., and Falkowski, P. G. (1994) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant, Mol. Biol. 45: 633–662., McCree, K. J. (1981) Photosynthetically active radiation. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 12A, O. L. Lange,, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond, and H. Zeigler, eds., Springer,, Berlin, pp. 41–55., Melis, A. (1996) Excitation energy transfer: Functional and dynamic, aspects of Lhc (cab) proteins. In Oxygenic Photosynthesis: The Light, Reactions, D. R. Ort and C. F. Yocum, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht,, Netherlands, pp. 523–538., Neftel, A., Friedle, H., Moor, E., Lötscher, H., Oeschger, H., Siegenthaler, U., and Stauffer, B. (1994) Historical CO2 record from the, Siple Station ice core. In Trends ‘93: A Compendium of Data on, Global Change (ORNL/CDIAC-65), T. A. Boden, D. P. Kaiser, R. J., Sepanski, and F. W. Stoss, eds., Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, pp. 11–15., Nishio, J. N., Sun, J., and Vogelmann, T. C. (1993) Carbon fixation, gradients across spinach leaves do not follow internal light gradient. Plant Cell 5: 953–961., O’Leary, M. H. (1988) Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis. BioScience, 38: 328–333., Ort, D. R., and Baker, N. R. (1988) Consideration of photosynthetic, efficiency at low light as a major determinant of crop photosynthetic performance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 26: 555–565., Osmond, C. B. (1994) What is photoinhibition? Some insights from, comparisons of shade and sun plants. In Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis: From Molecular Mechanisms to the Field. N. R. Baker and, J. R. Bowyer, eds., BIOS Scientific, Oxford, pp. 1–24., Pearcy, R. W., Gross, L. J., and He, D. (1997) An improved dynamic, model of photosynthesis for estimation of carbon gain in sunfleck, light regimes. Plant Cell Environ. 20: 411–424., Richter, T., and Fukshansky, L. (1996) Optics of a bifacial leaf: 2. Light, regime as affected by leaf structure and the light source. Photochem. Photobiol. 63: 517–527., Rupert, C. S., and Letarjet, R. (1978) Toward a nomenclature and, dosimetric scheme applicable to all radiations. Photochem. Photobiol. 28: 3–5., Sage, R. F., and Sharkey, T. D. (1987) The effect of temperature on the, occurrence of O2 and CO2 insensitive photosynthesis in field, grown plants. Plant Physiol. 84: 658–664., Sharkey, T. D. (1996) Emission of low molecular mass hydrocarbons, from plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 78–82., Sharkey, T. D., and Singsaas, E. L. (1995) Why plants emit isoprene., Nature 374: 769., Sharkey, T. D., Chen, X., and Yeh, S. (2001) Isoprene increases thermotolerance of fosmidomycin-fed leaves. Plant Physiol. 125:, 2001–2006., Smith, H. (1986). The perception of light quality. In Photomorphogenesis in Plants, R. E. Kendrick and G. H. M. Kronenberg, eds.,, Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 187–217., Smith, H. (1994). Sensing the light environment: The functions of the, phytochrome family. In Photomorphogenesis in Plants, 2nd ed.,, R. E. Kendrick and G. H. M. Kronenberg, eds., Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 377–416., Syvertsen, J. P., Lloyd, J., McConchie, C., Kriedemann, P. E., and Farquhar, G. D. (1995) On the relationship between leaf anatomy
Page 217 :
192, , Chapter 9, , and CO2 diffusion through the mesophyll of hypostomatous, leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 18: 149–157., Terashima, I. (1992) Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis., Photosynth. Res. 31: 195–212., Terashima, I., and Hikosaka, K. (1995) Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 18:, 1111–1128., Tlalka, M., and Fricker, M. (1999) The role of calcium in blue-lightdependent chloroplast movement in Lemna trisulca L. Plant J. 20:, 461–473., Vogelmann, T. C. (1993) Plant tissue optics. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., Plant Mol. Biol. 44: 231–251., , Vogelmann, T. C., and Björn, L. O. (1983) Response to directional, light by leaves of a sun-tracking lupine (Lupinus succulentus)., Physiol. Plant. 59: 533–538., Vogelmann, T. C., and Han, T. (2000) Measurement of gradients of, absorbed light in spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence, profiles. Plant Cell Environ. 23: 1303–1311., Vogelmann, T. C., Bornman, J. F., and Yates, D. J. (1996) Focusing of, light by leaf epidermal cells. Physiol. Plant. 98: 43–56., von Caemmerer, S. (2000) Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis., CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
Page 218 :
Chapter, , 10, , Translocation in the Phloem, , SURVIVAL ON LAND POSES SOME SERIOUS CHALLENGES to terrestrial plants, foremost of which is the need to acquire and retain water., In response to these environmental pressures, plants evolved roots and, leaves. Roots anchor the plant and absorb water and nutrients; leaves, absorb light and exchange gases. As plants increased in size, the roots, and leaves became increasingly separated from each other in space., Thus, systems evolved for long-distance transport that allowed the, shoot and the root to efficiently exchange products of absorption and, assimilation., You will recall from Chapters 4 and 6 that the xylem is the tissue that, transports water and minerals from the root system to the aerial portions, of the plant. The phloem is the tissue that translocates the products of, photosynthesis from mature leaves to areas of growth and storage,, including the roots. As we will see, the phloem also redistributes water, and various compounds throughout the plant body. These compounds,, some of which initially arrive in the mature leaves via the xylem, can be, either transferred out of the leaves without modification or metabolized, before redistribution., The discussion that follows emphasizes translocation in the phloem, of angiosperms because most of the research has been conducted on that, group of plants. Gymnosperms will be compared briefly to angiosperms, in terms of the anatomy of their conducting cells and possible differences, in their mechanism of translocation. First we will examine some aspects, of translocation in the phloem that have been researched extensively and, are thought to be well understood. These include the pathway and patterns of translocation, materials translocated in the phloem, and rates of, movement., In the second part of the chapter we will explore aspects of translocation in the phloem that need further investigation. Some of these areas,, such as phloem loading and unloading and the allocation and partitioning of photosynthetic products, are being studied intensively at present.
Page 219 :
194, , Chapter 10, , FIGURE 10.1 Transverse section of a vascular bundle of, trefoil, a clover (Trifolium). (130×) The primary phloem is, toward the outside of the stem. Both the primary phloem, and the primary xylem are surrounded by a bundle, sheath of thick-walled sclerenchyma cells, which isolate, the vascular tissue from the ground tissue. (© J. N. A., Lott/Biological Photo Service.), , Primary, phloem, , Bundle sheath, , PATHWAYS OF TRANSLOCATION, The two long-distance transport pathways—the phloem, and the xylem—extend throughout the plant body. The, phloem is generally found on the outer side of both primary and secondary vascular tissues (Figures 10.1 and, 10.2). In plants with secondary growth the phloem constitutes the inner bark., The cells of the phloem that conduct sugars and other, organic materials throughout the plant are called sieve elements. Sieve element is a comprehensive term that includes, both the highly differentiated sieve tube elements typical, of the angiosperms and the relatively unspecialized sieve, cells of gymnosperms. In addition to sieve elements, the, phloem tissue contains companion cells (discussed below), and parenchyma cells (which store and release food molecules). In some cases the phloem tissue also includes fibers, and sclereids (for protection and strengthening of the tissue) and laticifers (latex-containing cells). However, only, the sieve elements are directly involved in translocation., The small veins of leaves and the primary vascular bundles of stems are often surrounded by a bundle sheath (see, Figure 10.1), which consists of one or more layers of compactly arranged cells. (You will recall the bundle sheath, cells involved in C4 metabolism discussed in Chapter 8.) In, the vascular tissue of leaves, the bundle sheath surrounds, the small veins all the way to their ends, isolating the veins, from the intercellular spaces of the leaf., We will begin our discussion of translocation pathways, with the experimental evidence demonstrating that the, sieve elements are the conducting cells in the phloem. Then, we will examine the structure and physiology of these, unusual plant cells., , Sugar Is Translocated in Phloem Sieve Elements, Early experiments on phloem transport date back to the, nineteenth century, indicating the importance of long-distance transport in plants (see Web Topic 10.1). These classical experiments demonstrated that removal of a ring of, bark around the trunk of a tree, which removes the, phloem, effectively stops sugar transport from the leaves, to the roots without altering water transport through the, xylem. When radioactive compounds became available,, radiolabeled 14CO2 was used to show that sugars made in, the photosynthetic process are translocated through the, phloem sieve elements (see Web Topic 10.1)., , Primary, xylem, , Mature Sieve Elements Are Living Cells Highly, Specialized for Translocation, Detailed knowledge of the ultrastructure of sieve elements, is critical to any discussion of the mechanism of translocation in the phloem. Mature sieve elements are unique, among living plant cells (Figures 10.3 and 10.4). They lack, , Secondary, phloem, Vascular, cambium, , 3, , 2, , Secondary, xylem, , 1, , Pith, , FIGURE 10.2 Transverse section of a 3-year-old stem of an, ash (Fraxinus excelsior) tree. (27×) The numbers 1, 2, and 3, indicate growth rings in the secondary xylem. The old secondary phloem has been crushed by expansion of the, xylem. Only the most recent (innermost) layer of secondary, phloem is functional. (© P. Gates/Biological Photo Service.)
Page 220 :
Translocation in the Phloem, (B), , (A), , Sieve plate, P-protein, , Sieve plate, pore, , Lateral sieve, area, , Sieve tube, element, , Modified, plastid, , FIGURE 10.3 Schematic drawings of mature sieve, elements (sieve tube elements). (A) External view,, showing sieve plates and lateral sieve areas. (B), Longitudinal section, showing two sieve tube elements joined together to form a sieve tube. The, pores in the sieve plates between the sieve tube elements are open channels for transport through the, sieve tube. The plasma membrane of a sieve tube, element is continuous with that of its neighboring, sieve tube element. Each sieve tube element is associated with one or more companion cells, which, take over some of the essential metabolic functions, that are reduced or lost during differentiation of the, sieve tube elements. Note that the companion cell, has many cytoplasmic organelles, whereas the sieve, tube element has relatively few organelles. An ordinary companion cell is depicted here., , Sieve tube, element, Smooth, endoplasmic, reticulum, Cytoplasm, Plasma, membrane, , Companion, cell, Branched, plasmodesmata, Vacuole, Chloroplast, , Thickened, primary wall, , Nucleus, , Sieve plate, pore, , Mitochondrion, , Sieve plate, , many structures normally found in living cells, even the, undifferentiated cells from which mature sieve elements, are formed. For example, sieve elements lose their nuclei, and tonoplasts (vacuolar membrane) during development., Microfilaments, microtubules, Golgi bodies, and ribosomes, are also absent from the mature cells. In addition to the, plasma membrane, organelles that are retained include, somewhat modified mitochondria, plastids, and smooth, endoplasmic reticulum. The walls are nonlignified, though, they are secondarily thickened in some cases., Thus the sieve elements have a cellular structure different from that of tracheary elements of the xylem, which are, dead at maturity, lack a plasma membrane, and have lignified secondary walls. As we will see, living cells are critical to the mechanism of translocation in the phloem., , FIGURE 10.4 Electron micrograph of a transverse section of, ordinary companion cells and mature sieve tube elements., (3600×) The cellular components are distributed along the, walls of the sieve tube elements. (From Warmbrodt 1985.), , 195, , Companion, cell, , Sieve tube, elements
Page 221 :
196, , Chapter 10, , Sieve Areas Are the Prominent Feature of Sieve, Elements, Sieve elements (sieve cells and sieve tube elements) have, characteristic sieve areas in their cell walls, where pores, interconnect the conducting cells (see Figure 10.5). The, sieve area pores range in diameter from less than 1 µm to, approximately 15 µm. Unlike sieve areas of gymnosperms,, the sieve areas of angiosperms can differentiate into sieve, plates (see Figure 10.5 and Table 10.1)., Sieve plates have larger pores than the other sieve areas, in the cell and are generally found on the end walls of sieve, tube elements, where the individual cells are joined, together to form a longitudinal series called a sieve tube, (see Figure 10.3). Furthermore, the sieve plate pores of sieve, tube elements are open channels that allow transport, between cells (see Figure 10.5)., In contrast, all of the sieve areas are more or less the same, in gymnosperms such as conifers. The pores of gymnosperm, sieve areas meet in large median cavities in the middle of the, wall. Smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER) covers the sieve, (A), , (B), , Parenchyma, cell, Unobstructed, sieve plate, pores, Sieve, element, , Parenchyma, cell, , Wall between, sieve elements, Sieve, element, Companion cell, , FIGURE 10.5 Sieve elements and open sieve plate pores. (A), Electron micrograph of a longitudinal section of two, mature sieve elements (sieve tube elements), showing the, wall between the sieve elements (called a sieve plate) in the, hypocotyl of winter squash (Cucurbita maxima). (3685×) (B), The inset shows sieve plate pores in face view (4280×). In, both images A and B, the sieve plate pores are open—that, is, unobstructed by P-protein. (From Evert 1982.), , TABLE 10.1, Characteristics of the two types of sieve elements in, seed plants, Sieve tube elements found in angiosperms, , 1. Some sieve areas are differentiated into sieve plates;, individual sieve tube elements are joined together into a, sieve tube., 2. Sieve plate pores are open channels., 3. P-protein is present in all dicots and many monocots., 4. Companion cells are sources of ATP and perhaps other, compounds and, in some species, are transfer cells or, intermediary cells., Sieve cells found in gymnosperms, , 1. There are no sieve plates; all sieve areas are similar., 2. Pores in sieve areas appear blocked with membranes, 3. There is no P-protein., 4. Albuminous cells sometimes function as companion cells., , areas (Figure 10.6) and is continuous through the sieve pores, and median cavity, as indicated by ER-specific staining., Observation of living material with confocal laser scanning, microscopy confirms that the observed distribution of SER, is not an artifact of fixation (Schulz 1992)., , Deposition of P-Protein and Callose Seals Off, Damaged Sieve Elements, The sieve tube elements of most angiosperms are rich in a, phloem protein called P-protein (see Figure 10.3B) (Clark, et al. 1997). (In classical literature, P-protein was called, slime.) P-protein is found in all dicots and in many monocots, and it is absent in gymnosperms. It occurs in several, different forms (tubular, fibrillar, granular, and crystalline), depending on the species and maturity of the cell., In immature cells, P-protein is most evident as discrete, bodies in the cytosol known as P-protein bodies. P-protein, bodies may be spheroidal, spindle-shaped, or twisted and, coiled. They generally disperse into tubular or fibrillar, forms during cell maturation., P-proteins have been characterized at the molecular, level. For example, P-proteins from the genus Cucurbita, consist of two major proteins: PP1, the phloem filament, protein, and PP2, the phloem lectin. The gene that encodes, PP1 in pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) has sequence similarity to genes encoding cysteine proteinase inhibitors, suggesting a possible role in defense against phloem-feeding, insects. Both PP1 and PP2 are thought to be synthesized in, companion cells (discussed in the next section) and transported via the plasmodesmata to the sieve elements, where, they associate to form P-protein filaments and P-protein, bodies (Clark et al. 1997)., P-protein appears to function in sealing off damaged, sieve elements by plugging up the sieve plate pores. Sieve, tubes are under very high internal turgor pressure, and the, sieve elements in a sieve tube are connected through open, sieve plate pores. When a sieve tube is cut or punctured,
Page 222 :
Translocation in the Phloem, , Sieve, cell, , P, , Sieve, cell, SER, , P, , sa, , 1 µm, , FIGURE 10.6 Electron micrograph showing a sieve area (sa), linking two sieve cells of a conifer (Pinus resinosa). Smooth, endoplasmic reticulum (SER) covers the sieve area on both, sides and is also found within the pores and the extended, median cavity. Plastids (P) are enclosed by the SER. (From, Schulz 1990.), , the release of pressure causes the contents of the sieve elements to surge toward the cut end, from which the plant, could lose much sugar-rich phloem sap if there were no, sealing mechanism. (Sap is a general term used to refer to, the fluid contents of plant cells.) When surging occurs,, however, P-protein and other cellular inclusions are, trapped on the sieve plate pores, helping to seal the sieve, element and to prevent further loss of sap., A longer-term solution to sieve tube damage is the production of callose in the sieve pores. Callose, a β-1,3-glucan, is synthesized by an enzyme in the plasma membrane, and is deposited between the plasma membrane and the, cell wall. Callose is synthesized in functioning sieve elements in response to damage and other stresses, such as, mechanical stimulation and high temperatures, or in preparation for normal developmental events, such as dormancy., The deposition of wound callose in the sieve pores efficiently seals off damaged sieve elements from surrounding, intact tissue. As the sieve elements recover from damage,, the callose disappears from these pores., , Companion Cells Aid the Highly Specialized, Sieve Elements, Each sieve tube element is associated with one or more, companion cells (see Figures 10.3B, 10.4, and 10.5). The, division of a single mother cell forms the sieve tube element and the companion cell. Numerous plasmodesmata, (see Chapter 1) penetrate the walls between sieve tube elements and their companion cells, suggesting a close func-, , 197, , tional relationship and a ready exchange of solutes, between the two cells. The plasmodesmata are often complex and branched on the companion cell side., Companion cells play a role in the transport of photosynthetic products from producing cells in mature leaves, to the sieve elements in the minor (small) veins of the leaf., They are also thought to take over some of the critical, metabolic functions, such as protein synthesis, that are, reduced or lost during differentiation of the sieve elements, (Bostwick et al. 1992). In addition, the numerous mitochondria in companion cells may supply energy as ATP to, the sieve elements., There are at least three different types of companion, cells in the minor veins of mature, exporting leaves: “ordinary” companion cells, transfer cells, and intermediary, cells. All three cell types have dense cytoplasm and abundant mitochondria., Ordinary companion cells (Figure 10.7A) have chloroplasts with well-developed thylakoids and a cell wall with, a smooth inner surface. Of most significance, relatively few, plasmodesmata connect this type of companion cell to any, of the surrounding cells except its own sieve element. As a, result, the symplast of the sieve element and its companion cell is relatively, if not entirely, symplastically isolated, from that of surrounding cells., Transfer cells are similar to ordinary companion cells,, except for the development of fingerlike wall ingrowths,, particularly on the cell walls that face away from the sieve, element (Figure 10.7B). These wall ingrowths greatly, increase the surface area of the plasma membrane, thus, increasing the potential for solute transfer across the membrane., Because of the scarcity of cytoplasmic connections to, surrounding cells and the wall ingrowths in transfer cells,, the ordinary companion cell and the transfer cell are, thought to be specialized for taking up solutes from the, apoplast or cell wall space. Xylem parenchyma cells can, also be modified as transfer cells, probably serving to, retrieve and reroute solutes moving in the xylem, which is, also part of the apoplast., Though ordinary companion cells and transfer cells are, relatively isolated symplastically from surrounding cells,, there are some plasmodesmata in the walls of these cells., The function of these plasmodesmata is not known. The, fact that they are present indicates that they must have a, function, and an important one, since the cost of having, them is high: They are the avenues by which viruses, become systemic in the plant. They are, however, difficult, to study because they are so inaccessible., Intermediary cells appear well suited for taking up, solutes via cytoplasmic connections (Figure 10.7C). Intermediary cells have numerous plasmodesmata connecting, them to surrounding cells, particularly to the bundle sheath, cells. Although the presence of many plasmodesmatal connections to surrounding cells is their most characteristic, feature, intermediary cells are also distinctive in having
Page 223 :
198, , Chapter 10, , (A), , (B), , Wall, ingrowths, , Plasmodesmata, , Transfer, cell, Sieve, element, , Parenchyma cell, Ordinary, companion cell, , Sieve, elements, , Intermediary, cell, , (C), , Vascular, parenchyma, cell, , Sieve, elements, , Intermediary, cell, , Bundle sheath, cells, , numerous small vacuoles, as well as poorly developed thylakoids and a lack of starch grains in the chloroplasts., In general, ordinary companion cells and transfer cells, are found in plants that feature an apoplastic step in the, transfer of sugars from mesophyll cells to sieve elements., Companion cells and transfer cells transfer sugars from the, apoplast to the symplast of the sieve elements and companion cells in the source. Intermediary cells, on the other, hand, function in symplastic transport of sugars from mesophyll cells to sieve elements in plants where no apoplastic step appears to occur in the source leaf., , PATTERNS OF TRANSLOCATION:, SOURCE TO SINK, Sap in the phloem is not translocated exclusively in either, an upward or a downward direction, and translocation in, , FIGURE 10.7 Electron micrographs of companion cells in, minor veins of mature leaves. (A) Three sieve elements, abut two intermediary cells and a more lightly stained ordinary companion cell in a minor vein from Mimulus cardinalis. (6585×) (B) A sieve element adjacent to a transfer cell, with numerous wall ingrowths in pea (Pisum sativum)., (8020×) Such ingrowths greatly increase the surface area of, the transfer cell’s plasma membrane, thus increasing the, transfer of materials from the mesophyll to the sieve elements. (C) A typical intermediary cell with numerous fields, of plasmodesmata (arrows) connecting it to neighboring, bundle sheath cells. These plasmodesmata are branched on, both sides, but the branches are longer and narrower on the, intermediary cell side. Minor-vein phloem was taken from, heartleaf maskflower (Alonsoa warscewiczii). (4700×) (A and, C from Turgeon et al. 1993, courtesy of R. Turgeon; B from, Brentwood 1978.), , the phloem is not defined with respect to gravity. Rather,, sap is translocated from areas of supply, called sources, to, areas of metabolism or storage, called sinks., Sources include any exporting organs, typically mature, leaves, that are capable of producing photosynthate in, excess of their own needs. The term photosynthate refers to, products of photosynthesis. Another type of source is a, storage organ during the exporting phase of its development. For example, the storage root of the biennial wild, beet (Beta maritima) is a sink during the growing season of, the first year, when it accumulates sugars received from the, source leaves. During the second growing season the same, root becomes a source; the sugars are remobilized and utilized to produce a new shoot, which ultimately becomes, reproductive., It is noteworthy that cultivated varieties of beets have, been selected for the capacity of their roots to act as sinks, during all phases of development. Thus, roots of the cultivated sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) can increase in dry mass, during both the first and the second growing seasons, so
Page 224 :
Translocation in the Phloem, , 199, , the leaves serve as sources during both flowering and fruiting stages., Sinks include any nonphotosynthetic organs of the, plant and organs that do not produce enough photosynthetic products to support their own growth or storage, needs. Roots, tubers, developing fruits, and immature, leaves, which must import carbohydrate for normal development, are all examples of sink tissues. Both girdling and, labeling studies support the source-to-sink pattern of, translocation in the phloem., , young, immature leaves; the lower leaves supply predominantly the root system. Intermediate leaves export in both, directions, bypassing the intervening mature leaves., , Source-to-Sink Pathways Follow Anatomic and, Developmental Patterns, , Vascular connections. Source leaves preferentially sup-, , Although the overall pattern of transport in the phloem can, be stated simply as source-to-sink movement, the specific, pathways involved are often more complex. Not all sources, supply all sinks on a plant; rather, certain sources preferentially supply specific sinks. In the case of herbaceous, plants, such as sugar beet and soybean, the following generalizations can be made., , Proximity. The proximity of the source to the sink is a, significant factor. The upper mature leaves on a plant usually provide photosynthates to the growing shoot tip and, , (A), , (B), , 14, , Development. The importance of various sinks may shift, during plant development. Whereas the root and shoot, apices are usually the major sinks during vegetative, growth, fruits generally become the dominant sinks during reproductive development, particularly for adjacent, and other nearby leaves., , ply sinks with which they have direct vascular connections., In the shoot system, for example, a given leaf is generally, connected via the vascular system to other leaves directly, above or below it on the stem. Such a vertical row of leaves, is called an orthostichy. The number of internodes between, leaves on the same orthostichy varies with the species. Figure 10.8A shows the three-dimensional structure of the, phloem in an internode of dahlia (Dahlia pinnata)., , Modification of translocation pathways. Interference, with a translocation pathway by wounding or pruning can, alter the patterns established by proximity and vascular, , (C), , 14 CO, 2, , 14 CO, 2, , 10, , 7, , 9, 11, , 6, , 2, , 5, , 12, , 3, , 4, 4, , 1, , 8, , 8, , 3, 1, , 7, 5, , 6, , 2, , 9, , 11, , 13, , 15, 10, , FIGURE 10.8 (A) Longitudinal view of a typical threedimensional structure of the phloem in a thick section, (from an internode of dahlia [Dahlia pinnata]). View here, after clearing, staining with aniline blue, and observing, under an epifluorescent microscope; the sieve plates are, seen as numerous small dots because of the yellow staining, of callosa in the sieve areas. Two large longitudinal vascular bundles are prominent. This staining reveals the delicate, sieve tubes forming the phloem network; two phloem anastomoses are marked by arrows. (B) Distribution of radioactivity from a single labeled source leaf in an intact plant., The distribution of radioactivity in leaves of a sugar beet, plant (Beta vulgaris) was determined 1 week after 14CO2, , was supplied for 4 hours to a single source leaf (arrow). The, degree of radioactive labeling is indicated by the intensity of, shading of the leaves. Leaves are numbered according to, their age; the youngest, newly emerged leaf is designated 1., The 14C label was translocated mainly to the sink leaves, directly above the source leaf (that is, sink leaves on the, same orthostichy as the source; for example, leaves 1 and 6, are sink leaves directly above source leaf 14). (C) Same as B,, except all source leaves on the side of the plant opposite the, labeled leaf were removed 24 hours before labeling. Sink, leaves on both sides of the plant now receive 14C-labeled, assimilates from the source. (A courtesy of R. Aloni; B and C, based on data from Joy 1964.)
Page 225 :
200, , Chapter 10, , connections that have been outlined here. In the absence of, direct connections between source and sink, vascular interconnections, called anastomoses (singular anastomosis) (see, Figure 10.8A), can provide an alternative pathway. In sugar, beet, for example, removing source leaves from one side of, the plant can bring about cross-transfer of photosynthates, to young leaves (sink leaves) on the pruned side (Figure, 10.8C). Removal of the lower source leaves on a plant can, force the upper source leaves to translocate materials to the, roots, and removal of the upper source leaves can force, lower source leaves to translocate materials to the upper, parts of the plant., The plasticity of the translocation pathway depends on, the extent of the interconnections between vascular bundles and thus on the species and organs studied. In some, species the leaves on a branch with no fruits cannot transport photosynthate to the fruits on an adjacent defoliated, branch. But in other plants, such as soybean (Glycine max),, photosynthate is transferred readily from a partly defruited, side to a partly defoliated side., , MATERIALS TRANSLOCATED IN THE, PHLOEM: SUCROSE, AMINO ACIDS,, HORMONES, AND SOME INORGANIC IONS, Water is the most abundant substance transported in the, phloem. Dissolved in the water are the translocated solutes,, mainly carbohydrates (Table 10.2). Sucrose is the sugar, most commonly transported in sieve elements. There is, always some sucrose in sieve element sap, and it can reach, concentrations of 0.3 to 0.9 M., Nitrogen is found in the phloem largely in amino acids, and amides, especially glutamate and aspartate and their, respective amides, glutamine and asparagine. Reported, levels of amino acids and organic acids vary widely, even, for the same species, but they are usually low compared, with carbohydrates., Almost all the endogenous plant hormones, including, auxin, gibberellins, cytokinins, and abscisic acid (see Chapters 19, 20, 21, and 23), have been found in sieve elements., The long-distance transport of hormones is thought to, occur at least partly in the sieve elements. Nucleotide phosphates and proteins have also been found in phloem sap., Proteins found in the phloem include filamentous Pproteins (which are involved in the sealing of wounded, sieve elements), protein kinases (protein phosphorylation),, thioredoxin (disulfide reduction), ubiquitin (protein, turnover), chaperones (protein folding), and protease, inhibitors (protection of phloem proteins from degradation, and defense against phloem-feeding insects) (Schobert et, al. 1995; Yoo et al. 2000)., Inorganic solutes that move in the phloem include, potassium, magnesium, phosphate, and chloride (see Table, 10.2). In contrast, nitrate, calcium, sulfur, and iron are relatively immobile in the phloem., , TABLE 10.2, The composition of phloem sap from castor bean, (Ricinus communis), collected as an exudate from, cuts in the phloem, Component, , Sugars, Amino acids, Organic acids, Protein, Potassium, Chloride, Phosphate, Magnesium, , Concentration (mg mL–1), , 80.0–106.0, 5.2, 2.0–3.2, 1.45–2.20, 2.3–4.4, 0.355–0.675, 0.350–0.550, 0.109–0.122, , Source: Hall and Baker 1972., , We will begin the discussion of phloem content with a, look at the methods used to identify materials translocated, in the phloem. We will then examine the translocated sugars and the complexities of nitrogen transport in the plant., , Phloem Sap Can Be Collected and Analyzed, The collection of phloem sap has been experimentally challenging (see Web Topic 10.2). A few species exude phloem, sap from wounds that sever sieve elements, making it possible to collect relatively pure samples of phloem sap., Another approach is to use the stylet of an aphid as a “natural syringe.”, Aphids are small insects that feed by inserting their, mouthparts, consisting of four tubular stylets, into a single, sieve element of a leaf or stem. Sap can be collected from, aphid stylets cut from the body of the insect, usually with, a laser, after the aphid has been anesthetized with CO2. The, high turgor pressure in the sieve element forces the cell, contents through the stylet to the cut end, where they can, be collected. Exudate from severed stylets provides a fairly, accurate picture of the composition of phloem sap (see Web, Topic 10.2). Exudation from severed stylets can continue, for hours, suggesting that the aphid prevents the plant’s, normal sealing mechanisms from operating., , Sugars Are Translocated in Nonreducing Form, Results from analyses of collected sap indicate that the, translocated carbohydrates are all nonreducing sugars., Reducing sugars, such as glucose and fructose, contain an, exposed aldehyde or ketone group (Figure 10.9A). In a, nonreducing sugar, such as sucrose, the ketone or aldehyde, group is reduced to an alcohol or combined with a similar group on another sugar (Figure 10.9B). Most researchers, believe that the nonreducing sugars are the major compounds translocated in the phloem because they are less, reactive than their reducing counterparts., Sucrose is the most commonly translocated sugar; many, of the other mobile carbohydrates contain sucrose bound to, varying numbers of galactose molecules. Raffinose consists
Page 226 :
Translocation in the Phloem, (A) Reducing sugars, which are not generally translocated in the phloem, The reducing groups are aldehyde (glucose and mannose) and ketone (fructose) groups., Aldehyde, , Aldehyde, , H, , C, , O, , H, , C, , HO, , Ketone, , H, , C, , O, , CH2OH, , OH, , HO, , C, , H, , C, , O, , C, , H, , HO, , C, , H, , HO, , C, , H, , H, , C, , OH, , H, , C, , OH, , H, , C, , OH, , H, , C, , OH, , H, , C, , OH, , H, , C, , OH, , CH2OH, D-Glucose, , CH2OH, , CH2OH, , D-Mannose, , D-Fructose, , (B) Compounds commonly translocated in the phloem, Sucrose is a disaccharide made up, of one glucose and one fructose, molecule. Raffinose, stachyose,, and verbascose contain sucrose, bound to one, two, or three, galactose molecules, respectively., , Mannitol is a sugar, alcohol formed by, the reduction of, the aldehyde group, of mannose., , Sucrose, Raffinose, , CH2OH, , Stachyose, Verbascose, , HO, , C, , H, , H, , C, , OH, , H, , C, , OH, , O, , CH2OH, , HO, , OH O OH, , O, , Galactose, , H, , C, H2, , OH, , CH 2, O, O, , Galactose, , C, , HO, , HO, HO, , OH, , O, , O, , OH, CH 2, , HO CH 2, HO O, , OH, , HO CH 2, HO O, , OH, , HO, , Galactose, , HO, , Glucose, , OH, CH 2, , D-Mannitol, , Fructose, , Nonreducing sugar, , Sugar alcohol, , Glutamic acid, an amino acid, and glutamine, its amide, are important, nitrogenous compounds in the phloem, in addition to aspartate and, asparagine., , HO, , H, , H, , H, , C, , C, , C, , C, , C, , O, , H, , H, , N, , O, , H, , H2N, , OH, , H, , H, , H, , C, , C, , C, , C, , C, , O, , H, , H, , N, , O, , H, , H, , OH, , H, , Glutamic acid, , Glutamine, , Amino acid, , Amide, , Species with nitrogen-fixing nodules also utilize ureides as transport, forms of nitrogen., H, H2N, , C, , N, C, , O, H2N, , C, O, , N, , O, , H, C, O, , H, , Allantoic acid, , OH, , C, , NH, , HN, , C, C, , H, , N, H, , C, O, , NH2, , H2N, , C, , H, , H, , N, , CH2CH2CH2C, NH2, , O, , O, , Allantoin, Ureides, , Citrulline, , COOH, , 201, , FIGURE 10.9 Structures of compounds not normally translocated in the phloem (A) and of, compounds commonly translocated in the phloem (B).
Page 227 :
202, , Chapter 10, , of sucrose and one galactose molecule, stachyose consists of, sucrose and two galactose molecules, and verbascose consists, of sucrose and three galactose molecules (see Figure 10.9B)., Translocated sugar alcohols include mannitol and sorbitol., , Phloem and Xylem Interact to Transport, Nitrogenous Compounds, Nitrogen is transported throughout the plant in either, inorganic or organic form, with the predominant form, depending on several factors, including the transport pathway. Whereas nitrogen is transported in the phloem almost, entirely in organic form, in the xylem it can be transported, either as nitrate or as part of an organic molecule. (see, Chapter 12). Usually the same group of organic molecules, carries nitrogen in both the xylem and the phloem., The form in which nitrogen is transported in the xylem, depends on the species studied. Species that do not form a, symbiotic association with nitrogen-fixing microorganisms, usually depend on soil nitrate as their major nitrogen source, (see Chapter 12). In the xylem of these species, nitrogen is, usually present in the form of both nitrate and nitrogen-rich, organic molecules, particularly the amides asparagine and, glutamine (see Figure 10.9B)., Species with nitrogen-fixing nodules on their roots (see, Chapter 12) depend on atmospheric nitrogen, rather than, on soil nitrate, as their major nitrogen source. After being, converted to an organic form, this nitrogen is transported, in the xylem to the shoot, usually in the form of amides or, ureides such as allantoin, allantoic acid, or citrulline (see, Figure 10.9B)., Whenever nitrogen is assimilated into organic compounds in the roots, both the energy and the carbon skeletons required for assimilation are derived from photosynthates transported to the roots via the phloem. Nitrogen, levels in mature leaves are quite stable, indicating that at, least some of the excess nitrogen continuously arriving via, the xylem is redistributed via the phloem to fruits or, younger leaves. (See Web Topic 10.3 for information on, nitrogen transport in the soybean.), Finally, levels of nitrogenous compounds in the phloem, are quite high during leaf senescence. In woody species,, senescing leaves mobilize and export nitrogenous compounds to the woody tissues for storage; in herbaceous, plants nitrogen is exported generally to the seeds. Other, solutes, such as mineral ions, are redistributed from senescing leaves in the same manner., , RATES OF MOVEMENT, The rate of movement of materials in the sieve elements can, be expressed in two ways: as velocity, the linear distance, traveled per unit time, or as mass transfer rate, the quantity, of material passing through a given cross section of phloem, or sieve elements per unit time. Mass transfer rates based, on the cross-sectional area of the sieve elements are pre-, , ferred because the sieve elements are the conducting cells, of the phloem. Values for mass transfer rate range from 1 to, 15 g h–1 cm–2 of sieve elements (see Web Topic 10.4)., In early publications reporting on rates of transport in, the phloem, the units of velocity were centimeters per hour, (cm h–1), and the units of mass transfer were grams per, hour per square centimeter (g h–1 cm–2) of phloem or sieve, elements. The currently preferred units (SI units) are meters, (m) or millimeters (mm) for length, seconds (s) for time,, and kilograms (kg) for mass., , Velocities of Phloem Transport Far Exceed the, Rate of Diffusion, Both velocities and mass transfer rates can be measured, with radioactive tracers. (Methods of measuring mass, transfer rates are described in Web Topic 10.4.) In the simplest type of experiment for measuring velocity, 11C- or 14Clabeled CO2 is applied for a brief period of time to a source, leaf (pulse labeling), and the arrival of label at a sink tissue, or at a particular point along the pathway is monitored, with an appropriate detector., The length of the translocation pathway divided by the, time interval required for label to be first detected at the, sink yields a measure of velocity. A more accurate measurement of velocity is obtained from monitoring the, arrival of label at two points along the pathway. This, method excludes from the measurement the time required, for fixation of labeled carbon by photosynthesis, for its, incorporation into transport sugar, and for accumulation, of sugar in the sieve elements of the source leaf., In general, velocities measured by a variety of techniques average about 1 m h–1 and range from 0.3 to 1.5 m, h–1 (30–150 cm h–1). Transport velocities in the phloem are, clearly quite high, well in excess of the rate of diffusion, over long distances. Any proposed mechanism of phloem, translocation must account for these high velocities., , THE MECHANISM OF TRANSLOCATION, IN THE PHLOEM: THE PRESSURE-FLOW, MODEL, The mechanism of phloem translocation in angiosperms is, best explained by the pressure-flow model, which accounts, for most of the experimental and structural data currently, available. We will see in this discussion that the pressureflow model explains phloem translocation as a flow of solution (bulk flow) driven by an osmotically generated pressure gradient between source and sink., In early research on phloem translocation, both active and, passive mechanisms were considered. All theories, both, active and passive, assume an energy requirement in both, sources and sinks. In sources, energy is necessary to move, photosynthate from producing cells into the sieve elements., This movement of photosynthate is called phloem loading, and, it is discussed in detail later in the chapter. In sinks, energy is
Page 228 :
Translocation in the Phloem, essential for some aspects of movement from sieve elements, to sink cells, which store or metabolize the sugar. This movement of photosynthate from sieve elements to sink cells is, called phloem unloading and will also be discussed later., The passive mechanisms of phloem transport further, assume that energy is required in the sieve elements of the, path between sources and sinks simply to maintain structures such as the cell plasma membrane and to recover sugars lost from the phloem by leakage. The pressure-flow, model is an example of a passive mechanism. The active, theories, on the other hand, postulate an additional expenditure of energy by path sieve elements in order to drive, translocation itself (Zimmermann and Milburn 1975)., , A Pressure Gradient Drives Translocation, Diffusion is far too slow to account for the velocities of, solute movement observed in the phloem. Translocation, velocities average 1 m h–1; the rate of diffusion is 1 m per, 32 years! (See Chapter 3 for a discussion of diffusion velocities and the distances over which diffusion is an effective, transport mechanism.), The pressure-flow model, first proposed by Ernst, Münch in 1930, states that a flow of solution in the sieve, elements is driven by an osmotically generated pressure gradient between source and sink (∆Yp). The pressure gradient is established as a consequence of phloem loading at, the source and phloem unloading at the sink., Recall from Chapter 3 (Equation 3.6) that Yw = Ys + Yp;, that is, Yp = Yw − Ys. In source tissues, energy-driven, phloem loading leads to an accumulation of sugars in the, sieve elements, generating a low (negative) solute potential (∆Ys) and causing a steep drop in the water potential, (∆Yw). In response to the water potential gradient, water, enters the sieve elements and causes the turgor pressure, (Yp) to increase., At the receiving end of the translocation pathway,, phloem unloading leads to a lower sugar concentration in, the sieve elements, generating a higher (more positive), solute potential in the sieve elements of sink tissues. As the, water potential of the phloem rises above that of the xylem,, water tends to leave the phloem in response to the water, potential gradient, causing a decrease in turgor pressure in, the sieve elements of the sink. Figure 10.10 illustrates the, pressure-flow hypothesis., If no cross-walls were present in the translocation pathway—that is, if the entire pathway were a single membrane-enclosed compartment—the different pressures at, the source and sink would rapidly equilibrate. The presence of sieve plates greatly increases the resistance along, the pathway and results in the generation and maintenance of a substantial pressure gradient in the sieve elements between source and sink. The sieve element contents are physically pushed along the translocation, pathway as a bulk flow, much like water flowing through, a garden hose., , 203, , Close inspection of the water potential values shown in, Figure 10.10 shows that water in the phloem is moving against, a water potential gradient from source to sink. Such water, movement does not violate the laws of thermodynamics, because the water is moving by bulk flow rather than by, osmosis. That is, no membranes are crossed during transport from one sieve tube to another, and solutes are moving at the same rate as the water molecules., Under these conditions, the solute potential, Ys, cannot, contribute to the driving force for water movement,, although it still influences the water potential. Water movement in the translocation pathway is therefore driven by the, pressure gradient rather than by the water potential gradient. Of course, the passive, pressure-driven, long-distance, translocation in the sieve tubes ultimately depends on the, active, short-distance transport mechanisms involved in, phloem loading and unloading. These active mechanisms, are responsible for setting up the pressure gradient., , The Predictions of the Pressure-Flow Model Have, Been Confirmed, Some important predictions emerge from the pressure-flow, model:, • The sieve plate pores must be unobstructed. If P-protein or other materials blocked the pores, the resistance, to flow of the sieve element sap would be too great., • True bidirectional transport (i.e., simultaneous transport, in both directions) in a single sieve element cannot, occur. A mass flow of solution precludes such bidirectional movement because a solution can flow in only, one direction in a pipe at any one time. Solutes within, the phloem can move bidirectionally, but in different, sieve elements or at different times., • Great expenditures of energy are not required in, order to drive translocation in the tissues along the, path, although energy is required to maintain the, structure of the sieve elements and to reload any sugars lost to the apoplast by leakage. Therefore, treatments that restrict the supply of ATP in the path,, such as low temperature, anoxia, and metabolic, inhibitors, should not stop translocation., • The pressure-flow hypothesis demands the presence, of a positive pressure gradient. Turgor pressure must, be higher in sieve elements of sources than in sieve, elements of sinks, and the pressure difference must be, large enough to overcome the resistance of the pathway and to maintain flow at the observed velocities., The available evidence testing these predictions supports, the pressure-flow hypothesis., , Sieve Plate Pores Are Open Channels, Ultrastructural studies of sieve elements are challenging, because of the high internal pressure in these cells. When
Page 229 :
204, , Chapter 10, , Xylem vessel elements, , Companion cell, , Phloem sieve elements, H2O, , Source cell, , H2O, , Yw = –0.8 MPa, Yp = –0.7 MPa, Ys = –0.1 MPa, , Active phloem, loading into, sieve elements, decreases the, solute potential,, water enters,, and high turgor, pressure results., , Sugar at the source,, illustrated here by sucrose, (red spheres) is actively, loaded into the sieve, element–companion cell, complex., , Yw = –1.1 MPa, Yp = 0.6 MPa, Ys = –1.7 MPa, , Sucrose, H2O, , Pressure-driven, bulk flow of, water and solute, from source to, sink, , H2O, , Sink cell, , Transpiration, stream, , At the sink, sugars are, unloaded., , H2O, , Yw = –0.6 MPa, Yp = –0.5 MPa, Ys = –0.1 MPa, , Active phloem, unloading, increases the, solute potential,, water flows out,, and a lower, turgor pressure, results., , H2O, , Yw = –0.4 MPa, Yp = 0.3 MPa, Ys = –0.7 MPa, Sucrose, , FIGURE 10.10 Pressure-flow model of translocation in, , the phloem. Possible values for Yw, Yp, and Ys in the, xylem and phloem are illustrated. (After Nobel 1991.), , the phloem is excised or killed slowly with chemical fixatives, the turgor pressure in the sieve elements is released., The contents of the cell, including P-protein, surge toward, the point of pressure release and, in the case of sieve tube, elements, accumulate on the sieve plates. This accumulation is probably the reason that many earlier electron, micrographs show sieve plates that are obstructed., Newer, rapid freezing and fixation techniques provide, reliable pictures of undisturbed sieve elements. Electron, micrographs of sieve tube elements prepared by such techniques show that P-protein is usually found along the, periphery of the sieve tube elements (see Figures 10.3, 10.4,, and 10.5), or it is evenly distributed throughout the lumen, of the cell. Furthermore, the pores contain P-protein in similar positions, lining the pore or in a loose network. The, open condition of the pores, seen in many species, such as, , cucurbits, sugar beet, and bean (e.g., see Figure 10.5), supports the pressure-flow model., In addition to obtaining the structural evidence provided, by electron microscopy, it is important to determine whether, the sieve plate pores are open in the intact tissue. The use of, confocal laser scanning microscopy, which allows for the, direct observation of translocation through living sieve elements, addresses this question (Knoblauch and van Bel, 1998). Such experiments show that the sieve plate pores of, living, translocating sieve elements are open (Figure 10.11)., , Bidirectional Transport Cannot Be Seen in Single, Sieve Elements, Researchers have investigated bidirectional transport by, applying two different radiotracers to two source leaves,, one above the other (Eschrich 1975). Each leaf receives one
Page 230 :
Translocation in the Phloem, (A), , 205, , (B), Confocal, microscope, objective, , Main vein, , SE, , Basal, Apical, window window, , Translocation to, intact plant, , Phloem-mobile, dye added here, , SE, , *, , CC, , SE, , Direction of, translocation, , Leaf blade, , SP, , (C), , 15 µm, , FIGURE 10.11 Translocation in living, functional sieve eleSP, CC, SE, SE, CC, CC, , SE, , 15 µm, , of the tracers, and a point between the two sources is monitored for the presence of both tracers., Transport in two directions has often been detected in, sieve elements of different vascular bundles in stems., Transport in two directions has also been seen in adjacent, sieve elements of the same bundle in petioles. Bidirectional, transport in adjacent sieve elements can occur in the petiole of a leaf that is undergoing the transition from sink to, source and simultaneously importing and exporting photosynthates through its petiole. However, simultaneous, bidirectional transport in a single sieve element has never, been demonstrated., , Translocation Rate Is Typically Insensitive to the, Energy Supply of the Path Tissues, In plants that can survive periods of low temperature, such, as sugar beet, rapidly chilling a short segment of the peti-, , ments of a leaf attached to an intact broad bean (Vicia faba), plant. (A) Two windows were sliced parallel to the epidermis on the lower side of the main vein of a mature leaf,, exposing the phloem tissue. The objective of the laser confocal microscope was positioned over the basal window. A, phloem-mobile fluorescent dye was added at the apical, window. If translocation occurred, the dye would become, visible in the microscope at the basal window of the leaf. In, this way it could be demonstrated that the sieve elements, being observed were alive and functional. (B,C) Phloem tissue of bean doubly stained with a locally applied fluorescent dye (red) that primarily stains membranes, and a, translocated fluorescent dye (green). Protein (arrows), deposited against the plasma membrane and the sieve plate, does not impede translocation. A crystalline P-protein body, (asterisk) is stained by the green dye. Plastids (arrowheads), are evenly distributed around the periphery of the sieve, element. CC = companion cell, SP = sieve plate. See also, Web Topic 10.8. (From Knoblauch and van Bel 1998; courtesy of A. van Bel.), , ole of a source leaf to approximately 1°C does not cause, sustained inhibition of mass transport out of the leaf (Figure 10.12). Rather, there is a brief period of inhibition, after, which transport slowly returns to the control rate. Chilling, reduces respiration rate and both the synthesis and the consumption of ATP in the petiole by about 90%, at a time, when translocation has recovered and is proceeding normally. These experiments show that the energy requirement for transport through the pathway of these plants is, small, consistent with the pressure-flow hypothesis., Extreme treatments that inhibit all energy metabolism, do inhibit translocation. For example, in bean (Phaseolus, vulgaris), treating the petiole of a source leaf with a metabolic inhibitor (cyanide) inhibited translocation out of the
Page 231 :
Translocation rate (µg C min–1 dm2), , 206, , Chapter 10, , 60, , 30°C, , 1°C, , 25°C, , 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 80, , 120 160, , 200 240 280 320 360, Time (minutes), , 400, , 440 460, , FIGURE 10.12 Loss of metabolic energy resulting from the, , chilling of the leaf petiole partially reduces the rate of, translocation in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris), although translocation rates recover with time. The fact that translocation, recovers when ATP production and utilization are largely, inhibited by chilling indicates that the energy requirement, for translocation is small. 14 CO2 was supplied to a source, leaf, and a 2 cm portion of its petiole was chilled to 1°C., Translocation was monitored by the arrival of 14 C at a sink, leaf. (dm [decimeter] = 0.1 meter) (Data from Geiger and, Sovonick 1975.), , leaf. However, examination of the treated tissue by electron, microscopy revealed blockage of the sieve plate pores by, cellular debris (Giaquinta and Geiger 1977). Clearly, these, results do not bear on the question of whether energy is, required for translocation along the pathway., , Pressure Gradients Are Sufficient to Drive a Mass, Flow of Solution, Turgor pressure in sieve elements can be either calculated, from the water potential and solute potential (Yp = Yw −, Ys) or measured directly. The most effective technique uses, micromanometers or pressure transducers sealed over, exuding aphid stylets (see Figure 10.2.A in Web Topic 10.2), (Wright and Fisher 1980). The data obtained are accurate, because aphids pierce only a single sieve element, and the, plasma membrane apparently seals well around the aphid, stylet. When the turgor pressure of sieve elements is measured by this technique, the pressure at the source is higher, than that at the sink., In soybean, the observed pressure difference between, source and sink has been shown to be sufficient to drive a, mass flow of solution through the pathway, taking into, account the path resistance (caused mainly by the sieve plate, pores), the path length, and the velocity of translocation, (Fisher 1978). The actual pressure difference between source, and sink was calculated from the water potential and solute, potential to be 0.41 MPa, and the pressure difference required, for translocation by pressure flow was calculated to be 0.12, to 0.46 MPa. Thus the observed pressure difference appears, to be sufficient to drive mass flow through the phloem., , We can therefore conclude that all the experiments and, data described here support the operation of pressure flow, in angiosperm phloem. The lack of an energy requirement, in the pathway and the presence of open sieve plate pores, provide definitive evidence for a mechanism in which the, path phloem is relatively passive. The failure to detect bidirectional transport or motility proteins, as well as the positive data on pressure gradients, is in accord with the pressure-flow hypothesis., , The Mechanism of Phloem Transport in, Gymnosperms May Be Different, Although pressure flow explains translocation in angiosperms, it may not be sufficient for gymnosperms. Very little physiological information on gymnosperm phloem is, available, and speculation about translocation in these, species is based almost entirely on interpretations of electron micrographs. As discussed previously, the sieve cells, of gymnosperms are similar in many respects to sieve tube, elements of angiosperms, but the sieve areas of sieve cells, are relatively unspecialized and do not appear to consist of, open pores (see Figure 10.6)., The pores in gymnosperms are filled with numerous, membranes that are continuous with the smooth endoplasmic reticulum adjacent to the sieve areas. Such pores are, clearly inconsistent with the requirements of the pressureflow hypothesis. Although these electron micrographs might, be artifactual and fail to show conditions in the intact tissue,, translocation in gymnosperms might involve a different, mechanism—a possibility that requires further investigation., , PHLOEM LOADING: FROM, CHLOROPLASTS TO SIEVE ELEMENTS, Several transport steps are involved in the movement of, photosynthate from the mesophyll chloroplasts to the sieve, elements of mature leaves, which is called phloem loading, (Oparka and van Bel 1992):, 1. Triose phosphate formed by photosynthesis during, the day (see Chapter 8) is transported from the, chloroplast to the cytosol, where it is converted to, sucrose. During the night, carbon from stored starch, exits the chloroplast probably in the form of glucose, and is converted to sucrose. (Other transport sugars, are later synthesized from sucrose in some species.), 2. Sucrose moves from the mesophyll cell to the vicinity, of the sieve elements in the smallest veins of the leaf, (Figure 10.13). This short-distance transport pathway, usually covers a distance of only two or three cell, diameters., 3. In a process called sieve element loading, sugars are, transported into the sieve elements and companion, cells. In most of the species studied so far, sugars, become more concentrated in the sieve elements and
Page 232 :
Translocation in the Phloem, , Vascular, parenchyma, cell, , Sieve, element, , Part of, tracheary, element in, the xylem, , Phloem, parenchyma, cell, , Ordinary, companion, cell, Bundle, sheath cell, , FIGURE 10.13 Electron micrograph showing the relation-, , ship between the various cell types of a small vein in a, source leaf of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Photosynthetic, cells (mesophyll cells) surround the compactly arranged, cells of the bundle sheath layer. Photosynthate from the, mesophyll must move a distance equivalent to several cell, diameters before being loaded into the sieve elements., (From Evert and Mierzwa 1985, courtesy of R. Evert.), , companion cells than in the mesophyll. Note that with, respect to loading, the sieve elements and companion, cells are often considered a functional unit, called the, sieve element–companion cell complex. Once inside the, sieve elements, sucrose and other solutes are translocated away from the source, a process known as, export. Translocation through the vascular system to, the sink is referred to as long-distance transport., As discussed earlier, the processes of loading at the, source and unloading at the sink provide the driving force, that generates the pressure gradient pushing phloem sap, in long-distance transport and are thus of considerable, basic, as well as agricultural, importance. A thorough, understanding of these mechanisms should provide the, basis of technology aimed at enhancing crop productivity, by increasing the accumulation of photosynthate by edible, sink tissues, such as cereal grains., , Photosynthate Can Move from Mesophyll Cells to, the Sieve Elements via the Apoplast or the, Symplast, We have seen that solutes (mainly sugars) in source leaves, must move from the photosynthesizing cells in the mesophyll to the veins. Sugars might move entirely through the, , 207, , symplast (cytoplasm) via the plasmodesmata, or they might, enter the apoplast at some point en route to the phloem (Figure 10.14). (See Figure 4.3 for a general description of the, symplast and apoplast.) In the latter case, the sugars are, actively loaded from the apoplast into the sieve elements and, companion cells by an energy-driven, selective transporter, located in the plasma membranes of these cells. In fact, the, apoplastic and symplastic routes are used in different species., Early research on phloem loading focused on the, apoplastic pathway. Apoplastic phloem loading leads to, three basic predictions (Grusak et al. 1996): (1) Transported, sugars should be found in the apoplast; (2) in experiments, in which sugars are supplied to the apoplast, the exogenously supplied sugars should accumulate in sieve elements and companion cells; and (3) inhibition of sugar, uptake from the apoplast should result in inhibition of, export from the leaf. Many studies devoted to testing these, predictions have provided solid evidence for apoplastic, loading in several species (see Web Topic 10.5)., , Sucrose Uptake in the Apoplastic Pathway, Requires Metabolic Energy, In source leaves, sugars become more concentrated in the, sieve elements and companion cells than in the mesophyll., This difference in solute concentration, found in most of the, species studied, can be demonstrated through measurement of the osmotic potential (Ys) of the various cell types, in the leaf (see Chapter 3)., In sugar beet, the osmotic potential of the mesophyll is, approximately –1.3 MPa, and the osmotic potential of the, sieve elements and companion cells is about –3.0 MPa, (Geiger et al. 1973). Most of this difference in osmotic, potential is thought to result from accumulated sugar,, specifically sucrose because sucrose is the major transport, sugar in this species. Experimental studies have also, demonstrated that both externally supplied sucrose and, sucrose made from photosynthetic products accumulate in, the sieve elements and companion cells of the minor veins, of sugar beet source leaves (Figure 10.15)., The fact that sucrose is at a higher concentration in the, sieve element–companion cell complex than in surrounding cells indicates that sucrose is actively transported, against its chemical-potential gradient. The dependence of, sucrose accumulation on active transport is supported by, the fact that treating source tissue with respiratory, inhibitors both decreases ATP concentration and inhibits, loading of exogenous sugar. On the other hand, other, metabolites, such as organic acids and hormones, may, enter sieve elements passively (see Web Topic 10.6)., , In the Apoplastic Pathway, Sieve Element Loading, Involves a Sucrose–H+ Symporter, A sucrose–H+ symporter is thought to mediate the transport of sucrose from the apoplast into the sieve, element–companion cell complex. Recall from Chapter 6
Page 233 :
208, , Chapter 10, , CO2, , Small vein, Cell wall–apoplast, pathway, , Sugar, , Sieve, elements, , Plasmodesma, Companion, cells, Sugar, , Cytoplasm–symplast, pathway, , Active loading, , Sugar, Phloem parenchyma cell, Bundle sheath cell, Mesophyll cell, Plasma membrane, , FIGURE 10.14 Schematic diagram of pathways of phloem, , loading in source leaves. In the totally symplastic pathway,, sugars move from one cell to another in the plasmodesmata, all the way from the mesophyll to the sieve elements., In the partly apoplastic pathway, sugars enter the apoplast, at some point. For simplicity, sugars are shown here entering the apoplast near the sieve element–companion cell, , FIGURE 10.15 This autoradiograph shows that labeled sugar, , moves from the apoplast into sieve elements and companion cells against its concentration gradient. A solution of, 14C-labeled sucrose was applied for 30 minutes to the upper, surface of a sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) leaf that had previously been kept in darkness for 3 hours. The leaf cuticle was, removed to allow penetration of the solution to the interior, of the leaf. Label accumulates in the small veins, sieve elements, and companion cells of the source leaf, indicating the, ability of these cells to transport sucrose against its concentration gradient. (From Fondy 1975, courtesy of D. Geiger.), , complex, but they could also enter the apoplast earlier in, the path and then move to the small veins. In any case, the, sugars are actively loaded into the companion cells and, sieve elements from the apoplast. Sugars loaded into the, companion cells are thought to move through plasmodesmata into the sieve elements., , that symport is a secondary transport process that uses the, energy generated by the proton pump (see Figure 6.10A)., The energy dissipated by protons moving back into the cell, is coupled to the uptake of a substrate, in this case sucrose, (Figure 10.16)., High pH (low H+ concentration) in the apoplast reduces, the uptake of exogenous sucrose into the sieve elements, and companion cells of broad bean. This effect occurs, because a low proton concentration in the apoplast reduces, the driving force for proton diffusion into the symplast and, for the sucrose–H+ symporter., Data from molecular studies support the operation of a, sucrose–H+ symporter in sieve element loading. Protonpumping ATPases, localized by immunological techniques,, have been found in the plasma membranes of companion, cells of Arabidopsis and in transfer cells of broad bean. In, transfer cells, the H+-ATPase molecules are most concentrated in the plasma membrane infoldings that face the, bundle sheath and phloem parenchyma cells (for details,, see Web Topic 10.7)., Such localization suggests that the function of these H+ATPases is to energize the transport of photosynthate from
Page 234 :
Translocation in the Phloem, Sieve element–companion cell complex, , H+-ATPase, ATP, H+, , H+, ADP + Pi, Sucrose–H+, symporter, , H+, , H+, , Sucrose, , Sucrose, , High H+, concentration, , Low H+, concentration, , FIGURE 10.16 ATP-dependent sucrose transport in sieve, , element loading. In the cotransport model of sucrose loading into the symplast of the sieve element–companion cell, complex, the plasma membrane ATPase pumps protons out, of the cell into the apoplast, establishing a high proton concentration there. The energy in this proton gradient is then, used to drive the transport of sucrose into the symplast of, the sieve element–companion cell complex through a, sucrose–H+ symporter., , the apoplast to the sieve elements (Bouche-Pillon et al., 1994). Furthermore, the distribution of the H+-ATPases in, companion cells of Arabidopsis appears to be correlated with, the distribution of a sucrose–H+ symporter called SUC2, (DeWitt and Sussman 1995; Truernit and Sauer 1995). The, SUC2 transporter has also been localized in companion cells, of broad-leaved plantain, Plantago major (see Web Topic, 10.7). H+-ATPases and sucrose–H+ symporters are some-, , 209, , times co-localized in the plasma membranes of sieve elements (Langhans et al. 2001) rather than companion cells., SUC2 is one of several sucrose–H+ symporters that have, been cloned and localized in the phloem (Table 10.3). The, carriers are found in plasma membranes of either sieve elements (SUT1, SUT2, and SUT4) or companion cells (SUC2)., Work with SUT1 has shown that the messenger RNAs for, symporters found in the sieve element membrane are synthesized in the companion cells (Kuhn et al. 1997). This, finding agrees with the fact that sieve elements lack nuclei., The symporter protein is probably also synthesized in the, companion cells, since ribosomes do not appear to persist, in mature sieve elements., The roles played by the various carriers listed in Table, 10.3 are still being elucidated. Most of the transporters are, found in source, path, and sink tissues. SUT1, characterized, as a high-affinity/low-capacity transporter found in the, minor veins of source tissues, appears to be important in, phloem loading. Potato plants transformed with antisense, DNA to SUT1 showed reduced transporter activity, a, reduction in root and tuber growth, and accumulation of, starch and lipids in source leaves (Schulz et al. 1998)., SUT1 is also thought to play a role in the retrieval of, sucrose lost in transit. The important role of SUT1 in, phloem loading appears to be complemented by SUT4, a, low-affinity/high-capacity carrier (Weise et al. 2000). SUT2,, on the other hand, appears to function as a sucrose sensor., This is indicated by findings showing that SUT2 is more, highly expressed in sink and path tissues than in source, leaves, and by the similarity between many structural features of SUT2 and yeast sugar sensors (Lalonde et al. 1999;, Barker et al. 2000). Finally, uptake into companion cells, appears to be the function of SUC2., , Regulating sucrose loading. The mechanisms that regulate the loading of sucrose from the apoplast to the sieve, elements by the sucrose–H+ symporter await characterization. Possible regulatory factors include the following:, • The solute potential or, more likely, the turgor pressure of, the sieve elements. A decrease in sieve element turgor, below a certain threshold would lead to a compensatory increase in loading., , TABLE 10.3, Sucrose–H+ symporters in the phloem, Carrier, , Location, , Species, , Affinity, , Source, , SUT1, SUT2, SUT4, SUC2, , Sieve elements, Sieve elements, Sieve elements, Companion cells, , Tobacco, tomato, potato, Tomato, Arabidopsis, tomato, potato, Arabidopsis, plantain, , High, Sensor, Low, —, , Kuhn et al. 1997, Barker et al. 2000, Weise et al. 2000, Truernit and Sauer, 1995;, Stadler et al. 1995
Page 235 :
210, , Chapter 10, , • Sucrose concentration in the apoplast. High sucrose concentrations in the apoplast would increase phloem, loading., • The available number of symporter protein molecules. The, levels of SUT1 transporter mRNA and protein have, been shown to be lower after 15 hours of darkness, than after a light treatment. These data suggest that, the concentration of SUT1 transporter molecules, could regulate loading., Other studies have shown that sucrose efflux into the, apoplast is enhanced by potassium availability in the, apoplast, suggesting that a better nutrient supply increases, translocation to sinks and enhances sink growth., , Phloem Loading Appears to Be Symplastic in, Plants with Intermediary Cells, As discussed earlier, many results point to apoplastic, phloem loading in species that have ordinary companion, cells or transfer cells in the minor veins, and that transport, only sucrose. On the other hand, a symplastic pathway has, become evident in species that transport raffinose and, stachyose in the phloem, in addition to sucrose, and that, have intermediary cells in the minor veins. Some examples, of such species are common coleus (Coleus blumei), squash, (Cucurbita pepo), and melon (Cucumis melo) (see Web Topic, 10.8)., The operation of a symplastic pathway requires the presence of open plasmodesmata between the different cells in, , Bundle sheath cell, , Glucose, , Intermediary cell, , the pathway. Many species have numerous plasmodesmata, at the interface between the sieve element–companion cell, complex and the surrounding cells (see Figure 10.7C), and, experimental studies have demonstrated symplastic continuity in source leaves of some species (see Web Topic 10.8)., , The Polymer-Trapping Model Explains Symplastic, Loading in Source Leaves, The composition of sieve element sap is generally different, from the solute composition in tissues surrounding the, phloem. This difference indicates that certain sugars are, specifically selected for transport in the source leaf. The, involvement of symporters in apoplastic phloem loading, provides a clear mechanism for selectivity because symporters are specific for certain sugar molecules. Symplastic, loading, on the other hand, depends on the diffusion of, sugars from the mesophyll to the sieve elements via the, plasmodesmata. It is more difficult to envision how diffusion through plasmodesmata during symplastic loading, could be selective for certain sugars., Furthermore, data from several species showing symplastic loading indicate that sieve elements and companion, cells have a higher osmotic content than the mesophyll., How could diffusion-dependent symplastic loading, account for the observed selectivity for transported molecules and the accumulation of sugars against a concentration gradient?, The polymer-trapping model (Figure 10.17) has been, developed to address these questions (Turgeon and Gowan, , Sieve element, , Galactose, , Fructose, Sucrose, , Sucrose, Raffinose, , Plasmodesma, Sucrose, synthesized in the, mesophyll, diffuses from, the bundle sheath cells, into the intermediary cells, through the abundant, plasmodesmata., , In the intermediary cells,, raffinose (and stachyose), are synthesized from, sucrose and galactose,, thus maintaining the, diffusion gradient for, sucrose. Because of their, larger sizes, they are not, able to diffuse back into, the mesophyll., , Raffinose and stachyose, are able to diffuse into, the sieve elements. As a, result, the concentration, of transport sugar rises in, the intermediary cells and, the sieve elements., , FIGURE 10.17 Polymer-trap-, , ping model of phloem loading. For simplicity, the trisaccharide stachyose is omitted., (After van Bel 1992.)
Page 236 :
Translocation in the Phloem, 1990). This model states that the sucrose synthesized in the, mesophyll diffuses from the bundle sheath cells into the, intermediary cells through the abundant plasmodesmata, that connect the two cell types. In the intermediary cells,, raffinose and stachyose (polymers made of three and four, hexose sugars, respectively; see Figure 10.9B) are synthesized from the transported sucrose and from galactose., Because of the anatomy of the tissue and the relatively, large size of raffinose and stachyose, the polymers cannot, diffuse back into the bundle sheath cells, but they can diffuse into the sieve element. Sucrose can continue to diffuse, into the intermediary cells because its synthesis in the mesophyll and its utilization in the intermediary cells maintain, the concentration gradient (see Figure 10.17)., The polymer-trapping model makes three predictions:, 1. Sucrose should be more concentrated in the mesophyll than in the intermediary cells., 2. The enzymes for raffinose and stachyose synthesis, should be preferentially located in the intermediary, cells., 3. The plasmodesmata linking the bundle sheath cells, and the intermediary cells should exclude molecules, larger than sucrose., Many studies support the polymer-trapping model. For, instance, all of the enzymes required to synthesize stachyose, from sucrose have been found in intermediary cells. In, melon, raffinose and stachyose are present in high concentrations in intermediary cells, but not in mesophyll cells., , 211, , The Type of Phloem Loading Is Correlated with, Plant Family and with Climate, As discussed earlier, the operation of apoplastic and symplastic phloem-loading pathways is correlated with the, transport sugar, the type of companion cell in the minor, veins, and the number of plasmodesmata connecting the, sieve elements and companion cells to the surrounding, photosynthetic cells (Table 10.4) (van Bel et al. 1992):, • Species showing apoplastic phloem loading translocate sucrose almost exclusively, have either ordinary, companion cells or transfer cells in the minor veins,, and possess few connections between the sieve element–companion cell complex and the surrounding, cells., • Species having symplastic phloem loading translocate oligosaccharides such as raffinose in addition to, sucrose, have intermediary-type companion cells in, the minor veins, and possess abundant connections, between the sieve element–companion cell complex, and the surrounding cells., Plants that have abundant plasmodesmata between the, phloem and surrounding cells are often trees, shrubs, or, vines. Plants with few plasmodesmata at this interface are, more typically herbaceous plants. In general, plants with, abundant plasmodesmata between the phloem and surrounding cells tend to be found in tropical and subtropical, regions, and plants with few plasmodesmata at this interface tend to be found in temperate and arid climates., , TABLE 10.4, Patterns in apoplastic and symplastic loading, , Transport sugar, Type of companion, cell in the minor veins, Number of plasmodesmata, connecting the sieve elements, and companion cells to, surrounding cells, , Apoplastic loading, , Symplastic loading, , Sucrose, Ordinary companion cells, or transfer cells, Few, , Oligosaccharides in addition to sucrose, Intermediary cells, Abundant, , Xylem vessel, , Plasmodesmata, , Companion, cell, , Intermediary, cell, , Phloem, parenchyma, Sieve element, , Source: Drawings after van Bel et al. 1992., Note: Some species may load both apoplastically and symplastically, since different types of companion cells can be found, within the veins of a single species.
Page 237 :
212, , Chapter 10, , There are, of course, intermediate cases and exceptions, to these generalizations. Some species with apoplastic loading have more plasmodesmata linking their companion, cells to surrounding cells than might be predicted from, known apoplastically loading species (Goggin et al. 2001)., A number of species have more than one type of companion cell in their minor veins. For example, coleus has both, intermediary cells and ordinary companion cells. It has been, suggested that the symplastic and apoplastic pathways may, coexist in some species, simultaneously or at different times,, in different sieve elements in the same vein or in sieve elements in veins of different sizes (Turgeon et al. 2001)., Future research may reveal new loading pathways or, combinations of pathways (Flora and Madore 1996). Certainly, the evolution of different loading types and how, these types adapt species to their environment will be, important research areas in the future, as loading pathways, are clarified in more species., , PHLOEM UNLOADING AND SINK-TOSOURCE TRANSITION, Now that we have learned about the events leading up to, the export of sugars from sources, let’s take a look at, phloem unloading. In many ways the events in sink tissues, are simply the reverse of the events in sources. Transport, into sink organs, such as developing roots, tubers, and, reproductive structures, is termed import. The following, steps are involved in the import of sugars into sink cells., 1. Sieve element unloading. This is the process by which, imported sugars leave the sieve elements of sink tissues., 2. Short-distance transport. After sieve element unloading,, the sugars are transported to cells in the sink by means, of a short-distance transport pathway. This pathway, has also been called post–sieve element transport., 3. Storage and metabolism. In the final step, sugars are, stored or metabolized in sink cells., These three transport steps together constitute phloem, unloading, the movement of photosynthates from the sieve, elements and their distribution to the sink cells that store, or metabolize them (Oparka and van Bel 1992)., In this section we will discuss the following questions:, Is phloem unloading symplastic or apoplastic? Is sucrose, hydrolyzed during the process? Does phloem unloading, require energy? Finally, we will examine the transition, process by which a young, importing leaf becomes an, exporting source leaf., , Phloem Unloading Can Occur via Symplastic or, Apoplastic Pathways, In sink organs, sugars move from the sieve elements to the, cells that store or metabolize them. Sinks vary widely from, , growing vegetative organs (root tips and young leaves) to, storage tissues (roots and stems) to organs of reproduction, and dispersal (fruits and seeds). Because sinks vary so, greatly in structure and function, there is no single scheme, of phloem unloading. As in sources, the sugars may move, entirely through the symplast via the plasmodesmata, or, they may enter the apoplast at some point., Figure 10.18 diagrams several possible phloem-unloading, pathways. The unloading pathway appears to be completely, symplastic in some young dicot leaves, such as sugar beet, and tobacco (Figure 10.18A). Evidence for the symplastic, pathway of unloading includes insensitivity to PCMBS (pchloromercuribenzenesulfonic acid), a reagent that inhibits, the transport of sucrose across plasma membranes but does, not permeate the symplastic pathway. Meristematic and elongating regions of primary root tips also appear to unload, symplastically. Sufficient plasmodesmata exist in these pathways to support symplastic unloading., In some sink organs, part of the phloem-unloading, pathway is apoplastic (Figure 10.18B). In principle, the, apoplastic step could be located at the site of the sieve element–companion cell complex (type 1 in Figure 10.18B),, although this pattern has yet to receive experimental support. The apoplastic step could also be farther removed, from the sieve elements (type 2). This arrangement, typical, of developing seeds, appears to be the most common in, apoplastic phloem unloading., An apoplastic step is required in developing seeds, because there are no symplastic connections between the, maternal tissues and the tissues of the embryo. Sugars exit, the sieve elements (sieve element unloading) via a symplastic pathway and are transferred from the symplast to, the apoplast at some point removed from the sieve element–companion cell complex (type 2 in Figure 10.18B)., The apoplastic step permits membrane control over the, substances that enter the embryo because two membranes, must be crossed in the process., When phloem unloading is apoplastic, the transport, sugar can be partly metabolized in the apoplast, or it can, cross the apoplast unchanged (see Web Topic 10.9). For, example, sucrose can be hydrolyzed into glucose and fructose in the apoplast by invertase, a sucrose-splitting, enzyme, and glucose and/or fructose would then enter the, sink cells. As we will discuss later, such sucrose-cleaving, enzymes play a role in the control of phloem transport by, sink tissues., , Transport into Sink Tissues Requires, Metabolic Energy, Inhibitor studies have shown that import into sink tissues is, energy dependent. Growing leaves, roots, and storage sinks, in which carbon is stored in starch or protein utilize symplastic phloem unloading. Transport sugars are used as substrate for respiration and are metabolized into storage polymers and into compounds needed for growth. Sucrose
Page 238 :
Translocation in the Phloem, , 213, , (A) Symplastic phloem unloading, Phloem unloading pathway, Symplastic SE, unloading, CC/ SE, , Plasmodesma, , Cell wall, , Sink cell, , (B) Apoplastic phloem unloading, Type 1, Apoplastic SE, unloading, , Type 2A, Symplastic SE, unloading, , Type 2B, Symplastic SE, unloading, , Type 1: This phloem unloading pathway is designated, apoplastic because one step, transport from the sieve, element–companion cell complex to the successive sink, cells, occurs in the apoplast. Once the sugars are taken, back up into the symplast of adjoining cells, transport is, symplastic. This route has not yet been demonstrated in, any sink type., Type 2: This pathway also has an apoplastic step., However, the exit from the sieve element-companion, cell complex—that is, sieve element unloading—is, symplastic. The apoplastic step occurs later in the, pathway. The upper figure (2A) shows an apoplastic, step close to the sieve element–companion cell, complex; the lower figure (2B), an apoplastic step that, is further removed., , FIGURE 10.18 Pathways for phloem unloading. The sieve element–companion cell, , complex (CC/SE) is considered a single functional unit. The presence of plasmodesmata is assumed to provide functional symplastic continuity. An absence of, plasmodesmata between cells indicates an apoplastic transport step. (A) Symplastic, phloem unloading. (B) Three types of apoplastic phloem unloading. (After Oparka, and van Bel 1992.), , metabolism results in a low sucrose concentration in the sink, cells, thus maintaining a concentration gradient for sugar, uptake. No membranes are crossed during sugar uptake into, the sink cells, and unloading through the plasmodesmata is, passive because transport sugars move from a high concentration in the sieve elements to a low concentration in the sink, cells. Metabolic energy is thus required in these sink organs, for respiration and for biosynthesis reactions., In apoplastic phloem unloading, sugars must cross at, least two membranes: the plasma membrane of the cell that, is exporting the sugar, and the plasma membrane of the, sink cell. When sugars are transported into the vacuole of, the sink cell, they must also traverse the tonoplast., As discussed earlier, transport across membranes in an, apoplastic pathway may be energy dependent. Developing, seeds are valuable experimental systems for studying, unloading processes. In legumes such as soybean, the, embryo can be removed from the seed, and unloading, from the seed coat into the apoplast can be studied without the influence of the embryo. Uptake into the embryo, can also be investigated separately. Such studies have, shown that energy-requiring transporters mediate both, unloading of sucrose into the apoplast and uptake of, sucrose into the embryo in soybean (see Web Topic 10.10)., , The Transition of a Leaf from Sink to, Source Is Gradual, Leaves of dicots such as tomato or bean begin their development as sink organs. A transition from sink to source status occurs later in development, when the leaf is approximately 25% expanded, and it is usually complete when the, leaf is 40 to 50% expanded., Export from the leaf begins at the tip or apex of the, blade and progresses toward the base until the whole leaf, becomes a sugar exporter. During the transition period, the, tip exports sugar while the base imports it from the other, source leaves (Figure 10.19)., The maturation of leaves is accompanied by a large, number of functional and anatomic changes, many of, which are needed for the export of photosynthate. The, sink-to-source transition is quite different in species with, apoplastic versus symplastic loading. In leaves with, apoplastic phloem loading, a drastic switch from a symplastic unloading pathway to an apoplastic loading pathway must be made., In the development of a leaf that will load apoplastically,, the cessation of import and the initiation of export are independent events (Turgeon 1984). In albino leaves of tobacco,, which have no chlorophyll and therefore are incapable of
Page 239 :
214, (A), , Chapter 10, (B), , (C), , FIGURE 10.19 Autoradiographs of a leaf of summer squash, , (Cucurbita pepo), showing the transition of the leaf from sink, to source status. In each case, the leaf imported 14C from, the source leaf on the plant for 2 hours. Label is visible as, black accumulations. (A) The entire leaf is a sink, importing, , photosynthesis, import stops at the same developmental, stage as in green leaves, even though export is not possible., Therefore some other change must occur in developing, leaves of tobacco that causes them to cease importing sugars., Such a change could involve blockage of the unloading, pathway at some point in the development of mature, leaves. In dicot sink leaves with symplastic unloading, factors that could account for the cessation of unloading, include plasmodesmatal closure, a decrease in plasmodesmatal frequency, or another change in symplastic continuity. Experimental data have shown that the unloading pathway is blocked in mature leaves of apoplastic loaders., Export of sugars begins when phloem loading has accumulated sufficient photosynthate in the sieve elements to, drive translocation out of the leaf. In normal leaves with, apoplastic loading, export is initiated when, • The symplastic unloading pathway is closed., • The leaf is synthesizing photosynthate in sufficient, quantity that some is available for export., • The sucrose-synthesizing genes are being expressed., • The sucrose–H+ symporter is in place in the plasmalemma of the sieve element–companion cell complex., In leaves of plants like sugar beet and tobacco, the ability to accumulate exogenous [14C]sucrose in the sieve element–companion cell complex is acquired as the leaves, undergo the sink-to-source transition, suggesting that the, symporter required for loading has become functional. In, developing leaves of Arabidopsis, expression of the symporter that is thought to transport sugars during loading, begins in the tip and proceeds to the base during a sink-tosource transition. The same basipetal pattern is seen in the, development of export capacity., , (D), , sugar from the source leaf. (B–D) The base is still a sink. As, the tip of the leaf loses the ability to unload and stops, importing sugar (as shown by the loss of black accumulations), it gains the ability to load and to export sugar. (From, Turgeon and Webb 1973.), , In tobacco and other Nicotiana species, the minor veins, that are eventually responsible for most of the loading do, not mature until about the time import ceases. Thus, sugars are unloaded and loaded almost entirely via different, veins (Roberts et al. 1997)., In leaves in which the symplastic route for unloading is, maintained for loading, the transition from import to, export is to some extent reversible. In variegated leaves of, coleus that have both green and albino regions, the albino, portions of mature leaves retain many sinklike characteristics. The green regions of the leaves can export photosynthate to the albino regions; if the green regions are, removed, the albino regions can import and unload sugars, from other mature leaves., , PHOTOSYNTHATE ALLOCATION AND, PARTITIONING, The photosynthetic rate determines the total amount of, fixed carbon available to the leaf. However, the amount of, fixed carbon available for translocation depends on subsequent metabolic events. The regulation of the diversion of, fixed carbon into the various metabolic pathways is termed, allocation., The vascular bundles in a plant form a system of pipes, that can direct the flow of photosynthates to various sinks:, young leaves, stems, roots, fruits, or seeds. However, the vascular system is often highly interconnected, forming an open, network that allows source leaves to communicate with multiple sinks. Under these conditions, what determines the volume of flow to any given sink? The differential distribution, of photosynthates within the plant is termed partitioning., After giving an overview of allocation and partitioning,, we will examine the coordination of starch and sucrose
Page 240 :
Translocation in the Phloem, synthesis. We will conclude by discussing how sinks compete, how sink demand might regulate photosynthetic rate, in the source leaf, and how sources and sinks communicate, with each other., , Allocation Includes the Storage, Utilization, and, Transport of Fixed Carbon, The carbon fixed in a source cell can be used for storage,, metabolism, and transport:, • Synthesis of storage compounds. Starch is synthesized, and stored within chloroplasts and, in most species, is, the primary storage form that is mobilized for translocation during the night. Plants that store carbon primarily as starch are called starch storers., • Metabolic utilization. Fixed carbon can be utilized, within various compartments of the photosynthesizing cell to meet the energy needs of the cell or to provide carbon skeletons for the synthesis of other compounds required by the cell., • Synthesis of transport compounds. Fixed carbon can be, incorporated into transport sugars for export to various sink tissues. A portion of the transport sugar can, also be stored temporarily in the vacuole (see Web, Topic 10.9)., Allocation is also a key process in sink tissues. Once the, transport sugars have been unloaded and enter the sink, cells, they can remain as such or can be transformed into, various other compounds. In storage sinks, fixed carbon, can be accumulated as sucrose or hexose in vacuoles or as, starch in amyloplasts. In growing sinks, sugars can be utilized for respiration and for the synthesis of other molecules required for growth., , Transport Sugars Are Partitioned among the, Various Sink Tissues, The greater the ability of a sink to store or metabolize, imported sugars (the process of allocation), the greater its, ability to compete for photosynthate being exported by the, sources. Such competition determines the distribution of, transport sugars among the various sink tissues of the, plant (photosynthate partitioning), at least in the short, term., Of course, events in sources and sinks must be synchronized. Partitioning determines the patterns of growth,, and such growth must be balanced between shoot growth, (photosynthetic productivity) and root growth (water and, mineral uptake). So an additional level of control lies in the, interaction between areas of supply and demand., Turgor pressure in the sieve elements could be an, important means of communication between sources and, sinks, acting to coordinate rates of loading and unloading., Chemical messengers are also important in signaling to one, organ the status of the other. Such chemical messengers, , 215, , include plant hormones and nutrients, such as potassium, and phosphate and even the transport sugars themselves., Attainment of higher yields of crop plants is one goal of, research on photosynthate allocation and partitioning., Whereas grains and fruits are examples of edible yields, total, yield includes inedible portions of the shoot. An understanding of partitioning enables plant breeders to select and, develop varieties that have improved transport to edible portions of the plant. Significant improvements have been made, in the ratio of commercial or edible yield to total shoot yield., Allocation and partitioning in the whole plant must be, coordinated such that increased transport to edible tissues, does not occur at the expense of other essential processes and, structures. Crop yield will also be improved if photosynthates that are normally “lost” by the plant are retained. For, example, losses due to nonessential respiration or exudation, from roots could be reduced. In the latter case, care must be, taken not to disrupt essential processes outside the plant,, such as growth of beneficial microbial species in the vicinity of the root that obtain nutrients from the root exudate., , Allocation in Source Leaves Is Regulated, Increases in the rate of photosynthesis in a source leaf generally result in an increase in the rate of translocation from, the source. Control points for the allocation of photosynthate (Figure 10.20) include the allocation of triose phosphates to the following processes:, • Regeneration of intermediates in the C3 photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle (the Calvin cycle; see, Chapter 8), • Starch synthesis, • Sucrose synthesis, as well as distribution of sucrose, between transport and temporary storage pools, Various enzymes operate in the pathways that process the, photosynthate, and the control of these steps is complex, (Geiger and Servaites 1994.), During the day the rate of starch synthesis in the chloroplast must be coordinated with sucrose synthesis in the, cytosol. Triose phosphates (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, and dihydroxyacetone phosphate) produced in the chloroplast by the C3 Calvin cycle (see Chapter 8) can be used for, either starch or sucrose synthesis. Sucrose synthesis in the, cytoplasm diverts triose phosphate away from starch synthesis and storage. For example, it has been shown that, when the demand for sucrose by other parts of a soybean, plant is high, less carbon is stored as starch by the source, leaves. The key enzymes involved in the regulation of, sucrose synthesis in the cytoplasm and of starch synthesis, in the chloroplast are sucrose phosphate synthase and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in the cytoplasm and ADP-glucose, pyrophosphorylase in the chloroplast (see Chapter 8, Figure 10.20, and Web Topic 10.9).
Page 241 :
216, , Chapter 10, , CHLOROPLAST STROMA, Inner chloroplast, membrane, , 2, Fructose-1,6bisphosphate, , Fructose-6phosphate, , Calvin cycle, intermediates, Triose, phosphate, , CO2, , Sink Tissues Compete for Available Translocated, Photosynthate, , CYTOSOL, , Triose, phosphate, , Pi, , Pi, , 3, UDPG, , Sucrose, phosphate, , ADPG, 1, Starch, , Pi, , Antiport, Sucrose, system, (phosphate, translocator), Transport, , Storage, , Storage, , FIGURE 10.20 A simplified scheme for starch and sucrose, , synthesis during the day. Triose phosphate, formed in the, Calvin cycle, can either be utilized in starch formation in, the chloroplast or transported into the cytosol in exchange, for inorganic phosphate (Pi) via the phosphate translocator, in the inner chloroplast membrane. The outer chloroplast, membrane is porous to small molecules and is omitted here, for clarity. In the cytosol, triose phosphate can be converted, to sucrose for either storage in the vacuole or transport., Key enzymes involved are starch synthetase (1), fructose1,6-bisphosphatase (2), and sucrose phosphate synthase (3)., The second and third enzymes, along with ADP-glucose, pyrophosphorylase, which forms adenosine diphosphate, glucose (ADPG), are regulated enzymes in sucrose and, starch synthesis (see Chapter 8). UDPG, uridine diphosphate glucose. (After Preiss 1982.), , However, there is a limit to the amount of carbon that, normally can be diverted from starch synthesis in species, that store carbon primarily as starch. Studies of allocation, between starch and sucrose under different conditions suggest that a fairly steady rate of translocation throughout the, 24-hour period is a priority for most plants., The use of mutants and transgenic plants enables us to, ask a new set of questions about allocation. For example,, what happens when one of the competing processes, such, as starch synthesis, is inhibited or even eliminated? The, results have revealed the amazing flexibility of plants. For, example, starch-deficient tobacco mutants synthesize only, trace amounts of starch but are able to compensate for a lack, of stored carbon by doubling the rate of sucrose synthesis, and export during the day and by switching most of their, growth to the day (Geiger et al. 1995). On the other hand,, plants with enhanced starch synthesis during the day often, export more of their fixed carbon during the night., , As discussed earlier, translocation to sink tissues depends, on the position of the sink in relation to the source and on, the vascular connections between source and sink. Another, factor determining the pattern of transport is competition, between sinks. For example, reproductive tissues (seeds), might compete with growing vegetative tissues (young, leaves and roots) for photosynthates in the translocation, stream. Competition has been shown by numerous experiments in which removal of a sink tissue from a plant generally results in increased translocation to alternative, and, hence competing, sinks., In the reverse type of experiment, the source supply can, be altered while the sink tissues are left intact. When the, supply of photosynthates from sources to competing sinks, is suddenly and drastically reduced by shading of all the, source leaves but one, the sink tissues become dependent, on a single source. In sugar beet and bean plants, the rates, of photosynthesis and export from the single remaining, source leaf usually do not change over the short term, (approximately 8 hours; Fondy and Geiger 1980). However,, the roots receive less sugar from the single source, while, the young leaves receive relatively more. Thus the young, leaves are stronger sinks than the roots in these conditions., A stronger sink can deplete the sugar content of the sieve, elements more readily and thus increase the pressure gradient and the rate of translocation toward itself., An effect on the pressure gradient is also indicated indirectly by experiments in which investigators enhance transport to a sink by making the sink water potential more negative. Treatment of the root tips of pea seedlings with 350, mM mannitol solutions increased the import of, [14C]sucrose by more than 300%, presumably because of a, turgor decrease in the sink cells (Schulz 1994)., , Sink Strength Is a Function of Sink Size and Sink, Activity, Various experiments indicate that the ability of a sink to, mobilize photosynthate toward itself, the sink strength,, depends on two factors—sink size and sink activity—as, follows:, Sink strength = sink size × sink activity, , Sink size is the total weight of the sink tissue, and sink, activity is the rate of uptake of photosynthates per unit, weight of sink tissue. Altering either the size or the activity of the sink results in changes in translocation patterns., For example, the ability of a pea pod to import carbon, depends on the dry weight of that pod as a proportion of, the total number of pods (Jeuffroy and Warembourg 1991)., Changes in sink activity can be complex because various activities in sink tissues can potentially limit the rate of, uptake by the sink. These activities include unloading from, the sieve elements, metabolism in the cell wall, uptake from
Page 242 :
Translocation in the Phloem, the apoplast, and metabolic processes that use the photosynthate in either growth or storage., Cooling a sink tissue inhibits activities that require, metabolic energy and results in a decrease in the speed of, transport toward the sink. In corn, a mutant that has a, defective enzyme for starch synthesis in the kernels transports less material to the kernels than does its normal counterpart (Koch et al. 1982). In this mutant, a deficiency in, photosynthate storage leads to an inhibition of transport., Sink activity and thus sink strength are also thought to be, related to the presence and activity of the sucrose-splitting, enzymes acid invertase and sucrose synthase because they, catalyze the first step in sucrose utilization. Whether these, enzymes control sink strength or are simply correlated with, sink metabolism and growth is currently an active topic of, research. Interestingly, the genes for sucrose synthase and, invertase are among those regulated by carbohydrate supply. In general, carbohydrate depletion enhances the expression of genes for photosynthesis, reserve mobilization, and, export processes, while abundant carbon resources favor, genes for storage and utilization (Koch 1996)., However, the finding that different isoforms of sucrose, synthase, encoded by different genes, respond in opposite, ways to carbohydrate supply, indicates that the overall picture is complex. For example, the mRNA for one gene for, sucrose synthase in corn roots is widely distributed in root, tissues and is maximally expressed when sugars are abundant. The mRNA of a second sucrose synthase gene is, most abundant in the epidermis and outer tissues of the, root and is maximally expressed under conditions of sugar, depletion. Thus, utilization of imported sugars is broadly, maximized when sugars are abundant, but when sugar, supply is low, utilization is increasingly restricted to sites, that are crucial for uptake of water and minerals (Koch et, al. 1996)., In addition, genes for invertase and sucrose synthase are, often expressed at different times during sink development. In bean pods and corn kernels, changes in invertase, activity are found to precede changes in photosynthate, import. These results point to a key role of invertase and, sucrose synthase in controlling import patterns, both during the genetic program of sink development and during, responses to environmental stresses (see Web Topic 10.9)., , Changes in the Source-to-Sink Ratio Cause LongTerm Alterations in the Source, If all but one of the source leaves of a soybean plant are, shaded for an extended period (e.g., 8 days), many changes, occur in the single remaining source leaf. These changes, include a decrease in starch concentration and increases in, photosynthetic rate, rubisco activity, sucrose concentration,, transport from the source, and orthophosphate concentration (Thorne and Koller 1974). These data indicate that,, besides the observed short-term changes in the distribution, of photosynthate among different sinks, the metabolism of, , 217, , the source adjusts to the altered conditions in long-term, experiments., Photosynthetic rate (the net amount of carbon fixed per, unit leaf area per unit time) often increases over several, days when sink demand increases, and it decreases when, sink demand decreases. Photosynthesis is most strongly, inhibited under conditions of reduced sink demand in, plants that normally store starch, rather than sucrose, during the day. Perhaps an accumulation of photosynthate, (starch, sucrose, or hexoses) in the source leaf could, account for the linkage between sink demand and photosynthetic rate in starch-storing plants (see Web Topic, 10.11)., , Long-Distance Signals May Coordinate the, Activities of Sources and Sinks, Besides having a major function in the long-distance transport of photosynthate, the phloem is a conduit for the, transport of signal molecules from one part of the organism to another. Signals between sources and sinks might be, physical (such as turgor pressure) or chemical (such as, plant hormones and carbohydrates). Signals indicating turgor change could be transmitted rapidly via the interconnecting system of sieve elements., For example, if phloem unloading were rapid under, conditions of rapid sugar utilization at the sink tissue, turgor pressures in the sieve elements of sinks would be, reduced, and this reduction would be transmitted to the, sources. If loading were controlled in part by turgor in the, sieve elements of the source, it would increase in response, to this signal from the sinks. The opposite response would, be seen when unloading was slow in the sinks. Some data, suggest that cell turgor can modify the activity of the proton-pumping ATPase at the plasma membrane and therefore alter transport rates., Shoots produce growth regulators such as auxin (see, Chapter 19), which can be rapidly transported to the roots, via the phloem; and roots produce cytokinins (see Chapter, 21), which move to the shoots through the xylem. Gibberellins (GA) and abscisic acid (ABA) (see Chapters 20, and 23) are also transported throughout the plant in the, vascular system. Plant hormones play a role in regulating, source–sink relationships. They affect photosynthate partitioning by controlling sink growth, leaf senescence, and, other developmental processes., Loading of sucrose in castor bean is stimulated by, exogenous auxin but inhibited by ABA, while exogenous, ABA enhances, and auxin inhibits, sucrose uptake by sugar, beet taproot tissue. Active transporters in plasma membranes are obvious targets for regulation of apoplastic loading and unloading by hormones. Other potential sites of, hormone regulation of unloading include tonoplast transporters, enzymes for metabolism of incoming sucrose, wall, extensibility, and plasmodesmatal permeability in the case, of symplastic unloading (see the next section).
Page 243 :
218, , Chapter 10, , As indicated earlier, carbohydrate levels can influence, the expression of encoding photosynthesis component, genes, as well as genes involved in sucrose hydrolysis., Many genes have been shown to be responsive to sugar, depletion and abundance (Koch 1996). Thus, not only is, sucrose transported in the phloem, but sucrose or its, metabolites can act as signals that modify the activities of, sources and sinks. In sugar beet, for example,, proton–sucrose symporter activity declines in plasma, membrane vesicles isolated from source leaves fed exogenous sucrose through the xylem., The loss of symporter activity is accompanied by a, decline in symporter mRNA, suggesting an effect on transcription or mRNA stability. A working model includes the, following steps: (1) Decreased sink demand leads to high, sucrose levels in the vascular tissue; (2) high sucrose levels, lead to down-regulation of the symporter in the source; (3), decreased loading results in increased sucrose concentrations in the source (Chiou and Bush 1998). Increased, sucrose concentrations in the source can result in a lower, photosynthetic rate (see Web Topic 10.11). An increase of, starch accumulation in source leaves of plants transformed, with antisense DNA to the sucrose symporter SUT1 also, supports this model (Schulz et al. 1998)., In some source–sink systems, sugars and other metabolites have been shown to interact with hormonal signals to, control gene expression (Thomas and Rodriguez 1994)., , Long-Distance Signals May Also Regulate Plant, Growth and Development, It has long been known that viruses can move in the, phloem, traveling as complexes of proteins and nucleic, acids or as intact virus particles. More recently, endogenous, mRNA molecules and proteins have been found in phloem, sap, and at least some of these are thought to be signal, molecules., The following pathway appears to be open to the movement of macromolecules over long distances: from companion cells of sources to source sieve elements, through, the path to sink sieve elements, to companion cells of the, sink, and finally to cells of the sink itself., Proteins synthesized in companion cells can clearly, enter the sieve elements through the plasmodesmata that, connect the two cell types. As noted earlier, both the SUT1, transporter in the plasma membrane of the sieve element, and P-proteins in cucurbit sap (PP1 and PP2) appear to be, synthesized in companion cells. The plasmodesmata connecting the companion cells and sieve elements must thus, allow these macromolecules to move across them. Viral, particles have been observed in the plasmodesmata., Some of the proteins that enter sieve elements may simply diffuse through the plasmodesmata into the sieve elements, others may mediate their own cell-to-cell transport,, and yet others may be aided by specific control proteins, (Mezitt and Lucas 1996). Passive movement of proteins, , from companion cells to sieve elements has been demonstrated in Arabidopsis and tobacco plants, transformed with, the gene for a green fluorescent protein (GFP) from jellyfish,, under the control of the SUC2 promoter from Arabidopsis., The SUC2 sucrose–H+ symporter is synthesized within, the companion cells, so proteins expressed under the control of its promoter are also synthesized in the companion, cells. GFP, which is localized by its fluorescence after excitation with blue light, moves through plasmodesmata from, companion cells into sieve elements and migrates within, the phloem to sink tissues. Because jellyfish GFP is unlikely, to possess specific sequences for interaction with plasmodesmatal structures, its movement into sieve elements, is likely to occur by passive diffusion (Imlau et al. 1999)., Once in the sieve elements, some proteins (e.g., SUT1), are targeted to the plasma membrane or other cellular locations, while other proteins move with the translocation, stream to sink tissues. Proteins moving to sinks in the, phloem include the P-proteins PP1 and PP2. Subunits of Pproteins from cucumber (Cucumis sativus) can move across, graft unions from the cucumber stock (basal graft partner), to a pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) scion (upper graft partner). One experiment showed that the smaller PP2 protein, is able to move from the sieve elements to companion cells, of the scion stem; the larger PP1 was not detected in the, companion cells. Neither protein was able to move beyond, the sieve element–companion cell complex (Golecki et al., 1999). These proteins may be too large to pass through the, plasmodesmata that surround the sieve element–companion cell complex, or they may lack recognition factors allowing interaction with the plasmodesmata (Oparka and Santa, Cruz 2000). In contrast, the jellyfish green fluorescent protein is unloaded symplastically through the plasmodesmata, into sink tissues, such as seed coats, anthers, root tips, and, mesophyll cells in importing leaves (Imlau et al. 1999)., Clearly, proteins can be transported from the companion cells in the source through the intervening sieve elements to sink companion cells. However, little evidence, exists for a similar movement of proteins synthesized outside the companion cells. Other signals from outside the, sieve element–companion cell complex may give rise to the, production of mobile proteins in the companion cells. Evidence also exists for the translocation via the phloem of, mRNA molecules that are involved in sink tissue development (Oparka and Santa Cruz 2000). To be assigned a signaling role in plants, a macromolecule must be able to, leave the sieve element–companion cell complex in sink tissues, and perhaps most importantly, it must be able to, modify the functions of specific cells in the sink (Oparka, and Santa Cruz 2000). Such demonstrations await the, results of future experimentation., Plasmodesmata can exercise dynamic control of the, intercellular diffusion of small molecules (Lucas et al. 1993;, Baluska et al. 2001). RNA and protein also move from cell, to cell in plants via plasmodesmata. Virally encoded
Page 244 :
Translocation in the Phloem, “movement proteins” interact directly with plasmodesmata to allow the passage of viral nucleic acids. Potato, plants transformed with the tobacco mosaic virus movement protein show altered allocation patterns in source, leaves (Olesinski et al. 1996) and modified whole-plant partitioning patterns (Almon et al. 1997). The modification of, source leaf allocation depends on whether the movement, protein is expressed in mesophyll and bundle sheath cells, or in phloem parenchyma and companion cells., Plasmodesmata have been implicated in nearly every, aspect of phloem translocation, from loading to long-distance transport (remember that pores in sieve areas and, sieve plates are modified plasmodesmata) to allocation and, partitioning. Future research on phloem translocation and, on the roles of plasmodesmata in plant growth and development will surely go hand in hand., , SUMMARY, Translocation in the phloem is the movement of the products of photosynthesis from mature leaves to areas of, growth and storage. The phloem also redistributes water, and various compounds throughout the plant body., Some aspects of phloem translocation have been well, established by extensive research over many years. These, include the following:, • The pathway of translocation. Sugars and other organic, materials are conducted throughout the plant in the, phloem, specifically in cells called sieve elements., Sieve elements display a variety of structural adaptations that make them well suited for transport., • Patterns of translocation. Materials are translocated in, the phloem from sources (areas of photosynthate, supply) to sinks (areas of metabolism or storage of, photosynthate). Sources are usually mature leaves., Sinks include organs such as roots and immature, leaves and fruits., • Materials translocated in the phloem. The translocated, solutes are mainly carbohydrates, and sucrose is the, most commonly translocated sugar. Phloem sap also, contains other organic molecules, such as amino, acids, proteins, and plant hormones, as well as inorganic ions., • Rates of movement. Rates of movement in the phloem, are quite rapid, well in excess of rates of diffusion., Velocities average 1 m h–1, and mass transfer rates, range from 1 to 15 g h–1 cm–2 of sieve elements., Other aspects of phloem translocation require further, investigation, and most of these are being studied intensively, at the present time. These aspects include the following:, • Phloem loading and unloading. Transport of sugars into, and out of the sieve elements is called sieve element, , 219, , loading and unloading, respectively. In some species,, sugars must enter the apoplast of the source leaf, before loading. In these plants, loading into the sieve, elements requires metabolic energy, provided in the, form of a proton gradient. In other species, the whole, pathway from the photosynthesizing cells to the sieve, elements occurs in the symplast of the source leaf. In, either case, phloem loading is specific for the transported sugar. Phloem unloading requires metabolic, energy, but the transport pathway, the site of metabolism of transport sugars, and the site where energy is, expended vary with the organ and species., • Mechanism of translocation. Pressure flow is well, accepted as the most probable mechanism of phloem, translocation. In this model the bulk flow of phloem, sap occurs in response to an osmotically generated, pressure gradient. A variety of structural and physiological data indicate that materials are translocated in, the phloem of angiosperms by pressure flow. The, mechanism of translocation in gymnosperms requires, further investigation., • Photosynthate allocation and partitioning. Allocation is, the regulation of the quantities of fixed carbon that are, channeled into various metabolic pathways. In, sources, the regulatory mechanisms of allocation, determine the quantities of fixed carbon that will be, stored (usually as starch), metabolized within the cells, of the source, or immediately transported to sink tissues. In sinks, transport sugars are allocated to growth, processes or to storage. Partitioning is the differential, distribution of photosynthates within the whole plant., Partitioning mechanisms determine the quantities of, fixed carbon delivered to specific sink tissues. Phloem, loading and unloading, and photosynthate allocation, and partitioning, are of great research interest because, of their roles in crop productivity., , Web Material, Web Topics, 10.1 Classical Studies on Phloem Transport, Classical experiments illustrate some basic, properties of phloem transport., , 10.2 Sampling Phloem Sap, Aphid stylets are optimally suited to sample, phloem sap., , 10.3 Nitrogen Transport in Soybean, Nitrogen compounds synthesized in the roots, are transferred from the xylem to the phloem., , 10.4 Monitoring Traffic on the Sugar Freeway, Sugar transport rates in the phloem are measured with radioactive tracers.
Page 245 :
220, , Chapter 10, , 10.5 Evidence for Apoplastic Loading of Sieve, Elements, Transgenic plants have provided experimental, support for apoplastic loading., , 10.6 Some Substances Enter the Phloem by, Diffusion, Substances such as plant hormones might, enter the phloem by diffusion., , 10.7 Localization of the Sucrose–H+ Symporter in, the Phloem of Apoplastic Loaders, The sucrose H+ symporter of companion cells, has been localized using fluorescent dyes., , 10.8 Physiological Evidence for Symplastic, Continuity in Source Leaves, Fluorescent dyes have also been used to show, symplastic continuity in source leaves., , 10.9 Sugars in the Phloem, The transport, allocation, and metabolism of, phloem sugars are tightly regulated., , 10.10 Energy Requirements for Unloading in, Developing Seeds and Storage Organs, Unloading of seed storage sugars into the, embryo is mediated by active transporters., , 10.11 Possible Mechanisms Linking Sink Demand, and Photosynthetic Rate in Starch Storers, Photosynthate accumulation increases sink, demand., , Chapter References, Almon, E., Horowit, M., Wang, H.-L., Lucas, W. J., Zamski, E., and, Wolf, S. (1997) Phloem-specific expression of the tobacco mosaic, virus movement protein alters carbon metabolism and partitioning in transgenic potato plants. Plant Physiol. 115: 1599–1607., Baluska, F., Cvrckova, F., Kendrick-Jones, J., and Volkmann, D. (2001), Sink plasmodesmata as gateways for phloem unloading. Myosin, VIII and calreticulin as molecular determinants of sink strength?, Plant Physiol. 126: 39–46., Barker, L., Kuehn, C., Weise, A., Schulz, A., Gebhardt, C., Hirner, B.,, Hellmann, H., Schulze, W., Ward, J. M., and Frommer, W. B., (2000) SUT2, a putative sucrose sensor in sieve elements. Plant, Cell 12: 1153–1164., Bostwick, D. E., Dannenhoffer, J. M., Skaggs, M. I., Lister, R. M.,, Larkins, B. A., and Thompson, G. A. (1992) Pumpkin phloem, lectin genes are specifically expressed in companion cells. Plant, Cell 4: 1539–1548., Bouche-Pillon, S., Fleurat-Lessard, P., Fromont, J.-C., Serrano, R., and, Bonnemain, J.-L. (1994) Immunolocalization of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase in minor veins of Vicia faba in relation to, phloem loading. Plant Physiol. 105: 691–697., Brentwood, B., and Cronshaw, J. (1978) Cytochemical localization of, adenosine triphosphatase in the phloem of Pisum sativum and its, relation to the function of transfer cells. Planta 140: 111–120., Chiou, T.-J., and Bush, D. R. (1998) Sucrose is a signal molecule in, assimilate partitioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 4784–4788., , Clark, A. M., Jacobsen, K. R., Bostwick, D. E., Dannenhoffer, J. M.,, Skaggs, M. I., and Thompson, G. A. (1997) Molecular characterization of a phloem-specific gene encoding the filament protein,, phloem protein 1 (PP1), from Cucurbita maxima. Plant J. 12: 49–61., DeWitt, N. D., and Sussman, M. R. (1995) Immunocytological localization of an epitope-tagged plasma membrane proton pump, (H+-ATPase) in phloem companion cells. Plant Cell 7: 2053–2067., Eschrich, W. (1975) Bidirectional transport. In Transport in Plants, 1:, Phloem Transport (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series,, Vol. 1), M. H. Zimmermann and J. A. Milburn, eds., Springer,, New York, pp. 245–255., Evert, R. F. (1982) Sieve-tube structure in relation to function. BioScience 32: 789–795., Evert, R. F., and Mierzwa, R. J. (1985) Pathway(s) of assimilate movement from mesophyll cells to sieve tubes in the Beta vulgaris leaf., In Phloem Transport. Proceedings of an International Conference on, Phloem Transport, Asilomar, CA, J. Cronshaw, W. J. Lucas, and R., T. Giaquinta, eds. Liss, New York, pp. 419–432., Fisher, D. B. (1978) An evaluation of the Munch hypothesis for, phloem transport in soybean. Planta 139: 25–28., Flora, L. L., and Madore, M. A. (1996) Significance of minor-vein, anatomy to carbohydrate transport. Planta 198: 171–178., Fondy, B. R. (1975) Sugar selectivity of phloem loading in Beta vulgaris, vulgaris L. and Fraxinus americanus, americana L. Thesis, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH., Fondy, B. R., and Geiger, D. R. (1980) Effect of rapid changes in, sink–source ratio, on export and distribution of products of photosynthesis in leaves of Beta vulgaris L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L., Plant Physiol. 66: 945–949., Geiger, D. R., and Servaites, J. C. (1994) Diurnal regulation of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in C3 plants. Annu. Rev. Plant, Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 45: 235–256., Geiger, D. R., and Sovonick, S. A. (1975) Effects of temperature,, anoxia and other metabolic inhibitors on translocation. In Transport in Plants, 1: Phloem Transport (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 1), M. H. Zimmerman and J. A. Milburn,, eds., Springer, New York, pp. 256–286., Geiger, D. R., Giaquinta, R. T., Sovonick, S. A., and Fellows, R. J., (1973) Solute distribution in sugar beet leaves in relation to, phloem loading and translocation. Plant Physiol. 52: 585–589., Geiger, D. R., Shieh, W.-J., and Yu, X.-M. (1995) Photosynthetic carbon metabolism and translocation in wild-type and starch-deficient mutant Nicotiana sylvestris L. Plant Physiol. 107: 507–514., Giaquinta, R. T., and Geiger, D. R. (1977) Mechanism of cyanide inhibition of phloem translocation. Plant Physiol. 59: 178–180., Goggin, F. L., Medville, R., and Turgeon, R. (2001) Phloem loading, in the tulip tree. Mechanisms and evolutionary implications., Plant Physiol. 124: 891–899., Golecki, B., Schulz, A., and Thompson, G. A. (1999) Translocation of, structural P proteins in the phloem. Plant Cell 11: 127–140., Grusak, M. A., Beebe, D. U., and Turgeon, R. (1996) Phloem loading., In Photoassimilate Distribution in Plants and Crops: Source–Sink Relationships, E. Zamski and A. A. Schaffer, eds., Dekker, New York,, pp. 209–227., Hall, S. M., and Baker, D. A. (1972) The chemical composition of Ricinus phloem exudate. Planta 106: 131–140., Imlau, A., Truernit, E., and Sauer, N. (1999) Cell-to-cell and long-distance trafficking of the green fluorescent protein in the phloem, and symplastic unloading of the protein into sink tissues. Plant, Cell 11: 309–322., Jeuffory, M.-H., and Warembourg, F. R. (1991) Carbon transfer and, partitioning between vegetative and reproductive organs in, Pisum sativum L. Plant Physiol. 97: 440–448., Joy, K. W. (1964) Translocation in sugar beet. I. Assimilation of 14CO2, and distribution of materials from leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 15: 485–494., Knoblauch, M., and Van Bel, A. J. E. (1998) Sieve tubes in action., Plant Cell 10: 35–50.
Page 246 :
Translocation in the Phloem, Koch, K. E. (1996) Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in, plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 509–540., Koch, K. E., Tsui, C.-L., Schrader, L. E., and Nelson, O. E. (1982), Source–sink relations in maize mutants with starch deficient, endosperms. Plant Physiol. 70: 322–325., Koch, K. E., Wu, Y., and Xu, J. (1996) Sugar and metabolic regulation, of genes for sucrose metabolism: Potential influence of maize, sucrose synthase and soluble invertase responses on carbon partitioning and sugar sensing. J. Exp. Bot. 47 (special issue):, 1179–1185., Kuehn, C., Franceschi, V. R., Schulz, A., Lemoine, R., and Frommer,, W. B. (1997) Macromolecular trafficking indicated by localization, and turnover of sucrose transporters in enucleate sieve elements., Science 275: 1298–1300., Lalonde, S., Boles, E., Hellmann, H., Barker, L., Patrick, J. W., Frommer, W. B., and Ward, J. M. (1999) The dual function of sugar carriers: Transport and sugar sensing. Plant Cell 11: 707–726., Langhans, M., Ratajczak, R., Luetzelschwab, M., Michalke, W.,, Waechter, R., Fischer-Schliebs, E., and Ullrich, C. I. (2001), Immunolocalization of plasma-membrane H+-ATPase and tonoplast-type pyrophosphatase in the plasma membrane of the sieve, element-companion cell complex in the stem of Ricinus communis L. Planta 213: 11–19., Lucas, W. J., Ding, B., and Van der Schoot, C. (1993) Plasmodesmata, and the supracellular nature of plants. New Phytol. 125: 435–476., Mezitt, L. A., and Lucas, W. J. (1996) Plasmodesmal cell-to-cell transport of proteins and nucleic acids. Plant Mol. Biol. 32: 251–273., Münch, E. (1930) Die Stoffbewegungen in der Pflanze. Gustav Fischer,, Jena, Germany., Nobel, P. S. (1991) Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology., Academic Press, San Diego, CA., Olesinski, A. A., Almon, E., Navot, N., Perl, A., Galun, E., Lucas, W., J., and Wolf, S. (1996) Tissue-specific expression of the tobacco, mosaic virus movement protein in transgenic potato plants alters, plasmodesmal function and carbohydrate partitioning. Plant, Physiol. 111: 541–550., Oparka, K. J., and Santa Cruz, S. (2000) The great escape: Phloem, transport and unloading of macromolecules. Annu. Rev. Plant, Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51: 323–347., Oparka, K. J., and van Bel, A. J. E. (1992) Pathways of phloem loading and unloading: a plea for a uniform terminology. In Carbon, Partitioning within and between Organisms, C. J. Pollock, J. F. Farrar,, and A. J. Gordon, eds., BIOS Scientific, Oxford, pp. 249–254., Preiss, J. (1982) Regulation of the biosynthesis and degradation of, starch. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33: 431–454., Roberts, A. G., Santa Cruz, S., Roberts, I. M., Prior, D. A. M., Turgeon,, R., and Oparka, K. J. (1997) Phloem unloading in sink leaves of, Nicotiana benthamiana: Comparison of a fluorescent solute with a, fluorescent virus. Plant Cell 9: 1381–1396., Schobert, C., Grossmann, P., Gottschalk, M., Komor, E., Pecsvaradi,, A., and zur Nieden, U. (1995) Sieve-tube exudate from Ricinus, communis L. seedlings contains ubiquitin and chaperones. Planta, 196: 205–210., Schulz, A. (1990) Conifers. In Sieve Elements: Comparative Structure,, Induction and Development. H.-D. Behnke and R. D. Sjolund, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin., Schulz, A. (1992) Living sieve cells of conifers as visualized by confocal, laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy. Protoplasma 166:, 153–164., , 221, , Schulz, A. (1994) Phloem transport and differential unloading in pea, seedlings after source and sink manipulations. Planta 192:, 239–248., Schulz, A., Kuhn, C., Riesmeier, J. W., and Frommer, W. B. (1998), Ultrastructural effects in potato leaves due to antisense-inhibition of the sucrose transporter indicate an apoplasmic mode of, phloem loading. Planta 206: 533–543., Stadler, R., Brandner, J., Schulz, A., Gahrtz, M., and Sauer, N. (1995), Phloem loading by the PmSUC2 sucrose carrier from Plantago, major occurs into companion cells. Plant Cell 7: 1545–1554., Thomas, B. R., and Rodriguez, R. L. (1994) Metabolite signals regulate gene expression and source/sink relations in cereal, seedlings. Plant Physiol. 106: 1235–1239., Thorne, J. H., and Koller, H. R. (1974) Influence of assimilate demand, on photosynthesis, diffusive resistances, translocation, and carbohydrate levels of soybean leaves. Plant Physiol. 54: 201–207., Truernit, E., and Sauer, N. (1995) The promoter of the Arabidopsis, thaliana SUC2 sucrose-H+ symporter gene directs expression of, β-glucuronidase to the phloem: Evidence for phloem loading and, unloading by SUC2. Planta 196: 564–570., Turgeon, R. (1984) Termination of nutrient import and development, of vein loading capacity in albino tobacco leaves. Plant Physiol., 76: 45–48., Turgeon, R., and Gowan, E. (1990) Phloem loading in Coleus blumei, in the absence of carrier-mediated uptake of export sugar from, the apoplast. Plant Physiol. 94: 1244–1249., Turgeon, R., and Webb, J. A. (1973) Leaf development and phloem, transport in Cucurbita pepo: Transition from import to export., Planta 113: 179–191., Turgeon, R., Beebe, D. U., and Gowan, E. (1993) The intermediary, cell: Minor-vein anatomy and raffinose oligosaccharide synthesis in the Scrophulariaceae. Planta 191: 446–456., Turgeon, R., Medville, R., and Nixon, K. C. (2001) The evolution of, minor vein phloem and phloem loading. Am. J. Bot. 88:, 1331–1339., van Bel, A. J. E. (1992) Different phloem-loading machineries correlated with the climate. Acta Bot. Neerl. 41: 121–141., van Bel, A. J. E., Gamalei, Y. V., Ammerlaan, A., and Bik, L. P. M., (1992) Dissimilar phloem loading in leaves with symplasmic or, apoplasmic minor-vein configurations. Planta 186: 518–525., Warmbrodt, R. D. (1985) Studies on the root of Hordeum vulgare L.—, Ultrastructure of the seminal root with special reference to the, phloem. Am. J. Bot. 72: 414–432., Weise, A., Barker, L., Kuehn, C., Lalonde, S., Buschmann, H., Frommer, W. B., and Ward, J. M. (2000) A new subfamily of sucrose, transporters, SUT4, with low affinity/high capacity localized in, enucleate sieve elements of plants. Plant Cell 12: 1345–1355., Wright, J. P., and Fisher, D. B. (1980) Direct measurement of sieve, tube turgor pressure using severed aphid stylets. Plant Physiol., 65: 1133–1135., Yoo, B.-C., Aoki, K., Xiang, Y., Campbell, L. R., Hull, R. J., Xoconostle-Cazares, B., Monzer, J., Lee, J.-Y., Ullman, D. E., and Lucas, W., J. (2000) Characterization of Cucurbita maxima phloem serpin-1, (CmPS-1): A developmentally regulated elastase inhibitor. J. Biol., Chem. 275: 35122–35128., Zimmermann, M. H., and Milburn, J. A., eds. (1975) Transport in, Plants, 1: Phloem Transport (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology,, New Series, Vol. 1). Springer, New York.
Page 248 :
Chapter, , 11, , Respiration and, Lipid Metabolism, , PHOTOSYNTHESIS PROVIDES the organic building blocks that plants, (and nearly all other life) depend on. Respiration, with its associated carbon metabolism, releases the energy stored in carbon compounds in a, controlled manner for cellular use. At the same time it generates many, carbon precursors for biosynthesis. In the first part of this chapter we, will review respiration in its metabolic context, emphasizing the interconnections and the special features that are peculiar to plants. We will, also relate respiration to recent developments in our understanding of, the biochemistry and molecular biology of plant mitochondria., In the second part of the chapter we will describe the pathways of, lipid biosynthesis that lead to the accumulation of fats and oils, which, many plants use for storage. We will also examine lipid synthesis and, the influence of lipids on membrane properties. Finally, we will discuss, the catabolic pathways involved in the breakdown of lipids and the conversion of the degradation products to sugars that occurs during seed, germination., , OVERVIEW OF PLANT RESPIRATION, Aerobic (oxygen-requiring) respiration is common to nearly all eukaryotic organisms, and in its broad outlines, the respiratory process in plants, is similar to that found in animals and lower eukaryotes. However, some, specific aspects of plant respiration distinguish it from its animal counterpart. Aerobic respiration is the biological process by which reduced, organic compounds are mobilized and subsequently oxidized in a controlled manner. During respiration, free energy is released and transiently stored in a compound, ATP, which can be readily utilized for the, maintenance and development of the plant., Glucose is most commonly cited as the substrate for respiration. However, in a functioning plant cell the reduced carbon is derived from, sources such as the disaccharide sucrose, hexose phosphates and triose, phosphates from starch degradation and photosynthesis, fructose-containing polymers (fructans), and other sugars, as well as lipids (primarily triacylglycerols), organic acids, and on occasion, proteins (Figure 11.1).
Page 249 :
224, , Chapter 11, , FIGURE 11.1 Overview of respiration. Substrates for respiration are, generated by other cellular, processes and enter the respiratory, pathways. Glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathways in the, cytosol and plastid convert sugars, to organic acids, via hexose phosphates and triose phosphates, generating NADH or NADPH and, ATP. The organic acids are oxidized in the mitochondrial citric, acid cycle, and the NADH and, FADH2 produced provide the, energy for ATP synthesis by the, electron transport chain and ATP, synthase in oxidative phosphorylation. In gluconeogenesis, carbon, from lipid breakdown is broken, down in the glyoxysomes, metabolized in the citric acid cycle, and, then used to synthesize sugars in, the cytosol by reverse glycolysis., , CYTOSOL, PLASTID, Storage,, phloem transport, Pentose, phosphate, pathway, , Sucrose, , Starch, , Glycolysis, Hexose-P, , Hexose-P, , Pentose-P, , Pentose-P, Triose-P, , CO2, , Pentose, phosphate, pathway, , Triose-P, CO2, , NADPH, , NADPH, , Photosynthesis, Storage, , Organic acids, , ATP, , ATP, , NADH, MITOCHONDRION, NADH, Citric, acid, cycle, , Lipid, breakdown, , From a chemical standpoint, plant respiration can be, expressed as the oxidation of the 12-carbon molecule, sucrose and the reduction of 12 molecules of O2:, C12H22O11 + 13 H2O → 12 CO2 + 48 H+ + 48 e–, 12 O2 + 48 H+ + 48 e– → 24 H2O, , giving the following net reaction:, C12H22O11 + 12 O2 → 12 CO2 + 11 H2O, , This reaction is the reversal of the photosynthetic, process; it represents a coupled redox reaction in which, sucrose is completely oxidized to CO2 while oxygen serves, as the ultimate electron acceptor, being reduced to water., The standard free-energy decrease for the reaction as written is 5760 kJ (1380 kcal) per mole (342 g) of sucrose oxidized. The controlled release of this free energy, along with, its coupling to the synthesis of ATP, is the primary, though, by no means only, role of respiratory metabolism., To prevent damage (incineration) of cellular structures, the, cell mobilizes the large amount of free energy released in the, oxidation of sucrose in a series of step-by-step reactions., These reactions can be grouped into four major processes:, , FADH2, , Oxidative, phosphorylation, , CO2, , O2, , glycolysis, the citric acid cycle, the reactions of the pentose, phosphate pathway, and oxidative phosphorylation. The substrates of respiration enter the respiratory process at different, points in the pathways, as summarized in Figure 11.1:, • Glycolysis involves a series of reactions carried out, by a group of soluble enzymes located in both the, cytosol and the plastid. A sugar—for example,, sucrose—is partly oxidized via six-carbon sugar phosphates (hexose phosphates) and three-carbon sugar, phosphates (triose phosphates) to produce an organic, acid—for example, pyruvate. The process yields a, small amount of energy as ATP, and reducing power, in the form of a reduced pyridine nucleotide, NADH., • In the pentose phosphate pathway, also located both, in the cytosol and the plastid, the six-carbon glucose6-phosphate is initially oxidized to the five-carbon, ribulose-5-phosphate. The carbon is lost as CO2, and, reducing power is conserved in the form of two molecules of another reduced pyridine nucleotide,, NADPH. In the following near-equilibrium reactions,, ribulose-5-phosphate is converted into three- to, seven-carbon sugars.
Page 250 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, , 225, , species)—produced during glycolysis, the pentose, phosphate pathway, and the citric acid cycle—to oxygen. This electron transfer releases a large amount of, free energy, much of which is conserved through the, synthesis of ATP from ADP and Pi (inorganic phosphate) catalyzed by the enzyme ATP synthase. Collectively the redox reactions of the electron transport, chain and the synthesis of ATP are called oxidative, phosphorylation. This final stage completes the oxidation of sucrose., , • In the citric acid cycle, pyruvate is oxidized completely to CO2, and a considerable amount of reducing power (16 NADH + 4 FADH2 equivalents per, sucrose) is generated in the process. With one exception (succinate dehydrogenase), these reactions, involve a series of enzymes located in the internal, aqueous compartment, or matrix, of the mitochondrion (see Figure 11.5). As we will discuss later, succinate dehydrogenase is localized in the inner of the, two mitochondrial membranes., , Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+/NADH) is, an organic cofactor (coenzyme) associated with many, enzymes that catalyze cellular redox reactions. NAD+ is the, oxidized form of the cofactor, and it undergoes a reversible, two-electron reaction that yields NADH (Figure 11.2):, , • In oxidative phosphorylation, electrons are transferred along an electron transport chain, consisting, of a collection of electron transport proteins bound to, the inner of the two mitochondrial membranes. This, system transfers electrons from NADH (and related, , (A), NH2, , H H, , H, , N, , H, , N, , CONH2, , H, , H, , H, , CONH2, , H, N, O, H, , H, , P, , O, , O–, , H, , N, , O, , O, , H2CO, H, , +, , H, , H, , N, , P, , + 2 e– + 2H+, , OCH2, H, , O–, , H, , N, , H, , OH HO, , H— O HO, (2–O3P—), , H, , O, , H, , NAD+ (NADP+), , NAD(P)H, , (B), NH2, N, N, H, N, O, H, , H, , N, , H, , H2CO, H, , H, , HCOH, O, P, , O, , O–, , P, , O–, , + 2 e– + 2H+, , H, H3C, , H, , N, , N, , O, , O, NH, , H3 C, CH2, , H— O HO, , CH2, , N, H, , H, , O, , HCOH, , FAD, , FADH2, , HCOH, HCOH, CH2, H, N, , H3C, , N, , O, NH, , H3C, , N, H, , O, , FMN, , FIGURE 11.2 Structures and reactions of the major electroncarrying cofactors involved in respiratory bioenergetics. (A), Reduction of NAD(P)+ to NAD(P)H; (B) Reduction of FAD, to FADH2. FMN is identical to the flavin part of FAD and is, shown in the dashed box. Blue shaded areas show the portions of the molecules that are involved in the redox reaction.
Page 251 :
226, , Chapter 11, NAD+ + 2 e– + H+ → NADH, , The standard reduction potential for this redox couple is, about –320 mV, which makes it a relatively strong reductant (i.e., electron donor). NADH is thus a good molecule, in which to conserve the free energy carried by electrons, released during the stepwise oxidations of glycolysis and, the citric acid cycle. A related compound, nicotinamide, adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP+/NADPH), functions in redox reactions of photosynthesis (see Chapter 8), and of the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway; it also, takes part in mitochondrial metabolism (Møller and Rasmusson 1998). This will be discussed later in the chapter., The oxidation of NADH by oxygen via the electron, transport chain releases free energy (220 kJ mol–1, or 52 kcal, mol–1) that drives the synthesis of ATP. We can now formulate a more complete picture of respiration as related to, its role in cellular energy metabolism by coupling the following two reactions:, C12H22O11 + 12 O2 → 12 CO2 + 11 H2O, 60 ADP + 60 Pi → 60 ATP + 60 H2O, , Keep in mind that not all the carbon that enters the respiratory pathway ends up as CO2. Many respiratory intermediates are the starting points for pathways that assimilate nitrogen into organic form, pathways that synthesize, nucleotides and lipids, and many others (see Figure 11.13)., , GLYCOLYSIS: A CYTOSOLIC AND, PLASTIDIC PROCESS, In the early steps of glycolysis (from the Greek words, glykos, “sugar,” and lysis, “splitting”), carbohydrates are, converted to hexose phosphates, which are then split into, two triose phosphates. In a subsequent energy-conserving, phase, the triose phosphates are oxidized and rearranged, to yield two molecules of pyruvate, an organic acid., Besides preparing the substrate for oxidation in the citric, acid cycle, glycolysis yields a small amount of chemical, energy in the form of ATP and NADH., When molecular oxygen is unavailable—for example, in, plant roots in flooded soils—glycolysis can be the main, source of energy for cells. For this to work, the fermentation pathways, which are localized in the cytosol, reduce, pyruvate to recycle the NADH produced by glycolysis. In, this section we will describe the basic glycolytic and fermentative pathways, emphasizing features that are specific, for plant cells. We will end by discussing the pentose phosphate pathway., , Glycolysis Converts Carbohydrates into Pyruvate,, Producing NADH and ATP, Glycolysis occurs in all living organisms (prokaryotes and, eukaryotes). The principal reactions associated with the, , classic glycolytic and fermentative pathways in plants are, almost identical with those of animal cells (Figure 11.3)., However, plant glycolysis has unique regulatory features,, as well as a parallel partial glycolytic pathway in plastids, and alternative enzymatic routes for several cytosolic steps., In animals the substrate of glycolysis is glucose and the end, product pyruvate. Because sucrose is the major translocated sugar in most plants and is therefore the form of carbon that most nonphotosynthetic tissues import, sucrose, (not glucose) can be argued to be the true sugar substrate, for plant respiration. The end products of plant glycolysis, include another organic acid, malate., In the early steps of glycolysis, sucrose is broken down, into the two monosaccharides—glucose and fructose—, which can readily enter the glycolytic pathway. Two pathways for the degradation of sucrose are known in plants,, both of which also take part in the unloading of sucrose, from the phloem (see Chapter 10)., In most plant tissues sucrose synthase, localized in the, cytosol, is used to degrade sucrose by combining sucrose, with UDP to produce fructose and UDP-glucose. UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase then converts UDP-glucose and, pyrophosphate (PPi) into UTP and glucose-6-phosphate, (see Figure 11.3). In some tissues, invertases present in the, cell wall, vacuole, or cytosol hydrolyze sucrose to its two, component hexoses (glucose and fructose). The hexoses are, then phosphorylated in a reaction that uses ATP. Whereas, the sucrose synthase reaction is close to equilibrium, the, invertase reaction releases sufficient energy to be essentially, irreversible., Plastids such as chloroplasts or amyloplasts (see Chapter 1) can also supply substrates for glycolysis. Starch is, synthesized and catabolized only in plastids (see Chapter, 8), and carbon obtained from starch degradation enters the, glycolytic pathway in the cytosol primarily as hexose phosphate (which is translocated out of amyloplasts) or triose, phosphate (which is translocated out of chloroplasts). Photosynthetic products can also directly enter the glycolytic, pathway as triose phosphate (Hoefnagel et al. 1998)., Plastids convert starch into triose phosphates using a, separate set of glycolytic isozymes that convert hexose, phosphates to triose phosphates. All the enzymes shown in, Figure 11.3 have been measured at levels sufficient to support the respiration rates observed in intact plant tissues., In the initial phase of glycolysis, each hexose unit is, phosphorylated twice and then split, eventually producing, two molecules of triose phosphate. This series of reactions, consumes two to four molecules of ATP per sucrose unit,, depending on whether the sucrose is split by sucrose synthase or invertase. These reactions also include two of the, three essentially irreversible reactions of the glycolytic, pathway that are catalyzed by hexokinase and phosphofructokinase (see Figure 11.3). The phosphofructokinase, reaction is one of the control points of glycolysis in both, plants and animals.
Page 252 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, The energy-conserving phase of glycolysis., , The reactions discussed thus far transfer carbon from the various, substrate pools into triose phosphates. Once glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate is formed, the glycolytic pathway can, begin to extract usable energy in the energy-conserving, phase. The enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase catalyzes the oxidation of the aldehyde to a carboxylic acid, reducing NAD+ to NADH. This reaction, releases sufficient free energy to allow the phosphorylation, (using inorganic phosphate) of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate to produce 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate. The phosphorylated carboxylic acid on carbon 1 of 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate (see Figure 11.3) has a large standard free energy, of hydrolysis (–49.3 kJ mol–1, or –11.8 kcal mol–1). Thus,, 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate is a strong donor of phosphate, groups., In the next step of glycolysis, catalyzed by phosphoglycerate kinase, the phosphate on carbon 1 is transferred, to a molecule of ADP, yielding ATP and 3-phosphoglycerate. For each sucrose entering the pathway, four ATPs are, generated by this reaction—one for each molecule of 1,3bisphosphoglycerate., This type of ATP synthesis, traditionally referred to as, substrate-level phosphorylation, involves the direct transfer of a phosphate group from a substrate molecule to ADP,, to form ATP. As we will see, ATP synthesis by substratelevel phosphorylation is mechanistically distinct from ATP, synthesis by ATP synthases involved in the oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria (which will be described later, in this chapter) or photophosphorylation in chloroplasts, (see Chapter 7)., In the following reaction, the phosphate on 3-phosphoglycerate is transferred to carbon 2 and a molecule of water, is removed, yielding the compound phosphoenylpyruvate, (PEP). The phosphate group on PEP has a high standard, free energy of hydrolysis (–61.9 kJ mol–1, or –14.8 kcal, mol–1), which makes PEP an extremely good phosphate, donor for ATP formation. Using PEP as substrate, the, enzyme pyruvate kinase catalyzes a second substrate-level, phosphorylation to yield ATP and pyruvate. This final step,, which is the third essentially irreversible step in glycolysis,, yields four additional molecules of ATP for each sucrose, that enters the pathway., , Plants Have Alternative Glycolytic Reactions, The sequence of reactions leading to the formation of pyruvate from glucose occurs in all organisms that carry out, glycolysis. In addition, organisms can operate this pathway, in the opposite direction to synthesize sugar from organic, acids. This process is known as gluconeogenesis., Gluconeogenesis is not common in plants, but it does, operate in the seeds of some plants, such as castor bean and, sunflower, that store a significant quantity of their carbon, reserves in the form of oils (triacylglycerols). After the seed, germinates, much of the oil is converted by gluconeogene-, , 227, , sis to sucrose, which is then used to support the growing, seedling. In the initial phase of glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, overlaps with the pathway for synthesis of sucrose from, photosynthetic triose phosphate described in Chapter 8,, which is typical for plants., Because the glycolytic reaction catalyzed by ATPdependent phosphofructokinase is essentially irreversible, (see Figure 11.3), an additional enzyme, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, converts fructose-1,6-bisphosphate to fructose-6-phosphate and Pi during gluconeogenesis. ATPdependent phosphofructokinase and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase represent a major control point of carbon flux, through the glycolytic/gluconeogenic pathways in both, plants and animals, as well as in sucrose synthesis in, plants (see Chapter 8)., In plants, the interconversion of fructose-6-phosphate, and fructose-1,6-bisphosphate is made more complex by, the presence of an additional (cytosolic) enzyme, a PPidependent phosphofructokinase (pyrophosphate:fructose6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase), which catalyzes the, following reversible reaction (see Figure 11.3):, Fructose-6-P + PPi ↔ fructose-1,6-P2 + Pi, , where P represents phosphate and P2 bisphosphate. PPidependent phosphofructokinase is found in the cytosol of, most plant tissues at levels that are considerably higher, than those of the ATP-dependent phosphofructokinase, (Kruger 1997). Suppression of the PPi-dependent phosphofructokinase in transgenic potato has indicated that it, contributes to glycolytic flux, but that it is not essential for, plant survival, indicating that other enzymes can take over, its function., The reaction catalyzed by the PPi-dependent phosphofructokinase is readily reversible, but it is unlikely to operate in sucrose synthesis (Dennis and Blakely 2000). Like, ATP-dependent phosphofructokinase and fructose bisphosphatase, this enzyme appears to be regulated by fluctuations in cell metabolism (discussed later in the chapter),, suggesting that under some circumstances operation of the, glycolytic pathway in plants differs from that in many, other organisms (see Web Essay 11.1)., At the end of the glycolytic sequence, plants have alternative pathways for metabolizing PEP. In one pathway, PEP is carboxylated by the ubiquitous cytosolic enzyme, PEP carboxylase to form the organic acid oxaloacetate, (OAA). The OAA is then reduced to malate by the action, of malate dehydrogenase, which uses NADH as the source, of electrons, and this performs a role similar to that of the, dehydrogenases during fermentative metabolism (see Figure 11.3). The resulting malate can be stored by export to, the vacuole or transported to the mitochondrion, where it, can enter the citric acid cycle. Thus the operation of pyruvate kinase and PEP carboxylase can produce alternative, organic acids—pyruvate or malate—for mitochondrial respiration, though pyruvate dominates in most tissues.
Page 254 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, (B), , CH2OH, , HO, , P OH2C, , O, , H, , H, , HOCH2, , OH H, H, , O, , O, , H, , OH, , H, HO, , OH, , O, , H H, , H, , CH2OH, , OH, , H2COH, C, , HCOH, , P, , C, , CO, , P, , P, , H2 C, , 2-P-Glycerate, , Phosphoenolpyruvate, , O–, , O, C, , O, , HCOH, , Pyruvate, , Lactate, , CH3, , O–, , O, , H2COH, , P, , P, , CH3, , pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase act on, pyruvate, ultimately producing ethanol and CO2 and oxidizing NADH in the process. In lactic acid fermentation, (common to mammalian muscle but also found in plants),, the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase uses NADH to reduce, pyruvate to lactate, thus regenerating NAD+., Under some circumstances, plant tissues may be subjected to low (hypoxic) or zero (anoxic) concentrations of, ambient oxygen, forcing them to carry out fermentative, metabolism. The best-studied example involves flooded, or waterlogged soils in which the diffusion of oxygen is, sufficiently reduced to cause root tissues to become, hypoxic., In corn the initial response to low oxygen is lactic acid, fermentation, but the subsequent response is alcoholic fermentation. Ethanol is thought to be a less toxic end product of fermentation because it can diffuse out of the cell,, whereas lactate accumulates and promotes acidification of, the cytosol. In numerous other cases plants function under, near-anaerobic conditions by carrying out some form of, fermentation., , C, , HCO, , 3-P-Glycerate, , C, , H2CO, , 1,3-P2-Glycerate, , C, , HCOH, , C, , HCOH, , P, , O–, , O, , P, , CO, , O, , Dihydroxyacetone-P, , O–, , O–, , O, , H2CO, , Glyceraldehyde-3-P, , O, , H, , Fructose-1,6-P2, , H, , H2CO, , CH2O P, , HO OH, , H, , C, , O, , O, , P OH2C, , H, , H2CO, , OH, , Glucose-6-P, , Fructose-6-P, O, , OH, , H, , HO OH, , OH, , H, , OH, , HO, , CH2OH, , Sucrose, P OH2C, , O, , H, , 229, , O, CH, CH3, , Acetaldehyde, , CH2OH, CH3, , Ethanol, , FIGURE 11.3 Reactions of plant glycolysis and fermentation. (A) In the main pathway, sucrose is oxidized to the, organic acid pyruvate. The double arrows denote reversible, reactions; the single arrows, essentially irreversible reactions. (B) The structures of the intermediates. P, phosphate;, P2, bisphosphate., , In the Absence of O2, Fermentation Regenerates, the NAD+ Needed for Glycolysis, In the absence of oxygen, the citric acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation cannot function. Glycolysis thus cannot continue to operate because the cell’s supply of NAD+, is limited, and once all the NAD+ becomes tied up in the, reduced state (NADH), the reaction catalyzed by glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cannot take place., To overcome this problem, plants and other organisms can, further metabolize pyruvate by carrying out one or more, forms of fermentative metabolism (see Figure 11.3)., In alcoholic fermentation (common in plants, but more, widely known from brewer’s yeast), the two enzymes, , Fermentation Does Not Liberate All the Energy, Available in Each Sugar Molecule, Before we leave the topic of glycolysis, we need to consider the efficiency of fermentation. Efficiency is defined, here as the energy conserved as ATP relative to the energy, potentially available in a molecule of sucrose. The standard free-energy change (∆G0′) for the complete oxidation, of sucrose is –5760 kJ mol–1 (1380 kcal mol–1). The value of, ∆G0′ for the synthesis of ATP is 32 kJ mol–1 (7.7 kcal mol–1)., However, under the nonstandard conditions that normally, exist in both mammalian and plant cells, the synthesis of, ATP requires an input of free energy of approximately 50, kJ mol–1 (12 kcal mol–1). (For a discussion of free energy,, see Chapter 2 on the web site.), Given the net synthesis of four molecules of ATP for, each sucrose molecule that is converted to ethanol (or lactate), the efficiency of anaerobic fermentation is only about, 4%. Most of the energy available in sucrose remains in the, reduced by-product of fermentation: lactate or ethanol., During aerobic respiration, the pyruvate produced by glycolysis is transported into mitochondria, where it is further oxidized, resulting in a much more efficient conversion of the free energy originally available in the sucrose., Because of the low efficiency of energy conservation, under fermentation, an increased rate of glycolysis is, needed to sustain the ATP production necessary for cell, survival. This is called the Pasteur effect after the French, microbiologist Louis Pasteur, who first noted it when yeast, switched from aerobic respiration to anaerobic alcoholic, fermentation. The higher rates of glycolysis result from, changes in glycolytic metabolite levels, as well as from, increased expression of genes encoding enzymes of glycolysis and fermentation (Sachs et al. 1996).
Page 255 :
230, , Chapter 11, , Plant Glycolysis Is Controlled by Its Products, In vivo, glycolysis appears to be regulated at the level of fructose-6-phosphate phosphorylation and PEP turnover (see, Web Essay 11.1). In contrast to animals, AMP and ATP are, not major effectors of plant phosphofructokinase and pyruvate kinase. The cytosolic concentration of PEP, which is a, potent inhibitor of the plant ATP-dependent phosphofructokinase, is a more important regulator of plant glycolysis., This inhibitory effect of PEP on phosphofructokinase is, strongly decreased by inorganic phosphate, making the, cytosolic ratio of PEP to Pi a critical factor in the control of, plant glycolytic activity. Pyruvate kinase and PEP carboxylase, the enzymes that metabolize PEP in the last steps, of glycolysis (see Figure 11.3), are in turn sensitive to feedback inhibition by citric acid cycle intermediates and their, derivatives, including malate, citrate, 2-oxoglutarate, and, glutamate., In plants, therefore, the control of glycolysis comes from, the “bottom up” (see Figure 11.12), with primary regulation at the level of PEP metabolism by pyruvate kinase and, PEP carboxylase and secondary regulation exerted by PEP, at the conversion of fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6bisphosphate (see Figure 11.3). In animals, the primary control operates at the phosphofructokinase, and secondary, control at the pyruvate kinase., One conceivable benefit of bottom-up control of glycolysis is that it permits plants to control net glycolytic flux, to pyruvate independently of related metabolic processes, such as the Calvin cycle and sucrose–triose phosphate–, starch interconversion (Plaxton 1996). Another benefit of, this control mechanism is that glycolysis may adjust to the, demand for biosynthetic precursors., The presence of two enzymes metabolizing PEP in plant, cells—pyruvate kinase and PEP carboxylase—has consequences for the control of glycolysis that are not quite clear., Though the two enzymes are inhibited by similar metabolites, the PEP carboxylase can under some conditions perform a bypass reaction around the pyruvate kinase. The, resulting malate can then enter the mitochondrial citric acid, cycle. Hence, the bottom-up regulation enables a high flexibility in the control of plant glycolysis., Experimental support for multiple pathways of PEP, metabolism comes from the study of transgenic tobacco, plants with less than 5% of the normal level of cytosolic, pyruvate kinase in their leaves (Plaxton 1996). In these, plants, rates of both leaf respiration and photosynthesis, were unaffected relative to controls having wild-type levels of pyruvate kinase. However, reduced root growth in, the transgenic plants indicated that the pyruvate kinase, reaction could not be circumvented without some detrimental effects., The regulation of the conversion of fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate is also complex. Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate, another hexose bisphosphate, is present at varying levels in the cytosol (see Chapter 8). It, , markedly inhibits the activity of cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase but stimulates the activity of PPi-dependent, phosphofructokinase. These observations suggest that fructose-2,6-bisphosphate plays a central role in partitioning, flux between ATP-dependent and PPi-dependent pathways, of fructose phosphate metabolism at the crossing point, between sucrose synthesis and glycolysis., Understanding of the fine levels of glycolysis regulation, requires the study of temporal changes in metabolite levels (Givan 1999). Methods are now available by rapid, extraction and simultaneous analyses of many metabolites—for example, by mass spectrometry—an approach, called metabolic profiling (see Web Essay 11.2)., , The Pentose Phosphate Pathway Produces NADPH, and Biosynthetic Intermediates, The glycolytic pathway is not the only route available for, the oxidation of sugars in plant cells. Sharing common, metabolites, the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, (also known as the hexose monophosphate shunt) can also, accomplish this task (Figure 11.4). The reactions are carried, out by soluble enzymes present in the cytosol and in plastids. Generally, the pathway in plastids predominates over, the cytosolic pathway (Dennis et al. 1997)., The first two reactions of this pathway involve the, oxidative events that convert the six-carbon glucose-6phosphate to a five-carbon sugar, ribulose-5-phosphate,, with loss of a CO2 molecule and generation of two molecules of NADPH (not NADH). The remaining reactions of, the pathway convert ribulose-5-phosphate to the glycolytic, intermediates glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and fructose-6phosphate. Because glucose-6-phosphate can be regenerated from glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and fructose-6phosphate by glycolytic enzymes, for six turns of the cycle, we can write the reaction as follows:, 6 glucose-6-P + 12 NADP+ + 7 H2O →, 5 glucose-6-P + 6 CO2 + Pi + 12 NADPH + 12 H+, , The net result is the complete oxidation of one glucose-6phosphate molecule to CO2 with the concomitant synthesis of 12 NADPH molecules., Studies of the release of 14CO2 from isotopically labeled, glucose indicate that glycolysis is the more dominant, breakdown pathway, accounting for 80 to 95% of the total, carbon flux in most plant tissues. However, the pentose, phosphate pathway does contribute to the flux, and developmental studies indicate that its contribution increases as, plant cells develop from a meristematic to a more differentiated state (Ap Rees 1980). The oxidative pentose phosphate pathway plays several roles in plant metabolism:, • The product of the two oxidative steps is NADPH,, and this NADPH is thought to drive reductive steps, associated with various biosynthetic reactions that, occur in the cytosol. In nongreen plastids, such as, amyloplasts, and in chloroplasts functioning in the
Page 257 :
232, , Chapter 11, , dark, the pathway may also supply NADPH for, biosynthetic reactions such as lipid biosynthesis and, nitrogen assimilation., • Because plant mitochondria are able to oxidize, cytosolic NADPH via an NADPH dehydrogenase, localized on the external surface of the inner membrane, some of the reducing power generated by this, pathway may contribute to cellular energy metabolism; that is, electrons from NADPH may end up, reducing O2 and generating ATP., • The pathway produces ribose-5-phosphate, a precursor of the ribose and deoxyribose needed in the synthesis of RNA and DNA, respectively., • Another intermediate in this pathway, the four-carbon erythrose-4-phosphate, combines with PEP in the, initial reaction that produces plant phenolic compounds, including the aromatic amino acids and the, precursors of lignin, flavonoids, and phytoalexins, (see Chapter 13)., • During the early stages of greening, before leaf tissues become fully photoautotrophic, the oxidative, pentose phosphate pathway is thought to be, involved in generating Calvin cycle intermediates., , Control of the oxidative pathway. The oxidative pentose phosphate pathway is controlled by the initial reaction, of the pathway catalyzed by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, the activity of which is markedly inhibited by, a high ratio of NADPH to NADP+., In the light, however, little operation of the oxidative, pathway is likely to occur in the chloroplast because the, end products of the pathway, fructose-6-phosphate and, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, are being synthesized by the, Calvin cycle. Thus, mass action will drive the nonoxidative, interconversions of the pathway in the direction of pentose, synthesis. Moreover, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, will be inhibited during photosynthesis by the high ratio, of NADPH to NADP+ in the chloroplast, as well as by a, reductive inactivation involving the ferredoxin–thioredoxin, system (see Chapter 8)., , THE CITRIC ACID CYCLE: A, MITOCHONDRIAL MATRIX PROCESS, During the nineteenth century, biologists discovered that, in the absence of air, cells produce ethanol or lactic acid,, whereas in the presence of air, cells consume O2 and produce CO2 and H2O. In 1937 the German-born British biochemist Hans A. Krebs reported the discovery of the citric acid cycle—also called the tricarboxylic acid cycle or Krebs, cycle. The elucidation of the citric acid cycle not only, explained how pyruvate is broken down to CO2 and H2O;, it also highlighted the key concept of cycles in metabolic, , pathways. For his discovery, Hans Krebs was awarded the, Nobel Prize in physiology and medicine in 1953., Because the citric acid cycle is localized in the matrix of, mitochondria, we will begin with a general description of, mitochondrial structure and function, knowledge obtained, mainly through experiments on isolated mitochondria (see, Web Topic 11.1). We will then review the steps of the citric, acid cycle, emphasizing the features that are specific to, plants. For all plant-specific properties, we will consider, how they affect respiratory function., , Mitochondria Are Semiautonomous Organelles, The breakdown of sucrose to pyruvate releases less than, 25% of the total energy in sucrose; the remaining energy is, stored in the two molecules of pyruvate. The next two, stages of respiration (the citric acid cycle and oxidative, phosphorylation—i.e., electron transport coupled to ATP, synthesis) take place within an organelle enclosed by a double membrane, the mitochondrion (plural mitochondria)., In electron micrographs, plant mitochondria—whether, in situ or in vitro—usually look spherical or rodlike (Figure 11.5), ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 µm in diameter and up to, 3 µm in length (Douce 1985). With some exceptions, plant, cells have a substantially lower number of mitochondria, than that found in a typical animal cell. The number of, mitochondria per plant cell varies, and it is usually directly, related to the metabolic activity of the tissue, reflecting the, mitochondrial role in energy metabolism. Guard cells, for, example, are unusually rich in mitochondria., The ultrastructural features of plant mitochondria are, similar to those of mitochondria in nonplant tissues (see, Figure 11.5). Plant mitochondria have two membranes: a, smooth outer membrane that completely surrounds a, highly invaginated inner membrane. The invaginations of, the inner membrane are known as cristae (singular crista)., As a consequence of the greatly enlarged surface area, the, inner membrane can contain more than 50% of the total, mitochondrial protein. The aqueous phase contained, within the inner membrane is referred to as the mitochondrial matrix (plural matrices), and the region between the, two mitochondrial membranes is known as the intermembrane space., Intact mitochondria are osmotically active; that is, they, take up water and swell when placed in a hypo-osmotic, medium. Most inorganic ions and charged organic molecules are not able to diffuse freely into the matrix space., The inner membrane is the osmotic barrier; the outer membrane is permeable to solutes that have a molecular mass, of less than approximately 10,000 Da (i.e., most cellular, metabolites and ions, but not proteins). The lipid fraction, of both membranes is primarily made up of phospholipids,, 80% of which are either phosphatidylcholine or phosphatidylethanolamine., Like chloroplasts, mitochondria are semiautonomous, organelles because they contain ribosomes, RNA, and
Page 258 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, FIGURE 11.5 Structure of plant mitochondria. (A) Three-dimensional representation of a mitochondrion, showing the invaginations of the inner membrane that, are called cristae, as well as the location of the matrix and intermembrane spaces, (see also Figure 11.10). (B) Electron micrograph of mitochondria in a mesophyll, cell of Vicia faba. (Photo from Gunning and Steer 1996.), , (A), , 233, , (B), , Intermembrane space, Outer membrane, Inner membrane, , Matrix, , Cristae, , 0.5 mm, , DNA, which encodes a limited number of mitochondrial, proteins. Plant mitochondria are thus able to carry out the, various steps of protein synthesis and to transmit their, genetic information. Mitochondria proliferate through the, division by fission of preexisting mitochondria and not, through de novo biogenesis of the organelle., , Pyruvate Enters the Mitochondrion and Is, Oxidized via the Citric Acid Cycle, As already noted, the citric acid cycle is also known as the, tricarboxylic acid cycle, because of the importance of the, tricarboxylic acids citric acid (citrate) and isocitric acid, (isocitrate) as early intermediates (Figure 11.6). This cycle, constitutes the second stage in respiration and takes place, in the mitochondrial matrix. Its operation requires that the, pyruvate generated in the cytosol during glycolysis be, transported through the impermeable inner mitochondrial, membrane via a specific transport protein (as will be, described shortly)., Once inside the mitochondrial matrix, pyruvate is decarboxylated in an oxidation reaction by the enzyme pyruvate, dehydrogenase. The products are NADH (from NAD+),, CO2, and acetic acid in the form of acetyl-CoA, in which a, thioester bond links the acetic acid to a sulfur-containing, cofactor, coenzyme A (CoA) (see Figure 11.6). Pyruvate, dehydrogenase exists as a large complex of several enzymes, that catalyze the overall reaction in a three-step process:, decarboxylation, oxidation, and conjugation to CoA., In the next reaction the enzyme citrate synthase combines the acetyl group of acetyl-CoA with a four-carbon, , dicarboxylic acid (oxaloacetate, OAA) to give a six-carbon, tricarboxylic acid (citrate). Citrate is then isomerized to, isocitrate by the enzyme aconitase., The following two reactions are successive oxidative, decarboxylations, each of which produces one NADH and, releases one molecule of CO2, yielding a four-carbon molecule, succinyl-CoA. At this point, three molecules of CO2, have been produced for each pyruvate that entered the, mitochondrion, or 12 CO2 for each molecule of sucrose oxidized., During the remainder of the citric acid cycle, succinylCoA is oxidized to OAA, allowing the continued operation, of the cycle. Initially the large amount of free energy available in the thioester bond of succinyl-CoA is conserved, through the synthesis of ATP from ADP and Pi via a substrate-level phosphorylation catalyzed by succinyl-CoA, synthetase. (Recall that the free energy available in the, thioester bond of acetyl-CoA was used to form a carbon–carbon bond in the step catalyzed by citrate synthase.), The resulting succinate is oxidized to fumarate by succinate, dehydrogenase, which is the only membrane-associated, enzyme of the citric acid cycle and also part of the electron, transport chain (which is the next major topic to be discussed in this chapter)., The electrons and protons removed from succinate end, up not on NAD+ but on another cofactor involved in redox, reactions: FAD (flavin adenine dinucleotide). FAD is covalently bound to the active site of succinate dehydrogenase, and undergoes a reversible two-electron reduction to produce FADH2 (see Figure 11.2).
Page 260 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, , The Citric Acid Cycle of Plants Has Unique, Features, The citric acid cycle reactions outlined in Figure 11.6 are not, all identical with those carried out by animal mitochondria., For example, the step catalyzed by succinyl-CoA synthetase produces ATP in plants and GTP in animals., A feature of the plant citric acid cycle that is absent in, many other organisms is the significant activity of NAD+, malic enzyme, which has been found in the matrix of all, plant mitochondria analyzed to date. This enzyme catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of malate:, , (A), , 235, , 1 Pyruvate, , From cytosol:, , 1 Acetyl-CoA, , 1 Malate, 1 Citrate, , 1 Oxaloacetate, , 1 Malate, , 1 Isocitrate, , Malate + NAD+ → pyruvate + CO2 + NADH, , The presence of NAD+ malic enzyme enables plant, mitochondria to operate alternative pathways for the, metabolism of PEP derived from glycolysis. As already, described, malate can be synthesized from PEP in the, cytosol via the enzymes PEP carboxylase and malate dehydrogenase (see Figure 11.3). Malate is then transported into, the mitochondrial matrix, where NAD+ malic enzyme can, oxidize it to pyruvate. This reaction makes possible the, complete net oxidation of citric acid cycle intermediates, such as malate (Figure 11.7A) or citrate (Figure 11.7B), (Oliver and McIntosh 1995)., Alternatively, the malate produced via the PEP carboxylase can replace citric acid cycle intermediates used in, biosynthesis. Reactions that can replenish intermediates in, a metabolic cycle are known as anaplerotic. For example,, export of 2-oxoglutarate for nitrogen assimilation in the, chloroplast will cause a shortage of malate needed in the, citrate synthase reaction. This malate can be replaced, through the PEP carboxylase pathway (Figure 11.7C)., The presence of an alternative pathway for the oxidation, of malate is consistent with the observation that many, plants, in addition to those that carry out crassulacean acid, metabolism (see Chapter 8), store significant levels of, malate in their central vacuole., , ELECTRON TRANSPORT AND ATP, SYNTHESIS AT THE INNER, MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANE, ATP is the energy carrier used by cells to drive living, processes, and chemical energy conserved during the citric acid cycle in the form of NADH and FADH2 (redox, equivalents with high-energy electrons) must be converted, to ATP to perform useful work in the cell. This O2-dependent process, called oxidative phosphorylation, occurs in, the inner mitochondrial membrane., In this section we will describe the process by which the, energy level of the electrons is lowered in a stepwise fashion and conserved in the form of an electrochemical proton, gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane., Although fundamentally similar in all aerobic cells, the, electron transport chain of plants (and fungi) contains mul-, , (B), , 1 Pyruvate, , 1 Acetyl-CoA, , From cytosol:, 1 Citrate + 1 Citrate, , 1 Oxaloacetate, , 2 Malate, , 2 Isocitrate, , (C), , 2 PEP, , 1 Pyruvate, , 1 Acetyl-CoA, , 1 Oxaloacetate, , 1 Malate, , 1 Citrate, , 1 Isocitrate, , 2-Oxoglutarate, , Nitrogen, assimilation, , FIGURE 11.7 Malic enzyme and PEP carboxylase provide, plants with metabolic flexibility for the metabolism of, phosphoenolpyruvate. Malic enzyme makes it possible for, plant mitochondria to oxidize both malate (A) and citrate, (B) to CO2 without involving pyruvate delivered by glycolysis. The joint action of PEP carboxylase and pyruvate, kinase can convert glycolytic PEP to 2-oxoglutarate, which, is used for nitrogen assimilation (C).
Page 261 :
236, , Chapter 11, , tiple NAD(P)H dehydrogenases and an alternative oxidase, not found in mammalian mitochondria., We will also examine the enzyme that uses the energy, of the proton gradient to synthesize ATP: the FoF1-ATP synthase. After examining the various stages in the production, of ATP, we will summarize the energy conservation steps, at each stage, as well as the regulatory mechanisms that, coordinate the different pathways., , The Electron Transport Chain Catalyzes a Flow of, Electrons from NADH to O2, For each molecule of sucrose oxidized through glycolysis, and the citric acid cycle pathways, 4 molecules of NADH, are generated in the cytosol and 16 molecules of NADH, plus 4 molecules of FADH2 (associated with succinate, dehydrogenase) are generated in the mitochondrial matrix., These reduced compounds must be reoxidized or the entire, respiratory process will come to a halt., The electron transport chain catalyzes an electron flow, from NADH (and FADH2) to oxygen, the final electron, acceptor of the respiratory process. For the oxidation of, NADH, the overall two-electron transfer can be written as, follows:, NADH + H+ + 1⁄ 2 O2 → NAD+ + H2O, , From the reduction potentials for the NADH–NAD+, pair (–320 mV) and the H2O–1⁄ 2 O2 pair (+810 mV), it can be, calculated that the standard free energy released during, this overall reaction (–nF∆E 0 ′ ) is about 220 kJ mol–1 (52, kcal mol–1) per two electrons (for a detailed discussion on, standard free energy see Chapter 2 on the web site)., Because the succinate–fumarate reduction potential is, higher (+30 mV), only 152 kJ mol–1 (36 kcal mol–1) of, energy is released for each two electrons generated during, the oxidation of succinate. The role of the electron transport, chain is to bring about the oxidation of NADH (and, FADH2) and, in the process, utilize some of the free energy, released to generate an electrochemical proton gradient,, ∆m~Η+, across the inner mitochondrial membrane., The electron transport chain of plants contains the same, set of electron carriers found in mitochondria from other, organisms (Figure 11.8) (Siedow 1995; Siedow and Umbach, 1995). The individual electron transport proteins are organized into four multiprotein complexes (identified by, Roman numerals I through IV), all of which are localized, in the inner mitochondrial membrane:, , Complex I (NADH dehydrogenase)., , Electrons from, NADH generated in the mitochondrial matrix during the, citric acid cycle are oxidized by complex I (an NADH, dehydrogenase). The electron carriers in complex I include, a tightly bound cofactor (flavin mononucleotide [FMN],, which is chemically similar to FAD; see Figure 11.2B) and, several iron–sulfur centers. Complex I then transfers these, electrons to ubiquinone. Four protons are pumped from the, , matrix to the intermembrane space for every electron pair, passing through the complex., Ubiquinone, a small lipid-soluble electron and proton, carrier, is located within the inner membrane. It is not, tightly associated with any protein, and it can diffuse, within the hydrophobic core of the membrane bilayer., , Complex II (succinate dehydrogenase). Oxidation of, succinate in the citric acid cycle is catalyzed by this complex, and the reducing equivalents are transferred via the, FADH2 and a group of iron–sulfur proteins into the, ubiquinone pool. This complex does not pump protons., Complex III (cytochrome bc1 complex). This complex, oxidizes reduced ubiquinone (ubiquinol) and transfers the, electrons via an iron–sulfur center, two b-type cytochromes, (b565 and b560), and a membrane-bound cytochrome c1 to, cytochrome c. Four protons per electron pair are pumped, by complex III., Cytochrome c is a small protein loosely attached to the, outer surface of the inner membrane and serves as a mobile, carrier to transfer electrons between complexes III and IV., Complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase). This complex contains two copper centers (CuA and CuB ) and cytochromes a, and a3. Complex IV is the terminal oxidase and brings about, the four-electron reduction of O2 to two molecules of H2O., Two protons are pumped per electon pair (see Figure 11.8)., Both structurally and functionally, ubiquinone and the, cytochrome bc1 complex are very similar to plastoquinone, and the cytochrome b6 f complex, respectively, in the photosynthetic electron transport chain (see Chapter 7)., , Some Electron Transport Enzymes Are Unique to, Plant Mitochondria, In addition to the set of electron carriers described in the, previous section, plant mitochondria contain some components not found in mammalian mitochondria (see Figure 11.8). Note that none of these additional enzymes, pump protons and that energy conservation is therefore, lower whenever they are used:, • Two NAD(P)H dehydrogenases, both Ca2+-dependent, attached to the outer surface of the inner membrane facing the intermembrane space can oxidize, cytosolic NADH and NADPH. Electrons from these, external NAD(P)H dehydrogenases—NDex(NADH), and NDex(NADPH)—enter the main electron transport chain at the level of the ubiquinone pool (see, Web Topic 11.2) (Møller 2001)., • Plant mitochondria have two pathways for oxidizing, matrix NADH. Electron flow through complex I,, described in the previous section, is sensitive to inhibition by several compounds, including rotenone and, piericidin. In addition, plant mitochondria have a, rotenone-resistant dehydrogenase, NDin(NADH), for
Page 262 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, , 237, , INTERMEMBRANE SPACE, , Inner, membrane, , External (rotenone-insensitive), NAD(P)H dehydrogenases can accept, electrons directly from NAD(P)H, produced in the cytosol., NADP+, , NAD+, , 4 H+, , The ubiquinone (UQ) pool diffuses, freely within the inner membrane and, serves to transfer electrons from the, dehydrogenases to either complex III, or the alternative oxidase., , NADPH, , NADH, , Ca2+, , 4 H+, , Ca2+, , e–, , Cytochrome c is a peripheral, protein that transfers electrons, from complex III to complex IV., , 2 H+, , 3 H+, , Cyt c, , e–, e–, , e–, , e–, , e–, , UQ, , FO, , e–, e–, e–, Ca2+, NADPH, , NADH, , NADH, NAD+, , Complex I, NADH, dehydrogenase, , NAD+, , AOX, O2, Succinate, Fumarate, , NADP+, , Rotenone-insensitive, NAD(P)H dehydrogenases, exist on the matrix side, of the membrane., , Complex II, Succinate, dehydrogenase, , O2, H2O, , H2O, , F1, 3 H+, , Complex III, Complex IV, Cytochrome bc1 Cytochrome, complex, oxidase, ATP, ADP + Pi, , An alternative oxidase (AOX), accepts electrons directly, from ubiquinone., , Complex V, ATP synthase, , MATRIX, , FIGURE 11.8 Organization of the electron transport chain, and ATP synthesis in the inner membrane of plant mitochondria. In addition to the five standard protein complexes found in nearly all other mitochondria, the electron, transport chain of plant mitochondria contains five additional enzymes marked in green. None of these additional, , the oxidation of NADH derived from citric acid cycle, substrates. The role of this pathway may well be as a, bypass being engaged when complex I is overloaded, (Møller and Rasmusson 1998; Møller 2001), such as, under photorespiratory conditions, as we will see, shortly (see also Web Topic 11.2)., • An NADPH dehydrogenase, NDin(NADPH), is present on the matrix surface. Very little is known about, this enzyme., • Most, if not all, plants have an “alternative” respiratory pathway for the reduction of oxygen. This pathway involves the so-called alternative oxidase that,, unlike cytochrome c oxidase, is insensitive to inhibition by cyanide, azide, or carbon monoxide (see Web, Topic 11.3)., The nature and physiological significance of these plantspecific enzymes will be considered more fully later in the, chapter., , enzymes pumps protons. Specific inhibitors, rotenone for, complex I, antimycin for complex III, cyanide for complex, IV, and salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM) for the alternative, oxidase, are important tools to investigate the electron, transport chain of plant mitochondria., , ATP Synthesis in the Mitochondrion Is Coupled to, Electron Transport, In oxidative phosphorylation, the transfer of electrons to, oxygen via complexes I to IV is coupled to the synthesis of, ATP from ADP and Pi via the ATP synthase (complex V)., The number of ATPs synthesized depends on the nature of, the electron donor., In experiments conducted with the use of isolated, mitochondria, electrons derived from internal (matrix), NADH give ADP:O ratios (the number of ATPs synthesized per two electrons transferred to oxygen) of 2.4 to 2.7, (Table 11.1). Succinate and externally added NADH each, give values in the range of 1.6 to 1.8, while ascorbate,, which serves as an artificial electron donor to cytochrome, c, gives values of 0.8 to 0.9. Results such as these (for, both plant and animal mitochondria) have led to the general concept that there are three sites of energy conservation along the electron transport chain, at complexes I, III,, and IV.
Page 263 :
238, , Chapter 11, , TABLE 11.1, Theoretical and experimental ADP:O ratios in, isolated plant mitochondria, ADP:O ratio, Substrate, , Malate, Succinate, NADH (external), Ascorbate, , Theoreticala, , Experimental, , 2.5, 1.5, 1.5, 1.0b, , 2.4–2.7, 1.6–1.8, 1.6–1.8, 0.8–0.9, , aIt, , is assumed that complexes I, III, and IV pump 4, 4, and 2 H+ per 2, electrons, respectively; that the cost of synthesizing one ATP and, exporting it to the cytosol is 4 H+ (Brand 1994); and that the nonphosphorylating pathways are not active., bCytochrome c oxidase pumps only two protons when it is measured with ascorbate as electron donor. However, two electrons, move from the outer surface of the inner membrane (where the, electrons are donated) across the inner membrane to the inner,, matrix side. As a result, 2 H+ are consumed on the matrix side. This, means that the net movement of H+ and charges is equivalent to, the movement of a total of 4 H+, giving an ADP:O ratio of 1.0., , The experimental ADP:O ratios agree quite well with, the values calculated on the basis of the number of H+, pumped by complexes I, III, and IV and the cost of 4 H+ for, synthesizing one ATP (see next section and Table 11.1). For, instance, electrons from external NADH pass only complexes III and IV, so a total of 6 H+ are pumped, giving 1.5, ATP (when the alternative oxidase pathway is not used)., The mechanism of mitochondrial ATP synthesis is based, on the chemiosmotic hypothesis, described in Web Topic, 6.3 and Chapter 7, which was first proposed in 1961 by, Nobel laureate Peter Mitchell as a general mechanism of, energy conservation across biological membranes (Nicholls, and Ferguson 2002). According to the chemiosmotic theory,, the orientation of electron carriers within the mitochondrial inner membrane allows for the transfer of protons, (H+) across the inner membrane during electron flow., Numerous studies have confirmed that mitochondrial electron transport is associated with a net transfer of protons, from the mitochondrial matrix to the intermembrane space, (see Figure 11.8) (Whitehouse and Moore 1995)., Because the inner mitochondrial membrane is impermeable to H+, an electrochemical proton gradient can build up., As discussed in Chapters 6 and 7, the free energy associated, with the formation of an electrochemical proton gradient, (∆m~Η+, also referred to as a proton motive force, ∆p, when, expressed in units of volts) is made up of an electric transmembrane potential component (∆E) and a chemical-potential component (∆pH) according to the following equation:, ∆p = ∆E – 59∆pH, , where, ∆E = Einside – Eoutside, , and, ∆pH = pHinside – pHoutside, , ∆E results from the asymmetric distribution of a charged, species (H+) across the membrane, and ∆pH is due to the, proton concentration difference across the membrane., Because protons are translocated from the mitochondrial, matrix to the intermembrane space, the resulting ∆E across, the inner mitochondrial membrane is negative., As this equation shows, both ∆E and ∆pH contribute to, the proton motive force in plant mitochondria, although ∆E, is consistently found to be of greater magnitude, probably, because of the large buffering capacity of both cytosol and, matrix, which prevent large pH changes. This situation, contrasts to that in the chloroplast, where almost all of the, proton motive force across the thylakoid membrane is, made up by a proton gradient (see Chapter 7)., The free-energy input required to generate ∆m~Η+ comes, from the free energy released during electron transport., How electron transport is coupled to proton translocation, is not well understood in all cases. Because of the low permeability (conductance) of the inner membrane to protons,, the proton electrochemical gradient is reasonably stable,, once generated, and the free energy ∆m~Η+ can be utilized to, carry out chemical work (ATP synthesis). The ∆m~Η+ is coupled to the synthesis of ATP by an additional protein complex associated with the inner membrane, the FoF1-ATP, synthase., The FoF1-ATP synthase (also called complex V) consists, of two major components, F1 and Fo (see Figure 11.8). F1 is, a peripheral membrane protein complex that is composed, of at least five different subunits and contains the catalytic, site for converting ADP and Pi to ATP. This complex is, attached to the matrix side of the inner membrane. Fo is an, integral membrane protein complex that consists of at least, three different polypeptides that form the channel through, which protons cross the inner membrane., The passage of protons through the channel is coupled, to the catalytic cycle of the F1 component of the ATP synthase, allowing the ongoing synthesis of ATP and the simultaneous utilization of the ∆m~Η+. For each ATP synthesized,, 3 H+ pass through the Fo from the intermembrane space to, the matrix down the electrochemical proton gradient., A high-resolution X-ray structure of most of the F1 complex of the mammalian mitochondrial ATP synthase supports a “rotational model” for the catalytic mechanism of, ATP synthesis (see Web Topic 11.4) (Abrahams et al. 1994)., The structure and function of the mitochondrial ATP synthase is similar to that of the CFo–CF1 ATP synthase in photophosphorylation (see Chapter 7)., The operation of a chemiosmotic mechanism of ATP, synthesis has several implications. First, the true site of ATP, formation on the mitochondrial inner membrane is the ATP, synthase, not complex I, III, or IV. These complexes serve, as sites of energy conservation whereby electron transport, is coupled to the generation of a ∆m~Η+., Second, the chemiosmotic theory explains the action, mechanism of uncouplers, a wide range of chemically
Page 264 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, , Transporters Exchange Substrates and Products, The electrochemical proton gradient also plays a role in the, movement of the organic acids of the citric acid cycle and, of substrates and products of ATP synthesis in and out of, mitochondria. Although ATP is synthesized in the mitochondrial matrix, most of it is used outside the mitochondrion, so an efficient mechanism is needed for moving, ADP in and ATP out of the organelle., Adenylate transport involves another inner-membrane, protein, the ADP/ATP (adenine nucleotide) transporter,, which catalyzes an exchange of ADP and ATP across the, inner membrane (Figure 11.10). The movement of the more, negatively charged ATP4– out of the mitochondria in, exchange for ADP3–—that is, one net negative charge out—, is driven by the electric-potential gradient (∆E, positive outside) generated by proton pumping., The uptake of inorganic phosphate (Pi) involves an, active phosphate transporter protein that uses the proton, gradient component (∆pH) of the proton motive force to, drive the electroneutral exchange of Pi– (in) for OH– (out)., As long as a ∆pH is maintained across the inner membrane, the Pi content within the matrix will remain high., Similar reasoning applies to the uptake of pyruvate, which, is driven by the electroneutral exchange of pyruvate for, OH–, leading to continued uptake of pyruvate from the, cytosol (see Figure 11.10)., The total cost of taking up a phosphate (1 OH– out,, which is the same as 1 H+ in) and exchanging ADP for, ATP (one negative charge out, which is the same as one, positive charge in) is 1 H+. This proton should also be, included in calculation of the cost of synthesizing one ATP., Thus the total cost is 3 H+ used by the ATP synthase plus, 1 H+ for the exchange across the membrane, or a total of 4, H+., The inner membrane also contains transporters for, dicarboxylic acids (malate or succinate) exchanged for Pi2–, , 2. Addition of cyanide inhibits, electron flow through the main, cytochrome pathway and only, allows electron flow to oxygen, through the alternative,, cyanide-resistant pathway,, which is subsequently inhibited, by the addition of SHAM., , 1. Addition of succinate, initiates mitochondrial, electron transfer, which is, measured with an oxygen, electrode as the rate of, oxygen reduction (to H2O)., , 150, Mitochondria, 125, Percentage initial oxygen, , unrelated compounds (including 2,4-dinitrophenol and, FCCP [p-trifluoromethoxycarbonylcyanide phenylhydrazone]) that decreases mitochondrial ATP synthesis but, often stimulates the rate of electron transport (see Web, Topic 11.5). All of these compounds make the inner membrane leaky to protons, which prevents the buildup of a, sufficiently large ∆m~Η+ to drive ATP synthesis., In experiments on isolated mitochondria, higher rates of, electron flow (measured as the rate of oxygen uptake in the, presence of a substrate such as succinate) are observed, upon addition of ADP (referred to as state 3) than in its, absence (Figure 11.9). ADP provides a substrate that stimulates dissipation of the ∆m~Η+ through the FoF1-ATP synthase during ATP synthesis. Once all the ADP has been, converted to ATP, the ∆m~Η+ builds up again and reduces the, rate of electron flow (state 4). The ratio of the rates with and, without ADP (state 3:state 4) is referred to as the respiratory, control ratio., , 239, , Succinate, ADP, , 100, , 68, , State 3, 175, , 75, , ADP, , State 4 112, 50, , KCN, , 71, , 25, , 0, , SHAM, , 257, , 1, , 2, , 3, 4, Time (minutes), , 3. Addition of ADP stimulates, electron transfer (state 3) by, facilitating dissipation of the, electrochemical proton, gradient. The rate is higher, after the second ADP addition, because of activation of, succinate dehydrogenase., , 5, , 0, , 6, , 7, , 4. When all the ADP has, been converted to ATP,, electron transfer reverts, to a lower rate (state 4)., , FIGURE 11.9 Regulation of respiratory rate by ADP during, succinate oxidation in isolated mitochondria from mung, bean (Vigna radiata). The numbers below the traces are the, rates of oxygen uptake expressed as O2 consumed (nmol, min–1 mg protein–1). (Data courtesy of Steven J. Stegink.), , and for the tricarboxylic acid citrate exchanged for malate, (see Figure 11.10 and Web Topic 11.5)., , Aerobic Respiration Yields about 60 Molecules of, ATP per Molecule of Sucrose, The complete oxidation of a sucrose molecule leads to the, net formation of, • 8 molecules of ATP by substrate-level phosphorylation (4 during glycolysis and 4 in the citric acid cycle), • 4 molecules of NADH in the cytosol, • 16 molecules of NADH plus 4 molecules of FADH2, (via succinate dehydrogenase) in the mitochondrial, matrix, On the basis of theoretical ADP:O values (see Table 11.1), a, total of approximately 52 molecules of ATP will be generated
Page 265 :
240, , Chapter 11, Uptake of pyruvate in, exchange for a hydroxyl ion, is mediated by the pyruvate, transporter., , H+, Pyruvate–, , H+, , CYTOSOL, pH 7.5, OH–, , Inner membrane, , Pyruvate, transporter, , H+, , H+, H+, , Intermembrane space, MATRIX, pH 8.0, , Outer membrane, H+, , F1, Fo, , H+, Pi–, , The ∆pH drives, the electroneutral, uptake of Pi, through the, phosphate, transporter., , OH–, Phosphate, transporter, , H+, H+, , H+, , Pore, , H+, II, , H+, , H+, , IV, , III, , I, Electron, transport, complexes, Low [H+], , High, [H+], , Pi–, H+, , ADP3–, , ATP4–, ATP synthase, (complex V), , H+, , The membrane, potential component, (∆E) of the proton, gradient drives the, electrogenic exchange, of ADP from the, cytosol for ATP from, the mitochondrion via, the adenine nucleotide, transporter., , Tricarboxylate, transporter, Citrate2–, , H+, Free energy released, by the dissipation of, the proton gradient, is coupled to the, synthesis of ATP4–, from ADP3– and Pi, via the many FoF1ATP synthase, complexes that span, the inner membrane., , ADP3–, ATP4–, , F1, , Fo, H+, , H+, , Adenine, nucleotide, transporter, , Malate2–, Uncouplers, , H+, , H+, , H+, , F1, Fo, H+, , Uncouplers (and the uncoupling protein), permit the rapid movement of protons, across the inner membrane, preventing, buildup of the electrochemical proton, gradient and reducing the rate of ATP, synthesis but not the rate of electron, transfer., , H+, , H+, , Pi2–, , Malate2–, , The tricarboxylic, acid citrate is, exchanged for a, dicarboxylic acid, such as malate or, succinate., , Dicarboxylate, transporter, , Uptake of dicarboxylic, acids such as malate or, succinate in exchange, for a phosphate ion is, mediated by the dicarboxylate transporter.
Page 266 :
▲, , Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, FIGURE 11.10 Transmembrane transport in plant mitochon-, , 241, , joined by splicing. Plant mtDNA also lacks strict complementarity to translated mRNA (see Web Topic 11.6)., Another characteristic feature of the plant mitochondrial, genetic system is that it strictly observes the universal, genetic code, showing none of the deviations found in, mtDNA in all other kingdoms., Plant mitochondrial genomes are generally much larger, than those of animals. The plant mtDNA is in the range of, 200 to 2400 kilobase pairs (kb) in size, with large variations, even between closely related plant species. This size comper sucrose by oxidative phosphorylation. The result is a, pares with the compact and uniform 16 kb genome found, total of about 60 ATPs synthesized per sucrose (Table 11.2)., in mammalian mitochondria. The size differences are due, Using 50 kJ mol–1 (12 kcal mol–1) as the actual free, mainly to the presence of much noncoding sequence,, energy of formation of ATP in vivo, we find that about, including numerous introns, in plant mtDNA. Mammalian, 3010 kJ mol–1 (720 kcal mol–1) of free energy is conserved, mtDNA encodes only 13 proteins, in contrast to the 35, in the form of ATP per mole of sucrose oxidized during, known proteins encoded by the Arabidopsis mtDNA. Both, plant and mammalian mitochondria encode rRNAs and, aerobic respiration. This amount represents about 52% of, tRNAs., the standard free energy available from the complete oxiThe genes of the mtDNA can be divided into two main, dation of sucrose; the rest is lost as heat. This is a vast, groups: those needed for expression of mitochondrial genes, improvement over the conversion of only 4% of the energy, (tRNA, rRNA, and ribosome proteins) and those for oxidaavailable in sucrose to ATP that is associated with fertive phosphorylation complexes. Plant mtDNA encodes nine, mentative metabolism., subunits for complex I, one for complex III, three for comSeveral Subunits of Respiratory Complexes Are, plex IV, three for ATP synthase, and five proteins for bioEncoded by the Mitochondrial Genome, genesis of cytochromes (Marienfeld et al. 1999). The mitoWith the first complete sequencing of plant mitochondchondrially encoded subunits are essential for the activity of, rial DNA (mtDNA) in Arabidopsis thaliana (Marienfeld et al., the respiratory complexes, a feature also evident in the, 1999), our knowledge about the mitochondrial genome has, sequence conservation to their bacterial homologs. The, taken a great leap forward., nuclear genome encodes all proteins not encoded in, Some characteristics of the plant mitochondrial genetic, mtDNA, and the nuclear-encoded proteins are the large, system are not generally found in the mitochondria of animajority—for example, all proteins in the citric acid cycle., mals, protozoans, or even fungi. Most notably, RNA proThe nuclear-encoded mitochondrial proteins are synthesized, cessing differs between plant mitochondria and mitochonby cytosolic ribosomes and imported via translocators in the, dria from most other organisms. Several plant mitoouter and inner mitochondrial membrane. Therefore, oxidachondrial genes contain introns, and some genes are even, tive phosphorylation is dependent on expression of genes, split between separate transcript molecules, which must be, located in two separate genomes. Any change in expression, in response to a stimulus or for developmental reasons must be coordinated., Whereas the expression of nuclear, TABLE 11.2, genes for mitochondrial proteins appears, The maximum yield of cytosolic ATP from the complete oxidation of, to be regulated as other nuclear genes,, sucrose to CO2 via aerobic glycolysis and the citric acid cycle, much less is known about the expression, Part reaction, ATP per sucrosea, of mitochondrial genes. The master circle, Glycolysis, of plant mtDNA is normally split into, 4 substrate-level phosphorylations, 4, several smaller subgenomic segments,, 4 NADH, 4 ×1.5, 6, and genes can be down-regulated by, decreased copy number for a segment of, Citric acid cycle, the mtDNA (Leon et al. 1998). The gene, 4 substrate level phosphorylations, 4, promoters in mtDNA are of several kinds, 4 FADH2, 4 × 1.5, 6, 16 NADH, 16 × 2.5, 40, and show different transcriptional activity. However, a main control of mitoTotal, 60, chondrial gene expression appears to, Source: Adapted from Brand 1994., take place at the posttranslational level,, Note: Cytosolic NADH is assumed oxidized by the external NADH dehydrogenase. The, by degradation of excess polypeptides, nonphosphorylating pathways are assumed not to be engaged., aCalculated using the theoretical values from Table 11.1, (McCabe et al. 2000)., dria. An electrochemical proton gradient (∆m~Η+) consisting, of a membrane potential (∆E, –200mV, negative inside) and, a ∆pH (alkaline inside) is established across the inner mitochondrial membrane during electron transport as outlined, in the text. Specific metabolites are moved across the inner, membrane by specialized proteins, called transporters or, carriers (After Douce 1985).
Page 267 :
242, , Chapter 11, , Plants Have Several Mechanisms That Lower the, ATP Yield, As we have seen, a complex machinery is required for a, high efficiency of energy conservation in oxidative phosphorylation. So it is perhaps surprising that plant mitochondria have several functional proteins that reduce this, efficiency. Probably plants are less limited by the energy, supply (sunlight) than by other factors in the environment, (e.g., access to nitrogen or phosphate). As a consequence,, adaptational flexibility may be more important than energetic efficiency., In the following subsections we will discuss the role of, the nonphosphorylating mechanisms and their possible, usefulness in the life of the plant., , The alternative oxidase. If cyanide (1 mM) is added to, actively respiring animal tissues, cytochrome c oxidase is, inhibited and the respiration rate quickly drops to less than, 1% of its initial level. However, most plant tissues display a, level of cyanide-resistant respiration that can represent 10, to 25%, and in some tissues up to 100%, of the uninhibited, control rate. The enzyme responsible for this oxygen uptake, has been identified as a cyanide-resistant oxidase component of the plant mitochondrial electron transport chain, called the alternative oxidase (see Figure 11.8 and Web, Topic 11.3) (Vanlerberghe and McIntosh 1997)., Electrons feed off the main electron transport chain into, the alternative pathway at the level of the ubiquinone pool, (see Figure 11.8). The alternative oxidase, the only component of the alternative pathway, catalyzes a four-electron, reduction of oxygen to water and is specifically inhibited, by several compounds, most notably salicylhydroxamic, acid (SHAM)., When electrons pass to the alternative pathway from the, ubiquinone pool, two sites of proton pumping (at complexes III and IV) are bypassed. Because there is no energy, conservation site in the alternative pathway between, ubiquinone and oxygen, the free energy that would normally be conserved as ATP is lost as heat when electrons, are shunted through the alternative pathway., How can a process as seemingly energetically wasteful, as the alternative pathway contribute to plant metabolism?, One example of the functional usefulness of the alternative, oxidase is its activity during floral development in certain, members of the Araceae (the arum family)—for example,, the voodoo lily (Sauromatum guttatum). Just before pollination, tissues of the clublike inflorescence, called the appendix, which bears male and female flowers, exhibit a dramatic increase in the rate of respiration via the alternative, pathway. As a result, the temperature of the upper appendix increases by as much as 25°C over the ambient temperature for a period of about 7 hours., During this extraordinary burst of heat production, certain amines, indoles, and terpenes are volatilized, and the, plant therefore gives off a putrid odor that attracts insect, , pollinators. Salicylic acid, a phenolic compound related to, aspirin (see Chapter 13), has been identified as the chemical signal responsible for initiating this thermogenic event, in the voodoo lily (Raskin et al. 1989) (see Web Essay 11.3)., In most plants, however, both the respiratory rates and the, rate of cyanide-resistant respiration are too low to generate, sufficient heat to raise the temperature significantly, so, what other role(s) does the alternative pathway play?, It has been suggested that the alternative pathway can, function as an “energy overflow” pathway, oxidizing respiratory substrates that accumulate in excess of those, needed for growth, storage, or ATP synthesis (Lambers, 1985). This view suggests that electrons flow through the, alternative pathway only when the activity of the main, pathway is saturated. Such saturation is reached in the test, tube in state 4 (see Figure 11.9); in vivo, saturation may, occur if the respiration rate exceeds the cell’s demand for, ATP (i.e., if ADP levels are very low). However, it is now, clear that the alternative oxidase can be active before the, cytochrome pathway is saturated. Thus the alternative oxidase makes it possible for the mitochondrion to adjust the, relative rates of ATP production and synthesis of carbon, skeletons for use in biosynthetic reactions., Another possible function of the alternative pathway is, in the response of plants to a variety of stresses (phosphate, deficiency, chilling, drought, osmotic stress, and so on),, many of which can inhibit mitochondrial respiration (see, Chapter 25 and Web Essay 11.1) (Wagner and Krab 1995)., By draining off electrons from the electron transport, chain, the alternative pathway prevents a potential overreduction of the ubiquinone pool (see Figure 11.8), which, if, left unchecked, can lead to the generation of destructive, reactive oxygen species such as superoxide anions and, hydroxyl radicals. In this way the alternative pathway, may lessen the detrimental effects of stress on respiration, (see Web Essay 11.4) (Wagner and Krab 1995; Møller, 2001)., , The uncoupling protein., , A protein found in the inner, membrane of mammalian mitochondria, the uncoupling, protein, can dramatically increase the proton permeability, of the membrane and thus act as an uncoupler. As a result,, less ATP and more heat is generated. Heat production, appears to be one of the uncoupling protein’s main functions in mammalian cells., It has long been thought that the alternative oxidase in, plants and the uncoupling protein in mammals were simply two different means of achieving the same end. It was, therefore surprising when a protein similar to the uncoupling protein was discovered in plant mitochondria (Vercesi, et al. 1995; Laloi et al. 1997). This protein is stress induced, and, like the alternative oxidase, may function to prevent, overreduction of the electron transport chain (see Web Topic, 11.3 and Web Essay 11.4). It remains unclear, however, why, plant mitochondria require both mechanisms.
Page 268 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, The internal, rotenone-insensitive NADH dehydrogenase, NDin(NADH). This is one of the multiple, , NAD(P)H dehydrogenases found in plant mitochondria, (see Figure 11.8). It has been suggested to work as a nonproton-pumping bypass when complex I is overloaded., Complex I has a higher affinity for NADH (ten times lower, Km), than NDin(NADH). At lower NADH levels in the, matrix, typically when ADP is available (state 3), complex, I will dominate, whereas when ADP is rate limiting (state, 4), NADH levels will increase and NDin(NADH) will be, more active. The physiological importance of this enzyme, is, however, still unclear., , 243, , phatase. Pyruvate dehydrogenase is inactive in the phosphorylated state, and the regulatory kinase is inhibited by, pyruvate, allowing the enzyme to be active when substrate, is available (Figure 11.11). In addition, several citric acid cycle, enzymes, including pyruvate dehydrogenase and 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, are directly inhibited by NADH., Fructose-6-phosphate, , Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, , Mitochondrial Respiration Is Controlled by Key, Metabolites, The substrates of ATP synthesis—ADP and Pi—appear to, be key regulators of the rates of glycolysis in the cytosol, as, well as the citric acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation, in the mitochondria. Control points exist at all three stages, of respiration; here we will give just a brief overview of, some major features., The best-characterized site of regulation of the citric acid, cycle is at the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, which is, reversibly phosphorylated by a regulatory kinase and a phos-, , ADP, , P, , PDH, , Phosphoenolpyruvate, , Pyruvate, , Acetyl-CoA, , Citric, acid, cycle, , Inactive, Malate, PDH, kinase, , PDH, phosphatase, , PDH, , Pi, NADH, , Pyruvate + CoA + NAD+, Effect on PDH activity, , Isocitrate, , 2-Oxoglutarate, , Active, ATP, , Citrate, , Oxaloacetate, H2O, , NAD+, , Acetyl-CoA + CO2 + NADH, Electron, transport, chain, , Mechanism, , Activating, Pyruvate, ADP, Mg2+ (or Mn2+), , Inhibits kinase, Inhibits kinase, Stimulates phosphatase, , Inactivating, NADH, , Inhibits PDH, Stimulates kinase, , Acetyl CoA, , Inhibits PDH, Stimulates kinase, , NH4+, , Inhibits PDH, Stimulates kinase, , FIGURE 11.11 Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase, , (PDH) activity by reversible phosphorylation and by other, metabolites., , ATP, , ADP, +, Pi, , FIGURE 11.12 Concept of bottom-up regulation of plant respiration. Several substrates for respiration (e.g., ADP) stimulate enzymes in early steps of the pathways (green arrows ., In contrast, accumulation of products (e.g., ATP) inhibits, (red squares) earlier reactions in a stepwise fashion. For, instance, ATP inhibits the electron transport chain leading to, an accumulation of NADH. NADH inhibits citric acid, enzymes such as isocitrate dehydrogenase and 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase. Then, citric acid cycle intermediates, like citrate inhibit the PEP-metabolizing enzymes in the, cytosol. Finally, PEP inhibits the conversion of fructose-6phosphate to fructose-1,6-biphosphate and restricts carbon, feeding into glycolysis.
Page 269 :
244, , Chapter 11, , The citric acid cycle oxidations, and subsequently respiration, are dynamically controlled by the cellular level of, adenine nucleotides. As the cell’s demand for ATP in the, cytosol decreases relative to the rate of synthesis of ATP in, the mitochondria, less ADP will be available, and the electron transport chain will operate at a reduced rate (see Figure 11.10). This slowdown could be signaled to citric acid, cycle enzymes through an increase in matrix NADH,, inhibiting the activity of several citric acid cycle dehydrogenases (Oliver and McIntosh 1995)., The buildup of citric acid cycle intermediates and their, derivates, such as citrate and glutamate, inhibits the action, of cytosolic pyruvate kinase, increasing the cytosolic PEP, concentration, which in turn reduces the rate of conversion, of fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, thus, inhibiting glycolysis., , In summary, plant respiratory rates are controlled from, the “bottom up” by the cellular level of ADP (Figure 11.12)., ADP initially regulates the rate of electron transfer and ATP, synthesis, which in turn regulates citric acid cycle activity,, which, finally, regulates the rate of the glycolytic reactions., , Respiration Is Tightly Coupled to Other Pathways, Glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway, and the citric, acid cycle are linked to several other important metabolic, pathways, some of which will be covered in greater detail in, Chapter 13. The respiratory pathways are central to the production of a wide variety of plant metabolites, including, amino acids, lipids and related compounds, isoprenoids, and, porphyrins (Figure 11.13). Indeed, much of the reduced carbon that is metabolized by glycolysis and the citric acid cycle, is diverted to biosynthetic purposes and not oxidized to CO2., , Starch, , Nucleic acids, ADP, ATP, NAD, NADP, FMN, CoA, Cytokinins, , Alkaloids, Flavonoids, Lignin, , Nucleotides, Indoleacetic, acid (auxin), , Tryptophan, Tyrosine, Phenylalanine, , Proteins, , Glucose-1-phosphate, Pentose, phosphate, , Glucose-6-phosphate, , Cellulose, , Erythrose-4-phosphate, , Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, , Dihydroxyacetone, phosphate, , Shikimic acid, , Phosphoenolpyruvate, , Alanine, , Lipids and related, substances, , Pyruvate, , Fatty acids, , Acetyl-CoA, , Aspartate, , Oxaloacetate, Citrate, Malate, , Citric, acid, cycle, , and the citric acid cycle contribute precursors to many, biosynthetic pathways in higher plants. The pathways, shown illustrate the extent to which plant biosynthesis, depends on the flux of carbon through these pathways and, emphasize the fact that not all the carbon that enters the, glycolytic pathway is oxidized to CO2., , Gibberellins, Carotenoids, Sterols, Abscisic acid, , Isocitrate, Proteins, , Fumarate, , FIGURE 11.13 Glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway, , Glycerol-3-phosphate, , 2-Oxoglutarate, Succinate, Chlorophylls, Phycocyanins, Phytochrome, Cytochrome, Catalase, , Glutamate, , Other, amino acids
Page 270 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, , RESPIRATION IN INTACT PLANTS AND, TISSUES, Many rewarding studies of plant respiration and its regulation have been carried out on isolated organelles and on, cell-free extracts of plant tissues. But how does this knowledge relate to the function of the whole plant in a natural, or agricultural setting?, In this section we’ll examine respiration and mitochondrial function in the context of the whole plant under a, variety of conditions. First, when green tissues are exposed, to light, respiration and photosynthesis operate simultaneously and interact in complex ways. Next we will discuss different rates of tissue respiration, which may be, under developmental control, as well as the very interesting case of cytoplasmic male sterility. Finally, we will look, at the influence of various environmental factors on respiration rates., , Plants Respire Roughly Half of the Daily, Photosynthetic Yield, Many factors can affect the respiration rate of an intact, plant or of its individual organs. Relevant factors include, the species and growth habit of the plant, the type and age, of the specific organ, and environmental variables such as, the external oxygen concentration, temperature, and nutrient and water supply (see Chapter 25, Web Topic 11.7, and, Web Essay 11.5)., Whole-plant respiration rates, particularly when considered on a fresh-weight basis, are generally lower than, respiration rates reported for animal tissues. This difference, is due in large part to the presence, in plant cells, of a large, central vacuole and cell wall compartments, neither of, which contains mitochondria. Nonetheless, respiration, rates in some plant tissues are as high as those observed in, actively respiring animal tissues, so the plant respiratory, process is not inherently slower than respiration in animals., In fact, isolated plant mitochondria respire faster than, mammalian mitochondria, when expressed on a per mg, protein basis., Even though plants generally have low respiration rates,, the contribution of respiration to the overall carbon economy of the plant can be substantial (see Web Topic 11.7)., Whereas only green tissues photosynthesize, all tissues, respire, and they do so 24 hours a day. Even in photosynthetically active tissues, respiration, if integrated over the, entire day, can represent a substantial fraction of gross photosynthesis. A survey of several herbaceous species indicated that 30 to 60% of the daily gain in photosynthetic carbon was lost to respiration, although these values tended, to decrease in older plants (Lambers 1985)., Young trees lose roughly a third of their daily photosynthate as respiration, and this loss can double in older, trees as the ratio of photosynthetic to nonphotosynthetic, tissue decreases. In tropical areas, 70 to 80% of the daily, , 245, , photosynthetic gain can be lost to respiration because of the, high dark respiration rates associated with elevated night, temperatures., , Respiration Operates during Photosynthesis, Mitochondria are involved in the metabolism of photosynthesizing leaves. The glycine generated by photorespiration is oxidized to serine in the mitochondrion (see Chapter 8). At the same time, mitochondria in photosynthesizing, tissue also carry out respiration via the citric acid cycle, (often called dark respiration because it does not require, light). Relative to the maximum rate of photosynthesis,, dark respiration rates measured in green tissues are far, slower, generally by a factor ranging from 6- to 20-fold., Given that rates of photorespiration can often reach 20 to, 40% of the gross photosynthetic rate, citric acid cycle-mediated mitochondrial respiration operates at rates also well, below the rate of photorespiration., A question that has not been adequately answered is, how much mitochondrial respiration (apart from the, involvement of mitochondria in the photorespiratory carbon oxidation cycle) operates simultaneously with photosynthesis in illuminated green tissues. The activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase, one of the ports of entry into the citric, acid cycle, decreases in the light to 25% of the dark activity, (Budde and Randall 1990). The overall rate of respiration, decreases in the light, but the extent of the decrease, remains uncertain at present. It is clear, however, that the, mitochondrion is a major supplier of ATP to the cytosol, even in illuminated leaves (Krömer 1995)., Another role of mitochondrial respiration during photosynthesis is to supply carbon metabolites for biosynthetic, reactions—for example, by formation of 2-oxoglutarate, needed for nitrogen assimilation. Leaf mitochondria typically have high capacities of nonphosphorylating pathways, in the electron transport chain. By oxidizing NADH with, lower ATP yield, mitochondria can maintain a higher 2oxoglutarate production by the respiratory pathways without being restricted by the cytosolic demand for ATP (see, Figures 11.7C and 11.12) (Hoefnagel et al. 1998; Noctor and, Foyer 1998)., Additional evidence for the involvement of mitochondrial respiration in photosynthesizing leaves has been, obtained in studies with mitochondrial mutants defective, in respiratory complexes, showing that leaf development, and photosynthesis are negatively affected (Vedel et al., 1999)., , Different Tissues and Organs Respire at, Different Rates, A useful rule of thumb is that the greater the overall metabolic activity of a given tissue, the higher its respiration, rate. Developing buds usually show very high rates of respiration (on a dry-weight basis), and respiration rates of, vegetative tissues usually decrease from the point of
Page 271 :
246, , Chapter 11, , growth (e.g., the leaf tip in dicotyledons and the leaf base, in monocotyledons) to more differentiated regions. A wellstudied example is the growing barley leaf (Thompson et, al. 1998). In mature vegetative tissues, stems generally have, the lowest respiration rates, and leaf and root respiration, varies with the plant species and the conditions under, which the plants are growing., When a plant tissue has reached maturity, its respiration, rate will either remain roughly constant or decrease slowly, as the tissue ages and ultimately senesces. An exception to, this pattern is the marked rise in respiration, known as the, climacteric, that accompanies the onset of ripening in many, fruits (avocado, apple, banana) and senescence in detached, leaves and flowers. Both ripening and the climacteric respiratory rise are triggered by the endogenous production, of ethylene, as well as by an exogenous application of ethylene (see Chapter 22). In general, ethylene-induced respiration is associated with an active cyanide-resistant alternative pathway, but the role of this pathway in ripening is, not clear (Tucker 1993)., , Mitochondrial Function Is Crucial during Pollen, Development, A physiological feature directly linked to the plant mitochondrial genome is a phenomenon known as cytoplasmic, male sterility, or cms. Plant lines that display cms do not, form viable pollen—hence the designation male sterility., The term cytoplasmic here refers to the fact that this trait is, transmitted in a non-Mendelian fashion; the cms genotype, is always maternally inherited with the mitochondrial, genome. cms is a very important trait in plant breeding, because a stable male sterile line can facilitate the production of hybrid seed stock. For this use, cms traits that produce no major effects throughout the plant’s life cycle,, except for male sterility, have been found for many species., All plants carrying the cms trait that have been characterized at the molecular level show the presence of distinct, rearrangements in their mtDNA, relative to wild-type, plants. These rearrangements create novel open reading, frames and have been strongly correlated with cms phenotypes in various systems. Nuclear restorer genes can overcome the effects of the mtDNA rearrangements and restore, fertility to plants with the cms genotype. Such restorer, genes are essential for the commercial utilization of cms if, seeds are the harvested product., An interesting consequence of the use of the cms gene, occurred in the late 1960s, at which time 85% of the hybrid, feed corn grown in the United States was derived from the, use of a cms line of maize called cms-T (Texas). In cms-T, maize, the mtDNA rearrangements give rise to a unique 13, kDa protein, URF13 (Levings and Siedow 1992). How the, URF13 protein acts to bring about male sterility is not, known, but in the late 1960s a disease appeared, caused by, a race of the fungus Bipolaris maydis (also called Cochliobolus, heterostrophus). This specific race synthesizes a compound, , (HmT-toxin) that specifically interacts with the URF13 protein to produce pores in the inner mitochondrial membrane,, with the result that selective permeability is lost., The interaction between HmT-toxin and URF13 made, Bipolaris maydis race T a particularly virulent pathogen on, cms-T maize and led to an epidemic in the corn-growing, regions of the United States that was known as southern, corn leaf blight. As a result of this epidemic, the use of cmsT in the production of hybrid maize was discontinued. No, other cms maize has been found to be a suitable replacement,, so current production of hybrid corn seed has reverted to, manual detasseling that prevents self-pollination., As compared to other organs, the amount of mitochondria per cell and the expression of respiratory proteins are, very high in developing anthers, where pollen development is an energy-demanding process (Huang et al. 1994)., Male sterility is a common phenotype of mutations in mitochondrial genes for subunits of the complexes of oxidative, phosphorylation (Vedel et al. 1999). Such mutants can be, viable because of the existence of the alternative nonphosphorylating respiratory pathways., Programmed cell death (PCD) is part of normal anther, development. There are now indications that mitochondria, are involved in plant PCD and that PCD is premature in, anthers of cms sunflower (see Web Essay 11.6)., , Environmental Factors Alter Respiration Rates, Many environmental factors can alter the operation of, metabolic pathways and respiratory rates. Here we will, examine the roles of environmental oxygen (O2), temperature, and carbon dioxide (CO2)., , Oxygen., , Oxygen can affect plant respiration because of, its role as a substrate in the overall process. At 25°C, the, equilibrium concentration of O2 in an air-saturated (21%, O2), aqueous solution is about 250 µM. The Km value for, oxygen in the reaction catalyzed by cytochrome c oxidase, is well below 1 µM, so there should be no apparent dependence of the respiration rate on external O2 concentrations, (see Chapter 2 on the web site for a discussion of Km)., However, respiration rates decrease if the atmospheric oxygen concentration is below 5% for whole tissues or below, 2 to 3% for tissue slices. These findings show that oxygen, diffusion through the aqueous phase in the tissue imposes, a limitation on plant respiration., The diffusion limitation imposed by an aqueous phase, emphasizes the importance of the intercellular air spaces, found in plant tissues for oxygen availability in the mitochondria. If there were no gaseous diffusion pathway, throughout the plant, the cellular respiration rates of many, plants would be limited by an insufficient oxygen supply, (see Web Essay 11.3)., , Water saturation/low O2. Diffusion limitation is even, more significant when plant organs are growing in an
Page 272 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, aqueous medium. When plants are grown hydroponically,, the solutions must be aerated vigorously to keep oxygen, levels high in the vicinity of the roots. The problem of oxygen supply also arises with plants growing in very wet or, flooded soils (see Chapter 25)., Some plants, particularly trees, have a restricted geographic distribution because of the need to maintain a supply of oxygen to their roots. For instance, dogwood and, tulip tree poplar can survive only in well-drained, aerated, soils because their roots cannot tolerate more than a limited, exposure to a flooded condition. On the other hand, many, plant species are adapted to grow in flooded soils. Herbaceous species such as rice and sunflower often rely on a, network of intercellular air spaces (aerenchyma) running, from the leaves to the roots to provide a continuous,, gaseous pathway for the movement of oxygen to the, flooded roots., Limitation in oxygen supply can be more severe for, trees having very deep roots that grow in wet soils. Such, roots must survive on anaerobic (fermentative) metabolism, or develop structures that facilitate the movement of oxygen to the roots. Examples of such structures are outgrowths of the roots, called pneumatophores, that protrude, out of the water and provide a gaseous pathway for oxygen diffusion into the roots. Pneumatophores are found in, Avicennia and Rhizophora, trees that grow in mangrove, swamps under continuously flooded conditions., , Temperature., , Respiration typically increases with temperature (see, however, Web Essay 11.3). Between 0 and, 30°C, the increase in respiration rate for every 10°C increase, in ambient temperature (commonly referred to as the, dimensionless, temperature coefficient, Q10) is about 2., Above 30°C the respiration rate often increases more, slowly, reaches a plateau at 40 to 50°C and decreases at, even higher temperatures. High night temperatures are, thought to account for the high respiratory rates of tropical, plants., Low temperatures are utilized to retard postharvest respiration rates during the storage of fruits and vegetables., However, complications may arise from such storage. For, instance, when potato tubers are stored at temperatures, above 10°C, respiration and ancillary metabolic activities, are sufficient to allow sprouting. Below 5°C, respiration, rates and sprouting are reduced in most tissues, but the, breakdown of stored starch and its conversion to sucrose, impart an unwanted sweetness to the tubers. As a compromise, potatoes are stored at 7 to 9°C, which prevents the, breakdown of starch while minimizing respiration and germination., , CO2 concentration., , It is common practice in the commercial storage of fruits to take advantage of the effects of, atmospheric oxygen and temperature on respiration, and, to store fruits at low temperatures under 2 to 3% oxygen, , 247, , and 3 to 5% CO2. The reduced temperature lowers the respiration rate, as does the reduced oxygen. Low levels of, oxygen are used instead of anoxic conditions to avoid lowering tissue oxygen tensions to the point that stimulates fermentative metabolism., Carbon dioxide has a limited direct inhibitory effect on, the respiration rate at a concentration of 3 to 5%, which is, well in excess of the 0.036% (360 ppm) normally found in, the atmosphere. The atmospheric CO2 concentration is, increasing rapidly as a result of human activities, and it is, projected to double, to 700 ppm, before the end of the, twenty-first century (see Chapter 9)., Compared to plants grown at 350 ppm CO2, plants, grown at 700 ppm CO2 have been reported to have a 15 to, 20% slower dark respiration rate (on a dry-weight basis), (Drake et al. 1999), but this has been questioned (Jahnke, 2001; Bruhn et al. 2002). The number of mitochondria per, unit cell area actually doubles in the high CO2 environment. These data imply that the respiratory activity in the, light instead may increase at higher ambient CO2 concentrations (Griffin et al. 2001). Thus it is presently a matter of, debate how plants growing at an increased CO2 concentration will contribute to the global carbon cycle., , LIPID METABOLISM, Whereas animals use fats for energy storage, plants use, them mainly for carbon storage. Fats and oils are important, storage forms of reduced carbon in many seeds, including, those of agriculturally important species such as soybean,, sunflower, peanut, and cotton. Oils often serve a major, storage function in nondomesticated plants that produce, small seeds. Some fruits, such as olives and avocados, also, store fats and oils., In this final part of the chapter we describe the biosynthesis of two types of glycerolipids: the triacylglycerols (the, fats and oils stored in seeds) and the polar glycerolipids, (which form the lipid bilayers of cellular membranes) (Figure 11.14). We will see that the biosynthesis of triacylglycerols and polar glycerolipids requires the cooperation of, two organelles: the plastids and the endoplasmic reticulum., Plants can also use fats and oils for energy production. We, will thus examine the complex process by which germinating seeds obtain metabolic energy from the oxidation of, fats and oils., , Fats and Oils Store Large Amounts of Energy, Fats and oils belong to the general class lipids, a structurally, diverse group of hydrophobic compounds that are soluble, in organic solvents and highly insoluble in water. Lipids, represent a more reduced form of carbon than carbohydrates, so the complete oxidation of 1 g of fat or oil (which, contains about 40 kJ, or 9.3 kcal, of energy ) can produce, considerably more ATP than the oxidation of 1 g of starch, (about 15.9 kJ, or 3.8 kcal). Conversely, the biosynthesis of
Page 273 :
248, , Chapter 11, , FIGURE 11.14 Structural features of, , triacylglycerols and polar glycerolipids in higher plants. The carbon chain lengths of the fatty acids,, which always have an even number, of carbons, range from 12 to 20 but, are typically 16 or 18. Thus, the, value of n is usually 14 or 16., , O, , O, , CH2OH, , H2C, , O, , C, O, , (CH2)n, , CH3, , H2C, , O, , C, O, , (CH2)n, , CH3, , CHOH, , HC, , O, , C, O, , (CH2)n, , CH3, , HC, , O, , C, , (CH2)n, , CH3, , CH2OH, , H 2C, , O, , C, , (CH2)n, , CH3, , H2C, , O, , X, , Glycerol, , Triacylglycerol, (the major stored lipid), , Glycerolipid, , Diacylglycerol (DAG), , X=H, 2–, , Phosphatidic acid, , X = HPO3, , 2–, , CH2, , CH2, , 2–, , CH2, , CH2, , X = PO3, X = PO3, , Triacylglycerols Are Stored in Oleosomes, Fats and oils exist mainly in the form of triacylglycerols, (acyl refers to the fatty acid portion), or triglycerides, in, which fatty acid molecules are linked by ester bonds to the, three hydroxyl groups of glycerol (see Figure 11.14)., The fatty acids in plants are usually straight-chain carboxylic acids having an even number of carbon atoms. The, carbon chains can be as short as 12 units and as long as 20,, but more commonly they are 16 or 18 carbons long. Oils are, , N(CH3)3, , Phosphatidylcholine, , NH2, , Phosphatidylethanolamine, Galactolipids, , X = galactose, , fats, oils, and related molecules, such as the phospholipids, of membranes, requires a correspondingly large investment, of metabolic energy., Other lipids are important for plant structure and function but are not used for energy storage. These include, waxes, which make up the protective cuticle that reduces, water loss from exposed plant tissues, and terpenoids (also, known as isoprenoids), which include carotenoids, involved in photosynthesis and sterols present in many, plant membranes (see Chapter 13)., , +, , liquid at room temperature, primarily because of the presence of unsaturated bonds in their component fatty acids;, fats, which have a higher proportion of saturated fatty, acids, are solid at room temperature. The major fatty acids, in plant lipids are shown in Table 11.3., The composition of fatty acids in plant lipids varies with, the species. For example, peanut oil is about 9% palmitic acid,, 59% oleic acid, and 21% linoleic acid, and cottonseed oil is, 20% palmitic acid, 30% oleic acid, and 45% linoleic acid. The, biosynthesis of these fatty acids will be discussed shortly., Triacylglycerols in most seeds are stored in the cytoplasm of either cotyledon or endosperm cells in organelles, known as oleosomes (also called spherosomes or oil bodies), (see Chapter 1). Oleosomes have an unusual membrane, barrier that separates the triglycerides from the aqueous, cytoplasm. A single layer of phospholipids (i.e., a halfbilayer) surrounds the oil body with the hydrophilic ends, of the phospholipids exposed to the cytosol and the, hydrophobic acyl hydrocarbon chains facing the triacylglycerol interior (see Chapter 1). The oleosome is stabilized, , TABLE 11.3, Common fatty acids in higher plant tissues, Namea, , Structure, , Saturated Fatty Acids, Lauric acid (12:0), Myristic acid (14:0), Palmitic acid (16:0), Stearic acid (18:0), , CH3(CH2)10CO2H, CH3(CH2)12CO2H, CH3(CH2)14CO2H, CH3(CH2)16CO2H, , Unsaturated Fatty Acids, Oleic acid (18:1), Linoleic acid (18:2), Linolenic acid (18:3), , — CH(CH2)7CO2H, CH3(CH2)7CH —, — CH—CH2—CH —, — CH(CH2)7CO2H, CH3(CH2)4CH —, CH3CH2CH —, — CH—CH2—CH —, — CH—CH2—CH —, — CH—(CH2)7CO2H, , a Each fatty acid has a numerical abbreviation. The number before the colon represents the total number of carbons; the number after the colon is the number of double bonds.
Page 274 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, , 249, , by the presence of specific proteins, called oleosins, that coat, the surface and prevent the phospholipids of adjacent oil, bodies from coming in contact and fusing., This unique membrane structure for oleosomes results, from the pattern of triacylglycerol biosynthesis. Triacylglycerol synthesis is completed by enzymes located in the, membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and the, resulting fats accumulate between the two monolayers of, the ER membrane bilayer. The bilayer swells apart as, more fats are added to the growing structure, and ultimately a mature oil body buds off from the ER (Napier et, al. 1996)., , carotenoids, and tocopherols, which together account for, about one-third of the lipids in plant leaves., Figure 11.15 shows the nine major glycerolipid classes in, plants, each of which can be associated with many different, fatty acid combinations. The structures shown in Figure, 11.15 illustrate some of the more common molecular species., Chloroplast membranes, which account for 70% of the, membrane lipids in photosynthetic tissues, are dominated, by glyceroglycolipids; other membranes of the cell contain, glycerophospholipids (Table 11.4). In nonphotosynthetic, tissues, phospholipids are the major membrane glycerolipids., , Polar Glycerolipids Are the Main Structural Lipids, in Membranes, , Fatty Acid Biosynthesis Consists of Cycles of TwoCarbon Addition, , As outlined in Chapter 1, each membrane in the cell is a, bilayer of amphipathic (i.e., having both hydrophilic and, hydrophobic regions) lipid molecules in which a polar, head group interacts with the aqueous phase while, hydrophobic fatty acid chains form the center of the membrane. This hydrophobic core prevents random diffusion, of solutes between cell compartments and thereby allows, the biochemistry of the cell to be organized., The main structural lipids in membranes are the polar, glycerolipids (see Figure 11.14), in which the hydrophobic, portion consists of two 16-carbon or 18-carbon fatty acid, chains esterified to positions 1 and 2 of a glycerol backbone., The polar head group is attached to position 3 of the glycerol. There are two categories of polar glycerolipids:, , Fatty acid biosynthesis involves the cyclic condensation of, two-carbon units in which acetyl-CoA is the precursor. In, plants, fatty acids are synthesized exclusively in the plastids; in animals, fatty acids are synthesized primarily in the, cytosol., The enzymes of the pathway are thought to be held, together in a complex that is collectively referred to as fatty, acid synthase. The complex probably allows the series of, reactions to occur more efficiently than it would if the, enzymes were physically separated from each other. In, addition, the growing acyl chains are covalently bound to, a low-molecular-weight, acidic protein called acyl carrier, protein (ACP). When conjugated to the acyl carrier protein,, the fatty acid chain is referred to as acyl-ACP., The first committed step in the pathway (i.e., the first, step unique to the synthesis of fatty acids) is the synthesis, of malonyl-CoA from acetyl-CoA and CO2 by the enzyme, acetyl-CoA carboxylase (Figure 11.16) (Sasaki et al. 1995)., The tight regulation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase appears to, control the overall rate of fatty acid synthesis (Ohlrogge, and Jaworski 1997). The malonyl-CoA then reacts with, ACP to yield malonyl-ACP:, , 1. Glyceroglycolipids, in which sugars form the head, group (Figure 11.15A), 2. Glycerophospholipids, in which the head group, contains phosphate (Figure 11.15B), Plant membranes have additional structural lipids,, including sphingolipids and sterols (see Chapter 13), but, these are minor components. Other lipids perform specific, roles in photosynthesis and other processes. Included, among these lipids are chlorophylls, plastoquinone,, , 1. In the first cycle of fatty acid synthesis, the acetate, group from acetyl-CoA is transferred to a specific cys-, , TABLE 11.4, Glycerolipid components of cellular membranes, Lipid composition (percentage of total), Chloroplast, , Phosphatidylcholine, Phosphatidylethanolamine, Phosphatidylinositol, Phosphatidylglycerol, Diphosphatidylglycerol, Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol, Digalactosyldiacylglycerol, Sulfolipid, , 4, —, 1, 7, —, 55, 24, 8, , Endoplasmic, reticulum, , Mitochondrion, , 47, 34, 17, 2, —, —, —, —, , 43, 35, 6, 3, 13, —, —, —
Page 275 :
250, , Chapter 11, , CH2OH, O O, O, O, , CH2OH, , O, , O, , O, , Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol, (18:3 16:3), , O, , O O, O, , CH2SO3–, O O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , Digalactosyldiacylglycerol, (16:0 18:3), , O, O, , Sulfolipid (sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol), (18:3 16:0), (A) Glyceroglycolipids, , CH3, –, , O, , CH3, , CH3, , –, N+ O, , O, P, , O, , P, , O, , O, , OH O, , O, , O, O, , O, , CH2OH, O, , O, , O, O, , O, , Phosphatidylcholine, (16:0 18:3), , Phosphatidylglycerol, (18:3 16:0), OH, OH C, , O–, +, , H3N, , C, H2, , C, H2, , O, , O, , P, , O, , O, , O, , O, , C, H, H, C OH H C, H OH, O, C C, H, OH, , O–, O, , P, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, O, , Phosphatidylethanolamine, (16:0 18:2), , Phosphatidylinositol, (16:0 18:2), O–, , COO–, , O–, , +, , H3N, , C, H, , C, H2, , O, , P, O, , H 2C, , O, , O, HC, , O, , H 2C, O, , O, , O, , O–, , O, , O, , O, , P, O, , Phosphatidylserine, (16:0 18:2), , O, , OH, , O, O, , P, , O, , O, O, , O, O, O, , (B) Glycerophospholipids, , Diphosphatidylglycerol (cardiolipin), (18:2 18:2)
Page 277 :
252, , Chapter 11, , teine of condensing enzyme (3-ketoacyl-ACP synthase), and then combined with malonyl-ACP to form acetoacetyl-ACP., 2. Next the keto group at carbon 3 is removed (reduced), by the action of three enzymes to form a new acyl, chain (butyryl-ACP), which is now four carbons long, (see Figure 11.16)., 3. The four-carbon acid and another molecule of malonyl-ACP then become the new substrates for condensing enzyme, resulting in the addition of another, two-carbon unit to the growing chain, and the cycle, continues until 16 or 18 carbons have been added., 4. Some 16:0-ACP is released from the fatty acid synthase machinery, but most molecules that are elongated to 18:0-ACP are efficiently converted to 18:1ACP by a desaturase enzyme. The repetition of this, sequence of events makes 16:0-ACP and 18:1-ACP, the major products of fatty acid synthesis in plastids, (Figure 11.17)., Fatty acids may undergo further modification after they, are linked with glycerol to form glycerolipids. Additional, double bonds are placed in the 16:0 and 18:1 fatty acids by, a series of desaturase isozymes. Desaturase isozymes are, integral membrane proteins found in the chloroplast and, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Each desaturase inserts, a double bond at a specific position in the fatty acid chain,, and the enzymes act sequentially to produce the final 18:3, and 16:3 products (Ohlrogge and Browse 1995)., , Glycerolipids Are Synthesized in the Plastids, and the ER, The fatty acids synthesized in the plastid are next used to, make the glycerolipids of membranes and oleosomes. The, first steps of glycerolipid synthesis are two acylation reac-, , tions that transfer fatty acids from acyl-ACP or acyl-CoA, to glycerol-3-phosphate to form phosphatidic acid., The action of a specific phosphatase produces diacylglycerol (DAG) from phosphatidic acid. Phosphatidic acid, can also be converted directly to phosphatidylinositol, or phosphatidylglycerol; DAG can give rise to phosphatidylethanolamine or phosphatidylcholine (see Figure, 11.17)., The localization of the enzymes of glycerolipid synthesis reveals a complex and highly regulated interaction, between the chloroplast, where fatty acids are synthesized,, and other membrane systems of the cell. In simple terms,, the biochemistry involves two pathways referred to as the, prokaryotic (or chloroplast) pathway and the eukaryotic (or, ER) pathway., 1. In chloroplasts, the prokaryotic pathway utilizes the, 16:0- and 18:1-ACP products of chloroplast fatty acid, synthesis to synthesize phosphatidic acid and its, derivatives. Alternatively, the fatty acids may be, exported to the cytoplasm as CoA esters., 2. In the cytoplasm, the eukaryotic pathway uses a separate set of acyltransferases in the ER to incorporate, the fatty acids into phosphatidic acid and its derivatives., A simplified version of this model is depicted in Figure, 11.17., In some higher plants, including Arabidopsis and, spinach, the two pathways contribute almost equally to, chloroplast lipid synthesis. In many other angiosperms,, however, phosphatidylglycerol is the only product of the, prokaryotic pathway, and the remaining chloroplast lipids, are synthesized entirely by the eukaryotic pathway., The biochemistry of triacylglycerol synthesis in oilseeds, is generally the same as described for the glycerolipids., , Chloroplast, (Prokaryotic pathway), Fatty acid synthase, and, 18:0-ACP Desaturase, , FIGURE 11.17 The two path-, , ways for glycerolipid synthesis, in the chloroplast and ER of, Arabidopsis leaf cells. The major, membrane components are, shown in boxes. Glycerolipid, desaturates in the chloroplast,, and enzymes in the endoplasmic reticulum convert 16:0 and, 18:1 fatty acids to the more, highly unsaturated fatty acids, shown in Figure 11.15., , Phosphatidylglycerol, , 16:0-ACP, 18:1-ACP, , Sulfolipid, , 16:0-CoA, 18:1-CoA, , Phosphatidic, acid (PA), , Diacylglycerol, (DAG), , Diacylglycerol, (DAG), , Phosphatidylinositol, Phophatidylglycerol, , Phosphatidic, acid (PA), , Digalactosyldiacylglycerol, , Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol, , Endoplasmic Reticulum, (Eukaryotic pathway), , Phosphatidylcholine, , Phosphatidylethanolamine
Page 278 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, 16:0- and 18:1-ACP are synthesized in the plastids of the, cell and exported as CoA thioesters for incorporation into, DAG in the endoplasmic reticulum (see Figure 11.17)., The key enzymes in oilseed metabolism (not shown in, Figure 11.17), are acyl-CoA:DAG acyltransferase and, PC:DAG acyltransferase, which catalyze triacylglycerol, synthesis (Dahlqvist et al. 2000). As noted earlier, triacylglycerol molecules accumulate in specialized subcellular, structures—the oleosomes—from which they can be mobilized during germination and converted to sugar., , Lipid Composition Influences Membrane Function, A central question in membrane biology is the functional, reason behind lipid diversity. Each membrane system of, the cell has a characteristic and distinct complement of, lipid types, and within a single membrane each class of, lipids has a distinct fatty acid composition. Our understanding of a membrane is one in which lipids make up the, fluid, semipermeable bilayer that is the matrix for the functional membrane proteins., Since this bulk lipid role could be satisfied by a single, unsaturated species of phosphatidylcholine, obviously, such a simple model is unsatisfactory. Why is lipid diversity needed? One aspect of membrane biology that might, offer answers to this central question is the relationship, between lipid composition and the ability of organisms to, adjust to temperature changes (Wolter et al. 1992). For, example, chill-sensitive plants experience sharp reductions, in growth rate and development at temperatures between, 0 and 12°C (see Chapter 25). Many economically important, crops, such as cotton, soybean, maize, rice, and many tropical and subtropical fruits, are classified as chill sensitive., In contrast, most plants that originate from temperate, regions are able to grow and develop at chilling temperatures and are classified as chill-resistant plants., It has been suggested that because of the decrease in, lipid fluidity at lower temperatures, the primary event of, chilling injury is a transition from a liquid-crystalline phase, to a gel phase in the cellular membranes. According to this, proposal, this transition would result in alterations in the, metabolism of chilled cells and lead to injury and death of, the chill-sensitive plants. The degree of unsaturation of the, fatty acids would determine the temperature at which such, damage occurred., Recent research, however, suggests that the relationship, between membrane unsaturation and plant responses to, temperature is more subtle and complex (see Web Topic, 11.8). The responses of Arabidopsis mutants with increased, saturation of fatty acids to low temperature appear quite, distinct from what is predicted by the chilling sensitivity, hypothesis, suggesting that normal chilling injury may not, be strictly related to the level of unsaturation of membrane, lipids., On the other hand, experiments with transgenic tobacco, plants that are chill sensitive show opposite results. The, , 253, , transgenic expression of exogenous genes in tobacco has, been used specifically to decrease the level of saturated, phosphatidylglycerol or to bring about a general increase, in membrane unsaturation. In each case, damage caused, by chilling was alleviated to some extent., These new findings make it clear that the extent of, membrane unsaturation or the presence of particular lipids,, such as disaturated phosphatidylglycerol, can affect the, responses of plants to low temperature. As discussed in, Web Topic 11.8, more work is required to fully understand, the relationship between lipid composition and membrane, function., , Membrane Lipids Are Precursors of Important, Signaling Compounds, Plants, animals, and microbes all use membrane lipids as, precursors for compounds that are used for intracellular or, long-range signaling. For example, jasmonate derived from, linolenic acid (18:3) activates plant defenses against insects, and many fungal pathogens. In addition, jasmonate regulates other aspects of plant growth, including the development of anthers and pollen (Stintzi and Browse 2000)., Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) is the most, important of several phosphorylated derivatives of phosphatidylinositol known as phosphoinositides. In animals,, receptor-mediated activation of phospholipase C leads to, the hydrolysis of PIP2 to inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and, diacylglycerol, which both act as intracellular secondary, messengers., The action of IP3 in releasing Ca2+ into the cytoplasm, (through calcium-sensitive channels in the tonoplast and, other membranes) and thereby regulating cellular, processes has been demonstrated in several plant systems,, including the stomatal guard cells (Schroeder et al. 2001)., Information about other types of lipid signaling in plants, is becoming available through biochemical and molecular, genetic studies of phospholipases (Wang 2001) and other, enzymes involved in the generation of these signals., , Storage Lipids Are Converted into Carbohydrates, in Germinating Seeds, After germinating, oil-containing seeds metabolize stored, triacylglycerols by converting lipids to sucrose. Plants are, not able to transport fats from the endosperm to the root, and shoot tissues of the germinating seedling, so they must, convert stored lipids to a more mobile form of carbon, generally sucrose. This process involves several steps that are, located in different cellular compartments: oleosomes, glyoxysomes, mitochondria, and cytosol., , Overview: Lipids to sucrose. The conversion of lipids, to sucrose in oilseeds is triggered by germination and, begins with the hydrolysis of triacylglycerols stored in the, oil bodies to free fatty acids, followed by oxidation of the, fatty acids to produce acetyl-CoA (Figure 11.18). The fatty
Page 280 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, acids are oxidized in a type of peroxisome called a glyoxysome, an organelle enclosed by a single bilayer membrane that is found in the oil-rich storage tissues of seeds., Acetyl-CoA is metabolized in the glyoxysome (see Figure, 11.18A) to produce succinate, which is transported from the, glyoxysome to the mitochondrion, where it is converted, first to oxaloacetate and then to malate. The process ends, in the cytosol with the conversion of malate to glucose via, gluconeogenesis, and then to sucrose., Although some of this fatty acid–derived carbon is, diverted to other metabolic reactions in certain oilseeds, in, castor bean (Ricinus communis) the process is so efficient, that each gram of lipid metabolized results in the formation of 1 g of carbohydrate, which is equivalent to a 40%, recovery of free energy in the form of carbon bonds ([15.9, kJ/40 kJ] × 100 = 40%)., , Lipase hydrolysis., , The initial step in the conversion of, lipids to carbohydrate is the breakdown of triglycerides, stored in the oil bodies by the enzyme lipase, which, at, least in castor bean endosperm, is located on the half-membrane that serves as the outer boundary of the oil body. The, lipase hydrolyzes triacylglycerols to three molecules of, fatty acid and glycerol. Corn and cotton also contain a, lipase activity in the oil body, but peanut, soybean, and, cucumber show lipase activity in the glyoxysome instead., During the breakdown of lipids, oil bodies and glyoxysomes are generally in close physical association (see, Figure 11.18B)., , β-Oxidation of fatty acids. After hydrolysis of the triacylglycerols, the resulting fatty acids enter the glyoxysome,, where they are activated by conversion to fatty-acyl-CoA, by the enzyme fatty-acyl-CoA synthase. Fatty-acyl-CoA is, the initial substrate for the β-oxidation series of reactions,, in which Cn fatty acids (fatty acids composed of n number, of carbons) are sequentially broken down to n/2 molecules, of acetyl-CoA (see Figure 11.18A). This reaction sequence, involves the reduction of 1⁄ 2 O2 to H2O and the formation, of 1 NADH and 1 FADH2 for each acetyl-CoA produced., In mammalian tissues, the four enzymes associated with, β-oxidation are present in the mitochondrion; in plant seed, storage tissues, they are localized exclusively in the glyoxysome. Interestingly, in plant vegetative tissues (e.g.,, mung bean hypocotyl and potato tuber), the β-oxidation, reactions are localized in a related organelle, the peroxisome (see Chapter 1)., , The glyoxylate cycle. The function of the glyoxylate, cycle is to convert two molecules of acetyl-CoA to succinate. The acetyl-CoA produced by β-oxidation is further, metabolized in the glyoxysome through a series of reactions that make up the glyoxylate cycle (see Figure 11.18A)., Initially, the acetyl-CoA reacts with oxaloacetate to give citrate, which is then transferred to the cytoplasm for iso-, , 255, , merization to isocitrate by aconitase. Isocitrate is reimported into the peroxisome and converted to malate by two, reactions that are unique to the glyoxylate pathway., 1. First isocitrate (C6) is cleaved by the enzyme isocitrate, lyase to give succinate (C4) and glyoxylate (C2). This, succinate is exported to the motochondria., 2. Next malate synthase combines a second molecule of, acetyl-CoA with glyoxylate to produce malate., Malate is then oxidized by malate dehydrogenase to, oxaloacetate, which can combine with another acetyl-CoA, to continue the cycle (see Figure 11.18A). The glyoxylate, produced keeps the cycle operating in the glyoxysome, but, the succinate is exported to the mitochondria for further, processing., , The mitochondrial role. Moving from the glyoxysomes, to the mitochondria, the succinate is converted to malate, by the normal citric acid cycle reactions. The resulting, malate can be exported from the mitochondria in exchange, for succinate via the dicarboxylate transporter located in, the inner mitochondrial membrane. Malate is then oxidized, to oxaloacetate by malate dehydrogenase in the cytosol,, and the resulting oxaloacetate is converted to carbohydrate., This conversion requires circumventing the irreversibility of the pyruvate kinase reaction (see Figure 11.3) and is, facilitated by the enzyme PEP carboxykinase, which utilizes the phosphorylating ability of ATP to convert oxaloacetate to PEP and CO2 (see Figure 11.18A). From PEP, gluconeogenesis can proceed to the production of glucose, as, described earlier. Sucrose is the final product of this, process, and the primary form of reduced carbon translocated from the cotyledons to the growing seedling tissues., Not all seeds quantitatively convert fat to sugar (see Web, Topic 11.9)., , SUMMARY, In plant respiration, reduced cellular carbon generated during photosynthesis is oxidized to CO2 and water, and this, oxidation is coupled to the synthesis of ATP. Respiration, takes place in three main stages: glycolysis, the citric acid, cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation. The latter comprises, the electron transport chain and ATP synthesis., In glycolysis, carbohydrate is converted in the cytosol to, pyruvate, and a small amount of ATP is synthesized via, substrate-level phosphorylation. Pyruvate is subsequently, oxidized within the mitochondrial matrix through the citric acid cycle, generating a large number of reducing equivalents in the form of NADH and FADH2., In the third stage, oxidative phosphorylation, electrons, from NADH and FADH2 pass through the electron transport chain in the inner mitochondrial membrane to reduce, oxygen. The chemical energy is conserved in the form of an, electrochemical proton gradient, which is created by the
Page 281 :
256, , Chapter 11, , coupling of electron flow to proton pumping from the, matrix to the intermembrane space. This energy is then, converted into chemical energy in the form of ATP by the, FoF1-ATP synthase, also located in the inner membrane,, which couples ATP synthesis from ADP and Pi to the flow, of protons back into the matrix down their electrochemical, gradient., Aerobic respiration in plants has several unique features, including the presence of a cyanide-resistant alternative oxidase and multiple NAD(P)H dehydrogenases,, none of which pumps protons. Substrate oxidation during, respiration is regulated at control points in glycolysis, the, citric acid cycle, and the electron transport chain, but ultimately substrate oxidation is controlled by the level of cellular ADP. Carbohydrates can also be oxidized via the, oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, in which the reducing power is produced in the form of NADPH mainly for, biosynthetic purposes. Numerous glycolytic and citric acid, cycle intermediates also provide the starting material for a, multitude of biosynthetic pathways., More than 50% of the daily photosynthetic yield can be, respired by a plant, but many factors can affect the respiration rate observed at the whole-plant level. These factors, include the nature and age of the plant tissue, as well as, environmental factors such as light, oxygen concentration,, temperature, and CO2 concentration., Lipids play a major role in plants: Amphipathic lipids, serve as the primary nonprotein components of plant, membranes; fats and oils are an efficient storage form of, reduced carbon, particularly in seeds. Glycerolipids play, important roles as structural components of membranes., Fatty acids are synthesized in plastids using acetyl-CoA., Fatty acids from the plastid can be transported to the ER,, where they are further modified., Membrane function may be influenced by the lipid, composition. The degree of unsaturation of the fatty acids, influences the sensitivity of plants to cold but does not, seem to be involved in normal chilling injury. On the other, hand, certain membrane lipid breakdown products, such, as jasmonic acid, can act as signaling agents in plant cells., Triacylglycerol is synthesized in the ER and accumulates, within the phospholipid bilayer, forming oil bodies. During germination in oil-storing seeds, the stored lipids are, metabolized to carbohydrate in a series of reactions that, involve a metabolic sequence known as the glyoxylate, cycle. This cycle takes place in glyoxysomes, and subsequent steps occur in the mitochondria. The reduced carbon, generated during lipid breakdown in the glyoxysomes is, ultimately converted to carbohydrate in the cytosol by gluconeogenesis., , Web Material, Web Topics, 11.1 Isolation of Mitochondria, Methods for the isolation of intact, functional, mitochondria have been developed., , 11.2 The Electron Transport Chain of Plant, Mitochondria Contains Multiple NAD(P)H, Dehydrogenases, Mitochondrial NAD(P)H dehydrogenases oxidize NADH or NADPH and pass the electrons to, ubiquinone., , 11.3 The Alternative Oxidase, The alternative oxidase is an oxidoreductase, localized at the inner membrane of plant mitochondria., , 11.4 FoF1-ATP Synthases: The World’s Smallest, , Rotary Motors, Rotation of the g subunit brings about the conformational changes that allow the release of, ATP from the enzyme., , 11.5 Transport In and Out of Plant Mitochondria, Plant mitochondria operate different transport, mechanisms., , 11.6 The Genetic System of Plant Mitochondria, Has Some Special Features, The mitochondrial genome encodes about 40, mitochondrial proteins., , 11.7 Does Respiration Reduce Crop Yields?, Empirical relations between plant respiration, rates and crop yield have been established., , 11.8 The Lipid Composition of Membranes Affects, the Cell Biology and Physiology of Plants, Lipid mutants are expanding our understanding of the ability of organisms to adapt to temperature changes., , 11.9 Utilization of Oil Reserves in Cotyledons, In some species, only part of the stored lipid in, the cotyledons is exported as carbohydrate., , Web Essays, 11.1 Metabolic Flexibility Helps Plants Survive, Stress, The ability of plants to carry out a metabolic, step in different ways increases plant survival, under stress.
Page 282 :
Respiration and Lipid Metabolism, , 11.2 Metabolic Profiling of Plant Cells, Metabolic profiling complements genomics, and proteomics., , 11.3 Temperature Regulation by Thermogenic, Flowers, In thermogenic flowers, such as the Arum lilies,, temperature can increase up to 20°C above, their surroundings., , 11.4 Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Plant, Mitochondria, The production of damaging reactive oxygen, species is an unavoidable consequence of aerobic respiration., , 11.5 The Role of Respiration in Desiccation, Tolerance, Respiration has both positive and negative, effects on the survival of plant cells under, water stress., , 11.6 Balancing Life and Death; The Role of Mitochondria in Programmed Cell Death, Programmed cell death is an integral part of, the life cycle of plants, directly involving mitochondria., , Chapter References, Abrahams, J. P., Leslie, A. G. W., Lutter, R., and Walker, J. E. (1994), Structure at 2.8 Å resolution of F1-ATPase from bovine heart, mitochondria. Nature 370: 621–628., Ap Rees, T. (1980) Assessment of the contributions of metabolic pathways to plant respiration. In The Biochemistry of Plants, Vol. 2, D., D. Davies, ed., Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–29., Brand, M. D. (1994) The stoichiometry of proton pumping and ATP, synthesis in mitochondria. Biochemist 16(4): 20–24., Bruhn, D., Mikkelsen, T. N., and Atkin, O. K. (2002) Does the direct, effect of atmospheric CO2 concentration on leaf respiration vary, with temperature? Responses in two species of Plantago that differ in relative growth rate. Physiol. Plant. 114: 57–64., Budde, R. J. A., and Randall, D. D. (1990) Pea leaf mitochondrial, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex is inactivated in vivo in a lightdependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 673–676., Dahlqvist, A., Stahl, U., Lenman, M., Banas, A., Lee, M., Sandager,, L., Ronne, H., and Stymne, S. (2000) Phospholipid:diacylglycerol, acyltransferase: An enzyme that catalyzes the acyl-CoA-independent formation of triacylglycerol in yeast and plants. Proc., Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 6487–6492., Dennis, D. T., and Blakely, S. D. (2000) Carbohydrate metabolism. In, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants, B. Buchanan, W. Gruissem, and R. Jones, eds., American Society of Plant Physiologists,, Rockville, MD, pp. 630–674., Dennis, D. T., Huang, Y., and Negm, F. B. (1997) Glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway and anaerobic respiration. In Plant, Metabolism, 2nd ed., D. T. Dennis, D. H. Turpin, D. D. Lefebvre,, and D. B. Layzell, eds., Longman, Singapore, pp. 105–123., , 257, , Douce, R. (1985) Mitochondria in Higher Plants: Structure, Function,, and Biogenesis. Academic Press, Orlando, FL., Drake, B. G., Azcon-Bieto, J., Berry, J., Bunce, J., Dijkstra, P., Farrar, J.,, Gifford, R. M., Gonzalez-Meler, M. A., Koch, G., Lambers, H.,, Siedow, J., and Wullschleger, S. (1999) Does elevated atmospheric, CO2 concentration inhibit mitochondrial respiration in green, plants? Plant Cell Environ. 22: 649–657., Givan, C. V. (1999) Evolving concepts in plant glycolysis: Two centuries of progress. Biol. Rev. 74: 277–309., Griffin, K. L., Anderson, O. R., Gastrich, M. D., Lewis, J. D., Lin, G.,, Schuster, W., Seemann, J. R., Tissue, D. T., Turnbull, M. H., and, Whitehead, D. (2001) Plant growth in elevated CO2 alters mitochondrial number and chloroplast fine structure. Proc. Natl. Acad., Sci. USA 98: 2473–2478., Gunning, B. E. S., and Steer, M. W. (1996) Plant Cell Biology: Structure, and Function of Plant Cells. Jones and Bartlett, Boston., Hoefnagel, M. H. N., Atkin, O. K., and Wiskich, J. T. (1998) Interdependence between chloroplasts and mitochondria in the light, and the dark. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1366: 235–255., Huang, J., Struck, F., Matzinger, D. F., and Levings, C. S. (1994), Flower-enhanced expression of a nuclear-encoded mitochondrial respiratory protein is associated with changes in mitochondrion number. Plant Cell 6: 439–448., Jahnke, S. (2001) Atmospheric CO2 concentration does not directly, affect leaf respiration in bean or poplar. Plant Cell Environ. 24:, 1139–1151., Krömer, S. (1995) Respiration during photosynthesis. Annu. Rev., Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 45–70., Kruger, N. J. (1997) Carbohydrate synthesis and degradation. In, Plant Metabolism, 2nd ed., D. T. Dennis, D. H. Turpin, D. D. Lefebvre, and D. B. Layzell, eds., Longman, Singapore, pp. 83–104., Laloi, M., Klein, M., Riesmeier, J. W., Müller-Röber, B., Fleury, C.,, Bouillaud, F., and Ricquier, D. (1997) A plant cold-induced, uncoupling protein. Nature 389: 135–136., Lambers, H. (1985) Respiration in intact plants and tissues. Its regulation and dependence on environmental factors, metabolism, and invaded organisms. In Higher Plant Cell Respiration (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 18), R. Douce and, D. A. Day, eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 418–473., Leon, P., Arroyo, A., and Mackenzie, S. (1998) Nuclear control of, plastid and mitochondrial development in higher plants. Annu., Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49: 453–480., Levings, C. S., III, and Siedow, J. N. (1992) Molecular basis of disease, susceptibility in the Texas cytoplasm of maize. Plant Mol. Biol. 19:, 135–147., Marienfeld, J., Unseld, M., and Brennicke, A. (1999) The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis is composed of both native and, immigrant information. Trends Plant Sci. 4: 495–502., McCabe, T. C., Daley, D., and Whelan, J. (2000) Regulatory, developmental and tissue aspects of mitochondrial biogenesis in, plants. Plant Biol. 2: 121–135., Møller, I. M. (2001) Plant mitochondria and oxidative stress. Electron, transport, NADPH turnover and metabolism of reactive oxygen, species. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 561–591., Møller, I. M., and Rasmusson, A. G. (1998) The role of NADP in the, mitochondrial matrix. Trends Plant Sci. 3: 21–27., Napier, J. A., Stobart, A. K., and Shewry, P. R. (1996) The structure, and biogenesis of plant oil bodies: The role of the ER membrane, and the oleosin class of proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. 31: 945–956., Nicholls, D. G., and Ferguson, S. J. (2002) Bioenergetics 3, 3rd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA., Noctor, G., and Foyer, C. H. (1998) A re-evaluation of the, ATP:NADPH budget during C3 photosynthesis: A contribution
Page 283 :
258, , Chapter 11, , from nitrate assimilation and its associated respiratory activity?, J. Exp. Bot. 49: 1895–1908., Ohlrogge, J. B., and Browse, J. A. (1995) Lipid biosynthesis. Plant Cell, 7: 957–970., Ohlrogge, J. B., and Jaworski, J. G. (1997) Regulation of fatty acid, synthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 109–136., Oliver, D. J., and McIntosh, C. A. (1995) The biochemistry of the, mitochondrial matrix. In The Molecular Biology of Plant Mitochondria, C. S. Levings III and I. Vasil, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht,, Netherlands, pp. 237–280., Plaxton, W. C. (1996) The organization and regulation of plant glycolysis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 185–214., Raskin, I., Turner, I. M., and Melander, W. R. (1989) Regulation of, heat production in the inflorescences of an Arum lily by endogenous salicylic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 2214–2218., Sachs, M. M., Subbaiah, C. C., and Saab, I. N. (1996) Anaerobic gene, expression and flooding tolerance in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 47: 1–15., Sasaki, Y., Konishi, T., and Nagano, Y. (1995) The compartmentation, of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase in plants. Plant Physiol. 108:, 445–449., Schroeder, J. I., Allen, G. J., Hugouvieux, V., Kwak, J. M., and Waner,, D. (2001) Guard cell signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 627–658., Siedow, J. N. (1995) Bioenergetics: The plant mitochondrial electron, transfer chain. In The Molecular Biology of Plant Mitochondria, C. S., Levings III and I. Vasil, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp., 281–312., Siedow, J. N., and Umbach, A. L. (1995) Plant mitochondrial electron, transfer and molecular biology. Plant Cell 7: 821–831., , Stintzi, A., and Browse, J. (2000) The Arabidopsis male-sterile mutant,, opr3, lacks the 12-oxophytodienoic acid reductase required for, jasmonate synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10625–10630., Thompson, P., Bowsher, C. G., and Tobin, A. K. (1998) Heterogeneity of mitochondrial protein biogenesis during primary leaf, development in barley. Plant Physiol. 118: 1089–1099., Tucker, G. A. (1993) Introduction. In Biochemistry of Fruit Ripening, G., Seymour, J. Taylor, and G. Tucker, eds., Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 1–51., Vanlerberghe, G. C., and McIntosh, L. (1997) Alternative oxidase:, From gene to function. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 48: 703–734., Vedel, F., Lalanne, É., Sabar, M., Chétrit, P., and De Paepe, R. (1999), The mitochondrial respiratory chain and ATP synthase complexes: Composition, structure and mutational studies. Plant, Physiol. Biochem. 37: 629–643., Vercesi, A. E., Martins I. S., Silva, M. P., and Leite, H. M. F. (1995), PUMPing plants. Nature 375: 24., Wagner, A. M., and Krab, K. (1995) The alternative respiration pathway in plants: Role and regulation. Physiol. Plant. 95: 318–325., Wang, X. (2001) Plant phospholipases. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant, Mol. Biol. 52: 211–231., Whitehouse, D. G., and Moore, A. L. (1995) Regulation of oxidative, phosphorylation in plant mitochondria. In The Molecular Biology, of Plant Mitochondria, C. S. Levings III and I. K. Vasil, eds., Kluwer,, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 313–344., Wolter, F. P., Schmidt, R., and Heinz, E. (1992) Chilling sensitivity of, Arabidopsis thaliana with genetically engineered membrane lipids., EMBO J. 11: 4685–4692.
Page 284 :
Chapter, , 12, , Assimilation of Mineral, Nutrients, , HIGHER PLANTS ARE AUTOTROPHIC ORGANISMS that can synthesize their organic molecular components out of inorganic nutrients, obtained from their surroundings. For many mineral nutrients, this, process involves absorption from the soil by the roots (see Chapter 5), and incorporation into the organic compounds that are essential for, growth and development. This incorporation of mineral nutrients into, organic substances such as pigments, enzyme cofactors, lipids, nucleic, acids, and amino acids is termed nutrient assimilation., Assimilation of some nutrients—particularly nitrogen and sulfur—, requires a complex series of biochemical reactions that are among the, most energy-requiring reactions in living organisms:, • In nitrate (NO3–) assimilation, the nitrogen in NO3– is converted to, a higher-energy form in nitrite (NO2–), then to a yet higher-energy, form in ammonium (NH4+), and finally into the amide nitrogen of, glutamine. This process consumes the equivalent of 12 ATPs per, nitrogen (Bloom et al. 1992)., • Plants such as legumes form symbiotic relationships with nitrogen-fixing bacteria to convert molecular nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3). Ammonia (NH3) is the first stable product of natural, fixation; at physiological pH, however, ammonia is protonated to, form the ammonium ion (NH4+). The process of biological nitrogen fixation, together with the subsequent assimilation of NH3, into an amino acid, consumes about 16 ATPs per nitrogen (Pate, and Layzell 1990; Vande Broek and Vanderleyden 1995)., • The assimilation of sulfate (SO42–) into the amino acid cysteine via, the two pathways found in plants consumes about 14 ATPs (Hell, 1997)., For some perspective on the enormous energies involved, consider that, if these reactions run rapidly in reverse—say, from NH4NO3 (ammonium nitrate) to N2—they become explosive, liberating vast amounts of, energy as motion, heat, and light. Nearly all explosives are based on the, rapid oxidation of nitrogen or sulfur compounds.
Page 285 :
260, , Chapter 12, , Assimilation of other nutrients, especially the macronutrient and micronutrient cations (see Chapter 5), involves, the formation of complexes with organic compounds. For, example, Mg2+ associates with chlorophyll pigments, Ca2+, associates with pectates within the cell wall, and Mo6+, associates with enzymes such as nitrate reductase and, nitrogenase. These complexes are highly stable, and, removal of the nutrient from the complex may result in, total loss of function., This chapter outlines the primary reactions through, which the major nutrients (nitrogen, sulfur, phosphate,, cations, and oxygen) are assimilated. We emphasize the, physiological implications of the required energy expenditures and introduce the topic of symbiotic nitrogen fixation., , nitrate, and the fate of nitrate and ammonium in plant, tissues., , Nitrogen Passes through Several Forms in a, Biogeochemical Cycle, Nitrogen is present in many forms in the biosphere. The, atmosphere contains vast quantities (about 78% by volume) of molecular nitrogen (N2) (see Chapter 9). For the, most part, this large reservoir of nitrogen is not directly, available to living organisms. Acquisition of nitrogen from, the atmosphere requires the breaking of an exceptionally, stable triple covalent bond between two nitrogen atoms, —, (N—, — N) to produce ammonia (NH3) or nitrate (NO3–)., These reactions, known as nitrogen fixation, can be accomplished by both industrial and natural processes., Under elevated temperature (about 200°C) and high, pressure (about 200 atmospheres), N2 combines with, hydrogen to form ammonia. The extreme conditions are, required to overcome the high activation energy of the, reaction. This nitrogen fixation reaction, called the, Haber–Bosch process, is a starting point for the manufacture, of many industrial and agricultural products. Worldwide, industrial production of nitrogen fertilizers amounts to, more than 80 × 1012 g yr–1 (FAOSTAT 2001)., Natural processes fix about 190 × 1012 g yr–1 of nitrogen, (Table 12.1) through the following processes (Schlesinger, 1997):, , NITROGEN IN THE ENVIRONMENT, Many biochemical compounds present in plant cells contain nitrogen (see Chapter 5). For example, nitrogen is, found in the nucleoside phosphates and amino acids that, form the building blocks of nucleic acids and proteins,, respectively. Only the elements oxygen, carbon, and hydrogen are more abundant in plants than nitrogen. Most natural and agricultural ecosystems show dramatic gains in, productivity after fertilization with inorganic nitrogen,, attesting to the importance of this element., In this section we will discuss the biogeochemical cycle, of nitrogen, the crucial role of nitrogen fixation in the conversion of molecular nitrogen into ammonium and, , • Lightning. Lightning is responsible for about 8% of the, nitrogen fixed. Lightning converts water vapor and, , TABLE 12.1, The major processes of the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle, Rate, (1012 g yr–1)a, , Process, , Definition, , Industrial fixation, Atmospheric fixation, Biological fixation, Plant acquisition, Immobilization, Ammonification, Nitrification, , Industrial conversion of molecular nitrogen to ammonia, Lightning and photochemical conversion of molecular nitrogen to nitrate, Prokaryotic conversion of molecular nitrogen to ammonia, Plant absorption and assimilation of ammonium or nitrate, Microbial absorption and assimilation of ammonium or nitrate, Bacterial and fungal catabolism of soil organic matter to ammonium, Bacterial (Nitrosomonas sp.) oxidation of ammonium to nitrite and subsequent, bacterial (Nitrobacter sp.) oxidation of nitrite to nitrate, Bacterial and fungal catabolism of soil organic matter to mineral nitrogen through, ammonification or nitrification, Physical loss of gaseous ammonia to the atmosphere, Physical embedding of ammonium into soil particles, Bacterial conversion of nitrate to nitrous oxide and molecular nitrogen, Physical flow of nitrate dissolved in groundwater out of the topsoil and eventually, into the oceans, , Mineralization, Volatilization, Ammonium fixation, Denitrification, Nitrate leaching, , 80, 19, 170, 1200, N/C, N/C, N/C, N/C, 100, 10, 210, 36, , Note: Terrestrial organisms, the soil, and the oceans contain about 5.2 ×, g, 95 ×, g, and 6.5 x, g, respectively, of organic nitrogen that is, active in the cycle. Assuming that the amount of atmospheric N2 remains constant (inputs = outputs), the mean residence time (the average time, that a nitrogen molecule remains in organic forms) is about 370 years [(pool size)/(fixation input) = (5.2 × 1015 g + 95 × 1015 g)/(80 × 1012 g yr–1 +, 19 × 1012 g yr–1+ 170 × 1012 g yr–1)] (Schlesinger 1997)., aN/C, not calculated., 1015, , 1015, , 1015
Page 286 :
Assimilation of Mineral Nutrients, oxygen into highly reactive hydroxyl free radicals,, free hydrogen atoms, and free oxygen atoms that, attack molecular nitrogen (N2) to form nitric acid, (HNO3). This nitric acid subsequently falls to Earth, with rain., • Photochemical reactions. Approximately 2% of the, nitrogen fixed derives from photochemical reactions, between gaseous nitric oxide (NO) and ozone (O3), that produce nitric acid (HNO3)., • Biological nitrogen fixation. The remaining 90% results, from biological nitrogen fixation, in which bacteria or, blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) fix N2 into ammonium (NH4+)., From an agricultural standpoint, biological nitrogen fixation is critical because industrial production of nitrogen fertilizers seldom meets agricultural demand (FAOSTAT, 2001)., Once fixed in ammonium or nitrate, nitrogen enters a, biogeochemical cycle and passes through several organic, or inorganic forms before it eventually returns to molecular nitrogen (Figure 12.1; see also Table 12.1). The ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3–) ions that are generated, through fixation or released through decomposition of soil, organic matter become the object of intense competition, , among plants and microorganisms. To remain competitive,, plants have developed mechanisms for scavenging these, ions from the soil solution as quickly as possible (see Chapter 5). Under the elevated soil concentrations that occur, after fertilization, the absorption of ammonium and nitrate, by the roots may exceed the capacity of a plant to assimilate these ions, leading to their accumulation within the, plant’s tissues., , Stored Ammonium or Nitrate Can Be Toxic, Plants can store high levels of nitrate, or they can translocate it from tissue to tissue without deleterious effect. However, if livestock and humans consume plant material that, is high in nitrate, they may suffer methemoglobinemia, a, disease in which the liver reduces nitrate to nitrite, which, combines with hemoglobin and renders the hemoglobin, unable to bind oxygen. Humans and other animals may, also convert nitrate into nitrosamines, which are potent carcinogens. Some countries limit the nitrate content in plant, materials sold for human consumption., In contrast to nitrate, high levels of ammonium are toxic, to both plants and animals. Ammonium dissipates transmembrane proton gradients (Figure 12.2) that are required, for both photosynthetic and respiratory electron transport, (see Chapters 7 and 11) and for sequestering metabolites in, , Atmospheric, nitrogen, (N2), Industrial, fixation, , Biological, fixation, , Nitrogen, compounds, in rain, Denitrifiers, , Excreta and dead bodies, , Nitrate, (NO3–), , Immobilization, by bacteria, and fungi, , Dead, organic matter, , Free-living N2 fixers, , Mineralization, (ammonification), Loss by, leaching, , Nitrite, (NO2–), , 261, , Ammonium, (NH4+), , FIGURE 12.1 Nitrogen cycles through the atmosphere as it changes from a gaseous, form to reduced ions before being incorporated into organic compounds in living, organisms. Some of the steps involved in the nitrogen cycle are shown.
Page 287 :
262, , Chapter 12, , High pH:, Stroma, matrix,, or cytoplasm, OH–, , Membrane, , OH–, , OH–, , OH–, , H2O, , NH4+ + OH–, , H+, , H+, H+, , H+, , H+, , OH–, NH3, , OH–, , Low pH:, Lumen, intermembrane, space, or vacuole, , NH3 + H+, , OH–, , H+, , NH4++, , where NAD(P)H indicates NADH or NADPH. The most, common form of nitrate reductase uses only NADH as an, electron donor; another form of the enzyme that is found, predominantly in nongreen tissues such as roots can use, either NADH or NADPH (Warner and Kleinhofs 1992)., The nitrate reductases of higher plants are composed of, two identical subunits, each containing three prosthetic, groups: FAD (flavin adenine dinucleotide), heme, and a, molybdenum complexed to an organic molecule called a, pterin (Mendel and Stallmeyer 1995; Campbell 1999)., , H+, H+, , OH–, , O, N, , HN, , At high pH, NH4+, reacts with OH– to, produce NH3., , NH3 is membrane, permeable and, diffuses across the, membrane along, its concentration, gradient., , NH3 reacts with H+, to form NH4+., , N, , N, , A pterin (fully oxidized), , FIGURE 12.2 NH4+ toxicity can dissipate pH gradients. The, left side represents the stroma, matrix, or cytoplasm, where, the pH is high; the right side represents the lumen, intermembrane space, or vacuole, where the pH is low; and the, membrane represents the thylakoid, inner mitochondrial, or, tonoplast membrane for a chloroplast, mitochondrion, or, root cell, respectively. The net result of the reaction shown is, that both the OH– concentration on the left side and the H+, concentration on the right side have been diminished; that, is, the pH gradient has been dissipated. (After Bloom 1997.), , the vacuole (see Chapter 6). Because high levels of ammonium are dangerous, animals have developed a strong aversion to its smell. The active ingredient in smelling salts, a, medicinal vapor released under the nose to revive a person, who has fainted, is ammonium carbonate. Plants assimilate, ammonium near the site of absorption or generation and, rapidly store any excess in their vacuoles, thus avoiding, toxic effects on membranes and the cytosol., In the next section we will discuss the process by which, the nitrate absorbed by the roots via an H+–NO3– symporter (see Chapter 6 for a discussion of symport) is assimilated into organic compounds, and the enzymatic, processes mediating the reduction of nitrate first into nitrite, and then into ammonium., , Nitrate reductase is the main molybdenum-containing protein in vegetative tissues, and one symptom of molybdenum deficiency is the accumulation of nitrate that results, from diminished nitrate reductase activity., Comparison of the amino acid sequences for nitrate, reductase from several species with those of other wellcharacterized proteins that bind FAD, heme, or molybdenum has led to the three-domain model for nitrate reductase shown in Figure 12.3. The FAD-binding domain, accepts two electrons from NADH or NADPH. The electrons then pass through the heme domain to the molybdenum complex, where they are transferred to nitrate., , Nitrate, Light, and Carbohydrates, Regulate Nitrate Reductase, Nitrate, light, and carbohydrates influence nitrate reductase, at the transcription and translation levels (Sivasankar and, Oaks 1996). In barley seedlings, nitrate reductase mRNA, was detected approximately 40 minutes after addition of, nitrate, and maximum levels were attained within 3 hours, (Figure 12.4). In contrast to the rapid mRNA accumulation,, , N terminus, NO3–, NO3–, , MoCo, MoCo, , Hinge regions, Heme, Heme, , C terminus, FAD, FAD, , 2 e–, 2, , e–, , NADH, NADH, , Nitrate reductase, , NITRATE ASSIMILATION, Plants assimilate most of the nitrate absorbed by their roots, into organic nitrogen compounds. The first step of this, process is the reduction of nitrate to nitrite in the cytosol, (Oaks 1994). The enzyme nitrate reductase catalyzes this, reaction:, NO3– + NAD(P)H + H+ + 2 e– →, NO2– + NAD(P)+ + H2O, , H2N, , (12.1), , FIGURE 12.3 A model of the nitrate reductase dimer, illustrating the three binding domains whose polypeptide, sequences are similar in eukaryotes: molybdenum complex, (MoCo), heme, and FAD. The NADH binds at the FADbinding region of each subunit and initiates a two-electron, transfer from the carboxyl (C) terminus, through each of, the electron transfer components, to the amino (N) terminus. Nitrate is reduced at the molybdenum complex near, the amino terminus. The polypeptide sequences of the, hinge regions are highly variable among species.
Page 288 :
100, , 263, , 20, Root mRNA, , Shoot mRNA, , 80, 15, 60, Shoot, nitrate, reductase, , 40, , 10, , Root nitrate reductase, , 5, , 20, , 0, , 4, , 8, 12, 16, Time after induction (hours), , 20, , Nitrate reductase activity, (µmol gfw–1 h–1), , FIGURE 12.4 Stimulation of nitrate reductase activity follows the induction of, nitrate reductase mRNA in shoots and, roots of barley; gfw, grams fresh weight., (From Kleinhofs et al. 1989.), , Relative nitrate reductase mRNA (%), , Assimilation of Mineral Nutrients, , 24, , there was a gradual linear increase in nitrate reductase, activity, reflecting the slower synthesis of the protein., In addition, the protein is subject to posttranslational, modulation (involving a reversible phosphorylation) that, is analogous to the regulation of sucrose phosphate synthase (see Chapters 8 and 10). Light, carbohydrate levels,, and other environmental factors stimulate a protein phosphatase that dephosphorylates several serine residues on, the nitrate reductase protein and thereby activates the, enzyme., Operating in the reverse direction, darkness and Mg2+, stimulate a protein kinase that phosphorylates the same, serine residues, which then interact with a 14-3-3 inhibitor, protein, and thereby inactivate nitrate reductase (Kaiser et, al. 1999). Regulation of nitrate reductase activity through phosphorylation and dephosphorylation provides more rapid control, than can be achieved through synthesis or degradation of the, enzyme (minutes versus hours)., , ter 7) and from NADPH generated by the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway in nongreen tissues (see Chapter, 11)., Chloroplasts and root plastids contain different forms of, the enzyme, but both forms consist of a single polypeptide, containing two prosthetic groups: an iron–sulfur cluster, (Fe4S4) and a specialized heme (Siegel and Wilkerson 1989)., These groups acting together bind nitrite and reduce it, directly to ammonium, without accumulation of nitrogen, compounds of intermediate redox states. The electron flow, through ferredoxin, Fe 4S4, and heme can be represented as, in Figure 12.5., Nitrite reductase is encoded in the nucleus and synthesized in the cytoplasm with an N-terminal transit peptide, that targets it to the plastids (Wray 1993). Whereas NO3–, and light induce the transcription of nitrite reductase, mRNA, the end products of the process—asparagine and, glutamine—repress this induction., , Nitrite Reductase Converts Nitrite to Ammonium, , Plants Can Assimilate Nitrate in Both, Roots and Shoots, , Nitrite (NO2–) is a highly reactive, potentially toxic ion., Plant cells immediately transport the nitrite generated by, nitrate reduction (see Equation 12.1) from the cytosol into, chloroplasts in leaves and plastids in roots. In these, organelles, the enzyme nitrite, reductase reduces nitrite to, ammonium according to the, Light, following overall reaction:, NO2– + 6 Fdred + 8 H+ + 6 e– →, NH4+ + 6 Fdox + 2 H2O, (12.2), , where Fd is ferredoxin, and, the subscripts red and ox, stand for reduced and oxidized, respectively. Reduced, ferredoxin derives from photosynthetic electron transport, in the chloroplasts (see Chap-, , In many plants, when the roots receive small amounts of, nitrate, nitrate is reduced primarily in the roots. As the, supply of nitrate increases, a greater proportion of the, , H+, , Ferredoxin, (reduced), , NO2–, Nitrite, , e–, Light reactions, in photosynthesis, , (Fe4S4), , e–, Heme, , Nitrite reductase, Ferredoxin, (oxidized), , NH4+, Ammonia, , FIGURE 12.5 Model for coupling of photosynthetic electron flow, via ferredoxin, to, the reduction of nitrite by nitrite reductase. The enzyme contains two prosthetic, groups, Fe4S4 and heme, which participate in the reduction of nitrite to ammonium.
Page 289 :
264, , Chapter 12, , Conversion of Ammonium to Amino Acids, Requires Two Enzymes, , Cocklebur, Stellaria media, White clover, Perilla fruticosa, Oat, Corn, Impatiens, Sunflower, Barley, Bean, Broad bean, Pea, Radish, White lupine, , Glutamine synthetase (GS) combines ammonium with, glutamate to form glutamine (Figure 12.7A):, Glutamate + NH4+ + ATP → glutamine + ADP + Pi, , 0, , 10, , 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100, Nitrogen in xylem exudate (%), Nitrate, Amino acids, , Amides, Ureides, , FIGURE 12.6 Relative amounts of nitrate and other nitrogen, , compounds in the xylem exudate of various plant species., The plants were grown with their roots exposed to nitrate, solutions, and xylem sap was collected by severing of the, stem. Note the presence of ureides, specialized nitrogen, compounds, in bean and pea (which will be discussed later, in the text). (After Pate 1983.), , (12.3), , This reaction requires the hydrolysis of one ATP and, involves a divalent cation such as Mg2+, Mn2+, or Co2+ as a, cofactor. Plants contain two classes of GS, one in the cytosol, and the other in root plastids or shoot chloroplasts. The, cytosolic forms are expressed in germinating seeds or in the, vascular bundles of roots and shoots and produce glutamine for intracellular nitrogen transport. The GS in root, plastids generates amide nitrogen for local consumption;, the GS in shoot chloroplasts reassimilates photorespiratory, NH4+ (Lam et al. 1996). Light and carbohydrate levels alter, the expression of the plastid forms of the enzyme, but they, have little effect on the cytosolic forms., Elevated plastid levels of glutamine stimulate the activity of glutamate synthase (also known as glutamine:2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase, or GOGAT). This enzyme transfers the amide group of glutamine to 2-oxoglutarate, yielding two molecules of glutamate (see Figure 12.7A). Plants, contain two types of GOGAT: One accepts electrons from, NADH; the other accepts electrons from ferredoxin (Fd):, Glutamine + 2-oxoglutarate + NADH + H+ →, 2 glutamate + NAD+, (12.4), , absorbed nitrate is translocated to the shoot and assimilated there (Marschner 1995). Even under similar conditions of nitrate supply, the balance between root and shoot, nitrate metabolism—as indicated by the proportion of, nitrate reductase activity in each of the two organs or by, the relative concentrations of nitrate and reduced nitrogen, in the xylem sap—varies from species to species., In plants such as the cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium),, nitrate metabolism is restricted to the shoot; in other plants,, such as white lupine (Lupinus albus), most nitrate is metabolized in the roots (Figure 12.6). Generally, species native, to temperate regions rely more heavily on nitrate assimilation by the roots than do species of tropical or subtropical, origins., , AMMONIUM ASSIMILATION, Plant cells avoid ammonium toxicity by rapidly converting, the ammonium generated from nitrate assimilation or photorespiration (see Chapter 8) into amino acids. The primary, pathway for this conversion involves the sequential actions, of glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase (Lea et al., 1992). In this section we will discuss the enzymatic, processes that mediate the assimilation of ammonium into, essential amino acids, and the role of amides in the regulation of nitrogen and carbon metabolism., , Glutamine + 2-oxoglutarate + Fdred →, 2 glutamate + Fdox, , (12.5), , The NADH type of the enzyme (NADH-GOGAT) is, located in plastids of nonphotosynthetic tissues such as, roots or vascular bundles of developing leaves. In roots,, NADH-GOGAT is involved in the assimilation of NH4+, absorbed from the rhizosphere (the soil near the surface of, the roots); in vascular bundles of developing leaves,, NADH-GOGAT assimilates glutamine translocated from, roots or senescing leaves., The ferredoxin-dependent type of glutamate synthase (FdGOGAT) is found in chloroplasts and serves in photorespiratory nitrogen metabolism. Both the amount of protein and, its activity increase with light levels. Roots, particularly those, under nitrate nutrition, have Fd-GOGAT in plastids. FdGOGAT in the roots presumably functions to incorporate the, glutamine generated during nitrate assimilation., , Ammonium Can Be Assimilated via an Alternative, Pathway, Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) catalyzes a reversible, reaction that synthesizes or deaminates glutamate (Figure, 12.7B):, 2-Oxoglutarate + NH4+ + NAD(P)H ↔, glutamate + H2O + NAD(P)+, , (12.6)
Page 291 :
266, , Chapter 12, , An NADH-dependent form of GDH is found in mitochondria, and an NADPH-dependent form is localized in, the chloroplasts of photosynthetic organs. Although both, forms are relatively abundant, they cannot substitute for, the GS–GOGAT pathway for assimilation of ammonium,, and their primary function is to deaminate glutamate (see, Figure 12.7B)., , Transamination Reactions Transfer Nitrogen, Once assimilated into glutamine and glutamate, nitrogen, is incorporated into other amino acids via transamination, reactions. The enzymes that catalyze these reactions are, known as aminotransferases. An example is aspartate, aminotransferase (Asp-AT), which catalyzes the following, reaction (Figure 12.7C):, Glutamate + oxaloacetate →, aspartate + 2-oxoglutarate, , (12.7), , in which the amino group of glutamate is transferred to the, carboxyl atom of aspartate. Aspartate is an amino acid that, participates in the malate–aspartate shuttle to transfer, reducing equivalents from the mitochondrion and chloroplast into the cytosol (see Chapter 11) and in the transport, of carbon from mesophyll to bundle sheath for C4 carbon, fixation (see Chapter 8). All transamination reactions, require pyridoxal phosphate (vitamin B6) as a cofactor., Aminotransferases are found in the cytoplasm, chloroplasts, mitochondria, glyoxysomes, and peroxisomes. The, aminotransferases localized in the chloroplasts may have, a significant role in amino acid biosynthesis because plant, leaves or isolated chloroplasts exposed to radioactively, labeled carbon dioxide rapidly incorporate the label into, glutamate, aspartate, alanine, serine, and glycine., , Asparagine and Glutamine Link Carbon and, Nitrogen Metabolism, Asparagine, isolated from asparagus as early as 1806, was, the first amide to be identified (Lam et al. 1996). It serves, not only as a protein precursor, but as a key compound for, nitrogen transport and storage because of its stability and, high nitrogen-to-carbon ratio (2 N to 4 C for asparagine,, versus 2 N to 5 C for glutamine or 1 N to 5 C for glutamate)., The major pathway for asparagine synthesis involves, the transfer of the amide nitrogen from glutamine to, asparagine (Figure 12.7D):, Glutamine + aspartate + ATP →, asparagine + glutamate + AMP + PPi, , (12.8), , Asparagine synthetase (AS), the enzyme that catalyzes this, reaction, is found in the cytosol of leaves and roots and in, nitrogen-fixing nodules (see the next section). In maize, roots, particularly those under potentially toxic levels of, ammonia, ammonium may replace glutamine as the source, of the amide group (Sivasankar and Oaks 1996)., , High levels of light and carbohydrate—conditions that, stimulate plastid GS and Fd-GOGAT—inhibit the expression of genes coding for AS and the activity of the enzyme., The opposing regulation of these competing pathways helps, balance the metabolism of carbon and nitrogen in plants, (Lam et al. 1996). Conditions of ample energy (i.e., high levels of light and carbohydrates) stimulate GS and GOGAT,, inhibit AS, and thus favor nitrogen assimilation into glutamine and glutamate, compounds that are rich in carbon and, participate in the synthesis of new plant materials., By contrast, energy-limited conditions inhibit GS and, GOGAT, stimulate AS, and thus favor nitrogen assimilation, into asparagine, a compound that is rich in nitrogen and, sufficiently stable for long-distance transport or long-term, storage., , BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN FIXATION, Biological nitrogen fixation accounts for most of the fixation, of atmospheric N2 into ammonium, thus representing the, key entry point of molecular nitrogen into the biogeochemical cycle of nitrogen (see Figure 12.1). In this section we will, describe the properties of the nitrogenase enzymes that fix, nitrogen, the symbiotic relations between nitrogen-fixing, organisms and higher plants, the specialized structures that, form in roots when infected by nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and, the genetic and signaling interactions that regulate nitrogen, fixation by symbiotic prokaryotes and their hosts., , Free-Living and Symbiotic Bacteria Fix Nitrogen, Some bacteria, as stated earlier, can convert atmospheric, nitrogen into ammonium (Table 12.2). Most of these nitrogen-fixing prokaryotes are free-living in the soil. A few, form symbiotic associations with higher plants in which, the prokaryote directly provides the host plant with fixed, nitrogen in exchange for other nutrients and carbohydrates, (top portion of Table 12.2). Such symbioses occur in nodules that form on the roots of the plant and contain the, nitrogen-fixing bacteria., The most common type of symbiosis occurs between, members of the plant family Leguminosae and soil bacteria of the genera Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Photorhizobium, Rhizobium, and Sinorhizobium (collectively called rhizobia; Table 12.3 and Figure 12.8). Another common type, of symbiosis occurs between several woody plant species,, such as alder trees, and soil bacteria of the genus Frankia., Still other types involve the South American herb Gunnera, and the tiny water fern Azolla, which form associations, with the cyanobacteria Nostoc and Anabaena, respectively, (see Table 12.2 and Figure 12.9)., , Nitrogen Fixation Requires Anaerobic Conditions, Because oxygen irreversibly inactivates the nitrogenase, enzymes involved in nitrogen fixation, nitrogen must be, fixed under anaerobic conditions. Thus each of the nitro-
Page 293 :
268, , Chapter 12, day, a rate of fertilization that is sufficient to attain moderate rice yields., Free-living bacteria that are capable of fixing nitrogen are, aerobic, facultative, or anaerobic (see Table 12.2, bottom):, • Aerobic nitrogen-fixing bacteria such as Azotobacter are, thought to maintain reduced oxygen conditions, (microaerobic conditions) through their high levels of, respiration (Burris 1976). Others, such as Gloeothece,, evolve O2 photosynthetically during the day and fix, nitrogen during the night., • Facultative organisms, which are able to grow under, both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, generally fix, nitrogen only under anaerobic conditions., • For anaerobic nitrogen-fixing bacteria, oxygen does, not pose a problem, because it is absent in their habitat. These anaerobic organisms can be either photosynthetic (e.g., Rhodospirillum), or nonphotosynthetic, (e.g., Clostridium)., , Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation Occurs in, Specialized Structures, , FIGURE 12.8 Root nodules on soybean. The nodules are a, result of infection by Rhizobium japonicum. (© Wally, Eberhart/Visuals Unlimited.), , source of available nitrogen in flooded rice fields is the, water fern Azolla, which associates with the cyanobacterium Anabaena. The Azolla–Anabaena association can fix, as much as 0.5 kg of atmospheric nitrogen per hectare per, , Symbiotic nitrogen-fixing prokaryotes dwell within nodules, the special organs of the plant host that enclose the, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (see Figure 12.8). In the case of, Gunnera, these organs are existing stem glands that develop, independently of the symbiont. In the case of legumes and, actinorhizal plants, the nitrogen-fixing bacteria induce the, plant to form root nodules., Grasses can also develop symbiotic relationships with, nitrogen-fixing organisms, but in these associations root, nodules are not produced. Instead, the nitrogen-fixing bacteria seem to colonize plant tissues or anchor to the root, surfaces, mainly around the elongation zone and the root, hairs (Reis et al. 2000). For example, the nitrogen-fixing, , Vegetative, cells, , FIGURE 12.9 A heterocyst in a filament of the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Anabaena. The thick-walled, heterocysts, interspaced among vegetative cells, have an anaerobic inner, environment that allows cyanobacteria to fix nitrogen in aerobic, conditions. (© Paul W. Johnson/, Biological Photo Service.), , Heterocyst
Page 294 :
Assimilation of Mineral Nutrients, bacterium Acetobacter diazotrophicus lives in the apoplast of, stem tissues in sugarcane and may provide its host with, sufficient nitrogen to grant independence from nitrogen, fertilization (Dong et al. 1994). The potential for applying, Azospirillum to corn and other grains has been explored,, but Azospirillum seems to fix little nitrogen when associated, with plants (Vande Broek and Vanderleyden 1995)., Legumes and actinorhizal plants regulate gas permeability in their nodules, maintaining a level of oxygen, within the nodule that can support respiration but is sufficiently low to avoid inactivation of the nitrogenase (Kuzma, et al. 1993). Gas permeability increases in the light and, decreases under drought or upon exposure to nitrate. The, mechanism for regulating gas permeability is not yet, known., Nodules contain an oxygen-binding heme protein called, leghemoglobin. Leghemoglobin is present in the cytoplasm of infected nodule cells at high concentrations (700, µM in soybean nodules) and gives the nodules a pink color., The host plant produces the globin portion of leghemoglobin in response to infection by the bacteria (Marschner, 1995); the bacterial symbiont produces the heme portion., Leghemoglobin has a high affinity for oxygen (a Km of, about 0.01 µM), about ten times higher than the β chain of, human hemoglobin., Although leghemoglobin was once thought to provide, a buffer for nodule oxygen, recent studies indicate that it, stores only enough oxygen to support nodule respiration, for a few seconds (Denison and Harter 1995). Its function, is to help transport oxygen to the respiring symbiotic bacterial cells in a manner analogous to hemoglobin transporting oxygen to respiring tissues in animals (Ludwig and, de Vries 1986)., , Establishing Symbiosis Requires an, Exchange of Signals, The symbiosis between legumes and rhizobia is not obligatory. Legume seedlings germinate without any association, with rhizobia, and they may remain unassociated throughout their life cycle. Rhizobia also occur as free-living organisms in the soil. Under nitrogen-limited conditions, however, the symbionts seek out one another through an, elaborate exchange of signals. This signaling, the subsequent infection process, and the development of nitrogenfixing nodules involve specific genes in both the host and, the symbionts., Plant genes specific to nodules are called nodulin (Nod), genes; rhizobial genes that participate in nodule formation, are called nodulation (nod) genes (Heidstra and Bisseling, 1996). The nod genes are classified as common nod genes, or host-specific nod genes. The common nod genes—nodA,, nodB, and nodC—are found in all rhizobial strains; the, host-specific nod genes—such as nodP, nodQ, and nodH; or, nodF, nodE, and nodL—differ among rhizobial species and, determine the host range. Only one of the nod genes, the, , 269, , regulatory nodD, is constitutively expressed, and as we, will explain in detail, its protein product (NodD) regulates, the transcription of the other nod genes., The first stage in the formation of the symbiotic relationship between the nitrogen-fixing bacteria and their host, is migration of the bacteria toward the roots of the host, plant. This migration is a chemotactic response mediated, by chemical attractants, especially (iso)flavonoids and, betaines, secreted by the roots. These attractants activate, the rhizobial NodD protein, which then induces transcription of the other nod genes (Phillips and Kapulnik 1995)., The promoter region of all nod operons, except that of, nodD, contains a highly conserved sequence called the nod, box. Binding of the activated NodD to the nod box induces, transcription of the other nod genes., , Nod Factors Produced by Bacteria Act as Signals, for Symbiosis, The nod genes activated by NodD code for nodulation proteins, most of which are involved in the biosynthesis of, Nod factors. Nod factors are lipochitin oligosaccharide signal molecules, all of which have a chitin β-1→4-linked Nacetyl-D-glucosamine backbone (varying in length from, three to six sugar units) and a fatty acyl chain on the C-2, position of the nonreducing sugar (Figure 12.10)., Three of the nod genes (nodA, nodB, and nodC) encode, enzymes (NodA, NodB, and NodC, respectively) that are, required for synthesizing this basic structure (Stokkermans, et al. 1995):, 1. NodA is an N-acyltransferase that catalyzes the addition of a fatty acyl chain., 2. NodB is a chitin-oligosaccharide deacetylase that, removes the acetyl group from the terminal nonreducing sugar., , Hydrogen, sulfate,, fucose, or, 2-O-methyl fucose, O, CH2OH, O, HO, , CH2OH, O, , CH2, , O, , HO, , NH, , Fatty acid, , HO, , O, , O, N, C, CH3, , HO, O, , O, N, C, , n, , Hydrogen, or glycerol, , O, , CH3, , FIGURE 12.10 Nod factors are lipochitin oligosaccharides., , The fatty acid chain typically has 16 to 18 carbons. The, number of repeated middle sections (n) is usually 2 to 3., (After Stokkermans et al. 1995.)
Page 295 :
270, , Chapter 12, , Host-specific nod genes that vary among rhizobial species, are involved in the modification of the fatty acyl chain or, the addition of groups important in determining host, specificity (Carlson et al. 1995):, • NodE and NodF determine the length and degree of, saturation of the fatty acyl chain; those of Rhizobium, leguminosarum bv. viciae and R. meliloti result in the, synthesis of an 18:4 and a 16:2 fatty acyl group,, respectively. (Recall from Chapter 11 that the number, before the colon gives the total number of carbons in, the fatty acyl chain, and the number after the colon, gives the number of double bonds.), • Other enzymes, such as NodL, influence the host, specificity of Nod factors through the addition of, specific substitutions at the reducing or nonreducing, sugar moieties of the chitin backbone., A particular legume host responds to a specific Nod factor. The legume receptors for Nod factors appear to be special lectins (sugar-binding proteins) produced in the root, hairs (van Rhijn et al. 1998; Etzler et al. 1999). Nod factors, activate these lectins, increasing their hydrolysis of phosphoanhydride bonds of nucleoside di- and triphosphates., This lectin activation directs particular rhizobia to appropriate hosts and facilitates attachment of the rhizobia to the, cell walls of a root hair., , Nodule Formation Involves Several, Phytohormones, Two processes—infection and nodule organogenesis—, occur simultaneously during root nodule formation. During the infection process, rhizobia that are attached to the, root hairs release Nod factors that induce a pronounced, curling of the root hair cells (Figure 12.11A and B). The rhizobia become enclosed in the small compartment formed, by the curling. The cell wall of the root hair degrades in, these regions, also in response to Nod factors, allowing the, bacterial cells direct access to the outer surface of the plant, plasma membrane (Lazarowitz and Bisseling 1997)., The next step is formation of the infection thread (Figure 12.11C), an internal tubular extension of the plasma, membrane that is produced by the fusion of Golgi-derived, membrane vesicles at the site of infection. The thread grows, at its tip by the fusion of secretory vesicles to the end of the, tube. Deeper into the root cortex, near the xylem, cortical, cells dedifferentiate and start dividing, forming a distinct, area within the cortex, called a nodule primordium, from, which the nodule will develop. The nodule primordia form, opposite the protoxylem poles of the root vascular bundle, (Timmers et al. 1999) (See Web Topic 12.1)., Different signaling compounds, acting either positively, or negatively, control the position of nodule primordia. The, nucleoside uridine diffuses from the stele into the cortex in, , FIGURE 12.11 The infection process during nodule organo-, , genesis. (A) Rhizobia bind to an emerging root hair in, response to chemical attractants sent by the plant. (B) In, response to factors produced by the bacteria, the root hair, exhibits abnormal curling growth, and rhizobia cells proliferate within the coils. (C) Localized degradation of the root, hair wall leads to infection and formation of the infection, thread from Golgi secretory vesicles of root cells. (D) The, infection thread reaches the end of the cell, and its membrane fuses with the plasma membrane of the root hair cell., (E) Rhizobia are released into the apoplast and penetrate, the compound middle lamella to the subepidermal cell, plasma membrane, leading to the initiation of a new infection thread, which forms an open channel with the first. (F), The infection thread extends and branches until it reaches, target cells, where vesicles composed of plant membrane, that enclose bacterial cells are released into the cytosol., , the protoxylem zones of the root and stimulates cell division, (Lazarowitz and Bisseling 1997). Ethylene is synthesized in, the region of the pericycle, diffuses into the cortex, and, blocks cell division opposite the phloem poles of the root., The infection thread filled with proliferating rhizobia, elongates through the root hair and cortical cell layers, in, the direction of the nodule primordium. When the infection, thread reaches specialized cells within the nodule, its tip, fuses with the plasma membrane of the host cell, releasing, bacterial cells that are packaged in a membrane derived, from the host cell plasma membrane (see Figure 12.11D)., Branching of the infection thread inside the nodule enables, the bacteria to infect many cells (see Figure 12.11E and F), (Mylona et al. 1995)., At first the bacteria continue to divide, and the surrounding membrane increases in surface area to accommodate this growth by fusing with smaller vesicles. Soon, thereafter, upon an undetermined signal from the plant, the, bacteria stop dividing and begin to enlarge and to differentiate into nitrogen-fixing endosymbiotic organelles called, bacteroids. The membrane surrounding the bacteroids is, called the peribacteroid membrane., The nodule as a whole develops such features as a vascular system (which facilitates the exchange of fixed nitrogen produced by the bacteroids for nutrients contributed, by the plant) and a layer of cells to exclude O2 from the root, nodule interior. In some temperate legumes (e.g., peas), the, nodules are elongated and cylindrical because of the presence of a nodule meristem. The nodules of tropical legumes,, such as soybeans and peanuts, lack a persistent meristem, and are spherical (Rolfe and Gresshoff 1988)., , The Nitrogenase Enzyme Complex Fixes N2, Biological nitrogen fixation, like industrial nitrogen fixation, produces ammonia from molecular nitrogen. The, overall reaction is, N2 + 8 e– + 8 H+ + 16 ATP →, 2 NH3 + H2 + 16 ADP + 16 Pi, , (12.9), , ▲, , 3. NodC is a chitin-oligosaccharide synthase that links, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine monomers.
Page 296 :
Assimilation of Mineral Nutrients, (A), , 271, , (B), Root hair, Rhizobia, , Curling, growth, , (C), , Infection, thread, , (D), , Golgi, vesicle, , Golgi body, , (E), , Infection thread membrane, fuses with cell membrane, , (F), Vesicle containing rhizobia, , Note that the reduction of N2 to 2 NH3, a six-electron, transfer, is coupled to the reduction of two protons to, evolve H2. The nitrogenase enzyme complex catalyzes, this reaction., The nitrogenase enzyme complex can be separated into, two components—the Fe protein and the MoFe protein—, neither of which has catalytic activity by itself (Figure 12.12):, • The Fe protein is the smaller of the two components, and has two identical subunits of 30 to 72 kDa each,, depending on the organism. Each subunit contains an, iron–sulfur cluster (4 Fe and 4 S2– ) that participates in, the redox reactions involved in the conversion of N2, to NH3. The Fe protein is irreversibly inactivated by, O2 with typical half-decay times of 30 to 45 seconds, (Dixon and Wheeler 1986)., , • The MoFe protein has four subunits, with a total molecular mass of 180 to 235 kDa, depending on the, species. Each subunit has two Mo–Fe–S clusters. The, MoFe protein is also inactivated by oxygen, with a, half-decay time in air of 10 minutes., In the overall nitrogen reduction reaction (see Figure, 12.12), ferredoxin serves as an electron donor to the Fe protein, which in turn hydrolyzes ATP and reduces the MoFe, protein. The MoFe protein then can reduce numerous substrates (Table 12.4), although under natural conditions it, reacts only with N2 and H+. One of the reactions catalyzed, by nitrogenase, the reduction of acetylene to ethylene, is, used in estimating nitrogenase activity (see Web Topic 12.2)., The energetics of nitrogen fixation is complex. The production of NH3 from N2 and H2 is an exergonic reaction
Page 297 :
272, , Chapter 12, , FIGURE 12.12 The reaction cat-, , Nitrogenase enzyme complex, , alyzed by nitrogenase. Ferredoxin, reduces the Fe protein. Binding, and hydrolysis of ATP to the Fe, protein is thought to cause a conformational change of the Fe protein that facilitates the redox reactions. The Fe protein reduces the, MoFe protein, and the MoFe protein reduces the N2. (After Dixon, and Wheeler 1986, and Buchanan, et al. 2000.), , Ferredoxinox, , Fered, , Fered, Feox, , Ferredoxinred, , 16 ATP, , (see Chapter 2 on the website for a discussion of exergonic, reactions), with a ∆G0′ (change in free energy) of –27 kJ, mol–1. However, industrial production of NH3 from N2 and, H2 is endergonic, requiring a very large energy input, because of the activation energy needed to break the triple, bond in N2. For the same reason, the enzymatic reduction, of N2 by nitrogenase also requires a large investment of, energy (see Equation 12.9), although the exact changes in, free energy are not yet known., Calculations based on the carbohydrate metabolism of, legumes show that a plant consumes 12 g of organic carbon per gram of N2 fixed (Heytler et al. 1984). On the basis, of Equation 12.9, the ∆G0′ for the overall reaction of biological nitrogen fixation is about –200 kJ mol–1. Because the, overall reaction is highly exergonic, ammonium production is limited by the slow operation (number of N2 molecules reduced per unit time) of the nitrogenase complex, (Ludwig and de Vries 1986)., Under natural conditions, substantial amounts of H+ are, reduced to H2 gas, and this process can compete with N2, reduction for electrons from nitrogenase. In rhizobia, 30 to, 60% of the energy supplied to nitrogenase may be lost as, H2, diminishing the efficiency of nitrogen fixation. Some, rhizobia, however, contain hydrogenase, an enzyme that, can split the H2 formed and generate electrons for N2, , TABLE 12.4, Reactions catalyzed by nitrogenase, N2 → NH3, N2O → N2 + H2O, N3- →N2 + NH3, C2H2 → C2H4, 2 H + → H2, ATP → ADP + Pi, Source: After Burris 1976., , MoFe protein, , Fe protein, , Molecular nitrogen fixation, Nitrous oxide reduction, Azide reduction, Acetylene reduction, H2 production, ATP hydrolytic activity, , MoFeox, , Products, 2 NH3, H2, , MoFered, , Substrate, N2, 8 H+, , MoFeox, , 16 ADP, +, 16 Pi, , reduction, thus improving the efficiency of nitrogen fixation (Marschner 1995)., , Amides and Ureides Are the Transported, Forms of Nitrogen, The symbiotic nitrogen-fixing prokaryotes release ammonia that, to avoid toxicity, must be rapidly converted into, organic forms in the root nodules before being transported, to the shoot via the xylem. Nitrogen-fixing legumes can be, divided into amide exporters or ureide exporters on the, basis of the composition of the xylem sap. Amides (principally the amino acids asparagine or glutamine) are exported, by temperate-region legumes, such as pea (Pisum), clover, (Trifolium), broad bean (Vicia), and lentil (Lens)., Ureides are exported by legumes of tropical origin, such, as soybean (Glycine), kidney bean (Phaseolus), peanut, (Arachis), and southern pea (Vigna). The three major ureides are allantoin, allantoic acid, and citrulline (Figure, 12.13). Allantoin is synthesized in peroxisomes from uric, acid, and allantoic acid is synthesized from allantoin in the, endoplasmic reticulum. The site of citrulline synthesis from, the amino acid ornithine has not yet been determined. All, three compounds are ultimately released into the xylem, and transported to the shoot, where they are rapidly catabolized to ammonium. This ammonium enters the assimilation pathway described earlier., , SULFUR ASSIMILATION, Sulfur is among the most versatile elements in living organisms (Hell 1997). Disulfide bridges in proteins play structural and regulatory roles (see Chapter 8). Sulfur participates in electron transport through iron–sulfur clusters (see, Chapters 7 and 11). The catalytic sites for several enzymes, and coenzymes, such as urease and coenzyme A, contain, sulfur. Secondary metabolites (compounds that are not, involved in primary pathways of growth and develop-
Page 298 :
Assimilation of Mineral Nutrients, , 273, , H, H2N, , C, , C, , O, H2N, , H, , N, , C, , N, , O, , H, , C, O, , Allantoic acid, , O, OH, , C, , NH H, C, , HN, C, , N, , H, , C, , NH2, , O, , H2N, , C, , H, , H, , N, , CH2CH2CH2C, , O, , COOH, , NH2, , O, , Allantoin, , Citrulline, , FIGURE 12.13 The major ureide compounds used to trans-, , port nitrogen from sites of fixation to sites where their, deamination will provide nitrogen for amino acid and, nucleoside synthesis., , ment) that contain sulfur range from the rhizobial Nod factors discussed in the previous section to antiseptic alliin in, garlic and anticarcinogen sulforaphane in broccoli., The versatility of sulfur derives in part from the property that it shares with nitrogen: multiple stable oxidation, states. In this section we discuss the enzymatic steps that, mediate sulfur assimilation, and the biochemical reactions, that catalyze the reduction of sulfate into the two sulfurcontaining amino acids, cysteine and methionine., , Sulfate Is the Absorbed Form of Sulfur in Plants, Most of the sulfur in higher-plant cells derives from sulfate, (SO42–) absorbed via an H+–SO42– symporter (see Chapter, 6) from the soil solution. Sulfate in the soil comes predominantly from the weathering of parent rock material. Industrialization, however, adds an additional source of sulfate:, atmospheric pollution. The burning of fossil fuels releases, several gaseous forms of sulfur, including sulfur dioxide, (SO2) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which find their way to, the soil in rain., When dissolved in water, SO2 is hydrolyzed to become, sulfuric acid (H2SO4), a strong acid, which is the major, source of acid rain. Plants can also metabolize sulfur dioxide taken up in the gaseous form through their stomata., Nonetheless, prolonged exposure (more than 8 hours) to, high atmospheric concentrations (greater than 0.3 ppm) of, SO2 causes extensive tissue damage because of the formation of sulfuric acid., , Sulfate Assimilation Requires the Reduction of, Sulfate to Cysteine, The first step in the synthesis of sulfur-containing organic, compounds is the reduction of sulfate to the amino acid, cysteine (Figure 12.14). Sulfate is very stable and thus needs, to be activated before any subsequent reactions may proceed. Activation begins with the reaction between sulfate, and ATP to form 5′-adenylylsulfate (which is sometimes, referred to as adenosine-5′-phosphosulfate and thus is, abbreviated APS) and pyrophosphate (PPi) (see Figure, 12.14):, , SO42– + Mg-ATP → APS + PPi, , (12.10), , The enzyme that catalyzes this reaction, ATP sulfurylase, has two forms: The major one is found in plastids, and, a minor one is found in the cytoplasm (Leustek et al. 2000)., The activation reaction is energetically unfavorable. To, drive this reaction forward, the products APS and PPi must, be converted immediately to other compounds. PPi is, hydrolyzed to inorganic phosphate (Pi) by inorganic, pyrophosphatase according to the following reaction:, PPi + H2O → 2 Pi, , (12.11), , The other product, APS, is rapidly reduced or sulfated., Reduction is the dominant pathway (Leustek et al. 2000)., The reduction of APS is a multistep process that occurs, exclusively in the plastids. First, APS reductase transfers, two electrons apparently from reduced glutathione (GSH), to produce sulfite (SO32–):, APS + 2 GSH → SO32– + 2 H+ + GSSG + AMP, , (12.12), , where GSSG stands for oxidized glutathione. (The SH in, GSH and the SS in GSSG stand for S—H and S—S bonds,, respectively.), Second, sulfite reductase transfers six electrons from, ferredoxin (Fdred) to produce sulfide (S2–):, SO32– + 6 Fdred → S2– + 6 Fdox, , (12.13), , The resultant sulfide then reacts with O-acetylserine (OAS), to form cysteine and acetate. The O-acetylserine that reacts, with S2– is formed in a reaction catalyzed by serine acetyltransferase:, Serine + acetyl-CoA → OAS + CoA, , (12.14), , The reaction that produces cysteine and acetate is catalyzed, by OAS thiol-lyase:, OAS + S2– → cysteine + acetate, , (12.15), , The sulfation of APS, localized in the cytosol, is the alternative pathway. First, APS kinase catalyzes a reaction of, APS with ATP to form 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS)., APS + ATP → PAPS + ADP, , (12.16)
Page 300 :
Assimilation of Mineral Nutrients, , Methionine Is Synthesized from Cysteine, Methionine, the other sulfur-containing amino acid found, in proteins, is synthesized in plastids from cysteine (see, Web Topic 12.3 for further detail). After cysteine and, methionine are synthesized, sulfur can be incorporated into, proteins and a variety of other compounds, such as acetylCoA and S-adenosylmethionine. The latter compound is, important in the synthesis of ethylene (see Chapter 22) and, in reactions involving the transfer of methyl groups, as in, lignin synthesis (see Chapter 13)., , PHOSPHATE ASSIMILATION, Phosphate (HPO42–) in the soil solution is readily absorbed, by plant roots via an H+–HPO42– symporter (see Chapter 6), and incorporated into a variety of organic compounds,, including sugar phosphates, phospholipids, and nucleotides., The main entry point of phosphate into assimilatory pathways occurs during the formation of ATP, the energy “currency” of the cell. In the overall reaction for this process, inorganic phosphate is added to the second phosphate group in, adenosine diphosphate to form a phosphate ester bond., In mitochondria, the energy for ATP synthesis derives, from the oxidation of NADH by oxidative phosphorylation, (see Chapter 11). ATP synthesis is also driven by light-dependent photophosphorylation in the chloroplasts (see Chapter, 7). In addition to these reactions in mitochondria and chloroplasts, reactions in the cytosol also assimilate phosphate., Glycolysis incorporates inorganic phosphate into 1,3-bisphosphoglyceric acid, forming a high-energy acyl phosphate, group. This phosphate can be donated to ADP to form ATP, in a substrate-level phosphorylation reaction (see Chapter, 11). Once incorporated into ATP, the phosphate group may, be transferred via many different reactions to form the various phosphorylated compounds found in higher-plant cells., , CATION ASSIMILATION, Cations taken up by plant cells form complexes with, organic compounds in which the cation becomes bound to, the complex by noncovalent bonds (for a discussion of noncovalent bonds, see Chapter 2 on the web site). Plants, assimilate macronutrient cations such as potassium, magnesium, and calcium, as well as micronutrient cations such, as copper, iron, manganese, cobalt, sodium, and zinc, in, this manner. In this section we will describe coordination, bonds and electrostatic bonds, which mediate the assimilation of several cations that plants require as nutrients, and, the special requirements for the absorption of iron by roots, and subsequent assimilation of iron within plants., , Cations Form Noncovalent Bonds with Carbon, Compounds, The noncovalent bonds formed between cations and carbon compounds are of two types: coordination bonds and, , 275, , electrostatic bonds. In the formation of a coordination complex, several oxygen or nitrogen atoms of a carbon compound donate unshared electrons to form a bond with the, cation nutrient. As a result, the positive charge on the, cation is neutralized., Coordination bonds typically form between polyvalent, cations and carbon molecules—for example, complexes, between copper and tartaric acid (Figure 12.15A) or magnesium and chlorophyll a (Figure 12.15B). The nutrients, that are assimilated as coordination complexes include copper, zinc, iron, and magnesium. Calcium can also form, coordination complexes with the polygalacturonic acid of, cell walls (Figure 12.15C)., Electrostatic bonds form because of the attraction of a positively charged cation for a negatively charged group such, as carboxylate (—COO–) on a carbon compound. Unlike the, situation in coordination bonds, the cation in an electrostatic bond retains its positive charge. Monovalent cations such, as potassium (K+) can form electrostatic bonds with the carboxylic groups of many organic acids (Figure 12.16A)., Nonetheless, much of the potassium that is accumulated by, plant cells and functions in osmotic regulation and enzyme, activation remains in the cytosol and the vacuole as the free, ion. Divalent ions such as calcium form electrostatic bonds, with pectates (Figure 12.16B) and the carboxylic groups of, polygalacturonic acid (see Chapter 15)., In general, cations such as magnesium (Mg2+) and calcium (Ca2+) are assimilated by the formation of both coordination complexes and electrostatic bonds with amino, acids, phospholipids, and other negatively charged molecules., , Roots Modify the Rhizosphere to Acquire Iron, Iron is important in iron–sulfur proteins (see Chapter 7), and as a catalyst in enzyme-mediated redox reactions (see, Chapter 5), such as those of nitrogen metabolism discussed, earlier. Plants obtain iron from the soil, where it is present, primarily as ferric iron (Fe3+) in oxides such as Fe(OH)2+,, Fe(OH)3, and Fe(OH)4–. At neutral pH, ferric iron is highly, insoluble. To absorb sufficient amounts of iron from the soil, solution, roots have developed several mechanisms that, increase iron solubility and thus its availability. These, mechanisms include:, • Soil acidification that increases the solubility of ferric, iron., • Reduction of ferric iron to the more soluble ferrous, form (Fe2+)., • Release of compounds that form stable, soluble complexes with iron (Marschner 1995). Recall from, Chapter 5 that such compounds are called iron chelators (see Figure 5.2)., Roots generally acidify the soil around them. They, extrude protons during the absorption and assimilation of
Page 301 :
276, , Chapter 12, , (A), , (B), H2C, , COOH, HC, HC, , CH, , CH3, , COOH, , .., OH, .., .., OH, .., , +, , Cu, , .., OH, .., .. Cu, OH, .., , HC, , 2+, , HC, , COOH, , N, , N, Mg, , N, , COOH, , Tartaric acid, , C2H5, , CH3, , N, , CH3, , Copper–tartaric acid complex, , CH3, , CH2, CH2, , O, , C, , O, , OCH3, , H39C20OOC, , Chlorophyll a, , (C), H, H, .., , H, O, H, O, , HO, , CO2–, , .., , .., .., , H, , O, , O, .., , .., , .., , .., .., .., , O, , HO, , .., , .., , .., O, .., , O, , .., , HO, , Polygalacturonic acid chain, Calcium ions are held in, the spaces between two, polygalacturonic acid, chains., , Much of the calcium in, the cell wall is thought, to be bound in this, fashion., , H, , Ca, , H, , O, , H, , H, , H, , Polygalacturonic acid, , Coordination complexes form when oxygen or nitrogen, atoms of a carbon compound donate unshared electron, pairs (represented by dots) to form a bond with a cation., (A) Copper ions share electrons with the hydroxyl oxygens, of tartaric acid. (B) Magnesium ions share electrons with, nitrogen atoms in chlorophyll a. Dashed lines represent a, , coordination bond between unshared electrons from the, nitrogen atoms and the magnesium cation. (C) The “egg, box” model of the interaction of polygalacturonic acid, a, major constituent of pectins in cell walls, and calcium ions., At right is an enlargement of a single calcium ion forming a, coordination complex with the hydroxyl oxygens of the, galacturonic acid residues. (After Rees 1977.), , cations, particularly ammonium, and release organic acids, such as malic acid and citric acid that enhance iron and, phosphate availability (see Figure 5.4). Iron deficiencies, stimulate the extrusion of protons by roots. In addition,, plasma membranes in roots contain an enzyme, called ironchelating reductase, that reduces ferric iron to the ferrous, , form, with NADH or NADPH serving as the electron, donor. The activity of this enzyme increases under iron, deprivation., Several compounds secreted by roots form stable, chelates with iron. Examples include malic acid, citric acid,, phenolics, and piscidic acid. Grasses produce a special class, , FIGURE 12.15 Examples of coordination complexes., , (A) Monovalent cation, , (B) Divalent cation, , COOH, , COO, , HCOH, CH2, COOH, , Malic acid, , –, , COO– K, , HCOH, 2H, , +, , Dissociation of H+, , HCOH, , CH2, COO, , +, , 2K, –, , Malate, , +, , O, , FIGURE 12.16 Examples of electrostatic (ionic) complexes. (A) The mono-, , valent cation K+ and malate form the complex potassium malate. (B) The, divalent cation Ca2+ and pectate form the complex calcium pectate., Divalent cations can form cross-links between parallel strands that contain, negatively charged carboxyl groups. Calcium cross-links play a structural, role in the cell walls., , –, , O, , Ca2+, , COO– K+, , Potassium malate, , C, O–, , CH2, , Complex formation, , O, , C, , O, , O, , C, , C, O–, , –, , O, , Ca2+, , Calcium pectate
Page 302 :
Assimilation of Mineral Nutrients, of iron chelators called phytosiderophores. Phytosiderophores, are made of amino acids that are not found in proteins, such, as mugineic acid, and form highly stable complexes with, Fe3+. Root cells of grasses have Fe3+–phytosiderophore, transport systems in their plasma membrane that bring the, chelate into the cytoplasm. Under iron deficiency, grass, roots release more phytosiderophores into the soil and, increase the capacity of their Fe3+–phytosiderophore transport system., , 277, , level of free iron in plant cells regulates the de novo biosynthesis of phytoferritin (Lobreaux et al. 1992)., , OXYGEN ASSIMILATION, , Respiration accounts for the bulk (about 90%) of the oxygen (O2) assimilated by plant cells (see Chapter 11)., Another major pathway for the assimilation of O2 into, organic compounds involves the incorporation of O2 from, water (see reaction 1 in Table 8.1). A small proportion of, Iron Forms Complexes with Carbon, oxygen can be directly assimilated into organic compounds, and Phosphate, in the process of oxygen fixation., Once the roots absorb iron or an iron chelate, they oxidize, In oxygen fixation, molecular oxygen is added directly, it to a ferric form and translocate much of it to the leaves as, to an organic compound in reactions carried out by, an electrostatic complex with citrate., enzymes known as oxygenases. Recall from Chapter 8 that, oxygen is directly incorporated into an organic compound, Most of the iron in the plant is found in the heme moleduring photorespiration in a reaction that involves the oxycule of cytochromes within the chloroplasts and mitogenase activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxychondria (see Chapter 7). An important assimilatory reaclase/oxygenase (rubisco), the enzyme of CO2 fixation, tion for iron is its insertion into the porphyrin precursor, (Ogren 1984). The first stable product that contains oxygen, of heme. This reaction is catalyzed by the enzyme, originating from molecular oxygen is 2-phosphoglycolate., ferrochelatase (Figure 12.17) (Jones 1983). In addition,, In general, oxygenases are classified as dioxygenases or, iron–sulfur proteins of the electron transport chain (see, monooxygenases, according to the number of atoms of, Chapter 7) contain nonheme Fe covalently bound to the, oxygen that are transferred to a carbon compound in the, sulfur atoms of cysteine residues in the apoprotein. Iron is, catalyzed reaction. In dioxygenase reactions, both oxygen, also found in Fe2S2 centers, which contain two irons (each, complexed with the sulfur atoms of cysteine residues) and, atoms are incorporated into one or two carbon compounds, two inorganic sulfides., (Figure 12.18A and B). Examples of dioxygenases in plant, Free iron (iron that is not complexed with carbon comcells are lipoxygenase, which catalyzes the addition of two, pounds) may interact with oxygen to form superoxide, atoms of oxygen to unsaturated fatty acids (see Figure, anions (O2–), which can damage membranes by degrading, 12.18A), and prolyl hydroxylase, the enzyme that converts, unsaturated lipid components. Plant cells may limit such, proline to the less common amino acid hydroxyproline (see, damage by storing surplus iron in an iron–protein complex, Figure 12.18B)., called phytoferritin (Bienfait and Van der Mark 1983)., Hydroxyproline is an important component of the cell, Phytoferritin consists of a protein shell with 24 identical, wall protein extensin (see Chapter 15). The synthesis of, subunits forming a hollow sphere that has a molecular mass, hydroxyproline from proline differs from the synthesis of, of about 480 kDa. Within this sphere is a core of 5400 to 6200, all other amino acids in that the reaction occurs after the, iron atoms present as a ferric oxide–phosphate complex., proline has been incorporated into protein and is therefore, How iron is released from phytoferritin is uncertain, but, a posttranslational modification reaction. Prolyl hydroxybreakdown of the protein shell appears to be involved. The, lase is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, suggesting, that most proteins containing hydroxyproline are found in the secretory pathway., Monooxygenases add one of the atoms, in molecular oxygen to a carbon compound; the other oxygen atom is converted, N, N, N, N, into water. Monooxygenases are someFerrochelatase, + Fe2+, times referred to as mixed-function oxidases, Fe, because of their ability to catalyze simultaN, N, N, N, neously both the oxygenation reaction and, the oxidase reaction (reduction of oxygen, to water). The monooxygenase reaction, Porphyrin ring, also requires a reduced substrate (NADH, or NADPH) as an electron donor, accordFIGURE 12.17 The ferrochelatase reaction. The enzyme ferrochelatase cating to the following equation:, alyzes the insertion of iron into the porphyrin ring to form a coordination, complex. See Figure 7.37 for illustration of the biosynthesis of the porphyrin, ring., , A + O2 + BH2 → AO + H2O + B
Page 303 :
278, , Chapter 12, , (A) Dioxygenase reaction, H, C, , H, , H, , H, , C, , C, , C, , R1, , H, H, , H, , Lipoxygenase, , C, , C, , C, R2, , H, , R1, , O2, , H, C, , C, , CH, , cis, , R2, , trans, , O, , Fatty acid, , O, H, , The dioxygenase lipoxygenase, catalyzes the addition of two, atoms of oxygen to the, conjugated fatty acid to form, a hydroperoxide with a pair of, cis–trans conjugated double, bonds. The hydroxy peroxy, fatty acid may then be, enzymatically converted to, hydroxy fatty acids and other, metabolites., , (B) Dioxygenase reaction, COOH, , O, R1, O2 +, , C, H, H, , C, H, , C, , H, H, , N, , R2 +, , O, , CH2, , 4, , H, , Prolyl hydroxylase, Fe2+, ascorbate, , R1, , C, H, H, , CH2, , H, , Proline, (in polypeptide), , COOH, , O, C, OH, , COOH, , H, , N, , R2, , +, , CH2 + CO2, , 4, , H, , a-Ketoglutarate, , CH2, , H, , COOH, , H, , 4-trans-L-Hydroxyproline Succinate, (in polypeptide), , (C) Monooxygenase reaction, COOH, , COOH, , CH, CH, , CH, +, , O2, , +, , NADPH + H, , +, , Cytochrome P450, , CH, , Cinnamic acid, , +, , H2O +, , NADP+, , The dioxygenase prolyl, hydroxylase catalyzes the, addition of one oxygen from, O2 to proline in a polypeptide, chain to produce, hydroxyproline, and the, addition of one oxygen to αketoglutarate to produce, succinate and CO2., , The monooxygenase, cytochrome P450 uses one, oxygen from O2 to, hydroxylate cinnamic acid, (and other substrates) and the, other oxygen to produce, water. NAD(P)H serves as the, electron donor for, monooxygenase reactions., , OH, , p-Coumaric acid, , FIGURE 12.18 Examples of the two types of oxygenase reactions in cells of higher plants., , where A represents an organic compound and B represents, the electron donor., An important monooxygenase in plants is the family of, heme proteins collectively called cytochrome P450, which, catalyzes the hydroxylation of cinnamic acid to p-coumaric, acid (Figure 12.18C). In monooxygenases, the oxygen is, first activated by being combined with the iron atom of the, heme group; NADPH serves as the electron donor. The, mixed-function oxidase system is localized on the endoplasmic reticulum and is capable of oxidizing a variety of, substrates, including mono- and diterpenes and fatty acids., , THE ENERGETICS OF NUTRIENT, ASSIMILATION, Nutrient assimilation generally requires large amounts of, energy to convert stable, low-energy inorganic compounds, into high-energy organic compounds. For example, the, reduction of nitrate to nitrite and then to ammonium, requires the transfer of about ten electrons and accounts for, about 25% of the total energy expenditures in both roots and, shoots (Bloom 1997). Consequently, a plant may use one-, , fourth of its energy to assimilate nitrogen, a constituent that, accounts for less than 2% of the total dry weight of the plant., Many of these assimilatory reactions occur in the stroma, of the chloroplast, where they have ready access to powerful reducing agents such as NADPH, thioredoxin, and, ferredoxin generated during photosynthetic electron transport. This process—coupling nutrient assimilation to photosynthetic electron transport—is called photoassimilation, (Figure 12.19)., Photoassimilation and the Calvin cycle occur in the, same compartment but only when photosynthetic electron, transport generates reductant in excess of the needs of the, Calvin cycle (e.g., under conditions of high light and low, CO2), does photoassimilation proceed (Robinson 1988)., High levels of CO2 inhibit photoassimilation (Figure 12.20, see Web Essay 12.1). As a result, C4 plants (see Chapter 8), conduct the majority of their photoassimilation in mesophyll cells, where the CO2 concentrations are lower, (Becker et al. 1993)., The mechanisms that regulate the partitioning of reductant between the Calvin cycle and photoassimilation warrant investigation because atmospheric levels of CO2 are
Page 304 :
Assimilation of Mineral Nutrients, , 279, , MESOPHYLL CELL, , CHLOROPLAST, ATP, , NO3–, , NRT, , 3 ATP, , NO3–, , H+, , NR, , NADH, , 7 ATP, , NO2–, H+, , NO2–, , NiR, , Fdred, , 2 ATP, , NH4+, , GS/, GOGAT, , 2 ATP, , Glutamate, , Asp-AT, Glutamate, Aspartate, , ATP, Fdred, , expected to double during the next century (see Chapter 9),, so this phenomenon may affect plant–nutrient relations., , SUMMARY, Nutrient assimilation is the process by which nutrients, acquired by plants are incorporated into the carbon constituents necessary for growth and development. These, processes often involve chemical reactions that are highly, energy intensive and thus may depend directly on reductant generated through photosynthesis., , FIGURE 12.20 The assimilatory quotient (AQ = CO2 assimilated/O2 evolved) of wheat seedlings as a function of light, level (photosynthetic active radiation). Nitrate photoassimilation is directly related to assimilatory quotient because, transfer of electrons to nitrate and nitrite during photoassimilation increases O2 evolution from the light-dependent, reactions of photosynthesis, while CO2 assimilation by the, light-independent reactions continues at similar rates., Therefore, plants that are photoassimilating nitrate exhibit, a lower AQ. In measurements carried out at ambient, 360, µmol mol–1 CO2 concentrations (red trace), the AQ, decreased as a function of incident radiation, indicating, that photoassimilation rates increased. At elevated (700, µmol mol–1 CO2, blue trace) the AQ remains constant at all, light levels used, indicating that the CO2-fixing reactions, are competing for reductant, and inhibit photoassimilation., (After Bloom et al. 2002.), , Other amino, acids, , tase (NiR) and this ammonium is converted into glutamate, via the sequential action of glutamine synthetase (GS) and, glutamate synthase (GOGAT). Once again in the cytoplasm,, the glutamate is transaminated to aspartate via aspartate, aminotransferase (Asp-AT). Finally, asparagine synthetase, (AS) converts aspartate into asparagine. The approximate, amounts of ATP equivalents are given above each reaction., , For nitrogen, assimilation is but one in a series of steps, that constitute the nitrogen cycle. The nitrogen cycle encompasses the various states of nitrogen in the biosphere and, their interconversions. The principal sources of nitrogen, available to plants are nitrate (NO3–) and ammonium (NH4+)., The nitrate absorbed by roots is assimilated in either, roots or shoots, depending on nitrate availability and plant, , 1.0, , CO2 assimilated/O2 evolved, , assimilation of mineral nitrogen in the leaf. Nitrate translocated from the roots through the xylem is absorbed by a, mesophyll cell via one of the nitrate–proton symporters, (NRT) into the cytoplasm. There it is reduced to nitrite via, nitrate reductase (NR). Nitrite is translocated into the, stroma of the chloroplast along with a proton. In the, stroma, nitrite is reduced to ammonium via nitrite reduc-, , Asparagine, , ATP, , Proteins,, nucleic acids, , FIGURE 12.19 Summary of the processes involved in the, , AS, , 0.8, , 0.6, Measurement conditions, 700 mmol mol–1 CO2, 360 mmol mol–1 CO2, 0.4, , 0, , 400, 800, 1200, 1600, Photosynthetic active radiation (mmol m–2s–1), , 2000
Page 305 :
280, , Chapter 12, , species. In nitrate assimilation, nitrate is reduced to nitrite, (NO2–) in the cytosol via the enzyme nitrate reductase; then, nitrite is reduced to ammonium in root plastids or chloroplasts via the enzyme nitrite reductase., Ammonium, derived either from root absorption or, generated through nitrate assimilation or photorespiration,, is converted to glutamine and glutamate through the, sequential actions of glutamine synthetase and glutamate, synthase, which are located in the cytosol and root plastids, or chloroplasts., Once assimilated into glutamine or glutamate, nitrogen, may be transferred to many other organic compounds, through various reactions, including the transamination, reactions. Interconversion between glutamine and, asparagine by asparagine synthetase balances carbon, metabolism and nitrogen metabolism within a plant., Many plants form a symbiotic relationship with nitrogen-fixing bacteria that contain an enzyme complex, nitrogenase, that can reduce atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia., Legumes and actinorhizal plants form associations with, rhizobia and Frankia, respectively. These associations result, from a finely tuned interaction between the symbiont and, host plant that involves the recognition of specific signals,, the induction of a specialized developmental program, within the plant, the uptake of the bacteria by the plant,, and the development of nodules, unique organs that house, the bacteria within plant cells. Some nitrogen-fixing, prokaryotic microorganisms do not form symbiotic relationships with higher plants but benefit plants by enriching the nitrogen content of the soil., Like nitrate, sulfate (SO42–) must be reduced by assimilation. In sulfate reduction, an activated form of sulfate, called 5′-adenylylsulfate (APS) forms. Sulfide (S2–), the end, product of sulfate reduction, does not accumulate in plant, cells, but is instead rapidly incorporated into the amino, acids cysteine and methionine., Phosphate (HPO42–) is present in a variety of compounds found in plant cells, including sugar phosphates,, lipids, nucleic acids, and free nucleotides. The initial product of its assimilation is ATP, which is produced by substrate-level phosphorylations in the cytosol, oxidative, phosphorylation in the mitochondria, and photophosphorylation in the chloroplasts., Whereas the assimilation of nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus requires the formation of covalent bonds with carbon compounds, many macro- and micronutrient cations, (e.g., K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Mn2+, Co2+, Na+, Zn2+), simply form complexes. These complexes may be held, together by electrostatic bonds or coordination bonds., Iron assimilation may involve chelation, oxidation–, reduction reactions, and the formation of complexes. In order, to store large amounts of iron, plant cells synthesize phytoferritin, an iron storage protein. An important function of iron, in plant cells is to act as a redox component in the active site, , f enzymes, often as an iron–porphyrin complex. Iron is, inserted into a porphyrin group in the ferrochelatase reaction., In addition to being utilized in respiration, molecular, oxygen can be assimilated in the process of oxygen fixation,, the direct addition of oxygen to organic compounds. This, process is catalyzed by enzymes known as oxygenases,, which are classified as monooxygenases or dioxygenases., Nutrient assimilation requires large amounts of energy, to convert stable, low-energy, inorganic compounds into, high-energy organic compounds. A plant may use onefourth of its energy to assimilate nitrogen. Plants use, energy from photosynthesis to assimilate inorganic compounds in a process called photoassimilation., , Web Material, Web Topics, 12.1 Development of a Root Nodule, Nodule primordia form opposite to the protoxylem poles of the root vascular bundles., , 12.2 Measurement of Nitrogen Fixation, Acetylene reduction is used as an indirect, measurement of nitrogen reduction., , 12.3 The Synthesis of Methionine, Methionine is synthesized in plastids from, cysteine., , Web Essay, 12.1 Elevated CO2 and Nitrogen Photoassimilation, In leaves grown under high CO2 concentrations,, CO2 inhibits nitrogen photoassimilation because it competes for reductant., , Chapter References, Becker, T. W., Perrot-Rechenmann, C., Suzuki, A., and Hirel, B. (1993), Subcellular and immunocytochemical localization of the, enzymes involved in ammonia assimilation in mesophyll and, bundle-sheath cells of maize leaves. Planta 191: 129–136., Bergmann, L., and Rennenberg, H. (1993) Glutathione metabolism, in plants. In Sulfur Nutrition and Assimilation in Higher Plants. Regulatory, Agricultural and Environmental Aspects, L. J. De Kok, I., Stulen, H. Rennenberg, C. Brunold, and W. E. Rauser, eds., SPB, Acad. Pub., The Hague, Netherlands, pp. 109–123., Bienfait, H. F., and Van der Mark, F. (1983) Phytoferritin and its role, in iron metabolism. In Metals and Micronutrients: Uptake and Utilization by Plants, D. A. Robb and W. S. Pierpoint, eds., Academic, Press, New York, pp. 111–123., Bloom, A. J. (1997) Nitrogen as a limiting factor: Crop acquisition of, ammonium and nitrate. In Ecology in Agriculture, L. E. Jackson,, ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 145–172., Bloom, A. J., Smart, D. R., Nguyen, D. T., and Searles, P. S. (2002), Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 1730–1735.
Page 306 :
Assimilation of Mineral Nutrients, Bloom, A. J., Sukrapanna, S. S., and Warner, R. L. (1992) Root respiration associated with ammonium and nitrate absorption and, assimilation by barley. Plant Physiol. 99: 1294–1301., Buchanan, B., Gruissem, W., and Jones, R., eds. (2000) Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology of Plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists. Rockville, MD., Burris, R. H. (1976) Nitrogen fixation. In Plant Biochemistry, 3rd ed.,, J. Bonner and J. Varner, eds., Academic Press, New York, pp., 887–908., Campbell, W. H. (1999) Nitrate reductase structure, function and regulation: Bridging the gap between biochemistry and physiology., Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 277–303., Carlson, R. W., Forsberg, L. S., Price, N. P. J., Bhat, U. R., Kelly, T. M.,, and Raetz, C. R. H. (1995) The structure and biosynthesis of Rhizobium leguminosarum lipid A. In Progress in Clinical and Biological, Research, Vol. 392: Bacterial Endotoxins: Lipopolysaccharides from, Genes to Therapy: Proceedings of the Third Conference of the International Endotoxin Society, held in Helsinki, Finland, on August 15-18,, 1994, J. Levin et al., eds., John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp., 25–31., Denison, R. F., and Harter, B. L. (1995) Nitrate effects on nodule, oxygen permeability and leghemoglobin. Plant Physiol. 107:, 1355–1364., Dixon, R. O. D., and Wheeler, C. T. (1986) Nitrogen Fixation in Plants., Chapman and Hall, New York., Dong, Z., Canny, M. J., McCully, M. E., Roboredo, M. R., Cabadilla,, C. F., Ortega, E., and Rodes, R. (1994) A nitrogen-fixing endophyte of sugarcane stems: A new role for the apoplast. Plant Physiol. 105: 1139–1147., Etzler, M. E., Kalsi, G., Ewing, N. N., Roberts, N. J., Day, R. B., and, Murphy, J. B. (1999) A nod factor binding lectin with apyrase, activity from legume roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5856–, 5861., FAOSTAT. (2001) Agricultural Data. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome., Heidstra, R., and Bisseling, T. (1996) Nod factor-induced host, responses and mechanisms of Nod factor perception. New Phytol. 133: 25–43., Hell, R. (1997) Molecular physiology of plant sulfur metabolism., Planta 202: 138–148., Heytler, P. G., Reddy, G. S., and Hardy, R. W. F. (1984) In vivo energetics of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in soybeans. In Nitrogen Fixation and CO2 Metabolism, P. W. Ludden and I. E. Burris, eds., Elsevier, New York, pp. 283–292., Jones, O. T. G. (1983) Ferrochelatase. In Metals and Micronutrients:, Uptake and Utilization by Plants, D. A. Robb and W. S. Pierpoint,, eds., Academic Press, New York, pp. 125–144., Kaiser, W. M., Weiner, H., and Huber, S. C. (1999) Nitrate reductase, in higher plants: A case study for transduction of environmental, stimuli into control of catalytic activity. Physiol. Plant. 105: 385–390., Kleinhofs, A., Warner, R. L., Lawrence, J. M., Melzer, J. M., Jeter, J. M.,, and Kudrna, D. A. (1989) Molecular genetics of nitrate reductase, in barley. In Molecular and Genetic Aspects of Nitrate Assimilation,, J. L. Wray and J. R. Kinghorn, eds., Oxford Science, New York,, pp. 197–211., Kuzma, M. M., Hunt, S., and Layzell, D. B. (1993) Role of oxygen in, the limitation and inhibition of nitrogenase activity and respiration rate in individual soybean nodules. Plant Physiol. 101:, 161–169., Lam, H.-M., Coschigano, K. T., Oliveira, I. C., Melo-Oliveira, R., and, Coruzzi, G. M. (1996) The molecular-genetics of nitrogen assimilation into amino acids in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiology Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 569–593., Lazarowitz, S. G., and Bisseling, T. (1997) Plant development from, the cellular perspective: Integrating the signals (Cellular Integration of Signaling Pathways in Plant Development, Acquafredda, de Maratea, Italy, May 20–30, 1997). Plant Cell 9: 1884–1900., , 281, , Lea, P. J., Blackwell, R. D., and Joy, K. W. (1992) Ammonia assimilation in higher plants. In Nitrogen Metabolism of Plants (Proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe 33), K. Mengel and, D. J. Pilbeam, eds., Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 153–186., Leustek, T., and Saito, K. (1999) Sulfate transport and assimilation in, plants. Plant Physiol. 120: 637–643., Leustek, T., Martin, M. N., Bick, J.-A., and Davies, J. P. (2000) Pathways and regulation of sulfur metabolism revealed through molecular and genetic studies. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol., Biol. 51: 141–165., Lobreaux, S., Massenet, O., and Briat, J. -F. (1992) Iron induces ferritin synthesis in maize plantlets. Plant Mol. Biol. 19: 563–575., Ludwig, R. A., and de Vries, G. E. (1986) Biochemical physiology of, Rhizobium dinitrogen fixation. In Nitrogen Fixation, Vol. 4: Molecular Biology, W. I. Broughton and S. Puhler, eds., Clarendon,, Oxford, pp. 50–69., Marschner, H. (1995) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London., Mendel, R. R., and Stallmeyer, B. (1995) Molybdenum cofactor, (nitrate reductase) biosynthesis in plants: First molecular analysis. In Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, Vol., 22: Current Issues in Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology: Proceedings of the VIIIth International Congress on Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, Florence, Italy, 12–17 June, 1994, M. Terzi, R. Cella and A., Falavigna, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 577–582., Mylona, P., Pawlowski, K., and Bisseling, T. (1995) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Plant Cell 7: 869–885., Oaks, A. (1994) Primary nitrogen assimilation in higher plants and, its regulation. Can. J. Bot. 72: 739–750., Ogren, W. L. (1984) Photorespiration: Pathways, regulation, and, modification. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35: 415–442., Pate, J. S. (1983) Patterns of nitrogen metabolism in higher plants and, their ecological significance. In Nitrogen as an Ecological Factor: The, 22nd Symposium of the British Ecological Society, Oxford 1981, J. A., Lee, S. McNeill, and I. H. Rorison, eds., Blackwell, Boston, pp., 225–255., Pate, J. S., and Layzell, D. B. (1990) Energetics and biological costs of, nitrogen assimilation. In The Biochemistry of Plants, Vol. 16: Intermediary Nitrogen Metabolism, B. J. Miflin and P. J. Lea, eds., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 1–42., Phillips, D. A., and Kapulnik, Y. (1995) Plant isoflavonoids, pathogens and symbionts. Trends Microbiol. 3: 58–64., Rees, D. A. (1977) Polysaccharide Shapes. Chapman and Hall, London., Reis, V. M., Baldani, J. I., Baldani, V. L. D., and Dobereiner, J. (2000), Biological dinitrogen fixation in Gramineae and palm trees. Crit., Rev. Plant Sci. 19: 227–247., Robinson, J. M. (1988) Spinach leaf chloroplast carbon dioxide and, nitrite photoassimilations do not compete for photogenerated, reductant: Manipulation of reductant levels by quantum flux, density titrations. Plant Physiol. 88: 1373–1380., Rolfe, B. G., and Gresshoff, P. M. (1988) Genetic analysis of legume, nodule initiation. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 39:, 297–320., Schlesinger, W. H. (1997) Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global, Change, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA., Siegel, L. M., and Wilkerson, J. Q. (1989) Structure and function of, spinach ferredoxin-nitrite reductase. In Molecular and Genetic, Aspects of Nitrate Assimilation, J. L. Wray and J. R. Kinghorn, eds.,, Oxford Science, Oxford, pp. 263–283., Sivasankar, S., and Oaks, A. (1996) Nitrate assimilation in higher, plants—The effect of metabolites and light. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 34: 609–620., Stokkermans, T. J. W., Ikeshita, S., Cohn, J., Carlson, R. W., Stacey, G.,, Ogawa, T., and Peters, N. K. (1995) Structural requirements of, synthetic and natural product lipo-chitin oligosaccharides for, induction of nodule primordia on Glycine soja. Plant Physiol. 108:, 1587–1595.
Page 307 :
282, , Chapter 12, , Timmers, A. C. J., Auriac, M. –C., and Truchet, G. (1999) Refined, analysis of early symbiotic steps of the Rhizobium-Medicago:, Interaction in relation with microtubular cytoskeleton rearrangements. Development 126: 3617-3628, Vande Broek, A., and Vanderleyden, J. (1995) Review: Genetics of the, Azospirillum-plant root association. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 14:, 445–466., , van Rhijn, P., Goldberg, R. B., and Hirsch, A. M. (1998) Lotus corniculatus nodulation specificity is changed by the presence of a soybean lectin gene. Plant Cell 10: 1233–1249., Warner, R. L., and Kleinhofs, A. (1992) Genetics and molecular biology, of nitrate metabolism in higher plants. Physiol. Plant. 85: 245–252., Wray, J. L. (1993) Molecular biology, genetics and regulation of nitrite, reduction in higher plants. Physiol. Plant. 89: 607–612.
Page 308 :
Chapter, , 13, , Secondary Metabolites and, Plant Defense, , IN NATURAL HABITATS, plants are surrounded by an enormous number of potential enemies. Nearly all ecosystems contain a wide variety, of bacteria, viruses, fungi, nematodes, mites, insects, mammals, and, other herbivorous animals. By their nature, plants cannot avoid these, herbivores and pathogens simply by moving away; they must protect, themselves in other ways., The cuticle (a waxy outer layer) and the periderm (secondary protective tissue), besides retarding water loss, provide barriers to bacterial, and fungal entry. In addition, a group of plant compounds known as, secondary metabolites defend plants against a variety of herbivores and, pathogenic microbes. Secondary compounds may serve other important, functions as well, such as structural support, as in the case of lignin, or, pigments, as in the case of the anthocyanins., In this chapter we will discuss some of the mechanisms by which, plants protect themselves against both herbivory and pathogenic organisms. We will begin with a discussion of the three classes of compounds, that provide surface protection to the plant: cutin, suberin, and waxes., Next we will describe the structures and biosynthetic pathways for the, three major classes of secondary metabolites: terpenes, phenolics, and, nitrogen-containing compounds. Finally, we will examine specific plant, responses to pathogen attack, the genetic control of host–pathogen interactions, and cell signaling processes associated with infection., , CUTIN, WAXES, AND SUBERIN, All plant parts exposed to the atmosphere are coated with layers of lipid, material that reduce water loss and help block the entry of pathogenic, fungi and bacteria. The principal types of coatings are cutin, suberin, and, waxes. Cutin is found on most aboveground parts; suberin is present on, underground parts, woody stems, and healed wounds. Waxes are associated with both cutin and suberin.
Page 309 :
284, , Chapter 13, , Cutin, Waxes, and Suberin Are Made Up of, Hydrophobic Compounds, Cutin is a macromolecule, a polymer consisting of many, long-chain fatty acids that are attached to each other by, ester linkages, creating a rigid three-dimensional network. Cutin is formed from 16:0 and 18:1 fatty acids1, with hydroxyl or epoxide groups situated either in the, middle of the chain or at the end opposite the carboxylic, acid function (Figure 13.1A)., Cutin is a principal constituent of the cuticle, a multilayered secreted structure that coats the outer cell walls, of the epidermis on the aerial parts of all herbaceous plants (Figure 13.2). The cuticle is composed of a top coating of wax, a thick middle, Epidermal, cell, layer containing cutin embedded in wax (the, cuticle proper), and a lower layer formed of, cutin and wax blended with the cell wall substances pectin, cellulose, and other carbohydrates (the, cuticular layer). Recent research suggests that, in addition to cutin, the cuticle may contain a second lipid polymer, made up of long-chain hydrocarbons, that has been, named cutan (Jeffree 1996)., Waxes are not macromolecules, but complex mixtures of, long-chain acyl lipids that are extremely hydrophobic. The, most common components of wax are straight-chain alkanes and alcohols of 25 to 35 carbon atoms (see Figure 13.1B)., Long-chain aldehydes, ketones, esters, and free fatty acids, are also found. The waxes of the cuticle are synthesized by, , (A) Hydroxy fatty acids that polymerize to make cutin:, , (A), , Surface wax, Cuticle proper, (cutin embedded, in wax), Cuticular layer, (cutin, wax, and, carbohydrates), Cell wall, Middle lamella, Plasma membrane, Tonoplast, , Vacuole, , (B), , Cuticle, Cuticular, layer, Primary, cell wall, , Plasma, membrane, , HOCH2(CH2)14COOH, CH3(CH2)8CH(CH2)5COOH, OH, (B) Common wax components:, Straight-chain alkanes, , CH3(CH2)27CH3, , FIGURE 13.2 (A) Schematic drawing of the structure of the, plant cuticle, the protective covering on the epidermis of, leaves and young stems at the stage of full leaf expansion., (B) Electron micrograph of the cuticle of a glandular cell, from a young leaf (Lamium sp.), showing the presence of, the cuticle layers indicated in A, except for surface waxes,, which are not visible. (51,000×) (A, after Jeffree 1996; B,, from Gunning and Steer 1996.), , CH3(CH2)29CH3, O, Fatty acid ester, , CH3(CH2)22C — O(CH2)25CH3, , Long-chain fatty acid, , CH3(CH2)22COOH, , Long-chain alcohol, , CH3(CH2)24CH2OH, , (C) Hydroxy fatty acids that polymerize along with other, constituents to make suberin:, HOCH2(CH2)14COOH, , epidermal cells. They leave the epidermal cells as droplets, that pass through pores in the cell wall by an unknown, mechanism. The top coating of cuticle wax often crystallizes, in an intricate pattern of rods, tubes, or plates (Figure 13.3)., Suberin is a polymer whose structure is very poorly, understood. Like cutin, suberin is formed from hydroxy or, epoxy fatty acids joined by ester linkages. However, suberin, differs from cutin in that it has dicarboxylic acids (see Figure 13.1C), more long-chain components, and a significant, proportion of phenolic compounds as part of its structure., , HOOC(CH2)14COOH (a dicarboxylic acid), , FIGURE 13.1 Constituents of (A) cutin, (B) waxes, and, , (C) suberin., , 1 Recall from Chapter 11 that the nomenclature for fatty, acids is X:Y, where X is the number of carbon atoms and Y, is the number of cis double bonds.
Page 310 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, , 285, , FIGURE 13.3 Surface wax, deposits, which form the top, layer of the cuticle, adopt different forms. These scanning, electron micrographs show the, leaf surfaces of two different, lines of Brassica oleracea, which, differ in wax crystal structure., (From Eigenbrode et al. 1991,, courtesy of S. D. Eigenbrode,, with permission from the, Entomological Society of, America.), , 10 mm, , Suberin is a cell wall constituent found in many locations throughout the plant. We have already noted its presence in the Casparian strip of the root endodermis, which, forms a barrier between the apoplast of the cortex and the, stele (see Chapter 4). Suberin is a principal component of, the outer cell walls of all underground organs and is associated with the cork cells of the periderm, the tissue that, forms the outer bark of stems and roots during secondary, growth of woody plants. Suberin also forms at sites of leaf, abscission and in areas damaged by disease or wounding., , Cutin, Waxes, and Suberin Help Reduce, Transpiration and Pathogen Invasion, Cutin, suberin, and their associated waxes form barriers, between the plant and its environment that function to keep, water in and pathogens out. The cuticle is very effective at, limiting water loss from aerial parts of the plant but does not, block transpiration completely because even with the stomata closed, some water is lost. The thickness of the cuticle, varies with environmental conditions. Plant species native, to arid areas typically have thicker cuticles than plants from, moist habitats have, but plants from moist habitats often, develop thick cuticles when grown under dry conditions., The cuticle and suberized tissue are both important in, excluding fungi and bacteria, although they do not appear, to be as important in pathogen resistance as some of the, other defenses we will discuss in this chapter. Many fungi, penetrate directly through the plant surface by mechanical, means. Others produce cutinase, an enzyme that hydrolyzes, cutin and thus facilitates entry into the plant., , SECONDARY METABOLITES, Plants produce a large, diverse array of organic compounds, that appear to have no direct function in growth and development. These substances are known as secondary, metabolites, secondary products, or natural products. Secondary metabolites have no generally recognized, direct, roles in the processes of photosynthesis, respiration, solute, transport, translocation, protein synthesis, nutrient assimilation, differentiation, or the formation of carbohydrates,, proteins, and lipids discussed elsewhere in this book., Secondary metabolites also differ from primary metabolites (amino acids, nucleotides, sugars, acyl lipids) in having a restricted distribution in the plant kingdom. That is,, particular secondary metabolites are often found in only, one plant species or related group of species, whereas primary metabolites are found throughout the plant kingdom., , Secondary Metabolites Defend Plants against, Herbivores and Pathogens, For many years the adaptive significance of most plant secondary metabolites was unknown. These compounds were, thought to be simply functionless end products of metabolism, or metabolic wastes. Study of these substances was, pioneered by organic chemists of the nineteenth and early, twentieth centuries who were interested in these substances because of their importance as medicinal drugs,, poisons, flavors, and industrial materials., More recently, many secondary metabolites have been, suggested to have important ecological functions in plants:
Page 311 :
286, , Chapter 13, , • They protect plants against being eaten by herbivores, (herbivory) and against being infected by microbial, pathogens., , As long as these compounds were not unduly toxic to, the plants themselves and the metabolic cost of producing, them was not excessive, they gave the plants that possessed them greater reproductive fitness than undefended, plants had. Thus the defended plants left more descendants than undefended plants, and they passed their defensive traits on to the next generation., Interestingly, the very defense compounds that increase, the reproductive fitness of plants by warding off fungi, bacteria, and herbivores may also make them undesirable as, food for humans. Many important crop plants have been, artificially selected for producing relatively low levels of, these compounds, which of course can make them more, susceptible to insects and disease., , • They serve as attractants for pollinators and seeddispersing animals and as agents of plant–plant, competition., In the remainder of this chapter we will discuss the major, types of plant secondary metabolites, their biosynthesis,, and what is known about their functions in the plant, particularly their roles in defense., , Plant Defenses Are a Product of Evolution, We can begin by asking how plants came to have defenses., According to evolutionary biologists, plant defenses must, have arisen through heritable mutations, natural selection,, and evolutionary change. Random mutations in basic, metabolic pathways led to the appearance of new compounds that happened to be toxic or deterrent to herbivores and pathogenic microbes., , Secondary Metabolites Are Divided into, Three Major Groups, Plant secondary metabolites can be divided into three, chemically distinct groups: terpenes, phenolics, and nitrogen-containing compounds. Figure 13.4 shows in simpli-, , CO2, Photosynthesis, PRIMARY CARBON METABOLISM, Erythrose-4-phosphate, Phosphoenolpyruvate, , Tricarboxylic, acid cycle, , 3-Phosphoglycerate, (3-PGA), , Pyruvate, , Acetyl CoA, , Aliphatic, amino acids, , Malonic, acid pathway, , Shikimic acid, pathway, , Mevalonic, acid pathway, , MEP pathway, , Aromatic, amino acids, Nitrogen-containing, secondary products, , Phenolic, compounds, SECONDARY CARBON METABOLISM, , FIGURE 13.4 A simplified view of the major pathways of secondary-metabolite, biosynthesis and their interrelationships with primary metabolism., , Terpenes
Page 312 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, fied form the pathways involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and their interconnections with primary metabolism., , TERPENES, The terpenes, or terpenoids, constitute the largest class of, secondary products. The diverse substances of this class are, generally insoluble in water. They are biosynthesized from, acetyl-CoA or glycolytic intermediates. After discussing the, biosynthesis of terpenes, we’ll examine how they act to, repel herbivores and how some herbivores circumvent the, toxic effects of terpenes., , Terpenes Are Formed by the Fusion of FiveCarbon Isoprene Units, All terpenes are derived from the union of five-carbon elements that have the branched carbon skeleton of isopentane:, H3C, H3C, , CH — CH2 — CH3, , The basic structural elements of terpenes are sometimes, called isoprene units because terpenes can decompose at, high temperatures to give isoprene:, H3C, H2C, , CH — CH, , CH2, , Thus all terpenes are occasionally referred to as isoprenoids., Terpenes are classified by the number of five-carbon, units they contain, although extensive metabolic modifications can sometimes make it difficult to pick out the original five-carbon residues. Ten-carbon terpenes, which contain two C5 units, are called monoterpenes; 15-carbon, terpenes (three C5 units) are sesquiterpenes; and 20-carbon, terpenes (four C5 units) are diterpenes. Larger terpenes, include triterpenes (30 carbons), tetraterpenes (40 carbons),, and polyterpenoids ([C5]n carbons, where n > 8)., , There Are Two Pathways for Terpene Biosynthesis, Terpenes are biosynthesized from primary metabolites in, at least two different ways. In the well-studied mevalonic, acid pathway, three molecules of acetyl-CoA are joined, together stepwise to form mevalonic acid (Figure 13.5)., This key six-carbon intermediate is then pyrophosphorylated, decarboxylated, and dehydrated to yield isopentenyl, diphosphate (IPP2)., IPP is the activated five-carbon building block of terpenes. Recently, it was discovered that IPP also can be, formed from intermediates of glycolysis or the photosyn-, , 2, , IPP is the abbreviation for isopentenyl pyrophosphate, an, earlier name for this compound. The other pyrophosphorylated intermediates in the pathway are also now referred to, as diphosphates., , 287, , thetic carbon reduction cycle via a separate set of reactions, called the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway, that operates in chloroplasts and other plastids (Lichtenthaler 1999). Although all the details have not yet been elucidated, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and two carbon atoms, derived from pyruvate appear to combine to generate an, intermediate that is eventually converted to IPP., , Isopentenyl Diphosphate and Its Isomer Combine, to Form Larger Terpenes, Isopentenyl diphosphate and its isomer, dimethylallyl, diphosphate (DPP), are the activated five-carbon building, blocks of terpene biosynthesis that join together to form, larger molecules. First IPP and DPP react to give geranyl, diphosphate (GPP), the 10-carbon precursor of nearly all, the monoterpenes (see Figure 13.5). GPP can then link to, another molecule of IPP to give the 15-carbon compound, farnesyl diphosphate (FPP), the precursor of nearly all the, sesquiterpenes. Addition of yet another molecule of IPP, gives the 20-carbon compound geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP), the precursor of the diterpenes. Finally, FPP, and GGPP can dimerize to give the triterpenes (C30) and, the tetraterpenes (C40), respectively., , Some Terpenes Have Roles in Growth and, Development, Certain terpenes have a well-characterized function in, plant growth or development and so can be considered primary rather than secondary metabolites. For example, the, gibberellins, an important group of plant hormones, are, diterpenes. Sterols are triterpene derivatives that are essential components of cell membranes, which they stabilize by, interacting with phospholipids (see Chapter 11). The red,, orange, and yellow carotenoids are tetraterpenes that function as accessory pigments in photosynthesis and protect, photosynthetic tissues from photooxidation (see Chapter, 7). The hormone abscisic acid (see Chapter 23) is a C15 terpene produced by degradation of a carotenoid precursor., Long-chain polyterpene alcohols known as dolichols, function as carriers of sugars in cell wall and glycoprotein, synthesis (see Chapter 15). Terpene-derived side chains,, such as the phytol side chain of chlorophyll (see Chapter, 7), help anchor certain molecules in membranes. Thus various terpenes have important primary roles in plants. However, the vast majority of the different terpene structures, produced by plants are secondary metabolites that are presumed to be involved in defense., , Terpenes Defend against Herbivores in Many, Plants, Terpenes are toxins and feeding deterrents to many plantfeeding insects and mammals; thus they appear to play, important defensive roles in the plant kingdom (Gershenzon and Croteau 1992). For example, the monoterpene, esters called pyrethroids that occur in the leaves and flow-
Page 314 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, (A), CH3, , H3C, , CH2, , Limonene, (B), , CH3, , OH, H3C, , CH3, , Menthol, , FIGURE 13.6 Structures of limonene (A) and menthol (B)., These two well-known monoterpenes serve as defenses, against insects and other organisms that feed on these, plants. (A, photo © Calvin Larsen/Photo Researchers, Inc.;, B, photo © David Sieren/Visuals Unlimited.), , acteristic odor to their foliage. Peppermint, lemon, basil,, and sage are examples of plants that contain essential oils., The chief monoterpene constituent of peppermint oil is, menthol; that of lemon oil is limonene (Figure 13.6)., Essential oils have well-known insect repellent properties. They are frequently found in glandular hairs that project outward from the epidermis and serve to “advertise”, , 289, , the toxicity of the plant, repelling potential herbivores even, before they take a trial bite. In the glandular hairs, the terpenes are stored in a modified extracellular space in the cell, wall (Figure 13.7). Essential oils can be extracted from, plants by steam distillation and are important commercially in flavoring foods and making perfumes., Recent research has revealed an interesting twist on the, role of volatile terpenes in plant protection. In corn, cotton,, wild tobacco, and other species, certain monoterpenes and, sesquiterpenes are produced and emitted only after insect, feeding has already begun. These substances repel, ovipositing herbivores and attract natural enemies, including predatory and parasitic insects, that kill plant-feeding, insects and so help minimize further damage (Turlings et, al. 1995; Kessler and Baldwin 2001). Thus, volatile terpenes, are not only defenses in their own right, but also provide a, way for plants to call for defensive help from other organisms. The ability of plants to attract natural enemies of, plant-feeding insects shows promise as a new, ecologically, sound means of pest control (see Web Essay 13.1)., Among the nonvolatile terpene antiherbivore compounds are the limonoids, a group of triterpenes (C30) well, known as bitter substances in citrus fruit. Perhaps the most, powerful deterrent to insect feeding known is azadirachtin, (Figure 13.8A), a complex limonoid from the neem tree, (Azadirachta indica) of Africa and Asia. Azadirachtin is a, feeding deterrent to some insects at doses as low as 50 parts, per billion, and it exerts a variety of toxic effects (Aerts and, Mordue 1997). It has considerable potential as a commercial insect control agent because of its low toxicity to mammals, and several preparations containing azadirachtin are, now being marketed in North America and India., The phytoecdysones, first isolated from the common, fern, Polypodium vulgare, are a group of plant steroids that, have the same basic structure as insect molting hormones, (Figure 13.8B). Ingestion of phytoecdysones by insects disrupts molting and other developmental processes, often, with lethal consequences., Triterpenes that are active against vertebrate herbivores, include cardenolides and saponins. Cardenolides are glycosides (compounds containing an attached sugar or sugars) that taste bitter and are extremely toxic to higher animals. In humans, they have dramatic effects on the heart, muscle through their influence on Na+/K+-activated ATPases., In carefully regulated doses, they slow and strengthen the, heartbeat. Cardenolides extracted from species of foxglove, , FIGURE 13.7 Monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes are commonly found in, glandular hairs on the plant surface. This scanning electron micrograph, shows a glandular hair on a young leaf of spring sunflower (Balsamorhiza, sagittata). Terpenes are thought to be synthesized in the cells of the hair, and are stored in the rounded cap at the top. This “cap” is an extracellular, space that forms when the cuticle and a portion of the cell wall pull away, from the remainder of the cell. (1105×) (© J. N. A. Lott/Biological Photo, Service.)
Page 315 :
290, , Chapter 13, , FIGURE 13.8 Structure of two, triterpenes, azadirachtin (A), and, α-ecdysone (B), which serve as, powerful feeding deterrents to, insects. (A, photo © Inga, Spence/Visuals Unlimited; B,, photo ©Wally Eberhart/Visuals, Unlimited.), , (A) Azadirachtin, a limonoid, O, CH3OC, O, , CH3 O, C, , H3C, , O, , OH, , CH3, , HO, , O, CH3, , O, O, , O, CH3CO, , O, , OH, , CH3OC, , O, , (B) a-Ecdysone, an insect molting hormone, OH, H3C, CH3, , CH3, OH, CH3, , CH3, HO, OH, HO, O, , (Digitalis) are prescribed to millions of patients for the treatment of heart disease (see Web Topic 13.1)., Saponins are steroid and triterpene glycosides, so, named because of their soaplike properties. The presence, of both lipid-soluble (the steroid or triterpene) and watersoluble (the sugar) elements in one molecule gives, saponins detergent properties, and they form a soapy, lather when shaken with water. The toxicity of saponins is, thought to be a result of their ability to form complexes, with sterols. Saponins may interfere with sterol uptake, from the digestive system or disrupt cell membranes after, being absorbed into the bloodstream., , PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS, Plants produce a large variety of secondary products that, contain a phenol group—a hydroxyl functional group on, an aromatic ring:, OH, , These substances are classified as phenolic compounds., Plant phenolics are a chemically heterogeneous group of, nearly 10,000 individual compounds: Some are soluble only, in organic solvents, some are water-soluble carboxylic acids, and glycosides, and others are large, insoluble polymers., In keeping with their chemical diversity, phenolics play, a variety of roles in the plant. After giving a brief account, of phenolic biosynthesis, we will discuss several principal, groups of phenolic compounds and what is known about, their roles in the plant. Many serve as defense compounds, , against herbivores and pathogens. Others function in, mechanical support, in attracting pollinators and fruit dispersers, in absorbing harmful ultraviolet radiation, or in, reducing the growth of nearby competing plants., , Phenylalanine Is an Intermediate in the, Biosynthesis of Most Plant Phenolics, Plant phenolics are biosynthesized by several different, routes and thus constitute a heterogeneous group from a, metabolic point of view. Two basic pathways are involved:, the shikimic acid pathway and the malonic acid pathway, (Figure 13.9). The shikimic acid pathway participates in the, biosynthesis of most plant phenolics. The malonic acid, pathway, although an important source of phenolic secondary products in fungi and bacteria, is of less significance in higher plants., The shikimic acid pathway converts simple carbohydrate, precursors derived from glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway to the aromatic amino acids (see Web Topic, 13.2) (Herrmann and Weaver 1999). One of the pathway, intermediates is shikimic acid, which has given its name to, this whole sequence of reactions. The well-known, broadspectrum herbicide glyphosate (available commercially as, Roundup) kills plants by blocking a step in this pathway (see, Chapter 2 on the web site). The shikimic acid pathway is present in plants, fungi, and bacteria but is not found in animals., Animals have no way to synthesize the three aromatic amino, acids—phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan—which are, therefore essential nutrients in animal diets., The most abundant classes of secondary phenolic compounds in plants are derived from phenylalanine via the
Page 316 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, FIGURE 13.9 Plant phenolics are, biosynthesized in several different ways. In higher plants, most, phenolics are derived at least in, part from phenylalanine, a product of the shikimic acid pathway., Formulas in brackets indicate the, basic arrangement of carbon, skeletons:, , Phosphoenolpyruvic, acid (from glycolysis), , Erythrose-4, phosphate, (from pentose, phosphate pathway), Shikimic acid, pathway, , C6, , indicates a benzene ring, and, C3 is a three-carbon chain., More detail on the pathway, from phenylalanine onward is, given in Figure 13.10., , Gallic, acid, Hydrolyzable, tannins, , [C, , C6, , and a three-carbon side chain. Phenylpropanoids are, important building blocks of the more complex phenolic, compounds discussed later in this chapter., Now that the biosynthetic pathways leading to most, widespread phenolic compounds have been determined,, researchers have turned their attention to studying how these, pathways are regulated. In some cases, specific enzymes,, , Acetyl-CoA, , Phenylalanine, , [C, , 6, , C3, , Cinnamic acid, , [C, , 6, , C3, , ][ C, , C3, , 6, , 6, , ], , C1, , Malonic acid, pathway, , ], ], [C, , Simple phenolics, , [, , C6, , ], , C3 n, , Lignin, , elimination of an ammonia molecule to form cinnamic acid, (Figure 13.10). This reaction is catalyzed by phenylalanine, ammonia lyase (PAL), perhaps the most studied enzyme, in plant secondary metabolism. PAL is situated at a branch, point between primary and secondary metabolism, so the, reaction that it catalyzes is an important regulatory step in, the formation of many phenolic compounds., The activity of PAL is increased by environmental factors, such as low nutrient levels, light (through its effect on, phytochrome), and fungal infection. The point of control, appears to be the initiation of transcription. Fungal invasion, for example, triggers the transcription of messenger, RNA that codes for PAL, thus increasing the amount of, PAL in the plant, which then stimulates the synthesis of, phenolic compounds., The regulation of PAL activity in plants is made more, complex by the existence in many species of multiple PALencoding genes, some of which are expressed only in specific tissues or only under certain environmental conditions, (Logemann et al. 1995)., Reactions subsequent to that catalyzed by PAL lead to, the addition of more hydroxyl groups and other substituents. Trans-cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, and their, derivatives are simple phenolic compounds called phenylpropanoids because they contain a benzene ring:, , 291, , C3, , 6, , C6, , ], , Flavonoids, , [, , C6, , C3, , C6, , Miscellaneous, phenolics, , ]n, , Condensed tannins, , such as PAL, are important in controlling flux through the, pathway. Several transcription factors have been shown to, regulate phenolic metabolism by binding to the promoter, regions of certain biosynthetic genes and activating transcription. Some of these factors activate the transcription of, large groups of genes (Jin and Martin 1999)., , Some Simple Phenolics Are Activated by, Ultraviolet Light, Simple phenolic compounds are widespread in vascular, plants and appear to function in different capacities. Their, structures include the following:, • Simple phenylpropanoids, such as trans-cinnamic, acid, p-coumaric acid, and their derivatives, such as, caffeic acid, which have a basic phenylpropanoid carbon skeleton (Figure 13.11A):, C6, , C3, , • Phenylpropanoid lactones (cyclic esters) called, coumarins, also with a phenylpropanoid skeleton (see, Figure 13.11B), C6, , C1, , • Benzoic acid derivatives, which have a, skeleton: which is formed from phenylpropanoids by, cleavage of a two-carbon fragment from the side, chain (see Figure 13.11C) (see also Figure 13.10), As with many other secondary products, plants can elaborate on the basic carbon skeleton of simple phenolic compounds to make more complex products., Many simple phenolic compounds have important roles, in plants as defenses against insect herbivores and fungi., Of special interest is the phototoxicity of certain coumarins, called furanocoumarins, which have an attached furan, ring (see Figure 13.11B).
Page 317 :
292, , Chapter 13, FIGURE 13.10 Outline of phenolic biosynthesis from phenylalanine. The formation, , COOH, , of many plant phenolics, including simple phenylpropanoids, coumarins, benzoic, acid derivatives, lignin, anthocyanins, isoflavones, condensed tannins, and other, flavonoids, begins with phenylalanine., , NH2, , Phenylalanine, , NH3, , Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), COOH, , Benzoic acid, derivatives (Figure 13.11C), trans-Cinnamic acid, , Caffeic acid, and other simple, phenylpropanoids, (Figure 13.11A), , COOH, , HO, , p-Coumaric acid, CoA-SH, , Coumarins (Figure 13.11B), COSCoA, , Lignin precursors, (Web Topic 13.3), , HO, , p-Coumaroyl-CoA, 3 Malonyl-CoA molecules, Chalcone synthase, OH, HO, , OH, OH, OH, , O, , HO, , The Release of Phenolics into the Soil, May Limit the Growth of Other Plants, , O, , Chalcones, OH, OH, , HO, , O, , O, , Flavones, , OH, , HO, , O, , O, , Flavanones, OH, , O, OH, , OH, , Isoflavones (isoflavonoids), HO, , O, OH, OH, OH, , O, , HO, , O, , Dihydroflavonols, OH, OH, , Anthocyanins (Figure 13.13B), Condensed tannins (Figure 13.15A), , These compounds are not toxic until they, are activated by light. Sunlight in the ultraviolet A (UV-A) region (320–400 nm) causes, some furanocoumarins to become activated, to a high-energy electron state. Activated, furanocoumarins can insert themselves into, the double helix of DNA and bind to the, pyrimidine bases cytosine and thymine,, thus blocking transcription and repair and, leading eventually to cell death., Phototoxic furanocoumarins are especially abundant in members of the Umbelliferae family, including celery, parsnip, and, parsley. In celery, the level of these compounds can increase about 100-fold if the, plant is stressed or diseased. Celery pickers,, and even some grocery shoppers, have been, known to develop skin rashes from handling stressed or diseased celery. Some, insects have adapted to survive on plants, that contain furanocoumarins and other, phototoxic compounds by living in silken, webs or rolled-up leaves, which screen out, the activating wavelengths (Sandberg and, Berenbaum 1989)., , O, , Flavonols, , From leaves, roots, and decaying litter, plants, release a variety of primary and secondary, metabolites into the environment. Investigation of the effects of these compounds on, neighboring plants is the study of allelopathy. If a plant can reduce the growth of, nearby plants by releasing chemicals into the, soil, it may increase its access to light, water,, and nutrients and thus its evolutionary fitness. Generally speaking, the term allelopathy, has come to be applied to the harmful effects, of plants on their neighbors, although a precise definition also includes beneficial effects., Simple phenylpropanoids and benzoic, acid derivatives are frequently cited as having allelopathic activity. Compounds such, as caffeic acid and ferulic acid (see Figure, 13.11A) occur in soil in appreciable amounts, and have been shown in laboratory experiments to inhibit the germination and growth, of many plants (Inderjit et al. 1995).
Page 318 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, (A), H, , H, , COOH, C, , COOH, , C, , C, , C, , H, HO, , H, , HO, OH, , Ferulic acid, , C, Simple phenylpropanoids [, , weeds or residues from the previous crop may in some, cases be a result of allelopathy. An exciting future prospect, is the development of crop plants genetically engineered to, be allelopathic to weeds., , Lignin Is a Highly Complex Phenolic, Macromolecule, , OCH3, , Caffeic acid, , 293, , After cellulose, the most abundant organic substance in, plants is lignin, a highly branched polymer of phenylpropanoid groups, , ], , C3, , 6, , (B), , C6, , C3, , Furan ring, , HO, , O, , O, , O, , O, , Psoralen,, a furanocoumarin, , Umbelliferone,, a simple coumarin, Coumarins, , O, , [C, , ], , C3, , 6, , (C), O, COOH, , CH, , HO, , OH, OCH3, , Vanillin, Benzoic acid derivatives, , Salicylic acid, , [C, , 6, , ], , C1, , FIGURE 13.11 Simple phenolic compounds play a great, , diversity of roles in plants. (A) Caffeic acid and ferulic acid, may be released into the soil and inhibit the growth of, neighboring plants. (B) Psoralen is a furanocoumarin that, exhibits phototoxicity to insect herbivores. (C) Salicylic acid, is a plant growth regulator that is involved in systemic, resistance to plant pathogens., , In spite of results such as these, the importance of, allelopathy in natural ecosystems is still controversial., Many scientists doubt that allelopathy is a significant factor in plant–plant interactions because good evidence for, this phenomenon has been hard to obtain. It is easy to, show that extracts or purified compounds from one plant, can inhibit the growth of other plants in laboratory experiments, but it has been very difficult to demonstrate that, these compounds are present in the soil in sufficient concentration to inhibit growth. Furthermore, organic substances in the soil are often bound to soil particles and may, be rapidly degraded by microbes., In spite of the lack of supporting evidence, allelopathy, is currently of great interest because of its potential agricultural applications. Reductions in crop yields caused by, , that plays both primary and secondary roles. The precise, structure of lignin is not known because it is difficult to, extract lignin from plants, where it is covalently bound to, cellulose and other polysaccharides of the cell wall., Lignin is generally formed from three different phenylpropanoid alcohols: coniferyl, coumaryl, and sinapyl, alcohols which are synthesized from phenylalanine via various, cinnamic acid derivatives. The phenylpropanoid alcohols are, joined into a polymer through the action of enzymes that, generate free-radical intermediates. The proportions of the, three monomeric units in lignin vary among species, plant, organs, and even layers of a single cell wall. In the polymer,, there are often multiple C—C and C—O—C bonds in each, phenylpropanoid alcohol unit, resulting in a complex structure that branches in three dimensions. Unlike polymers, such as starch, rubber, or cellulose, the units of lignin do not, appear to be linked in a simple, repeating way. However,, recent research suggests that a guiding protein may bind the, individual phenylpropanoid units during lignin biosynthesis, giving rise to a scaffold that then directs the formation of, a large, repeating unit (Davin and Lewis 2000; Hatfield and, Vermerris 2001). (See Web Topic 13.3 for the partial structure, of a hypothetical lignin molecule.), Lignin is found in the cell walls of various types of supporting and conducting tissue, notably the tracheids and, vessel elements of the xylem. It is deposited chiefly in the, thickened secondary wall but can also occur in the primary, wall and middle lamella in close contact with the celluloses, and hemicelluloses already present. The mechanical rigidity of lignin strengthens stems and vascular tissue, allowing upward growth and permitting water and minerals to, be conducted through the xylem under negative pressure, without collapse of the tissue. Because lignin is such a key, component of water transport tissue, the ability to make, lignin must have been one of the most important adaptations permitting primitive plants to colonize dry land., Besides providing mechanical support, lignin has significant protective functions in plants. Its physical toughness, deters feeding by animals, and its chemical durability makes, it relatively indigestible to herbivores. By bonding to cellulose and protein, lignin also reduces the digestibility of these, substances. Lignification blocks the growth of pathogens, and is a frequent response to infection or wounding.
Page 319 :
294, , Chapter 13, (A), , From shikimic acid, pathway via phenylalanine, , [C, , 3′, , ], , C3, , 6, , 3′, From malonic, acid pathway, , [ ], , 2′, 1, , 8, , O, , 7, , C6, , 4′, , 2′, , A, , C, , 6, , 1′, 2, , O, , A, , B, , FIGURE 13.12 Basic flavonoid carbon skeleton. Flavonoids, , are biosynthesized from products of the shikimic acid and, malonic acid pathways. Positions on the flavonoid ring system are numbered as shown., , 5′, 6′, , OH, OH, , Anthocyanidin, , 4, , The three-carbon bridge, Basic flavonoid skeleton, , 1′, , C, , 5′, 6′, , 3, 5, , +, , HO, , 4′, , B, , (B), OH, , B, , +, , HO, , O, , A, , C, O, , Sugar, , OH, , Anthocyanin, , There Are Four Major Groups of Flavonoids, , FIGURE 13.13 The structures of anthocyanidins (A) and, , The flavonoids are one of the largest classes of plant phenolics. The basic carbon skeleton of a flavonoid contains 15, carbons arranged in two aromatic rings connected by a, three-carbon bridge:, , anthocyanin (B). The colors of anthocyanidins depend in, part on the substituents attached to ring B (see Table 13.1)., An increase in the number of hydroxyl groups shifts, absorption to a longer wavelength and gives a bluer color., Replacement of a hydroxyl group with a methoxyl group, (OCH3) shifts absorption to a slightly shorter wavelength,, resulting in a redder color., , C6, , C3, , C6, , This structure results from two separate biosynthetic pathways: the shikimic acid pathway and the malonic acid, pathway (Figure 13.12)., Flavonoids are classified into different groups, primarily on the basis of the degree of oxidation of the three-carbon bridge. We will discuss four of the groups shown in, Figure 13.10: the anthocyanins, the flavones, the flavonols,, and the isoflavones., The basic flavonoid carbon skeleton may have numerous substituents. Hydroxyl groups are usually present at, positions 4, 5, and 7, but they may also be found at other, positions. Sugars are very common as well; in fact, the, majority of flavonoids exist naturally as glycosides., Whereas both hydroxyl groups and sugars increase the, water solubility of flavonoids, other substituents, such as, methyl ethers or modified isopentyl units, make flavonoids, lipophilic (hydrophobic). Different types of flavonoids perform very different functions in the plant, including pigmentation and defense., , Anthocyanins Are Colored Flavonoids That, Attract Animals, In addition to predator–prey interactions, there are mutualistic associations among plants and animals. In return for the, reward of ingesting nectar or fruit pulp, animals perform, extremely important services for plants as carriers of pollen, , and seeds. Secondary metabolites are involved in these, plant–animal interactions, helping to attract animals to flowers and fruit by providing visual and olfactory signals., The colored pigments of plants are of two principal, types: carotenoids and flavonoids. Carotenoids, as we have, already seen, are yellow, orange, and red terpenoid compounds that also serve as accessory pigments in photosynthesis (see Chapter 7). Flavonoids are phenolic compounds that include a wide range of colored substances., The most widespread group of pigmented flavonoids is, the anthocyanins, which are responsible for most of the red,, pink, purple, and blue colors observed in plant parts. By coloring flowers and fruits, the anthocyanins are vitally important in attracting animals for pollination and seed dispersal., Anthocyanins are glycosides that have sugars at position, 3 (Figure 13.13B) and sometimes elsewhere. Without their, sugars, anthocyanins are known as anthocyanidins (Figure, 13.13A). Anthocyanin color is influenced by many factors,, including the number of hydroxyl and methoxyl groups in, ring B of the anthocyanidin (see Figure 13.13A), the presence, of aromatic acids esterified to the main skeleton, and the pH, of the cell vacuole in which these compounds are stored., Anthocyanins may also exist in supramolecular complexes, along with chelated metal ions and flavone copigments. The, blue pigment of dayflower (Commelina communis) was found
Page 320 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, , 295, , generally absorb light at shorter wavelengths, than anthocyanins do, so they are not visible to, the human eye. However, insects such as bees,, Anthocyanidin, Substituents, Color, which see farther into the ultraviolet range of the, Pelargonidin, 4′— OH, Orange red, spectrum than humans do, may respond to, Cyanidin, 3′— OH, 4′— OH, Purplish red, flavones and flavonols as attractant cues (Figure, Delphinidin, 3′— OH,4′— OH,5′— OH, Bluish purple, 13.14). Flavonols in a flower often form symPeonidin, 3′— OCH3, 4′— OH, Rosy red, metric patterns of stripes, spots, or concentric, Petunidin, 3′— OCH3, 4′— OH, 5′— OCH3, Purple, circles called nectar guides (Lunau 1992). These, patterns may be conspicuous to insects and are, to consist of a large complex of six anthocyanin molecules,, thought to help indicate the location of pollen and nectar., six flavones, and two associated magnesium ions (Kondo et, Flavones and flavonols are not restricted to flowers; they, al. 1992). The most common anthocyanidins and their colors, are also present in the leaves of all green plants. These two, are shown in Figure 13.13 and Table 13.1., classes of flavonoids function to protect cells from excesConsidering the variety of factors affecting anthocyanin, sive UV-B radiation (280–320 nm) because they accumulate, in the epidermal layers of leaves and stems and absorb, coloration and the possible presence of carotenoids as well,, light strongly in the UV-B region while allowing the visible, it is not surprising that so many different shades of flower, (photosynthetically active) wavelengths to pass through, and fruit color are found in nature. The evolution of flower, uninterrupted. In addition, exposure of plants to increased, color may have been governed by selection pressures for, UV-B light has been demonstrated to increase the synthedifferent sorts of pollinators, which often have different, sis of flavones and flavonols., color preferences., Arabidopsis thaliana mutants that lack the enzyme chalColor, of course, is just one type of signal used to attract, cone synthase produce no flavonoids. Lacking flavonoids,, pollinators to flowers. Volatile chemicals, particularly, these plants are much more sensitive to UV-B radiation, monoterpenes, frequently provide attractive scents., than wild-type individuals are, and they grow very poorly, Flavonoids May Protect against Damage by, under normal conditions. When shielded from UV light,, Ultraviolet Light, however, they grow normally (Li et al. 1993). A group of, Two other major groups of flavonoids found in flowers are, simple phenylpropanoid esters are also important in UV, flavones and flavonols (see Figure 13.10). These flavonoids, protection in Arabidopsis., , TABLE 13.1, Effects of ring substituents on anthocyanidin color, , (A), , (B), , FIGURE 13.14 Black-eyed Susan (Rudbeckia sp.) as seen by, , distribution of flavonols in the rays and the sensitivity of, insects to part of the UV spectrum contribute to the, “bull’s-eye” pattern seen by honeybees, which presumably, helps them locate pollen and nectar. Special lighting was, used to simulate the spectral sensitivity of the honeybee, visual system. (Courtesy of Thomas Eisner.), , humans (A) and as it might appear to honeybees (B). (A), To humans, the golden-eye has yellow rays and a brown, central disc. (B) To bees, the tips of the rays appear “light, yellow,” the inner portion of the rays “dark yellow,” and, the central disc “black.” Ultraviolet-absorbing flavonols are, found in the inner parts of the rays but not in the tips. The
Page 321 :
296, , Chapter 13, , Other functions of flavonoids have recently been discovered. For example, flavones and flavonols secreted into, the soil by legume roots mediate the interaction of legumes, and nitrogen-fixing symbionts, a phenomenon described in, Chapter 12. As will be discussed in Chapter 19, recent work, suggests that flavonoids also play a regulatory role in plant, development as modulators of polar auxin transport., , Isoflavonoids Have Antimicrobial Activity, , Hydrolyzable tannins are heterogeneous polymers containing phenolic acids, especially gallic acid, and simple, sugars (see Figure 13.15B). They are smaller than condensed tannins and may be hydrolyzed more easily; only, dilute acid is needed. Most tannins have molecular masses, between 600 and 3000., Tannins are general toxins that significantly reduce the, growth and survivorship of many herbivores when added, to their diets. In addition, tannins act as feeding repellents, to a great diversity of animals. Mammals such as cattle,, deer, and apes characteristically avoid plants or parts of, plants with high tannin contents. Unripe fruits, for, , The isoflavonoids (isoflavones) are a group of flavonoids in, which the position of one aromatic ring (ring B) is shifted, (see Figure 13.10). Isoflavonoids are found mostly in, legumes and have several different biological activities. Some, such as the, rotenoids, have strong insecticidal, actions; others have anti-estrogenic, effects. For example, sheep grazing on, (A) Condensed tannin, clover rich in isoflavonoids often suffer, from infertility. The isoflavonoid ring sysB, HO, tem has a three-dimensional structure, O, similar to that of steroids (see Figure, A, C, 13.8B), allowing these substances to bind, OH, to estrogen receptors. Isoflavonoids may, OH, also be responsible for the anticancer, HO, O, benefits of food prepared from soybeans., In the past few years, isoflavonoids, have become best known for their role as, OH, phytoalexins, antimicrobial compounds, HO, synthesized in response to bacterial or, fungal infection that help limit the spread, of the invading pathogen. Phytoalexins, OH, are discussed in more detail later in this, chapter., , OH, , OH, , OH, , OH, , n, , OH, , OH, , O, , OH, OH, , (B) Hydrolyzable tannin, , Tannins Deter Feeding by, Herbivores, A second category of plant phenolic, polymers with defensive properties,, besides lignins, is the tannins. The term, tannin was first used to describe compounds that could convert raw animal, hides into leather in the process known, as tanning. Tannins bind the collagen, proteins of animal hides, increasing their, resistance to heat, water, and microbes., There are two categories of tannins:, condensed and hydrolyzable. Condensed tannins are compounds formed, by the polymerization of flavonoid units, (Figure 13.15A). They are frequent constituents of woody plants. Because condensed tannins can often be hydrolyzed, to anthocyanidins by treatment with, strong acids, they are sometimes called, pro-anthocyanidins., , OH, , O, CH2O, , HO, , O, , O, H, , HO, HO, , OH, , C, , C, HO, , O O, O, , O, , H, , OH, OH, O, , C, OH, , O, , C, , OH, , OH, OH, OH, , OH, , H, O, C, , O, C, , H, , CO, , HO, , C, , O, , O, , O, , O, , Gallic acid, HO, , OH, OH, , HO, , OH, OH, , FIGURE 13.15 Structure of some tannins formed from phenolic acids or, , flavonoid units. (A) The general structure of a condensed tannin, where n is, usually 1 to 10. There may also be a third —OH group on ring B. (B) The, hydrolyzable tannin from sumac (Rhus semialata) consists of glucose and eight, molecules of gallic acid.
Page 322 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, instance, frequently have very high tannin levels, which, may be concentrated in the outer cell layers., Interestingly, humans often prefer a certain level of, astringency in tannin-containing foods, such as apples,, blackberries, tea, and red wine. Recently, polyphenols (tannins) in red wine were shown to block the formation of, endothelin-1, a signaling molecule that makes blood vessels constrict (Corder et al. 2001). This effect of wine tannins may account for the often-touted health benefits of red, wine, especially the reduction in the risk of heart disease, associated with moderate red wine consumption., Although moderate amounts of specific polyphenolics, may have health benefits for humans, the defensive properties of most tannins are due to their toxicity, which is generally attributed to their ability to bind proteins nonspecifically. It has long been thought that plant tannins complex, proteins in the guts of herbivores by forming hydrogen, bonds between their hydroxyl groups and electronegative, sites on the protein (Figure 13.16A)., , (A) Hydrogen bonding between tannins and protein, , O, , d+, , d−, , H, , N, H2, , Tannin, , Protein, , 297, , More recent evidence indicates that tannins and other, phenolics can also bind to dietary protein in a covalent fashion (see Figure 13.16B). The foliage of many plants contains, enzymes that oxidize phenolics to their corresponding, quinone forms in the guts of herbivores (Felton et al. 1989)., Quinones are highly reactive electrophilic molecules that, readily react with the nucleophilic —NH2 and —SH groups, of proteins (see Figure 13.16B). By whatever mechanism, protein–tannin binding occurs, this process has a negative, impact on herbivore nutrition. Tannins can inactivate herbivore digestive enzymes and create complex aggregates of, tannins and plant proteins that are difficult to digest., Herbivores that habitually feed on tannin-rich plant, material appear to possess some interesting adaptations to, remove tannins from their digestive systems. For example,, some mammals, such as rodents and rabbits, produce salivary proteins with a very high proline content (25–45%) that, have a high affinity for tannins. Secretion of these proteins, is induced by ingestion of food with a high tannin content, and greatly diminishes the toxic effects of tannins (Butler, 1989). The large number of proline residues gives these proteins a very flexible, open conformation and a high degree, of hydrophobicity that facilitates binding to tannins., Plant tannins also serve as defenses against microorganisms. For example, the nonliving heartwood of many, trees contains high concentrations of tannins that help prevent fungal and bacterial decay., , NITROGEN-CONTAINING COMPOUNDS, (B) Covalent bonding to protein after oxidation, Tannin in phenol form, OH, , Polyphenol oxidase, , Tannin in quinone form, O, H2N, , Protein, , HN, , Protein, Covalent bond, OH, , Tannin linked to protein, , FIGURE 13.16 Proposed mechanisms for the interaction of, , tannins with proteins. (A) Hydrogen bonds may form, between the phenolic hydroxyl groups of tannins and electronegative sites on the protein. (B) Phenolic hydroxyl, groups may bind covalently to proteins following activation by oxidative enzymes, such as polyphenol oxidase., , A large variety of plant secondary metabolites have nitrogen in their structure. Included in this category are such, well-known antiherbivore defenses as alkaloids and, cyanogenic glycosides, which are of considerable interest, because of their toxicity to humans and their medicinal, properties. Most nitrogenous secondary metabolites are, biosynthesized from common amino acids., In this section we will examine the structure and biological properties of various nitrogen-containing secondary, metabolites, including alkaloids, cyanogenic glycosides, glucosinolates, and nonprotein amino acids. In addition, we will, discuss the ability of systemin, a protein released from damaged cells, to serve as a wound signal to the rest of the plant., , Alkaloids Have Dramatic Physiological Effects on, Animals, The alkaloids are a large family of more than 15,000 nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites found in approximately 20% of the species of vascular plants. The nitrogen, atom in these substances is usually part of a heterocyclic, ring, a ring that contains both nitrogen and carbon atoms., As a group, alkaloids are best known for their striking, pharmacological effects on vertebrate animals., As their name would suggest, most alkaloids are alkaline. At pH values commonly found in the cytosol (pH 7.2)
Page 323 :
298, , Chapter 13, , TABLE 13.2, Major types of alkaloids, their amino acid precursors, and well-known examples of each type, Alkaloid class, , Structure, , Pyrrolidine, , Biosynthetic, precursor, , Examples, , Human uses, , Ornithine (aspartate), , Nicotine, , Stimulant, depressant, tranquilizer, , Ornithine, , Atropine, , Prevention of intestinal spasms, antidote to other, poisons, dilation of pupils for examination, , Cocaine, , Stimulant of the central nervous system, local, anesthetic, , Lysine (or acetate), , Coniine, , Poison (paralyzes motor neurons), , Ornithine, , Retrorsine, , None, , Lysine, , Lupinine, , Restoration of heart rhythm, , Tyrosine, , Codeine, , Analgesic (pain relief ), treatment of coughs, , Morphine, , Analgesic, , Psilocybin, , Halucinogen, , Reserpine, , Treatment of hypertension, treatment of psychoses, , Strychnine, , Rat poison, treatment of eye disorders, , N, , Tropane, , N, , Piperidine, N, , Pyrrolizidine, N, , Quinolizidine, N, , Isoquinoline, N, , Indole, , Tryptophan, N, , or the vacuole (pH 5 to 6), the nitrogen atom is protonated;, hence, alkaloids are positively charged and are generally, water soluble., Alkaloids are usually synthesized from one of a few, common amino acids—in particular, lysine, tyrosine, and, tryptophan. However, the carbon skeleton of some alkaloids contains a component derived from the terpene, pathway. Table 13.2 lists the major alkaloid types and their, amino acid precursors. Several different types, including, nicotine and its relatives (Figure 13.17), are derived from, ornithine, an intermediate in arginine biosynthesis. The B, vitamin nicotinic acid (niacin) is a precursor of the pyridine, (six-membered) ring of this alkaloid; the pyrrolidine (fivemembered) ring of nicotine arises from ornithine (Figure, 13.18). Nicotinic acid is also a constituent of NAD+ and, NADP+, which serve as electron carriers in metabolism., The role of alkaloids in plants has been a subject of speculation for at least 100 years. Alkaloids were once thought, to be nitrogenous wastes (analogous to urea and uric acid, in animals), nitrogen storage compounds, or growth regulators, but there is little evidence to support any of these, functions. Most alkaloids are now believed to function as, defenses against predators, especially mammals, because, , O, C, N, , CH3, , OCH3, N, , OC, , CH3, , N, , O, , Cocaine, , Nicotine, , HO, O, , CH3, N, , H3C, , O, N, HO, , CH3, , N, O, , N, , N, , CH3, , Caffeine, Morphine, Representative alkaloids, , FIGURE 13.17 Examples of alkaloids, a diverse group of, , secondary metabolites that contain nitrogen, usually as part, of a heterocyclic ring. Caffeine is a purine-type alkaloid, similar to the nucleic acid bases adenine and guanine. The, pyrrolidine (five-membered) ring of nicotine arises from, ornithine; the pyridine (six-membered) ring is derived from, nicotinic acid.
Page 324 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, , Indeed, some livestock actually seem to prefer alkaloidcontaining plants to less harmful forage., Nearly all alkaloids are also toxic to humans when taken, in sufficient quantity. For example, strychnine, atropine, and, coniine (from poison hemlock) are classic alkaloid poisoning agents. At lower doses, however, many are useful pharmacologically. Morphine, codeine, and scopolamine are just, a few of the plant alkaloids currently used in medicine., Other alkaloids, including cocaine, nicotine, and caffeine (see, Figure 13.17), enjoy widespread nonmedical use as stimulants or sedatives., On a cellular level, the mode of action of alkaloids in, animals is quite variable. Many alkaloids interfere with, components of the nervous system, especially the chemical transmitters; others affect membrane transport, protein, synthesis, or miscellaneous enzyme activities., One group of alkaloids, the pyrrolizidine alkaloids, illustrates how herbivores can become adapted to tolerate plant, defensive substances and even use them in their own, defense (Hartmann 1999). Within plants, pyrrolizidine alkaloids occur naturally as nontoxic N-oxides. In herbivore, digestive tracts, however, they are quickly reduced to, uncharged, hydrophobic tertiary alkaloids (Figure 13.19),, which easily pass through membranes and are toxic. Nevertheless, some herbivores, such as cinnabar moth (Tyria, jacobeae), have developed the ability to reconvert tertiary, pyrrolizidine alkaloids to the nontoxic N-oxide form immediately after its absorption from the digestive tract. These, herbivores may then store the N-oxides in their bodies as, defenses against their own predators., Not all of the alkaloids that appear in plants are produced by the plant itself. Many grasses harbor endogenous, fungal symbionts that grow in the apoplast and synthesize, a variety of different types of alkaloids. Grasses with fungal symbionts often grow faster and are better defended, , CH2, , H2 C, , COOH, , NH2 CH, , H2 C, , NH2, , Ornithine, , COOH, +, , N, +, , P OH2C, , N, , O, H, HO, , CH3, , H, OH, , N-Methyl pyrrolinium, , Nicotinic acid mononucleotide (NADP+), , COOH, N, , Nicotinic acid, N, CH3, , N, , Nicotine, , FIGURE 13.18 Nicotine biosynthesis begins with the biosyn-, , thesis of the nicotinic acid (niacin) from aspartate and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate. Nicotinic acid is also a component, of NAD+ and NADP+, important participants in biological, oxidation–reduction reactions. The five-membered ring of, nicotine is derived from ornithine, an intermediate in arginine biosynthesis., , of their general toxicity and deterrence capability (Hartmann 1992)., Large numbers of livestock, deaths are caused by the ingestion, of alkaloid-containing plants. In, the United States, a significant percentage of all grazing livestock, animals are poisoned each year by, consumption of large quantities of, alkaloid-containing plants such as, lupines (Lupinus), larkspur (Delphinium), and groundsel (Senecio)., This phenomenon may be due to, the fact that domestic animals,, unlike wild animals, have not, been subjected to natural selection, for the avoidance of toxic plants., , HO, , CH3, O, , H3C, O, , O, , CH3, , Reduced in digestive, tracts of most herbivores, to toxic form, , O, , N+, , O, , 299, , –, , N-oxide, (nontoxic form,, stored in plants), , HO, , O, H3C, O, , Oxidized to nontoxic, form by certain adapted, herbivores, , CH3, , O, , CH3, , O, , N, , Tertiary alkaloid, (toxic form), , FIGURE 13.19 Two forms of pyrrolizidine alkaloids occur in nature: the N-oxide, , form and the tertiary alkaloid. The nontoxic N-oxide found in plants is reduced to, the toxic tertiary form in the digestive tracts of most herbivores. However, some, adapted herbivores can convert the toxic tertiary alkaloid back to the nontoxic Noxide. These forms are illustrated here for the alkaloid senecionine, found in species, of ragwort (Senecio).
Page 325 :
300, , Chapter 13, , against insect and mammalian herbivores than those without symbionts. Unfortunately, certain grasses with symbionts, such as tall fescue, are important pasture grasses, that may become toxic to livestock when their alkaloid content is too high. Efforts are under way to breed tall fescue, with alkaloid levels that are not poisonous to livestock but, still provide protection against insects (see Web Essay 13.2)., Like monoterpenes in conifer resin and many other antiherbivore defense compounds, alkaloids increase in, response to initial herbivore damage, fortifying the plant, against subsequent attack (Karban and Baldwin 1997). For, example, Nicotiana attenuata, a wild tobacco that grows in, the deserts of the Great Basin, produces higher levels of, nicotine following herbivory. When it is attacked by nicotine-tolerant caterpillars, however, there is no increase in, nicotine. Instead, volatile terpenes are released that attract, enemies of the caterpillars. Clearly, wild tobacco and other, plants must have ways of determining what type of herbivore is damaging their foliage. Herbivores might signal, their presence by the type of damage they inflict or the distinctive chemical compounds they release. Recently, the oral, secretions of caterpillars feeding on corn leaves were shown, to contain a fatty acid–amino acid conjugate that induced, the plant to produce defensive terpenes when applied to cut, leaves., , Cyanogenic Glycosides Release the Poison, Hydrogen Cyanide, Various nitrogenous protective compounds other than, alkaloids are found in plants. Two groups of these substances—cyanogenic glycosides and glucosinolates—are, not in themselves toxic but are readily broken down to give, off volatile poisons when the plant is crushed. Cyanogenic, glycosides release the well-known poisonous gas hydrogen, cyanide (HCN)., The breakdown of cyanogenic glycosides in plants is a, two-step enzymatic process. Species that make cyanogenic, glycosides also make the enzymes necessary to hydrolyze, the sugar and liberate HCN:, 1. In the first step the sugar is cleaved by a glycosidase,, an enzyme that separates sugars from other molecules to which they are linked (Figure 13.20)., , O—Sugar, , R, C, R′, , C, , 2. In the second step the resulting hydrolysis product,, called an α-hydroxynitrile or cyanohydrin, can, decompose spontaneously at a low rate to liberate, HCN. This second step can be accelerated by the, enzyme hydroxynitrile lyase., Cyanogenic glycosides are not normally broken down, in the intact plant because the glycoside and the degradative enzymes are spatially separated, in different cellular, compartments or in different tissues. In sorghum, for example, the cyanogenic glycoside dhurrin is present in the vacuoles of epidermal cells, while the hydrolytic and lytic, enzymes are found in the mesophyll (Poulton 1990)., Under ordinary conditions this compartmentation prevents decomposition of the glycoside. When the leaf is, damaged, however, as during herbivore feeding, the cell, contents of different tissues mix and HCN forms., Cyanogenic glycosides are widely distributed in the plant, kingdom and are frequently encountered in legumes,, grasses, and species of the rose family., Considerable evidence indicates that cyanogenic glycosides have a protective function in certain plants. HCN is a, fast-acting toxin that inhibits metalloproteins, such as the, iron-containing cytochrome oxidase, a key enzyme of mitochondrial respiration. The presence of cyanogenic glycosides, deters feeding by insects and other herbivores, such as snails, and slugs. As with other classes of secondary metabolites,, however, some herbivores have adapted to feed on, cyanogenic plants and can tolerate large doses of HCN., The tubers of cassava (Manihot esculenta), a high-carbohydrate, staple food in many tropical countries, contain, high levels of cyanogenic glycosides. Traditional processing methods, such as grating, grinding, soaking, and drying, lead to the removal or degradation of a large fraction, of the cyanogenic glycosides present in cassava tubers., However, chronic cyanide poisoning leading to partial, paralysis of the limbs is still widespread in regions where, cassava is a major food source because the traditional, detoxification methods employed to remove cyanogenic, glycosides from cassava are not completely effective. In, addition, many populations that consume cassava have, poor nutrition, which aggravates the effects of the, cyanogenic glycosides., , Glycosidase, , N, , R, , OH, C, , R′, , C, , N, , Sugar, Cyanogenic, glycoside, , Cyanohydrin, , Hydroxynitrile, lyase, , R, , or, spontaneous, , R′, , C, , O, , Ketone, , +, , HC, , N, , Hydrogen, cyanide, , FIGURE 13.20 Enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of cyanogenic glycosides to release hydro-, , gen cyanide. R and R′ represent various alkyl or aryl substituents. For example, if R is, phenyl, R′ is hydrogen, and the sugar is the disaccharide β-gentiobiose, the compound, is amygdalin (the common cyanogenic glycoside found in the seeds of almonds, apricots, cherries, and peaches).
Page 326 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, R, S, R, , C, N, , Glucose Thioglucosidase, O, , SH, R, , Spontaneous, , C, , –, , SO3, , N, , O, , C, , S, , Isothiocyanate, , –, , SO3, , SO42–, , Glucose, Glucosinolate, , N, , 301, , R, , Aglycone, , C, , N, , Nitrile, , FIGURE 13.21 Hydrolysis of glucosinolates to mustard-smelling volatiles. R repre-, , — CH—CH2–, the, sents various alkyl or aryl substituents. For example, if R is CH2 —, compound is sinigrin, a major glucosinolate of black mustard seeds and horseradish roots., , Efforts are currently under way to reduce the cyanogenic, glycoside content of cassava through both conventional, breeding and genetic engineering approaches. However, the, complete elimination of cyanogenic glycosides may not be, desirable because these substances are probably responsible for the fact that cassava can be stored for very long periods of time without being attacked by pests., , Glucosinolates Release Volatile Toxins, A second class of plant glycosides, called the glucosinolates, or mustard oil glycosides, break down to release, volatile defensive substances. Found principally in the, Brassicaceae and related plant families, glucosinolates give, off the compounds responsible for the smell and taste of, vegetables such as cabbage, broccoli, and radishes., The release of these mustard-smelling volatiles from, glucosinolates is catalyzed by a hydrolytic enzyme, called, a thioglucosidase or myrosinase, that cleaves glucose from, its bond with the sulfur atom (Figure 13.21). The resulting, aglycone, the nonsugar portion of the molecule, rearranges, with loss of the sulfate to give pungent and chemically, reactive products, including isothiocyanates and nitriles,, depending on the conditions of hydrolysis. These products, function in defense as herbivore toxins and feeding repellents. Like cyanogenic glycosides, glucosinolates are stored, in the intact plant separately from the enzymes that, hydrolyze them, and they are brought into contact with, these enzymes only when the plant is crushed., As with other secondary metabolites, certain animals are, adapted to feed on glucosinolate-containing plants without ill, , Nonprotein amino acid, HOOC, , CH, , CH2, , CH2, , O, , NH, , NH2, , CH, , Canavanine, CH2, , Nonprotein Amino Acids Defend against, Herbivores, Plants and animals incorporate the same 20 amino acids, into their proteins. However, many plants also contain, unusual amino acids, called nonprotein amino acids, that, are not incorporated into proteins but are present instead, in the free form and act as protective substances. Nonprotein amino acids are often very similar to common protein, amino acids. Canavanine, for example, is a close analog of, arginine, and azetidine-2-carboxylic acid has a structure, very much like that of proline (Figure 13.22)., Nonprotein amino acids exert their toxicity in various, ways. Some block the synthesis or uptake of protein amino, , Protein amino acid analog, , NH, , CH2, , effects. For adapted herbivores, such as the cabbage butterfly,, glucosinolates often serve as stimulants for feeding and egg, laying, and the isothiocyanates produced after glucosinolate, hydrolysis act as volatile attractants (Renwick et al. 1992)., Most of the recent research on glucosinolates in plant, defense has concentrated on rape, or canola (Brassica, napus), a major oil crop in both North America and Europe., Plant breeders have tried to lower the glucosinolate levels, of rapeseed so that the high-protein seed meal remaining, after oil extraction can be used as animal food. The first, low-glucosinolate varieties tested in the field were unable, to survive because of severe pest problems. However, more, recently developed varieties with low glucosinolate levels, in seeds but high glucosinolate levels in leaves are able to, hold their own against pests and still provide a protein-rich, seed residue for animal feeding., , NH2, , HOOC, , CH, , CH2, , CH2, , CH2, , NH, , NH2, , COOH, , NH, , Azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, , NH2, , NH, , Arginine, CH2 CH2, , CH, , CH, , CH2, CH, NH, , COOH, , Proline, , FIGURE 13.22 Nonprotein, , amino acids and their protein amino acid analogs., The nonprotein amino, acids are not incorporated, into proteins but are defensive compounds found in, free form in plant cells.
Page 327 :
302, , Chapter 13, , acids; others, such as canavanine, can be mistakenly incorporated into proteins. After ingestion, canavanine is recognized by the herbivore enzyme that normally binds arginine, to the arginine transfer RNA molecule, so it becomes incorporated into proteins in place of arginine. The usual result, is a nonfunctional protein because either its tertiary structure or its catalytic site is disrupted. Canavanine is less basic, than arginine and may alter the ability of an enzyme to bind, substrates or catalyze chemical reactions (Rosenthal 1991)., Plants that synthesize nonprotein amino acids are not, susceptible to the toxicity of these compounds. The jack, bean (Canavalia ensiformis), which synthesizes large amounts, of canavanine in its seeds, has protein-synthesizing machinery that can discriminate between canavanine and arginine,, and it does not incorporate canavanine into its own proteins. Some insects that specialize on plants containing nonprotein amino acids have similar biochemical adaptations., , Some Plant Proteins Inhibit Herbivore Digestion, , inhibitors throughout the plant, even in undamaged areas, far from the initial feeding site. The systemic production of, proteinase inhibitors in young tomato plants is triggered, by a complex sequence of events:, 1. Wounded tomato leaves synthesize prosystemin, a, large (200 amino acid) precursor protein., 2. Prosystemin is proteolytically processed to produce, the short (18 amino acid) polypeptide called systemin, the first (and so far only) polypeptide hormone discovered in plants (Pearce et al. 1991) (Figure, 13.23)., 3. Systemin is released from damaged cells into the, apoplast., 4. Systemin is then transported out of the wounded leaf, via the phloem., 5. In target cells, systemin is believed to bind to a site, on the plasma membrane and initiate the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid, a plant growth regulator that, has wide-ranging effects (Creelman and Mullet 1997)., , Among the diverse components of plant defense arsenals, are proteins that interfere with herbivore digestion. For, example, some legumes synthesize α-amylase inhibitors, 6. Jasmonic acid eventually activates the expression of, that block the action of the starch-digesting enzyme α-amygenes that encode proteinase inhibitors (see Figure, lase. Other plant species produce lectins, defensive proteins, 13.23). Other signals, such as ABA (abscisic acid), salthat bind to carbohydrates or carbohydrate-containing proicylic acid, and pectin fragments from damaged plant, teins. After being ingested by an herbivore, lectins bind to, cell walls also appear to participate in this woundthe epithelial cells lining the digestive tract and interfere, signaling cascade, but their specific roles are still, unclear., with nutrient absorption (Peumans and Van Damme 1995)., The best-known antidigestive proteins in, Wounded leaf releases hormone, plants are the proteinase inhibitors. Found in, legumes, tomatoes, and other plants, these substances block the action of herbivore proteolytic, Systemin, enzymes. After entering the herbivore’s diges(polypeptide, tive tract, they hinder protein digestion by bindhormone), Herbivory, ing tightly and specifically to the active site of, protein-hydrolyzing enzymes such as trypsin, OUTSIDE, OF CELL, and chymotrypsin. Insects that feed on plants, Transported through phloem, containing proteinase inhibitors suffer reduced, to target cells in other organs, rates of growth and development that can be, offset by supplemental amino acids in their diet., The defensive role of proteinase inhibitors has, Membrane lipids, Lipase, been confirmed by experiments with transgenic, Plasma, tobacco. Plants that had been transformed to, Receptor, Free linolenic acid, membrane, accumulate increased levels of proteinase, inhibitors suffered less damage from insect herJasmonic acid biosynthesis, bivores than did untransformed control plants, (see Figure 13.24), (Johnson et al. 1989)., O, , Herbivore Damage Triggers a Complex, Signaling Pathway, Proteinase inhibitors and certain other defenses, are not continuously present in plants, but are, synthesized only after initial herbivore or, pathogen attack. In tomatoes, insect feeding, leads to the rapid accumulation of proteinase, , Activation of proteinase, inhibitor genes, CYTOPLASM, , Signaling, pathway, , COOH, , Jasmonic acid, , FIGURE 13.23 Proposed signaling pathway for the rapid induction of, , proteinase inhibitor biosynthesis in wounded tomato plants.
Page 328 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, , Jasmonic Acid Is a Plant Stress Hormone That, Activates Many Defense Responses, Jasmonic acid levels rise steeply in response to damage, caused by a variety of different herbivores and trigger the, formation of many different kinds of plant defenses besides, proteinase inhibitors, including terpenes and alkaloids. The, structure and biosynthesis of jasmonic acid have intrigued, plant biologists because of the parallels to some eicosanoids, that are central to inflammatory responses and other physiological processes in mammals (see Chapter 14 on the web, site). In plants, jasmonic acid is synthesized from linolenic, acid (18:3), which is released from membrane lipids and, then converted to jasmonic acid as outlined in Figure 13.24., Jasmonic acid is known to induce the transcription of a, host of genes involved in plant defense metabolism. The, mechanisms for this gene activation are slowly becoming, clear. For example, recent research on the Madagascar periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus), which makes some valuable, anticancer alkaloids, identified a transcription factor that, responds to jasmonic acid by activating the expression of, several genes encoding alkaloid biosynthetic genes (van der, Fits and Memelink 2000). Interestingly, this transcription, factor also activates the genes of certain primary metabolic, pathways that provide precursors for alkaloid formation, so, it appears to be a master regulator of metabolism in Madagascar periwinkle., , COOH, , Linolenic acid, , O, , COOH, , 12-Oxophytodienoic acid, , O, , COOH, , Jasmonic acid, , FIGURE 13.24 Steps in the pathway for conversion of, , linolenic acid (18:3) to jasmonic acid., , 303, , Direct demonstration of the role of jasmonic acid in, insect resistance has come from research with mutant lines, of Arabidopsis that produce only low levels of jasmonic acid, (McConn et al. 1997). Such mutants are easily killed by, insect pests, such as fungus gnats, that normally do not, damage Arabidopsis. However, application of exogenous, jasmonic acid can restore resistance nearly to the levels of, the wild-type plant., , PLANT DEFENSE AGAINST PATHOGENS, Even though they lack an immune system, plants are surprisingly resistant to diseases caused by the fungi, bacteria,, viruses, and nematodes that are ever present in the environment. In this section we will examine the diverse array, of mechanisms that plants have evolved to resist infection,, including the production of antimicrobial agents and a type, of programmed cell death (see Chapter 16) called the hypersensitive response. Finally, we will discuss a special type of, plant immunity called systemic acquired resistance., , Some Antimicrobial Compounds Are Synthesized, before Pathogen Attack, Several classes of secondary metabolites that we have, already discussed have strong antimicrobial activity when, tested in vitro; thus they have been proposed to function as, defenses against pathogens in the intact plant. Among, these are saponins, a group of triterpenes thought to disrupt fungal membranes by binding to sterols., Experiments performed in the laboratory of Anne, Osbourn at the John Innes Centre (Norwich, England) utilized genetic approaches to demonstrate the role of saponins, in defense against pathogens of oat (Papadopoulou et al., 1999). Mutant oat lines with reduced saponin levels had, much less resistance to fungal pathogens than wild-type, oats. Interestingly, one fungal strain that normally grows on, oats was able to detoxify one of the principal saponins in the, plant. However, mutants of this strain that could no longer, detoxify saponins failed to infect oats, but could grow successfully on wheat that did not contain any saponins., , Infection Induces Additional Antipathogen, Defenses, Some defenses are induced by herbivore attack or microbial infection. Defenses that are produced only after initial, herbivore damage theoretically require a smaller investment of plant resources than defenses that are always present, but they must be activated quickly to be effective. Like, proteinase inhibitors, other induced defenses appear to be, triggered by complex signal transduction networks, which, often involve jasmonic acid., After being infected by a pathogen, plants deploy a, broad spectrum of defenses against invading microbes. A, common defense is the hypersensitive response, in which, cells immediately surrounding the infection site die rapidly,
Page 329 :
304, , Chapter 13, , depriving the pathogen of nutrients and preventing its, spread. After a successful hypersensitive response, a small, region of dead tissue is left at the site of the attempted invasion, but the rest of the plant is unaffected., The hypersensitive response is often preceded by the production of reactive oxygen species. Cells in the vicinity of the, infection synthesize a burst of toxic compounds formed by, the reduction of molecular oxygen, including the superoxide, anion (O2• –), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and the hydroxyl, radical (•OH). An NADPH-dependent oxidase located on the, plasma membrane (Figure 13.25) is thought to produce O2• –,, which in turn is converted to •OH and H2O2., The hydroxyl radical is the strongest oxidant of these, active oxygen species and can initiate radical chain reactions with a range of organic molecules, leading to lipid, peroxidation, enzyme inactivation, and nucleic acid degradation (Lamb and Dixon 1997). Active oxygen species may, contribute to cell death as part of the hypersensitive, response or act to kill the pathogen directly., Many species react to fungal or bacterial invasion by, synthesizing lignin or callose (see Chapter 10). These polymers are thought to serve as barriers, walling off the, pathogen from the rest of the plant and physically blocking its spread. A related response is the modification of cell, wall proteins. Certain proline-rich proteins of the wall, become oxidatively cross-linked after pathogen attack in, an H2O2-mediated reaction (see Figure 13.25) (Bradley et, al. 1992). This process strengthens the walls of the cells in, the vicinity of the infection site, increasing their resistance, to microbial digestion., , OUTSIDE OF CELL, , Another defensive response to infection is the formation, of hydrolytic enzymes that attack the cell wall of the, pathogen. An assortment of glucanases, chitinases, and, other hydrolases are induced by fungal invasion. Chitin, a, polymer of N-acetylglucosamine residues, is a principal, component of fungal cell walls. These hydrolytic enzymes, belong to a group of proteins that are closely associated, with pathogen infection and so are known as pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins., , Phytoalexins. Perhaps the best-studied response of plants, to bacterial or fungal invasion is the synthesis of phytoalexins. Phytoalexins are a chemically diverse group of, secondary metabolites with strong antimicrobial activity, that accumulate around the site of infection., Phytoalexin production appears to be a common mechanism of resistance to pathogenic microbes in a wide range, of plants. However, different plant families employ different types of secondary products as phytoalexins. For example, isoflavonoids are common phytoalexins in the legume, family, whereas in plants of the potato family (Solanaceae),, such as potato, tobacco, and tomato, various sesquiterpenes, are produced as phytoalexins (Figure 13.26)., Phytoalexins are generally undetectable in the plant, before infection, but they are synthesized very rapidly after, microbial attack because of the activation of new biosynthetic pathways. The point of control is usually the initiation of gene transcription. Thus, plants do not appear to, store any of the enzymatic machinery required for phytoalexin synthesis. Instead, soon after microbial invasion, , Pathogen, , Elicitor (product of an avr gene), Reactive oxygen, species, , O2, , Cell wall, , Cell wall, cross-linking, , NADPH, oxidase, Plasma, membrane, , ?, Ion fluxes,, change in, membrane, potential, , CYTOPLASM, , Receptor, (R gene, product), ?, , Activation of genes for:, Hypersensitive response, Phytoalexin biosynthesis, Lignin biosynthesis, Salicylic acid biosynthesis, Biosynthesis of hydrolytic, enzymes, , Systemic, acquired, resistance, , FIGURE 13.25 Many modes of antipathogen defense are induced by infection., , Fragments of pathogen molecules called elicitors initiate a complex signaling pathway leading to the activation of defensive responses. Some bacterial protein elicitors are injected directly into the cell, where they interact with R gene products.
Page 330 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, Additional ring formed from a C5, unit from the terpene pathway, CH3, , 305, , FIGURE 13.26 Structure of some phytoalex-, , ins—secondary metabolites with antimicrobial, properties that are rapidly synthesized after, microbial infection., , H 3C, HO, , O, , O, , O, OH, , function in defense against fungi, bacteria,, and nematodes. Most of the R genes are, O, O, thought to encode protein receptors that recOH, OCH3, ognize and bind specific molecules originating from pathogens. This binding alerts the, Glyceollin I (from soybean), Medicarpin (from alfalfa), plant to the pathogen’s presence (see Figure, Isoflavonoids from the Leguminosae (the pea family), 13.25). The specific pathogen molecules recognized are referred to as elicitors, and they, OH, include proteins, peptides, sterols, and polyHO, saccharide fragments arising from the, pathogen cell wall, outer membrane, or a, CH2, CH2, secretion process (Boller 1995)., HO, HO, CH3, The R gene products themselves are nearly, CH3, CH3, CH3, CH3, all proteins with a leucine-rich domain that is, Rishitin (from potato and tomato), Capsidiol (from pepper and tobacco), repeated inexactly several times in the amino, acid sequence (see Chapter 14 on the webSesquiterpenes from the Solanaceae (the potato family), site). Such domains may be involved in elicitor binding and pathogen recognition. In, addition, the R gene product is equipped to, they begin transcribing and translating the appropriate, initiate signaling pathways that activate the various modes, mRNAs and synthesizing the enzymes de novo., of antipathogen defense. Some R genes encode a, nucleotide-binding site that binds ATP or GTP; others, Although phytoalexins accumulate in concentrations that, encode a protein kinase domain (Young 2000)., have been shown to be toxic to pathogens in bioassays, the, R gene products are distributed in more than one place, defensive significance of these compounds in the intact plant, in the cell. Some appear to be situated on the outside of the, is not fully known. Recent experiments on genetically modplasma membrane, where they could rapidly detect eliciified plants and pathogens have provided the first direct, tors; others are cytoplasmic to detect either pathogen molproof of phytoalexin function in vivo. For example, when, ecules that are injected into the cell or other metabolic, tobacco was transformed with a gene catalyzing the biosynchanges indicating pathogen infection. R genes constitute, thesis of the phenylpropanoid phytoalexin resveratrol, it, one of the largest gene families in plants and are often clusbecame much more resistant to a fungal pathogen than nontered together in the genome. The structures of R gene clustransformed control plants were (Hain et al. 1993). In conters may help generate R gene diversity by promoting, trast, Arabidopsis mutants deficient in the tryptophan-derived, phytoalexin camalexin were more susceptible than the wildexchange between chromosomes., type to a fungal pathogen. In other experiments, pathogens, Studies of plant disease have revealed complex patterns, that had been transformed with genes encoding phytoalexinof host relationships between plants and pathogen strains., degrading enzymes were then able to infect plants that were, Plant species are generally susceptible to the attack of certain, normally resistant to them (Kombrink and Somssich 1995)., pathogen strains, but resistant to others. This specificity is, thought to be determined by interaction between the prodSome Plants Recognize Specific Substances, ucts of host R genes and pathogen avr (avirulence) genes, Released from Pathogens, believed to encode specific elicitors. According to current, Within a species, individual plants often differ greatly in, thinking, successful resistance requires the elicitor, a product, their resistance to microbial pathogens. These differences, of the pathogen avr gene, to be rapidly recognized by a host, plant receptor, the product of an R gene. Despite their name,, often lie in the speed and intensity of a plant’s reactions., avr genes appear to encode factors that promote infection., Resistant plants respond more rapidly and more vigorously to pathogens than susceptible plants. Hence it is, Exposure to Elicitors Induces a Signal, important to learn how plants sense the presence of, Transduction Cascade, pathogens and initiate defense., Within a few minutes after pathogen elicitors have been, In the last few years, researchers have isolated over 20, recognized by an R gene, complex signaling pathways are, different plant resistance genes, known as R genes, that
Page 331 :
306, , Chapter 13, , set in motion that lead eventually to defense responses (see, Figure 13.25). A common early element of these cascades is, a transient change in the ion permeability of the plasma, membrane. R gene activation stimulates an influx of Ca2+ and, H+ ions into the cell and an efflux of K+ and Cl– ions (Nürnberger and Scheel 2001). The influx of Ca2+ activates the, oxidative burst that may act directly in defense (as already, described), as well as signaling other defense reactions. Other, components of pathogen-stimulated signal transduction, pathways include nitric oxide, mitogen-activated protein, (MAP) kinases, calcium-dependent protein kinases, jasmonic, acid, and salicylic acid (see the next section)., , A Single Encounter with a Pathogen May Increase, Resistance to Future Attacks, When a plant survives the infection of a pathogen at one, site, it often develops increased resistance to subsequent, attacks at sites throughout the plant and enjoys protection, against a wide range of pathogen species. This phenomenon, called systemic acquired resistance (SAR), develops, over a period of several days following initial infection, (Ryals et al. 1996). Systemic acquired resistance appears to, result from increased levels of certain defense compounds, that we have already mentioned, including chitinases and, other hydrolytic enzymes., Although the mechanism of SAR induction is still, unknown, one of the endogenous signals is likely to be salicylic acid. The level of this benzoic acid derivative, a, C6, , C1, , compound rises dramatically in the zone of, infection after initial attack, and it is thought to establish, SAR in other parts of the plant, although salicylic acid itself, is not the mobile signal (Figure 13.27)., In addition to salicylic acid, recent studies suggest that, its methyl ester, methyl salicylate, acts as a volatile SARinducing signal transmitted to distant parts of the plant, and even to neighboring plants (Shulaev et al. 1997). Thus,, even though plants lack immune systems like those present, in many animals, they have developed elaborate mechanisms to protect themselves from disease-causing microbes., , SUMMARY, Plants produce an enormous diversity of substances that, have no apparent roles in growth and development, processes and so are classified under the heading of secondary metabolites. Scientists have long speculated that, these compounds protect plants from predators and, pathogens on the basis of their toxicity and repellency to, herbivores and microbes when tested in vitro. Recent, experiments on plants whose secondary-metabolite expression has been altered by modern molecular methods have, begun to confirm these defensive roles., , Infection of, one leaf, , OH, , OH, , COOH, , COOCH3, , Accumulation, of salicylic acid, , Synthesis and, release of volatile, methyl salicylate, , Transmission of, signal to other, parts of plant via, vascular system,, resulting in, increased systemic, resistance, to pathogens, , Airborne, transmission, of signal to, other parts of, plant (and, neighboring, plants), , FIGURE 13.27 Initial pathogen infection may increase resis-, , tance to future pathogen attack through development of, systemic acquired resistance., , There are three major groups of secondary metabolites:, terpenes, phenolics, and nitrogen-containing compounds., Terpenes, composed of five-carbon isoprene units, are toxins and feeding deterrents to many herbivores., Phenolics, which are synthesized primarily from products of the shikimic acid pathway, have several important, roles in plants. Lignin mechanically strengthens cell walls., Flavonoid pigments function as shields against harmful, ultraviolet radiation and as attractants for pollinators and, fruit dispersers. Finally, lignin, flavonoids, and other phenolic compounds serve as defenses against herbivores and, pathogens., Members of the third major group, nitrogen-containing, secondary metabolites, are synthesized principally from, common amino acids. Compounds such as alkaloids,, cyanogenic glycosides, glucosinolates, nonprotein amino, acids, and proteinase inhibitors protect plants from a variety of herbivorous animals., Plants have evolved multiple defense mechanisms, against microbial pathogens. Besides antimicrobial secondary metabolites, some of which are preformed and, some of which are induced by infection, other modes of, defense include the construction of polymeric barriers to, pathogen penetration and the synthesis of enzymes that, degrade pathogen cell walls. In addition, plants employ, specific recognition and signaling systems enabling the, rapid detection of pathogen invasion and initiation of a, vigorous defensive response. Once infected, some plants, also develop an immunity to subsequent microbial attacks.
Page 332 :
Secondary Metabolites and Plant Defense, For millions of years, plants have produced defenses, against herbivory and microbial attack. Well-defended, plants have tended to leave more survivors than poorly, defended plants, so the capacity to produce effective defensive products has become widely established in the plant, kingdom. In response, many species of herbivores and, microbes have evolved the ability to feed on or infect plants, containing secondary products without being adversely, affected, and this herbivore and pathogen pressure has in, turn selected for new defensive products in plants., The study of plant secondary metabolites has many, practical applications. By virtue of their biological activities against herbivorous animals and microbes, many of, these substances are employed commercially as insecticides, fungicides, and pharmaceuticals, while others find, uses as fragrances, flavorings, medicinal drugs, and industrial materials. The breeding of increased levels of secondary metabolites into crop plants has made it possible to, reduce the need for certain costly and potentially harmful, pesticides. In some cases, however, it has been necessary to, reduce the levels of naturally occurring secondary metabolites to minimize toxicity to humans and domestic animals., , Web Material, Web Topics, 13.1 Structure of Various Triterpenes, The structures of several triterpenes are given., , 13.2 The Shikimic Acid Pathway, The biochemical pathway for the synthesis of, aromatic amino acids, the precursors of phenolic compounds, is presented., , 13.3 Detailed Chemical Structure of a Portion of a, Lignin Molecule, The partial structure of a hypothetical lignin, molecule from European beech (Fagus sylvatica) is described., , Web Essays, 13.1 Unraveling the Function of Secondary, Metabolites, Wild tobacco plants use alkaloids and terpenes, to defend themselves against herbivores., , 13.2 Alkaloid-Making Fungal Symbionts, Fungal endophytes can enhance plant growth,, increase resistance to various stresses, and act, as “defensive mutualists” against herbivores., , 307, , Chapter References, Aerts, R. J., and Mordue, A. J. (1997) Feeding deterrence and toxocity of neem triterpenoids. J. Chem. Ecol. 23: 2117–2132., Boller, T. (1995) Chemoperception of microbial signals in plant cells., Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 189–214., Bradley, D. J., Kjellbom, P., and Lamb, C. J. (1992) Elicitor- and, wound-induced oxidative cross-linking of a proline-rich plant, cell wall protein: A novel, rapid defense response. Cell 70: 21–30., Butler, L. G. (1989) Effects of condensed tannin on animal nutrition., In Chemistry and Significance of Condensed Tannins, R. W. Hemingway and J. J. Karchesy, eds., Plenum, New York, pp. 391–402., Corder, R., Douthwaite, J. A., Lees, D. M., Khan, N. Q., Viseu dos, Santos, A. C., Wood, E. G., and Carrier, M. J. (2001) Endothelin-1, synthesis reduced by red wine. Nature 414: 863–864., Creelman, R. A., and Mullet, J. E. (1997) Biosynthesis and action of, jasmonates in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:, 355–381., Davin, L. B., and Lewis, N. G. (2000) Dirigent proteins and dirigent, sites explain the mystery of specificity of radical precursor, coupling in lignan and lignin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 123:, 453–461., Eigenbrode, S. D., Stoner, K. A., Shelton, A. M., and Kain, W. C., (1991) Characteristics of glossy leaf waxes associated with resistance to diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Brassica oleracea. J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 1609–1618., Felton, G. W., Donato, K., Del Vecchio, R. J., and Duffey, S. S. (1989), Activation of plant foliar oxidases by insect feeding reduces, nutritive quality of foliage for noctuid herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol., 15: 2667–2694., Gershenzon, J., and Croteau, R. (1992) Terpenoids. In Herbivores:, Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites, Vol. 1: The Chemical Participants, 2nd ed., G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum,, eds., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 165–219., Gunning, B. E. S., and Steer, M. W. (1996) Plant Cell Biology: Structure, and Function of Plant Cells. Jones and Bartlett, Boston., Hain, R., Reif, H.-J., Krause, E., Langebartels, R., Kindl, H., Vornam,, B., Wiese, W., Schmelzer, E., Schreier, P. H., Stoecker, R. H., and, Stenzel, K. (1993) Disease resistance results from foreign phytoalexin expression in a novel plant. Nature 361: 153–156., Hartmann, T. (1992) Alkaloids. In Herbivores: Their Interactions with, Secondary Plant Metabolites, Vol. 1: The Chemical Participants, 2nd, ed., G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum, eds., Academic Press,, San Diego, CA, pp. 79–121., Hartmann, T. (1999) Chemical ecology of pyrrolizidine alkaloids., Planta 207: 483–495., Hatfield, R., and Vermerris, W. (2001) Lignin formation in plants. The, dilemma of linkage specificity. Plant Physiol. 126: 1351–1357., Herrmann, K. M., and Weaver, L. M. (1999) The shikimate pathway., Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 473–503., Inderjit, Dakshini, K. M. M., and Einhellig, F. A., eds. (1995) Allelopathy: Organisms, Processes, and Applications. ACS Symposium series, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC., Jeffree, C. E. (1996) Structure and ontogeny of plant cuticles. In Plant, Cuticles: An Integrated Functional Approach, G. Kerstiens, ed., BIOS, Scientific, Oxford, pp. 33–85., Jin, H., and Martin, C. (1999) Multifunctionality and diversity within, the plant MYB-gene family. Plant Mol. Biol. 41: 577–585., Johnson, R., Narvaez, J., An, G., and Ryan, C. (1989) Expression of, proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco plants: Effects, on natural defense against Manduca sexta larvae. Proc. Natl. Acad., Sci. USA 86: 9871–9875., Karban, R., and Baldwin, I. T. (1997) Induced Responses to Herbivory., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Page 333 :
308, , Chapter 13, , Kessler, A., and Baldwin, I. T. (2001) Defensive function of herbivoreinduced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291: 2141–2144., Kombrink, E., and Somssich, I. E. (1995) Defense responses of plants, to pathogens. Adv. Bot. Res. 21: 1–34., Kondo, T., Yoshida, K., Nakagawa, A., Kawai, T., Tamura, H., and, Goto, T. (1992) Structural basis of blue-color development in, flower petals from Commelina communis. Nature 358: 515–518., Lamb, C., and Dixon, R. A. (1997) The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:, 251–275., Li, J., Ou-Lee, T.-M., Raba, R., Amundson, R. G., and Last, R. L., (1993) Arabidopsis flavonoid mutants are hypersensitive to UV-B, irradiation. Plant Cell 5: 171–179., Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1999) The 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate, pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant, Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 47–65., Logemann, E., Parniske, M., and Hahlbrock, K. (1995) Modes of, expression and common structural features of the complete, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene family in parsley. Proc. Natl., Acad. Sci. USA 92: 5905–5909., Lunau, K. (1992) A new interpretation of flower guide colouration:, Absorption of ultraviolet light enhances colour saturation. Plant, Sys. Evol. 183: 51–65., McConn, M., Creelman, R. A., Bell, E., Mullet, J. E., and Browse, J., (1997) Jasmonate is essential for insect defense in Arabidopsis., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 5473–5477., Nürnberger, T., and Scheel, D. (2001) Signal transmission in the plant, immune response. Trends Plant Sci. 6: 372–379., Papadopoulou, K., Melton, R. E., Legget, M., Daniels, M. J., and, Osbourn, A. E. (1999) Compromised disease resistance in, saponin-deficient plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:, 12923–12928., , Pearce, G., Strydom, D., Johnson, S., and Ryan, C. A. (1991) A, polypeptide from tomato leaves induces wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor proteins. Science 253: 895–898., Peumans, W. J., and Van Damme, E. J. M. (1995) Lectins as plant, defense proteins. Plant Physiol. 109: 347–352., Poulton, J. E. (1990) Cyanogenesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 94:, 401–405., Renwick, J. A. A., Radke, C. D., Sachdev-Gupta, K., and Staedler, E., (1992) Leaf surface chemicals stimulating oviposition by Pieris, rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on cabbage. Chemoecology 3: 33–38., Rosenthal, G. A. (1991) The biochemical basis for the deleterious, effects of L-canavanine. Phytochemistry 30: 1055–1058., Ryals, J. A., Neuenschwander, U. H., Willits, M. G., Molina, A.,, Steiner, H.-Y., and Hunt, M. D. (1996) Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 8: 1809–1819., Sandberg, S. L., and Berenbaum, M. R. (1989) Leaf-tying by tortricid, larvae as an adaptation for feeding on phototoxic Hypericum perforatum. J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 875–886., Shulaev, V., Silverman, P., and Raskin, I. (1997) Airborne signalling, by methyl salicylate in plant pathogen resistance. Nature 385:, 718–721., Trapp, S., and Croteau, R. (2001) Defensive resin biosynthesis in, conifers. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 689–724., Turlings, T. C. J., Loughrin, J. H., McCall, P. J., Rose, U. S. R., Lewis,, W. J., and Tumlinson, J. H. (1995) How caterpillar-damaged, plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. Proc. Natl., Acad. Sci. USA 92: 4169–4174., van der Fits, L., and Memelink, J. (2000) ORCA3, a jasmonateresponsive transcriptional regulator of plant primary and secondary metabolism. Science 289: 295–297., Young, N. D. (2000) The genetic architecture of resistance. Curr. Opin., Plant Biol. 3: 285–290.
Page 334 :
14, , Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, , PLANT BIOLOGISTS MAY BE FORGIVEN for taking abiding satisfaction in the fact that Mendel’s classic studies on the role of heritable factors in development were carried out on a flowering plant:, the garden pea. The heritable factors that Mendel discovered, which, control such characters as flower color, flower position, pod shape,, stem length, seed color, and seed shape, came to be called genes., Genes are the DNA sequences that encode the RNA molecules, directly involved in making the enzymes and structural proteins of, the cell. Genes are arranged linearly on chromosomes, which form, linkage groups—that is, genes that are inherited together. The total, amount of DNA or genetic information contained in a cell, nucleus,, or organelle is termed its genome., Since Mendel’s pioneering discoveries in his garden, the principle has become firmly established that the growth, development,, and environmental responses of even the simplest microorganism, are determined by the programmed expression of its genes. Among, multicellular organisms, turning genes on (gene expression) or off, alters a cell’s complement of enzymes and structural proteins,, allowing cells to differentiate. In the chapters that follow, we will, discuss various aspects of plant development in relation to the regulation of gene expression., Various internal signals are required for coordinating the expression of genes during development and for enabling the plant to, respond to environmental signals. Such internal (as well as external), signaling agents typically bring about their effects by means of, sequences of biochemical reactions, called signal transduction pathways, that greatly amplify the original signal and ultimately result, in the activation or repression of genes., Much progress has been made in the study of signal transduction, pathways in plants in recent years. However, before describing what, 1
Page 335 :
2, , CHAPTER 14, , is known about these pathways in plants, we will provide, background information on gene expression and signal, transduction in other organisms, such as bacteria, yeasts,, and animals, making reference to plant systems wherever, appropriate. These models will provide the framework, for the recent advances in the study of plant development, that are discussed in subsequent chapters., , Genome Size, Organization, and, Complexity, As might be expected, the size of the genome bears some, relation to the complexity of the organism. For example,, the genome size of E. coli is 4.7 × 106 bp (base pairs), that, of the fruit fly is 2 × 108 bp per haploid cell, and that of a, human is 3 × 109 bp per haploid cell. However, genome, size in eukaryotes is an unreliable indicator of complexity because not all of the DNA encodes genes., In prokaryotes, nearly all of the DNA consists of, unique sequences that encode proteins or functional, RNA molecules. In addition to unique sequences, however, eukaryotic chromosomes contain large amounts of, noncoding DNA whose main functions appear to be, chromosome organization and structure. Much of this, noncoding DNA consists of multicopy sequences, called, repetitive DNA. The remainder of the noncoding DNA, is made up of single-copy sequences called spacer DNA., Together, repetitive and spacer DNA can make up the, majority of the total genome in some eukaryotes. For, example, in humans only about 5% of the total DNA, consists of genes, the unique sequences that encode for, RNA and protein synthesis., The genome size in plants is more variable than in, any other group of eukaryotes. In angiosperms, the haploid genome ranges from about 1.5 × 108 bp for Arabidopsis thaliana (smaller than that of the fruit fly) to 1 ×, 1011 bp for the monocot Trillium, which is considerably, larger than the human genome. Even closely related, beans of the genus Vicia exhibit genomic DNA contents, that vary over a 20-fold range. Why are plant genomes, so variable in size?, Studies of plant molecular biology have shown that, most of the DNA in plants with large genomes is repetitive DNA. Arabidopsis has the smallest genome of any, plant because only 10% of its nuclear DNA is repetitive, DNA. The genome size of rice is estimated to be about, five times that of Arabidopsis, yet the total amount of, unique sequence DNA in the rice genome is about the, same as in Arabidopsis. Thus the difference in genome, size between Arabidopsis and rice is due mainly to repetitive and spacer DNA., Most Plant Haploid Genomes Contain 20,000 to, 30,000 Genes, Until recently, the total number of genes in an organism’s genome was difficult to assess. Thanks to recent, , advances in many genomic sequencing projects, such, numbers are now becoming available, although precise, values are still lacking. According to Miklos and Rubin, (1996), the number of genes in bacteria varies from 500, to 8,000 and overlaps with the number of genes in many, simple unicellular eukaryotes. For example, the yeast, genome appears to contain about 6,000 genes. More, complex eukaryotes, such as protozoans, worms, and, flies, all seem to have gene numbers in the range of, 12,000 to 14,000. The Drosophila (fruit fly) genome contains about 12,000 genes. Thus, the current view is that, it takes roughly 12,000 basic types of genes to form a, eukaryotic organism, although values as high as 43,000, genes are common, as a result of multiple copies of certain genes, or multigene families., The best-studied plant genome is that of Arabidopsis thaliana. Chris Somerville and his colleagues at Stanford University have estimated that the Arabidopsis, genome contains roughly 20,000 genes (Rounsley et al., 1996). This estimate is based on more than one, approach. For example, since large regions of the, genome have been sequenced, we know there is one, gene for every 5 kb (kilobases) of DNA. Since the entire, genome contains about 100,000 kb, there must be about, 20,000 genes. However, 6% of the genome encodes, ribosomal RNA, and another 2% consists of highly, repetitive sequences, so the number could be lower., Similar values likely will be found for the genomes of, other plants as well. The current consensus is that the, genomes of most plants will be found to contain from, 20,000 to 30,000 genes., Some of these genes encode proteins that perform, housekeeping functions, basic cellular processes that go, on in all the different kinds of cells. Such genes are permanently turned on; that is, they are constitutively, expressed. Other genes are highly regulated, being, turned on or off at specific stages of development or in, response to specific environmental stimuli., , Prokaryotic Gene Expression, The first step in gene expression is transcription, the, synthesis of an mRNA copy of the DNA template that, encodes a protein (Alberts et al. 1994; Lodish et al. 1995)., Transcription is followed by translation, the synthesis, of the protein on the ribosome. Developmental studies, have shown that each plant organ contains large numbers of organ-specific mRNAs. Transcription is controlled by proteins that bind DNA, and these DNAbinding proteins are themselves subject to various types, of regulation., Much of our understanding of the basic elements of, transcription is derived from early work on bacterial, systems; hence we precede our discussion of eukaryotic, gene expression with a brief overview of transcriptional, regulation in prokaryotes. However, it is now clear that
Page 336 :
3, , Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, gene regulation in eukaryotes is far more complex than, in prokaryotes. The added complexity of gene expression in eukaryotes is what allows cells and tissues to differentiate and makes possible the diverse life cycles of, plants and animals., DNA-Binding Proteins Regulate Transcription in, Prokaryotes, In prokaryotes, genes are arranged in operons, sets of, contiguous genes that include structural genes and regulatory sequences. A famous example is the E. coli lactose (lac) operon, which was first described in 1961 by, François Jacob and Jacques Monod of the Pasteur Institute in Paris. The lac operon is an example of an, inducible operon—that is, one in which a key metabolic, intermediate induces the transcription of the genes., , The lac operon is responsible for the production of, three proteins involved in utilization of the disaccharide, lactose. This operon consists of three structural genes, and three regulatory sequences. The structural genes (z,, y, and a) code for the sequence of amino acids in three, proteins: β-galactosidase, the enzyme that catalyzes the, hydrolysis of lactose to glucose and galactose; permease, a carrier protein for the membrane transport of lactose into the cell; and transacetylase, the significance of, which is unknown., The three regulatory sequences (i, p, and o) control, the transcription of mRNA for the synthesis of these, proteins (Figure 14.1). Gene i is responsible for the synthesis of a repressor protein that recognizes and binds, to a specific nucleotide sequence, the operator. The, operator, o, is located downstream (i.e., on the 3′ side) of, , (A), , Lactose operon, 5′, , Regulatory, gene i, , DNA, , Transcription, mRNA, , Operator o, , Promoter p, RNA, polymerase, attaches to promoter, , 5′, , Regulatory, gene i, Transcription, , Promoter p, , Transcription is blocked when, repressor protein binds to operator;, z y a mRNA is not made, and, therefore enzymes are not, produced, , Operator o, , 3′, Gene z, , Gene y, , Gene a, , Transcription occurs, , RNA, polymerase, , mRNA, , mRNA, Translation, , Repressor, protein, , β-Galactosidase, Lactose, inducer, , Gene a, , Structural genes, , Repressor protein binds, to the operator gene, , DNA, , Gene y, , Transcription initiation site, , Translation, , (B), , 3′, Gene z, , Repressor–inducer, (inactive), , Figure 14.1 The lac operon of E. coli uses negative control. (A) The regulatory gene i,, located upstream of the operon, is transcribed to produce an mRNA that encodes a, repressor protein. The repressor protein binds to the operator gene o. The operator is a, short stretch of DNA located between the promoter sequence p (the site of RNA polymerase attachment to the DNA) and the three structural genes, z, y, and a. Upon binding, to the operator, the repressor prevents RNA polymerase from binding to the transcription, initiation site. (B) When lactose (inducer) is added to the medium and is taken up by the, cell, it binds to the repressor and inactivates it. The inactivated repressor is unable to bind, to o, and transcription and translation can proceed. The mRNA produced is termed “polycistronic” because it encodes multiple genes. Note that translation begins while transcription is still in progress., , Acetylase, , Permease
Page 337 :
4, , CHAPTER 14, , (A), , Lactose operon, 5′, , DNA, , Regulatory, gene i, , Catabolite, activator, protein, , CAP, , Promoter p, , Operator o, , 3′, Gene z, , Gene y, , Gene a, , Gene y, , Gene a, , CAP–cAMP, complex, RNA polymerase, Cyclic AMP, (cAMP), , (B), 5′, DNA, , Regulatory, gene i, , Promoter p, , Operator o, , Transcription, occurs, , Figure 14.2 Stimulation of transcription by the catabolite, activator protein (CAP) and cyclic AMP (cAMP). CAP has no, effect on transcription until cAMP binds to it. (A) The CAP–, cAMP complex binds to a specific DNA sequence near the, promoter region of the lac operon. (B) Binding of the CAP–, cAMP complex makes the promoter region more accessible to, RNA polymerase, and transcription rates are enhanced., , the promoter sequence, p, where RNA polymerase, attaches to the operon to initiate transcription, and, immediately upstream (i.e., on the 5′ side) of the transcription start site, where transcription begins. (The initiation site is considered to be at the 5′ end of the gene,, even though the RNA polymerase transcribes from the, 3′ end to the 5′ end along the opposite strand. This convention was adopted so that the sequence of the mRNA, would match the DNA sequence of the gene.), In the absence of lactose, the lactose repressor forms a, tight complex with the operator sequence and blocks the, interaction of RNA polymerase with the transcription start, site, effectively preventing transcription (see Figure 14.1A)., When present, lactose binds to the repressor, causing it to, undergo a conformational change (see Figure 14.1B). The, lac repressor is thus an allosteric protein whose conformation is determined by the presence or absence of an, effector molecule, in this case lactose. As a result of the, conformational change due to binding lactose, the lac, repressor detaches from the operator. When the operator, sequence is unobstructed, the RNA polymerase can move, along the DNA, synthesizing a continuous mRNA. The, translation of this mRNA yields the three proteins, and, lactose is said to induce their synthesis., The lac repressor is an example of negative control,, since the repressor blocks transcription upon binding to, , 3′, Gene z, , mRNA, , the operator region of the operon. The lac operon is also, regulated by positive control, which was discovered in, connection with a phenomenon called the glucose effect., If glucose is added to a nutrient medium that includes, lactose, the E. coli cells metabolize the glucose and ignore, the lactose. Glucose suppresses expression of the lac, operon and prevents synthesis of the enzymes needed to, degrade lactose. Glucose exerts this effect by lowering, the cellular concentration of cyclic AMP (cAMP). When, glucose levels are low, cAMP levels are high. Cyclic AMP, binds to an activator protein, the catabolite activator protein (CAP), which recognizes and binds to a specific, nucleotide sequence immediately upstream of the lac, operator and promoter sites (Figure 14.2)., In contrast to the behavior of the lactose repressor protein, when the CAP is complexed with its effector, cAMP,, its affinity for its DNA-binding site is dramatically, increased (hence the reference to positive control). The, ternary complex formed by CAP, cAMP, and the lactose, operon DNA sequences induces bending of the DNA,, which activates transcription of the lactose operon structural genes by increasing the affinity of RNA polymerase, for the neighboring promoter site. Bacteria synthesize, cyclic AMP when they exhaust the glucose in their, growth medium. The lactose operon genes are thus under, opposing regulation by the absence of glucose (high levels of cyclic AMP) and the presence of lactose, since glucose is a catabolite of lactose., In bacteria, metabolites can also serve as corepressors,, activating a repressor protein that blocks transcription., Repression of enzyme synthesis is often involved in the, regulation of biosynthetic pathways in which one or
Page 338 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, (A), , 5, , Tryptophan operon, 5′, , DNA, , Regulatory, gene i, Transcription, , Promoter p, , Operator o, , 3′, Gene E, , Gene D, , Gene C, , Gene B, , Gene A, , Transcription occurs, , RNA, polymerase, , mRNA, , mRNA, Translation, Repressor (inactive), , Enzymes for tryptophan synthesis, , (B), DNA, , 5′, , Regulatory, gene i, Transcription, , Promoter p, , Operator o, , 3′, Gene E, , Gene D, , Gene C, , Gene B, , Gene A, , Transcription is blocked, , RNA, polymerase, , Repressor–corepressor complex (active), , mRNA, Translation, Repressor, protein, , Corepressor, (tryptophan), , Figure 14.3 The tryptophan (trp) operon of E. coli. Tryptophan (Trp) is the end product, of the pathway catalyzed by tryptophan synthetase and other enzymes. Transcription of, the repressor genes results in the production of a repressor protein. However, the repressor is inactive until it forms a complex with its corepressor, Trp. (A) In the absence of, Trp, transcription and translation proceed. (B) In the presence of Trp, the activated repressor–corepressor complex blocks transcription by binding to the operator sequence., , more enzymes are synthesized only if the end product, of the pathway—an amino acid, for example—is not, available. In such a case the amino acid acts as a corepressor: It complexes with the repressor protein, and, this complex attaches to the operator DNA, preventing, transcription. The tryptophan (trp) operon in E. coli is an, example of an operon that works by corepression (Figure 14.3)., , Eukaryotic Gene Expression, The study of bacterial gene expression has provided, models that can be tested in eukaryotes. However, the, details of the process are quite different and more complex in eukaryotes. In prokaryotes, translation is coupled to transcription: As the mRNA transcripts elongate,, they bind to ribosomes and begin synthesizing proteins, (translation). In eukaryotes, however, the nuclear enve-, , lope separates the genome from the translational, machinery. The transcripts must first be transported to, the cytoplasm, adding another level of control., Eukaryotic Nuclear Transcripts Require Extensive, Processing, Eukaryotes differ from prokaryotes also in the organization of their genomes. In most eukaryotic organisms,, each gene encodes a single polypeptide. The eukaryotic, nuclear genome contains no operons, with one notable, exception.* Furthermore, eukaryotic genes are divided, into coding regions called exons and noncoding regions, * About 25% of the genes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans are in operons. The operon pre-mRNAs are processed, into individual mRNAs that encode single polypeptides, (monocistronic mRNAs) by a combination of cleavage,, polyadenylation, and splicing (Kuersten et al. 1997).
Page 339 :
6, , CHAPTER 14, , Transcription, starts here, , AUG (Translational start site), , Translational stop site, , 5′, DNA, , 3′, Promoter, , RNA polymerase II, , Intron, , Exon, , Transcription occurs, m7G cap, Pre-mRNA, , Exon, , Intron, , Exon, , Transcription, (+ capping and polyadenylation), AAAAn, Processing of precursor, , mRNA, , AAAAn, Transport out of nucleus to cytoplasm, , Polysome, AAAAn, Translation, , Released polypeptides, , Figure 14.4 Gene expression in eukaryotes. RNA polymerase II binds to the promoter of, genes that encode proteins. Unlike prokaryotic genes, eukaryotic genes are not clustered, in operons, and each is divided into introns and exons. Transcription from the template, strand proceeds in the 3′-to-5′ direction at the transcription start site, and the growing, RNA chain extends one nucleotide at a time in the 5′-to-3′ direction. Translation begins, with the first AUG encoding methionine, as in prokaryotes, and ends with the stop, codon. The pre-mRNA transcript is first “capped” by the addition of 7-methylguanylate, (m7G) to the 5′ end. The 3′ end is shortened slightly by cleavage at a specific site, and a, poly-A tail is added. The capped and polyadenylated pre-mRNA is then spliced by a, spliceosome complex, and the introns are removed. The mature mRNA exits the nucleus, through the pores and initiates translation on ribosomes in the cytosol. As each ribosome, progresses toward the 3′ end of the mRNA, new ribosomes attach at the 5′ end and begin, translating, leading to the formation of polysomes., , called introns (Figure 14.4). Since the primary transcript, or pre-mRNA, contains both exon and intron, sequences, the pre-mRNA must be processed to remove, the introns., RNA processing involves multiple steps. The newly, synthesized pre-mRNA is immediately packaged into a, string of small protein-containing particles, called heteronuclear ribonucleoprotein particles, or hnRNP particles. Some of these particles are composed of proteins, and small nuclear RNAs, and are called small nuclear, ribonucleoproteins, or snRNPs (pronounced “snurps”)., Various snRNPs assemble into spliceosome complexes, at exon–intron boundaries of the pre-mRNA and carry, out the splicing reaction., In some cases, the primary transcript can be spliced, in different ways, a process called alternative RNA, splicing. For example, an exon that is present in one, , version of a processed transcript may be spliced out of, another version. In this way, the same gene can give rise, to different polypeptide chains. Approximately 15% of, human genes are processed by alternative splicing., Although alternative splicing is rare in plants, it is, involved in the synthesis of rubisco activase, RNA polymerase II, and the gene product of a rice homeobox gene, (discussed later in the chapter), as well as other proteins, (Golovkin and Reddy 1996)., Before splicing, the pre-mRNA is modified in two, important ways. First it is capped by the addition of 7methylguanylate to the 5′ end of the transcript via a 5′to-5′ linkage. The pre-mRNA is capped almost immediately after the initiation of mRNA synthesis. One of the, functions of the 5′ cap is to protect the growing RNA, transcript from degradation by RNases. At a later stage, in the synthesis of the primary transcript, the 3′ end is
Page 340 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, , The levels for control, of gene expression, 1 Genome, , Chromatin, NUCLEUS, Gene amplification (rare), DNA rearrangements (rare), Chromatin decondensation, DNA methylation, DNA available for expression, , 2 Transcription, , Figure 14.5 Eukaryotic gene expression can be regulated, at multiple levels. (1) genomic regulation, by gene amplification, DNA rearrangements, chromatin decondensation or, condensation, or DNA methylation; (2) transcriptional regulation; (3) RNA processing, and RNA turnover in the nucleus, and translocation out of the nucleus; (4) translational control (including binding to ER in some cases); (5) posttranslational control, including mRNA turnover in the cytosol, and, the folding, assembly, modification, and import of proteins, into organelles. (After Becker et al. 1996.), , RNA polymerase II, Primary RNA transcript, Processing (5′ capping, addition, of poly-A tail, excision of, introns, splicing together of, exons) and turnover, , RNA processing, 3, and translocation, , mRNA in nucleus, Transport of mRNA across, nuclear envelope, CYTOPLASM, mRNA in cytosol, 4 Translation, Translation, , mRNA degradation, (turnover), , Possible targeting to ER, , 5 Posttranslation, , 7, , Polypeptide product in cytosol or ER, Protein folding and assembly, Possible polypeptide cleavage, Possible modification, Possible import into organelles, Functional protein, Protein degradation, (turnover), , cleaved at a specific site, and a poly-A tail, usually consisting of about 100 to 200 adenylic acid residues, is, added by the enzyme poly-A polymerase (see Figure, 14.4)., The poly-A tail has several functions: (1) It protects, against RNases and therefore increases the stability of, mRNA molecules in the cytoplasm, (2) both it and the 5′, cap are required for transit through the nuclear pore,, and (3) it increases the efficiency of translation on the, ribosomes. The requirement of eukaryotic mRNAs to, have both a 5′ cap and a poly-A tail ensures that only, properly processed transcripts will reach the ribosome, and be translated., Each step in eukaryotic gene expression can potentially regulate the amount of gene product in the cell at, any given time (Figure 14.5). Like transcription initiation, splicing may be regulated. Export from the nucleus, is also regulated. For example, to exit the nucleus an, mRNA must possess a 5′ cap and a poly-A tail, and it, must be properly spliced. Incompletely processed transcripts remain in the nucleus and are degraded., , Various Posttranscriptional Regulatory, Mechanisms Have Been Identified, The stabilities or turnover rates of mRNA molecules differ from one another, and may vary from tissue to tissue, depending on the physiological conditions. For, example, in bean (Vicia faba), fungal infection causes the, rapid degradation of the mRNA that encodes the proline-rich protein PvPRP1 of the bean cell wall. Another, example of the regulation of gene expression by RNA, degradation is the regulation of expression of one of the, genes for the small subunit of rubisco in roots of the, aquatic duckweed Lemna gibba. Lemna roots are photosynthetic and therefore express genes for the small subunit of rubisco, but the expression of one of the genes, (SSU5B) is much lower in roots than in the fronds, (leaves). Jane Silverthorne and her colleagues at the University of California, Santa Cruz, showed that the low, level of SSU5B in the roots is due to a high rate of, turnover of the SSU5B pre-mRNA in the nucleus (Peters, and Silverthorne 1995)., In addition to RNA turnover, the translatability of, mRNA molecules is variable. For example, RNAs fold, into molecules with varying secondary and tertiary, structures that can influence the accessibility of the, translation initiation codon (the first AUG sequence) to, the ribosome. Another factor that can influence translatability of an mRNA is codon usage. There is redundancy in the triplet codons that specify a given amino, acid during translation, and each cell has a characteristic ratio of the different aminoacylated tRNAs available,, known as codon bias. If a message contains a large, number of triplet codons that are rare for that cell, the, small number of charged tRNAs available for those, codons will slow translation. Finally, the cellular location at which translation occurs seems to affect the rate, of gene expression. Free polysomes may translate, mRNAs at very different rates from those at which, polysomes bound to the endoplasmic reticulum do;, even within the endoplasmic reticulum, there may be, differential translation rates., Although examples of posttranscriptional regulation, have been demonstrated for each of the steps described, above and summarized in Figure 14.5, the expression of, most eukaryotic genes, like their prokaryotic counterparts,, appears to be regulated at the level of transcription.
Page 341 :
8, , CHAPTER 14, , Transcription in Eukaryotes Is Modulated, by cis-Acting Regulatory Sequences, The synthesis of most eukaryotic proteins is regulated, at the level of transcription. However, transcription in, eukaryotes is much more complex than in prokaryotes., First, there are three different RNA polymerases in, eukaryotes: I, II, and III. RNA polymerase I is located in, the nucleolus and functions in the synthesis of most, ribosomal RNAs. RNA polymerase II, located in the, nucleoplasm, is responsible for pre-mRNA synthesis., RNA polymerase III, also located in the nucleoplasm,, synthesizes small RNAs, such as tRNA and 5S rRNA., A second important difference between transcription, in prokaryotes and in eukaryotes is that the RNA polymerases of eukaryotes require additional proteins called, general transcription factors to position them at the correct start site. While prokaryotic RNA polymerases also, require accessory polypeptides called sigma factors (σ),, these polypeptides are considered to be subunits of the, RNA polymerase. In contrast, eukaryotic general transcription factors make up a large, multisubunit transcription initiation complex. For example, seven general transcription factors constitute the initiation, complex of RNA polymerase II, each of which must be, added in a specific order during assembly (Figure 14.6)., According to one current model, transcription is initiated when the final transcription factor, TFIIH (transcription factor for RNA polymerase II protein H), joins, the complex and causes phosphorylation of the RNA, polymerase. RNA polymerase II then separates from the, initiation complex and proceeds along the antisense, strand in the 3′-to-5′ direction. While some of the general transcription factors dissociate from the complex at, this point, others remain to bind another RNA polymerase molecule and initiate another round of transcription., A third difference between transcription in prokaryotes and in eukaryotes is in the complexity of the promoters, the sequences upstream (5′) of the initiation site, that regulate transcription. We can divide the structure, of the eukaryotic promoter into two parts, the core or, minimum promoter, consisting of the minimum upstream sequence required for gene expression, and the, additional regulatory sequences, which control the, activity of the core promoter., Each of the three RNA polymerases has a different, type of promoter. An example of a typical RNA polymerase II promoter is shown schematically in Figure, 14.7A. The minimum promoter for genes transcribed by, RNA polymerase II typically extends about 100 bp, upstream of the transcription initiation site and includes, several sequence elements referred to as proximal promoter sequences. About 25 to 35 bp upstream of the, transcriptional start site is a short sequence called the, TATA box, consisting of the sequence TATAAA(A). The, , Start of transcription, TATA, , 1, , TFIID, , 2, , TFIIB, , TFIIF, TFIIE, RNA polymerase II, , TFIIH, 3, , Protein kinase (TFIIH) activity, 4, , P P P P, , Transcription Begins, , Figure 14.6 Ordered assembly of the general transcription, factors required for transcription by RNA polymerase II. (1), TFIID, a multisubunit complex, binds to the TATA box via, the TATA-binding protein. (2) TFIIB joins the complex. (3), TFIIF bound to RNA polymerase II associates with the complex, along with TFIIE and TFIIH. The assembly of proteins is, referred to as the transcription initiation complex. (4) TFIIH,, a protein kinase, phosphorylates the RNA polymerase, some, of the general transcription factors are released, and transcription begins. (From Alberts et al. 1994.), , TATA box plays a crucial role in transcription because it, serves as the site of assembly of the transcription initiation complex. Approximately 85% of the plant genes, sequenced thus far contain TATA boxes., In addition to the TATA box, the minimum promoters of eukaryotes also contain two additional regulatory, sequences: the CAAT box and the GC box (see Figure, 14.7A). These two sequences are the sites of binding of, transcription factors, proteins that enhance the rate of, transcription by facilitating the assembly of the initiation complex. The DNA sequences themselves are
Page 342 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, (A), , 9, , General, transcription, factors, RNA, polymerase II, , Gene regulatory proteins, , Gene X, , DNA, GGGCGG, , GCCCAATCT, , –100, , –80, , GC box, , CAAT box, , TATAAA, , Spacer, DNA, , –25, TATA box, , Proximal control element, , Promoter, , The gene, control, region, for gene X, , RNA, transcript, , Regulatory, sequence, (B), , Strongly activating, assembly, , Silent assembly of, regulatory proteins, , Strongly, inhibiting, protein, , RNA polymerase II and, general transcription factors, , Weakly, activating, protein, assembly, TATA, , Figure 14.7 Organization and regulation of a typical eukaryotic gene. (A) Features of a, typical eukaryotic RNA polymerase II minimum promoter and proteins that regulate gene, expression. RNA polymerase II is situated at the TATA box in association with the general, transcription factors about 25 bp upstream of the transcription start site. Two cis-acting, regulatory sequences that enhance the activity of RNA polymerase II are the CAAT box, and the GC box, located at about 80 and 100 bp upstream, respectively, of the transcription start site. The DNA proteins that bind to these elements are indicated. (B) Regulation, of transcription by distal regulatory sequences and trans-acting factors. trans-acting factors bound to distal regulatory sequences can act in concert to activate transcription by, making direct physical contact with the transcription initiation complex. The details of, this process are not well understood. (A after Alberts et al. 1994; B from Alberts et al, 1994.), , termed cis-acting sequences, since they are adjacent to, the transcription units they are regulating. The transcription factors that bind to the cis-acting sequences are, called trans-acting factors, since the genes that encode, them are located elsewhere in the genome., Numerous other cis-acting sequences located farther, upstream of the proximal promoter sequences can exert, either positive or negative control over eukaryotic promoters. These sequences are termed the distal regulatory sequences and they are usually located within 1000, bp of the transcription initiation site. As with prokaryotes, the positively acting transcription factors that bind, to these sites are called activators, while those that, inhibit transcription are called repressors., As we will see in Chapters 19 and 20, the regulation, of gene expression by the plant hormones and by phytochrome is thought to involve the deactivation of repres-, , sor proteins. Cis-acting sequences involved in gene regulation by hormones and other signaling agents are, called response elements. As will be discussed in Chapters 17 and 19 through 23 (on phytochrome and the, plant hormones), numerous response elements that regulate gene expression have been identified in plants., In addition to having regulatory sequences within the, promoter itself, eukaryotic genes can be regulated by, control elements located tens of thousands of base pairs, away from the start site. Distantly located positive regulatory sequences are called enhancers. Enhancers may, be located either upstream or downstream from the promoter. In plants, many developmentally important plant, genes have been shown to be regulated by enhancers, (Sundaresan et al. 1995)., How do all the DNA-binding proteins on the cis-acting sequences regulate transcription? During formation
Page 343 :
10, , CHAPTER 14, , Table 14.1, DNA-Binding Motifs, Name, , Examples of proteins, , Key structural features, , Helix-turn-helix, , Transcription factors that, regulate genes in anthocyanin biosynthesis, pathway, , Two α helices separated, by a turn in the polypeptide chain; function as, dimers, , Illustration, , COOH, , NH2, , Zinc finger, , Helix-loop-helix, , COP1 in Arabidopsis, , GT element–binding protein, of phytochrome-regulated, genes, , Various structures in which, zinc plays an important, structural role; bind to DNA, either as monomers or as, dimers, , His, Zn, His, , Cys, , Cys, , Cys, , Cys, , Cys, Zn, , Cys, , A short α helix connected, by a loop to a longer α helix;, function as dimers, H+3N, , Leucine zipper, , Fos and Jun, , NH+3, , An α helix of about 35 amino, acids containing leucine, at every seventh position;, dimerization occurs along, the hydrophobic surface, , Leu, Leu, Leu, , Leu, Leu, Leu, , COO–, , COO–, , H+3N, , Basic zipper, (bZip), , Opaque 2 protein in maize,, G box factors of phytochrome-regulated genes,, transcription factors that, bind ABA response, elements, , Variation of the leucine zipper, motif in which other hydrophobic amino acids substitute, for leucine and the DNAbinding domain contains, amino acids, , of the initiation complex, the DNA between the core, promoter and the most distally located control elements, loops out in such a way as to allow all of the transcription factors bound to that segment of DNA to make, physical contact with the initiation complex (see Figure, 14.7B). Through this physical contact the transcription, factor exerts its control, either positive or negative, over, transcription. Given the large number of control elements that can modify the activity of a single promoter,, the possibilities for differential gene regulation in, eukaryotes are nearly infinite., Transcription Factors Contain Specific, Structural Motifs, Transcription factors generally have three structural features: a DNA-binding domain, a transcription-activating domain, and a ligand-binding domain. To bind to, a specific sequence of DNA, the DNA-binding domain, must have extensive interactions with the double helix, through the formation of hydrogen, ionic, and hydro-, , NH+3, +, , +, , +, , +, Leu, Ise, Val, , +, , +, , +, , +, , Ala, Val, Ala, , COO–, , COO–, , phobic bonds. Although the particular combination and, spatial distribution of such interactions are unique for, each sequence, analyses of many DNA-binding proteins, have led to the identification of a small number of, highly conserved DNA-binding structural motifs, which, are summarized in Table 14.1., Most of the transcription factors characterized thus, far in plants belong to the basic zipper (bZIP) class of, DNA-binding proteins. DNA-binding proteins containing the zinc finger domain are relatively rare in plants., Homeodomain Proteins Are a Special Class of, Helix-Turn-Helix Proteins, The term “homeodomain protein” is derived from a, group of Drosophila (fruit fly) genes called selector genes, or homeotic genes. Drosophila homeotic genes encode, transcription factors that determine which structures, develop at specific locations on the fly’s body; that is,, they act as major developmental switches that activate, a large number of genes that constitute the entire genetic
Page 344 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, program for a particular structure. Mutations in, homeotic genes cause homeosis, the transformation of, one body part into another. For example, a homeotic, mutation in the ANTENNAPEDIA gene causes a leg to, form in place of an antenna. When the sequences of various homeotic genes in Drosophila were compared, the, proteins were all found to contain a highly conserved, stretch of 60 amino acids called the homeobox., Homologous homeobox sequences have now been, identified in developmentally important genes of vertebrates and plants. As will be discussed in Chapter 16,, the KN1 (KNOTTED) gene of maize encodes a homeodomain protein that can affect cell fate during development. Maize plants with the kn1 mutation exhibit, abnormal cell divisions in the vascular tissues, giving, rise to the “knotted” appearance of the leaf surface., However, the kn1 mutation is not a homeotic mutation,, since it does not involve the substitution of one entire, structure for another. Rather, the plant homeodomain, protein, KN1, is involved in the regulation of cell division. Thus, not all genes that encode homeodomain proteins are homeotic genes, and vice versa. As will be discussed in Chapter 24, four of the floral homeotic genes, in plants encode proteins with the DNA-binding helixturn-helix motif called the MADS domain., Eukaryotic Genes Can Be Coordinately Regulated, Although eukaryotic nuclear genes are not arranged, into operons, they are often coordinately regulated in, the cell. For example, in yeast, many of the enzymes, involved in galactose metabolism and transport are, inducible and coregulated, even though the genes are, located on different chromosomes. Incubation of wildtype yeast cells in galactose-containing media results in, more than a thousandfold increase in the mRNA levels, for all of these enzymes., The six yeast genes that encode the enzymes in the, galactose metabolism pathway are under both positive, and negative control (Figure 14.8). Most yeast genes are, regulated by a single proximal control element called an, upstream activating sequence (UAS). The GAL4 gene, encodes a transcription factor that binds to UAS elements located about 200 bp upstream of the transcription start sites of all six genes. The UAS of each of the six, genes, while not identical, consists of one or more copies, of a similar 17 bp repeated sequence. The GAL4 protein, can bind to each of them and activate transcription. In, this way a single transcription factor can control the expression of many genes., Protein–protein interactions can modify the effects of, DNA-binding transcription factors. Another gene on a, different yeast chromosome, GAL80, encodes a negative, transcription regulator that forms a complex with the, GAL4 protein when it is bound to the UAS. When the, GAL80 protein is complexed with GAL4, transcription is, blocked. In the presence of galactose, however, the meta-, , 11, , bolite formed by the enzyme that is encoded by the GAL3, gene acts as an inducer by causing the dissociation of, GAL80 from GAL4 (Johnston 1987; Mortimer et al. 1989)., There are many other examples of coordinate regulation of genes in eukaryotes. In plants, the developmental effects induced by light and hormones (see, Chapters 17 through 23), as well as the adaptive, responses caused by various types of stress (see Chapter 25), involve the coordinate regulation of groups of, genes that share a common response element upstream, of the promoter. In addition, genes that act as major, developmental switches, such as the homeotic genes,, encode transcription factors that bind to a common regulatory sequence that is present on dozens, or even hundreds, of genes scattered throughout the genome (see, Chapters 16 and 24)., The Ubiquitin Pathway Regulates Protein Turnover, An enzyme molecule, once synthesized, has a finite lifetime in the cell, ranging from a few minutes to several, hours. Hence, steady-state levels of cellular enzymes are, attained as the result of an equilibrium between enzyme, synthesis and enzyme degradation, or turnover. Protein, turnover plays an important role in development. In etiolated seedlings, for example, the red-light photoreceptor, phytochrome, is regulated by proteolysis. The phytochrome synthesized in the dark is highly stable and, accumulates in the cells to high concentrations. Upon, exposure to red light, however, the phytochrome is converted to its active form and simultaneously becomes, highly susceptible to degradation by proteases (see, Chapter 17)., In animal cells there are two distinct pathways of protein turnover, one in specialized digestive vacuoles, called lysosomes and the other in the cytosol. Proteins, destined to be digested in lysosomes appear to be, specifically targeted to these organelles. Upon entering, the lysosomes, the proteins are rapidly degraded by, lysosomal proteases. Lysosomes are also capable of, engulfing and digesting entire organelles by an autophagic process. The central vacuole of plant cells is rich, in proteases and is the plant equivalent of lysosomes,, but as yet there is no clear evidence that plant vacuoles, either engulf organelles or participate in the turnover of, cytosolic proteins, except during senescence., The nonlysosomal pathway of protein turnover, involves the ATP-dependent formation of a covalent, bond to a small, 76-amino-acid polypeptide called ubiquitin. Ubiquitination of an enzyme molecule apparently, marks it for destruction by a large ATP-dependent proteolytic complex (26S proteasome) that specifically recognizes the “tagged” molecule (Coux et al. 1996). More, than 90% of the short-lived proteins in eukaryotic cells, are degraded via the ubiquitin pathway (Lam 1997). The, ubiquitin pathway regulates cytosolic protein turnover, in plant cells as well (Shanklin et al. 1987).
Page 346 :
13, , Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, Sensor protein, , Response regulator, +, – P, , Input, signal, , Input, , Transmitter, , Receiver, , Figure 14.10 Signaling via bacterial two-component systems. The sensor protein detects the stimulus via the input, domain and transfers the signal to the transmitter domain, by means of a conformational change (indicated by the, first dashed arrow). The transmitter domain of the sensor, then communicates with the response regulator by protein, phosphorylation of the receiver domain. Phosphorylation, of the receiver domain induces a conformational change, (second dashed arrow) that activates the output domain, and brings about the cellular response. (After Parkinson, 1993.), , the regulation of gene expression by the phytohormone,, auxin, may be mediated in part by the activation of the, ubiquitin pathway., , Signal Transduction in Prokaryotes, Prokaryotic cells could not have survived billions of, years of evolution without an exquisitely developed, ability to sense their environment. As we have seen, bacteria respond to the presence of a nutrient by synthesizing the proteins involved in the uptake and metabolism, of that nutrient. Bacteria can also respond to nonnutrient signals, both physical and chemical. Motile bacteria, can adjust their movements according to the prevailing, gradients of light, oxygen, osmolarity, temperature, and, toxic chemicals in the medium., The basic mechanisms that enable bacteria to sense, and to respond to their environment are common to all, cell sensory systems, and include stimulus detection, signal amplification, and the appropriate output responses., Many bacterial signaling pathways have been shown to, consist of modular units called transmitters and receivers., These modules form the basis of the so-called two-component regulatory systems., Bacteria Employ Two-Component Regulatory, Systems to Sense Extracellular Signals, Bacteria sense chemicals in the environment by means, of a small family of cell surface receptors, each involved, in the response to a defined group of chemicals (hereafter referred to as ligands). A protein in the plasma, membrane of bacteria binds directly to a ligand, or, binds to a soluble protein that has already attached to, the ligand, in the periplasmic space between the plasma, membrane and the cell wall. Upon binding, the membrane protein undergoes a conformational change that, is propagated across the membrane to the cytosolic, domain of the receptor protein. This conformational, change initiates the signaling pathway that leads to the, response., , Output, signal, , Output, , A broad spectrum of responses in bacteria, including, osmoregulation, chemotaxis, and sporulation, are regulated by two-component systems. Two-component regulatory systems are composed of a sensor protein and, a response regulator protein (Figure 14.10) (Parkinson, 1993). The function of the sensor is to receive the signal, and to pass the signal on to the response regulator,, which brings about the cellular response, typically gene, expression. Sensor proteins have two domains, an input, domain, which receives the environmental signal, and, a transmitter domain, which transmits the signal to the, response regulator. The response regulator also has two, domains, a receiver domain, which receives the signal, from the transmitter domain of the sensor protein, and, an output domain, such as a DNA-binding domain,, which brings about the response., The signal is passed from transmitter domain to receiver domain via protein phosphorylation. Transmitter, domains have the ability to phosphorylate themselves,, using ATP, on a specific histidine residue near the amino, terminus (Figure 14.11A). For this reason, sensor proteins, containing transmitter domains are called autophosphorylating histidine kinases. These proteins normally, , (A), Transmitter (T):, H, Phosphorylation sites, D, Receiver (R):, , (B), , T, H, , Autophosphorylation, ATP, , ADP, , T, H, , ∫, P, , P, Conformational, change, of response, regulator, , ∫, , D, , R, , D, , Phosphorylation, , R, , Figure 14.11 Phosphorylation signaling mechanism of bacterial two-component systems. (A) The transmitter domain, of the sensor protein contains a conserved histidine (H) at, its N-terminal end, while the receiver domain of the response regulator contains a conserved aspartate (D)., (B) The transmitter phosphorylates itself at its conserved, histidine and transfers the phosphate to the aspartate of, the response regulator. The response regulator then undergoes a conformational change leading to the response., (After Parkinson 1993.)
Page 347 :
14, , CHAPTER 14, , function as dimers in which the catalytic site of one subunit phosphorylates the acceptor site on the other., Immediately after the transmitter domain becomes, autophosphorylated on a histidine residue, the phosphate is transferred to a specific aspartate residue near, the middle of the receiver domain of the response regulator protein (see Figure 14.11A). As a result, a specific, aspartate residue of the response regulator becomes, phosphorylated (Figure 14.11B). Phosphorylation of the, aspartate residue causes the response regulator to, undergo a conformational change that results in its activation., Osmolarity Is Detected by a Two-Component, System, An example of a relatively simple bacterial two-component system is the signaling system involved in sensing, osmolarity in E. coli. E. coli is a Gram-negative bacterium, and thus has two cell membranes, an inner membrane, and an outer membrane, separated by a cell wall. The, inner membrane is the primary permeability barrier of, the cell. The outer membrane contains large pores composed of two types of porin proteins, OmpF and OmpC., Pores made with OmpF are larger than those made with, OmpC., When E. coli is subjected to high osmolarity in the, medium, it synthesizes more OmpC than OmpF, resulting in smaller pores on the outer membrane. These, smaller pores filter out the solutes from the periplasmic, space, shielding the inner membrane from the effects of, the high solute concentration in the external medium., When the bacterium is placed in a medium with low, osmolarity, more OmpF is synthesized, and the average, pore size increases., As Figure 14.12 shows, expression of the genes that, encode the two porin proteins is regulated by a twocomponent system. The sensor protein, EnvZ, is located, on the inner membrane. It consists of an N-terminal, periplasmic input domain that detects the osmolarity, changes in the medium, flanked by two membranespanning segments, and a C-terminal cytoplasmic transmitter domain., When the osmolarity of the medium increases, the, input domain undergoes a conformational change that, is transduced across the membrane to the transmitter, domain. The transmitter then autophosphorylates its, histidine residue. The phosphate is rapidly transferred, to an aspartate residue of the receiver domain of the, response regulator, OmpR. The N terminus of OmpR, consists of a DNA-binding domain. When activated by, phosphorylation, this domain interacts with RNA polymerase at the promoters of the porin genes, enhancing, the expression of ompC and repressing the expression of, ompF. Under conditions of low osmolarity in the, medium, the nonphosphorylated form of OmpR stimu-, , lates ompF expression and represses ompC expression. In, this way the osmolarity stimulus is communicated to, the genes., Related Two-Component Systems Have Been, Identified in Eukaryotes, Recently, combination sensor–response regulator proteins related to the bacterial two-component systems, have been discovered in yeast and in plants. For example, The SLN1 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encodes a 134-kilodalton protein that has sequence similarities to both the transmitter and the receiver domains, of bacteria and appears to function in osmoregulation, (Ota and Varshavsky 1993)., There is increasing evidence that several plant signaling systems evolved from bacterial two-component, systems. For example, the red/far-red–absorbing pigment, phytochrome, has now been demonstrated in, , Medium, osmolarity, , High, , PERIPLASMIC, SPACE, , Low, , CYTOPLASMIC, MEMBRANE, , ATP, P, , EnvZ, P, OmpR, , P, , DNA-binding, domain, Control of, porin expression, , Figure 14.12 E. coli two-component system for osmoregulation. When the osmolarity of the medium is high, the, membrane sensor protein, EnvZ (in the form of a dimer),, acts as an autophosphorylating histidine kinase. The phosphorylated EnvZ then phosphorylates the response regulator, OmpR, which has a DNA-binding domain. Phosphorylated OmpR binds to the promoters of the two porin genes,, ompC and ompF, enhancing expression of the former and, repressing expression of the latter. When the osmolarity of, the medium is low, EnvZ acts as a protein phosphatase, instead of a kinase and dephosphorylates OmpR. When the, nonphosphorylated form of OmpR binds to the promoters, of the two porin genes, ompC expression is repressed and, ompF expression is stimulated. (From Parkinson 1993.)
Page 348 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, cyanobacteria, and it appears to be related to bacterial, sensor proteins (see Chapter 17). In addition, the genes, that encode putative receptors for two plant hormones,, cytokinin and ethylene, both contain autophosphorylating histidine kinase domains, as well as contiguous, response regulator motifs. These proteins will be discussed further in Chapters 21 and 22., , Signal Transduction in Eukaryotes, Many eukaryotic microorganisms use chemical signals, in cell–cell communication. For example, in the slime, mold Dictyostelium, starvation induces certain cells to, secrete cyclic AMP (cAMP). The secreted cAMP diffuses, across the substrate and induces nearby cells to aggregate into a sluglike colony. Yeast mating-type factors are, another example of chemical communication between, the cells of simple microorganisms. Around a billion, years ago, however, cell signaling took a great leap in, complexity when eukaryotic cells began to associate, together as multicellular organisms. After the evolution, of multicellularity came a trend toward ever-increasing, cell specialization, as well as the development of tissues, and organs to perform specific functions., Coordination of the development and environmental, responses of complex multicellular organisms required, an array of signaling mechanisms. Two main systems, evolved in animals: the nervous system and the endocrine system. Plants, lacking motility, never developed a, nervous system, but they did evolve hormones as chemical messengers. As photosynthesizing organisms, plants, also evolved mechanisms for adapting their growth and, development to the amount and quality of light., In the sections that follow we will explore some of the, basic mechanisms of signal transduction in animals,, emphasizing pathways that may have some parallel in, plants. However, keep in mind that plant signal transduction pathways may differ in significant ways from, those of animals. To illustrate this point, we end the, chapter with an overview of some of the known plantspecific transmembrane receptors., Two Classes of Signals Define Two Classes of, Receptors, Hormones fall into two classes based on their ability to, move across the plasma membrane: lipophilic hormones,, which diffuse readily across the hydrophobic bilayer of, the plasma membrane; and water-soluble hormones,, which are unable to enter the cell. Lipophilic hormones, bind mainly to receptors in the cytoplasm or nucleus;, water-soluble hormones bind to receptors located on the, cell surface. In either case, ligand binding alters the, receptor, typically by causing a conformational change., Some receptors, such as the steroid hormone receptors (see the next section), can regulate gene expression, , 15, , directly. In the vast majority of cases, however, the, receptor initiates one or more sequences of biochemical, reactions that connect the stimulus to a cellular, response. Such a sequence of reactions is called a signal, transduction pathway. Typically, the end result of signal transduction pathways is to regulate transcription, factors, which in turn regulate gene expression., Signal transduction pathways often involve the generation of second messengers, transient secondary signals inside the cell that greatly amplify the original signal. For example, a single hormone molecule might lead, to the activation of an enzyme that produces hundreds, of molecules of a second messenger. Among the most, common second messengers are 3′,5′-cyclic AMP, (cAMP); 3′,5′-cyclic GMP (cGMP); nitric oxide (NO);, cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR); 1,2-diacylglycerol (DAG);, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3); and Ca2+ (Figure 14.13)., Hormone binding normally causes elevated levels of, one or more of these second messengers, resulting in the, activation or inactivation of enzymes or regulatory proteins. Protein kinases and phosphatases are nearly, always involved., Most Steroid Receptors Act as Transcription, Factors, The steroid hormones, thyroid hormones, retinoids, and, vitamin D all pass freely across the plasma membrane, because of their hydrophobic nature and they bind to, intracellular receptor proteins. When activated by binding to their ligand, these proteins function as transcription factors. All such steroid receptor proteins have similar DNA-binding domains. Steroid response elements, are typically located in enhancer regions of steroid-stimulated genes. Most steroid receptors are localized in the, nucleus, where they are anchored to nuclear proteins in, an inactive form., When the receptor binds to the steroid, it is released, from the anchor protein and becomes activated as a, transcription factor. The activated transcription factor, then binds to the enhancer and stimulates transcription., The receptor for thyroid hormone deviates from this, pattern in that it is already bound to the DNA but is, unable to stimulate transcription in the absence of the, hormone. Binding to the hormone converts the receptor, to an active transcription factor., Not all intracellular steroid receptors are localized in, the nucleus. The receptor for glucocorticoid hormone, (cortisol) differs from the others in that it is located in, the cytosol, anchored in an inactive state to a cytosolic, protein. Binding of the hormone causes the release of, the receptor from its cytosolic anchor, and the receptor–hormone complex then migrates into the nucleus,, where it binds to the enhancer and stimulates transcription (Figure 14.14)., Although most studies on animal steroid hormones
Page 349 :
16, , CHAPTER 14, , Figure 14.13 Structure of seven eukaryotic second messengers., , OH, H, H, , HO, H, H, , NH2, N, , O, , O, , N, , N, , 5′, , CH2, , N, , N, O, , CH2, , O, , NH2, , OH, , –O, , P, , O, CH2, H, H, , 2′, , O, , OH, , HO, , O, O, , 3′,5′-Cyclic AMP, , C, , N, , C, , P, , 1′, 3′, , C, , N, , O, , O, , 2′, , O, , NH, , N, HC, , HO, , 4′, , P, , O, N, , O, , O, P, , 1′, 3′, , –O, , HO, , N, , N, , 5′, , O, , 4′, , CH2, , N, , O, , C, H, , H, H, OH, , Cyclic ADP-Ribose (cADPR), , 3′,5′-Cyclic GMP, , 1, , CH3, CH3, , (CH2)n, , C, , (CH2)n, , O, C, O, , Fatty acyl groups, , O, , CH2, 2, , O, , CH, 3, , CH2OH, , Glycerol, 1,2-Diacylglycerol, , PO32–, O, 1, , 6, , OH, OH, 2, , OPO32–, 5, , HO 4 2–, OPO3, , N, , O, , Ca2+, , 3, , Inositol, 1,4,5-trisphosphate, , have focused on their roles in regulating gene expression via receptors that act as transcription factors,, increasing evidence suggests that steroids can also interact with proteins on the cell surface (McEwen 1991). As, will be discussed in Chapter 17, brassinosteroid has, recently been demonstrated to be an authentic steroid, hormone in plants, and the gene for a brassinosteroid, receptor has recently been cloned and sequenced. It, encodes a type of transmembrane receptor called a, leucine-rich repeat receptor, which is described at the end, of this chapter., Cell Surface Receptors Can Interact with, G Proteins, All water-soluble mammalian hormones bind to cell, surface receptors. Members of the largest class of mammalian cell surface receptors interact with signal-transducing, GTP-binding regulatory proteins called heterotrimeric G proteins. The activated G proteins, in, turn, activate an effector enzyme. The activated effector, enzyme generates an intracellular second messenger,, which stimulates a variety of cellular processes., Receptors using heterotrimeric G proteins are structurally similar and functionally diverse. Their overall, structure is similar to that of bacteriorhodopsin, the purple pigment involved in photosynthesis in bacteria of, the genus Halobacterium, and to that of rhodopsin, the, visual pigment of the vertebrate eye. The recently characterized olfactory receptors of the vertebrate nose also, , Nitric oxide, , Calcium ion, , belong to this group. The receptor proteins consist of, seven transmembrane a helices (Figure 14.15). These, receptors are sometimes referred to as seven-spanning,, seven-pass, or serpentine receptors., Heterotrimeric G Proteins Cycle between Active, and Inactive Forms, The G proteins that transduce the signals from the, seven-spanning receptors are called heterotrimeric G proteins because they are composed of three different subunits: α, β, and γ (gamma). They are distinct from the, monomeric G proteins, which will be discussed later., Heterotrimeric G proteins cycle between active and, inactive forms, thus acting as molecular switches. The β, and γ subunits form a tight complex that anchors the, trimeric G protein to the membrane on the cytoplasmic, side (Figure 14.16). The G protein becomes activated, upon binding to the ligand-activated seven-spanning, receptor. In its inactive form, G exists as a trimer with, GDP bound to the α subunit. Binding to the, receptor–ligand complex induces the α subunit to, exchange GDP for GTP. This exchange causes the α subunit to dissociate from β and γ, allowing α to associate, instead with an effector enzyme., The α subunit has a GTPase activity that is activated, when it binds to the effector enzyme, in this case adenylyl cyclase (also called adenylate cyclase) (see Figure, 14.16). GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP, thereby inactivating, the α subunit, which in turn inactivates adenylyl
Page 350 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, cyclase. The α subunit bound to GDP reassociates with, the β and γ subunits and can then be reactivated by, associating with the hormone–receptor complex., Activation of Adenylyl Cyclase Increases the, Level of Cyclic AMP, Cyclic AMP is an important signaling molecule in both, prokaryotes and animal cells, and increasing evidence, suggests that cAMP plays a similar role in plant cells., In vertebrates, adenylyl cyclase is an integral membrane protein that contains two clusters of six membrane-spanning domains separating two catalytic, domains that extend into the cytoplasm. Activation of, adenylyl cyclase by heterotrimeric G proteins raises the, concentration of cAMP in the cell, which is normally, maintained at a low level by the action of cyclic AMP, phosphodiesterase, which hydrolyzes cAMP to 5′AMP., Nearly all the effects of cAMP in animal cells are, mediated by the enzyme protein kinase A (PKA). In, unstimulated cells, PKA is in the inactive state because, of the presence of a pair of inhibitory subunits. Cyclic, AMP binds to these inhibitory subunits, causing them, to dissociate from the two catalytic subunits, thereby, activating the catalytic subunits. The activated catalytic, subunits then are able to phosphorylate specific serine, or threonine residues of selected proteins, which may, also be protein kinases. An example of an enzyme that, is phosphorylated by PKA is glycogen phosphorylase, kinase. When phosphorylated by PKA, glycogen phosphorylase kinase phosphorylates (activates) glycogen, phosphorylase, the enzyme that breaks down glycogen in, muscle cells to glucose-1-phosphate., In cells in which cAMP regulates gene expression,, PKA phosphorylates a transcription factor called CREB, (cyclic AMP response element–binding protein). Upon, activation by PKA, CREB binds to the cAMP response, element (CRE), which is located in the promoter regions, of genes that are regulated by cAMP., In addition to activating PKA, cAMP can interact, with specific cAMP-gated cation channels. For example,, in olfactory receptor neurons, cAMP binds to and opens, Na+ channels on the plasma membrane, resulting in Na+, influx and membrane depolarization., Because of the extremely low levels of cyclic AMP, that have been detected in plant tissue extracts, the role, of cAMP in plant signal transduction has been highly, controversial (Assmann 1995). Nevertheless, various, lines of evidence supporting a role of cAMP in plant, cells have accumulated. For example, genes that encode, homologs of CREB have been identified in plants (Kategiri et al. 1989). Pollen tube growth in lily has been, shown to be stimulated by concentrations of cAMP as, low as 10 nM (Tezuka et al. 1993). Li and colleagues, (1994) showed that cAMP activates K+ channels in the, , Steroid, hormone, , 17, , EXTRACELLULAR, SPACE, , 1, , Plasma, membrane, , CYTOSOL, , 2, , Receptor, +++, , Inhibitory, protein, 3, , Hormone–, receptor, complex, DNA-binding, site, , +++, , Inhibitor, Gene, activation, site, 4, , +++, , 5, NUCLEUS, , DNA, Enhancer region, , Coding region, 6, , mRNA, , Figure 14.14 Glucocorticoid steroid receptors are transcription factors. (1) Glucocorticoid hormone is lipophilic and, diffuses readily through the membrane to the cytosol. (2), Once in the cytosol, the hormone binds to its cytosolic, receptor, (3) causing the release of an inhibitory protein, from the receptor. (4) The activated receptor then diffuses, into the nucleus. (5) In the nucleus, the receptor–hormone, complex binds to the enhancer regions of steroid-regulated, genes. (6) Transcription of the genes is stimulated. (From, Becker et al. 1996.), , plasma membrane of fava bean (Vicia faba) mesophyll, cells. And Ichikawa and coworkers (1997) recently identified possible genes for adenylyl cyclase in tobacco, (Nicotiana tabacum) and Arabidopsis. Thus, despite years, of doubt, the role of cAMP as a universal signaling agent, in living organisms, including plants, seems likely.
Page 351 :
18, , CHAPTER 14, , (A), , (B), , NH2, Ligand-binding, domain, , NH2, , Ligand-binding domains, , EXTRACELLULAR, SPACE, Plasma, membrane, CYTOSOL, G protein–, binding domains, COOH, , Activation of Phospholipase C Initiates the, IP3 Pathway, Calcium serves as a second messenger for a wide variety of cell signaling events. This role of calcium is well, established in animal cells, and as we will see in later, chapters, circumstantial evidence suggests a role for calcium in signal transduction in plants as well. The concentration of free Ca2+ in the cytosol normally is maintained at extremely low levels (1 × 10–7 M). Ca2+ATPases on the plasma membrane and on the endoplasmic reticulum pump calcium ions out of the cell and, into the lumen of the ER, respectively. In plant cells,, most of the calcium of the cell accumulates in the vacuole. The proton electrochemical gradient across the, vacuolar membrane that is generated by tonoplast proton pumps drives calcium uptake via Ca2+–H+ antiporters (see Chapter 6)., In animal cells, certain hormones can induce a transient rise in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration to about 5, × 10–6 M. This increase may occur even in the absence of, extracellular calcium, indicating that the Ca2+ is being, released from intracellular compartments by the opening of intracellular calcium channels. However, the coupling of hormone binding to the opening of intracellular calcium channels is mediated by yet another second, messenger, inositol trisphosphate (IP3)., Phosphatidylinositol (PI) is a minor phospholipid, component of cell membranes (see Chapter 11). PI can, be converted to the polyphosphoinositides PI phosphate, (PIP) and PI bisphosphate (PIP2) by kinases (Figure, 14.17). Although PIP2 is even less abundant in the membrane than PI is, it plays a central role in signal transduction. In animal cells, binding of a hormone, such as, vasopressin, to its receptor leads to the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. The α subunit then dissociates, from G and activates a phosphoinositide-specific phos-, , G protein–, binding domains, , Figure 14.15 Schematic drawing of two types of sevenspanning receptors. (A) Large, extracellular ligand-binding, domains are characteristic of, seven-spanning receptors that, bind proteins. The region of, the intracellular domain that, interacts with the heterotrimeric G protein is indicated., (B) Small extracellular domains, are characteristic of sevenspanning receptors that bind, to small ligands such as epinephrine. The ligand-binding, site is usually formed by several of the transmembrane, helices within the bilayer., (After Alberts et al. 1994.), , COOH, , pholipase, phospholipase C (PLC). The activated PLC, rapidly hydrolyzes PIP2, generating inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) as products. Each, of these two molecules plays an important role in cell, signaling., IP3 Opens Calcium Channels on the ER and on the, Tonoplast, The IP3 generated by the activated phospholipase C is, water soluble and diffuses through the cytosol until it, encounters IP3-binding sites on the ER and (in plants) on, the tonoplast. These binding sites are IP3-gated Ca2+, channels that open when they bind IP3 (Figure 14.18)., Since these organelles maintain internal Ca2+ concentrations in the millimolar range, calcium diffuses rapidly, into the cytosol down a steep concentration gradient., The response is terminated when IP3 is broken down by, specific phosphatases or when the released calcium is, pumped out of the cytoplasm by Ca2+-ATPases., Studies with Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent indicators,, such as fura-2 and aequorin, have shown that the calcium signal often originates in a localized region of the, cell and propagates as a wave throughout the cytosol., Repeated waves called calcium oscillations can follow the, original signal, each lasting from a few seconds to several minutes. The biological significance of calcium, oscillation is still unclear, although it has been suggested, that it is a mechanism for avoiding the toxicity that, might result from a sustained elevation in cytosolic levels of free calcium. Such wavelike oscillations have, recently been detected in plant stomatal guard cells, (McAinsh et al. 1995)., Cyclic ADP-Ribose Mediates Intracellular Ca2+, Release Independently of IP3 Signaling, Cyclic ADP-Ribose (cADPR) acts as a second messenger
Page 352 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, Hormone, Receptor, protein, , EXTRACELLULAR, SPACE, Plasma, membrane, , R, , Heterotrimeric, G protein, Adenylyl, cyclase, , γ, β, , C, , α, GDP, , CYTOSOL, , 1, , R, , γ, β, , Binding of hormone, produces conformational, change in recepto, receptor, , 19, , Figure 14.16 Hormone-induced activation of an effector, enzyme is mediated by the α subunit of a heterotrimeric G, protein. (1) Upon binding to its hormonal ligand, the sevenspanning receptor undergoes a conformational change. (2), The receptor binds to the heterotrimeric G protein. (3), Contact with the receptor induces the α subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein to exchange GDP for GTP, and the α, subunit then dissociates from the complex. (4) The G protein α subunit associates with the effector protein (adenylyl, cyclase) in the membrane, causing its activation. At the, same time the hormone is released from its receptor. (5), The effector enzyme becomes inactivated when GTP is, hydrolyzed to GDP. The α subunit then reassociates with, the heterotrimeric G protein and is ready to be reactivated, by a second hormonal stimulus. (From Lodish et al. 1995.), , C, , α, GDP, 2, , R, , γ, β, , Receptor binds to G, protein, , C, , α, GDP, , GDP, GTP, , R, , 3, , γ, β, , GDP bound to G protein, is replaced by GTP, and, subunits of G protein, dissociate, , C, , α, GTP, 4, , R, , α Subunit binds to adenylyl, cyclase, activating synthesis, of cAMP; hormone tends to, dissociate, , γ, β, , C, , α, GTP, , ATP, 5, , Pi, , R, , γ, β, , cAMP + PPi, , Hydrolysis of GTP to GDP, causes α subunit to, dissociate from adenylyl, cyclase and bind to β–γ,, regenerating a conformation, of G protein that can be, activated by a receptor–, hormone complex, , α, GDP, , C, , that can release calcium from intracellular stores, independent of the IP3 signaling pathway. Like cAMP,, cADPR is a cyclic nucleotide, but whereas cAMP brings, about its effects by activating protein kinase A, cADPR, binds to and activates specific calcium channels, called, type-3 ryanodine receptors (ryanodine is a calcium, channel blocker). These ryanodine receptor/calcium, channels are located on the membranes of calcium-storing organelles, such as sarcoplasmic reticulum of animal, cells or the vacuoles of plant cells. By stimulating the, release of calcium into the cytosol, cADPR helps to regulate calcium oscillations that bring about physiological, effects. Abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure is an, example of the roles of cADPR and calcium oscillations, in plants (see Chapter 23)., Some Protein Kinases Are Activated by, Calcium–Calmodulin Complexes, As we have seen with IP3-gated channels, calcium can, activate some proteins, such as channels, by binding, directly to them. However, most of the effects of calcium, result from the binding of calcium to the regulatory protein calmodulin (Figure 14.19). Calmodulin is a highly, conserved protein that is abundant in all eukaryotic, cells, but it appears to be absent from prokaryotic cells., The same calcium-binding site is found in a wide variety of calcium-binding proteins and is called an EF, hand. The name is derived from the two α helices, E and, F, that are part of the calcium-binding domain of the, protein parvalbumin (Kretsinger 1980)., Each calmodulin molecule binds four Ca2+ ions and, changes conformation, enabling it to bind to and activate other proteins. The Ca2+–calmodulin complex can, stimulate some enzymes directly, such as the plasma, membrane Ca2+-ATPase, which pumps calcium out of, the cell. Most of the effects of calcium, however, are, brought about by activation of Ca2+–calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CaM kinases). CaM kinases, phosphorylate serine or threonine residues of their target enzymes, causing enzyme activation. Thus, the effect
Page 353 :
20, , CHAPTER 14, , Fatty acid chains of outer, lipid monolayer of plasma membrane, , Fatty acid, chains of, inner lipid, monolayer, of plasma, membrane, , CH2, , C, , O C, , O, , O, , CH, , CH2, ATP, , O, –O, , P, , O, 6, , O, 1, , CH2, ADP, , OH PI kinase, 5, , OH, OH HO, 2, , O, , 3, , OH, , Inositol, Phosphatidylinositol (Pl), , O C, , O, , O, , CH, , CH2, , –O, , P, , O, , ATP, , O, , O, 4, , C, , O, , OH PIP kinase, , P, , O, O P, , O, , O, , O, –O, , O, , OH, OH HO, , O C, , O, , CH, CH2, O–, , CH2, ADP, , C, , O, O, , O–, , Pl 4-phosphate (PIP), , O–, , O, , Phospholipase C, (PLC), , O, , O, , CH, , CH2, , CYTOSOL, , Activates, protein, kinase C, , Diacylglycerol, (DAG), O, , O–, , O–, , Pl 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), , Figure 14.17 Phospholipase C pathway of membrane hydrolysis. The rare, phospholipid phosphatidylinositol (PI) is the starting point for the pathway., The phosphoinositol head group of PI is phosphorylated twice, producing, first PI 4-phosphate (PIP) and then PI 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). PIP2 is then, hydrolyzed by phospholipase C to diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5trisphosphate (IP3). (After Alberts et al. 1994.), , Plants Contain Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases, The most abundant calcium-regulated protein kinases, , O, , O, , OH, OH HO, O P, , that calcium has on a particular cell depends to a large, extent on which CaM kinases are expressed in that cell., Calcium signaling has been strongly implicated in, many developmental processes in plants, ranging from, the regulation of development by phytochrome (see, Chapter 17) to the regulation of stomatal guard cells by, abscisic acid (see Chapter 23). Thus far, however, there, have been few reports of CaM kinase activity in plants., Recently, however, a gene that codes for a CaM kinase, has been cloned from lily and shown to be specifically, expressed in anthers. The lily CaM kinase is a, serine/threonine kinase that phosphorylates various, protein substrates in vitro in a Ca2+–calmodulin-dependent manner (Takezawa et al. 1996). The occurrence and, regulatory roles of such plant CaM kinases remain to be, determined., , O C, , OH, , P, , O, , O–, , CH2, , C, , –O, , P, O, , O, O, , O–, , P, O, , OH, OH HO, O, O P, , O–, , Releases Ca2+, from the, endoplasmic, reticulum and, vacuole, , O–, , Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), , in plants appear to be the calcium-dependent protein, kinases (CDPKs) (Harper et al. 1991; Roberts and Harmon 1992). CDPKs are strongly activated by calcium,, but are insensitive to calmodulin. The proteins are characterized by two domains: a catalytic domain that is, similar to those of the animal CaM kinases, and a, calmodulin-like domain. The presence of a calmodulinlike domain may explain why the enzyme does not, require calmodulin for activity., CDPKs are widespread in plants and are encoded by, multigene families. A CDPK has also been identified in, Chara, the giant freshwater green alga thought to be a, precursor of land plants (McCurdy and Harmon 1992)., In Chara the enzyme was shown to be associated with, the actin microfilaments that line the outer cortex of the, cytoplasm along the inner surface of the plasma membrane. The function of these microfilaments is to drive, cytoplasmic streaming around the cell. The rate of cytoplasmic streaming is inhibited by increases in cytosolic
Page 355 :
22, , CHAPTER 14, , (A), Membrane, phospholipid, , C, , O, , CH2, , O, C, , O, , CH, , O, , CH2, , Phospholipase A2, Arachidonic acid, (20 carbons),, extended conformation, , O–, O, , P, , O, , X, , O, , COOH, , Figure 14.20 Eicosanoid biosynthetic pathway. (A) The first, step is the hydrolysis of 20-carbon fatty acid chains containing at least three double bonds from a membrane phospholipid by the enzyme phospholipase A2, producing, arachidonic acid, which can be oxidized by prostaglandin., (B) Arachidonic acid is further metabolized by two pathways: one cyclooxygenase dependent, the other lipoxygenase dependent. (From Alberts et al. 1994.), , COOH, , Arachidonic acid,, folded conformation, , Oxidation steps, O, COOH, , Prostaglandin, OH, , (B), , OH, , Arachidonic acid, , Cyclooxygenasedependent, pathway, , Prostaglandins, Prostacyclins, Thromboxanes, , Lipoxygenasedependent, pathway, , Leukotrienes, , calcium, and it has been proposed that CDPKs mediate, the effects of calcium by phosphorylating the heavy, chain of myosin, a component of the microfilaments, (McCurdy and Harmon 1992)., CDPKs may also mediate the effects of calcium in, guard cells. Abscisic acid–induced stomatal closure, involves calcium as a second messenger (see Chapter, 23). Recent studies using isolated vacuoles from guard, cells of Vicia faba (fava bean) suggest that CDPKs can, regulate anion channels on the tonoplast (Pei et al. 1996)., Thus, CDPKs may be a component of the abscisic acid, signaling pathway., Diacylglycerol Activates Protein Kinase C, Cleavage of PIP2 by phospholipase C produces diacylgycerol (DAG) in addition to IP3 (see Figure 14.17)., Whereas IP3 is hydrophilic and diffuses rapidly into the, cytoplasm, DAG is a lipid and remains in the mem-, , brane. In animal cells, DAG can associate with and activate the serine/threonine kinase protein kinase C, (PKC). The inactive form of PKC is a soluble enzyme, that is located in the cytosol. Upon binding to calcium,, the soluble, inactive PKC undergoes a conformational, change and associates with a PKC receptor protein that, transports it to the inner surface of the plasma membrane, where it encounters DAG., PKCs have been shown to phosphorylate ion channels, transcription factors, and enzymes in animal cells., One of the enzymes phosphorylated by PKC is another, protein kinase that regulates cell proliferation and differentiation, MAP kinase kinase kinase (discussed later in, the chapter). G proteins, phospholipase C, and various, protein kinases have been identified in plant membranes (Millner and Causier 1996). PKC activity has also, been detected in plants (Elliott and Kokke 1987; Chen et, al. 1996), and a plant gene encoding the PKC receptor, protein that transports the soluble enzyme to the membrane has recently been cloned (Kwak et al. 1997). However, there is as yet no evidence that activation of PKC, by DAG plays a role in plant signal transduction., Phospholipase A2 Generates Other MembraneDerived Signaling Agents, In animals, the endocrine system is involved in signaling between hormone-producing cells at one location of, the body and hormone-responding cells at another location; in contrast, the autocrine system involves cells, sending signals to themselves and their immediate, neighbors. One type of autocrine signaling system that, plays important roles in pain and inflammatory responses, as well as platelet aggregation and smoothmuscle contraction, is called the eicosanoid pathway., There are four major classes of eicosanoids:, prostaglandins, prostacyclins, thromboxanes, and leuko-
Page 356 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, trienes. All are derived from the breakdown of membrane phospholipids, and in this respect the eicosanoid, pathway resembles the IP3 pathway. There the resemblance ends, however. For whereas the IP3 pathway, begins with the cleavage of IP3 from PIP2 by phospholipase C, the eicosanoid pathway is initiated by the cleavage of the 20-carbon fatty acid arachidonic acid from the, intact phospholipid by the enzyme phospholipase A2, (PLA2) (Figure 14.20A). Two oxidative pathways—one, cyclooxygenase dependent, the other lipoxygenase, dependent—then convert arachidonic acid to the four, eicosanoids (Figure 14.20B). As we will see in Chapter, 19, there is some indirect evidence for the possible, involvement of prostaglandins in the regulation of the, plant cell cycle, although direct evidence is lacking., Higher plants generally have negligible amounts of, arachidonic acid in their membranes, although the level, is higher in certain mosses., In addition to generating arachidonic acid, PLA2 produces lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) as a breakdown, product of phosphatidylcholine. LPC has detergent, properties, and it has been shown to regulate ion channels through its effects on protein kinases. For example,, LPC has been shown to modulate the sodium currents, in cardiac-muscle cells by signal transduction pathways, that involve the activation of both protein kinase C and, a tyrosine kinase (Watson and Gold 1997). Protein, kinase C is activated by LPC independently of the phospholipase C pathway., In recent years plant biologists have become increas-, , H3C, 2, 3, , CH3, 1, , 4, , 6, , CH3, , 7, 8, , 13, , 5, , CH3, , 14, , H3C, , 15, , + H2N, , In Vertebrate Vision, a Heterotrimeric G Protein, Activates Cyclic GMP Phosphodiesterase, The human eye contains two types of photoreceptor, cells: rods and cones. Rods are responsible for monochromatic vision in dim light; cones are involved in, color vision in bright light. Signal transduction in, response to light has been studied more intensively in, rods. The rod is a highly specialized tubular cell that, contains an elongated stack of densely packed membrane sacs called discs at the tip, or outer segment,, reminiscent of the grana stacks of chloroplasts. The disc, membranes of rod cells contain the photosensitive protein pigment rhodopsin, a member of the seven-spanning transmembrane family of receptors. Rhodopsin, consists of the protein opsin covalently bound to the, light-absorbing molecule 11-cis-retinal. When 11-cis-retinal absorbs a single photon of light (400 to 600 nm) it, immediately isomerizes to all-trans-retinal (Figure, 14.21). This change causes a slower conformational, change in the protein, converting it to meta-rhodopsin II,, or activated opsin., , cis-Retinal moiety, , H+, , 12, , 10, , ingly interested in the eicosanoid pathway because it, now appears that an important signaling agent in plant, defense responses, jasmonic acid, is produced by a similar pathway, which was described in Chapter 13. In, addition, LPC has been shown to activate plant protein, kinases in vitro. As we will see in Chapter 19, LPC is one, of many candidates for a second messenger in the rapid, responses of plant cells to auxin., , Lysine side chain, on opsin, , cis double, bond, , 11, , 9, , (CH2)4, , Opsin, , R, , H, C, 15, , N+, H, , (CH2)4, , Opsin + H2O, , Opsin, Rhodopsin, , C, O, , H, , Light-induced, isomerization, , 11-cis-Retinal, trans-Retinal portion, of rhodopsin, , trans double bond, , Figure 14.21 Transduction of the light signal in vertebrate vision. The photoreceptor, pigment is rhodopsin, a transmembrane, protein composed of the protein opsin and, the chromophore 11-cis-retinal. Light, absorption causes the rapid isomerization, of cis-retinal to trans-retinal. The formation, of trans-retinal then causes a conformational change in the protein opsin, forming, meta-rhodopsin II, the activated form of, opsin. The activated opsin then interacts, with the heterotrimeric G protein transducin. (After Lodish et al. 1995.), , H3C, , CH3, , 23, , CH3, , CH3, C, , N, , CH3, , Meta-rhodopsin II, (activated opsin), , Transducin, , (CH2)4, , Opsin
Page 357 :
24, , CHAPTER 14, , Activated transducin, , cGMP phosphodiesterase, (active), Depolarization of, plasma membrane, , Opens Na+, channels, , cGMP, (active), , Increase in, cytosolic Ca2+, , Opens Ca2+, channels, , Closes Na+, channels, , Hyperpolarization of, plasma membrane, , Closes Ca2+, channels, , Decrease in, cytosolic Ca2+, , 5′-GMP, (inactive), Guanylate, cyclase, , GTP, , Stimulates, High Ca2+ inhibits, , Ca2+-sensing, , Low Ca2+ stimulates, , protein, , Figure 14.22 The role of cyclic GMP (cGMP) and calcium as, second messengers in vertebrate vision. Activation of the, heterotrimeric G protein transducin by activated opsin, causes the activation of cGMP phosphodiesterase, which, lowers the concentration of cGMP in the cell. The reduction, in cGMP closes cGMP-activated Na+ channels. Closure of the, Na+ channels blocks the influx of Na+, causing membrane, hyperpolarization. Cyclic GMP also regulates calcium channels. When the cGMP concentration in the cell is high, the, calcium channels open, raising the cytosolic calcium concentration. Guanylate cyclase, the enzyme that synthesizes, cGMP from GTP, is inhibited by high levels of calcium., Conversely, when cGMP levels are low, closure of calcium, channels lowers the cytosolic calcium concentration. This, lowering of the calcium concentration stimulates guanylate, cyclase. Calcium thus provides a feedback system for regulating cGMP levels in the cell., , Activated opsin, in turn, lowers the concentration of, the cyclic nucleotide 3′5′-cGMP. Cyclic GMP is synthesized from GTP by the enzyme guanylate cyclase. In the, dark, guanylate cyclase activity results in the buildup of, a high concentration of cGMP in the rod cells. Because, the plasma membrane contains cGMP-gated Na+ channels, the high cGMP concentration in the cytosol maintains the Na+ channels in the open position in the, absence of light. When the Na+ channels are open, Na+, can enter the cell freely, and this passage of Na+ tends to, depolarize the membrane potential., When opsin becomes activated by light, however, it, binds to the heterotrimeric G protein transducin. This, binding causes the α subunit of transducin to exchange, GDP for GTP and dissociate from the complex. The α, subunit of transducin then activates the enzyme cyclic, GMP phosphodiesterase, which breaks down 3′5′-cGMP, to 5′-GMP (Figure 14.22). Light therefore has the effect, of decreasing the concentration of cGMP in the rod cell., A lower concentration of cGMP has the effect of closing, the cGMP-gated Na+ channels on the plasma mem-, , brane, which are kept open in the dark by a high cGMP, concentration. To give some idea of the signal amplification provided, a single photon may cause the closure, of hundreds of Na+ channels, blocking the uptake of, about 10 million Na+ ions., By preventing the influx of Na+, which tends to, depolarize the membrane, the membrane polarity, increases—that is, becomes hyperpolarized. In this way, a light signal is converted into an electric signal. Membrane hyperpolarization, in turn, inhibits neurotransmitter release from the synaptic body of the rod cell., Paradoxically, the nervous system detects light as an, inhibition rather than a stimulation of neurotransmitter, release., Cyclic GMP, which regulates ion channels and protein kinases in animal cells, appears to be an important, regulatory molecule in plant cells as well. Cyclic GMP, has been definitively identified in plant extracts by gas, chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, (Janistyn 1983; Newton and Brown 1992). Moreover,, cGMP has been implicated as a second messenger in the, responses of phytochrome (see Chapter 17) and gibberellin (see Chapter 20)., Nitric Oxide Gas Stimulates the Synthesis of cGMP, The level of 3′,5′-cyclic GMP in cells is controlled by the, balance between the rate of cGMP synthesis by the, enzyme, guanylyl (or guanylate) cyclase, and the rate of, cGMP degradation by the enzyme cGMP phosphodiesterase. We have seen how light activation of, rhodopsin leads to the activation of cGMP phosphodiesterase in vertebrate rod cells, resulting in a reduction, in cGMP. In smooth muscle tissue of animal cells, cGMP, levels can be increased via the direct activation of, guanylyl cyclase by the signaling intermediate, nitric
Page 358 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, oxide (NO). NO is synthesized from arginine by the, enzyme, NO synthase, in a reaction involving oxygen:, NO synthase, Arginine + O2→Citrulline + NO, Once produced in animal endothelial cells, dissolved, NO passes rapidly across membranes and acts locally, on neighboring smooth muscle cells, with a half-life of, 5–10 seconds. Guanylyl cyclase contains a heme group, that binds NO tightly, and binding of NO causes a conformational change which activates the enzyme. The, NO-induced increase in cGMP causes smooth muscle, cells to relax. Nitroglycerine, which can be metabolized, to yield NO, has long been administered to heart, patients to prevent the coronary artery spasms responsible for variant angina. In plants, NO has recently been, implicated as an intermediate in ABA-induced stomatal, closure (see Chapter 23)., Cell Surface Receptors May Have Catalytic Activity, Some cell surface receptors are enzymes themselves or, are directly associated with enzymes. Unlike the sevenspanning receptors, the catalytic receptors, as these, enzyme or enzyme-associated receptors are called, are, typically attached to the membrane via a single transmembrane helix and do not interact with heterotrimeric, G proteins. The six main categories of catalytic receptors, in animals include: (1) receptor tyrosine kinases, (2), receptor tyrosine phosphatases, (3) receptor serine/threonine kinases, (4) tyrosine kinase–linked receptors, (5), receptor guanylate cyclases, and (6) cell surface proteases. Of these, the receptor tyrosine kinases are probably the most abundant in animal cells., Thus far, no receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) have, been identified in plants. However, plant cells do contain a class of receptors called receptorlike kinases, (RLKs) that are structurally similar to the animal RTKs., In addition, some of the components of the RTK signaling pathway of animals have been identified in plants., After first reviewing the animal RTK pathway, we will, examine the RLK receptors of plants., Ligand Binding to Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Induces Autophosphorylation, The receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) make up the most, important class of enzyme-linked cell surface receptors, in animal cells, although so far they have not been, found in either plants or fungi. Their ligands are soluble, or membrane-bound peptide or protein hormones,, including insulin, epidermal growth factor (EGF),, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and several, other protein growth factors., Since the transmembrane domain that separates the, hormone-binding site on the outer surface of the membrane from the catalytic site on the cytoplasmic surface, consists of only a single α helix, the hormone cannot, , 25, , transmit a signal directly to the cytosolic side of the, membrane via a conformational change. Rather, binding of the ligand to its receptor induces dimerization of, adjacent receptors, which allows the two catalytic, domains to come into contact and phosphorylate each, other on multiple tyrosine residues (autophosphorylation) (Figure 14.23). Dimerization may be a general, mechanism for activating cell surface receptors that contain single transmembrane domains., Intracellular Signaling Proteins That Bind to RTKs, Are Activated by Phosphorylation, Once autophosphorylated, the catalytic site of the RTKs, binds to a variety of cytosolic signaling proteins. After, binding to the RTK, the inactive signaling protein is itself, phosphorylated on specific tyrosine residues. Some transcription factors are activated in this way, after which, they migrate to the nucleus and stimulate gene expression directly. Other signaling molecules take part in a signaling cascade that ultimately results in the activation of, transcription factors. The signaling cascade initiated by, RTKs begins with the small, monomeric G protein Ras., The Ras superfamily. In addition to possessing het-, , erotrimeric G proteins, eukaryotic cells contain small, monomeric G proteins that are related to the α subunits of the heterotrimeric G proteins. The three families, Ras, Rab, and Rho/Rac, all belong to the Ras, superfamily of monomeric GTPases. Rho and Rac, relay signals from surface receptors to the actin cytoskeleton; members of the Rab family of GTPases are, involved in regulating intracellular membrane vesicle, traffic; the Ras proteins, which are located on the inner, surface of the membrane, play a crucial role in initiating the kinase cascade that relays signals from RTKs to, the nucleus., The RAS gene was originally discovered as a viral, oncogene (cancer-causing gene) and was later shown to, be present as a normal gene in animal cells. Ras is a G, protein that cycles between an inactive GDP-binding, form and an active GTP-binding form. Ras also possesses GTPase activity that hydrolyzes bound GTP to, GDP, thus terminating the response. The RAS oncogene, is a mutant form of the protein that is unable to, hydrolyze GTP. As a result, the molecular switch remains, in the on position, triggering uncontrolled cell division., The study of small GTP-binding proteins in plants is, still in its infancy. Thus far, about 30 genes encoding, members of monomeric G protein families have been, cloned, including homologs of RAB and RHO. Surprisingly, RAS itself has so far not yet been identified in, plants (Terryn et al. 1996)., Ras Recruits Raf to the Plasma Membrane, The initial steps in the Ras signaling pathway are illus-
Page 359 :
26, , CHAPTER 14, , Ligand, , Extracellular, domain Ligand-binding site, Ligand, binding, Receptor, dimerization, , EXTRACELLULAR, SPACE, , Autophosphorylation on, tyrosines, , Active Ras, , Transmembrane, domain, ATP, , CYTOSOL, Cytosolic, domain, , Kinase, catalytic, site, , ADP, , ATP, , P, , P, , ADP, , P, P, P, , P, P, P, , The Activated MAP Kinase Enters the Nucleus, The MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) cascade, owes its name to a series of protein kinases that phosphorylate each other in a specific sequence, much like, runners in a relay race passing a baton (Figure 14.24)., The first kinase in the sequence is Raf, referred to in this, , P, P, P, , Ras, GTP, Sos, , P, Grb2, , Phosphotyrosines, , Figure 14.23 Hormone-induced activation of receptor tyrosine kinases. Binding, of the hormone to the monomeric receptors induces receptor dimerization., Dimerization leads to autophosphorylation of the cytosolic domains at multiple, tyrosine residues. The phosphorylated cytoplasmic domains then serve as binding sites for various regulatory proteins. Among these are the Grb2–Sos heterodimer. When Grb2–Sos associates with the activated RTK, the Sos polypeptide binds to the small monomeric G protein Ras, which is bound to the inner, surface of the plasma membrane. Binding of Grb2–Sos to Ras induces Ras to, exchange GTP for GDP, and Ras becomes active. The activated Ras then acts as a, binding site for the protein kinase Raf. Once localized at the plasma membrane,, Raf triggers a series of phosphorylation reactions called the MAP kinase cascade, (see Figure 14.24). (After Lodish et al. 1995 and Karp 1996.), , trated in Figure 14.23. First, binding of the hormone to, the RTK induces dimerization followed by autophosphorylation of the catalytic domain. Autophosphorylation of the receptor causes binding to the Grb2 protein,, which is tightly associated with another protein, called, Sos. As a result, the Grb2–Sos complex attaches to the, RTK at the phosphorylation site. The Sos protein then, binds to the inactive form of Ras, which is associated, with the inner surface of the plasma membrane. Upon, binding to Sos, Ras releases GDP and binds GTP, instead, which converts Ras to the active form. The activated Ras, in turn, provides a binding site for the soluble serine/threonine kinase Raf. The primary function, of the activated Ras is thus to recruit Raf to the plasma, membrane. Binding to Ras activates Raf and initiates a, chain of phosphorylation reactions called the MAPK, cascade (see the next section)., As we will see in later chapters, increasing evidence, suggests that plant signaling pathways also employ the, MAPK cascade. For example, the ethylene receptor,, ETR1, probably passes its signal to CTR1, a protein, kinase of the Raf family (see Chapter 22)., , P, P, , Grb2–Sos, associates with, activated RTK, and activates, Ras, , P, P, , P, P, P, , P, , Ras, GTP, Sos, , Raf, Grb2, Raf binds to, activated Ras, , context as MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK)., MAPKKK passes the phosphate baton to MAP kinase, kinase (MAPKK), which hands it off to MAP kinase, (MAPK). MAPK, the “anchor” of the relay team, enters, the nucleus, where it activates still other protein kinases,, specific transcription factors, and regulatory proteins., The transcription factors that are activated by MAPK, are called serum response factors (SRFs) because all of, the growth factors that bind to RTKs are transported in, the serum. Serum response factors bind to specific, nucleotide sequences on the genes they regulate called, serum response elements (SREs). The entire process, from binding of the growth factor to the receptor to transcriptional activation of gene expression can be very, rapid, taking place in a few minutes., Some of the genes that are activated encode other, transcription factors that regulate the expression of other, genes. Because these genes are important for cell proliferation and growth, many of them are proto-oncogenes., For example, one of the genes whose expression is stimulated by MAPK is the proto-oncogene FOS. A protooncogene is a normal gene that potentially can cause, malignant tumors when mutated. When the Fos protein, combines with the phosphorylated Jun protein (one of, the nuclear proteins that is phosphorylated by MAPK),, it forms a heterodimeric transcription factor called AP1, which turns on other genes. Other important protooncogenes that encode nuclear transcription factors, include MYC and MYB. Both phytochrome (see Chap-
Page 360 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, ter 17) and gibberellin (see Chapter 20) are believed to, regulate gene expression via the up-regulation of MYBlike transcription factors., Plant Receptorlike Kinases Are Structurally Similar, to Animal Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Because of the recent progress in sequencing the, genomes of plants such as Arabidopsis and rice, it is possible to use computers to search for DNA nucleotide, sequences that correspond to the amino acid sequences, of proteins identified in other organisms. Such database, searches of plant DNA sequences have successfully identified a large family of receptorlike protein kinases, (RLKs) by homology to animal receptor tyrosine kinases., These plant RLKs are structurally similar to the animal, RTKs. They have a large extracellular domain, span the, membrane only once, and contain a catalytic domain on, the cytoplasmic side. Although they resemble the RTKs, in their general structure, they differ in catalytic activity., Whereas RTKs of animals are autophosphorylating tyrosine kinases, the plant RLKs are autophosphorylating, serine/threonine kinases (Walker 1994)., Three types of RLKs have been identified in plants,, primarily on the basis of their extracellular domains., The first class is characterized by an extracellular S, domain and is called S receptor kinase or SRK. The S, domain was first identified in a group of secreted glycoproteins, called S locus glycoproteins (SLGs), which, regulate self-incompatibility in Brassica species. Selfincompatibility is characterized by the failure of pollen, tubes to grow when placed on pistils from the same, plant, and self-incompatibility loci are genes that regulate this phenotype., The S domain consists of ten cysteines in a particular, arrangement with other amino acids. The high degree, of homology between the S domains of SRKs and those, of SLGs suggests that they are functionally related and, are involved in the recognition pathways involved in, pollen tube growth. Consistent with this idea, SRK, genes are expressed predominantly in pistils. Several, other S domain RLKs with highly divergent sequences, have been identified in other species, and each of these, may play unique roles in plant cell signaling., The leucine-rich repeat (LRR) family of receptors, constitute the second group of RLKs. They were first, identified as disease resistance genes that may play key, roles in the cell surface recognition of ligands produced, by pathogens and the subsequent activation of the intracellular defense response (Bent 1996; Song et al. 1995)., However, plant LRR receptors have been implicated in, normal developmental functions as well. For example,, a pollen-specific LRR receptor has been identified in, sunflower that may be involved in cell–cell recognition, during pollination (Reddy et al. 1995), and the Arabidopsis ERECTA gene, which regulates the shape and, , 27, , Growth factor, , P, RTK, , RTK, , P, , Binding of, P growth factor, activates RTK, , Grb2, +, Sos, , Cytoplasm, Ras binds GTP, and is activated, Ras-GTP, , Ras-GDP, , MAPKKK (Raf), phosphorylates, MAP kinase, kinase, (MAPKK), , MAPKKK (Raf), , P, MAPKK, , MAPKK, , MAPKK, phosphorylates, MAP kinase, (MAPK), MAPK, , P, MAPK, P, , The activated, MAPK enters, the nucleus, and activates, transcription, factors, , P, TF, , TF, , Nucleus, The activated, transcription, factors, stimulate, gene, expression, , Gene, Transcription, , Figure 14.24 The MAPK cascade. Hormonal stimulation of, the receptor tyrosine kinase leads to the activation of Raf, (see Figure 14.23), also known as MAP kinase kinase kinase, (MAPKKK). (1) MAPKKK phosphorylates MAP kinase kinase, (MAPKK). (2) MAPKK phosphorylates MAP kinase (MAPK)., (3) The activated MAPK enters the nucleus. and activates, transcription factors (TF). (4) The activated transcription factors stimulate gene expression. (After Karp 1996.), , size of organs originating from the shoot apical meristem, encodes an LRR receptor (Torii et al. 1996). More, recently, the receptor for the plant steroid hormone, brassinosteroid has been identified as an LRR receptor, (see Web Topic 19.14)., The LRR receptors are members of a larger family of, LRR proteins that includes soluble forms with lower, molecular mass that are widespread in plants and animals. The most conserved element of the LRR domain, forms a β sheet with an exposed face that participates in, protein–protein interactions (Buchanan and Gay 1996).
Page 361 :
28, , CHAPTER 14, , The small soluble LRR proteins may participate in cell, signaling by hydrophobic binding to LRR receptors. For, example, in tomato a protein that contains four tandem, repeats of a canonical 24-amino-acid leucine-rich repeat, motif is up-regulated during virus infection. This protein is apparently secreted into the apoplast along with, a protease that digests it to lower molecular weight peptides (Tornero et al. 1996). These peptides could form, part of a signaling pathway by interacting with cell surface LRR receptors., Finally, a third type of RLK that contains an epidermal growth factor–like repeat has been identified in Arabidopsis. Interestingly, the receptor, called PRO25, is, localized in the chloroplast and interacts with a lightharvesting chlorophyll a/b–binding protein (LHCP), (Walker 1994). Little or nothing is known about signaling within plastids, which undoubtedly will be an, important area for future research., , Summary, The size of the genome (the total amount of DNA in a, cell, a nucleus, or an organelle) is related to the complexity of the organism. However, not all of the DNA in, a genome codes for genes. Prokaryotic genomes consist, mainly of unique sequences (genes). Much of the, genome in eukaryotes, however, consists of repetitive, DNA and spacer DNA. The genome size in plants is, highly variable, ranging from 1.5 × 108 bp in Arabidopsis, to 1 × 1011 bp in Trillium. Plant genomes contain about, 25,000 genes; by comparison, the Drosophila genome, contains about 12,000 genes., In prokaryotes, structural genes involved in related, functions are organized into operons, such as the lac, operon. Regulatory genes encode DNA-binding proteins that may repress or activate transcription. In, inducible systems, the regulatory proteins are themselves activated or inactivated by binding to small effector molecules., Similar control systems are present in eukaryotic, genomes. However, related genes are not clustered in, operons, and genes are subdivided into exons and, introns. Pre-mRNA transcripts must be processed by, splicing, capping, and addition of poly-A tails to produce the mature mRNA, and the mature mRNA must, then exit the nucleus to initiate translation in the cytosol., Despite these differences, most eukaryotic genes are regulated at the level of transcription, as in prokaryotes., Transcription in eukaryotes is characterized by three, different RNA polymerases whose activities are modulated by a diverse group of cis-acting regulatory, sequences. RNA polymerase II is responsible for the, synthesis of pre-mRNA. General transcription factors, assemble into a transcription initiation complex at the, TATA box of the minimum promoter, which lies within, , 100 bp of the transcription start site of the gene. Additional cis-acting regulatory sequences, such as the CAAT, box and GC box, bind transcription factors that enhance, expression of the gene. Distal regulatory sequences, located farther upstream bind to other transcription factors called activators or repressors. Many plant genes, are also regulated by enhancers, distantly located positive regulatory sequences., Despite being scattered throughout the genome,, many eukaryotic genes are both inducible and coregulated. Genes that are coordinately regulated have common cis-acting regulatory sequences in their promoters., Most transcription factors in plants contain the basic zipper (bZIP) motif. An important group of transcription, factors in plants, the floral homeotic genes, contain the, MADS domain., Enzyme concentration is also regulated by protein, degradation, or turnover. As yet there is no evidence, that plant vacuoles function like animal lysosomes in, protein turnover, except during senescence, when the, contents of the vacuole are released. However, protein, turnover via the covalent attachment of the short, polypeptide ubiquitin and subsequent proteolysis is an, important mechanism for regulating the cytosolic protein concentration in plants., Signal transduction pathways coordinate gene expression with environmental conditions and with development. Prokaryotes employ two-component regulatory, systems that include a sensor protein and a response regulator protein that facilitates the response, typically gene, expression. The sensor and the response regulator communicate via protein phosphorylation. Receptor proteins, related to the bacterial two-component systems have, recently been identified in yeast and plants., In multicellular eukaryotes, lipophilic hormones usually bind to intracellular receptors, while water-soluble, hormones bind to cell surface receptors. Binding to a, receptor initiates a signal transduction pathway, often, involving the generation of second messengers, such as, cyclic nucleotides, inositol trisphosphate, and calcium,, which greatly amplify the original signal and bring, about the cellular response. Such pathways normally, lead to changes in gene expression. In plants, the receptor for the phytohormone brassinosteroid is a cell surface receptor., The seven-spanning receptors of animal cells interact, with heterotrimeric G proteins, which act as molecular, switches by cycling between active (GTP-binding) forms, and inactive (GDP-binding) forms. Dissociation of the α, subunit from the complex allows it to activate the effector enzyme. Activation of adenylyl cyclase increases, cAMP levels, resulting in the activation of protein kinase, A. Cyclic AMP can also regulate cation channels directly., When heterotrimeric G proteins activate phospholipase C, it initiates the IP3 pathway. IP3 released from the
Page 362 :
Gene Expression and Signal Transduction, membrane opens intracellular calcium channels, releasing calcium from the ER and vacuole into the cytosol., The increase in calcium concentration, in turn, activates, protein kinases and other enzymes. In plants, calcium, dependent protein kinases, which have a calmodulin, domain, are activated by calcium directly. The other byproduct of phospholipase C, diacylglycerol, can also act, as a second messenger by activating protein kinase C., There is increasing evidence that cyclic GMP operates, as a second messenger in plant cells as it does in animal, cells. In animal cells, cyclic GMP has been shown to regulate ion channels and protein kinases., The most common family of cell surface catalytic, receptors in animals consists of the receptor tyrosine, kinases. RTKs dimerize upon binding to the hormone;, then their multiple tyrosine residues are autophosphorylated. The phosphorylated receptor then acts as an, assembly site for various protein complexes, including, the Ras superfamily of monomeric GTPases. Binding of, Ras leads to recruitment of the protein kinase Raf to the, membrane. Raf initiates the MAPK cascade. The last, kinase to be phosphorylated (activated) is MAP kinase,, which enters the nucleus and activates various transcription factors (serum response factors), which bind to, cis-acting regulatory sequences called serum response, elements., Plants appear to lack RTKs, but they have structurally similar receptors called receptorlike kinases,, which are serine/threonine kinases. The three main categories of plant RLKs are the S receptor kinases, the, leucine-rich repeat receptors, and a receptor on the, chloroplast called PRO25. Little is known about the signaling pathways used by these receptors, although, enzymes of the MAPK cascade have been identified in, plants., General Reading, *Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Watson, J., D. (1994) Molecular Biology of the Cell, 3rd ed. Garland, New York., *Becker, W. M., Reece, J. B., and Poenie, M. F. (1996) The World of the, Cell, 3rd ed. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif., Dey, P. M., and Harborne, J. B., eds. (1997) Plant Biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego., Fosket, D. E. (1994) Plant Growth and Development: A Molecular, Approach. Academic Press, San Diego., *Karp, G. (1996) Cell and Molecular Biology: Concepts and Experiments., Wiley, New York., *Lodish, H., Baltimore, D., Berk, A., Zipursky, S., Matsidaira, P., and, Darnell, J. (1995) Molecular Cell Biology. Scientific American Books,, New York., Tobin, A. J., and Morel, R. E. (1997) Asking about Cells. Harcourt, Brace, Fort Worth, Tex., * Indicates a reference that is general reading in the field and is also cited, in this chapter., , 29, , Chapter References, Assmann, A. M. (1995) Cyclic AMP as a second messenger in higher, plants: Status and future prospects. Plant Physiol. 91: 624–628., Bent, A. F. (1996) Plant disease resistance genes: Function meets, structure. Plant Cell 8: 1757–1771., Buchanan, S. G., and Gay, N. J. (1996) Structural and functional, diversity in the leucine-rich repeat family of proteins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 65: 1–44., Chen, X., Xiao Z-A., and Zhang, C-H. (1996) A preliminary study on, plant protein kinase C. Acta Phytophysiol. Sinica 22: 437–440., Coux, O., Tanaka, K., and Goldberg, A. L. (1996) Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:, 2069–2076., Darnell, J., Lodish, H., and Baltimore, D. (1990) Molecular Cell Biology, 2nd ed. Scientific American Books, W. H. Freeman, New, York., Elliott, D. C., and Kokke, Y. S. (1987) Partial purification and properties of a protein kinase C type enzyme from plants. Phytochemistry 26: 2929–2936., Golovkin, M., and Reddy, A. S. N. (1996) Structure and expression, of a plant U1 snRNP 70K gene—Alternative splicing of U1, snRNP pre-mRNA produces two different transcripts. Plant Cell, 8: 1421–1435., Harper, J. J., Sussman, M. R., Schaller, G. E., Putnam-Evans, C., Charbonneau, H., and Harmon, A. C. (1991) A calcium-dependent, protein kinase with a regulatory domain similar to calmodulin., Science 252: 951–954., Ichikawa, T., Suzuki, Y., Czaja, I., Schommer, C., Lesnick, A., Schell,, J., and Walden, R. (1997) Identification and role of adenylyl, cyclase in auxin signalling in higher plants. Nature 390: 698–701., Janistyn, B. (1983) Gas chromatographic-mass spectroscopic identification and quantification of cyclic guanosine-3′:5′-monophosphate in maize seedlings (Zea mays). Planta 159: 382–385., Johnston, M. (1987) A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: The, GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 51: 458–476., Kategiri, F., Lam, E., and Chua, N-H. (1989) Two tobacco DNA binding proteins with homology to the nuclear factor CREB. Nature, 340: 727–730., Kretsinger, R. (1980) Structure and evolution of calcium-modulated, proteins. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 8: 119–174., Kuersten, S., Lea, K., Macmorris, M., Spieth, J., and Blumenthal, T., (1997) Relationship between 3′ end formation and SL2-specific, trans-splicing in polycistronic Caenorhabditis elegans pre-mRNA, processing. RNA 3: 269–278., Kwak, J. M., Kim, S. A., Lee, S. K., Oh, S-A., Byoun, C-H., Han, J-K.,, and Nam, H. G. (1997) Insulin-induced maturation of Xenopus, oocytes is inhibited by microinjection of a Brassica napus cDNA, clone with high similarity to a mammalian receptor for activated, protein kinase C. Planta 201: 245–251., Lam, E. (1997) Nucleic acids and proteins. In Plant Biochemistry, P. M., Dey and J. B. Harborne, eds., Academic Press, San Diego, pp., 316–352., Li, W., Luan, S., Schreiber, S. L., and Assmann, S. M. (1994) Cyclic, AMP stimulates K+ channel activity in mesophyll cells of Vicia, faba L. Plant Physiol. 106: 957–961., McAinsh, M. R., Webb, A. A. R., Taylor, J. E., and Hetherington, A., M. (1995) Stimulus-induced oscillations in guard cell cytosolic, free calcium. Plant Cell 7: 1207–1219., McCurdy, D. W., and Harmon, A. C. (1992) Calcium-dependent protein kinase in the green alga Chara. Planta 188: 54–61., McEwen, B. S. (1991) Non-genomic and genomic effects of steroids, on neural activity. TIPS 12: 141–147., Miklos, L. G., and Rubin, G. M. (1996) The role of the genome project in determining gene function: Insights from model organisms. Cell 86: 521–529., Millner, P. A., and Causier, B. E. (1996) G-protein coupled receptors, in plant cells. J. Exp. Bot. 47: 983–992.
Page 363 :
Mortimer, R. K., Schild, D., Contopoulou, C. R., and Kans, J. A. (1989), Genetic map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Edition l0. Yeast 5:, 321–403., Newton, R. P., and Brown, E. G. (1992) Analytical procedures for, cyclic nucleotides and their associated enzymes in plant tissues., Phytochem. Anal. 3: 1–13., Ota, I. M., and Varshavsky, A. (1993) A yeast protein similar to bacterial two-component regulators. Science 262: 566–569., Parkinson, J. S. (1993) Signal transduction schemes of bacteria. Cell, 73: 857–871., Pei, Z-M., Ward, J. M., Harper, J. F., and Schroeder, J. I. (1996) A novel, chloride channel in Vicia faba guard cell vacuoles activated by the, serine-threonine kinase, CDPK. EMBO J. 15: 6564–6574., Peters, J. L., and Silverthorne, J. (1995) Organ-specific stability of two, Lemna rbcS mRNAs is determined primarily in the nuclear compartment. Plant Cell 7: 131–140., Reddy, J. T., Dudareva, N., Evrard, J-L., Krauter, R., Steinmetz, A.,, and Pillay, D. T. N. (1995) A pollen-specific gene from sunflower, encodes a member of the leucine-rich-repeat protein superfamily. Plant Sci. 111: 81–93., Roberts, D. M., and Harmon, A. C. (1992) Calcium-modulated protein targets of intracellular calcium signals in higher plants. Annu., Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 43: 375–414., Rounsley, S. D., Glodek, A., Sutton, G., Adams, M. D., Somerville, C., R., Venter, J. C., and Kerlavage, A. R. (1996) The construction of, Arabidopsis EST assemblies: A new resource to facilitate gene, identification. Plant Physiol. 112: 1177–1183., Shanklin, J., Jabben, M., and Vierstra, R.D. (1987) Red light induced, formation of ubiquitin-phytochrome conjugates: Identification, of possible intermediates of phytochrome degradation. Proc. Natl., Acad. Sci. USA 84:359–363., Song, W-Y., Wang, G-L., Chen, L-L., Kim, H-S., Pi, L-Y., Holsten, T.,, Gardner, J., Wang, B., Zhai, W-X., Zhu, L-H., et al. (1995) A recep-, , tor kinase-like protein encoded by the rice disease resistance, gene, Xa21. Science 270: 1804–1806., Sundaresan, V., Springer, P., Volpe, T., Haward, S., Jones, J. D. G.,, Dean, C., Ma, H., and Martienssen, R. (1995) Patterns of gene, action in plant development revealed by enhancer trap and gene, trap transposable elements. Genes Dev. 9: 1797–1810., Takezawa, D., Ramachandiran, S., Paranjape, V., and Poovaiah, B., W. (1996) Dual regulation of a chimeric plant serine-threonine, kinase by calcium and calcium-calmodulin. J. Biol. Chem. 271:, 8126–8132., Terryn, N., Inze, D., and Van Montagu, M. (1996) Small GTP-binding proteins in plants. In Proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of, Europe. Plant Membrane Biology, I. M. Møller and P. Brodelius,, eds., Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 19–27., Terzaghi, W. B., and Cashmore, A. R. (1995) Light-regulated transcription. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 445–474., Tezuka, T., Hiratsuka, S., and Takahasi, S. Y. (1993) Promotion of the, growth of self-incompatible pollen tubes in lily by cAMP. Plant, Cell Physiol. 27: 193–197., Torii, K. U., Mitsukawa, N., Oosumi, T., Matsuura, Y., Yokayama, R.,, Whittier, R. F., and Komeda, Y. (1996) The Arabidopsis ERECTA, gene encodes a putative receptor protein kinase with extracellular leucine-rich repeats. Plant Cell 8: 735–746., Tornero, P., Mayda, E., Gomez, M. D., Canas, L., Conejero, V., and, Vera, P. (1996) Characterization of LRP, a leucine-rich repeat, (LRR) protein from tomato plants that is processed during pathogenesis. Plant J. 10: 315–330., Walker, J. C. (1994) Structure and function of the receptor-like protein kinases of higher plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 26: 1599–1609., Watson, C. L., and Gold, M. R. (1997) Lysophosphatidylcholine modulates cardiac I-Na via multiple protein kinase pathways. Circ., Res. 81: 387–395.
Page 364 :
Chapter, , 15, , Cell Walls: Structure,, Biogenesis, and Expansion, , PLANT CELLS, UNLIKE ANIMAL CELLS, are surrounded by a relatively thin but mechanically strong cell wall. This wall consists of a complex mixture of polysaccharides and other polymers that are secreted by, the cell and are assembled into an organized network linked together by, both covalent and noncovalent bonds. Plant cell walls also contain structural proteins, enzymes, phenolic polymers, and other materials that, modify the wall’s physical and chemical characteristics., The cell walls of prokaryotes, fungi, algae, and plants are distinctive, from each other in chemical composition and microscopic structure, yet, they all serve two common primary functions: regulating cell volume, and determining cell shape. As we will see, however, plant cell walls, have acquired additional functions that are not apparent in the walls of, other organisms. Because of these diverse functions, the structure and, composition of plant cell walls are complex and variable., In addition to these biological functions, the plant cell wall is important in human economics. As a natural product, the plant cell wall is, used commercially in the form of paper, textiles, fibers (cotton, flax,, hemp, and others), charcoal, lumber, and other wood products. Another, major use of plant cell walls is in the form of extracted polysaccharides, that have been modified to make plastics, films, coatings, adhesives, gels,, and thickeners in a huge variety of products., As the most abundant reservoir of organic carbon in nature, the plant, cell wall also takes part in the processes of carbon flow through ecosystems. The organic substances that make up humus in the soil and that, enhance soil structure and fertility are derived from cell walls. Finally,, as an important source of roughage in our diet, the plant cell wall is a, significant factor in human health and nutrition., We begin this chapter with a description of the general structure and, composition of cell walls and the mechanisms of the biosynthesis and, secretion of cell wall materials. We then turn to the role of the primary, cell wall in cell expansion. The mechanisms of tip growth will be contrasted with those of diffuse growth, particularly with respect to the
Page 365 :
314, , Chapter 15, , establishment of cell polarity and the control of the rate of, cell expansion. Finally, we will describe the dynamic, changes in the cell wall that often accompany cell differentiation, along with the role of cell wall fragments as signaling molecules., , THE STRUCTURE AND SYNTHESIS OF, PLANT CELL WALLS, Without a cell wall, plants would be very different organisms from what we know. Indeed, the plant cell wall is, essential for many processes in plant growth, development,, maintenance, and reproduction:, • Plant cell walls determine the mechanical strength of, plant structures, allowing those structures to grow to, great heights., • Cell walls glue cells together, preventing them from, sliding past one another. This constraint on cellular, movement contrasts markedly to the situation in animal cells, and it dictates the way in which plants, develop (see Chapter 16)., • A tough outer coating enclosing the cell, the cell wall, acts as a cellular “exoskeleton” that controls cell, shape and allows high turgor pressures to develop., • Plant morphogenesis depends, largely on the control of cell wall, properties because the expansive, growth of plant cells is limited principally by the ability of the cell wall, to expand., • The cell wall is required for normal, water relations of plants because the, wall determines the relationship, between the cell turgor pressure and, cell volume (see Chapter 3)., • The bulk flow of water in the xylem, requires a mechanically tough wall, that resists collapse by the negative, pressure in the xylem., • The wall acts as a diffusion barrier, that limits the size of macromolecules that can reach the plasma, membrane from outside, and it is a, major structural barrier to pathogen, invasion., , phenomenon is most notable in many seeds, in which wall, polysaccharides of the endosperm or cotyledons function, primarily as food reserves. Furthermore, oligosaccharide, components of the cell wall may act as important signaling, molecules during cell differentiation and during recognition of pathogens and symbionts., The diversity of functions of the plant cell wall requires, a diverse and complex plant cell wall structure. In this section we will begin with a brief description of the morphology and basic architecture of plant cell walls. Then we will, discuss the organization, composition, and synthesis of primary and secondary cell walls., , Plant Cell Walls Have Varied Architecture, Stained sections of plant tissues reveal that the cell wall is, not uniform, but varies greatly in appearance and composition in different cell types (Figure 15.1). Cell walls of the, cortical parenchyma are generally thin and have few distinguishing features. In contrast, the walls of some specialized cells, such as epidermal cells, collenchyma, phloem, fibers, xylem tracheary elements, and other forms of sclerenchyma have thicker, multilayered walls. Often these, walls are intricately sculpted and are impregnated with, specific substances, such as lignin, cutin, suberin, waxes,, silica, or structural proteins., , Epidermis, Cortex, , Phloem fibers, Phloem, Cambium, , Xylem, , Pith, , Much of the carbon that is assimilated, in photosynthesis is channeled into polysaccharides in the wall. During specific, phases of development, these polymers, may be hydrolyzed into their constituent, sugars, which may be scavenged by the, cell and used to make new polymers. This, , FIGURE 15.1 Cross section of a stem of Trifolium (clover), showing cells, with varying wall morphology. Note the highly thickened walls of the, phloem fibers. (Photo © James Solliday/Biological Photo Service.)
Page 366 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, , 315, , The individual sides of a wall surrounding a cell may also, vary in thickness, embedded substances, sculpting, and frequency of pitting and plasmodesmata. For example, the outer, wall of the epidermis is usually much thicker than the other, walls of the cell; moreover, this wall lacks plasmodesmata, and is impregnated with cutin and waxes. In guard cells, the, side of the wall adjacent to the stomatal pore is much thicker, than the walls on the other sides of the cell. Such variations, in wall architecture for a single cell reflect the polarity and, differentiated functions of the cell and arise from targeted, secretion of wall components to the cell surface., Despite this diversity in cell wall morphology, cell walls, commonly are classified into two major types: primary, walls and secondary walls. Primary walls are formed by, growing cells and are usually considered to be relatively, unspecialized and similar in molecular architecture in all, cell types. Nevertheless, the ultrastructure of primary, walls also shows wide variation. Some primary walls,, such as those of the onion bulb parenchyma, are very thin, (100 nm) and architecturally simple (Figure 15.2). Other, primary walls, such as those found in collenchyma or in, the epidermis (Figure 15.3), may be much thicker and consist of multiple layers., Secondary walls are the cell walls that form after cell, growth (enlargement) has ceased. Secondary walls may, become highly specialized in structure and composition,, reflecting the differentiated state of the cell. Xylem cells,, such as those found in wood, are notable for possessing, , In primary cell walls, cellulose microfibrils are embedded, in a highly hydrated matrix (Figure 15.4). This structure, provides both strength and flexibility. In the case of cell, walls, the matrix (plural matrices) consists of two major, groups of polysaccharides, usually called hemicelluloses, and pectins, plus a small amount of structural protein. The, matrix polysaccharides consist of a variety of polymers, that may vary according to cell type and plant species, (Table 15.1)., , (A), , (B), , highly thickened secondary walls that are strengthened by, lignin (see Chapter 13)., A thin layer of material, the middle lamella (plural, lamellae), can usually be seen at the junction where the, walls of neighboring cells come into contact. The composition of the middle lamella differs from the rest of the wall, in that it is high in pectin and contains different proteins, compared with the bulk of the wall. Its origin can be traced, to the cell plate that formed during cell division., As we saw in Chapter 1, the cell wall is usually penetrated by tiny membrane-lined channels, called plasmodesmata (singular plasmodesma), which connect neighboring cells. Plasmodesmata function in communication, between cells, by allowing passive transport of small molecules and active transport of proteins and nucleic acids, between the cytoplasms of adjacent cells., , The Primary Cell Wall Is Composed of Cellulose, Microfibrils Embedded in a Polysaccharide Matrix, , 200 nm, , FIGURE 15.2 Primary cell walls from onion parenchyma. (A) This surface view of, cell wall fragments was taken through the use of Nomarski optics. Note that the, wall looks like a very thin sheet with small surface depressions; these depressions, may be pit fields, places where plasmodesmatal connections between cells are concentrated. (B) This surface view of a cell wall was prepared by a freeze-etch replica, technique. It shows the fibrillar nature of the cell wall. (From McCann et al. 1990,, courtesy of M. McCann.), , 200 nm
Page 367 :
316, , Chapter 15, , FIGURE 15.3 Electron micrograph of the outer epidermal, cell wall from the growing, region of a bean hypocotyl., Multiple layers are visible, within the wall. The inner layers are thicker and more, defined than the outer layers, because the outer layers are, the older regions of the wall, and have been stretched and, thinned by cell expansion., (From Roland et al. 1982.), , Cuticle, , Outer wall layers, , Inner wall layers, , Hemicelluloses, , Pectins, , Rhamnogalacturonan I, (a pectin), , Cellulose, microfibril, , Structural, protein, , FIGURE 15.4 Schematic diagram of the major structural components of the primary, cell wall and their likely arrangement. Cellulose microfibrils are coated with hemicelluloses (such as xyloglucan), which may also cross-link the microfibrils to one, another. Pectins form an interlocking matrix gel, perhaps interacting with structural, proteins. (From Brett and Waldron 1996.)
Page 368 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, TABLE 15.1, Structural components of plant cell walls, Class, , Examples, , Cellulose, , Microfibrils of (1→4)β-D-glucan, , Matrix Polysaccharides, Pectins, Homogalacturonan, Rhamnogalacturonan, Arabinan, Galactan, Hemicelluloses, Xyloglucan, Xylan, Glucomannan, Arabinoxylan, Callose (1→3)β-D-glucan, (1→3,1→4)β-D-glucan [grasses only], Lignin, Structural proteins, , (see Chapter 13), (see Table 15.2), , These polysaccharides are named after the principal, sugars they contain. For example, a glucan is a polymer, made up of glucose, a xylan is a polymer made up of, xylose, a galactan is made from galactose, and so on. Glycan, is the general term for a polymer made up of sugars. For, branched polysaccharides, the backbone of the polysaccharide is usually indicated by the last part of the name., For example, xyloglucan has a glucan backbone (a linear, chain of glucose residues) with xylose sugars attached to it, in the side chains; glucuronoarabinoxylan has a xylan backbone (made up of xylose subunits) with glucuronic acid, and arabinose side chains. However, a compound name, does not necessarily imply a branched structure. For example, glucomannan is the name given to a polymer containing both glucose and mannose in its backbone., Cellulose microfibrils are relatively stiff structures that, contribute to the strength and structural bias of the cell wall., The individual glucans that make up the microfibril are, closely aligned and bonded to each other to make a highly, ordered (crystalline) ribbon that excludes water and is relatively inaccessible to enzymatic attack. As a result, cellulose is very strong and very stable and resists degradation., Hemicelluloses are flexible polysaccharides that characteristically bind to the surface of cellulose. They may, form tethers that bind cellulose microfibrils together into a, cohesive network (see Figure 15.4), or they may act as a, slippery coating to prevent direct microfibril–microfibril, contact. Another term for these molecules is cross-linking, glucans, but in this chapter we’ll use the more traditional, term, hemicelluloses. As described later, the term hemicellulose includes several different kinds of polysaccharides., Pectins form a hydrated gel phase in which the cellulose–hemicellulose network is embedded. They act as, hydrophilic filler, to prevent aggregation and collapse of, , 317, , the cellulose network. They also determine the porosity of, the cell wall to macromolecules. Like hemicelluloses,, pectins include several different kinds of polysaccharides., The precise role of wall structural proteins is uncertain,, but they may add mechanical strength to the wall and, assist in the proper assembly of other wall components., The primary wall is composed of approximately 25%, cellulose, 25% hemicelluloses, and 35% pectins, with perhaps 1 to 8% structural protein, on a dry-weight basis., However, large deviations from these values may be found., For example, the walls of grass coleoptiles consist of 60 to, 70% hemicelluloses, 20 to 25% cellulose, and only about, 10% pectins. Cereal endosperm walls are mostly (about, 85%) hemicelluloses. Secondary walls typically contain, much higher cellulose contents., In this chapter we will present a basic model of the primary wall, but be aware that plant cell walls are more diverse, than this model suggests. The composition of matrix polysaccharides and structural proteins in walls varies significantly among different species and cell types (Carpita and, McCann 2000). Most notably, in grasses and related species, the major matrix polysaccharides differ from those that make, up the matrix of most other land plants (Carpita 1996)., The primary wall also contains much water. This water, is located mostly in the matrix, which is perhaps 75 to 80%, water. The hydration state of the matrix is an important, determinant of the physical properties of the wall; for, example, removal of water makes the wall stiffer and less, extensible. This stiffening effect of dehydration may play a, role in growth inhibition by water deficits. We will examine the structure of each of the major polymers of the cell, wall in more detail in the sections that follow., , Cellulose Microfibrils Are Synthesized at the, Plasma Membrane, Cellulose is a tightly packed microfibril of linear chains of, (1→4)-linked β-D-glucose (Figure 15.5 and Web Topic 15.1)., Because of the alternating spatial configuration of the glucosidic bonds linking adjacent glucose residues, the repeating unit in cellulose is considered to be cellobiose, a (1→4)linked β-D-glucose disaccharide., Cellulose microfibrils are of indeterminate length and vary, considerably in width and in degree of order, depending on, the source. For instance, cellulose microfibrils in land plants, appear under the electron microscope to be 5 to 12 nm wide,, whereas those formed by algae may be up to 30 nm wide and, more crystalline. This variety in width corresponds to a variation in the number of parallel chains that make up the cross, section of a microfibril—estimated to consist of about 20 to, 40 individual chains in the thinner microfibrils., The precise molecular structure of the cellulose microfibril is uncertain. Current models of microfibril organization, suggest that it has a substructure consisting of highly crystalline domains linked together by less organized “amor-
Page 369 :
318, , Chapter 15, (A) Hexoses, O, , CH2OH, , HO, , (B) Pentoses, H, , H, , H, , H, , H, , b-D-Xylose, , O, , CH2OH, , HO, , H, , HO, , H, , OH, , HO, , H, OH, , HO, , CH2OH, , b-L-Arabinose, , O, OH, , H, , O, , H, OH, , H, , HO, , H, H, , H, , H, , OH, , HOCH2, , H, , OH, , OH, , b-D-Mannose, , a-D-Apiose, , (C) Uronic acids, O–, HO C, , (D) Deoxy sugars, H, , O, , O, , OH, , H, , HO, , H, , H, HO, , OH, , CH3, , H, , H, , OH, , O, , H, , OH, , H, , H, , OH, , a-D-Galacturonic acid (GalA), , a-L-Rhamnose (Rha), H, , O–, H, , OH, , OH, , H, , H, , H, , H, HO, , OH, , CH3, , O, , O, , C, , H, , OH, , H, , b-D-Glucose, , H, , H, , H, , H, , HO, , O, , H, , H, , OH, , H, , H, , OH, H, , OH, , HO, , b-D-Galactose, , H, , H, , H, , H, , OH, , HO, , H, , HO, , OH, , H, , O, , HO, , OH, , O, , H, , OH, , OH, H, , H, , a-L-Fucose (Fuc), , a-D-Glucuronic acid (GlcA), , (E) Cellobiose, H, HO, , OH H, , H, , HO, , O, , H, H, , CH2OH, , H, , O, , HO, , CH2OH O, H, H, OH, , H, OH, , H, , Glucosyl, , Glucose, , FIGURE 15.5 Conformational structures of sugars commonly found in plant cell walls. (A) Hexoses (six-carbon, sugars). (B) Pentoses (five-carbon sugars). (C) Uronic acids, (acidic sugars). (D) Deoxy sugars. (E) Cellobiose (showing, the (1→4)β-D-linkage between two glucose residues in, inverted orientation)., , phous” regions (Figure 15.6). Within the crystalline, domains, adjacent glucans are highly ordered and bonded, to each other by noncovalent bonding, such as hydrogen, bonds and hydrophobic interactions., The individual glucan chains of cellulose are composed, of 2000 to more than 25,000 glucose residues (Brown et al., 1996). These chains are long enough (about 1 to 5 µm long), to extend through multiple crystalline and amorphous, regions within a microfibril. When cellulose is degraded—, for example, by fungal cellulases—the amorphous regions, are degraded first, releasing small crystallites that are, thought to correspond to the crystalline domains of the, microfibril., The extensive noncovalent bonding between adjacent, glucans within a cellulose microfibril gives this structure, remarkable properties. Cellulose has a high tensile, strength, equivalent to that of steel. Cellulose is also insoluble, chemically stable, and relatively immune to chemical, and enzymatic attack. These properties make cellulose an, excellent structural material for building a strong cell wall., Evidence from electron microscopy indicates that cellulose microfibrils are synthesized by large, ordered protein, complexes, called particle rosettes or terminal complexes,, that are embedded in the plasma membrane (Figure 15.7), (Kimura et al. 1999). These structures contain many units, of cellulose synthase, the enzyme that synthesizes the, individual (1→4)β-D-glucans that make up the microfibril (see Web Topic 15.2)., Cellulose synthase, which is located on the cytoplasmic, side of the plasma membrane, transfers a glucose residue, from a sugar nucleotide donor to the growing glucan, chain. Sterol-glucosides (sterols linked to a chain of two or, three glucose residues) serve as the primers, or initial, acceptors, to start the growth of the glucan chain (Peng et, al. 2002). The sterol is clipped from the glucan by an, endoglucanase, and the growing glucan chain is then, extruded through the membrane to the exterior of the cell,, where, together with other glucan chains, it crystallizes, into a microfibril and interacts with xyloglucans and other, matrix polysaccharides., The sugar nucleotide donor is probably uridine diphosphate D-glucose (UDP-glucose). Recent evidence suggests, that the glucose used for the synthesis of cellulose may be, obtained from sucrose (a disaccharide composed of fructose, and glucose) (Amor et al. 1995; Salnikov et al. 2001). According to this hypothesis, the enzyme sucrose synthase acts as, a metabolic channel to transfer glucose taken from sucrose,, via UDP-glucose, to the growing cellulose chain (Figure 15.8)., After many years of fruitless searching, the genes for, cellulose synthase in higher plants have now been isolated, (Pear et al. 1996; Arioli et al. 1998; Holland et al. 2000; Richmond and Somerville 2000). In Arabidopsis, the cellulose, synthases are part of a large family of proteins whose function may be to synthesize the backbones of many cell wall, polysaccharides.
Page 370 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, , 319, , FIGURE 15.6 Structural model of a cellulose, microfibril. The microfibril has regions of, high crystallinity intermixed with less organized glucans. Some hemicelluloses may, also be trapped within the microfibril and, bound to the surface., Cellulose, microfibril, Cell wall, Hemicelluloses bound to, the surface and entrapped, within the microfibril, , Amorphous, regions, 4 nm, , Crystalline domains, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , (1→4)b-Glucan chains, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , b-1→4 Glycosidic linkage, H, H, O, HO, , CH2OH O, H, H, OH, , H, , HO, H, , O, H, , OH H, O, , H, H, , CH2OH, , H, , O, , HO, , H, , CH2OH O, H, H, OH, , HO, , H, , OH H, , H, , O, , O, , H, H, , CH2OH, , O, , H, , Cellobiose repeating unit, , The formation of cellulose involves not only the synthesis of the glucan, but also the crystallization of multiple, glucan chains into a microfibril. Little is known about the, control of this process, except that the direction of microfibril deposition may be guided by microtubules adjacent to, the membrane., When the cellulose microfibril is synthesized, it is, deposited into a milieu (the wall) that contains a high concentration of other polysaccharides that are able to interact, with and perhaps modify the growing microfibril. In vitro, binding studies have shown that hemicelluloses such as, xyloglucan and xylan may bind to the surface of cellulose., Some hemicelluloses may also become physically en-, , trapped within the microfibril during its formation, thereby, reducing the crystallinity and order of the microfibril, (Hayashi 1989)., , Matrix Polymers Are Synthesized in the Golgi and, Secreted in Vesicles, The matrix is a highly hydrated phase in which the cellulose microfibrils are embedded. The major polysaccharides, of the matrix are synthesized by membrane-bound, enzymes in the Golgi apparatus and are delivered to the, cell wall via exocytosis of tiny vesicles (Figure 15.9 and, Web Topic 15.3). The enzymes responsible for synthesis are, sugar-nucleotide polysaccharide glycosyltransferases. These
Page 371 :
(A), , FIGURE 15.7 Cellulose synthesis by the cell., , (A) Electron micrograph showing newly synthesized cellulose microfibrils immediately exterior, to the plasma membrane. (B) Freeze-fracture, labeled replicas showing reactions with antibodies against cellulose synthase. A field of labeled, rosettes (arrows) with seven clearly labeled, rosettes and one unlabeled rosette. The inset, shows an enlarged view of two selected rosettes, (terminal complexes) with immunogold labels., (C) Schematic diagram showing cellulose being, synthesized by membrane synthase, complex (“rosette”) and its presumed guidance, by the underlying microtubules in the cytoplasm. (A and C from Gunning and Steer 1996, B from Kimura et al. 1999.), , Microtubule, , Microfibril in, the cell wall, Microfilament, bundle, , (B), , 0.1 µm, , 30 nm, , Wall matrix in which, microfibrils are embedded, , (C), , (1→4)b-glucan chains in a, cellulose microfibril, , Cellulose-synthesizing, complex in the plasma, membrane, , Microfibrils linked, by xyloglucans, Outer leaflet of, lipid bilayer, , Cell wall, , Microfibril, emerging from, plasma membrane, Lipid bilayer of, plasma membrane, Cellulose microfibril, emerging from rosette, Inner leaflet of, lipid bilayer, , Intermicrotubule, bridge, , Microtubule, , Microtubule bridged, to plasma membrane, (and cell wall)
Page 372 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, , CELL WALL, , Glucan, chains, , Plasma, membrane, , UDP, , UDP-G, , 321, , enzymes transfer monosaccharides from sugar nucleotides, to the growing end of the polysaccharide chain., Unlike cellulose, which forms a crystalline microfibril,, the matrix polysaccharides are much less ordered and are, often described as amorphous. This noncrystalline character is a consequence of the structure of these polysaccharides—their branching and their nonlinear conformation., Nevertheless, spectroscopy studies indicate that there is, partial order in the orientation of hemicelluloses and, pectins in the cell wall, probably as a result of a physical, tendency for these polymers to become aligned along the, long axis of cellulose (Séné et al. 1994; Wilson et al. 2000)., , Hemicelluloses Are Matrix Polysaccharides That, Bind to Cellulose, Cellulose, synthase, , Sucrose, synthase, , Sucrose, (glucose–, fructose), , Fructose, CYTOPLASM, , FIGURE 15.8 Model of cellulose synthesis by a multisubunit, complex containing cellulose synthase. Glucose residues are, donated to the growing glucan chains by UDP-glucose, (UDP-G). Sucrose synthase may act as a metabolic channel, to transfer glucose taken from sucrose to UDP-glucose, or, UDP-glucose may be obtained directly from the cytoplasm., (After Delmer and Amor 1995.), , Cell wall, Plasma membrane, , Golgi, body, , Hemicelluloses are a heterogeneous group of polysaccharides, (Figure 15.10) that are bound tightly in the wall. Typically, they are solubilized from depectinated walls by the use of a, strong alkali (1–4 M NaOH). Several kinds of hemicelluloses, are found in plant cell walls, and walls from different tissues, and different species vary in their hemicellulose composition., In the primary wall of dicotyledons (the best-studied, example), the most abundant hemicellulose is xyloglucan, (see Figure 15.10A). Like cellulose, this polysaccharide has, a backbone of (1→4)-linked β-D-glucose residues. Unlike, cellulose, however, xyloglucan has short side chains that, contain xylose, galactose, and often, though not always, a, terminal fucose., By interfering with the linear alignment of the glucan, backbones with one another, these side chains prevent the, , Rough, endoplasmic, reticulum, , Vesicle from ER, , Vesicle from Golgi body, Matrix polysaccharides, , FIGURE 15.9 Scheme for the synthesis and delivery of matrix polysaccharides to the cell wall. Polysaccharides are synthesized by enzymes in, the Golgi apparatus and then, secreted to the wall by fusion of, membrane vesicles to the plasma, membrane.
Page 373 :
322, , Chapter 15, FIGURE 15.10 Partial structures of, , (A) Xyloglucan, O, O, , O, HO, , HO, , OH, , HO, OH, , HO, HO, O, , O, , HO, , O, CH2, , OH, , HO, , HO, , O, , O, , O, , O, , HOCH2, , OH, , CH2, , HO, , OH, , HO, , CH2, , CH2, , OH, , HO, , O, , O, , OH, , HO, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, CH2, , OH, , HOCH2, , O, , OH, , HO, , OH O, , HO, O, , a-, , a-, , D, , -X, , yl, , a-, , D, , -X, , -(1, , -X, , yl, , -(1, , -(1, , 6), , 4)b-D-Glc-(1, , D, , yl, , 6), , 4)b-D-Glc-(1, , 4)b-D-Glc-(1, 6), 1, l-(, Xy, D, a-, , 4)b-D-Glc-(1, , 6), 4)b-D-Glc, , 4)b-D-Glc-(1, , common hemicelluloses. (For details, on carbohydrate nomenclature, see, Web Topic 15.1.) (A) Xyloglucan has, a backbone of (1→4)-linked β-D-glucose (Glc), with (1→6)-linked, branches containing β-D-xylose (Xyl)., In some cases galactose (Gal) and, fucose (Fuc) are added to the xylose, side chains. (B) Glucuronoarabinoxylans have a (1→4)-linked backbone of, β-D-xylose (Xyl). They may also have, side chains containing arabinose, (Ara), 4-O-methyl-glucuronic acid (4O-Me-α−D−GlcA), or other sugars., (From Carpita and McCann 2000.), , (B) Glucuronoarabinoxylan, O, HO, , O—OH, , OH, , O, , CH2OH, , HO, , HO, OH, , HO, , HO, , O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , OH, , OH, , O, , D-, , a-, , Gl, , cA, , O, , OH, O, , O, , HO, , O, , O, , HOCH2, HO, , a-, , HO, O, , O, , HOCH2, HO, , OH, , OH, , O, , O, , OH, , L-, , Ar, , a-, , -(1, 2), , 2), 4)b-D-Xyl-(1, , 4)b-D-Xyl-(1, , 4)b-D-Xyl-(1, , 4)b-D-Xyl-(1, , 4)b-D-Xyl, , assembly of xyloglucan into a crystalline microfibril., Because xyloglucans are longer (about 50–500 nm) than the, spacing between cellulose microfibrils (20–40 nm), they, have the potential to link several microfibrils together., Varying with the developmental state and plant species,, the hemicellulose fraction of the wall may also contain large, amounts of other important polysaccharides—for example,, glucuronoarabinoxylans (see Figure 15.10B) and glucomannans. Secondary walls typically contain less xyloglucan and more xylans and glucomannans, which also bind, tightly to cellulose. The cell walls of grasses contain only, small amounts of xyloglucan and pectin, which are replaced, by glucuronoarabinoxylan and (1→3,1→4)β-D-glucan., , Pectins Are Gel-Forming Components, of the Matrix, Like the hemicelluloses, pectins constitute a heterogeneous, group of polysaccharides (Figure 15.11), characteristically, , -(1, ra, A, L-, , a-, , a-, , L-, , A, , ra, , -(1, , 2), , 4)b-D-Xyl-(1, , (1, , 2), , HO, O, , containing acidic sugars such as galacturonic acid and neutral sugars such as rhamnose, galactose, and arabinose., Pectins are the most soluble of the wall polysaccharides;, they can be extracted with hot water or with calcium chelators. In the wall, pectins are very large and complex molecules composed of different kinds of pectic polysaccharides., Some pectic polysaccharides have a relatively simple, primary structure, such as homogalacturonan (see Figure, 15.11A). This polysaccharide, also called polygalacturonic, acid, is a (1→4)-linked polymer of α-D-glucuronic acid, residues. Figure 15.12 shows a triple-fluorescence-labeled, section of tobacco stem parenchyma cells showing the distribution of cellulose and pectic homogalacturonan., One of the most abundant of the pectins is the complex, polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan I (RG I), which has a, long backbone and a variety of side chains (see Figure, 15.11B). This molecule is very large and is believed to contain highly branched (“hairy”) regions (i.e., with arabinan,
Page 374 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, (A) Homogalacturonan (HGA), HO, O, , O, , H3CO, , O, O, OH O, , C, O, , C, , –, , O, , O, , OCH3, O, , C, , OH, , OH, , O, , OCH3, , O, , O, , HO, , O, , O, , C, , O, , C, , OH O, , HO, , HO, , H3CO, , O, OH, , HO, , (B) Rhamnogalacturonan I (RG I), CH3, , (C) 5-Arabinan, O, , O, , HO, , CH2, , O, , O, , OH, , HO, O, O, , OH, , O, , CH2, , OH, , O, , O, , O, , HO, , OH, , O, , CH3, HO, , O, , CH2, , C, O–, , CH2, , HO, , OH, O, , HO, , O, OH, , O, , OH, , OH, CH2, , O, , O, , O, , HO, O, , OH, , CH2, HO, , O, , OH, , O—CCH3, C, O–, HO, , O, , O, , CH3, , O, , (D) Type I arabinogalactan, , O, , O, , OH, , CH2OH, , O, , O, O, , HO, , OH, , CH2OH, , OH, , O, O, , OH, , O, O, , O, , CH2OH, , OH, , O, , C, O–, , O, , O, , HOCH2, , O, , O, , O, CH2OH, , OH, , O, , OH, , HO, HOCH2, , O, , O, , HO, OH, , HO, , FIGURE 15.11 Partial structures of the most common pectins., , (A) Homogalacturonan, also known as polygalacturonic acid or, pectic acid, is made up of (1→4)-linked α-D-galacturonic acid, (GalA) with occasional rhamnosyl residues that put a kink in, the chain. The carboxyl residues are often methyl esterified. (B), Rhamnogalacturonan I (RG I) is a very large and heterogeneous, pectin, with a backbone of alternating (1→4)α-D-galacturonic, acid (GalA) and (1→2)α-D-rhamnose (Rha). Side chains are, attached to rhamnose and are composed principally of arabinans (C), galactans, and arabinogalactans (D). These side chains, may be short or quite long. The galacturonic acid residues are, often methyl esterified. (From Carpita and McCann 2000.), , FIGURE 15.12 Triple-fluorescence-labeled section of tobacco stem show-, , ing the primary cell walls of three adjacent parenchyma cells bordering, an intercellular space. The blue color is calcofluor (staining of cellulose),, and the red and green colors indicate the binding of two monoclonal, antibodies to different epitopes (immunologically distinct regions) of, pectic homogalacturonan. (Courtesy of W. Willats.), , O, OH, , OH, , 323
Page 375 :
324, , Chapter 15, , and galactan side shains) interspersed with unbranched, (“smooth”) regions of homogalacturonan (Figure 15.13A)., Pectic polysaccharides may be very complex. A striking, example is a highly branched pectic polysaccharide called, rhamnogalacturonan II (RG II) (see Figure 15.13C), which contains at least ten different sugars in a complicated pattern of, linkages. Although RG I and RG II have similar names, they, have very different structures. RG II units may be cross-linked, , by borate diesters (Ishi et al. 1999) and are important for wall, structure. For example, Arabidopsis mutants that synthesize, an altered RG II that is unable to be cross-linked by borate, show substantial growth abnormalities (O’Neill et al. 2001)., Pectins typically form gels—loose networks formed by, highly hydrated polymers. Pectins are what make fruit jams, and jellies “gel,” or solidify. In pectic gels, the charged carboxyl (COO–) groups of neighboring pectin chains are linked, , FIGURE 15.13 Pectin structure. (A), , (A) Rhamnogalacturonan I structure, , Proposed structure of rhamnogalacturonan, I, containing highly branched segments, interspersed with nonbranched segments,, and a backbone of rhamnose and galacturonic acid. (B) Formation of a pectin network involves ionic bridging of the nonesterified carboxyl groups (COO–) by calcium, ions. When blocked by methyl-esterified, groups, the carboxyl groups cannot participate in this type of interchain network formation. Likewise, the presence of side, chains on the backbone interferes with network formation. (C) Structure of rhamnogalacturonan II (RG II). (B and C from, Carpita and McCann 2000.), , Side chains of arabinan,, galactan or arabinogalactan, Rhamnose–galacturonic acid backbone, Homogalacturonan, , Nonbranched, segments, , Highly branched, segments, , (B) Ionic bonding of pectin network by calcium, O, O–, , O, , C, , OH O–, , O, , O, , C, , OH O–, , O, , C, , OH, , O, , OH, O, , OH, , OH, , O, , O, , OH, , OH, , O, , O, , O, , OH, , OH, , O, , O, , HO O, , O, , C, , HO O, , O, , O, O, H3CO, , C, , O, O, , HO, , HO, , O, , HO, , O, , O, , O OH, , Methyl, ester, , O, , HO, , O, , O HO, , C, , –, , O, , O, , HO, O, , O, , O HO, , C, O, , C, , O, , HO, , O, , O, , C, , Ca2+, , O, , O OH, , HO, , HO, , O, , C, , O, , O, , Ca2+, , O, , O OH, , OH, , C, , HO O, , O, , O, , Ca2+, , O, , O, , C, , OCH3, , C, HO, , C, , –, , O, , O, , –, , (C) Rhamnogalacturonan II (RG II) dimer cross-linked by borate diester bonds, , O, O, O, O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O O, O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , B, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , OO, , O, , O, O, , O, O, O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, OO, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, O O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, O, , O, O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, O, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, , O, O, , O, , O, O, O, , O, O, , O, , O, , O, O
Page 376 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, , 325, , together via Ca2+, which forms, TABLE 15.2, Structural proteins of the cell wall, a tight complex with pectin. A, large calcium-bridged netPercentage, work may thus form, as illusClass of cell wall proteins, carbohydrate, Localization typically in:, trated in Figure 15.13B., HRGP (hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein), ~55, Phloem, cambium, sclereids, Pectins are subject to modifications that may alter their, PRP (proline-rich protein), ~0–20, Xylem, fibers, cortex, conformation and linkage in, GRP (glycine-rich protein), 0, Xylem, the wall. Many of the acidic, residues are esterified with, methyl, acetyl, and other, In vitro extraction studies have shown that newly, unidentified groups during biosynthesis in the Golgi appasecreted wall structural proteins are relatively soluble, but, ratus. Such esterification masks the charges of carboxyl, they become more and more insoluble during cell matugroups and prevents calcium bridging between pectins,, ration or in response to wounding. The biochemical, thereby reducing the gel-forming character of the pectin., nature of the insolubilization process is uncertain, howOnce the pectin has been secreted into the wall, the ester, ever., groups may be removed by pectin esterases found in the, Wall structural proteins vary greatly in their abundance,, wall, thus unmasking the charges of the carboxyl groups and, depending on cell type, maturation, and previous stimulaincreasing the ability of the pectin to form a rigid gel. By cretion. Wounding, pathogen attack, and treatment with elicating free carboxyl groups, de-esterification also increases the, itors (molecules that activate plant defense responses; see, electric-charge density in the wall, which in turn may influChapter 13) increase expression of the genes that code for, ence the concentration of ions in the wall and the activities of, many of these proteins. In histological studies, wall strucwall enzymes. In addition to being connected by calcium, tural proteins are often localized to specific cell and tissue, bridging, pectins may be linked to each other by various, types. For example, HRGPs are associated mostly with, covalent bonds, including ester linkages between phenolic, cambium, phloem parenchyma, and various types of scleresidues such as ferulic acid (see Chapter 13)., renchyma. GRPs and PRPs are most often localized to, Structural Proteins Become Cross-Linked, xylem vessels and fibers and thus are more characteristic, in the Wall, of a differentiated cell wall., In addition to the major polysaccharides described in the, In addition to the structural proteins already listed, cell, previous section, the cell wall contains several classes of, walls contain arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) which usually amount to less than 1% of the dry mass of the wall., structural proteins. These proteins usually are classified, These water-soluble proteins are very heavily glycosylated:, according to their predominant amino acid composition—, More than 90% of the mass of AGPs may be sugar, for example, hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein (HRGP),, residues—primarily galactose and arabinose (Figure 15.15), glycine-rich protein (GRP), proline-rich protein (PRP), and, (Gaspar et al. 2001). Multiple AGP forms are found in plant, so on (Table 15.2). Some wall proteins have sequences that, tissues, either in the wall or associated with the plasma, are characteristic of more than one class. Many structural, membrane, and they display tissue- and cell-specific, proteins of walls have highly repetitive primary structures, expression patterns., and sometimes are highly glycosylated (Figure 15.14)., , Ser Hyp Hyp Hyp Hyp Ser Hyp Ser Hyp Hyp Hyp Hyp X X X X Val, , Tyr, , Lys, , Tyr, , O, , Isodityrosine, , Tomato extensin, (extensive glycosylation), , FIGURE 15.14 A repeated hydroxyproline-rich motif from a molecule of extensin from, , tomato, showing extensive glycosylation and the formation of intramolecular isodityrosine bonds. (From Carpita and McCann 2000.)
Page 377 :
326, , Chapter 15, , Arabinogalactan, side chains, , Protein, , After a wall forms, it can grow and mature through a, process that may be outlined as follows:, Synthesis → secretion → assembly →, expansion (in growing cells) →, cross-linking and secondary wall formation, , The synthesis and secretion of the major wall polymers, were described earlier. Here we will consider the assembly, and expansion of the wall., After their secretion into the extracellular space, the wall, polymers must be assembled into a cohesive structure; that, is, the individual polymers must attain the physical, arrangement and bonding relationships that are characteristic of the wall. Although the details of wall assembly are, not understood, the prime candidates for this process are, self-assembly and enzyme-mediated assembly., , Self-assembly., , FIGURE 15.15 A highly branched arabinogalactan molecule., , (From Carpita and McCann 2000.), , AGPs may function in cell adhesion and in cell signaling during cell differentiation. As evidence for the latter, idea, treatment of suspension cultures with exogenous, AGPs or with agents that specifically bind AGPs is, reported to influence cell proliferation and embryogenesis., AGPs are also implicated in the growth, nutrition, and, guidance of pollen tubes through stylar tissues, as well as, in other developmental processes (Cheung et al. 1996; Gaspar et al. 2001). Finally, AGPs may also function as a kind, of polysaccharide chaperone within secretory vesicles to, reduce spontaneous association of newly synthesized polysaccharides until they are secreted to the cell wall., , New Primary Walls Are Assembled during, Cytokinesis, Primary walls originate de novo during the final stages of, cell division, when the newly formed cell plate separates, the two daughter cells and solidifies into a stable wall that, is capable of bearing a physical load from turgor pressure., The cell plate forms when Golgi vesicles and ER cisternae, aggregate in the spindle midzone area of a dividing cell. This, aggregation is organized by the phragmoplast, a complex, assembly of microtubules, membranes, and vesicles that, forms during late anaphase or early telophase (see Chapter, 1). The membranes of the vesicles fuse with each other, and, with the lateral plasma membrane, to become the new, plasma membrane separating the daughter cells. The contents of the vesicles are the precursors from which the new, middle lamella and the primary wall are assembled., , Self-assembly is attractive because it is, mechanistically simple. Wall polysaccharides possess a, marked tendency to aggregate spontaneously into organized structures. For example, isolated cellulose may be, dissolved in strong solvents and then extruded to form stable fibers, called rayon., Similarly, hemicelluloses may be dissolved in strong, alkali; when the alkali is removed, these polysaccharides, aggregate into concentric, ordered networks that resemble, the native wall at the ultrastructural level. This tendency to, aggregate can make the separation of hemicellulose into its, component polymers technically difficult. In contrast,, pectins are more soluble and tend to form dispersed,, isotropic networks (gels). These observations indicate that, the wall polymers have an inherent ability to aggregate, into partly ordered structures., , Enzyme-mediated assembly. In addition to self-assembly, wall enzymes may take part in putting the wall, together. A prime candidate for enzyme-mediated wall, assembly is xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET). This, enzyme has the ability to cut the backbone of a xyloglucan, and to join one end of the cut xyloglucan with the free end, of an acceptor xyloglucan (Figure 15.16). Such a transfer, reaction integrates newly synthesized xyloglucans into the, wall (Nishitani 1997; Thompson and Fry 2001)., Other wall enzymes that might aid in assembly of the, wall include glycosidases, pectin methyl esterases, and, various oxidases. Some glycosidases remove the side, chains of hemicelluloses. This “debranching” activity, increases the tendency of hemicelluloses to adhere to the, surface of cellulose microfibrils. Pectin methyl esterases, hydrolyze the methyl esters that block the carboxyl groups, of pectins. By unblocking the carboxyl groups, these, enzymes increase the concentration of acidic groups on the, pectins and enhance the ability of pectins to form a Ca2+bridged gel network., Oxidases such as peroxidase may catalyze cross-linking, between phenolic groups (tyrosine, phenylalanine, ferulic
Page 378 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET), , (A), Xyloglucans, , (B), , (C), , 327, , walls than in primary walls. Secondary walls are often (but, not always) impregnated with lignin., Lignin is a phenolic polymer with a complex, irregular, pattern of linkages that link the aromatic alcohol subunits, together (see Chapter 13). These subunits are synthesized, from phenylalanine and are secreted to the wall, where, they are oxidized in place by the enzymes peroxidase and, laccase. As lignin forms in the wall, it displaces water from, the matrix and forms a hydrophobic network that bonds, tightly to cellulose and prevents wall enlargement (Figure, 15.18)., Lignin adds significant mechanical strength to cell walls, and reduces the susceptibility of walls to attack by pathogens., (A), , (D), , (E), , (F), , FIGURE 15.16 Action of xyloglucan endotransglycosylase, , (XET) to cut and stitch xyloglucan polymers into new configurations. Two xyloglucan chains are shown in (A) with, two distinct patterns to emphasize their rearrangement., XET binds to the middle of one xyloglucan (B), cuts it (C),, and transfers one end to the end of a second xyloglucan, (D, E), resulting in one shorter and one longer xyloglucan, (F). (After Smith and Fry 1991.), , (B), S3, , S2, , Secondary, wall, Primary, wall, , S1, , acid) in wall proteins, pectins, and other wall polymers., Such phenolic coupling is clearly important for the formation of lignin cross-links, and it may likewise link diverse, components of the wall together., , Middle, lamella, , Secondary Walls Form in Some Cells after, Expansion Ceases, After wall expansion ceases, cells sometimes continue to synthesize a wall, known as a secondary wall. Secondary walls, are often quite thick, as in tracheids, fibers, and other cells, that serve in mechanical support of the plant (Figure 15.17)., Often such secondary walls are multilayered and differ, in structure and composition from the primary wall. For, example, the secondary walls in wood contain xylans, rather than xyloglucans, as well as a higher proportion of, cellulose. The orientation of the cellulose microfibrils may, be more neatly aligned parallel to each other in secondary, , S3, , S2, , S1, , FIGURE 15.17 (A) Cross section of a Podocarpus sclereid, in, which multiple layers in the secondary wall are visible. (B), Diagram of the cell wall organization often found in tracheids and other cells with thick secondary walls. Three, distinct layers (S1, S2, S3) are formed interior to the primary, wall. (Photo ©David Webb.)
Page 379 :
328, , Chapter 15, , Microfibril Orientation Determines, Growth Directionality of Cells with, Diffuse Growth, , Cellulose microfibril, (cross section), , During growth, the loosened cell wall is, extended by physical forces generated, from cell turgor pressure. Turgor pressure creates an outward-directed force,, equal in all directions. The directionality, of growth is determined largely by the, structure of the cell wall—in particular,, the orientation of cellulose microfibrils., Lignin formed by, cross-linking phenolic, When cells first form in the meristem,, compounds, they are isodiametric; that is, they have, equal diameters in all directions. If the, FIGURE 15.18 Diagram illustrating how the phenolic subunits of lignin infilorientation of cellulose microfibrils in the, trate the space between cellulose microfibrils, where they become crosslinked. (Other components of the matrix are omitted from this diagram.), primary cell wall were isotropic (randomly arranged), the cell would grow, equally in all directions, expanding radially to generate a sphere (Figure 15.20A)., Lignin also reduces the digestibility of plant material by aniIn most plant cell walls, however, the arrangement of celmals. Genetic engineering of lignin content and structure, lulose microfibrils is anisotropic (nonrandom)., Cellulose microfibrils are synthesized mainly in the latmay improve the digestibility and nutritional content of, eral walls of cylindrical, enlarging cells such as cortical and, plants used as animal fodder., vascular cells of stems and roots, or the giant internode cells, of the filamentous green alga Nitella. Moreover, the cellulose, PATTERNS OF CELL EXPANSION, microfibrils are deposited circumferentially (transversely) in, During plant cell enlargement, new wall polymers are conthese lateral walls, at right angles to the long axis of the cell., tinuously synthesized and secreted at the same time that, The circumferentially arranged cellulose microfibrils have, the preexisting wall is expanding. Wall expansion may be, been likened to hoops in a barrel, restricting growth in girth, highly localized (as in the case of tip growth) or evenly disand promoting growth in length (see Figure 15.20B). Howtributed over the wall surface (diffuse growth) (Figure, ever, because individual cellulose microfibrils do not actu15.19). Whereas tip growth is characteristic of root hairs, ally form closed hoops around the cell, a more accurate analand pollen tubes (see Web Essay 15.1), most of the other, ogy would be the glass fibers in fiberglass., cells in the plant body exhibit diffuse growth. Cells such as, Fiberglass is a complex composite material, composed of, an amorphous resin matrix reinforced by discontinuous, fibers, some sclereids, and trichomes grow in a pattern that, strengthening elements, in this case glass fibers. In complex, is intermediate between diffuse growth and tip growth., composites, rod-shaped crystalline elements exert their, Even in cells with diffuse growth, however, different, maximum reinforcement of the matrix in the direction parparts of the wall may enlarge at different rates or in differallel to their orientation, and their minimum reinforcement, ent directions. For example, in cortical cells of the stem, the, perpendicular to their orientation. The reinforcement of the, end walls grow much less than side walls. This difference, wall is greater in the parallel direction because the matrix, may be due to structural or enzymatic variations in specific, must physically scrape along the entire length of the fibers, walls or variations in the stresses borne by different walls., for lateral displacement to occur., As a consequence of this uneven pattern of wall expansion,, plant cells may assume irregular forms., Phenolic, subunit, , (A) Tip growth, , FIGURE 15.19 The cell surface expands differently during, , tip growth and diffuse growth. (A) Expansion of a tipgrowing cell is confined to an apical dome at one end of the, cell. If marks are placed on the cell surface and the cell is, allowed to continue to grow, only the marks that were initially within the apical dome grow farther apart. Root hairs, and pollen tubes are examples of plant cells that exhibit tip, growth. (B) If marks are placed on the surface of a diffusegrowing cell, the distance between all the marks increases, as the cell grows. Most cells in multicellular plants grow by, diffuse growth., , Marks on, cell surface, , (B) Diffuse growth, , Cell expansion
Page 380 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, (A) Randomly oriented cellulose microfibrils, , 329, , one-fourth of the wall bears nearly all the stress due to turgor pressure and determines the directionality of cell, expansion (see Web Topic 15.4)., , Cortical Microtubules Determine the Orientation, of Newly Deposited Microfibrils, , (B) Transverse cellulose microfibrils, , FIGURE 15.20 The orientation of newly deposited cellulose, , microfibrils determines the direction of cell expansion. (A), If the cell wall is reinforced by randomly oriented cellulose, microfibrils, the cell will expand equally in all directions,, forming a sphere. (B) When most of the reinforcing cellulose microfibrils have the same orientation, the cell expands, at right angles to the microfibril orientation and is constrained in the direction of the reinforcement. Here the, microfibril orientation is transverse, so cell expansion is, longitudinal., , In contrast, when the material is stretched in the perpendicular direction, the matrix polymers need only slip over, the diameters of the fibrous elements, resulting in little or no, strengthening of the matrix. Because the glass fibers in fiberglass are randomly arranged, fiberglass is equally strong in, all directions; that is, it is mechanically isotropic., Plant cell walls, like fiberglass, are complex composite, materials, composed of an amorphous phase and crystalline elements (Darley et al. 2001). Unlike fiberglass, however, the microfibril strengthening elements of a typical primary cell wall are transversely oriented, rendering the wall, structurally and mechanically anisotropic. For this reason, growing plant cells tend to elongate, and they increase only, minimally in girth., Cell wall deposition continues as cells enlarge. According to the multinet hypothesis, each successive wall layer, is stretched and thinned during cell expansion, so the, microfibrils become passively reoriented in the longitudinal direction—that is, in the direction of growth. Successive, layers of microfibrils thus show a gradation in their degree, of reorientation across the thickness of the wall, and those, in the outer layers are longitudinally oriented as a result of, wall stretching (Figure 15.21)., Because of thinning and fragmentation, these outer layers have much less influence on the direction of cell expansion than do the newly deposited inner layers. The inner, , Newly deposited cellulose microfibrils and cytoplasmic, microtubules in cell walls usually are coaligned, suggesting that microtubules determine the orientation of cellulose microfibril deposition. The orientation of microtubules, in the cortical cytoplasm, the cytoplasm immediately adjacent to the plasma membrane, usually mirrors that of the, newly deposited microfibrils in the adjacent cell wall, and, both are usually coaligned in the transverse direction, at, right angles to the axis of polarity (Figure 15.22). In some, cell types, such as tracheids, the microfibrils in the wall, alternate between transverse and longitudinal orientations,, and in such cases the microtubules are parallel to the, microfibrils of the most recently deposited wall layer., The main evidence for the involvement of microtubules, in the deposition of cellulose microfibrils is that the orientation of the microfibrils can be perturbed by genetic mutations and certain drugs that disrupt cytoplasmic microtubules. For example, several drugs bind to tubulin, the, subunit protein of microtubules, causing them to depolymerize. When growing roots are treated with a microtubule-depolymerizing drug, such as oryzalin, the region, of elongation expands laterally, becoming bulbous and, tumorlike (Figure 15.23)., This disrupted growth is due to the isotropic expansion, of the cells; that is, they enlarge like a sphere instead of, elongating. The drug-induced destruction of microtubules, , FIGURE 15.21 The multinet hypothesis for wall extension., , Newly synthesized cellulose microfibrils are continually, deposited on the inner surface of the wall in the transverse, orientation. As cell elongation proceeds, the older outer, wall layers are progressively thinned and weakened, and, their cellulose microfibrils are passively rearranged to a, longitudinal orientation. The wall mechanical properties, are determined by the inner layers.
Page 381 :
330, , Chapter 15, , (A), , (B), , 5 µm, , FIGURE 15.22 The orientation of microtubules in the cortical cytoplasm mir-, , rors the orientation of newly deposited cellulose microfibrils in the cell wall, of cells that are elongating. (A) The arrangement of microtubules can be, revealed with fluorescently labeled antibodies to the microtubule protein, tubulin. In this differentiating tracheary element from a Zinnia cell suspension culture, the pattern of microtubules (green) mirrors the orientation of, the cellulose microfibrils in the wall, as shown by calcofluor staining (blue)., (B) The alignment of cellulose microfibrils in the cell wall can sometimes be, seen in grazing sections prepared for electron microscopy, as in this micrograph of a developing sieve tube element in a root of Azolla (a water fern)., The longitudinal axis of the root and the sieve tube element runs vertically., Both the wall microfibrils (double-headed arrows) and the cortical microtubules (single-headed arrows) are aligned transversely. (A courtesy of, Robert W. Seagull; B courtesy of A. Hardham.), , Control, (no drug, (A) treatment), , 1 mM Oryzalin, , (B), , Control (no drug, treatment), , FIGURE 15.23 The disruption of cortical microtubules, , results in a dramatic increase in radial cell expansion and a, concomitant decrease in elongation. (A) Root of Arabidopsis, seedling treated with the microtubule-depolymerizing drug, oryzalin (1 mM) for 2 days before this photomicrograph was, taken. The drug has altered the polarity of growth., , 1 mM Oryzalin, , (B) Microtubules were visualized by means of an indirect, immunofluorescence technique and an antitubulin antibody. Whereas cortical microtubules in the control are oriented at right angles to the direction of cell elongation, very, few microtubules remain in roots treated with 1 mM oryzalin. (From Baskin et al. 1994, courtesy of T. Baskin.)
Page 382 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, in the growing cells also disrupts the transverse orientation, of cellulose microfibrils in the most recently deposited layers of the wall. Cell wall deposition continues in the, absence of microtubules, but the cellulose microfibrils are, deposited randomly and the cells expand equally in all, directions. Since the antimicrotubule drugs specifically target the microtubules, these results suggest that microtubules act as guides for the orientation of cellulose, microfibril deposition., , THE RATE OF CELL ELONGATION, Plant cells typically expand 10- to 100-fold in volume, before reaching maturity. In extreme cases, cells may, enlarge more than 10,000-fold in volume (e.g., xylem vessel elements). The cell wall typically undergoes this profound expansion without losing its mechanical integrity, and without becoming thinner. Thus, newly synthesized, polymers are integrated into the wall without destabilizing, it. Exactly how this integration is accomplished is uncertain, although self-assembly and xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET) play important roles, as already described., This integrating process may be particularly critical for, rapidly growing root hairs, pollen tubes, and other specialized cells that exhibit tip growth, in which the region of wall, deposition and surface expansion is localized to the hemispherical dome at the apex of the tubelike cell, and cell, expansion and wall deposition must be closely coordinated., In rapidly growing cells with tip growth, the wall doubles its surface area and is displaced to the nonexpanding, part of the cell within minutes. This is a much greater rate, of wall expansion than is typically found in cells with diffuse growth, and tip-growing cells are therefore susceptible to wall thinning and bursting. Although diffuse growth, and tip growth appear to be different growth patterns, both, types of wall expansion must have analogous, if not identical, processes of polymer integration, stress relaxation,, and wall polymer creep., Many factors influence the rate of cell wall expansion., Cell type and age are important developmental factors. So,, too, are hormones such as auxin and gibberellin. Environmental conditions such as light and water availability may, likewise modulate cell expansion. These internal and external factors most likely modify cell expansion by loosening, the cell wall so that it yields (stretches irreversibly). In this, context we speak of the yielding properties of the cell wall., In this section we will first examine the biomechanical and, biophysical parameters that characterize the yielding properties of the wall. For cells to expand at all, the rigid cell wall, must be loosened in some way. The type of wall loosening, involved in plant cell expansion is termed stress relaxation., According to the acid growth hypothesis for auxin action, (see Chapter 19), one mechanism that causes wall stress, relaxation and wall yielding is cell wall acidification, resulting from proton extrusion across the plasma membrane., , 331, , Cell wall loosening is enhanced at acidic pH. A little later, we will explore the biochemical basis for acid-induced wall, loosening and stress relaxation, including the role of a special class of wall-loosening proteins called expansins., As the cell approaches its maximum size, its growth rate, diminishes and finally ceases altogether. At the end of this, section we will consider the process of cell wall rigidification that leads to the cessation of growth., , Stress Relaxation of the Cell Wall Drives Water, Uptake and Cell Elongation, Because the cell wall is the major mechanical restraint that, limits cell expansion, much attention has been given to its, physical properties. As a hydrated polymeric material, the, plant cell wall has physical properties that are intermediate between those of a solid and those of a liquid. We call, these viscoelastic, or rheological (flow), properties. Growing-cell walls are generally less rigid than walls of nongrowing cells, and under appropriate conditions they, exhibit a long-term irreversible stretching, or yielding, that, is lacking or nearly lacking in nongrowing walls., Stress relaxation is a crucial concept for understanding how, cell walls enlarge (Cosgrove 1997). The term stress is used, here in the mechanical sense, as force per unit area. Wall, stresses arise as an inevitable consequence of cell turgor. The, turgor pressure in growing plant cells is typically between 0.3, and 1.0 MPa. Turgor pressure stretches the cell wall and generates a counterbalancing physical stress or tension in the, wall. Because of cell geometry (a large pressurized volume, contained by a thin wall), this wall tension is equivalent to 10, to 100 MPa of tensile stress—a very large stress indeed., This simple fact has important consequences for the, mechanics of cell enlargement. Whereas animal cells can, change shape in response to cytoskeleton-generated forces,, such forces are negligible compared with the turgor-generated forces that are resisted by the plant cell wall. To change, shape, plant cells must thus control the direction and rate of, wall expansion, which they do by depositing cellulose in a, biased orientation (which determines the directionality of, cell wall expansion) and by selectively loosening the bonding between cell wall polymers. This biochemical loosening, enables the wall polymers to slip by each other, thereby, increasing the wall surface area. At the same time, such, loosening reduces the physical stress in the wall., Wall stress relaxation is crucial because it allows growing, plant cells to reduce their turgor and water potentials, which, enables them to absorb water and to expand. Without stress, relaxation, wall synthesis would only thicken the wall, not, expand it. During secondary-wall deposition in nongrowing cells, for example, stress relaxation does not occur., , The Rate of Cell Expansion Is Governed By Two, Growth Equations, When plant cells enlarge before maturation, the increase in, volume is generated mostly by water uptake. This water
Page 383 :
332, , Chapter 15, , ends up mainly in the vacuole, which takes up an ever larger, proportion of the cell volume as the cell grows. Here we will, describe how growing cells regulate their water uptake and, how this uptake is coordinated with wall yielding., Water uptake by growing cells is a passive process., There are no active water pumps; instead the growing cell, is able to lower the water potential inside the cell so that, water is taken up spontaneously in response to a water, potential difference, without direct energy expenditure., We define the water potential difference, ∆Yw, (expressed in megapascals), as the water potential outside, the cell minus the water potential inside (see Chapters 3, and 4). The rate of uptake also depends on the surface area, of the cell (A, in square meters) and the permeability of the, plasma membrane to water (Lp, in meters per second per, megapascal)., Membrane Lp is a measure of how readily water crosses, the membrane, and it is a function of the physical structure, of the membrane and the activity of aquaporins (see Chapter 3). Thus we have the rate of water uptake in volume, units: ∆V/∆t, expressed in cubic meters per second., Assuming that a growing cell is in contact with pure water, (with zero water potential), then, Rate of water uptake = A × Lp (∆Yw), = A × Lp (Yo – Yi), , (15.1), , This equation states that the rate of water uptake depends, only on the cell area, membrane permeability to water, cell, turgor, and osmotic potential., Equation 15.1 is valid for both growing and nongrowing cells in pure water. But how can we account for the, fact that growing cells can continue to take up water for, a long time, whereas nongrowing cells soon cease water, uptake?, In a nongrowing cell, water absorption increases cell volume, causing the protoplast to push harder against the cell, wall, thereby increasing cell turgor pressure, Yp. This increase, in Yp would increase cell water potential Yw, quickly bringing ∆Yw to zero. Water uptake would then cease., In a growing cell, ∆Yw is prevented from reaching zero, because the cell wall is “loosened”: It yields irreversibly to, the forces generated by turgor and thereby reduces simultaneously the wall stress and the cell turgor. This process is, called stress relaxation, and it is the crucial physical difference between growing and nongrowing cells., Stress relaxation can be understood as follows. In a, turgid cell, the cell contents push against the wall, causing, the wall to stretch elastically (i.e., reversibly) and giving rise, to a counterforce, a wall stress. In a growing cell, biochemical loosening enables the wall to yield inelastically (irreversibly) to the wall stress. Because water is nearly incompressible, only an infinitesimal expansion of the wall is, needed to reduce cell turgor pressure and, simultaneously,, wall stress. Thus, stress relaxation is a decrease in wall stress, with nearly no change in wall dimensions., , As a consequence of wall stress relaxation, the cell water, potential is reduced and water flows into the cell, causing, a measurable extension of the cell wall and increasing cell, surface area and volume. Sustained growth of plant cells, entails simultaneous stress relaxation of the wall (which, tends to reduce turgor pressure) and water absorption, (which tends to increase turgor pressure)., Empirical evidence has shown that wall relaxation and, expansion depend on turgor pressure. As turgor is, reduced, wall relaxation and growth slow down. Growth, usually ceases before turgor reaches zero. The turgor value, at which growth ceases is called the yield threshold (usually represented by the symbol Y). This dependence of cell, wall expansion on turgor pressure is embodied in the following equation:, GR = m(Yp – Y), , (15.2), , where GR is the cell growth rate, and m is the coefficient that, relates growth rate to the turgor in excess of the yield threshold. The coefficient m is usually called wall extensibility and, is the slope of the line relating growth rate to turgor pressure., Under conditions of steady-state growth, GR in Equation 15.2 is the same as the rate of water uptake in Equation, 15.1. That is, the increase in the volume of the cell equals, the volume of water taken up. The two equations are plotted in Figure 15.24. Note that the two processes of wall, expansion and water uptake show opposing reactions to a, change in turgor. For example, an increase in turgor, increases wall extension but reduces water uptake. Under, normal conditions, the turgor is dynamically balanced in a, growing cell exactly at the point where the two lines intersect. At this point both equations are satisfied, and water, uptake is exactly matched by enlargement of the wall, chamber., This intersection point in Figure 15.24 is the steady-state, condition, and any deviations from this point will cause, transient imbalances between the processes of water, uptake and wall expansion. The result of these imbalances, is that turgor will return to the point of intersection, the, point of dynamic steady state for the growing cell., The regulation of cell growth—for example, by hormones or by light—typically is accomplished by regulation, of the biochemical processes that regulate wall loosening, and stress relaxation. Such changes can be measured as a, change in m or in Y., The water uptake that is induced by wall stress relaxation enlarges the cell and tends to restore wall stress and, turgor pressure to their equilibrium values, as we have, shown. However, if growing cells are physically prevented, from taking up water, wall relaxation progressively reduces, cell turgor. This situation may be detected, for example, by, turgor measurements with a pressure probe or by water, potential measurements with a psychrometer or a pressure, chamber (see Web Topic 3.6). Figure 15.25 shows the results, of such an experiment.
Page 384 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, , 333, , FIGURE 15.24 Graphic representation of the, Rate of cell expansion (m3 s–1), , Stable point, where, both processes are equal, , Rate of water uptake (m3 s–1), , two equations that relate water uptake and, cell expansion to cell turgor pressure and cell, water potential. The values for the rates of, cell expansion and water uptake are arbitrary. Steady-state growth is attained only at, the point where the two equations intersect., Any imbalance between water uptake and, wall expansion will result in changes in cell, turgor and bring the cell back to this stable, point of intersection between the two, processes., , Wall yielding, GR = m(Yp – Y), Full, turgor, , Water, uptake, Yield, threshold, dV/dt = A × Lp(∆Yw), 0.0, , 0.1, , 0.2, , 0.3, , 0.4, , 0.5, , 0.6, , 0.7, , –0.1, , 0, , 0.8, , Turgor pressure (MPa), , –0.7, , –0.6, , Acid-Induced Growth Is Mediated by Expansins, An important characteristic of growing cell walls is that, they extend much faster at acidic pH than at neutral pH, (Rayle and Cleland 1992). This phenomenon is called acid, growth. In living cells, acid growth is evident when growing cells are treated with acid buffers or with the drug, , Turgor pressure (MPa), , 0.7, Control, 0.6, 0.5, (P–Y), 0.4, , +Auxin, , 0.3, , –Auxin, , Yield, threshold (Y), , 0.2, 0, , 2, , 4, Time (hours), , 6, , FIGURE 15.25 Reduction of cell turgor pressure (water, , potential) by stress relaxation. In this experiment, the, excised stem segments from growing pea seedlings were, incubated in solution with or without auxin, then blotted, dry and sealed in a humid chamber. Cell turgor pressure, (P) was measured at various time points. The segments, treated with auxin rapidly reduced their turgor to the yield, threshold (Y), as a result of rapid wall relaxation. The segments without auxin showed a slower rate of relaxation., The control segments were treated the same as the group, treated with auxin, except that they remained in contact, with a drop of water, which prevented wall relaxation., (After Cosgrove 1985.), , –0.5, , –0.4, –0.3, –0.2, Water potential (MPa), , fusicoccin, which induces acidification of the cell wall solution by activating an H+-ATPase in the plasma membrane., An example of acid-induced growth can be found in the, initiation of the root hair, where the local wall pH drops to, a value of 4.5 at the time when the epidermal cell begins to, bulge outward (Bibikova et al. 1998). Auxin-induced, growth is also associated with wall acidification, but it is, probably not sufficient to account for the entire growth, induction by this hormone (see Chapter 19), and other, wall-loosening processes may be involved. Recent work,, for example, implicates the production of hydroxyl radicals, in wall loosening during auxin-induced growth (Schopfer, 2001). Nevertheless, this pH-dependent mechanism of wall, extension appears to be an evolutionarily conserved, process common to all land plants (Cosgrove 2000) and, involved in a variety of growth processes., Acid growth may also be observed in isolated cell walls,, which lack normal cellular, metabolic, and synthetic, processes. Such observation requires the use of an extensometer to put the walls under tension and to measure the, pH-dependent wall creep (Figure 15.26)., The term creep refers to a time-dependent irreversible, extension, typically the result of slippage of wall polymers, relative to one another. When growing walls are incubated, in neutral buffer (pH 7) and clamped in an extensometer,, the walls extend briefly when tension is applied, but extension soon ceases. When transferred to an acidic buffer (pH, 5 or less), the wall begins to extend rapidly, in some, instances continuing for many hours., This acid-induced creep is characteristic of walls from, growing cells, but it is not observed in mature (nongrowing) walls. When walls are pretreated with heat, proteases,
Page 385 :
334, , Chapter 15, , Freeze, thaw,, abrade, Cut, , Solution, that can be, made acidic, , Length (mm), , Electronic, transducer, measures, extension, , 0.6, , pH 4.5, Constant, force, , 0.4, 0.2, 0, , 1, , 2, , Time (hours), , FIGURE 15.26 Acid-induced extension of isolated cell walls,, , measured in an extensometer. The wall sample from killed, cells is clamped and put under tension in an extensometer, that measures the length with an electronic transducer, attached to a clamp. When the solution surrounding the, wall is replaced with an acidic buffer (e.g., pH 4.5), the wall, extends irreversibly in a time-dependent fashion (it creeps)., , or other agents that denature proteins, they lose their acid, growth ability. Such results indicate that acid growth is not, due simply to the physical chemistry of the wall (e.g., a, weakening of the pectin gel), but is catalyzed by one or, more wall proteins., , Etiolated, cucumber, seedling, , The idea that proteins are required for acid growth was, confirmed in reconstitution experiments, in which heatinactivated walls were restored to nearly full acid growth, responsiveness by addition of proteins extracted from growing walls (Figure 15.27). The active components proved to, be a group of proteins that were named expansins, (McQueen-Mason et al. 1992; Li et al. 1993). These proteins, catalyze the pH-dependent extension and stress relaxation, of cell walls. They are effective in catalytic amounts (about, 1 part protein per 5000 parts wall, by dry weight)., The molecular basis for expansin action on wall rheology is still uncertain, but most evidence indicates that, expansins cause wall creep by loosening noncovalent adhesion between wall polysaccharides (Cosgrove 2000; Li and, Cosgrove 2001). Binding studies suggest that expansins, may act at the interface between cellulose and one or more, hemicelluloses., With the completion of the Arabidopsis genome, we now, know that Arabidopsis has a large collection of expansin, genes, divided into two families: α-expansins and βexpansins. The two kinds of expansins act on different, polymers of the cell wall (Cosgrove 2000). β-expansins, have also been found in grass pollen, where they probably, function to aid pollen tube penetration into the stigma and, style (Li and Cosgrove 2001)., , Glucanases and Other Hydrolytic Enzymes May, Modify the Matrix, Several types of experiments implicate (1→4)β-D-glucanases, in cell wall loosening, especially during auxin-induced cell, elongation (see Chapter 19). For example, matrix glucans, , Freeze, thaw,, abrade, , Excise, growing, region, , Wall, specimen, , Inactivate, with heat, , Apply protein, to wall, Homogenize., Collect, and wash walls., Extract walls to solubilize, the protein expansin., , Electronic, transducer, measures, extension, , Constant, force, , Length (%), , 40, 30, 20, 10, , Expansin added, , FIGURE 15.27 Scheme for the reconstitution of extensibility of isolated cell, , pH 4.5, buffer, Control, , 0, Time, , walls. (A) Cell walls are prepared as in Figure 15.21, and briefly heated to, inactivate the endogenous acid extension response. To restore this, response, proteins are extracted from growing walls and added to the, solution surrounding the wall. (B) Addition of proteins containing, expansins restores the acid extension properties of the wall. (After, Cosgrove 1997.)
Page 386 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, such as xyloglucan show enhanced hydrolysis and turnover, in excised segments when growth is stimulated by auxin., Interference with this hydrolytic activity by antibodies or, lectins reduces growth in excised segments., Expression of (1→4)β-D-glucanases is associated with, growing tissues, and application of glucanases to cells in, vitro may stimulate growth. Such results support the idea, that wall stress relaxation and expansion are the direct, result of the activity of glucanases that digest xyloglucan, in dicotyledons or (1→3,1→4)β-D-glucans in grass cell walls, (Hoson 1993)., However, most glucanases and related wall hydrolases, do not cause walls to extend in the same way that, expansins do. Instead, treatment of walls with glucanases, or pectinases may enhance the subsequent extension, response to expansins (Cosgrove and Durachko 1994)., These results suggest that wall hydrolytic enzymes such as, (1→4)β-D-glucanases are not the principal catalysts of wall, expansion, but they may act indirectly by modulating, expansin-mediated polymer creep., Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase has also been suggested as a potential wall-loosening enzyme. XET helps, integrate newly secreted xyloglucan into the existing wall, structure, but its function as a wall-loosening agent is still, speculative., , Many Structural Changes Accompany the, Cessation of Wall Expansion, The growth cessation that occurs during cell maturation is, generally irreversible and is typically accompanied by a, reduction in wall extensibility, as measured by various biophysical methods. These physical changes in the wall might, come about by (1) a reduction in wall-loosening processes,, (2) an increase in wall cross-linking, or (3) an alteration in, the composition of the wall, making for a more rigid structure or one less susceptible to wall loosening. There is some, evidence for each of these ideas (Cosgrove 1997)., Several modifications of the maturing wall may contribute to wall rigidification:, • Newly secreted matrix polysaccharides may be, altered in structure so as to form tighter complexes, with cellulose or other wall polymers, or they may be, resistant to wall-loosening activities., • Removal of mixed-link β-D-glucans is also coincident, with growth cessation in these walls., • De-esterification of pectins, leading to more rigid, pectin gels, is similarly associated with growth cessation in both grasses and dicotyledons., • Cross-linking of phenolic groups in the wall (such as, tyrosine residues in HRGPs, ferulic acid residues, attached to pectins, and lignin) generally coincides, with wall maturation and is believed to be mediated, by peroxidase, a putative wall rigidification enzyme., , 335, , Many structural changes occur in the wall during and, after cessation of growth, and it has not yet been possible, to identify the significance of individual processes for cessation of wall expansion., , WALL DEGRADATION AND PLANT DEFENSE, The plant cell wall is not simply an inert and static exoskeleton. In addition to acting as a mechanical restraint, the wall, serves as an extracellular matrix that interacts with cell surface proteins, providing positional and developmental, information. It contains numerous enzymes and smaller, molecules that are biologically active and that can modify, the physical properties of the wall, sometimes within seconds. In some cases, wall-derived molecules can also act as, signals to inform the cell of environmental conditions, such, as the presence of pathogens. This is an important aspect of, the defense response of plants (see Chapter 13)., Walls may also be substantially modified long after, growth has ceased. For instance, the cell wall may be massively degraded, such as occurs in ripening fruit or in the, endosperm of germinating seeds. In cells that make up the, abscission zones of leaves and fruits (see Chapter 22), the, middle lamella may be selectively degraded, with the, result that the cells become unglued and separate. Cells, may also separate selectively during the formation of intercellular air spaces, during the emergence of the root from, germinating seeds, and during other developmental, processes. Plant cells may also modify their walls during, pathogen attack as a form of defense., In the sections that follow we will consider two types of, dynamic changes that can occur in mature cell walls:, hydrolysis and oxidative cross-linking. We will also discuss, how fragments of the cell wall released during pathogen, attack, or even during normal cell wall turnover, may act as, cellular signals that influence metabolism and development., , Enzymes Mediate Wall Hydrolysis and, Degradation, Hemicelluloses and pectins may be modified and broken, down by a variety of enzymes that are found naturally in, the cell wall. This process has been studied in greatest, detail in ripening fruit, in which softening is thought to be, the result of disassembly of the wall (Rose and Bennett, 1999). Glucanases and related enzymes may hydrolyze the, backbone of hemicelluloses. Xylosidases and related, enzymes may remove the side branches from the backbone, of xyloglucan. Transglycosylases may cut and join hemicelluloses together. Such enzymatic changes may alter the, physical properties of the wall, for example, by changing, the viscosity of the matrix or by altering the tendency of the, hemicelluloses to stick to cellulose., Messenger RNAs for expansin are expressed in ripening tomato fruit, suggesting that they play a role in wall, disassembly (Rose et al. 1997). Similarly, softening fruits
Page 387 :
336, , Chapter 15, , express high levels of pectin methyl esterase,, which hydrolyzes the methyl esters from, pectins. This hydrolysis makes the pectin more, susceptible to subsequent hydrolysis by pectinases and related enzymes. The presence of, these and related enzymes in the cell wall indicates that walls are capable of significant modification during development., , Oxidative Bursts Accompany Pathogen, Attack, , e, e, e, , e, , FUNGAL CELL WALL, e, , Glucanase, , Pectinase, , Chitinase, , e, , e, e, , HIGHER-PLANT CELL WALL, , e, , e, When plant cells are wounded or treated with, certain low-molecular-weight elicitors (see, Chapter 13), they activate a defense response, that results in the production of high concenStimulation of, phytoalexin, trations of hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, CYTOPLASM, in the plant, radicals, and other active oxygen species in, the cell wall. This “oxidative burst” appears to, FIGURE 15.28 Scheme for the production of oligosaccharins during, be part of a defense response against invading, fungal invasion of plant cells. Enzymes secreted by the plant, such as, pathogens (see Chapter 13) (Brisson et al. 1994;, chitinase and glucanase, attack the fungal wall, releasing oligosacchaOtte and Barz 1996)., rins that elicit the production of defense compounds (phytoalexins) in, the plant. Similarly, fungal pectinase releases biologically active, Active oxygen species may directly attack, oligosaccharins from the plant cell wall. (After Brett and Waldron 1996.), the pathogenic organisms, and they may indirectly deter subsequent invasion by the pathogenic organisms by causing a rapid crosslinking of phenolic components of the cell, wall. In tobacco stems, for example, prolinethis enzyme attacks the fungal wall, it releases glucan, rich structural proteins of the wall become rapidly insoluoligomers with potent elicitor activity. The wall compobilized upon wounding or elicitor treatment, and this, nents serve in this case as part of a sensitive system for the, cross-linking is associated with an oxidative burst and, detection of pathogen invasion., with a mechanical stiffening of the cell walls., Oligosaccharins may also function during the normal, Wall Fragments Can Act as Signaling Molecules, control of cell growth and differentiation. For example, a, Degradation of cell walls can result in the production of, specific nonasaccharide (an oligosaccharide containing, biologically active fragments 10 to 15 residues long, called, nine sugar residues) derived from xyloglucan has been, oligosaccharins, that may be involved in natural develfound to inhibit growth promotion by the auxin 2,4opmental responses and in defense responses (see Web, dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). The nonasaccharide, Topic 15.5). Some of the reported physiological and develacts at an optimal concentration of 10–9 M. This xylogluopmental effects of oligosaccharins include stimulation of, can oligosaccharin may act as a feedback inhibitor of, phytoalexin synthesis, oxidative bursts, ethylene synthegrowth; for example, when auxin-induced breakdown of, sis, membrane depolarization, changes in cytoplasmic calxyloglucan is maximal, it may prevent excessive weakencium, induced synthesis of pathogen-related proteins such, ing of the cell wall. Related xyloglucan oligomers have, as chitinase and glucanase, other systemic and local, also been reported to influence organogenesis in tissue cul“wound” signals, and alterations in the growth and mortures and may play a wider role in cell differentiation, phogenesis of isolated tissue samples (John et al. 1997)., (Creelman and Mullet 1997)., The best-studied examples are oligosaccharide elicitors, produced during pathogen invasion (see Chapter 13). For, SUMMARY, example, the fungus Phytophthora secretes an endopolyThe architecture, mechanics, and function of plants depend, galacturonase (a type of pectinase) during its attack on plant, crucially on the structure of the cell wall. The wall is, tissues. As this enzyme degrades the pectin component of, secreted and assembled as a complex structure that varies, the plant cell wall, it produces pectin fragments—oligogalacturonans—that elicit multiple defense responses by, in form and composition as the cell differentiates. Primary, the plant cell (Figure 15.28). The oligogalacturonans that are, cell walls are synthesized in actively growing cells, and sec10 to 13 residues long are most active in these responses., ondary cell walls are deposited in certain cells, such as, Plant cell walls also contain a β-D-glucanase that attacks, xylem vessel elements and sclerenchyma, after cell expanthe β-D-glucan that is specific to the fungal cell wall. When, sion ceases.
Page 388 :
Cell Walls: Structure, Biogenesis, and Expansion, The basic model of the primary wall is a network of cellulose microfibrils embedded in a matrix of hemicelluloses,, pectins, and structural proteins. Cellulose microfibrils are, highly ordered arrays of glucan chains synthesized on the, membrane by protein complexes called particle rosettes., The genes for cellulose synthase in plants have recently, been identified, bringing the realization that a large gene, family encodes these and related proteins. The matrix is, secreted into the wall via the Golgi apparatus. Hemicelluloses and proteins cross-link microfibrils, and pectins form, hydrophilic gels that can become cross-linked by calcium, ions. Wall assembly may be mediated by enzymes. For, example, xyloglucan endotransglycosylase has the ability, to carry out transglycosylation reactions that integrate, newly synthesized xyloglucans into the wall., Secondary walls differ from primary walls in that they, contain a higher percentage of cellulose, they have different, hemicelluloses, and lignin replaces pectins in the matrix. Secondary walls can also become highly thickened, sculpted,, and embedded with specialized structural proteins., In diffuse-growing cells, growth directionality is determined by wall structure, in particular the orientation of the, cellulose microfibrils, which in turn is determined by the, orientation of microtubules in the cytoplasm. Upon leaving the meristem, plant cells typically elongate greatly. Cell, enlargement is limited by the ability of the cell wall to, undergo polymer creep, which in turn is controlled in a, complex way by the adhesion of wall polymers to one, another and by the influence of pH on wall-loosening proteins such as expansins, glucanases, and other enzymes., According to the acid growth hypothesis, proton extrusion by the plasma membrane H+-ATPase acidifies the, wall, activating the protein expansin. Expansins induce, stress relaxation of the wall by loosening the bonds holding microfibrils together. The cessation of cell elongation, appears to be due to cell wall rigidification caused by an, increase in the number of cross-links., Hydrolytic enzymes may degrade mature cell walls, completely or selectively during fruit ripening, seed germination, and the formation of abscission layers. Cell walls, can also undergo oxidative cross-linking in response to, pathogen attack. In addition, pathogen attack may release, cell wall fragments, and certain wall fragments have been, shown to be capable of acting as cell signaling agents., , Web Material, Web Topics, 15.1 Terminology for Polysaccharide Chemistry, A brief review of terms used to describe the, structures, bonds, and polymers in polysaccharide chemistry is provided., , 337, , 15.2 Molecular Model for the Synthesis of, Cellulose and Other Wall Polysaccharides, That Consist of a Disaccharide Repeat, A model is presented for the polymerization of, cellubiose units into glucan chains by the, enzyme cellulose synthase., , 15.3 Matrix Components of the Cell Wall, The secretion of xyloglucan and glycosylated, proteins by the Golgi can be demonstrated at, the ultrastructural level., , 15.4 The Mechanical Properties of Cell Walls:, Studies with Nitella, Experiments demonstrating that the inner 25%, of the cell wall determines the directionality of, cell expansion are described., , 15.5 Structure of Biologically Active Oligosaccharins, Some cell wall fragments have been demonstrated to have biological activity., , Web Essay, 15.1 Calcium Gradients and Oscillations in, Growing Pollen Tube, The role of calcium in regulating pollen tube tip, growth is described., , Chapter References, Amor, Y., Haigler, C. H., Johnson, S., Wainscott, M., and Delmer, D., P. (1995) A membrane-associated form of sucrose synthase and, its potential role in synthesis of cellulose and callose in plants., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 9353–9357., Arioli, T., Peng, L., Betzner, A. S., Burn, J., Wittke, W., Herth, W.,, Camilleri, C., Hofte, H., Plazinski, J., Birch, R., Cork, A., Glover,, J., Redmond, J., Williamson, R. E. (1998) Molecular analysis of cellulose biosynthesis in Arapidopsis. Science 279: 717–720., Baskin, T. I., Wilson, J. E., Cork, A., and Williamson, R. E. (1994) Morphology and microtubule organization in Arabidopsis roots, exposed to oryzalin or taxol. Plant Cell Physiol. 35: 935–942., Bibikova, T. N., Jacob, T., Dahse, I., and Gilroy, S. (1998) Localized, changes in apoplastic and cytoplasmic pH are associated with root, hair development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125:, 2925–2934., Brett, C. T., and Waldron, K. W. (1996) Physiology and Biochemistry, of Plant Cell Walls, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London., Brisson, L. F., Tenhaken, R., and Lamb, C. (1994) Function of oxidative cross-linking of cell wall structural proteins in plant disease, resistance. Plant Cell 6: 1703–1712., Brown, R. M., Jr., Saxena, I. M., and Kudlicka, K. (1996) Cellulose, biosynthesis in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 149–155., Buchanan, B. B., Gruissem, W., and Jones, R. L., eds. (2000) Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology of Plants. Amer. Soc. Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD., Carpita, N. C. (1996). Structure and biogenesis of the cell walls of, grasses. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 455–476., Carpita, N. C., and McCann, M. (2000) The cell wall. In Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology of Plants, B. B. Buchanan, W. Gruissem, and
Page 389 :
338, , Chapter 15, , R. L. Jones, eds., American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville,, MD, pp. 52–108., Cheung, A. Y., Zhan, X. Y., Wang, H., and Wu, H.-M. (1996) Organspecific and Agamous-regulated expression and glycosylation of, a pollen tube growth-promoting protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 93: 3853–3858., Cosgrove, D. J. (1985) Cell wall yield properties of growing tissues., Evaluation by in vivo stress relaxation. Plant Physiol. 78: 347–356., Cosgrove, D. J. (1997) Relaxation in a high-stress environment: The, molecular bases of extensible cell walls and cell enlargement., Plant Cell 9: 1031–1041., Cosgrove, D. J. (2000) Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins., Nature 407: 321–326., Cosgrove, D. J., and Durachko, D. M. (1994) Autolysis and extension, of isolated walls from growing cucumber hypocotyls. J. Exp. Bot., 45: 1711–1719., Creelman, R. A., and Mullet, J. E. (1997) Oligosaccharins, brassinolides, and jasmonates: Nontraditional regulators of plant growth,, development, and gene expression. Plant Cell 9: 1211–1223., Darley, C. P., Forrester, A. M., and McQueen-Mason, S. J. (2001) The, molecular basis of plant cell wall extension. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:, 179–195., Delmer, D. P., and Amor, Y. (1995) Cellulose biosynthesis. Plant Cell, 7: 987–1000., Gaspar, Y., Johnson, K. L., McKenna, J. A., Bacic, A., and Schultz, C., J. (2001) The complex structures of arabinogalactan-proteins and, the journey towards understanding function. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:, 161–176., Gunning, B. S., and Steer, M. W. (1996) Plant Cell Biology: Structure, and Function. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston., Hayashi, T. (1989) Xyloglucans in the primary cell wall. Annu. Rev., Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 139–168., Holland, N., Holland, D., Helentjaris, T., Dhugga, K. S., XoconostleCazares, B., and Delmer D. P. (2000) A comparative analysis of, the plant cellulose synthase (CesA) gene family. Plant Physiol. 123:, 1313–1324., Hoson, T. (1993) Regulation of polysaccharide breakdown during, auxin-induced cell wall loosening. J. Plant Res. 103: 369–381., Ishii, T., Matsunaga, T., Pellerin, P., O’Neill, M. A., Darvill, A., and, Albersheim, P. (1999) The plant cell wall polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan II self-assembles into a covalently cross-linked, dimer. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 13098–13104., John, M., Röhrig, H., Schmidt, J., Walden, R., and Schell, J. (1997) Cell, signalling by oligosaccharides. Trends Plant Sci. 2: 111–115., Kimura, S., Laosinchai, W., Itoh, T., Cui, X. J., Linder, C. R., and, Brown, R. M., Jr. (1999) Immunogold labeling of rosette terminal, cellulose-synthesizing complexes in the vascular plant Vigna, angularis. Plant Cell 11: 2075–2085., Li, L.-C., and Cosgrove, D. J. (2001) Grass group I pollen allergens, (beta-expansins) lack proteinase activity and do not cause wall, loosening via proteolysis. Eur. J. Biochem. 268: 4217–4226., Li, Z.-C., Durachko, D. M., and Cosgrove, D. J. (1993) An oat coleoptile wall protein that induces wall extension in vitro and that is, antigenically related to a similar protein from cucumber, hypocotyls. Planta 191: 349–356., , McCann, M. C., Wells, B., and Roberts, K. (1990) Direct visualization, of cross-links in the primary plant cell wall. J. Cell Sci. 96: 323–334., McQueen-Mason, S., Durachko, D. M., and Cosgrove, D. J. (1992), Two endogenous proteins that induce cell wall expansion in, plants. Plant Cell 4: 1425–1433., Nishitani, K. (1997) The role of endoxyloglucan transferase in the, organization of plant cell walls. Int. Rev. Cytol. 173: 157–206., O’Neill, M. A., Eberhard, S., Albersheim, P., and Darvill, A. G. (2001), Requirement of borate cross-linking of cell wall rhamnogalacturonan II for Arabidopsis growth. Science 294: 846–849., Otte, O., and Barz, W. (1996) The elicitor-induced oxidative burst in, cultured chickpea cells drives the rapid insolubilization of two, cell wall structural proteins. Planta 200: 238–246., Pear, J. R., Kawagoe, Y., Schreckengost, W. E., Delmer, D. P., and, Stalker, D. M. (1996) Higher plants contain homologs of the bacterial celA genes encoding the catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 12637–12642., Peng, L., Kawagoe, Y., Hogan, P., and Delmer, D. (2002) Sitosterol-βglucoside as primer for cellulose synthesis in plants. Science 295:, 147–148., Rayle, D. L., and Cleland, R. E. (1992) The acid growth theory of, auxin-induced cell elongation is alive and well. Plant Physiol. 99:, 1271–1274., Richmond, T. A., and Somerville, C. R. (2000) The cellulose synthase, superfamily. Plant Physiol. 124: 495–498., Roland, J. C., Reis, D., Mosiniak, M., and Vian, B. (1982) Cell wall texture along the growth gradient of the mung bean hypocotyl:, Ordered assembly and dissipative processes. J. Cell Sci. 56: 303−, 318., Rose, J. K. C., and Bennett, A. B. (1999) Cooperative disassembly of, the cellulose-xyloglucan network of plant cell walls: Parallels, between cell expansion and fruit ripening. Trends Plant Sci. 4:, 176–183., Rose, J. K. C., Lee, H. H., and Bennett, A. B. (1997) Expression of a, divergent expansin gene is fruit-specific and ripening-regulated., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 5955–5960., Salnikov, V. V., Grimson, M. J., Delmer, D. P., and Haigler, C. H., (2001) Sucrose synthase localizes to cellulose synthesis sites in, tracheary elements. Phytochemistry 57: 823–833., Schopfer, P. (2001) Hydroxyl radical-induced cell-wall loosening in, vitro and in vivo: Implications for the control of elongation, growth. Plant J. 28: 679–688., Séné, C. F. B., McCann, M. C., Wilson, R. H., and Grinter, R. (1994), Fourier-transform Raman and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. An investigation of five higher plant cell walls and their, components. Plant Physiol. 106: 1623–1631., Smith, R. C., and Fry, S. C. (1991) Endotransglycosylation of xyloglucans in plant cell suspension cultures. Biochem. J. 279: 529–536., Thompson, J. E., and Fry, S. C. (2001) Restructuring of wall-bound, xyloglucan by transglycosylation in living plant cells. Plant J. 26:, 23–34., Wilson, R. H., Smith, A. C., Kacurakova, M., Saunders, P. K., Wellner, N., and Waldron, K. W. (2000) The mechanical properties and, molecular dynamics of plant cell wall polysaccharides studied, by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Plant Physiol. 124:, 397–405.
Page 390 :
Chapter, , 16, , Growth and Development, , THE VEGETATIVE PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT begins with embryogenesis, but development continues throughout the life of a plant. Plant, developmental biologists are concerned with questions such as, How, does a zygote give rise to an embryo, an embryo to a seedling? How do, new plant structures arise from preexisting structures? Organs are generated by cell division and expansion, but they are also composed of tissues in which groups of cells have acquired specialized functions, and, these tissues are arranged in specific patterns. How do these tissues form, in a particular pattern, and how do cells differentiate? What are the basic, principles that govern the size increase (growth) that occurs throughout, plant development?, Understanding how growth, cell differentiation, and pattern formation are regulated at the cellular, biochemical, and molecular levels is the, ultimate goal of developmental biologists. Such an understanding also, must include the genetic basis of development. Ultimately, development, is the unfolding of genetically encoded programs. Which genes are, involved, what is their hierarchical order, and how do they bring about, developmental change?, In this chapter we will explore what is known about these questions,, beginning with embryogenesis. Embryogenesis initiates plant development, but unlike animal development, plant development is an ongoing, process. Embryogenesis establishes the basic plant body plan and forms, the meristems that generate additional organs in the adult., After discussing the formation of the embryo, we will examine root, and shoot meristems. Most plant development is postembryonic, and it, occurs from meristems. Meristems can be considered to be cell factories, in which the ongoing processes of cell division, expansion, and differentiation generate the plant body. Cells derived from meristems become, the tissues and organs that determine the overall size, shape, and structure of the plant., Vegetative meristems are highly repetitive—they produce the same, or similar structures over and over again—and their activity can con-
Page 391 :
340, , Chapter 16, , tinue indefinitely, a phenomenon known as indeterminate, growth. Some long-lived trees, such as bristlecone pines and, the California redwoods, continue to grow for thousands, of years. Others, particularly annual plants, may cease vegetative development with the initiation of flowering after, only a few weeks or months of growth. Eventually the, adult plant undergoes a transition from vegetative to reproductive development, culminating in the production of a, zygote, and the process begins again. Reproductive development will be discussed in Chapter 24., Cells derived from the apical meristems exhibit specific, patterns of cell expansion, and these expansion patterns, determine the overall shape and size of the plant. We will examine how plant growth is analyzed after discussing meristems, with an emphasis on growth patterns in space (relationship of plant structures) and time (when events occur)., Finally, despite their indeterminate growth habit, plants,, like all other multicellular organisms, senesce and die. At, the end of the chapter we will consider death as a developmental phenomenon, at both the cellular and organismal, levels. Foe an historical overviw of the study of plant, development, see Web Essay 16.1., , EMBRYOGENESIS, The developmental process known as embryogenesis initiates plant development. Although embryogenesis usually, begins with the union of a sperm with an egg, forming a, single-celled zygote, somatic cells also may undergo, embryogenesis under special circumstances. Fertilization, also initiates three other developmental programs: endosperm, seed, and fruit development. Here we will focus on, embryogenesis because it provides the key to understanding plant development., Embryogenesis transforms a single-celled zygote into a, multicellular, microscopic, embryonic plant. A completed, embryo has the basic body plan of the mature plant and, many of the tissue types of the adult, although these are, present in a rudimentary form., Double fertilization is unique to the flowering plants, (see Web Topics 1.1 and 1.2). In plants, as in all other, eukaryotes, the union of one sperm with the egg forms a, single-celled zygote. In angiosperms, however, this event, is accompanied by a second fertilization event, in which, another sperm unites with two polar nuclei to form the, triploid endosperm nucleus, from which the endosperm, (the tissue that supplies food for the growing embryo) will, develop., Embryogenesis occurs within the embryo sac of the, ovule while the ovule and associated structures develop, into the seed. Embryogenesis and endosperm development, typically occur in parallel with seed development, and the, embryo is part of the seed. Endosperm may also be part of, the mature seed, but in some species the endosperm disappears before seed development is completed. Embryo-, , genesis and seed development are highly ordered, integrated processes, both of which are initiated by double fertilization. When completed, both the seed and the embryo, within it become dormant and are able to survive long, periods unfavorable for growth. The ability to form seeds, is one of the keys to the evolutionary success of, angiosperms as well as gymnosperms., The fact that a zygote gives rise to an organized embryo, with a predictable and species-specific structure tells us, that the zygote is genetically programmed to develop in a, particular way, and that cell division, cell expansion, and, cell differentiation are tightly controlled during embryogenesis. If these processes were to occur at random in the, embryo, the result would be a clump of disorganized cells, with no definable form or function., In this section we will examine these changes in greater, detail. We will focus on molecular genetic studies that have, been conducted with the model plant Arabidopsis that have, provided insights into plant development. It is most likely, that most angiosperms probably use similar developmental mechanisms that appeared early in the evolution of the, flowering plants and that the diversity of plant form is, brought about by relatively subtle changes in the time and, place where the molecular regulators of development are, expressed, rather than by different mechanisms altogether, (Doebley and Lukens 1998)., Arabidopsis thaliana is a member of the Brassicaceae, or, mustard family (Figure 16.1). It is a small plant, well suited, for laboratory culture and experimentation. It has been, called the Drosophila of plant biology because of its widespread use in the study of plant genetics and molecular, genetic mechanisms, particularly in an effort to understand, plant developmental change. It was the first higher plant, to have its genome completely sequenced. Furthermore,, there is a concerted international effort to understand the, function of every gene in the Arabidopsis genome by the, year 2010. As a result, we are much closer to an understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing Arabidopsis embryogenesis than of those for any other plant, species., , Embryogenesis Establishes the Essential Features, of the Mature Plant, Plants differ from most animals in that embryogenesis does, not directly generate the tissues and organs of the adult., For example, angiosperm embryogenesis forms a rudimentary plant body, typically consisting of an embryonic, axis and two cotyledons (if it is a dicot). Nevertheless,, embryogenesis establishes the two basic developmental, patterns that persist and can easily be seen in the adult, plant:, 1. The apical–basal axial developmental pattern., 2. The radial pattern of tissues found in stems and, roots.
Page 392 :
Growth and Development, (A), , (B), , 341, , (D), , Stamen, , Carpel, , Silique (fruit), , Petal, Sepal, , (C), , Cauline (stem) leaf, , Internode, Rosette leaf, , Roots, , FIGURE 16.1 Arabidopsis thaliana. (A) Drawing of a mature, , Arabidopsis plant showing the various organs. (B) Drawing of, a flower showing the floral organs. (C) An immature vegetative plant consisting of basal rosette leaves and a root system, (not shown). (D) A mature plant after most of the flowers, have matured and the siliques have developed. (A and B, after Clark 2001; C and D courtesy of Caren Chang.), , Embryogenesis also establishes the primary meristems., Most of the structures that make up the adult plant are generated after embryogenesis through the activity of merisstems. Although these primary meristems are established, during embryogenesis, only upon germination will they, become active and begin to generate the organs and tissues, of the adult., , Axial patterning. Almost all plants exhibit an axial polarity in which the tissues and organs are arrayed in a precise, order along a linear, or polarized, axis. The shoot apical, meristem is at one end of the axis, the root apical meristem, , at the other. In the embryo and seedling, one or two cotyledons are attached just below the shoot apical meristem., Next in this linear array is the hypocotyl, followed by the, root, the root apical meristem, and the root cap. This axial, pattern is established during embryogenesis., What may not be so obvious is the fact that any individual segment of either the root or the shoot also has apical and, basal ends with different, distinct physiological and structural, properties. For example, whereas adventitious roots develop, from the basal ends of stem cuttings, buds develop from the, apical ends, even if they are inverted (see Figure 19.12)., , Radial patterning. Different tissues are organized in a precise pattern within plant organs. In stems and roots the tissues are arranged in a radial pattern extending from the, outside of a stem or a root into its center. If we examine a, root in cross section, for example, we see three concentric, rings of tissues arrayed along a radial axis: An outermost
Page 393 :
342, , Chapter 16, , Epidermis, , Cortex, , Endodermis, Pericycle, , Arabidopsis Embryos Pass through Four Distinct, Stages of Development, , Casparian strip, , The Arabidopsis pattern of embryogenesis has been studied, extensively and is the one we will present here, but keep, in mind that angiosperms exhibit many different patterns, of embryonic development, and this is only one type., The most important stages of embryogenesis in Arabidopsis, and many other angiosperms, are these:, , Protoxylem, , 1 mm, , FIGURE 16.2 The radial pattern of tissues found in plant, , organs can be observed in a crosssection of the root. This, crosssection of an Arabidopsis root was taken approximately, 1 mm back from the root tip, a region in which the different, tissues have formed., (A), , layer of epidermal cells (the epidermis) covers a cylinder, of cortical tissue (the cortex), which in turn overlies the, vascular cylinder (the endodermis, pericycle, phloem, and, xylem) (Figure 16.2) (see Chapter 1)., The protoderm is the meristem that gives rise to the epidermis, the ground meristem produces the future cortex and, endodermis, and the procambium is the meristem that gives, rise to the primary vascular tissue and vascular cambium., , 1. The globular stage embryo. After the first zygotic division, the apical cell undergoes a series of highly, ordered divisions, generating an eight-cell (octant), globular embryo by 30 hours after fertilization, (Figure 16.3C). Additional precise cell divisions, , (C), , (B), , (D), , Apical cells, , Protoderm, , Basal cells, , (E), , 25 µm, , (F), , 25 µm, , (G), , 25 µm, , (H), , 25 µm, , Shoot apex, Cotyledon, , Cotyledon, Axis, , Axis, , Root apex, 50 µm, , 50 µm, , FIGURE 16.3 Arabidopsis embryogenesis is characterized by, , a precise pattern of cell division. Successive stages of, embryogenesis are depicted here. (A) One-cell embryo after, the first division of the zygote, which forms the apical and, basal cells; (B) two-cell embryo; (C) eight-cell embryo; (D), early globular stage, which has developed a distinct proto-, , 50 µm, , 50 µm, , derm (surface layer); (E) early heart stage; (F) late heart, stage; (G) torpedo stage; (H) mature embryo. (From West, and Harada 1993 photographs taken by K. Matsudaira Yee;, courtesy of John Harada, © American Society of Plant, Biologists, reprinted with permission.)
Page 394 :
Growth and Development, , 343, , increase the number of cells in the sphere (Figure, 16.3D)., 2. The heart stage embryo. This stage forms through, rapid cell divisions in two regions on either side of, the future shoot apex. These two regions produce, outgrowths that later will give rise to the cotyledons, and give the embryo bilateral symmetry (Figure, 16.3E and F)., 3. The torpedo stage embryo. This stage forms as a result, of cell elongation throughout the embryo axis and, further development of the cotyledons (Figure, 16.3G)., 4. The maturation stage embryo. Toward the end of, embryogenesis, the embryo and seed lose water and, become metabolically quiescent as they enter dormancy (Figure 16.3H)., Cotyledons are food storage organs for many species,, and during the cotyledon growth phase, proteins, starch,, and lipids are synthesized and deposited in the cotyledons, to be utilized by the seedling during the heterotrophic, (nonphotosynthetic) growth that occurs after germination., Although food reserves are stored in the Arabidopsis cotyledons, the growth of the cotyledons is not as extensive in, this species as it is in many other dicots. In monocots, the, food reserves are stored mainly in the endosperm. In Arabidopsis and many other dicots, the endosperm develops, rapidly early in embryogenesis but then is reabsorbed, and, the mature seed lacks endosperm tissue., , The Axial Pattern of the Embryo Is Established, during the First Cell Division of the Zygote, Axial polarity is established very early in embryogenesis, (see Web Topic 16.1). In fact, the zygote itself becomes, polarized and elongates approximately threefold before its, first division. The apical end of the zygote is densely cytoplasmic, but the basal half of the cell contains a large central vacuole (Figure 16.4)., The first division of the zygote is asymmetric and occurs, at right angles to its long axis. This division creates two, cells—an apical and a basal cell—that have very different, fates (see Figure 16.3A). The smaller, apical daughter cell, receives more cytoplasm than the larger, basal cell, which, inherits the large zygotic vacuole. Almost all of the structures of the embryo, and ultimately the mature plant, are, derived from the smaller apical cell. Two vertical divisions, and one horizontal division of the apical cell generate the, eight-celled (octant) globular embryo (see Figure 16.3C)., The basal cell also divides, but all of its divisions are horizontal, at right angles to the long axis. The result is a filament of six to nine cells known as the suspensor that, attaches the embryo to the vascular system of the plant. Only, one of the basal cell derivatives contributes to the embryo., The basal cell derivative nearest the embryo is known as the, hypophysis (plural hypophyses), and it forms the columella,, , Endosperm, nucleus, , Embryo sac, Nucellus, , Zygote nucleus, Zygote, , Vacuole, Ovule, integuments, , FIGURE 16.4 Arabidopsis ovule containing the embryo sac at, , about 4 hours after double fertilization. The zygote exhibits, a marked polarization. The terminal half of the zygote has, dense cytoplasm and a single large nucleus, while a large, central vacuole occupies the basal half of the cell. At this, stage, the embryo sac surrounding the zygote also contains, 4 endosperm nuclei., , or central part of the root cap, and an essential part of the, root apical meristem known as the quiescent center, which, will be discussed later in the chapter (Figure 16.5)., Even though the embryo is spherical throughout the, globular stage of embryogenesis (see Figure 16.3A–D), the, cells within the apical and basal halves of the sphere have, different identities and functions. As the embryo continues, to grow and reaches the heart stage, its axial polarity, becomes more distinct (see Figure 16.5), and three axial, regions can readily be recognized:, 1. The apical region gives rise to the cotyledons and shoot, apical meristem., 2. The middle region gives rise to the hypocotyl, root,, and most of the root meristem., 3. The hypophysis gives rise to the rest of the root meristem (see Figure 16.5)., The cells of the upper and lower tiers of the early globular, stage embryo differ, and the embryo is divided into apical, and basal halves, reflecting the axial pattern imposed on, the embryo in the zygote., , The Radial Pattern of Tissue Differentiation Is First, Visible at the Globular Stage, The radial pattern of tissue differentiation is first observed, in the octant embryo (Figure 16.6). As cell division continues in the globular embryo, transverse divisions divide the
Page 395 :
344, , Chapter 16, , FIGURE 16.5 The apical–basal organization of, , Cotyledons, , plant tissues and organs is established very, early in embryogenesis. This diagram illustrates, how the organs of the early Arabidopsis seedling, originate from specific regions of the embryo., (From Willemsen et al. 1998.), , Terminal cell, , Shoot apical, meristem, , Shoot apical, meristem, , Hypocotyl, , Apical cells, Central cells, , Embryonic root, , Hypophysis, , Root meristem, Quiescent center, Columella root cap, , Heart stage, , Suspensor, , Early seedling, Basal cell, of suspensor, , Basal cell, Two-cell stage, , Octant stage, , Early globular stage, Cotyledons, Shoot apical, meristem, Hypophysis, , Hypocotyl, , Epidermis, , Protoderm, , Root, Ground, meristem/, cortex and, epidermis, , Heart stage, Columella, of root cap, , Root cap, Torpedo stage, , Vascular, cambium/, stele, , FIGURE 16.6 The radial tissue patterns are also established during embryogene-, , sis. This drawing illustrates the origin of the different tissues and organs from, embryonic regions in Arabidopsis embryogenesis. The gray lines between the torpedo and seedling stages indicate the regions of the embryo that give rise to, various regions of the seedling. The expanded regions represent boundaries, where developmental fate is somewhat flexible. (After Van Den Berg et al. 1995.), , Seedling, , Quiescent, center
Page 396 :
Growth and Development, lower tier of cells radially into three regions., These regions will become the radially arranged, tissues of the root and stem axes. The outermost, cells form a one-cell-thick surface layer, known as, the protoderm. The protoderm covers both halves, of the embryo and will generate the epidermis., Cells that will become the ground meristem, underlie the protoderm. The ground meristem, gives rise to the cortex and, in the root and, hypocotyl, it will also produce the endodermis., The procambium is the inner core of elongated, cells that will generate the vascular tissues and,, in the root, the pericycle (see Figure 16.2)., , Embryogenesis Requires Specific Gene, Expression, Analysis of Arabidopsis mutants that either fail to, establish axial polarity or develop abnormally, during embryogenesis has led to the identification of genes whose expression participates in tissue patterning during embryogenesis., , The GNOM gene: Axial patterning. Seedlings, , (A), , Wild type, , gnom mutant, , GNOM genes control apical–, basal polarity, , (B), , Wild type, , 345, , monopteros mutant, , MONOPTEROS genes control formation, of the primary root, , FIGURE 16.7 Genes whose functions are essential for Arabidopsis, , embryogenesis have been identified by the selection of mutants in, which a stage of embryogenesis is blocked, such as gnom and, monopteros. The development of mutant seedlings is contrasted here, with that of the wild type at the same stage of development. (A) The, GNOM gene helps establish apical–basal polarity. A plant homozygous for gnom is shown on the right. (B) The MONOPTEROS gene is, necessary for basal patterning and formation of the primary root., Plants homozygous for the monopteros mutation have a hypocotyl, a, normal shoot apical meristem, and cotyledons, but they lack the primary root. (A from Willemsen et al. 1998; B from Berleth and Jürgens, 1993.), , homozygous for mutations in the GNOM gene, lack both roots and cotyledons (Figure 16.7A), (Mayer et al. 1993). Defects in gnom embryos first, appear during the initial division of the zygote,, and they persist throughout embryogenesis. In, the most extreme mutants, gnom embryos are, spherical and lack axial polarity entirely. We can conclude, that GNOM gene expression is required for the establishment of axial polarity.1, , for root formation in the adult plant. The MP gene is, important for the formation of vascular tissue in postembryonic development (Przemeck et al. 1996)., , The MONOPTEROS gene: Primary root and vascular, tissue. Mutations in the MONOPTEROS (MP) gene result, , The SHORT ROOT and SCARECROW genes: Ground, tissue development. Genes have been identified that func-, , in seedlings that lack both a hypocotyl and a root, although, they do produce an apical region. The apical structures in, the mp mutant embryos are not structurally normal, however, and the tissues of the cotyledons are disorganized, (Figure 16.7B) (Berleth and Jürgens 1993). Embryos of mp, mutants first show abnormalities at the octant stage, and, they do not form a procambium in the lower part of the, globular embryo, the part that should give rise to the, hypocotyl and root. Later some vascular tissue does form, in the cotyledons, but the strands are improperly connected., Although the mp mutant embryos lack a primary root, when they germinate, they will form adventitious roots as, the seedlings grow into adult plants. The vascular tissues, in all organs of these mutant plants are poorly developed,, with frequent discontinuities. Thus the MP gene is required, for the formation of the embryonic primary root, but not, , tion in the establishment of the radial tissue pattern in the, root and hypocotyl during embryogenesis. These genes, also are required for maintenance of the radial pattern during postembryonic development (Scheres et al. 1995; Di, Laurenzio et al. 1996). To identify these genes, investigators, isolated Arabidopsis mutants that caused roots to grow, slowly (Figure 16.8B). Analysis of these mutants identified, several that have defects in the radial tissue pattern. Two, of the affected genes, SHORT ROOT (SHR) and SCARECROW (SCR), are necessary for tissue differentiation and, cell differentiation not only in the embryo, but also in both, primary and secondary roots and in the hypocotyl., Mutants of SHR and SCR both produce roots with a single-celled layer of ground tissue (Figure 16.8D). Cells making up the single-celled layer of ground tissue have a, mixed identity and show characteristics of both endodermal and cortical cells in plants with the scr mutation. These, scr mutants also lack the cell layer called the starch sheath,, a structure that is involved in the growth response to gravity, (see Chapter 19). Roots of plants with the shr mutation also, , 1 In discussions of plant and yeast genetics, wild-type (nor-, , mal) genes are capitalized and italicized (in this case GNOM),, and mutations are set in lowercase letters (here gnom).
Page 397 :
346, , Chapter 16, , (A), , Anticlinal, cell divisions, , Stem cell, , Endodermal cell, , Daughter, cell, , (B), , Wild type, , scr1, , scr2, , Cortical cell, Periclinal, cell divisions, , Stem cell, , This step is, blocked in, scr mutants, , (C), Epidermis, Cortex, Endodermis, , Pericycle, , (D), , 50 µm, , Mutant, layer, cell, , FIGURE 16.8 Mutations in the Arabidopsis gene SCARECROW (SCR), alter the pattern of tissues in the root. (A) The cell divisions forming, the endodermis and cortex. The endodermal cells and cortical cells, are derived from the same initial cells as a result of two asymmetric, cell divisions. The cortical–endodermal stem cell (uncommitted cell), expands and then divides anticlinally, reproducing itself and a, daughter cell. The daughter cell then divides periclinally to produce a, small cell that develops endodermal characteristics and a larger cell, that becomes a cortical cell. The second asymmetric division does not, occur in scr mutants, and the daughter cell formed as a result of the, anticlinal division of the initial has characteristics of both cortical and, endodermal cells. (B) The growth of a 12-day-old wild-type seedling, (left) is compared with that of two 12-day-old seedlings homozygous, for a mutation in the SCARECROW (SCR) gene (middle and right)., (C) Cross section of the primary root of a wild-type seedling. (D), Cross section of the primary root of a seedling homozygous for the, scr mutant. (From Di Laurenzio et al. 1996; photos © Cell Press, courtesy of P. Benfey.), , Pericycle, Epidermis, , 50 µm, , have a single layer of ground tissue, but it has only cortical, cell characteristics and lacks endodermal characteristics., , The HOBBIT gene: The root meristem. The primary root, and shoot meristems are established during embryogenesis. Because in most cases they do not become active at this, time, the term promeristem may be more appropriate to, , describe these structures. A promeristem may be defined, as an embryonic structure that will become a meristem, upon germination., A molecular marker for the root promeristem has not, yet been identified, but it appears to be determined early, in embryogenesis. Root cap stem cells (the cells that divide, to produce the root cap) are formed from the hypophysis, at the heart stage of embryogenesis, indicating that the root, promeristem is established at least by this stage of embryogenesis (Figure 16.9). The expression of the HOBBIT gene, may be an early marker of root meristem identity (Willemsen et al. 1998).
Page 398 :
Growth and Development, (A) Wild type, , (B) hobbit mutant, , 347, , FIGURE 16.9 The HOBBIT (HBT) gene is important for the, , development of a functional root apical meristem. (A) Wildtype Arabidopsis seedling; (B) hobbit mutant seedling; (C), root tip of wild type showing quiescent center (QC), columella (COL) and lateral root cap (LRC); (D) root tip of hobbit mutant; (E) quiescent center and columella of wild-type;, (F) absence of quiescent center and columella in hobbit. The, seedlings in A and B are both shown 7 days after germination (4× magnification). Staining with iodine reveals starch, grains in the columella cells of the root cap in the wild type, (E). No starch grains are present in the hbt mutant root tip, (F). (From Willemsen et al. 1998.), , at the two- or four-cell stage, before the formation of the, globular embryo. The primary defect in hbt mutants is in, the hypophyseal precursor, which divides vertically, instead of horizontally. As a result, the hypophysis does, not form, and the root meristem that subsequently forms, lacks a quiescent center and the columella (see Figure, 16.9F). Embryos of hbt mutants appear to have a root, meristem, but it does not function when the seedlings germinate. Furthermore, plants grown from hbt mutant, embryos are unable to form lateral roots., (C), , (D), , COL, LRC, , (E), , QC, , 25 mm, , (F), , QC, , 25 mm, , Mutants of the HOBBIT (HBT) gene are defective in the, formation of a functional embryonic root, as are plants with, mp mutants. However, these two mutations act in very different ways. The hbt mutants begin to show abnormalities, , The SHOOTMERISTEMLESS gene: The shoot promeristem. The shoot promeristem can be recognized morphologically by the torpedo stage of embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Oriented cell divisions of some of the cells, between the cotyledons result in a layered appearance of, this region that is characteristic of the shoot apical meristem (as described later in the chapter). However, the progenitors of these cells probably acquired the molecular, identity of the shoot apical meristem cells much earlier,, during the globular stage., The SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) gene is expressed, specifically in the cells that will become the shoot apical, meristem, and its expression in these cells is required for, the formation of the shoot promeristem. Arabidopsis plants, homozygous for a mutated, loss-of-function STM gene do, not form a shoot apical meristem, and instead all the cells, in this region differentiate (Lincoln et al. 1994). The product of the wild-type STM gene appears to suppress cell differentiation, ensuring that the meristem cells remain undifferentiated., STM mRNA can first be detected in one or two cells at, the apical end of the midglobular embryo. By the heart, stage, STM expression is confined to a few cells between, the cotyledons (Long et al. 1996). Because STM acts as a, marker for these cells, the shoot apical meristem must be, specified long before it can be recognized morphologically., The STM gene is necessary not only for the formation of, the embryonic shoot apical meristem, but also for the, maintenance of shoot apical meristem identity in the adult, plant. The role of the nucleus in controlling development, was first demonstrated in the giant algal unicell, acetabularia (see Web Essay 16.2).
Page 399 :
348, , Chapter 16, , Embryo Maturation Requires Specific, Gene Expression, The Arabidopsis embryo enters dormancy after it has generated about 20,000 cells. Dormancy is brought about by, the loss of water and a general shutting down of gene transcription and protein synthesis, not only in the embryo, but, also throughout the seed. To adapt the cell to the special, conditions of dormancy, specific gene expression is, required. For example, the ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3, (ABI3) and FUSCA3 genes are necessary for the initiation, of dormancy and are sensitive to the hormone abscisic acid,, which is the signaling molecule that initiates seed and, embryo dormancy. ABI3 also controls the expression of, genes encoding the storage proteins that are deposited in, the cotyledons during the maturation phase of embryogenesis (see Chapter 23)., The LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1) gene also is active in, late embryogenesis. Because lec1 mutants cannot survive, desiccation and do not enter dormancy, the embryos die, unless they are rescued through isolation before desiccation occurs. The rescued embryos will germinate in culture, and produce fertile plants, which are like wild-type plants, except that they lack the 7S storage protein and they have, leaflike cotyledons with trichomes on their upper surface., The normal appearance and development of the mature, lec1 mutants indicates that the LEC1 gene is required only, Wild-type Arabidopsis, (A), (B), , during embryogenesis. Although the most obvious defects, of the lec1 mutants are seen only in the maturation phase, embryo, mRNA from LEC1 gene expression can be, detected throughout embryogenesis. It has been proposed, that LEC1 is a general repressor of vegetative development, and its expression is necessary throughout embryogenesis, (Lotan et al. 1998)., , THE ROLE OF CYTOKINESIS IN, PATTERN FORMATION, One of the most striking features of tissue organization in, many plants, illustrated by Arabidopsis, is the remarkably, precise pattern of oriented, often called stereotypic, cell divisions. This pattern of divisions generates files of cells, extending from the meristem toward the base of the plant., Although the division pattern is not as precise in all other, species, the basic pattern of tissue formation is similar., How important is the plane of cell division for the establishment of the tissue patterns found in plant organs?, , The Stereotypic Cell Division Pattern Is Not, Required for the Axial and Radial Patterns of, Tissue Differentiation, Two Arabidopsis mutants, fass and ton, have dramatic effects, on the patterns of cell division in all stages of development, , (C), , FIGURE 16.10 Arabidopsis plants with, , 50 µm, , Homozygous ton mutant, (D), , (E), , (F), , 60 µm, , mutations in the TON gene are, unable to form a preprophase band, of microtubules in cells at any stage, of division. Plants carrying this, mutation are highly irregular in their, cell division and expansion planes,, and as a result they are severely, deformed. However, they continue, to produce recognizable tissues and, organs in their correct positions., Although the organs and tissues produced by these mutant plants are, highly abnormal, the radial tissue, pattern is not disturbed. (A–C) Wildtype Arabidopsis: (A) early globular, stage embryo; (B) seedling seen from, the top; (C) cross section of a root., (D–F) Comparable stages of, Arabidopsis homozygous for the ton, mutation: (D) early embryogenesis;, (E) mutant seedling seen from the, top; (F) cross section of the mutant, root showing the random orientation, of the cells, but a near wild-type tissue order; an outer epidermal layer, covers a multicellular cortex, which, in turn surrounds the vascular cylinder. (From Traas et al. 1995.)
Page 400 :
Growth and Development, and eliminate the stereotypic divisions seen in the wild, type (Torres-Ruiz and Jürgens 1994; Traas et al. 1995). These, mutations probably are in the same gene, and cells in, plants homozygous for the ton (fass) mutation lack a cytoplasmic structure known as the preprophase band of microtubules. The preprophase band appears to be essential for, the orientation of the phragmoplast during cytokinesis, and, thus is required for oriented cell divisions (see Chapter 1, and Web Topic 16.2)., The effects of the ton (fass) mutation are seen from the, earliest stages of embryogenesis and persist throughout, development. The plants are tiny, never reaching more than, 2 to 3 cm in height. They have misshapen leaves, roots, and, stems, and they are sterile (Figure 16.10D–F). Nevertheless,, the mutant plants not only establish an axial pattern, but, they have all the cell types and organs of the wild-type, plant, and these occur in their correct positions. The precise, numbers of cells found in each tissue layer are radically dif-, , 349, , ferent in the mutants, but each tissue is present and in the, proper order., The fact that these mutations do not prevent the establishment of the radial tissue pattern is strong evidence that, the stereotypic cell division pattern found in the Arabidopsis embryo and in the root is not essential for the radial pattern of tissue differentiation., , An Arabidopsis Mutant with Defective Cytokinesis, Cannot Establish the Radial Tissue Pattern, The Arabidopsis mutant knolle is defective in cytokinesis, the, step at the end of mitosis in which a new wall is formed, partitioning the daughter nuclei into separate cells. The, KNOLLE gene encodes a syntaxin-like protein that is, important for vesicle fusion. Syntaxins are proteins that, integrate into membranes, permitting the membranes to, fuse. Vesicle fusion is essential for cytokinesis (Figure, 16.11)., , (B), , (A), , Abnormal cross wall, , n, , e, o, , n, , Vesicle membrane, , (C), , C, , Synaptobrevin, (a vesicle, membrane, protein), , Several soluble, proteins mediate, interactions of, membrane proteins, N, , N, , Syntaxin protein, (in Arabidopsis coded, by KNOLLE gene), , C, , Target membrane, , FIGURE 16.11 Encoded by the KNOLLE gene, syntaxin pro-, , teins play a critical role in the fusion of Golgi-derived membranes, which is required for normal cytokinesis in most, organisms, including Arabidopsis. (A) Electron micrograph of a, region of an Arabidopsis embryo with the knolle mutation. The, box outlined is 5 mm wide. (B) Higher-magnification photomicrograph showing an incomplete and abnormal crosswall attached to the parent cell wall. (C) A model for the, fusion of vesicles during cell plate formation. A complex of, soluble proteins mediates the interaction of synaptobrevin, protein with the syntaxin protein (encoded by the KNOLLE, gene) on the target membrane. (A and B from Lukowitz et al., 1996, courtesy of G. Jürgens; C after Assaad et al. 1996.)
Page 401 :
350, , Chapter 16, , Although cell division is not blocked by the knolle mutation, cell plate formation is irregular and often incomplete., As a result, many cells are binucleate, while other cells are, only partly separated or are connected by large cytoplasmic bridges. The division planes also are irregular. These, irregularities have severe effects on development., Plants homozygous for the knolle mutation go through, embryogenesis, but the radial tissue pattern is severely disrupted and an epidermal layer does not form in early, embryogenesis. The knolle mutation does not prevent formation of the apical–basal axis, and embryogenesis is completed, although the seedlings are very short-lived and die, soon after germination. The plants also lack functional, meristems., The conclusion drawn from studies of the knolle mutation appears to contradict what we learned from the ton, (fass) mutations. Both the knolle and the ton mutations disrupt the normal pattern of cell division in embryonic and, postembryonic development. But whereas the knolle mutations block the establishment of the radial tissue pattern, in, the ton mutants the pattern is established., One difference between the ton and the knolle mutations, is that the latter usually prevents the effective separation of, daughter cells during cytokinesis because the cell plate is, incomplete. Since cell–cell communication is important for, pattern formation, it may be necessary for cells to be isolated effectively so that the information exchange can be, regulated. Even though the cytosol is continuous between, adjacent plant cells through plasmodesmata, complete cellularization is required for normal development. Thus the, ton mutants are able to perceive positional information correctly, while the knolle mutants cannot. For a review of the, mechanisms determining the plane of cell division in plant, cells, see Web Essay 16.3., , MERISTEMS IN PLANT DEVELOPMENT, Meristems are populations of small, isodiametric (having, equal dimensions on all sides) cells with embryonic characteristics. Vegetative meristems are self-perpetuating. Not, only do they produce the tissues that will form the body of, the root or stem, but they also continuously regenerate, themselves. A meristem can retain its embryonic character, indefinitely, possibly even for thousands of years in the, case of trees. The reason for this ability is that some meristematic cells do not become committed to a differentiation, pathway, and they retain the capacity for cell division, as, long as the meristem remains vegetative., Undifferentiated cells that retain the capacity for cell, division indefinitely are said to be stem cells. Although historically called initial cells in plants, in function they are, very similar, if not identical, to animal stem cells (Weigel, and Jürgens 2002). When stem cells divide, on average one, of the daughter cells retains the identity of the stem cell,, while the other is committed to a particular developmental pathway (Figure 16.12)., , Stem, cell, , Daughter Committed, cells, cells, , Differentiated, cells, , FIGURE 16.12 Stem cells generate daughter cells, some of, , which remain uncommitted and retain the property of stem, cells, while others become committed to differentiate., , Stem cells usually divide slowly. Their committed, daughters, however, may enter a period of rapid cell division before they stop dividing and can be recognized as specific cell types. Stem cells represent the ultimate source of, all the cells in the meristem and the entire rest of the plant—, both roots, leaves, and other organs, as well as stems., , The Shoot Apical Meristem Is a Highly, Dynamic Structure, The vegetative shoot apical meristem generates the stem,, as well as the lateral organs attached to the stem (leaves, and lateral buds). The shoot apical meristem typically contains a few hundred to a thousand cells, although the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem has only about 60 cells., The shoot apical meristem is located at the extreme tip, of the shoot, but it is surrounded and covered by immature, leaves. These are the youngest leaves produced by the, activity of the meristem. It is useful to distinguish the shoot, apex from the meristem proper. The shoot apex (plural, apices) consists of the apical meristem plus the most, recently formed leaf primordia. The shoot apical meristem, is the undifferentiated cell population only and does not, include any of the derivative organs., The shoot apical meristem is a flat or slightly mounded, region, 100 to 300 µm in diameter, composed mostly of, small, thin-walled cells, with a dense cytoplasm, and lacking large central vacuoles. The shoot apical meristem is a, dynamic structure that changes during its cycle of leaf and, stem formation. In addition, in many plants it exhibits seasonal activity, as does the entire shoot. Shoot apical meristems may grow rapidly in the spring, enter a period of, slower growth during the summer, and become dormant, in the fall, with dormancy lasting through the winter. The, size and structure of the shoot apical meristem also change, with seasonal activity., Shoots develop and grow at their tips, as is the case with, roots, but the developing regions are not as stratified and, precisely ordered as they are in the root. Moreover, growth, occurs over a much broader region of the shoot than is the, case for roots. At any given time, a region containing several internodes, typically 10 to 15 cm long, may be undergoing primary growth.
Page 402 :
Growth and Development, , The Shoot Apical Meristem Contains Different, Functional Zones and Layers, , cells, called the peripheral zone, flanks the central zone. A, rib zone lies underneath the central cell zone and gives rise, to the internal tissues of the stem., These different zones most likely represent different, developmental domains. The peripheral zone is the region, in which the first cell divisions leading to the formation of, leaf primordia will occur. The rib zone contributes cells that, become the stem. The central zone contains the pool of, stem cells, some fraction of which remains uncommitted,, while others replenish the rib and peripheral zone populations (Bowman and Eshed 2000)., , The shoot apical meristem consists of different functional, regions that can be distinguished by the orientation of the, cell division planes and by cell size and activity. The, angiosperm vegetative shoot apical meristem usually has, a highly stratified appearance, typically with three distinct, layers of cells. These layers are designated L1, L2, and L3,, where L1 is the outermost layer (Figure 16.13). Cell divisions are anticlinal in the L1 and L2 layers; that is, the new, cell wall separating the daughter cells is oriented at right, angles to the meristem surface. Cell divisions tend to be, less regularly oriented in the L3 layer. Each layer has its, own stem cells, and all three layers contribute to the formation of the stem and lateral organs., Active apical meristems also have an organizational pattern called cytohistological zonation. Each zone is composed of cells that may be distinguished not only on the, basis of their division planes, but also by differences in size, and by degrees of vacuolation (see Figure 16.13B). These, zones exhibit different patterns of gene expression, reflecting the different functions of each zone (Nishimura et al., 1999; Fletcher and Meyerowitz 2000)., The center of an active meristem contains a cluster of, relatively large, highly vacuolate cells called the central, zone. The central zone is somewhat comparable to the quiescent center of root meristems (which will be discussed, later in the chapter). A doughnut-shaped region of smaller, , (A), , Leaf primordia, , 351, , Some Meristems Arise during Postembryonic, Development, The root and shoot apical meristems formed during, embryogenesis are called primary meristems. After germination, the activity of these primary meristems generates the primary tissues and organs that constitute the primary plant body., Most plants also develop a variety of secondary meristems during postembryonic development. Secondary, meristems can have a structure similar to that of primary, meristems, but some secondary meristems have a quite different structure. These include axillary meristems, inflorescence meristems, floral meristems, intercalary meristems, and lateral meristems (the vascular cambium and, cork cambium). (Inflorescence and floral meristems will be, discussed in Chapter 24.):, , (B), Leaf primordium, , Shoot apical, meristem, , Shoot, apical, meristem, L1 – Generates, epidermis, L2, L3, , Peripheral, zone, , L3, with randomly, oriented cell divisions, , Central, zone, , Rib, zone, , Generate, internal, tissues, , Peripheral, zone, , L1 and L2, with anticlinal, cell divisions, , FIGURE 16.13 The shoot apical meristem generates the aer-, , ial organs of the plant. (A) This longitudinal section, through the center of the shoot apex of Coleus blumei shows, the layered appearance of the shoot apical meristem. Most, cell divisions are anticlinal in the outer L1 and L2 layers,, while the planes of cell divisions are more randomly oriented in the L3 layer. The outermost (L1) layer generates, the shoot epidermis; the L2 and L3 layers generate internal, tissues. (B) The shoot apical meristem also has cytohistolog-, , ical zones, which represent regions with different identities, and functions. The central zone contains the stem cells,, which divide slowly but are the ultimate source of the tissues that make up the plant body. The peripheral zone, in, which cells divide rapidly, surrounds the central zone and, produces the leaf primordia. A rib zone lies below the central zone and generates the central tissues of the stem. (A, ©J. N. A. Lott/Biological Photo Service.)
Page 403 :
352, , Chapter 16, , • Axillary meristems are formed in the axils of leaves, and are derived from the shoot apical meristem. The, growth and development of axillary meristems produces branches from the main axis of the plant., , Leaf, , • Intercalary meristems are found within organs, often, near their bases. The intercalary meristems of grass, leaves and stems enables them to continue to grow, despite mowing or grazing by cows., , Node, Phytomere, Internode, Bud, , • Branch root meristems have the structure of the primary root meristem, but they form from pericycle, cells in mature regions of the root. Adventitious roots, also can be produced from lateral root meristems that, develop on stems, as when stem cuttings are rooted, to propagate a plant., • The vascular cambium (plural cambia) is a secondary, meristem that differentiates along with the primary, vascular tissue from the procambium within the vascular cylinder. It does not produce lateral organs, but, only the woody tissues of stems and roots. The vascular cambium contains two types of meristematic, cells: fusiform stem cells and ray stem cells. Fusiform, stem cells are highly elongated, vacuolate cells that, divide longitudinally to regenerate themselves, and, whose derivatives differentiate into the conducting, cells of the secondary xylem and phloem. Ray stem, cells are small cells whose derivatives include the, radially oriented files of parenchyma cells within, wood known as rays., • The cork cambium is a meristematic layer that develops within mature cells of the cortex and the secondary phloem. Derivatives of the cork cambium differentiate as cork cells that make up a protective layer, called the periderm, or bark. The periderm forms the, protective outer surface of the secondary plant body,, replacing the epidermis in woody stems and roots., , Axillary, Floral, and Inflorescence Shoot Meristems, Are Variants of the Vegetative Meristem, Several different types of shoot meristems can be distinguished on the basis of their developmental origin, the, types of lateral organs they generate, and whether they are, determinate (having a genetically programmed limit to, their growth) or indeterminate (showing no predetermined limit to growth; growth continues so long as, resources permit)., The vegetative shoot apical meristem usually is indeterminate in its development. It repetitively forms phytomeres as long as environmental conditions favor growth, but do not generate a flowering stimulus. A phytomere is, a developmental unit consisting of one or more leaves, the, node to which the leaves are attached, the internode below, the node, and one or more axillary buds (Figure 16.14)., Axillary buds are secondary meristems; if they are also, vegetative meristems, they will have a structure and developmental potential similar to that of the apical meristem., , Root, , FIGURE 16.14 The shoot apical meristem repetitively forms, , units known as phytomeres. Each phytomere consists of, one or more leaves, the node at which the leaves are, attached, the internode immediately below the leaves, and, one or more buds in the axils of the leaves., , Vegetative meristems may be converted directly into floral meristems when the plant is induced to flower (see, Chapter 24). Floral meristems differ from vegetative meristems in that instead of leaves they produce floral organs:, sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. In addition, floral, meristems are determinate: All meristematic activity stops, after the last floral organs are produced., In many cases, vegetative meristems are not directly, converted to floral meristems. Instead, the vegetative, meristem is first transformed into an inflorescence meristem. The types of lateral organs produced by an inflorescence meristem are different from the types produced by a, floral meristem. The inflorescence meristem produces, bracts and floral meristems in the axils of the bracts, instead, of the sepals, petals, stamens, and ovules produced by floral meristems. Inflorescence meristems may be determinate, or indeterminate, depending on the species., , LEAF DEVELOPMENT, The leaves of most plants are the organs of photosynthesis., This is where light energy is captured and used to drive the, chemical reactions that are vital to the life of the plant., Although highly variable in size and shape from species to, species, in general leaves are thin, flat structures with dorsiventral polarity. This pattern contrasts with that of the
Page 404 :
Growth and Development, (A), , Most recently formed, primordium, which has, radial symmetry at this stage, , Site of next, primordium, , 353, , Apical, meristem, , (B), , Midrib, Margin, , P0, P1, Dorsal, , P2, Distal, Primordium, elongates in the, proximodistal axis, , Proximal, Node, , P3, , Primordium begins, to flatten, developing, a dorsiventral axis, , Axillary bud, , Ventral, Petiole, , FIGURE 16.15 The origin of leaves at the shoot apex and, , their axes of symmetry on the stem (A) Leaf primordia in, the flanks of the shoot apical meristem. (B) Diagram of a, shoot showing the various axes along which development, occurs. (After Christensen and Weigel 1998.), , shoot apical meristem and stem, both of which have radial, symmetry. Another important difference is that leaf primordia exhibit determinate growth, while the vegetative, shoot apical meristem is indeterminate. As described in the, sections that follow, several distinct stages can be recognized in leaf development (Sinha 1999)., , Stage 1: Organogenesis. A small number of cells in the L1, and L2 layers in the flanks of the apical dome of the shoot, apical meristem acquire the leaf founder cell identity., These cells divide more rapidly than surrounding cells and, produce the outgrowth that represents the leaf primordium (plural primordia) (Figure 16.15A). These primordia subsequently grow and develop into leaves., Stage 2: Development of suborgan domains. Different, regions of the primordium acquire identity as specific parts, of the leaf. This differentiation occurs along three axes: dorsiventral (abaxial–adaxial), proximodistal (apical–basal),, and lateral (margin–blade–midrib) (Figure 16.15B). The, upper (adaxial) side of the leaf is specialized for light, absorption; the lower (abaxial) surface is specialized for gas, exchange. Leaf structure and maturation rates also vary, along the proximodistal and lateral axes., Stage 3: Cell and tissue differentiation. As the developing leaf grows, tissues and cells differentiate. Cells derived, from the L1 layer differentiate as epidermis (epidermal, cells, trichomes, and guard cells), derivatives of the L2 layer, differentiate as the photosynthetic mesophyll cells, and vascular elements and bundle sheath cells are derived from, the L3 layer. These cells differentiate in a genetically deter-, , mined pattern that is characteristic of the species but to, some degree modified in response to the environment., , The Arrangement of Leaf Primordia Is Genetically, Programmed, The timing and pattern with which the primordia form is, genetically determined and usually is a characteristic of the, species. The number and order in which leaf primordia, form is reflected in the subsequent arrangement of leaves, around the stem, known as phyllotaxy (Figure 16.16)., There are five main types of phyllotaxy:, 1. Alternate phyllotaxy. A single leaf is initiated at each, node (see Figure 16.16A)., 2. Opposite phyllotaxy. Leaves are formed in pairs on, opposite side of the stem (see Figure 16.16B)., 3. Decussate phyllotaxy. Leaves are initiated in a pattern with two opposite leaves per node and with successive leaf pairs oriented at right angles to each, other during vegetative development (see Figure, 16.16C)., 4. Whorled phyllotaxy. More than two leaves arise at, each node (see Figure 16.16D)., 5. Spiral phyllotaxy. A type of alternate phyllotaxy in, which each leaf is initiated at a defined angle to the, previous leaf, resulting in a spiral arrangement of, leaves around the stem (see Figure 16.16E)., The positioning of leaf primordia must result from the, precise spatial regulation of growth within the apex. We, know little about how this positioning is regulated, or, about the signals that initiate the formation of a primordium. One idea is that inhibitory fields generated by, existing primordia influence the spacing of the next primordium.
Page 405 :
354, , Chapter 16, , FIGURE 16.16 Five types of leaf, , (A) Alternate, , (B) Opposite, , (C) Decussate, , (D) Whorled, , (E) Spiral, , arrangements (phyllotactic patterns) along the shoot axis. The, same terms also are used for, inflorescences and flowers., , ROOT DEVELOPMENT, Roots are adapted for growing through soil and absorbing, the water and mineral nutrients in the capillary spaces, between soil particles. These functions have placed constraints on the evolution of root structure. For example, lateral appendages would interfere with their penetration, through the soil. As a result, roots have a streamlined axis,, and no lateral organs are produced by the apical meristem., Branch roots arise internally and form only in mature, nongrowing regions. Absorption of water and minerals is, enhanced by fragile root hairs, which also form behind the, growth zone. These long, threadlike cells greatly increase, the root’s absorptive surface area., In this section we will discuss the origin of root form, and structure (root morphogenesis), beginning with a, description of the four developmental zones of the root tip., We will then turn to the apical meristem. The absence of, leaves or buds makes cell lineages easier to follow in roots, than in shoots, thus facilitating molecular genetic studies, on the role of patterns of cell division in root development., , Pericycle, Cortical cells, Lateral root, primordium, , Emerging, lateral root, , Root hair, , Maturation, zone, , Mature vessel, elements, Endodermal, cells differentiate, , The Root Tip Has Four Developmental Zones, Roots grow and develop from their distal ends. Although, the boundaries are not sharp, four developmental zones can, be distinguished in a root tip: the root cap, the meristematic, zone, the elongation zone, and the maturation zone (Figure, 16.17). These four developmental zones occupy only a little, more than a millimeter of the tip of the Arabidopsis root. The, developing region is larger in other species, but growth is, still confined to the tip. With the exception of the root cap,, the boundaries of these zones overlap considerably:, , Epidermis, , First vessel, elements begin to, differentiate, Maximum rate of, cell elongation, Elongation, zone, , First sieve tube, element begins to, differentiate, Cell division ceases, in most layers, , Meristematic, zone, , Maximum rate of, cell division, , FIGURE 16.17 Simplified diagram of a primary root show-, , ing the root cap, the meristematic zone, the elongation, zone, and the maturation zone. Cells in the meristematic, zone have small vacuoles and expand and divide rapidly,, generating many files of cells., , Quiescent center, Root cap
Page 406 :
Growth and Development, • The root cap protects the apical meristem from, mechanical injury as the root pushes its way through, the soil. Root cap cells form by specialized root cap, stem cells. As the root cap stem cells produce new, cells, older cells are progressively displaced toward, the tip, where they are eventually sloughed off. As, root cap cells differentiate, they acquire the ability to, perceive gravitational stimuli and secrete, mucopolysaccharides (slime) that help the root penetrate the soil., • The meristematic zone lies just under the root cap,, and in Arabidopsis it is about a quarter of a millimeter, long. The root meristem generates only one organ,, the primary root. It produces no lateral appendages., • The elongation zone, as its name implies, is the site, of rapid and extensive cell elongation. Although, some cells may continue to divide while they elongate within this zone, the rate of division decreases, progressively to zero with increasing distance from, the meristem., • The maturation zone is the region in which cells, acquire their differentiated characteristics. Cells enter, the maturation zone after division and elongation, have ceased. Differentiation may begin much earlier,, but cells do not achieve the mature state until they, reach this zone. The radial pattern of differentiated, tissues becomes obvious in the maturation zone., Later in the chapter we will examine the differentiation and maturation of one of these cell types, the tracheary element., As discussed earlier, lateral or branch roots arise from, the pericycle in mature regions of the root. Cell divisions in, the pericycle establish secondary meristems that grow out, , Stage 1, , Stage 2, , Stage 3, , Stage 4, , 355, , through the cortex and epidermis, establishing a new, growth axis (Figure 16.18). The primary and the secondary, root meristems behave similarly in that divisions of the, cells in the meristem give rise to progenitors of all the cells, of the root., , Root Stem Cells Generate Longitudinal, Files of Cells, Meristems are populations of dividing cells, but not all cells, in the meristematic region divide at the same rate or with, the same frequency. Typically, the central cells divide much, more slowly than the surrounding cells. These rarely dividing cells are called the quiescent center of the root meristem (see Figure 16.17)., Cells are more sensitive to ionizing radiation when they, are dividing. This is the basis of the use of radiation as a, treatment for cancer in humans. As a result, the rapidly, dividing cells of the meristem can be killed by doses of, radiation that nondividing and slowly dividing cells, such, as those of the quiescent center, can survive. If the rapidly, dividing cells of the root are killed by ionizing radiation, in, many cases the root can regenerate from the cells of the, quiescent center. This ability suggests that quiescent-center cells are important for the patterning involved in forming a root., The most striking structural feature of the root tip, when, viewed in longitudinal section, is the presence of the long, files of clonally related cells. Most cell divisions in the root, tip are transverse, or anticlinal, with the plane of cytokinesis oriented at right angles to the axis of the root (such, divisions tend to increase root length). There are relatively, few periclinal divisions, in which the plane of division is, parallel to the root axis (such divisions tend to increase root, diameter)., , Stage 5, , Stage 6, , Epidermis, , Cortical–endodermal, stem cell, , Cortex, , Root cap–epidermal, stem cell, , Vasculature, , Quiescent center, , Pericycle, , Root cap, , Endodermis, , FIGURE 16.18 Model for lateral root formation in Arabidopsis. Six major stages are, , shown in the development of the primordium. The different tissue types are designated by colors. By stage 6, all tissues found in the primary root are present in the, typical radial pattern of the branch root. (From Malamy and Benfey 1997.)
Page 407 :
356, , Chapter 16, , Periclinal divisions occur mostly near the root tip and, establish new files of cells. As a result, the ultimate origin, of any particular mature cell can be traced back to one or a, few cells in the meristem. These are the stem cells of a particular file. In Arabidopsis, the stem cells surround the quiescent center, but they are not part of the quiescent center. The, stem cells ultimately may be derived from quiescent-center, cells, but this origin must occur during embryogenesis, since, the quiescent-center cells do not divide after germination in, normal development. Analysis of the cell division patterns, in the roots of the water fern Azolla have contributed to our, detailed understanding of meristem function. (For a discussion of this work, see Web Topic 16.3.), , Root Apical Meristems Contain Several Types, of Stem Cells, The patterns of cellular organization found in the root, meristems of seed plants are substantially different from, those observed in more primitive vascular plants. All seed, plants have several stem cells instead of the single stem cell, found in plants such as the water fern Azolla. However,, they are similar to Azolla in that it is possible to follow files, of cells from the region of maturation into the meristem, and, in some cases, to identify the stem cell from which the, file was produced., The Arabidopsis root apical meristem has the following, structure (Figure 16.19):, , • The quiescent center is composed of a group of four, cells, also known as the center cells in the Arabidopsis, root meristem. The quiescent-center cells in the, Arabidopsis root usually do not divide after embryogenesis., • The cortical–endodermal stem cells form a ring of, cells that surround the quiescent center. These stem, cells generate the cortical and endodermal layers., They undergo one anticlinal division (i.e., perpendicular to the longitudinal axis); then these daughters, divide periclinally (i.e., parallel to the longitudinal, axis) to establish the files that become the cortex and, the endodermis, each of which constitutes only one, cell layer in the Arabidopsis root (see also Figures 16.2, and 16.8C)., • The columella stem cells are the cells immediately, above (apical to) the central cells. They divide anticlinally and periclinally to generate a sector of the root, cap known as the columella., • The root cap–epidermal stem cells are in the same, tier as the columella stem cells but form a ring surrounding them. Anticlinal divisions of the root, cap–epidermal stem cells generate the epidermal cell, layer. Periclinal divisions of the same stem cells, followed by subsequent anticlinal divisions of the derivatives, produce the lateral root cap., , (A), , All the tissues in the Arabidopsis root are derived from a, small number of stem cells in the root apical meristem. (A) Longitudinal, section through the center of a root. The promeristem containing the, stem cells that give rise to all the tissues of the root is outlined in green., (B) Diagram of the promeristem region outlined in A. Only two of the, four quiescent-center cells are depicted in this section. The black lines, indicate the cell division planes that occur in the stem cells. White lines, indicate the secondary cell divisions that occur in the cortical–endodermal and lateral root cap–epidermal stem cells. (From Schiefelbein et al., 1997, courtesy of J. Schiefelbein, © the American Society of Plant, Biologists, reprinted with permission.), , FIGURE 16.19, , (B), Cortex, , Quiescent, Stele, center cell, stem cell, Pericycle, , Epidermis, , Endodermis, Cortical, endodermal, stem cell, Epidermis, Lateral, root cap, , Columella, stem cell, , Columella of, root cap, , Root cap–, epidermal, stem cell
Page 408 :
P, ph rim, lo ar, em y, , Pr, ot, ox, yl, em, M, et, ax, yl, em, , • The stele stem cells are a tier of cells just behind the, quiescent-center cells. These cells generate the pericycle and vascular tissues., The stem cells, together with their immediate derivatives, in the apical meristem, are called the promeristem., , CELL DIFFERENTIATION, Differentiation is the process by which a cell acquires metabolic, structural, and functional properties that are distinct, from those of its progenitor cell. In plants, unlike animals, cell, differentiation is frequently reversible, particularly when differentiated cells are removed from the plant and placed in tissue culture. Under these conditions, cells dedifferentiate (i.e.,, lose their differentiated characteristics), reinitiate cell division,, and in some cases, when provided with the appropriate, nutrients and hormones, even regenerate whole plants., This ability to dedifferentiate demonstrates that differentiated plant cells retain all the genetic information, required for the development of a complete plant, a property termed totipotency. The only exceptions to this rule, are cells that lose their nuclei, such as sieve tube elements, of phloem, and cells that are dead at maturity, such as vessel elements and tracheids (collectively referred to as tracheary elements) in xylem., As an example of the process of cell differentiation, we, will discuss the formation of tracheary elements. The, development of these cells from the meristematic to the, fully differentiated state illustrates the types of control that, plants exercise over cell specialization and provides an, example of the cellular changes that are brought about by, differentiation (Fukuda 1996)., , A Secondary Cell Wall Forms during Tracheary, Element Differentiation, As described in Chapter 4, tracheary elements are the conducting cells in which water and solutes move through the, plant. They are dead at maturity, but before their death, they are highly active and construct a secondary wall, often, with an elaborate pattern, and they may grow extensively., Cell death (discussed later in this chapter) is the genetically, programmed finale to tracheary element differentiation., The formation of secondary walls during tracheary element differentiation involves the deposition of cellulose, microfibrils and other noncellulosic polysaccharides at specific sites on the primary or secondary wall, resulting in characteristically patterned wall thickenings (see Chapter 15). The, secondary walls of tracheary elements have a higher content, of cellulose than primary walls, and they are impregnated, with lignin, which is not usually present in primary walls., In rapidly growing regions, the secondary-wall material is deposited as discrete annular rings, or in a spiral pattern, with the thickenings separated by bands of primary, , FIGURE 16.20 The formation of primary xylem and primary phloem in a developing strand in a young internode, of cucumber (Cucumis sativus). The pattern of secondarywall deposition during vessel element development varies, according to the rate of cell elongation. The two first vessels, to differentiate—the protoxylem—are observed on the left, with secondary-wall thickening in the pattern of “annular, rings.” Because the first formed vessel was strongly, stretched by internode growth, the narrow annular rings, are pulled apart. The metaxylem vessels differentiate after, the protoxylem and are characterized by spiral thickening., The early formed metaxylem vessel has a stretched helical, thickening due to cell elongation, while the later formed, vessel shows a dense helical thickening which has not been, extended by elongation. The primary phloem sieve tubes, are shown on the right, with typical delicate sieve elements., Their sieve plates are stained light blue, while the cytoplasm stains dark blue. (Courtesy of R. Aloni)., , wall (Figure 16.20). As the cell grows, the primary wall, extends and the rings or spirals are pulled apart. The tracheary elements that form after elongation stops usually, have walls that are thickened. This thickening can be either, uniformly or in a reticulate pattern. These cells cannot be, stretched by growth., Microtubules participate in determining the pattern of, secondary-wall deposition. Before any alteration in the pattern of wall deposition is evident, cortical microtubules, change from being more or less evenly distributed along, the longitudinal walls of the cell to being clustered into, bands (Figure 16.21A). Secondary wall is then deposited, beneath the microtubule clusters (see Figure 16.21B)., The orientation of the cellulose microfibrils within the, secondary-wall thickening is reflected in the alignment of, microtubules in the cortical cytoplasm (Hepler 1981). If the, microtubules are destroyed with an antimicrotubule agent, such as colchicine, cell wall deposition can continue, but, the cellulose microfibrils are no longer precisely ordered, within the thickening, and the pattern of the secondary, wall is disrupted (Figure 16.22).
Page 409 :
358, , Chapter 16, , FIGURE 16.21 Development of secondary-, , (A), , (B), , wall thickenings in vessel elements in roots of, the water fern Azolla. (A) Electron micrograph, of a grazing section through a differentiating, cell. Groups of microtubules are seen in the, cell cortex, forming bands at the site of wall, thickening before the secondary wall begins, to form. Many small vesicles lie along the, microtubules. (B) Annular thickenings, develop beneath the bands of microtubules, and are hemispheric in profile. (Courtesy of, A. Hardham.), , Microtubule, , Secondary-wall, thickening, , Plane of section, through cell, , 0.2 µm, , 0.2 µm, , (A), , (B), , (C), , Recovered cells, with normal, wall deposition, , FIGURE 16.22 Colchicine treatments that destroy micro-, , tubules also disrupt the normal formation of secondarywall thickenings in differentiating vessel elements. (A), During normal root growth in Azolla the wall thickenings, are spaced evenly along the side walls. (B) In the presence, of colchicine, secondary-wall materials are deposited in, irregular patterns. (C) Normal growth resumes when the, roots are transferred to fresh medium that lacks colchicine,, and the newly differentiated vessel elements form with normal annular thickenings. (A from Hardham and Gunning, 1979; B and C from Hardham and Gunning 1980.), , Cells with, abnormal wall, thickenings, , 120 µm, , 120 µm, , 120 µm
Page 410 :
Growth and Development, , INITIATION AND REGULATION OF, DEVELOPMENTAL PATHWAYS, Rapid progress has been made in identifying genes that, play critical roles in regulating growth, cell differentiation,, and pattern formation. This progress is largely a consequence of an intensive, international effort focused on Arabidopsis—first to sequence its genome, and subsequently to, understand the function of all of its genes. However, many, important discoveries have been made as a result of studies with other species, including Antirrhinum, maize, petunia, tomato, and tobacco., In most cases, genes important for development were, revealed by elaborate screens of the offspring of mutagenized plants to find mutant individuals with altered development (see the example in Figure 16.8B). These studies, often involved heroic efforts to map, clone, and sequence, the mutant gene, although now that its genome has been, sequenced, the path to identifying any particular mutant, gene and what it encodes is now much shorter in Arabidopsis., At this point we have identified some of the players, but, the rules of the game and the specific roles of most of the, genes are still being worked out. However, many of these, developmentally important genes have been found to, encode either transcription factors (proteins with the ability to bind to specific DNA sequences and thus control the, expression of other genes) or components of signaling, pathways. The nature of these genes suggests some possible ways that development might be regulated., Where these molecular genetic studies have been coupled with clonal analysis, cell biological, physiological,, and/or biochemical studies, it has been possible to identify, important principles of plant development. Although we, are far from a complete understanding, these insights, include the following:, • The expression of genes that encode transcription factors determines cell, tissue, and organ identity., • The fate of a cell is determined by its position and, not its clonal history., • Developmental pathways are controlled by networks, of interacting genes., • Development is regulated by cell-to-cell signaling., In the following discussion we will first examine the, nature of some of the transcription factor and signal transduction component genes that have been shown to play, key roles in development. Then we will outline in greater, detail each of the developmental principles described here., , 2 The name MADS comes from the initials of the first four, members of a family of transcription factors: MCM1, AGAMOUS, DEFICIENS, and SRF., , 359, , Transcription Factor Genes Control Development, With the completion of the sequencing of the Arabidopsis, genome, it became apparent that approximately 1500 of its, nearly 26,000 genes encode transcription factors (Riechmann et al. 2000). Transcription factors are proteins that, have an affinity for DNA. They are able to turn the expression of genes on or off by binding to specific DNA, sequences (see Chapter 14 on the web site)., These 1500 transcription factor genes belong to numerous families. Fewer than half of these families are found, only in plants, but the majority are found in all eukaryotes., It is not known, or can even be estimated at this time, how, many of these transcription factor genes regulate developmental pathways because only a small percentage of them, have been studied. However, many members of two of, these families—the MADS box and homeobox genes—, have been found to be particularly important in plant, development., MADS box genes are key regulators of important biological functions in plants, animals, and fungi.2 There are, about 30 MADS box genes in the Arabidopsis genome,, many of which control aspects of development. Specific, MADS box genes are important for developmental events, in the root, leaf, flower, ovule, and fruit (Riechmann and, Meyerowitz 1997). They control the expression of specific, sets of target genes, although at this point most of these, downstream genes remain to be identified., Any given MADS box gene is expressed in a specific, temporally and spatially restricted manner, with its expression determined by other genes or signaling events. This, has been established most clearly in the case of the development of the flower, where interacting sets of MADS box, genes have been shown to determine floral organ identity, (see Chapter 24)., Homeobox genes encode homeodomain proteins that, act as transcription factors. Homeodomain proteins play a, major role in regulating developmental pathways in all, eukaryotes (see Chapter 14 on the web site). As with the, MADS box genes, each homeobox gene participates in regulating a unique developmental event by controlling the, expression of a unique set of target genes., Homeodomain proteins belonging to the KNOTTED1, (KN1) class are involved in maintaining the indeterminacy, of the shoot apical meristem. The original knotted (kn1), mutation was found in maize and is a gain-of-function, mutation. In gain-of-function, or dominant, mutations, the, phenotype results from the abnormal expression of a gene., In contrast, the phenotypes of loss-of-function mutations, result from the loss of gene expression, and the mutations, are therefore recessive., Plants with the kn1 mutation have small, irregular,, tumorlike knots along the leaf veins. These knots result, from abnormal cell divisions within the vascular tissues, that distort the veins to form the knots, which protrude, from the leaf surface (Figure 16.23) (Hake et al. 1989).
Page 411 :
360, , Chapter 16, KN1 gene expression is involved in defining meristem, function., , Many Plant Signaling Pathways Utilize, Protein Kinases, , FIGURE 16.23 Inappropriate expression of the KN1 gene, during leaf development causes severe abnormalities, around the leaf veins. The gain-of-function mutation kn1, causes cell proliferation after normal cell division ceases; in, addition, the division planes are abnormal, causing gross, distortion of the blade surface. (From Sinha et al. 1993a,, courtesy of S. Hake.), , Cell differentiation is relatively normal in the leaves of, kn1 mutant plants, except in the vicinity of the knots. The, knots are similar to meristems in that they contain undifferentiated cells and continue to divide after cells around, them have matured and ceased dividing. This behavior, suggests that the KN1 gene controls meristem function. The, mutant phenotype results from the expression of the gene, in the wrong tissues, rather than the loss of the normal, developmental expression pattern. KNOTTED1-like homeobox, or KNOX, genes have been found in several other, plant species. Arabidopsis has three: KNAT1, KNAT2, and, SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) (Lincoln et al. 1994; Long, et al. 1996)., Tobacco plants that have been transformed with the, maize KN1 gene, driven by a promoter that expresses the, gene throughout the plant, develop numerous adventitious, shoot meristems along leaf surfaces (Sinha et al. 1993b)., These abnormalities are similar to the original gain-of-function kn1 mutation. We can conclude from this that correct, , Protein kinases are ATP-dependent enzymes that add phosphate groups to proteins. Protein phosphorylation is a key, regulatory mechanism that is utilized extensively to regulate, the activity of enzymes and transcription factors. Although, widely utilized by all eukaryotes, plant genomes are especially rich in genes that encode these enzymes. The Arabidopsis genome contains over 1200 genes that encode protein, kinases. Of these, more than 600 encode receptor protein kinases, (see Chapter 14 on the web site) (Shiu and Bleecker 2001)., The functions of most of these receptor protein kinases, are unknown, but recently some have been shown to play, important signaling roles in plant development. Arabidopsis has two such genes: BRI1, which encodes a receptor, kinase that functions in brassinosteroid signaling (see Web, Topic 19.14) and CLAVATA1 (CLV1), which encodes a, receptor kinase that participates in regulating the size of the, uncommitted cell population in shoot apical meristem, (we’ll discuss CLV1 a little later in the chapter)., Receptor kinases typically are integral membrane proteins. The receptor domain of these kinases resides outside, the plasma membrane; the kinase catalytic domain is inside, the cell, linked to the receptor domain by a transmembrane, domain. The receptor domain has affinity for a signaling, molecule, often a small protein or peptide, which is called, the receptor ligand., In the absence of the ligand, the kinase enzyme is inactive. The binding of the ligand to the receptor converts the, protein to an active kinase (Figure 16.24). In the case of, CLV1, ligand binding also triggers the formation of a complex consisting of a related protein, CLAVATA, a kinaseassociated protein phosphatase (KAPP), and a rho GTPaserelated protein. The ligand for CLV1 most likely is a small, protein encoded by a third CLAVATA gene, CLV3 (see Figure 16.24) (Clark et al. 1993; Clark 2001)., The CLAVATA genes were first identified as mutations, that led to an increase in the size of the vegetative shoot, apical meristem and floral meristems. One result was an, increase in the number of lateral organs produced by the, meristems of these mutants, which is particularly evident, in the number of floral organs produced by the mutant, meristems. Whereas CLV1 encodes a typical receptor-like, protein kinase, CLV2 encodes a protein with a receptor, domain similar to that of CLV1, but lacking a kinase, domain. The protein encoded by the CLV3 gene is unrelated to either CLV1 or CLV2., , A Cell’s Fate Is Determined by Its Position, In both the root and shoot meristem, a small number of stem, cells are the ultimate source of any particular tissue, and, most of the cells in a given tissue are clonal, having arisen
Page 412 :
Growth and Development, , OUTSIDE OF CELL, , 2. The binding of the CLV3, multimer to the extracellular, domain of the CLV1/CLV2, heterodimer induces, autophosphorylation of the, cytoplasmic domain of CLV1., , X, CLV3, Plasma, membrane, , –S—S–, –S—S–, , CLV1, , CLV3, , CLV3, , CLV3, , –S—S–, –S—S–, , –S—S–, –S—S–, , CLV2, CLV1, , P, CLV1/CLV2, heterodimer, , X, , –S—S–, –S—S–, , CLV2, P, , 3. Phosphorylated CLV1 binds to, the downstream effector, molecules: kinase-associated, protein phosphatase (KAPP) and, rho-GTPase (ROP)., , X, , X, ATP, , P, , P, , P, , P, , CLV3, , CLV1, P, , WUS, , 1. WUS gene expression, promotes the expression, of the CLV3 gene., CYTOPLASM, , FIGURE 16.24 Model of the CLAVATA1/CLAVATA2, , (CLV1/CLV2) receptor kinase signaling cascade, forming a, negative feedback loop with the WUS gene. See Chapter 14, , from the same stem cell. However, most evidence supports, the view that cell fate does not depend on cell lineage, but instead, is determined by positional information (Scheres 2001)., In the vast majority of cases, shoot epidermal cells are, derived from a small number of stem cells in the L1 layer., However, the derivatives of the L1 layer are committed to, become epidermal cells because they occupy the outermost, layer and lie on top of the cortical cell layer, not because they, were clonally derived from the stem cells in the L1 layer., The plane in which a cell divides will determine the, position of its daughter cells within a tissue, and this positioning in turn plays the most significant role in determining the fate of the daughter cells. The strongest evidence, for the importance of position in determining a cell’s ultimate fate comes from an examination of the fate of cells, that are displaced from their usual position, such that they, come to occupy a different layer., The vast majority of the divisions in the L1 and L2 layers of the meristem are anticlinal, and anticlinal division is, responsible for generating the layers in the first place. Nevertheless, occasional periclinal divisions occur, causing one, derivative to occupy the adjacent layer. This periclinal division does not alter the composition of the tissue derived, , CLV2, , CLV2, , P, , P, , P, P, , 361, , KAPP, 4. KAPP is a, negative, regulator of, CLV1., , CLV1, , P, , P, P, , P, ROP, , MAPKs?, 5. ROP may act through a, mitogen-activated protein kinase, (MAPK) cascade to repress WUS, gene expression, forming a, negative feedback loop., , on the web site for further information about receptor, kinase signaling pathways. (After Clark 2001.), , from this layer. Instead, the derivatives assume a function, that is appropriate for a cell occupying that layer., Further support for the importance of position in determining cell fate has been obtained through observations of, cell differentiation in leaves of English ivy (Hedera helix),, which have a mixture of mutant and wild-type cells. When, a mutation occurs in a stem cell in the shoot apical meristem, all the cells in the plant derived from that stem cell, will carry the mutation. Such a plant is said to be a, chimera, a mixture of cells with a different genetic makeup., The analysis of chimeras is useful for studies on the clonal, origin of different tissues., When the mutation affects the ability of chloroplasts to, differentiate, the presence of albino sectors shows that these, sectors were derived from the stem cells carrying the mutation. In the ivy plant shown in Figure 16.25, the L2 layer carried a mutation causing albinism, and the L1 and L3 layers, had a wild-type copy of the same gene. The L1 layer gives, rise to the leaf and stem epidermis, but it is colorless, because chloroplasts do not differentiate in most epidermal, cells. Mesophyll tissue typically is derived from the L2 layer,, so the leaves should be white because the L2 stem cells carried the mutant gene and passed it on to their derivatives.
Page 413 :
362, , Chapter 16, , FIGURE 16.25 Periclinal chimeras demonstrate that the, , mesophyll tissue has more than a single clonal origin in, English ivy (Hedera helix). These variegated leaves provide, clues on the clonal origins of different tissues. A mutation, in a gene essential for chloroplast development occurred in, some of the initial cells of the meristem, and cells derived, from these mutated stem cells lack chloroplasts and are, white, while cells derived from other stem cells have normal chloroplasts and appear green. (Courtesy of S., Poethig.), , Although a few of the leaves are white, or nearly so,, most of the leaves show green patches. They are variegated. The green tissue in these leaves was derived from, the cells originally in the L1 or L3 layer; the colorless, regions were derived from the L2 layer. The variegation, occurs because occasional periclinal divisions in the L1 or, L3 layer early in leaf development establish clones of cells, that can differentiate as green mesophyll cells. This is further evidence that cell differentiation is not dependent on, cell lineage. The fate of a cell during development is determined by the position it occupies in the plant body., , Developmental Pathways Are Controlled by, Networks of Interacting Genes, We have a great deal more to learn about the regulatory, networks that control developmental pathways. However,, several discoveries point to a model in which local and, long-distance signaling events control the expression of, genes that encode transcription factors. These transcription, factors in turn determine the character or activities of a, given tissue or cell. Often these mechanisms involve feedback loops in which two or more genes interact to regulate, each other’s expression. These interactions are seen most, clearly in the case of the shoot apical meristem., , Expression of the KNOX gene STM (SHOOTMERISTEMLESS) is essential for the formation of the shoot apical, meristem in the Arabidopsis embryo and for meristem function in the growing plant. STM is expressed throughout the, apical dome of the vegetative meristem, except in the, developing leaf primordia. Similarly, STM is expressed in, the dome of the floral meristem, but it is silenced as floral, organs appear. Two additional KNOX genes—KNAT1 and, KNAT2—also are expressed in the apical meristem of Arabidopsis and participate in maintaining the meristem cells, in an undifferentiated state., Because cells actively divide in the early stages of leaf, and floral organ primordia development, STM is not necessary for cell division. Rather KN1, STM, and their functional homologs maintain meristem identity by suppressing differentiation. Another gene, ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1, (AS1) promotes leaf development and is expressed in the, primordia and young leaves of Arabidopsis (Figure 16.26), (Byrne et al. 2000). STM represses the expression of AS1,, and AS1 in turn represses the expression of KNAT1 in the, developing leaf primordia (Ori et al. 2000):, (A) Wild-type embryos, , 25 mm, , 25 mm, , (B) stm mutant embryos, , 25 mm, , 25 mm, , FIGURE 16.26 The meristem identity gene, STM, inhibits, expression of the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1) gene,, which promotes leaf development in Arabidopsis. Arrows, point to the shoot apical meristem–forming region. (A), Expression of the STM gene is normally confined to the, shoot apical meristem in the wild type, and it confers meristem identity on the vegetative meristem. In contrast, the AS1, gene is confined to leaf primordia and developing cotyledons in the wild type, as shown by in situ hybridization in, embryos at two stages of development. (B) In stm mutants,, expression of AS1 expands into the region that would normally become the shoot apical meristem. As a result, the apical meristem does not form. (From Byrne et al. 2000.)
Page 414 :
Growth and Development, , STM, , AS1, , Promotes leaf development, , 363, , 1. Ligand-induced signaling, 2. Hormonal signaling, , KNAT1, , Maintains meristem, , The WUSCHEL (WUS) gene, which encodes another, homeodomain transcription factor, is a key regulator of, stem cell indeterminacy (Laux et. al. 1996). In plants with, loss-of-function wus mutations, either an apical meristem, is lacking entirely, or their stem cells are used up after they, have formed a few leaves. The CLAVATA genes negatively, regulate WUS expression. WUS expression is expanded in, both clv1 and clv3 mutants (Figure 16.27). Conversely, WUS, expression positively regulates CLV3 gene expression; (see, Figure 16.24) (Brand et al. 2000)., , Development Is Regulated by, Cell-to-Cell Signaling, How do cells know where they are? If a cell’s fate is determined by its position and not by clonal lineage, then cells, must be able to sense their position relative to other cells,, tissues, and organs. Neighboring cells and distant tissues, and organs provide positional information. Cells in multicellular plants usually are in close contact with others, around them, and the behavior of each cell is carefully, coordinated with that of its neighbors throughout the life, of the plant. Furthermore, each cell occupies a specific position within the tissue and organ to which it belongs., Coordination of cellular activity requires cell–cell communication. That is, some developmentally important genes, act nonautonomously. They do not have to be expressed in a, given cell to affect the fate of that cell. A given gene or set of, genes can exert an effect on development in neighboring, cells or even cells in distant tissues through cell–cell communication, via at least three different mechanisms:, , (A) Wild type, , 3. Signaling via trafficking of regulatory proteins, and/or mRNAs, , Ligand-induced signaling. There is evidence that cell wall, components, particularly a class of glycoprotein macromolecules known as arabinogalactan proteins, or AGPs,, may communicate positional information that will determine cell fate (see Chapter 15). AGPs would not be, involved in signaling over a distance, but rather in telling, a given cell who its neighbors were. That information then, would program the cell to differentiate, or acquire a fate, appropriate to its position., Because plants have numerous, perhaps hundreds, of, receptor kinases, we might expect many signaling events, to be initiated by ligand-induced protein phosphorylation., At present, however, relatively few of the ligands activating protein kinases are known. But there is good evidence, that the small protein encoded by the CLV3 gene is the ligand that activates the CLV1 protein kinase., The CLV3 protein contains fewer than 100 amino acids, and contains a leader sequence suggesting that it would be, excreted from the cells that produce it (Fletcher et al. 1999)., Because of its small size and water solubility, it could freely, diffuse through the extracellular space, or apoplast., The apoplast consists mostly of the space occupied by, the cell walls. Cell wall macromolecules are largely, hydrophilic, and the wall contains passages between the, macromolecules with an apparent pore size of 3.5 to 5 nm., This means that molecules with a mass of less than approximately 15 kDa can diffuse freely through the apoplast., With a molecular weight of approximately 11 kDa, the, CLV3 protein easily could diffuse through the apoplast., , (B) clv3 mutant, , FIGURE 16.27 WUS gene expression in, , 20 mm, , 20 mm, , the shoot apical meristem of the wild, type and the clv3 mutant. The localization, of WUS mRNA was detected by an in situ, hybridization procedure. (A) In the wild, type, WUS expression is confined to a, small cluster of cells. (B) In the clv3, mutant, WUS expression expands both, apically and laterally, and the apical, meristem itself is enlarged. (Brand et al., 2000.)
Page 415 :
364, , Chapter 16, , AS1, , AS1, , CLV3, WUS, CLV1, , STM, , FIGURE 16.28 Patterns of expression of some developmen-, , tally important genes in the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem. (From Clark 2001.), , The CLV3 gene is expressed in cells of the L1 and L2 layers in the central zone of the shoot apical meristem, but not, within the L3 layer or in the peripheral zone. In contrast,, CLV1 is expressed in deeper layers within the central zone, in the L3 layer, as is the WUS gene. However, CLV1 is, expressed within a somewhat larger domain than WUS, (Figure 16.28). Although WUS gene expression is required, to maintain stem cell identity, WUS is expressed in only a, small number of cells in the L3 layer of the meristem. It, functions nonautonomously, acting on cells a short distance, from the cells that express the gene., The CLV3 protein controls the size of the stem cell population in the shoot apex by negatively regulating the, , Wild-type embryos, (A) Early globular, , (B) Midheart, , expression of WUS in the L3 layer. The CLV3 gene is, expressed in cells in the central zone of the meristem, within, the L1 and L2 layers. When CLV1 or CLV3 is knocked out, by mutation, WUS gene expression spreads, and the number of undifferentiated stem cells expands (Brand et al., 2000). Because this expansion requires CLV1, it is likely that, CLV3 protein diffuses from the L1 cells and binds to the, receptor domain of CLV1 to activate its kinase domain to, initiate a signal that represses WUS gene transcription., WUS expression promotes CLV3 expression, which in, turn represses WUS expression. Thus the meristem has a, sensitive feedback mechanism for controlling the size of the, stem cell population., , Hormonal signaling. The plant hormones—auxin, ethylene, gibberellins, abscisic acid, cytokinins, and brassinosteroids—all play roles in regulating development. These, roles will be presented in some detail in the chapters and, sections devoted to these topics. In this discussion, however, we will focus on auxin signaling as an example of the, types of mechanisms these roles might entail. This topic, will be discussed in greater detail in Chapter 19., Auxin signaling is essential for the development of axial, polarity and the development of vascular tissue. Auxin has, long been known to be the signal for the initiation of vascular tissue differentiation (see Chapter 19). This conclusion,, however, is based largely on studies of the effects of applied, auxins and auxin transport inhibitors. More recently, two, Arabidopsis genes—GNOM and MONOPTEROS—known, to be essential for the development of axial polarity and tissue differentiation during embryogenesis and adult plant, development, have been found to be involved in auxin signaling. As presented earlier, the Arabidopsis GNOM gene, was identified because embryos homozygous for mutations, in this gene lack both roots and cotyledons and fail to, develop axial polarity (see Figure 16.7A) (Mayer et al. 1993)., The GNOM gene product is required for correct localization of the auxin efflux carrier protein PIN1 (Figure 16.29)., , FIGURE 16.29 Comparison of the distribution patterns of, gnom mutant embryos, (C) Early globular, , (D) Midheart, , the auxin efflux protein PIN1 in wild-type and gnom, mutant Arabidopsis embryos. (A) Wild-type, early globular;, PIN1 is localized in the provascular tissue early in the early, globular stage, where the protein accumulates at the basal, boundary of the four inner cells that will give rise to the, provascular tissue. (B) Wild-type, midheart; in the heart, stage, the provascular cells have accumulated PIN1 protein, at their basal ends (see insert). (C) gnom mutant, early globular; PIN1 does not accumulate in the region where the, provascular tissue will form in the early globular stage of, the gnom mutant. (From Steinmann et al. 1999). (D) gnom, mutant, midheart; formation of provascular tissue is, blocked in the gnom mutant, and normal development is, disrupted. PIN1 is still inserted in membranes in the, mutant, but the localization is disorganized (see insert)., (From Steinmann et al. 1999.)
Page 416 :
Growth and Development, GNOM encodes a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that, is a component of the cellular machinery that establishes, cell polarity. This machinery, and the GNOM protein in, particular, are required for the correct localization of the, auxin efflux carrier protein PIN1 at the basal end of the, procambium cells during the globular stage of embryogenesis and subsequently in vascular cells throughout development (Steinmann et al. 1999; Grebe et al. 2000)., As we have seen, mutations in the MONOPTEROS, (MP) gene result in seedlings that lack both a hypocotyl, and root, although they do produce an apical region. The, apical structures in the mp mutant embryos are not structurally normal, however, and the tissues of the cotyledons, are disorganized (see Figure 16.7B) (Berleth and Jürgens, 1993). Embryos of mp mutants first show abnormalities at, the octant stage, and they do not form a procambium in the, lower part of the globular embryo, the part that should, give rise to the hypocotyl and root. Later some vascular tissue does form in the cotyledons, but the strands are, improperly connected., The MP gene encodes a protein related to the transcription factor known as ARF (auxin response factor) (Hardtke, and Berleth 1998). Both ARF and MONOPTEROS bind to, auxin response elements in the promoters of certain genes, that are transcribed in the presence of auxin. Apparently, the MP gene is required for expression of genes involved, in vascular tissue differentiation., Other evidence in support of auxin signaling during, embryogenesis includes the finding that the putative auxin, receptor protein, ABP1, is required for organized cell elongation and division in embryogenesis. Arabidopsis mutants, homozygous for abp1 do not form mature embryos,, although they develop normally up to the early globular, stage. These mutants cannot make the transition to bilateral symmetry, and cells fail to elongate (Chen et al. 2001)., Auxin signaling also participates in organogenesis from, the shoot apical meristem and in the formation of lateral, roots. Arabidopsis plants with mutations in the auxin efflux, carrier gene PIN1 develop a pinlike inflorescence that is, devoid of lateral organs (Figure 16.30). In wild-type plants,, PIN1 gene expression is up-regulated in the early stages of, primordium formation, before the primordia begin to, bulge. The shoot apical meristem at the tip of the pinlike, inflorescence in the pin1 mutant plants has a normal structure, except that no organs are generated in the peripheral, , FIGURE 16.30 The PIN1 gene is essential for the formation, , of lateral organs from the inflorescence meristem in, Arabidopsis. (A) The inflorescence meristem generates a, stem bearing cauline leaves and numerous floral buds in, the wild type. (B) Plants with pin1 mutations produce an, inflorescence meristem, but it fails to generate lateral, organs. (C) The inflorescence meristem produces only axial, tissues, similar to the root apical meristem, as shown in this, scanning electron micrograph. (From Vernoux et al. 2000.), , 365, , zone and the shoot produced lacks lateral appendages, (Vernoux et al. 2000). Thus, auxin is likely to be required for, signaling early events necessary for organogenesis from the, shoot apical meristem., This hypothesis is supported by work with tomato., When tomato apical meristems are cultured on medium, containing the auxin transport inhibitor N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA), they continue to grow, but they, develop into pinlike shoots lacking lateral appendages., When these NPA-induced pin meristems were treated with, auxin at their tips, leaf initiation was restored (Reinhardt et, al. 2000)., , Other signaling mechanisms remain to be discovered., The mechanism by which cells communicate has not been, established in other cases, although it is clear that positional, information is exchanged between cells in different tissues., As presented earlier, the SHR and SCR genes are important, for the establishment of the radial tissue patterns in roots., They encode rather similar transcription factors, but these two, genes are expressed and function in different tissues., SCR is required for the asymmetric cell division that, forms the epidermis and cortex, and it also determines the, endodermis cell fate. SCR is expressed in the stem cell that, will give rise to the ground tissue before it divides asymmetrically to form the precursors of endodermis and cortex (Figure 16.31A). SCR continues to be expressed in the, endodermis after the stem cell divides (Figure 16.31B)., SCR gene expression requires SHR expression, but the, SHR gene is not expressed in either the cortex or the endodermis. Rather, SHR is expressed in the pericycle and the, vascular cylinder (Figure 16.31C) (Helariutta et al. 2000)., This implies that SHR gene expression generates a signal, , Wild-type, (A), , pin1 mutation, (B), , (C)
Page 417 :
366, , Chapter 16, , FIGURE 16.31 The SHORTROOT (SHR), and SCARECROW (SCR) genes in, Arabidopsis control tissue patterning during root development. The SHR or SCR, proteins have been localized by confocal, laser scanning microscopy after being, tagged with green fluorescent protein, (GFP), which has a greenish-yellow, color. (A) During embryogenesis in wildtype Arabidopsis, the SHR protein is, localized in the provascular tissues. (B), The SHR protein continues to be localized in the vascular cylinder throughout, growth of the primary root. (C) In wildtype roots, SCR protein is localized in, the quiescent center, endodermis, and, cortical–endodermal stem cell (CEI). It is, not present in the cortex, vascular cylinder, or epidermis. (D) The expression of, SCR is markedly reduced in the shr, mutant root, and now appears only in, the mutant cell layer that has characteristics of both endodermis and cortex., CEI = cortical–endodermal stem cell; co, = cortex; d = daughter cells; en = endodermis; ep = epidermis; m = mutant cell, layer; QC = quiescent center; st = vascular cylinder. (From Helariutta et al. 2000.), , Wild-type SHR expression, (B) Root, , (A) Embryo, , st, , ep, co, en, , st, , CEI, , 25 mm, , QC, , 50 mm, , SCR expression, (D) shr mutant root, , (C) Wild-type root, , st, st, , ep, , ep, m, co, en, , that is received by the ground tissue, stem cells and causes the expression of, the SCR gene in these cells. This illustrates again the potential importance of, cell-to-cell signaling in cell fate determination and in plant development. At, present it is not known how this communication takes place., , d, QC, , Signaling via trafficking of regulatory proteins and/or, mRNAs. Symplastic communication between plant cells, occurs via the plasmodesmatal connections through their, cell walls (see Chapter 1). Most living cells in a plant are, connected symplastically to their neighbors by plasmodesmata that pass through the adjoining cell walls and provide some degree of cytosolic continuity between them., There is increasing evidence that the signals exchanged, through plasmodesmata include both regulatory proteins, and mRNAs (Zambryski and Crawford 2000)., The importance of plasmodesmata for cell–cell communication during development became apparent with the, discovery that the mRNA of the maize meristem identity, gene KN1 cannot be detected in the L1 layer of the maize, vegetative shoot apical meristem. The KN1 gene is, expressed only in cells of the L2 layer. The KN1 protein,, however, is detected in all regions of the shoot apical meristem, including the L1 layer. Since the KN1 protein is not, , CEI, , 50 mm, , 50 mm, , synthesized in the L1 layer, it must be transported into the, L1 layer from the L2 layer, through the plasmodesmata, joining them (Figure 16.32) (Lucas et al. 1995)., In Antirrhinum, expression of the FLO gene in the L1, layer activates expression of the floral organ identity genes, in all cell layers of the meristem (Carpenter and Coen, 1995). Although many explanations for this relationship are, possible, one is that the FLO protein, by passing through, the plasmodesmata, moves into these other layers from the, cells in which it is synthesized., Viruses invade plants and spread from cell to cell by, passing through plasmodesmata. Their genomes encode, proteins designated movement proteins that can facilitate, the movement of the viral RNA genome through plasmodesmata. It is likely that viruses have hijacked a mechanism that evolved for cell–cell communication. At present, it isn’t clear why information exchange would be organized in this manner, but this type of communication may, be a fairly general phenomenon in plant development.
Page 418 :
Growth and Development, , 367, , Plant Growth Can Be Measured in Different Ways, , 2, , 1, , FIGURE 16.32 The KN1 gene is expressed throughout the, maize shoot apical meristem, but it is not expressed in the, L1 layer or in leaf primordia. The KN1 mRNA was localized here in a longitudinal section through the meristem by, a hybridization procedure. The arrow points to the predicted site of the next leaf primordium (P0); the numbers 1, and 2 identify the P1 and P2 leaf primordia, respectively., (After Jackson et al. 1994.), , Growth in plants is defined as an irreversible increase in, volume. The largest component of plant growth is cell, expansion driven by turgor pressure. During this process,, cells increase in volume manyfold and become highly vacuolate. However, size is only one criterion that may be used, to measure growth., Growth also can be measured in terms of change in, fresh weight—that is, the weight of the living tissue—over, a particular period of time. However, the fresh weight of, plants growing in soil fluctuates in response to changes in, the water status, so this criterion may be a poor indicator, of actual growth. In these situations, measurements of dry, weight are often more appropriate., Cell number is a common and convenient parameter by, which to measure the growth of unicellular organisms,, such as the green alga Chlamydomonas (Figure 16.33). In, multicellular plants, however, cell number can be a misleading growth measurement because cells can divide, without increasing in volume., For example, during the early stages of embryogenesis,, the zygote subdivides into progressively smaller cells with, no net increase in the size of the embryo. Only after it, , Stationary, 6, , How do plants grow? This deceptively simple question has, challenged plant scientists for more than 150 years. New, cells form continually in the apical meristems. Cells enlarge, slowly in the apical meristem and more rapidly in the subapical regions. The resulting increase in cell volume can, range from severalfold to 100-fold, depending on the species, and environmental conditions. Classically, plant growth has, been analyzed in terms of cell number or overall size (or, mass). However, these measures tell only part of the story., Tissue growth is neither uniform nor random. The, derivatives of the apical meristems expand in predictable, and site-specific ways, and the expansion patterns in these, subapical regions largely determine the size and shape of, the primary plant body. The total growth of the plant can be, thought of as the sum of the local patterns of cell expansion., The analysis of the motions of cells or “tissue elements”, (and the related problem of cell expansion) is called kinematics. In this section we will discuss both the classical definitions of growth and the more modern, kinematic, approach. As we will see, the advantage of the kinematic, approach is that it allows one to describe the growth patterns of organs mathematically in terms of the expansion, patterns of their component cells., , Logarithmic, Number of cells per mL (× 106), , THE ANALYSIS OF PLANT GROWTH, , 5, 4, 3, Lag, 2, 1, , 0, , 20, , 40, , 60, , 80, , 100, , 120, , Time (h), , FIGURE 16.33 Growth of the unicellular green alga, , Chlamydomonas. Growth is assessed by a count of the number of cells per milliliter at increasing times after the cells, are placed in fresh growth medium. Temperature, light, and, nutrients provided are optimal for growth. An initial lag, period during which cells may synthesize enzymes, required for rapid growth is followed by a period in which, cell number increases exponentially. This period of rapid, growth is followed by a period of slowing growth in which, the cell number increases linearly. Then comes the stationary phase, in which the cell number remains constant or, even declines as nutrients are exhausted from the medium.
Page 419 :
368, , Chapter 16, , reaches the eight-cell stage does the increase in volume, begin to mirror the increase in cell number. Because the, zygote is an especially large cell, this lack of correspondence between an increase in cell number and growth may, be unusual, but it points out the potential problem in, equating an increase in cell number with growth., Although cell number may not always be a reliable, measure of plant growth, under most circumstances dividing cells, particularly in meristems, double in volume during their cell cycle. Therefore, an increase in cell number,, such as the increase brought about by the activity of the, apical meristems, does contribute to plant growth. However, the largest component of plant growth is the rapid, cell expansion that occurs in the subapical region after cell, division ceases., Because all the cells of the plant axis elongate under, normal conditions, the greater the number of cells produced by the apical meristem, the longer the axis will be., For example, when Arabidopsis plants are transformed, with a gene that encodes cyclin, a key component of the, cell cycle regulatory machinery (see Chapter 1), the cells, of the apical meristem progress through their cell cycles, more rapidly, so more cells form per unit time. As a result,, the roots of these transgenic plants have more cells and are, substantially longer than the roots of wild-type plants, grown under similar conditions (Doerner et al. 1996)., New cells form continually in the apical meristems., With each new round of cell division and associated cell, expansion, the older derivatives are displaced a small distance from the apex. As the cells recede farther from the, apex, the rate of displacement is greatly accelerated. By, viewing plant growth as a process of cell displacement, from the apex, we can apply the principles of kinematics., , The Production of Cells by the Meristem Is, Comparable to a Fountain, Moving fluids such as waterfalls, fountains, and the wakes, of boats can generate specific forms. The study of the, motion of fluid particles and the shape changes that the fluids undergo is called kinematics. The ideas and numerical, methods used to study these fluid forms are useful for, characterizing meristematic growth. In both cases, an, unchanging form is produced, even though it is composed, of moving and changing elements., An example of an unchanging form composed of, changing and displaced elements in plants is the, hypocotyl hook of a dicot such as the common bean (Figure 16.34). As the bean seedling emerges from the seed, coat, the apical end of the hypocotyl bends back on itself, to form a hook. The hook is thought to protect the seedling, apex from damage during growth through the soil. During seedling growth (in soil or dim light) the hook, migrates up the stem, from the hypocotyl into the epicotyl, and then to the first and second internodes, but the form, of the hook remains constant., , If we mark a specific epidermal cell on the seedling stem, located close to the seedling apex, we can watch it as it, flows into the hook summit, then down into the straight, region below the hook (see Figure 16.34). The mark is not, crawling over the plant surface, of course; plant cells are, cemented together and do not experience much relative, motion during development. The change in position of the, mark relative to the hook implies that the hook is composed of a procession of tissue elements, each of which first, curves and then straightens as it is displaced from the plant, apex during growth. The steady form is produced by a, parade of changing cells., A root tip is another example of a steady form composed of changing tissue elements. Here, too, the form is, observed to be steady only when distance is measured, from the root tip. A region of cell division occupies perhaps, 2 mm of the root tip. The elongation zone extends for about, 10 mm behind the root tip. Phloem differentiation is first, observed beginning at 3 mm from the tip, and functional, xylem elements may be seen at about 12 mm from the tip., A marked cell near the tip will seem to flow first through, the region of cell division, then through the elongation, zone and into the region of xylem differentiation, and so, on. This shifting implies that developing tissue elements, first divide and elongate, and then differentiate., In an analogous fashion, the shoot bears a succession of, leaves of different developmental stages. During a period, of 24 hours, a leaf may grow to the same size, shape, and, biochemical composition that its neighbor had a day earlier. Thus, shoot form is also produced by a parade of, changing elements that can be analyzed with kinematics., Such an analysis is not merely descriptive; it permits calculations of the growth and biosynthetic rates of individual tissue elements (cells) within a dynamic structure., , Hook structure is maintained, as mark is displaced, Identifying mark or, particle on surface, , Cotyledons, , Summit, of hook, , FIGURE 16.34 The dicot hypocotyl hook is an example of a, , constant form composed of changing elements. The hooked, form is maintained over time, while different tissues first, curve and then straighten as they are displaced from the, seedling apex during growth. If a mark is placed at a fixed, point on the surface, it will be displaced (indicated by the, arrow), appearing to flow through the hook over time., (After Silk 1994.)
Page 420 :
Growth and Development, , As Regions Move Away from the Apex, Their, Growth Rate Increases, As a given region of the plant axis moves away from the, apex, its growth velocity increases (the rate of elongation, accelerates) until a constant limiting velocity is reached, equal to the overall organ extension rate. The reason for, this increase in growth velocity is that with time, progressively more tissue is located between the moving particle, and the apex, and progressively more cells are expanding,, so the particle is displaced more and more rapidly. In a, rapidly growing maize root, a tissue element takes about 8, hours to move from 2 mm (the end of the meristematic, zone) to 12 mm (the end of the elongation zone)., Beyond the growth zone, elements do not separate;, neighboring elements have the same velocity (expressed, as the change in distance from the tip per unit of time),, and the rate at which particles are displaced from the tip, is the same as the rate at which the tip moves through the, soil. The root tip of maize is pushed through the soil at 3, mm h–1. This is also the rate at which the nongrowing, region recedes from the apex, and it is equal to the final, slope of the growth trajectory., , The Growth Velocity Profile Is a Spatial, Description of Growth, The velocities of different tissue elements are plotted, against their distance from the apex to give the spatial pattern of growth velocity, or growth velocity profile (Figure, 16.35A). Growth velocity increases with position in the, growth zone. A constant value is obtained at the base of the, growth zone. The final growth velocity is the final, constant, slope of the growth trajectory equal to the elongation rate, of the organ, as discussed in the previous section. In the, rapidly growing maize root, the growth velocity is 1 mm, h–1 at 4 mm, and it reaches its final value of nearly 3 mm, h–1 at 12 mm., , 3, Growth velocity (mm h–1), , As we have seen, growth in shoots and roots is localized in, regions at the tips of these organs. Regions with expanding tissue are called growth zones. With time, meristems, move away from the plant base by the growth of the cells, in the growth zone., If successive marks are placed on the stem or root, the, distance between the marks will change, depending on, where they are within the growth zone. In addition, all of, these marks will move away from the tip of the root or, shoot, but their rate of movement will differ depending on, their distance from the tip., From another perspective, if you were to stand at the tip, of a root that had marks placed at intervals along the axis,, you would see that all marks would move farther away, from you with time. The reason is that discrete regions on, the plant axis experience displacement as well as expansion during growth and development., , (A) Growth velocity profile, , 2, Region of maximum, growth velocity, 1, , 0, , 5, , 10, , 15, , Position (mm from tip), (B) Relative elemental growth rate, Relative elemental growth rate (h–1), , Tissue Elements Are Displaced during Expansion, , 369, , 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, 0, , 5, , 10, , 15, , Position (mm from tip), , FIGURE 16.35 The growth of the primary root of Zea mays, , (maize) can be represented kinematically by two related, growth curves. (A) The growth velocity profile plots the, velocity of movement away from the tip of points at different distances from the tip. This tells us that growth velocity, increases with distance from the tip until it reaches a uniform velocity equal to the rate of elongation of the root., (B) The relative elemental growth rate tells us the rate of, expansion of any particular point on the root. It is the most, useful measure for the physiologist because it tells us, where the most rapidly expanding regions are located., (From Silk 1994.), , If the growth velocity is known, the relative elemental, growth rate, which represents the fractional change in, length per unit time, can be calculated (see Web Topic, 16.4). The relative elemental growth rate shows the location and magnitude of the extension rate and can be used, to quantify the effects of environmental variation on the, growth pattern (Figure 16.35B)., , SENESCENCE AND PROGRAMMED, CELL DEATH, Every autumn, people who live in temperate regions can, enjoy the beautiful color changes that precede the loss of, leaves from deciduous trees. The leaves change color
Page 421 :
370, , Chapter 16, , because changing day length and cooling temperatures, trigger developmental processes that lead to leaf senescence and death. Senescence is distinct from necrosis,, although both senescence and necrosis lead to death., Necrosis is death brought about by physical damage, poisons, or other external injury. In contrast, senescence is a, normal, energy-dependent developmental process that is, controlled by the plant’s own genetic program. Leaves are, genetically programmed to die, and their senescence can, be initiated by environmental cues., As new leaves are initiated from the shoot apical meristem, older leaves often are shaded and lose the ability to, function efficiently in photosynthesis. Senescence recovers, a portion of the valuable resources that the plant invested, in leaf formation. During senescence, hydrolytic enzymes, break down many cellular proteins, carbohydrates, and, nucleic acids. The component sugars, nucleosides, and, amino acids are then transported back into the plant via the, phloem, where they will be reused for synthetic processes., Many minerals also are transported out of senescing, organs, back into the main body of the plant., Senescence of plant organs is frequently associated with, abscission, a process whereby specific cells in the petiole differentiate to form an abscission layer, allowing the senescent, organ to separate from the plant. In Chapter 22 we will have, more to say about the control of abscission by ethylene., In this section we will examine the roles that senescence, and programmed cell death play in plant development. We, will see that there are many types of senescence, each with, its own genetic program. Then, in Chapters 21 and 22, we, will describe how cytokinins and ethylene can act as signaling agents that regulate plant senescence., , FIGURE 16.36 Monocarpic senescence in soybeans (Glycine, max). The entire plant on the left underwent senescence, after flowering and producing fruit (pods). The plant on the, right remained remained green and vegetative because its, flowers were continually removed. (Courtesy of L., Noodén.), , Plants Exhibit Various Types of Senescence, Senescence occurs in a variety of organs and in response to, many different cues. Many annual plants, including major, crop plants such as wheat, maize, and soybeans, abruptly, yellow and die following fruit production, even under optimal growing conditions. Senescence of the entire plant after, a single reproductive cycle is called monocarpic senescence (Figure 16.36)., Other types of senescence include the following:, • Senescence of aerial shoots in herbaceous perennials, • Seasonal leaf senescence (as in deciduous trees), • Sequential leaf senescence (in which the leaves die, when they reach a certain age), • Senescence (ripening) of fleshy fruits; senescence of, dry fruits, • Senescence of storage cotyledons and floral organs, (Figure 16.37), • Senescence of specialized cell types (e.g., trichomes,, tracheids, and vessel elements), , The triggers for the various types of senescence are different and can be internal, as in monocarpic senescence, or, external, such as day length and temperature in the autumnal leaf senescence of deciduous trees. Regardless of the, initial stimulus, the different senescence patterns may share, common internal programs in which a regulatory senescence gene initiates a cascade of secondary gene expression, that eventually brings about senescence and death., , Senescence Is an Ordered Series of Cytological, and Biochemical Events, Because it is genetically encoded, senescence follows a predictable course of cellular events. On the cytological level,, some organelles are destroyed while others remain active., The chloroplast is the first organelle to deteriorate during, the onset of leaf senescence, with the destruction of thylakoid protein components and stromal enzymes., In contrast to the rapid deterioration of chloroplasts,, nuclei remain structurally and functionally intact until the, late stages of senescence. Senescing tissues carry out cata-
Page 422 :
Growth and Development, , 371, , FIGURE 16.37 Stages of flower senescence in morning glory (Ipomoea acuminata)., , (Courtesy of S. L. Taiz.), , bolic processes that require the de novo synthesis of various hydrolytic enzymes, such as proteases, nucleases,, lipases, and chlorophyll-degrading enzymes. The synthesis of these senescence-specific enzymes involves the activation of specific genes., Not surprisingly, the levels of most leaf mRNAs decline, significantly during the senescence phase, but the abundance of certain specific mRNA transcripts increases., Genes whose expression decreases during senescence are, called senescence down-regulated genes (SDGs). SDGs, include genes that encode proteins involved in photosynthesis. However, senescence involves much more than the, simple switching off of photosynthesis genes., Genes whose expression is induced during senescence, are called senescence-associated genes (SAGs). SAGs, include genes that encode hydrolytic enzymes, such as proteases, ribonucleases, and lipases, as well as enzymes, involved in the biosynthesis of ethylene, such as ACC (laminocyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid) synthase and ACC, oxidase. SAGs of another class have secondary functions, in senescence. These genes encode enzymes involved in the, conversion or remobilization of breakdown products, such, as glutamine synthetase, which catalyzes the conversion of, ammonium to glutamine (see Chapter 12) and is responsible for nitrogen recycling from senescing tissues., , Programmed Cell Death Is a Specialized Type of, Senescence, Senescence can occur at the level of the whole plant, as in, monocarpic senescence; at the organ level, as in leaf senescence; and at the cellular level, as in tracheary element differentiation. The process whereby individual cells activate, an intrinsic senescence program is called programmed cell, death (PCD). PCD plays an important part in animal, development, in which the molecular mechanism has been, studied extensively. PCD can be initiated by specific signals, such as errors in DNA replication during division,, , and involves the expression of a characteristic set of genes., The expression of these genes results in cell death. Much, less is known about PCD in plants (Pennell and Lamb, 1997)., PCD in animals is usually accompanied by a distinct set, of morphological and biochemical changes called apoptosis (plural apoptoses) (from a Greek word meaning “falling, off,” as in autumn leaves). During apoptosis, the cell, nucleus condenses and the nuclear DNA fragments in a, specific pattern caused by degradation of the DNA, between nucleosomes (see Chapter 2 on the web site)., Some plant cells, particularly in senescing tissues,, exhibit similar cytological changes. PCD also appears to, occur during the differentiation of xylem tracheary elements, during which the nuclei and chromatin degrade, and the cytoplasm disappears. These changes result from, the activation of genes that encode nucleases and proteases., One of the important functions of PCD in plants is protection against pathogenic organisms. When a pathogenic, organism infects a plant, signals from the pathogen cause, the plant cells at the site of the infection to quickly accumulate high concentrations of toxic phenolic compounds, and die. The dead cells form a small circular island of cell, death called a necrotic lesion., The necrotic lesion isolates and prevents the infection, from spreading to surrounding healthy tissues by surrounding the pathogen with a toxic and nutritionally, depleted environment.This rapid, localized cell death due, to pathogen attack is called the hypersensitive response, (see Chapter 13)., The existence of Arabidopsis mutants that can mimic the, effect of infection and trigger the entire cascade of events, leading to the formation of necrotic lesions, even in the, absence of the pathogen, has demonstrated that the hypersensitive response is a genetically programmed process, rather than simple necrosis.
Page 423 :
372, , Chapter 16, , SUMMARY, The basic body plan of the mature plant is established during embryogenesis; in this process, tissues are arranged, radially: an outer epidermal layer surrounding a cylinder, of vascular tissue that is embedded within cortical or, ground tissues. The apical–basal axial pattern of the mature, plant, with root and shoot polar axes, also is established, during embryogenesis, as are the primary meristems that, will generate the adult plant., One common type of angiosperm embryonic development, exemplified by Arabidopsis thaliana, is characterized by, precise patterns of cell divisions, forming successive stages:, the globular, heart, torpedo, and maturation stages. The axial, body pattern is established during the first division of the, zygote, and mutant genes eliminate part of the embryo. The, radial tissue pattern is established during the globular stage,, apparently as a result of the expression of genes that control, cell identity. The SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) gene is, expressed in the region that gives rise to the shoot apical, meristem during the heart stage of embryogenesis, and its, continued expression suppresses differentiation of the cells, of the shoot apical meristem. The GNOM gene is required, for the establishment of axial polarity, and the, MONOPTEROS gene is required for formation of the, embryonic primary root as well as vascular development., A complete explanation of the mechanisms responsible, for establishing and maintaining these patterns is not possible at present, but there is evidence that an association of, microtubules and microfilaments known as the preprophase band is important in determining the plane of cell, division. Cell differentiation does not depend on cell lineage; however, the division of the stem cell is essential for, this process. Expression of the SCR (SCARECROW) gene,, which has been cloned and encodes a novel protein, is necessary for the division of the stem cell, and the SHR, (SHORTROOT) gene must be expressed for the establishment of endodermal cell identity., Meristems are populations of small, isodiametric cells, that have “embryonic” characteristics. Vegetative meristems generate specific portions of the plant body, and they, regenerate themselves. In many plants, the root and shoot, apical meristems are capable of indefinite growth., The vegetative shoot apical meristem repetitively generates lateral organs (leaves and lateral buds), as well as, segments of the stem. Shoot apical meristems in, angiosperms typically are organized into three distinct layers, designated L1, L2, and L3., The root and shoot apical meristems are primary meristems formed during embryogenesis. Secondary meristems, are initiated during postembryonic development and, include the vascular cambium, cork cambium, axillary, meristems, and secondary root meristems., The repetitive activity of the vegetative shoot apical, meristem generates a succession of developmental units,, called phytomeres, each consisting of one or more leaves,, , the node, the internode, and one or more axillary buds. The, vegetative shoot apical meristem is indeterminate in its, activity in that it may function indefinitely, but it gives rise, to leaf primordia that are determinate in their growth., Leaves form in a characteristic pattern, with three, stages: (1) organogenesis, (2) development of suborgan, domains, (3) cell and tissue differentiation. The number, and order in which leaf primordia form is reflected in the, subsequent phyllotaxy (alternate, opposite, decussate,, whorled, or spiral). The leaf primordia must be positioned, as a result of the precise spatial regulation of cell division, within the apex, but the factors controlling this activity are, not known., Roots grow from their distal ends. The root apical meristem is subterminal and covered by a root cap. Cell divisions in the root apex generate files of cells that subsequently elongate and differentiate to acquire specialized, function. Four developmental zones are recognized in the, root: root cap, meristematic zone, elongation zone, and, maturation zone. In Arabidopsis, files of mature cells can be, traced to stem cells within the meristem cell population., The Arabidopsis root apical meristem consists of a quiescent, center, cortical–endodermal stem cells, columella stem cells,, root cap–epidermal stem cells, and stele stem cells., Differentiation is the process by which cells acquire, metabolic, structural, and functional properties distinct, from those of their progenitors. Tracheary element differentiation is an example of plant cell differentiation. Microtubules participate in determining the pattern in which the, cellulose microfibrils are deposited in the secondary walls, of tracheary elements., MADS box genes are key regulators of important biological functions in plants, animals, and fungi. Homeobox, genes encode homeodomain proteins that act as transcription factors. These transcription factors control the expression of other genes whose products transform and characterize the differentiated cell., In the determination of a cell’s fate, the cell’s position is, more important than its lineage. Plant cell fate is relatively, plastic and can be changed when the positional signals necessary for its maintenance are altered., The expression of homeobox genes similar to the maize, genes KNOTTED1 and SHOOTMERISTEMLESS is necessary for the continued indeterminate character of the shoot, apical meristem, but the WUSCHEL gene determines stem, cell identity. Loss of expression of KNOX genes in the leaf, primordia appears to be important in the shift to determinate growth in these structures., Cell position is communicated via cell–cell signaling,, which may involve ligand-induced signaling, hormone signaling or trafficking of regulatory proteins and/or mRNAs, through plasmodesmata. Molecules ranging in size up to, about 1.6 nm (700–1000 Da) can pass from cell to cell, through plasmodesmata connecting leaf epidermal cells., Plasmodesmata are, to some extent, gated so that passage, through them can be regulated, and their size exclusion
Page 424 :
Growth and Development, limit can be modified to permit the passage of much larger, molecules, such as viruses., Growth in plants is defined as an irreversible increase in, volume. Plant growth can be quantitatively analyzed with, kinematics, the study of particle movement and shape, change., Plant growth can be described in both spatial and material terms. Spatial descriptions focus on the patterns generated by all the cells located at different positions in the, growth zones. Material analyses focus on the fate of the, individual cells or tissue elements at various stages of development. A growth trajectory shows the distance of a tissue, element from the apex over time, and is therefore a material description of growth. The growth velocity is the speed, at which the tissue elements are being displaced from the, apex. The relative elemental growth rate is a measure of the, fractional increase in length of the axis per unit time and, represents the magnitude of growth at a particular location., Senescence and programmed cell death are essential, aspects of plant development. Plants exhibit a variety of, different senescence phenomena. Leaves are genetically, programmed to senesce and die. Senescence is an active, developmental process that is controlled by the plant’s, genetic program and initiated by specific environmental or, developmental cues., Senescence is an ordered series of cytological and biochemical events. The expression of most genes is reduced, during senescence, but the expression of some genes, (senescence-associated genes, or SAGs) is initiated. The, newly active genes encode various hydrolytic enzymes,, such as proteases, ribonucleases, lipases, and enzymes, involved in the biosynthesis of ethylene, which carry out, the degradative processes as the tissues die., Programmed cell death (PCD) is a specialized type of, senescence. One important function of PCD in plants is, protection against pathogenic organisms in what is called, the hypersensitive response, which has been demonstrated, to be a genetically programmed process., , Web Material, Web Topics, 16.1 Polarity of Fucus Zygotes, A wide variety of external gradients can polarize growth of cells that are initially apolar., , 16.2 The Preprophase Band of Microtubules, Ultrastructural studies have elucidated the structure of the preprophase band of micro-tubules, and its role in orienting the plane of cell division., , 16.3 Azolla Root Development, Anatomical studies of the root of the aquatic, fern, Azolla, have provided insights into cell fate, during root development., , 373, , 16.4 The Relative Elemental Growth Rate, The relative elemental growth rate at various, points along a root can be evaluated by differentiation of the growth velocity with respect to, position., , Web Essay, 16.1 Plant Meristems: An Historical Overview, Scientists have used many approaches to unravel the secrets of plant meristems., , 16.2 The Mermaids Wineglass, The giant marine green alga, Acetabularia, acetabulum, holds a classic place in the history, of biology., , 16.3 Division Plane Determination in Plant Cells, Plant cells appear to utilize mechanisms different from those used by other eukaryotes to, control their division planes., , Chapter References, Assaad, F., Mayer, U., Warner, G., and Jürgens, G. 1996. The KEULE, gene is involved in cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Gen. Genet., 253: 267–277., Berleth, T., and Jürgens, G. (1993) The role of the MONOPTEROS, gene in organising the basal body region of the Arabidopsis, embryo. Development 118: 575–587., Bowman, J. L., and Eshed, Y. (2000) Formation and maintenance of, the shoot apical meristem. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 110–115., Brand, U., Fletcher, J. C., Hobo, M., Meyerowitz, E. M., and Simon,, R. (2000) Dependence of stem cell fate in Arabidopsis on a feedback loop regulated by CLV3 activity. Science 289: 617–619., Byrne, M. E., Barley, R., Curtis, M., Arroyo, J. M., Dunham, M., Hudson, A., and Martienssen, R. (2000) Asymmetric leaves1 mediates, leaf patterning and stem cell function in Arabidopsis. Nature 408:, 967–971., Carpenter, R., and Coen, E. S. (1995) Transposon induced chimeras, show that floricaula, a meristem identity gene, acts nonautonomously between cell layers. Development 121: 19–26., Chen, J. -G., Ullah, H., Young, J. C., Sussman, M. R., and Jones, A. M., (2001) ABP1 is required for organized cell elongation and division in Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 15: 902–911., Christensen, D., and Weigel, D. (1998) Plant development: The making of a leaf. Curr. Biol. 8: R643–645., Clark, S. E. (2001) Cell signaling at the shoot meristem. Nature Rev., Mol. Cell. Biol. 2: 276–284., Clark, S. E., Running, M. P., and Meyerowitz, E. M. (1993), CLAVATA1, a regulator of meristem and flower development in, Arabidopsis. Development 119: 397–418., Di Laurenzio, L., Wysocka-Diller, J., Malamy, J. E., Pysh, L., Helariutta, Y., Freshour, G., Hahn, M. G., Fledman, K. A., and Benfey, P., N. (1996) The SCARECROW gene regulates an asymmetric cell, division that is essential for generating the radial organization of, the Arabidopsis root. Cell 86: 423–433., Doebley, J., and Lukens, L. (1998) Transcriptional regulators and the, evolution of plant form. Plant Cell 10: 1075–1082., Doerner, P., Jorgensen, J.-E., You, R., Steppuhn, J., and Lamb, C., (1996) Control of root growth and development by cyclin expression. Nature 380: 520–523.
Page 425 :
374, , Chapter 16, , Fletcher, J. C., and Meyerowitz, E. M. (2000) Cell signaling within the, shoot meristem. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3: 23–30., Fletcher, J. C., Brand, U., Running, M. P., Simon, R., and Meyerowitz,, E. M. (1999) Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283: 1911–1914., Fukuda, H. (1996) Xylogenesis: Initiation, progression and cell death., Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47: 299–325., Grebe, M., Gadea, G., Steinmann, T., Kientz, M., Rahfeld, J.-U.,, Salchert, K., Koncz, C., and Jürgens, G. (2000) A conserved, domain of the Arabidopsis GNOM protein mediates subunit interaction and cyclophilin 5 binding. Plant Cell 12: 343–356., Hake, S., Vollbrecht, E., and Freeling, M. (1989) Cloning KNOTTED,, the dominant morphological mutant in maize using Ds2 as a, transposon tag. EMBO J. 8: 15–22., Hardham, A. R., and Gunning, B. E. S. (1979) Interpolation of microtubules into cortical arrays during cell elongation and differentiation in roots of Azolla pinnata. J. Cell Sci. 37: 411–442., Hardham, A. R., and Gunning, B. E. S. (1980) Some effects of, colchicine on microtubules and cell division of Azolla pinnata. Protoplasma 102: 31–51., Hardtke, C., and Berleth, T. (1998) The Arabidopsis gene, MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating, embryo axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J. 17:, 1405–1411., Helariutta, Y., Fukaki, H., Wysocka-Diller, J., Nakajima, K., Sena, G.,, Hauser, M.-T., and Benfey, P. N. (2000) The SHORT-ROOT gene, controls radial patterning of the Arabidopsis root through radial, signaling. Cell 10: 555–567., Hepler, P. K. (1981) Morphogenesis of tracheary elements and guard, cells. In Cytomorphogenesis in Plants, O. Kiermayer, ed., Springer,, Berlin, pp. 327–347., Jackson, D., Veit, B., and Hake, S. (1994) Expression of maize KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development 120: 405–413., Laux, T., Mayer, Klaus, F. X., Berger, J., and Jürgens, G. (1996) The, WUSCHEL gene is required for shoot and floral meristem, integrity in Arabidopsis. Development 122: 87–96., Lincoln, C., Long, J., Yamaguchi, J., Serikawa, K., and Hake, S. (1994), A knotted1-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the, vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology, when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 6: 1859–1876., Long, J. A., Moan, E. I., Medford, J. I., and Barton, M. K. (1996) A, member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins, encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis. Nature 379: 66–69., Lotan, T., Ohto, M.-A., Yee, K. M., West, M. A., Lo, R., Kwong, R. W.,, Yamagishi, K., Fisher, R. L., and Goldberg, R. B. (1998) Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 93: 1195–1205., Lucas, W. J., Bouche-Pillon, S., Jackson, D. P., Nguyen, L., Baker, L.,, Ding, B., and Hake, S. (1995) Selective trafficking of KNOTTED1, homeodomain protein and its mRNA through plasmodesmata., Science 270: 1980–1983., Lukowitz, W., Mayer, U., and Jürgens, G. (1996) Cytokinesis in the, Arabidopsis embryo involves the syntaxin-related KNOLLE gene, product. Cell 84: 61–71., Malamy, J. E. and Benfey, P. N. (1997) Organization and cell differentiation in lateral roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 124:, 33–44., Mayer, U., Buettner, G., and Jürgens, G. (1993) Apical-basal pattern, formation in the Arabidopsis embryo: Studies on the role of the, gnom gene. Development 117: 149–162., Nishimura, A., Tamaoki, M., Sato, Y., and Matsuoka, M. (1999) The, expression of tobacco knotted1-type homeobox genes corresponds, to regions predicted by the cytohistological zonation model. Plant, J. 18: 337–347., Ori, N., Eshed, Y., Chuck, G., Bowman, J. L., and Hake, S. (2000), Mechanisms that control knox gene expression in the Arabidopsis, shoot. Development 127: 5523–5532., , Pennell, R. I., and Lamb, C. (1997) Programmed cell death in plants., Plant Cell 9: 1157–1168., Przemeck, G. K. H., Mattsson, J., Hardtke, C. S., Sung, Z. R., and, Berleth, T. (1996) Studies on the role of the Arabidopsis gene, MONOPTEROS in vascular development and plant cell axialization. Planta 200: 229–237., Reinhardt, D., Mandel, T., and Kuhlemeier, C. (2000) Auxin regulates, the initiation and radial position of plant lateral organs. Plant Cell, 12: 507–518., Riechmann, J. L., and Meyerowitz, E. M. (1997) MADS domain proteins in plant development. Biol. Chem. 378: 1079–1101., Riechmann, J. L., Herd, J., Martin, G, Reuber, L., Jiang, C. Z., Keddie,, J., Adam, L., Pineda, O., Ratcliffe, O. J., Samaha, R. R., Creelman,, R., Pilgrim, M., Broun, P., Zhang, J. Z., Ghandelhari, D., Sherman,, B. K., and Yu, G.-L. (2000) Arabidopsis transcription factors:, Genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science, 290: 2105–2110., Scheres, B. (2001) Plant cell identity. The role of position and lineage., Plant Physiol. 125: 112–114., Scheres, B., Di Laurenzio, L., Willemsen, V., Hauser, M.-T., Janmaat,, K., Weisbeek, P., and Benfey, P. N. (1995) Mutations affecting the, radial organisation of the Arabidopsis root display specific defects, throughout the embryonic axis. Development 121: 53–62., Schiefelbein, J. W., Masucci, J. D., and Wang, H. (1997) Building a, root: The control of patterning and morphogenesis during root, development. Plant Cell 9: 1089–1098., Shiu, S. H., and Bleecker, A. B. (2001) Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 10763–10768., Silk, W. K. (1994) Kinematics and dynamics of primary growth. Biomimetics 2: 199–213., Sinha, N. (1999) Leaf development in angiosperms. Annu. Rev. Plant, Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 419–446., Sinha, N., Hake, S., and Freeling, M. (1993a) Genetic and molecular analysis of leaf development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 28: 47–80., Sinha, N. R., Williams, R. E., and Hake, S. (1993b) Overexpression of, the maize homeo box gene, KNOTTED-1, causes a switch from, determinate to indeterminate cell fates. Genes Dev. 7: 787–795., Steinmann, T., Geldner, N., Grebe, M., Mangold, S. A., Jackson, C. L.,, Paris, S., Galweiler, L., Palme, K., and Jürgens, G. (1999) Coordinated polar localization of auxin efflux carrier PIN1 by GNOM, ARF GEF. Science 286: 316–318., Torres-Ruiz, R. A., and Jürgens, G. (1994) Mutations in the FASS gene, uncouple pattern formation and morphogenesis in Arabidopsis, development. Development 120: 2967–2978., Traas, J., Bellini, C., Nacry, P., Kronenberger, J., Bouchez, D., and, Caboche, M. (1995) Normal differentiation patterns in plants, lacking microtubular preprophase bands. Nature 375: 676–677., Van Den Berg, C., Willemsen, V., Hage, W., Weisbeek, P., and Scheres,, B. (1995) Cell fate in the Arabidopsis root meristem determined by, directional signaling. Nature 378: 62–65., Vernoux, T., Kronenberger, J., Grandjean, O., Laufs, P., and Traas, J., (2000) PIN-FORMED1 regulates cell fate at the periphery of the, shoot apical meristem. Development 127: 5157–5165., Weigel, D., and Jürgens, G. (2002) Stem cells that make stems. Nature, 415: 751–754., West, M. A. L., and Harada, J. J. 1993. Embryogenesis in higher, plants: An overview. Plant Cell. 5: 1361–1369., Willemsen, V., Wolkenfelt, H., de Vrieze, G., Weisbeek, P., and, Scheres, B. (1998) The HOBBIT gene is required for formation of, the root meristem in the Arabidopsis embryo. Development 125:, 521–531., Zambryski, P., and Crawford, K. (2000) Plasmodesmata: Gatekeepers for cell-to-cell transport of developmental signals in plants., Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16: 393–421.
Page 426 :
Chapter, , 17, , Phytochrome and Light Control, of Plant Development, , HAVE YOU EVER LIFTED UP A BOARD that has been lying on a lawn, for a few weeks and noticed that the grass growing underneath was, much paler and spindlier than the surrounding grass? The reason this, happens is that the board is opaque, keeping the underlying grass in, darkness. Seedlings grown in the dark have a pale, unusually tall and, spindly appearance. This form of growth, known as etiolated growth,, is dramatically different from the stockier, green appearance of seedlings, grown in the light (Figure 17.1)., Given the key role of photosynthesis in plant metabolism, one might, be tempted to attribute much of this contrast to differences in the availability of light-derived metabolic energy. However, it takes very little, light or time to initiate the transformation from the etiolated to the green, state. So in the change from dark to light growth, light acts as a developmental trigger rather than a direct energy source., If you were to remove the board and expose the pale patch of grass, to light, it would appear almost the same shade of green as the surrounding grass within a week or so. Although not visible to the naked, eye, these changes actually start almost immediately after exposure to, light. For example, within hours of applying a single flash of relatively, dim light to a dark-grown bean seedling in the laboratory, one can measure several developmental changes: a decrease in the rate of stem elongation, the beginning of apical-hook straightening, and the initiation of, the synthesis of pigments that are characteristic of green plants., Light has acted as a signal to induce a change in the form of the, seedling, from one that facilitates growth beneath the soil, to one that is, more adaptive to growth above ground. In the absence of light, the, seedling uses primarily stored seed reserves for etiolated growth. However, seed plants, including grasses, don’t store enough energy to sustain growth indefinitely. They require light energy not only to fuel photosynthesis, but to initiate the developmental switch from dark to light, growth., Photosynthesis cannot be the driving force of this transformation, because chlorophyll is not present during this time. Full de-etiolation
Page 427 :
376, , Chapter 17, , FIGURE 17.1 Corn (Zea mays) (A and B) and bean (Phaseolus, , (A) Light-grown corn, , (B) Dark-grown corn, , (C) Light-grown bean, , (D) Dark-grown bean, , vulgaris) (C and D) seedlings grown either in the light (A, and C) or the dark (B and D). Symptoms of etiolation in, corn, a monocot, include the absence of greening, reduction, in leaf size, failure of leaves to unroll, and elongation of the, coleoptile and mesocotyl. In bean, a dicot, etiolation symptoms include absence of greening, reduced leaf size,, hypocotyl elongation, and maintenance of the apical hook., (Photos © M. B. Wilkins.), , does require some photosynthesis, but the initial rapid, changes are induced by a distinctly different light response,, called photomorphogenesis (from Latin, meaning literally, “light form begins”)., Among the different pigments that can promote photomorphogenic responses in plants, the most important are those, that absorb red and blue light. The blue-light photoreceptors, will be discussed in relation to guard cells and phototropism, in Chapter 18. The focus of this chapter is phytochrome, a protein pigment that absorbs red and far-red light most strongly,, but that also absorbs blue light. As we will see in this chapter, and in Chapter 24, phytochrome plays a key role in light-regulated vegetative and reproductive development., We begin with the discovery of phytochrome and the, phenomenon of red/far-red photoreversibility. Next we will, discuss the biochemical and photochemical properties of, phytochrome, and the conformational changes induced by, light. Different types of phytochromes are encoded by different members of a multigene family, and different phytochromes regulate distinct processes in the plant. These different phytochrome responses can be classified according, to the amount of light and light quality required to produce, the effect. Finally, we will examine what is known about the, mechanism of phytochrome action at the cellular and molecular levels, including signal transduction pathways and, gene regulation., , THE PHOTOCHEMICAL AND, BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF, PHYTOCHROME, Phytochrome, a blue protein pigment with a molecular, mass of about 125 kDa (kilodaltons), was not identified as, a unique chemical species until 1959, mainly because of, technical difficulties in isolating and purifying the protein., However, many of the biological properties of phytochrome, had been established earlier in studies of whole plants., The first clues regarding the role of phytochrome in, plant development came from studies that began in the, 1930s on red light–induced morphogenic responses, especially seed germination. The list of such responses is now, enormous and includes one or more responses at almost, every stage in the life history of a wide range of different, green plants (Table 17.1)., A key breakthrough in the history of phytochrome was, the discovery that the effects of red light (650–680 nm) on, , morphogenesis could be reversed by a subsequent irradiation with light of longer wavelengths (710–740 nm), called, far-red light. This phenomenon was first demonstrated in, germinating seeds, but was also observed in relation to stem, and leaf growth, as well as floral induction (see Chapter 24)., The initial observation was that the germination of lettuce, seeds is stimulated by red light and inhibited by far-red, light. But the real breakthrough was made many years later, when lettuce seeds were exposed to alternating treatments, of red and far-red light. Nearly 100% of the seeds that, received red light as the final treatment germinated; in seeds, that received far-red light as the final treatment, however,, germination was strongly inhibited (Figure 17.2) (Flint 1936)., Two interpretations of these results were possible. One, is that there are two pigments, a red light–absorbing pigment and a far-red light–absorbing pigment, and the two, pigments act antagonistically in the regulation of seed germination. Alternatively, there might be a single pigment, that can exist in two interconvertible forms: a red
Page 428 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, , 377, , TABLE 17.1, Typical photoreversible responses induced by phytochrome in a variety of higher and lower plants, Group, , Genus, , Stage of development, , Effect of red light, , Angiosperms, , Lactuca (lettuce), Avena (oat), Sinapis (mustard), , Seed, Seedling (etiolated), Seedling, , Pisum (pea), Xanthium (cocklebur), Pinus (pine), Onoclea (sensitive fern), Polytrichum (moss), Mougeotia (alga), , Adult, Adult, Seedling, Young gametophyte, Germling, Mature gametophyte, , Promotes germination, Promotes de-etiolation (e.g., leaf unrolling), Promotes formation of leaf primordia, development of primary, leaves, and production of anthocyanin, Inhibits internode elongation, Inhibits flowering (photoperiodic response), Enhances rate of chlorophyll accumulation, Promotes growth, Promotes replication of plastids, Promotes orientation of chloroplasts to directional dim light, , Gymnosperms, Pteridophytes, Bryophytes, Chlorophytes, , light–absorbing form and a far-red light–absorbing form, (Borthwick et al. 1952)., The model chosen—the one-pigment model—was the, more radical of the two because there was no precedent for, such a photoreversible pigment. Several years later phytochrome was demonstrated in plant extracts for the first, time, and its unique photoreversible properties were exhibited in vitro, confirming the prediction (Butler et al. 1959)., In this section we will consider three broad topics:, 1. Photoreversibility and its relationship to phytochrome, responses, , Dark, , Red Far-red Red, , 2. The structure of phytochrome, its synthesis and, assembly, and the conformational changes associated, with the interconversions of the two main forms of, phytochrome: Pr and Pfr, 3. The phytochrome gene family, the members of which, have different functions in photomorphogenesis, , Phytochrome Can Interconvert between, Pr and Pfr Forms, In dark-grown or etiolated plants, phytochrome is present, in a red light–absorbing form, referred to as Pr because it, , Red, , Red Far-red, , Red Far-red Red Far-red, , FIGURE 17.2 Lettuce seed germination is a typical photoreversible response controlled by phytochrome. Red light, promotes lettuce seed germination, but this effect is, reversed by far-red light. Imbibed (water-moistened) seeds, were given alternating treatments of red followed by farred light. The effect of the light treatment depended on the, last treatment given. (Photos © M. B. Wilkins.)
Page 429 :
378, , Chapter 17, , is synthesized in this form. Pr, which to the human eye is, blue, is converted by red light to a far-red light–absorbing, form called Pfr, which is blue-green. Pfr, in turn, can be, converted back to Pr by far-red light., Known as photoreversibility, this conversion/reconversion property is the most distinctive property of phytochrome, and it may be expressed in abbreviated form as, follows:, Red light, , Pr, , Pfr, , Far-red light, , The interconversion of the Pr and Pfr forms can be measured in vivo or in vitro. In fact, most of the spectral properties of carefully purified phytochrome measured in vitro, are the same as those observed in vivo., When Pr molecules are exposed to red light, most of, them absorb it and are converted to Pfr, but some of the Pfr, also absorbs the red light and is converted back to Pr, because both Pr and Pfr absorb red light (Figure 17.3). Thus, the proportion of phytochrome in the Pfr form after saturating irradiation by red light is only about 85%. Similarly,, the very small amount of far-red light absorbed by Pr, makes it impossible to convert Pfr entirely to Pr by broadspectrum far-red light. Instead, an equilibrium of 97% Pr, and 3% Pfr is achieved. This equilibrium is termed the photostationary state., In addition to absorbing red light, both forms of phytochrome absorb light in the blue region of the spectrum, (see Figure 17.3). Therefore, phytochrome effects can be, , FIGURE 17.3 Absorption spectra of purified oat phytochrome in the Pr (green line) and Pfr (blue line) forms, overlap. (After Vierstra and Quail 1983.), , elicited also by blue light, which can convert Pr to Pfr and, vice versa. Blue-light responses can also result from the, action of one or more specific blue-light photoreceptors (see, Chapter 18). Whether phytochrome is involved in a, response to blue light is often determined by a test of the, ability of far-red light to reverse the response, since only, phytochrome-induced responses are reversed by far-red, light. Another way to discriminate between photoreceptors, is to study mutants that are deficient in one of the photoreceptors., , Short-lived phytochrome intermediates. The photoconversions of Pr to Pfr, and of Pfr to Pr, are not one-step, processes. By irradiating phytochrome with very brief, flashes of light, we can observe absorption changes that, occur in less than a millisecond., Of course, sunlight includes a mixture of all visible, wavelengths. Under such white-light conditions, both Pr, and Pfr are excited, and phytochrome cycles continuously, between the two. In this situation the intermediate forms, of phytochrome accumulate and make up a significant fraction of the total phytochrome. Such intermediates could, even play a role in initiating or amplifying phytochrome, responses under natural sunlight, but this question has yet, to be resolved., , Pfr Is the Physiologically Active Form of, Phytochrome, Because phytochrome responses are induced by red light,, they could in theory result either from the appearance of, Pfr or from the disappearance of Pr. In most cases studied,, a quantitative relationship holds between the magnitude, of the physiological response and the amount of Pfr generated by light, but no such relationship holds between the, physiological response and the loss of Pr., Evidence such as this has led to the conclusion that Pfr, is the physiologically active form of phytochrome. In cases, in which it has been shown that a phytochrome response, is not quantitatively related to the absolute amount of Pfr,, it has been proposed that the ratio between Pfr and Pr, or, between Pfr and the total amount of phytochrome, determines the magnitude of the response., The conclusion that Pfr is the physiologically active, form of phytochrome is supported by studies with mutants, of Arabidopsis that are unable to synthesize phytochrome., In wild-type seedlings, hypocotyl elongation is strongly, inhibited by white light, and phytochrome is one of the, photoreceptors involved in this response. When grown, under continuous white light, mutant seedlings with long, hypocotyls were discovered and were termed hy mutants., Different hy mutants are designated by numbers: hy1, hy2,, and so on. Because white light is a mixture of wavelengths, (including red, far red, and blue), some, but not all, of the, hy mutants have been shown to be deficient for one or, more functional phytochrome(s).
Page 430 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, Chromophore: phytochromobilin, O, H, , Pro, , Polypeptide, , The phenotypes of phytochrome-deficient mutants have, been useful in identifying the physiologically active form, of phytochrome. If the phytochrome-induced response to, white light (hypocotyl growth inhibition) is caused by the, absence of Pr, such phytochrome-deficient mutants (which, have neither Pr nor Pfr) should have short hypocotyls in, both darkness and white light. Instead, the opposite occurs;, that is, they have long hypocotyls in both darkness and, white light. It is the absence of Pfr that prevents the, seedlings from responding to white light. In other words,, Pfr brings about the physiological response., , A, , His, , R, , N, , Cys, , 5, , Gln, , Phytochromobilin Is Synthesized in Plastids, The phytochrome apoprotein alone cannot absorb red or, far-red light. Light can be absorbed only when the, polypeptide is covalently linked with phytochromobilin to, form the holoprotein. Phytochromobilin is synthesized, inside plastids and is derived from 5-aminolevulinic acid, via a pathway that branches from the chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway (see Web Topic 7.11). It is thought to leak, out of the plastid into the cytosol by a passive process., Assembly of the phytochrome apoprotein with its chromophore is autocatalytic; that is, it occurs spontaneously, when purified phytochrome polypeptide is mixed with, purified chromophore in the test tube, with no additional, proteins or cofactors (Li and Lagarias 1992). The resultant, holoprotein has spectral properties similar to those, observed for the holoprotein purified from plants, and it, exhibits red/far-red reversibility (Li and Lagarias 1992)., Mutant plants that lack the ability to synthesize the, chromophore are defective in processes that require the, , N, , N, , 10, , N, , H, , D, , H, , H, , His, Leu, , 15, +, , B, , Ser, S, , H, , R, , C, , O, , Pr, , Cis isomer, , Thioether, linkage, Red light, converts, cis to trans, , Phytochrome Is a Dimer Composed of, Two Polypeptides, Native phytochrome is a soluble protein with a molecular, mass of about 250 kDa. It occurs as a dimer made up of two, equivalent subunits. Each subunit consists of two components: a light-absorbing pigment molecule called the chromophore, and a polypeptide chain called the apoprotein., The apoprotein monomer has a molecular mass of about, 125 kDa. Together, the apoprotein and its chromophore, make up the holoprotein. In higher plants the chromophore, of phytochrome is a linear tetrapyrrole termed phytochromobilin. There is only one chromophore per monomer of, apoprotein, and it is attached to the protein through a, thioether linkage to a cysteine residue (Figure 17.4)., Researchers have visualized the Pr form of phytochrome, using electron microscopy and X-ray scattering, and the, model shown in Figure 17.5 has been proposed (Nakasako, et al. 1990). The polypeptide folds into two major domains, separated by a “hinge” region. The larger N-terminal, domain is approximately 70 kDa and bears the chromophore; the smaller C-terminal domain is approximately, 55 kDa and contains the site where the two monomers associate with each other to form the dimer (see Web Topic 17.1)., , 379, , O, , D, , O, H, , Pro, His, , A, , R, , N, , N, , 5, , N, , 10, , N, H, , H, , +, , B, S, , 15, , C, , Ser, Cys, , R, , Trans isomer, , H, , H, , His, , Pfr, , Leu, Gln, , FIGURE 17.4 Structure of the Pr and Pfr forms of the chro-, , mophore (phytochromobilin) and the peptide region bound, to the chromophore through a thioether linkage. The chromophore undergoes a cis–trans isomerization at carbon 15 in, response to red and far-red light. (After Andel et al. 1997.), , action of phytochrome, even though the apoprotein, polypeptides are present. For example, several of the hy, mutants noted earlier, in which white light fails to suppress, hypocotyl elongation, have defects in chromophore biosynthesis. In hy1 and hy2 mutant plants, phytochrome apoprotein levels are normal, but there is little or no spectrally, , Chromophore-binding, domains, IA, , IIA, IB, , IIB, , FIGURE 17.5 Structure of the phytochrome dimer. The, monomers are labeled I and II. Each monomer consists of a, chromophore-binding domain (A) and a smaller nonchromophore domain (B). The molecule as a whole has an ellipsoidal rather than globular shape. (After Tokutomi et al., 1989.)
Page 431 :
380, , Chapter 17, , active holoprotein. When a chromophore precursor is supplied to these seedlings, normal growth is restored., The same type of mutation has been observed in other, species. For example, the yellow-green mutant of tomato has, properties similar to those of hy mutants, suggesting that it, is also a chromophore mutant., , Both Chromophore and Protein Undergo, Conformational Changes, Because the chromophore absorbs the light, conformational, changes in the protein are initiated by changes in the chromophore. Upon absorption of light, the Pr chromophore, undergoes a cis–trans isomerization of the double bond, between carbons 15 and 16 and rotation of the C14–C15, single bond (see Figure 17.4) (Andel et al. 1997). During the, conversion of Pr to Pfr, the protein moiety of the phytochrome holoprotein also undergoes a subtle conformational change., Several lines of evidence suggest that the light-induced, change in the conformation of the polypeptide occurs both, in the N-terminal chromophore-binding domain and in the, C-terminal region of the protein., , Two Types of Phytochromes Have Been Identified, Phytochrome is most abundant in etiolated seedlings; thus, most biochemical studies have been carried out on phytochrome purified from nongreen tissues. Very little phytochrome is extractable from green tissues, and a portion, of the phytochrome that can be extracted differs in molecular mass from the abundant form of phytochrome found, in etiolated plants., Research has shown that there are two different classes, of phytochrome with distinct properties. These have been, termed Type I and Type II phytochromes (Furuya 1993)., Type I is about nine times more abundant than Type II in, dark-grown pea seedlings; in light-grown pea seedlings the, amounts of the two types are about equal. More recently,, the two types have been shown to be distinct proteins., The cloning of genes that encode different phytochrome, polypeptides has clarified the distinct nature of the phytochromes present in etiolated and green seedlings. Even, in etiolated seedlings, phytochrome is a mixture of related, proteins encoded by different genes., , Phytochrome Is Encoded by a Multigene Family, The cloning of phytochrome genes made it possible to, carry out a detailed comparison of the amino acid, sequences of the related proteins. It also allowed the study, of their expression patterns, at both the mRNA and the protein levels., The first phytochrome sequences cloned were from, monocots. These studies and subsequent research indicated, that phytochromes are soluble proteins—a finding that is, consistent with previous purification studies. A comple-, , mentary-DNA clone encoding phytochrome from the dicot, zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) was used to identify five structurally related phytochrome genes in Arabidopsis (Sharrock, and Quail 1989). This phytochrome gene family is named, PHY, and its five individual members are PHYA, PHYB,, PHYC, PHYD, and PHYE., The apoprotein by itself (without the chromophore) is, designated PHY; the holoprotein (with the chromophore), is designated phy. By convention, phytochrome sequences, from other higher plants are named according to their, homology with the Arabidopsis PHY genes. Monocots, appear to have representatives of only the PHYA through, PHYC families, while dicots have others derived by gene, duplication (Mathews and Sharrock 1997)., Some of the hy mutants have turned out to be selectively, deficient in specific phytochromes. For example, hy3 is deficient in phyB, and hy1 and hy2 are deficient in chromophore. These and other phy mutants have been useful in, determining the physiological functions of the different, phytochromes (as discussed later in this chapter)., , PHY Genes Encode Two Types of Phytochrome, On the basis of their expression patterns, the products of, members of the PHY gene family can be classified as either, Type I or Type II phytochromes. PHYA is the only gene that, encodes a Type I phytochrome. This conclusion is based on, the expression pattern of the PHYA promoter, as well as on, the accumulation of its mRNA and polypeptide in response, to light. Additional studies of plants that contain mutated, forms of the PHYA gene (termed phyA alleles) have confirmed this conclusion and have given some clues about, the role of this phytochrome in whole plants., The PHYA gene is transcriptionally active in dark-grown, seedlings, but its expression is strongly inhibited in the, light in monocots. In dark-grown oat, treatment with red, light reduces phytochrome synthesis because the Pfr form, of phytochrome inhibits the expression of its own gene. In, addition, the PHYA mRNA is unstable, so once etiolated, oat seedlings are transferred to the light, PHYA mRNA, rapidly disappears. The inhibitory effect of light on PHYA, transcription is less dramatic in dicots, and in Arabidopsis, red light has no measurable effect on PHYA., The amount of phyA in the cell is also regulated by protein destruction. The Pfr form of the protein encoded by the, PHYA gene, called PfrA, is unstable. There is evidence that, PfrA may become marked or tagged for destruction by the, ubiquitin system (Vierstra 1994). As discussed in Chapter, 14 on the web site, ubiquitin is a small polypeptide that, binds covalently to proteins and serves as a recognition site, for a large proteolytic complex, the proteasome., Therefore, oats and other monocots rapidly lose most of, their Type I phytochrome (phyA) in the light as a result of, a combination of factors: inhibition of transcription, mRNA, degradation, and proteolysis:
Page 432 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, , –, PHYA, , Phytochrome Can Be Detected in Tissues, Spectrophotometrically, , Red, , mRNA, , Pr, , Far red, , Pfr, , Response, Ubiquitin +, , ATP, , Ubiquitin, , Degradation, , Degradation, , In dicots, phyA levels also decline in the light as a result of, proteolysis, but not as dramatically., The remaining PHY genes (PHYB through PHYE), encode the Type II phytochromes. Although detected in, green plants, these phytochromes are also present in etiolated plants. The reason is that the expression of their, mRNAs is not significantly changed by light, and the, encoded phyB through phyE proteins are more stable in, the Pfr form than is PfrA., Red, , PHYB–E, , mRNA, , Pr, , Far red, , 381, , Pfr, , Response, , LOCALIZATION OF PHYTOCHROME IN, TISSUES AND CELLS, Valuable insights into the function of a protein can be, gained from a determination of where it is located. It is not, surprising, therefore, that much effort has been devoted to, the localization of phytochrome in organs and tissues, and, within individual cells., , The unique photoreversible properties of phytochrome can, be used to quantify the pigment in whole plants through, the use of a spectrophotometer. Because its color is masked, by chlorophyll, phytochrome is difficult to detect in green, tissue. In dark-grown plants, where there is no chlorophyll,, phytochrome has been detected in many angiosperm tissues—both monocot and dicot—as well as in gymnosperms, ferns, mosses, and algae., In etiolated seedlings the highest phytochrome levels, are usually found in meristematic regions or in regions that, were recently meristematic, such as the bud and first node, of pea (Figure 17.6), or the tip and node regions of the, coleoptile in oat. However, differences in expression patterns between monocots and dicots and between Type I, and Type II phytochromes are apparent when other, more, sensitive methods are used., , Phytochrome Is Differentially Expressed In, Different Tissues, The cloning of individual PHY genes has enabled researchers, to determine the patterns of expression of individual phytochromes in specific tissues by several methods. The, sequences can be used directly to probe mRNAs isolated, from different tissues or to analyze transcriptional activity by, means of a reporter gene, which visually reveals sites of gene, expression. In the latter approach, the promoter of a PHYA or, PHYB gene is joined to the coding portion of a reporter gene,, such as the gene for the enzyme β-glucuronidase, which is, , First node, 0, 2, 12, Epicotyl, , Cotyledon, , Distance (mm), , 22, , 0, 10, 20, , Root, 20, 10, 0, Concentration of phytochrome, , FIGURE 17.6 Phytochrome is, most heavily concentrated in, the regions where dramatic, developmental changes are, occurring: the apical meristems, of the epicotyl and root. Shown, here is the distribution of phytochrome in an etiolated pea, seedling, as measured spectrophotometrically. (From, Kendrick and Frankland 1983.)
Page 433 :
382, , Chapter 17, , called GUS (recall that the promoter is the sequence upstream, of the gene that is required for transcription)., The advantage of using the GUS sequence is that it, encodes an enzyme that, even in very small amounts, converts a colorless substrate to a colored precipitate when the, substrate is supplied to the plant. Thus, cells in which the, PHYA promoter is active will be stained blue, and other, cells will be colorless. The hybrid, or fused, gene is then, placed back into the plant through use of the Ti plasmid of, Agrobacterium tumefaciens as a vector (see Web Topic 21.5)., When this method was used to examine the transcription of two different PHYA genes in tobacco, dark-grown, seedlings were found to contain the highest amount of, stain in the apical hook and the root tips, in keeping with, earlier immunological studies (Adam et al. 1994). The pattern of staining in light-grown seedlings was similar but,, as might be expected, was of much lower intensity. Similar, studies with Arabidopsis PHYA–GUS and PHYB–GUS, fusions placed back in Arabidopsis confirmed the PHYA, results for tobacco and indicated that PHYB–GUS is, expressed at much lower levels than PHYA–GUS in all tissues (Somers and Quail 1995)., A recent study comparing the expression patterns of, PHYB–GUS, PHYD–GUS, and PHYE–GUS fusions in Arabidopsis has revealed that although these Type II promoters, are less active than the Type I promoters, they do show distinct expression patterns (Goosey et al. 1997). Thus the general picture emerging from these studies is that the phytochromes are expressed in distinct but overlapping, patterns., In summary, phytochromes are most abundant in, young, undifferentiated tissues, in the cells where the, mRNAs are most abundant and the promoters are most, active. The strong correlation between phytochrome abundance and cells that have the potential for dynamic developmental changes is consistent with the important role of, phytochromes in controlling such developmental changes., However, note that the studies discussed here do not, address whether the phytochromes are photoactive as, apoproteins or holoproteins., Because the expression patterns of individual phytochromes overlap, it is not surprising that they function, cooperatively, although they probably also use distinct signal transduction pathways. Support for this idea also, comes from the study of phytochrome mutants, which we, will discuss later in this chapter., , CHARACTERISTICS OF PHYTOCHROMEINDUCED WHOLE-PLANT RESPONSES, The variety of different phytochrome responses in intact, plants is extensive, in terms of both the kinds of responses, (see Table 17.1) and the quantity of light needed to induce, the responses. A survey of this variety will show how, diversely the effects of a single photoevent—the absorption, , of light by Pr—are manifested throughout the plant. For, ease of discussion, phytochrome-induced responses may, be logically grouped into two types:, 1. Rapid biochemical events, 2. Slower morphological changes, including movements, and growth, Some of the early biochemical reactions affect later, developmental responses. The nature of these early biochemical events, which comprise signal transduction pathways, will be treated in detail later in the chapter. Here we, will focus on the effects of phytochrome on whole-plant, responses. As we will see, such responses can be classified, into various types, depending on the amount and duration, of light required, and on their action spectra., , Phytochrome Responses Vary in Lag Time and, Escape Time, Morphological responses to the photoactivation of phytochrome may be observed visually after a lag time—the, time between a stimulation and an observed response. The, lag time may be as brief as a few minutes or as long as several weeks. The more rapid of these responses are usually, reversible movements of organelles (see Web Topic 17.2), or reversible volume changes (swelling, shrinking) in cells,, but even some growth responses are remarkably fast., Red-light inhibition of the stem elongation rate of lightgrown pigweed (Chenopodium album) is observed within 8, minutes after its relative level of Pfr is increased. Kinetic, studies using Arabidopsis have confirmed this observation, and further shown that phyA acts within minutes after, exposure to red light (Parks and Spalding 1999). In these, studies the primary contribution of phyA was found to be, over by 3 hours, at which time phyA protein was no longer, detectable through the use of antibodies, and the contribution of phyB increased (Morgan and Smith 1978). Longer, lag times of several weeks are observed for the induction, of flowering (see Chapter 24)., Information about the lag time for a phytochrome, response helps researchers evaluate the kinds of biochemical events that could precede and cause the induction of, that response. The shorter the lag time, the more limited the, range of biochemical events that could have been involved., Variety in phytochrome responses can also be seen in, the phenomenon called escape from photoreversibility., Red light–induced events are reversible by far-red light for, only a limited period of time, after which the response is, said to have “escaped” from reversal control by light., A model to explain this phenomenon assumes that phytochrome-controlled morphological responses are the result, of a step-by-step sequence of linked biochemical reactions, in the responding cells. Each of these sequences has a point, of no return beyond which it proceeds irrevocably to the, response. The escape time for different responses ranges, from less than a minute to, remarkably, hours.
Page 434 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, , Phytochrome Responses Can Be Distinguished by, the Amount of Light Required, , Very-Low-Fluence Responses Are, Nonphotoreversible, Some phytochrome responses can be initiated by fluences, as low as 0.0001 µmol m–2 (one-tenth of the amount of, light emitted from a firefly in a single flash), and they saturate (i.e., reach a maximum) at about 0.05 µmol m–2. For, example, in dark-grown oat seedlings, red light can stimulate the growth of the coleoptile and inhibit the growth, of the mesocotyl (the elongated axis between the coleoptile and the root) at such low fluences. Arabidopsis seeds, can be induced to germinate with red light in the range of, 0.001 to 0.1 µmol m–2. These remarkable effects of vanishingly low levels of illumination are called very-low-fluence responses (VLFRs)., The minute amount of light needed to induce VLFRs, converts less than 0.02% of the total phytochrome to Pfr., Because the far-red light that would normally reverse a, red-light effect converts 97% of the Pfr to Pr (as discussed, earlier), about 3% of the phytochrome remains as Pfr—significantly more than is needed to induce VLFRs (Mandoli, and Briggs 1984). Thus, far-red light cannot reverse VLFRs., The VLFR action spectrum matches the absorption spectrum of Pr, supporting the view that Pfr is the active form, for these responses (Shinomura et al. 1996)., Ecological implications of the VLFR in seed germination are discussed in Web Essay 17.1, , 1, , For definitions of fluence, irradiance, and other terms, involved in light measurement, see Web Topic 9.1., 2 Irradiance is sometimes loosely equated with light intensity. The term intensity, however, refers to light emitted by, the source, whereas irradiance refers to light that is incident, on the object., , I1, , VLFR:, LFR:, Reciprocity applies, Reciprocity applies,, not FR-reversible, FR-reversible, , I2, I3, , HIR: Fluence rate, dependent, long, irradiation required,, and not photoreversible, reciprocity, does not apply, , Relative response, , In addition to being distinguished by lag times and escape, times, phytochrome responses can be distinguished by the, amount of light required to induce them. The amount of, light is referred to as the fluence,1 which is defined as the, number of photons impinging on a unit surface area (see, Chapter 9 and Web Topic 9.1). The most commonly used, units for fluence are moles of quanta per square meter (mol, m–2). In addition to the fluence, some phytochrome, responses are sensitive to the irradiance,2 or fluence rate, of, light. The units of irradiance in terms of photons are moles, of quanta per square meter per second (mol m–2 s–1)., Each phytochrome response has a characteristic range, of light fluences over which the magnitude of the response, is proportional to the fluence. As Figure 17.7 shows, these, responses fall into three major categories based on the, amount of light required: very-low-fluence responses, (VLFRs), low-fluence responses (LFRs), and high-irradiance responses (HIRs)., , 383, , –8, , –6, , –4, –2, 0, 2, 4, Log fluence (µmol m–2), , 6, , 8, , FIGURE 17.7 Three types of phytochrome responses, based, on their sensitivities to fluence. The relative magnitudes of, representative responses are plotted against increasing fluences of red light. Short light pulses activate VLFRs and, LFRs. Because HIRs are also proportional to the irradiance,, the effects of three different irradiances given continuously, are illustrated (I1 > I2 > I3). (From Briggs et al. 1984.), , Low-Fluence Responses Are Photoreversible, Another set of phytochrome responses cannot be initiated, until the fluence reaches 1.0 µmol m–2, and they are saturated at 1000 µmol m–2. These responses are referred to as, low-fluence responses (LFRs), and they include most of, the red/far-red photoreversible responses, such as the promotion of lettuce seed germination and the regulation of, leaf movements, that are mentioned in Table 17.1. The LFR, action spectrum for Arabidopsis seed germination is shown, in Figure 17.8. LFR spectra include a main peak for stimulation in the red region (660 nm), and a major peak for, inhibition in the far-red region (720 nm)., Both VLFRs and LFRs can be induced by brief pulses of, light, provided that the total amount of light energy adds, up to the required fluence. The total fluence is a function of, two factors: the fluence rate (mol m–2 s–1) and the irradiation time. Thus a brief pulse of red light will induce a, response, provided that the light is sufficiently bright, and, conversely, very dim light will work if the irradiation time, is long enough. This reciprocal relationship between fluence, rate and time is known as the law of reciprocity, which was, first formulated by R. W. Bunsen and H. E. Roscoe in 1850., VLFRs and LFRs both obey the law of reciprocity., , High-Irradiance Responses Are Proportional to the, Irradiance and the Duration, Phytochrome responses of the third type are termed highirradiance responses (HIRs), several of which are listed in
Page 435 :
384, , Chapter 17, , FIGURE 17.8 LFR action spectra, for the photoreversible stimulation and inhibition of seed germination in Arabidopsis. (After, Shropshire et al. 1961.), , Table 17.2. HIRs require prolonged or continuous exposure, to light of relatively high irradiance, and the response is, proportional to the irradiance within a certain range., The reason that these responses are called high-irradiance, responses rather than high-fluence responses is that they are, proportional to irradiance (loosely speaking, the brightness, of the light) rather than to fluence. HIRs saturate at much, higher fluences than LFRs—at least 100 times higher—and, are not photoreversible. Because neither continuous exposure to dim light nor transient exposure to bright light can, induce HIRs, HIRs do not obey the law of reciprocity., Many of the photoreversible LFRs listed in Table 17.1,, particularly those involved in de-etiolation, also qualify as, HIRs. For example, at low fluences the action spectrum for, anthocyanin production in seedlings of white mustard, (Sinapis alba) shows a single peak in the red region of the, spectrum, the effect is reversible with far-red light, and the, response obeys the law of reciprocity. However, if the darkgrown seedlings are instead exposed to high-irradiance, light for several hours, the action spectrum now includes, peaks in the far-red and blue regions (see the next section),, the effect is no longer photoreversible, and the response, becomes proportional to the irradiance. Thus the same, effect can be either an LFR or an HIR, depending on its history of exposure to light., , The HIR Action Spectrum of Etiolated Seedlings, Has Peaks in the Far-Red, Blue, and UV-A Regions, , HIRs, such as the inhibition of stem or hypocotyl growth,, have usually been studied in dark-grown, etiolated, seedlings. The HIR action spectrum for the inhibition of, hypocotyl elongation in dark-grown lettuce seedlings is, shown in Figure 17.9. For HIRs the main peak of activity is, in the far-red region between the absorption maxima of Pr, and Pfr, and there are peaks in the blue and UV-A regions, as well. Because the absence of a peak in the red region is, unusual for a phytochrome-mediated response, at first, researchers believed that another pigment might be, involved., A large body of evidence now supports the view that, phytochrome is one of the photoreceptors involved in HIRs, (see Web Topic 17.3). However, it has long been suspected, that the peaks in the UV-A and blue regions are due to a, separate photoreceptor that absorbs UV-A and blue light., As a test of this hypothesis, the HIR action spectrum for, the inhibition of hypocotyl elongation was determined in, dark-grown hy2 mutants of Arabidopsis, which have little or, no phytochrome holoprotein. As expected, the wild-type, seedlings exhibited peaks in the UV-A, blue, and far-red, regions of the spectrum. In contrast, the hy2 mutant failed, to respond to either far-red or red light., Although the phytochrome-deficient hy2, TABLE 17.2, mutant exhibited no peak in the far-red, Some plant photomorphogenic responses induced by high irradiances, region, it showed a normal response to, UV-A and blue light (Goto et al. 1993)., Synthesis of anthocyanin in various dicot seedings and in apple skin segments, Inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in mustard, lettuce, and petunia seedlings, These results demonstrate that phyInduction of flowering in henbane (Hyoscyamus), tochrome is not involved in the HIR to, Plumular hook opening in lettuce, either UV-A or blue light, and that a sepEnlargement of cotyledons in mustard, arate blue/UV-A photoreceptor is, Production of ethylene in sorghum, responsible for the response to these
Page 436 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, , 385, , Type II phytochrome phyB and possibly others., , ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS:, SHADE AVOIDANCE, Thus far we have discussed phytochrome-regulated responses as, studied in the laboratory. However,, phytochrome plays important ecological roles for plants growing in the, environment. In the discussion that, follows we will learn how plants, sense and respond to shading by, other plants, and how phytochrome, is involved in regulating various, daily rhythms. We will also examine, the specialized functions of the different phytochrome gene family, members in these processes., , Phytochrome Enables Plants, to Adapt to Changing Light, Conditions, The presence of a red/far-red reversible pigment in all green plants,, from algae to dicots, suggests that, these wavelengths of light provide, information that helps plants adjust to, their environment. What environmental conditions change the relative levels of these two wavelengths of light in natural radiation?, The ratio of red light (R) to far-red light (FR) varies, remarkably in different environments. This ratio can be, defined as follows:, , FIGURE 17.9 HIR action spectrum for the inhibition of hypocotyl elongation of, dark-grown lettuce seedlings. The peaks of activity for the inhibition of, hypocotyl elongation occur in the UV-A, blue, and far-red regions of the spectrum. (After Hartmann 1967.), , wavelengths. More recent studies indicate that the bluelight photoreceptors CRY1 and CRY2 are involved in bluelight inhibition of hypocotyl elongation., , The HIR Action Spectrum of Green Plants Has a, Major Red Peak, During studies of the HIR of etiolated seedlings, it was, observed that the response to continuous far-red light, declines rapidly as the seedlings begin to green. For example, the action spectrum for the inhibition of hypocotyl, growth of light-grown green Sinapis alba (white mustard), seedlings is shown in Figure 17.10. In general, HIR action, spectra for light-grown plants exhibit a single major peak, in the red, similar to the action spectra of LFRs (see Figure, 17.8), except that the effect is nonphotoreversible., The loss of responsiveness to continuous far-red light is, strongly correlated with the depletion of the light-labile, pool of Type I phytochrome, which consists mostly of, phyA. This finding suggests that the HIR of etiolated, seedlings to far-red light is mediated by phyA, whereas, the HIR of green seedlings to red light is mediated by the, , FIGURE 17.10 HIR action spectra for the inhibition of hypocotyl elongation of light-, , grown white mustard (Sinapis alba) seedlings. (After Beggs et al. 1980.)
Page 437 :
Chapter 17, , R/FR =, , Photon fluence rate, in 10 nm band centered on 660 nm, Photon fluence rate, in 10 nm band centered on 730 nm, , Table 17.3 compares both the total light intensity in photons, (400–800 nm) and the R/FR values in eight natural environments. Both parameters vary greatly in different environments., Compared with direct daylight, there is relatively more, far-red light during sunset, under 5 mm of soil, or under, the canopy of other plants (as on the floor of a forest). The, canopy phenomenon results from the fact that green leaves, absorb red light because of their high chlorophyll content, but are relatively transparent to far-red light., , The R:FR ratio and shading. An important function of, phytochrome is that it enables plants to sense shading by, other plants. Plants that increase stem extension in response, to shading are said to exhibit a shade avoidance response., As shading increases, the R:FR ratio decreases. The greater, proportion of far-red light converts more Pfr to Pr, and the, ratio of Pfr to total phytochrome (Pfr/Ptotal) decreases., When simulated natural radiation was used to vary the farred content, it was found that for so-called sun plants, (plants that normally grow in an open-field habitat), the, higher the far-red content (i.e., the lower the Pfr:Ptotal ratio),, the higher the rate of stem extension (Figure 17.11)., In other words, simulated canopy shading (high levels, of far-red light) induced these plants to allocate more of, their resources to growing taller. This correlation did not, hold for “shade plants,” which normally grow in a shaded, environment. Shade plants showed little or no reduction in, their stem extension rate as they were exposed to higher, R/FR values (see Figure 17.11). Thus there appears to be, , TABLE 17.3, Ecologically important light parameters, Photon flux density, (µmol m–2 s–1), , Daylight, Sunset, Moonlight, Ivy canopy, Lakes, at a depth of 1 m, Black Loch, Loch Leven, Loch Borralie, Soil, at a depth of 5 mm, , 1900, 26.5, 0.005, 17.7, 680, 300, 1200, 8.6, , 0.10, Logarithm of the stem elongation rate, , 386, , 0.08, Sun plants, , 0.06, Shade plants, 0.04, , 0.02, , 0.0, , 0.2, , 0.4, Pfr/Ptotal, , 0.6, , 0.8, , FIGURE 17.11 Role of phytochrome in shade perception in, , sun plants (solid line) versus shade plants (dashed line)., (After Morgan and Smith 1979.), , a systematic relationship between phytochrome-controlled, growth and species habitat. Such results are taken as an, indication of the involvement of phytochrome in shade, perception., For a “sun plant” or “shade-avoiding plant” there is a, clear adaptive value in allocating its resources toward more, rapid extension growth when it is shaded by another plant., In this way it can enhance its chances of, growing above the canopy and acquiring, a greater share of unfiltered, photosynthetically active light. The price for favoring internode elongation is usually, reduced leaf area and reduced branching,, R/FRa, but at least in the short run this adapta1.19, tion to canopy shade seems to work., 0.96, 0.94, 0.13, , 17.2, 3.1, 1.2, 0.88, , Source: Smith 1982, p. 493., Note: The light intensity factor (400–800 nm) is given as the photon flux density, and phytochrome-active light is given as the R:FR ratio., aAbsolute values taken from spectroradiometer scans; the values should be taken to indicate the relationships between the various natural conditions and not as actual environmental means., , The R:FR ratio and seed germination., Light quality also plays a role in regulating the germination of some seeds. As, discussed earlier, phytochrome was discovered in studies of light-dependent lettuce seed germination., In general, large-seeded species, with, ample food reserves to sustain prolonged, seedling growth in darkness (e.g., underground), do not require light for germination. However, a light requirement is
Page 438 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, often observed in the small seeds of herbaceous and grassland species, many of which remain dormant, even while, hydrated, if they are buried below the depth to which light, penetrates. Even when such seeds are on or near the soil, surface, their level of shading by the vegetation canopy, (i.e., the R:FR ratio they receive) is likely to affect their germination. For example, it is well documented that far-red, enrichment imparted by a leaf canopy inhibits germination, in a range of small-seeded species., For the small seeds of the tropical species trumpet tree, (Cecropia obtusifolia) and Veracruz pepper (Piper auritum), planted on the floor of a deeply shaded forest, this inhibition can be reversed if a light filter is placed immediately, above the seeds that permits the red component of the, canopy-shaded light to pass through while blocking the, far-red component. Although the canopy transmits very little red light, the level is enough to stimulate the seeds to, germinate, probably because most of the inhibitory far-red, light is excluded by the filter and the R:FR ratio is very, high. These seeds would also be more likely to germinate, in spaces receiving sunlight through gaps in the canopy, than in densely shaded spaces. The sunlight would help, ensure that the seedlings became photosynthetically selfsustaining before their seed food reserves were exhausted., As will be discussed later in the chapter, recent studies, on light-dependent lettuce seeds have shown that red, light–induced germination is the result of an increase in the, level of the biologically active form of the hormone gibberellin. Thus, phytochrome may promote seed germination through its effects on gibberellin biosynthesis (see, Chapter 20)., , ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS:, CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS, Various metabolic processes in, plants, such as oxygen evolution and, respiration, cycle alternately through, high-activity and low-activity phases, with a regular periodicity of about 24, hours. These rhythmic changes are, referred to as circadian rhythms, (from the Latin circa diem, meaning, “approximately a day”). The period, of a rhythm is the time that elapses, between successive peaks or troughs, in the cycle, and because the rhythm, persists in the absence of external, controlling factors, it is considered to, be endogenous., The endogenous nature of circadian rhythms suggests that they are, governed by an internal pacemaker,, called an oscillator. The endogenous oscillator is coupled to a vari-, , (A), , 387, , ety of physiological processes. An important feature of the, oscillator is that it is unaffected by temperature, which, enables the clock to function normally under a wide variety, of seasonal and climatic conditions. The clock is said to, exhibit temperature compensation., Light is a strong modulator of rhythms in both plants, and animals. Although circadian rhythms that persist, under controlled laboratory conditions usually have periods one or more hours longer or shorter than 24 hours, in, nature their periods tend to be uniformly closer to 24 hours, because of the synchronizing effects of light at daybreak,, referred to as entrainment. Both red and blue light are, effective in entrainment. The red-light effect is photoreversible by far-red light, indicative of phytochrome; the, blue-light effect is mediated by blue-light photoreceptor(s)., , Phytochrome Regulates the Sleep Movements, of Leaves, The sleep movements of leaves, referred to as nyctinasty,, are a well-described example of a plant circadian rhythm, that is regulated by light. In nyctinasty, leaves and/or, leaflets extend horizontally (open) to face the light during, the day and fold together vertically (close) at night (Figure, 17.12). Nyctinastic leaf movements are exhibited by many, legumes, such as Mimosa, Albizia, and Samanea, as well as, members of the oxalis family. The change in leaf or leaflet, angle is caused by rhythmic turgor changes in the cells of, the pulvinus (plural pulvini), a specialized structure at the, base of the petiole., Once initiated, the rhythm of opening and closing persists even in constant darkness, both in whole plants and, in isolated leaflets (Figure 17.13). The phase of the rhythm, (see Chapter 24), however, can be shifted by various exogenous signals, including red or blue light., , (B), , FIGURE 17.12 Thigmotropic (touch-sensitive) leaf movements of Mimosa pudica., , (A) Leaflets open. (B) Leaflets closed. Similar leaflet movements occur diurnally, in nyctonasty. (Photos © David Sieren/Visuals Unlimited.)
Page 439 :
388, , Chapter 17, , Leaf position, , with circadian rhythms at the level of, gene expression. The expression of genes, in the LHCB family, encoding the lightLeaf, Petiole, harvesting chlorophyll a/b–binding proLeaflet, teins of photosystem II, is regulated at, the transcriptional level by both circadian rhythms and phytochrome., Up, In leaves of pea and wheat, the level of, LHCB mRNA has been found to oscillate, during daily light–dark cycles, rising in, the morning and falling in the evening., Since the rhythm persists even in continuous darkness, it appears to be a circadian, rhythm. But phytochrome can perturb, this cyclical pattern of expression., When wheat plants are transferred, Light, Dark, Light, Dark, Light, Dark, from, a cycle of 12 hours light and 12, Down, hours, dark to continuous darkness, the, 12, 24, 12, 24, 12, 24, 12, 24, Time, rhythm persists for a while, but it slowly, damps out (i.e., reduces in amplitude until, FIGURE 17.13 Circadian rhythm in the diurnal movements of Albizia leaves., no, peaks or troughs are discernible). If,, The leaves are elevated in the morning and lowered in the evening. In parallel, however, the plants are given a pulse, with the raising and lowering of the leaves, the leaflets open and close. The, of red light before they are transferred, rhythm persists at a lower amplitude for a limited time in total darkness., to continuous darkness, no damping, occurs (i.e., the levels of LHCB mRNA, continue to oscillate as they do during, the, light–dark, cycles)., Light also directly affects movement: Blue light stimuIn contrast, a far-red flash at the end of the day prevents, lates closed leaflets to open, and red light followed by darkthe expression of LHCB in continuous darkness, and the, ness causes open leaflets to close. The leaflets begin to close, within 5 minutes after being transferred to darkness, and, effect of far red is reversed by red light. Note that it is not the, closure is complete in 30 minutes. Because the effect of red, oscillator that damps out under constant conditions, but the, light can be canceled by far-red light, phytochrome regucoupling of the oscillator to the physiological event being, lates leaflet closure., monitored. Red light restores the coupling between the oscilThe physiological mechanism of leaf movement is well, lator and the physiological process., understood. It results from turgor, changes in cells located on opposite, sides of the pulvinus, called ventral, (A) Open, (B) Closed, motor cells and dorsal motor cells, Ventral, Ventral, (Figure 17.14). These changes in turgor, motor, cells, motor cells, +, –, pressure depend on K and Cl fluxes, (turgid), (flaccid), across the plasma membranes of the, dorsal and ventral motor cells. Leaflets, open when the ventral motor cells accumulate K+ and Cl–, causing them to, K+, K+, swell, while the dorsal motor cells, Cl–, Cl–, release K+ and Cl–, causing them to, shrink. Reversal of this process results, in leaflet closure. Leaflet closure is, therefore an example of a rapid, response to phytochrome involving, Dorsal, Dorsal, Epidermis, motor cells, motor cells, ion fluxes across membranes., Vascular tissue, , Gene expression and circadian rhythms. Phytochrome can also interact, , (flaccid), , (turgid), , Ion fluxes between the dorsal and ventral motor cells of Albizia, pulvini regulate leaflet opening and closing. (After Galston 1994.), , FIGURE 17.14
Page 440 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, , Circadian Clock Genes of Arabidopsis, Have Been Identified, The isolation of clock mutants has been an important tool, for the identification of clock genes in other organisms. Isolating clock mutants in plants requires a convenient assay, that allows monitoring of the circadian rhythms of many, thousands of individual plants to detect the rare abnormal, phenotype., To allow screening for clock mutants in Arabidopsis, the, promoter region of the LHCB gene was fused to the gene, that encodes luciferase, an enzyme that emits light in the, presence of its substrate, luciferin. This reporter gene construct was then used to transform Arabidopsis with the Ti, plasmid of Agrobacterium as a vector. Investigators were, then able to monitor the temporal and spatial regulation of, bioluminescence in individual seedlings in real time using, a video camera (Millar et al. 1995)., A total of 21 independent toc (timing of CAB [LHCB], expression) mutants have been isolated, including both, short-period and long-period lines. The toc1 mutant in particular has been implicated in the core oscillator mechanism (Strayer et al. 2001). A model for the endogenous, oscillator will be discussed later in the chapter., , ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS:, PHYTOCHROME SPECIALIZATION, Phytochrome is encoded by a multigene family: PHYA, through PHYE. Despite the great similarity in their structures,, each of these phytochromes performs distinct roles in the life, of the plant. In this section we will discuss the current state, of our knowledge of the ecological functions of the different, phytochromes, focusing primarily on phyA and phyB., , Phytochrome B Mediates Responses to, Continuous Red or White Light, Phytochrome B was first suspected to play a role in, responses to continuous light because the hy3 mutant (now, called phyB), which has long hypocotyls under continuous, white light, was found to have an altered PHYB gene. In, these mutants, PHYB mRNA was reduced in amount or, was absent, and little or no phyB protein could be detected., In contrast, the levels of PHYA mRNA and phyA protein, were normal., Phytochrome B mediates shade avoidance by regulating, hypocotyl length in response to red light given in low-fluence pulses or continuously, and as might be expected, the, phyB mutant is unable to respond to shading by increasing, hypocotyl extension. In addition, these plants do not, extend their hypocotyls in response to far-red light given, at the end of each photoperiod (called the end-of-day far-red, response). Both of these responses are likely to involve perception of the Pfr:Ptotal ratio and occur in the low-fluence, region of the spectrum. Although phyB is centrally, involved in the shade avoidance response, evidence sug-, , 389, , gests that other phytochromes play important roles as well, (Smith and Whitelam 1997)., The phyB mutant is deficient in chlorophyll and in some, mRNAs that encode chloroplast proteins, and it is impaired, in its ability to respond to plant hormones. Since a mutation in PHYB results in impaired perception of continuous, red light, the presence of the other phytochromes must not, be sufficient to confer responsiveness to continuous red or, white light., Phytochrome B also appears to regulate photoreversible, seed germination, the phenomenon that originally led to, the discovery of phytochrome. Wild-type Arabidopsis seeds, require light for germination, and the response shows, red/far-red reversibility in the low-fluence range. Mutants, that lack phyA respond normally to red light; mutants deficient in phyB are unable to respond to low-fluence red light, (Shinomura et al. 1996). This experimental evidence, strongly suggests that phyB mediates photoreversible seed, germination., , Phytochrome A Is Required for the Response, to Continuous Far-Red Light, No phytochrome gene mutations other than phyB were, found in the original hy collection, so the identification of, phyA mutants required the development of more ingenious, screens. As discussed previously, because the far-red HIRs, were known to require light-labile (Type I) phytochrome,, it was suspected that phyA must be the photoreceptor, involved in the perception of continuous far-red light. If, this is true, then the phyA mutants should fail to respond, to continuous far-red light and grow tall and spindly under, these light conditions. However, mutants lacking chromophore would also look like this because phyA can detect, far-red light only when assembled with the chromophore, into holophytochrome., To select for just the phyA mutants, the seedlings that, grew tall in continuous far-red light were then grown, under continuous red light. The phyA-deficient mutants, can grow normally under this regimen, but a chromophore-deficient mutant, which also lacks functional, phyB, does not respond. The phyA mutant seedlings, selected in this screen had no obvious phenotype when, grown in normal white light, confirming that phyA has no, discernible role in sensing white light., This also explains why phyA mutants were not detected, in the original long-hypocotyl screen. Thus, phyA appears, to have a limited role in photomorphogenesis, restricted, primarily to de-etiolation and far-red responses. For example, phyA would be important when seeds germinate, under a canopy, which filters out much of the red light., It is also clear from this constant far-red light phenotype, that none of the other phytochromes is sufficient for the, perception of constant far-red light, and despite the ability, of all phytochromes to absorb red and far-red light, at least, phyA and phyB have distinct roles in this regard.
Page 441 :
390, , Chapter 17, , TABLE 17.4, Comparison of the very-low-fluence (VLFR), low-fluence (LFR), and high-irradiance responses (HIR), Type of Response, , Photoreversibility, , Reciprocity, , No, Yes, No, , Yes, Yes, No, , VLFR, LFR, HIR, a phyE, , Peaks of action spectraa, , Photoreceptor, , Red, Blue, Red, far red, Dark-grown: far red, blue, UV-A, Light-grown: red, , phyA, phyEa, phyB, phyD, phyE, Dark-grown: phyA, cryptochrome, Light-grown: phyB, , is required for seed germination but not for other VLFR responses mediated by phyA, , Phytochrome A also appears to be involved in the germination VLFR of Arabidopsis seeds. Thus, mutants lacking, phyA cannot germinate in response to red light in the verylow-fluence range, but they show a normal response to red, light in the low-fluence range (Shinomura et al. 1996). This, result demonstrates that phyA functions as the primary, photoreceptor for this VLFR, although recent evidence suggests that phyE is required for this component of seed germination (Hennig et al. 2002)., Table 17.4 summarizes the different roles of phyA, phyB,, and other photoreceptors in the various phytochromemediated responses., , Developmental Roles for Phytochromes C, D, and E, Are Also Emerging, Some of the roles of other phytochromes in plant growth, and development have recently begun to be elucidated, through experiments on mutant plants. Because these phytochromes have functions that overlap with those of phyA, and phyB, it was necessary to screen for mutants in phyAB, null mutant backgrounds to uncover mutations. For example, both phyD and phyE help mediate the shade avoidance response—a response mediated primarily by phyB., The creation of double and triple mutants has made it, , possible to assess the relative role of each phytochrome in, a given response. Thus it was found that, like phyB, phyD, plays a role in regulating leaf petiole elongation, as well as, in flowering time (see Chapter 24). Similar analyses support the idea that phyE acts redundantly with phyB and, phyD in these processes, but also acts redundantly with, phyA and phyB in inhibition of internode elongation., Of the Arabidopsis phytochromes, phyC is the least well, characterized. However, although phyAphyBphyDphyE, quadruple mutants appear to have normal responses to the, red:far red ratio, there are differences in phytochrome-regulated gene expression., In summary, phyC, phyD, and phyE appear to play, roles that are for the most part redundant with those of, phyA and phyB. Whereas phyB appears to be involved in, regulating all stages of development, the functions of the, other phytochromes are restricted to specific developmental steps or responses., , Phytochrome Interactions Are Important Early in, Germination, Figure 17.15A shows the action of constant red and far-red, light absorbed separately by the phyA and phyB systems., Continuous red light absorbed by phyB stimulates de-eti-, , (B), , (A), , Stimulates, de-etiolation, , Continuous, red light, , Inhibits, de-etiolation, , Continuous illumination, , Continuous, far-red light, , Inhibits, de-etiolation, , Stimulates, de-etiolation, , Red, , Far red, , Red, , Far red, , Red, , Far red, , Red, PrB, , PfrB, Far red, , PrA Photo- PfrA, equilibrium, phyB, , Stimulates, de-etiolation, , phyA, , phyB, , Stimulates, de-etiolation, , FIGURE 17.15 Mutually antagonistic roles of phyA and, , phyB. (After Quail et al. 1995.)
Page 442 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, olation by maintaining high levels of PfrB. Continuous farred light absorbed by PfrB prevents this stimulation by, reducing the amount of PfrB. The stimulation of de-etiolation by phyA depends on the photostationary state of phytochrome (indicated in Figure 17.15A by the circular, arrows). Continuous far-red light stimulates de-etiolation, when absorbed by the phyA system; continuous red light, inhibits the response., The effects of phyA and phyB on seedling development, in sunlight versus canopy shade (enriched in far-red light), are shown in Figure 17.15B. In open sunlight, which is, enriched in red light compared with canopy shade, de-etiolation is mediated primarily by the phyB system (on the, left in the figure). A seedling emerging under canopy, shade, enriched in far-red light, initiates de-etiolation primarily through the phyA system (center). Because phyA is, labile, however, the response is taken over by phyB (right)., In switching over to phyB, the stem is released from, growth inhibition (see Figure 17.15A), allowing for the, accelerated rate of stem elongation that is part of the shade, avoidance response (see Web Topic 17.4)., For a discussion of how plants sense their neighbors, using reflected light, see Web Essay 17.2., , PHYTOCHROME FUNCTIONAL DOMAINS, Prior to the identification of the multiple forms of phytochrome, it was difficult to understand how a single photoreceptor could regulate such diverse processes in the, cell. However, the discovery that phytochrome is encoded, by members of a multigene family, each with its own pattern of expression, provided a more plausible alternative, explanation: Each phytochrome-mediated response is regulated by a specific phytochrome, or by interactions, between specific phytochromes. As discussed earlier, this, , 391, , hypothesis was supported by the phenotypes of mutants, deficient in either phyA or phyB., As a corollary to this hypothesis, it was further postulated, that specific regions of the PHY proteins must be specialized, to allow them to perform their distinct functions. Molecular, biology provides the tools to answer such difficult questions., In this section we will describe what is known about the, functional domains of the phytochrome holoprotein., Just as mutations reducing the amount of a particular, phytochrome have yielded information about its role,, plants genetically engineered to overexpress a specific phytochrome are also useful. First, they allow an extension of, the range of phytochrome levels testable in relation to function. Second, as we will see, a particular phytochrome, sequence can be changed and reintroduced into a normal, plant to test its phenotypic effects., Usually plants overexpressing an introduced PHYA or, PHYB gene have a dramatically altered phenotype. Such, transgenic plants are often dwarfed, are dark green because, of elevated chlorophyll levels, and show reduced apical, dominance. This phenotype requires elevated levels of an, intact, photoactive holoprotein because overexpression of, a mutated form of phytochrome that is unable to combine, with its chromophore has a normal phenotype. Similarly,, plants expressing only the N-terminal domain of each phytochrome have a normal phenotype, even though elevated, levels of the photoactive fragment accumulate., Although protein overexpression greatly perturbs the, normal metabolism of a cell and is therefore subject to certain artifacts, such studies of structure and function have, helped build a picture of phytochrome as a molecule having two domains linked by a hinge: an N-terminal lightsensing domain in which the light specificity and stability, reside, and a C-terminal domain that contains the signaltransmitting sequences (Figure 17.16)., , Phytochrome A/B specificity, Chromophore, , Signal transmission, Regulatory, region, , Ubiquitination, site, , COOH, , H2N, , PEST (photodegradation), 74 kDa, N-terminal domain, , Dimerization, site, 55 kDa, C-terminal domain, , FIGURE 17.16 Schematic diagram of the phytochrome holoprotein, showing the, , various functional domains. The chromophore-binding site and PEST sequence are, located in the N-terminal domain, which confers photosensory specificity to the, molecule—that is, whether it responds to continuous red or far-red light. The C-terminal domain contains a dimerization site, a ubiquitination site, and a regulatory, region. The C-terminal domain transmits signals to proteins that act downstream of, phytochrome.
Page 443 :
392, , Chapter 17, , The C-terminal domain also contains the site for the formation of phytochrome dimers and the site for the addition, of ubiquitin, a tag for degradation. (For a more detailed, description of experiments that helped map the functional, domains of phytochrome, see Web Topic 17.5.), , CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR, MECHANISMS, All phytochrome-regulated changes in plants begin with, absorption of light by the pigment. After light absorption, the, molecular properties of phytochrome are altered, probably, causing the signal-transmitting sequences in the C terminus, to interact with one or more components of a signal transduction pathway that ultimately bring about changes in the, growth, development, or position of an organ (see Table 17.1)., Some of the signal-transmitting motifs appear to interact with multiple signal transduction pathways; others, appear to be unique to a specific pathway. Furthermore, it, is reasonable to assume that the different phytochrome proteins utilize different sets of signal transduction pathways., Molecular and biochemical techniques are helping to, unravel the early steps in phytochrome action and the signal transduction pathways that lead to physiological or, developmental responses. These responses fall into two, general categories:, 1. Relatively rapid turgor responses involving ion fluxes, 2. Slower, long-term processes associated with photomorphogenesis, involving alterations in gene expression, In this section we will examine the effects of phytochrome on both membrane permeability and gene, expression, as well as the possible chain of events constituting the signal transduction pathways that bring about, these effects., , Phytochrome Regulates Membrane Potentials, and Ion Fluxes, Phytochrome can rapidly alter the properties of membranes. We have already seen that low-fluence red light is, required before the dark period to induce rapid leaflet closure during nyctinasty, and that fluxes of K+ and Cl– into, and out of dorsal and ventral motor cells mediate the, response. However, the rapidity of leaf closure in the dark, (lag time about 5 minutes) would seem to rule out mechanisms based on gene expression. Instead, rapid phytochrome-induced changes in membrane permeability and, transport appear to be involved., During phytochrome-mediated leaflet closure, the, apoplastic pH of the dorsal motor cells (the cells that swell, during leaflet closure) decreases, while the apoplastic pH of, the ventral motor cells (the cells that shrink during leaflet, closure) increases. Thus the plasma membrane H+ pump of, the dorsal cells appears to be activated by darkness (provided that phytochrome is in the Pfr form), and the H+, , pump of the ventral cells appears to be deactivated under, the same conditions (see Figure 17.14). The reverse pattern, of apoplastic pH change is observed during leaflet opening., Studies have also been carried out on phytochrome regulation of K+ channels in isolated protoplasts (cells without, their cell walls) of both dorsal and ventral motor cells from, Samanea leaves (Kim et al. 1993). When the extracellular K+, concentration was raised, K+ entered the protoplasts and, depolarized the membrane potential only if the K+ channels were open. When the dorsal and ventral motor cell, protoplasts were transferred to constant darkness, the state, of the K+ channels exhibited a circadian rhythmicity during a 21-hour incubation period, and the two cell types varied reciprocally, just as they do in vivo. That is, when the, dorsal cell K+ channels were open, the ventral cell K+ channels were closed, and vice versa. Thus the circadian rhythm, of leaf movements has its origins in the circadian rhythm, of K+ channel opening., On the basis of the evidence thus far, we can conclude, that phytochrome brings about leaflet closure by regulating, the activities of the primary proton pumps and the K+ channels of the dorsal and ventral motor cells. Although the effect, is rapid, it is not instantaneous, and it is therefore unlikely, to be due to a direct effect of phytochrome on the membrane., Instead, phytochrome acts indirectly via one or more signal, transduction pathways, as in the case of the regulation of, gene expression by phytochrome (see the next section)., However, some effects of red and far-red light on the, membrane potential are so rapid that phytochrome may, also interact directly with the membrane. Such rapid modulation has been measured in individual cells and has been, inferred from the effects of red and far-red light on the surface potential of roots and oat (Avena) coleoptiles, where, the lag between the production of Pfr and the onset of measurable potential changes is 4.5 s for hyperpolarization., Changes in the bioelectric potential of cells imply, changes in the flux of ions across the plasma membrane, (see Web Topic 17.6). Membrane isolation studies provide, evidence that a small portion of the total phytochrome is, tightly bound to various organellar membranes., These findings led some workers to suggest that membrane-bound phytochrome represents the physiologically, active fraction, and that all the effects of phytochrome on, gene expression are initiated by changes in membrane permeability. On the basis of sequence analysis, however, it is, now clear that phytochrome is a hydrophilic protein without membrane-spanning domains. The current view is that, it may be associated with microtubules located directly, beneath the plasma membrane, at least in the case of the, alga, Mougeotia, as described in Web Topic 17.2., If phytochrome exerts its effects on membranes from, some distance, no matter how small, involvement of a second messenger is implied, and calcium is a good candidate., Rapid changes in cytosolic free calcium have been implicated as second messengers in several signal transduction
Page 444 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, , Phytochrome Regulates Gene Expression, , Both Phytochrome and the Circadian Rhythm, Regulate LHCB, A MYB-related transcription factor whose mRNA level, increases rapidly when Arabidopsis is transferred from the, dark to the light is involved in phytochrome-mediated, expression of LHCB genes (Figure 17.17). (For information, on MYB, see Chapter 14 on the web site.), This transcription factor appears to bind to the promoter, of certain LHCB genes and regulate their transcription,, which, as Figure 17.17 shows, occurs later than the increase, in the MYB-related protein (Wang et al. 1997). The gene, that encodes the MYB-related protein is therefore probably, a primary response gene, and the LHCB gene itself is probably a secondary response gene., Recent work has indicated that this MYB-related protein, now known as circadian clock associated 1 (CCA1),, also plays a role in the circadian regulation of LHCB gene, expression. A second but distinct MYB-related protein, late, elongated hypocotyl (LHY), has also been identified as a, potential clock gene. Expression of CCA1 and LHY oscillates with a circadian rhythm. Constitutive expression of, CCA1 abolishes several circadian rhythms and suppresses, both CCA1 and LHY expression. When the CCA1 gene is, mutated so that no functional protein is produced, circadian and phytochrome regulation of four genes, including, LHCB, is affected. These observations suggest that CCA1, and LHY are associated with the circadian clock., , 0.02, , 2, MYB, , LHCB, , 0.01, , 0, , 2, , 4, 6, 8, Time in light (hours), , 1, , 10, , LHCB mRNA, , As the term photomorphogenesis implies, plant development, is profoundly influenced by light. Etiolation symptoms, include spindly stems, small leaves (in dicots), and the, absence of chlorophyll. Complete reversal of these symptoms by light involves major long-term alterations in, metabolism that can be brought about only by changes in, gene expression., The stimulation and repression of transcription by light, can be very rapid, with lag times as short as 5 minutes., Such early-gene expression is likely to be regulated by the, direct activation of transcription factors by one or more, phytochrome-initiated signal transduction pathways. The, activated transcription factors then enter the nucleus,, where they stimulate the transcription of specific genes., Some of these early gene products are transcription factors themselves, which activate the expression of other, genes. Expression of the early genes, also called primary, response genes, is independent of protein synthesis;, expression of the late genes, or secondary response genes,, requires the synthesis of new proteins., The photoregulation of gene expression has focused on, the nuclear genes that encode messages for chloroplast proteins: the small subunit of ribulose-1,6-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) and the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b–binding proteins associated with the, light-harvesting complex of photosystem II (LHCIIb proteins). These proteins play important roles in chloroplast, development and greening; hence their regulation by phytochrome has been studied in detail. The genes for both of, these proteins—RBCS and LHCB (also called CAB in some, studies)—are present in multiple copies in the genome., We can demonstrate phytochrome regulation of mRNA, abundance (e.g., RBCS mRNAs) experimentally by giving, etiolated plants a brief pulse of low-fluence red or far-red, light, returning them to darkness to allow the signal transduction pathway to operate, and then measuring the abundance of specific mRNAs in total RNA prepared from each, set of plants. If its abundance is regulated by phytochrome,, the mRNA is absent or present at low levels in etiolated, plants but is increased by red light. The red light–induced, increase in expression can be reversed by immediate treatment with far-red light, but far-red light alone has little, effect on mRNA abundance. The expression of some other, genes is down-regulated under these conditions., Recently red-light stimulation of lettuce seed germination has been correlated with an increase in the biologically active form of the hormone gibberellin. Red light, causes a large increase in the expression of the gene coding for a key enzyme in the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway (Toyomasu et al. 1998). The effect of red light is, reversed by a treatment with far-red light, indicative of, , phytochrome. Since gibberellin can substitute for red light, in promoting lettuce seed germination, it appears that, phytochrome promotes seed germination by increasing, the biosynthesis of the hormone. Gibberellins are discussed in detail in Chapter 20., For an expanded discussion see Web Topic 17.7., , MYB-related protein mRNA, , pathways, and there is evidence that calcium plays a role, in chloroplast movement in Mougeotia., , 393, , 12, , FIGURE 17.17 Time course for inducing transcription., , Kinetics of the induction of transcripts for a MYB-related, transcription factor (MYB) and the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b–binding protein (LHCB) in Arabidopsis after transfer of the seedlings from darkness to continuous white, light. (After Wang et al. 1997.)
Page 445 :
394, , Chapter 17, , A protein kinase (CK2) can interact with and phosphorylate CCA1. The CK2 kinase is a multisubunit protein, with serine/threonine kinase activity. The regulatory subunit of CK2 (CKB3) has been shown to interact with, and, phosphorylate, CCA1 in vitro. Mutations in CKB3 have, also been found to perturb CK2 activity and, in turn,, change the period of rhythmic expression of CCA1. These, mutations affect many clock outputs, from gene expression, to flowering time, suggesting that CK2 is involved in the, regulation of the circadian clock via its interactions with, CCA1 (Sugano et al. 1999)., , The Circadian Oscillator Involves a Transcriptional, Negative Feedback Loop, The circadian oscillators of cyanobacteria (Synechococcus),, fungi (Neurospora crassa), insects (Drosophila melanogaster),, and mouse (Mus musculus) have now been elucidated. In, these four organisms, the oscillator is composed of several, “clock genes” involved in a transcriptional–translational, negative feedback loop., So far, three major clock genes have been identified in, Arabidopsis: TOC1, LHY, and CCA1. The protein products, of these genes are all regulatory proteins. TOC1 is not, related to the clock genes of other organisms, suggesting, that the plant oscillator is unique., According to a recent model (Alabadi et al. 2001), light, and the TOC1 regulatory protein activate LHY and CCA1, expression at dawn (Figure 17.18). The increase in LHY and, CCA1 represses the expression of the TOC1 gene. Because, TOC1 is a positive regulator of the LHY and CCA1 genes,, the repression of TOC1 expression causes a progressive, reduction in the levels of LHY and CCA1, which reach, , 4. Progressive reduction of, LHY and CCA1 expression, levels during the day allows, TOC1 transcript levels to rise, and reach maximum levels, toward the end of the day., , their minimum levels at the end of the day. As LHY and, CCA1 levels decline, TOC1 gene expression is released, from inhibition. TOC1 reaches its maximum at the end of, the day, when LHY and CCA1 are at their minimum. TOC1, then either directly or indirectly stimulates the expression, of LHY and CCA1, and the cycle begins again., The two MYB regulator proteins—LHY and CCA1—, have dual functions. In addition to serving as components, of the oscillator, they regulate the expression of other genes,, such as LHCB and other “morning genes,” and they repress, genes expressed at night. Light acts to reinforce the effect, of the TOC1 gene in promoting LHY and CCA1 expression., This reinforcement represents the underlying mechanism, of entrainment. Other proteins, such as the CK2 kinase,, affect the activity of CCA1, and thus regulate the clock., Phytochrome and the blue-light photoreceptor CRY2 (see, Chapter 18) mediate the effects of red and blue light,, respectively., , Regulatory Sequences Control Light-Regulated, Transcription, The cis-acting regulatory sequences required to confer, light regulation of gene expression have been studied, extensively. Most eukaryotic promoters for genes that, encode proteins comprise two functionally distinct, regions: a short sequence that determines the transcription, start site (the TATA box, named for its most abundant, nucleotides) and upstream sequences, called cis-acting, regulatory elements, that regulate the amount and pattern, of transcription (see Chapter 14 on the web site). These, regulatory sequences bind specific proteins, called transacting factors, that modulate the activity of the general, , 5. TOC1 augments the expression, of LHY and CCA1, which reach, maximum levels at dawn, starting, the cycle again., , TOC1, , LHY, CCA1, , TOC1 and other, evening genes, , LHY, CCA1, , 1. Light activates LHY and, CCA1 expression at dawn., , Night, Day, 3. CCA1 and LHY repress, TOC1 and other evening, genes., , LHCB and other, morning genes, , Light, , 2. LHY and CCA1 activate, the expression of LHCB, and other morning genes., , FIGURE 17.18 Circadian oscillator model showing the hypothetical interactions, , between the TOC1 and MYB genes LHY and CCA1. Light acts at dawn to increase, LHY and CCA1 expression. LHY and CCA1 act to regulate other daytime and, evening genes.
Page 446 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, transcription factors that assemble around the transcription start site with RNA polymerase II., Overall, the picture emerging for light-regulated plant, promoters is similar to that for other eukaryotic genes: a, collection of modular elements, the number, position,, flanking sequences, and binding activities of which can, lead to a wide range of transcriptional patterns. No single, DNA sequence or binding protein is common to all phytochrome-regulated genes., At first it may appear paradoxical that light-regulated, genes have such a range of elements, any combination of, which can confer light-regulated expression. However, this, array of sequences allows for the differential light- and tissue-specific regulation of many genes through the action, of multiple photoreceptors. (For an expanded discussion,, see Web Topic 17.8.), , Regulatory factors. As might be expected, the diverse, range of phytochrome regulatory sequences can bind a, wide variety of transcription factors. At least 50 of these, regulatory factors have been identified recently by the use, of genetic and molecular screens (Tepperman et al. 2001)., Although some of the early-acting signaling pathways, are specific to phyA or phyB, it is clear that late-acting signaling pathways common to multiple photoreceptors must, be used because different light qualities can trigger the, same response (Chory and Wu 2001)., For example, SPA1 is a phyA-specific signaling intermediate that acts as a light-dependent repressor of photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis seedlings (Hoecker and Quail, 2001). The SPA1 protein has a coiled-coil protein domain, that enables it to interact with another factor, COP1 (constitutive photomorphogenesis 1), that acts downstream of, both phyA and phyB. The COP1 protein was identified in, the screen for constitutive photomorphogenesis mutants, that has yielded several other factors that act downstream, (A), , 395, , of photoreceptors (see Web Topic 17.9). COP1 is an E3, ubiquitin ligase that targets other proteins for destruction, by the 26S proteasome (see Chapter 14 on the web site)., The functions of many of these factors are probably, modulated through the action of HY5, a protein first identified through the long-hypocotyl screen, discussed earlier, in the chapter. HY5 is a basic leucine zipper–type transcription factor that is always located in the nucleus (see, Chapter 14 on the web site). HY5 binds to the G-box motif, of multiple light-inducible promoters and is necessary for, optimal expression of the corresponding genes. In the dark,, HY5 is ubiquitinated by COP1 and degraded by the 26S, proteasome complex., , Phytochrome Moves to the Nucleus, It has long been a mystery as to how phytochrome could, act in the nucleus when it is apparently localized in the, cytosol. Recent exciting work has finally opened up the, black box between phytochrome and gene expression. The, most surprising finding is that in some cases phytochrome, itself moves to the nucleus in a light-dependent manner., Detection of this movement relied on the ability to fuse, phytochrome to a visible marker, green fluorescent protein (GFP), that can be activated by light of an appropriate, wavelength being shone on plant cells. A big advantage of, GFP fusions is that they can be visualized in living cells,, making it possible to follow dynamic processes within the, cell under the microscope., Both phyA–GFP and phyB–GFP show light-activated, import into the nucleus (Figure 17.19) (Sakamoto and, Nagatani 1996; Sharma 2001). The phyB fusion moves to the, nucleus in the Pfr form only, and transport is slow, taking, several hours for full mobilization. In contrast, phyA–GFP, can move in the Pfr or the Pr form, provided that it has cycled, through Pfr first. Movement of phyA–GFP is much more, rapid than that of phyB–GFP, taking only about 15 minutes., , (B), , FIGURE 17.19 Nuclear localization, , of phy–GFP fusion proteins in epidermal cells of Arabidopsis, hypocotyls. Transgenic Arabidopsis, expressing phyA–GFP (left) or, phyB–GFP (right) was observed, under a fluorescence microscope., Only nuclei are visible. The plants, were placed either under continuous far-red light (left) or white, light (right) to induce the nuclear, accumulation. The smaller bright, green dots inside the nucleus are, called “speckles.” The significance, of speckles is unknown. (From, Yamaguchi et al. 1999, courtesy of, A. Nagatani)., , 10 µm
Page 447 :
396, , Chapter 17, , Most satisfying is the observation that phyB–GFP transport is promoted by red light and inhibited by far-red light,, while transport of phyA–GFP is maximal under continuous far-red light. Furthermore, nuclear translocation of, phyB is under circadian control, as would be expected,, since phyB regulates the expression of clock-regulated, genes. These light conditions are the ones known to be, responsible for activation of phyA and phyB and would be, consistent with their activity in the nucleus., What happens when Pfr moves to the nucleus? Two, nuclear proteins that interact with phytochrome have been, identified to date, although there are probably additional, targets. The first, phytochrome interacting factor 3 (PIF3),, reacts with the C-terminal end of phyA or phyB. However,, it reacts preferentially with the full-length phyB protein in, a light-dependent manner, and it is thought to be a functional primary reaction partner for this phytochrome., Although its precise function is not yet known, PIF3, resembles transcription factors that bind to a particular element in plant promoters, the G-box motif, that confers light, regulation to genes. It is also known that phyB in the Pfr, form can form a complex with PIF3 bound to its target, DNA. A picture is therefore emerging in which some phytochrome-regulated genes are activated directly by move-, , 1. PhyB is, synthesized in, the cytoplasm in, the inactive PrB, form., , ment of phyB to the nucleus in the Pfr form. Once in the, nucleus, phyB interacts with transcription factors such as, PIF3. A model for the direct activation of gene expression, by phyB in the nucleus is shown in Figure 17.20., , Phytochome Acts through Multiple Signal, Transduction Pathways, Using biochemical approaches, researchers have shown, that signaling involves several different mechanisms,, including G-proteins, Ca2+, and phosphorylation. We will, consider the evidence for each of these in turn., , G-proteins and calcium., , Well-characterized signaling, pathways in other systems (e.g., mating in yeasts) often, include G-proteins (which are reviewed in Chapter 14 on, the web site). These protein complexes are normally membrane associated, have three different subunits, and bind, GTP or GDP on one subunit. The hydrolysis of GTP to, GDP is required for regulation of G-protein function., Sequences that encode G-protein subunits have been, cloned from plants, indicating that this type of system is, present. One way that the function of G-proteins can be, tested is to treat cells with chemicals that activate or inhibit, the ability of the complex to bind or break down GTP., , Cytoplasm, PrB, Nucleus, , 2. When, converted to the, active PfrB form, by red light, it, moves into the, nucleus., , Red, light, , Far-red, light, , PfrB, , PIF 3 PIF 3, G-BOX, , TATA, , MYB, , PIC, TATA, , MYB, , DNA, , PfrB, PfrB, , 3. PfrB binds to, a dimer of the, transcription, factor, PIF3,, which is bound, to the G-BOX, elements of, MYB gene, promoter., , PIF 3 PIF 3, G-BOX, 4. Upon, addition of the, pre-initiation, complex (PIC),, the transcription, of MYB genes,, including CCA1, and LHY, is, activated., , FIGURE 17.20 Direct regulation of gene expression by phyB, , transport to the nucleus. (After Quail 2000.), , MYB, MYB, , PIC, TATA, , LHCB, , 5. MYB transcription factors in turn, activate the transcription of other, genes, such as LHCB.
Page 448 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, Microinjection experiments (see Web Topic 17.10) indicate that phytochrome signaling can occur in single cells, and does not require light after activation of phytochrome., At least one G-protein may function downstream of phytochrome. After the G-protein step, there are at least two, branching pathways. One of these pathways—gene, expression and chloroplast development—requires Ca2+, , 397, , and calmodulin; the other—anthocyanin synthesis—is, Ca2+ independent., The branching pathways can be distinguished further, by the cis-acting regulatory elements targeted and the signaling intermediate employed. For many years, it has been, known that both cyclic AMP (cAMP) and cyclic GMP, (cGMP) are important intermediates in hormone- and light-, , (A) Bacterial phytochrome, , Red light, Chromophore, Sensor protein, Input, , Transmitter, , His, , Response regulator protein, ATP, , Chromophore, , Asp, , Receiver, , Output, , Receiver, , Output, , P, Input, , Transmitter, , His, P, , 1. After receiving a signal from the input, domain, the transmitter domain of the, sensor protein autophosphorylates a, histidine., , Asp, , 2. The phosphorylated sensor protein, phosphorylates the response regulator, protein at an aspartate., , Output, signal, , 3. The phosphorylated, response regulator, stimulates the response., , (B) Plant phytochrome, , Red light, Chromophore, H2N, , Ser, , Kinase domain, , COOH, , Phytochrome, 1. Phytochrome is, autophosphorylated, on serine., P, H2N, , ATP, , Chromophore, , Ser, , X, , Kinase domain, , X, , 2. Phytochrome may, phosphorylate other, proteins., , P, , COOH, , FIGURE 17.21 Phytochrome is an autophospho-, , rylating protein kinase. (A) Bacterial phytochrome is an example of a two-component, signaling system, in which phytochrome functions as a sensor protein that phosphorylates a, response regulator (see Chapter 14 on the web, site). (B) Plant phytochrome is an autophosphorylating serine/threonine kinase that may phosphorylate other proteins (X).
Page 449 :
398, , Chapter 17, , induced signaling pathways in animals (see Chapter 14 on, the web site). Although the presence of cAMP has been difficult to demonstrate in plants, the presence of cGMP in, plant tissues is well established. Indeed, recent studies have, shown that cGMP may serve as a second messenger in, phytochrome action., However, the role of the G-protein cascade in plants is, still controversial. Some key genes (e.g., guanylylate, cyclase) have not yet been identified in plant genomes,, and cGMP levels are vanishingly small in plants. On the, other hand, studies with inhibitors have implicated cGMP, as a second messenger for the hormones gibberellin (see, Chapter 20) and abscisic acid (see Chapter 23). Thus a role, for cGMP in phytochrome signaling, although controversial, remains a possibility., , Phosphorylation. The evidence for a potential role of, phosphorylation in phytochrome action first came from, red-light regulation of protein phosphorylation and phosphorylation-dependent binding of transcription factors to, the promoters of phytochrome-regulated genes. Some, highly purified preparations of phytochrome were also, reported to have kinase activity., Kinases are enzymes that have the capacity to transfer, phosphate groups from ATP to amino acids such as serine, or tyrosine, either on themselves or on other proteins., Kinases are often found in signal transduction pathways, in which the addition or removal of phosphate groups regulates enzyme activity., Phytochrome is now known to be a protein kinase. The, evolutionary origin of phytochrome is very ancient, predating the appearance of eukaryotes. Bacterial phytochromes are light-dependent histidine kinases that function as sensor proteins that phosphorylate corresponding, response regulator proteins (Figure 17.21A). (See also, Chapter 14 on the web site and Web Topic 17.11), However, although higher-plant phytochromes have, some homology with the kinase domains, they do not, function as histidine kinases. Instead, they are serine/threonine kinases. In addition, recombinant versions of higherplant and algal phytochromes have been shown to be, light- and chromophore-modulated kinases that can phosphorylate themselves, as well as other proteins (Figure, 17.21B) (Sharma 2001)., At least one potential target is a cytosolic protein, termed phytochrome kinase substrate 1, or PKS1, that, can accept a phosphate from phyA. Phosphorylation, occurs on serines, and to a lesser extent on threonines., The PKS1 phosphorylation is regulated by phytochrome, both in the test tube and in the plant, with Pfr having a, twofold higher level of activity than Pr. Overexpression, of PKS1 in transgenic plants suggests that it may function, to negatively regulate phyB-mediated events (Fankhauser, et al. 1999)., , Another protein kinase associated with phytochrome is, nucleoside diphosphate kinase 2 (NDPK2). Phytochrome, A has been found to interact with this protein, and its, kinase activity is increased about twofold when phyA is, bound in the Pfr form. Because the NDPK2 protein is, found in both the nucleus and the cytosol, the location of, its primary site of action is unclear., A summary of the possible signaling and regulatory, pathways of phytochrome is shown in Figure 17.22., , Phytochrome Action Can Be Modulated by the, Action of Other Photoreceptors, The recent isolation of the genes encoding the cryptochrome and phototropin photoreceptors (see Chapter 18), mediating blue light–regulated responses has made it possible to analyze whether these photoreceptors have overlapping functions (Chory and Wu 2001). This possibility, was suspected because mutations in the cryptochrome, CRY2 gene led to delayed flowering under continuous, white light, and flowering time was also known to be, under phytochrome control., In Arabidopsis, continuous blue or far-red light treatment, leads to promotion of flowering, and red light inhibits, flowering. Far-red light acts through phyA, and the antagonistic effect of red light is through the action of phyB. One, might expect the cry2 mutant to be delayed in flowering,, since blue light promotes flowering. However, cry2, mutants flower at the same time as the wild type under, either continuous blue or continuous red light. Delay is, observed only if both blue and red light are given together., Therefore, cry2 probably functions to promote flowering in, blue light by repressing phyB function., Additional experiments have confirmed that the other, cryptochrome, cry1, also interacts with phytochromes. Both, cry1 and cry2 interact with phyA in vitro and can be phosphorylated in a phyA-dependent manner. Phosphorylation, of cry1 has also been demonstrated to occur in vivo in a red, light–dependent manner. Indeed, the importance of cryptochromes as developmental regulators has been underscored by their subsequent discovery in animal systems,, such as mouse and human., , SUMMARY, The term photomorphogenesis refers to the dramatic effects, of light on plant development and cellular metabolism., Red light exerts the strongest influence, and the effects of, red light are often reversible by far-red light., Phytochrome is the pigment involved in most photomorphogenic phenomena. Phytochrome exists in two, forms: a red light–absorbing form (Pr) and a far-red, light–absorbing form (Pfr). Phytochrome is synthesized in, the dark in the Pr form. Absorption of red light by Pr converts it to Pfr, and absorption of far-red light by Pfr con-
Page 451 :
400, , Chapter 17, , verts it to Pr. However, the absorption spectra of the two, forms overlap in the red region of the spectrum, leading to, an equilibrium between the two forms called a photostationary state., Pfr is considered to be the active form that gives rise to, the physiological response; however, Pr, particularly cycled, Pr, plays a role in phyA-mediated responses. Other factors, in addition to light regulate the steady-state level of Pfr,, including the expression level of the protein and its stability in the Pfr form., Phytochrome is a large dimeric protein made up of two, equivalent subunits. The monomer has a molecular mass, of about 125 kDa and is covalently bound to a chromophore molecule, an open-chain tetrapyrrole called phytochromobilin., Phytochrome is encoded by a family of divergent genes, that give rise to two types of proteins: Type I and Type II., Type I, which is encoded by the PHYA gene, is abundant in, etiolated tissue. However, Type I phytochrome is present, at low levels in light-grown plants because of its instability, in the Pfr form, the phyA-mediated suppression of transcription of its own gene, and the instability of its mRNA., Type II phytochrome (encoded by the PHYB, PHYC,, PHYD, and PHYE genes) is present at low levels in both, light-grown and dark-grown plants because its genes are, constitutively expressed at low levels and the protein is stable in the Pfr form., Spectrophotometric and immunological studies indicate, that the phytochromes are concentrated in meristematic, regions. PhyA and phyB move to the nucleus upon conversion to the Pfr forms., Phytochrome responses have been classified into verylow-fluence, low-fluence, and high-irradiance responses, (VLFRs, LFRs, and HIRs). These three types of responses, differ not only in their fluence requirements but also in, other parameters, such as their escape times, action spectra, and photoreversibility. Phytochrome B plays an important role in the detection of shade in plants adapted to high, levels of sunlight; phytochrome A has a more limited role,, mediating the far-red HIR during early greening. Phytochromes C, D, and E also have specific roles during limited phases of development, and these roles are partially, redundant with those of phyA and phyB., Phytochrome is known to regulate the transcription of, numerous genes. Many of the genes involved in greening,, such as the nuclear-encoded genes for the small subunit of, rubisco and the chlorophyll a/b–binding protein of the, light-harvesting complex, are transcriptionally regulated, by phytochrome (both phyA and phyB)., Phytochrome also represses the transcription of various, genes, including PHYA. Activation or repression of these, genes is thought to be mediated by general transcription, factors that bind to cis-acting regulatory elements within, the promoter regions of these genes in a combinatorial, fashion. In some cases, phytochrome in the Pfr form inter-, , acts directly with these factors. These transcription factors,, in turn, are linked to phytochrome action by a complex, series of signal transduction pathways involving COP and, DET proteins, kinases, cyclic GMP, trimeric G-proteins,, Ca2+, and calmodulin., The discovery and characterization of bacterial phytochrome suggest that flowering-plant phytochrome, evolved from a bacterial histidine kinase that participates, in two-component signaling pathways., In addition to the long-term effects involving changes in, gene expression, phytochrome induces a variety of rapid, responses, including chloroplast rotation in the alga, Mougeotia, leaf closure during nyctinasty, and alterations in, membrane potential. These responses involve rapid, changes in membrane properties. The current view is that, even these rapid effects of phytochrome involve signal, transduction pathways., , Web Material, Web Topics, 17.1, , The Structure of Phytochromes, The purification and characterization of phytochrome as a homodimer are described., , 17.2, , Mougeotia: A Chloroplast with a Twist, Microbeam irradiation experiments have, been used to localize phytochrome in this filamentous green alga., , 17.3, , Phytochrome and High-Irradiance Responses, Dual-wavelength experiments helped demonstrate the role of phytochrome in HIRs., , 17.4, , Phytochrome Interactions during, Germination, The interactions between phyA and phyB during germination are described., , 17.5, , Phytochrome Functional Domains, Phytochrome overexpression has been used, to characterize the functional domains of, phytochrome., , 17.6, , Phytochrome Effects on Ion Fluxes, Phytochrome regulates ion fluxes across membranes by altering the activities of ion channels, and the plasma membrane proton pump., , 17.7, , Phytochrome Regulation of Gene Expression, Evidence shows that phytochrome regulates, gene expression at the level of transcription., , 17.8, , Regulation of Transcription by Cis-Acting, Sequences, Phytochrome response elements are described, briefly.
Page 452 :
Phytochrome and Light Control of Plant Development, , 17.9, , Genes That Suppress Photomorphogenesis, Further information is provided about genes, like COP and DET that negatively regulate, photomorphogenesis., , 17.10 The Roles of G-Proteins and Calcium in, Phytochrome Responses, Evidence suggests that G-proteins and calcium participate in phytochrome action., , 17.11 The Origins of Phytochrome as a Bacterial, Two-Component Receptor, The discovery of bacterial phytochrome led to, the identification of phytochrome as a protein, kinase., , Web Essay, 17.1, , Awakened by a flash of sunlight, When placed in the proper soil environment,, seeds acquire extraordinary sensitivity to, light so that germination can be stimulated, by less than a second of exposure to sunlight, during soil cultivations., , 17.2, , Know thy neighbor through phytochrome, Plants can detect the proximity of neighbors, through phytochrome perception of the R:FR, of reflected light and produce adaptive morphological changes before being shaded by, potential competitors., , Chapter References, Adam, E., Szell, M., Szekeres, M., Schaefer, E., and Nagy, F. (1994), The developmental and tissue-specific expression of tobacco phytochrome-A genes. Plant J. 6: 283–293., Alabadi, D., Oyama, T., Yanovsky, M. J., Harmon, F. G., Mas, P., and, Kay, S. A. (2001) Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/, CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293; 880–883., Andel, F., Hasson, K. C., Gai, F., Anfinrud, P. A., and Mathies, R. A., (1997) Femtosecond time-resolved spectroscopy of the primary, photochemistry of phytochrome. Biospectroscopy 3: 421–433., Beggs, C. J., Holmes, M. G., Jabben, M., and Schaefer, E. (1980) Action, spectra for the inhibition of hypocotyl growth by continuous irradiation in light- and dark-grown Sinapis alba L. seedlings. Plant, Physiol. 66: 615–618., Borthwick, H. A., Hendricks, S. B., Parker, M. W., Toole, E. H., and, Toole, V. K. (1952) A reversible photoreaction controlling seed, germination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 38: 662–666., Briggs, W. R., Mandoli, D. F., Shinkle, J. R., Kaufman, L. S., Watson,, J. C., and Thompson, W. F. (1984) Phytochrome regulation of, plant development at the whole plant, physiological, and molecular levels. In Sensory Perception and Transduction in Aneural, Organisms, G. Colombetti, F. Lenci, and P.-S. Song, eds., Plenum,, New York, pp. 265–280., Butler, W. L., Norris, K. H., Siegelman, H. W., and Hendricks, S. B., (1959) Detection, assay, and preliminary purification of the pigment controlling photosensitive development of plants. Proc., Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 45: 1703–1708., , 401, , Chory, J., and Wu, D. (2001) Weaving the complex web of signal, transduction. Plant Physiol. 125: 77–80., Fankhauser, C., Yeh, K.-C., Lagarias, J. C., Zhang, H., Elich, T. D., and, Chory, J. (1999) PKS1, a substrate phosphorylated by phytochrome that modulates light signaling in Arabidopsis. Science, 284: 1539–1541., Flint, L. H. (1936) The action of radiation of specific wave-lengths in, relation to the germination of light-sensitive lettuce seed. Proc., Int. Seed Test. Assoc. 8: 1–4., Furuya, M. (1993) Phytochromes: Their molecular species, gene families and functions. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44:, 617–645., Galston, A. (1994) Life Processes of Plants. Scientific American Library,, New York., Goosey, L., Palecanda, L., and Sharrock, R. A. (1997) Differential patterns of expression of the Arabidopsis PHYB, PHYD and PHYE, phytochrome genes. Plant Physiol. 115: 959–969., Goto, N., Yamamoto, K. T., and Watanabe, M. (1993) Action spectra for inhibition of hypocotyl growth of wild-type plants and of, the hy2 long-hypocotyl mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Photochem. Photobiol. 57: 867–871., Hartmann, K. M. (1967) Ein Wirkungsspecktrum der Photomorphogenese unter Hochenergiebedingungen und seine Interpretation, auf der Basis des Phytochroms (Hypokotylwachstumshemmung bei Lactuca sativa L.). Z. Naturforsch. 22b: 1172–1175., Hennig, L., Stoddart, W. M., Dieterle, M., Whitelam, G. C., and, Schäfer, E. (2002) Phytochrome E controls light-induced germination of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 128: 194–200., Hoecker, U., and Quail, P. H. (2001) The phytochrome A-specific signaling intermediate SPA1 interacts directly with COP1, a constitutive repressor of light signaling in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 276:, 38173–38178., Kendrick, R. E., and Frankland, B. (1983) Phytochrome and Plant, Growth, 2nd ed. Edward Arnold, London., Kim, H. Y., Cote, G. G., and Crain, R. C. (1993) Potassium channels, in Samanea-Saman protoplasts controlled by phytochrome and, the biological clock. Science 260: 960–962., Li, L., and Lagarias, J. C. (1992) Phytochrome assembly—Defining, chromophore structural requirements for covalent attachment, and photoreversibility. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 19204–19210., Mandoli, D. F., and Briggs, W. R. (1984) Fiber optics in plants. Sci., Am. 251: 90–98., Mathews, S., and Sharrock, R. A. (1997) Phytochrome gene diversity., Plant Cell Environ. 20: 666–671., Millar, A. J., Carre, I. A., Strayer, C. A., Chua, N.-H., and Kay, S. A., (1995) Circadian clock mutants in Arabidopsis identified by, luciferase imaging. Science 267: 1161–1163., Morgan, D. C., and Smith, H. (1978) Simulated sunflecks have large,, rapid effects on plant stem extension. Nature 273: 534–536., Morgan, D. C., and Smith, H. (1979) A systematic relationship, between phytochrome-controlled development and species habitat, for plants grown in simulated natural irradiation. Planta 145:, 253–258., Nakasako, M., Wada, M., Tokutomi, S., Yamamoto, K. T., Sakai, J.,, Kataoka, M., Tokunaga, F., and Furuya, M. (1990) Quaternary, structure of pea phytochrome I dimer studied with small angle, X-ray scattering and rotary-shadowing electron microscopy. Photochem. Photobiol. 52: 3–12., Parks, B. M., and Spalding, E. P. (1999) Sequential and coordinated, action of phytochromes A and B during Arabidopsis stem growth, revealed by kinetic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:, 14142–14146., Quail, P. H., Boylan, M. T., Parks, B. M., Short, T. W., Xu, Y., and, Wagner, D. (1995) Phytochrome: Photosensory perception and, signal transduction. Science 268: 675–680., Quail, P. H. (2000) Phytochrome-interacting factors. Seminars in Cell, & Devel. Biol. 11: 457–466.
Page 454 :
Chapter, , 18, , Blue-Light Responses:, Stomatal Movements, and Morphogenesis, , MOST OF US are familiar with the observation that house plants placed, near a window have branches that grow toward the incoming light. This, response, called phototropism, is an example of how plants alter their, growth patterns in response to the direction of incident radiation. This, response to light is intrinsically different from light trapping by photosynthesis. In photosynthesis, plants harness light and convert it into, chemical energy (see Chapters 7 and 8). In contrast, phototropism is an, example of the use of light as an environmental signal. There are two, major families of plant responses to light signals: the phytochrome, responses, which were covered in Chapter 17, and the blue-light, responses., Some blue-light responses were introduced in Chapter 9—for example, chloroplast movement within cells in response to incident photon, fluxes, and sun tracking by leaves. As with the family of the phytochrome responses, there are numerous plant responses to blue light., Besides phototropism, they include inhibition of hypocotyl elongation,, stimulation of chlorophyll and carotenoid synthesis, activation of gene, expression, stomatal movements, phototaxis (the movement of motile, unicellular organisms such as algae and bacteria toward or away from, light), enhancement of respiration, and anion uptake in algae (Senger, 1984). Blue-light responses have been reported in higher plants, algae,, ferns, fungi, and prokaryotes., Some responses, such as electrical events at the plasma membrane, can, be detected within seconds of irradiation by blue light. More complex, metabolic or morphogenetic responses, such as blue light–stimulated pigment biosynthesis in the fungus Neurospora or branching in the alga, Vaucheria, might require minutes, hours, or even days (Horwitz 1994)., Readers may be puzzled by the different approaches to naming phytochrome and blue-light responses. The former are identified by a specific photoreceptor (phytochrome), the latter by the blue-light region of, the visible spectrum. In the case of phytochrome, several of its spectroscopic and biochemical properties, particularly its red/far-red reversibil-
Page 455 :
404, , Chapter 18, , Curvature per photon, relative to 436 nm, , ity, made possible its early identification, and hundreds of, photobiological responses of plants can be clearly attributed to the phytochrome photoreceptor (see Chapter 17)., In contrast, the spectroscopy of blue-light responses is, complex. Both chlorophylls and phytochrome absorb blue, light (400–500 nm) from the visible spectrum, and other, chromophores and some amino acids, such as tryptophan,, absorb light in the ultraviolet (250–400 nm) region. How,, then, can we then distinguish specific responses to blue, light? One important identification criterion is that in specific blue-light responses, blue light cannot be replaced by, a red-light treatment, and there is no red/far-red reversibility. Red or far-red light would be effective if photosynthesis or phytochrome were involved., Another key distinction is that many blue-light responses, of higher plants share a characteristic action spectrum. You will, recall from Chapter 7 that an action spectrum is a graph of, the magnitude of the observed light response as a function, of wavelength (see Web Topic 7.1 for a detailed discussion, of spectroscopy and action spectra). The action spectrum, of the response can be compared with the absorption spectra, of candidate photoreceptors. A close correspondence, between action and absorption spectra provides a strong, indication that the pigment under consideration is the photoreceptor mediating the light response under study (see, Figure 7.8)., Action spectra for blue light–stimulated phototropism,, stomatal movements, inhibition of hypocotyl elongation,, and other key blue-light responses share a characteristic, “three-finger” fine structure in the 400 to 500 nm region, (Figure 18.1) that is not observed in spectra for responses, , 1.40, , Blue region of spectrum, , 1.20, 1.00, 0.80, 0.60, 0.40, 0.20, 0, 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500, Wavelength (nm), , FIGURE 18.1 Action spectrum for blue light–stimulated, phototropism in oat coleoptiles. An action spectrum shows, the relationship between a biological response and the, wavelengths of light absorbed. The “three-finger” pattern, in the 400 to 500 nm region is characteristic of specific bluelight responses. (After Thimann and Curry 1960.), , to light that are mediated by photosynthesis, phytochrome,, or other photoreceptors (Cosgrove 1994)., In this chapter we will describe representative blue-light, responses in plants: phototropism, inhibition of stem elongation, and stomatal movements. The stomatal responses, to blue light are discussed in detail because of the importance of stomata in leaf gas exchange (see Chapter 9) and, in plant acclimations and adaptations to their environment., We will also discuss blue-light photoreceptors and the signal transduction cascade that links light perception with, the final expression of blue-light sensing in the organism., , THE PHOTOPHYSIOLOGY OF, BLUE-LIGHT RESPONSES, Blue-light signals are utilized by the plant in many, responses, allowing the plant to sense the presence of light, and its direction. This section describes the major morphological, physiological, and biochemical changes associated with typical blue-light responses., , Blue Light Stimulates Asymmetric Growth and, Bending, Directional growth toward (or in special circumstances, away from) the light, is called phototropism. It can be, observed in fungi, ferns, and higher plants. Phototropism, is a photomorphogenetic response that is particularly dramatic in dark-grown seedlings of both monocots and, dicots. Unilateral light is commonly used in experimental, studies, but phototropism can also be observed when a, seedling is exposed to two unequally bright light sources, (Figure 18.2), a condition that can occur in nature., As it grows through the soil, the shoot of a grass is protected by a modified leaf that covers it, called a coleoptile, (Figure 18.3; see also Figure 19.1). As discussed in detail in, Chapter 19, unequal light perception in the coleoptile, results in unequal concentrations of auxin in the lighted, and shaded sides of the coleoptile, unequal growth, and, bending., Keep in mind that phototropic bending occurs only in, growing organs, and that coleoptiles and shoots that have, stopped elongating will not bend when exposed to unilateral light. In grass seedlings growing in soil under sunlight,, coleoptiles stop growing as soon as the shoot has emerged, from the soil and the first true leaf has pierced the tip of the, coleoptile., On the other hand, dark-grown, etiolated coleoptiles continue to elongate at high rates for several days and,, depending on the species, can attain several centimeters in, length. The large phototropic response of these etiolated, coleoptiles (see Figure 18.3) has made them a classic model, for studies of phototropism (Firn 1994)., The action spectrum shown in Figure 18.1 was obtained, through measurement of the angles of curvature from oat, coleoptiles that were irradiated with light of different
Page 456 :
Blue-Light Responses: Stomatal Movements and Morphogenesis, Light source, Direction of growth, Cotyledons, , Unilateral light, , Unequal bilateral illumination, , Two equal lights from, the side, , Two unequal lights from, the side, , FIGURE 18.2 Relationship between direction of growth and, unequal incident light. Cotyledons from a young seedling, are shown as viewed from the top. The arrows indicate the, direction of phototropic curvature. The diagrams illustrate, how the direction of growth varies with the location and, the intensity of the light source, but growth is always, toward light. (After Firn 1994.), , 405, , wavelengths. The spectrum shows a peak at about 370 nm, and the “three-finger” pattern in the 400 to 500 nm region, discussed earlier. An action spectrum for phototropism in, the dicot alfalfa (Medicago sativa) was found to be very similar to that of oat coleoptiles, suggesting that a common, photoreceptor mediates phototropism in the two species., Phototropism in sporangiophores of the mold Phycomyces has been studied to identify genes involved in phototropic responses. The sporangiophore consists of a sporangium (spore-bearing spherical structure) that develops, on a stalk consisting of a long, single cell. Growth in the, sporangiophore is restricted to a growing zone just below, the sporangium., When irradiated with unilateral blue light, the sporangiophore bends toward the light with an action spectrum, similar to that of coleoptile phototropism (Cerda-Olmedo, and Lipson 1987). These studies of Phycomyces have led to, the isolation of many mutants with altered phototropic, responses and the identification of several genes that are, required for normal phototropism., In recent years, phototropism of the stem of the small, dicot Arabidopsis (Figure 18.4) has attracted much attention, because of the ease with which advanced molecular techniques can be applied to Arabidopsis mutants. The genetics, and the molecular biology of phototropism in Arabidopsis, are discussed later in this chapter., , (A) Wild-type, Blue light, , (B) Mutant, , FIGURE 18.3 Time-lapse photograph of a corn coleoptile, growing toward unilateral blue light given from the right., The consecutive exposures were made 30 minutes apart., Note the increasing angle of curvature as the coleoptile, bends. (Courtesy of M. A. Quiñones.), , Blue light, , FIGURE 18.4 Phototropism in wild-type (A) and mutant (B), , Arabidopsis seedlings. Unilateral light was applied from the, right. (Courtesy of Dr. Eva Huala.)
Page 457 :
406, , Chapter 18, , How Do Plants Sense the Direction of the Light, Signal?, , Light (relative units), , However, action spectra for the decrease in elongation, rate show strong activity in the blue region, which cannot, Light gradients between lighted and shaded sides have been, be explained by the absorption properties of phytochrome, measured in coleoptiles and in hypocotyls from dicot, (see Figure 17.9). In fact, the 400 to 500 nm blue region of, seedlings irradiated with unilateral blue light. When a, the action spectrum for the inhibition of stem elongation, coleoptile is illuminated with 450 nm blue light, the ratio, closely resembles that of phototropism (compare the action, between the light that is incident to the surface of the illuspectra in Figures 17.10 and 18.1)., minated side and the light that reaches the shaded side is, There are several ways to experimentally separate a, 4:1 at the tip and the midregion of the coleoptile, and 8:1 at, reduction in elongation rates mediated by phytochrome, the base (Figure 18.5)., from a reduction mediated by a specific blue-light response., On the other hand, there is a lens effect in the sporangioIf lettuce seedlings are given low fluence rates of blue light, phore of the mold Phycomyces irradiated with unilateral, under a strong background of yellow light, their hypocotyl, blue light, and as a result, the light measured at the distal, elongation rate is reduced by more than 50%. The backcell surface of the sporangiophore is about twice the, ground yellow light establishes a well-defined Pr:Pfr ratio, amount of light that is incident at the surface of the illumi(see Chapter 17). In such conditions, the low fluence rates, nated side. Light gradients and lens effects could play a, of blue light added are too small to significantly change this, role in how the bending organ senses the direction of the, ratio, ruling out a phytochrome effect on the reduction in, unilateral light (Vogelmann 1994)., elongation rate observed upon the addition of blue light., Blue light– and phytochrome-mediated hypocotyl, Blue Light Rapidly Inhibits Stem Elongation, responses can also be distinguished by the swiftness of the, The stems of seedlings growing in the dark elongate very, response. Whereas phytochrome-mediated changes in, rapidly, and the inhibition of stem elongation by light is a, elongation rates can be detected within 8 to 90 minutes,, key morphogenetic response of the seedling emerging, depending on the species, blue-light responses are rapid,, from the soil surface (see Chapter 17). The conversion of, and can be measured within 15 to 30 s (Figure 18.6). InterPr to Pfr (the red- and far red–absorbing forms of phyactions between phytochrome and the blue light–depentochrome, respectively) in etiolated seedlings causes a, dent sensory transduction cascade in the regulation of elonphytochrome-dependent, sharp decrease in elongation, gation rates will be described later in the chapter., rates (see Figure 17.1)., Another fast response elicited by blue light is a depolarization of the membrane of hypocotyl cells that, precedes the inhibition of growth rate (see Figure, 18.6). The membrane depolarization is caused by, the activation of anion channels (see Chapter 6),, which facilitates the efflux of anions such as chloProbe, ride. Use of an anion channel blocker prevents the, Probe, blue light–dependent membrane depolarization, 1.2, Blue, Blue, and decreases the inhibitory effect of blue light on, light, light, hypocotyl elongation (Parks et al. 1998)., 0.8, , Blue Light Regulates Gene Expression, , 0.4, 0, , 0, , 1.0, , 0, Distance (mm), , 1.0, , 2.0, , FIGURE 18.5 Distribution of transmitted, 450 nm blue light in an, etiolated corn coleoptile. The diagram in the upper right of each, frame shows the area of the coleoptile being measured by a fiberoptic probe. A cross section of the tissue appears at the bottom of, each frame. The trace above it shows the amount of light sensed by, the probe at each point. A sensing mechanism that depended on, light gradients would sense the difference in the amount of light, between the lighted and shaded sides of the coleoptile, and this, information would be transduced into an unequal auxin concentration and bending. (After Vogelmann and Haupt 1985.), , Blue light also regulates the expression of genes, involved in several important morphogenetic, processes. Some of these light-activated genes have, been studied in detail—for example, the genes that, code for the enzyme chalcone synthase, which catalyzes the first committed step in flavonoid biosynthesis, for the small subunit of rubisco, and for the, proteins that bind chlorophylls a and b (see Chapters 13, 8, and 7, respectively). Most of the studies, on light-activated genes show sensitivity to both, blue and red light, as well as red/far-red reversibility, implicating both phytochrome and specific bluelight responses., A recent study reported that SIG5, one of six SIG, nuclear genes in Arabidopsis that play a regulatory, role in the transcription of the chloroplast gene
Page 458 :
Blue-Light Responses: Stomatal Movements and Morphogenesis, (A), , the onset of illumination, GSA mRNA levels are 26-fold, higher than they are in the dark (Figure 18.7). These blue, light–mediated mRNA increases precede increases in, chlorophyll content, indicating that chlorophyll biosynthesis is being regulated by activation of the GSA gene., , 2.5, , 2.0, , Blue Light Stimulates Stomatal Opening, 1.5, , 1.0, (B), , 0, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , • The stomatal response to blue light is rapid and, reversible, and it is localized in a single cell type, the, guard cell., , –60, –80, , • The stomatal response to blue light regulates stomatal movements throughout the life of the plant. This, is unlike phototropism or hypocotyl elongation,, which are functionally important at early stages of, development., , –100, –120, , • The signal transduction cascade that links the perception of blue light with the opening of stomata is, understood in considerable detail., , –140, –160, , We now turn our attention to the stomatal response to blue, light. Stomata have a major regulatory role in gas exchange, in leaves (see Chapter 9), and they can often affect yields of, agricultural crops (see Chapter 25). Several characteristics, of blue light–dependent stomatal movements make guard, cells a valuable experimental system for the study of bluelight responses:, , 0, , 1, , 2, Time (min), , 3, , 4, , FIGURE 18.6 Blue light–induced (A) changes in elongation, rates of etiolated cucumber seedlings and (B) transient, membrane depolarization of hypocotyl cells. As the membrane depolarization (measured with intracellular electrodes) reaches its maximum, growth rate (measured with, position transducers) declines sharply. Comparison of the, two curves shows that the membrane starts to depolarize, before the growth rate begins to decline, suggesting a, cause–effect relation between the two phenomena. (After, Spalding and Cosgrove 1989.), , psbD, which encodes the D2 subunit of the PSII reaction, center (see Chapter 7), is specifically activated by blue light, (Tsunoyama et al. 2002). In contrast, the other five SIG, genes are activated by both blue and red light., Another well-documented instance of gene expression, that is mediated solely by a blue light–sensing system, involves the GSA gene in the photosynthetic unicellular, alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Matters and Beale 1995)., This gene encodes the enzyme glutamate-1-semialdehyde, aminotransferase (GSA), a key enzyme in the chlorophyll, biosynthesis pathway (see Chapter 7). The absence of phytochrome in C. reinhardtii simplifies the analysis of bluelight responses in this experimental system., In synchronized cultures of C. reinhardtii, levels of GSA, mRNA are strictly regulated by blue light, and 2 hours after, , In the following sections we will discuss two central, aspects of the stomatal response to light, the osmoregulatory mechanisms that drive stomatal movements, and the, role of a blue light–activated H+-ATPase in ion uptake by, guard cells., , Relative abundance of GSA mRNA, , Growth rate (mm h–1), , Blue light on, , Membrane potential difference (mV), , 407, , Blue, light, on, , –2, , 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 12, Time of blue-light treatment (h), , FIGURE 18.7 Time course of blue light–dependent gene, expression in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The GSA gene, encodes the enzyme glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase, which regulates an early step in chlorophyll, biosynthesis. (After Matters and Beale 1995.)
Page 459 :
408, , Chapter 18, , (A), , (B), , Stomatal aperture, (pore width, µm), , Photosynthetically active, radiation (400–700 nm), (µmol m–2 s–1), , broad bean (Vicia faba), stomatal movements, closely track incident solar radiation at the leaf, surface (Figure 18.9)., Pore, Chloroplast, Early studies of the stomatal response to, light showed that DCMU (dichlorophenyldimethylurea), an inhibitor of photosynthetic, electron transport (see Figure 7.31), causes a, partial inhibition of light-stimulated stomatal, opening. These results indicated that photosynthesis in the guard cell chloroplast plays a, role in light-dependent stomatal opening, but, the observation that the inhibition was only, partial pointed to a nonphotosynthetic component of the stomatal response to light. Detailed, studies of the light response of stomata have, shown that light activates two distinct, Guard cells, responses of guard cells: photosynthesis in the, guard cell chloroplast (see Web Essay 18.1),, 20 µm, and a specific blue-light response., The specific stomatal response to blue light, FIGURE 18.8 Light-stimulated stomatal opening in detached epidermis, cannot be resolved properly under blue-light, of Vicia faba. Open, light-treated stoma (A), is shown in the darktreated, closed state in (B). Stomatal opening is quantified by microillumination because blue light simultaneously, scopic measurement of the width of the stomatal pore. (Courtesy of, stimulates both the specific blue-light response, E. Raveh.), and guard cell photosynthesis (for the photosynthetic response to blue light, see the action, Light is the dominant environmental signal controlling, spectrum for photosynthesis in Figure 7.8). A clear-cut sepstomatal movements in leaves of well-watered plants, aration of the responses of the two light responses can be, growing in natural environments. Stomata open as light, obtained in dual-beam experiments. High fluence rates of, levels reaching the leaf surface increase, and close as they, red light are used to saturate the photosynthetic response,, and low photon fluxes of blue light are added after the, decrease (Figure 18.8). In greenhouse-grown leaves of, response to the saturating red light has been completed, (Figure 18.10). The addition of blue light causes substantial, further stomatal opening that cannot be explained as a fur(A), 1250, ther stimulation of guard cell photosynthesis because photosynthesis is saturated by the background red light., 1000, An action spectrum for the stomatal response to blue, light, under background red illumination shows the three750, finger pattern discussed earlier (Figure 18.11). This action, spectrum, typical of blue-light responses and distinctly dif500, ferent from the action spectrum for photosynthesis, further, 250, indicates that, in addition to photosynthesis, guard cells, respond specifically to blue light., 0, When guard cells are treated with cellulolytic enzymes, (B), 14, that digest the cell walls, guard cell protoplasts are released., Guard cell protoplasts swell when illuminated with blue, 12, light (Figure 18.12), indicating that blue light is sensed, 10, within the guard cells proper. The swelling of guard cell, 8, 6, 4, 2, 0, 5:00, , 9:00, , 13:00 17:00, Time of day, , 21:00, , FIGURE 18.9 Stomatal opening tracks photosynthetic active radiation at, the leaf surface. Stomatal opening in the lower surface of leaves of Vicia, faba grown in a greenhouse, measured as the width of the stomatal pore, (A), closely follows the levels of photosynthetically active radiation, (400–700 nm) incident to the leaf (B), indicating that the response to light, was the dominant response regulating stomatal opening. (After Srivastava, and Zeiger 1995a.)
Page 460 :
Blue-Light Responses: Stomatal Movements and Morphogenesis, , 409, , (A), , Blue, light, , 10, , Blue light, , 8, 6, 4, 2, 0, , Undigested, stomatal, pore, , Red light, , 1, , 2, 3, Time (h), , 4, , FIGURE 18.10 The response of stomata to blue light under a, , red-light background. Stomata from detached epidermis of, Commelina communis (common dayflower) were treated, with saturating photon fluxes of red light (red trace). In a, parallel treatment, stomata illuminated with red light were, also illuminated with blue light, as indicated by the arrow, (blue trace). The increase in stomatal opening above the, level reached in the presence of saturating red light indicates that a different photoreceptor system, stimulated by, blue light, is mediating the additional increases in opening., (From Schwartz and Zeiger 1984.), , Relative effectiveness, , protoplasts also illustrates how intact guard cells function., The light-stimulated uptake of ions and the accumulation, of organic solutes decrease the cell’s osmotic potential, (increase the osmotic pressure). Water flows in as a result,, leading to an increase in turgor that in guard cells with, intact walls is mechanically transduced into an increase in, stomatal apertures (see Chapter 4). In the absence of a cell, wall, the blue light–mediated increase in osmotic pressure, causes the guard cell protoplast to swell., , Protoplasts in dark, , Protoplasts swell in, blue light, , (B), Guard cell protoplast volume (µm3 × 10–2), , Stomatal aperture (µm), , 12, , 55, , Red light on, Blue light on, , 50, , Control, , 45, 40, , 500 µM, Vanadate, , 35, 30, , 0, , 20, , 40, Time (min), , 60, , FIGURE 18.12 Blue light–stimulated swelling of guard cell, protoplasts. (A) In the absence of a rigid cell wall, guard, cell protoplasts of onion (Allium cepa) swell. (B) Blue light, stimulates the swelling of guard cell protoplasts of broad, bean (Vicia faba), and vanadate, an inhibitor of the H+ATPase, inhibits this swelling. Blue light stimulates ion and, water uptake in the guard cell protoplasts, which in the, intact guard cells provides a mechanical force that drives, increases in stomatal apertures. (A from Zeiger and Hepler, 1977; B after Amodeo et al. 1992.), , Blue Light Activates a Proton Pump at the Guard, Cell Plasma Membrane, , 350, , 400, 450, 500, Wavelength (nm), , FIGURE 18.11 The action spectrum for blue light–stimulated stomatal opening (under a red-light background)., (After Karlsson 1986.), , When guard cell protoplasts from broad bean (Vicia faba), are irradiated with blue light under background red-light, illumination, the pH of the suspension medium becomes, more acidic (Figure 18.13). This blue light–induced acidification is blocked by inhibitors that dissipate pH gradients,, such as CCCP (discussed shortly), and by inhibitors of the, proton-pumping H+-ATPase, such as vanadate (see Figure, 18.12C; see also Chapter 6).
Page 461 :
410, , Chapter 18, More, alkaline, , (A), , Blue photon, fluxes, (µmol m–2 s–1):, 5, 10, 50, 500, , 10, , 20, , 30, , 40, , 50, , 60, , 1 min, (B), , Time (min), , FIGURE 18.13 Acidification of a suspension medium of, , guard cell protoplasts of Vicia faba stimulated by a 30 s, pulse of blue light. The acidification results from the stimulation of an H+-ATPase at the plasma membrane by blue, light, and it is associated with protoplast swelling (see, Figure 18.12). (After Shimazaki et al. 1986.), , Electric current, , 0, , Fusicoccin activates, H+-ATPase, , Blue-light, pulse, , 2 pA, , More, acidic, , Blue-light, pulse, , 2 pA, , pH of suspension medium, , Baseline under, saturating red, light, , Electric current, , CCCP proton ionophore, , 30 s, , This indicates that the acidification results from the activation by blue light of a proton-pumping ATPase in the guard cell, plasma membrane that extrudes protons into the protoplast, suspension medium and lowers its pH. In the intact leaf,, this blue-light stimulation of proton pumping lowers the, pH of the apoplastic space surrounding the guard cells., The plasma membrane ATPase from guard cells has been, isolated and extensively characterized (Kinoshita et al., 2001)., The activation of electrogenic pumps such as the protonpumping ATPase can be measured in patch-clamping, experiments as an outward electric current at the plasma, membrane (see Web Topic 6.2 for a description of patch, clamping). A patch clamp recording of a guard cell protoplast treated with the fungal toxin fusicoccin, a well-characterized activator of plasma membrane ATPases, is shown, in Figure 18.14A. Exposure to fusicoccin stimulates an outward electric current, which is abolished by the proton, ionophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, (CCCP). This proton ionophore makes the plasma membrane highly permeable to protons, thus precluding the formation of a proton gradient across the membrane and abolishing net proton efflux., The relationship between proton pumping at the guard, cell plasma membrane and stomatal opening is evident, from the observation that fusicoccin stimulates both proton extrusion from guard cell protoplasts and stomatal, opening, and that CCCP inhibits the fusiccocin-stimulated, opening. The increase in proton-pumping rates as a function of fluence rates of blue light (see Figure 18.13) indicates, that the increasing rates of blue photons in the solar radiation reaching the leaf cause a larger stomatal opening., , FIGURE 18.14 Activation of the H+-ATPase at the plasma, , membrane of guard cell protoplasts by fusiccocin and blue, light can be measured as electric current in patch clamp, experiments. (A) Outward electric current (measured in, picoamps, pA) at the plasma membrane of a guard cell protoplast stimulated by the fungal toxin fusicoccin, an activator of the H+-ATPase. The current is abolished by the proton ionophore CCCP (carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone). (B) Outward electric current at the plasma membrane of a guard cell protoplast stimulated by a blue-light, pulse. These results indicate that blue light stimulates the, H+-ATPase. (A after Serrano et al. 1988; B after Assmann et, al. 1985.), , The close relationship among the number of incident, blue-light photons, proton pumping at the guard cell, plasma membrane, and stomatal opening further suggests, that the blue-light response of stomata might function as a, sensor of photon fluxes reaching the guard cell., Pulses of blue light given under a saturating red-light, background also stimulate an outward electric current from, guard cell protoplasts (see Figure 18.14B). The acidification, measurements shown in Figure 18.13 indicate that the outward electric current measured in patch clamp experiments, is carried by protons., , Blue-Light Responses Have Characteristic, Kinetics and Lag Times, Some of the characteristics of the responses to blue-light, pulses underscore some important properties of blue-light, responses: the persistence of the response after the light sig-
Page 462 :
Blue-Light Responses: Stomatal Movements and Morphogenesis, nal has been switched off, and a significant lag time separating the onset of the light signal and the beginning of the, response., In contrast to typical photosynthetic responses, which, are activated very quickly after a “light on” signal, and, cease when the light goes off (see, for instance, Figure 7.13),, blue-light responses proceed at maximal rates for several, minutes after application of the pulse (see Figure 18.14B)., This property can be explained by a physiologically inactive form of the blue-light photoreceptor that is converted, to an active form by blue light, with the active form reverting slowly to the physiologically inactive form in the, absence of blue light (Iino et al. 1985). The rate of the, response to a blue-light pulse would thus depend on the, time course of the reversion of the active form to the inactive one., Another property of the response to blue-light pulses is, a lag time, which lasts about 25 s in both the acidification, response and the outward electric currents stimulated by, blue light (see Figures 18.13 and 18.14). This amount of, time is probably required for the signal transduction cascade to proceed from the photoreceptor site to the protonpumping ATPase and for the proton gradient to form. Similar lag times have been measured for blue light–dependent, inhibition of hypocotyl elongation, which was discussed, earlier., , Blue Light Regulates Osmotic Relations, of Guard Cells, Blue light modulates guard cell osmoregulation via its activation of proton pumping (described earlier) and via the, stimulation of the synthesis of organic solutes. Before discussing these blue-light responses, let us briefly describe, the major osmotically active solutes in guard cells., The botanist Hugo von Mohl proposed in 1856 that turgor changes in guard cells provide the mechanical force for, changes in stomatal apertures. The plant physiologist F. E., Lloyd hypothesized in 1908 that guard cell turgor is regulated by osmotic changes resulting from starch–sugar interconversions, a concept that led to a starch–sugar hypothesis of stomatal movements. The discovery of the changes, in potassium concentrations in guard cells in the 1960s led, to the modern theory of guard cell osmoregulation by, potassium and its counterions., Potassium concentration in guard cells increases severalfold when stomata open, from 100 mM in the closed state, to 400 to 800 mM in the open state, depending on the plant, species and the experimental conditions. These large concentration changes in the positively charged potassium, ions are electrically balanced by the anions Cl– and, malate2– (Figure 18.15A). In species of the genus Allium,, such as onion (Allium cepa), K+ ions are balanced solely by, Cl–. In most species, however, potassium fluxes are balanced by varying amounts of Cl– and the organic anion, malate2– (Talbott et al. 1996)., , 411, , The Cl– ion is taken up into the guard cells during stomatal opening and extruded during stomatal closing. Malate,, on the other hand, is synthesized in the guard cell cytosol,, in a metabolic pathway that uses carbon skeletons generated by starch hydrolysis (see Figure 18.15B). The malate, content of guard cells decreases during stomatal closing,, but it remains to be established whether malate is catabolized in mitochondrial respiration or is extruded into the, apoplast., Potassium and chloride are taken up into guard cells via, secondary transport mechanisms driven by the gradient of, electrochemical potential for H+, ∆mH+, generated by the, proton pump (see Chapter 6) discussed earlier in the chapter. Proton extrusion makes the electric-potential difference, across the guard cell plasma membrane more negative;, light-dependent hyperpolarizations as high as 50 mV have, been measured. In addition, proton pumping generates a, pH gradient of about 0.5 to 1 pH unit., The electrical component of the proton gradient provides a driving force for the passive uptake of potassium, ions via voltage-regulated potassium channels (see Chapter 6) (Schroeder et al. 2001). Chloride is thought to be, taken up through anion channels. Thus, blue light–dependent stimulation of proton pumping plays a key role in, guard cell osmoregulation during light-dependent stomatal movements, Guard cell chloroplasts (see Figure 18.8) contain large, starch grains, and their starch content decreases during, stomatal opening and increases during closing. Starch, an, insoluble, high-molecular-weight polymer of glucose, does, not contribute to the cell’s osmotic potential, but the, hydrolysis of starch into soluble sugars causes a decrease, in the osmotic potential (or increase in osmotic pressure) of, guard cells. In the reverse process, starch synthesis, decreases the sugar concentration, resulting in an increase, of the cell’s osmotic potential, which the starch–sugar, hypothesis predicted to be associated with stomatal closing., With the discovery of the major role of potassium and, its counterion in guard cell osmoregulation, the sugar–, starch hypothesis was no longer considered important, (Outlaw 1983). Recent studies, however, described in the, next section, have characterized a major osmoregulatory, phase of guard cells in which sucrose is the dominant, osmotically active solute., , Sucrose Is an Osmotically Active Solute, in Guard Cells, Studies of daily courses of stomatal movements in intact, leaves have shown that the potassium content in guard, cells increases in parallel with early-morning opening, but, it decreases in the early afternoon under conditions in, which apertures continue to increase. The sucrose content, of guard cells increases slowly in the morning, but upon, potassium efflux, sucrose becomes the dominant osmoti-
Page 464 :
FIGURE 18.15 Three distinct osmoregulatory pathways in, , guard cells. The dark arrows identify the major metabolic, steps of each pathway that lead to the accumulation of, osmotically active solutes in the guard cells. (A) Potassium, and its counterions. Potassium and chloride are taken up in, secondary transport processes driven by a proton gradient;, malate is formed from the hydrolysis of starch. (B), Accumulation of sucrose from starch hydrolysis. (C), Accumulation of sucrose from photosynthetic carbon fixation. The possible uptake of apoplastic sucrose is also indicated. (From Talbott and Zeiger 1998.), , cally active solute, and stomatal closing at the end of the, day parallels a decrease in the sucrose content of guard, cells (Figure 18.16) (Talbott and Zeiger 1998)., These osmoregulatory features indicate that stomatal, opening is associated primarily with K+ uptake, and closing is associated with a decrease in sucrose content (see, Figure 18.16). The need for distinct potassium- and sucrosedominated osmoregulatory phases is unclear, but it might, underlie regulatory aspects of stomatal function. Potassium, might be the solute of choice for the consistent daily opening that occurs at sunrise. The sucrose phase might be associated with the coordination of stomatal movements in the, epidermis with rates of photosynthesis in the mesophyll., Where do osmotically active solutes originate? Four distinct metabolic pathways that can supply osmotically, active solutes to guard cells have been characterized (see, Figure 18.15):, 1. The uptake of K+ and Cl– coupled to the biosynthesis, of malate2–, 2. The production of sucrose from starch hydrolysis, 3. The production of sucrose by photosynthetic carbon, fixation in the guard cell chloroplast, , 55, , 20, , 45, 35, , 15, , K+, , Sucrose, 25, , 23:00, , 21:00, , 19:00, , 17:00, , 15:00, , 13:00, , 5, 11:00, , 5, 9:00, , 15, , 7:00, , 10, , 2.25, 1.75, 1.25, 0.75, , Sucrose (pmol/guard cell pair), , Stomatal aperture, , K+ stain (percent area), , 25, Stomatal aperture (µm), , ▲, , Blue-Light Responses: Stomatal Movements and Morphogenesis, , 0.25, , Time of day, , FIGURE 18.16 Daily course of changes in stomatal aperture,, , and in potassium and sucrose content, of guard cells from, intact leaves of broad bean (Vicia faba). These results indicate that the changes in osmotic potential required for, stomatal opening in the morning are mediated by potassium and its counterions, whereas the afternoon changes, are mediated by sucrose. (After Talbott and Zeiger 1998.), , 413, , 4. The uptake of apoplastic sucrose generated by mesophyll photosynthesis, Depending on environmental conditions, one or several, pathways may be activated. For instance, red light–stimulated stomatal opening in detached epidermis depends, solely on sucrose generated by guard cell photosynthesis,, with no detectable K+ uptake. The other osmoregulatory, pathways can be selectively activated under different, experimental conditions (see Web Topic 18.1). Current, studies are beginning to unravel the mysteries of guard cell, osmoregulation in the intact leaf (Dietrich et al. 2001)., , BLUE-LIGHT PHOTORECEPTORS, Experiments carried out by Charles Darwin and his son, Francis in the nineteenth century determined that the site, of photoreception in blue light–stimulated phototropism is, in the coleoptile tip. Early hypotheses about blue-light photoreceptors focused on carotenoids and flavins (for a historical account of early research on blue-light photoreceptors, see Web Topic 18.2). Despite active research efforts,, no significant advances toward the identification of bluelight photoreceptors were made until the early 1990s. In the, case of phototropism and the inhibition of stem elongation,, progress resulted from the identification of mutants for key, blue-light responses, and the subsequent isolation of the, relevant gene., Cloning of the gene led to the identification and characterization of the protein encoded by the gene. In the case, of stomatal guard cells, the carotenoid zeaxanthin has been, postulated to be the chromophore of a blue-light photoreceptor, whereas the identity of the apoprotein remains to, be established. For a detailed discussion of the basic differences between carotenoid and flavin photoreceptors, see, Web Topic 18.3. In the following section we will describe, the three photoreceptors associated with blue-light, responses: cryptochromes, phototropins, and zeaxanthin., , Cryptochromes Are Involved in the Inhibition of, Stem Elongation, The hy4 mutant of Arabidopsis lacks the blue light–stimulated, inhibition of hypocotyl elongation described earlier in the, chapter. As a result of this genetic defect, hy4 plants show an, elongated hypocotyl when irradiated with blue light. Isolation of the HY4 gene showed that it encodes a 75 kDa protein, with significant sequence homology to microbial DNA photolyase, a blue light–activated enzyme that repairs pyrimidine dimers in DNA formed as a result of exposure to ultraviolet radiation (Ahmad and Cashmore 1993). In view of this, sequence similarity, the hy4 protein, later renamed cryptochrome 1 (cry1), was proposed to be a blue-light photoreceptor mediating the inhibition of stem elongation., Photolyases are pigment proteins that contain a flavin, adenine dinucleotide (FAD; see Figure 11.2B) and a pterin.
Page 465 :
414, , Chapter 18, (B), 0.8, , Hypocotyl length (cm), , Anthocyanin accumulation, absorbance change, , (A), , 0.6, 0.4, 0.2, 0.0, , CRY1, OE, , WT, , cry1, , response. In addition, CRY1 has been shown to be involved, in the setting of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis (see Chapter 17), and both CRY1 and CRY2 have been shown to play, a role in the induction of flowering (see Chapter 24). Cryptochrome homologs have been found to regulate the circadian clock in Drosophila, mouse, and humans., , 1.5, 1.0, , Phototropins Are Involved in Phototropism and, Chloroplast Movements, , 0.5, , CRY1, OE, , WT, , cry1, , FIGURE 18.17 Blue light stimulates the accumulation of, , anthocyanin (A) and the inhibition of stem elongation (B) in, transgenic and mutant seedlings of Arabidopsis. These bar, graphs show a transgenic phenotype overexpressing the, gene that encodes CRY1 (CRY1 OE), the wild type (WT),, and cry1 mutants. The enhanced blue-light response of the, transgenic plant overexpressing the gene that encodes, CRY1 demonstrates the important role of this gene product, in stimulating anthocyanin biosynthesis and inhibiting, stem elongation. (After Ahmad et al. 1998.), , Pterins are light-absorbing, pteridine derivatives that often, function as pigments in insects, fishes, and birds (see Chapter 12 for pterin structure). When expressed in Escherichia coli,, the cry1 protein binds FAD and a pterin, but it lacks, detectable photolyase activity. No information is available, on the chromophore(s) bound to cry1 in vivo, or on the, nature of the photochemical reactions involving cry1, that, would start the postulated sensory transduction cascade, mediating the several blue-light responses mediated by cry1., The most important evidence for a role of cry1 in blue, light–mediated inhibition of stem elongation comes from, overexpression studies. Overexpression of the CRY1 protein in transgenic tobacco or Arabidopsis plants results in a, stronger blue light–stimulated inhibition of hypocotyl, elongation than in the wild type, as well as increased, production of anthocyanin, another blue-light response, (Figure 18.17). Thus, overexpression of CRY1 caused an, enhanced sensitivity to blue light in transgenic plants., Other blue-light responses, such as phototropism and blue, light–dependent stomatal movements, appear to be normal in the cry1 mutant phenotype., A second gene product homologous to CRY1, named, CRY2, has been isolated from Arabidopsis (Lin 2000). Both, CRY1 and CRY2 appear ubiquitous throughout the plant, kingdom. A major difference between them is that CRY2 is, rapidly degraded in the light, whereas CRY1 is stable in, light-grown seedlings., Transgenic plants overexpressing the gene that encodes, CRY2 show a small enhancement of the inhibition of, hypocotyl elongation, indicating that unlike CRY1, CRY2, does not play a primary role in inhibiting stem elongation., On the other hand, the transgenic plants overexpressing the, gene that encodes CRY2 show a large increase in blue, light–stimulated cotyledon expansion, yet another blue-light, , Some recently isolated Arabidopsis mutants impaired in, blue light–dependent phototropism of the hypocotyl have, provided valuable information about cellular events preceding bending. One of these mutants, the nph1 (nonphototropic hypocotyl) mutant has been found to be genetically, independent of the hy4 (cry1) mutant discussed earlier: The, nph1 mutant lacks a phototropic response in the hypocotyl, but has normal blue light–stimulated inhibition of, hypocotyl elongation, while hy4 has the converse phenotype. Recently the nph1 gene was renamed phot1, and the, protein it encodes was named phototropin (Briggs and, Christie 2002)., The C-terminal half of phototropin is a serine/threonine, kinase. The N-terminal half contains two repeated, domains, of about 100 amino acids each, that have, sequence similarities to other proteins involved in signaling in bacteria and mammals. Proteins with sequence similarity to the N terminus of phototropin bind flavin cofactors. These proteins are oxygen sensors in Escherichia coli, and Azotobacter, and voltage sensors in potassium channels, of Drosophila and vertebrates., When expressed in insect cells, the N-terminal half of, phototropin binds flavin mononucleotide (FMN) (see Figure 11.2B and Web Essay 18.2) and shows a blue, light–dependent autophosphorylation reaction. This reaction resembles the blue light–dependent phosphorylation, of a 120 kDa membrane protein found in growing regions, of etiolated seedlings., The Arabidopsis genome contains a second gene, phot2,, which is related to phot1. The phot1 mutant lacks hypocotyl, phototropism in response to low-intensity blue light (0.01–1, µmol mol–2 s–1) but retains a phototropic response at higher, intensities (1–10 µmol m–2 s–1). The phot2 mutant has a normal phototropic response, but the phot1/phot2 double, mutant is severely impaired at both low and high intensities. These data indicate that both phot1 and phot2 are, involved in the phototropic response, with phot2 functioning at high light fluence rates., , Blue light–activated chloroplast movement. Leaves, show an adaptive feature that can alter the intracellular distribution of their chloroplasts in order to control light, absorption and prevent photodamage (see Figure 9.5). The, action spectrum for chloroplast movement shows the, “three finger” fine structure typical of blue-light responses., When incident radiation is weak, chloroplasts gather at the, upper and lower surfaces of the mesophyll cells (the “accu-
Page 466 :
Blue-Light Responses: Stomatal Movements and Morphogenesis, , The carotenoid zeaxanthin has been implicated as a photoreceptor in blue light–stimulated stomatal opening. Recall, from Chapters 7 and 9 that zeaxanthin is one of the three, components of the xanthophyll cycle of chloroplasts, which, protects photosynthetic pigments from excess excitation, energy. In guard cells, however, the changes in zeaxanthin, content as a function of incident radiation are distinctly different from the changes in mesophyll cells (Figure 18.18)., In sun plants such as Vicia faba, zeaxanthin accumulation in the mesophyll begins at about 200 µmol m–2 s–1, and, there is no detectable zeaxanthin in the early morning or, late afternoon. In contrast, the zeaxanthin content in guard, cells closely follows incident solar radiation at the leaf surface throughout the day, and it is nearly linearly proportional to incident photon fluxes in the early morning and, late afternoon. Several key characteristics of the guard cell, chloroplast strongly indicate that the primary function of, the guard cell chloroplast is sensory transduction and not, carbon fixation (Zeiger et al. 2002)., Compelling evidence indicates that zeaxanthin is a bluelight photoreceptor in guard cells:, , Zeaxanthin (mmol mol–1 Chl a+b), (B), Stomatal aperture (mm), , The Carotenoid Zeaxanthin Mediates Blue-Light, Photoreception in Guard Cells, , (A), 250, , 1250, , 200, , 1000, , 150, , Guard, cells, , 100, 50, 0, , Mesophyll, cells, 6:00, , 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00, , 6:00, , 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00, Time of day, , 750, 500, 250, , Photosynthetically active, radiation (µmol m–2 s–1), , mulation” response; see Figure 9.5B), thus maximizing, light absorption., Under strong light, the chloroplasts move to the cell surfaces that are parallel to the incident light (the “avoidance”, response; see Figure 9.5C), thus minimizing light absorption. Recent studies have shown that mesophyll cells of the, phot1 mutant have a normal avoidance response and a rudimentary accumulation response. Cells from the phot2, mutant show a normal accumulation response but lack the, avoidance response. Cells from the phot1/phot2 double, mutant lack both the avoidance and accumulation, responses (Sakai et al. 2001). These results indicate that phot2, plays a key role in the avoidance response, and that both, phot1 and phot2 contribute to the accumulation response., , 415, , 14, 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, 2, 0, , FIGURE 18.18 The zeaxanthin content of guard cells closely, , tracks photosynthetic active radiation and stomatal apertures. (A) Daily course of photosynthetic active radiation, reaching the leaf surface, and of zeaxanthin content of, guard cells and mesophyll cells of Vicia faba leaves grown in, a greenhouse. The white areas within the graph highlight, the contrasting sensitivity of the xanthophyll cycle in mesophyll and guard cell chloroplasts under the low irradiances, prevailing early and late in the day. (B) Stomatal apertures, in the same leaves used to measure guard cell zeaxanthin, content. (After Srivastava and Zeiger 1995a.), , • The absorption spectrum of zeaxanthin (Figure 18.19), closely matches the action spectrum for blue, light–stimulated stomatal opening (see Figure 18.11)., , • The blue-light sensitivity of guard cells increases as a, function of their zeaxanthin concentration., Experimentally, zeaxanthin concentration in guard, cells can be varied with increasing fluence rates of, red light. When guard cells from epidermal peels, illuminated with increasing fluence rates of red light, are exposed to blue light, the resulting blue, light–stimulated stomatal opening is linearly related, to the fluence rate of background red-light irradiation, (see the wild-type treatment in Figure 18.20) and to, , 0.25, 0.2, Absorbance, , • In daily courses of stomatal opening in intact leaves, grown in a greenhouse, incident radiation, zeaxanthin content of guard cells, and stomatal apertures, are closely related (see Figure 18.18)., , 0.15, 0.1, 0.05, , 350, , 400, 450, 500, Wavelength (nm), , FIGURE 18.19 The absorption spectrum of zeaxanthin in, , ethanol.
Page 467 :
416, , Chapter 18, , FIGURE 18.20 Stomatal responses to blue light in the wild, Stomatal aperture (mm), , type and npq1, an Arabidopsis mutant that lacks zeaxanthin., Stomata in detached epidermis were irradiated with red, light for 2 hours, and 20 µmol m–2 s–1 of blue light was, added for one additional hour. Stomatal opening in the, wild type is proportional to the fluence rates of background, red light. In contrast, npq1 stomata lacked this response and, showed reduced opening under both blue and red light,, probably mediated by guard cell photosynthesis. (From, Frechilla et al. 1999.), , Wild type, 2.8, , npq1 (mutant, lacking zeaxanthin), , 2.4, , 2.0, 50, , 100, , 150, , Background red light (mmol m–2 s–1), , zeaxanthin content (Srivastava and Zeiger 1995b)., The same relationship among background red light,, zeaxanthin content, and blue-light sensitivity has, been found in blue light–stimulated phototropism of, corn coleoptiles (see Web Topic 18.4)., , enzyme that converts violaxanthin into zeaxanthin., The specificity of the inhibition of blue light–stimulated stomatal opening by DTT, and its concentration, dependence, indicate that guard cell zeaxanthin is, required for the stomatal response to blue light., , • Blue light–stimulated stomatal opening is completely, inhibited by 3 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and the inhibition is concentration dependent. Zeaxanthin formation is blocked by DTT, a reducing agent that reduces, S—S bonds to –SH groups and effectively inhibits the, , • In the facultative CAM species Mesembryanthemum, crystallinum (see Chapters 8 and 25), salt accumulation, , CHLOROPLAST, , Light energy, (PAR), , ATP, , H+, , ATP, synthase, , ADP, +, Pi, , CO2 sensing by rubisco, Ribulose-1,5, biphosphate, , H+, , CO2, , Carboxylation, Regeneration, , ATP, +, NADPH, , H+, , Grana, thylakoid, , Reduction, ADP, +, Pi, , H+, , Triose, phosphate, , ATP, , ADP + Pi, , Violaxanthin, Blue-light, sensing, , Calvin, cycle, , + NADP+, , npq1, Zeaxanthin, CYTOPLASM, ?, , 14-3-3, , phot1 phot2, , Serine/threonine, protein kinase, , H+, , H+ Cl–, , K+, , H+ Cl–, , K+, , P, C terminus, H+-ATPase, Inactive, H+, Active, , FIGURE 18.21 A sensory transduction, , cascade of blue light–stimulated stomatal, opening.
Page 468 :
Blue-Light Responses: Stomatal Movements and Morphogenesis, shifts its carbon metabolism from C3 to CAM mode. In, the C3 mode, stomata accumulate zeaxanthin and, show a blue-light response. CAM induction inhibits, the ability of guard cells to accumulate zeaxanthin,, and to respond to blue light (Tallman et al. 1997)., , SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION, , The blue-light response of the Arabidopsis mutant, npq1. The Arabidopsis mutant npq1 (nonphotochemical, quenching), has a genetic lesion in the enzyme that converts violaxanthin into zeaxanthin (see Figure 18.21), (Niyogi et al. 1998). Because of this mutation, neither mesophyll nor guard cell chloroplasts of npq1 accumulate zeaxanthin (Frechilla et al. 1999). Availability of this mutant, made it possible to test the zeaxanthin hypothesis with, guard cells in which zeaxanthin accumulation is genetically, blocked., Because photosynthesis in the guard cell chloroplast is, stimulated by blue light (see Figure 18.10), an adequate test, for the blue-light response of the zeaxanthin-less npq1, mutant requires an experimental design ensuring that any, observed response to blue light is blue light specific and, not mediated by photosynthesis. As discussed earlier in the, chapter, action spectra provide a stringent test of specificity,, but determination of action spectra is time-consuming and, labor-intensive., Another option is to test the enhancement of blue-light, sensitivity by background red light, a specific characteristic of blue light–stimulated stomatal movements (Assmann, 1988), discussed earlier. In experiments testing the enhancement of the blue-light response in npq1 by background red, light, the zeaxanthin-less stomata showed baseline apertures in response to blue or red light, driven by guard cell, photosynthesis, and failed to show any increases in the, blue-light response., The close relationship between incident solar radiation, and zeaxanthin content in guard cells, and the role of zeaxanthin in blue-light photoreception suggest that the bluelight component of the stomatal response to light functions, as a light sensor that couples stomatal apertures to incident, photon fluxes at the leaf surface. The photosynthetic, component, on the other hand, could function in the, coupling of the stomatal responses with photosynthetic rates in the mesophyll (see Chapter 9)., , Sensory transduction cascades for the blue-light responses, encompass the sequence of events linking the initial, absorption of blue light by a chromophore and the final, expression of a blue-light response, such as stomatal opening or phototropism. In this section we will discuss available information on signal transduction cascades for cryptochromes, phototropin, and zeaxanthin., , Cryptochromes Accumulate in the Nucleus, The sequence similarity of cry1 and cry2 to photolyase suggests that like photolyase, cryptochromes initiate their sensory transduction cascade by the reduction of a flavin chromophore by light, and a subsequent electron transfer, reaction to an electron acceptor (see Figure 11.2). However,, there is no experimental evidence for an involvement of, cry1 or cry2 in redox reactions., Recent studies have shown that cry2, and to a lesser, extent cry1, accumulates in the nucleus. This suggests that, both proteins might be involved in the regulation of gene, expression. But some of the cryptochrome action in, response to blue light seems to occur in the cytoplasm, because one of the earliest detected defects in cry1 mutant, seedlings is impaired activation of anion channels at the, plasma membrane. In addition, cry1 and cry2 have been, shown to interact with phytochrome A in vivo, and to be, phosphorylated by phytochrome A in vitro (see Chapter 17, and Web Essay 18.3)., , Phototropin Binds FMN, As discussed earlier, the products of the phot1 and phot2, genes expressed in vitro bind FMN and undergo photophosphorylation in response to blue light. Recent spectroscopic studies have shown that the blue light–induced spectral changes of phototropin-bound FMN resemble those, typical of the binding of FMN to a cysteine residue of phototropin (Figure 18.22; see also Web Essay 18.2) (Swartz et, al. 2001). This reaction is reversed by a dark treatment., , R, , The phot1/phot2 mutant lacks blue light–stimulated opening. Stomata from the phot1/phot2 double, mutant fail to exhibit a specific blue-light response,, whereas in the single phot1 or phot2 mutant the bluelight response is only slightly affected (Kinoshita et al., 2001). These findings implicate phototropin in the, blue-light response of stomata (Figure 18.21). It will be, of great interest to determine whether phototropin is, a second blue-light photoreceptor in guard cells or, plays a regulatory role in later steps of the sensory, transduction cascade., , 417, , N, , R, N, NH, , N, XH, S, Cys, , –, , O, , O, , N, , Light, Dark, X, , N, NH, , N, H, , –, , S, , O, , O, , Cys, , FIGURE 18.22 Proposed adduct formation of FMN and a cys-, , teine residue of phototropin protein upon blue-light irradiation., XH and X– represent an unidentified, proton donor acceptor., (After Briggs and Christie 2002.)
Page 469 :
418, , Chapter 18, , These results suggest that blue irradiation of the proteinbound FMN in intact cells causes a conformational change, of phototropin that triggers autophosphorylation and starts, the sensory transduction cascade. The cellular events that, follow the autophosphorylation remain unknown., High-resolution analysis of the changes in growth rate, mediating the inhibition of hypocotyl elongation by blue, light has provided valuable information about the interactions among phototropin, cry1, cry2, and the phytochrome, phyA (Parks et al. 2001). After a lag of 30 s, blue, light–treated, wild-type Arabidopsis seedlings show a rapid, decrease in elongation rates during the first 30 minutes,, and then they grow very slowly for several days (Figure, 18.23)., Analysis of the same response in phot1, cry1, cry2, and, phyA mutants has shown that suppression of stem elongation by blue light during seedling de-etiolation is initiated, by phot1, with cry1, and to a limited extent cry2, modulating the response after 30 minutes. The slow growth rate of, stems in blue light–treated seedlings is primarily a result, of the persistent action of cry1, and this is the reason that, cry1 mutants of Arabidopsis show a long hypocotyl, compared to the short hypocotyl of the wild type. There is also, a role for phytochrome A in at least the early stages of blue, light–regulated growth because growth inhibition does not, progress normally in phyA mutants., , Relative growth rate, , 1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2, , Blue, light, on, , 0, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , Time (h), phot1, , cry1/cry2/phyA (via anion channels), , FIGURE 18.23 Sensory transduction cascade of blue, , light–stimulated inhibition of stem elongation in, Arabidopsis. Elongation rates in the dark (0.25 mm h–1) were, normalized to 1. Within 30 s of the onset of blue-light irradiation, growth rates decreased and approached zero, within 30 minutes, then continued at very reduced rates for, several days. If blue light is applied to a phot1 mutant,, dark-growth rates remain unchanged for the first 30 minutes, indicating that the inhibition of elongation in the first, 30 minutes is under phototropin control. Similar experiments with cry1, cry2, and phyA mutants indicate that the, respective gene products control elongation rates at later, times. (After Parks et al. 2001.), , Zeaxanthin Isomerization Might Start a Cascade, Mediating Blue Light–Stimulated Stomatal, Opening, Several key steps in the sensory transduction cascade for, blue light–stimulated stomatal opening have been characterized (see Figure 18.21). The C terminus of the H+-ATPase, (see Figure 6.15) has an autoinhibitory domain that regulates the activity of the enzyme. If this autoinhibitory, domain is experimentally removed by a protease, the H+ATPase becomes irreversibly activated. The autoinhibitory, domain of the C terminus is thought to lower the activity, of the enzyme by blocking its catalytic site. Conversely, fusiccocin appears to activate the enzyme by moving the, autoinhibitory domain away from the catalytic site., Upon blue-light irradiation, the H+-ATPase shows a, lower Km for ATP and a higher Vmax (see Chapter 6), indicating that blue light activates the H+-ATPase. Activation, of the enzyme involves the phosphorylation of serine and, threonine residues of the C-terminal domain of the H+ATPase (Kinoshita and Shimazaki 1999). Blue light–stimulated proton pumping and stomatal opening are prevented, by inhibitors of protein kinases, which might block phosphorylation of the H+-ATPase. As with fusiccocin, phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain appears also to displace the autoinhibitory domain of the C-terminal from the, catalytic site of the enzyme., A 14-3-3 protein has been found to bind to the phosphorylated C terminus of the guard cell H+-ATPase, but, not the nonphosphorylated one. The family of 14-3-3 proteins was originally discovered in brain tissue, and its, members were found to be ubiquitous regulatory proteins, in eukaryotic organisms. In plants, 14-3-3 proteins regulate, transcription by binding to activators in the nucleus, and, they regulate metabolic enzymes such as nitrate reductase., Only one of the four 14-3-3 isoforms found in guard, cells binds to the H+-ATPase, so the binding appears to be, specific (Emi et al. 2001). The same 14-3-3 isoform binds to, the guard cell H+-ATPase in response to both fusiccocin, and blue-light treatments. The 14-3-3 protein seems to dissociate from the H+-ATPase upon dephosphorylation of the, C-terminal domain., Proton-pumping rates of guard cells increase with fluence rates of blue light (see Figure 18.13), and the electrochemical gradient generated by the proton pump drives, ion uptake into the guard cells, increasing turgor and turgor-mediated stomatal apertures. Taken together, these, steps define the major sensory transducing steps linking, the activation of a serine/threonine protein kinase by blue, light and blue light–stimulated stomatal opening (see Figure 18.21)., The zeaxanthin hypothesis postulates that excitation of, zeaxanthin in the antenna bed of the guard cell chloroplast, by blue light starts the sensory transduction cascade that, activates the serine/threonine kinase in the cytosol. Isomerization is the predominant photochemical reaction of
Page 470 :
Blue-Light Responses: Stomatal Movements and Morphogenesis, , Light pulse:, , Stomatal opening, , Blue, , Blue-green, , Blue-green-blue, , -10, , 0, , 10, , 20, , 30, , 40, , Time (min), , FIGURE 18.24 Blue/green reversibility of stomatal movements. Stomata open when given a 30 s blue-light pulse, (1800 mmol m–2 s–1) under a background of continuous red, light (120 mmol m–2 s–1). A green-light pulse (3600 mmol, m–2 s–1) applied after the blue-light pulse blocks the bluelight response, and the opening is restored upon application of a second blue-light pulse given after the green-light, pulse. (After Frechilla et al. 2000.), , carotenoids, so blue light would isomerize zeaxanthin and, the conformational change would start the transducing cascade., , The reversal of blue light–stimulated opening by green, light. A reversal of blue light–stimulated stomatal opening by green light has been recently discovered. Stomata in, epidermal strips open in response to a 30 s blue-light pulse, (Figure 18.24), but the opening is not observed if the bluelight pulse is followed by a green-light pulse. The opening, is restored if the green pulse is followed by a second, blue-light pulse, in a response analogous to the red/far-red, reversibility of phytochrome responses. (Frechilla et al., 2000.), The blue/green reversibility response has been reported, in stomata of several species, and in blue light–stimulated,, coleoptile phototropism (see Web Essay 18.4). The role of, the blue/green reversal of stomatal movements under natural conditions remains to be established, but it could be, related to the sensing of environmental conditions such as, sun and shade., The action spectrum for the green reversal of blue, light–stimulated opening shows a maximum at 540 nm,, and two minor peaks at 490 and 580 nm. Such an action, spectrum rules out the involvement of phytochrome or, chlorophylls in the response. Rather, the action spectrum is, remarkably similar to the action spectrum for blue, , 419, , light–stimulated stomatal opening (see Figure 18.11), but, red-shifted (displaced toward the longer, red wave band of, the spectrum) by about 90 nm., Such spectral red shifts have been observed upon the, isomerization of carotenoids in a protein environment (see, Web Essay 18.4). In reconstituted vesicles containing, chlorophyll a/b–binding protein and the xanthophylls zeaxanthin, violaxanthin, and neoxanthin, blue/green, reversible absorption spectrum changes have been associated with zeaxanthin isomerization., The blue/green reversal of stomatal movements and the, absorption spectrum changes elicited by blue and green, light suggest that a physiologically inactive, trans isomer of, zeaxanthin is converted to a cis isomer by blue light, and, that the isomerization starts the sensory transduction cascade. Available data suggest that green light converts the, cis isomer into the physiologically inactive trans form, and, therefore reverses the blue light–stimulated opening signal., Results from a previous study further indicate that after a, blue pulse, the cis form slowly reverts to the trans form in, the dark (Iino et al. 1985)., , The Xanthophyll Cycle Confers Plasticity to the, Stomatal Responses to Light, Zeaxanthin concentration in guard cells varies with the, activity of the xanthophyll cycle. The enzyme that converts violaxanthin to zeaxanthin is an integral thylakoid, protein showing a pH optimum at pH 5.2 (Yamamoto, 1979). Acidification of lumen pH stimulates zeaxanthin, formation, and lumen alkalinization favors violaxanthin, formation., Lumen pH depends on levels of incident photosynthetic, active radiation (most effective at blue and red wavelengths; see Chapter 7), and on the rate of ATP synthesis,, that dissipates the pH gradient across the thylakoid. Thus,, photosynthetic activity in the guard cell chloroplast, lumen, pH, zeaxanthin content, blue-light sensitivity, and stomatal, apertures are tightly coupled., Some unique properties of the guard cell chloroplast, appear optimally geared for its sensory transducing function. Compared with their mesophyll counterparts, guard, cell chloroplasts are enriched in photosystem II, and they, have unusually high rates of photosynthetic electron transport and low rates of photosynthetic carbon fixation, (Zeiger et al. 2002). These properties favor lumen acidification at low photon fluxes, and they explain zeaxanthin, formation in the guard cell chloroplast early in the day (see, Figure 18.18)., The regulation of zeaxanthin content by lumen pH, and, the tight coupling between lumen pH and Calvin cycle, activity in the guard cell chloroplast (see Figure 18.21) further suggest that zeaxanthin can also operate as a CO2 sensor in guard cells (see Web Essay 18.5)., The remarkable progress achieved by the recent discoveries in the molecular biology of blue-light responses has
Page 471 :
420, , Chapter 18, , dramatically increased our understanding of the subject., The identification of cryptochromes, phototropin, and, zeaxanthin as putative blue-light photoreceptors in plant, cells has stimulated great interest in this aspect of plant, photobiology. Current and future work is addressing, important open questions, such as the detailed sequence of, the sensory transduction cascades and the precise localization and composition of the pigment proteins involved., Ongoing research on the subject virtually ensures rapid further progress., , SUMMARY, Plants utilize light as a source of energy and as a signal that, provides information about their environment. A large, family of blue-light responses is used to sense light quantity and direction. These blue-light signals are transduced, into electrical, metabolic, and genetic processes that allow, plants to alter growth, development, and function in order, to acclimate to changing environmental conditions. Bluelight responses include phototropism, stomatal movements, inhibition of stem elongation, gene activation, pigment biosynthesis, tracking of the sun by leaves, and, chloroplast movements within cells., Specific blue-light responses can be distinguished from, other responses that have some sensitivity to blue light by, a characteristic “three-finger” action spectrum in the 400 to, 500 nm region., The physiology of blue-light responses varies broadly., In phototropism, stems grow toward unilateral light, sources by asymmetric growth on their shaded side. In the, inhibition of stem elongation, perception of blue light, depolarizes the membrane potential of elongating cells,, and the rate of elongation rapidly decreases. In gene activation, blue light stimulates transcription and translation,, leading to the accumulation of gene products that are, required for the morphogenetic response to light., Blue light–stimulated stomatal movements are driven, by blue light–dependent changes in the osmoregulation of, guard cells. Blue light stimulates an H+-ATPase at the, guard cell plasma membrane, and the resulting pumping, of protons across the membrane generates an electrochemical-potential gradient that provides a driving force, for ion uptake. Blue light also stimulates starch degradation and malate biosynthesis. Solute accumulation within, the guard cells leads to stomatal opening. Guard cells also, utilize sucrose as a major osmotically active solute, and, light quality can change the activity of different osmoregulatory pathways that modulate stomatal movements., Cry1 and cry2 are two Arabidopsis genes involved in blue, light–dependent inhibition of stem elongation, cotyledon, expansion, anthocyanin synthesis, the control of flowering,, and the setting of circadian rhythms. It has been proposed, that CRY1 and CRY2 are apoproteins of flavin-containing, pigment proteins that mediate blue-light photoreception., , The cry1 and cry2 gene products have sequence similarity to photolyase but no photolyase activity. The cry1, protein, and to a lesser extent cry2, accumulates in the, nucleus and might be involved in gene expression. The, cry1 protein also regulates anion channel activity at the, plasma membrane., The protein phototropin has a major role in the regulation, of phototropism. The C-terminal half of phototropin is a serine/threonine kinase, and the N-terminal half has two flavinbinding domains. In vitro, phototropin binds the flavin FMN, and autophosphorylates in response to blue light. Mutants, called phot1 and phot2 are defective in phototropism and in, chloroplast movements. The phot1/phot2 double mutant lacks, blue light–stimulated stomatal opening., The chloroplastic carotenoid zeaxanthin has been implicated in blue-light photoreception in guard cells. Blue, light–stimulated stomatal opening is blocked if zeaxanthin, accumulation in guard cells is prevented by genetic or biochemical means. Manipulation of zeaxanthin content in, guard cells makes it possible to regulate their response to, blue light. The signal transduction cascade for the bluelight response of guard cells comprises blue-light perception in the guard cell chloroplast, transduction of the bluelight signal across the chloroplast envelope, activation of, the H+-ATPase, turgor buildup, and stomatal opening., , Web Material, Web Topics, 18.1 Guard Cell Osmoregulation and a, Blue Light–Activated Metabolic Switch, Blue light controls major osmoregulatory pathways in guard cells and unicellular algae., , 18.2 Historical Notes on the Research of, Blue-Light Photoreceptors, Carotenoids and flavins have been the main, candidates for blue-light photoreceptors., , 18.3 Comparing Flavins and Carotenoids, Flavin and carotenoid photoreceptors have, contrasting functional properties., , 18.4 The Coleoptile Chloroplast, Both the coleoptile and the guard cell chloroplasts specialize in sensory transduction., , Web Essays, 18.1 Guard Cell Photosynthesis, Photosynthesis in the guard cell chloroplast, shows unique regulatory features., , 18.2 Phototropins, Phototropins regulate several light responses, in plants.
Page 472 :
Blue-Light Responses: Stomatal Movements and Morphogenesis, , 18.3 The Sensory Transduction of the Inhibition of, Stem Elongation by Blue Light, The regulation of stem elongation rates by blue, light has critical importance for plant development., , 18.4 The Blue/Green Reversibility of the, Blue-Light Response of Stomata, The blue/green reversal of stomatal movements is a remarkable photobiological response., , 18.5 Zeaxanthin and CO2 Sensing in Guard Cells, The functional relationship between Calvin, cycle activity and zeaxanthin content of guard, cells couples blue light and CO2 sensing during, stomatal movements., , Chapter References, Ahmad, M., and Cashmore, A. R. (1993) HY4 gene of A. thaliana, encodes a protein with characteristics of a blue light photoreceptor. Nature 366: 162–166., Ahmad, M., Jarillo, J. A., Smirnova, O., and Cashmore, A. R. (1998), Cryptochrome blue light photoreceptors of Arabidopsis implicated, in phototropism. Nature 392: 720–723., Amodeo, G., Srivastava, A., and Zeiger, E. (1992) Vanadate inhibits, blue light–stimulated swelling of Vicia guard cell protoplasts., Plant Physiol. 100: 1567–1570., Assmann, S. M. (1988) Enhancement of the stomatal response to blue, light by red light, reduced intercellular concentrations of carbon, dioxide and low vapor pressure differences. Plant Physiol. 87:, 226–231., Assmann, S. M., Simoncini, L., and Schroeder, J. I. (1985) Blue light, activates electrogenic ion pumping in guard cell protoplasts of, Vicia faba. Nature 318: 285–287., Briggs, W. R., and Christie, J. M. (2002) Phototropins 1 and 2: Versatile plant blue-light receptors. Trends Plant Sci. 7: 204–210., Cerda-Olmedo, E., and Lipson, E. D. (1987) Phycomyces. Cold Spring, Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY., Cosgrove, D. J. (1994) Photomodulation of growth. In Photomorphogenesis in Plants, 2nd ed., R. E. Kendrick and G. H. M. Kronenberg, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 631–658., Dietrich, P., Sanders, D., and Hedrich, R. (2001) The role of ion channels in light-dependent stomatal opening. J. Exp. Bot. 52: 1959–1967., Emi, T., Kinoshita, T., and Shimazaki, K. (2001) Specific binding of, vf14-3-3a isoform to the plasma membrane H+-ATPase in, response to blue light and fusicoccin in guard cells of broad bean., Plant Physiol. 125: 1115–1125., Firn, R. D. (1994) Phototropism. In Photomorphogenesis in Plants, 2nd, ed., R. E. Kendrick and G. H. M. Kronenberg, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 659–681., Frechilla, S., Talbott, L. D., Bogomolni, R. A., and Zeiger, E. (2000), Reversal of blue light-stimulated stomatal opening by green light., Plant Cell Physiol. 41: 171–176., Frechilla, S., Zhu, J., Talbott, L. D., and Zeiger, E. (1999) Stomata from, npq1, a zeaxanthin-less Arabidopsis mutant, lack a specific, response to blue light. Plant Cell Physiol. 40: 949–954., Horwitz, B. A. (1994) Properties and transduction chains of the UV, and blue light photoreceptors. In Photomorphogenesis in Plants,, 2nd ed., R. E. Kendrick and G. H. M. Kronenberg, eds., Kluwer,, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 327–350., , 421, , Iino, M., Ogawa, T., and Zeiger, E. (1985) Kinetic properties of the, blue light response of stomata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:, 8019–8023., Karlsson, P. E. (1986) Blue light regulation of stomata in wheat, seedlings. II. Action spectrum and search for action dichroism., Physiol. Plant. 66: 207–210., Kinoshita, T., and Shimazaki, K. (1999) Blue light activates the, plasma membrane H+-ATPase by phosphorylation of the C-terminus in stomatal guard cells. EMBO J. 18: 5548–5558., Kinoshita, T., and Shimazaki, K. (2001) Analysis of the phosphorylation level in guard-cell plasma membrane H+-ATPase in, response to fusicoccin. Plant Cell Physiol. 42: 424–432., Kinoshita, T., Doi, M., Suetsugu, N., Kagawa, T., Wada, M., and Shimazaki, K. (2001) phot1 and phot2 mediate blue light regulation, of stomatal opening. Nature 414: 656–660., Lin, C. (2000) Plant blue-light receptors. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 337–342., Matters, G. L., and Beale, S. I. (1995) Blue-light-regulated expression, of genes for two early steps of chlorophyll biosynthesis in, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 109: 471–479., Niyogi, K. K., Grossman, A. R., and Björkman, O. (1998) Arabidopsis, mutants define a central role for the xanthophyll cycle in the regulation of photosynthetic energy conversion. Plant Cell 10:, 1121–1134., Outlaw, W. H., Jr. (1983) Current concepts on the role of potassium, in stomatal movements. Physiol. Plant. 59: 302–311., Parks, B. M., Cho, M. H., and Spalding, E. P. (1998) Two genetically, separable phases of growth inhibition induced by blue light in, Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol. 118: 609–615., Parks, B. M., Folta, K. M., and Spalding, E. P. (2001) Photocontrol of, stem growth. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 436–440., Sakai, T., Kagawa, T., Kasahara, M., Swartz, T. E., Christie, J. M.,, Briggs, W. R., Wada, M., and Okada, K. (2001) Arabidopsis nph1, and npl1: Blue light receptors that mediate both phototropism, and chloroplast relocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:, 6969–6974., Schroeder, J. I., Allen, G. J., Hugouvieux, V., Kwak, J. M., and Waner,, D. (2001) Guard cell signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 627–658., Schwartz, A., and Zeiger, E. (1984) Metabolic energy for stomatal, opening. Roles of photophosphorylation and oxidative phosphorylation. Planta 161: 129–136., Senger, H. (1984) Blue Light Effects in Biological Systems. Springer,, Berlin., Serrano, E. E., Zeiger, E., and Hagiwara, S. (1988) Red light stimulates an electrogenic proton pump in Vicia guard cell protoplasts., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 436–440., Shimazaki, K., Iino, M., and Zeiger, E. (1986) Blue light–dependent, proton extrusion by guard cell protoplasts of Vicia faba. Nature, 319: 324–326., Spalding, E. P., and Cosgrove, D. J. (1989) Large membrane depolarization precedes rapid blue-light induced growth inhibition in, cucumber. Planta 178: 407–410., Srivastava, A., and Zeiger, E. (1995a) Guard cell zeaxanthin tracks, photosynthetic active radiation and stomatal apertures in Vicia, faba leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 18: 813–817., Srivastava, A., and Zeiger, E. (1995b) The inhibitor of zeaxanthin formation, dithiothreitol, inhibits blue-light-stimulated stomatal, opening in Vicia faba. Planta 196: 445–449., Swartz, T. E., Corchnoy, S. B., Christie, J. M., Lewis, J. W., Szundi, I.,, Briggs, W. R., and Bogomolni, R. A. (2001) The photocycle of a, flavin-binding domain of the blue light photoreceptor phototropin. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 36493–36500., Talbott, L. D., and Zeiger, E. (1998) The role of sucrose in guard cell, osmoregulation. J. Exp. Bot. 49: 329–337., Talbott, L. D., Srivastava, A., and Zeiger, E. (1996) Stomata from, growth-chamber-grown Vicia faba have an enhanced sensitivity, to CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 19: 1188–1194.
Page 474 :
Chapter, , 19, , Auxin: The Growth Hormone, , THE FORM AND FUNCTION of multicellular organism would not be, possible without efficient communication among cells, tissues, and, organs. In higher plants, regulation and coordination of metabolism,, growth, and morphogenesis often depend on chemical signals from one, part of the plant to another. This idea originated in the nineteenth century with the German botanist Julius von Sachs (1832–1897)., Sachs proposed that chemical messengers are responsible for the formation and growth of different plant organs. He also suggested that, external factors such as gravity could affect the distribution of these substances within a plant. Although Sachs did not know the identity of, these chemical messengers, his ideas led to their eventual discovery., Many of our current concepts about intercellular communication in, plants have been derived from similar studies in animals. In animals the, chemical messengers that mediate intercellular communication are, called hormones. Hormones interact with specific cellular proteins called, receptors., Most animal hormones are synthesized and secreted in one part of, the body and are transferred to specific target sites in another part of the, body via the bloodstream. Animal hormones fall into four general categories: proteins, small peptides, amino acid derivatives, and steroids., Plants also produce signaling molecules, called hormones, that have, profound effects on development at vanishingly low concentrations., Until quite recently, plant development was thought to be regulated by, only five types of hormones: auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, ethylene,, and abscisic acid. However, there is now compelling evidence for the, existence of plant steroid hormones, the brassinosteroids, that have a, wide range of morphological effects on plant development. (Brassinosteroids as plant hormones are discussed in Web Essay 19.1.), A variety of other signaling molecules that play roles in resistance to, pathogens and defense against herbivores have also been identified,, including jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and the polypeptide systemin (see, Chapter 13). Thus the number and types of hormones and hormonelike, signaling agents in plants keep expanding.
Page 475 :
424, , Chapter 19, , The first plant hormone we will consider is auxin. Auxin, deserves pride of place in any discussion of plant hormones because it was the first growth hormone to be discovered in plants, and much of the early physiological, work on the mechanism of plant cell expansion was carried, out in relation to auxin action., Moreover, both auxin and cytokinin differ from the, other plant hormones and signaling agents in one important respect: They are required for viability. Thus far, no, mutants lacking either auxin or cytokinin have been found,, suggesting that mutations that eliminate them are lethal., Whereas the other plant hormones seem to act as on/off, switches that regulate specific developmental processes,, auxin and cytokinin appear to be required at some level, more or less continuously., We begin our discussion of auxins with a brief history, of their discovery, followed by a description of their chemical structures and the methods used to detect auxins in, plant tissues. A look at the pathways of auxin biosynthesis, and the polar nature of auxin transport follows. We will, then review the various developmental processes controlled by auxin, such as stem elongation, apical dominance, root initiation, fruit development, and oriented, or, tropic, growth. Finally, we will examine what is currently, known about the mechanism of auxin-induced growth at, the cellular and molecular levels., , THE EMERGENCE OF THE AUXIN, CONCEPT, During the latter part of the nineteenth century, Charles, Darwin and his son Francis studied plant growth phenomena involving tropisms. One of their interests was the, bending of plants toward light. This phenomenon, which, is caused by differential growth, is called phototropism. In, some experiments the Darwins used seedlings of canary, grass (Phalaris canariensis), in which, as in many other, grasses, the youngest leaves are sheathed in a protective, organ called the coleoptile (Figure 19.1)., Coleoptiles are very sensitive to light, especially to blue, light (see Chapter 18). If illuminated on one side with a, short pulse of dim blue light, they will bend (grow) toward, the source of the light pulse within an hour. The Darwins, found that the tip of the coleoptile perceived the light, for, if they covered the tip with foil, the coleoptile would not, bend. But the region of the coleoptile that is responsible for, the bending toward the light, called the growth zone, is, several millimeters below the tip., Thus they concluded that some sort of signal is produced in the tip, travels to the growth zone, and causes the, shaded side to grow faster than the illuminated side. The, results of their experiments were published in 1881 in a, remarkable book entitled The Power of Movement in Plants., There followed a long period of experimentation by, many investigators on the nature of the growth stimulus in, , coleoptiles. This research culminated in the demonstration, in 1926 by Frits Went of the presence of a growth-promoting chemical in the tip of oat (Avena sativa) coleoptiles. It, was known that if the tip of a coleoptile was removed,, coleoptile growth ceased. Previous workers had attempted, to isolate and identify the growth-promoting chemical by, grinding up coleoptile tips and testing the activity of the, extracts. This approach failed because grinding up the tissue released into the extract inhibitory substances that normally were compartmentalized in the cell., Went’s major breakthrough was to avoid grinding by, allowing the material to diffuse out of excised coleoptile, tips directly into gelatin blocks. If placed asymmetrically, on top of a decapitated coleoptile, these blocks could be, tested for their ability to cause bending in the absence of, a unilateral light source (see Figure 19.1). Because the substance promoted the elongation of the coleoptile sections, (Figure 19.2), it was eventually named auxin from the, Greek auxein, meaning “to increase” or “to grow.”, , BIOSYNTHESIS AND METABOLISM, OF AUXIN, Went’s studies with agar blocks demonstrated unequivocally that the growth-promoting “influence” diffusing from, the coleoptile tip was a chemical substance. The fact that it, was produced at one location and transported in minute, amounts to its site of action qualified it as an authentic, plant hormone., In the years that followed, the chemical identity of the, “growth substance” was determined, and because of its, potential agricultural uses, many related chemical analogs, were tested. This testing led to generalizations about the, chemical requirements for auxin activity. In parallel with, these studies, the agar block diffusion technique was being, applied to the problem of auxin transport. Technological, advances, especially the use of isotopes as tracers, enabled, plant biochemists to unravel the pathways of auxin biosynthesis and breakdown., Our discussion begins with the chemical nature of auxin, and continues with a description of its biosynthesis, transport, and metabolism. Increasingly powerful analytical, methods and the application of molecular biological, approaches have recently allowed scientists to identify, auxin precursors and to study auxin turnover and distribution within the plant., , The Principal Auxin in Higher Plants Is, Indole-3-Acetic Acid, In the mid-1930s it was determined that auxin is indole-3acetic acid (IAA). Several other auxins in higher plants, were discovered later (Figure 19.3), but IAA is by far the, most abundant and physiologically relevant. Because the, structure of IAA is relatively simple, academic and industrial laboratories were quickly able to synthesize a wide
Page 476 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, , Darwin (1880), , 4-day-old, oat seedling, , From experiments on, coleoptile phototropism,, Darwin concluded in 1880, that a growth stimulus is, produced in the coleoptile, tip and is transmitted to the, growth zone., , Light, , Coleoptile, Seed, Intact seedling, (curvature), , 1 cm, , Roots, , Tip of coleoptile Opaque cap, excised, on tip, (no curvature), (no curvature), , Boysen-Jensen (1913), , Mica sheet, inserted, on dark side, (no curvature), , Mica sheet, inserted, on light side, (curvature), , In 1913, P. Boysen-Jensen, discovered that the growth, stimulus passes through, gelatin but not through, water-impermeable barriers, such as mica., Tip removed Gelatin, between tip, and coleoptile, stump, , Normal, phototropic, curvature, remains, possible, , Paál (1919), , In 1919, A. Paál provided, evidence that the growthpromoting stimulus, produced in the tip was, chemical in nature., , Tip removed, , Tip replaced, Growth curvature, on one side of, develops without, coleoptile stump a unilateral light, stimulus, , Went (1926), 45°, , Tips discarded; gelatin, cut up into smaller, blocks, , 20, 15, 10, 5, 0, , Each gelatin, block placed on, one side of, coleoptile stump, Curvature (degrees), , Coleoptile tips, on gelatin, , Curvature (degrees), , 425, , Coleoptile bends in, total darkness; angle, of curvature can, be measured, , 20, 15, 10, , 2, 4, 6, 8 10, Number of coleoptile, tips on gelatin, , FIGURE 19.1 Summary of early experiments in auxin research., , 5, 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30, IAA in gelatin block (mg/L), , In 1926, F. W. Went showed, that the active growthpromoting substance can, diffuse into a gelatin block., He also devised a, coleoptile-bending assay for, quantitative auxin analysis.
Page 477 :
426, , Chapter 19, , (A), , (B), , FIGURE 19.2 Auxin stimulates the elongation of oat coleoptile sections. These, coleoptile sections were incubated for 18 hours in either water (A) or auxin (B). The, yellow tissue inside the translucent coleoptile is the primary leaves. (Photos ©, M. B. Wilkins.), , array of molecules with auxin activity. Some of these are, used as herbicides in horticulture and agriculture (Figure, 19.4) (for additional synthetic auxins, see Web Topic 19.1)., An early definition of auxins included all natural and, synthetic chemical substances that stimulate elongation in, coleoptiles and stem sections. However, auxins affect many, developmental processes besides cell elongation. Thus auxins can be defined as compounds with biological activities, similar to those of IAA, including the ability to promote cell, elongation in coleoptile and stem sections, cell division in, callus cultures in the presence of cytokinins, formation of, adventitious roots on detached leaves and stems, and other, developmental phenomena associated with IAA action., Although they are chemically diverse, a common feature, of all active auxins is a molecular distance of about 0.5 nm, between a fractional positive charge on the aromatic ring and, a negatively charged carboxyl group (see Web Topic 19.2)., , Auxins in Biological Samples Can Be Quantified, Depending on the information that a researcher needs, the, amounts and/or identity of auxins in biological samples, can be determined by bioassay, mass spectrometry, or, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which is abbreviated, as ELISA (see Web Topic 19.3)., A bioassay is a measurement of the effect of a known or, suspected biologically active substance on living material. In, his pioneering work more than 60 years ago, Went used, Avena sativa (oat) coleoptiles in a technique called the Avena, coleoptile curvature test (see Figure 19.1). The coleoptile, curved because the increase in auxin on one side stimulated, cell elongation, and the decrease in auxin on the other side, (due to the absence of the coleoptile tip) caused a decrease in, the growth rate—a phenomenon called differential growth., Went found that he could estimate the amount of auxin, in a sample by measuring the resulting coleoptile curva-, , Cl, CH2, , COOH, , CH2, , COOH, CH2, , N, , N, , H, , H, , Indole-3-acetic acid, (IAA), , 4-Chloroindole-3-acetic acid, (4-CI-IAA), , N, H, , Indole-3-butyric acid, (IBA), , FIGURE 19.3 Structure of three natural auxins. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) occurs in, all plants, but other related compounds in plants have auxin activity. Peas, for, example, contain 4-chloroindole-3-acetic acid. Mustards and corn contain indole-3butyric acid (IBA)., , CH2, , CH2, , COOH
Page 478 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, , O, , CH2, , COOH, COOH, , Cl, Cl, , Cl, , 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic, acid (2,4-D), , OCH3, , Cl, , 2-Methoxy-3,, 6-dichlorobenzoic acid, (dicamba), , FIGURE 19.4 Structures of two synthetic auxins. Most synthetic auxins are used as herbicides in horticulture and, agriculture., , ture. Auxin bioassays are still used today to detect the presence of auxin activity in a sample. The Avena coleoptile curvature assay is a sensitive measure of auxin activity (it is, effective for IAA concentrations of about 0.02 to 0.2 mg, L–1). Another bioassay measures auxin-induced changes in, the straight growth of Avena coleoptiles floating in solution, (see Figure 19.2). Both of these bioassays can establish the, presence of an auxin in a sample, but they cannot be used, for precise quantification or identification of the specific, compound., Mass spectrometry is the method of choice when information about both the chemical structure and the amount, of IAA is needed. This method is used in conjunction with, separation protocols involving gas chromatography. It, allows the precise quantification and identification of auxins, and can detect as little as 10–12 g (1 picogram, or pg) of, IAA, which is well within the range of auxin found in a single pea stem section or a corn kernel. These sophisticated, techniques have enabled researchers to accurately analyze, auxin precursors, auxin turnover, and auxin distribution, within the plant., , 427, , transforming Arabidopsis leaves with this construct in a Ti, plasmid using Agrobacterium, it is possible to visualize the, distribution of free auxin in young, developing leaves., Wherever free auxin is produced, GUS expression occurs—, and can be detected histochemically. By use of this technique, it has recently been demonstrated that auxin is, produced by a cluster of cells located at sites where hydathodes will develop (Figure 19.5)., Hydathodes are glandlike modifications of the ground, and vascular tissues, typically at the margins of leaves, that, allow the release of liquid water (guttation fluid) through, pores in the epidermis in the presence of root pressure (see, Chapter 4). As shown in Figure 19.5, during early stages of, hydathode differentiation a center of high auxin synthesis, is evident as a concentrated dark blue GUS stain (arrow) in, the lobes of serrated leaves of Arabidopsis (Aloni et al. 2002)., A diffuse trail of GUS activity leads down to differentiating vessel elements in a developing vascular strand. This, remarkable micrograph captures the process of auxin-regulated vascular differentiation in the very act!, We will return to the topic of the control of vascular differentiation later in the chapter., , IAA Is Synthesized in Meristems, Young Leaves,, and Developing Fruits and Seeds, IAA biosynthesis is associated with rapidly dividing and, rapidly growing tissues, especially in shoots. Although virtually all plant tissues appear to be capable of producing, low levels of IAA, shoot apical meristems, young leaves,, and developing fruits and seeds are the primary sites of, IAA synthesis (Ljung et al. in press)., In very young leaf primordia of Arabidopsis, auxin is, synthesized at the tip. During leaf development there is a, gradual shift in the site of auxin production basipetally, along the margins, and later, in the central region of the, lamina. The basipetal shift in auxin production correlates, closely with, and is probably causally related to, the, basipetal maturation sequence of leaf development and, vascular differentiation (Aloni 2001)., By fusing the GUS (β-glucuronidase) reporter gene to, a promoter containing an auxin response element, and, , FIGURE 19.5 Detection of sites of auxin synthesis and transport in a young leaf primordium of DR5 Arabidopsis by, means of a GUS reporter gene with an auxin-sensitive promoter. During the early stages of hydathode differentiation,, a center of auxin synthesis is evident as a concentrated dark, blue GUS stain (arrow) in the lobes of the serrated leaf margin. A gradient of diluted GUS activity extends from the, margin toward a differentiating vascular strand (arrowhead), which functions as a sink for the auxin flow originating in the lobe. (Courtesy of R. Aloni and C. I. Ullrich.)
Page 479 :
428, , Chapter 19, , Multiple Pathways Exist for the Biosynthesis of, IAA, , acetaldehyde is then oxidized to IAA by a specific dehydrogenase., , IAA is structurally related to the amino acid tryptophan,, and early studies on auxin biosynthesis focused on tryptophan as the probable precursor. However, the incorporation of exogenous labeled tryptophan (e.g., [3H]tryptophan) into IAA by plant tissues has proved difficult to, demonstrate. Nevertheless, an enormous body of evidence, has now accumulated showing that plants convert tryptophan to IAA by several pathways, which are described in, the paragraphs that follow., , The IPA pathway. The indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPA) pathway (see Figure 19.6C), is probably the most common of, the tryptophan-dependent pathways. It involves a deamination reaction to form IPA, followed by a decarboxylation, reaction to form indole-3-acetaldehyde (IAld). Indole-3-, , (A), , The TAM pathway. The tryptamine (TAM) pathway (see, Figure 19.6D) is similar to the IPA pathway, except that the, order of the deamination and decarboxylation reactions is, reversed, and different enzymes are involved. Species that, do not utilize the IPA pathway possess the TAM pathway., In at least one case (tomato), there is evidence for both the, IPA and the TAM pathways (Nonhebel et al. 1993)., , The IAN pathway. In the indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN), pathway (see Figure 19.6B), tryptophan is first converted, to indole-3-acetaldoxime and then to indole-3-acetonitrile., The enzyme that converts IAN to IAA is called nitrilase., The IAN pathway may be important in only three plant, families: the Brassicaceae (mustard family), Poaceae (grass, , (B), , (C), , (D), , Indole-3-pyruvic acid pathway, COOH, , NH2, , N, H, , Tryptophan (Trp), , *Trp, monooxygenase, , COOH, , IAN, , N, H, , Trp, decarboxylase, , Trp, transaminase, , NOH, , N, H, , O, , Bacterial pathway, , Tryptamine (TAM), , IPA, decarboxylase, , Amine, oxidase, , O, N, NH2, , Indole-3-acetamide (IAM), , N, H, , Indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPA), , Indole-3-acetaldoxime, , N, H, , TAM, , N, H, , N, H, , O, , Indole-3-acetaldehyde (IAld), , Indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN), IAld, dehydrogenase, , Nitrilase, , COOH, , *IAM hydrolase, N, H, , Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), , FIGURE 19.6 Tryptophan-dependent pathways of IAA biosynthesis in plants and, bacteria. The enzymes that are present only in bacteria are marked with an asterisk., (After Bartel 1997.), , NH2
Page 480 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, family), and Musaceae (banana family). Nevertheless, nitrilase-like genes or activities have recently been identified in, the Cucurbitaceae (squash family), Solanaceae (tobacco, family), Fabaceae (legumes), and Rosaceae (rose family)., Four genes (NIT1 through NIT4) that encode nitrilase, enzymes have now been cloned from Arabidopsis. When, NIT2 was expressed in transgenic tobacco, the resultant, plants acquired the ability to respond to IAN as an auxin, by hydrolyzing it to IAA (Schmidt et al. 1996)., Another tryptophan-dependent biosynthetic pathway—, one that uses indole-3-acetamide (IAM) as an intermediate (see Figure19.6A)—is used by various pathogenic bacteria, such as Pseudomonas savastanoi and Agrobacterium, tumefaciens. This pathway involves the two enzymes tryptophan monooxygenase and IAM hydrolase. The auxins, produced by these bacteria often elicit morphological, changes in their plant hosts., In addition to the tryptophan-dependent pathways,, recent genetic studies have provided evidence that plants, can synthesize IAA via one or more tryptophan-independent pathways. The existence of multiple pathways for, IAA biosynthesis makes it nearly impossible for plants to, run out of auxin and is probably a reflection of the essential role of this hormone in plant development., , IAA Is Also Synthesized from Indole or from, Indole-3-Glycerol Phosphate, Although a tryptophan-independent pathway of IAA, biosynthesis had long been suspected because of the low, levels of conversion of radiolabeled tryptophan to IAA, not, until genetic approaches were available could the existence, of such pathways be confirmed and defined. Perhaps the, most striking of these studies in maize involves the orange, pericarp (orp) mutant (Figure 19.7), in which both subunits, of the enzyme tryptophan synthase are inactive (Figure, 19.8). The orp mutant is a true tryptophan auxotroph,, requiring exogenous tryptophan to survive. However, nei-, , 429, , ther the orp seedlings nor the wild-type seedlings can convert tryptophan to IAA, even when the mutant seedlings, are given enough tryptophan to reverse the lethal effects of, the mutation., Despite the block in tryptophan biosynthesis, the orp, mutant contains amounts of IAA 50-fold higher than those, of a wild-type plant (Wright et al. 1991). Signficantly, when, orp seedlings were fed [15N]anthranilate (see Figure 19.8),, the label subsequently appeared in IAA, but not in tryptophan. These results provided the best experimental evidence for a tryptophan-independent pathway of IAA, biosynthesis., Further studies established that the branch point for, IAA biosynthesis is either indole or its precursor, indole-3glycerol phosphate (see Figure 19.8). IAN and IPA are possible intermediates, but the immediate precursor of IAA in, the tryptophan-independent pathway has not yet been, identified., The discovery of the tryptophan-independent pathway, has drastically altered our view of IAA biosynthesis, but, the relative importance of the two pathways (tryptophandependent versus tryptophan-independent) is poorly, understood. In several plants it has been found that the, type of IAA biosynthesis pathway varies between different, tissues, and between different times of development. For, example, during embryogenesis in carrot, the tryptophandependent pathway is important very early in development, whereas the tryptophan-independent pathway takes, over soon after the root–shoot axis is established. (For more, evidence of the tryptophan-independent biosynthesis of, IAA, see Web Topic 19.4.), , Most IAA in the Plant Is in a Covalently Bound, Form, Although free IAA is the biologically active form of the, hormone, the vast majority of auxin in plants is found in a, covalently bound state. These conjugated, or “bound,” auxins have been identified in all higher plants and are considered hormonally inactive., IAA has been found to be conjugated to both high- and, low-molecular-weight compounds., • Low-molecular-weight conjugated auxins include, esters of IAA with glucose or myo-inositol and amide, conjugates such as IAA-N-aspartate (Figure 19.9)., • High-molecular-weight IAA conjugates include IAAglucan (7–50 glucose units per IAA) and IAA-glycoproteins found in cereal seeds., , FIGURE 19.7 The orange pericarp (orp) mutant of maize is, missing both subunits of tryptophan synthase. As a result,, the pericarps surrounding each kernel accumulate glycosides of anthranilic acid and indole. The orange color is due, to excess indole. (Courtesy of Jerry D. Cohen.), , The compound to which IAA is conjugated and the extent, of the conjugation depend on the specific conjugating, enzymes. The best-studied reaction is the conjugation of, IAA to glucose in Zea mays., The highest concentrations of free auxin in the living, plant are in the apical meristems of shoots and in young, leaves because these are the primary sites of auxin synthe-
Page 481 :
430, , Chapter 19, FIGURE 19.8 Tryptophan-independent pathways of IAA biosynthesis in, plants. The tryptophan (Trp) biosynthetic pathway is shown on the left., Mutants discussed in Web Topic 19.4 are indicated in parentheses. The, branch-point precursor for tryptophan-independent biosynthesis is, uncertain (indole-3-glycerol phosphate or indole), and IAN and IPA are, two possible intermediates. PR, phosphoribosyl. (After Bartel 1997.), , TRYPTOPHAN BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAY, Chorismate, Anthranilate, synthase, Anthranilate, Anthranilate, PR-transferase, 5-Phosphoribosylanthranilate, PR-anthranilate, isomerase, 1-(o-Carboxyphenylamino)-1deoxyribulose 5-P, Feedback inhibition, , IGP synthase, , TRYPTOPHAN-INDEPENDENT PATHWAYS OF IAA SYNTHESIS, OH, N, CH2OP, OH, , N, H, , Nitrilase, (nit1), , N, H, , Indole-3-acetonitrile, (IAN), , Indole-3-glycerol phosphate, (IGP), , N, H, , ?, , Trp synthase a, (trp3), , COOH, , N, H, , Serine +, , COOH, , IAA, , O, , Indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPA), , N, H, , Indole, Trp synthase b, (trp2, orp), COOH, , Trypotophan, aminotransferase, (hypothetical), , NH2, , N, H, , Trp, , sis. However, auxins are widely distributed in the plant., Metabolism of conjugated auxin may be a major contributing factor in the regulation of the levels of free auxin., For example, during the germination of seeds of Zea mays,, IAA-myo-inositol is translocated from the endosperm to the, coleoptile via the phloem. At least a portion of the free IAA, produced in coleoptile tips of Zea mays is believed to be, derived from the hydrolysis of IAA-myo-inositol., In addition, environmental stimuli such as light and, gravity have been shown to influence both the rate of auxin, conjugation (removal of free auxin) and the rate of release, of free auxin (hydrolysis of conjugated auxin). The formation of conjugated auxins may serve other functions as, well, including storage and protection against oxidative, degradation., , IAA Is Degraded by Multiple Pathways, Like IAA biosynthesis, the enzymatic breakdown (oxidation) of IAA may involve more than one pathway. For, some time it has been thought that peroxidative enzymes, are chiefly responsible for IAA oxidation, primarily, because these enzymes are ubiquitous in higher plants and, their ability to degrade IAA can be demonstrated in vitro, (Figure 19.10A). However, the physiological significance of, the peroxidase pathway is unclear. For example, no change, in the IAA levels of transgenic plants was observed with, either a tenfold increase in peroxidase expression or a tenfold repression of peroxidase activity (Normanly et al., 1995)., On the basis of isotopic labeling and metabolite identification, two other oxidative pathways are more likely to, be involved in the controlled degradation of IAA (see Figure 19.10B). The end product of this pathway is oxindole3-acetic acid (OxIAA), a naturally occurring compound in, the endosperm and shoot tissues of Zea mays. In one pathway, IAA is oxidized without decarboxylation to OxIAA.
Page 483 :
432, , Chapter 19, , auxin tends to accumulate in the more alkaline compartments of the cell., The distribution of IAA and its metabolites has been studied in tobacco cells. About, one-third of the IAA is found in the chloroplast, and the remainder is located in the, cytosol. IAA conjugates are located exclusively in the cytosol. IAA in the cytosol is, metabolized either by conjugation or by nondecarboxylative catabolism (see Figure 19.10)., The IAA in the chloroplast is protected from, these processes, but it is regulated by the, amount of IAA in the cytosol, with which it is, in equilibrium (Sitbon et al. 1993)., The factors that regulate the steady-state, concentration of free auxin in plant cells are, diagrammatically summarized in Web Topic, , 19.5., , Agar donor block containing, radiolabeled auxin, A (donor), , Shoot, apex, , Apical end (A), Excised, section, , Hypocotyl, , B (receiver), Transport into, receiver takes place, Invert, B (donor), , Basal end (B), , Seedling, , A (receiver), Transport into, receiver is blocked, , FIGURE 19.11 The standard method for measuring polar auxin transport., , The polarity of transport is independent of orientation with respect to, gravity., , AUXIN TRANSPORT, The main axes of shoots and roots, along with their, branches, exhibit apex–base structural polarity, and this, structural polarity has its origin in the polarity of auxin, transport. Soon after Went developed the coleoptile curvature test for auxin, it was discovered that IAA moves, mainly from the apical to the basal end (basipetally) in, excised oat coleoptile sections. This type of unidirectional, transport is termed polar transport. Auxin is the only plant, growth hormone known to be transported polarly., Because the shoot apex serves as the primary source of, auxin for the entire plant, polar transport has long been, believed to be the principal cause of an auxin gradient, extending from the shoot tip to the root tip. The longitudinal gradient of auxin from the shoot to the root affects various developmental processes, including stem elongation,, apical dominance, wound healing, and leaf senescence., Recently it has been recognized that a significant, amount of auxin transport also occurs in the phloem, and, that the phloem is probably the principal route by which, auxin is transported acropetally (i.e., toward the tip) in the, root. Thus, more than one pathway is responsible for the, distribution of auxin in the plant, , Polar Transport Requires Energy and Is Gravity, Independent, To study polar transport, researchers have employed the, donor–receiver agar block method (Figure 19.11): An agar block, containing radioisotope-labeled auxin (donor block) is placed, on one end of a tissue segment, and a receiver block is placed, on the other end. The movement of auxin through the tissue, into the receiver block can be determined over time by measurement of the radioactivity in the receiver block., From a multitude of such studies, the general properties, of polar IAA transport have emerged. Tissues differ in the, , degree of polarity of IAA transport. In coleoptiles, vegetative stems, and leaf petioles, basipetal transport predominates. Polar transport is not affected by the orientation of, the tissue (at least over short periods of time), so it is independent of gravity., A demonstration of the lack of effect of gravity on basipetal auxin, transport is shown in Figure 19.12. When stem cuttings, in this, case grape hardwood, are placed in a moist chamber, adventitious, roots form at the basal ends of the cuttings, and shoots form at the, apical ends, even when the cuttings are inverted. Roots form at, the base because root differentiation is stimulated by auxin, accumulation due to basipetal transport. Shoots tend to form at the, apical end where the auxin concentration is lowest., , Polar transport proceeds in a cell-to-cell fashion, rather, than via the symplast. That is, auxin exits the cell through, the plasma membrane, diffuses across the compound middle lamella, and enters the cell below through its plasma, membrane. The loss of auxin from cells is termed auxin, efflux; the entry of auxin into cells is called auxin uptake or, influx. The overall process requires metabolic energy, as evidenced by the sensitivity of polar transport to O2 deprivation and metabolic inhibitors., The velocity of polar auxin transport is 5 to 20 cm h–1—, faster than the rate of diffusion (see Web Topic 3.2), but, slower than phloem translocation rates (see Chapter 10)., Polar transport is also specific for active auxins, both natural and synthetic. Neither inactive auxin analogs nor, auxin metabolites are transported polarly, suggesting that, polar transport involves specific protein carriers on the, plasma membrane that can recognize the hormone and its, active analogs., The major site of basipetal polar auxin transport in stems, and leaves is the vascular parenchyma tissue. Coleoptiles, appear to be the exception in that basipetal polar transport
Page 484 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, , 433, , A crucial feature of the polar transport model is that the, auxin efflux carriers are localized at the basal ends of the, conducting cells (Figure 19.13). The evidence for each step, in this model is considered separately in the discussion that, follows., , Auxin influx. The first step in polar transport is auxin, influx. According to the model, auxin can enter plant cells, from any direction by either of two mechanisms:, 1. Passive diffusion of the protonated (IAAH) form, across the phospholipid bilayer, 2. Secondary active transport of the dissociated (IAA–), form via a 2H+–IAA– symporter, , FIGURE 19.12 Adventitious roots grow from the basal ends,, and shoots grow from the apical ends, of grape hardwood, cuttings, whether they are maintained in the inverted (the, two cuttings on the left) or upright orientation (the cuttings, on the right). The roots always form at the basal ends because, polar auxin transport is independent of gravity., (From Hartmann and Kester 1983.), , occurs mainly in the nonvascular tissues. Acropetal polar, transport in the root is specifically associated with the, xylem parenchyma of the stele (Palme and Gälweiler 1999)., However, as we shall see later in the chapter, most of the, auxin that reaches the root tip is translocated via the, phloem., A small amount of basipetal auxin transport from the, root tip has also been demonstrated. In maize roots, for, example, radiolabeled IAA applied to the root tip is transported basipetally about 2 to 8 mm (Young and Evans, 1996). Basipetal auxin transport in the root occurs in the, epidermal and cortical tissues, and as we shall see, it plays, a central role in gravitropism., , A Chemiosmotic Model Has Been Proposed to, Explain Polar Transport, The discovery of the chemiosmotic mechanism of solute, transport in the late 1960s (see Chapter 6) led to the application of this model to polar auxin transport. According to, the now generally accepted chemiosmotic model for polar, auxin transport, auxin uptake is driven by the proton, motive force (∆E + ∆pH) across the plasma membrane,, while auxin efflux is driven by the membrane potential, ∆E., (Proton motive force is described in more detail in Web, Topic 6.3 and Chapter 7.), , The dual pathway of auxin uptake arises because the passive permeability of the membrane to auxin depends, strongly on the apoplastic pH., The undissociated form of indole-3-acetic acid, in which, the carboxyl group is protonated, is lipophilic and readily, diffuses across lipid bilayer membranes. In contrast, the dissociated form of auxin is negatively charged and therefore, does not cross membranes unaided. Because the plasma, membrane H+-ATPase normally maintains the cell wall solution at about pH 5, about half of the auxin (pKa = 4.75) in the, apoplast will be in the undissociated form and will diffuse, passively across the plasma membrane down a concentration gradient. Experimental support for pH-dependent, passive auxin uptake was first provided by the demonstration, that IAA uptake by plant cells increases as the extracellular, pH is lowered from a neutral to a more acidic value., A carrier-mediated, secondary active uptake mechanism, was shown to be saturable and specific for active auxins, (Lomax 1986). In experiments in which the ∆pH and ∆E, values of isolated membrane vesicles from zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) hypocotyls were manipulated artificially, the, uptake of radiolabeled auxin was shown to be stimulated, in the presence of a pH gradient, as in passive uptake, but, also when the inside of the vesicle was negatively charged, relative to the outside., These and other experiments suggested that an, H+–IAA– symporter cotransports two protons along with, the auxin anion. This secondary active transport of auxin, allows for greater auxin accumulation than simple diffusion does because it is driven across the membrane by the, proton motive force., A permease-type auxin uptake carrier, AUX1, related to, bacterial amino acid carriers, has been identified in Arabidopsis roots (Bennett et al. 1996). The roots of aux1, mutants are agravitropic, suggesting that auxin influx is a, limiting factor for gravitropism in roots. As predicted by, the chemiosmotic model, AUX1 appears to be uniformly, distributed around cells in the polar transport pathway, (Marchant et al. 1999). Thus in general, the polarity of auxin, transport is governed by the efflux step rather than the, influx step.
Page 485 :
434, , Chapter 19, IAA–, , Plasma, membrane, H+, , Permease, H+-cotransport, , H+, , IAA–, , Apex, , 1. IAA enters the cell either, passively in the undissociated, form (IAAH) or by secondary, active cotransport in the, anionic form (IAA–)., , IAAH, +, , 2H, , Cell wall, IAAH, , pH 5, , Cytosol, ATP, , 2. The cell wall is maintained, at an acidic pH by the activity, of the plasma membrane H+ATPase., , H+, , ATP, H+, , IAA–, pH 7, , ATP, , 3. In the cytosol, which has a, neutral pH, the anionic form, (IAA–) predominates., , H+, , Vacuole, ATP, H+, IAA–, , Base, , 4. The anions exit the cell via, auxin anion efflux carriers, that are concentrated at the, basal ends of each cell in the, longitudinal pathway., , IAA–, H+, , ATP, , IAAH, , FIGURE 19.13 The chemiosmotic model for, polar auxin transport. Shown here is one cell, in a column of auxin-transporting cells., (From Jacobs and Gilbert 1983.), , Auxin efflux. Once IAA enters the cytosol,, which has a pH of approximately 7.2,, nearly all of it will dissociate to the anionic, form. Because the membrane is less permeable to IAA– than to IAAH, IAA– will, tend to accumulate in the cytosol. However, much of the auxin that enters the cell, escapes via an auxin anion efflux carrier., According to the chemiosmotic model,, transport of IAA– out of the cell is driven, by the inside negative membrane potential., As noted earlier, the central feature of, the chemiosmotic model for polar transport, is that IAA– efflux takes place preferentially, at the basal end of each cell. The repetition, of auxin uptake at the apical end of the cell, and preferential release from the base of, each cell in the pathway gives rise to the, total polar transport effect. A family of, putative auxin efflux carriers known as, PIN proteins (named after the pin-shaped, inflorescences formed by the pin1 mutant, of Arabidopsis; Figure 19.14A) are localized, precisely as the model would predict—that, is, at the basal ends of the conducting cells, (see Figure 19.14B)., , (A), , (B), , FIGURE 19.14 The pin1 mutant of, , Arabidopsis (A) and localization of the, PIN1 protein at the basal ends of conducting cells by immunofluorescence, microscopy (B). (Courtesy of L., Gälweiler and K. Palme.)
Page 486 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, , OUTSIDE OF CELL, , I, , II, , III, , Plasma, membrane, , IV, , V, , VI, , VII, , VIII, , XI, , NH2, , X, , COOH, , CYTOPLASM, , FIGURE 19.15 The topology of the PIN1 protein with ten, , transmembrane segments and a large hydrophilic loop in, the middle. (After Palme and Gälweiler 1999.), , PIN proteins have 10 to 12 transmembrane regions characteristic of a major superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic transporters, which include drug resistance proteins, and sugar transporters (Figure 19.15). Despite topological, similarities to other transporters, recent studies suggest that, PIN may require other proteins for activity, and may be, part of a larger protein complex., , Inhibitors of Auxin Transport Block Auxin Efflux, Several compounds have been synthesized that can act as, auxin transport inhibitors (ATIs), including NPA (1-Nnaphthylphthalamic acid) and TIBA (2,3,5-triiodobenzoic, acid) (Figure 19.16). These inhibitors block polar transport, by preventing auxin efflux. We can demonstrate this phe-, , nomenon by incorporating NPA or TIBA into either the, donor or the receiver block in an auxin transport experiment. Both compounds inhibit auxin efflux into the, receiver block, but they do not affect auxin uptake from, the donor block., Some ATIs, such as TIBA, that have weak auxin activity, and are transported polarly, may inhibit polar transport in, part by competing with auxin for its binding site on the, efflux carrier. Others, such as NPA, are not transported, polarly and are believed to interfere with auxin transport, by binding to proteins associated in a complex with the, efflux carrier. Such NPA-binding proteins are also found at, the basal ends of the conducting cells, consistent with the, localization of PIN proteins (Jacobs and Gilbert 1983)., Recently another class of ATIs has been identified that, inhibits the AUX1 uptake carrier (Parry et al. 2001). For, example, 1-naphthoxyacetic acid (1-NOA) (see Figure, 19.16) blocks auxin uptake into cells, and when applied to, Arabidopsis plants it causes root agravitropism similar to, that of the aux1 mutant. Like the aux1 mutation, neither 1NOA nor any of the other AUX1-specific inhibitors block, polar auxin transport., , PIN Proteins Are Rapidly Cycled to and from the, Plasma Membrane, The basal localization of the auxin efflux carriers involves, targeted vesicle secretion to the basal ends of the conducting cells. Recently it has been demonstrated that PIN proteins, although stable, do not remain on the plasma membrane permanently, but are rapidly cycled to an, unidentified endosomal compartment via endocytotic vesicles, and then recycled back to the plasma membrane, (Geldner et al. 2001)., , Naturally occurring auxin, transport inhibitors, , Auxin transport inhibitors not found in plants, , OH, O, , HO, , OH, , O, OH, , I, , NH, , OH, HO, , O, , O, , OH, I, , NPA (1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid), , I, , O, , Quercetin (flavonol), , TIBA (2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid), OH, , O—CH2—COOH, , OH, , HO, , 1-NOA (1-naphthoxyacetic acid), , FIGURE 19.16 Structures of auxin transport inhibitors., , 435, , O, , O, , Genistein
Page 487 :
436, , Chapter 19, , (A), , (B), , (D), , (E), , (C), , FIGURE 19.17 Auxin transport, , inhibitors block secretion of the auxin, efflux carrier PIN1 to the plasma, membrane. (A) Control, showing, asymmetric localization of PIN1. (B), After treatment with brefeldin A (BFA)., (C) Following an additional two-hour, washout of BFA. (D) Following a BFA, washout with cytochalasin D. (E), Following a BFA washout with the, auxin transport inhibitor TIBA., (Photos courtesy of Klaus Palme 1999.), , Prior to treatment, the PIN1 protein is localized at the, basal ends (top) of root cortical parenchyma cells (Figure, 19.17A). Treatment of Arabidopsis seedlings with brefeldin, A (BFA), which causes Golgi vesicles and other endosomal, compartments to aggregate near the nucleus, causes PIN, to accumulate in these abnormal intracellular compartments (see Figure 19.17B). When the BFA is washed out, with buffer, the normal localization on the plasma membrane at the base of the cell is restored (see Figure 19.17C)., But when cytochalasin D, an inhibitor of actin polymerization, is included in the buffer washout solution, normal, relocalization of PIN to the plasma membrane is prevented, (see Figure 19.17D). These results indicate that PIN is, rapidly cycled between the plasma membrane at the base, of the cell and an unidentified endosomal compartment by, an actin-dependent mechanism., Although they bind different targets, both TIBA and NPA, interfere with vesicle traffic to and from the plasma membrane. The best way to demonstrate this phenomenon is to, include TIBA in the washout solution after BFA treatment., Under these conditions, TIBA prevents the normal relocalization of PIN on the plasma membrane following the, washout treatment (see Figure 19.17E) (Geldner et al. 2001)., , The effects of TIBA and NPA on cycling are not specific, for PIN proteins, and it has been proposed that ATIs may, actually represent general inhibitors of membrane cycling, (Geldner et al. 2001). On the other hand, neither TIBA nor, NPA alone causes PIN delocalization, even though they, block auxin efflux. Therefore, TIBA and NPA must also be, able to directly inhibit the transport activity of PIN complexes on the plasma membrane—by binding either to PIN, (as TIBA does) or to one or more regulatory proteins (as, NPA does)., A simplified model of the effects of TIBA and NPA on, PIN cycling and auxin efflux is shown in Figure 19.18. A, more complete model that incorporates many of the recent, findings is presented in Web Essay 19.2., , Flavonoids Serve as Endogenous ATIs, There is mounting evidence that flavonoids (see Chapter, 13) can function as endogenous regulators of polar auxin, transport. Indeed, naturally occurring aglycone flavonoid, compounds (flavonoids without attached sugars) are able, to compete with NPA for its binding site on membranes, (Jacobs and Rubery 1988) and are typically localized on the, plasma membrane at the basal ends of cells where the
Page 488 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, FIGURE 19.18 Actin-dependent PIN cycling between the, , plasma membrane and an endosomal compartment. Auxin, transport inhibitors TIBA and NPA both interfere with relocalization of PIN1 proteins to basal plasma membranes, after BFA washout (see Figure 19.17). This suggests that, both of these auxin transport inhibitors interfere with PIN1, cycling., , efflux carrier is concentrated (Peer et al. 2001). In addition,, recent studies have shown that the cells of flavonoid-deficient Arabidopsis mutants are less able to accumulate auxin, than wild-type cells, and the mutant seedlings that lack, flavonoid have altered auxin distribution profiles (Murphy, et al. 1999; Brown et al. 2001)., Many of the flavonoids that displace NPA from its binding site on membranes are also inhibitors of protein kinases, and protein phosphatases (Bernasconi 1996). An Arabidopsis mutant designated rcn1 (roots curl in NPA 1) was identified on the basis of an enhanced sensitivity to NPA. The, RCN1 gene is closely related to the regulatory subunit of, protein phosphatase 2A, a serine/threonine phosphatase, (Garbers et al. 1996)., Protein phosphatases are known to play important roles, in enzyme regulation, gene expression, and signal transduction by removing regulatory phosphate groups from, proteins (see Chapter 14 on the web site). This finding suggests that a signal transduction pathway involving protein, kinases and protein phosphatases may be involved in signaling between NPA-binding proteins and the auxin efflux, carrier., , Auxin Is Also Transported Nonpolarly in the, Phloem, Most of the IAA that is synthesized in mature leaves, appears to be transported to the rest of the plant nonpolarly via the phloem. Auxin, along with other components, of phloem sap, can move from these leaves up or down the, plant at velocities much higher than those of polar transport (see Chapter 10). Auxin translocation in the phloem is, largely passive, not requiring energy directly., Although the overall importance of the phloem pathway versus the polar transport system for the long-distance, movement of IAA in plants is still unresolved, the evidence, suggests that long-distance auxin transport in the phloem, is important for controlling such processes as cambial cell, divisions, callose accumulation or removal from sieve tube, elements, and branch root formation. Indeed, the phloem, appears to represent the principal pathway for long-distance auxin translocation to the root (Aloni 1995; Swarup, et al. 2001)., Polar transport and phloem transport are not independent of each other. Recent studies with radiolabeled IAA, suggest that in pea, auxin can be transferred from the nonpolar phloem pathway to the polar transport pathway. This, , 437, , Plasma, membrane, , ENDOSOMAL, COMPARTMENT, PIN, , PIN, , Actindependent, cycling, , Vesicle, , Vesicle, , PIN, , PIN, TIBA,, NPA, , PIN, , PIN complex, , PIN, Actin, microfilament, , transfer takes place mainly in the immature tissues of the, shoot apex., A second example of transfer of auxin from the nonpolar phloem pathway to a polar transport system has, recently been documented in Arabidopsis. It was shown that, the AUX1 permease is asymmetrically localized on the, plasma membrane at the upper end of root protophloem, cells (i.e., the end distal from the tip) (Figure 19.19)., It has been proposed that the asymmetrically oriented, AUX1 permease promotes the acropetal movement of, auxin from the phloem to the root apex (Swarup et al., 2001). This type of polar auxin transport based on the, asymmetric localization of AUX1 differs from the polar, transport that occurs in the shoot and basal region of the, root, which is based on the asymmetric distribution of the, PIN complex., Note in Figure 19.19B that AUX1 is also strongly, expressed in a cluster of cells in the columella of the root, cap, as well as in lateral root cap cells that overlay the cells, of the distal elongation zone of the root. These cells form a, minor, but physiologically important, basipetal pathway, whereby auxin reaching the columella is redirected backward toward the outer tissues of the elongation zone. The, importance of this pathway will become apparent when, we examine the mechanism of root gravitropism.
Page 489 :
438, , Chapter 19, , (A), , (B), , (C), , Epidermis, , Cortex, , Endodermis, , Pericycle, , Vasculature, , Lateral root cap, , Quiescent center, and stem cells, Columella of, root cap, , PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF AUXIN:, CELL ELONGATION, Auxin was discovered as the hormone involved in the, bending of coleoptiles toward light. The coleoptile bends, because of the unequal rates of cell elongation on its, shaded versus its illuminated side (see Figure 19.1). The, ability of auxin to regulate the rate of cell elongation has, long fascinated plant scientists. In this section we will, review the physiology of auxin-induced cell elongation,, some aspects of which were discussed in Chapter 15., , Auxins Promote Growth in Stems and Coleoptiles,, While Inhibiting Growth in Roots, As we have seen, auxin is synthesized in the shoot apex, and transported basipetally to the tissues below. The steady, supply of auxin arriving at the subapical region of the stem, or coleoptile is required for the continued elongation of, , 20 mm, , FIGURE 19.19 The auxin permease AUX1 is specifically, , expressed in a subset of columella, lateral root cap, and, stellar tissues. (A) Diagram of tissues in the Arabidopsis root, tip. (B) Immunolocalization of AUX1 in protophloem cells, of the stele, a central cluster of cells in the columella, and, lateral root cap cells. (C) Asymmetric localization of AUX1, in a file of protophloem cells. Scale bar is 2 µm in C., (From Swarup et al. 2001.), , these cells. Because the level of endogenous auxin in the, elongation region of a normal healthy plant is nearly optimal for growth, spraying the plant with exogenous auxin, causes only a modest and short-lived stimulation in, growth, and may even be inhibitory in the case of darkgrown seedlings, which are more sensitive to supraoptimal, auxin concentrations than light-grown plants are., However, when the endogenous source of auxin is, removed by excision of sections containing the elongation, zones, the growth rate rapidly decreases to a low basal rate., Such excised sections will often respond dramatically to, exogenous auxin by rapidly increasing their growth rate, back to the level in the intact plant., In long-term experiments, treatment of excised sections, of coleoptiles (see Figure 19.2) or dicot stems with auxin, stimulates the rate of elongation of the section for up to 20, hours (Figure 19.20). The optimal auxin concentration for, elongation growth is typically 10–6 to 10–5 M (Figure 19.21).
Page 490 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, , The Outer Tissues of Dicot Stems Are the Targets, of Auxin Action, , Growth (mm), Elongation (% increase in length), , 10 20 30, IAA, , 2, 1, , IAA + Suc, , Lag phase, , 0, 90, , 60, IAA, 30, Suc, 0, , 5, , 10, , 15, , 20, , 25, , Time (hours), , FIGURE 19.20 Time course for auxin-induced growth of, , Avena (oat) coleoptile sections. Growth is plotted as the percent increase in length. Auxin was added at time zero., When sucrose (Suc) is included in the medium, the response, can continue for as long as 20 hours. Sucrose prolongs the, growth response to auxin mainly by providing osmotically, active solute that can be taken up for the maintenance of, turgor pressure during cell elongation. KCl can substitute, for sucrose. The inset shows a short-term time course plotted with an electronic position-sensing transducer. In this, graph, growth is plotted as the absolute length in millimeters versus time. The curve shows a lag time of about 15, minutes for auxin-stimulated growth to begin. (From, Cleland 1995.), , The inhibition beyond the optimal concentration is generally attributed to auxin-induced ethylene biosynthesis. As, we will see in Chapter 22, the gaseous hormone ethylene, inhibits stem elongation in many species., Auxin control of root elongation growth has been more, difficult to demonstrate, perhaps because auxin induces the, production of ethylene, a root growth inhibitor. However,, even if ethylene biosynthesis is specifically blocked, low, concentrations (10–10 to 10–9 M) of auxin promote the, growth of intact roots, whereas higher concentrations (10–6, M) inhibit growth. Thus, roots may require a minimum, concentration of auxin to grow, but root growth is strongly, inhibited by auxin concentrations that promote elongation, in stems and coleoptiles., , Dicot stems are composed of many types of tissues and, cells, only some of which may limit the growth rate. This, point is illustrated by a simple experiment. When stem sections from growing regions of an etiolated dicot stem, such, as pea, are split lengthwise and incubated in buffer, the two, halves bend outward., This result indicates that, in the absence of auxin the, central tissues, including the pith, vascular tissues, and, inner cortex, elongate at a faster rate than the outer tissues,, consisting of the outer cortex and epidermis. Thus the, outer tissues must be limiting the extension rate of the stem, in the absence of auxin. However, when the split sections, are incubated in buffer plus auxin, the two halves now, curve inward, demonstrating that the outer tissues of dicot, stems are the primary targets of auxin action during cell, elongation., The observation that the outer cell layers are the targets, of auxin seems to conflict with the localization of polar, transport in the parenchyma cells of the vascular bundles., However, auxin can move laterally from the vascular tissues of dicot stems to the outer tissues of the elongation, zone. In coleoptiles, on the other hand, all of the nonvascular tissues (epidermis plus mesophyll) are capable of, transporting auxin, as well as responding to it., , The Minimum Lag Time for Auxin-Induced Growth, Is Ten Minutes, When a stem or coleoptile section is excised and inserted, into a sensitive growth-measuring device, the growth, response to auxin can be monitored at very high resolution., Without auxin in the medium, the growth rate declines, rapidly. Addition of auxin markedly stimulates the growth, rate after a lag period of only 10 to 12 minutes (see the inset, in Figure 19.20)., Both Avena (oat) coleoptiles and Glycine max (soybean), hypocotyls (dicot stem) reach a maximum growth rate after, , FIGURE 19.21 Typical dose–response curve for IAA-induced growth in, , pea stem or oat coleoptile sections. Elongation growth of excised sections, of coleoptiles or young stems is plotted versus increasing concentrations of, exogenous IAA. At higher concentrations (above 10–5 M), IAA becomes less, and less effective; above about 10–4 M it becomes inhibitory, as shown by the, fact that the curve falls below the dashed line, which represents growth in, the absence of added IAA., , Relative segment elongation growth, , Time (min), 0, , 439, , +IAA, +, , 0, Control growth, (no added IAA), , –, , 10–8, , 10–7, , 10–6, , 10–5, , 10–4, , 10–3, , IAA concentration (M), , 10–2
Page 491 :
Chapter 19, , Elongation rate (% h–1), , 440, , Soybean, , The effects of these parameters on the growth rate are, encapsulated in the growth rate equation:, GR = m (Yp – Y), , 5, , Oat, IAA, , 0, 1, 2, 3, Incubation time in 10µM IAA (hours), , FIGURE 19.22 Comparison of the growth kinetics of oat, , coleoptile and soybean hypocotyl sections, incubated with, 10 µM IAA and 2% sucrose. Growth is plotted as the rate at, each time point, rather than the rate of the absolute length., The growth rate of the soybean hypocotyl oscillates after, 1 hour, whereas that of the oat coleoptile is constant., (After Cleland 1995.), , where GR is the growth rate, Yp is the turgor pressure, Y is, the yield threshold, and m is the coefficient (wall extensibility) that relates the growth rate to the difference between, Yp and Y., In principle, auxin could increase the growth rate by, increasing m, increasing Yp, or decreasing Y. Although, extensive experiments have shown that auxin does not, increase turgor pressure when it stimulates growth, conflicting results have been obtained regarding auxininduced decreases in Y. However, there is general agreement that auxin causes an increase in the wall extensibility, parameter, m., , Auxin-Induced Proton Extrusion Acidifies the Cell, Wall and Increases Cell Extension, 30 to 60 minutes of auxin treatment (Figure 19.22). This, maximum represents a five- to tenfold increase over the, basal rate. Oat coleoptile sections can maintain this maximum rate for up to 18 hours in the presence of osmotically, active solutes such as sucrose or KCl., As might be expected, the stimulation of growth by, auxin requires energy, and metabolic inhibitors inhibit the, response within minutes. Auxin-induced growth is also sensitive to inhibitors of protein synthesis such as cycloheximide, suggesting that proteins with high turnover rates are, involved. Inhibitors of RNA synthesis also inhibit auxininduced growth, after a slightly longer delay (Cleland 1995)., Although the length of the lag time for auxin-stimulated, growth can be increased by lowering of the temperature or, by the use of suboptimal auxin concentrations, the lag time, cannot be shortened by raising of the temperature, by the, use of supraoptimal auxin concentrations, or by abrasion, of the waxy cuticle to allow auxin to penetrate the tissue, more rapidly. Thus the minimum lag time of 10 minutes is, not determined by the time required for auxin to reach its, site of action. Rather, the lag time reflects the time needed, for the biochemical machinery of the cell to bring about the, increase in the growth rate., , Auxin Rapidly Increases the Extensibility of the, Cell Wall, How does auxin cause a five- to tenfold increase in the, growth rate in only 10 minutes? To understand the mechanism, we must first review the process of cell enlargement, in plants (see Chapter 15). Plant cells expand in three steps:, 1. Osmotic uptake of water across the plasma membrane, is driven by the gradient in water potential (∆Yw)., 2. Turgor pressure builds up because of the rigidity of, the cell wall., 3. Biochemical wall loosening occurs, allowing the cell, to expand in response to turgor pressure., , According to the widely accepted acid growth hypothesis,, hydrogen ions act as the intermediate between auxin and, cell wall loosening. The source of the hydrogen ions is the, plasma membrane H+-ATPase, whose activity is thought, to increase in response to auxin. The acid growth hypothesis allows five main predictions:, 1. Acid buffers alone should promote short-term, growth, provided the cuticle has been abraded to, allow the protons access to the cell wall., 2. Auxin should increase the rate of proton extrusion, (wall acidification), and the kinetics of proton extrusion should closely match those of auxin-induced, growth., 3. Neutral buffers should inhibit auxin-induced growth., 4. Compounds (other than auxin) that promote proton, extrusion should stimulate growth., 5. Cell walls should contain a “wall loosening factor”, with an acidic pH optimum., All five of these predictions have been confirmed. Acidic, buffers cause a rapid and immediate increase in the growth, rate, provided the cuticle has been abraded. Auxin stimulates proton extrusion into the cell wall after 10 to 15 minutes of lag time, consistent with the growth kinetics (Figure 19.23)., Auxin-induced growth has also been shown to be inhibited by neutral buffers, as long as the cuticle has been, abraided. Fusicoccin, a fungal phytotoxin, stimulates both, rapid proton extrusion and transient growth in stem and, coleoptile sections (see Web Topic 19.6). And finally, wallloosening proteins called expansins have been identified, in the cell walls of a wide range of plant species (see Chapter 15). At acidic pH values, expansins loosen cell walls by, weakening the hydrogen bonds between the polysaccharide components of the wall.
Page 492 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, , IAA, , 240, , 6.0, , 5.5, , 160, , Length, , pH, , pH, , 120, 5.0, 80, 4.5, , Elongation (microns), , 200, , 40, , –10, , 0, , 10, , 20, , 30, , 40, , 50, , 60, , Time (minutes), , 441, , been isolated and appear to be able to activate the plasma, membrane H+-ATPase in the presence of auxin (Steffens et, al. 2001)., Recently an ABP from rice, ABP57, was shown to bind, directly to plasma membrane H+-ATPases and stimulate, proton extrusion—but only in the presence of IAA (Kim et, al. 2001). When IAA is absent, the activity of the H+ATPase is repressed by the C-terminal domain of the, enzyme, which can block the catalytic site. ABP57 (with, bound IAA) interacts with the H+-ATPase, activating the, enzyme. A second auxin-binding site interferes with the, action of the first, possibly explaining the bell-shaped, curve of auxin action. This hypothetical model for the, action of ABP57 is shown in Figure 19.24., , H+-ATPase synthesis. The ability of protein synthesis, , FIGURE 19.23 Kinetics of auxin-induced elongation and cell, , wall acidification in maize coleoptiles. The pH of the cell, wall was measured with a pH microelectrode. Note the, similar lag times (10 to 15 minutes) for both cell wall acidification and the increase in the rate of elongation. (From, Jacobs and Ray 1976.), , Auxin-Induced Proton Extrusion May Involve Both, Activation and Synthesis, In theory, auxin could increase the rate of proton extrusion, by two possible mechanisms:, 1. Activation of preexisting plasma membrane H+ATPases, , inhibitors, such as cycloheximide, to rapidly inhibit auxininduced proton extrusion and growth suggests that auxin, might also stimulate proton pumping by increasing the, synthesis of the H+-ATPase. An increase in the amount of, plasma membrane ATPase in corn coleoptiles was detected, immunologically after only 5 minutes of auxin treatment,, and a doubling of the H+-ATPase was observed after 40, minutes of treatment. A threefold stimulation by auxin of, an mRNA for the H+-ATPase was demonstrated specifically in the nonvascular tissues of the coleoptiles., In summary, the question of activation versus synthesis is still unresolved, and it is possible that auxin stimulates proton extrusion by both activation and stimulation, of synthesis of the H+-ATPase. Figure 19.25 summarizes, , 2. Synthesis of new H+-ATPases on, the plasma membrane, , H+-ATPase activation. When auxin, was added directly to isolated plasma, membrane vesicles from tobacco cells,, a small stimulation (about 20%) of the, ATP-driven proton-pumping activity, was observed, suggesting that auxin, directly activates the H+-ATPase. A, greater stimulation (about 40%) was, observed if the living cells were treated, with IAA just before the membranes, were isolated, suggesting that a cellular factor is also required (Peltier and, Rossignol 1996)., Although an auxin receptor has not, yet been unequivocally identified (as, discussed later in the chapter), various, auxin-binding proteins (ABPs) have, , OUTSIDE, Catalytic, site, , ATP, Inhibitory, domain, , Docking, site, , ABP57, , H+, IAA, , ADP + Pi, , INSIDE, ABP57 binds PM, H+-ATPase at, docking site., , Model for the activation of the plasma membrane (PM), H+-ATPase by ABP57 and auxin., FIGURE 19.24, , H+, , PM H+-ATPase, , IAA binding, causes, conformational, change in, ABP57. ABP57, then interacts, with inhibitory, domain of PM, H+-ATPase, activating the, enzyme., , Binding of IAA, to second site, decreases, interaction, with H+-ATPase, inhibitory, domain; the, enzyme is, inhibited.
Page 493 :
442, , Chapter 19, , Activation hypothesis:, Auxin binds to an auxinbinding protein (ABP1), located either on the cell, surface or in the cytosol., ABP1-IAA then interacts, directly with plasma, membrane H+-ATPase to, stimulate proton pumping, (step 1). Second, messengers, such as, calcium or intracellular pH,, could also be involved., , H+, , IAA, , H+, , H+, , H+, , ABP1, ATP, , ATP, , 1, , IAA, , ATP, , H+, , ATP, ATP, , Activation, hypothesis, , ABP1, IAA, , ATP, H+, 4, , Synthesis hypothesis:, IAA-induced second, messengers activate the, expression of genes (step, 2) that encode the plasma, membrane H+-ATPase, (step 3). The protein is, synthesized on the rough, endoplasmic reticulum, (step 4) and targeted via, the secretory pathway to, the plasma membrane, (steps 5 and 6). The, increase in proton, extrusion results from an, increase in the number of, proton pumps on the, membrane., , Second, messengers, , Rough ER, , Golgi body, ATP, , NUCLEUS, 6, 2, , Promoter, , H+, , Protein, processing, , H+-ATPase, gene, , ATP, H+, , Synthesis, hypothesis, , 5, , mRNA, , Plasma, membrane, , ATP, , H+-ATPase, in vesicle membrane, , 3, , CELL WALL, , Expansin, , Activation, , H+, , FIGURE 19.25 Current models for IAA-induced H+ extrusion. In many plants, both, of these mechanisms may operate. Regardless of how H+ pumping is increased,, acid-induced wall loosening is thought to be mediated by expansins., , the proposed mechanisms of auxin-induced cell wall loosening via proton extrusion., , PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF AUXIN:, PHOTOTROPISM AND GRAVITROPISM, Three main guidance systems control the orientation of, plant growth:, 1. Phototropism, or growth with respect to light, is, expressed in all shoots and some roots; it ensures that, leaves will receive optimal sunlight for photosynthesis., 2. Gravitropism, growth in response to gravity, enables, roots to grow downward into the soil and shoots to, grow upward away from the soil, which is especially, critical during the early stages of germination., 3. Thigmotropism, or growth with respect to touch,, enables roots to grow around rocks and is responsible for the ability of the shoots of climbing plants to, wrap around other structures for support., , In this section we will examine the evidence that bending in response to light or gravity results from the lateral, redistribution of auxin. We will also consider the cellular, mechanisms involved in generating lateral auxin gradients, during bending growth. Less is known about the mechanism of thigmotropism, although it, too, probably involves, auxin gradients., , Phototropism Is Mediated by the Lateral, Redistribution of Auxin, As we saw earlier, Charles and Francis Darwin provided, the first clue concerning the mechanism of phototropism, by demonstrating that the sites of perception and differential growth (bending) are separate: Light is perceived at the, tip, but bending occurs below the tip. The Darwins proposed that some “influence” that was transported from the, tip to the growing region brought about the observed, asymmetric growth response. This influence was later, shown to be indole-3-acetic acid—auxin., When a shoot is growing vertically, auxin is transported, polarly from the growing tip to the elongation zone. The
Page 494 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, , 1. The production of auxin, 2. The perception of a unilateral light stimulus, , 1.8, , Shaded side, , 1.5, Growth in length (mm), , polarity of auxin transport from tip to base is developmentally determined and is independent of orientation with, respect to gravity. However, auxin can also be transported, laterally, and this lateral movement of auxin lies at the heart, of a model for tropisms originally proposed separately by, the Russian plant physiologist, Nicolai Cholodny and Frits, Went from the Netherlands in the 1920s., According to the Cholodny–Went model of phototropism, the tips of grass coleoptiles have three specialized, functions:, , 1.2, , 0.9, Control, (no light), 0.6, , 3. The lateral transport of IAA in response to the phototropic stimulus, , Irradiated side, , 0.3, , Thus, in response to a directional light stimulus, the auxin, produced at the tip, instead of being transported, basipetally, is transported laterally toward the shaded side., The precise sites of auxin production, light perception,, and lateral transport have been difficult to define. In maize, coleoptiles, auxin is produced in the upper 1 to 2 mm of, the tip. The zones of photosensing and lateral transport, extend farther, within the upper 5 mm of the tip. The, response is also strongly dependent on the light fluence, (see Web Topic 19.7)., Two flavoproteins, phototropins 1 and 2, are the photoreceptors for the blue-light signaling pathway (see Web, Essay 19.3) that induces phototropic bending in Arabidopsis hypocotyls and oat coleoptiles under both high- and, low-fluence conditions (Briggs et al. 2001)., Phototropins are autophosphorylating protein kinases, whose activity is stimulated by blue light. The action spectrum for blue-light activation of the kinase activity closely, matches the action spectrum for phototropism, including, the multiple peaks in the blue region. Phototropin 1 displays a lateral gradient in phosphorylation during exposure to low-fluence unilateral blue light., According to the current hypothesis, the gradient in, phototropin phosphorylation induces the movement of, auxin to the shaded side of the coleoptile (see Web Topic, 19.7). Once the auxin reaches the shaded side of the tip, it, is transported basipetally to the elongation zone, where it, stimulates cell elongation. The acceleration of growth on, the shaded side and the slowing of growth on the illuminated side (differential growth) give rise to the curvature, toward light (Figure 19.26)., Direct tests of the Cholodny–Went model using the agar, block/coleoptile curvature bioassay have supported the, model’s prediction that auxin in coleoptile tips is transported laterally in response to unilateral light (Figure, 19.27). The total amount of auxin diffusing out of the tip, (here expressed as the angle of curvature) is the same in the, presence of unilateral light as in darkness (compare Figure, 19.27A and B). This result indicates that light does not, , 443, , 0, , 20, , 40, , 60, 80, Time (min), , 100, , 120, , FIGURE 19.26 Time course of growth on the illuminated, , and shaded sides of a coleoptile responding to a 30-second, pulse of unidirectional blue light. Control coleoptiles were, not given a light treatment. (After Iino and Briggs 1984.), , cause the photodestruction of auxin on the illuminated, side, as had been proposed by some investigators., Consistent with both the Cholodny–Went hypothesis, and the acid growth hypothesis, the apoplastic pH on the, shaded side of a phototropically bending stem or coleoptile is more acidic than the side facing the light (Mulkey et, al. 1981)., , Gravitropism Also Involves Lateral Redistribution, of Auxin, When dark-grown Avena seedlings are oriented horizontally, the coleoptiles bend upward in response to gravity., According to the Cholodny–Went model, auxin in a horizontally oriented coleoptile tip is transported laterally to, the lower side, causing the lower side of the coleoptile to, grow faster than the upper side. Early experimental evidence indicated that the tip of the coleoptile can perceive, gravity and redistribute auxin to the lower side. For example, if coleoptile tips are oriented horizontally, a greater, amount of auxin diffuses from the lower half than the, upper half (Figure 19.28)., Tissues below the tip are able to respond to gravity as, well. For example, when vertically oriented maize coleoptiles are decapitated by removal of the upper 2 mm of the, tip and oriented horizontally, gravitropic bending occurs, at a slow rate for several hours even without the tip. Application of IAA to the cut surface restores the rate of bending
Page 495 :
444, , Chapter 19, , Undivided agar block, (A) Dark, , Divided agar block, (C), , Corn coleoptile tip, excised and placed, on agar, 25.8, , (B) Unilateral light, , 25.6, , Agar block, 11.5 11.2, , Curvature angle, (degrees), , Coleoptile tip, completely divided, by thin piece of mica;, no redistribution, of auxin observed., , (D), , No destruction of auxin, , Unilateral light does not cause the, photodestruction of auxin on the, illuminated side., , 8.1, , 15.4, , Coleoptile tip partly, divided by thin piece, of mica; lateral, redistribution of, auxin occurs., , Auxin is transported laterally to the, shaded side in the tip., , FIGURE 19.27 Evidence that the lateral redistribution of auxin is stimulated by uni-, , directional light in corn coleoptiles., , to normal levels. This finding indicates that both the perception of the gravitational stimulus and the lateral redistribution of auxin can occur in the tissues below the tip,, although the tip is still required for auxin production., Lateral redistribution of auxin in shoot apical meristems, is more difficult to demonstrate than in coleoptiles because, of the presence of leaves. In recent years, molecular markers have been widely used as reporter genes to detect lateral auxin gradients in horizontally placed stems and roots., In soybean hypocotyls, gravitropism leads to a rapid, asymmetry in the accumulation of a group of auxin-stimulated mRNAs called SAURs (small auxin up-regulated, (A), , (B), , RNAs) (McClure and Guilfoyle 1989). In vertical seedlings,, SAUR gene expression is symmetrically distributed. Within, 20 minutes after the seedling is oriented horizontally,, SAURs begin to accumulate on the lower half of the, hypocotyl. Under these conditions, gravitropic bending, first becomes evident after 45 minutes, well after the induction of the SAURs (see Web Topic 19.8). The existence of, a lateral gradient in SAUR gene expression is indirect evidence for the existence of a lateral gradient in auxin, detectable within 20 minutes of the gravitropic stimulus., As will be discussed later in the chapter, the GH3 gene, family is also up-regulated within 5 minutes of auxin treatLower half, , FIGURE 19.28 Auxin is transported to the lower side of a horizontally oriented oat, , coleoptile tip. (A) Auxin from the upper and lower halves of a horizontal tip is, allowed to diffuse into two agar blocks. (B) The agar block from the lower half (left), induces greater curvature in a decapitated coleoptile than the agar block from the, upper half (right). (Photo © M. B. Wilkins.), , Upper half
Page 496 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, FIGURE 19.29 Lateral auxin gradients are formed in, , Arabidopsis hypocotyls during the differential growth, responses to light (A). Treatment with the auxin efflux, inhibitor NPA blocks auxin redistribution and bending (B)., The plants were transformed with the DR5::GUS reporter, gene. Auxin accumulation on the shaded side of the, hypocotyls is indicated by the blue staining shown in the, insets (A). A similar redistribution of auxin occurs in, gravitropism. (Photos courtesy of Klaus Palme.), , (A), , 445, , (B), , ment and has been used as a molecular marker for the presence of auxin. By fusing an artificial promoter sequence based, on the GH3 promoter to the GUS reporter gene, it is possible, to visualize the lateral gradient in auxin concentration that, occurs during both photo- and gravitropism (Figure 19.29)., , Statoliths Serve as Gravity Sensors in Shoots and, Roots, Unlike unilateral light, gravity does not form a gradient, between the upper and lower sides of an organ. All parts, of the plant experience the gravitational stimulus equally., How do plant cells detect gravity? The only way that gravity can be sensed is through the motion of a falling or sedimenting body., Obvious candidates for intracellular gravity sensors in, plants are the large, dense amyloplasts that are present in, many plant cells. These specialized amyloplasts are of sufficiently high density relative to the cytosol that they readily sediment to the bottom of the cell (Figure 19.30). Amyloplasts that function as gravity sensors are called, statoliths, and the specialized gravity-sensing cells in, which they occur are called statocytes. Whether the statocyte is able to detect the downward motion of the statolith, as it passes through the cytoskeleton or whether the stimulus is perceived only when the statolith comes to rest at, the bottom of the cell has not yet been resolved., , Shoots and Coleoptiles. In shoots and coleoptiles, gravity, is perceived in the starch sheath, a layer of cells that surrounds the vascular tissues of the shoot. The starch sheath, is continuous with the endodermis of the root, but unlike, the endodermis it contains amyloplasts. Arabidopsis, mutants lacking amyloplasts in the starch sheath display, agravitropic shoot growth but normal gravitropic root, growth (Fujihira et al. 2000)., As noted in Chapter 16, the scarecrow (scr) mutant of, Arabidopsis is missing both the endodermis and the starch, sheath. As a result, the hypocotyl and inflorescence of the, scr mutant are agravitropic, while the root exhibits a normal gravitropic response. On the basis of the phenotypes, of these two mutants, we can conclude the following:, • The starch sheath is required for gravitropism in, shoots., • The root endodermis, which does not contain statoliths, is not required for gravitropism in roots., , Roots. The site of gravity perception in primary roots is the, root cap. Large, graviresponsive amyloplasts are located in, the statocytes (see Figure 19.30A and B) in the central cylinder, or columella, of the root cap. Removal of the root cap, from otherwise intact roots abolishes root gravitropism, without inhibiting growth., Precisely how the statocytes sense their falling statoliths, is still poorly understood. According to one hypothesis,, contact or pressure resulting from the amyloplast resting, on the endoplasmic reticulum on the lower side of the cell, triggers the response (see Figure 19.30C). The endoplasmic, reticulum of columella cells is structurally unique, consisting of five to seven rough-ER sheets attached to a central, nodal rod in a whorl, like petals on a flower. This specialized “nodal ER” differs from the more tubular cortical ER, cisternae and may be involved in the gravity response, (Zheng and Staehelin 2001)., The starch–statolith hypothesis of gravity perception in, roots is supported by several lines of evidence. Amyloplasts are the only organelles that consistently sediment in, the columella cells of different plant species, and the rate, of sedimentation correlates closely with the time required, to perceive the gravitational stimulus. The gravitropic, responses of starch-deficient mutants are generally much, slower than those of wild-type plants. Nevertheless, starchless mutants exhibit some gravitropism, suggesting that, although starch is required for a normal gravitropic, response, starch-independent gravity perception mechanisms may also exist., Other organelles, such as nuclei, may be dense enough, to act as statoliths. It may not even be necessary for a statolith to come to rest at the bottom of the cell. The, cytoskeletal network may be able to detect a partial vertical displacement of an organelle.
Page 497 :
(A), , (C), Vertical orientation, , M, , C, , Uniform, pressure, on ER, , Amyloplast, , Statolith, , Amyloplasts tend to, sediment in response to, reorientation of the cell, and to remain resting, against the ER. When, the root is oriented, vertically, the pressure, exerted by the amyloplasts on the ER is, equally distributed., , Root tip, , Horizontal orientation, , P, (B), Root tip, , Statolith, , In a horizontal orientation the pressure on, the ER is unequal on, either side of the, vertical axis of the root., , Unequal, pressure, on ER, , FIGURE 19.30 The perception of gravity by statocytes of Arabidopsis. (A) Electron, , micrograph of root tip, showing apical meristem (M), columella (C), and peripheral (P) cells. (B) Enlarged view of a columella cell, showing the amyloplasts, resting on top of endoplasmic reticulum at the bottom of the cell. (C) Diagram of, the changes that occur during reorientation from the vertical to the horizontal, position. (A, B courtesy of Dr. John Kiss; C based on Sievers et al. 1996 and, Volkmann and Sievers 1979.), Endoplasmic reticulum, , Recently Andrew Staehelin and colleagues proposed a, new model for gravitropism, called the tensegrity model, (Yoder et al. 2001). Tensegrity is an architectural term—a, contraction of tensional integrity—coined by the innovative, architect R. Buckminster Fuller. In essence, tensegrity refers, to structural integrity created by interactive tension, between the structural components. In this case the structural components consist of the meshwork of actin microfilaments that form part of the cytoskeleton of the central, columella cells of the root cap. The actin network is, assumed to be anchored to stretch-activated receptors on, the plasma membrane. Stretch receptors in animal cells are, typically mechanosensitive ion channels, and stretch-activated calcium channels have been demonstrated in plants., According to the tensegrity model, sedimentation of the, statoliths through the cytosol locally disrupts the actin, meshwork, changing the distribution of tension transmitted to calcium channels on the plasma membrane, thus, altering their activities. Yoder and colleagues (2001) have, , further proposed that the nodal ER, which is also connected to channels via actin microfilaments, may protect, the cytoskeleton from being disrupted by the statoliths in, specific regions, thus providing a signal for the directionality of the stimulus., , Gravity perception without statoliths? An alternative, mechanism of gravity perception that does not involve statoliths has been proposed for the giant-celled freshwater, alga Chara. See Web Topic 19.8 for details., , Auxin Is Redistribution Laterally in the Root Cap, In addition to functioning to protect the sensitive cells of, the apical meristem as the tip penetrates the soil, the root, cap is the site of gravity perception. Because the cap is, some distance away from the elongation zone where bending occurs, a chemical messenger is presumed to be, involved in communication between the cap and the elongation zone. Microsurgery experiments in which half of the
Page 498 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, (A), , Removal of the cap, from the vertical root, slightly stimulates, elongation growth., , 447, , Removal of half of the, cap causes a vertical root, to bend toward the side, with the remaining half-cap., , during gravitropism? As discussed earlier, in the chapter, auxin from the shoot is, translocated from the stele to the root tip, via protophloem cells. Asymmetrically, localized AUX1 permeases on the protophloem parenchyma cells direct the, Root, acropetal transport of auxin from the, phloem to a cluster of cells in the columella of the cap. Auxin is then transported radially to the lateral root cap cells,, Root cap, where AUX1 is also strongly expressed, (see Figure 19.19)., The lateral root cap cells overlay the, (B), Removal of the cap from a, distal elongation zone (DEZ) of the root—, Horizontally oriented, horizontal root abolishes, the first region that responds to gravity., control root with cap, the response to gravity,, The auxin from the cap is taken up by the, shows normal, while slightly stimulating, gravitropic bending., elongation growth., cortical parenchyma of the DEZ and transported basipetally through the elongation, zone of the root. This basipetal transport,, which is limited to the elongation zone, is, facilitated by auxin anion carriers related, to the PIN family (called AGR1), which are, localized at the basal ends of the cortical, parenchyma cells., FIGURE 19.31 Microsurgery experiments demonstrating that the root cap, The basipetally transported auxin, produces an inhibitor that regulates root gravitropism. (After Shaw and, accumulates in the elongation zone and, Wilkins 1973.), does not pass beyond this region., Flavonoids capable of inhibiting auxin, cap was removed showed that the cap produces a root, efflux are synthesized in this region of the root and probgrowth inhibitor (Figure 19.31). This finding suggests that, ably promote auxin retention by these cells (Figure 19.32), the cap supplies an inhibitor to the lower side of the root, (Murphy et al. 2000)., during gravitropic bending., Although root caps contain small amounts of IAA and, abscisic acid (ABA) (see Chapter 23), IAA is more, inhibitory to root growth than ABA when applied directly, to the elongation zone, suggesting that IAA is the root cap, inhibitor. Consistent with this conclusion, ABA-deficient, Arabidopsis mutants have normal root gravitropism,, whereas the roots of mutants defective in auxin transport,, Cotyledon and, such as aux1 and agr1, are agravitropic (Palme and Gälapical region, weiler 1999). The agr mutant lacks an auxin efflux carrier, related to the PIN proteins (Chen et al. 1998; Müller et al., 1998; Utsuno et al. 1998). The AGR1 protein is localized at, the basal (distal) end of cortical cells near the root tip in, Arabidopsis., How do we reconcile the fact that the shoot apical, meristem is the primary source of auxin to the root with the, role of the root cap as the source of the inhibitory auxin, Hypocotyl–root, Vertically oriented, control root with cap, , transition zone, , FIGURE 19.32 Flavonoid localization in a 6-day-old Arabidopsis, , seedling. The staining procedure used causes the flavonoids to fluoresce. Flavonoids are concentrated in three regions: the cotyledon, and apical region, the hypocotyl–root transition zone, and the root, tip area (inset). In the root tip, flavonoids are localized specifically, in the elongation zone and the cap, the tissues involved in basipetal, auxin transport. (From Murphy et al. 2000.), , Root tip
Page 499 :
448, , Chapter 19, (A) Vertical orientation, , 1. IAA is synthesized, in the shoot and, transported to the, root in the stele., , Cortex, , Elongation, zone, (flavonoid, synthesis), , Stele, IAA, , Root cap, IAA, , IAA, Root cap cell, (enlarged), , IAA, , FIGURE 19.33 Proposed model for the, , redistribution of auxin during gravitropism in maize roots. (After Hasenstein, and Evans 1988.), , 2. When the root is vertical, the, statoliths in the cap settle to the, basal ends of the cells. Auxin, transported acropetally in the root, via the stele is distributed equally on, all sides of the root cap. The IAA is, then transported basipetally within, the cortex to the elongation zone,, where it regulates cell elongation., , Statoliths, (B) Horizontal orientation, 6. The decreased auxin, concentration on the, upper side stimulates, the upper side to, grow. As a result, the, root bends down., , IAA, , IAA, IAA, , 5. The high concentration, of auxin on the lower, side of the root inhibits, growth., , IAA, , 4. The majority of the, auxin in the cap is, then transported, basipetally in the, cortex on the lower, side of the root., , 3. In a horizontal root, the statoliths settle to, the side of the cap, cells, triggering polar, transport of IAA to the, lower side of the cap., , According to the model, basipetal auxin transport in a, vertically oriented root is equal on all sides (Figure 19.33A)., When the root is oriented horizontally, however, the cap, redirects the bulk of the auxin to the lower side, thus inhibiting the growth of that lower side (see Figure 19.33B). Consistent with this idea, the transport of [3H]IAA across a horizontally oriented root cap is polar, with a preferential, downward movement (Young et al. 1990)., , to a directional stimulus. In a vertically oriented root, PIN3, is uniformly distributed around the columella cell (see Figure 19.34A). But when the root is placed on its side, PIN3, is preferentially targeted to the lower side of the cell (see, Figure 19.34B). As a result, auxin is transported polarly to, the lower half of the cap., , PIN3 Is Relocated Laterally to the Lower Side of, Root Columella Cells, , A variety of experiments have suggested that calcium–, calmodulin is required for root gravitropism in maize. Some, of these experiments involve EGTA (ethylene glycol-bis(βaminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid), a compound, that can chelate (form a complex with) calcium ions, thus, preventing calcium uptake by cells. EGTA inhibits both root, gravitropism and the asymmetric distribution of auxin in, response to gravity (Young and Evans 1994)., Placing a block of agar that contains calcium ions on the, side of the cap of a vertically oriented corn root induces the, root to grow toward the side with the agar block (Figure, 19.35). As in the case of [+H]IAA, 45Ca2+ is polarly transported to the lower half of the cap of a root stimulated by, , Recently the mechanism of lateral auxin redistribution in, the root cap has new been elucidated (Friml et al. 2002)., One of the members of the PIN protein family of auxin, efflux carriers, PIN3, is not only required for both photoand gravitropism in Arabidopsis, but it has been shown to, be relocalized to the lower side of the columella cells during root gravitropism (Figure 19.34)., As noted previously, PIN proteins are constantly being, cycled between the plasma membrane and intracellular, secretory compartments. This cycling allows some PIN proteins to be targeted to specific sides of the cell in response, , Gravity Sensing May Involve Calcium and pH as, Second Messengers
Page 500 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, (A) Vertical orientation, , 449, , (B) Horizontal orientation, , 10 mm, , 10 mm, , FIGURE 19.34 Relocalization of the auxin efflux carrier PIN3 during, , root gravitropism in Arabidopsis. (A) In a vertically oriented root, PIN3, is uniformly distributed around the columella cells. (B) After being oriented horizontally for 10 minutes, PIN3 has been relocalized to the, lower side of the columella cells. The photo in (B) has been reorientated, so that the lower side is on the right. (The direction of gravity is indicated by the arrows.) (From Friml et al. 2002, courtesy of Klaus Palme.), , gravity. However, thus far no changes in the distribution of, intracellular calcium have been detected in columella cells, in response to a gravitational stimulus., Recent evidence suggests that a change in intracellular, pH is the earliest detectable change in columella cells, responding to gravity. Fasano et al. (2001) used pH-sensitive dyes to monitor both intracellular and extracellular pH, in Arabidopsis roots after they were placed in a horizontal, , position. Within 2 minutes of gravistimulation, the cytoplasmic pH of the columella cells of the root cap increased, from 7.2 to 7.6, and the apoplastic pH declined from 5.5 to, 4.5. These changes preceded any detectable tropic curvature by about 10 minutes., The alkalinization of the cytosol combined with the acidification of the apoplast suggests that an activation of the, plasma membrane H+-ATPase is one of the initial events, that mediate root gravity perception or signal transduction., , DEVELOPMENTAL EFFECTS OF AUXIN, Although originally discovered in relation to growth, auxin, influences nearly every stage of a plant’s life cycle from, germination to senescence. Because the effect that auxin, produces depends on the identity of the target tissue, the, response of a tissue to auxin is governed by its developmentally determined genetic program and is further influenced by the presence or absence of other signaling molecules. As we will see in this and subsequent chapters,, interaction between two or more hormones is a recurring, theme in plant development., In this section we will examine some additional developmental processes regulated by auxin, including apical, dominance, leaf abscission, lateral-root formation, and vascular differentiation. Throughout this discussion we, assume that the primary mechanism of auxin action is, comparable in all cases, involving similar receptors and signal transduction pathways. The current state of our knowledge of auxin signaling pathways will be considered at the, end of the chapter., FIGURE 19.35 A corn root bending toward an agar block, , containing calcium placed on the cap. (Courtesy of Michael, L. Evans.), , Auxin Regulates Apical Dominance, In most higher plants, the growing apical bud inhibits the, growth of lateral (axillary) buds—a phenomenon called
Page 501 :
450, , Chapter 19, , FIGURE 19.36 Auxin sup-, , (A), , (B), , presses the growth of axillary, buds in bean (Phaseolus, vulgaris) plants. (A) The axillary, buds are suppressed in the, intact plant because of apical, dominance. (B) Removal of the, terminal bud releases the axillary buds from apical dominance (arrows). (C) Applying, IAA in lanolin paste (contained, in the gelatin capsule) to the cut, surface prevents the outgrowth, of the axillary buds., (Photos ©M. B. Wilkins.), (C), , apical dominance. Removal of the shoot apex (decapitation), usually results in the growth of one or more of the lateral, buds. Not long after the discovery of auxin, it was found that, IAA could substitute for the apical bud in maintaining the, inhibition of lateral buds of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants., This classic experiment is illustrated in Figure 19.36., This result was soon confirmed for numerous other, plant species, leading to the hypothesis that the outgrowth, of the axillary bud is inhibited by auxin that is transported, basipetally from the apical bud. In support of this idea, a, ring of the auxin transport inhibitor TIBA in lanolin paste, (as a carrier) placed below the shoot apex released the axillary buds from inhibition., How does auxin from the shoot apex inhibit the growth, of lateral buds? Kenneth V. Thimann and Folke Skoog originally proposed that auxin from the shoot apex inhibits the, growth of the axillary bud directly—the so-called directinhibition model. According to the model, the optimal auxin, concentration for bud growth is low, much lower than the, auxin concentration normally found in the stem. The level, of auxin normally present in the stem was thought to, inhibit the growth of lateral buds., If the direct-inhibition model of apical dominance is correct, the concentration of auxin in the axillary bud should, decrease following decapitation of the shoot apex. However, the reverse appears to be true. This was demonstrated, with transgenic plants that contained the reporter genes for, bacterial luciferase (LUXA and LUXB) under the control of, , an auxin-responsive promoter (Langridge et al. 1989)., These reporter genes allowed researchers to study the level, of auxin in different tissues by monitoring the amount of, light emitted by the luciferase-catalyzed reaction., When these transgenic plants were decapitated, the, expression of the LUX genes increased in and around the, axillary buds within 12 hours. This experiment indicated, that after decapitation, the auxin content of the axillary, buds increased rather than decreased., Direct physical measurements of auxin levels in buds, have also shown an increase in the auxin of the axillary, buds after decapitation. The IAA concentration in the axillary bud of Phaseolus vulgaris (kidney bean) increased fivefold within 4 hours after decapitation (Gocal et al. 1991)., These and other similar results make it unlikely that auxin, from the shoot apex inhibits the axillary bud directly., Other hormones, such as cytokinins and ABA, may be, involved. Direct application of cytokinins to axillary buds, stimulates bud growth in many species, overriding the, inhibitory effect of the shoot apex. Auxin makes the shoot, apex a sink for cytokinin synthesized in the root, and this, may be one of the factors involved in apical dominance, (see Web Topic 19.10)., Finally, ABA has been found in dormant lateral buds in, intact plants. When the shoot apex is removed, the ABA, levels in the lateral buds decrease. High levels of IAA in the, shoot may help keep ABA levels high in the lateral buds., Removing the apex removes a major source of IAA, which
Page 502 :
Wild-type, (A), , (B), , (C), , may allow the levels of bud growth inhibitor to fall, (see Web Topic 19.11)., , Auxin Promotes the Formation of Lateral, and Adventitious Roots, Although elongation of the primary root is inhibited, by auxin concentrations greater than 10–8 M, initiation of lateral (branch) roots and adventitious roots, is stimulated by high auxin levels. Lateral roots are, commonly found above the elongation and root hair, zone and originate from small groups of cells in the, pericycle (see Chapter 16). Auxin stimulates these, alf-1, (D), (E), (F), pericycle cells to divide. The dividing cells gradually form into a root apex, and the lateral root grows, through the root cortex and epidermis., Adventitious roots (roots originating from nonroot tissue) can arise in a variety of tissue locations, from clusters of mature cells that renew their cell, division activity. These dividing cells develop into a, root apical meristem in a manner somewhat analogous to the formation of lateral roots. In horticulture, the stimulatory effect of auxin on the formation, of adventitious roots has been very useful for the, vegetative propagation of plants by cuttings., A series of Arabidopsis mutants, named alf (aberrant lateral root formation), have provided some, FIGURE 19.37 Root morphology of Arabidopsis (A–C) wild-type, insights into the role of auxin in the initiation of latand alf1 seedlings (D–F) on hormone-free medium. Note the proliferation of root primoridia growing from the pericycle in the alf1, eral roots. The alf1 mutant exhibits extreme proliferseedlings (D and E). (From Celenza et al. 1995, courtesy of J., ation of adventitious and lateral roots, coupled with, Celenza.), a 17-fold increase in endogenous auxin (Figure 19.37)., Another mutant, alf4, has the opposite phenotype:, It is completely devoid of lateral roots. Microscopic, base of the petiole of leaves. In most plants, leaf abscission, analysis of alf4 roots indicates that lateral-root primordia, is preceded by the differentiation of a distinct layer of cells,, are absent. The alf4 phenotype cannot be reversed by application of exogenous IAA., the abscission layer, within the abscission zone. During, leaf senescence, the walls of the cells in the abscission layer, Yet another mutant, alf3, is defective in the development, of lateral-root primordia into mature lateral roots. The priare digested, which causes them to become soft and weak., mary root is covered with arrested lateral-root primordia, The leaf eventually breaks off at the abscission layer as a, that grow until they protrude through the epidermal cell, result of stress on the weakened cell walls., layer and then stop growing. The arrested growth can be, Auxin levels are high in young leaves, progressively, alleviated by application of exogenous IAA., decrease in maturing leaves, and are relatively low in, On the basis of the phenotypes of the alf mutants, a, senescing leaves when the abscission process begins. The, model in which IAA is required for at least two steps in the, role of auxin in leaf abscission can be readily demonstrated, formation of lateral roots has been proposed (Figure 19.38), by excision of the blade from a mature leaf, leaving the peti(Celenza et al. 1995):, ole intact on the stem. Whereas removal of the leaf blade, accelerates the formation of the abscission layer in the peti1. IAA transported acropetally (toward the tip) in the, ole, application of IAA in lanolin paste to the cut surface of, stele is required to initiate cell division in the pericycle., the petiole prevents the formation of the abscission layer., 2. IAA is required to promote cell division and main(Lanolin paste alone does not prevent abscission.), tain cell viability in the developing lateral root., These results suggest the following:, , Auxin Delays the Onset of Leaf Abscission, The shedding of leaves, flowers, and fruits from the living, plant is known as abscission. These parts abscise in a, region called the abscission zone, which is located near the, , • Auxin transported from the blade normally prevents, abscission., • Abscission is triggered during leaf senescence, when, auxin is no longer being produced.
Page 503 :
452, , Chapter 19, , IAA, ALF1, , IAA transported acropetally in, the vascular cylinder is required, to initiate cell division in the, pericycle. IAA normally restricts, supply of auxin to root., , may take over as the main auxin source during the later, stages., Figure 19.39 shows the influence of auxin produced by, the achenes of strawberry on the growth of the receptacle, of strawberry., , Auxin Induces Vascular Differentiation, ALF4, , ALF3, , Gene and IAA, required to, initiate, lateral-root, formation, , Gene and IAA, required to, maintain, lateral-root, growth, , FIGURE 19.38 A model for the formation of lateral roots,, , based on the alf mutants of Arabidopsis., (After Celenza et al. 1995.), , However, as will be discussed in Chapter 22, ethylene also, plays a crucial role as a positive regulator of abscission., , Auxin Transport Regulates Floral Bud, Development, , New vascular tissues differentiate directly, below developing buds and young growing, leaves (see Figure 19.5), and removal of the, young leaves prevents vascular differentiation (Aloni 1995). The ability of an apical bud, to stimulate vascular differentiation can be demonstrated, in tissue culture. When the apical bud is grafted onto a, clump of undifferentiated cells, or callus, xylem and, phloem differentiate beneath the graft., The relative amounts of xylem and phloem formed are, regulated by the auxin concentration: High auxin concentrations induce the differentiation of xylem and phloem,, but only phloem differentiates at low auxin concentrations., Similarly, experiments on stem tissues have shown that low, auxin concentrations induce phloem differentiation,, whereas higher IAA levels induce xylem (Aloni 1995)., The regeneration of vascular tissue following wounding, is also controlled by auxin produced by the young leaf, directly above the wound site (Figure 19.40). Removal of, the leaf prevents the regeneration of vascular tissue, and, applied auxin can substitute for the leaf in stimulating, regeneration., Vascular differentiation is polar and occurs from leaves, to roots. In woody perennials, auxin produced by growing, buds in the spring stimulates activation of the cambium in, IAA, , Treating Arabidopsis plants with the auxin transport, inhibitor NPA causes abnormal floral development, suggesting that polar auxin transport in the inflorescence, meristem is required for normal floral development. In, Arabidopsis, the “pin-formed” mutant pin1, which lacks an, auxin efflux carrier in shoot tissues, has abnormal flowers, similar to those of NPA-treated plants (see Figure 19.14A)., Apparently the developing floral meristem depends on, auxin being transported to it from subapical tissues. In the, absence of the efflux carriers, the, meristem is starved for auxin, and, normal phyllotaxis and floral development are disrupted (Kuhlemeier, (A) Normal fruit, and Reinhardt 2001)., , (B) Achenes, removed, , (C) Achenes removed;, sprayed with auxin, , Auxin Promotes Fruit, Development, Much evidence suggests that auxin is, involved in the regulation of fruit, development. Auxin is produced in, pollen and in the endosperm and the, embryo of developing seeds, and the, initial stimulus for fruit growth may, result from pollination., Successful pollination initiates, ovule growth, which is known as, fruit set. After fertilization, fruit, growth may depend on auxin produced in developing seeds. The, endosperm may contribute auxin, during the initial stage of fruit, growth, and the developing embryo, , Swollen, receptacle, , Achene, , FIGURE 19.39 (A) The strawberry “fruit” is actually a swollen receptacle whose, , growth is regulated by auxin produced by the “seeds,” which are actually achenes−, the true fruits. (B) When the achenes are removed, the receptacle fails to develop, normally. (C) Spraying the achene-less receptacle with IAA restores normal growth, and development. (After A. Galston 1994.)
Page 504 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, (A), , The stem was, decapitated, and the, leaves and buds above, the wound site were, removed to lower the, endogenous auxin., , Immediately after the, wounding, IAA in lanolin, paste was applied to the, stem above the wound., , 453, , (B), , Node, Apical bud, Young, leaf, Mature leaf, , IAA in, lanolin, paste, , Wound, , Wound, Vascular, strands, Cotyledon, , Xylem differentiation, occurs around the wound,, following the path of, auxin diffusion., Intact cucumber plant, , FIGURE 19.40 IAA-induced xylem regeneration around the wound in cucumber, , (Cucumis sativus) stem tissue. (A) Method for carrying out the wound regeneration, experiment. (B) Fluorescence micrograph showing regenerating vascular tissue, around the wound. (B courtesy of R. Aloni.), , a basipetal direction. The new round of secondary growth, begins at the smallest twigs and progresses downward, toward the root tip., Further evidence for the role of auxin in vascular differentiation comes from studies in which the auxin concentration is manipulated by the transformation of plants, with auxin biosynthesis genes through use of the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium. When an auxin biosynthesis gene, was overexpressed in petunia plants, the number of xylem, tracheary elements increased. In contrast, when the level of, free IAA in tobacco plants was decreased by transformation with a gene coding for an enzyme that conjugated IAA, to the amino acid lysine, the number of vessel elements, decreased and their sizes increased (Romano et al. 1991)., Thus the level of free auxin appears to regulate the number, of tracheary elements, as well as their size., In Zinnia elegans mesophyll cell cultures, auxin is, required for tracheary cell differentiation, but cytokinins, also participate, perhaps by increasing the sensitivity of the, cells to auxin. Whereas auxin is produced in the shoot and, transported downward to the root, cytokinins are produced by the root tips and transported upward into the, shoot. Both hormones are probably involved in the regulation of cambium activation and vascular differentiation (see, Chapter 21)., , Synthetic Auxins Have a Variety, of Commercial Uses, Auxins have been used commercially in agriculture and, horticulture for more than 50 years. The early commercial, uses included prevention of fruit and leaf drop, promotion, of flowering in pineapple, induction of parthenocarpic, fruit, thinning of fruit, and rooting of cuttings for plant, propagation. Rooting is enhanced if the excised leaf or, stem cutting is dipped in an auxin solution, which, increases the initiation of adventitious roots at the cut end., This is the basis of commercial rooting compounds, which, consist mainly of a synthetic auxin mixed with talcum, powder., In some plant species, seedless fruits may be produced, naturally, or they may be induced by treatment of the, unpollinated flowers with auxin. The production of such, seedless fruits is called parthenocarpy. In stimulating the, formation of parthenocarpic fruits, auxin may act primarily to induce fruit set, which in turn may trigger the, endogenous production of auxin by certain fruit tissues to, complete the developmental process., Ethylene is also involved in fruit development, and, some of the effects of auxin on fruiting may result from the, promotion of ethylene synthesis. The control of ethylene in, the commercial handling of fruit is discussed in Chapter 22.
Page 505 :
454, , Chapter 19, , In addition to these applications, today auxins are, widely used as herbicides. The chemicals 2,4-D and, dicamba (see Figure 19.4) are probably the most widely, used synthetic auxins. Synthetic auxins are very effective, because they are not metabolized by the plant as quickly as, IAA is. Because maize and other monocotyledons can, rapidly inactivate synthetic auxins by conjugation, these, auxins are used by farmers for the control of dicot weeds,, also called broad-leaved weeds, in commercial cereal fields,, and by home gardeners for the control of weeds such as, dandelions and daisies in lawns., , AUXIN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION, PATHWAYS, The ultimate goal of research on the molecular mechanism, of hormone action is to reconstruct each step in the signal, transduction pathway, from receptor binding to the physiological response. In this last section of the chapter, we will, examine candidates for the auxin receptor and then discuss, the various signaling pathways that have been implicated, in auxin action. Finally we will turn our attention to auxinregulated gene expression., , ABP1 Functions as an Auxin Receptor, In addition to its possible direct role in plasma membrane, H+-ATPase activation (discussed earlier), the auxin-binding protein ABP1 appears to function as an auxin receptor, in other signal transduction pathways. ABP1 homologs, have been identified in a variety of monocot and dicot, species (Venis and Napier 1997). Knockouts of the ABP1, gene in Arabidopsis are lethal, and less severe mutations, result in altered development (Chen et al. 2001). Recent, studies indicate that, despite being localized primarily on, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), a small amount of ABP1, is secreted to the plasma membrane outer surface where it, interacts with auxin to cause protoplast swelling and H+pumping (Venis et al. 1996; Steffens et al. 2001)., However, it is unlikely that ABP1 mediates all auxin, response pathways because expression of a number of, auxin-responsive genes is not affected when protoplasts are, incubated with anti-ABP1 antibodies. It is also unclear, what role the ABP1 in the ER plays in auxin-responsive signal transduction. Finally, it remains to be determined, whether ABP57, the soluble and unrelated ABP from rice, that activates the H+-ATPase (see Figure 19.24), is involved, in a signal transduction pathway., , Calcium and Intracellular pH Are Possible, Signaling Intermediates, Calcium plays an important role in signal transduction in, animals and is thought to be involved in the action of certain plant hormones as well. The role of calcium in auxin, action seems very complex and, at this point in time, very, , uncertain. Nevertheless, some experimental evidence shows, that auxin increases the level of free calcium in the cell., Changes in cytoplasmic pH can also serve as a second, messenger in animals and plants. In plants, auxin induces, a decrease in cytosolic pH of about 0.2 units within 4 minutes of application. The cause of this pH drop is not, known. Since the cytosolic pH is normally around 7.4, and, the pH optimum of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase is, 6.5, a decrease in the cytosolic pH of 0.2 units could cause, a marked increase in the activity of the plasma membrane, H+-ATPase. The decrease in cytosolic pH might also, account for the auxin-induced increase in free intracellular, calcium, by promoting the dissociation of bound forms., MAP kinases (see Chapter 14 on the web site) that play, a role in signal transduction by phosphorylating proteins, in a cascade that ultimately activates transcription factors, have also been implicated in auxin responses. When, tobacco cells are deprived of auxin, they arrest at the end, of either the G1 or the G2 phase and cease dividing; if auxin, is added back into the culture medium, the cell cycle, resumes (Koens et al. 1995). (For a description of the cell, cycle, see Chapter 1.) Auxin appears to exert its effect on, the cell cycle primarily by stimulating the synthesis of the, major cyclin-dependent protein kinase (CDK): Cdc2 (cell, division cycle 2) (see Chapter 14 on the web site)., , Auxin-Induced Genes Fall into Two Classes: Early, and Late, One of the important functions of the signal transduction, pathway(s) initiated when auxin binds to its receptor is the, activation of a select group of transcription factors. The, activated transcription factors enter the nucleus and promote the expression of specific genes. Genes whose expression is stimulated by the activation of preexisting transcription factors are called primary response genes or, early genes., This definition implies that all of the proteins required, for auxin-induced expression of the early genes are present, in the cell at the time of exposure to the hormone; thus,, early-gene expression cannot be blocked by inhibitors of, protein synthesis such as cycloheximide. As a consequence,, the time required for the expression of the early genes can, be quite short, ranging from a few minutes to several hours, (Abel and Theologis 1996)., In general, primary response genes have three main, functions: (1) Some of the early genes encode proteins that, regulate the transcription of secondary response genes, or, late genes, that are required for the long-term responses to, the hormone. Because late genes require de novo protein, synthesis, their expression can be blocked by protein synthesis inhibitors. (2) Other early genes are involved in intercellular communication, or cell-to-cell signaling. (3), Another group of early genes is involved in adaptation to, stress.
Page 506 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, Five major classes of early auxin-responsive genes have, been identified:, • Genes involved in auxin-regulated growth and development:, 1. The AUX/IAA gene family, 2. The SAUR gene family, 3. The GH3 gene family, • Stress response genes:, 1. Genes encoding glutathione S-transferases, 2. Genes encoding 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase, the key enzyme, in the ethylene biosynthetic pathway (see, Chapter 22), , Early genes for growth and development. Members of the, AUX/IAA gene family encode short-lived transcription factors that function as repressors or activators of the expression of late auxin-inducible genes. The expression of most, of the AUX/IAA family of genes is stimulated by auxin, within 5 to 60 minutes of hormone addition All the genes, encode small hydrophilic polypeptides that have putative, DNA-binding motifs similar to those of bacterial repressors. They also have short half-lives (about 7 minutes), indicating that they are turning over rapidly., The SAUR gene family was mentioned earlier in the, chapter in relation to tropisms. Auxin stimulates the, expression of SAUR genes within 2 to 5 minutes of treatment, and the response is insensitive to cycloheximide. The, five SAUR genes of soybean are clustered together, contain, no introns, and encode highly similar polypeptides of, unknown function. Because of the rapidity of the response,, expression of SAUR genes has proven to be a convenient, probe for the lateral transport of auxin during photo- and, gravitropism., GH3 early-gene family members, identified in both soybean and Arabidopsis, are stimulated by auxin within 5 minutes. Mutations in Arabidopsis GH3-like genes result in, dwarfism (Nakazawa et al. 2001) and appear to function in, light-regulated auxin responses (Hsieh et al. 2000). Because, GH3 expression is a good reflection of the presence of, endogenous auxin, a synthetic GH3-based reporter gene, known as DR5 is widely used in auxin bioassays (see Figure 19.5 and Web Topic 19.12) (Ulmasov et al. 1997)., , Early genes for stress adaptations. As mentioned earlier, in the chapter, auxin is involved in stress responses, such, as wounding. Several genes encoding glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs), a class of proteins stimulated by various, stress conditions, are induced by elevated auxin concentrations. Likewise, ACC synthase, which is also induced by, , 455, , stress and is the rate-limiting step in ethylene biosynthesis, (see Chapter 22), is induced by high levels of auxin., To be induced, the promoters of the early auxin genes, must contain response elements that bind to the transcription factors that become activated in the presence of auxin., A limited number of these response elements appear to be, arranged combinatorily within the promoters of a variety, of auxin-induced genes., , Auxin-Responsive Domains Are Composite, Structures, A conserved auxin response element (AuxRE) within the, promoters of the early auxin genes, like GH3, is usually, combined with other response elements to form auxin, response domains (AuxRDs). For example, the GH3 gene, promoter of soybean is composed of three independently, acting AuxRDs (each containing multiple AuxREs) that, contribute incrementally to the strong auxin inducibility of, the promoter., , Early Auxin Genes Are Regulated by Auxin, Response Factors, As noted previously, early auxin genes are by definition, insensitive to protein synthesis inhibitors such as cycloheximide. Instead of being inhibited, the expression of, many of the early auxin genes has been found to be stimulated by cycloheximide., Cycloheximide stimulation of gene expression is accomplished both by transcriptional activation and by mRNA, stabilization. Transcriptional activation of a gene by, inhibitors of protein synthesis usually indicates that the, gene is being repressed by a short-lived repressor protein, or by a regulatory pathway that involves a protein with a, high turnover rate., A family of auxin response factors (ARFs) function as, transcriptional activators by binding to the auxin response, element TGTCTC, which is present in the promoters of GH3, and other early auxin response genes. Mutations in ARF, genes result in severe developmental defects. To bind the, AuxRE stably, ARFs must form dimers. It has been proposed, that ARF dimers promote transcription by binding to two, AuxREs arranged in a palindrome (Ulmasov et al. 1997)., Recent studies also indicate that proteins encoded by the, AUX/IAA gene family (itself one of the early auxin, response gene families) can inhibit the transcription of, early auxin response genes by forming inactive heterodimers with ARFs. These inactive heterodimers may act, to inhibit ARF–AuxRE binding, thereby blocking either, gene activation or repression. AUX/IAA proteins may thus, function as ARF inhibitors., It is now believed that auxin induces the transcription, of the early response genes by promoting the proteolytic, degradation of the inhibitory AUX/IAA proteins so that, active ARF dimers can form. The precise mechanism by
Page 507 :
456, , Chapter 19, , 1. In the absence, of IAA, the, transcription, factor, ARF, forms, inactive, heterodimers with, AUX/IAA proteins., Inactive ARF, heterodimer, ARF, AUX/IAA, , 3. In the presence of, auxin, AUX/IAA, proteins are targeted, for destruction by an, activated ubiquitin, ligase., , IAA, , 5. IAA-induced, degradation of the, AUX/IAA proteins, allows active ARF, homodimers to, form., , Signal, transduction, pathway, , Active ARF, homodimer, , ARF, TGTCTC, , Activation of, ubiquitin ligase, , ARF, CTCTGT, , DNA, , Palindromic AuxRE, AUX/IAA and, other early genes, 2. Inactive heterodimers block the, transcription of the, early auxin genes., There is no auxin, response., , ATP, , Ubiquitin, , Ubi, AUX/IAA, , 4. The AUX/IAA, proteins are tagged, with ubiquitin and, degraded by the, 26S proteasome., , 6. The active ARF, homodimers bind to, palindromic AuxREs in, the promoters of the, early genes, activating, transcription., AUX/IAA and, other early genes, , Auxin-mediated, growth/development, Proteasome, , 8. The stimulation, of AUX/IAA genes, introduces a, negative feedback, loop., , 7. Transcription of, the early genes, initiates the auxin, response., , FIGURE 19.41 A model for auxin regulation of transcriptional activation of early, , response genes by auxin. (After Gray et al. 2001.), , which auxin causes AUX/IAA turnover is unknown,, although it is known to involve ubiquitination by a ubiquitin ligase and proteolysis by the massive 26S proteasome, complex (see Chapter 14 on the web site) (Gray et al. 2001;, Zenser et al. 2001). Note that a negative feedback loop is, introduced into the pathway by virtue of the fact that one, of the gene families turned on by auxin is AUX/IAA, which, inhibits the response., A model for auxin regulation of the early response, genes based on the findings described here is shown in, Figure 19.41., , SUMMARY, Auxin was the first hormone to be discovered in plants and, is one of an expanding list of chemical signaling agents that, regulate plant development. The most common naturally, occurring form of auxin is indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). One, of the most important roles of auxin in higher plants is the, regulation of elongation growth in young stems and, coleoptiles. Low levels of auxin are also required for root, elongation, although at higher concentrations auxin acts as, a root growth inhibitor., , Accurate measurement of the amount of auxin in plant, tissues is critical for understanding the role of this hormone, in plant physiology. Early coleoptile-based bioassays have, been replaced by more accurate techniques, including, physicochemical methods and immunoassay., Regulation of growth in plants may depend in part on the, amount of free auxin present in plant cells, tissues, and, organs. There are two main pools of auxin in the cell: the, cytosol and the chloroplasts. Levels of free auxin can be modulated by several factors, including the synthesis and breakdown of conjugated IAA, IAA metabolism, compartmentation, and polar auxin transport. Several pathways have been, implicated in IAA biosynthesis, including tryptophan-dependent and tryptophan-independent pathways. Several, degradative pathways for IAA have also been identified., IAA is synthesized primarily in the apical bud and is, transported polarly to the root. Polar transport is thought, to occur mainly in the parenchyma cells associated with the, vascular tissue. Polar auxin transport can be divided into, two main processes: IAA influx and IAA efflux. In accord, with the chemiosmotic model for polar transport, there are, two modes of IAA influx: by a pH-dependent passive, transport of the undissociated form, or by an active H+
Page 508 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, cotransport mechanism driven by the plasma membrane, H+-ATPase., Auxin efflux is thought to occur preferentially at the, basal ends of the transporting cells via anion efflux carriers, and to be driven by the membrane potential generated by, the plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Auxin transport, inhibitors (ATIs) can interrupt auxin transport directly by, competing with auxin for the efflux channel pore or by, binding to regulatory or structural proteins associated with, the efflux channel. Auxin can be transported nonpolarly in, the phloem., Auxin-induced cell elongation begins after a lag time of, about 10 minutes. Auxin promotes elongation growth primarily by increasing cell wall extensibility. Auxin-induced, wall loosening requires continuous metabolic input and is, mimicked in part by treatment with acidic buffers., According to the acid growth hypothesis, one of the, important actions of auxin is to induce cells to transport, protons into the cell wall by stimulating the plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Two mechanisms have been proposed, for auxin-induced proton extrusion: direct activation of the, proton pump and enhanced synthesis of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase. The ability of protons to cause cell wall, loosening is mediated by a class of proteins called, expansins. Expansins loosen the cell wall by breaking, hydrogen bonds between the polysaccharide components, of the wall. In addition to proton extrusion, long-term, auxin-induced growth involves the uptake of solutes and, the synthesis and deposition of polysaccharides and proteins needed to maintain the acid-induced wall-loosening, capacity., Promotion of growth in stems and coleoptiles and inhibition of growth in roots are the best-studied physiological, effects of auxins. Auxin-promoted differential growth in, these organs is responsible for the responses to directional, stimuli (i.e., light, gravity) called tropisms. According to the, Cholodny–Went model, auxin is transported laterally to the, shaded side during phototropism and to the lower side, during gravitropism. Statoliths (starch-filled amyloplasts), in the statocytes are involved in the normal percepton of, gravity, but they are not absolutely required., In addition to its roles in growth and tropisms, auxin, plays central regulatory roles in apical dominance, lateralroot initiation, leaf abscission, vascular differentiation, floral bud formation, and fruit development. Commercial, applications of auxins include rooting compounds and herbicides., The auxin-binding soluble protein ABP1 is a strong candidate for the auxin receptor. ABP1 is located primarily in, the ER lumen. Studies of the signal transduction pathways, involved in auxin action have implicated other signaling, intermediates such as Ca2+, intracellular pH, and kinases, in auxin-induced cell division., Auxin-induced genes fall into two categories: early and, late. Induction of early genes by auxin does not require, , 457, , protein synthesis and is insensitive to protein synthesis, inhibitors. The early genes fall into three functional classes:, expression of the late genes (secondary response genes),, stress adaptation, and intercellular signaling. The auxin, response domains of the promoters of the auxin early genes, have a composite structure in which an auxin-inducible, response element is combined with a constitutive response, element. Auxin-induced genes may be negatively regulated, by repressor proteins that are degraded via a ubiquitin activation pathway., , Web Material, Web Topics, 19.1, , Additional Synthetic Auxins, Biologically active synthetic auxins have, suprisingly diverse structures., , 19.2, , The Structural Requirements for Auxin, Activity, Comparisons of a wide variety of compounds, that possess auxin activity have revealed, common features at the molecular level that, are essential for biological activity., , 19.3, , Auxin Measurement by Radioimmunoassy, Radioimmunoassay (RIA) allows the measurement of physiological levels (10−9 g = 1 ng) of, IAA in plant tissues., , 19.4, , Evidence for the Tryptophan-Independent, Biosynthesis of IAA, Additional experimental evidence for the, tryptophan-independent biosynthesis of IAA, is provided., , 19.5, , The Multiple Factors That Regulate SteadyState IAA Levels, The steady-state level of free IAA in the, cytosol is determined by several interconnected processes, including synthesis, degradation, conjugation, compartmentation and, transport., , 19.6, , The Mechanism of Fusicoccin Activation of, the Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase, Fusicoccin, a phytotoxin produced by the fungus Fusicoccum amygdale, causes membrane, hyperpolarization and proton extrusion in, nearly all plant tissues, and acts as a “superauxin“ in elongation assays., , 19.7, , The Fluence Response of Phototropism, The effect of light dose on phototropism is, described and a model explaining the phenomenon is presented.
Page 509 :
458, , Chapter 19, , Chapter References, 19.8, , Differential SAUR Gene Expression during, Gravitropism, SAUR gene expression is used to detect the, lateral auxin gradient during gravitropism., , 19.9, , Gravity Perception without Statoliths in, Chara, The giant-celled freshwater alga, Chara, bends, in response to gravity without any apparent, statoliths., , 19.10 The Role of Cytokinins in Apical Dominance, In the Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii, there is, a correlation between cytokinin levels and axillary bud growth., , 19.11 The Role of ABA in Apical Dominance, In Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) axillary bud, growth is correlated with a reduction in ABA., , 19.12 The Facilitation of IAA Measurements by, GH3-Based Reporter Constructs, Because GH3 expression is a good reflection, of the presence of endogenous auxin, a GH3based reporter gene, known as DR5, is widely, used in auxin bioassays., , 19.13 The Effect of Auxin on Ubiquitin-Mediated, Degradation of AUX/IAA Proteins, A model for auxin-regulated degradation of, AUX/IAA proteins is discussed., , Web Essays, 19.1, , 19.2, , 19.3, , Brassinosteroids: A New Class of Plant, Steroid Hormones, Brassinosteroids have been implicated in a, wide range of developmental phenomena in, plants, including stem elongation, inhibition, of root growth, and ethylene biosynthesis., Exploring the Cellular Basis of Polar Auxin, Transport., Experimental evidence indicates that the, polar transport of the plant hormone auxin is, regulated at the cellular level.This implies that, proteins involved in auxin transport must be, asymmetrically distributed on the plasma, membrane. How those transport proteins get, to their destination is the focus of ongoing, research., Phototropism: From Photoperception to, Auxin-Dependent Changes in Gene Expression, How photoperception by phototropins is, coupled to auxin signaling is the subject of, this essay., , Abel, S., Ballas, N., Wong, L-M., and Theologis, A. (1996) DNA elements responsive to auxin. Bioessays 18: 647–654., Aloni, R. (2001) Foliar and axial aspects of vascular differentiation:, Hypotheses and evidence. J. Plant Growth Regul. 20: 22–34., Aloni, R. (1995) The induction of vascular tissue by auxin and, cytokinin. In Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth, Development, 2nd ed., P. J. Davies, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht,, Netherlands, pp. 531–546., Aloni, R., Schwalm, K., Langhans, M., and Ullrich, C. I. (2002), Gradual shifts in sites and levels of auxin synthesis during leafprimordium development and their role in vascular differentiation and leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Manuscript submitted for publication., Bartel, B. (1997) Auxin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant, Mol. Biol. 48: 51–66., Bennett, M. J., Marchand, A., Green, H. G., May, S. T., Ward, S. P.,, Millner, P. A., Walker, A. R., Schultz, B., and Feldmann, K. A., (1996) Arabidopsis AUX1 gene: A permease-like regulator of, root gravitropism. Science 273: 948–950., Bernasconi, P. (1996) Effect of synthetic and natural protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors on auxin efflux in zucchini (Cucurbita, pepo) hypocotyls. Physiol. Plant. 96: 205–210., Briggs, W. R., Beck, C. F., Cashmore, A. R., Christie, J. M., Hughes,, J., Jarillo, J. A., Kagawa, T., Kanegae, H., Liscum, E., Nagatani,, A., Okada, K., Salomon, M., Ruediger, W., Sakai, T., Takano, M.,, Wada, M., and Watson, J. C. (2001) The phototropin family of, photoreceptors. Plant Cell 13: 993–997., Brown, D. E., Rashotte, A. M, Murphy, A. S., Normanly, J., Tague,, B.W., Peer W. A., Taiz, L., and Muday, G. K. (2001) Flavonoids, act as negative regulators of auxin transport in vivo in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 126: 524–535., Celenza, J. L., Grisafi, P. L., and Fink, G. R. (1995) A pathway for, lateral root formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 9:, 2131–2142., Chen, J. G., Ullah, H., Young, J. C., Sussman, M. R., and Jones, A., M. (2001) ABP1 is required for organized cell elongation and, division in Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 15: 902–911., Chen, R., Hilson, P., Sedbrook, J., Rosen, E., Caspar, T., and Masson, P. H. (1998) The Arabidopsis thaliana AGRAVITROPIC 1, gene encodes a component of the polar-auxin-transport efflux, carrier. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 15112–15117., Cleland, R. E. (1995) Auxin and cell elongation. In Plant Hormones, and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development, 2nd ed., P. J., Davies, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 214–227., Fasano, J. M., Swanson, S. J., Blancaflor, E. B., Dowd, P. E., Kao, T., H., and Gilroy, S. (2001) Changes in root cap pH are required, for the gravity response of the Arabidopsis root. Plant Cell 13:, 907–921., Friml, J., Wlšniewska, J., Benková, E., Mendgen, K., and Palme, K., (2002) Lateral relocation of auxin efflux regulator PIN3 mediates tropism in Arabidopsis. Nature 415: 806–809., Fujihira, K., Kurata, T., Watahiki, M. K., Karahara, I., and, Yamamoto, K. T. (2000) An agravitropic mutant of Arabidopsis, endodermal-amyloplast less 1, that lacks amyloplasts in, hypocotyl endodermal cell layer. Plant Cell Physiol. 41:, 1193–1199., Galston, A. (1994) Life Processes of Plants. Scientific American, Library, New York., Garbers, C., DeLong, A., Deruere, J., Bernasconi, P., and Soll, D., (1996) A mutation in protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit affects auxin transport in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 15:, 2115–2124., Geldner, N., Friml, J., Stierhof, Y. D., Jurgens, G., and Palme, K., (2001) Auxin transport inhibitors block PIN1 cycling and vesicle trafficking. Nature. 413: 425–428.
Page 510 :
Auxin: The Growth Hormone, Gocal, G. F. W., Pharis, R. P., Yeung, E. C., and Pearce, D. (1991), Changes after decapitation in concentrations of IAA and, abscisic acid in the larger axillary bud of Phaseolus vulgaris L., cultivar Tender Green. Plant Physiol. 95: 344–350., Gray, W. M., Kepinski, S., Rouse, D., Leyser, O., and Estelle, M., (2001) Auxin regulates the SCFTIR1–dependent degradation of, AUX/IAA proteins. Nature 414: 271–276., Hartmann, H. T., and Kester, D. E. (1983) Plant Propagation:, Principles and Practices, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., N.J., Hasenstein, K. H., and Evans, M. L. (1988) Effects of cations on, hormone transport in primary roots of Zea mays. Plant Physiol., 86: 890–894., Hsieh, H. L., Okamoto, H, Wang, M. L., Ang, L. H., Matsui, M.,, Goodman, H., Deng, XW. (2000) FIN219, an Auxin-regulated, gene, defines a link between phytochrome A and the downstream regulator COP1 in light control of Arabidopsis development. Genes Dev. 14: 1958–1970., Iino, M., and Briggs, W. R. (1984) Growth distribution during first, positive phototropic curvature of maize coleoptiles. Plant Cell, Environ. 7: 97–104., Jacobs, M., and Gilbert, S. F. (1983) Basal localization of the presumptive auxin carrier in pea stem cells. Science 220: 1297–1300., Jacobs, M., and Rubery, P. H. (1988) Naturally occurring auxin, transport regulators. Science 241: 346–349., Jacobs, M, and Ray, P. M. (1976) Rapid auxin-induced decrease in, the free space pH and its relationship to auxin-induced growth, in maize and pea. Plant Physiol. 58: 203–209., Kim, Y.-S., Min, J.-K., Kim, D., and Jung, J. (2001) A soluble auxinbinding protein, ABP57. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 10730–10736., Koens, K. B., Nicoloso, F. T., Harteveld, M., Libbenga, K. R., and, Kijne, J. W. (1995) Auxin starvation results in G2-arrest in suspension-cultured tobacco cells. J. Plant Physiol. 147: 391–396., Kuhlemeier, C. and Reinhardt, D. (2001) Auxin and Phyllotaxis., Trends in Plant Science. 6: 187–189., Langridge, W. H. R., Fitzgerald, K. J., Koncz, C., Schell, J., and Szalay, A. A. (1989) Dual promoter of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, mannopine synthase genes is regulated by plant growth hormones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 3219–3223., Ljung, K., Bhalerao, R. P., and Sandberg, G. (2001) Sites and homeostatic control of auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis during vegetative growth. Plant J. 29: 325–332., Lomax, T. L. (1986) Active auxin uptake by specific plasma membrane carriers. In Plant Growth Substances, M. Bopp, ed.,, Springer, Berlin, pp. 209–213., Marchant, A., Kargul, J., May, S. T., Muller, P., Delbarre, A., PerrotRechenmann, C., and Bennet, M. J. (1999) AUX1 regulates root, gravitropism in Arabidopsis by facilitating auxin uptake within, root apical tissues. EMBO J. 18: 2066–2073., McClure, B. A., and Guilfoyle, T. (1989) Rapid redistribution of, auxin-regulated RNAs during gravitropism. Science 243: 91–93., Mulkey, T. I., Kuzmanoff, K. M., and Evans, M. L. (1981) Correlations between proton-efflux and growth patterns during, geotropism and phototropism in maize and sunflower. Planta, 152: 239–241., Müller, A., Guan, C., Gälweiler, L., Taenzler, P., Huijser, P.,, Marchant, A., Parry, G., Bennett, M., Wisman, E., and Palme,, K. (1998) AtPIN2 defines a locus of Arabidopsis for root gravitropism control. EMBO J. 17: 6903–6911., Murphy, A. S., Peer W. A., and Taiz, L. (2000) Regulation of auxin, transport by aminopeptidases and endogenous flavonoids., Planta 211: 315–324., Nakazawa, M., Yabe, N., Ishikawa, T., Yamamoto, Y. Y. Yoshizumi,, T., Hasunuma, K., Matsui, M. (2001) DFL1, an auxin-responsive GH3 gene homologue, negatively regulates shoot cell elongation and lateral root formation, and positively regulates the, light response of hypocotyls length. Plant J. 25: 213–221., Nonhebel, J. M., T. P. Cooney, and R. Simpson. (1993) The route,, control and compartmentation of auxin synthesis. Aust J. Plant, Physiol. 20: 527–539., , 459, , Normanly, J. P., Slovin, J., and Cohen, J. (1995) Rethinking auxin, biosynthesis and metabolism. Plant Physiol. 107: 323–329., Palme, K., and Gälweiler, L. (1999) PIN-pointing the molecular, basis of auxin transport. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2: 375–381., Parry, G., Delbarre, A., Marchant, A., Swarup, R., Napier, R., Perrot-Rechenmann, C., Bennett, M. J. (2001) Novel auxin transport inhibitors phenocopy the auxin influx carrier mutation, aux1. Plant J. 25: 399–406., Peer, W. A., Brown, D., Taiz, L., Muday, G. K., and Murphy, A. S., (2001) Flavonol accumulation patterns correlate with developmental phenotypes of transparent testa mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 126: 536–548., Peltier, J.-B., and Rossignol, M. (1996) Auxin-induced differential, sensitivity of the H+-ATPase in plasma membrane subfractions, from tobacco cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 219:, 492–496., Romano, C. P., Hein, M. B., and Klee, H. J. (1991) Inactivation of, auxin in tobacco transformed with the indoleacetic acid-lysine, synthetase gene of Pseudomonas savastanoi. Genes Dev. 5:, 438–446., Schmidt, R. C., Müller, A., Hain, R., Bartling, D., and Weiler, E. W., (1996) Transgenic tobacco plants expressing Arabidopsis thaliana, nitrilase II enzyme. Plant J. 9: 683–691., Shaw, S., and Wilkins, M. B. (1973) The source and lateral transport of growth inhibitors in geotropically stimulated roots of, Zea mays and Pisum sativum. Planta 109: 11–26., Sievers, A., Buchen, B., and Hodick, D. (1996) Gravity sensing in, tip-growing cells. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 273–279., Sitbon, F., Edlund, A., Gardestrom, P., Olsson, O., and Sandberg,, G. (1993) Compartmentation of indole-3-acetic acid metabolism in protoplasts isolated from leaves of wild-type and IAAoverproducing transgenic tobacco plants. Planta 191: 274–279., Steffens, B., Feckler, C., Palme, K., Christian, M., Bottger, M., and, Luthen, H. (2001) The auxin signal for protoplast swelling is, perceived by extracellular ABP1. Plant J. 27: 1–10., Swarup, R., Friml, J., Marchant, A., Ljung, K., Sandberg, G., Palme,, K., and Bennett, M. (2001) Localization of the auxin permease, AUX1 suggests two functionally distinct hormone transport, pathways operate in the Arabidopsis root apex. Genes Dev. 15:, 2648–2653., Ulmasov, T., Murfett, J., Hagen, G., and Guilfoyle, T. J. (1997), Aux/IAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. Plant Cell. 9: 1963–1971., Utsuno, K., Shikanai, T., Yamada, Y., and Hashimoto, T. (1998), AGR, an AGRAVITROPIC locus of Arabidopsis thaliana,, encodes a novel membrane protein family member. Plant Cell, Physiol. 39: 1111–1118., Venis, M. A., and Napier, R. M. (1997) Auxin perception and signal transduction. In Signal Transduction in Plants, P. Aducci, ed.,, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 45–63., Venis, M. A., Napier, R. M., Oliver, S. (1996) Molecular analysis of, auxin-specific signal transduction. Plant Growth Regulation. 18:, 1–6., Volkmann, D., and Sievers, A. (1979) Graviperception in multicellular organs. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series,, Vol. 7, W. Haupt and M. E. Feinleib, eds., Springer, Berlin, pp., 573–600., Wright, A. D., Sampson, M. B., Neuffer, M. G., Michalczuk, L. P.,, Slovin, J., and Cohen, J. (1991) Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis in the mutant maize orange pericarp, a tryptophan auxotroph. Science 254: 998–1000., Yoder, T. L., Zheng, H.-Q., Todd, P., and Staehelin, L. A. (2001), Amyloplast sedimentation dynamics in maize columella cells, support a new model for the gravity-sensing apparatus of, roots. Plant Physiol. 125: 1045–1060.
Page 511 :
460, , Chapter 19, , Young, L. M., and Evans, M. L. (1994) Calcium-dependent asymmetric movement of 3H-indole-3-acetic acid across gravistimulated isolated root caps of maize. Plant Growth Regul. 14:, 235–242., Young, L. M., and Evans, M. L. (1996) Patterns of auxin and, abscisic acid movement in the tips of gravistimulated primary, roots of maize. Plant Growth Regul. 20: 253–258., Young, L. M., Evans, M. L., and Hertel, R. (1990) Correlations, between gravitropic curvature and auxin movement across, gravistimulated roots of Zea mays. Plant Physiol. 92: 792–796., , Zenser, N., Ellsmore, A., Leasure, C., and Callis, J. (2001) Auxin, modulates the degradation rate of Aux/IAA proteins. Proc., Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 11795–11800., Zheng, H. Q., and Staehelin, L. A. (2001) Nodal endoplasmic reticulum, a specialized form of endoplasmic reticulum found in, gravity-sensing root tip columella cells. Plant Physiol. 125:, 252–265.
Page 512 :
Chapter, , 20, , Gibberellins:, Regulators of Plant Height, , FOR NEARLY 30 YEARS after the discovery of auxin in 1927, and more, than 20 years after its structural elucidation as indole-3-acetic acid, Western plant scientists tried to ascribe the regulation of all developmental, phenomena in plants to auxin. However, as we will see in this and subsequent chapters, plant growth and development are regulated by several different types of hormones acting individually and in concert., In the 1950s the second group of hormones, the gibberellins (GAs),, was characterized. The gibberellins are a large group of related compounds (more than 125 are known) that, unlike the auxins, are defined, by their chemical structure rather than by their biological activity. Gibberellins are most often associated with the promotion of stem growth,, and the application of gibberellin to intact plants can induce large, increases in plant height. As we will see, however, gibberellins play, important roles in a variety of physiological phenomena., The biosynthesis of gibberellins is under strict genetic, developmental, and environmental control, and numerous gibberellin-deficient, mutants have been isolated. Mendel’s tall/dwarf alleles in peas are a, famous example. Such mutants have been useful in elucidating the complex pathways of gibberellin biosynthesis., We begin this chapter by describing the discovery, chemical structure,, and role of gibberellins in regulating various physiological processes,, including seed germination, mobilization of endosperm storage reserves,, shoot growth, flowering, floral development, and fruit set. We then, examine biosynthesis of the gibberellins, as well as identification of the, active form of the hormone., In recent years, the application of molecular genetic approaches has, led to considerable progress in our understanding of the mechanism of, gibberellin action at the molecular level. These advances will be discussed at the end of the chapter.
Page 513 :
462, , Chapter 20, , THE DISCOVERY OF THE GIBBERELLINS, Although gibberellins did not become known to American, and British scientists until the 1950s, they had been discovered much earlier by Japanese scientists. Rice farmers, in Asia had long known of a disease that makes the rice, plants grow tall but eliminates seed production. In Japan, this disease was called the “foolish seedling,” or bakanae,, disease., Plant pathologists investigating the disease found that, the tallness of these plants was induced by a chemical, secreted by a fungus that had infected the tall plants. This, chemical was isolated from filtrates of the cultured fungus, and called gibberellin after Gibberella fujikuroi, the name of, the fungus., In the 1930s Japanese scientists succeeded in obtaining, impure crystals of two fungal growth-active compounds,, which they termed gibberellin A and B, but because of communication barriers and World War II, the information did, not reach the West. Not until the mid-1950s did two, groups—one at the Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), research station at Welyn in Britain, the other at the U.S., Department of Agriculture (USDA) in Peoria, Illinois—succeed in elucidating the structure of the material that they, had purified from fungal culture filtrates, which they, named gibberellic acid:, O, , HO, , CO, , CH3, , OH, H, , CH2, COOH, , Gibberellic acid (GA3 ), , At about the same time scientists at Tokyo University, isolated three gibberellins from the original gibberellin A, and named them gibberellin A1, gibberellin A2, and gibberellin A3. Gibberellin A3 and gibberellic acid proved to, be identical., It became evident that an entire family of gibberellins, exists and that in each fungal culture different gibberellins, predominate, though gibberellic acid is always a principal, component. As we will see, the structural feature that all, gibberellins have in common, and that defines them as a, family of molecules, is that they are derived from the entkaurene ring structure:, , rosette plants, particularly in genetically dwarf peas (Pisum, sativum), dwarf maize (Zea mays), and many rosette plants., In contrast, plants that were genetically very tall showed, no further response to applied gibberellins. More recently,, experiments with dwarf peas and dwarf corn have confirmed that the natural elongation growth of plants is regulated by gibberellins, as we will describe later., Because applications of gibberellins could increase the, height of dwarf plants, it was natural to ask whether plants, contain their own gibberellins. Shortly after the discovery, of the growth effects of gibberellic acid, gibberellin-like, substances were isolated from several species of plants.1, Gibberellin-like substance refers to a compound or an extract, that has gibberellin-like biological activity, but whose, chemical structure has not yet been defined. Such a, response indicates, but does not prove, that the tested substance is a gibberellin., In 1958 a gibberellin (gibberellin A1) was conclusively, identified from a higher plant (runner bean seeds, Phaseolus coccineus):, O, H, , CO, , HO, , OH, CH2, COOH, , CH3, , Gibberellin A1 (GA1), , Because the concentration of gibberellins in immature, seeds far exceeds that in vegetative tissue, immature seeds, were the tissue of choice for gibberellin extraction. However,, because the concentration of gibberellins in plants is very, low (usually 1–10 parts per billion for the active gibberellin, in vegetative tissue and up to 1 part per million of total gibberellins in seeds), chemists had to use truckloads of seeds., As more and more gibberellins from fungal and plant, sources were characterized, they were numbered as gibberellin AX (or GAX), where X is a number, in the order of, their discovery. This scheme was adopted for all gibberellins in 1968. However, the number of a gibberellin is, simply a cataloging convenience, designed to prevent, chaos in the naming of the gibberellins. The system implies, no close chemical similarity or metabolic relationship, between gibberellins with adjacent numbers., All gibberellins are based on the ent-gibberellane skeleton:, 11, 1, , CH2, , 2, , 9, 10, , A, , 5, , 3, , B, , 4, 18, , 19, , H, , 13, 14, , H, 8, , D, , 16, , 17, , 6 7 15, , ent-Gibberellane structure, , ent-Kaurene, , As gibberellic acid became available, physiologists began, testing it on a wide variety of plants. Spectacular responses, were obtained in the elongation growth of dwarf and, , 12, , C, , 20, , 1, , Phinney (1983) provides a wonderful personal account of, the history of gibberellin discoveries.
Page 514 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, Some gibberellins have the full complement of 20 carbons, (C20-GAs):, 20, , H3C, H, , H3C, , H, COOH, , CH2, , 6 7, , COOH, , GA12 (a C20-gibberellin), , Others have only 19 (C19-GAs), having lost one carbon to, metabolism., There are other variations in the basic structure, especially the oxidation state of carbon 20 (in C20-GAs) and the, number and position of hydroxyl groups on the molecule, (see Web Topic 20.1). Despite the plethora of gibberellins, present in plants, genetic analyses have demonstrated that, only a few are biologically active as hormones. All the others serve as precursors or represent inactivated forms., , EFFECTS OF GIBBERELLIN ON, GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, Though they were originally discovered as the cause of a, disease of rice that stimulated internode elongation,, endogenous gibberellins influence a wide variety of developmental processes. In addition to stem elongation, gibberellins control various aspects of seed germination,, including the loss of dormancy and the mobilization of, endosperm reserves. In reproductive development, gibberellin can affect the transition from the juvenile to the, mature stage, as well as floral initiation, sex determination,, and fruit set. In this section we will review some of these, gibberellin-regulated phenomena., , Gibberellins Stimulate Stem Growth in Dwarf and, Rosette Plants, Applied gibberellin promotes internodal elongation in a, wide range of species. However, the most dramatic stimulations are seen in dwarf and rosette species, as well as, members of the grass family. Exogenous GA3 causes such, extreme stem elongation in dwarf plants that they resemble the tallest varieties of the same species (Figure 20.1)., Accompanying this effect are a decrease in stem thickness,, a decrease in leaf size, and a pale green color of the leaves., Some plants assume a rosette form in short days and, undergo shoot elongation and flowering only in long days, (see Chapter 24). Gibberellin application results in bolting, (stem growth) in plants kept in short days (Figure 20.2),, and normal bolting is regulated by endogenous gibberellin., , FIGURE 20.1 The effect of exogenous GA1 on normal and, dwarf (d1) corn. Gibberellin stimulates dramatic stem elongation in the dwarf mutant but has little or no effect on the, tall wild-type plant. (Courtesy of B. Phinney.), , 463, , In addition, as noted earlier, many long-day rosette plants, have a cold requirement for stem elongation and flowering, and this requirement is overcome by applied gibberellin., GA also promotes internodal elongation in members of, the grass family. The target of gibberellin action is the intercalary meristem—a meristem near the base of the internode that produces derivatives above and below. Deepwater rice is a particularly striking example. We will, examine the effects of gibberellin on the growth of deepwater rice in the section on the mechanism of gibberellininduced stem elongation later in the chapter., Although stem growth may be dramatically enhanced, by GAs, gibberellins have little direct effect on root growth., However, the root growth of extreme dwarfs is less than, that of wild-type plants, and gibberellin application to the, shoot enhances both shoot and root growth. Whether the, effect of gibberellin on root growth is direct or indirect is, currently unresolved., , Gibberellins Regulate the Transition from Juvenile, to Adult Phases, Many woody perennials do not flower until they reach a, certain stage of maturity; up to that stage they are said to
Page 515 :
464, , Chapter 20, especially rosette species (see Chapter 24). Gibberellin is, thus a component of the flowering stimulus in some plants,, but apparently not in others., In plants where flowers are unisexual rather than hermaphroditic, floral sex determination is genetically regulated. However, it is also influenced by environmental factors, such as photoperiod and nutritional status, and these, environmental effects may be mediated by gibberellin. In, maize, for example, the staminate flowers (male) are, restricted to the tassel, and the pistillate flowers (female), are contained in the ear. Exposure to short days and cool, nights increases the endogenous gibberellin levels in the, tassels 100-fold and simultaneously causes feminization of, the tassel flowers. Application of exogenous gibberellic acid, to the tassels can also induce pistillate flowers., For studies on genetic regulation, a large collection of, maize mutants that have altered patterns of sex determination have been isolated. Mutations in genes that affect, either gibberellin biosynthesis or gibberellin signal transduction result in a failure to suppress stamen development, in the flowers of the ear (Figure 20.3). Thus the primary role, of gibberellin in sex determination in maize seems to be to, suppress stamen development (Irish 1996)., In dicots such as cucumber, hemp, and spinach, gibberellin seems to have the opposite effect. In these species,, application of gibberellin promotes the formation of staminate flowers, and inhibitors of gibberellin biosynthesis, promote the formation of pistillate flowers., , Gibberellins Promote Fruit Set, , FIGURE 20.2 Cabbage, a long-day plant, remains as a, rosette in short days, but it can be induced to bolt and, flower by applications of gibberellin. In the case illustrated,, giant flowering stalks were produced. (© Sylvan, Wittwer/Visuals Unlimited.), , Applications of gibberellins can cause fruit set (the initiation of fruit growth following pollination) and growth of, some fruits, in cases where auxin may have no effect. For, example, stimulation of fruit set by gibberellin has been, observed in apple (Malus sylvestris)., , Gibberellins Promote Seed Germination, Seed germination may require gibberellins for one of several possible steps: the activation of vegetative growth of, , be juvenile (see Chapter 24). The juvenile and mature, stages often have different leaf forms, as in English ivy, (Hedera helix) (see Figure 24.9). Applied gibberellins can, regulate this juvenility in both directions, depending on the, species. Thus, in English ivy GA3 can cause a reversion, from a mature to a juvenile state, and many juvenile, conifers can be induced to enter the reproductive phase by, applications of nonpolar gibberellins such as GA4 + GA7., (The latter example is one instance in which GA3 is not, effective.), , Gibberellins Influence Floral Initiation and Sex, Determination, As already noted, gibberellin can substitute for the longday or cold requirement for flowering in many plants,, , FIGURE 20.3 Anthers develop in the ears of a gibberellindeficient dwarf mutant of corn (Zea mays). (Bottom), Unfertilized ear of the dwarf mutant an1, showing conspicuous anthers. (Top) Ear from a plant that has been treated, with gibberellin. (Courtesy of M. G. Neuffer.)
Page 516 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, the embryo, the weakening of a growth-constraining, endosperm layer surrounding the embryo, and the mobilization of stored food reserves of the endosperm. Some, seeds, particularly those of wild plants, require light or cold, to induce germination. In such seeds this dormancy (see, Chapter 23) can often be overcome by application of gibberellin. Since changes in gibberellin levels are often, but, not always, seen in response to chilling of seeds, gibberellins may represent a natural regulator of one or more, of the processes involved in germination., Gibberellin application also stimulates the production, of numerous hydrolases, notably α-amylase, by the aleurone layers of germinating cereal grains. This aspect of gibberellin action has led to its use in the brewing industry in, the production of malt (discussed in the next section)., Because this is the principal system in which gibberellin, signal transduction pathways have been analyzed, it will, be treated in detail later in the chapter., , Gibberellins Have Commercial Applications, The major uses of gibberellins (GA3, unless noted otherwise), applied as a spray or dip, are to manage fruit crops,, to malt barley, and to increase sugar yield in sugarcane. In, some crops a reduction in height is desirable, and this can, be accomplished by the use of gibberellin synthesis, inhibitors (see Web Topic 20.1)., , Fruit production. A major use of gibberellins is to increase, the stalk length of seedless grapes. Because of the shortness, of the individual fruit stalks, bunches of seedless grapes are, too compact and the growth of the berries is restricted. Gibberellin stimulates the stalks to grow longer, thereby allowing the grapes to grow larger by alleviating compaction, and, it promotes elongation of the fruit (Figure 20.4)., A mixture of benzyladenine (a cytokinin; see Chapter, 21) and GA4 + GA7 can cause apple fruit to elongate and is, used to improve the shape of Delicious-type apples under, certain conditions. Although this treatment does not affect, yield or taste, it is considered commercially desirable., In citrus fruits, gibberellins delay senescence, allowing the, fruits to be left on the tree longer to extend the market period., , Malting of barley. Malting is the first step in the brewing process. During malting, barley seeds (Hordeum vulgare), are allowed to germinate at temperatures that maximize, the production of hydrolytic enzymes by the aleurone, layer. Gibberellin is sometimes used to speed up the malting process. The germinated seeds are then dried and pulverized to produce “malt,” consisting mainly of a mixture, of amylolytic (starch-degrading) enzymes and partly, digested starch., During the subsequent “mashing” step, water is added, and the amylases in the malt convert the residual starch, as, well as added starch, to the disaccharide maltose, which is, converted to glucose by the enzyme maltase. The resulting, “wort” is then boiled to stop the reaction. In the final step,, , 465, , FIGURE 20.4 Gibberellin induces growth in Thompson’s, seedless grapes. The bunch on the left is an untreated control. The bunch on the right was sprayed with gibberellin, during fruit development. (© Sylvan Wittwer/Visuals, Unlimited.), , yeast converts the glucose in the wort to ethanol by fermentation., , Increasing sugarcane yields. Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) is one of relatively few plants that store their carbohydrate as sugar (sucrose) instead of starch (the other, important sugar-storing crop is sugar beet). Originally from, New Guinea, sugarcane is a giant perennial grass that can, grow from 4 to 6 m tall. The sucrose is stored in the central, vacuoles of the internode parenchyma cells. Spraying the, crop with gibberellin can increase the yield of raw cane by, up to 20 tons per acre, and the sugar yield by 2 tons per, acre. This increase is a result of the stimulation of internode, elongation during the winter season., , Uses in plant breeding., , The long juvenility period in, conifers can be detrimental to a breeding program by preventing the reproduction of desirable trees for many years., Spraying with GA4 + GA7 can considerably reduce the time, to seed production by inducing cones to form on very, young trees. In addition, the promotion of male flowers in, cucurbits, and the stimulation of bolting in biennial rosette, crops such as beet (Beta vulgaris) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea), are beneficial effects of gibberellins that are occasionally used commercially in seed production., , Gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitors. Bigger is not always, better. Thus, gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitors are used, commercially to prevent elongation growth in some plants., In floral crops, short, stocky plants such as lilies, chrysanthemums, and poinsettias are desirable, and restrictions on, elongation growth can be achieved by applications of gibberellin synthesis inhibitors such as ancymidol (known, commercially as A-Rest) or paclobutrazol (known as Bonzi).
Page 517 :
466, , Chapter 20, , Tallness is also a disadvantage for cereal crops grown in, cool, damp climates, as occur in Europe, where lodging can, be a problem. Lodging—the bending of stems to the ground, caused by the weight of water collecting on the ripened, heads—makes it difficult to harvest the grain with a combine harvester. Shorter internodes reduce the tendency of, the plants to lodge, increasing the yield of the crop. Even, genetically dwarf wheats grown in Europe are sprayed, with gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitors to further reduce, stem length and lodging., Yet another application of gibberellin biosynthesis, inhibitors is the restriction of growth in roadside shrub, plantings., , BIOSYNTHESIS AND METABOLISM OF, GIBBERELLIN, Gibberellins constitute a large family of diterpene acids and, are synthesized by a branch of the terpenoid pathway,, which was described in Chapter 13. The elucidation of the, gibberellin biosynthetic pathway would not have been possible without the development of sensitive methods of, detection. As noted earlier, plants contain a bewildering, array of gibberellins, many of which are biologically inactive., In this section we will discuss the biosynthesis of GAs, as, well as other factors that regulate the steady-state levels of, the biologically active form of the hormone in different, plant tissues., , Gibberellins Are Measured via Highly Sensitive, Physical Techniques, Systems of measurement using a biological response, called, bioassays, were originally important for detecting gibberellin-like activity in partly purified extracts and for, assessing the biological activity of known gibberellins (Fig-, , ure 20.5). The use of bioassays, however, has declined with, the development of highly sensitive physical techniques, that allow precise identification and quantification of specific gibberellins from small amounts of tissue., High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of, plant extracts, followed by the highly sensitive and selective analytical method of gas chromatography combined, with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), has now become the, method of choice. With the availability of published mass, spectra, researchers can now identify gibberellins without, possessing pure standards. The availability of heavy-isotope-labeled standards of common gibberellins, which can, themselves be separately detected on a mass spectrometer,, allows the accurate measurement of levels in plant tissues, by mass spectrometry with these heavy-isotope-labeled, gibberellins as internal standards for quantification (see, Web Topic 20.2)., , Gibberellins Are Synthesized via the Terpenoid, Pathway in Three Stages, Gibberellins are tetracyclic diterpenoids made up of four, isoprenoid units. Terpenoids are compounds made up of, five-carbon (isoprene) building blocks:, OH, CH2, , C, , CH, , CH2, , joined head to tail. Researchers have determined the entire, gibberellin biosynthetic pathway in seed and vegetative tissues of several species by feeding various radioactive precursors and intermediates and examining the production of, the other compounds of the pathway (Kobayashi et al. 1996)., The gibberellin biosynthetic pathway can be divided, into three stages, each residing in a different cellular compartment (Figure 20.6) (Hedden and Phillips 2000)., , FIGURE 20.5 Gibberellin causes, elongation of the leaf sheath of, rice seedlings, and this response, is used in the dwarf rice leaf, sheath bioassay. Here 4-day-old, seedlings were treated with different amounts of GA and, allowed to grow for another 5, days. (Courtesy of P. Davies.)
Page 520 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, , glucose, and it may be attached to the gibberellin via a carboxyl group forming a gibberellin glycoside, or via a, hydroxyl group forming a gibberellin glycosyl ether., When gibberellins are applied to a plant, a certain proportion usually becomes glycosylated. Glycosylation therefore represents another form of inactivation. In some cases,, applied glucosides are metabolized back to free GAs, so, glucosides may also be a storage form of gibberellins, (Schneider and Schmidt 1990)., , GA1, by hydroxylation of carbon 3. (Because this is in the, beta configuration [drawn as if the bond to the hydroxyl, group were toward the viewer], it is referred to as 3βhydroxylation.), Finally, GA1 is inactivated by its conversion to GA8 by a, hydroxylation on carbon 2. This hydroxylation can also, remove GA20 from the biosynthetic pathway by converting, it to GA29., Inhibitors of the third stage of the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway interfere with enzymes that utilize 2-oxoglutarate as cosubstrates. Among these, the compound prohexadione (BX-112), is especially useful because it, specifically inhibits GA 3-oxidase, the enzyme that converts, inactive GA20 to growth-active GA1., , GA1 Is the Biologically Active Gibberellin, Controlling Stem Growth, Knowledge of biosynthetic pathways for gibberellins reveals, where and how dwarf mutations act (Figure 20.7). Although, it had long been assumed that gibberellins were natural, growth regulators because gibberellin application caused, dwarf plants to grow tall, direct evidence was initially lacking., In the early 1980s it was demonstrated that tall stems do contain more bioactive gibberellin than dwarf stems have, and, that the level of the endogenous bioactive gibberellin mediates, the genetic control of tallness (Reid and Howell 1995)., The gibberellins of tall pea plants containing the, homozygous Le allele (wild type) were compared with, dwarf plants having the same genetic makeup, except containing the le allele (mutant). Le and le are the two alleles of, the gene that regulates tallness in peas, the genetic trait first, investigated by Gregor Mendel in his pioneering study in, 1866. We now know that tall peas contain much more bioactive GA1 than dwarf peas have (Ingram et al. 1983)., As we have seen, the precursor of GA1 in higher plants is, GA20 (GA1 is 3β-OH GA20). If GA20 is applied to homozygous dwarf (le) pea plants, they fail to respond, although they, do respond to applied GA1. The implication is that the Le, gene enables the plants to convert GA20 to GA1. Metabolic, studies using both stable and radioactive isotopes demonstrated conclusively that the Le gene encodes an enzyme that, 3β-hydroxylates GA20 to produce GA1 (Figure 20.8)., Mendel’s Le gene was isolated, and the recessive le allele, was shown to have a single base change leading to a defective enzyme only one-twentieth as active as the wild-type, , The Enzymes and Genes of the Gibberellin, Biosynthetic Pathway Have Been Characterized, The enzymes of the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway are, now known, and the genes for many of these enzymes, have been isolated and characterized (see Figure 20.7)., Most notable from a regulatory standpoint are two biosynthetic enzymes—GA 20-oxidase (GA20ox)3 and GA 3-oxidase (GA3ox)—and an enzyme involved in gibberellin, metabolism, GA 2-oxidase (GA2ox):, • GA 20-oxidase catalyzes all the reactions involving the, successive oxidation steps of carbon 20 between GA53, and GA20, including the removal of C-20 as CO2., • GA 3-oxidase functions as a 3β-hydroxylase, adding, a hydroxyl group to C-3 to form the active gibberellin, GA1. (The evidence demonstrating that GA1, is the active gibberellin will be discussed shortly.), • GA 2-oxidase inactivates GA1 by catalyzing the addition of a hydroxyl group to C-2., The transcription of the genes for the two gibberellin, biosynthetic enzymes, as well as for GA 2-oxidase, is highly, regulated. All three of these genes have sequences in common with each other and with other enzymes utilizing 2oxoglutarate and Fe2+ as cofactors. The common sequences, represent the binding sites for 2-oxoglutarate and, Fe2+., , Gibberellins May Be Covalently Linked to, Sugars, Although active gibberellins are free, a variety of, gibberellin glycosides are formed by a covalent, linkage between gibberellin and a sugar. These, gibberellin conjugates are particularly prevalent, in some seeds. The conjugating sugar is usually, , OH, , GA 20-oxidase means an enzyme that oxidizes at, carbon 20; it is not the same as GA20, which is gibberellin 20 in the GA numbering scheme., , OH, CH2, , H, O, , CH2, , H, O, , + OH, GA 3b-hydroxylase, , CO, , CO, H, , CH3, 3, , 469, , COOH, , HO, , H, , COOH, , CH3, GA20, , GA1, , FIGURE 20.8 Conversion of GA20 to GA1 by GA 3β-hydroxylase,, which adds a hydroxyl group (OH) to carbon 3 of GA20.
Page 521 :
470, , Chapter 20, , enzyme, so much less GA1 is produced and the plants are, dwarf (Lester et al. 1997)., , Endogenous GA1 Levels Are Correlated, with Tallness, , Length between nodes 4 and 6 (cm), , Although the shoots of gibberellin-deficient le dwarf peas are, much shorter than those of normal plants (internodes of 3 cm, in mature dwarf plants versus 15 cm in mature normal, plants), the mutation is “leaky” (i.e., the mutated gene produces a partially active enzyme) and some endogenous GA1, remains to cause growth. Different le alleles give rise to peas, differing in their height, and the height of the plant has been, correlated with the amount of endogenous GA1 (Figure 20.9)., There is also an extreme dwarf mutant of pea that has, even fewer gibberellins. This dwarf has the allele na (the, wild-type allele is Na), which completely blocks gibberellin, biosynthesis between ent-kaurene and GA12-aldehyde (Reid, and Howell 1995). As a result, homozygous (nana) mutants,, which are almost completely free of gibberellins, achieve a, stature of only about 1 cm at maturity (Figure 20.10)., However, nana plants may still possess an active GA 3βhydroxylase encoded by Le, and thus can convert GA20 to, GA1. If a nana naLe shoot is grafted onto a dwarf le plant,, the resulting plant is tall because the nana shoot tip can, convert the GA20 from the dwarf into GA1., Such observations have led to the conclusion that GA1, is the biologically active gibberellin that regulates tallness, in peas (Ingram et al. 1986; Davies 1995). The same result, has been obtained for maize, a monocot, in parallel studies, using genotypes that have blocks in the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway. Thus the control of stem elongation by GA1, appears to be universal., Although GA1 appears to be the primary active gibberellin in stem growth for most species, a few other gib-, , 16, GA1 content of pea plants, possessing three different, Le le alleles, , 12, , Le, , 8, , le-1, , 4, le-2, , 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, Endogenous GA1 (ng per plant), , FIGURE 20.9 Stem elongation corresponds closely to the, level of GA1. Here the GA1 content in peas with three different alleles at the Le locus is plotted against the internode, elongation in plants with those alleles. The allele le-2 is a, more intense dwarfing allele of Le than is the regular le-1, allele. There is a close correlation between the GA level and, internode elongation. (After Ross et al. 1989.), , Ultradwarf:, no GAs, nana, , Dwarf:, contains, GA20, Na le, , Tall:, contains, GA1, Na Le, , Ultratall:, contains, no GAs, na la cry s, , FIGURE 20.10 Phenotypes and genotypes of peas that differ in the, , gibberellin content of their vegetative tissue. (All alleles are, homozygous.) (After Davies 1995.)
Page 522 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, , 471, , berellins have biological activity in other species or tissues., For example, GA3, which differs from GA1 only in having, one double bond, is relatively rare in higher plants but is, able to substitute for GA1 in most bioassays:, O, , HO, , OH, H, , CO, , CH2, COOH, , CH3, , Gibberellic acid (GA3 ), , GA4, which lacks an OH group at C-13, is present in, both Arabidopsis and members of the squash family (Cucurbitaceae). It is as active as GA1, or even more active, in, some bioassays, indicating that GA4 is a bioactive gibberellin in the species where it occurs (Xu et al. 1997). The, structure of GA4 looks like this:, FIGURE 20.11 Gibberellin is synthesized mainly in the shoot, , O, H, , CO, HO, , H, CH3, , CH2, COOH, , Gibberellin A4 (GA4), , Gibberellins Are Biosynthesized in Apical Tissues, The highest levels of gibberellins are found in immature, seeds and developing fruits. However, because the gibberellin level normally decreases to zero in mature seeds,, there is no evidence that seedlings obtain any active gibberellins from their seeds., Work with pea seedlings indicates that the gibberellin, biosynthetic enzymes and GA3ox are specifically localized, in young, actively growing buds, leaves, and upper internodes (Elliott et al. 2001). In Arabidopsis, GA20ox is, expressed primarily in the apical bud and young leaves,, which thus appear to be the principal sites of gibberellin, synthesis (Figure 20.11)., The gibberellins that are synthesized in the shoot can be, transported to the rest of the plant via the phloem. Intermediates of gibberellin biosynthesis may also be translocated in the phloem. Indeed, the initial steps of gibberellin, biosynthesis may occur in one tissue, and metabolism to, active gibberellins in another., Gibberellins also have been identified in root exudates, and root extracts, suggesting that roots can also synthesize, gibberellins and transport them to the shoot via the xylem., , apex and in young developing leaves. This false color image, shows light emitted by transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the firefly luciferase coding sequence coupled to the, GA20ox gene promoter. The emitted light was recorded by a, CCD camera after the rosette was sprayed with the substrate, luciferin. The image was then color-coded for intensity and, superimposed on a photograph of the same plant. The red, and yellow regions correspond to the highest light intensity., (Courtesy of Jeremy P. Coles, Andrew L. Phillips, and Peter, Hedden, IACR-Long Ashton Research Station.), , available and the enzymes of gibberellin biosynthesis and, degradation are functional., For example, the application of gibberellin causes a, down-regulation of the biosynthetic genes—GA20ox and, GA3ox—and an elevation in transcription of the degradative gene—GA2ox (Hedden and Phillips 2000; Elliott et al., 2001). A mutation in the GA 2-oxidase gene, which prevents, GA1 from being degraded, is functionally equivalent to, applying exogenous gibberellin to the plant, and produces, the same effect on the biosynthetic gene transcription., Conversely, a mutation that lowers the level of active, gibberellin, such as GA1, in the plant stimulates the transcription of the biosynthetic genes—GA20ox and GA3ox—, and down-regulates the degradative enzyme—GA2ox. In, peas this is particularly evident in very dwarf plants, such, as those with a mutation in the LS gene (CPP synthase) or, even more severely dwarf na plants (defective GA12-aldehyde synthase) (Figure 20.12)., , Gibberellin Regulates Its Own Metabolism, , Environmental Conditions Can Alter the, Transcription of Gibberellin Biosynthesis Genes, , Endogenous gibberellin regulates its own metabolism by, either switching on or inhibiting the transcription of the, genes that encode enzymes of gibberellin biosynthesis and, degradation (feedback and feed-forward regulation,, respectively). In this way the level of active gibberellins is, kept within a narrow range, provided that precursors are, , Gibberellins play an important role in mediating the effects, of environmental stimuli on plant development. Environmental factors such as photoperiod and temperature can, alter the levels of active gibberellins by affecting gene transcription for specific steps in the biosynthetic pathway, (Yamaguchi and Kamiya 2000).
Page 523 :
472, , Chapter 20, , FIGURE 20.12 Northern blots of the, mRNA for the enzymes of gibberellin, biosynthesis in different tissues of, peas. The more intense the band, the, more mRNA was present. The plants, designated LS are tall wild-type, plants. Those designated ls are very, dwarf mutants due to a defective, copalyl diphosphate synthase that, creates a block in the GA biosynthesis, pathway. The differences in the spot, intensity show that a low level of, GA1 in the mutant ls plants causes, the upregulation of GA1 biosynthesis, by GA20ox and GA3ox, and a repression of GA1 breakdown by GA2ox., (From Elliott et al. 2001.), , Apical, ls, LS, , Leaflets, ls, LS, , ls, , Roots, LS, , PsGA20ox1, , PsGA3ox1, , PsGA2ox1, , Light regulation of GA1 biosynthesis. The presence of, light has many profound effects. Some seeds germinate, only in the light, and in such cases gibberellin application, can stimulate germination in darkness. The promotion of, germination by light has been shown to be due to, increases in GA1 levels resulting from a light-induced, increase in the transcription of the gene for GA3ox, which, converts GA20 to GA1 (Toyomasu et al. 1998). This effect, shows red/far-red photoreversibility and is mediated by, phytochrome (see Chapter 17)., When a seedling becomes exposed to light as it emerges, from the soil, it changes its form (see Chapter 17)—a, process referred to as de-etiolation. One of the most strik-, , (A), , ing changes is a decrease in the rate of stem elongation, such that the stem in the light is shorter than the one in the, dark. Initially it was assumed that the light-grown plants, would contain less GA1 than dark-grown plants. However,, light-grown plants turned out to contain more GA1 than, dark-grown plants—indicating that de-etiolation is a complex process involving changes in the level of GA1, as well, as changes in the responsiveness of the plant to GA1., In peas, for example, the level of GA1 initially falls, within 4 hours of exposure to light because of an increase, in transcription of the gene for GA2ox, leading to an, increase in GA1 breakdown (Figure 20.13A). The level of, GA1 remains low for a day but then increases, so that by, (B), , 7, Rate of elongation (mm d-1), , 30, , 6, GA1 level ng g FW –1, , Internodes, ls, LS, , 5, 4, 3, , Rapid decline in GA1, due to degradation, , 2, 1, 0, , Dark, , Dark to, 4 hours, light, , Dark to, 24 hours, light, , Dark to, Continuous, 120 hours light, light, , FIGURE 20.13 When a plant grows in the light, the rate of, extension slows down through regulation by changes in, hormone levels and sensitivity. (A) When dark-grown pea, seedlings are transferred to light, GA1 level drops rapidly, because of metabolism of GA1, but then increases to a, higher level, similar to that of light-grown plants, over the, next 4 days. (B) To investigate the GA1 response in various, light regimes, 10 µg of GA1 was applied to the internode of, , 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 0, , Dark, , Dark to, light 1D, after GA1, application, , Light, , GA-deficient na plants in darkness, 1 day after the start of, the light, or 6 days of continuous light, and growth in the, next 24 hours was measured. The results show that the gibberellin sensitivity of pea seedlings falls rapidly upon transfer from darkness to light, so the elongation rate of plants, in the light is lower than in the dark, even though their, total GA1 content is higher. (After O’Neill et al. 2000.)
Page 524 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, , another inhibitor, BX-112, which, blocks the production of GA1 from, GA20, can be overcome only by GA1, (Figure 20.16B). This result demonstrates that the rise in GA1 is the, crucial factor in regulating spinach, stem growth., The level of GA 20-oxidase mRNA, in spinach tissues, which occurs in, the highest amount in shoot tips and, elongating stems (see Figure 20.11), is, increased under long-day conditions, (Wu et al. 1996). The fact that GA 20oxidase is the enzyme that converts, GA53 to GA20 (see Figure 20.7) explains why the concentration of GA20, was found to be higher in spinach, under long-day conditions (Zeevaart, et al. 1993)., , FIGURE 20.14 Spinach plants undergo stem and petiole elongation only in long, , days, remaining in a rosette form in short days. Treatment with the GA biosynthesis inhibitor AMO-1618 prevents stem and petiole elongation and maintains the, rosette growth habit even under long days. Gibberellic acid can reverse the, inhibitory effect of AMO-1618 on stem and petiole elongation. As shown in Figure, 20.16, long days cause changes in the gibberellin content of the plant. (Courtesy of, J. A. D. Zeevaart.), , 5 days there is a fivefold increase in the GA1 content of the, stems, even though the stem elongation rate is lower (Figure 20.13B) (O’Neill et al. 2000). The reason that growth, slows down despite the increase in GA1 level is that the, plants are now severalfold less sensitive to the GA1 present., As will be discussed later in the chapter, sensitivity to, active gibberellin is governed by components of the gibberellin signal transduction pathway., , Photoperiod control of tuber formation. Potato tuberization is, , another process regulated by photoperiod (Figure 20.17). Tubers form, on wild potatoes only in short days, (although the requirement for short, days has been bred out of many cultivated varieties), and, this tuberization can be blocked by applications of gibberellin. The transcription of GA20ox was found to fluctuate during the light–dark cycle, leading to lower levels of, GA1 in short days. Potato plants overexpressing the, GA20ox gene showed delayed tuberization, whereas trans-, , Percent change in amount, , Photoperiod regulation of GA1 biosynthesis., , When, plants that require long days to flower (see Chapter 24) are, shifted from short days to long days, gibberellin metabolism is altered. In spinach (Spinacia oleracea), in short days,, when the plants maintain a rosette form (Figure 20.14), the, level of gibberellins hydroxylated at carbon 13 is relatively, low. In response to increasing day length, the shoots of, spinach plants begin to elongate after about 14 long days., The levels of all the gibberellins of the carbon, 13–hydroxylated gibberellin pathway (GA53 → GA44 →, GA19 → GA20 → GA1 → GA8) start to increase after about, 4 days (Figure 20.15). Although the level of GA20 increases, 16-fold during the first 12 days, it is the fivefold increase in, GA1 that induces stem growth (Zeevaart et al. 1993)., The dependence of stem growth on GA1 has been, shown through the use of different inhibitors of gibberellin, synthesis and metabolism. The inhibitors AMO-1618 and, BX-112 both prevent internode elongation (bolting). The, effect of AMO-1618, which blocks gibberellin biosynthesis prior to GA12-aldehyde, can be overcome by applications of GA20 (Figure 20.16A). However, the effect of, , 473, , 1500, , 1000, , Level at the start, of long days (ng/g fresh weight):, GA20: 1.4, GA1: 1.0, GA8: 18.0, GA20, (inactive GA1, precursor), GA8, (inactive GA1, metabolite), , 500, GA1 (active GA,, responsible for growth), 0, , 4, , 12, 8, Number of long days, , FIGURE 20.15 The fivefold increase in GA1 is what causes, , growth in spinach exposed to an increasing number of long, days but before stem elongation starts at about 14 days., (After Davies 1995; redrawn from data in Zeevaart et al., 1993.)
Page 525 :
474, , Chapter 20, , (A) AMO-1618, , (B) BX-112, In contrast, BX-112, which blocks the, conversion of GA20 to GA1, inhibits growth, even in the presence of GA20., , AMO-1618, which blocks GA biosynthesis at, the cyclization step, does not inhibit growth, in the presence of either GA20 or GA1., Control, AMO-1618, AMO-1618 + GA20, AMO-1618 + GA1, , 40, Stem length (cm), , Stem length (cm), , 40, , 30, , 20, , 30, , 20, , 10, , 10, , 0, , Control, BX-112, BX-112 + GA20, BX-112 + GA1, , 12, , 14, , 16, , 18, , 20, , 22, , 0, , 24, , 12, , Number of long days, , 14, , 16, , 18, , 20, , 22, , 24, , Number of long days, , FIGURE 20.16 The use of specific growth retardants (GA biosynthesis inhibitors), , and the reversal of the effects of the growth retardants by different GAs can show, which steps in GA biosynthesis are regulated by environmental change, in this case, the effect of long days on stem growth in spinach. The control lacks inhibitors or, added GA. (After Zeevaart et al. 1993.), , formation with the antisense gene for GA20ox promoted, tuberization, demonstrating the importance of the transcription of this gene in the regulation of potato tuberization (Carrera et al. 2000)., In general, de-etiolation, light-dependent seed germination, and the photoperiodic control of stem growth in, rosette plants and tuberization in potato are all mediated, by phytochromes (see Chapter 17). There is mounting evi-, , dence that many phytochrome effects are in part due to, modulation of the levels of gibberellins through changes in, the transcription of the genes for gibberellin biosynthesis, and degradation., , Temperature effects. Cold temperatures are required for, the germination of certain seeds (stratification) and for, flowering in certain species (vernalization) (see Chapter, , FIGURE 20.17 Tuberization of potatoes is, , promoted by short days. Potato (Solanum, tuberosum spp. Andigena) plants were, grown under either long days or short, days. The formation of tubers in short, days is associated with a decline in GA1, levels (see Chapter 24). (Courtesy of S., Jackson.), , Long days, , Short days
Page 526 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, , 475, , GA1 level, ng.g–1, , 15, Decapitated, + IAA, 10, , 7, , 5, , Intact, , 7, , 6, , 6, , 7, , 6, , Decapitated, 0, Intact, , Decapitated, , Decapitated, + IAA, , FIGURE 20.18 Decapitation reduces, and IAA (auxin) restores, endogenous GA1, , content in pea plants. Numbers refer to the leaf node. (From Ross et al. 2000.), , 24). For example, a prolonged cold treatment is required, for both the stem elongation and the flowering of Thlaspi, arvense (field pennycress), and gibberellins can substitute, for the cold treatment., In the absence of the cold treatment, ent-kaurenoic acid, accumulates to high levels in the shoot tip, which is also the, site of perception of the cold stimulus. After cold treatment, and a return to high temperatures, the ent-kaurenoic acid is, converted to GA9, the most active gibberellin for stimulating the flowering response. These results are consistent with, a cold-induced increase in the activity of ent-kaurenoic acid, hydroxylase in the shoot tip (Hazebroek and Metzger 1990)., , Auxin Promotes Gibberellin Biosynthesis, Although we often discuss the action of hormones as if, they act singly, the net growth and development of the, (A), , Decap., + IAA, , Decap,, , Intact, , GA3ox mRNA, (GA20 to GA1), , plant are the results of many combined signals. In addition,, hormones can influence each other’s biosynthesis so that, the effects produced by one hormone may in fact be mediated by others., For example, it has long been known that auxin induces, ethylene biosynthesis. It is now evident that gibberellin can, induce auxin biosynthesis and that auxin can induce gibberellin biosynthesis. If pea plants are decapitated, leading, to a cessation in stem elongation, not only is the level of, auxin lowered because its source has been removed, but the, level of GA1 in the upper stem drops sharply. This change, can be shown to be an auxin effect because replacing the bud, with a supply of auxin restores the GA1 level (Figure 20.18)., The presence of auxin has been shown to promote the, transcription of GA3ox and to repress the transcription of, GA2ox (Figure 20.19). In the absence of auxin the reverse, occurs. Thus the apical bud promotes growth not only, through the direct biosynthesis of auxin, but also through, the auxin-induced biosynthesis of GA1 (Figure 20.20) (Ross, et al. 2000; Ross and O’Neill 2001)., Figure 20.21 summarizes some of the factors that modulate the active gibberellin level through regulation of the, transcription of the genes for gibberellin biosynthesis or, metabolism., , Dwarfness Can Now Be Genetically Engineered, GA2ox mRNA, (GA20 to GA29,, and GA1 to GA8), , (B), Con., , 0h, , 2h, IAA, , Con., , 4h, IAA, , Con., , The characterization of the gibberellin biosynthesis and, metabolism genes—GA20ox, GA3ox, and GA2ox—has, , 6h, IAA, , Con., , IAA, , 8h, Con. IAA, , Intact, , FIGURE 20.19 (A) IAA up-regulates, , GA3ox mRNA, , the transcription of GA 3β-hydroxylase (forming GA1), and down-regulates that of GA 2-oxidase, which, destroys GA1. (B) The increase in, GA 3β-hydroxylase in response to, IAA can be seen by 2 hours. Con.,, control. (From Ross et al. 2000.)
Page 527 :
476, , Chapter 20, , Apical, bud, IAA, , IAA, GA20, , growth, GA1, , growth, , IAA, GA29, , GA8, , FIGURE 20.22 Genetically engineered dwarf wheat plants., , FIGURE 20.20 IAA (from the apical bud) promotes and is, , required for GA1 biosynthesis in subtending internodes., IAA also inhibits GA1 breakdown. (From Ross and O’Neill, 2001.), , enabled genetic engineers to modify the transcription of, these genes to alter the gibberellin level in plants, and thus, affect their height (Hedden and Phillips 2000). The desired, effect is usually to increase dwarfness because plants, grown in dense crop communities, such as cereals, often, grow too tall and thus are prone to lodging. In addition,, because gibberellin regulates bolting, one can prevent bolting by inhibiting the rise in gibberellin. An example of the, latter is the inhibition of bolting in sugar beet., , The untransformed wheat is shown on the extreme left. The, three plants on the right were transformed with a gibberellin 2-oxidase cDNA from bean under the control of a, constitutive promoter, so that the endogenous active GA1, was degraded. The varying degrees of dwarfing reflects, varying degrees of overexpression of the foreign gene., (Photo from Hedden and Phillips 2000, courtesy of Andy, Phillips.), , Sugar beet is a biennial, forming a swollen storage root, in the first season and a flower and seed stalk in the second., To extend the growing season and obtain bigger beets,, farmers sow the beets as early as possible in the spring, but, sowing too early leads to bolting in the first year, with the, result that no storage roots form. A reduction in the capacity to make gibberellin inhibits bolting, allowing earlier, sowing of the seeds and thus the growth of larger beets., Reductions in GA1 levels have recently been achieved in, such crops as sugar beet and wheat, either by, the transformation of plants with antisense, constructs of the GA20ox or GA3ox genes,, which encode the enzymes leading to the, Auxin, synthesis of GA1, or by overexpressing the, gene responsible for GA1 metabolism: GA2ox., Either approach results in dwarfing in wheat, GA20ox, GA3ox, GA response, (Figure 20.22) or an inhibition of bolting in, GA12/53, GA9/20, GA4/1, pathway, Photoperiod, Red light, rosette plants such as beet., (stem elongation, (germination), The inhibition of seed production in such, and tuberization), transgenic plants can be overcome by sprays, GA2ox, of gibberellin solution, provided that the, reduction in gibberellin has been achieved by, Multiple genes, GA34/8, blocking the genes for GA20ox or GA3ox, the, = with differential, expression, gibberellin biosynthetic enzymes. A similar, strategy has recently been applied to turf, FIGURE 20.21 The pathway of gibberellin biosynthesis showing the idengrass, keeping the grass short with no seedtities of the genes for the metabolic enzymes and the way that their tranheads, so that mowing can be virtually elimscription is regulated by feedback, environment, and other endogenous, inated—a boon for homeowners!, hormones.
Page 528 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, 3, , PHYSIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF, GIBBERELLIN-INDUCED GROWTH, , Gibberellins Stimulate Cell Elongation, and Cell Division, The effect of gibberellins applied to intact dwarf plants is, so dramatic that it would seem to be a simple task to determine how they act. Unfortunately, this is not the case, because, as we have seen with auxin, so much about plant, cell growth is not understood. However, we do know some, characteristics of gibberellin-induced stem elongation., Gibberellin increases both cell elongation and cell division, as evidenced by increases in cell length and cell number in response to applications of gibberellin. For example,, internodes of tall peas have more cells than those of dwarf, peas, and the cells are longer. Mitosis increases markedly, in the subapical region of the meristem of rosette long-day, plants after treatment with gibberellin (Figure 20.24). The, dramatic stimulation of internode elongation in deep-water, rice is due in part to increased cell division activity in the, intercalary meristem. Moreover, only the cells of the inter-, , Leaf, , Node, , 2, , Lag period, , Growth (mm), , As we have seen, the growth-promoting effects of gibberellin are most evident in dwarf and rosette plants. When, dwarf plants are treated with gibberellin, they resemble the, tallest varieties of the same species (see Figure 20.1). Other, examples of gibberellin action include the elongation of, hypocotyls and of grass internodes., A particularly striking example of internode elongation, is found in deep-water rice (Oryza sativa). In general, rice, plants are adapted to conditions of partial submergence. To, enable the upper foliage of the plant to stay above water,, the internodes elongate as the water level rises. Deep-water, rice has the greatest potential for rapid internode elongation. Under field conditions, growth rates of up to 25 cm, per day have been measured., The initial signal is the reduced partial pressure of O2, resulting from submergence, which induces ethylene, biosynthesis (see Chapter 22). The ethylene trapped in the, submerged tissues, in turn, reduces the level of abscisic, acid (see Chapter 23), which acts as an antagonist of, gibberellin. The end result is that the tissue becomes more, responsive to its endogenous gibberellin (Kende et al., 1998). Because inhibitors of gibberellin biosynthesis, block the stimulatory effect of both submergence and ethylene on growth, and exogenous gibberellin can stimulate growth in the absence of submergence, gibberellin, appears to be the hormone directly responsible for growth, stimulation., GA-stimulated growth in deep-water rice can be studied in an excised stem system (Figure 20.23). The addition, of gibberellin causes a marked increase in the growth rate, after a lag period of about 40 minutes. Cell elongation, accounts for about 90% of the length increase during the, first 2 hours of gibberellin treatment., , 477, , Intercalary, meristem, Node, , GA3 added, to internode, section, , 1, Control internode section, (no GA3 added), , Excision of internode, section, 0, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , Time (hours) after internode excised from plant, , FIGURE 20.23 Continuous recording of the growth of the, , upper internode of deep-water rice in the presence or, absence of exogenous GA3. The control internode elongates, at a constant rate after an initial growth burst during the, first 2 hours after excision of the section. Addition of GA, after 3 hours induced a sharp increase in the growth rate, after a 40-minute lag period (upper curve). The difference in, the initial growth rates of the two treatments is not significant here, but reflects slight variation in experimental materials. The inset shows the internode section of the rice stem, used in the experiment. The intercalary meristem just above, the node responds to GA. (After Sauter and Kende 1992.), , calary meristem whose division is increased by gibberellin, exhibit gibberellin-stimulated cell elongation., Because gibberellin-induced cell elongation appears to, precede gibberellin-induced cell division, we begin our, discussion with the role of gibberellin in regulating cell, elongation., , Gibberellins Enhance Cell Wall Extensibility, without Acidification, As discussed in Chapter 15, the elongation rate can be, influenced by both cell wall extensibility and the osmotically driven rate of water uptake. Gibberellin has no effect
Page 529 :
Chapter 20, , (A), , (B), , Each dot represents a, mitotic event, , 0h, , 24 h, , 48 h, , 72 h, , Distribution of cell division following application of GA, , FIGURE 20.24 Gibberellin applications to rosette plants, , induce stem internode elongation in part by increasing cell, division. (A) Longitudinal sections through the axis of, Samolus parviflorus (brookweed) show an increase in cell, , on the osmotic parameters but has consistently been, observed to cause an increase in both the mechanical extensibility of cell walls and the stress relaxation of the walls of, living cells. An analysis of pea genotypes differing in gibberellin content or sensitivity showed that gibberellin, decreases the minimum force that will cause wall extension, (the wall yield threshold) (Behringer et al. 1990). Thus, both, gibberellin and auxin seem to exert their effects by modifying cell wall properties., In the case of auxin, cell wall loosening appears to be, mediated in part by cell wall acidification (see Chapter 19)., However, this does not appear to be the mechanism of gibberellin action. In no case has a gibberellin-stimulated, increase in proton extrusion been demonstrated. On the, other hand, gibberellin is never present in tissues in the, complete absence of auxin, and the effects of gibberellin on, growth may depend on auxin-induced wall acidification., The typical lag time before gibberellin-stimulated growth, begins is longer than for auxin; as noted already, in deepwater rice it is about 40 minutes (see Figure 20.23), and in, peas it is 2 to 3 hours (Yang et al. 1996). These longer lag, times point to a growth-promoting mechanism distinct from, that of auxin. Consistent with the existence of a separate gibberellin-specific wall-loosening mechanism, the growth, responses to applied gibberellin and auxin are additive., Various suggestions have been made regarding the, mechanism of gibberellin-stimulated stem elongation, and, all have some experimental support, but as yet none provide a clear-cut answer. For example, there is evidence that, the enzyme xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET) is, involved in gibberellin-promoted wall extension. The function of XET may be to facilitate the penetration of, expansins into the cell wall. (Recall that expansins are cell, wall proteins that cause wall loosening in acidic conditions, , Mitotic figures per 64 µm slice, , 478, , 30, GA, applied, 20, , 10, Control, 0, , 12, 24, 36, Time (hours) following, treatment with GA, , 48, , division after application of GA. (Each dot represents one, mitotic figure in a section 64 µm thick.) (B) The number of, such mitotic figures with and without GA in stem apices of, Hyoscyamus niger (black henbane). (After Sachs 1965.), , by weakening hydrogen bonds between wall polysaccharides [see Chapter 15].) Both expansins and XET may be, required for gibberellin-stimulated cell elongation (see Web, Topic 20.3)., , Gibberellins Regulate the Transcription of Cell, Cycle Kinases in Intercalary Meristems, As noted earlier, the growth rate of the internodes of deepwater rice dramatically increases in response to submergence, and part of this response is due to increased cell divisions in the intercalary meristem. To study the effect of, gibberellin on the cell cycle, researchers isolated nuclei from, the intercalary meristem and quantified the amount of, DNA per nucleus (Figure 20.25) (Sauter and Kende 1992)., In submergence-induced plants, gibberellin activates the, cell division cycle first at the transition from G1 to S phase,, leading to an increase in mitotic activity. To do this, gibberellin induces the expression of the genes for several, cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDKs), which are, involved in regulation of the cell cycle (see Chapter 1). The, transcription of these genes—first those regulating the transition from G1 to S phase, followed by those regulating the, transition from G2 to M phase—is induced in the intercalary meristem by gibberellin. The result is a gibberellininduced increase in the progression from the G1 to the S, phase through to mitosis and cell division (see Web Topic, 20.4) (Fabian et al. 2000)., , Gibberellin Response Mutants Have Defects, in Signal Transduction, Single-gene mutants impaired in their response to gibberellin provide valuable tools for identifying genes that, encode possible gibberellin receptors or components of signal transduction pathways. In screenings for such mutants,
Page 530 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, Mitosis, M, , 30, , 90, G1, , G2, , (DNA, synthesis), 80, , 20, G1, S, , 10, , 70, , G2, , Percent nuclei in G1 phase, , Percent nuclei in S and G2 phases, , S, , 479, , identified so far are repressors of gibberellin signaling; that is,, they repress what we regard as gibberellin-induced tall, growth and make the plant dwarf. The repressor proteins, are negated or turned off by gibberellin so that the defaulttype growth—namely, tall—is allowed to proceed. The loss, of function resulting from a mutation in the functional, domain of such a negative regulator results in the mutant, appearing as if it has been treated with gibberellin; that is,, it has a tall phenotype. Thus a loss-of-function mutation of, a negative regulator is like a double negative in English, grammar: It translates into a positive., Because the effects of these loss-of-function mutations, are pleiotropic—that is, they also affect developmental, processes other than stem elongation—the steps in the, pathway involved in the growth response are probably, common to all gibberellin responses., , Regulatory domain., , 0, , 5, , 10, , 15, , 20, , 60, 25, , GA treatment (hours), , FIGURE 20.25 Changes in the cell cycle status of nuclei from, , the intercalary meristems of deep-water rice internodes, treated with GA3. Note that the scale for the G1 nuclei is on, the right side of the graph. (After Sauter and Kende 1992.), , three main classes of mutations affecting plant height have, been selected:, 1. Gibberellin-insensitive dwarfs, 2. Gibberellin-deficient mutants in which the gibberellin, deficiency has been overcome by a second “suppressor” mutation, so the plants look closer to normal, 3. Mutants with a constitutive gibberellin response, (“slender” mutants), All three types of gibberellin response mutants have, been generated in Arabidopsis, but equivalent mutations, have also been found in several other species; in fact, some, have been in agricultural use for many years., The three types of mutant screens have sometimes identified genes encoding the same signal transduction components, even though the phenotypes being selected are, completely different. This is possible because mutations at, different sites in the same protein can produce vastly different phenotypes, depending on whether the mutation is, in a regulatory domain or in an activity, or functional,, domain. Some examples of the different phenotypes that, can result from changes at different sites in the same protein are described in the sections that follow., , Functional domain (repression)., , The principal gibberellin signal transduction components that have been, , If a mutation in the gene for the, same negative regulator causes a change in the regulatory, domain (i.e., that part of the protein that receives a signal, from the gibberellin receptor indicating the presence of gibberellin), the protein is unable to receive the signal, and it, retains its growth-repressing activity. The phenotype of, such a mutant will be that of a gibberellin-insensitive, dwarf. Thus, different mutations in the same gene can give, opposite phenotypes (tall versus dwarf), depending on, whether the mutation is located in the repression domain, or the regulatory domain., The regulatory domain mutations that confer loss of gibberellin sensitivity result in the synthesis of a constitutively, active form of the repressor than cannot be turned off by gibberellin. The more of this type of mutant repressor that is, present in the cell, the more dwarf the plant will be. Hence,, such regulatory domain mutations are semidominant., In contrast, mutations in the repression domain inactivate the negative regulator (i.e., they act as “knockout” alleles) so that it no longer represses growth; such mutations, are recessive because in a heterozygote half the proteins, will still be able to repress growth in the absence of gibberellin. All of the negative regulators have to be nonfunctional for the plant to grow tall without gibberellin., With this as background, we now examine specific, examples of mutations in the genes that encode proteins in, the gibberellin signal transduction pathway., , Different Genetic Screens Have Identified the, Related Repressors GAI and RGA, Several gibberellin-insensitive dwarf mutants have been, isolated from various species. The first to be isolated in Arabidopsis was the gai-1 mutant (Figure 20.26) (Sun 2000). The, gai-1 mutants resemble gibberellin-deficient mutants,, except that they do not respond to exogenous gibberellin., Another mutant was obtained by screening for a second, mutation in a gibberellin-deficient Arabidopsis mutant that, restores, or partially restores, wild-type growth. The origi-
Page 531 :
480, , Chapter 20, FIGURE 20.26 The effects of gibberellin treatment and mutations in three, , different genes (gai, ga1, and rga) on the phenotype of Arabidopsis., Wild type, , + GA or spy, , The reason that gai-1 is dwarf, while rga is tall,, is that the mutations are in different parts of the, protein. Whereas the gai-1 mutation (which, negates sensitivity of the repressor to gibberellin), is in the regulatory domain, the rga mutation, (which prevents the action of the repressor in, blocking growth) is located in the repression, domain, as illustrated in Figure 20.28., The mutant gai-1 gene has been shown to, encode a mutant protein with a deletion of 17, amino acids, which corresponds to the regulatory, domain of the repressor (Dill et al. 2001). A similar, mutation in the receptor domain of the RGA gene, also produces a gibberellin-insensitive dwarf,, demonstrating that the two related proteins have, overlapping functions. Because of this deletion in, the gai-1 mutant, the action of the repressor cannot, be alleviated by gibberellin, and growth is constitutively inhibited., , gai, , ga1, , Gibberellins Cause the Degradation of RGA, Transcriptional Repressors, , rga, , The Arabidopsis wild-type GAI and RGA genes are, members of a large gene family encoding tran-, , nal gibberellin-deficient mutant was ga1-3, and the second mutation that partially “rescued” the phenotype, (i.e., restored normal growth) was called rga (for repressor of ga1-3).4 The rga mutation is a recessive mutation, that, when present in double copy, gives a plant of, intermediate height (see Figure 20.26)., Despite the contrasting phenotypes of the mutants,, the wild-type GAI and RGA genes turned out to be, closely related, with a very high (82%) sequence identity. The gai-1 mutation is semidominant, as are similar, gibberellin-insensitive dwarf mutations in other, species., Genetic analyses have indicated that both the GAI, and RGA proteins normally act as repressors of gibberellin responses. Gibberellin acts indirectly through an, unidentified signaling intermediate, which is thought to, bind to the regulatory domains of the GAI and RGA, proteins (Figure 20.27). The repressor is no longer able, to inhibit growth, and the resulting plant is tall., , GA signaling, intermediate, , Active, form, , Inactive, form, , Regulatory, domain, Degradation, Repression, domain, , NUCLEUS, , FIGURE 20.27 Two main functional domains of GAI and RGA:, 4, , Be careful not to confuse gai (gibberellin insensitive), and ga1 (gibberellin-deficient #1), which can look alike, in print., , the regulatory domain and the repression domain. The repression domain is active in the absence of gibberellin. A gibberellin-induced signaling intermediate binds to the regulatory, domain, targeting it for destruction. Note that the protein forms, homodimers.
Page 532 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, Active, form, , Inactive, form, , GA signaling, intermediate, , Mutated, regulatory domain, , 481, , Mutated, repression domain, , Regulatory, domain, , Repression, domain, , Degradation, No growth, , Growth, , No growth, , Growth, , Wild-type repressor, in the absence of, GA represses, elongation growth., , In the presence of GA,, the repressor is, degraded, allowing, elongation to occur., , A mutation in the, regulatory domain, turns the repressor, into a constitutively, active repressor, so, the plant is dwarf, even in the presence, of GA., , A mutation in the, repression domain, disables the, regulatory protein,, so the plant grows, tall even in the, absence of GA., , FIGURE 20.28 Different mutations in the repressors GAI, , and RGA can have different effects on growth., , scriptional repressors that have highly conserved regions, with nuclear localization signals. To demonstrate the, nuclear localization and repressor nature of the RGA product, the RGA promoter was fused to the gene for a green, fluorescent protein whose product can be visualized under, the microscope. The green color could be seen in cell nuclei., When the plants were treated with gibberellin, there, was no green color, showing that the RGA protein was not, present following gibberellin treatment. However, when, the gibberellin content was severely lowered by treatment, , (B), , (A), , FIGURE 20.29 The RGA pro-, , tein is found in the cell, nucleus, consistent with its, identity as a transcription factor, and its level is affected by, the level of GA. (A) Plant, cells were transformed with, the gene for RGA fused to the, gene for green fluorescent, protein (GFP), allowing detection of RGA in the nucleus by, fluorescence microscopy. (B), Effect of GA on RGA. A 2hour pretreatment with gibberellin causes the loss of, RGA from the cell (top)., When the gibberellin biosynthesis is inhibited in the presence of paclobutrazole, the, RGA content in the nucleus, increases (bottom). (From, Silverstone et al. 2001.), , with the gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor paclobutrazol,, the nuclei acquired a very intense green fluorescence,, demonstrating both the presence and nuclear localization, of the RGA protein only when gibberellin was absent or, low (Figure 20.29) (Silverstone et al. 2001)., Both GAI and RGA also have a conserved region at the, amino terminus of the protein referred to as DELLA, after, , + GA, 2h, 48 h, +, Paclobutrazole, , RGA, DNA, construct, , Promoter, , GFP, , RGA
Page 533 :
482, , Chapter 20, , the code letters for the amino acids in that sequence. This, region is involved in the gibberellin response because it is, the location of the mutation in gai-1 that renders it nonresponsive to gibberellin. It turns out that the RGA protein is, synthesized all the time; in the presence of gibberellin this, protein is targeted for destruction, and the DELLA region, is required for this response (Dill et al. 2001)., It is likely that gibberellin also brings about the turnover, of GAI. RGA and GAI have partially redundant functions, in maintaining the repressed state of the gibberellin signaling pathway. However, RGA appears to play a more, dominant role than GAI because in a gibberellin-deficient, mutant, a second mutation in the repression domain of gai, (gai-t6) does not restore growth, whereas a comparable, mutation in rga does. On the other hand, the existence of, repression domain mutations in both of these genes allows, for complete expression of many characteristics induced by, GA, including plant height, in the absence of gibberellin, (see Figure 20.26) (Dill and Sun 2001; King et al. 2001)., , DELLA Repressors Have Been Identified, in Crop Plants, Functional DELLA repressors have been found in several, crop plants that have dwarfing mutations, analogous to gai1, in the genes encoding these proteins. Most notable are, the rht (reduced height) mutations of wheat that have been, in use in agriculture for 30 years. These alleles encode gibberellin response modulators that lack gibberellin responsiveness, leading to dwarfness (Peng et al. 1999; Silverstone, and Sun 2000)., Cereal dwarfs such as these are very important as the, foundations of the green revolution that enabled large, increases in yield to be obtained. Normal cereals grow too tall, when close together in a field, especially with high levels of, fertilizer. The result is that plants fall down (lodge), and the, yield decreases concomitantly. The use of these stiff-strawed, dwarf varieties that resist lodging enables high yields., Wild type, , ga1, , FIGURE 20.30 The Arabidopsis spy mutation causes the, , negation of a growth repressor, so the plants look as if they, were treated with gibberellin. From left to right: wild type,, , The Negative Regulator SPINDLY Is an Enzyme, That Alters Protein Activity, “Slender mutants” resemble wild-type plants that have, been treated with gibberellin repeatedly. They exhibit elongated internodes, parthenocarpic (seed-free) fruit growth, (in dicots), and poor pollen production. Slender mutants, are rare compared to dwarf mutants., One possible explanation of the slender phenotype, could be simply that the mutants have higher-than-normal, levels of endogenous gibberellins. For example, in the sln, mutation of peas, a gibberellin deactivation step is blocked, in the seed. As a result, the mature seed, which in the wild, type contains little or no GA, has abnormally high levels of, GA20. The GA20 from the seed is then taken up by the germinating seedling and converted to the bioactive GA1, giving rise to the slender phenotype. However, once the, seedling runs out of GA20 from the seed, its phenotype, returns to normal (Reid and Howell 1995)., If, on the other hand, the slender phenotype is not due, to an overproduction of endogenous gibberellin, the, mutant is considered to be a constitutive response mutant, (Sun 2000). The best characterized of such mutants are the, ultratall mutants: la crys in pea, (representing mutations at, two loci: La and Crys) (see Figure 20.10); procera (pro) in, tomato; slender (sln) in barley; and spindly (spy) in Arabidopsis (Figure 20.30). All of these mutations are recessive, and appear to be loss-of-function mutations in negative, regulators of the gibberellin response pathway, as in the, case of the DELLA regulators., SPINDLY (SPY) in Arabidopsis and related genes in other, species are similar in sequence to genes that encode glucosamine transferases in animals (Thornton et al. 1999). These, enzymes modify target proteins by the glycosylation of serine or threonine residues. Glycosylation can modify protein, activity either directly or indirectly by interfering with or, blocking sites of phosphorylation by protein kinases. The target protein for spindly proteins has not yet been identified., ga1/spy, , spy, , ga1 (GA-deficient), ga1/spy double mutant, and spy., (Courtesy of N. Olszewski.)
Page 534 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, GA acts to block the, actions of SPY, GAI,, and RGA, , SPY Acts Upstream of GAI and RGA in the, Gibberellin Signal Transduction Chain, , GA, , SPY: also a negative, regulator; enhances the, effect of GAI and RGA, GAI/RGA: act in the, absence of GA to, suppress growth, , SPY, , GAI/RGA, , 483, , – O–GlcNAc transferase:, involved in protein, modification, – transcription factors, , mRNA transcription, leading to growth, , Growth, , FIGURE 20.31 Interactions between gibberellin and the genes, , SPY, GAI, and RGA in the regulation of stem elongation., , On the basis of the evidence presented in the preceding sections and other studies on the expression of SPY, GAI, and, RGA (Sun 2000; Dill et al. 2001), we can begin to sketch out, the following elements of the gibberellin signal transduction chain (Figures 20.31 and 20.32):, • Two or more transcriptional regulators encoded by, GAI and RGA act as inhibitors of the transcription of, genes that directly or indirectly promote growth., • SPY appears to be a signal transduction intermediate, acting upstream of GAI and RGA that, itself, turns on, or enhances the transcription or action of GAI and, RGA, or another negative regulator., • In the presence of gibberellin, SPY, GAI, and RGA are, all negated or turned off., , GA-deficient plant cell: No growth, , GA, receptor, , CYTOPLASM, SPY, GAI, RGA, , Transcription of, GA-induced genes, Plasma, membrane, , NUCLEUS, , In a GA-deficient cell in a GA biosynthesis, mutant, or a wild-type cell without the, GA signal, the transmembrane GA, receptor is inactive in the absence of GA, signal. In this situation, SPY is an active, O-GlcNAc transferase that catalyzes the, addition of a signal GlcNAc residue (from, UDP-GlcNAc) via an O linkage to specific, serine and/or threonine residues of, target proteins, possibly RGA and GAI., Active RGA and GAI function as, repressors of transcription, and they, indirectly or directly inhibit the, expression of GA-induced genes., , Plant cell with GA: Growth, , CYTOPLASM, , GA, receptor, SPY, , GAI, RGA, GA, , In the presence of GA the GA receptor is, activated by binding of bioactive GA., The GA signal inhibits RGA and GAI, repressors both directly and by, deactivating SPY. In the absence of, repression by RGA and GAI, GA-induced, genes are transcribed., , Transcription of, GA-induced genes, , NUCLEUS, , FIGURE 20.32 Proposed roles of the active SPY, GAI, and RGA, , proteins in the GA signaling pathway within a plant cell.
Page 535 :
484, , Chapter 20, , • The RGA protein is degraded, and it is likely that, GAI is similarly destroyed., Whether gibberellin negates GAI and RGA through SPY,, or independently, or both, is currently under investigation., However, the basic message in this case and in the cases of, other plant hormones, such as ethylene (see Chapter 22), and the photoreceptor phytochrome (see Chapter 17), is, that the default developmental program is for the induced, type of growth to occur, but the default pathway is prevented by the presence of various negative regulators., Rather than directly promoting an effect, the arrival of the, developmental signal—in this case gibberellin—negates the, growth repressor, enabling the default condition., , GIBBERELLIN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION:, CEREAL ALEURONE LAYERS, Genetic analyses of gibberellin-regulated growth, such as, the studies described in the previous section, have identified some of the genes and their gene products, but not the, biochemical pathways involved in gibberellin signal transduction. The biochemical and molecular mechanisms,, which are probably common to all gibberellin responses,, have been studied most extensively in relation to the gibberellin-stimulated synthesis and secretion of α-amylase in, cereal aleurone layers (Jacobsen et al. 1995)., In this section we will describe how such studies have, shed light on the location of the gibberellin receptor, the, transcriptional regulation of the genes for α-amylase and, other proteins, and the possible signal transduction pathways involved in the control of α-amylase synthesis and, secretion by gibberellin., , Gibberellin from the Embryo Induces α-Amylase, Production by Aleurone Layers, Cereal grains (caryopses; singular caryopsis) can be divided, into three parts: the diploid embryo, the triploid, endosperm, and the fused testa–pericarp (seed coat–fruit, wall). The embryo part consists of the plant embryo proper,, along with its specialized absorptive organ, the scutellum, (plural scutella), which functions in absorbing the solubilized food reserves from the endosperm and transmitting, them to the growing embryo. The endosperm is composed, of two tissues: the centrally located starchy endosperm and, the aleurone layer (Figure 20.33A)., The starchy endosperm, typically nonliving at maturity,, consists of thin-walled cells filled with starch grains. The, aleurone layer surrounds the starchy endosperm and is, cytologically and biochemically distinct from it. Aleurone, cells are enclosed in thick primary cell walls and contain, large numbers of protein-storing vacuoles called protein, bodies (Figures 20.33B–D), enclosed by a single membrane., The protein bodies also contain phytin, a mixed cation salt, (mainly Mg2+ and K+) of myo-inositolhexaphosphoric acid, (phytic acid)., , During germination and early seedling growth, the, stored food reserves of the endosperm—chiefly starch and, protein—are broken down by a variety of hydrolytic, enzymes, and the solubilized sugars, amino acids, and, other products are transported to the growing embryo. The, two enzymes responsible for starch degradation are α- and, β-amylase. α-Amylase hydrolyzes starch chains internally, to produce oligosaccharides consisting of α-1,4-linked glucose residues. β-Amylase degrades these oligosaccharides, from the ends to produce maltose, a disaccharide. Maltase, then converts maltose to glucose., α-Amylase is secreted into the starchy endosperm of, cereal seeds by both the scutellum and the aleurone layer, (see Figure 20.33A). The sole function of the aleurone layer, of the seeds of graminaceous monocots (e.g., barley, wheat,, rice, rye, and oats) appears to be the synthesis and release, of hydrolytic enzymes. After completing this function,, aleurone cells undergo programmed cell death., Experiments carried out in the 1960s confirmed Gottlieb, Haberlandt’s original observation of 1890 that the secretion, of starch-degrading enzymes by barley aleurone layers, depends on the presence of the embryo. When the embryo, was removed (i.e., the seed was de-embryonated), no, starch was degraded. However, when the de-embryonated, “half-seed” was incubated in close proximity to the excised, embryo, starch was digested, demonstrating that the, embryo produced a diffusible substance that triggered αamylase release by the aleurone layer., It was soon discovered that gibberellic acid (GA3) could, substitute for the embryo in stimulating starch degradation. When de-embryonated half-seeds were incubated in, buffered solutions containing gibberellic acid, secretion of, α-amylase into the medium was greatly stimulated after an, 8-hour lag period (relative to the control half-seeds incubated in the absence of gibberellic acid)., The significance of the gibberellin effect became clear, when it was shown that the embryo synthesizes and, releases gibberellins (chiefly GA1) into the endosperm during germination. Thus the cereal embryo efficiently regulates the mobilization of its own food reserves through the, secretion of gibberellins, which stimulate the digestive, function of the aleurone layer (see Figure 20.33A)., Gibberellin has been found to promote the production, and/or secretion of a variety of hydrolytic enzymes that are, involved in the solubilization of endosperm reserves; principal among these is α-amylase. Since the 1960s, investigators have utilized isolated aleurone layers, or even aleurone, cell protoplasts (see Figure 20.33C and D), rather than halfseeds (see Figure 20.33B). The isolated aleurone layer, consisting of a homogeneous population of target cells, provides a unique opportunity to study the molecular aspects, of gibberellin action in the absence of nonresponding cell, types., In the following discussion of gibberellin-induced αamylase production we focus on three questions:
Page 536 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, (A), , First foliage, leaf, , Testa-pericarp, , 2. Gibberellins, diffuse to the, aleurone layer., , Coleoptile, , Aleurone layer, , Shoot apical, meristem, 1. Gibberellins are, synthesized by the, embryo and, released into the, starchy endosperm, via the scutellum., , 485, , Starchy endosperm, Aleurone cells, , GAs, , Hydrolytic, enzymes, , GAs, , 3. Aleurone layer cells are, induced to synthesize and, secrete a-amylase and, other hydrolases into the, endosperm., , Endosperm, solutes, , 5. The endosperm, solutes are absorbed, by the scutellum, and transported to, the growing, embyro., , Scutellum, , Root, , 4. Starch and other, macromolecules are, broken down to small, molecules., , (B), , (D), , (C), PSV, , G, , PSV, N, , PSV, , FIGURE 20.33 Structure of a barley grain and the functions, , of various tissues during germination (A). Microscope photos of the barley aleurone layer (B) and barley aleurone protoplasts at an early (C) and late stage (D) of amylase production. Protein storage vesicles (PSV) can be seen in each, cell. G = phytin globoid; N = nucleus. (Photos from Bethke, et al. 1997, courtesy of P. Bethke.), , i, 1. How does gibberellin regulate the increase in a-amylase?, 2. Where is the gibberellin receptor located in the cell?, 3. What signal transduction pathways operate between, the gibberellin receptor and a-amylase production?, , Gibberellic Acid Enhances the Transcription of αAmylase mRNA, Before molecular biological approaches were developed,, there was already physiological and biochemical evidence, that gibberellic acid might enhance α-amylase production, , at the level of gene transcription (Jacobsen et al. 1995). The, two main lines of evidence were as follows:, 1. GA3-stimulated α-amylase production was shown to, be blocked by inhibitors of transcription and translation., 2. Heavy-isotope- and radioactive-isotope-labeling, studies demonstrated that the stimulation of α-amylase activity by gibberellin involved de novo synthesis of the enzyme from amino acids, rather than activation of preexisting enzyme., Definitive molecular evidence now shows that gibberellin acts primarily by inducing the expression of the
Page 537 :
486, , Chapter 20, , (A) Enzyme synthesis, , Rate of α-amylase synthesis, (enzyme units per 120 min), , Synthesis of a-amylase by isolated barley, aleurone layers is evident after 6–8 hours, of treatment with GA3 (10–6 M)., , 16, 12, 8, , Treated, with GA3, No GA, treatment, , 4, , 0, , 5, , 10, , 15, , Duration of exposure to GA3 (h), , a-Amylase translatable mRNA, (percent of total in vitro protein synthesis), , (B) mRNA synthesis, A gibberellin-induced increase in, translatable a-amylase mRNA precedes, the release of the a-amylase from the, aleurone cells by several hours., , 16, 12, , Treated, with GA3, , 8, 4, , 0, , No GA, treatment, , 5, 10, 15, Duration of exposure to GA3 (h), , FIGURE 20.34 Gibberellin effects on enzyme synthesis and, , mRNA synthesis. The α-amylase mRNA in this case was, measured by the in vitro production of α-amylase as a percentage of the protein produced by the translation of the, bulk mRNA. (From Higgins et al. 1976.), , gene for α-amylase. It has been shown that GA3 enhances, the level of translatable mRNA for α-amylase in aleurone, layers (Figure 20.34). Furthermore, by using isolated nuclei,, investigators also demonstrated that there was an, enhanced transcription of the α-amylase gene rather than, a decrease in mRNA turnover (see Web Topic 20.5)., The purification of α-amylase mRNA, which is produced in relatively large amounts in aleurone cells, enabled, the isolation of genomic clones containing both the structural gene for α-amylase and its upstream promoter, sequences. These promoter sequences were then fused to, the reporter gene that encodes the enzyme β-glucuronidase, (GUS), which yields a blue color in the presence of an artificial substrate when the gene is expressed. The regulation, of transcription by gibberellin was proved when such, chimeric genes containing α-amylase promoters that were, fused to reporter genes were introduced into aleurone pro-, , toplasts and the production of the blue color was shown to, be stimulated by gibberellin (Jacobsen et al. 1995)., The partial deletion of known sequences of bases from, α-amylase promoters from several cereals indicates that the, sequences conferring gibberellin responsiveness, termed, gibberellin response elements, are located 200 to 300 base pairs, upstream of the transcription start site (see Web Topic 20.6)., , A GA-MYB Transcription Factor Regulates αAmylase Gene Expression, The stimulation of α-amylase gene expression by gibberellin, is mediated by a specific transcription factor that binds to the, promoter of the α-amylase gene (Lovegrove and Hooley, 2000). To demonstrate such DNA-binding proteins in rice, a, technique called a mobility shift assay was used (see Web, Topic 20.7). This assay detects the increase in size that occurs, when the α-amylase promoter binds to a protein isolated, from gibberellin-treated aleurone cells (Ou-Lee et al. 1988)., The mobility shift assay also allowed identification of the, regulatory DNA sequences (gibberellin response elements), in the promoter that are involved in binding the protein., Identical gibberellin response elements were found to, occur in all cereal α-amylase promoters, and their presence, was shown to be essential for the induction of α-amylase, gene transcription by gibberellin. These studies demonstrated that gibberellin increases either the level or the activity of a transcription factor protein that switches on the production of α-amylase mRNA by binding to an upstream, regulatory element in the α-amylase gene promoter., The sequence of the gibberellin response element in the, α-amylase gene promoter turned out to be similar to that, of the binding sites for MYB transcription factors that are, known to regulate growth and development in phytochrome responses (see Chapter 14 on the Web site and, Chapter 17) (Jacobsen et al. 1995). This knowledge enabled, the isolation of mRNA for a MYB transcription factor,, named GA-MYB, associated with the gibberellin induction, of α-amylase gene expression., The synthesis of GA-MYB mRNA in aleurone cells, increases within 3 hours of gibberellin application, several, hours before the increase in α-amylase mRNA (Gubler et, al. 1995) (Figure 20.35). The inhibitor of translation, cycloheximide, has no effect on the production of MYB mRNA,, indicating that GA-MYB is a primary response gene, or early, gene. In contrast, the α-amylase gene is a secondary response, gene, or late gene, as indicated by the fact that its transcription is blocked by cycloheximide., How does gibberellin cause the MYB gene to be, expressed? Because protein synthesis is not involved, gibberellin may bring about the activation of one or more preexisting transcription factors. The activation of transcription, factors is typically mediated by protein phosphorylation, events occurring at the end of a signal transduction pathway. We will now examine what is known about the signaling pathways involved in gibberellin-induced α-amylase production up to the point of GA-MYB production.
Page 538 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, , Relative transcript levels, , 100, , GA-MYB mRNA, , 75, , 50, a-Amylase mRNA, 25, , 0, , 3, , 6, , 12, , 18, , 24, , Hours after exposure to GA, , FIGURE 20.35 Time course for the induction of GA-MYB, , and α-amylase mRNA by gibberellic acid. The production, of GA-MYB mRNA precedes α-amylase mRNA by about 5, hours. This result is consistent with the role of GA-MYB as, an early GA response gene that regulates the transcription, of the gene for α-amylase. In the absence of GA, the levels, of both GA-MYB and α-amylase mRNAs are negligible., (After Gubler et al. 1995.), , 487, , expression and secretion were inhibited by a guanine, nucleotide analog that binds to the α subunit of heterotrimeric G-proteins and inhibits GTP/GDP exchange,, further supporting the preceding conclusion., Recent genetic studies have provided further support, for the role of G-proteins as intermediates in the gibberellin, signal transduction pathway. The rice dwarf mutant dwarf, 1 (d1) has a defective gene encoding the α subunit. Besides, being dwarf, the aleurone layers of the d1 mutant synthesize less α-amylase in response to gibberellin than wildtype aleurone layers do. This reduction in α-amylase production by the d1 mutant demonstrates that G-proteins are, one of the components of the gibberellin signal transduction pathway involved in both the growth response and the, production of α-amylase. However, the difference in αamylase production between the mutant and the wild type, goes away with increasing gibberellin concentration, suggesting that gibberellin can also stimulate α-amylase production by a G-protein-independent pathway (Ashikari et, al. 1999; Ueguchi-Tanaka et al. 2000)., , Cyclic GMP, Ca2+, and Protein Kinases Are Possible, Signaling Intermediates, , A cell surface localization of the gibberellin receptor is suggested from the fact that gibberellin that has been bound to, microbeads that are unable to cross the plasma membrane is, still active in inducing α-amylase production in aleurone, protoplasts (Hooley et al. 1991). In addition, microinjection, of GA3 into aleurone protoplasts had no effect, but when the, protoplasts were immersed in GA3 solution, they produced, α-amylase (Gilroy and Jones 1994). These results suggest that, gibberellin acts on the outer face of the plasma membrane., Two gibberellin-binding plasma membrane proteins, have been isolated through the use of purified plasma, membrane and a radioactively labeled gibberellin that was, chemically modified to permanently attach to protein to, which it was weakly bound. Because the presence of excess, gibberellin reduces binding, and these proteins from a, semidwarf, gibberellin-insensitive sweet pea bind gibberellin less strongly, they may represent the gibberellin, receptors (Lovegrove et al. 1998)., In animal cells, heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (Gproteins) in the cell membrane are often involved as first, steps in a pathway between a hormone receptor and subsequent cytosolic signals. Evidence has been obtained that, G-proteins are also involved in the early gibberellin signaling events in aleurone cells (Jones et al. 1998)., Treatment of oat aleurone protoplasts with a peptide, called Mas7, which stimulates GTP/GDP exchange by Gproteins, was found to induce α-amylase gene expression, and to stimulate α-amylase secretion, suggesting that such, a GTP/GDP exchange on the cell membrane is a reaction, en route to the induction of α-amylase biosynthesis by gibberellin. In addition, gibberellin-induced α-amylase gene, , In animal cells, G-proteins can activate the enzyme guanylyl cyclase, the enzyme that synthesizes cGMP from GTP,, leading to an increase in cGMP concetration. Cyclic GMP,, in turn, can regulate ion channels, Ca2+ levels, protein, kinase activity, and gene transcription (see Chapter 14 on, the Web site). Gibberellin has been reported to cause a transient rise in cGMP levels in barley aleurone layers, suggesting a possible role for cGMP in α-amylase production, (Figure 20.36) (see Web Topic 20.8) (Pensen et al. 1996)., Calcium and the calcium-binding protein calmodulin, act as second messengers for many hormonal responses in, , GA-MYB, , 100, Response to GA (percent), , Gibberellin Receptors May Interact with GProteins on the Plasma Membrane, , 80, 60, 40, , [Ca2+]i, , pHi, , a-Amylase, RNase, , 20, 0, , 0, , CaM, , 10, , cGMP, 100, , DNase, , 1000, , 10,000, , Time after GA treatment (min), , FIGURE 20.36 Following the addition of GA to barley aleu-, , rone protoplasts, a multiple signal transduction pathway is, initiated. The timing of some of these events is shown., (From Bethke et al. 1997.)
Page 539 :
488, , Chapter 20, , FIGURE 20.37 Increase in the calcium in barley, , aleurone protoplasts following GA addition can, be seen from this false color image. The level of, calcium corresponding to the colors is in the, lower scale. (A) Untreated protoplast. (B) GAtreated protoplast. (C) Protoplast treated with, both abscisic acid (AB) and GA. Abscisic acid, opposes the effects of GA in aleurone cells., (From Ritchie and Gilroy 1998b.), , (A), , (B), , (C), , v, v, , Control, , 50, , GA, , 100, , GA+, , 300, 500, Cytoplasmic [Ca2+] (nM), , ABA, , 1000, , animal cells (see Chapter 14 on the Web site), and they have, been implicated in various plant responses to environmental and hormonal stimuli. The earliest event in aleurone protoplasts after the application of gibberellin is a rise, in the cytoplasmic calcium concentration that occurs well, before the onset of α-amylase synthesis (see Figures 20.36, and 20.37) (Bethke et al. 1997). Without calcium, α-amylase, secretion does not occur, though in barley aleurone protoplasts its synthesis goes ahead normally, so we have to conclude that, in barley, calcium is not on the signaling pathway to α-amylase gene transcription, though it does play, a role in enzyme secretion., Protein phosphorylation by protein kinases is another, component in many signaling pathways, and gibberellin, appears to be no exception. The injection of a protein, kinase substrate into barley aleurone protoplasts to compete with endogenous protein phosphorylation inhibited, α-amylase secretion, suggesting the involvement of protein, phosphorylation in the α-amylase secretion pathway, (Ritchie and Gilroy 1998a). This did not affect the gibberellin-stimulated increase in calcium, indicating that the, protein kinase step is downstream of the calcium signaling, event., In conclusion, gibberellin signal transduction in aleurone cells seems to involve G-proteins as well as cyclic, GMP, leading to production of the transcription factor GAMYB, which induces α-amylase gene transcription. α-Amylase secretion has similar initial components but also, involves an increase in cytoplasmic calcium and protein, phosphorylation. The detailed signaling pathways remain, to be worked out. A model of the known biochemical components of the gibberellin signal transduction pathways in, aleurone cells is illustrated in Figure 20.38., , opment. As we have seen, the genetic approaches applied to, the study of gibberellin-stimulated growth led to the identification of the SPY/GAI/RGA negative regulatory pathway., The proteins SPY, GAI, and RGA act as repressors of gibberellin responses. Gibberellin deactivates these repressors., Because the aleurone layers of gibberellin-insensitive, dwarf wheat are also insensitive to GA, the same signal, transduction pathways that regulate growth appear to regulate gibberellin-induced α-amylase production. Indeed a, SPY-type gene associated with α-amylase production has, been isolated from barley (HvSPY), and its expression is, able to inhibit gibberellin-induced α-amylase synthesis,, while GA-MYB-type factors are also implicated in the gibberellin transduction chain regulating stem growth., Rice with the dwarf 1 mutation also produces little αamylase in response to gibberellin. As noted earlier, the, mutation causing dwarf 1 is known to be in the α subunit, of the G-protein complex, providing evidence that the, action of gibberellin in both stem elongation and the production of α-amylase are regulated by plasma membrane, heterotrimeric G-proteins., As the entire elongation growth and α-amylase signaling pathways are worked out, it will be interesting to see, how much they have in common and where they diverge., , The Gibberellin Signal Transduction Pathway Is, Similar for Stem Growth and α-Amylase, Production, , FIGURE 20.38 Composite model for the induction of αamylase synthesis in barley aleurone layers by gibberellin., A calcium-independent pathway induces α-amylase gene, transcription; a calcium-dependent pathway is involved in, α-amylase secretion. (The SPY negative regulator was omitted for clarity.), , Gibberellins are a family of compounds defined by their, structure. They now number over 125, some of which are, found only in the fungus Gibberella fujikuroi. Gibberellins, induce dramatic internode elongation in certain types of, plants, such as dwarf and rosette species and grasses., , ▲, , It is widely believed that gibberellin initially acts through a, common pathway or pathways in all of its effects on devel-, , SUMMARY
Page 540 :
Gibberellins: Regulators of Plant Height, GA1, , Heterotrimeric, G-protein, , GA receptor, 1. GA1 from the embryo, first binds to a cell, surface receptor., 2. The cell surface GA, receptor complex, interacts with a, heterotrimeric Gprotein, initiating two, separate signal, transduction chains., , γ, β, 1, , Plasma, membrane, α, GTP, , ALEURONE LAYER, CELL, , 2, Ca2+-dependent signal, transduction pathway, involving calmodulin, and protein kinase, , Ca2+-independent, signal transduction, pathway with cGMP, 3, , 3. A calciumindependent pathway,, involving cGMP, results, in the activation of a, signaling intermediate., , Activated GA, signaling, intermediate, Secretion, , 4. The activated signaling intermediate binds, to DELLA repressor, proteins in the nucleus., , NUCLEUS, 5, Repressor, degraded, , DELLA, repressor, , 5. The DELLA repressors, are degraded when, bound to the GA signal., , 4, GA-MYB gene, , DNA, , 6, , 6. The inactivation of, the DELLA repressors, allows the expression of, the MYB gene, as well as, other genes, to proceed, through transcription,, processing, and, translation., , Transcription, and processing, , GA-MYB mRNA, 7, GA-MYB, transcription, factor, , α-amylase gene, 8, , 7. The newly, synthesized MYB, protein then enters the, nucleus and binds to, the promoter genes for, a-amylase and other, hydrolytic enzymes., , Transcription, and processing, , α-amylase mRNA, Ribosomes, Rough ER, , 8. Transcription of, a-amylase and other, hydrolytic genes is, activated., , 9, , Golgi body, , 9. a-Amylase and other, hydrolases are, synthesized on the, rough ER., 10. Proteins are secreted, via the Golgi., 11. The secretory, pathway requires GA, stimulation via a, calcium–calmodulindependent signal, transduction pathway., , Secretory, vesicles, containing, a-amylase, , 10, , 11, , a-amylase, Starch degradation in endosperm, , 489
Page 541 :
490, , Chapter 20, , Other physiological effects of gibberellin include changes, in juvenility and flower sexuality, and the promotion of, fruit set, fruit growth, and seed germination. Gibberellins, have several commercial applications, mainly in enhancement of the size of seedless grapes and in the malting of, barley. Gibberellin synthesis inhibitors are used as dwarfing agents., Gibberellins are identified and quantified by gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, following, separation by high-performance liquid chromatography., Bioassays may be used to give an initial idea of the gibberellins present in a sample. Only certain GAs, notably, GA1 and GA4, are responsible for the effects in plants; the, others are precursors or metabolites., Gibberellins are terpenoid compounds, made up of isoprene units. The first compound in the isoprenoid pathway, committed to gibberellin biosynthesis is ent-kaurene. The, biosynthesis up to ent-kaurene occurs in plastids. ent-Kaurene is converted to GA12—the precursor of all the other, gibberellins—on the plastid envelope and then on the, endoplasmic reticulum via cytochrome P450 monooxygenases. Commonly a hydroxylation at C-13 also takes place, to give GA53., GA53 or GA12, each of which has 20 carbon atoms, is converted to other gibberellins by sequential oxidation of carbon, 20, followed by the loss of this carbon to give 19-carbon gibberellins. This process is followed by hydroxylation at carbon, 3 to give the growth-active GA1 or GA4. A subsequent, hydroxylation at carbon 2 eliminates biological activity., The steps after GA53 or GA12 occur in the cytoplasm., The genes for GA 20-oxidase (GA20ox), which catalyzes, the steps between GA53 and GA20, GA 3β-hydroxylase (or, GA 3-oxidase; GA3ox), which converts GA20 into GA1, and, GA 2-oxidase (GA2ox), which converts active GA1 to inactive GA8, have been isolated. Dwarf plants have been, genetically engineered by the use of antisense GA20ox or, GA3ox, or overexpression of GA2ox. Gibberellins may also, be glycosylated to give either an inactivated form or a storage form., The endogenous level of active gibberellin regulates its, own synthesis by switching on or inhibiting the transcription of the genes for the enzymes of gibberellin biosynthesis and degradation. Environmental factors such as photoperiod (e.g., leading to bolting and potato tuberization), and temperature (vernalization), and the presence of auxin, from the stem apex, also modulate gibberellin biosynthesis, through the transcription of the genes for the gibberellin, biosynthetic enzymes. Light regulates both GA1 biosynthesis through regulation of the transcription of the gibberellin, degradation gene and also causes a decrease in the responsiveness of stem elongation to the presence of gibberellin., The most pronounced effect of applied gibberellins is, stem elongation in dwarf and rosette plants. Gibberellins, , stimulate stem growth by promoting both cell elongation, and cell division. The activity of some wall enzymes has, been correlated with gibberellin-induced growth and cell, wall loosening. Gibberellin-stimulated cell divisions in, deep-water rice are regulated at the transition between, DNA replication and cell division., Three types of gibberellin response mutants have been, useful in the identification of genes involved in the gibberellin signaling pathway involved in stem growth: (1), gibberellin-insensitive dwarfs (e.g., gai-1), (2) gibberellin, deficiency reversion mutants (e.g., rga), and (3) constitutive, gibberellin responders (slender mutants) (e.g., spy)., GAI and RGA are related nuclear transcription factors, that repress growth. In the presence of gibberellin they are, degraded. The mutant gai-1, and the related wheat dwarfing gene mutant rht, have lost the ability to respond to gibberellin. SPY encodes a glycosyl transferase that is a member of a signal transduction chain prior to GAI/RGA., When a mutation interferes with the repressor function of, any of these, the plants grow tall., Gibberellin induces transcription of the gene for α-amylase biosynthesis in cereal grain aleurone cells. This process, is mediated by the transcription of a specific transcription, factor, GA-MYB, which binds to the upstream region of the, α-amylase gene, thus switching it on. The gibberellin receptor is located on the surface of aleurone cells. G-proteins, and cyclic GMP have been implicated as members of the, signal transduction chain on the way to GA-MYB. Calcium, is not on the route to α-amylase gene transcription, though, it does play a role in α-amylase secretion via protein phosphorylation., The gibberellin signal transduction pathway is probably, similar for stem elongation and α-amylase production., Dwarf wheat and rice also have impaired α-amylase gene, transcription. Gibberellin acts by deactivating repressors,, such as SPY, GAI, and RGA en route to both an increase in, cell elongation and the production of α-amylase., , Web Material, Web Topics, 20.1 Structures of Some Important Gibberellins,, Their Precursors and Derivatives, and, Inhibitors of Gibberellin Biosynthesis, The chemical structures of various gibberellins, and inhibitors of gibberellin biosynthesis are, presented., , 20.2 Gibberellin Detection, Gibberellin quantitation is now routine thanks to, sensitive modern physical methods of detection.
Page 543 :
492, , Chapter 20, , Lovegrove, A., Barratt, D. H. P., Beale, M. H., and Hooley, R. (1998), Gibberellin-photoaffinity labelling of two polypeptides in plant, plasma membranes. Plant J. 15: 311–320., O’Neill, D. P., Ross, J. J., and Reid, J. B. (2000) Changes in gibberellin, A1 levels and response during de-etiolation of pea seedlings., Plant Physiol. 124: 805–812., Ou-Lee, T. M., Turgeon, R., and Wu, R. (1988) Interaction of a gibberellin-induced factor with the upstream region of an α-amylase gene in rice aleurone tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:, 6366–6369., Peng, J., Richards, D. E., Hartley, N. M., Murphy, G. P., Flintham, J., E., Beales, J., Fish, L. J., Pelica, F., Sudhakar, D., Christou, P.,, Snape, J. W., Gale, M. D., and Harberd, N. P. (1999) ‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators., Nature 400: 256–261., Pensen, S. P., Schuurink, R. C., Fath, A., Gubler, F., Jacobsen, J. V., and, Jones, R. L. (1996) cGMP is required for gibberellic acid-induced, gene expression in barley aleurone. Plant Cell 8: 2325–2333., Phinney, B. O. (1983) The history of gibberellins. In The Biochemistry, and Physiology of Gibberellins, A. Crozier (ed.), Praeger, New York,, pp. 15–52., Reid, J. B., and Howell, S. H. (1995) Hormone mutants and plant, development. In Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, P. J. Davies, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands,, pp. 448–485., Ritchie, S., and Gilroy, S. (1998a) Calcium-dependent protein phosphorylation may mediate the gibberellic acid response in barley aleurone. Plant Physiol. 116: 765–776., Ritchie, S., and Gilroy, S. (1998b) Tansley Review No. 100: Gibberellins: Regulating genes and germination. New Phytol. 140:, 363–383., Ross, J., and O’Neill, D. (2001) New interactions between classical, plant hormones. Trends Plant Sci. 6: 2–4., Ross, J. J., O’Neill, D. P., Smith, J. J., Kerckhoffs, L. H. J., and Elliott,, R. C. (2000) Evidence that auxin promotes gibberellin A1 biosynthesis in pea. Plant J. 21: 547–552., Ross, J. J., Reid, J. B., Gaskin, P. and Macmillan, J. (1989) Internode, length in Pisum. Estimation of GA1 levels in genotypes Le, le and, led. Physiol. Plant. 76: 173–176., Sachs, R. M. (1965) Stem elongation. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 16:, 73–96., Sauter, M., and Kende, H. (1992) Gibberellin-induced growth and, regulation of the cell division cycle in deepwater rice. Planta 188:, 362–368., , Schneider, G., and Schmidt, J. (1990) Conjugation of gibberellins in, Zea mays L. In Plant Growth Substances, 1988, R. P. Pharis and S. B., Rood eds., Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 300–306., Silverstone, A. L., and Sun, T. P. (2000) Gibberellins and the green, revolution. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 1–2., Silverstone, A. L., Jung, H. S., Dill, A., Kawaide, H., Kamiya, Y., and, Sun, T. P. (2001) Repressing a repressor: Gibberellin-induced, rapid reduction of the RGA protein in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13:, 1555–1565., Sun, T. P. (2000) Gibberellin signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Plant, Biol. 3: 374–380., Thornton, T. M., Swain, S. M., and Olszewski, N. E. (1999) Gibberellin signal transduction presents . . . the SPY who O-GlcNAc’d me. Trends Plant Sci. 4: 424–428., Toyomasu, T., Kawaide, H., Mitsuhashi, W., Inoue, Y., and Kamiya,, Y. (1998) Phytochrome regulates gibberellin biosynthesis during, germination of photoblastic lettuce seeds. Plant Physiol. 118:, 1517–1523., Ueguchi-Tanaka, M., Fujisawa, Y., Kobayashi, M., Ashikari, M.,, Iwasaki, Y., Kitano, H., and Matsuoka, M. (2000) Rice dwarf, mutant d1, which is defective in the alpha subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein, affects gibberellin signal transduction. Proc., Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11638–11643., Wu, K., Li, L., Gage, D. A., and Zeevaart, J. A. D. (1996) Molecular, cloning and photoperiod-regulated expression of gibberellin 20oxidase from the long-day plant spinach. Plant Physiol. 110:, 547–554., Xu, Y. L., Gage, D. A., and Zeevaart, J. A. D. (1997) Gibberellins and, stem growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 114: 1471–1476., Yamaguchi, S., and Kamiya, Y. (2000) Gibberellin biosynthesis: Its, regulation by endogenous and environmental signals. Plant Cell, Physiol. 41: 251–257., Yang, T., Davies, P. J., and Reid, J. B. (1996) Genetic dissection of the, relative roles of auxin and gibberellin in the regulation of stem, elongation in intact light-grown peas. Plant Physiol. 110:, 1029–1034., Zeevaart, J. A. D., Gage, D. A., and Talon, M. (1993) Gibberellin A1 is, required for stem elongation in spinach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 7401–7405.
Page 544 :
Chapter, , 21, , Cytokinins:, Regulators of Cell Division, , THE CYTOKININS WERE DISCOVERED in the search for factors that, stimulate plant cells to divide (i.e., undergo cytokinesis). Since their discovery, cytokinins have been shown to have effects on many other physiological and developmental processes, including leaf senescence, nutrient mobilization, apical dominance, the formation and activity of shoot, apical meristems, floral development, the breaking of bud dormancy,, and seed germination. Cytokinins also appear to mediate many aspects, of light-regulated development, including chloroplast differentiation,, the development of autotrophic metabolism, and leaf and cotyledon, expansion., Although cytokinins regulate many cellular processes, the control of, cell division is central in plant growth and development and is considered diagnostic for this class of plant growth regulators. For these reasons we will preface our discussion of cytokinin function with a brief, consideration of the roles of cell division in normal development,, wounding, gall formation, and tissue culture., Later in the chapter we will examine the regulation of plant cell proliferation by cytokinins. Then we will turn to cytokinin functions not, directly related to cell division: chloroplast differentiation, the prevention of leaf senescence, and nutrient mobilization. Finally, we will consider the molecular mechanisms underlying cytokinin perception and, signaling., , CELL DIVISION AND PLANT DEVELOPMENT, Plant cells form as the result of cell divisions in a primary or secondary, meristem. Newly formed plant cells typically enlarge and differentiate,, but once they have assumed their function—whether transport, photosynthesis, support, storage, or protection—usually they do not divide, again during the life of the plant. In this respect they appear to be similar to animal cells, which are considered to be terminally differentiated., However, this similarity to the behavior of animal cells is only superficial. Almost every type of plant cell that retains its nucleus at maturity
Page 545 :
494, , Chapter 21, , has been shown to be capable of dividing. This property, comes into play during such processes as wound healing, and leaf abscission., , Differentiated Plant Cells Can Resume Division, Under some circumstances, mature, differentiated plant, cells may resume cell division in the intact plant. In many, species, mature cells of the cortex and/or phloem resume, division to form secondary meristems, such as the vascular, cambium or the cork cambium. The abscission zone at the, base of a leaf petiole is a region where mature parenchyma, cells begin to divide again after a period of mitotic inactivity, forming a layer of cells with relatively weak cell walls, where abscission can occur (see Chapter 22)., Wounding of plant tissues induces cell divisions at the, wound site. Even highly specialized cells, such as phloem, fibers and guard cells, may be stimulated by wounding to, divide at least once. Wound-induced mitotic activity typically is self-limiting; after a few divisions the derivative cells, stop dividing and redifferentiate. However, when the soildwelling bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens invades a, wound, it can cause the neoplastic (tumor-forming) disease, known as crown gall. This phenomenon is dramatic natural, evidence of the mitotic potential of mature plant cells., Without Agrobacterium infection, the wound-induced, cell division would subside after a few days and some of, the new cells would differentiate as a protective layer of, cork cells or vascular tissue. However, Agrobacterium, changes the character of the cells that divide in response to, the wound, making them tumorlike. They do not stop, dividing; rather they continue to divide throughout the life, of the plant to produce an unorganized mass of tumorlike, tissue called a gall (Figure 21.1). We will have more to say, about this important disease later in this chapter., , FIGURE 21.1 Tumor that formed on a tomato stem infected, with the crown gall bacterium, Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Two, months before this photo was taken the stem was wounded, and inoculated with a virulent strain of the crown gall bacterium. (From Aloni et al. 1998, courtesy of R. Aloni.), , Diffusible Factors May Control Cell Division, The considerations addressed in the previous section suggest that mature plant cells stop dividing because they no, longer receive a particular signal, possibly a hormone, that, is necessary for the initiation of cell division. The idea that, cell division may be initiated by a diffusible factor originated with the Austrian plant physiologist G. Haberlandt,, who, in about 1913, demonstrated that vascular tissue contains a water-soluble substance or substances that will stimulate the division of wounded potato tuber tissue. The, effort to determine the nature of this factor (or factors) led, to the discovery of the cytokinins in the 1950s., , Plant Tissues and Organs Can Be Cultured, Biologists have long been intrigued by the possibility of, growing organs, tissues, and cells in culture on a simple, nutrient medium, in the same way that microorganisms, can be cultured in test tubes or on petri dishes. In the 1930s,, Philip White demonstrated that tomato roots can be grown, indefinitely in a simple nutrient medium containing only, sucrose, mineral salts, and a few vitamins, with no added, hormones (White 1934)., In contrast to roots, isolated stem tissues exhibit very little growth in culture without added hormones in the, medium. Even if auxin is added, only limited growth may, occur, and usually this growth is not sustained. Frequently, this auxin-induced growth is due to cell enlargement only., The shoots of most plants cannot grow on a simple, medium lacking hormones, even if the cultured stem tissue contains apical or lateral meristems, until adventitious, roots form. Once the stem tissue has rooted, shoot growth, resumes, but now as an integrated, whole plant., These observations indicate that there is a difference in, the regulation of cell division in root and shoot meristems., They also suggest that some root-derived factor(s) may regulate growth in the shoot., Crown gall stem tissue is an exception to these generalizations. After a gall has formed on a plant, heating the, plant to 42°C will kill the bacterium that induced gall formation. The plant will survive the heat treatment, and its, gall tissue will continue to grow as a bacteria-free tumor, (Braun 1958)., Tissues removed from these bacteria-free tumors grow, on simple, chemically defined culture media that would, not support the proliferation of normal stem tissue of the, same species. However, these stem-derived tissues are not, organized. Instead they grow as a mass of disorganized,, relatively undifferentiated cells called callus tissue., Callus tissue sometimes forms naturally in response to, wounding, or in graft unions where stems of two different, plants are joined. Crown gall tumors are a specific type of, callus, whether they are growing attached to the plant or, in culture. The finding that crown gall callus tissue can be, cultured demonstrated that cells derived from stem tissues, are capable of proliferating in culture and that contact with
Page 546 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, the bacteria may cause the stem cells to produce cell division–stimulating factors., , THE DISCOVERY, IDENTIFICATION, AND, PROPERTIES OF CYTOKININS, A great many substances were tested in an effort to initiate, and sustain the proliferation of normal stem tissues in culture. Materials ranging from yeast extract to tomato juice, were found to have a positive effect, at least with some tissues. However, culture growth was stimulated most dramatically when the liquid endosperm of coconut, also, known as coconut milk, was added to the culture medium., Philip White’s nutrient medium, supplemented with an, auxin and 10 to 20% coconut milk, will support the continued cell division of mature, differentiated cells from a, wide variety of tissues and species, leading to the formation of callus tissue (Caplin and Steward 1948). This finding indicated that coconut milk contains a substance or, substances that stimulate mature cells to enter and remain, in the cell division cycle., Eventually coconut milk was shown to contain the, cytokinin zeatin, but this finding was not obtained until, several years after the discovery of the cytokinins (Letham, 1974). The first cytokinin to be discovered was the synthetic, analog kinetin., , Kinetin Was Discovered as a Breakdown Product, of DNA, In the 1940s and 1950s, Folke Skoog and coworkers at the, University of Wisconsin tested many substances for their, ability to initiate and sustain the proliferation of cultured, tobacco pith tissue. They had observed that the nucleic acid, base adenine had a slight promotive effect, so they tested, the possibility that nucleic acids would stimulate division, in this tissue. Surprisingly, autoclaved herring sperm DNA, had a powerful cell division–promoting effect., After much work, a small molecule was identified from, the autoclaved DNA and named kinetin. It was shown to, be an adenine (or aminopurine) derivative, 6-furfurylaminopurine (Miller et al. 1955):, H, , H, C, , H, N, , H, , C, , C, , H, , N, , 6, , C, , 3 4C, , 1, 2, , N, , 5C, , C, O, , H, , Amino, purine, , C, , C, , H, , N, , 7, , 9, , 8C, , H, , N, H, , Kinetin, , In the presence of an auxin, kinetin would stimulate, tobacco pith parenchyma tissue to proliferate in culture. No, kinetin-induced cell division occurs without auxin in the, culture medium. (For more details, see Web Topic 21.1.), , 495, , Kinetin is not a naturally occurring plant growth regulator, and it does not occur as a base in the DNA of any, species. It is a by-product of the heat-induced degradation, of DNA, in which the deoxyribose sugar of adenosine is, converted to a furfuryl ring and shifted from the 9 position, to the 6 position on the adenine ring., The discovery of kinetin was important because it demonstrated that cell division could be induced by a simple chemical substance. Of greater importance, the discovery of kinetin, suggested that naturally occurring molecules with structures, similar to that of kinetin regulate cell division activity within, the plant. This hypothesis proved to be correct., , Zeatin Is the Most Abundant Natural Cytokinin, Several years after the discovery of kinetin, extracts of the, immature endosperm of corn (Zea mays) were found to, contain a substance that has the same biological effect as, kinetin. This substance stimulates mature plant cells to, divide when added to a culture medium along with an, auxin. Letham (1973) isolated the molecule responsible for, this activity and identified it as trans-6-(4-hydroxy-3methylbut-2-enylamino)purine, which he called zeatin:, H, HN, , CH2, N, , N, N, , N, H, , H, , CH2OH, C, , C, , CH3, C, , CH3, , HN, , C, , CH2, , CH2OH, , N, , N, N, , N, H, , trans-Zeatin, cis-Zeatin, 6-(4-Hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enylamino)purine, , The molecular structure of zeatin is similar to that of, kinetin. Both molecules are adenine or aminopurine, derivatives. Although they have different side chains, in, both cases the side chain is attached to the 6 nitrogen of, the aminopurine. Because the side chain of zeatin has a, double bond, it can exist in either the cis or the trans configuration., In higher plants, zeatin occurs in both the cis and the, trans configurations, and these forms can be interconverted, by an enzyme known as zeatin isomerase. Although the trans, form of zeatin is much more active in biological assays, the, cis form may also play important roles, as suggested by the, fact that it has been found in high levels in a number of, plant species and particular tissues. A gene encoding a glucosyl transferase enzyme specific to cis-zeatin has recently, been cloned, which further supports a biological role for, this isoform of zeatin., Since its discovery in immature maize endosperm,, zeatin has been found in many plants and in some bacteria. It is the most prevalent cytokinin in higher plants, but, other substituted aminopurines that are active as, cytokinins have been isolated from many plant and bac-
Page 547 :
496, , Chapter 21, , terial species. These aminopurines differ from zeatin in the, nature of the side chain attached to the 6 nitrogen or in the, attachment of a side chain to carbon 2:, H, , CH3, C, , HN, , C, CH3, , CH2, , and all the naturally occurring cytokinins are aminopurine, derivatives. There are also synthetic cytokinin compounds, that have not been identified in plants, most notable of, which are the diphenylurea-type cytokinins, such as thidiazuron, which is used commercially as a defoliant and an, herbicide:, O, , NH, , N, , N, , 9, N, H, , N, , C, , HN, , N,N′-Diphenylurea (nonamino, purine with weak activity), , N6-(∆2-Isopentenyl)-adenine (iP), N, H, , CH2OH, C, , HN, , CH2, , S, , C, H, , N, N, H, , CH3, , N, H, , Thidiazuron, , N, , N, , N, H, , N, , Dihydrozeatin (DZ), , In addition, these cytokinins can be present in the plant, as a riboside (in which a ribose sugar is attached to the 9, nitrogen of the purine ring), a ribotide (in which the ribose, sugar moiety contains a phosphate group), or a glycoside, (in which a sugar molecule is attached to the 3, 7, or 9 nitrogen of the purine ring, or to the oxygen of the zeatin or, dihydrozeatin side chain) (see Web Topic 21.2)., , Some Synthetic Compounds Can Mimic or, Antagonize Cytokinin Action, Cytokinins are defined as compounds that have biological, activities similar to those of trans-zeatin. These activities, include the ability to do the following:, • Induce cell division in callus cells in the presence of, an auxin, • Promote bud or root formation from callus cultures, when in the appropriate molar ratios to auxin, • Delay senescence of leaves, • Promote expansion of dicot cotyledons, Many chemical compounds have been synthesized and, tested for cytokinin activity. Analysis of these compounds, provides insight into the structural requirements for activity. Nearly all compounds active as cytokinins are N6-substituted aminopurines, such as benzyladenine (BA):, , CH2, HN, N, , N, N, , N, H, , Benzyladenine, (benzylaminopurine), (BA), , In the course of determining the structural requirements, for cytokinin activity, investigators found that some molecules act as cytokinin antagonists:, CH3, NH, N, , CH2, N, , CH2, , CH, CH3, , N, N, CH3, , 3-Methyl-7-(3-methylbutylamino)pyrazolo[4,3-D]pyrimidine, , These molecules are able to block the action of cytokinins,, and their effects may be overcome by the addition of more, cytokinin. Naturally occurring molecules with cytokinin, activity may be detected and identified by a combination, of physical methods and bioassays (see Web Topic 21.3)., , Cytokinins Occur in Both Free and Bound Forms, Hormonal cytokinins are present as free molecules (not, covalently attached to any macromolecule) in plants and, certain bacteria. Free cytokinins have been found in a wide, spectrum of angiosperms and probably are universal in, this group of plants. They have also been found in algae,, diatoms, mosses, ferns, and conifers., The regulatory role of cytokinins has been demonstrated, only in angiosperms, conifers, and mosses, but they may, function to regulate the growth, development, and metabolism of all plants. Usually zeatin is the most abundant naturally occurring free cytokinin, but dihydrozeatin (DZ) and, isopentenyl adenine (iP) also are commonly found in higher, plants and bacteria. Numerous derivatives of these three, cytokinins have been identified in plant extracts (see the, structures illustrated in Figure 21.6)., Transfer RNA (tRNA) contains not only the four, nucleotides used to construct all other forms of RNA, but, also some unusual nucleotides in which the base has been, modified. Some of these “hypermodified” bases act as, cytokinins when the tRNA is hydrolyzed and tested in one, of the cytokinin bioassays. Some plant tRNAs contain cis-
Page 548 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, zeatin as a hypermodified base. However, cytokinins are, not confined to plant tRNAs. They are part of certain, tRNAs from all organisms, from bacteria to humans. (For, details, see Web Topic 21.4.), , H, , It has been difficult to determine which species of cytokinin, represents the active form of the hormone, but the recent, identification of the cytokinin receptor CRE1 has allowed, this question to be addressed. The relevant experiments have, shown that the free-base form of trans-zeatin, but not its riboside or ribotide derivatives, binds directly to CRE1, indicating that the free base is the active form (Yamada et al. 2001)., Although the free-base form of trans-zeatin is thought to, be the hormonally active cytokinin, some other compounds, have cytokinin activity, either because they are readily converted to zeatin, dihydrozeatin, or isopentenyl adenine, or, because they release these compounds from other molecules, such as cytokinin glucosides. For example, tobacco, cells in culture do not grow unless cytokinin ribosides supplied in the culture medium are converted to the free base., In another example, excised radish cotyledons grow, when they are cultured in a solution containing the, cytokinin base benzyladenine (BA, an N6-substituted, aminopurine cytokinin). The cultured cotyledons readily, take up the hormone and convert it to various BA glucosides, BA ribonucleoside, and BA ribonucleotide. When the, cotyledons are transferred back to a medium lacking a, cytokinin, their growth rate declines, as do the concentrations of BA, BA ribonucleoside, and BA ribonucleotide in, the tissues. However, the level of the BA glucosides, remains constant. This finding suggests that the glucosides, cannot be the active form of the hormone., , C, CH3, , CH2, N, , N, , The Hormonally Active Cytokinin Is the Free Base, , CH2OH, C, , HN, , 497, , 9, N, N, HOCH2, O, , O, H, , O, H, , Ribosylzeatin (zeatin riboside), , H, , CH3, C, , HN, , CH2, , C, CH3, , N, , N, , 9, N, N, HOCH2, O, , O, H, , O, H, , N6-(D2-Isopentenyl)adenosine, ([9R]iP), , FIGURE 21.2 Structures of ribosylzeatin and N6-(∆2-isopentenyl)adenosine ([9R]iP)., , Some Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Insects, and, Nematodes Secrete Free Cytokinins, Some bacteria and fungi are intimately associated with, higher plants. Many of these microorganisms produce and, secrete substantial amounts of cytokinins and/or cause the, plant cells to synthesize plant hormones, including, cytokinins (Akiyoshi et al. 1987). The cytokinins produced, by microorganisms include trans-zeatin, [9R]iP, cis-zeatin,, and their ribosides (Figure 21.2). Infection of plant tissues, with these microorganisms can induce the tissues to divide, and, in some cases, to form special structures, such as mycorrhizae, in which the microorganism can reside in a mutualistic relationship with the plant., In addition to the crown gall bacterium, Agrobacterium, tumefaciens, other pathogenic bacteria may stimulate plant, cells to divide. For example, Corynebacterium fascians is a, major cause of the growth abnormality known as witches’broom (Figure 21.3). The shoots of plants infected by C. fascians resemble an old-fashioned straw broom because the, lateral buds, which normally remain dormant, are stimulated by the bacterial cytokinin to grow (Hamilton and, Lowe 1972)., , FIGURE 21.3 Witches’ broom on balsam fir (Abies balsamea)., , (Photo © Gregory K. Scott/Photo Researchers, Inc.)
Page 549 :
498, , Chapter 21, , Infection with a close relative of the crown gall organism, Agrobacterium rhizogenes, causes masses of roots, instead of callus tissue to develop from the site of infection. A. rhizogenes is able to modify cytokinin metabolism, in infected plant tissues through a mechanism that will be, described later in this chapter., Certain insects secrete cytokinins, which may play a, role in the formation of galls utilized by these insects as, feeding sites. Root-knot nematodes also produce, cytokinins, which may be involved in manipulating host, development to produce the giant cells from which the, nematode feeds (Elzen 1983)., , BIOSYNTHESIS, METABOLISM, AND, TRANSPORT OF CYTOKININS, The side chains of naturally occurring cytokinins are, chemically related to rubber, carotenoid pigments, the, plant hormones gibberellin and abscisic acid, and some of, the plant defense compounds known as phytoalexins. All, of these compounds are constructed, at least in part, from, isoprene units (see Chapter 13)., Isoprene is similar in structure to the side chains of, zeatin and iP (see the structures illustrated in Figure 21.6)., These cytokinin side chains are synthesized from an isoprene derivative. Large molecules of rubber and the, carotenoids are constructed by the polymerization of, many isoprene units; cytokinins contain just one of these, units. The precursor(s) for the formation of these isoprene, structures are either mevalonic acid or pyruvate plus 3phosphoglycerate, depending on which pathway is, involved (see Chapter 13). These precursors are converted, to the biological isoprene unit dimethylallyl diphosphate, (DMAPP)., , Crown Gall Cells Have Acquired a Gene for, Cytokinin Synthesis, Bacteria-free tissues from crown gall tumors proliferate in, culture without the addition of any hormones to the culture medium. Crown gall tissues contain substantial, amounts of both auxin and free cytokinins. Furthermore,, when radioactively labeled adenine is fed to periwinkle, (Vinca rosea) crown gall tissues, it is incorporated into both, zeatin and zeatin riboside, demonstrating that gall tissues, contain the cytokinin biosynthetic pathway. Control stem, tissue, which has not been transformed by Agrobacterium,, does not incorporate labeled adenine into cytokinins., During infection by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, plant, cells incorporate bacterial DNA into their chromosomes., The virulent strains of Agrobacterium contain a large plasmid known as the Ti plasmid. Plasmids are circular pieces, of extrachromosomal DNA that are not essential for the, life of the bacterium. However, plasmids frequently contain genes that enhance the ability of the bacterium to survive in special environments., , A small portion of the Ti plasmid, known as the TDNA, is incorporated into the nuclear DNA of the host, plant cell (Figure 21.4) (Chilton et al. 1977). T-DNA carries, genes necessary for the biosynthesis of trans-zeatin and, auxin, as well as a member of a class of unusual nitrogencontaining compounds called opines (Figure 21.5). Opines, are not synthesized by plants except after crown gall transformation., The T-DNA gene involved in cytokinin biosynthesis—, known as the ipt1 gene—encodes an isopentenyl transferase (IPT) enzyme that transfers the isopentenyl group, from DMAPP to AMP (adenosine monophosphate) to form, isopentenyl adenine ribotide (Figure 21.6) (Akiyoshi et al., 1984; Barry et al. 1984). The ipt gene has been called the tmr, locus because, when inactivated by mutation, it results in, “rooty” tumors. Isopentenyl adenine ribotide can be converted to the active cytokinins isopentenyl adenine, transzeatin, and dihydrozeatin by endogenous enzymes in plant, cells. This conversion route is similar to the pathway for, cytokinin synthesis that has been postulated for normal tissue (see Figure 21.6)., The T-DNA also contains two genes encoding enzymes, that convert tryptophan to the auxin indole-3-acetic acid, (IAA). This pathway of auxin biosynthesis differs from the, one in nontransformed cells and involves indoleacetamide, as an intermediate (see Figure 19.6). The ipt gene and the, two auxin biosynthetic genes of T-DNA are phyto-oncogenes, since they can induce tumors in plants (see Web, Topic 21.5)., Because their promoters are plant eukaryotic promoters,, none of the T-DNA genes are expressed in the bacterium;, rather they are transcribed after they are inserted into the, plant chromosomes. Transcription of the genes leads to, synthesis of the enzymes they encode, resulting in the production of zeatin, auxin, and an opine. The bacterium can, utilize the opine as a nitrogen source, but cells of higher, plants cannot. Thus, by transforming the plant cells, the, bacterium provides itself with an expanding environment, (the gall tissue) in which the host cells are directed to produce a substance (the opine) that only the bacterium can, utilize for its nutrition (Bomhoff et al. 1976)., An important difference between the control of, cytokinin biosynthesis in crown gall tissues and in normal, tissues is that the T-DNA genes for cytokinin synthesis are, expressed in all infected cells, even those in which the, native plant genes for biosynthesis of the hormone are normally repressed., , IPT Catalyzes the First Step in Cytokinin, Biosynthesis, The first committed step in cytokinin biosynthesis is the, transfer of the isopentenyl group of dimethylallyl diphos1, , Bacterial genes, unlike plant genes, are written in lowercase italics.
Page 550 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, , 499, , 2. A virulent bacterium carries a Ti plasmid, in addition to its own chromosomal DNA., The plasmid‘s T-DNA enters a cell and, integrates into the cell‘s chromosomal DNA., T-DNA, , Chromosomal, DNA, , T-DNA, Nucleus, , Ti plasmid, , Chromosome, , Crown gall, , Agrobacterium, tumefaciens, 1. The tumor is initiated, when bacteria enter a, lesion and attach, themselves to cells., , Transformed, plant cell, , 3. Transformed cells, proliferate to form a, crown gall tumor., 4. Tumor tissue can be “cured“ of, bacteria by incubation at 42ºC., The bacteria-free tumor can be, cultured indefinitely in the, absence of hormones., , FIGURE 21.4 Tumor induction by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. (After Chilton 1983.), , phate (DMAPP ) to an adenosine moiety. An enzyme that, catalyzes such an activity was first identified in the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum, and subsequently, the ipt gene from Agrobacterium was found to encode such, an enzyme. In both cases, DMAPP and AMP are converted, to isopentenyladenosine-5′-monophosphate (iPMP)., As noted earlier, cytokinins are also present in the, tRNAs of most cells, including plant and animal cells. The, tRNA cytokinins are synthesized by modification of specific adenine residues within the fully transcribed tRNA., As with the free cytokinins, isopentenyl groups are transferred to the adenine molecules from DMAPP by an, enzyme call tRNA-IPT. The genes for tRNA-IPT have been, cloned from many species., , NH2, C, , NH, , (CH2)3, , NH, , CH, , COOH, , NH, CH3, , CH, , COOH, , CH, , COOH, , Octopine, , NH2, C, , NH, , (CH2)3, , NH, , NH, , FIGURE 21.5 The two major opines, octopine and nopaline, are found only in crown, , gall tumors. The genes required for their synthesis are present in the T-DNA from, Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The bacterium, but not the plant, can utilize the opines as, a nitrogen source., , COOH, , (CH2)2, , Nopaline, , CH, , COOH
Page 551 :
Plant, , Bacterial, , NH2, , NH2, N, , N, , N, , N, , N, , N, , O, , O, , P P P, , N, , N, , O, , O, , P, , +, , O, , P P, , DMAPP, ATP/ADP, , HO, , AMP, , OH, , AtIPT4, , HO, , Bacterial, IPT (TMR), , N, N, , P, , HO, , OH, , iPMP, OH, , OH, , N, N, , O, , O, , HO, , ZTP/ZDP, , N, N, , N, , N, , N, , OH, , O, , O, , HO, , N, N, , N, , N, , N, , P, , OH, , OH, , N, , N, , P P P, , iP, , O, , O, , OH, , iPTP/iPDP, , iPA, , N, , N, , O, , HO, , N, , N, , N, , N, O, , First enzyme in biosynthetic, pathway for cytokinins, , N, , N, , P P P, , OH, , OH, , HO, , ZMP, , N, , trans-Zeatin, , OH, , transZOG1, , N, H, , cis-Zeatin, , Glucosidase, , cisZOG1, , Glucosidase, , ZR, O, , FIGURE 21.6 Biosynthetic pathway for cytokinin biosynthesis. The first committed step in cytokinin biosynthesis is the addition of the isopentenyl side, chain from DMAPP to an adenosine moiety. The plant and bacterial IPT, enzymes differ in the adenosine substrate used; the plant enzyme appears to, utilize both ADP and ATP, and the bacterial enzyme utilizes AMP. The products of these reactions (iPMP, iPDP, or iPTP) are converted to zeatin by an, unidentified hydroxylase. The various phosphorylated forms can be interconverted and free trans-Zeatin can be formed from the riboside by enzymes of, general purine metabolism. trans-Zeatin can be metabolized in various ways, as shown, and these reactions are catalyzed by the indicated enzymes., , The possibility that free cytokinins are derived from, tRNA has been explored extensively. Although the tRNAbound cytokinins can act as hormonal signals for plant cells, if the tRNA is degraded and fed back to the cells, it is, unlikely that any significant amount of the free hormonal, cytokinin in plants is derived from the turnover of tRNA., , N, , N, , N, H, , N, , O, , HO, , cis-trans, isomerase, , N, , N, , N, , N, , OH, , N, , Glc, , N, N, , N, N, , O, , N, , N, H, , O-glucosyltrans-zeatin, , Glc, , N, , N, N, , N, H, , O-glucosylcis-zeatin, , An enzyme with IPT activity was identified from crude, extracts of various plant tissues, but researchers were, unable to purify the protein to homogeneity. Recently, plant, IPT genes were cloned after the Arabidopsis genome was, analyzed for potential ipt-like sequences (Kakimoto 2001;, Takei et al. 2001). Nine different IPT genes were identified
Page 552 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, in Arabidopsis—many more than are present in animal, genomes, which generally contain only one or two such, genes used in tRNA modification., Phylogenetic analysis revealed that one of the Arabidopsis IPT genes resembles bacterial tRNA-ipt, another resembles eukaryotic tRNA-IPT, and the other seven form a distinct group or clade together with other plant sequences, (see Web Topic 21.6). The grouping of the seven Arabidopsis IPT genes in this unique plant clade provided a clue that, these genes may encode the cytokinin biosynthetic enzyme., The proteins encoded by these genes were expressed in, E. coli and analyzed. It was found that, with the exception, of the gene most closely related to the animal tRNA-IPT, genes, these genes encoded proteins capable of synthesizing free cytokinins. Unlike their bacterial counterparts, however, the Arabidopsis enzymes that have been analyzed utilize ATP and ADP preferentially over AMP (see Figure 21.6)., , Cytokinins from the Root Are Transported, to the Shoot via the Xylem, Root apical meristems are major sites of synthesis of the, free cytokinins in whole plants. The cytokinins synthesized, in roots appear to move through the xylem into the shoot,, along with the water and minerals taken up by the roots., This pathway of cytokinin movement has been inferred, from the analysis of xylem exudate., When the shoot is cut from a rooted plant near the soil, line, the xylem sap may continue to flow from the cut, stump for some time. This xylem exudate contains cytokinins. If the soil covering the roots is kept moist, the flow, of xylem exudate can continue for several days. Because, the cytokinin content of the exudate does not diminish, the, cytokinins found in it are likely to be synthesized by the, roots. In addition, environmental factors that interfere with, root function, such as water stress, reduce the cytokinin, content of the xylem exudate (Itai and Vaadia 1971). Conversely, resupply of nitrate to nitrogen-starved maize roots, results in an elevation of the concentration of cytokinins in, the xylem sap (Samuelson 1992), which has been correlated, to an induction of cytokinin-regulated gene expression in, the shoots (Takei et al. 2001)., Although the presence of cytokinin in the xylem is well, established, recent grafting experiments have cast doubt on, the presumed role of this root-derived cytokinin in shoot, development. Tobacco transformed with an inducible ipt, gene from Agrobacterium displayed increased lateral bud, outgrowth and delayed senescence., To assess the role of cytokinin derived from the root, the, tobacco root stock engineered to overproduce cytokinin, was grafted to a wild-type shoot. Surprisingly, no phenotypic consequences were observed in the shoot, even, though an increased concentration of cytokinin was measured in the transpiration stream (Faiss et al. 1997). Thus, the excess cytokinin in the roots had no effect on the, grafted shoot., , 501, , Roots are not the only parts of the plant capable of synthesizing cytokinins. For example, young maize embryos, synthesize cytokinins, as do young developing leaves,, young fruits, and possibly many other tissues. Clearly, further studies will be needed to resolve the roles of, cytokinins transported from the root versus cytokinins, synthesized in the shoot., , A Signal from the Shoot Regulates the Transport, of Zeatin Ribosides from the Root, The cytokinins in the xylem exudate are mainly in the, form of zeatin ribosides. Once they reach the leaves, some, of these nucleosides are converted to the free-base form or, to glucosides (Noodén and Letham 1993). Cytokinin glucosides may accumulate to high levels in seeds and in, leaves, and substantial amounts may be present even in, senescing leaves. Although the glucosides are active as, cytokinins in bioassays, often they lack hormonal activity after they form within cells, possibly because they are, compartmentalized in such a way that they are unavailable. Compartmentation may explain the conflicting observations that cytokinins are transported readily by the, xylem but that radioactive cytokinins applied to leaves in, intact plants do not appear to move from the site of application., Evidence from grafting experiments with mutants suggests that the transport of zeatin riboside from the root to, the shoot is regulated by signals from the shoot. The rms4, mutant of pea (Pisum sativum L.) is characterized by a 40fold decrease in the concentration of zeatin riboside in the, xylem sap of the roots. However, grafting a wild-type shoot, onto an rms4 mutant root increased the zeatin riboside levels in the xylem exudate to wild-type levels. Conversely,, grafting an rms4 mutant shoot onto a wild-type root lowered the concentration of zeatin riboside in the xylem exudate to mutant levels (Beveridge et al. 1997)., These results suggest that a signal from the shoot can, regulate cytokinin transport from the root. The identity of, this signal has not yet been determined., , Cytokinins Are Rapidly Metabolized by, Plant Tissues, Free cytokinins are readily converted to their respective, nucleoside and nucleotide forms. Such interconversions, likely involve enzymes common to purine metabolism., Many plant tissues contain the enzyme cytokinin oxidase, which cleaves the side chain from zeatin (both cis, and trans), zeatin riboside, iP, and their N-glucosides, but, not their O-glucoside derivatives (Figure 21.7). However,, dihydrozeatin and its conjugates are resistant to cleavage., Cytokinin oxidase irreversibly inactivates cytokinins, and, it could be important in regulating or limiting cytokinin, effects. The activity of the enzyme is induced by high, cytokinin concentrations, due at least in part to an elevation of the RNA levels for a subset of the genes.
Page 553 :
502, , Chapter 21, , HN, , ever, as germination is initiated, and this increase in free, cytokinins is accompanied by a corresponding decrease in, cytokinin glucosides., , NH2, N, , N, , N, H, , N, , iP, , Cytokinin, oxidase, N, O2, , CH3, , N, , +, N, , N, H, , Adenine, , H, C, , CH3, , CH, , C, , THE BIOLOGICAL ROLES OF CYTOKININS, O, , 3-Methyl-2-butenal, , FIGURE 21.7 Cytokinin oxidase irreversibly degrades some, , cytokinins., , A gene encoding cytokinin oxidase was first identified, in maize (Houba-Herin et al. 1999; Morris et al. 1999). In, Arabidopsis, cytokinin oxidase is encoded by a multigene, family whose members show distinct patterns of expression. Interestingly, several of the genes contain putative, secretory signals, suggesting that at least some of these, enzymes may be extracellular., Cytokinin levels can also be regulated by conjugation of, the hormone at various positions. The nitrogens at the 3, 7,, and 9 positions of the adenine ring of cytokinins can be, conjugated to glucose residues. Alanine can also be conjugated to the nitrogen at the 9 positon, forming lupinic acid., These modifications are generally irreversible, and such, conjugated forms of cytokinin are inactive in bioassays,, with the exception of the N3-glucosides., The hydroxyl group of the side chain of cytokinins is, also the target for conjugation to glucose residues, or in, some cases xylose residues, yielding O-glucoside and Oxyloside cytokinins. O-glucosides are resistant to cleavage, by cytokinin oxidases, which may explain why these derivatives have higher biological activity in some assays than, their corresponding free bases have., Enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of either glucose, or xylose to zeatin have been purified, and their respective, genes have been cloned (Martin et al. 1999). These enzymes, have stringent substrate specificities for the sugar donor, and the cytokinin bases. Only free trans-zeatin and dihydrozeatin bases are efficient substrates; the corresponding, nucleosides are not substrates, nor is cis-zeatin. The specificity of these enzymes suggests that the conjugation to the, side chain is precisely regulated., The conjugations at the side chain can be removed by, glucosidase enzymes to yield free cytokinins, which, as discussed earlier, are the active forms. Thus, cytokinin glucosides may be a storage form, or metabolically inactive state,, of these compounds. A gene encoding a glucosidase that can, release cytokinins from sugar conjugates has been cloned, from maize, and its expression could play an important role, in the germination of maize seeds (Brzobohaty et al. 1993)., Dormant seeds often have high levels of cytokinin glucosides but very low levels of hormonally active free, cytokinins. Levels of free cytokinins increase rapidly, how-, , Although discovered as a cell division factor, cytokinins, can stimulate or inhibit a variety of physiological, metabolic, biochemical, and developmental processes when, they are applied to higher plants, and it is increasingly, clear that endogenous cytokinins play an important role in, the regulation of these events in the intact plant., In this section we will survey some of the diverse effects, of cytokinin on plant growth and development, including, a discussion of its role in regulating cell division. The discovery of the tumor-inducing Ti plasmid in the plant-pathogenic bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens provided plant, scientists with a powerful new tool for introducing foreign, genes into plants, and for studying the role of cytokinin in, development. In addition to its role in cell proliferation,, cytokinin affects many other processes, including differentiation, apical dominance, and senescence., , Cytokinins Regulate Cell Division in Shoots, and Roots, As discussed earlier, cytokinins are generally required for, cell division of plant cells in vitro. Several lines of evidence, suggest that cytokinins also play key roles in the regulation, of cell division in vivo., Much of the cell division in an adult plant occurs in the, meristems (see Chapter 16). Localized expression of the ipt, gene of Agrobacterium in somatic sectors of tobacco leaves, causes the formation of ectopic (abnormally located) meristems, indicating that elevated levels of cytokinin are sufficient to initiate cell divisions in these leaves (Estruch et al., 1991). Elevation of endogenous cytokinin levels in transgenic Arabidopsis results in overexpression of the KNOTTED homeobox transcription factor homologs KNAT1 and, STM—genes that are important in the regulation of meristem function (see Chapter 16) (Rupp et al. 1999). Interestingly, overexpression of KNAT1 also appears to elevate, cytokinin levels in transgenic tobacco, suggesting an interdependent relationship between KNAT and the level of, cytokinins., Overexpression of several of the Arabidopsis cytokinin, oxidase genes in tobacco results in a reduction of endogenous cytokinin levels and a consequent strong retardation, of shoot development due to a reduction in the rate of cell, proliferation in the shoot apical meristem (Figures 21.8 and, 21.9) (Werner et al. 2001). This finding strongly supports, the notion that endogenous cytokinins regulate cell division in vivo., Surprisingly, the same overexpression of cytokinin oxidase in tobacco led to an enhancement of root growth (Figure 21.10), primarily by increasing the size of the root api-
Page 554 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, , 503, , mutations in the cytokinin receptor (which will be discussed later in the chapter). Mutations in the cytokinin, receptor disrupt the development of the root vasculature., Known as cre1, these mutants have no phloem in their, roots; the root vascular system is composed almost entirely, of xylem (see Chapters 4 and 10)., Further analysis revealed that this defect was due to an, insufficient number of vasculature stem cells. That is, at the, time of differentiation of the phloem and xylem, the pool, of stem cells is abnormally small in cre1 mutants; all the, cells become committed to a xylem fate, and no stem cells, remain to specify phloem. These results indicate that, cytokinin plays a key role in regulating proliferation of the, vasculature stem cells of the root., , Cytokinins Regulate Specific Components of the, Cell Cycle, , FIGURE 21.8 Tobacco plants overexpressing the gene for, cytokinin oxidase. The plant on the left is wild type. The, two plants on the right are overexpressing two different, constructs of the Arabidopsis gene for cytokinin oxidase:, AtCKX1 and AtCKX2. Shoot growth is strongly inhibited in, the transgenic plants. (From Werner et al. 2001.), , cal meristem (Figure 21.11). Since the root is a major source, of cytokinin, this result may indicate that cytokinins play, opposite roles in regulating cell proliferation in root and, shoot meristems., An additional line of evidence linking cytokinin to the, regulation of cell division in vivo came from analyses of, (A), , Cytokinins regulate cell division by affecting the controls, that govern the passage of the cell through the cell division, cycle. Zeatin levels were found to peak in synchronized, culture tobacco cells at the end of S phase, mitosis, and G1, phase., Cytokinins were discovered in relation to their ability to, stimulate cell division in tissues supplied with an optimal, level of auxin. Evidence suggests that both auxin and, cytokinins participate in regulation of the cell cycle and that, they do so by controlling the activity of cyclin-dependent, kinases. As discussed in Chapter 1, cyclin-dependent protein, kinases (CDKs), in concert with their regulatory subunits, the, cyclins, are enzymes that regulate the eukaryotic cell cycle., The expression of the gene that encodes the major CDK,, Cdc2 (cell division cycle 2), is regulated by auxin (see Chapter 19). In pea root tissues, CDC2 mRNA was induced, within 10 minutes after treatment with auxin, and high levels of CDK are induced in tobacco pith when it is cultured, on medium containing auxin (John et al. 1993). However,, the CDK induced by auxin is enzymatically inactive, and, , (B), , FIGURE 21.9 Cytokinin is required for normal growth of the shoot apical meristem., (A) Longitudinal section through the shoot apical meristem of a wild-type tobacco plant., (B) Longitudinal section through the shoot apical meristem of a transgenic tobacco overexpressing the gene that encodes cytokinin oxidase (AtCKX1). Note the reduction in the, size of the apical meristem in the cytokinin-deficient plant. (From Werner et al. 2001.)
Page 555 :
(A), , (B), , FIGURE 21.10 Cytokinin suppresses the growth of roots., , FIGURE 21.11 Cytokinin suppresses the size and cell divi-, , The cytokinin-deficient AtCKX1 roots (right) are larger than, those of the wild-type tobacco plant (left). (From Werner et, al. 2001.), , sion activity of roots. (A) Wild type. (B) AtCKX1. These, roots were stained with the fluorescent dye, 4’, 6diamidino-2-phenylindole, which stains the nucleus. (From, Werner et al. 2001.), , high levels of CDK alone are not sufficient to permit cells, to divide., Cytokinin has been linked to the activation of a Cdc25like phosphatase, whose role is to remove an inhibitory, phosphate group from the Cdc2 kinase (Zhang et al. 1996)., This action of cytokinin provides one potential link, between cytokinin and auxin in regulating the cell cycle., Recently, a second major input for cytokinin in regulating, the cell cycle has emerged. Cytokinins elevate the expression, of the CYCD3 gene, which encodes a D-type cyclin (Soni et, al. 1995; Riou-Khamlichi et al. 1999). In animal cells, D-type, cyclins are regulated by a wide variety of growth factors and, play a key role in regulating the passage through the restriction point of the cell cycle in G1. D-type cyclins are thus key, players in the regulation of cell proliferation., In Arabidopsis, CYCD3 is expressed in proliferating tissues such as shoot meristems and young leaf primordia. In, , a crucial experiment, it was found that overexpression of, CYCD3 can bypass the cytokinin requirement for cell proliferation in culture (Figure 21.12) (Riou-Khamlichi et al., 1999). These and other results suggest that a major mechanism for cytokinin’s ability to stimulate cell division is its, increase of CYCD3 function., , FIGURE 21.12 CYCD3-, , expressing callus cells can, divide in the absence of, cytokinin. Leaf explants from, transgenic Arabidopsis plants, expressing CYCD3 under a, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S, promoter were induced to, form calluses through culturing in the presence of auxin, plus cytokinin or auxin alone., The wild-type control calluses, required cytokinin to grow., The CYCD3-expressing calluses grew well on medium, containing auxin alone. The, photographs were taken after, 29 days. (From RiouKhamlichi et al. 1999.), , Auxin + cytokinin, , Auxin, , The Auxin: Cytokinin Ratio Regulates, Morphogenesis in Cultured Tissues, Shortly after the discovery of kinetin, it was observed that, the differentiation of cultured callus tissue derived from, tobacco pith segments into either roots or shoots depends on, the ratio of auxin to cytokinin in the culture medium., Whereas high auxin:cytokinin ratios stimulated the formation of roots, low auxin:cytokinin ratios led to the formation, of shoots. At intermediate levels the tissue grew as an undifferentiated callus (Figure 21.13) (Skoog and Miller 1965)., The effect of auxin:, cytokinin ratios on morphogenesis can also be seen in, crown gall tumors by mutation of the T-DNA of the, Agrobacterium Ti plasmid, (Garfinkel et al. 1981). Mutatwild type, ing the ipt gene (the tmr locus), of the Ti plasmid blocks, zeatin biosynthesis in the, CYCD3, overexpressor, infected cells. The resulting, high auxin:cytokinin ratio in, the tumor cells causes the, proliferation of roots instead, of undifferentiated callus tiswild type, sue. In contrast, mutating, either of the genes for auxin, CYCD3, biosynthesis (tms locus) lowoverexpressor
Page 556 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, IAA concentration (mg/ml), 0.0, , 0.005, , 0.03, , 0.18, , 1.08, , ers the auxin:cytokinin ratio and stimulates the proliferation of shoots (Figure 21.14) (Akiyoshi et al., 1983). These partially differentiated tumors are, known as teratomas., , 3.0, , 0.0, Kinetin concentration (mg/ml), , 505, , Cytokinins Modify Apical Dominance and, Promote Lateral Bud Growth, 0.2, , 1.0, , FIGURE 21.13 The regulation of growth and organ formation in, , cultured tobacco callus at different concentrations of auxin and, kinetin. At low auxin and high kinetin concentrations (lower left), buds developed. At high auxin and low kinetin concentrations, (upper right) roots developed. At intermediate or high concentrations of both hormones (middle and lower right) undifferentiated, callus developed. (Courtesy of Donald Armstrong.), , Gene for, cytokinin, biosynthesis, , Genes for, auxin biosynthesis, , T-DNA, 5, , 7, , Mutation or deletion, of these regions gives, Ti plasmids that, initiate tumors with, specific characteristics:, , 2, , One of the primary determinants of plant form is the, degree of apical dominance (see Chapter 19). Plants, with strong apical dominance, such as maize, have, a single growing axis with few lateral branches. In, contrast, many lateral buds initiate growth in, shrubby plants., Although apical dominance may be determined, primarily by auxin, physiological studies indicate that, cytokinins play a role in initiating the growth of lateral buds. For example, direct applications of cytokinins to the axillary buds of many species stimulate, cell division activity and growth of the buds., The phenotypes of cytokinin-overproducing, mutants are consistent with this result. Wild-type, tobacco shows strong apical dominance during vegetative development, and the lateral buds of, cytokinin overproducers grow vigorously, developing into shoots that compete with the main shoot., Consequently, cytokinin-overproducing plants tend, to be bushy., , 1, , tms, , Shooty tumors, produced by tms, mutations or deletions, , FIGURE 21.14 Map of the T-DNA from an Agrobacterium Ti, , plasmid, showing the effects of T-DNA mutations on crown, gall tumor morphology. Genes 1 and 2 encode the two, enzymes involved in auxin biosynthesis; gene 4 encodes a, , 4, , tmr, , Rooty tumors produced, by tmr mutations or, deletions, , Genes for, tumor growth, 6a, , 6b, , Gene for, octopine, synthase, 3, , tml, , Large, undifferentiated tumors, produced by tml mutations or, deletions, , cytokinin biosynthesis enzyme. Mutations in these genes, produce the phenotypes illustrated. (From Morris 1986,, courtesy of R. Morris.)
Page 557 :
506, (A), , Chapter 21, (B), , (C), , (D), , called genetic tumors (Figure 21.17), (Smith 1988)., Genetic tumors are similar morphologically to those induced by, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, discussed, at the beginning of this chapter, but, genetic tumors form spontaneously, in the absence of any external inducing agent. The tumors are composed, of masses of rapidly proliferating, cells in regions of the plant that ordi25 µm, narily would contain few dividing, FIGURE 21.15 Bud formation in the moss Funaria begins with the formation of a, cells. Furthermore, the cells divide, protuberance at the apical ends of certain cells in the protonema filament. A–D, show various stages of bud development. Once formed, the bud goes on to produce without differentiating into the cell, types normally associated with the, the leafy gametophyte stage of the moss. (Courtesy of K. S. Schumaker.), tissues giving rise to the tumor., Nicotiana hybrids that produce, genetic tumors have abnormally high, Cytokinins Induce Bud Formation in a Moss, levels of both auxin and cytokinins. Typically, the cytokinin, Thus far we have restricted our discussion of plant hormones to the angiosperms. However, many plant hormones, (A), are present and developmentally active in representative, species throughout the plant kingdom. The moss Funaria, hygrometrica is a well-studied example. The germination of, moss spores gives rise to a filament of cells called a protonema (plural protonemata). The protonema elongates and, undergoes cell divisions at the tip, and it forms branches, some distance back from the tip (see Web Essay 21.1)., The transition from filamentous growth to leafy growth, begins with the formation of a swelling or protuberance near, the apical ends of specific cells (Figure 21.15). An asymmetric cell division follows, creating the initial cell. The initial, cell then divides mitotically to produce the bud, the structure that gives rise to the leafy gametophyte. During normal, growth, buds and branches are regularly initiated, usually, beginning at the third cell from the tip of the filament., (B), Light, especially red light, is required for bud formation, in Funaria. In the dark, buds fail to develop, but cytokinin, added to the medium can substitute for the light requirement. Cytokinin not only stimulates normal bud development; it also increases the total number of buds (Figure, 21.16). Even very low levels of cytokinin (picomolar, or, 10–12 M) can stimulate the first step in bud formation: the, swelling at the apical end of the specific protonemal cell., , Cytokinin Overproduction Has Been Implicated in, Genetic Tumors, Many species in the genus Nicotiana can be crossed to generate interspecific hybrids. More than 300 such interspecific, hybrids have been produced; 90% of these hybrids are normal, exhibiting phenotypic characteristics intermediate, between those of both parents. The plant used for cigarette, tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum, for example, is an interspecific, hybrid. However, about 10% of these interspecific crosses, result in progeny that tend to form spontaneous tumors, , FIGURE 21.16 Cytokinin stimulates bud development in, , Funaria. (A) Control protonemal filaments. (B) Protonemal, filaments treated with benzyladenine. (Courtesy of H., Kende.)
Page 558 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, , 507, , The cytokinins involved in delaying senescence are primarily zeatin riboside and dihydrozeatin riboside, which, may be transported into the leaves from the roots through, the xylem, along with the transpiration stream (Noodén et, al. 1990)., To test the role of cytokinin in regulating the onset of, leaf senescence, tobacco plants were transformed with a, chimeric gene in which a senescence-specific promoter was, used to drive the expression of the ipt gene (Gan and, Amasino 1995). The transformed plants had wild-type levels of cytokinins and developed normally, up to the onset, of leaf senescence., As the leaves aged, however, the senescence-specific, promoter was activated, triggering the expression of the ipt, gene within leaf cells just as senescence would have been, initiated. The resulting elevated cytokinin levels not only, blocked senescence, but also limited further expression of, the ipt gene, preventing cytokinin overproduction (Figure, 21.18). This result suggests that cytokinins are a natural regulator of leaf senescence., , FIGURE 21.17 Expression of genetic tumors in the hybrid, , Nicotiana langsdorffii × N. glauca. (From Smith 1988.), , levels in tumor-prone hybrids are five to six times higher, than those found in either parent., , Cytokinins Delay Leaf Senescence, Leaves detached from the plant slowly lose chlorophyll,, RNA, lipids, and protein, even if they are kept moist and, provided with minerals. This programmed aging process, leading to death is termed senescence (see Chapters 16 and, 23). Leaf senescence is more rapid in the dark than in the, light. Treating isolated leaves of many species with, cytokinins will delay their senescence., Although applied cytokinins do not prevent senescence, completely, their effects can be dramatic, particularly when, the cytokinin is sprayed directly on the intact plant. If only, one leaf is treated, it remains green after other leaves of, similar developmental age have yellowed and dropped off, the plant. Even a small spot on a leaf will remain green if, treated with a cytokinin, after the surrounding tissues on, the same leaf begin to senesce., Unlike young leaves, mature leaves produce little if any, cytokinin. Mature leaves may depend on root-derived, cytokinins to postpone their senescence. Senescence is initiated in soybean leaves by seed maturation—a phenomenon known as monocarpic senescence—and can be delayed, by seed removal. Although the seedpods control the onset, of senescence, they do so by controlling the delivery of, root-derived cytokinins to the leaves., , Plant expressing ipt, gene remains green, and photosynthetic, , Age-matched control:, advanced senescence,, no photosynthesis, , FIGURE 21.18 Leaf senescence is retarded in a transgenic, , tobacco plant containing a cytokinin biosynthesis gene, ipt., The ipt gene is expressed in response to signals that induce, senescence. (From Gan and Amasino 1995, courtesy of R., Amasino.)
Page 559 :
508, , Chapter 21, , Cytokinins Promote Movement of Nutrients, Cytokinins influence the movement of nutrients into leaves, from other parts of the plant, a phenomenon known as, cytokinin-induced nutrient mobilization. This process is, revealed when nutrients (sugars, amino acids, and so on), radiolabeled with 14C or 3H are fed to plants after one leaf, or part of a leaf is treated with a cytokinin. Later the whole, plant is subjected to autoradiography to reveal the pattern, of movement and the sites at which the labeled nutrients, accumulate., Experiments of this nature have demonstrated that, nutrients are preferentially transported to, and accumulated in, the cytokinin-treated tissues. It has been postulated that the hormone causes nutrient mobilization by creating a new source–sink relationship. As discussed in, Chapter 10, nutrients translocated in the phloem move, from a site of production or storage (the source) to a site of, utilization (the sink). The metabolism of the treated area, may be stimulated by the hormone so that nutrients move, toward it. However, it is not necessary for the nutrient itself, to be metabolized in the sink cells because even nonmetabolizable substrate analogs are mobilized by cytokinins, (Figure 21.19)., , Cytokinins Promote Chloroplast Development, Although seeds can germinate in the dark, the morphology, of dark-grown seedlings is very different from that of lightgrown seedlings (see Chapter 17): Dark-grown seedlings, are said to be etiolated. The hypocotyl and internodes of, etiolated seedlings are more elongated, cotyledons and, leaves do not expand, and chloroplasts do not mature., Instead of maturing as chloroplasts, the proplastids of, dark-grown seedlings develop into etioplasts, which do, In seedling A, the left cotyledon was sprayed, with water as a control. The left cotyledon of, seedling B, and the right cotyledon of seedling, C, were each sprayed with a solution containing, 50mM kinetin., , not synthesize chlorophyll or most of the enzymes and, structural proteins required for the formation of the chloroplast thylakoid system and photosynthesis machinery., When seedlings germinate in the light, chloroplasts mature, directly from the proplastids present in the embryo, but, etioplasts also can mature into chloroplasts when etiolated, seedlings are illuminated., If the etiolated leaves are treated with cytokinin before, being illuminated, they form chloroplasts with more extensive grana, and chlorophyll and photosynthetic enzymes, are synthesized at a greater rate upon illumination (Figure, 21.20). These results suggest that cytokinins—along with, other factors, such as light, nutrition, and development—, regulate the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments and proteins. The ability of exogenous cytokinin to enhance de-etiolation of dark-grown seedlings is mimicked by certain, mutations that lead to cytokinin overproduction. (For more, on how cytokinins promote light-mediated development,, see Web Topic 21.7.), , Cytokinins Promote Cell Expansion in Leaves and, Cotyledons, The promotion of cell enlargement by cytokinins is most, clearly demonstrated in the cotyledons of dicots with leafy, cotyledons, such as mustard, cucumber, and sunflower., The cotyledons of these species expand as a result of cell, enlargement during seedling growth. Cytokinin treatment, promotes additional cell expansion, with no increase in the, dry weight of the treated cotyledons., Leafy cotyledons expand to a much greater extent when, the seedlings are grown in the light than in the dark, and, cytokinins promote cotyledon growth in both light- and, dark-grown seedlings (Figure 21.21). As with auxin-, , The dark stippling represents, the distribution of the, radioactive amino acid as, revealed by autoradiography., , The results show that the cytokinin-treated, cotyledon has become a nutrient sink., However, radioactivity is retained in the, cotyledon to which the amino acid was, applied when the labeled cotyledon is, treated with kinetin (seedling C)., , Site of [14C] aminoisobutyric acid application, , Sprayed with, water only, , Untreated, , Sprayed with, a kinetin, solution, , Seedling A, , FIGURE 21.19 The effect of cytokinin on the movement of, , an amino acid in cucumber seedlings. A radioactively, labeled amino acid that cannot be metabolized, such as, , Untreated, , Seedling B, , Untreated, (no radioactivity), , Sprayed with, a kinetin, solution, , Seedling C, , aminoisobutyric acid, was applied as a discrete spot on the, right cotyledon of each of these seedlings. (Drawn from, data obtained by K. Mothes.)
Page 560 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, (A), , 509, , (B), , FIGURE 21.20 Cytokinin, , influence on the development of wild-type, Arabidopsis seedlings grown, in darkness. (A) Plastids, develop as etioplasts in the, untreated, dark grown control. (B) Cytokinin treatment, resulted in thylakoid formation in the plastids of darkgrown seedlings. (From, Chory et al. 1994, courtesy of, J. Chory, © American Society, of Plant Biologists, reprinted, with permission.), , induced growth, cytokinin-stimulated expansion of radish, cotyledons is associated with an increase in the mechanical, extensibility of the cell walls. However, cytokinin-induced, wall loosening is not accompanied by proton extrusion., Neither auxin nor gibberellin promotes cell expansion in, cotyledons., , ▲, , ▲, , T0, Dark, , Light, , T3 control, , T3 control, , T3 + zeatin, , T3 + zeatin, , FIGURE 21.21 The effect of cytokinin on the expansion of, , radish cotyledons. The experiment described here shows, that the effects of light and cytokinin are additive. T0 represents germinating radish seedlings before the experiment began. The detached cotyledons were incubated for, 3 days (T3) in either darkness or light with or without 2.5, mM zeatin. In both the light and the dark, zeatin-treated, cotyledons expanded more than in the control. (From, Huff and Ross 1975.), , Cytokinins Regulate Growth of Stems and Roots, Although endogenous cytokinins are clearly required for, normal cell proliferation in the apical meristem, and therefore normal shoot growth (see Figure 21.9), applied, cytokinins typically inhibit the process of cell elongation in, both stems and roots. For example, exogenous cytokinin, inhibits hypocotyl elongation at concentrations that promote leaf and cotyledon expansion in the dark-grown, seedlings., In related experiments, internode and root elongation, are both inhibited in transgenic plants expressing the ipt, gene and in cytokinin-overproducing mutants. It is likely, that the inhibition of hypocotyl and internode elongation, induced by excess cytokinin is due to the production of ethylene, and this inhibition thus may represent another, example of the interdependence of hormonal regulatory, pathways (Cary et al. 1995; Vogel et al. 1998)., On the other hand, other experiments suggest that, endogenous cytokinins at normal physiological concentrations inhibit root growth. For example, a weak allele of a, cytokinin receptor mutant and a loss-of-function allele of a, cytokinin signaling element both have longer roots than the, wild type (Inoue et al. 2001; Sakai et al. 2001). As previously, noted, transgenic tobacco engineered to overexpress, cytokinin oxidase (and thus to have lower levels of, cytokinin) also has longer roots than its wild-type counterpart (see Figure 21.10) (Werner et al. 2001). These results, indicate that endogenous cytokinins may negatively regulate root elongation., , Cytokinin-Regulated Processes Are Revealed in, Plants That Overproduce Cytokinin, The ipt gene from the Agrobacterium Ti plasmid has been, introduced into many species of plants, resulting in
Page 561 :
510, , Chapter 21, , cytokinin overproduction. These transgenic plants exhibit, an array of developmental abnormalities that tell us a great, deal about the biological role of cytokinins., As discussed earlier, plant tissues transformed by, Agrobacterium carrying a wild-type Ti plasmid proliferate, as tumors as a result of the overproduction of both auxin, and cytokinin. And as mentioned already, if all of the other, genes in the T-DNA are deleted and plant tissues are transformed with T-DNA containing only a selective antibiotic, resistance marker gene and the ipt gene, shoots proliferate, instead of callus., The shoot teratomas formed by ipt-transformed tissues, are difficult to root, and when roots are formed, they tend, to be stunted in their growth. As a result, it is difficult to, obtain plants from shoots expressing the ipt gene under the, control of its own promoter because the promoter is a constitutive promoter and the gene is continuously expressed., To circumvent this problem, a variety of promoters, whose expression can be regulated have been used to drive, the expression of the ipt gene in the transformed tissues., For example, several studies have employed a heat shock, promoter, which is induced in response to elevated temperature, to drive inducible expression of the ipt gene in, transgenic tobacco and Arabidopsis. In these plants, heat, induction substantially increased the level of zeatin, zeatin, riboside and ribotide, and N-conjugated zeatin., These cytokinin-overproducing plants exhibit several, characteristics that point to roles played by cytokinin in, plant physiology and development:, • The shoot apical meristems of cytokinin-overproducing plants produce more leaves., • The leaves have higher chlorophyll levels and are, much greener., • Adventitious shoots may form from unwounded leaf, veins and petioles., • Leaf senescence is retarded., • Apical dominance is greatly reduced., • The more extreme cytokinin-overproducing plants, are stunted, with greatly shortened internodes., • Rooting of stem cuttings is reduced, as is the root, growth rate., Some of the consequences of cytokinin overproduction, could be highly beneficial for agriculture if synthesis of the, hormone can be controlled. Because leaf senescence is, delayed in the cytokinin-overproducing plants, it should, be possible to extend their photosynthetic productivity, (which we’ll discuss shortly)., In addition, cytokinin production could be linked to, damage caused by predators. For example, tobacco plants, transformed with an ipt gene under the control of the promoter from a wound-inducible protease inhibitor II gene, , were more resistant to insect damage. The tobacco hornworm consumed up to 70% fewer tobacco leaves in plants, that expressed the ipt gene driven by the protease inhibitor, promoter (Smigocki et al. 1993)., , CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MODES OF, CYTOKININ ACTION, The diversity of the effects of cytokinin on plant growth, and development is consistent with the involvement of signal transduction pathways with branches leading to specific responses. Although our knowledge of how cytokinin, works at the cellular and molecular levels is still quite fragmentary, significant progress has been achieved. In this section we will discuss the nature of the cytokinin receptor, and various cytokinin-regulated genes, as well as a model, for cytokinin signaling based on current information., , A Cytokinin Receptor Related to Bacterial TwoComponent Receptors Has Been Identified, The first clue to the nature of the cytokinin receptor came, from the discovery of the CKI1 gene. CKI1 was identified, in a screen for genes that, when overexpressed, conferred, cytokinin-independent growth on Arabidopsis cells in culture. As discussed already, plant cells generally require, cytokinin in order to divide in culture. However, a cell line, that overexpresses CKI1 is capable of growing in culture in, the absence of added cytokinin., CKI1 encodes a protein similar in sequence to bacterial, two-component sensor histidine kinases, which are ubiquitous receptors in prokaryotes (see Chapter 14 on the web, site and Chapter 17). Bacterial two-component regulatory, systems mediate a range of responses to environmental, stimuli, such as osmoregulation and chemotaxis. Typically, these systems are composed of two functional elements: a, sensor histidine kinase, to which a signal binds, and a downstream response regulator, whose activity is regulated via, phosphorylation by the sensor histidine kinase. The sensor, histidine kinase is usually a membrane-bound protein that, contains two distinct domains, called the input and histidine kinase, or “transmitter,” domains (Figure 21.22)., Detection of a signal by the input domain alters the, activity of the histidine kinase domain. Active sensor, kinases are dimers that transphosphorylate a conserved, histidine residue. This phosphate is then transferred to a, conserved aspartate residue in the receiver domain of a, cognate response regulator (see Figure 21.22), and this, phosphorylation alters the activity of the kinases. Most, response regulators also contain output domains that act as, transcription factors., The phenotype resulting from CKI1 overexpression,, combined with its similarity to bacterial receptors, suggested that the CKI1 and/or similar histidine kinases are, cytokinin receptors. Support for this model came from, identification of the CRE1 gene (Inoue et al. 2001).
Page 562 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, , 511, , Simple two-component, signaing system, P, , P, , H, , D, , Input, Transmitter, Sensor histidine kinase, , Activation of, transcription, , Receiver, Output, Response regulator, , Phosphorelay two-component, signaling system, P, , P, , P, , P, , H, , D, , H, , D, , Hybrid sensor histidine kinase, , Hpt (AHP), , Activation of, transcription, , Response regulator (ARR), , FIGURE 21.22 Simple versus phosphorelay types of two-, , component signaling systems. (A) In simple two-component systems, the input domain is the site where the signal, is sensed. This regulates the activity of the histidine kinase, domain, which when activated autophosphorylates on a, conserved His residue. The phosphate is then transferred to, an Asp residue that resides within the receiver domain of a, response regulator. Phosphorylation of this Asp regulates, , Like CKI1, CRE1 encodes a protein similar to bacterial, histidine kinases. Loss-of-function cre1 mutations were, identified in a genetic screen for mutants that failed to, develop shoots from undifferentiated tissue culture cells in, response to cytokinin. This is essentially the opposite, screen from the one just described, from which the CKI1, gene was identified by a gain-of-function (ability to divide, in the absence of cytokinin) mutation. The cre1 mutants are, also resistant to the inhibition of root elongation observed, in response to cytokinin., Convincing evidence that CRE1 encodes a cytokinin, receptor came from analysis of the expression of the protein in yeast. Yeast cells also contain a sensor histidine, kinase, and deletion of the gene that encodes this kinase—, SLN1—is lethal. Expression of CRE1 in SLN1-deficient, yeast can restore viability, but only if cytokinins are present in, the medium. Thus the activity of CRE1 (i.e., its ability to, replace SLN1) is dependent on cytokinin, which, coupled, with the cytokinin-insensitive phenotype of the cre1, mutants in Arabidopsis, unequivocally demonstrates that, CRE1 is a cytokinin receptor. It remains to be determined, if CKI1 is also a cytokinin receptor., Two other genes in the Arabidopsis genome (AHK2 and, AHK3) are closely related to CRE1, suggesting that, like the, ethylene receptors (see Chapter 22), the cytokinin receptors, are encoded by a multigene family. Indeed, it has been, demonstrated that cytokinins bind to the predicted extracellular domains of CRE1, AHK2, and AHK3 with high, affinity, confirming that they are indeed cytokinin receptors (Yamada et al. 2001). This raises the possibility that, these genes are at least partially genetically redundant (as, are the ethylene receptors), which may explain the rela-, , the activity of the output domain of the response regulator,, which in many cases is a transcription factor. (B) In the, phosphorelay-type two-component signaling system, an, extra set of phosphotransfers is mediated by a histidine, phosphotransfer protein (Hpt), called AHP in Arabidopsis., The Arabidopsis response regulators are called ARRs. H =, histidine, D = aspartate., , tively mild phenotypes that result from loss-of-function, cre1 mutations., , Cytokinins Cause a Rapid Increase in the, Expression of Response Regulator Genes, One of the primary effects of cytokinin is to alter the, expression of various genes. The first set of genes to be upregulated in response to cytokinin are the ARR (Arabidopsis response regulator) genes. These genes are homologous, to the receiver domain of bacterial two-component, response regulators, the downstream target of sensor histidine kinases (see the previous section)., In Arabidopsis, response regulators are encoded by a, multigene family. They fall into two basic classes: the typeA ARR genes, which are made up solely of a receiver, domain, and the type-B ARR genes, which contain a transcription factor domain in addition to the receiver domain, (Figure 21.23). The rate of transcription of the type-A gene, is increased within 10 minutes in response to applied, cytokinin (Figure 21.24) (D’Agostino et al. 2000). This rapid, induction is specific for cytokinin and does not require new, protein synthesis. Both of these features are hallmarks of, primary response genes (discussed in Chapters 17 and 19)., The rapid induction of the type-A genes, coupled with, their similarity to signaling elements predicted to act, downstream of sensor histidine kinases, suggests that these, elements act downstream of the CRE1 cytokinin receptor, family to mediate the primary cytokinin response. Interestingly, one of these type-A genes, ARR5, is expressed primarily in the apical meristems of both shoots and roots, (Figure 21.25), consistent with a role in regulating cell proliferation, a key aspect of cytokinin action.
Page 563 :
512, , Chapter 21, , FIGURE 21.23 Phylogenetic tree of Arabidopsis, response regulators. The top part of the figure, shows a phylogenetic tree that represents the degree, of relatedness of the receiver domains present in the, Arabidopsis genome. The closer two proteins are on, the tree, the more similar are their amino acid, sequences. Note that these proteins fall into two distinct groups, or clades, called the type-A ARRs, (blue) and the type-B ARRs (red). These differences, in sequence are also reflected in a distinct domain, structure, as depicted below the tree. The type-A, ARRs consist solely of a receiver domain, but the, type-A proteins also contain a fused output domain, at the carboxy-terminus., , ARR13, ARR14, ARR7 ARR5, ARR6, ARR15, ARR4, ARR3, , ARR1, ARR2, ARR10, ARR12, , ARR16 ARR19 ARR8, ARR17, Type A ARRs, D, Receiver, domain, , The expression of a wide variety of other genes is, altered in response to cytokinin, but generally with slower, kinetics than the type-A genes. These include the gene that, encodes nitrate reductase, light-regulated genes such as, LHCB and SSU, and defense-related genes such as PR1, as, well as genes that encode an extensin (cell wall protein rich, in hydroxyproline), rRNAs, cytochrome P450s, and peroxidase. Cytokinin elevates the expression of these genes both, by increasing the rate of transcription (as in the case of the, type-A ARRs) and/or by a stabilization of the RNA transcript (e.g., the -ß extensin gene)., , ARR11, , COOH, , Type B ARRs, D, Receiver, domain, , COOH, Output, domain, (transcription, factor), , Histidine Phosphotransferases May Mediate the, Cytokinin Signaling Cascade, , From the preceding discussions we have seen that, cytokinin binds to the CRE1 receptors to initiate a response, that culminates in the elevation of transcription of the typeA ARRs. The type-A ARR proteins, in turn, may regulate, the expression of numerous other genes, as well as the, activities of various target proteins that ultimately alter cellular function. How is the signal propagated from CRE1, (which is at the plasma membrane) to the nucleus to alter, type-A ARR transcription?, One set of genes that are likely to be, involved in this signaling cascade encode the, Time following cytokinin treatment (min), AHP (Arabidopsis histidine phosphotransfer), proteins. In two-component systems that, 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 25, 30, 40, 60, 120, 180, Probe, involve a sensor kinase fused to a receiver, domain (the structure of most eukaryotic, ARR4, sensor histidine kinases, including those of, the CRE1 family), there is an additional set of, ARR5, phosphotransfers that are mediated by a histidine phosphotransfer protein (Hpt)., Phosphate is first transferred from ATP, ARR6, to a histidine within the histidine kinase, domain, and then transferred to an asparARR7, tate residue on the fused receiver. From the, aspartate residue the phosphate group is, then transferred to a histidine on the Hpt, ARR16, protein and then finally to an aspartate on, the receiver domain of the response regulaTubulin, tor (see Figure 21.22). This phosphorylation, of the receiver domain of the response regulator alters its activity. Thus, Hpt proteins, FIGURE 21.24 Induction of type-A ARR genes in response to cytokinin., are predicted to mediate the phosphotransRNA from Arabidopsis seedlings treated for the indicated time with, fer between sensor kinases and response, cytokinin was isolated and analyzed by Northern blotting. Each row shows, regulators., the result of probing the Northern blot with an individual type-A gene, and, In Arabidopsis there are 5 Hpt genes,, each lane contains RNA derived from Arabidopsis seedlings treated for the, called, AHPs. The AHP proteins have been, indicated time with cytokinin. The darker the band, the higher the level of, ARR mRNA in that sample. (From D’Agostino et al. 2000.), shown to physically associate with receiver
Page 564 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, (A), , (B), , 513, , (C), , FIGURE 21.25 Expression of ARR5. The pattern of ARR5 expression was examined, by fusion of the promoter to a GUS reporter gene (A) or by whole-mount in situ, hybridization (B and C). For the latter, the tissue is hybridized with labeled singlestranded ARR5 RNA in either the sense orientation (B) or the antisense (C). The, sense RNA is a negative control and reveals background, nonspecific staining. The, antisense probe specifically hybridizes with the ARR5 mRNA present in the tissue,, thereby revealing its spatial distribution. With both methods, ARR5 expression is, observed primarily in the apical meristems. (From D’Agostino et al. 2000.), , domains from several Arabidopsis histidine kinases, including CRE1, and a subset of the AHPs have been demonstrated to transiently translocate from the cytoplasm to the, nucleus in response to cytokinin (Figure 21.26) (Hwang and, Sheen 2001). This finding suggests that the AHPs, are the immediate downstream targets of the activated CRE receptors, and that these proteins, transduce the cytokinin signal into the nucleus., , Cytokinin-Induced Phosphorylation, Activates Transcription Factors, The question now becomes, How do the activated AHPs, once in the nucleus, act to regulate, gene transcription? Genetic studies in intact Arabidopsis plants and overexpression studies in isolated Arabidopsis protoplasts using a cytokinin, , AHP1-GFP, , AHP2-GFP, , Cytokinin induces the transient, movement of some AHP proteins into the, nucleus. Arabidopsis protoplasts expressing various AHP genes fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter were treated with zeatin, and monitored for 1.5 hours. AHP1-GFP and, AHP2-GFP show nuclear localization after 30, minutes, but this localization is transient in the, case of AHP1-GFP. Zeatin did not seem to affect, the distribution of AHP5-GFP. (From Hwang and, Sheen 2001.), FIGURE 21.26, , AHP5-GFP, , responsive reporter have provided a likely answer (Hwang, and Sheen 2001; Sakai et al. 2001)., Disruption of ARR1, one of the type-B ARR genes,, reduces the induction of the type-A ARR genes in response, , –Zeatin, , +Zeatin, 0.5 h, , +Zeatin, 1.5 h
Page 565 :
514, , Chapter 21, Cytokinin, , 1. Cytokinin binds to CRE1, which is likely to, occur as a dimer. Cytokinin binds to an, extracellular portion of CRE1 called the CHASE, domain.Two other hybrid sensor kinases (AHK2, and AHK3) containing a CHASE domain are also, likely to act as cytokinin receptors in Arabidopsis., , CHASE, domain, 1, , Plasma, membrane, NH4, , NH4, ATP, 2. Cytokinin binding to these, receptors activates their histidine, kinase activity. The phosphate is, transferred to an asparate residue, (D) on the fused receiver domains., , P, , H, , H His kinase, domain, , D, , D, , CRE1, AHK2, AHK3, , ADP, CYTOPLASM, , 2, P, , Receiver, domain, , COOH COOH, 3. The phosphate is then transferred, to a conserved histidine present in, an AHP protein., , P, , 3, , H, , AHP, , Phosphorylation, NUCLEUS, 4. Phosphorylation causes the AHP, protein to move into the nucleus,, where it transfers the phosphate, to an asparate residue located, within the receiver domain of a, type-B ARR., , P, H, , 6. The type-A ARRs are likely also, to be phosphorylated by the AHP, proteins., , AHP, , Phosphorylation?, 4, , 6, , P, , P, , D, , D, , Receiver, Output, domain, domain, Type-B ARR, 5. The phosphorylation of the, type-B ARR activates the output, domain to induce transcription of, genes encoding type-A ARRs., , Other, effectors?, DNA, Cytokinin, responses, , mRNA, , FIGURE 21.27 Model of cytokinin signaling. The near future should see significant, , Other, effectors?, , Type-A ARR, 7, , 5, , Type A ARR, transcription, , Phy B, , Cytokinin, responses, 7. The phosphorylated, type-A ARRs interact, with various effectors to, mediate the changes in, cell function appropriate, to cytokinin (indicated in, the model as "cytokinin, responses")., , refinement of this model, the tools are now in hand to analyze the interactions, among these elements., , to cytokinin. Conversely, an increase in ARR1 function, increases the response of the type-A genes to cytokinin. This, suggests that ARR1, which is a transcription factor, directly, regulates transcription of the type-A ARRs, and that by, analogy other members of the type-B ARR family (see Figure 21.23) also mediate cytokinin-regulated gene expression., This conclusion is supported by the findings that typeB ARRs operate as transcriptional activators and that there, are multiple binding sites for ARR1, a type-B ARR, in the, 5′ DNA regulatory sequences of the type-A ARR genes., , A model of cytokinin signaling is presented in Figure, 21.27. Cytokinin binds to the CRE1 receptor and initiates a, phosphorylation cascade that results in the phosphorylation and activation of a subset of the type-B ARR proteins., Activation of the type-B proteins (transcription factors), leads to the transcriptional activation of the type-A genes., The type-A ARR proteins are likely also phosphorylated in, response to cytokinin, and perhaps together with the typeB proteins, they interact with various targets to mediate the, changes in cellular function, such as an activation of the cell
Page 566 :
Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division, cycle. Type-A ARRs are also able to inhibit their own, expression by an unknown mechanism, providing a negative feedback loop (see Figure 21.27). Much work needs to, be done to confirm and refine this model, but we are, beginning to glimpse for the first time the molecular basis, for cytokinin action in plants., , SUMMARY, Mature plant cells generally do not divide in the intact, plant, but they can be stimulated to divide by wounding,, by infection with certain bacteria, and by plant hormones,, including cytokinins. Cytokinins are N6-substituted, aminopurines that will initiate cell proliferation in many, plant cells when they are cultured on a medium that also, contains an auxin. The principal cytokinin of higher, plants—zeatin, or trans-6-(4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enylamino)purine—is also present in plants as a riboside or, ribotide and as glycosides. These forms are generally also, active as cytokinins in bioassays through their enzymatic, conversion to the free zeatin base by plant tissue., The first committed step in cytokinin biosynthesis—the, transfer of the isopentenyl group from DMAPP to the 6, nitrogen of adenosine tri- and diphosphate—is catalyzed, by isopentenyl transferase (IPT). The product of this reaction is readily converted to zeatin and other cytokinins., Cytokinins are synthesized in roots, in developing, embryos, young leaves, fruits, and crown gall tissues., Cytokinins are also synthesized by plant-associated bacteria, insects, and nematodes., Cytokinin oxidases degrade cytokinin irreversibly and, may play a role in regulation of the levels of this hormone., Conjugation of both the side chain and the adenosine moiety to sugars (mostly glucose) also may play a role in the, regulation of cytokinin levels and may target subpools of, the hormone for distinct roles, such as transport., Cytokinins are also interconverted among the free base and, the nucleoside and nucleotide forms., Crown galls originate from plant tissues that have been, infected with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The bacterium, injects a specific region of its Ti plasmid called T-DNA into, wounded plant cells, and the T-DNA is incorporated into, the host nuclear genome. The T-DNA contains a gene for, cytokinin biosynthesis, as well as genes for auxin biosynthesis. These phyto-oncogenes are expressed in the plant, cells, leading to hormone synthesis and unregulated proliferation of the cells to form the gall., Cytokinins are most abundant in the young, rapidly, dividing cells of the shoot and root apical meristems. They, do not appear to be actively transported through living, plant tissues. Instead, they are transported passively into, the shoot from the root through the xylem, along with, water and minerals. At least in pea, however, the shoot can, regulate the flow of cytokinin from the root., , 515, , Cytokinins participate in the regulation of many plant, processes, including cell division, morphogenesis of shoots, and roots, chloroplast maturation, cell enlargement, and, senescence. Both cytokinin and auxin regulate the plant cell, cycle and are needed for cell division. The roles of, cytokinins have been elucidated from application of exogenous cytokinins, the phenotype of transgenic plants, designed to overexpress cytokinins as a result of introduction of the bacterial ipt gene, and recently from transgenic, plants that have a reduced endogenous cytokinin content, as a result of overexpression of cytokinin oxidase., In addition to cell division, the ratio of auxin to, cytokinin determines the differentiation of cultured plant, tissues into either roots or buds: High ratios promote roots;, low ratios, buds. Cytokinins also have been implicated in, the release of axillary buds from apical dominance. In the, moss Funaria, cytokinins greatly increase the number of, “buds,” the structures that give rise to the leafy gametophyte stage of development., The mechanism of action of cytokinin is just beginning, to emerge. A cytokinin receptor has been identified in Arabidopsis. This transmembrane protein is related to the bacterial two-component sensor histidine kinases. Cytokinins, increase the abundance of several specific mRNAs. Some, of these are primary response genes that are similar to bacterial two-component response regulators. The signal transduction mechanism from CRE1 to transcriptional activation of the type-A ARRs involves other homologs of, two-component elements., , Web Material, Web Topics, 21.1 Cultured Cells Can Acquire the Ability to, Synthesize Cytokinins, The phenomenon of habituation is described,, whereby callus tissues become cytokinin independent., , 21.2 Structures of Some Naturally Occurring, Cytokinins, The structures of various naturally occurring, cytokinins are presented., , 21.3 Various Methods Are Used to Detect and, Identify Cytokinins, Cytokinins can be qualified using immunological and sensitive physical methods., , 21.4 Cytokinins Are Also Present in Some tRNAs in, Animal and Plant Cells, Modified adenosines near the 3′ end of the anticodons of some tRNAs have cytokinin activity.
Page 570 :
Chapter, , 22, , Ethylene:, The Gaseous Hormone, , DURING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, when coal gas was used for, street illumination, it was observed that trees in the vicinity of streetlamps defoliated more extensively than other trees. Eventually it became, apparent that coal gas and air pollutants affect plant growth and development, and ethylene was identified as the active component of coal gas., In 1901, Dimitry Neljubov, a graduate student at the Botanical Institute of St. Petersburg in Russia, observed that dark-grown pea seedlings, growing in the laboratory exhibited symptoms that were later termed, the triple response: reduced stem elongation, increased lateral growth, (swelling), and abnormal, horizontal growth. When the plants were, allowed to grow in fresh air, they regained their normal morphology and, rate of growth. Neljubov identified ethylene, which was present in the, laboratory air from coal gas, as the molecule causing the response., The first indication that ethylene is a natural product of plant tissues, was published by H. H. Cousins in 1910. Cousins reported that “emanations” from oranges stored in a chamber caused the premature ripening of bananas when these gases were passed through a chamber containing the fruit. However, given that oranges synthesize relatively little, ethylene compared to other fruits, such as apples, it is likely that the, oranges used by Cousins were infected with the fungus Penicillium,, which produces copious amounts of ethylene. In 1934, R. Gane and others identified ethylene chemically as a natural product of plant metabolism, and because of its dramatic effects on the plant it was classified as, a hormone., For 25 years ethylene was not recognized as an important plant hormone, mainly because many physiologists believed that the effects of, ethylene were due to auxin, the first plant hormone to be discovered (see, Chapter 19). Auxin was thought to be the main plant hormone, and ethylene was considered to play only an insignificant and indirect physiological role. Work on ethylene was also hampered by the lack of chemical techniques for its quantification. However, after gas chromatography, was introduced in ethylene research in 1959, the importance of ethylene
Page 571 :
520, , Chapter 22, , was rediscovered and its physiological significance as a, plant growth regulator was recognized (Burg and Thimann 1959)., In this chapter we will describe the discovery of the ethylene biosynthetic pathway and outline some of the important effects of ethylene on plant growth and development., At the end of the chapter we will consider how ethylene, acts at the cellular and molecular levels., , STRUCTURE, BIOSYNTHESIS, AND, MEASUREMENT OF ETHYLENE, Ethylene can be produced by almost all parts of higher, plants, although the rate of production depends on the, type of tissue and the stage of development. In general,, meristematic regions and nodal regions are the most active, in ethylene biosynthesis. However, ethylene production, also increases during leaf abscission and flower senescence,, as well as during fruit ripening. Any type of wounding can, induce ethylene biosynthesis, as can physiological stresses, such as flooding, chilling, disease, and temperature or, drought stress., The amino acid methionine is the precursor of ethylene,, and ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) serves, as an intermediate in the conversion of methionine to ethylene. As we will see, the complete pathway is a cycle, taking its place among the many metabolic cycles that operate, in plant cells., , The Properties of Ethylene Are Deceptively Simple, Ethylene is the simplest known olefin (its molecular, weight is 28), and it is lighter than air under physiological, conditions:, H, , H, C, , C, H, , H, , Ethylene, , It is flammable and readily undergoes oxidation. Ethylene, can be oxidized to ethylene oxide:, H, , H, C, H, , C, H, , O, , Ethylene, oxide, , and ethylene oxide can be hydrolyzed to ethylene glycol:, , HO, , H, , H, , C, , C, , H, , H, , OH, , Ethylene glycol, , In most plant tissues, ethylene can be completely oxidized, to CO2, in the following reaction:, Complete oxidation of ethylene, H, , H, C, , C, H, , H, , Ethylene, , [O], , H, C, H, , C, O, , Ethylene, oxide, , H O, 2, , HOOC, , COOH, , H, , Oxalic acid, , CO2, , Carbon, dioxide, , Ethylene is released easily from the tissue and diffuses, in the gas phase through the intercellular spaces and outside the tissue. At an ethylene concentration of 1 µL L–1 in, the gas phase at 25°C, the concentration of ethylene in, water is 4.4 × 10–9 M. Because they are easier to measure,, gas phase concentrations are normally given for ethylene., Because ethylene gas is easily lost from the tissue and, may affect other tissues or organs, ethylene-trapping systems are used during the storage of fruits, vegetables, and, flowers. Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) is an effective, absorbent of ethylene and can reduce the concentration of, ethylene in apple storage areas from 250 to 10 µL L–1,, markedly extending the storage life of the fruit., , Bacteria, Fungi, and Plant Organs Produce, Ethylene, Even away from cities and industrial air pollutants, the, environment is seldom free of ethylene because of its production by plants and microorganisms. The production of, ethylene in plants is highest in senescing tissues and, ripening fruits (>1.0 nL g-fresh-weight–1 h–1), but all, organs of higher plants can synthesize ethylene. Ethylene, is biologically active at very low concentrations—less than, 1 part per million (1 µL L–1). The internal ethylene concentration in a ripe apple has been reported to be as high, as 2500 µL L–1., Young developing leaves produce more ethylene than, do fully expanded leaves. In bean (Phaseolus vulgaris),, young leaves produce 0.4 nL g–1 h–1, compared with 0.04, nL g–1 h–1 for older leaves. With few exceptions, nonsenescent tissues that are wounded or mechanically perturbed will temporarily increase their ethylene production, severalfold within 30 minutes. Ethylene levels later return, to normal., Gymnosperms and lower plants, including ferns,, mosses, liverworts, and certain cyanobacteria, all have, shown the ability to produce ethylene. Ethylene production by fungi and bacteria contributes significantly to the, ethylene content of soil. Certain strains of the common, enteric bacterium Escherichia coli and of yeast (a fungus), produce large amounts of ethylene from methionine., There is no evidence that healthy mammalian tissues, produce ethylene, nor does ethylene appear to be a metabolic product of invertebrates. However, recently it was, found that both a marine sponge and cultured mammalian
Page 573 :
Chapter 22, , Catabolism. Researchers have studied the catabolism of, ethylene by supplying 14C2H4 to plant tissues and tracing, the radioactive compounds produced. Carbon dioxide, ethylene oxide, ethylene glycol, and the glucose conjugate of, ethylene glycol have been identified as metabolic breakdown products. However, because certain cyclic olefin, compounds, such as 1,4-cyclohexadiene, have been shown, to block ethylene breakdown without inhibiting ethylene, action, ethylene catabolism does not appear to play a significant role in regulating the level of the hormone (Raskin, and Beyer 1989)., Conjugation. Not all the ACC found in the tissue is converted to ethylene. ACC can also be converted to a conjugated form, N-malonyl ACC (see Figure 22.1), which does, not appear to break down and accumulates in the tissue., , A second conjugated form of ACC, 1-(γ-L-glutamylamino), cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (GACC), has also been identified. The conjugation of ACC may play an important role, in the control of ethylene biosynthesis, in a manner analogous to the conjugation of auxin and cytokinin., , Environmental Stresses and Auxins Promote, Ethylene Biosynthesis, Ethylene biosynthesis is stimulated by several factors,, including developmental state, environmental conditions,, other plant hormones, and physical and chemical injury., Ethylene biosynthesis also varies in a circadian manner,, peaking during the day and reaching a minimum at night., , Fruit ripening. As fruits mature, the rate of ACC and ethylene biosynthesis increases. Enzyme activities for both, ACC oxidase (Figure 22.2) and ACC synthase increase, as, do the mRNA levels for subsets of the genes encoding each, enzyme. However, application of ACC to unripe fruits only, slightly enhances ethylene production, indicating that an, increase in the activity of ACC oxidase is the rate-limiting, step in ripening (McKeon et al. 1995)., , 5, , 100, , ACC oxidase, , Ethylene, , 4, , 10, , ACC, , 3, , 1, 2, , ACC (nmol g–1), , observation indicates that the synthesis of ACC is usually, the biosynthetic step that limits ethylene production in, plant tissues., ACC synthase, the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of AdoMet to ACC (see Figure 22.1), has been characterized in many types of tissues of various plants. ACC, synthase is an unstable, cytosolic enzyme. Its level is regulated by environmental and internal factors, such as, wounding, drought stress, flooding, and auxin. Because, ACC synthase is present in such low amounts in plant tissues (0.0001% of the total protein of ripe tomato) and is, very unstable, it is difficult to purify the enzyme for biochemical analysis (see Web Topic 22.1)., ACC synthase is encoded by members of a divergent, multigene family that are differentially regulated by various inducers of ethylene biosynthesis. In tomato, for example, there are at least nine ACC synthase genes, different, subsets of which are induced by auxin, wounding, and/or, fruit ripening., ACC oxidase catalyzes the last step in ethylene biosynthesis: the conversion of ACC to ethylene (see Figure 22.1)., In tissues that show high rates of ethylene production, such, as ripening fruit, ACC oxidase activity can be the rate-limiting step in ethylene biosynthesis. The gene that encodes, ACC oxidase has been cloned (see Web Topic 22.2). Like, ACC synthase, ACC oxidase is encoded by a multigene, family that is differentially regulated. For example, in ripening tomato fruits and senescing petunia flowers, the mRNA, levels of a subset of ACC oxidase genes are highly elevated., The deduced amino acid sequences of ACC oxidases, revealed that these enzymes belong to the Fe2+/ascorbate, oxidase superfamily. This similarity suggested that ACC, oxidase might require Fe2+ and ascorbate for activity—a, requirement that has been confirmed by biochemical, analysis of the protein. The low abundance of ACC oxidase and its requirement for cofactors presumably explain, why the purification of this enzyme eluded researchers for, so many years., , Ethylene (nL g–1) or ACC oxidase (nL g–1 h–1), , 522, , 0.1, 1, , 0, 0, , 2, , 4, , 6, 8, 10, Days after harvest, , 12, , 14, , FIGURE 22.2 Changes in ethylene and ACC content and, ACC oxidase activity during fruit ripening. Changes in the, ACC oxidase activity and ethylene and ACC concentrations, of Golden Delicious apples. The data are plotted as a function of days after harvest. Increases in ethylene and ACC, concentrations and in ACC oxidase activity are closely correlated with ripening. (From Yang 1987.)
Page 574 :
Ethylene: The Gaseous Hormone, Stress-induced ethylene production., , Ethylene biosynthesis is increased by stress conditions such as drought,, flooding, chilling, exposure to ozone, or mechanical, wounding. In all these cases ethylene is produced by the, usual biosynthetic pathway, and the increased ethylene, production has been shown to result at least in part from, an increase in transcription of ACC synthase mRNA. This, “stress ethylene” is involved in the onset of stress responses, such as abscission, senescence, wound healing, and, increased disease resistance (see Chapter 25)., , Auxin-induced ethylene production. In some instances,, auxins and ethylene can cause similar plant responses,, such as induction of flowering in pineapple and inhibition, of stem elongation. These responses might be due to the, ability of auxins to promote ethylene synthesis by enhancing ACC synthase activity. These observations suggest that, some responses previously attributed to auxin (indole-3acetic acid, or IAA) are in fact mediated by the ethylene, produced in response to auxin., Inhibitors of protein synthesis block both ACC and, IAA-induced ethylene synthesis, indicating that the synthesis of new ACC synthase protein caused by auxins, brings about the marked increase in ethylene production., Several ACC synthase genes have been identified whose, transcription is elevated following application of exogenous IAA, suggesting that increased transcription is at, least partly responsible for the increased ethylene production observed in response to auxin (Nakagawa et al., 1991; Liang et al. 1992)., , Posttranscriptional regulation of ethylene production. Ethylene production can also be regulated posttranscriptionally. Cytokinins also promote ethylene biosynthesis in some plant tissues. For example, in etiolated, Arabidopsis seedlings, application of exogenous cytokinins, causes a rise in ethylene production, resulting in the tripleresponse phenotype (see Figure 22.5A)., Molecular genetic studies in Arabidopsis have shown, that cytokinins elevate ethylene biosynthesis by increasing, the stability and/or activity of one isoform of ACC synthase (Vogel et al. 1998). The carboxy-terminal domain of, this ACC synthase isoform appears to be the target for this, posttranscriptional regulation. Consistent with this, the carboxy-terminal domain of an ACC synthase isoform from, tomato has been shown to be the target for a calciumdependent phosphorylation (Tatsuki and Mori 2001)., , Ethylene Production and Action Can Be Inhibited, Inhibitors of hormone synthesis or action are valuable for, the study of the biosynthetic pathways and physiological, roles of hormones. Inhibitors are particularly helpful when, it is difficult to distinguish between different hormones that, have identical effects in plant tissue or when a hormone, affects the synthesis or the action of another hormone., , 523, , For example, ethylene mimics high concentrations of, auxins by inhibiting stem growth and causing epinasty (a, downward curvature of leaves). Use of specific inhibitors, of ethylene biosynthesis and action made it possible to discriminate between the actions of auxin and ethylene. Studies using inhibitors showed that ethylene is the primary, effector of epinasty and that auxin acts indirectly by causing a substantial increase in ethylene production., , Inhibitors of ethylene synthesis. Aminoethoxy-vinylglycine (AVG) and aminooxyacetic acid (AOA) block the, conversion of AdoMet to ACC (see Figure 22.1). AVG and, AOA are known to inhibit enzymes that use the cofactor, pyridoxal phosphate. The cobalt ion (Co2+) is also an, inhibitor of the ethylene biosynthetic pathway, blocking the, conversion of ACC to ethylene by ACC oxidase, the last, step in ethylene biosynthesis., , Inhibitors of ethylene action. Most of the effects of ethylene can be antagonized by specific ethylene inhibitors., Silver ions (Ag+) applied as silver nitrate (AgNO3) or as silver thiosulfate (Ag(S2O3)23–) are potent inhibitors of ethylene action. Silver is very specific; the inhibition it causes, cannot be induced by any other metal ion., Carbon dioxide at high concentrations (in the range of 5, to 10%) also inhibits many effects of ethylene, such as the, induction of fruit ripening, although CO2 is less efficient, than Ag+. This effect of CO2 has often been exploited in the, storage of fruits, whose ripening is delayed at elevated CO2, concentrations. The high concentrations of CO2 required, for inhibition make it unlikely that CO2 acts as an ethylene, antagonist under natural conditions., The volatile compound trans-cyclooctene, but not its, isomer cis-cyclooctene, is a strong competitive inhibitor of, ethylene binding (Sisler et al. 1990); trans-cyclooctene is, thought to act by competing with ethylene for binding to, the receptor. A novel inhibitor, 1-methylcyclopropene, (MCP), was recently found that binds almost irreversibly, to the ethylene receptor (Figure 22.3) (Sisler and Serek, 1997). MCP shows tremendous promise in commercial, applications., , H3C, , 1-Methylcyclopropene trans-Cyclooctene, (MCP), , cis-Cyclooctene, , FIGURE 22.3 Inhibitors that block ethylene binding to its, receptor. Only the trans form of cyclooctene is active.
Page 575 :
524, , Chapter 22, , Historically, bioassays based on the seedling triple response, were used to measure ethylene levels, but they have been, replaced by gas chromatography. As little as 5 parts per, billion (ppb) (5 pL per liter)1 of ethylene can be detected,, and the analysis time is only 1 to 5 minutes., Usually the ethylene produced by a plant tissue is, allowed to accumulate in a sealed vial, and a sample is, withdrawn with a syringe. The sample is injected into a gas, chromatograph column in which the different gases are, separated and detected by a flame ionization detector., Quantification of ethylene by this method is very accurate., Recently a novel method to measure ethylene was developed that uses a laser-driven photoacoustic detector that, can detect as little as 50 parts per trillion (50 ppt = 0.05 pL, L–1) ethylene (Voesenek et al. 1997)., , 25, , DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL, EFFECTS OF ETHYLENE, As we have seen, ethylene was discovered in connection, with its effects on seedling growth and fruit ripening. It has, since been shown to regulate a wide range of responses in, plants, including seed germination, cell expansion, cell differentiation, flowering, senescence, and abscission. In this, section we will consider the phenotypic effects of ethylene, in more detail., , Ethylene Promotes the Ripening of Some Fruits, In everyday usage, the term fruit ripening refers to the, changes in fruit that make it ready to eat. Such changes typically include softening due to the enzymatic breakdown, of the cell walls, starch hydrolysis, sugar accumulation, and, the disappearance of organic acids and phenolic compounds, including tannins. From the perspective of the, plant, fruit ripening means that the seeds are ready for dispersal., For seeds whose dispersal depends on animal ingestion,, ripeness and edibility are synonymous. Brightly colored, anthocyanins and carotenoids often accumulate in the epidermis of such fruits, enhancing their visibility. However,, for seeds that rely on mechanical or other means for dispersal, fruit ripening may mean drying followed by splitting., Because of their importance in agriculture, the vast majority of studies on fruit ripening have focused on edible fruits., Ethylene has long been recognized as the hormone that, accelerates the ripening of edible fruits. Exposure of such, fruits to ethylene hastens the processes associated with, ripening, and a dramatic increase in ethylene production, accompanies the initiation of ripening. However, surveys, of a wide range of fruits have shown that not all of them, respond to ethylene., 1, , pL = picoliter = 10–12 L., , CO2 production (µL g–1 h–1), , 30, , 100, , Ethylene, 20, 15, , 50, , 10, , CO2, , Ethylene content (µL L–1), , Ethylene Can Be Measured by Gas, Chromatography, , 5, , 0, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , Days after harvest, , FIGURE 22.4 Ethylene production and respiration. In, banana, ripening is characterized by a climacteric rise in, respiration rate, as evidenced by the increased CO2 production. A climacteric rise in ethylene production precedes the, increase in CO2 production, suggesting that ethylene is the, hormone that triggers the ripening process. (From Burg and, Burg 1965.), , All fruits that ripen in response to ethylene exhibit a, characteristic respiratory rise before the ripening phase, called a climacteric.2 Such fruits also show a spike of ethylene production immediately before the respiratory rise, (Figure 22.4). Inasmuch as treatment with ethylene induces, the fruit to produce additional ethylene, its action can be, described as autocatalytic. Apples, bananas, avocados, and, tomatoes are examples of climacteric fruits., In contrast, fruits such as citrus fruits and grapes do not, exhibit the respiration and ethylene production rise and are, called nonclimacteric fruits. Other examples of climacteric, and nonclimacteric fruits are given in Table 22.1., When unripe climacteric fruits are treated with ethylene,, the onset of the climacteric rise is hastened. When nonclimacteric fruits are treated in the same way, the magnitude, of the respiratory rise increases as a function of the ethylene, concentration, but the treatment does not trigger production of endogenous ethylene and does not accelerate ripening. Elucidation of the role of ethylene in the ripening of climacteric fruits has resulted in many practical applications, aimed at either uniform ripening or the delay of ripening., Although the effects of exogenous ethylene on fruit ripening are straightforward and clear, establishing a causal relation between the level of endogenous ethylene and fruit, ripening is more difficult. Inhibitors of ethylene biosynthe2 The term climacteric can be used either as a noun, as in, “most fruits exhibit a climacteric during ripening” or as an, adjective, as in “a climacteric rise in respiration.” The term, nonclimacteric, however, is used only as an adjective.
Page 576 :
Ethylene: The Gaseous Hormone, , 525, , TABLE 22.1, Climacteric and nonclimacteric fruits, , Thus, not all of the processes associated with ripening in, tomato are ethylene dependent., , Climacteric, , Nonclimacteric, , Apple, Avocado, Banana, Cantaloupe, Cherimoya, Fig, Mango, Olive, Peach, Pear, Persimmon, Plum, Tomato, , Bell pepper, Cherry, Citrus, Grape, Pineapple, Snap bean, Strawberry, Watermelon, , Leaf Epinasty Results When ACC from the Root Is, Transported to the Shoot, , sis (such as AVG) or of ethylene action (such as CO2, MCP,, or Ag+) have been shown to delay or even prevent ripening., However, the definitive demonstration that ethylene is, required for fruit ripening was provided by experiments in, which ethylene biosynthesis was blocked by expression of, an antisense version of either ACC synthase or ACC oxidase, in transgenic tomatoes (see Web Topic 22.3). Elimination of, ethylene biosynthesis in these transgenic tomatoes completely blocked fruit ripening, and ripening was restored by, application of exogenous ethylene (Oeller et al. 1991)., Further demonstration of the requirement for ethylene, in fruit ripening came from the analysis of the never-ripe, mutation in tomato. As the name implies, this mutation, completely blocks the ripening of tomato fruit. Molecular, analysis revealed that never-ripe was due to a mutation in, an ethylene receptor that rendered it unable to bind ethylene (Lanahan et al. 1994). These experiments provided, unequivocal proof of the role of ethylene in fruit ripening,, and they opened the door to the manipulation of fruit, ripening through biotechnology., In tomatoes several genes have been identified that are, highly regulated during ripening (Gray et al. 1994). During, tomato fruit ripening, the fruit softens as the result of cell, wall hydrolysis and changes from green to red as a consequence of chlorophyll loss and the synthesis of the, carotenoid pigment lycopene. At the same time, aroma and, flavor components are produced., Analysis of mRNA from tomato fruits from wild-type, and transgenic tomato plants genetically engineered to lack, ethylene has revealed that gene expression during ripening is regulated by at least two independent pathways:, 1. An ethylene-dependent pathway includes genes, involved in lycopene and aroma biosynthesis, respiratory metabolism, and ACC synthase., 2. A developmental, ethylene-independent pathway includes, genes encoding ACC oxidase and chlorophyllase., , The downward curvature of leaves that occurs when the, upper (adaxial) side of the petiole grows faster than the, lower (abaxial) side is termed epinasty (Figure 22.5B). Ethylene and high concentrations of auxin induce epinasty,, and it has now been established that auxin acts indirectly, by inducing ethylene production. As will be discussed later, in the chapter, a variety of stress conditions, such as salt, stress or pathogen infection, increase ethylene production, and also induce epinasty. There is no known physiological, function for the response., In tomato and other dicots, flooding (waterlogging) or, anaerobic conditions around the roots enhances the synthesis of ethylene in the shoot, leading to the epinastic, response. Because these environmental stresses are sensed, by the roots and the response is displayed by the shoots,, a signal from the roots must be transported to the shoots., This signal is ACC, the immediate precursor of ethylene., ACC levels were found to be significantly higher in the, xylem sap after flooding of tomato roots for 1 to 2 days, (Figure 22.6) (Bradford and Yang 1980)., Because water fills the air spaces in waterlogged soil, and O2 diffuses slowly through water, the concentration of, oxygen around flooded roots decreases dramatically. The, elevated production of ethylene appears to be caused by, the accumulation of ACC in the roots under anaerobic conditions, since the conversion of ACC to ethylene requires, oxygen (see Figure 22.1). The ACC accumulated in the, anaerobic roots is then transported to shoots via the transpiration stream, where it is readily converted to ethylene., , Ethylene Induces Lateral Cell Expansion, At concentrations above 0.1 µL L–1, ethylene changes the, growth pattern of seedlings by reducing the rate of elongation and increasing lateral expansion, leading to swelling, of the region below the hook. These effects of ethylene are, common to growing shoots of most dicots, forming part of, the triple response. In Arabidopsis, the triple response consists of inhibition and swelling of the hypocotyl, inhibition, of root elongation, and exaggeration of the apical hook, (Figure 22.7)., As discussed in Chapter 15, the directionality of plant, cell expansion is determined by the orientation of the cellulose microfibrils in the cell wall. Transverse microfibrils, reinforce the cell wall in the lateral direction, so that turgor, pressure is channeled into cell elongation. The orientation, of the microfibrils in turn is determined by the orientation, of the cortical array of microtubules in the cortical (peripheral) cytoplasm. In typical elongating plant cells, the cortical microtubules are arranged transversely, giving rise to, transversely arranged cellulose microfibrils.
Page 577 :
526, , Chapter 22, , (A), , (B), , (C), (D), , FIGURE 22.5 Some physiological effects of ethylene on plant, , tissue in various developmental stages. (A) Triple response, of etiolated pea seedlings. Six-day-old pea seedlings were, treated with 10 ppm (parts per million) ethylene (right) or, left untreated (left). The treated seedlings show a radial, swelling, inhibition of elongation of the epicotyl, and horizontal growth of the epicotyl (diagravitropism). (B), Epinasty, or downward bending of the tomato leaves (right),, is caused by ethylene treatment. Epinasty results when the, cells on the upper side of the petiole grow faster than those, on the bottom. (C) Inhibition of flower senescence by inhibition of ethylene action. Carnation flowers were held in, deionized water for 14 days with (left) or without (right), silver thiosulfate (STS), a potent inhibitor of ethylene action., Blocking of ethylene results in a marked inhibition of floral, senescence. (D) Promotion of root hair formation by ethylene in lettuce seedlings. Two-day-old seedlings were treated, with air (left) or 10 ppm ethylene (right) for 24 hours before, the photo was taken. Note the profusion of root hairs on the, ethylene-treated seedling. (A and B courtesy of S. Gepstein;, C from Reid 1995, courtesy of M. Reid; D from Abeles et al., 1992, courtesy of F. Abeles.), , During the seedling triple response to ethylene, the, transverse pattern of microtubule alignment is disrupted,, and the microtubules switch over to a longitudinal orientation. This 90° shift in microtubule orientation leads to a, parallel shift in cellulose microfibril deposition. The newly, deposited wall is reinforced in the longitudinal direction, , Air, , Ethylene, , rather than the transverse direction, which promotes lateral expansion instead of elongation., How do microtubules shift from one orientation to, another? To study this phenomenon, pea (Pisum sativum), epidermal cells were injected with the microtubule protein, tubulin, to which a fluorescent dye was covalently, attached. The fluorescent “tag” did not interfere with the, assembly of microtubules. This procedure allowed, researchers to monitor the assembly of microtubules in living cells using a confocal laser scanning microscope, which, can focus in many planes throughout the cell., It was found that microtubules do not reorient from the, transverse to the longitudinal direction by complete, depolymerization of the transverse microtubules followed, by repolymerization of a new longitudinal array of microtubules. Instead, increasing numbers of nontransversely
Page 578 :
Ethylene: The Gaseous Hormone, 3.0, , 1.2, ACC, (flooded), , 2.5, , 2.0, , 0.8, , 1.5, , 0.6, Ethylene, (flooded), , 0.4, , Ethylene, (control), , 0.2, , 24, , 48, Hours flooded, , ACC (nmol h–1), , Ethylene (nL g–1 h–1), , 1.0, , 0, , 527, , 1.0, , ACC, (control), , 0.5, , 72, , FIGURE 22.6 Changes in the amounts of ACC in the xylem, sap and ethylene production in the petiole following flooding of tomato plants. ACC is synthesized in roots, but it is, converted to ethylene very slowly under anaerobic conditions of flooding. ACC is transported via the xylem to the, shoot, where it is converted to ethylene. The gaseous ethylene cannot be transported, so it usually affects the tissue, near the site of its production. The ethylene precursor ACC, is transportable and can produce ethylene far from the site, of ACC synthesis. (From Bradford and Yang 1980.), , FIGURE 22.7 The triple response in Arabidopsis. Three-dayold etiolated seedlings grown in the presence (right) or, absence (left) of 10 ppm ethylene. Note the shortened, hypocotyl, reduced root elongation and exaggeration of the, curvature of the apical hook that results from the presence, of ethylene., , aligned microtubules appear in particular locations (Figure 22.8). Neighboring microtubules then adopt the new, alignment, so at one stage different alignments coexist, before they adopt a uniformly longitudinal orientation, (Yuan et al., 1994). Although the reorientations observed, in this study were spontaneous rather than induced by, ethylene, it is presumed that ethylene-induced microtubule reorientation operates by a similar mechanism., , Transverse microtubules, , The Hooks of Dark-Grown Seedlings Are, Maintained by Ethylene Production, Etiolated dicot seedlings are usually characterized by a, pronounced hook located just behind the shoot apex (see, Figure 22.7). This hook shape facilitates penetration of the, seedling through the soil, protecting the tender apical, meristem., Like epinasty, hook formation and maintenance result, from ethylene-induced asymmetric growth. The closed, shape of the hook is a consequence of the more rapid, elongation of the outer side of the stem compared with, the inner side. When the hook is exposed to white light,, it opens because the elongation rate of the inner side, , FIGURE 22.8 Reorientation of microtubules from transverse to, vertical in pea stem epidermis cells in response to wounding. A, living epidermal cell was microinjected with rhodamine-conjugated tubulin, which incorporates into the plant microtubules., A time series of approximately 6-minute intervals shows the, cortical microtubules undergoing reorientation from net transverse to oblique/longitudinal. The reorientation seems to, involve the appearance of patches of new “discordant” microtubules in the new direction, concomitant with the disappearance of microtubules from the previous alignment. (From Yuan, et al. 1994, photo courtesy of C. Lloyd.)
Page 579 :
528, , Chapter 22, , increases, equalizing the growth rates on both sides. The, kinematic aspects of hook growth (i.e., maintenance of the, hook shape over time) were discussed in Chapter 16., Red light induces hook opening, and far-red light, reverses the effect of red, indicating that phytochrome is, the photoreceptor involved in this process (see Chapter 17)., A close interaction between phytochrome and ethylene, controls hook opening. As long as ethylene is produced by, the hook tissue in the dark, elongation of the cells on the, inner side is inhibited. Red light inhibits ethylene formation, promoting growth on the inner side, thereby causing, the hook to open., The auxin-insensitive mutation axr1 and treatment of, wild-type seedlings with NPA (1-N-naphthylphthalamic, acid), an inhibitor of polar auxin transport, both block the, formation of the apical hook in Arabidopsis. These and other, results indicate a role for auxin in maintaining hook structure. The more rapid growth rate of the outer tissues relative to the inner tissues could reflect an ethylene-dependent, auxin gradient, analogous to the lateral auxin gradient that, develops during phototropic curvature (see Chapter 19)., A gene required for formation of the apical hook,, HOOKLESS1 (so called because mutations in this gene, result in seedlings lacking an apical hook), was identified, in Arabidopsis (Lehman et al. 1996). Disruption of this gene, severely alters the pattern of expression of auxin-responsive genes. When the gene is overexpressed in Arabidopsis,, it causes constitutive hook formation even in the light., HOOKLESS1 encodes a putative N-acetyltransferase that is, hypothesized to regulate—by an unknown mechanism—, differential auxin distribution in the apical hook induced, by ethylene., , Ethylene Breaks Seed and Bud Dormancy in Some, Species, Seeds that fail to germinate under normal conditions (water,, oxygen, temperature suitable for growth) are said to be dormant (see Chapter 23). Ethylene has the ability to break dormancy and initiate germination in certain seeds, such as, cereals. In addition to its effect on dormancy, ethylene, increases the rate of seed germination of several species. In, peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), ethylene production and seed, germination are closely correlated. Ethylene can also break, bud dormancy, and ethylene treatment is sometimes used to, promote bud sprouting in potato and other tubers., , Ethylene Promotes the Elongation Growth of, Submerged Aquatic Species, Although usually thought of as an inhibitor of stem elongation, ethylene is able to promote stem and petiole elongation in various submerged or partially submerged, aquatic plants. These include the dicots Ranunculus sceleratus, Nymphoides peltata, and Callitriche platycarpa, and the, fern Regnellidium diphyllum. Another agriculturally important example is the cereal deepwater rice (see Chapter 20)., , In these species, submergence induces rapid internode, or petiole elongation, which allows the leaves or upper, parts of the shoot to remain above water. Treatment with, ethylene mimics the effects of submergence., Growth is stimulated in the submerged plants because, ethylene builds up in the tissues. In the absence of O2, ethylene synthesis is diminished, but the loss of ethylene by, diffusion is retarded under water. Sufficient oxygen for, growth and ethylene synthesis in the underwater parts is, usually provided by aerenchyma tissue., As we saw in Chapter 20, in deepwater rice it has been, shown that ethylene stimulates internode elongation by, increasing the amount of, and the sensitivity to, gibberellin, in the cells of the intercalary meristem. The increased sensitivity to GA (gibberellic acid) in these cells in response to, ethylene is brought about by a decrease in the level of, abscisic acid (ABA), a potent antagonist of GA., , Ethylene Induces the Formation of Roots, and Root Hairs, Ethylene is capable of inducing adventitious root formation in leaves, stems, flower stems, and even other roots., Ethylene has also been shown to act as a positive regulator, of root hair formation in several species (see Figure 22.5D)., This relationship has been best studied in Arabidopsis, in, which root hairs normally are located in the epidermal cells, that overlie a junction between the underlying cortical cells, (Dolan et al. 1994)., In ethylene-treated roots, extra hairs form in abnormal, locations in the epidermis; that is, cells not overlying a cortical cell junction differentiate into hair cells (Tanimoto et al., 1995). Seedlings grown in the presence of ethylene inhibitors, (such as Ag+), as well as ethylene-insensitive mutants, display a reduction in root hair formation in response to ethylene. These observations suggest that ethylene acts as a positive regulator in the differentiation of root hairs., , Ethylene Induces Flowering in the, Pineapple Family, Although ethylene inhibits flowering in many species, it, induces flowering in pineapple and its relatives, and it is, used commercially in pineapple for synchronization of fruit, set. Flowering of other species, such as mango, is also initiated by ethylene. On plants that have separate male and, female flowers (monoecious species), ethylene may change, the sex of developing flowers (see Chapter 24). The promotion of female flower formation in cucumber is one, example of this effect., , Ethylene Enhances the Rate of Leaf Senescence, As described in Chapter 16, senescence is a genetically programmed developmental process that affects all tissues of, the plant. Several lines of physiological evidence support, roles for ethylene and cytokinins in the control of leaf, senescence:
Page 580 :
Ethylene: The Gaseous Hormone, • Exogenous applications of ethylene or ACC (the precursor of ethylene) accelerate leaf senescence, and, treatment with exogenous cytokinins delays leaf, senescence (see Chapter 21)., • Enhanced ethylene production is associated with, chlorophyll loss and color fading, which are characteristic features of leaf and flower senescence (see, Figure 22.5C); an inverse correlation has been found, between cytokinin levels in leaves and the onset of, senescence., • Inhibitors of ethylene synthesis (e.g., AVG or Co2+), and action (e.g., Ag+ or CO2) retard leaf senescence., Taken together, the physiological studies suggest that, senescence is regulated by the balance of ethylene and, cytokinin. In addition, abscisic acid (ABA) has been implicated in the control of leaf senescence. The role of ABA in, senescence will be discussed in Chapter 23., , Senescence in ethylene mutants., , Direct evidence for, the involvement of ethylene in the regulation of leaf, senescence has come from molecular genetic studies on, Arabidopsis. As will be discussed later in the chapter, several mutants affecting the response to ethylene have been, identified. The specific bioassay employed was the tripleresponse assay in which ethylene significantly inhibits, seedling hypocotyl elongation and promotes lateral, expansion., Ethylene-insensitive mutants, such as etr1 (ethyleneresistant 1) and ein2 (ethylene-insensitive 2), were identified by their failure to respond to ethylene (as will be, described later in the chapter). The etr1 mutant is unable, to perceive the ethylene signal because of a mutation in the, gene that codes for the ethylene receptor protein; the ein2, mutant is blocked at a later step in the signal transduction, pathway., Consistent with a role for ethylene in leaf senescence,, both etr1 and ein2 were found to be affected not only during the early stages of germination, but throughout the life, cycle, including senescence (Zacarias and Reid 1990;, Hensel et al. 1993; Grbič and Bleecker 1995). The ethylene, mutants retained their chlorophyll and other chloroplast, components for a longer period of time compared to the, wild type. However, because the total life spans of these, mutants were increased by only 30% over that of the wild, type, ethylene appears to increase the rate of senescence,, rather than acting as a developmental switch that initiates, the senescence process., , Use of genetic engineering to probe senescence. Another, very useful genetic approach that offers direct evidence for, the function of specific gene(s) is based on transgenic, plants. Through genetic engineering technology, the roles, of both ethylene and cytokinins in the regulation of leaf, senescence have been confirmed., , 529, , One way to suppress the expression of a gene is to transform the plant with antisense DNA, which consists of the, gene of interest in the reverse orientation with respect to, the promoter. When the antisense gene is transcribed, the, resulting antisense mRNA is complementary to the sense, mRNA and will hybridize to it. Because double-stranded, RNA is rapidly degraded in the cell, the effect of the antisense gene is to deplete the cell of the sense mRNA., Transgenic plants expressing antisense versions of genes, that encode enzymes involved in the ethylene biosynthetic, pathway, such as ACC synthase and ACC oxidase, can synthesize ethylene only at very low levels. Consistent with, a role for ethylene in senescence, such antisense mutants, have been shown to exhibit delayed leaf senescence, as well, as fruit ripening, in tomato (see Web Topic 22.1)., , The Role of Ethylene in Defense Responses, Is Complex, Pathogen infection and disease will occur only if the interactions between host and pathogen are genetically compatible. However, ethylene production generally increases, in response to pathogen attack in both compatible (i.e.,, pathogenic) and noncompatible (nonpathogenic) interactions., The discovery of ethylene-insensitive mutants has, allowed the role of ethylene in the response to various, pathogens to be assessed. The emerging picture is that the, involvement of ethylene in pathogenesis is complex and, depends on the particular host–pathogen interaction. For, example, blocking the ethylene response does not affect the, resistance response to Pseudomonas bacteria in Arabidopsis, or to tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco. In compatible interactions of these pathogens and hosts, however, elimination, of ethylene responsiveness prevents the development of, disease symptoms, even though the growth of the, pathogen appears to be unaffected., On the other hand, ethylene, in combination with jasmonic acid (see Chapter 13), is required for the activation, of several plant defense genes. In addition, ethylene-insensitive tobacco and Arabidopsis mutants become susceptible, to several necrotrophic (cell-killing) soil fungal pathogens, that are normally not plant pathogens. Thus, ethylene, appears to be involved in the resistance response to some, pathogens, but not others., , Ethylene Biosynthesis in the Abscission Zone Is, Regulated by Auxin, The shedding of leaves, fruits, flowers, and other plant, organs is termed abscission (see Web Topic 22.4). Abscission takes place in specific layers of cells, called abscission, layers, which become morphologically and biochemically, differentiated during organ development. Weakening of, the cell walls at the abscission layer depends on cell, wall–degrading enzymes such as cellulase and polygalacturonase (Figure 22.9).
Page 581 :
530, (A), , Chapter 22, (B), , FIGURE 22.9 During the formation of the abscission layer, in this case that of, jewelweed (Impatiens), two or three rows of cells in the abscission zone (A), undergo cell wall breakdown because of an increase in cell wall–hydrolyzing, enzymes (B). The resulting protoplasts round up and increase in volume,, pushing apart the xylem tracheary cells, and facilitating the separation of the, leaf from the stem. (From Sexton et al. 1984.), , The ability of ethylene gas to cause, defoliation in birch trees is shown in Figure 22.10. The wild-type tree on the left, has lost all its leaves. The tree on the right, has been transformed with a gene for the, Arabidopsis ethylene receptor ETR1-1 carrying a dominant mutation (discussed in, the next section). This tree is unable to, respond to ethylene and does not shed its, leaves after ethylene treatment., Ethylene appears to be the primary, regulator of the abscission process, with, auxin acting as a suppressor of the ethylene effect (see Chapter 19). However,, supraoptimal auxin concentrations stimulate ethylene production, which has led to, the use of auxin analogs as defoliants. For, example, 2,4,5-T, the active ingredient in, Agent Orange, was widely used as a defoliant during the Vietnam War. Its action is, based on its ability to increase ethylene, biosynthesis, thereby stimulating leaf, abscission., A model of the hormonal control of leaf, abscission describes the process in three, distinct sequential phases (Figure 22.11), (Reid 1995):, 1. Leaf maintenance phase. Prior to the, perception of any signal (internal or, external) that initiates the abscission, process, the leaf remains healthy and, fully functional in the plant. A gradient of auxin from the blade to the, stem maintains the abscission zone, in a nonsensitive state., 2. Shedding induction phase. A reduction, or reversal in the auxin gradient, from the leaf, normally associated, with leaf senescence, causes the, abscission zone to become sensitive, to ethylene. Treatments that enhance, leaf senescence may promote abscission by interfering with auxin synthesis and/or transport in the leaf., , FIGURE 22.10 Effect of ethylene on abscis-, , sion in birch (Betula pendula). The plant on, the left is the wild type; the plant on the, right was transformed with a mutated, version of the Arabidopsis ethylene receptor, ETR1-1. The expression of this gene, was under the transcriptional control of, its own promoter. One of the characteristics of these mutant trees is that they do, not drop their leaves when fumigated 3, days with 50 ppm of ethylene., , 3. Shedding phase. The sensitized cells, of the abscission zone respond to, low concentrations of endogenous, ethylene by synthesizing and secreting cellulase and other cell, wall–degrading enzymes, resulting, in shedding., During the early phase of leaf maintenance, auxin from the leaf prevents abscission by maintaining the cells of the abscis-
Page 582 :
Ethylene: The Gaseous Hormone, , 531, , Auxin, , Auxin, , Separation layer, digested, Yellowing, , Ethylene, , Leaf maintenance phase, High auxin from leaf reduces, ethylene sensitivity of abscission, zone and prevents leaf shedding., , Shedding induction phase, A reduction in auxin from the, leaf increases ethylene production, and ethylene sensitivity in the, abscission zone, which triggers, the shedding phase., , Shedding phase, Synthesis of enzymes that, hydrolyze the cell wall, polysaccharides, resulting in cell, separation and leaf abscission., , FIGURE 22.11 Schematic view of the roles of auxin and eth-, , sion zone in an ethylene-insensitive state. It has long been, known that removal of the leaf blade (the site of auxin production) promotes petiole abscission. Application of exogenous auxin to petioles from which the leaf blade has been, removed delays the abscission process. However, application of auxin to the proximal side of the abscission zone, (i.e., the side closest to the stem) actually accelerates the, abscission process. These results indicate that it is not the, absolute amount of auxin at the abscission zone, but rather, the auxin gradient, that controls the ethylene sensitivity of, these cells., In the shedding induction phase, the amount of auxin, from the leaf decreases and the ethylene level rises. Ethylene appears to decrease the activity of auxin both by reducing its synthesis and transport and by increasing its, destruction. The reduction in the concentration of free, auxin increases the response of specific target cells to ethylene. The shedding phase is characterized by the induction of genes encoding specific hydrolytic enzymes of cell, wall polysaccharides and proteins., The target cells, located in the abscission zone, synthesize, cellulase and other polysaccharide-degrading enzymes,, and secrete them into the cell wall via secretory vesicles, derived from the Golgi. The action of these enzymes leads, to cell wall loosening, cell separation, and abscission., , Ethylene Has Important Commercial Uses, Because ethylene regulates so many physiological, processes in plant development, it is one of the most, widely used plant hormones in agriculture. Auxins and, ACC can trigger the natural biosynthesis of ethylene and, in several cases are used in agricultural practice. Because, of its high diffusion rate, ethylene is very difficult to apply, in the field as a gas, but this limitation can be overcome, , ylene during leaf abscission. In the shedding induction, phase, the level of auxin decreases, and the level of ethylene increases. These changes in the hormonal balance, increase the sensitivity of the target cells to ethylene., (After Morgan 1984.), , if an ethylene-releasing compound is used. The most, widely used such compound is ethephon, or 2chloroethylphosphonic acid, which was discovered in the, 1960s and is known by various trade names, such as, Ethrel., Ethephon is sprayed in aqueous solution and is readily, absorbed and transported within the plant. It releases ethylene slowly by a chemical reaction, allowing the hormone, to exert its effects:, Ethephon hastens fruit ripening of apple and tomato, and degreening of citrus, synchronizes flowering and fruit, set in pineapple, and accelerates abscission of flowers and, fruits. It can be used to induce fruit thinning or fruit drop, in cotton, cherry, and walnut. It is also used to promote, female sex expression in cucumber, to prevent self-pollination and increase yield, and to inhibit terminal growth, of some plants in order to promote lateral growth and, compact flowering stems., Storage facilities developed to inhibit ethylene production and promote preservation of fruits have a controlled, atmosphere of low O2 concentration and low temperature, that inhibits ethylene biosynthesis. A relatively high concentration of CO2 (3 to 5%) prevents ethylene’s action as a, ripening promoter. Low pressure (vacuum) is used to, remove ethylene and oxygen from the storage chambers,, reducing the rate of ripening and preventing overripening., Specific inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis and action, are also useful in postharvest preservation. Silver (Ag+) is
Page 583 :
532, , Chapter 22, , used extensively to increase the longevity of cut carnations, and several other flowers. The potent inhibitor AVG retards, fruit ripening and flower fading, but its commercial use has, not yet been approved by regulatory agencies. The strong,, O, Cl, , CH2, , CH2, , P, , OH + OH–, , O, , CH2, , CH2 + H2PO4– + Cl–, , Ethylene, , 2-Chloroethylphosphonic acid, (ethephon), , offensive odor of trans-cyclooctene precludes its use in agriculture. Currently, 1-methylcyclopropene (MCP) is being, developed for use in a variety of postharvest applications., The near future may see a variety of agriculturally, important species that have been genetically modified to, manipulate the biosynthesis of ethylene or its perception., The inhibition of ripening in tomato by expression of an, antisense version of ACC synthase and ACC oxidase has, already been mentioned. Another example of this technology is in petunia, in which ethylene biosynthesis has been, blocked by transformation of an antisense version of ACC, oxidase. Senescence and petal wilting of cut flowers are, delayed for weeks in these transgenic plants., , ylene. Conversely, constitutive ethylene response mutants, are identified as seedlings displaying the triple response in, the absence of exogenous ethylene., , Ethylene Receptors Are Related to Bacterial TwoComponent System Histidine Kinases, The first ethylene-insensitive mutant isolated was etr1, (ethylene-resistant 1) (Figure 22.12). The etr1 mutant was, identified in a screen for mutations that block the, response of Arabidopsis seedlings to ethylene. The amino, acid sequence of the carboxy-terminal half of ETR1 is similar to bacterial two-component histidine kinases—receptors used by bacteria to perceive various environmental, cues, such as chemo-sensory stimuli, phosphate availability, and osmolarity., Bacterial two-component systems consist of a sensor histidine kinase and a response regulator, which often acts as, a transcription factor (see Chapter 14 on the web site)., ETR1 was the first example of a eukaryotic histidine kinase,, , CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MODES OF, ETHYLENE ACTION, Despite the broad range of ethylene’s effects on development, the primary steps in ethylene action are assumed to, be similar in all cases: They all involve binding to a receptor, followed by activation of one or more signal transduction pathways (see Chapter 14 on the web site) leading to, the cellular response. Ultimately, ethylene exerts its effects, primarily by altering the pattern of gene expression. In, recent years, remarkable progress has been made in our, understanding of ethylene perception, as the result of molecular genetic studies of Arabidopsis thaliana., One key to the elucidation of ethylene signaling components has been the use of the triple-response morphology of etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings to isolate mutants, affected in their response to ethylene (see Figure 22.7), (Guzman and Ecker 1990). Two classes of mutants have, been identified by experiments in which mutagenized Arabidopsis seeds were grown on an agar medium in the presence or absence of ethylene for 3 days in the dark:, 1. Mutants that fail to respond to exogenous ethylene, (ethylene-resistant or ethylene-insensitive mutants), 2. Mutants that display the response even in the, absence of ethylene (constitutive mutants), Ethylene-insensitive mutants are identified as tall, seedlings extending above the lawn of short, tripleresponding seedlings when grown in the presence of eth-, , FIGURE 22.12 Screen for the etr1 mutant of Arabidopsis., Seedlings were grown for 3 days in the dark in ethylene., Note that all but one of the seedlings are exhibiting the, triple response: exaggeration in curvature of the apical, hook, inhibition and radial swelling of the hypocotyl, and, horizontal growth. The etr1 mutant is completely insensitive to the hormone and grows like an untreated seedling., (Photograph by K. Stepnitz of the MSU/DOE Plant, Research Laboratory.)
Page 584 :
Ethylene: The Gaseous Hormone, but others have since been found in yeast, mammals, and, plants. Both phytochrome (see Chapter 17) and the, cytokinin receptor (see Chapter 21) also share sequence, similarity to bacterial two-component histidine kinases., The similarity to bacterial receptors and the ethylene, insensitivity of the etr1 mutants suggested that ETR1 might, be an ethylene receptor. Consistent with this hypothesis,, ETR1 expression in yeast conferred the ability to bind radiolabeled ethylene with an affinity that closely parallels the, dose-response curve of Arabidopsis seedlings to ethylene, (see Web Topic 22.5)., The Arabidopsis genome encodes four additional proteins similar to ETR1 that also function as ethylene receptors: ETR2, ERS1 (ETR1-related sequence 1), ERS2, and, EIN4 (Figure 22.13). Like ETR1, these receptors have been, shown to bind ethylene, and missense mutations in the, genes that encode these proteins, analogous to the original, etr1 mutation, prevent ethylene binding to the receptor, while allowing the receptor to function normally as a regulator of the ethylene response pathway in the absence of, ethylene., All of these proteins share at least two domains:, 1. The amino-terminal domain spans the membrane at, least three times and contains the ethylene-binding, site. Ethylene can readily access this site because of, its hydrophobicity., 2. The middle portion of the ethylene receptors contains a histidine kinase catalytic domain., A subset of the ethylene receptors also have a carboxyterminal domain that is similar to bacterial two-component, receiver domains. In other two-component systems, binding, of ligand regulates the activity of the histidine kinase, domain, which autophosphorylates a conserved histidine, residue. The phosphate is then transferred to an aspartic acid, residue located within the fused receiver domain.Although, histidine kinase activity has been demonstrated for one of, the ethylene receptors—ETR1—several others are missing, critical amino acids, making it unlikely that they possess his-, , Subfamily 1, , Ethylene, binding, , GAF, , Histidine kinase, , ETR1, , H, , ERS1, , H, , Subfamily 2, EIN4, ETR2, ERS2, , 533, , tidine kinase activity. Thus the biochemical mechanism of, these ethylene receptors is not known., Recent studies indicate that ETR1 is located on the endoplasmic reticulum, rather than on the plasma membrane as, originally assumed. Such an intracellular location for the, ethylene receptor is consistent with the hydrophobic nature, of ethylene, which enables it to pass freely through the, plasma membrane into the cell. In this respect ethylene is, similar to the hydrophobic signaling molecules of animals,, such as steroids and the gas nitric oxide, which also bind, to intracellular receptors., , High-Affinity Binding of Ethylene to Its Receptor, Requires a Copper Cofactor, Even prior to the identification of its receptor, scientists had, predicted that ethylene would bind to its receptor via a, transition metal cofactor, most likely copper or zinc. This, prediction was based on the high affinity of olefins, such as, ethylene, for these transition metals. Recent genetic and, biochemical studies have borne out these predictions., Analysis of the ETR1 ethylene receptor expressed in, yeast demonstrated that a copper ion was coordinated to, the protein and that this copper was necessary for highaffinity ethylene binding (Rodriguez et al. 1999). Silver ion, could substitute for copper to yield high-affinity binding,, which indicates that silver blocks the action of ethylene not, by interfering with ethylene binding, but by preventing the, changes in the protein that normally occur when ethylene, binds to the receptor., Evidence that copper binding is required for ethylene, receptor function in vivo came from identification of the, RAN1 gene in Arabidopsis (Hirayama et al. 1999). Strong, ran1 mutations block the formation of functional ethylene, receptors (Woeste and Kieber 2000). Cloning of RAN1, revealed that it encodes a protein similar to a yeast protein, required for the transfer of a copper ion cofactor to an iron, transport protein. In an analogous manner, RAN1 is likely, to be involved in the addition of a copper ion cofactor necessary for the function of the ethylene receptors., , Receiver, D, , COOH, , Degenerate histidine, kinase domains, H, , D, D, , FIGURE 22.13 Schematic diagram of five ethylene receptor proteins and their functional, domains. The GAF domain is a conserved, , cGMP-binding domain found in a diverse, group of proteins. Note that EIN4, ETR2,, and ERS2 have degenerate histidine kinase, domains.
Page 585 :
534, , Chapter 22, , (A), , (B), , Ethylene (C2H4), , Ethylene binding, inactivates receptors, Plasma, membrane, , ETR1, , ETR2, , ERS1, , ERS2, , EIN4, , ETR1, , Ethylene response pathway, , ETR2, , ERS1, , ERS2, , EIN4, , Ethylene response pathway, In the absence of ethylene,, the receptors are active and, suppress the ethylene response., , The ethylene response occurs., , (C), , (D), , Ethylene, binding, inactivates, receptors, , ETR1, , Ethylene (C2H4), , ETR2, , ERS1, , ERS2, , Ethylene response pathway, , Missense mutation, at binding site makes, receptor insensitive to, ethylene., , Disruptions in the regulatory, domains of multiple ethylene, receptors (at least three), , ETR1, , EIN4, The active, receptor, inhibits the, response., , The response does not occur; the, mutant exhibits a dominant, negative phenotype., , ETR2, , ERS1, , ERS2, , EIN4, , Disrupted receptors are inactive in, the presence or absence of ethylene., Ethylene response pathway, The ethylene response occurs., , FIGURE 22.14 Model for ethylene receptor action based on, the phenotype of receptor mutants. (A) In the wild type,, ethylene binding inactivates the receptors, allowing the, response to occur. (B) In the absence of ethylene the receptors act as negative regulators of the response pathway. (C), , A missense mutation that interferes with ethylene binding, to its receptor, but leaves the regulatory site active, results, in a dominant negative phenotype. (D) Disruption mutations in the regulatory sites result in a constitutive ethylene, response., , Unbound Ethylene Receptors Are Negative, Regulators of the Response Pathway, , (i.e., in the active state) in the absence of ethylene, and that, the function of the receptor minus its ligand (ethylene), is, to shut off the signaling pathway that leads to the response, (Figure 22.14B). Binding of ethylene turns off the receptors,, thus allowing the response pathway to proceed (Figure, 22.14A)., This somewhat counterintuitive model for ethylene, receptors as negative regulators of a signaling pathway is, unlike the mechanism of most animal receptors, which,, after binding their ligands, serve as positive regulators of, their respective signal transduction pathways., In contrast to the disrupted receptors, receptors with, missense mutations at the ethylene binding site (as occurs, in the original etr1 mutant) are unable to bind ethylene,, but are still active as negative regulators of the ethylene, , In Arabidopsis, tomato, and probably most other plant, species, the ethylene receptors are encoded by multigene, families. Targeted disruption (complete inactivation) of the, five Arabidopsis ethylene receptors (ETR1, ETR2, ERS1,, ERS2, and EIN4) has revealed that they are functionally, redundant (Hua and Meyerowitz 1998). That is, disruption, of any single gene encoding one of these proteins has no, effect, but a plant with disruptions in all five receptor, genes exhibits a constitutive ethylene response phenotype, (Figure 22.14D)., The observation that ethylene responses, such as the, triple response, become constitutive when the receptors are, disrupted indicates that the receptors are normally “on”
Page 586 :
Ethylene: The Gaseous Hormone, response pathway. Such missense mutations result in a, plant that expresses a subset of receptors that can no, longer be turned off by ethylene, and thus confer a dominant ethylene-insensitive phenotype (Figure 22.14C). Even, though the normal receptors can all be turned off by ethylene, the mutant receptors continue to signal the cell to, suppress ethylene responses whether ethylene is present, or not., , A Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase Is Also Involved, in Ethylene Signaling, The recessive ctr1 (constitutive triple response 1 = triple, response in the absence of ethylene) mutation was identified in screens for mutations that constitutively activated, ethylene responses (Figure 22.15). The fact that the mutation caused an activation of the ethylene response suggests, that the wild-type protein also acts as a negative regulator of, the response pathway (Kieber et al. 1993), similar to the, ethylene receptors., CTR1 appears to be related to RAF-1, a MAPKKK serine/threonine protein kinase (mitogen-activated protein, kinase kinase kinase) that is involved in the transduction of, various external regulatory signals and developmental signaling pathways in organisms ranging from yeast to, humans (see Chapter 14 on the web site). In animal cells,, the final product in the MAP kinase cascade is a phosphorylated transcription factor that regulates gene expression, in the nucleus., , EIN2 Encodes a Transmembrane Protein, The ein2 (ethylene-insensitive 2) mutation blocks all ethylene responses in both seedling and adult Arabidopsis plants., The EIN2 gene encodes a protein containing 12 membranespanning domains that is most similar to the N-RAMP, , 535, , (natural resistance–associated macrophage protein) family, of cation transporters in animals (Alonso et al. 1999), suggesting that it may act as a channel or pore. To date, however, researchers have failed to demonstrate a transport, activity for this protein, and the intracellular location of the, protein is not known., Interestingly, mutations in the EIN2 gene have also been, identified in genetic screens for resistance to other hormones, such as jasmonic acid and ABA, suggesting that, EIN2 may be a common intermediate in the signal transduction pathways of various hormones and other chemical signals., , Ethylene Regulates Gene Expression, One of the primary effects of ethylene signaling is an alteration in the expression of various target genes. Ethylene, affects the mRNA transcript levels of numerous genes,, including the genes that encode cellulase, as well as ripening-related genes and ethylene biosynthesis genes. Regulatory sequences called ethylene response elements, or EREs,, have been identified from the ethylene-regulated genes., Key components mediating ethylene’s effects on gene, expression are the EIN3 family of transcription factors, (Chao et al. 1997). There are at least four EIN3-like genes in, Arabidopsis, and homologs have been identified in both, tomato and tobacco. In response to an ethylene signal,, homodimers of EIN3 or its paralogs (closely related proteins), bind to the promoter of a gene called ERF1 (ethylene, response factor 1) and activate its transcription (Solano et, al. 1998)., ERF1 encodes a protein that belongs to the ERE-binding, protein (EREBP) family of transcription factors, which were, first identified in tobacco as proteins that bind to ERE, sequences (Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi 1995). Several EREBPs, are rapidly up-regulated in response to ethylene. The EREBP, genes exist in Arabidopsis as a very large gene family, but, only a few of the genes are inducible by ethylene., , Genetic Epistasis Reveals the Order of the, Ethylene Signaling Components, , FIGURE 22.15 Screen for Arabidopsis mutants that constitutively display the triple response. Seedlings were grown for, 3 days in the dark in air. A single ctr1 mutant seedling is, evident among the taller, wild-type seedlings. (Courtesy of, J. Kieber.), , The order of action of the genes ETR1, EIN2, EIN3, and, CTR1 has been determined by the analysis of how the, mutations interact with each other (i.e., their epistatic, order). Two mutants with opposite phenotypes are, crossed, and a line harboring both mutations (the double, mutant) is identified in the F2 generation. In the case of, the ethylene response mutants, researchers constructed a, line doubly mutant for ctr1, a constitutive ethylene, response mutant, and one of the ethylene-insensitive, mutations., The phenotype that the double mutant displays reveals, which of the mutations is epistatic to the other. For example, if an etr1/ctr1 double mutant displays a ctr1 mutant, phenotype, the ctr1 mutation is said to be epistatic to etr1., From this it can be inferred that CTR1 acts downstream of
Page 587 :
536, , Chapter 22, , ETR1 (Avery and Wasserman 1992). In this way, the order, of action of ETR1, EIN2, and EIN3 were determined relative to CTR1., The ETR1 protein has been shown to interact physically, with the predicted downstream protein, CTR1, suggesting, that the ethylene receptors may directly regulate the, kinase activity of CTR1 (Clark et al. 1998). The model in, Figure 22.16 summarizes these and other data. Genes that, are similar to several of these Arabidopsis signaling genes, have been found in other species (see Web Topic 22.6)., This model is still incomplete because other ethylene, response mutations have been identified that act in this, pathway. In addition, we are only beginning to understand the biochemical properties of these proteins and, how they interact. However, we are beginning to glimpse, the outline of the molecular basis for the perception and, transduction of this hormonal signal., , SUMMARY, Ethylene is formed in most organs of higher plants. Senescing tissues and ripening fruits produce more ethylene than, do young or mature tissues. The precursor of ethylene in, vivo is the amino acid methionine, which is converted to, AdoMet (S-adenosylmethionine), ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid), and ethylene. The rate-limiting, step of this pathway is the conversion of AdoMet to ACC,, which is catalyzed by ACC synthase. ACC synthase is, encoded by members of a multigene family that are differentially regulated in various plant tissues and in response, to various inducers of ethylene biosynthesis., Ethylene biosynthesis is triggered by various developmental processes, by auxins, and by environmental stresses., In all these cases the level of activity and of mRNA of ACC, synthase increases. The physiological effects of ethylene can, , The RAN1 protein is, required to assemble the, copper cofactor into the, ethylene receptor., , C2H4, , –S–S–, , Cu, , In the absence of ethylene,, ETR1 and the other ethylene, receptors activate the kinase, activity of CTR1. This leads, to a repression of the, ethylene response pathway,, possibly through a MAP, kinase cascade. The binding, of ethylene to the ETR1, dimer results in its, inactivation, which causes, CTR1 to become inactive., , ATP, , Cu, , RAN1, , P, , H, , ADP, , His kinase, domain, , ER membrane, , Activation, P, , D, , Receiver, domain, N C, CTR1, RAF-like, kinase, , HOOC, COOH, ETR1, histidine, kinase, , MAPK? MAPKK?, , The inactivation of CTR1, allows the transmembrane, protein EIN2 to become, active., , EIN2, N-RAMP, homolog, , FIGURE 22.16 Model of ethylene signaling in, , Arabidopsis. Ethylene binds to the ETR1 receptor, which is an integral membrane protein of, the ER membrane. Multiple isoforms of ethylene receptors may be present in a cell; only, ETR1 is shown for simplicity. The receptor is a, dimer, held together by disulfide bonds., Ethylene binds within the trans-membrane, domain, through a copper co-factor, which is, assembled into the ethylene receptors through, the RAN1 protein., , Activation of EIN2 turns on, the EIN3 family of, transcription factors, which, in turn induce the, expression of ERF1. The, activation of this, transcriptional cascade, leads to large-scale changes, in gene expression, which, ultimately bring about, alterations in cell functions., , NUCLEUS, EIN3, Transcription, factors, ERF1, , Ethylene response genes
Page 588 :
Ethylene: The Gaseous Hormone, be blocked by biosynthesis inhibitors or by antagonists., AVG (aminoethoxy-vinylglycine) and AOA (aminooxyacetic acid) inhibit the synthesis of ethylene; carbon dioxide, silver ions, trans-cyclooctene, and MCP inhibit ethylene action. Ethylene can be detected and measured by gas, chromatography., Ethylene regulates fruit ripening and other processes, associated with leaf and flower senescence, leaf and fruit, abscission, root hair development, seedling growth, and, hook opening. Ethylene also regulates the expression of, various genes, including ripening-related genes and pathogenesis-related genes., The ethylene receptor is encoded by a family of genes, that encode proteins similar to bacterial two-component, histidine kinases. Ethylene binds to these receptors in a, transmembrane domain through a copper cofactor. Downstream signal transduction components include CTR1, a, member of the RAF family of protein kinases; and EIN2,, a channel-like transmembrane protein. The pathway activates a cascade of transcription factors, including the EIN3, and EREBP families, which then modulate gene expression., , Web Material, Web Topics, 22.1 Cloning of ACC Synthase, A brief description of the cloning of the gene, for ACC synthase using antibodies raised, against the partially purified protein., , 22.2 Cloning of the ACC Oxidase Gene, The ACC oxidase gene was cloned by a circuitous route using antisense DNA., , 22.3 ACC Synthase Gene Expression and, Biotechnology, A discussion of the use of the ACC synthase, gene in biotechnology., , 22.4 Abscission and the Dawn of Agriculture, A short essay on the domestication of modern, cereals based on artificial selection for nonshattering rachises., , 22.5 Ethylene Binding to ETR1 and Seedling, Response to Ethylene, Ethylene-binding to its receptor ETR1 was first, demonstrated by expressing the gene in yeast., , 22.6 Conservation of Ethylene Signaling, Components in Other Plant Species, The evidence suggests that ethylene signaling, is similar in all plant species., , 537, , Chapter References, Abeles, F. B., Morgan, P. W., and Saltveit, M. E., Jr. (1992) Ethylene, in Plant Biology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego., Alonso, J. M., Hirayama, T., Roman, G., Nourizadeh, S., and Ecker,, J. R. (1999) EIN2, a bifunctional transducer of ethylene and stress, responses in Arabidopsis. Science 284: 2148–2152., Avery, L., and Wasserman, S. (1992) Ordering gene function: The, interpretation of epistasis in regulatory hierarchies. Trends Genet., 8: 312–316., Bradford, K. J., and Yang, S. F. (1980) Xylem transport of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, an ethylene precursor, in waterlogged tomato plants. Plant Physiol. 65: 322–326., Burg, S. P., and Burg, E. A. (1965) Relationship between ethylene production and ripening in bananas. Bot. Gaz. 126: 200–204., Burg, S. P., and Thimann, K. V. (1959) The physiology of ethylene formation in apples. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 45: 335–344., Chao, Q., Rothenberg, M., Solano, R., Roman, G., Terzaghi, W., and, Ecker, J. R. (1997) Activation of the ethylene gas response pathway in Arabidopsis by the nuclear protein ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 and related proteins. Cell 89: 1133–1144., Clark, K. L., Larsen, P. B., Wang, X., and Chang, C. (1998) Association of the Arabidopsis CTR1 Raf-like kinase with the ETR1 and, ERS ethylene receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 5401–5406., Dolan, L., Duckett, C. M., Grierson, C., Linstead, P., Schneider, K.,, Lawson, E., Dean, C., Poethig, S., and Roberts, K. (1994) Clonal, relationships and cell patterning in the root epidermis of Arabidopsis. Development 120: 2465–2474., Gray, J. E., Picton, S., Giovannoni, J. J., and Grierson, D. (1994) The, use of transgenic and naturally occurring mutants to understand, and manipulate tomato fruit ripening. Plant Cell Environ. 17:, 557–571., Grbič, V., and Bleecker, A. B. (1995) Ethylene regulates the timing of, leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 8: 595–602., Guzman, P., and Ecker, J. R. (1990) Exploiting the triple response of, Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell 2:, 513–523., Hensel, L. L., Grbič, V., Baumgarten, D. A., and Bleecker, A. B. (1993), Developmental and age-related processes that influence the, longevity and senescence of photosynthetic tissues in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5: 553–564., Hirayama, T., Kieber, J. J., Hirayama, N., Kogan, M., Guzman, P.,, Nourizadeh, S., Alonso, J. M., Dailey, W. P., Dancis, A., and Ecker,, J. R. (1999) RESPONSIVE-TO-ANTAGONIST1, a Menkes/Wilson disease-related copper transporter, is required for ethylene, signaling in Arabidopsis. Cell 97: 383–393., Hoffman, N. E., and Yang, S. F. (1980) Changes of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid content in ripening fruits in relation to, their ethylene production rates. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105:, 492–495., Hua, J., and Meyerowitz, E. M. (1998) Ethylene responses are negatively regulated by a receptor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana., Cell 94: 261–271., Kieber, J. J., Rothenburg, M., Roman, G., Feldmann, K. A., and Ecker,, J. R. (1993) CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response, pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the Raf family of, protein kinases. Cell 72: 427–441., Lanahan, M., Yen, H.-C., Giovannoni, J., and Klee, H. (1994) The, Never-ripe mutation blocks ethylene perception in tomato. Plant, Cell 6: 427–441., Lehman, A., Black, R., and Ecker, J. R. (1996) Hookless1, an ethylene, response gene, is required for differential cell elongation in the, Arabidopsis hook. Cell 85: 183–194., Liang, X., Abel, S., Keller, J., Shen, N., and Theologis, A. (1992) The, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 11046–11050.
Page 589 :
538, , Chapter 22, , McKeon, T. A., Fernández-Maculet, J. C., and Yang, S. F. (1995), Biosynthesis and metabolism of ethylene. In Plant Hormones:, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2nd ed., P. J. Davies,, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 118–139., Morgan, P. W. (1984) Is ethylene the natural regulator of abscission?, In Ethylene: Biochemical, Physiological and Applied Aspects, Y. Fuchs, and E. Chalutz, eds., Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands,, pp. 231–240., Nakagawa, J. H., Mori, H., Yamazaki, K., and Imaseki, H. (1991), Cloning of the complementary DNA for auxin-induced 1aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase and differential, expression of the gene by auxin and wounding. Plant Cell Physiol. 32: 1153–1163., Oeller, P., Min-Wong, L., Taylor, L., Pike, D., and Theologis, A. (1991), Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense, RNA. Science 254: 437–439., Ohme-Takagi, M., and Shinshi, H. (1995) Ethylene-inducible DNA, binding proteins that interact with an ethylene-responsive element. Plant Cell 7: 173–182., Olson, D. C., White, J. A., Edelman, L., Harkins, R. N., and Kende,, H. (1991) Differential expression of two genes for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase in tomato fruits. Proc. Natl. Acad., Sci. USA 88: 5340–5344., Perovic, S., Seack, J., Gamulin, V., Müller, W. E. G., and Schröder, H., C. (2001) Modulation of intracellular calcium and proliferative, activity of invertebrate and vertebrate cells by ethylene. BMC Cell, Biol. 2: 7., Raskin, I., and Beyer, E. M., Jr. (1989) Role of ethylene metabolism in, Amaranthus retroflexus. Plant Physiol. 90: 1–5., Reid, M. S. (1995) Ethylene in plant growth, development and senescence. In Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular, Biology, 2nd ed., P. J. Davies, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands,, pp. 486–508., Rodriguez, F. I., Esch, J. J., Hall, A. E., Binder, B. M., Schaller, E. G.,, and Bleecker, A. B. (1999) A copper cofactor for the ethylene, receptor ETR1 from Arabidopsis. Science 283: 396–398., Sexton, R., Burdon, J. N., Reid, J. S. G., Durbin, M. L., and Lewis, L., N. (1984) Cell wall breakdown and abscission. In Structure, Function, and Biosynthesis of Plant Cell Walls, W. M. Dugger and S., Bartnicki-Garcia, eds., American Society of Plant Physiologists,, Rockville, MD, pp. 383–406., , Sisler, E. C., and Serek, M. (1997) Inhibitors of ethylene responses in, plants at the receptor level: Recent developments. Physiol. Plant., 100: 577–582., Sisler, E., Blankenship, S., and Guest, M. (1990) Competition of, cyclooctenes and cyclooctadienes for ethylene binding and activity in plants. Plant Growth Regul. 9: 157–164., Solano, R., Stepanova, A., Chao, Q., and Ecker, J. R. (1998) Nuclear, events in ethylene signaling: A transcriptional cascade mediated, by ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 and ETHYLENE-RESPONSEFACTOR1. Gene Dev. 12: 3703–3714., Tanimoto, M., Roberts, K., and Dolan, L. (1995) Ethylene is a positive regulator of root hair development in Arabidopsis thaliana., Plant J. 8: 943–948., Tatsuki, M., and Mori, H. (2001) Phosphorylation of tomato 1aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase, LE-ACS2, at the, C-terminal region. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 28051–28057., Voesenek, L. A. C. J., Banga, M., Rijnders, J. H. G. M., Visser, E. J. W.,, Harren, F. J. M., Brailsford, R. W., Jackson, M. B., and Blom, C. W., P. M. (1997) Laser-driven photoacoustic spectroscopy: What we, can do with it in flooding research. Ann. Bot. 79: 57–65., Vogel, J. P., Schuerman, P., Woeste, K., Brandstatter, I. Kieber, J. J., (1998) Isolation and characterization of Arapidopsis mutants defective in the induction of ethylene biosynthesis by cytokinin. Genetics 149: 417–427., Woeste, K., and Kieber, J. J. (2000) A strong loss-of-function allele of, RAN1 results in constitutive activation of ethylene responses as, well as a rosette-lethal phenotype. Plant Cell 12: 443–455., Yang, S. F. (1987) The role of ethylene and ethylene synthesis in fruit, ripening. In Plant Senescence: Its Biochemistry and Physiology, W., W. Thomson, E. A. Nothnagel, and R. C. Huffaker, eds., American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, pp. 156–166., Yuan, M., Shaw, P. J., Warn, R. M., and Lloyd, C. W. (1994) Dynamic, reorientation of cortical microtubules, from transverse to longitudinal, in living plant cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:, 6050–6053., Zacarias, L., and Reid, M. S. (1990) Role of growth regulators in, the senescence of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Physiol. Plant. 80:, 549–554.
Page 590 :
Chapter, , 23, , Abscisic Acid:, A Seed Maturation, and Antistress Signal, , THE EXTENT AND TIMING OF PLANT GROWTH are controlled by, the coordinated actions of positive and negative regulators. Some of the, most obvious examples of regulated nongrowth are seed and bud dormancy, adaptive features that delay growth until environmental conditions are favorable. For many years, plant physiologists suspected that, the phenomena of seed and bud dormancy were caused by inhibitory, compounds, and they attempted to extract and isolate such compounds, from a variety of plant tissues, especially dormant buds., Early experiments used paper chromatography for the separation of, plant extracts, as well as bioassays based on oat coleoptile growth. These, early experiments led to the identification of a group of growth-inhibiting compounds, including a substance known as dormin purified from, sycamore leaves collected in early autumn, when the trees were entering dormancy. Upon discovery that dormin was chemically identical to, a substance that promotes the abscission of cotton fruits, abscisin II, the, compound was renamed abscisic acid (ABA) (see Figure 23.1), to reflect, its supposed involvement in the abscission process., It is now known that ethylene is the hormone that triggers abscission, and that ABA-induced abscission of cotton fruits is due to ABA’s ability, to stimulate ethylene production. As will be discussed in this chapter,, ABA is now recognized as an important plant hormone in its own right., It inhibits growth and stomatal opening, particularly when the plant is, under environmental stress. Another important function is its regulation, of seed maturation and dormancy. In retrospect, dormin would have, been a more appropriate name for this hormone, but the name abscisic, acid is firmly entrenched in the literature., , OCCURRENCE, CHEMICAL STRUCTURE, AND, MEASUREMENT OF ABA, Abscisic acid has been found to be a ubiquitous plant hormone in vascular plants. It has been detected in mosses but appears to be absent in
Page 591 :
540, , Chapter 23, CH3, , H3C, , 6‘ 1‘, , 5‘, O 4‘, , 3‘, , 5, , 4, OH, , 2‘, CH3, , CH3, 3, , H3C, 2, , 1, COOH, , (S)-cis-ABA, (naturally occurring, active form), , H3C, , CH3, , CH3, OH, , O, , CH3, , COOH, , (R)-cis-ABA, (inactive in stomatal closure), , CH3, , CH3, , COOH, OH, , O, , (S)-2-trans-ABA (inactive, but, interconvertible with active, [cis] form), , FIGURE 23.1 The chemical structures of the S (counterclockwise array) and R (clockwise array) forms of cis-ABA, and, the (S)-2-trans form of ABA. The numbers in the diagram of, (S)-cis-ABA identify the carbon atoms., , liverworts (see Web Topic 23.1). Several genera of fungi, make ABA as a secondary metabolite (Milborrow 2001)., Within the plant, ABA has been detected in every major, organ or living tissue from the root cap to the apical bud., ABA is synthesized in almost all cells that contain chloroplasts or amyloplasts., , The Chemical Structure of ABA Determines Its, Physiological Activity, ABA is a 15-carbon compound that resembles the terminal, portion of some carotenoid molecules (Figure 23.1). The, orientation of the carboxyl group at carbon 2 determines, the cis and trans isomers of ABA. Nearly all the naturally, occurring ABA is in the cis form, and by convention the, name abscisic acid refers to that isomer., ABA also has an asymmetric carbon atom at position 1′, in the ring, resulting in the S and R (or + and –, respectively) enantiomers. The S enantiomer is the natural form;, commercially available synthetic ABA is a mixture of, approximately equal amounts of the S and R forms. The S, enantiomer is the only one that is active in fast responses, to ABA, such as stomatal closure. In long-term responses,, such as seed maturation, both enantiomers are active. In, contrast to the cis and trans isomers, the S and R forms cannot be interconverted in the plant tissue., Studies of the structural requirements for biological, activity of ABA have shown that almost any change in the, molecule results in loss of activity (see Web Topic 23.2)., , ABA Is Assayed by Biological, Physical, and, Chemical Methods, A variety of bioassays have been used for ABA, including, inhibition of coleoptile growth, germination, or GA-, , induced α-amylase synthesis. Alternatively, promotion of, stomatal closure and gene expression are examples of, rapid inductive responses (see Web Topic 23.3)., Physical methods of detection are much more reliable, than bioassays because of their specificity and suitability, for quantitative analysis. The most widely used techniques, are those based on gas chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Gas chromatography allows detection of as little as 10–13 g ABA, but it, requires several preliminary purification steps, including, thin-layer chromatography. Immunoassays are also highly, sensitive and specific., , BIOSYNTHESIS, METABOLISM, AND, TRANSPORT OF ABA, As with the other hormones, the response to ABA depends, on its concentration within the tissue and on the sensitivity of the tissue to the hormone. The processes of biosynthesis, catabolism, compartmentation, and transport all, contribute to the concentration of active hormone in the tissue at any given stage of development. The complete, biosynthetic pathway of ABA was elucidated with the aid, of ABA-deficient mutants blocked at specific steps in the, pathway., , ABA Is Synthesized from a Carotenoid, Intermediate, ABA biosynthesis takes place in chloroplasts and other, plastids via the pathway depicted in Figure 23.2. Several, ABA-deficient mutants have been identified with lesions, at specific steps of the pathway. These mutants exhibit, abnormal phenotypes that can be corrected by the application of exogenous ABA. For example, flacca (flc) and, sitiens (sit) are “wilty mutants” of tomato in which the tendency of the leaves to wilt (due to an inability to close their, stomata) can be prevented by the application of exogenous, ABA. The aba mutants of Arabidopsis also exhibit a wilty, phenotype. These and other mutants have been useful in, elucidating the details of the pathway (Milborrow 2001)., The pathway begins with isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP),, the biological isoprene unit, and leads to the synthesis of the, C40 xanthophyll (i.e., oxygenated carotenoid) violaxanthin, (see Figure 23.2). Synthesis of violaxanthin is catalyzed by, zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP), the enzyme encoded by the, ABA1 locus of Arabidopsis. This discovery provided conclusive evidence that ABA synthesis occurs via the “indirect”, or carotenoid pathway, rather than as a small molecule., Maize mutants (vp) that are blocked at other steps in the, carotenoid pathway also have reduced levels of ABA and, exhibit vivipary—the precocious germination of seeds in, the fruit while still attached to the plant (Figure 23.3). Vivipary is a feature of many ABA-deficient seeds., Violaxanthin is converted to the C40 compound 9′-cisneoxanthin, which is then cleaved to form the C15 com-
Page 593 :
542, , Chapter 23, stress as a result of synthesis in the leaf, redistribution, within the mesophyll cell, import from the roots, and recirculation from other leaves. The concentration of ABA, declines after rewatering because of degradation and export, from the leaf, as well as a decrease in the rate of synthesis., , ABA Can Be Inactivated by Oxidation or, Conjugation, , FIGURE 23.3 Precocious germination in the ABA-deficient, , vp14 mutant of maize. The VP14 protein catalyzes the, cleavage of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoids to form xanthoxal,, a precursor of ABA. (Courtesy of Bao Cai Tan and Don, McCarty.), , pound xanthoxal, previously called xanthoxin, a neutral, growth inhibitor that has physiological properties similar, to those of ABA. The cleavage is catalyzed by 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED), so named because it can, cleave both 9-cis-violaxanthin and 9′-cis-neoxanthin., Synthesis of NCED is rapidly induced by water stress,, suggesting that the reaction it catalyzes is a key regulatory, step for ABA synthesis. The enzyme is localized on the thylakoids, where the carotenoid substrate is located. Finally,, xanthoxal is converted to ABA via oxidative steps involving the intermediate(s) ABA-aldehyde and/or possibly, xanthoxic acid. This final step is catalyzed by a family of, aldehyde oxidases that all require a molybdenum cofactor;, the aba3 mutants of Arabidopsis lack a functional molybdenum cofactor and are therefore unable to synthesize ABA., , ABA Concentrations in Tissues Are Highly Variable, ABA biosynthesis and concentrations can fluctuate dramatically in specific tissues during development or in, response to changing environmental conditions. In developing seeds, for example, ABA levels can increase 100-fold, within a few days and then decline to vanishingly low levels as maturation proceeds. Under conditions of water, stress, ABA in the leaves can increase 50-fold within 4 to 8, hours. Upon rewatering, the ABA level declines to normal, in the same amount of time., Biosynthesis is not the only factor that regulates ABA, concentrations in the tissue. As with other plant hormones,, the concentration of free ABA in the cytosol is also regulated, by degradation, compartmentation, conjugation, and transport. For example, cytosolic ABA increases during water, , A major cause of the inactivation of free ABA is oxidation,, yielding the unstable intermediate 6-hydroxymethyl ABA,, which is rapidly converted to phaseic acid (PA) and dihydrophaseic acid (DPA) (see Figure 23.2). PA is usually inactive, or it exhibits greatly reduced activity, in bioassays., However, PA can induce stomatal closure in some species,, and it is as active as ABA in inhibiting gibberellic, acid–induced α-amylase production in barley aleurone layers. These effects suggest that PA may be able to bind to, ABA receptors. In contrast to PA, DPA has no detectable, activity in any of the bioassays tested., Free ABA is also inactivated by covalent conjugation to, another molecule, such as a monosaccharide. A common, example of an ABA conjugate is ABA-b-D-glucosyl ester, (ABA-GE). Conjugation not only renders ABA inactive as, a hormone; it also alters its polarity and cellular distribution. Whereas free ABA is localized in the cytosol, ABA-GE, accumulates in vacuoles and thus could theoretically serve, as a storage form of the hormone., Esterase enzymes in plant cells could release free ABA, from the conjugated form. However, there is no evidence, that ABA-GE hydrolysis contributes to the rapid increase in, ABA in the leaf during water stress. When plants were subjected to a series of stress and rewatering cycles, the ABAGE concentration increased steadily, suggesting that the, conjugated form is not broken down during water stress., , ABA Is Translocated in Vascular Tissue, ABA is transported by both the xylem and the phloem, but, it is normally much more abundant in the phloem sap., When radioactive ABA is applied to a leaf, it is transported, both up the stem and down toward the roots. Most of the, radioactive ABA is found in the roots within 24 hours., Destruction of the phloem by a stem girdle prevents ABA, accumulation in the roots, indicating that the hormone is, transported in the phloem sap., ABA synthesized in the roots can also be transported to, the shoot via the xylem. Whereas the concentration of ABA, in the xylem sap of well-watered sunflower plants is, between 1.0 and 15.0 nM, the ABA concentration in waterstressed sunflower plants increases to as much as 3000 nM, (3.0 µM ) (Schurr et al. 1992). The magnitude of the stressinduced change in xylem ABA content varies widely, among species, and it has been suggested that ABA also is, transported in a conjugated form, then released by hydrolysis in leaves. However, the postulated hydrolases have yet, to be identified.
Page 594 :
Abscisic Acid: A Seed Maturation and Antistress Signal, As water stress begins, some of the ABA carried by the, xylem stream is synthesized in roots that are in direct contact, with the drying soil. Because this transport can occur before, the low water potential of the soil causes any measurable, change in the water status of the leaves, ABA is believed to, be a root signal that helps reduce the transpiration rate by, closing stomata in leaves (Davies and Zhang 1991)., Although a concentration of 3.0 µM ABA in the apoplast, is sufficient to close stomata, not all of the ABA in the, xylem stream reaches the guard cells. Much of the ABA in, the transpiration stream is taken up and metabolized by, the mesophyll cells. During the early stages of water stress,, however, the pH of the xylem sap becomes more alkaline,, increasing from about pH 6.3 to about pH 7.2 (Wilkinson, and Davies 1997)., The major control of ABA distribution among plant cell, compartments follows the “anion trap” concept: The dissociated (anion) form of this weak acid accumulates in alkaline, compartments and may be redistributed according to the, steepness of the pH gradients across membranes. In addition to partitioning according to the relative pH of compartments, specific uptake carriers contribute to maintaining a, low apoplastic ABA concentration in unstressed plants., Stress-induced alkalinization of the apoplast favors formation of the dissociated form of abscisic acid, ABA–, which, does not readily cross membranes. Hence, less ABA enters, the mesophyll cells, and more reaches the guard cells via the, transpiration stream (Figure 23.4). Note that ABA is redistributed in the leaf in this way without any increase in the, total ABA level. This increase in xylem sap pH may function, as a root signal that promotes early closure of the stomata., , 543, , DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL, EFFECTS OF ABA, Abscisic acid plays primary regulatory roles in the initiation, and maintenance of seed and bud dormancy and in the, plant’s response to stress, particularly water stress. In addition, ABA influences many other aspects of plant development by interacting, usually as an antagonist, with auxin,, cytokinin, gibberellin, ethylene, and brassinosteroids. In this, section we will explore the diverse physiological effects of, ABA, beginning with its role in seed development., , ABA Levels in Seeds Peak during Embryogenesis, Seed development can be divided into three phases of, approximately equal duration:, 1. During the first phase, which is characterized by cell, divisions and tissue differentiation, the zygote undergoes embryogenesis and the endosperm tissue proliferates., 2. During the second phase, cell divisions cease and, storage compounds accumulate., 3. In the final phase, the embryo becomes tolerant to, desiccation, and the seed dehydrates, losing up to, 90% of its water. As a consequence of dehydration,, metabolism comes to a halt and the seed enters a quiescent (“resting”) state. In contrast to dormant seeds,, quiescent seeds will germinate upon rehydration., The latter two phases result in the production of viable, seeds with adequate resources to support germination and, , Upper, epidermis, Palisade, parenchyma, Mesophyll, cells, , Xylem, Well-watered conditions, pH 6.3, , Acidic xylem sap favors, uptake of the undissociated form of ABA, (ABAH) by the mesophyll, cells., , ABA, , Water stress, pH 7.2, , ABA–, , ABAH, , During water stress, the, slightly alkaline xylem sap, favors the dissociation of, ABAH to ABA–., , Lower, epidermis, , Guard cell, , FIGURE 23.4 Redistribution of ABA in the leaf result-, , ing from alkalinization of the xylem sap during, water stress., , Because ABA– does not easily, pass through membranes, under, conditions of water stress, more, ABA reaches guard cells.
Page 595 :
544, , Chapter 23, , the capacity to wait weeks to years before resuming, growth. Typically, the ABA content of seeds is very low, early in embryogenesis, reaches a maximum at about the, halfway point, and then gradually falls to low levels as the, seed reaches maturity. Thus there is a broad peak of ABA, accumulation in the seed corresponding to mid- to late, embryogenesis., The hormonal balance of seeds is complicated by the, fact that not all the tissues have the same genotype. The, seed coat is derived from maternal tissues (see Web Topic, 1.2); the zygote and endosperm are derived from both parents. Genetic studies with ABA-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis have shown that the zygotic genotype controls, ABA synthesis in the embryo and endosperm and is essential to dormancy induction, whereas the maternal genotype controls the major, early peak of ABA accumulation, and helps suppress vivipary in midembryogenesis (Raz et, al. 2001)., , ABA Promotes Desiccation Tolerance in, the Embryo, An important function of ABA in the developing seed is to, promote the acquisition of desiccation tolerance. As will, be described in Chapter 25 (on stress physiology), desiccation can severely damage membranes and other cellular, constituents. During the mid- to late stages of seed development, specific mRNAs accumulate in embryos at the, time of high levels of endogenous ABA. These mRNAs, encode so-called late-embryogenesis-abundant (LEA), proteins thought to be involved in desiccation tolerance., Synthesis of many LEA proteins, or related family members, can be induced by ABA treatment of either young, embryos or vegetative tissues. Thus the synthesis of most, LEA proteins is under ABA control (see Web Topic 23.4)., , ABA Promotes the Accumulation of Seed Storage, Protein during Embryogenesis, Storage compounds accumulate during mid- to late, embryogenesis. Because ABA levels are still high, ABA, could be affecting the translocation of sugars and amino, acids, the synthesis of the reserve materials, or both., Studies in mutants impaired in both ABA synthesis and, response showed no effect of ABA on sugar translocation., In contrast, ABA has been shown to affect the amounts, and composition of storage proteins. For example, exogenous ABA promotes accumulation of storage proteins in, cultured embryos of many species, and some ABA-deficient or -insensitive mutants have reduced storage protein, accumulation. However, storage protein synthesis is also, reduced in other seed developmental mutants with normal ABA levels and responses, indicating that ABA is only, one of several signals controlling the expression of storage, protein genes during embryogenesis., ABA not only regulates the accumulation of storage, proteins during embryogenesis; it can also maintain the, mature embryo in a dormant state until the environmen-, , tal conditions are optimal for growth. Seed dormancy is an, important factor in the adaptation of plants to unfavorable, environments. As we will discuss in the next few sections,, plants have evolved a variety of mechanisms, some of, them involving ABA, that enable them to maintain their, seeds in a dormant state., , Seed Dormancy May Be Imposed by the Coat or, the Embryo, During seed maturation, the embryo enters a quiescent, phase in response to desiccation. Seed germination can be, defined as the resumption of growth of the embryo of the, mature seed; it depends on the same environmental conditions as vegetative growth does. Water and oxygen must, be available, the temperature must be suitable, and there, must be no inhibitory substances present., In many cases a viable (living) seed will not germinate, even if all the necessary environmental conditions for, growth are satisfied. This phenomenon is termed seed, dormancy. Seed dormancy introduces a temporal delay in, the germination process that provides additional time for, seed dispersal over greater geographic distances. It also, maximizes seedling survival by preventing germination, under unfavorable conditions. Two types of seed dormancy have been recognized: coat-imposed dormancy and, embryo dormancy., , Coat-imposed dormancy. Dormancy imposed on the, embryo by the seed coat and other enclosing tissues, such, as endosperm, pericarp, or extrafloral organs, is known as, coat-imposed dormancy. The embryos of such seeds will, germinate readily in the presence of water and oxygen, once the seed coat and other surrounding tissues have, been either removed or damaged. There are five basic, mechanisms of coat-imposed dormancy (Bewley and, Black 1994):, 1. Prevention of water uptake., 2. Mechanical constraint. The first visible sign of germination is typically the radicle breaking through the, seed coat. In some cases, however, the seed coat may, be too rigid for the radicle to penetrate. For the seeds, to germinate, the endosperm cell walls must be, weakened by the production of cell wall–degrading, enzymes., 3. Interference with gas exchange. Lowered permeability, of seed coats to oxygen suggests that the seed coat, inhibits germination by limiting the oxygen supply, to the embryo., 4. Retention of inhibitors. The seed coat may prevent the, escape of inhibitors from the seed., 5. Inhibitor production. Seed coats and pericarps may, contain relatively high concentrations of growth, inhibitors, including ABA, that can suppress germination of the embryo.
Page 596 :
Abscisic Acid: A Seed Maturation and Antistress Signal, Embryo dormancy. The second type of seed dormancy is, embryo dormancy, a dormancy that is intrinsic to the, embryo and is not due to any influence of the seed coat or, other surrounding tissues. In some cases, embryo dormancy can be relieved by amputation of the cotyledons., Species in which the cotyledons exert an inhibitory effect, include European hazel (Corylus avellana) and European, ash (Fraxinus excelsior)., A fascinating demonstration of the cotyledon’s ability to, inhibit growth is found in species (e.g., peach) in which the, isolated dormant embryos germinate but grow extremely, slowly to form a dwarf plant. If the cotyledons are removed, at an early stage of development, however, the plant, abruptly shifts to normal growth., Embryo dormancy is thought to be due to the presence, of inhibitors, especially ABA, as well as the absence of, growth promoters, such as GA (gibberellic acid). The loss, of embryo dormancy is often associated with a sharp drop, in the ratio of ABA to GA., , Primary versus secondary seed dormancy. Different, types of seed dormancy also can be distinguished on the, basis of the timing of dormancy onset rather than the cause, of dormancy:, • Seeds that are released from the plant in a dormant, state are said to exhibit primary dormancy., • Seeds that are released from the plant in a nondormant state, but that become dormant if the conditions, for germination are unfavorable, exhibit secondary, dormancy. For example, seeds of Avena sativa (oat), can become dormant in the presence of temperatures, higher than the maximum for germination, whereas, seeds of Phacelia dubia (small-flower scorpionweed), become dormant at temperatures below the minimum for germination. The mechanisms of secondary, dormancy are poorly understood., , Environmental Factors Control the Release, from Seed Dormancy, Various external factors release the seed from embryo dormancy, and dormant seeds typically respond to more than, one of three factors:, 1. Afterripening. Many seeds lose their dormancy when, their moisture content is reduced to a certain level by, drying—a phenomenon known as afterripening., 2. Chilling. Low temperature, or chilling, can release, seeds from dormancy. Many seeds require a period of, cold (0–10°C) while in a fully hydrated (imbibed), state in order to germinate., 3. Light. Many seeds have a light requirement for germination, which may involve only a brief exposure,, as in the case of lettuce, an intermittent treatment, (e.g., succulents of the genus Kalanchoe), or even a, specific photoperiod involving short or long days., , 545, , For further information on environmental factors affecting, seed dormancy, see Web Topic 23.5. For a discussion of, seed longevity, see Web Topic 23.6., , Seed Dormancy Is Controlled by the Ratio, of ABA to GA, Mature seeds may be either dormant or nondormant,, depending on the species. Nondormant seeds, such as pea,, will germinate readily if provided with water only. Dormant seeds, on the other hand, fail to germinate in the presence of water, and instead require some additional treatment or condition. As we have seen, dormancy may arise, from the rigidity or impermeability of the seed coat (coatimposed dormancy) or from the persistence of the state of, arrested development of the embryo. Examples of the latter include seeds that require afterripening, chilling, or light, to germinate., ABA mutants have been extremely useful in demonstrating the role of ABA in seed dormancy. Dormancy of, Arabidopsis seeds can be overcome with a period of afterripening and/or cold treatment. ABA-deficient (aba), mutants of Arabidopsis have been shown to be nondormant, at maturity. When reciprocal crosses between aba and wildtype plants were carried out, the seeds exhibited dormancy, only when the embryo itself produced the ABA. Neither, maternal nor exogenously applied ABA was effective in, inducing dormancy in an aba embryo., On the other hand, maternally derived ABA constitutes, the major peak present in seeds and is required for other, aspects of seed development—for example, helping suppress vivipary in midembryogenesis. Thus the two sources, of ABA function in different developmental pathways. Dormancy is also greatly reduced in seeds from the ABAinsensitive mutants abi1 (ABA-insensitive1), abi2, and abi3,, even though these seeds contain higher ABA concentrations than those of the wild type throughout development,, possibly reflecting feedback regulation of ABA metabolism., ABA-deficient tomato mutants seem to function in the, same way, indicating that the phenomenon is probably a, general one. However, other mutants with reduced dormancy, but normal ABA levels and sensitivity, point to, additional regulators of dormancy., Although the role of ABA in initiating and maintaining, seed dormancy is well established, other hormones contribute to the overall effect. For example, in most plants the, peak of ABA production in the seed coincides with a, decline in the levels of IAA and GA., An elegant demonstration of the importance of the ratio, of ABA to GA in seeds was provided by the genetic screen, that led to isolation of the first ABA-deficient mutants of, Arabidopsis (Koornneef et al. 1982). Seeds of a GA-deficient, mutant that could not germinate in the absence of exogenous GA were mutagenized and then grown in the greenhouse. The seeds produced by these mutagenized plants, were then screened for revertants—that is, seeds that had, regained their ability to germinate.
Page 597 :
546, , Chapter 23, , Revertants were isolated, and they turned out to be, mutants of abscisic acid synthesis. The revertants germinated because dormancy had not been induced, so subsequent synthesis of GA was no longer required to overcome, it. This study elegantly illustrates the general principle that, the balance of plant hormones is often more critical than, are their absolute concentrations in regulating development. However, ABA and GA exert their effects on seed, dormancy at different times, so their antagonistic effects on, dormancy do not necessarily reflect a direct interaction., Recent genetic screens for suppressors of ABA insensitivity have identified additional antagonistic interactions, between ABA and ethylene or brassinosteroid effects on, germination. In addition, many new alleles of ABA-deficient or ABA-insensitive4 (abi4) mutants have been identified in screens for altered sensitivity to sugar. These studies show that a complex regulatory web integrates, hormonal and nutrient signaling., , ABA Inhibits Precocious Germination and Vivipary, When immature embryos are removed from their seeds, and placed in culture midway through development before, the onset of dormancy, they germinate precociously—that, is, without passing through the normal quiescent and/or, dormant stage of development. ABA added to the culture, medium inhibits precocious germination. This result, in, combination with the fact that the level of endogenous, ABA is high during mid- to late seed development, suggests that ABA is the natural constraint that keeps developing embryos in their embryogenic state., Further evidence for the role of ABA in preventing precocious germination has been provided by genetic studies, of vivipary. The tendency toward vivipary, also known as, preharvest sprouting, is a varietal characteristic in grain crops, that is favored by wet weather. In maize, several viviparous, (vp) mutants have been selected in which the embryos germinate directly on the cob while still attached to the plant., Several of these mutants are ABA deficient (vp2, vp5, vp7,, and vp14) (see Figure 23.3); one is ABA insensitive (vp1)., Vivipary in the ABA-deficient mutants can be partially prevented by treatment with exogenous ABA. Vivipary in, maize also requires synthesis of GA early in embryogenesis as a positive signal; double mutants deficient in both, GA and ABA do not exhibit vivipary (White et al. 2000)., In contrast to the maize mutants, single-gene mutants of, Arabidopsis (aba1, aba3, abi1, and abi3) fail to exhibit vivipary, although they are nondormant. The lack of vivipary, might reflect a lack of moisture because such seeds will germinate within the fruits under conditions of high relative, humidity. However, other Arabidopsis mutants with a normal ABA response and only moderately reduced ABA levels (e.g., fusca3, which belongs to a class of mutants1 defec1, , Named after the Latin term for the reddish brown color of, the embryos., , tive in regulating the transition from embryogenesis to germination) exhibit some vivipary even at low humidities., Furthermore, double mutants combining either defects in, ABA biosynthesis or ABA response with the fusca3 mutation have a high frequency of vivipary (Nambara et al., 2000), suggesting that redundant control mechanisms suppress vivipary in Arabidopsis., , ABA Accumulates in Dormant Buds, In woody species, dormancy is an important adaptive feature in cold climates. When a tree is exposed to very low, temperatures in winter, it protects its meristems with bud, scales and temporarily stops bud growth. This response to, low temperatures requires a sensory mechanism that detects, the environmental changes (sensory signals), and a control, system that transduces the sensory signals and triggers the, developmental processes leading to bud dormancy., ABA was originally suggested as the dormancy-inducing hormone because it accumulates in dormant buds and, decreases after the tissue is exposed to low temperatures., However, later studies showed that the ABA content of, buds does not always correlate with the degree of dormancy. As we saw in the case of seed dormancy, this apparent discrepancy could reflect interactions between ABA and, other hormones as part of a process in which bud dormancy and growth are regulated by the balance between, bud growth inhibitors, such as ABA, and growth-inducing, substances, such as cytokinins and gibberellins., Although much progress has been achieved in elucidating the role of ABA in seed dormancy by the use of, ABA-deficient mutants, progress on the role of ABA in bud, dormancy, which applies mainly to woody perennials, has, lagged because of the lack of a convenient genetic system., This discrepancy illustrates the tremendous contribution, that genetics and molecular biology have made to plant, physiology, and it underscores the need for extending such, approaches to woody species., Analyses of traits such as dormancy are complicated by, the fact that they are often controlled by the combined, action of several genes, resulting in a gradation of phenotypes referred to as quantitative traits. Recent genetic mapping studies suggest that homologs of ABI1 may regulate, bud dormancy in poplar trees. For a description of such, studies, see Web Topic 23.7., , ABA Inhibits GA-Induced Enzyme Production, ABA inhibits the synthesis of hydrolytic enzymes that are, essential for the breakdown of storage reserves in seeds., For example, GA stimulates the aleurone layer of cereal, grains to produce α-amylase and other hydrolytic enzymes, that break down stored resources in the endosperm during, germination (see Chapter 20). ABA inhibits this GA-dependent enzyme synthesis by inhibiting the transcription of αamylase mRNA. ABA exerts this inhibitory effect via at, least two mechanisms:
Page 598 :
Abscisic Acid: A Seed Maturation and Antistress Signal, 1. VP1, a protein originally identified as an activator of, ABA-induced gene expression, acts as a transcriptional repressor of some GA-regulated genes, (Hoecker et al. 1995)., 2. ABA represses the GA-induced expression of GAMYB, a transcription factor that mediates the GA, induction of α-amylase expression (Gomez-Cadenas, et al. 2001)., , ABA Closes Stomata in Response to Water Stress, , Water withheld, , Water provided, , 0, , –0.8, , –1.6, , Water potential decreases, as soil dries out, , 70, , Stomatal, resistance, decreases, (stomata open, as soil rehydrates), , 35, 20, , ABA, content, , 8, , 4, , 0, , ABA (ng cm–2), , Stomatal resistance (s cm–1), , Leaf water potential (MPa), , Elucidation of the roles of ABA in freezing, salt, and water, stress (see Chapter 25) led to the characterization of ABA, as a stress hormone. As noted earlier, ABA concentrations, in leaves can increase up to 50 times under drought conditions—the most dramatic change in concentration, reported for any hormone in response to an environmental signal. Redistribution or biosynthesis of ABA is very, effective in causing stomatal closure, and its accumulation, in stressed leaves plays an important role in the reduction, of water loss by transpiration under water stress conditions (Figure 23.5)., Stomatal closing can also be caused by ABA synthesized, in the roots and exported to the shoot. Mutants that lack the, ability to produce ABA exhibit permanent wilting and are, called wilty mutants because of their inability to close their, stomata. Application of exogenous ABA to such mutants, causes stomatal closure and a restoration of turgor pressure., , 0, 0, , 2, , 4, 6, Time (days), , 8, , FIGURE 23.5 Changes in water potential, stomatal resistance (the inverse of stomatal conductance), and ABA content in maize in response to water stress. As the soil dried, out, the water potential of the leaf decreased, and the ABA, content and stomatal resistance increased. The process was, reversed by rewatering. (After Beardsell and Cohen 1975.), , 547, , ABA Promotes Root Growth and Inhibits Shoot, Growth at Low Water Potentials, ABA has different effects on the growth of roots and shoots,, and the effects are strongly dependent on the water status, of the plant. Figure 23.6 compares the growth of shoots and, roots of maize seedlings grown under either abundant, water conditions (high water potential) or dehydrating, conditions (low water potential). Two types of seedlings, were used: (1) wild-type seedlings with normal ABA levels and (2) an ABA-deficient, viviparous mutant., When the water supply is ample (high water potential),, shoot growth is greater in the wild-type plant (normal, endogenous ABA levels) than in the ABA-deficient mutant., The reduced shoot growth in the ABA-deficient mutant, could be due in part to excessive water loss from the leaves., In maize and tomato, however, the stunted shoot growth of, ABA-deficient plants at high water potentials seems to be, due to the overproduction of ethylene, which is normally, inhibited by endogenous ABA (Sharp et al. 2000). This finding suggests that endogenous ABA promotes shoot growth, in well-watered plants by suppressing ethylene production., When water is limiting (i.e., at low water potentials), the, opposite occurs: Shoot growth is greater in the ABA-deficient mutant than in the wild type. Thus, endogenous ABA, acts as a signal to reduce shoot growth only under water, stress conditions., Now let’s examine how ABA affects roots. When water, is abundant, root growth is slightly greater in the wild type, (normal endogenous ABA) than in the ABA-deficient, mutant, similar to growth in shoots. Therefore, at high, water potentials (when the total ABA levels are low),, endogenous ABA exerts a slight positive effect on the, growth of both roots and shoots., Under dehydrating conditions, however, the growth of, the roots is much higher in the wild type than in the ABAdeficient mutant, although growth is still inhibited relative, to root growth of either genotype when water is abundant., In this case, endogenous ABA promotes root growth, apparently by inhibiting ethylene production during water stress, (Spollen et al. 2000)., To summarize, under dehydrating conditons, when ABA, levels are high, the endogenous hormone exerts a strong, positive effect on root growth by suppressing ethylene production, and a slight negative effect on shoot growth. The, overall effect is a dramatic increase in the root:shoot ratio at, low water potentials (see Figure 23.6C), which, along with, the effect of ABA on stomatal closure, helps the plant cope, with water stress. For another example of the role of ABA in, the response to dehydration, see Web Essay 1., , ABA Promotes Leaf Senescence Independently of, Ethylene, Abscisic acid was originally isolated as an abscission-causing factor. However, it has since become evident that ABA, stimulates abscission of organs in only a few species and
Page 599 :
Chapter 23, , (A) Shoot, , (B) Root, , 60, , 150, , 5.0, Water stress, conditions, (Low Yw), , 50, , 120, Root length increase (mm), , Shoot length increase (mm), , (C) Root:shoot ratio, , 40, High Yw, wild type, 30, , High Yw, mutant, Low Yw, mutant, , 20, , 4.0, High Yw, wild type, , 90, , High Yw, mutant, , 60, , Low Yw, wild type, Low Yw, mutant, , 30, , 10, , Root:shoot ratio, , 548, , 3.0, Wild type, (+ ABA), 2.0, ABA-deficient, mutant, 1.0, , Low Yw, wild type, 0, , 10, , 20, , 30, , 40, , Hours after transplanting, , 50, , 0, , 30, , 60, , 90, , Hours after transplanting, , 120, , 0, , 15, , 30, , 45, , 60, , Hours after transplanting, , FIGURE 23.6 Comparison of the growth of the shoots (A), and roots (B) of normal versus ABA-deficient (viviparous), maize plants growing in vermiculite maintained either at, high water potential (–0.03 MPa) or at low water potential, (–0.3 Mpa in A and –1.6 MPa in B). Water stress (low water, potential) depresses the growth of both shoots and roots, , compared to the controls. (C) Note that under water stress, conditions (low Yw), the ratio of root growth to shoot, growth is much higher when ABA is present (i.e., in the, wild type) than when it is absent (in the mutant). (From, Saab et al. 1990.), , that the primary hormone causing abscission is ethylene., On the other hand, ABA is clearly involved in leaf senescence, and through its promotion of senescence it might, indirectly increase ethylene formation and stimulate abscission. (For more discussion on the relationship between, ABA and ethylene, see Web Topic 23.8.), Leaf senescence has been studied extensively, and the, anatomical, physiological, and biochemical changes that take, place during this process were described in Chapter 16. Leaf, segments senesce faster in darkness than in light, and they, turn yellow as a result of chlorophyll breakdown. In addition,, the breakdown of proteins and nucleic acids is increased by, the stimulation of several hydrolases. ABA greatly accelerates, the senescence of both leaf segments and attached leaves., , term effects of ABA. Genetic studies have shown that many, conserved signaling components regulate both short- and, long-term responses, indicating that they share common, signaling mechanisms. In this section we will describe, what is known about the mechanism of ABA action at the, cellular and molecular levels., , CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MODES OF, ABA ACTION, ABA is involved in short-term physiological effects (e.g.,, stomatal closure), as well as long-term developmental, processes (e.g., seed maturation). Rapid physiological, responses frequently involve alterations in the fluxes of, ions across membranes and may involve some gene regulation as well, and long-term processes inevitably involve, major changes in the pattern of gene expression., Signal transduction pathways, which amplify the primary signal generated when the hormone binds to its, receptor, are required for both the short-term and the long-, , ABA Is Perceived Both Extracellularly, and Intracellularly, Although ABA has been shown to interact directly with, phospholipids, it is widely assumed that the ABA receptor, is a protein. To date, however, the protein receptor for ABA, has not been identified. Experiments have been performed, to determine whether the hormone must enter the cell to be, effective, or whether it can act externally by binding to a, receptor located on the outer surface of the plasma membrane. The results so far suggest multiple sites of perception., Some experiments point to a receptor on the outer surface of the cell. For example, microinjected ABA fails to, alter stomatal opening in the spiderwort Commelina, or to, inhibit GA-induced α-amylase synthesis in barley aleurone, protoplasts (Anderson et al. 1994; Gilroy and Jones 1994)., Furthermore, impermeant ABA–protein conjugates have, been shown to activate both ion channel activity and gene, expression (Schultz and Quatrano 1997; Jeannette et al., 1999)., Other experiments, however, support an intracellular, location for the ABA receptor:
Page 600 :
Abscisic Acid: A Seed Maturation and Antistress Signal, , 549, , (A), H3C, , CH3, , UV, , CH3, , CH3, , CH3, , CH3, , CH3, , OH, O, , H3C, , CH3, , OH, O, , CO2CH, , COOH + HO, , CH3, , O2N, , CH, O2N, , Photolyzable caged ABA, , (S)-cis-ABA, , (B), , (C), , (D), , 7, , Aperture (µm), , 6, , Uninjected, , 5, , Nonphotolyzable, caged ABA, , 4, 3, 2, , Photolyzable, caged ABA, , 30 s UV flash, , 1, 0, , 10, , 20, , 30, , 40, , Time (min), , • Extracellular application of ABA was nearly twice as, effective at inhibiting stomatal opening at pH 6.15,, when it is fully protonated and readily taken up by, guard cells, versus at pH 8, when it is largely dissociated to the anionic form that does not readily cross, membranes (Anderson et al. 1994)., • ABA supplied directly and continuously to the, cytosol via a patch pipette inhibited K+in channels,, which are required for stomatal opening (Schwartz et, al. 1994)., • Microinjection of an inactive “caged” form of ABA, into guard cells of Commelina resulted in stomatal closure after the stomata were treated briefly with UV, irradiation to activate the hormone—that is, release it, from its molecular cage (Figure 23.7) (Allan et al., 1994). Control guard cells injected with a nonphotolyzable form of the caged ABA did not close after, UV irradiation., Taken together, these results indicate that extracellular, perception of ABA can prevent stomatal opening and regulate gene expression, and intracellular ABA can both, induce stomatal closure and inhibit the K+in current, required for opening. Thus there appear to be both extracellular and intracellular ABA receptors. However, they, have yet to be identified or localized., , FIGURE 23.7 Stomatal closure induced by UV photolysis of, caged ABA in the guard cell cytoplasm. Single guard cells in, stomatal complexes of Commelina were microinjected with, caged ABA. (A) Photolysis reaction induced by UV irradiation. (B) The stomatal apertures recorded before and after a, 30-second exposure of the cells to UV. (C, D) Light micrographs of the same stomatal complex in which the right-hand, guard cell was loaded with the photolyzable cages ABA 10, minutes before UV photolysis (C) and 30 minutes after photolysis (D). (A and B from Allan et al. 1994; C and D courtesy, of A. Allan, from Allan et al. 1994; © American Society of, Plant Biologists, reprinted with permission.), , ABA Increases Cytosolic Ca2+, Raises Cytosolic pH,, and Depolarizes the Membrane, As discussed in Chapter 18, stomatal closure is driven by a, reduction in guard cell turgor pressure caused by a massive long-term efflux of K+ and anions from the cell. During the subsequent shrinkage of the cell due to water loss,, the surface area of the plasma membrane may contract by, as much as 50%. Where does the extra membrane go? The, answer seems to be that it is taken up as small vesicles by, endocytosis—a process that also involves reorganization of, the actin cytoskeleton. However, the first changes detected, after exposure of guard cells to ABA are transient membrane depolarization caused by the net influx of positive, charge, and transient increases in the cytosolic calcium concentration (Figure 23.8)., ABA stimulates elevations in the concentration of cytosolic Ca2+ by inducing both influx through plasma membrane, channels and release of calcium into the cytosol from internal compartments, such as the central vacuole (Schroeder et, al. 2001). Stimulation of influx occurs via a pathway that uses, reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydrogen peroxide, (H2O2) or superoxide (O2•–), as secondary messengers leading to plasma membrane channel activation (Pei et al. 2000)., Calcium release from intracellular stores can be induced, by a variety of second messengers, including inositol 1,4,5trisphosphate (IP3), cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR), and self-
Page 601 :
Picoamps, , 550, , Chapter 23, , +20, , ABA, , Inward positive currents, (membrane depolarization events), , Current, –20, , Calcium concentration, , Increases in cytosolic Ca2+, 5 minutes, , 2 µM, [Ca2+], , The increases in cytoplasmic, Ca2+ roughly coincide with the, membrane depolarization, events., , 0, ABA, , FIGURE 23.8 Simultaneous measurements of ABA-induced, inward positive currents and ABA-induced increases in, cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations in a guard cell of Vicia faba, (broad bean). The current was measured by the patch, , clamp technique; calcium was measured by use of a fluorescent indicator dye. ABA was added to the system at the, arrow in each case. (From Schroeder and Hagiwara 1990.), , amplifying (calcium-induced) Ca2+ release. Recent studies, have shown that ABA stimulates nitric oxide (NO), synthesis in guard cells, which induces stomatal closure in, a cADPR-dependent manner, indicating that NO is an even, earlier secondary messenger in this response pathway, (Neill et al. 2002) (for background on NO, see Chapter 14, on the Web site)., The combination of calcium influx and the release of calcium from internal stores raises the cytosolic calcium concentration from 50 to 350 nM to as high as 1100 nM (1.1, mM) (Figure 23.9) (Mansfield and McAinsh, in Davies, 1995). This increase is sufficient to cause stomatal closure,, as demonstrated by the following experiment., As in the experiment described earlier, calcium was microinjected into guard cells in a, 10–3, caged form that could be hydrolyzed by a pulse, of UV light. This method allowed the investigators to control both the concentration of free, calcium and the time of release to the cytosol. At, cytosolic concentrations of 600 nM or more,, release of calcium from its cage triggered stomatal closure (Gilroy et al. 1990). This level of, intracellular calcium is well within the concen10–4, tration range observed after ABA treatment., In the preceding studies, intracellular free, 10–5, calcium was measured by the use of microin13, , jected calcium-sensitive ratiometric fluorescent dyes2, such, as fura-2 or indo-1. However, microinjections of fluorescent, dyes into single plant cells are difficult and often result in, cell death. Success rates of viable injections into Arabidopsis, guard cells can be less than 3%. In contrast, transgenic, plants expressing the gene for the calcium indicator protein, yellow cameleon make it possible to monitor several fluorescing cells in parallel, without the need for invasive injections (Allen et al. 1999b) (see Web Topic 23.9). Such studies, have demonstrated that the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, oscillates with distinct periodicities, depending on the signals received (Figure 23.10)., , 2, , Ratiometric fluorescent dyes undergo a shift, in their excitation and emission spectra when, they bind calcium. On the basis of property,, one can determine the intracellular concentrations of both forms of the dye (with and without bound calcium) by exciting them with the, appropriate two wavelengths. The ratio of the, two emissions provides a measure of the calcium concentration that is independent of dye, concentration., , Stomatal, aperture (µm), , Cytosolic [Ca 2+], (mol m–3), , Cytostolic Ca2+, concentration after, addition of ABA, , ABA, Control, , 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, , ABA, , 0, , Size of, stomatal opening, 5, , 10, Time (min), , 15, , FIGURE 23.9 Time course of the ABA-induced increase in guard cell, cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (upper panel) and ABA-induced stomatal, aperture (lower panel). (From Mansfield and McAinsh 1995.), , 20
Page 602 :
Abscisic Acid: A Seed Maturation and Antistress Signal, , 551, , (A), 535:480 nm ratio, , 1.4, 5 min, , 1.3, 1.2, , ABA, , 1.1, 1.0, Time (minutes), , (B), , FIGURE 23.10 ABA-induced calcium oscillations in Arabidopsis guard cells expressing yellow cameleon, a calcium indicator protein dye. (A) Oscillations elicited by, ABA are indicated by increases in the ratio of flourescence emission at 535 and 480, nm. (B) Pseudo colored images of fluorescence in Arabidopsis guard cells, where, blue, green, yellow and red represent increasing cytosolic calcium concentration., (From Schroeder et al. 2001.), , These results support the hypothesis that an increase in, cytosolic calcium, partly derived from intracellular stores, is, responsible for ABA-induced stomatal closure. However, the, growth hormone auxin can induce stomatal opening, and, this auxin-induced stomatal opening, like ABA-induced, stomatal closure, is accompanied by increases in cytosolic calcium. This finding suggests that the detailed characteristics, of the location and periodicity of Ca2+ oscillations (the “Ca2+, signature”), rather than the overall concentration of cytosolic calcium, determine the cellular response., In addition to increasing the cytosolic calcium concentration, ABA causes an alkalinization of the cytosol from, about pH 7.67 to pH 7.94. The increase in cytosolic pH has, been shown to activate the K+ efflux channels on the, plasma membrane apparently by increasing the number of, channels available for activation (see Chapter 6)., , ABA Activation of Slow Anion Channels Causes, Long-Term Membrane Depolarization, The rapid, transient depolarizations induced by ABA are, insufficient to open the K+ efflux channels, which require, long-term membrane depolarization in order to open., However, long-term depolarizations in response to ABA, have been demonstrated. According to a widely accepted, model, long-term membrane depolarization is triggered, by two factors: (1) an ABA-induced transient depolarization of the plasma membrane, coupled with (2) an increase, in cytosolic calcium. Both of these conditions are required, to open calcium-activated slow (S-type) anion channels on, , the plasma membrane (Schroeder, and Hagiwara 1990) (see Chapter, 6). ABA has been shown to activate, slow anion channels in guard cells, (Grabov et al. 1997; Pei et al. 1997)., The prolonged opening of these slow anion channels, permits large quantities of Cl– and malate2– ions to escape, from the cell, moving down their electrochemical gradients., (The inside of the cell is negatively charged, thus pushing, Cl– and malate2– out of the cell, and the outside has lower, Cl– and malate2– concentrations than the interior.) The outward flow of negatively charged Cl– and malate2– ions generated in this way strongly depolarizes the membrane, triggering the voltage-gated K+ efflux channels to open., In support of this model, inhibitors that block slow, anion channels, such as 5-nitro-2,3-phenylpropylaminobenzoic acid (NPPB), also block ABA-induced stomatal closing. Inhibitors of the rapid (R-type) anion channels,, such as 4,4′-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid, (DIDS), have no effect on ABA-induced stomatal closing, (Schwartz et al. 1995)., Another factor that can contribute to membrane depolarization is inhibition of the plasma membrane H+ATPase. ABA inhibits blue light–stimulated proton pumping by guard cell protoplasts (Figure 23.11), consistent with, the model that the depolarization of the plasma membrane, by ABA is partially caused by a decrease in the activity of, the plasma membrane H+-ATPase. However, ABA does not, inhibit the proton pump directly., In Vicia faba (broad bean), at least, the plasma membrane, H+-ATPase of the leaves is strongly inhibited by calcium., A calcium concentration of 0.3 µM blocks 50% of the activity of H+-ATPase, and 1 µM calcium blocks the enzyme, completely (Kinoshita et al. 1995). It appears that two fac-
Page 603 :
552, , Chapter 23, , as an inhibitor of inositol phosphatase,, which rapidly removes phosphate groups, from IP3. Under these conditions, a 90%, ABA-induced increase in the level of IP3, was measured within 10 seconds of hormone treatment (Lee et al. 1996). Recent, 5 µM ABA, 2. Addition of ABA to the, studies in Arabidopsis using antisense, medium inhibits the acidification, Control, DNA to block expression of an ABAby 40%., induced phospholipase C have shown, that this enzyme is required for ABA, 3. These results demonstrate, effects on germination, growth, and gene, that ABA induces changes in the, expression (Sanchez and Chua 2001)., 50 µM ABA, cell that inhibit the plasma, Heterotrimeric G-proteins may medimembrane H+-ATPase., ate the effects of ABA on stomatal move0, 7.5, 15, 30, ments. For example, in Vicia faba most, Time (minutes), studies have shown that G-protein actiFIGURE 23.11 ABA inhibition of blue light–stimulated proton pumping by, vators, such as GTPγS, can inhibit the, guard cell protoplasts. A suspension of guard cell protoplasts was incubated, activity of the inward K+ channels. Conunder red-light irradiation, and the pH of the suspension medium was monsistent with the inhibitor results, ABA, itored with a pH electrode. The starting pH was the same in all cases (the, failed to inhibit inward K+ channels or, curves are displaced for ease of viewing). (After Shimazaki et al. 1986.), light-induced stomatal opening in an Arabidopsis mutant with a defective Gα subunit (Wang et al. 2001). However, ABA, still promoted stomatal closure in this, tors contribute to ABA inhibition of the plasma membrane, mutant, indicating that inhibition of opening and promoproton pump: an increase in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration of closing take two distinct paths to the same end, tion, and alkalinization of the cytosol., point—that is, closed stomata., In addition to causing stomatal closure, ABA prevents, Other potential second messengers mediating the ABA, light-induced stomatal opening. In this case ABA acts by, response, such as phosphatidic acid and myo-inositol-hexaphosphate (IP6) have been identified, but the relationship of, inhibiting the inward K+ channels, which are open when, the membrane is hyperpolarized by the proton pump (see, these compounds to IP3 and Ca2+ signaling is not yet known., All of these experiments indicate that stomatal guard cells, Chapters 6 and 18). Inhibition of the inward K+ channels is, mediated by the ABA-induced increase in cytosolic calcium, respond to multiple signals, possibly involving multiple, concentration. Thus calcium and pH affect guard cell, receptors and overlapping signal transduction pathways., plasma membrane channels in two ways:, 1. A pulse of blue light activates, the plasma membrane H+ATPase, which pumps protons, into the external medium and, lowers the pH., , Increasing pH, , Blue light, , 1. They prevent stomatal opening by inhibiting inward, K+ channels and plasma membrane proton pumps., 2. They promote stomatal closing by activating outward, anion channels, thus leading to activation of K+, efflux channels., , ABA Stimulates Phospholipid Metabolism, As discussed previously, much evidence supports a role, for calcium both in the promotion of stomatal closing and in, the inhibition of stomatal opening. According to the classic, calcium-dependent signal transduction pathway of animal, cells, IP3 is released, along with diacylglycerol (DAG), when, phospholipase C is activated by a G-protein in the plasma, membrane (see Chapter 14 on the web site). Does ABA use, the same pathway when it induces stomatal closure?, In agreement with this model, ABA has been shown to, stimulate phosphoinositide metabolism in Vicia faba (broad, bean) guard cells. To detect the effect of ABA on IP3 release,, it was necessary to include Li+ in the incubation medium, , Protein Kinases and Phosphatases Participate in, ABA Action, , Nearly all biological signaling systems involve protein, phosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions at some, step in the pathway. Thus we can expect that signal transduction in guard cells, with their multiple sensory inputs,, involves protein kinases and phosphatases. Artificially raising the ATP concentration inside guard cells by allowing, the cytoplasm to equilibrate with the solution inside a, patch pipette (see Chapter 6) strongly activates the slow, anion channels., This activation of the slow anion channels by ATP is, abolished by the inclusion of protein kinase inhibitors in, the patch pipette solution (Schmidt et al. 1995). Protein, kinase inhibitors also block ABA-induced stomatal closing., In contrast, lowering the concentration of ATP in the, cytosol inactivates the slow anion channels. Additional, experiments confirm that this inactivation is due to the, presence of protein phosphatases, which remove phosphate groups that are covalently attached to proteins. In
Page 604 :
Abscisic Acid: A Seed Maturation and Antistress Signal, view of these results, it appears that protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation play important roles in the, ABA signal transduction pathway in guard cells., There is now direct evidence for an ABA-activated protein kinase (AAPK) in Vicia faba guard cells (Li and Assmann 1996; Mori and Muto 1997). AAPK activity appears, to be required for ABA activation of S-type anion currents, and stomatal closing. This enzyme is an autophosphorylating protein kinase that either forms part of a Ca2+-independent signal transduction pathway for ABA, or acts farther downstream of calcium-induced signaling events. (The, presence of both Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent, pathways for ABA action will be discussed shortly.) In, addition, two Ca2+-dependent protein kinases, as well as, MAP kinases, have been implicated in the ABA regulation, of stomatal aperture., The analysis of ABA-insensitive mutants has begun to, help in the identification of genes coding for components, of the signal transduction pathway. The Arabidopsis abi1-1, and abi2-1 mutations result in insensitivity to ABA in both, seeds and adult plants. These abi mutants display phenotypes consistent with a defect in ABA signaling, including, reduced seed dormancy, a tendency to wilt (due to, improper regulation of stomatal aperture), and decreased, expression of various ABA-inducible genes., The defects in stomatal response include the ABA insensitivity of S-type anion channels—both inward and outward K+ channels—and actin reorganization. Although, nonresponsive to ABA, the mutant stomata will close when, exposed to high external concentrations of Ca2+, suggesting that they are defective in their ability to initiate Ca2+, signaling. Consistent with this finding, ABA does not, induce Ca2+ oscillations in these mutants (Allen et al., 1999a)., , ABI Protein Phosphatases Are Negative Regulators, of the ABA Response, The Arabidopsis ABI1 and ABI2 genes have been cloned and, identified as encoding two closely related serine/threonine, protein phosphatases. This finding suggests that ABI1 and, ABI2 regulate the activity of target proteins by dephosphorylating specific serine or threonine residues, but none, of their substrates have been definitively identified., Because the abi1-1 and abi2-1 mutations result in, decreased response to ABA, it was initially assumed that, the wild-type genes promote the ABA response. However,, the original mutations turned out to be dominant rather, than recessive, and recent studies have shown that they act, as “dominant negatives”; that is, one defective copy of the, gene is sufficient to disrupt the ABA response by poisoning the activity of the functional gene products from the, remaining wild-type allele., Subsequently, recessive mutants of ABI1 were obtained, that exhibited a simple loss of ABI1 activity. These recessive, mutants of ABI1 actually showed increased ABA sensitiv-, , 553, , ity (Gosti et al. 1999). Furthermore, overproducing the, wild-type gene products or their homologs (closely related, proteins) by reintroducing the gene into plants, under control of a highly expressed promoter, confers reduced ABA, sensitivity (Sheen 1998). Thus the wild-type function of, these protein phosphatases is to inhibit the ABA response., , ABA Signaling Also Involves Ca2+-Independent, Pathways, Although an ABA-induced increase in cytosolic calcium, concentration is a key feature of the current model for, ABA-induced guard cell closure, ABA is able to induce, stomatal closure even in guard cells that show no increase, in cytosolic calcium (Allan et al. 1994). In other words, ABA, seems to be able to act via one or more calcium-independent pathways., In addition to calcium, ABA can utilize cytosolic pH as, a signaling intermediate. As previously discussed, a rise in, cytosolic pH can lead to the activation of outward K+ channels, and one effect of the abi1 mutation is to render these, K+ channels insensitive to pH., Such redundancy in the signal transduction pathways, explains how guard cells are able to integrate a wide range, of hormonal and environmental stimuli that affect stomatal, aperture, and such redundancy is probably not unique to, guard cells., A simplified general model for ABA action in stomatal, guard cells is shown in Figure 23.12. For clarity, only the, cell surface receptors are shown., , ABA Regulation of Gene Expression Is Mediated, by Transcription Factors, Downstream of the early ABA signal transduction, processes already discussed, ABA causes changes in gene, expression. ABA has been shown to regulate the expression, of numerous genes during seed maturation and under certain stress conditions, such as heat shock, adaptation to low, temperatures, and salt tolerance (Rock 2000). The ABAand stress-induced genes are presumed to contribute to, adaptive aspects of induced tolerance (see Chapter 25)., They include genes encoding proteases, chaperonins, proteins similar to LEA proteins, enzymes of sugar or other, compatible solute3 metabolism, ion and water channel proteins, enzymes that detoxify active oxygen species, and regulatory proteins such as transcription factors and protein, kinases., In a few cases, stimulation of transcription by ABA has, been demonstrated directly. Gene activation by ABA is, mediated by transcription factors. Four main classes of regulatory sequences conferring ABA inducibility have been, identified, and proteins that bind to these sequences have, 3 An organic compound that can serve as a nontoxic, osmotically active solute in the cytosol; such compounds usually, accumulate during water or salt stress (see Chapter 25).
Page 605 :
554, , Chapter 23, , 1. ABA binds to its receptors., , ROS pathway, K+, , 2. ABA-binding induces the, formation of reactive oxygen, species, which activate plasma, membrane Ca2+ channels., , H+, Ca2+, , 3. ABA increases the levels of, cyclic ADP-ribose and IP3,, which activate additional, calcium channels on the, tonoplast., , ATP, , Ca2+, , 6. The rise in intracellular, calcium promotes the, opening if Cl–out (anion), channels on the plasma, membrane, causing, membrane depolarization., 7. The plasma membrane, proton pump is inhibited by, the ABA-induced increase in, cytostolic calcium and a rise in, intracellular pH, further, depolarizing the membrane., 8. Membrane depolarization, activates K+out channels., 9. K+ and anions to be, released across the plasma, membrane are first released, from vacuoles into the cytosol., , 1, ABA, , 7, Ca2+, 6, , ABA, , ADP, +, Pi, , pH, increase, , 4, , ROS, (H2O2,, O2•–), , H+, , 5, , 2, , 4. The influx of calcium, initiates intracellular calcium, oscillations and promotes the, further release of calcium, from vacuoles., 5. The rise in intracellular, calcium blocks K+in channels., , IP3, cADPR pathways, , Ca2+, , Ca2+, , Ca2+, , Ca2+, , Ca2+, , 3, , 1, ABA, , cADPR, IP3, , ABA, , Cl–, Cl–, , 8, K+, , K+ Cl–, , PLC, Vacuole, , K+, , K+, , Vacuole, , Cl–, 9, , FIGURE 23.12 Simplified model for ABA signaling in stomatal guard cells. The net, , effect is the loss of potassium and its anion (Cl– or malate2–) from the cell. (R =, receptor; ROS = reactive oxygen species; cADPR = cyclic ADP-ribose; G-protein =, GTP-binding protein; PLC = phospholipiase C.), , been characterized (see Web Topic 23.10). Under stress, conditions, induction of gene expression may be ABA, dependent or ABA independent, and additional transcription factors have been identified that specifically mediate, responses to cold, drought, or salt (see Chapter 25)., A few DNA elements have been identified that are, involved in transcriptional repression by ABA. The bestcharacterized of these are the gibberellin response elements, (GAREs) that mediate the gibberellin-inducible, ABArepressible expression of the barley α-amylase gene (see, Chapter 20)., Four transcription factors involved in ABA gene activation in maturing seeds have been identified by genetic, means; mutations in the genes encoding any of these proteins reduce seed ABA responsiveness. The maize VP1, (VIVIPAROUS-1) and Arabidopsis ABI3 (ABA-INSENSITIVE3) genes encode highly similar proteins, and the ABI4, and ABI5 genes encode members of two other transcription factor families. VP1/ABI3, and ABI4 are members of, gene families found only in plants. In contrast, ABI5 is a, member of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family, whose, , members are present in all eukaryotes (Finkelstein and, Lynch 2000)., Additional members of the ABI5 subfamily have been, identified by nongenetic means and are also correlated with, ABA-, embryonic-, drought-, or salt stress–induced gene, expression. Characterization of vp1, abi4, and abi5 mutants, has shown that each of these genes can either activate or, repress transcription, depending on the target gene. Because, the promoter of any given gene contains binding sites for a, variety of regulators, it is likely that these transcription factors act in complexes made up of varying combinations of, regulators, whose composition is determined by the combination of available regulators and binding sites., To date, the protein ABI3/VP1 has been shown to interact physically with a variety of proteins, including ABI5 and, its rice homolog (TRAB1). ABI5 also forms homodimers and, heterodimers with other bZIP family members. There is, additional evidence for indirect interactions that may be, mediated by 14-3-3 proteins, a class of acidic proteins that, dimerize and facilitate protein–protein interactions in a variety of signaling, transport, and enzymatic functions (see
Page 606 :
Abscisic Acid: A Seed Maturation and Antistress Signal, Web Topic 23.11). These studies demonstrate the capacity, for specific binding among a variety of transcription factors, predicted to interact as components of regulatory complexes involved in ABA-induced gene expression., , Other Negative Regulators of the ABA Response, Have Been Identified, As described already, negative regulators of the ABA, response (protein phosphatases) have been identified by, isolation of dominant negative mutants such as abi1 and, abi2 that result in ABA-insensitive phenotypes (analogous, to the dominant negative effects of the ethylene receptor, mutant etr1; see Chapter 22)., Other negative regulators have been identified through, isolation of mutants exhibiting enhanced responses to, ABA. Mutants showing increased sensitivity to ABA during germination include era (enhanced response to ABA), and abh (ABA hypersensitive) (Cutler et al. 1996; Hugouvieux et al. in press). The era and abh mutants both confer, ABA hypersensitivity in both stomatal closing and germination, making these mutants resistant to wilting and, mildly drought tolerant., , Farnesyl transferase. The ERA1 gene was cloned, and its, protein product was identified as a subunit of the enzyme, farnesyl transferase. Farnesyl transferases catalyze attachment of the isoprenoid intermediate farnesyl diphosphate, (see Chapter 13) to proteins that contain a specific signal, sequence of amino acids. Many proteins that have been, shown to participate in signal transduction are farnesylated., Farnesylated proteins are anchored to the membrane via, hydrophobic interactions between the farnesyl group and, the membrane lipids (see Figure 1.6). The identification of, ERA1 as part of farnesyl transferase suggests that a protein, that normally suppresses the ABA response requires farnesylation and is possibly anchored to the membrane., mRNA processing. ABH1 encodes an mRNA 5′ cap–binding protein that may be involved in mRNA processing of, negative regulators of ABA signaling. (Recall that eukaryotic messenger RNAs have a “cap” consisting of methylated guanosine at the 5′ end.) Comparison of transcript, accumulation in wild-type and abh1 plants showed a small, number of misexpressed genes in the mutant, including, some encoding possible signaling molecules., Ethylene insensitivity. ERA3 was found to be allelic to a, previously identified ethylene signaling locus, ETHYLENEINSENSITIVE 2 (EIN2) (Ghassemian et al. 2000) (see Chapter 22). In addition to displaying defects in ABA and ethylene responses, mutations in this gene result in defects in the, responses to auxin, jasmonic acid, and stress. This gene, encodes a membrane-bound protein that appears to represent a point of “cross-talk”—i.e., a common signaling intermediate—mediating the responses to many different signals., , 555, , IP3 catabolism. Other screens have identified ABA signaling mutants on the basis of incorrect expression of, reporter genes controlled by ABA-responsive promoters., Although the defects in some of these mutants are limited, to gene expression, others affect plant growth responses., One such mutant, termed fiery (fry) to reflect the intensity, of light emission by its ABA/stress-responsive luciferase, reporter, is also hypersensitive to ABA and stress inhibition, of germination and growth. The FIERY gene encodes an, enzyme required for IP3 catabolism (Xiong et al. 2001). The, mutant phenotype demonstrates that the ability to attenuate, as well as induce, stress signaling is important for successful induction of stress tolerance., Similar to the signaling mechanisms documented for, other plant hormones, ABA signaling involves the coordinated action of positive and negative regulators affecting, processes as diverse as transcription, RNA processing, protein phosphorylation or farnesylation, and metabolism of, secondary messengers. As the signaling components are, identified, and often are found to function in responses to, multiple signals, the next challenge is to determine how, they can lead to ABA-specific responses., , SUMMARY, Abscisic acid plays major roles in seed and bud dormancy,, as well as responses to water stress. ABA is a 15-carbon, terpenoid compound derived from the terminal portion of, carotenoids. ABA in tissues can be measured by bioassays, based on growth, germination, or stomatal closure. Gas, chromatography, HPLC, and immunoassays are the most, reliable and accurate methods available for measuring, ABA levels., ABA is produced by cleavage of a 40-carbon carotenoid, precursor that is synthesized from isopentenyl diphosphate, via the plastid terpenoid pathway. ABA is inactivated by, both oxidative degradation and conjugation., ABA is synthesized in almost all cells that contain plastids and is transported via both the xylem and the phloem., The level of ABA fluctuates dramatically in response to, developmental and environmental changes. During seed, maturation, ABA levels peak in mid- to late embryogenesis., ABA is required for the development of desiccation tolerance in the developing embryo, the synthesis of storage, proteins, and the acquisition of dormancy. Seed dormancy, and germination are controlled by the ratio of ABA to GA,, and ABA-deficient embryos may exhibit precocious germination and vivipary. ABA is also antagonized by ethylene and brassinosteroid promotion of germination., Although less is known about the role of ABA in buds,, ABA is one of the inhibitors that accumulates in dormant, buds., During water stress, the ABA level of the leaf can, increase 50-fold. In addition to closing stomata, ABA, increases the hydraulic conductivity of the root and
Page 607 :
556, , Chapter 23, , increases the root:shoot ratio at low water potentials. ABA, and an alkalinization of the xylem sap are thought to be, two chemical signals that the root sends to the shoot as the, soil dries. The increased pH of the xylem sap may allow, more of the ABA of the leaf to be translocated to the stomata via the transpiration stream., ABA exerts both short-term and long-term control over, plant development. The long-term effects are mediated by, ABA-induced gene expression. ABA stimulates the synthesis of many classes of proteins during seed development, and during water stress, including the LEA family, proteases and chaperonins, ion and water channels, and, enzymes catalyzing compatible solute metabolism or, detoxification of active oxygen species. These proteins may, protect membranes and other proteins from desiccation, damage, or they may aid in recovery from the deleterious, effects of stress. ABA response elements and several transcription factors that bind to them have been identified., ABA also suppresses GA-induced gene expression—for, example, the synthesis of GA-MYB and α-amylase by barley aleurone layers., There is evidence for both extracellular and intracellular ABA receptors in guard cells. ABA closes stomata by, causing long-term depolarization of the guard cell plasma, membrane. Depolarization is believed to be caused by an, increase in cytosolic Ca2+, as well as alkalinization of the, cytosol. The increase in cytosolic calcium is due to a combination of calcium uptake and release of calcium from, internal stores. This calcium increase leads to the opening, of slow anion channels, which results in membrane depolarization. IP3, IP6, cADPR, PA, and reactive oxygen, species all function as secondary messengers in ABAtreated guard cells, and G-proteins participate in the, response. Outward K+ channels open in response to membrane depolarization and to the rise in pH, bringing about, massive K+ efflux., In general, the ABA response appears to be regulated by, more than one signal transduction pathway, even within a, single cell type. This redundancy is consistent with the ability of plant cells to respond to multiple sensory inputs., There is genetic evidence for cross-talk between ABA signaling and the signaling of all other major classes of phytohormones, as well as sugars., , 23.2, , 23.3, , Structural Requirements for Biological, Activity of Abscisic Acid, To be active as a hormone, ABA requires certain functional groups, The Bioassay of ABA, Several ABA-responding tissues have been, used to detect and measure ABA., , 23.4, , Proteins Required for Desiccation Tolerance, ABA induces the synthesis of proteins that, protect cells from damage due to dessication., , 23.5, , Types of Seed Dormancy and the Roles of, Environmental Factors, This discussion expands on the various types, of seed dormancy and describes how environmental factors affect seed dormancy., , 23.6, , The Longevity of Seeds, Under certain conditions, seeds can remain, dormant for hundreds of years., , 23.7, , Genetic Mapping of Dormancy:, Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) Scoring of, Vegetative Dormancy Combined with a, Candidate Gene Approach, A genetic method for determining the number and chromosomal locations of genes, affecting a quantitative trait affected by, many unlinked genes is described., , 23.8, , ABA-Induced Senescence and Ethylene, Hormone-insensitive mutants have made it, possible to distinguish the effects of ethylene, from those of ABA on senescence., Yellow Cameleon: A Noninvasive Tool for, Measuring Intracellular Calcium, The features of the yellow cameleon protein, that enable it to act as a reporter for calcium, concentration are described., , 23.9, , 23.10 Promoter Elements That Regulate ABA, Induction of Gene Expression, A table of the different ABA response elements is presented., , 23.11 The Two-Hybrid System, , Web Material, Web Topics, 23.1, , The Structure of Lunularic Acid from, Liverworts, Although inactive in higher plants, lunularic, acid appears to have a function similar to ABA, in liverworts., , The GAL4 transcription factor can be used to, detect protein-protein interactions in yeast., , Web Essay, 23.1, , Heterophylly in Aquatic Plants, Abscisic acid induces aerial-type leaf morphology in many aquatic plants.
Page 608 :
Abscisic Acid: A Seed Maturation and Antistress Signal, , Chapter References, Allan, A. C., Fricker, M. D., Ward, J. L., Beale, M. H., and Trewavas,, A. J. (1994) Two transduction pathways mediate rapid effects of, abscisic acid in Commelina guard cells. Plant Cell 6: 1319–1328., Allen, G. J., Kuchitsu, K., Chu, S. P., Murata, Y., and Schroeder, J. I., (1999a) Arabidopsis abi1-1 and abi2-1 phosphatase mutations, reduce abscisic acid-induced cytoplasmic calcium rises in guard, cells. Plant Cell 11: 1785–1798., Allen, G. J., Kwak, J. M., Chu, S. P., Llopis, J., Tsien, R. Y., Harper, J., F., and Schroeder, J. I. (1999b) Cameleon calcium indicator reports, cytoplasmic calcium dynamics in Arabidopsis guard cells. Plant J., 19: 735–747., Anderson, B. E., Ward, J. M., and Schroeder, J. I. (1994) Evidence for, an extracellular reception site for abscisic acid in Commelina, guard cells. Plant Physiol. 104: 1177–1183., Beardsell, M. F., and Cohen, D. (1975) Relationships between leaf, water status, abscisic acid levels, and stomatal resistance in maize, and sorghum. Plant Physiol. 56: 207–212., Bewley, J. D., and Black, M. (1994) Seeds: Physiology of Development, and Germination, 2nd ed. Plenum, New York., Cutler, S., Ghassemian, M., Bonetta, D., Cooney, S., and McCourt, P., (1996) A protein farnesyl transferase involved in abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Science 273: 1239–1241., Davies, P. J., ed. (1995) Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and, Molecular Biology, 2nd ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands., Davies, W. J., and Zhang, J. (1991) Root signals and the regulation of, growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu. Rev., Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 55–76., Finkelstein, R. R., and Lynch, T. J. (2000) The Arabidopsis abscisic acid, response gene ABI5 encodes a basic leucine zipper transcription, factor. Plant Cell 12: 599–609., Finkelstein, R. R., Wang, M. L., Lynch, T. J., Rao, S., and Goodman,, H. M. (1998) The Arabidopsis abscisic acid response locus ABI4, encodes an APETALA2 domain protein. Plant Cell 10: 1043–1054., Ghassemian, M., Nambara, E., Cutler, S., Kawaide, H., Kamiya, Y.,, and McCourt, P. (2000) Regulation of abscisic acid signaling by, the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12:, 1117–1126., Gilroy, S., and Jones, R. L. (1994) Perception of gibberellin and, abscisic acid at the external face of the plasma membrane of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) aleurone protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 104:, 1185–1192., Gilroy, S., Read, N. D., and Trewavas, A. J. (1990) Elevation of cytoplasmic calcium by caged calcium or caged inositol trisphosphate, initiates stomatal closure. Nature 343: 769–771., Gomez-Cadenas, A., Zentella, R., Walker-Simmons, M. K., and Ho,, T.-H. D. (2001) Gibberellin/abscisic acid antagonism in barley, aleurone cells: Site of action of the protein kinase PKABA1 in, relation to gibberellin signaling molecules. Plant Cell 13: 667–679., Gosti, F., Beaudoin, N., Serizet, C., Webb, A. A. R., Vartanian, N., and, Giraudat, J. (1999) ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C is a negative regulator of abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 11: 1897–1909., Grabov, A., Leung, J., Giraudat, J., and Blatt, M. (1997) Alteration of, anion channel kinetics in wild-type and abi1-1 transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana guard cells by abscisic acid. Plant J. 12: 203–213., Hoecker, U., Vasil, I. K., and McCarty, D. R. (1995) Integrated control, of seed maturation and germination programs by activator and, repressor functions of Viviparous-1 of maize. Genes Dev. 9:, 2459–2469., Hugouvieux, V., Kwak, J. M., and Schroeder, J. I. (In press) A mRNA, cap binding protein, ABH1, modulates early abscisic acid signal, transduction in Arabidopsis. Cell., Jeannette, E., Rona, J.-P., Bardat, F., Cornel, D., Sotta, B., and Miginiac,, E. (1999) Induction of RAB18 gene expression and activation of, K+ outward rectifying channels depend on an extracellular per-, , 557, , ception of ABA in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells. Plant J. 18:, 13–22., Kinoshita, T., Nishimura, M., and Shimazaki, K.-I. (1995) Cytosolic, concentration of Ca2+ regulates the plasma membrane H+ATPase in guard cells of fava bean. Plant Cell 7: 1333–1342., Koornneef, M., Jorna, M. L., Brinkhorst-van der Swan, D. L. C., and, Karssen, C. M. (1982) The isolation of abscisic acid (ABA) deficient mutants by selection of induced revertants in non-germinating gibberellin sensitive lines of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh., Theor. Appl. Genet. 61: 385–393., Lee, Y., Choi, Y. B., Suh, S., Lee, J., Assmann, S. M., Joe, C. O., Kelleher, J. F., and Crain, R. C. (1996) Abscisic acid-induced phosphoinositide turnover in guard cell protoplasts of Vicia faba. Plant, Physiol. 110: 987–996., Li, J., and Assmann, S. M. (1996) An abscisic acid-activated and calcium-independent protein kinase from guard cells of fava bean., Plant Cell 8: 2359–2368., Mansfield, T. A., and McAinsh, M. R. (1995) Hormones as regulators, of water balance. In Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and, Molecular Biology, 2nd ed., P. J. Davies, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht,, Netherlands, pp. 598–616., Milborrow, B. V. (2001) The pathway of biosynthesis of abscisic acid, in vascular plants: A review of the present state of knowledge of, ABA biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 52: 1145–1164., Mori, I. C., and Muto, S. (1997) Abscisic acid activates a 48-kilodalton protein kinase in guard cell protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 113:, 833–839., Nambara, E., Hayama, R., Tsuchiya, Y., Nishimura, M., Kawaide, H.,, Kamiya, Y., and Naito, S. (2000) The role of abi3 and fus3 loci in, Arabidopsis thaliana on phase transition from late embryo development to germination. Dev. Biol. 220: 412–423., Neill, S. J., Desikan, R., Clarke, A., and Hancock, J. T. (2002) Nitric, oxide is a novel component of abscisic acid signaling in stomatal, guard cells. Plant Physiol. 128: 13–16., Pei, Z.-M., Kuchitsu, K., Ward, J. M., Schwarz, M., and Schroeder,, J. I. (1997) Differential abscisic acid regulation of guard cell slow, anion channels in Arabidopsis wild-type and abi1 and abi2, mutants. Plant Cell 9: 409–423., Pei, Z. M., Murata, Y., Benning, G., Thomine, S., Klusener, B., Allen,, G. J., Grill, E., and Schroeder, J. I. (2000) Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in, guard cells. Nature 406: 731–734., Raz, V., Bergervoet, J. H. W., and Koornneef, M. (2001) Sequential, steps for developmental arrest in Arabidopsis seeds. Development, 128: 243–252., Rock, C. D. (2000) Pathways to abscisic acid-regulated gene expression. New Phytol. 148: 357–396., Saab, I. N., Sharp, R. E., Pritchard, J., and Voetberg, G. S. (1990), Increased endogenous abscisic acid maintains primary root, growth and inhibits shoot growth of maize seedlings at low, water potentials. Plant Physiol. 93: 1329–1336., Sanchez, J.-P., and Chua, N.-H. (2001) Arabidopsis PLC1 is required, for secondary responses to abscisic acid signals. Plant Cell 13:, 1143–1154., Schmidt, C., Schelle, I., Liao, Y.-J., and Schroeder, J. I. (1995) Strong, regulation of slow anion channels and abscisic acid signaling in, guard cells by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 9535–9539., Schroeder, J. I., and Hagiwara, S. (1990) Repetitive increases in cystolic Ca2+ of guard cells by abscisic acid activation of nonselective Ca2+ permeable channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:, 9305–9309., Schroeder, J. I., Allen, G. J., Hugouvieux, V., Kwak, J. M., and Waner,, D. (2001) Guard cell signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Phys., Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 627–658.
Page 609 :
558, , Chapter 23, , Schultz, T. F., and Quatrano, R. S. (1997) Evidence for surface perception of abscisic acid by rice suspension cells as assayed by Em, gene expression. Plant Sci. 130: 63–71., Schurr, U., Gollan, T., and Schulze, E.-D. (1992) Stomatal response to, drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition, of Helianthus annuus. II. Stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid, imported from the xylem sap. Plant Cell Environ. 15: 561–567., Schwartz, A., Ilan, N., Schwartz, M., Scheaffer, J., Assmann, S. M.,, and Schroeder, J. I. (1995) Anion-channel blockers inhibit S-type, anion channels and abscisic acid responses in guard cells. Plant, Physiol. 109: 651–658., Schwartz, A., Wu, W.-H., Tucker, E. B., and Assmann, S. M. (1994), Inhibition of inward K+ channels and stomatal response by, abscisic acid: An intracellular locus of phytohormone action. Proc., Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 4019–4023., Sharp, R. E., LeNoble, M. E., Else, M. A., Thorne, E. T., and Gherardi,, F. (2000) Endogenous ABA maintains shoot growth in tomato, independently of effects on plant water balance: Evidence for an, interaction with ethylene. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1575–1584., Sheen, J. (1998) Mutational analysis of protein phosphatase 2C, involved in abscisic acid signal transduction in higher plants., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 975–980., , Shimazaki, K., Iino, M., and Zeiger, E. (1986) Blue light–dependent, proton extrusion by guard cell protoplasts of Vicia faba. Nature, 319: 324–326., Spollen, W. G., LeNoble, M. E., Samuels, T. D., Bernstein, N., and, Sharp, R. E. (2000) Abscisic acid accumulation maintains maize, primary root elongation at low water potentials by restricting, ethylene production. Plant Physiol. 122: 967–976., Wang, X.-Q., Ullah, H., Jones, A. M., and Assmann, S. M. (2001) G, protein regulation of ion channels and abscisic acid signaling in, Arabidopsis guard cells. Science 292: 2070–2072., White, C. N., Proebsting, W. M., Hedden, P., and Rivin, C.J. (2000), Gibberellins and seed development in maize. I. Evidence that, gibberellin/abscisic acid balance governs germination versus, maturation pathways. Plant Physiol. 122: 1081–1088., Wilkinson, S., and Davies, W. J. (1997) Xylem sap pH increase: A, drought signal received at the apoplastic face of the guard cell, that involves the suppression of saturable abscisic acid uptake, by the epidermal symplast. Plant Physiol. 113: 559–573., Xiong, L., Lee, H., Ishitani, M., Zhang, C., and Zhu, J.-K. (2001), FIERY1 encoding an inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase is a, negative regulator of abscisic acid and stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 15: 1971–1984.
Page 610 :
Chapter, , 24, , The Control of Flowering, , MOST PEOPLE LOOK FORWARD to the spring season and the profusion of flowers it brings. Many vacationers carefully time their travels to, coincide with specific blooming seasons: Citrus along Blossom Trail in, southern California, tulips in Holland. In Washington, D.C., and, throughout Japan, the cherry blossoms are received with spirited ceremonies. As spring progresses into summer, summer into fall, and fall, into winter, wildflowers bloom at their appointed times., Although the strong correlation between flowering and seasons is, common knowledge, the phenomenon poses fundamental questions, that will be addressed in this chapter:, • How do plants keep track of the seasons of the year and the time, of day?, • Which environmental signals control flowering, and how are, those signals perceived?, • How are environmental signals transduced to bring about the, developmental changes associated with flowering?, In Chapter 16 we discussed the role of the root and shoot apical, meristems in vegetative growth and development. The transition to, flowering involves major changes in the pattern of morphogenesis and, cell differentiation at the shoot apical meristem. Ultimately this process, leads to the production of the floral organs—sepals, petals, stamens, and, carpels (see Figure 1.2.A in Web Topic 1.2)., Specialized cells in the anther undergo meiosis to produce four haploid microspores that develop into pollen grains. Similarly, a cell within, the ovule divides meiotically to produce four haploid megaspores, one, of which survives and undergoes three mitotic divisions to produce the, cells of the embryo sac (see Figure 1.2.B in Web Topic 1.2). The embryo, sac represents the mature female gametophyte. The pollen grain, with, its germinating pollen tube, is the mature male gametophyte generation., The two gametophytic structures produce the gametes (egg and sperm
Page 611 :
560, , Chapter 24, , cells), which fuse to form the diploid zygote, the first stage, of the new sporophyte generation., Clearly, flowers represent a complex array of functionally specialized structures that differ substantially from the, vegetative plant body in form and cell types. The transition, to flowering therefore entails radical changes in cell fate, within the shoot apical meristem. In the first part of this, chapter we will discuss these changes, which are manifested as floral development. Recently genes have been identified that play crucial roles in the formation of the floral, organs. Such studies have shed new light on the genetic, control of plant reproductive development., The events occurring in the shoot apex that specifically, commit the apical meristem to produce flowers are collectively referred to as floral evocation. In the second part of, this chapter we will discuss the events leading to floral evocation. The developmental signals that bring about floral, evocation include endogenous factors, such as circadian, rhythms, phase change, and hormones, and external factors,, such as day length (photoperiod) and temperature (vernalization). In the case of photoperiodism, transmissible signals from the leaves, collectively referred to as the floral, stimulus, are translocated to the shoot apical meristem., The interactions of these endogenous and external factors, enable plants to synchronize their reproductive development with the environment., , FLORAL MERISTEMS AND FLORAL, ORGAN DEVELOPMENT, Floral meristems usually can be distinguished from vegetative meristems, even in the early stages of reproductive, development, by their larger size. The transition from vegetative to reproductive development is marked by an, , (A), , increase in the frequency of cell divisions within the central zone of the shoot apical meristem. In the vegetative, meristem, the cells of the central zone complete their division cycles slowly. As reproductive development commences, the increase in the size of the meristem is largely a, result of the increased division rate of these central cells., Recently, genetic and molecular studies have identified a, network of genes that control floral morphogenesis in Arabidopsis, snapdragon (Antirrhinum), and other species., In this section we will focus on floral development in, Arabidopsis, which has been studied extensively (Figure, 24.1). First we will outline the basic morphological changes, that occur during the transition from the vegetative to the, reproductive phase. Next we will consider the arrangement, of the floral organs in four whorls on the meristem, and the, types of genes that govern the normal pattern of floral, development. According to the widely accepted ABC, model (which is described in Figure 24.6), the specific locations of floral organs in the flower are regulated by the, overlapping expression of three types of floral organ identity genes., , The Characteristics of Shoot Meristems in, Arabidopsis Change with Development, During the vegetative phase of growth, the Arabidopsis vegetative apical meristem produces phytomeres with very, short internodes, resulting in a basal rosette of leaves (see, Figure 24.1A). (Recall from Chapter 16 that a phytomere, consists of a leaf, the node to which the leaf is attached, the, axillary bud, and the internode below the node.), As plants initiate reproductive development, the vegetative meristem is transformed into an indeterminate primary inflorescence meristem that produces floral meristems on its flanks (Figure 24.2). The lateral buds of the, , (B), , (A) The shoot apical, meristem in Arabidopsis thaliana, generates different organs at different stages of development., Early in development the shoot, apical meristem forms a rosette of, basal leaves. When the plant, makes the transition to flowering,, the shoot apical meristem is, transformed into a primary inflorescence meristem that ultimately, produces an elongated stem bearing flowers. Leaf primordia initiated prior to the floral transition, become cauline leaves, and secondary inflorescences develop in, the axils of the cauline leaves., (B) Photograph of an Arabidopsis, plant. (Photo courtesy of Richard, Amasino.), FIGURE 24.1, , Flower, , Secondary, inflorescence, , Primary, inflorescence, , Cauline leaf, Rosette leaf
Page 612 :
The Control of Flowering, (A), , 561, , (B), , FIGURE 24.2 Longitudinal sections through a vegetative (A) and a reproductive (B), shoot apical region of Arabidopsis. (Photos courtesy of V. Grbic´ and M. Nelson, and, assembled and labeled by E. Himelblau.), , cauline leaves (inflorescence leaves) develop into secondary inflorescence meristems, and their activity repeats, the pattern of development of the primary inflorescence, meristem, as shown in Figure 24.1A., , the floral bud develops. In the wild-type Arabidopsis flower,, the whorls are arranged as follows:, , The Four Different Types of Floral Organs Are, Initiated as Separate Whorls, , The second whorl is composed of four petals, which are, white at maturity., , Floral meristems initiate four different types of floral, organs: sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels (Coen and Carpenter 1993). These sets of organs are initiated in concentric rings, called whorls, around the flanks of the meristem, (Figure 24.3). The initiation of the innermost organs, the, carpels, consumes all of the meristematic cells in the apical, dome, and only the floral organ primordia are present as, , • The third whorl contains six stamens, two of which, are shorter than the other four., , (A) Longitudinal section through, developing flower, , • The first (outermost) whorl consists of four sepals,, which are green at maturity., , • The fourth whorl is a single complex organ, the, gynoecium or pistil, which is composed of an ovary, with two fused carpels, each containing numerous, ovules, and a short style capped with a stigma, (Figure 24.4)., , (B) Cross- section of developing flower, showing floral whorls, , Whorl 1: sepals, Stamen, , Whorl 2: petals, , Carpel, , Whorl 3: stamens, , Petal, Sepal, , (C) Schematic diagram of, developmental fields, , Field 1, , Field 2, Field 3, , Whorl 4: carpels, , Vascular, tissue, , FIGURE 24.3 The floral organs are initiated sequentially by, the floral meristem of Arabidopsis. (A and B) The floral, organs are produced as successive whorls (concentric circles), starting with the sepals and progressing inward. (C), According to the combinatorial model, the functions of, , each whorl are determined by overlapping developmental, fields. These fields correspond to the expression patterns of, specific floral organ identity genes. (From Bewley et al., 2000.)
Page 613 :
562, , Chapter 24, , (A), , FIGURE 24.4 The Arabidopsis pistil consists, , (B), , of two fused carpels, each containing many, ovules. (A) Scanning electron micrograph of, a pistil, showing the stigma, a short style,, and the ovary. (B) Longitudinal section, through the pistil, showing the many, ovules. (From Gasser and Robinson-Beers, 1993, courtesy of C. S. Gasser, © American, Society of Plant Biologists, reprinted with, permission.), , Stigma, Style, , Transmitting, tissue, Ovary, Ovules, , Three Types of Genes Regulate Floral, Development, Mutations have identified three classes of genes that regulate floral development: floral organ identity genes, cadastral genes, and meristem identity genes., 1. Floral organ identity genes directly control floral, identity. The proteins encoded by these genes are, transcription factors that likely control the expression, of other genes whose products are involved in the formation and/or function of floral organs., 2. Cadastral genes act as spatial regulators of the floral, organ identity genes by setting boundaries for their, expression. (The word cadastre refers to a map or survey showing property boundaries for taxation purposes.), 3. Meristem identity genes are necessary for the initial, induction of the organ identity genes. These genes, are the positive regulators of floral organ identity., , Meristem Identity Genes Regulate Meristem, Function, Meristem identity genes must be active for the primordia, formed at the flanks of the apical meristem to become floral meristems. (Recall that an apical meristem that is forming floral meristems on its flanks is known as an inflorescence meristem.) For example, mutants of Antirrhinum, (snapdragon) that have a defect in the meristem identity, gene FLORICAULA develop an inflorescence that does not, , produce flowers. Instead of causing floral meristems to, form in the axils of the bracts, the mutant floricaula gene, results in the development of additional inflorescence, meristems at the bract axils. The wild-type floricaula (FLO), gene controls the determination step in which floral meristem identity is established., In Arabidopsis, AGAMOUS-LIKE 201 (AGL20), APETALA1, (AP1), and LEAFY (LFY) are all critical genes in the genetic, pathway that must be activated to establish floral meristem, identity. LFY is the Arabidopsis version of the snapdragon, FLO gene. AGL20 plays a central role in floral evocation by, integrating signals from several different pathways involving both environmental and internal cues (Borner et al., 2000). AGL20 thus appears to serve as a master switch initiating floral development., Once activated, AGL20 triggers the expression of LFY,, and LFY turns on the expression of AP1 (Simon et al. 1996)., In Arabidopsis, LFY and AP1 are involved in a positive feedback loop; that is, AP1 expression also stimulates the, expression of LFY., , Homeotic Mutations Led to the Identification of, Floral Organ Identity Genes, The genes that determine floral organ identity were discovered as floral homeotic mutants (see Chapter 14 on the, , 1 Also, , known as SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF, CONSTANS 1 (SOC1).
Page 614 :
The Control of Flowering, web site). As discussed in Chapter 14, mutations in the fruit, fly, Drosophila, led to the identification of a set of homeotic, genes encoding transcription factors that determine the, locations at which specific structures develop. Such genes, act as major developmental switches that activate the entire, genetic program for a particular structure. The expression, of homeotic genes thus gives organs their identity., As we have seen already in this chapter, dicot flowers, consist of successive whorls of organs that form as a result, of the activity of floral meristems: sepals, petals, stamens,, and carpels. These organs are produced when and where, they are because of the orderly, patterned expression and, interactions of a small group of homeotic genes that specify floral organ identity., The floral organ identity genes were identified through, homeotic mutations that altered floral organ identity so that, some of the floral organs appeared in the wrong place. For, example, Arabidopsis plants with mutations in the APETALA2, (AP2) gene produce flowers with carpels where sepals, should be, and stamens where petals normally appear., The homeotic genes that have been cloned so far encode, transcription factors—proteins that control the expression, of other genes. Most plant homeotic genes belong to a class, of related sequences known as MADS box genes, whereas, animal homeotic genes contain sequences called homeoboxes (see Chapter 14 on the web site)., Many of the genes that determine floral organ identity, are MADS box genes, including the DEFICIENS gene of, snapdragon and the AGAMOUS, PISTILLATA1, and, APETALA3 genes of Arabidopsis. The MADS box genes, , (A), , (B), , (C), , share a characteristic, conserved nucleotide sequence, known as a MADS box, which encodes a protein structure, known as the MADS domain. The MADS domain enables, these transcription factors to bind to DNA that has a specific nucleotide sequence., Not all genes containing the MADS box domain are, homeotic genes. For example, AGL20 is a MADS box gene,, but it functions as a meristem identity gene., , Three Types of Homeotic Genes Control Floral, Organ Identity, Five different genes are known to specify floral organ, identity in Arabidopsis: APETALA1 (AP1), APETALA2, (AP2), APETALA3 (AP3), PISTILLATA (PI), and AGAMOUS (AG) (Bowman et al. 1989; Weigel and, Meyerowitz 1994). The organ identity genes initially were, identified through mutations that dramatically alter the, structure and thus the identity of the floral organs produced in two adjacent whorls (Figure 24.5). For example,, plants with the ap2 mutation lack sepals and petals (see, Figure 24.5B). Plants bearing ap3 or pi mutations produce, sepals instead of petals in the second whorl, and carpels, instead of stamens in the third whorl (see Figure 24.5C)., And plants homozygous for the ag mutation lack both stamens and carpels (see Figure 24.5D)., Because mutations in these genes change floral organ, identity without affecting the initiation of flowers, they are, homeotic genes. These homeotic genes fall into three, classes—types A, B, and C—defining three different kinds, of activities (Figure 24.6):, , (D), , Stamen, Carpel, Petal, Sepal, , Wild type, , apetala2-2, , pistillata2, , 563, , agamous1, , FIGURE 24.5 Mutations in the floral organ identity genes dramatically alter the, structure of the flower. (A) Wild type; (B) apetala2-2 mutants lack sepals and petals;, (C) pistillata2 mutants lack petals and stamens; (D) agamous1 mutants lack both, stamens and carpels. (From Bewley et al. 2000.)
Page 615 :
564, , Chapter 24, , FIGURE 24.6 The ABC model for the acquisition of floral, organ identity is based on the interactions of three different, types of activities of floral homeotic genes: A, B, and C. In, the first whorl, expression of type A (AP2) alone results in, the formation of sepals. In the second whorl, expression of, both type A (AP2) and type B (AP3/PI) results in the formation of petals. In the third whorl, the expression of B, (AP3/PI) and C (AG) causes the formation of stamens. In, the fourth whorl, activity C (AG) alone specifies carpels. In, addition, activity A (AP2) represses activity C (AG) in, whorls 1 and 2, while C represses A in whorls 3 and 4., , Whorl, , Structure, , 3. Type C activity, encoded by AG, controls events in, the third and fourth whorls. Loss of type C activity, results in the formation of petals instead of stamens, in the third whorl, and replacement of the fourth, whorl by a new flower such that the fourth whorl of, the ag mutant flower is occupied by sepals., The control of organ identity by type A, B, and C homeotic, genes (the ABC model) is described in more detail in the, next section., , 3, , 4, , B, A, Sepal, , C, Petal, , Stamen, , Carpel, , APETALA3/PISTILLATA, , Structure, , 2. Type B activity, encoded by AP3 and PI, controls, organ determination in the second and third whorls., Loss of type B activity results in the formation of, sepals instead of petals in the second whorl, and of, carpels instead of stamens in the third whorl., , 2, , Activity, type, , Genes, , 1. Type A activity, encoded by AP1 and AP2, controls, organ identity in the first and second whorls. Loss of, type A activity results in the formation of carpels, instead of sepals in the first whorl, and of stamens, instead of petals in the second whorl., , 1, , APETALA2, Sepal, , Petal, , AGAMOUS, Stamen, , Carpel, , The role of the organ identity genes in floral development, is dramatically illustrated by experiments in which two or, three activities are eliminated by loss-of-function mutations, (Figure 24.7). Quadruple-mutant plants (ap1, ap2, ap3/pi, and, ag) produce floral meristems that develop as pseudoflowers;, all the floral organs are replaced with green leaflike structures, although these organs are produced with a whorled, phyllotaxy. Evolutionary biologists, beginning with the eighteenth-century German poet, philosopher, and natural scientist Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), have speculated that floral organs are highly modified leaves, and this, experiment gives direct support to these ideas., , The ABC Model Explains the Determination of, Floral Organ Identity, In 1991 the ABC model was proposed to explain how, homeotic genes control organ identity. The ABC model, postulates that organ identity in each whorl is determined, by a unique combination of the three organ identity gene, activities (see Figure 24.6):, • Activity of type A alone specifies sepals., • Activities of both A and B are required for the formation of petals., • Activities of B and C form stamens., • Activity of C alone specifies carpels., , FIGURE 24.7 A quadruple mutant (ap1, ap2, ap3/pi, ag ), results in the production of leaf-like structures in place of, floral organs. (Courtesy of John Bowman.), , The model further proposes that activities A and C mutually repress each other (see Figure 24.6); that is, both A- and, C-type genes have cadastral function in addition to their, function in determining organ identity., The patterns of organ formation in the wild type and, most of the mutant phenotypes are predicted and, explained by this model (Figure 24.8). The challenge now, is to understand how the expression pattern of these organ, identity genes is controlled by cadastral genes; how organ, identity genes, which encode transcription factors, alter the, pattern of other genes expressed in the developing organ;, and finally how this altered pattern of gene expression, results in the development of a specific floral organ.
Page 616 :
The Control of Flowering, (A) Wild type, , Whorl, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , B, Genes, Structure, , A, Sepal, , C, Petal, , Stamen, , Carpel, , 565, , FIGURE 24.8 Interpretation of the phenotypes of floral homeotic mutants, based on the ABC model. (A) Wild, type. (B) Loss of C function results in, expansion of the A function throughout, the floral meristem. (C) Loss of A function results in the spread of C function, throughout the meristem. (D) Loss of B, function results in the expression of, only A and C functions., , (B) Loss of C function, , Whorl, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , Petal, , Sepal, , 3, , 4, , B, Genes, Structure, , A, Sepal, , Petal, , (C) Loss of A function, Whorl, , 1, , 2, B, , Genes, Structure, , C, Carpel, , Stamen, , 1, , 2, , Stamen, , Carpel, , (D) Loss of B function, , Whorl, , Genes, Structure, , 3, , 4, , A, Sepal, , C, Sepal, , Carpel, , FLORAL EVOCATION: INTERNAL AND, EXTERNAL CUES, A plant may flower within a few weeks after germinating,, as in annual plants such as groundsel (Senecio vulgaris)., Alternatively, some perennial plants, such as many forest, trees, may grow for 20 or more years before they begin to, produce flowers. Different species flower at widely different ages, indicating that the age, or perhaps the size, of the, plant is an internal factor controlling the switch to reproductive development. The case in which flowering occurs, strictly in response to internal developmental factors and, does not depend on any particular environmental conditions is referred to as autonomous regulation., , Carpel, , In contrast to plants that flower entirely through an, autonomous pathway, some plants exhibit an absolute, requirement for the proper environmental cues in order to, flower. This condition is termed an obligate or qualitative, response to an environmental cue. In other plant species,, flowering is promoted by certain environmental cues but, will eventually occur in the absence of such cues. This is, called a facultative or quantitative response to an environmental cue. The flowering of this latter group of plants,, which includes Arabidopsis, thus relies on both environmental and autonomous flowering systems., Photoperiodism and vernalization are two of the most, important mechanisms underlying seasonal responses., Photoperiodism is a response to the length of day; vernaliza-
Page 617 :
566, , Chapter 24, , tion is the promotion of flowering—at subsequent higher, temperatures—brought about by exposure to cold. Other, signals, such as total light radiation and water availability,, can also be important external cues., The evolution of both internal (autonomous) and external (environment-sensing) control systems enables plants, to carefully regulate flowering at the optimal time for, reproductive success. For example, in many populations of, a particular species, flowering is synchronized. This synchrony favors crossbreeding and allows seeds to be produced in favorable environments, particularly with respect, to water and temperature., , THE SHOOT APEX AND PHASE CHANGES, All multicellular organisms pass through a series of more, or less defined developmental stages, each with its characteristic features. In humans, infancy, childhood, adolescence, and adulthood represent four general stages of, development, and puberty is the dividing line between the, nonreproductive and the reproductive phases. Higher, plants likewise pass through developmental stages, but, whereas in animals these changes take place throughout, the entire organism, in higher plants they occur in a single,, dynamic region, the shoot apical meristem., , Shoot Apical Meristems Have Three, Developmental Phases, During postembryonic development, the shoot apical, meristem passes through three more or less well-defined, developmental stages in sequence:, 1. The juvenile phase, 2. The adult vegetative phase, 3. The adult reproductive phase, The transition from one phase to another is called phase, change., The primary distinction between the juvenile and the, adult vegetative phases is that the latter has the ability to, form reproductive structures: flowers in angiosperms,, cones in gymnosperms. However, actual expression of the, reproductive competence of the adult phase (i.e., flowering) often depends on specific environmental and developmental signals. Thus the absence of flowering itself is not, a reliable indicator of juvenility., The transition from juvenile to adult is frequently accompanied by changes in vegetative characteristics, such as leaf, morphology, phyllotaxy (the arrangement of leaves on the, stem), thorniness, rooting capacity, and leaf retention in, deciduous plants (Figure 24.9; see also Web Topic 24.1). Such, changes are most evident in woody perennials, but they are, apparent in many herbaceous species as well. Unlike the, abrupt transition from the adult vegetative phase to the, , FIGURE 24.9 Juvenile and adult forms of ivy (Hedera helix)., , The juvenile form has lobed palmate leaves arranged alternately, a climbing growth habit, and no flowers. The adult, form (projecting out to the right) has entire ovate leaves, arranged in spirals, an upright growth habit, and flowers., (Photo by L. Taiz.), , reproductive phase, the transition from juvenile to vegetative adult is usually gradual, involving intermediate forms., Sometimes the transition can be observed in a single, leaf. A dramatic example of this is the progressive transformation of juvenile leaves of the leguminous tree Acacia, heterophylla into phyllodes, a phenomenon noted by, Goethe. Whereas the juvenile pinnately compound leaves, consist of rachis (stalk) and leaflets, adult phyllodes are, specialized structures representing flattened petioles (Figure 24.10)., Intermediate structures also form during the transition, from aquatic to aerial leaf types of aquatic plants such as, Hippuris vulgaris (common marestail). As in the case of A., heterophylla, these intermediate forms possess distinct, regions with different developmental patterns. To account, for intermediate forms during the transition from juvenile, to adult in maize (see Web Topic 24.2), a combinatorial, model has been proposed (Figure 24.11). According to this, model, shoot development can be described as a series of, independently regulated, overlapping programs (juvenile,, adult, and reproductive) that modulate the expression of a, common set of developmental processes.
Page 618 :
The Control of Flowering, , 567, , FIGURE 24.10 Leaves of Acacia heterophylla, showing transitions from pinnately, compound leaves (juvenile phase) to phyllodes (adult phase). Note that the previous phase is retained at the top of the leaf in the intermediate forms., , In the transition from juvenile to adult leaves, the intermediate forms indicate that different regions of the same, leaf can express different developmental programs. Thus, the cells at the tip of the leaf remain committed to the juvenile program, while the cells at the base of the leaf become, committed to the adult program. The developmental fates, of the two sets of cells in the same leaf are quite different., , Juvenile Tissues Are Produced First and Are, Located at the Base of the Shoot, The sequence in time of the three developmental phases, results in a spatial gradient of juvenility along the shoot, axis. Because growth in height is restricted to the apical, meristem, the juvenile tissues and organs, which form first,, are located at the base of the shoot. In rapidly flowering, herbaceous species, the juvenile phase may last only a few, days, and few juvenile structures are produced. In contrast,, woody species have a more prolonged juvenile phase, in, some cases lasting 30 to 40 years (Table 24.1). In these cases, the juvenile structures can account for a significant portion, of the mature plant., , (A) Vegetative young, adult plant, , Phases, Juvenile, Vegetative adult, Reproductive, Flower, , (B) Flowering, plant, , Flattened, petiole, , Petiole, Juvenile, phase, , Intermediate, stages, , Adult, phase, , Once the meristem has switched over to the adult phase,, only adult vegetative structures are produced, culminating, in floral evocation. The adult and reproductive phases are, therefore located in the upper and peripheral regions of the, shoot., Attainment of a sufficiently large size appears to be more, important than the plant’s chronological age in determining the transition to the adult phase. Conditions that retard, growth, such as mineral deficiencies, low light, water stress,, defoliation, and low temperature tend to prolong the juvenile phase or even cause rejuvenation (reversion to juvenility) of adult shoots. In contrast, conditions that promote, vigorous growth accelerate the transition to the adult phase., When growth is accelerated, exposure to the correct flowerinducing treatment can result in flowering., Although plant size seems to be the most important factor, it is not always clear which specific component associated with size is critical. In some Nicotiana species, it, appears that plants must produce a certain number of, leaves to transmit a sufficient amount of the floral stimulus to the apex., , FIGURE 24.11 Schematic representation of the combinatorial model of, , Processes, required, at all phases, , shoot development in maize. Overlapping gradients of expression of, the juvenile, vegetative adult, and reproductive phases are indicated, along the length of the main axis and branches. The continuous black, line represents processes that are required during all phases of development. Each of the three phases may be regulated by separated, developmental programs, with intermediate phases arising when the, programs overlap. (A) Vegetative young adult plant. (B) Flowering, plant. (After Poethig 1990.)
Page 619 :
568, , Chapter 24, , TABLE 24.1, Length of juvenile period in some woody plant species, , Species, , Length of, juvenile, period, , Rose (Rosa [hybrid tea]), Grape (Vitis spp.), Apple (Malus spp.), Citrus spp., English ivy (Hedera helix), Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), Sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), English oak (Quercus robur), European beech (Fagus sylvatica), , 20–30 days, 1 year, 4–8 years, 5–8 years, 5–10 years, 5–15 years, 15–20 years, 25–30 years, 30–40 years, , Source: Clark 1983., , Once the adult phase has been attained, it is relatively, stable, and it is maintained during vegetative propagation, or grafting. For example, in mature plants of English ivy, (Hedera helix), cuttings taken from the basal region develop, into juvenile plants, while those from the tip develop into, adult plants. When scions were taken from the base of the, flowering tree silver birch (Betula verrucosa) and grafted, onto seedling rootstocks, there were no flowers on the, grafts within the first 2 years. In contrast, the grafts flowered freely when scions were taken from the top of the, flowering tree., In some species, the juvenile meristem appears to be, capable of flowering but does not receive sufficient floral, stimulus until the plant becomes large enough. In mango, (Mangifera indica), for example, juvenile seedlings can be, induced to flower when grafted to a mature tree. In many, other woody species, however, grafting to an adult flowering plant does not induce flowering., , Phase Changes Can Be Influenced by Nutrients,, Gibberellins, and Other Chemical Signals, The transition at the shoot apex from the juvenile to the, adult phase can be affected by transmissible factors from the, rest of the plant. In many plants, exposure to low-light conditions prolongs juvenility or causes reversion to juvenility., A major consequence of the low-light regime is a reduction, in the supply of carbohydrates to the apex; thus carbohydrate supply, especially sucrose, may play a role in the transition between juvenility and maturity. Carbohydrate supply as a source of energy and raw material can affect the, size of the apex. For example, in the florist’s chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium), flower primordia are not, initiated until a minimum apex size has been reached., The apex receives a variety of hormonal and other factors from the rest of the plant in addition to carbohydrates, and other nutrients. Experimental evidence shows that the, application of gibberellins causes reproductive structures, , to form in young, juvenile plants of several conifer families. The involvement of endogenous GAs in the control of, reproduction is also indicated by the fact that other treatments that accelerate cone production in pines (e.g., root, removal, water stress, and nitrogen starvation) often also, result in a buildup of GAs in the plant., On the other hand, although gibberellins promote the, attainment of reproductive maturity in conifers and many, herbaceous angiosperms as well, GA3 causes rejuvenation, in Hedera and in several other woody angiosperms. The, role of gibberellins in the control of phase change is thus, complex, varies among species, and probably involves, interactions with other factors., , Competence and Determination Are Two Stages in, Floral Evocation, The term juvenility has different meanings for herbaceous, and woody species. Whereas juvenile herbaceous meristems flower readily when grafted onto flowering adult, plants (see Web Topic 24.3), juvenile woody meristems, generally do not. What is the difference between the two?, Extensive studies in tobacco have demonstrated that floral evocation requires the apical bud to pass through two, developmental stages (Figure 24.12) (McDaniel et al. 1992)., One stage is the acquisition of competence. A bud is said to, be competent if it is able to flower when given the appropriate developmental signal., For example, if a vegetative shoot (scion) is grafted onto, a flowering stock and the scion flowers immediately, it is, demonstrably capable of responding to the level of floral, stimulus present in the stock and is therefore competent., Failure of the scion to flower would indicate that the shoot, apical meristem has not yet attained competence. Thus the, juvenile meristems of herbaceous plants are competent to, flower, but those of woody species are not., The next stage that a competent vegetative bud goes, through is determination. A bud is said to be determined, if it progresses to the next developmental stage (flowering), even after being removed from its normal context. Thus a, florally determined bud will produce flowers even if it is, grafted onto a vegetative plant that is not producing any, floral stimulus., In a day-neutral tobacco, for example, plants typically, flower after producing about 41 leaves or nodes. In an, experiment to measure the floral determination of the axillary buds, flowering tobacco plants were decapitated just, above the thirty-fourth leaf (from the bottom). Released, from apical dominance, the axillary bud of the thirty-fourth, leaf grew out, and after producing 7 more leaves (for a total, of 41), it flowered (Figure 24.13A) (McDaniel 1996). However, if the thirty-fourth bud was excised from the plant, and either rooted or grafted onto a stock without leaves, near the base, it produced a complete set of leaves (41), before flowering. This result shows that the thirty-fourth, bud was not yet florally determined.
Page 620 :
The Control of Flowering, , Induction, Competent:, , Signal, Determined:, , Expressed:, , Able to respond in, Able to follow same, expected manner, developmental, when given the, Photoperiod program even after Hormones ?, appropriate, removal from its, developmental, normal position in, signals., plant., Vegetative growth, , shoot apex in which the cells of the vegetative meristem, acquire new developmental fates. To initiate floral development, the cells of the meristem must first become competent. A competent vegetative meristem is one that can, , In another experiment, the donor plant was decapitated, above the thirty-seventh leaf. This time the thirty-seventh, axillary bud flowered after producing four leaves in all three, situations (see Figure 24.13B). This result demonstrates that, the terminal bud became florally determined after initiating 37 leaves., Extensive grafting of shoot tips among tobacco varieties, has established that the number of nodes a meristem produces before flowering is a function of two factors: (1) the, strength of the floral stimulus from the leaves and (2) the, competence of the meristem to respond to the signal, (McDaniel et al. 1996)., , respond to a floral stimulus (induction) by becoming florally determined (committed to producing a flower). The, determined state is usually expressed, but this may require, an additional signal. (After McDaniel et al. 1992.), , In some cases the expression of flowering may be, delayed or arrested even after the apex becomes determined, unless it receives a second developmental signal, that stimulates expression (see Figure 24.12). For example,, intact Lolium temulentum (darnel ryegrass) plants become, committed to flowering after a single exposure to a long, day. If the Lolium shoot apical meristem is excised 28 hours, after the beginning of the long day and cultured in vitro, it, will produce normal inflorescences in culture, but only if, the hormone gibberellic acid (GA) is present in the, medium. Because apices cultured from plants grown exclusively in short days never flower, even in the presence of, , (A) Bud not determined, , (B) Bud florally determined, , Decapitation, here, , Decapitation, here, , In situ, , The apical, meristem, undergoes, morphogenesis., , Flowers, , FIGURE 24.12 A simplified model for floral evocation at the, , Donor, , 569, , Rooted, , Grafted, , Donor, , In situ, , FIGURE 24.13 Demonstration of the deter-, , mined state of axillary buds in tobacco. A, specific axillary bud of a flowering donor, plant is forced to grow, either directly on the, plant (in situ) by decapitation, or by rooting, or grafting to the base of the plant. The new, leaves and flowers produced by the axillary, bud are indicated by shading. (A) Result, when the bud is not determined. (B) Result, when the bud is florally determined. (After, McDaniel 1996.), , Rooted, , Grafted
Page 621 :
570, , Chapter 24, , FIGURE 24.14 Effect of plant age on the number of long-, , day (LD) inductive cycles required for flowering in the, long-day plant Lolium temulentum (darnel ryegrass). An, inductive long-day cycle consisted of 8 hours of sunlight, followed by 16 hours of low-intensity incandescent light., The older the plant is, the fewer photoinductive cycles are, needed to produce flowering., , CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS:, THE CLOCK WITHIN, Organisms are normally subjected to daily cycles of light, and darkness, and both plants and animals often exhibit, rhythmic behavior in association with these changes., Examples of such rhythms include leaf and petal movements (day and night positions), stomatal opening and, closing, growth and sporulation patterns in fungi (e.g.,, Pilobolus and Neurospora), time of day of pupal emergence, (the fruit fly Drosophila), and activity cycles in rodents, as, well as metabolic processes such as photosynthetic capacity and respiration rate., When organisms are transferred from daily light–dark, cycles to continuous darkness (or continuous dim light),, many of these rhythms continue to be expressed, at least, for several days. Under such uniform conditions the period, of the rhythm is then close to 24 hours, and consequently, the term circadian rhythm is applied (see Chapter 17)., Because they continue in a constant light or dark environment, these circadian rhythms cannot be direct responses, to the presence or absence of light but must be based on an, internal pacemaker, often called an endogenous oscillator., A molecular model for a plant endogenous oscillator was, described in Chapter 17., The endogenous oscillator is coupled to a variety of, physiological processes, such as leaf movement or photosynthesis, and it maintains the rhythm. For this reason the, , Flowering stage:, Vegetative stage:, 5, , Spike length (mm), , GA, we can conclude that long days are required for determination in Lolium, whereas GA is required for expression, of the determined state., In general, once a meristem has become competent, it, exhibits an increasing tendency to flower with age (leaf, number). For example, in plants controlled by day length,, the number of short-day or long-day cycles necessary to, achieve flowering is often fewer in older plants (Figure, 24.14). As will be discussed later in the chapter, this increasing tendency to flower with age has its physiological basis, in the greater capacity of the leaves to produce a floral, stimulus., Before discussing how plants perceive day length, however, we will lay the foundation by examining how organisms measure time in general. This topic is known as, chronobiology, or the study of biological clocks. The bestunderstood biological clock is the circadian rhythm., , 6, , 4, , Oldest plant, (6 –7 leaves),, flowering after, 1 LD cycle, , 3, , 2, , Younger plant, (4 – 5 leaves),, flowering after, 2 LD cycles, Youngest plant, (2 – 3 leaves),, flowering after, 4 LD cycles, , 1, , 0, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , Number of LD cycles, , endogenous oscillator can be considered the clock mechanism, and the physiological functions that are being regulated, such as leaf movements or photosynthesis, are sometimes referred to as the hands of the clock., , Circadian Rhythms Exhibit Characteristic Features, Circadian rhythms arise from cyclic phenomena that are, defined by three parameters:, 1. Period, the time between comparable points in the, repeating cycle. Typically the period is measured as, the time between consecutive maxima (peaks) or, minima (troughs) (Figure 24.15A)., 2. Phase2, any point in the cycle that is recognizable by, its relationship to the rest of the cycle. The most obvious phase points are the peak and trough positions., 3. Amplitude, usually considered to be the distance, between peak and trough. The amplitude of a biological rhythm can often vary while the period remains, unchanged (as, for example, in Figure 24.15C)., In constant light or darkness, rhythms depart from an, exact 24-hour period. The rhythms then drift in relation to, solar time, either gaining or losing time depending on, whether the period is shorter or longer than 24 hours., Under natural conditions, the endogenous oscillator is, , 2, , The term phase should not be confused with the term, phase change in meristem development, discussed earlier.
Page 622 :
The Control of Flowering, , 571, , (A), , Amplitude, , Period, , A typical circadian rhythm. The period is the, time between comparable points in the, repeating cycle; the phase is any point in the, repeating cycle recognizable by its relationship, with the rest of the cycle; the amplitude, is the distance between peak and trough., , Phase, points, , (B), , 24 h, , 12D, , 12L, , 12D, , 26 h, , 12L, , 12D, , 12L, , A circadian rhythm entrained to a 24 h, light –dark (L–D) cycle and its reversion to, the free-running period (26 h in this example), following transfer to continuous darkness., , (h), , (C), Suspension of a circadian rhythm in, continuous bright light and the release, or restarting of the rhythm following, transfer to darkness., , Light, , (h), , (D), Light, pulse, , 12D, , 12L, , 12D, , 12L, , 12D, , 12L, , Rephased, rhythm, , Typical phase-shifting response to a, light pulse given shortly after transfer to, darkness. The rhythm is rephased (delayed), without its period being changed., , (h), , FIGURE 24.15 Some characteristics of circadian rhythms., , entrained (synchronized) to a true 24-hour period by environmental signals, the most important of which are the, light-to-dark transition at dusk and the dark-to-light transition at dawn (see Figure 24.15B)., Such environmental signals are termed zeitgebers (German for “time givers”). When such signals are removed—, for example, by transfer to continuous darkness—the, , rhythm is said to be free-running, and it reverts to the circadian period that is characteristic of the particular organism (see Figure 24.15B)., Although the rhythms are generated internally, they, normally require an environmental signal, such as exposure to light or a change in temperature, to initiate their, expression. In addition, many rhythms damp out (i.e., the
Page 623 :
572, , Chapter 24, , amplitude decreases) when the organism is in a constant, environment for some time and then require an environmental zeitgeber, such as a transfer from light to dark or a, change in temperature, to be restarted (see Figure 24.15C)., Note that the clock itself does not damp out; only the coupling between the molecular clock (endogenous oscillator), and the physiological function is affected., The circadian clock would be of no value to the organism if it could not keep accurate time under the fluctuating, temperatures experienced in natural conditions. Indeed,, temperature has little or no effect on the period of the freerunning rhythm. The feature that enables the clock to keep, time at different temperatures is called temperature compensation. Although all of the biochemical steps in the, pathway are temperature-sensitive, their temperature, responses probably cancel each other. For example,, changes in the rates of synthesis of intermediates could be, compensated for by parallel changes in their rates of degradation. In this way, the steady-state levels of clock regulators would remain constant at different temperatures., , Phase Shifting Adjusts Circadian Rhythms to, Different Day–Night Cycles, In circadian rhythms, the operation of the endogenous, oscillator sets a response to occur at a particular time of, day. A single oscillator can be coupled to multiple circadian, rhythms, which may even be out of phase with each other., How do such responses remain on time when the daily, durations of light and darkness change with the seasons?, The answer to this question lies in the fact that the phase of, the rhythm can be changed if the whole cycle is moved forward or backward in time without its period being altered., Investigators test the response of the endogenous oscillator usually by placing the organism in continuous darkness and examining the response to a short pulse of light, (usually less than 1 hour) given at different phase points in, the free-running rhythm. When an organism is entrained, to a cycle of 12 hours light and 12 hours dark and then, allowed to free-run in darkness, the phase of the rhythm, that coincides with the light period of the previous entraining cycle is called the subjective day, and the phase that, coincides with the dark period is called the subjective, night., If a light pulse is given during the first few hours of the, subjective night, the rhythm is delayed; the organism interprets the light pulse as the end of the previous day (see Figure 24.15D). In contrast, a light pulse given toward the end, of the subjective night advances the phase of the rhythm;, now the organism interprets the light pulse as the beginning of the following day., As already pointed out, this is precisely the pattern of, response that would be expected if the rhythm is to stay on, local time. Therefore, these phase-shifting responses enable, the rhythm to be entrained to approximately 24-hour cycles, with different durations of light and darkness, and they, , demonstrate that the rhythm will run differently under different natural conditions of day length., , Phytochromes and Cryptochromes, Entrain the Clock, The molecular mechanism whereby a light signal causes, phase shifting is not yet known, but studies in Arabidopsis, have identified some of the key elements of the circadian, oscillator and its inputs and outputs (see Chapter 17). The, low levels and specific wavelengths of light that can induce, phase shifting indicate that the light response must be, mediated by specific photoreceptors rather than rates of, photosynthesis. For example, the red-light entrainment of, rhythmic nyctonastic leaf movements in Samanea, a semitropical leguminous tree, is a low-fluence response mediated by phytochrome (see Chapter 17)., Arabidopsis has five phytochromes, and all but one of them, (phytochrome C) have been implicated in clock entrainment., Each phytochrome acts as a specific photoreceptor for red,, far-red, or blue light. In addition, the CRY1 and CRY2 proteins participate in blue-light entrainment of the clock, as they, do in insects and mammals (Devlin and Kay 2000). Surprisingly, CRY proteins also appear to be required for normal, entrainment by red light. Since these proteins do not absorb, red light, this requirement suggests that CRY1 and CRY2, may act as intermediates in phytochrome signaling during, entrainment of the clock (Yanovsky and Kay 2001)., In Drosophila, CRY proteins interact physically with, clock components and thus constitute part of the oscillator, mechanism (Devlin and Kay 2000). However, this does not, appear to be the case in Arabidopsis, in which cry1/cry2 double mutants have normal circadian rhythms. Precisely how, Arabidopsis CRY proteins interact with the endogenous, oscillator mechanism to induce phase shifting remains to, be elucidated (Yanovsky et al. 2001)., , PHOTOPERIODISM:, MONITORING DAY LENGTH, As we have seen, the circadian clock enables organisms to, determine the time of day at which a particular molecular, or biochemical event occurs. Photoperiodism, or the ability of an organism to detect day length, makes it possible, for an event to occur at a particular time of year, thus allowing for a seasonal response. Circadian rhythms and photoperiodism have the common property of responding to, cycles of light and darkness., Precisely at the equator, day length and night length are, equal and constant throughout the year. As one moves, away from the equator toward the poles, the days become, longer in summer and shorter in winter (Figure 24.16). Not, surprisingly, plant species have evolved to detect these seasonal changes in day length, and their specific photoperiodic responses are strongly influenced by the latitude from, which they originated.
Page 624 :
The Control of Flowering, (A), , Perhaps all plant photoperiodic responses utilize the, same photoreceptors, with subsequent specific signal transduction pathways regulating different responses. Because, it is clear that monitoring the passage of time is essential to, all photoperiodic responses, a timekeeping mechanism, must underlie both the time-of-year and the time-of-day, responses. The circadian oscillator is thought to provide an, endogenous time-measuring mechanism that serves as a, reference point for the response to incoming light (or dark), signals from the environment. How changing photoperiods are evaluated against the circadian oscillator reference, will be discussed shortly., , 60˚, , 19, 18, 17, , 50˚, , 16, 40˚, , Hours of daylight, , 15, , 30˚, , 14, , 20˚, 10˚, , 13, , 0˚, , 12, , Plants Can Be Classified by Their Photoperiodic, Responses, , 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, J, , F, , M, , A, , M J, J A, Month of year, , 573, , S, , O, , N, , D, , (B), , FIGURE 24.16 (A) The effect of latitude on day length at, , different times of the year. Day length was measured on the, twentieth of each month. (B) Global map showing longitudes and latitudes., , Photoperiodic phenomena are found in both animals, and plants. In the animal kingdom, day length controls, such seasonal activities as hibernation, development of, summer or winter coats, and reproductive activity. Plant, responses controlled by day length are numerous, including the initiation of flowering, asexual reproduction, the, formation of storage organs, and the onset of dormancy., , Numerous plant species flower during the long days of, summer, and for many years plant physiologists believed, that the correlation between long days and flowering was, a consequence of the accumulation of photosynthetic products synthesized during long days., This hypothesis was shown to be incorrect by the work, of Wightman Garner and Henry Allard, conducted in the, 1920s at the U.S. Department of Agriculture laboratories in, Beltsville, Maryland. They found that a mutant variety of, tobacco, Maryland Mammoth, grew profusely to about 5, m in height but failed to flower in the prevailing conditions of summer (Figure 24.17). However,, the plants flowered in the greenhouse, during the winter under natural light, 60˚, conditions., These results ultimately led Garner, 30˚, and Allard to test the effect of artificially providing short days by covering plants grown during the long days, 0˚, of summer with a light-tight tent from, late in the afternoon until the following, morning. These artificial short days, 30˚, also caused the plants to flower. This, requirement for short days was difficult, to reconcile with the idea that longer peri60˚, ods of radiation and the resulting increase, in photosynthesis promote flowering in general. Garner and Allard concluded that the length of, the day was the determining factor in flowering and were, able to confirm this hypothesis in many different species, and conditions. This work laid the foundations for the, extensive subsequent research on photoperiodic responses., The classification of plants according to their photoperiodic responses is usually based on flowering, even though, many other aspects of plants’ development may also be, affected by day length. The two main photoperiodic response, categories are short-day plants and long-day plants:, 1. Short-day plants (SDPs) flower only in short days, (qualitative SDPs), or their flowering is accelerated by, short days (quantitative SDPs).
Page 625 :
574, , Chapter 24, length varies widely among species, and only when flowering is examined for a range of day lengths can the correct, photoperiodic classification be established (Figure 24.18)., Long-day plants can effectively measure the lengthening days of spring or early summer and delay flowering, until the critical day length is reached. Many varieties of, wheat (Triticum aestivum) behave in this way. SDPs often, flower in fall, when the days shorten below the critical day, length, as in many varieties of Chrysanthemum morifolium., However, day length alone is an ambiguous signal because, it cannot distinguish between spring and fall., Plants exhibit several adaptations for avoiding the ambiguity of day length signal. One is the coupling of a temperature requirement to a photoperiodic response. Certain, plant species, such as winter wheat, do not respond to photoperiod until after a cold period (vernalization or overwintering) has occurred. (We will discuss vernalization a, little later in the chapter.), Other plants avoid seasonal ambiguity by distinguishing between shortening and lengthening days. Such, “dual–day length plants” fall into two categories:, 1. Long-short-day plants (LSDPs) flower only after a, sequence of long days followed by short days. LSDPs,, such as Bryophyllum, Kalanchoe, and Cestrum nocturnum (night-blooming jasmine), flower in the late summer and fall, when the days are shortening., , FIGURE 24.17 Maryland Mammoth mutant of tobacco, , (right) compared to wild-type tobacco (left). Both plants, were grown during summer in the greenhouse. (University, of Wisconsin graduate students used for scale.) (Photo, courtesy of R. Amasino.), , 2. Short-long-day plants (SLDPs) flower only after a, sequence of short days followed by long days., SLDPs, such as Trifolium repens (white clover),, Campanula medium (Canterbury bells), and Echeveria, harmsii (echeveria), flower in the early spring in, response to lengthening days., , 2. Long-day plants (LDPs) flower only in long days, (qualitative LDPs), or their flowering is accelerated by, long days (quantitative LDPs)., The essential distinction between long-day and shortday plants is that flowering in LDPs is promoted only when, the day length exceeds a certain duration, called the critical, day length, in every 24-hour cycle, whereas promotion of, flowering in SDPs requires a day length that is less than the, critical day length. The absolute value of the critical day, , Finally, species that flower under any photoperiodic condition are referred to as day-neutral plants. Day-neutral, plants (DNPs) are insensitive to day length. Flowering in, DNPs is typically under autonomous regulation—that is,, internal developmental control. Some day-neutral species,, , Percent flowering, , 100, Short-day plants, (SDPs), , Long-day plants, (LDPs), , 50, , Long-day plants, flower when the day, length exceeds (or, the night length is, less than) a certain, critical duration in a, 24-hour cycle., , Short-day plants, flower when the day, length is less than (or, the night length, exceeds) a certain, critical duration in a, 24-hour cycle., , FIGURE 24.18 The photoperi-, , 0, Day length, , 6, , 8, , 10, , 12, , 14, , 16, , 18, , 20, , 22, , 24 (h), , Night length, , 18, , 16, , 14, , 12, , 10, , 8, , 6, , 4, , 2, , 0 (h), , odic response in long- and, short-day plants. The critical, duration varies between, species: In this example, both, the SDPs and the LDPs would, flower in photoperiods, between 12 and 14 h long.
Page 626 :
The Control of Flowering, , 575, , (A), , Light, 24, h, , 24, Critical, duration h, of darkness, Flash of, light, Darkness, , Short-day plants, Short-day (long-night) plants flower when night length, exceeds a critical dark period. Interruption of the dark, period by a brief light treatment (a night break) prevents, flowering., , Night, break, , Long-day plants, Long-day (short-night) plants flower if the night length, is shorter than a critical period. In some long-day plants,, shortening the night with a night break induces, flowering., , FIGURE 24.19 The photoperiodic regulation of flowering., , (B), Lighting treatment, Light, , Darkness, , Flowering response, SDP, , LDP, , Flowering, , Vegetative, , Vegetative, , Flowering, , Vegetative, , Flowering, , Vegetative, , Flowering, , Vegetative, , Flowering, , Flowering, , Vegetative, , 24 h, , such as Phaseolus vulgaris (kidney bean) evolved near the, equator where the daylength is constant throughout the, year. Many desert annuals, such as Castilleja chromosa (desert, paintbrush) and Abronia villosa (desert sand verbena),, evolved to germinate, grow, and flower quickly whenever, sufficient water is available. These are also DNPs., , (A) Effects on SDPs and LDPs. (B) Effects of the duration of, the dark period on flowering. Treating short- and long-day, plants with different photoperiods clearly shows that the, critical variable is the length of the dark period., , Plants Monitor Day Length by Measuring, the Length of the Night, Under natural conditions, day and night lengths configure a 24-hour cycle of light and darkness. In principle, a, plant could perceive a critical day length by measuring the, duration of either light or darkness. Much experimental, work in the early studies of photoperiodism was devoted, to establishing which part of the light–dark cycle is the, controlling factor in flowering. Results showed that flowering of SDPs is determined primarily by the duration of, darkness (Figure 24.19A). It was possible to induce flowering in SDPs with light periods longer than the critical, value, provided that these were followed by sufficiently, long nights (Figure 24.19B). Similarly, SDPs did not flower, when short days were followed by short nights., More detailed experiments demonstrated that photoperiodic timekeeping in SDPs is a matter of measuring the, duration of darkness. For example, flowering occurred, only when the dark period exceeded 8.5 hours in cocklebur
Page 627 :
576, , Chapter 24, , (Xanthium strumarium) or 10 hours in soybean (Glycine, max). The duration of darkness was also shown to be, important in LDPs (see Figure 24.19). These plants were, found to flower in short days, provided that the accompanying night length was also short; however, a regime of, long days followed by long nights was ineffective., , Night Breaks Can Cancel the Effect of the, Dark Period, A feature that underscores the importance of the dark, period is that it can be made ineffective by interruption, with a short exposure to light, called a night break (see, Figure 24.19A). In contrast, interrupting a long day with, a brief dark period does not cancel the effect of the long, day (see Figure 24.19B). Night-break treatments of only a, few minutes are effective in preventing flowering in many, SDPs, including Xanthium and Pharbitis, but much longer, exposures are often required to promote flowering in LDPs., In addition, the effect of a night break varies greatly, according to the time when it is given. For both LDPs and, SDPs, a night break was found to be most effective when, given near the middle of a dark period of 16 hours (Figure 24.20)., The discovery of the night-break effect, and its time, dependence, had several important consequences. It established the central role of the dark period and provided a, , valuable probe for studying photoperiodic timekeeping., Because only small amounts of light are needed, it became, possible to study the action and identity of the photoreceptor without the interfering effects of photosynthesis and, other nonphotoperiodic phenomena. This discovery has, also led to the development of commercial methods for, regulating the time of flowering in horticultural species,, such as Kalanchoe, chrysanthemum, and poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima)., , The Circadian Clock Is Involved in Photoperiodic, Timekeeping, The decisive effect of night length on flowering indicates, that measuring the passage of time in darkness is central, to photoperiodic timekeeping. Most of the available evidence favors a mechanism based on a circadian rhythm, (Bünning 1960). According to the clock hypothesis, photoperiodic timekeeping depends on an endogenous circadian oscillator of the type involved in the daily rhythms, described in Chapter 17 in relation to phytochrome. The, central oscillator is coupled to various physiological, processes that involve gene expression, including flowering in photoperiodic species., Measurements of the effect of a night break on flowering can be used to investigate the role of circadian rhythms, in photoperiodic timekeeping. For example, when soybean, , Percentage of maximum flowering, , 100, , 50, Xanthium (SDP), 16 h dark period, Night break:, 1 min red light, , Fuchsia (LDP), 16 h dark period, Night break:, 1 h of red light, , 0, 2, 8-h, light period, , 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, Time of night break from beginning of dark period (h), , FIGURE 24.20 The time when a night break is given deter-, , mines the flowering response. When given during a long, dark period, a night break promotes flowering in LDPs and, inhibits flowering in SDPs. In both cases, the greatest effect, on flowering occurs when the night break is given near the, middle of the 16-hour dark period. The LDP Fuchsia was, , 16, , given a 1-hour exposure to red light in a 16-hour dark, period. Xanthium was exposed to red light for 1 minute in a, 16-hour dark period. (Data for Fuchsia from Vince-Prue, 1975; data for Xanthium from Salisbury 1963 and Papenfuss, and Salisbury 1967.)
Page 628 :
FIGURE 24.21 Rhythmic flowering in response to night, , plants, which are SDPs, are transferred from an 8-hour, light period to an extended 64-hour dark period, the flowering response to night breaks shows a circadian rhythm, (Figure 24.21)., This type of experiment provides strong support for the, clock hypothesis. If this SDP were simply measuring the, length of night by the accumulation of a particular intermediate in the dark, any dark period greater than the critical night length should cause flowering. Yet long dark, periods are not inductive for flowering if the light break is, given at a time that does not properly coincide with a certain phase of the endogenous circadian oscillator. This finding demonstrates that flowering in SDPs requires both a, dark period of sufficient duration and a dawn signal at an, appropriate time in the circadian cycle (see Figure 24.15)., Further evidence for the role of a circadian oscillator in, photoperiod measurement is the observation that the photoperiodic response can be phase-shifted by light treatments (see Web Topic 24.4)., , The Coincidence Model Is Based on Oscillating, Phases of Light Sensitivity, The involvement of a circadian oscillator in photoperiodism poses an important question: How does an oscillation with a 24-hour period measure a critical duration of, darkness of, say, 8 to 9 hours, as in the SDP Xanthium?, Erwin Bünning proposed in 1936 that the control of flowering by photoperiodism is achieved by an oscillation of, phases with different sensitivities to light. This proposal, has evolved into a coincidence model (Bünning 1960), in, which the circadian oscillator controls the timing of lightsensitive and light-insensitive phases., The ability of light either to promote or to inhibit flowering depends on the phase in which the light is given., When a light signal is administered during the light-sensitive phase of the rhythm, the effect is either to promote flowering in LDPs or to prevent flowering in SDPs. As shown in, Figure 24.21, the phases of sensitivity and insensitivity to, , 100, , Flowering, , 577, , Light, sensitivity, Sensitivity to light, , breaks. In this experiment, the SDP soybean (Glycine max), received cycles of an 8-hour light period followed by a 64hour dark period. A 4-hour night break was given at various times during the long inductive dark period. The flowering response, plotted as the percentage of the maximum,, was then plotted for each night break given. Note that a, night break given at 26 hours induced maximum flowering,, while no flowering was obtained when the night break was, given at 40 hours. Moreover, this experiment demonstrates, that the sensitivity to the effect of the night break shows a, circadian rhythm. These data support a model in which, flowering in SDPs is induced only when dawn (or a night, break) occurs after the completion of the light-sensitive, phase. In LDPs the light break must coincide with the lightsensitive phase for flowering to occur. (Data from Coulter, and Hamner 1964.), , Percentage of maximum flowering, , The Control of Flowering, , 50, , 0, , 8, Light, period, , 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, Time at which night break was given (h), , 72, , light continue to oscillate in darkness in SDPs. Flowering, in SDPs is induced only when exposure to light from a, night break or from dawn occurs after completion of the, light-sensitive phase of the rhythm. In other words, flowering is induced when the light exposure is coincident with the, appropriate phase of the rhythm. This continued oscillation of, sensitive and insensitive phases in the absence of dawn, and dusk light signals is characteristic of a variety of, processes controlled by the circadian oscillator., , The Leaf Is the Site of Perception of the, Photoperiodic Stimulus, The photoperiodic stimulus in both LDPs and SDPs is perceived by the leaves. For example, treatment of a single leaf, of the SDP Xanthium with short photoperiods is sufficient, to cause the formation of flowers, even when the rest of the, plant is exposed to long days. Thus, in response to photoperiod the leaf transmits a signal that regulates the transition to flowering at the shoot apex. The photoperiod-regulated processes that occur in the leaves resulting in the, transmission of a floral stimulus to the shoot apex are, referred to collectively as photoperiodic induction., Photoperiodic induction can take place in a leaf that has, been separated from the plant. For example, in the SDP Perilla crispa, an excised leaf exposed to short days can cause, flowering when subsequently grafted to a noninduced, plant maintained in long days (Zeevaart and Boyer 1987)., This result indicates that photoperiodic induction depends, on events that take place exclusively in the leaf., Grafting experiments, which have contributed greatly, to our understanding of the floral stimulus, will be discussed in more detail later in the chapter., , The Floral Stimulus Is Transported via the Phloem, Once produced, the flowering stimulus appears to be transported to the meristem via the phloem, and it appears to be
Page 629 :
578, , Chapter 24, , chemical rather than physical in nature. Treatments that block, phloem transport, such as girdling or localized heat-killing, (see Chapter 10), prevent movement of the floral signal., It is possible to measure rates of movement of the flowering stimulus by removing a leaf at different times after, induction, and comparing the time it takes for the signal, to reach two buds located at different distances from the, induced leaf. The rationale for this type of measurement is, that a threshold amount of the signaling compound has, reached the bud when flowering takes place, despite the, removal of the leaf., Studies using this method have shown that the rate of, transport of the flowering signal is comparable to, or, somewhat slower than, the rate of translocation of sugars, in the phloem (see Chapter 10). For example, export of the, floral stimulus from adult leaves of the SDP Chenopodium, is complete within 22.5 hours from the beginning of the, long night period. In the LDP Sinapis, movement of the floral stimulus out of the leaf is complete by as early as 16, hours after the start of the long-day treatment. These rates, are consistent with a floral stimulus that moves in the, phloem (Zeevaart 1976)., Because the floral stimulus is translocated along with, sugars in the phloem, it is subject to source–sink relations., An induced leaf positioned close to the shoot apex is more, likely to cause flowering than an induced leaf at the base, of a stem, which normally feeds the roots. Similarly, noninduced leaves positioned between the induced leaf and, the apical bud will tend to inhibit flowering by serving as, , the preferred source leaves for the bud, thus preventing, the floral stimulus from the more distal induced leaf from, reaching its target. This inhibition also explains why a, minimum amount of photosynthesis is required by the, induced leaf to drive translocation., , Phytochrome Is the Primary Photoreceptor in, Photoperiodism, Night-break experiments are well suited for studying the, nature of the photoreceptors involved in the reception of, light signals during the photoperiodic response. The inhibition of flowering in SDPs by night breaks was one of the, first physiological processes shown to be under the control of phytochrome (Figure 24.22)., In many SDPs, a night break becomes effective only, when the supplied dose of light is sufficient to saturate the, photoconversion of Pr (phytochrome that absorbs red, light) to Pfr (phytochrome that absorbs far-red light) (see, Chapter 17). A subsequent exposure to far-red light, which, photoconverts the pigment back to the physiologically, inactive Pr form, restores the flowering response., In some LDPs, red and far-red reversibility has also, been demonstrated. In these plants, a night break of red, light promoted flowering, and a subsequent exposure to, far-red light prevented this response., Action spectra for the inhibition and restoration of the, flowering response in SDPs are shown in Figure 24.23. A, peak at 660 nm, the absorption maximum of Pr (see Chapter 17), is obtained when dark-grown Pharbitis seedlings are, , Short-day (long-night) plant, , 24, , R, , FR, R, , Hours, , 16, , FR, R, FR, R, , Critical night length, , 20, , R, FR, R, , 12, , 8, , FIGURE 24.22 Phytochrome control, , of flowering by red (R) and far-red, (FR) light. A flash of red light during the dark period induces flowering in an LDP, and the effect is, reversed by a flash of far-red light., This response indicates the involvement of phytochrome. In SDPs, a, flash of red light prevents flowering, and the effect is reversed by a, flash of far-red light., , 4, , 0, , Long-day (short-night) plant
Page 630 :
The Control of Flowering, , Relative effectiveness of light, , Xanthium, , Reversal of, the night break, inhibition, , Pharbitis, , Xanthium, , 50, , 0, 500, , 600, 700, Wavelength (nm), , 800, , FIGURE 24.23 Action spectra for the control of flowering by, , night breaks implicates phytochrome. Flowering in SDPs is, inhibited by a short light treatment (night break) given in, an otherwise inductive period. In the SDP Xanthium strumarium, red-light night breaks of 620 to 640 nm are the, most effective. Reversal of the red-light effect is maximal at, 725 nm. In the dark-grown SDP Pharbitis nil, which is, devoid of chlorophyll and its interference with light, absorption, night breaks of 660 nm are the most effective., This 660 nm maximum coincides with the absorption maximum of phytochrome. (Data for Xanthium from Hendricks, and Siegelman 1967; data for Pharbitis from Saji et al. 1983.), , 100, , 80, Light, sensitivity, Sensitivity to light, , used to avoid interference from chlorophyll. In contrast, the, spectra for Xanthium provide an example of the response, in green plants, in which the presence of chlorophyll can, cause some discrepancy between the action spectrum and, the absorption spectrum of Pr. These action spectra and the, reversibility between red light and far-red light confirm the, role of phytochrome as the photoreceptor that is involved, in photoperiod measurement in SDPs., In LDPs the role of phytochrome is more complex, and, a blue-light photoreceptor (which will be discussed shortly), also plays a role in controlling flowering., , exposed to far-red light for 4 to 6 hours, flowering is promoted compared with plants maintained under continuous white or red light—a response mediated by PHYB. The, rhythm continues to run in the light., In SDPs, on the other hand, a characteristic feature of, the timing mechanism is that the rhythm of the response, to far-red light damps out after a few hours in continuous, light and is restarted upon transfer to darkness., The response to far-red light is not the only rhythmic, feature in LDPs. Although relatively insensitive to a night, break of only a few minutes, many LDPs can be induced, to flower with a longer night break, usually of at least 1, hour. A circadian oscillation in the flowering response to, such a long night break has been observed in LDPs, showing that a rhythm of responsiveness to light continues to, run in darkness., Thus, circadian rhythms that modify the flowering, response in LDPs have been shown to run both in the light, (promotion by far-red light) and in the dark (promotion by, red or white light). However, we do not yet know how the, circadian rhythm is coupled to the photoperiodic response., , Relative increase in number of floral buds (% of control), , 100, , Inhibition of, flowering by, a night break, , 60, , 40, , 20, , 12, , Far-Red Light Modifies Flowering in Some LDPs, Circadian rhythms have also been found in LDPs. A circadian rhythm in the promotion of flowering by far-red light, has been observed in barley (Hordeum vulgare) and Arabidopsis (Deitzer 1984), as well as in darnel ryegrass (Lolium, temulentum) (Figure 24.24). The response is proportional to, the irradiance and duration of far-red light and is therefore, a high-irradiance response (HIR). Like other HIRs, PHYA, is the phytochrome that mediates the response to far-red, light (see Chapter 17). In both cases, when the plant is, , 579, , 24, , 36, , 48, , 60, , 72, , Time (h) at which far-red light was given, , FIGURE 24.24 Effect of far-red light on floral induction in, , Arabidopsis. Four hours of far-red light was added at the, indicated times during a continuous 72-hour daylight, period. Data points in the graph are plotted at the centers, of the 6-hour treatments. The data show a circadian, rhythm of sensitivity to the far-red promotion of flowering, (red line). This supports a model in which flowering in, LDPs is promoted when the light treatment (in this case, far-red light) coincides with the peak of light sensitivity., (After Deitzer 1984.)
Page 631 :
580, , Chapter 24, , A Blue-Light Photoreceptor Also, Regulates Flowering, In some LDPs, such as Arabidopsis, blue light can promote, flowering, suggesting the possible participation of a bluelight photoreceptor in the control of flowering. The role of, blue light in flowering and its relationship to circadian, rhythms have been investigated by use of the luciferase, reporter gene construct mentioned in Web Topic 24.6. In, continuous white light, the cyclic luminescence has a, period of 24.7 hours, but in constant darkness the period, lengthens to 30 to 36 hours. Either red or blue light, given, individually, shortens the period to 25 hours., To distinguish between the effects of phytochrome and, a blue-light photoreceptor, researchers transformed phytochrome-deficient hy1 mutants, which are defective in, chromophore synthesis and are therefore deficient in all, phytochromes (see Chapter 17), with the luciferase construct to determine the effect of the mutation on the period, length (Millar et al. 1995)., Under continuous white light, the hy1 plants had a, period similar to that of the wild type, indicating that little, or no phytochrome is required for white light to affect the, period. Furthermore, under continuous red light, which, would be perceived only by PHYB (see Chapter 17), the, period of hy1 was significantly lengthened (i.e., it became, more like constant darkness), whereas the period was not, lengthened by continuous blue light. These results indicate, that both phytochrome and a blue-light photoreceptor are, involved in period control., , Winter-annual Arabidopsis, without vernalization, , FIGURE 24.25 Vernalization induces flowering in the winter-annual types of Arabidopsis thaliana. The plant on the left, is a winter-annual type that has not been exposed to cold., The plant on the right is a genetically identical winter-, , The role of blue light in regulating both circadian rhythmicity and flowering is also supported by studies with an, Arabidopsis flowering-time mutant: elf3 (early flowering 3), (see Web Topics 24.5 and 24.6). Confirmation that a bluelight photoreceptor is involved in sensing inductive photoperiods in Arabidopsis was recently provided by experiments demonstrating that mutations in one of the, cryptochrome genes, CRY2 (see Chapter 18), caused a delay, in flowering and an inability to perceive inductive photoperiods (Guo et al. 1998). As discussed in Chapter 18,, CRY1 encodes a blue-light photoreceptor controlling, seedling growth in Arabidopsis. Thus, various CRY family, members have, through evolution, become specialized for, different functions in the plant. As noted earlier, the CRY, protein has also been implicated in the entrainment of the, circadian oscillator (see Chapter 17)., , VERNALIZATION:, PROMOTING FLOWERING WITH COLD, Vernalization is the process whereby flowering is promoted, by a cold treatment given to a fully hydrated seed (i.e., a seed, that has imbibed water) or to a growing plant. Dry seeds do, not respond to the cold treatment. Without the cold treatment, plants that require vernalization show delayed flowering or remain vegetative. In many cases these plants grow, as rosettes with no elongation of the stem (Figure 24.25)., In this section we will examine some of the characteristics of the cold requirement for flowering, including the, , Winter-annual Arabidopsis, with vernalization, , annual type that was exposed to 40 days of temperatures, slightly above freezing (4 °C) as a seedling. It flowered 3, weeks after the end of the cold treatment with about 9, leaves on the primary stem. (Courtesy of Colleen Bizzell.)
Page 632 :
The Control of Flowering, range and duration of the inductive temperatures, the sites, of perception, the relationship to photoperiodism, and a, possible molecular mechanism., , Vernalization Results in Competence to Flower at, the Shoot Apical Meristem, Plants differ considerably in the age at which they become, sensitive to vernalization. Winter annuals, such as the winter forms of cereals (which are sown in the fall and flower, in the following summer), respond to low temperature, very early in their life cycle. They can be vernalized before, germination if the seeds have imbibed water and become, metabolically active. Other plants, including most biennials (which grow as rosettes during the first season after, sowing and flower in the following summer), must reach, a minimal size before they become sensitive to low temperature for vernalization., The effective temperature range for vernalization is from, just below freezing to about 10°C, with a broad optimum, usually between about 1 and 7°C (Lang 1965). The effect of, cold increases with the duration of the cold treatment until, the response is saturated. The response usually requires, several weeks of exposure to low temperature, but the precise duration varies widely with species and variety., Vernalization can be lost as a result of exposure to devernalizing conditions, such as high temperature (Figure, 24.26), but the longer the exposure to low temperature, the, more permanent the vernalization effect., Vernalization appears to take place primarily in the, shoot apical meristem. Localized cooling causes flowering, when only the stem apex is chilled, and this effect appears, to be largely independent of the temperature experienced, by the rest of the plant. Excised shoot tips have been suc-, , Percent of seeds remaining vernalized, after devernalizing treatment, , 100, , 80, , 60, , 581, , cessfully vernalized, and where seed vernalization is possible, fragments of embryos consisting essentially of the, shoot tip are sensitive to low temperature., In developmental terms, vernalization results in the, acquisition of competence of the meristem to undergo the, floral transition. Yet, as discussed earlier in the chapter, competence to flower does not guarantee that flowering will, occur. A vernalization requirement is often linked with a, requirement for a particular photoperiod (Lang 1965). The, most common combination is a requirement for cold treatment followed by a requirement for long days—a combination that leads to flowering in early summer at high latitudes, (see Web Topic 24.7). Unless devernalized, the vernalized, meristem can remain competent to flower for as long as 300, days in the absence of the inductive photoperiod., , Vernalization May Involve Epigenetic Changes in, Gene Expression, It is important to note that for vernalization to occur, active, metabolism is required during the cold treatment. Sources, of energy (sugars) and oxygen are required, and temperatures below freezing at which metabolic activity is suppressed are not effective for vernalization. Furthermore, cell, division and DNA replication also appear to be required., One model for how vernalization affects competence is, that there are stable changes in the pattern of gene expression, in the meristem after cold treatment. Changes in gene expression that are stable even after the signal that induced the, change (in this case cold) is removed are known as epigenetic regulation. Epigenetic changes of gene expression in, many organisms, from yeast to mammals, often require cell, division and DNA replication, as is the case for vernalization., The involvement of epigenetic regulation in the vernalization process has been confirmed in the LDP Arabidopsis., In winter-annual ecotypes of Arabidopsis that require both, vernalization and long days to flower, a gene that acts as a, repressor of flowering has been identified: FLOWERING, LOCUS C (FLC). FLC is highly expressed in nonvernalized, shoot apical meristems (Michaels and Amasino 2000). After, vernalization, this gene is epigenetically switched off by an, unknown mechanism for the remainder of the plant’s life, cycle, permitting flowering in response to long days to, occur (Figure 24.27). In the next generation, however, the, gene is switched on again, restoring the requirement for, , 40, , FIGURE 24.26 The duration of exposure to low temperature, 20, , 0, 2, 4, 6, Duration of cold treatment (weeks), , 8, , increases the stability of the vernalization effect. The longer that, winter rye (Secale cereale) is exposed to a cold treatment, the, greater the number of plants that remain vernalized when the, cold treatment is followed by a devernalizing treatment. In this, experiment, seeds of rye that had imbibed water were exposed to, 5°C for different lengths of time, then immediately given a devernalizing treatment of 3 days at 35°C. (Data from Purvis and, Gregory 1952.)
Page 633 :
582, , Chapter 24, FIGURE 24.27 (Left) Vernalization blocks the expression of, , the gene FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) in cold-requiring, winter annual ecotypes of Arabidopsis. (Right) A winter, annual with an FLC mutation exhibits early flowering without cold treatment. (Photo courtesy of R. Amasino.), , Winter annual, without cold, , Winter annual, after 40 days cold, FLC mRNA, , cold. Thus in Arabidopsis, the state of expression of the FLC, gene represents a major determinant of meristem competence (Michaels and Amasino 2000)., , BIOCHEMICAL SIGNALING, INVOLVED IN FLOWERING, In the preceding sections we examined the influence of, environmental conditions (such as temperature and day, length) versus that of autonomous factors (such as age) on, flowering. Although floral evocation occurs at the apical, meristems of the shoots, some of the events that result in, floral evocation are triggered by biochemical signals arriving at the apex from other parts of the plant, especially, from the leaves. Mutants have been isolated that are deficient in the floral stimulus (see Web Topic 24.6)., In this section we will consider the nature of the biochemical signals arriving from the leaves and other parts, of the plant in response to photoperiodic stimuli. Such signals may serve either as activators or as inhibitors of flowering. After years of investigation, no single substance has, been identified as the universal floral stimulus, although, certain hormones, such as gibberellins and ethylene, can, induce flowering in some species. Hence, most current, models of the floral stimulus are based on multiple factors., , Winter annual, without cold, but, with an FLC, mutation, , Grafting Studies Have Provided Evidence for a, Transmissible Floral Stimulus, The production in photoperiodically induced leaves of a, biochemical signal that is transported to a distant target tissue (the shoot apex) where it stimulates a response (flowering) satisfies an important criterion for a hormonal effect., In the 1930s, Mikhail Chailakhyan, working in Russia, postulated the existence of a universal flowering hormone,, which he named florigen., The evidence in support of florigen comes mainly from, early grafting experiments in which noninduced receptor, plants were stimulated to flower by being grafted onto a, leaf or shoot from photoperiodically induced donor plants., For example, in the SDP Perilla crispa, a member of the mint, family, grafting a leaf from a plant grown under inductive, short days onto a plant grown under noninductive long, days causes the latter to flower (Figure 24.28). Moreover, the, floral stimulus seems to be the same in plants with different, photoperiodic requirements. Thus, grafting an induced leaf, from the LDP Nicotiana sylvestris, grown under long days,, onto the SDP Maryland Mammoth tobacco caused the latter to flower under noninductive (long day) conditions., The leaves of DNPs have also been shown to produce a, graft-transmissible floral stimulus (Table 24.2). For example, grafting a single leaf of a day-neutral variety of soy-
Page 634 :
FIGURE 24.28 Demonstration by grafting of a leaf-generated floral stimulus in the, , SDP Perilla. (Left) Grafting an induced leaf from a plant grown under short days, onto a noninduced shoot causes the axillary shoots to produce flowers. The donor, leaf has been trimmed to facilitate grafting, and the upper leaves have been, removed from the stock to promote phloem translocation from the scion to the, receptor shoots. (Right) Grafting a noninduced leaf from a plant grown under LDs, results in the formation of vegetative branches only. (Photo courtesy of J. A. D., Zeevaart.), , Induced, graft donor, , Uninduced, graft donor, , bean, Agate, onto the short-day variety, Biloxi, caused flowering in Biloxi even when the latter was maintained in noninductive long days. Similarly, a leaf from a day-neutral, variety of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum, cv. Trapezond), grafted onto the LDP Nicotiana sylvestris induced the latter, to flower under noninductive short days., In a few cases, flowering has been induced by grafts, between different genera. The SDP Xanthium strumarium, flowered under long-day conditions when shoots of flowering Calendula officinalis were grafted onto a vegetative Xanthium stock. Similarly, grafting a shoot from the LDP Petunia, hybrida onto a stock of the cold-requiring biennial Hyoscyamus niger (henbane) caused the latter to flower under long, days, even though it was nonvernalized (Figure 24.29)., In Perilla (see Figure 24.28), the movement of the floral, stimulus from a donor leaf to the stock across the graft union, , FIGURE 24.29 Successful transfer of the floral stimulus, , between different genera: The scion (right branch) is the, LDP Petunia hybrida, and the stock is nonvernalized, Hyoscyamus niger (henbane). The graft combination was, maintained under LDs. (Photo courtesy of J. A. D., Zeevaart.), , TABLE 24.2, Transmissible factors regulate flowering., Donor plants, maintained under flowerinducing conditions, , Photoperiod, typea,b, , Vegetative receptor plant, induced to flower, , Photoperiod, typea,b, , Helianthus annus, , DNP in LD, , H. tuberosus, , SDP in LD, , Nicotiana tabacum Delcrest, , DNP in SD, , N. sylvestris, , LDP in SD, , Nicotiana sylvestris, , LDP in LD, , SDP in LD, , Nicotiana tabacum, Maryland Mammoth, , SDP in SD, , N. tabacum, Maryland Mammoth, N. sylvestris, , LDP in SD, , Note: The successful transfer of a flowering induction signal by grafting between plants of different photoperiodic response groups shows the existence of a transmissible floral hormone that is effective., aLDPs = Long-day plants; SDPs = Short- day plants; DNPs = Day-neutral plants., bLD, long days; SD, short days.
Page 635 :
584, , Chapter 24, , correlated closely with the translocation of 14C-labeled, assimilates from the donor, and this movement was dependent on the establishment of vascular continuity across the, graft union (Zeevaart 1976). These results confirmed earlier, girdling studies showing that the floral stimulus is translocated along with photoassimilates in the phloem., , Indirect Induction Implies That the Floral Stimulus, Is Self-Propagating, In at least three cases—Xanthium (SDP), Bryophyllum, (SLDP), and Silene (LDP)—the induced state appears to be, , self-propagating (Zeevaart 1976). That is, young leaves that, develop on the receptor plant after it has been induced to, flower by a donor leaf can themselves be used as donor, leaves in subsequent grafting experiments, even though, these leaves have never been subjected to an inductive photoperiod. This phenomenon is called indirect induction., It is characteristic of indirect induction that the strength, of the floral stimulus from the donor leaf remains constant, even after serial grafting of new donors to several plants, has taken place (Figure 24.30A). This suggests that the, induced state is in some way propagated throughout the, , (A) Indirect induction can be demonstrated in serial grafting experiments in Xanthium., Male, inflorescence, , First, graft, , Second, graft, , Induced, Xanthium, plant, , First, noninduced, stock, , Third, graft, , Second, noninduced, stock, , Fourth, graft, , Third, noninduced, stock, , Fourth, noninduced, stock, , (B) Grafting of induced leaf to uninduced shoot causes flowering in multiple grafts in Perilla., , Second, graft, , First, graft, , Induced, plant, , Third, graft, , FIGURE 24.30 Different types of, , Uninduced stock, , Uninduced stock, , Uninduced stock, , Uninduced leaves removed from stock to promote, source sink movement to axillary bud from induced leaf, , leaf induction in Xanthium and, Perilla. (A) Xanthium exhibits, indirect induction. Noninduced, leaves from a plant induced to, flower are capable of inducing, other plants to flower even, though they have never, received an inductive photoperiod. This suggests that the floral stimulus is self-propagating., (B) In Perilla, only the leaf given, the inductive photoperiod is, capable of serving as a donor, for the floral stimulus. In Perilla, as well as Xanthium, one leaf, can continue to induce flowering in successive grafting experiments (Lang 1965).
Page 636 :
The Control of Flowering, plant. Although this feature of the floral stimulus has sometimes been described as viruslike, it is unlikely that the floral stimulus can replicate itself like a virus. Rather, the floral stimulus is likely to be a molecule that induces its own, production in a positive feedback loop. In Xanthium (cocklebur), removal of all buds from the shoot blocks indirect, induction, indicating that meristematic tissue, or perhaps, auxin, is required for propagation of the induced state., On the other hand, indirect induction does not occur in, the SDP Perilla. In Perilla, only the leaf actually given an, inductive photoperiod is capable of transmitting the floral, stimulus in a grafting experiment (see Figure 24.30B). Thus, the floral stimulus of Perilla is not self-propagating as it is, in Xanthium, Bryophyllum, and Silene. Either the mechanism, for a positive feedback loop is absent in Perilla leaves, or, translocation of the floral stimulus is restricted to the meristem so that it never enters the leaves., Unlike Xanthium, which requires the presence of a bud, for stable induction, Perilla leaves can be stably induced, even when detached from the plant. Once induced, Perilla, leaves cannot be uninduced, and the same leaf can continue to serve as a donor of the floral stimulus in successive, grafting experiments without any reduction in potency, (Zeevaart 1976)., , Evidence for Antiflorigen Has Been Found, in Some LDPs, Grafting studies have implicated transmissible inhibitors in, flowering regulation as well. Such inhibitors have been, called antiflorigen, but (like florigen) antiflorigen may consist of multiple compounds. For example, grafting an uninduced leafy shoot from the LDP Nicotiana sylvestris onto the, day-neutral tobacco cultivar Trapezond suppressed flowering in the day-neutral plant under short days but not longday conditions (Figure 24.31). On the other hand, when an, uninduced donor from the SDP Maryland Mammoth was, grafted onto Trapezond, it had no effect on flowering in, either short-day or long-day conditions. This and similar, results suggest that the leaves of LDPs, but not SDPs, produce flowering inhibitors under noninductive conditions., Similar studies in peas have led to the identification of, several genetic loci that regulate steps in the biosynthetic, pathways of both floral activators and floral inhibitors (see, Web Topic 24.5)., , Attempts to Isolate Transmissible Floral, Regulators Have Been Unsuccessful, The many attempts to isolate and characterize the floral, stimulus have been largely unsuccessful. The most common approach has been to make extracts from induced leaf, tissue and test for their ability to elicit flowering in noninduced plants. In other experiments, investigators have, extracted and analyzed phloem sap from induced plants., In some studies, extracts from one of these sources have, induced flowering in test plants, but these results have not, , Long days, , 585, , Short days, , FIGURE 24.31 Graft transmission of an inhibitor of flower-, , ing. Non-induced rosettes from the LDP Nicotiana sylvestris, were grafted onto the day-neutral tobacco (Nicotiana, tabacum, cv. Trapezond). Flowering of the day-neutral plant, was suppressed under short days (left branch of plant on, right), but not under long days (left branch of plant on left)., Arrowheads indicate graft unions. (From Lang et al. 1977.), , been consistently reproduced. Most of these extractions, have focused on small molecules., Recent studies using fluorescent tracers have shown that, in Arabidopsis there is actually a decrease in the movement, of small molecules from the leaf-to-shoot apex via the symplast at the time of floral induction (Gisel et al. 2002). The, lack of tracer movement from the leaf to the shoot apex, may indicate either a reduction in overall symplastic transport to the shoot apex, or a change in the selectivity of the, plasmodesmata during floral induction. There is increasing evidence that macromolecular traffic between cells via, plasmodesmata plays essential roles in normal meristem, development and function (see Chapter 16). Particles as, large as viruses can move from cell to cell via plasmodesmata, and throughout the plant via the phloem. Phloem, translocation of small RNAs has recently been implicated, in the spread of a viral resistance mechanism throughout, plants (Hamilton and Baulcombe 1999). It is therefore possible that the floral stimulus is a macromolecule, such as, RNA or protein, that is translocated via the phloem from, the leaf to the apical meristem, where it functions as a regulator of gene expression (Crawford and Zambryski 1999).
Page 637 :
586, , Chapter 24, , However, thus far attempts to identify such a signal have, been unsuccessful., Efforts to isolate a specific, graft-transmissible inhibitor, of flowering have also been unsuccessful. Thus, despite, unequivocal data from grafting experiments showing that, transmissible factors regulate flowering (see Table 24.2), (Zeevaart 1976), the substances involved remain elusive., , Gibberellins and Ethylene Can Induce, Flowering in Some Plants, Among the naturally occurring growth hormones, gibberellins (GAs) (see Chapter 20) can have a strong influence, on flowering (see Web Topic 24.8). Recent studies suggest, that gibberellin promotes flowering in Arabidopsis by activating expression of the LFY gene (Blazquez and Weigel, 2000). Exogenous gibberellin can evoke flowering when, applied either to rosette LDPs like Arabidopsis, or to, dual–day length plants such as Bryophyllum, when grown, under short days (Lang 1965; Zeevaart 1985)., In addition, application of GAs can evoke flowering in, a few SDPs in noninductive conditions, and in cold-requiring plants that have not been vernalized. As previously discussed, cone formation can also be promoted in juvenile, plants of several gymnosperm families by addition of GAs., Thus, in some plants exogenous GAs can bypass the, endogenous trigger of age in autonomous flowering, as, well as the primary environmental signals of day length, and temperature., As discussed in Chapter 20, plants contain many GAlike compounds. Most of these compounds are either precursors to, or inactive metabolites of, the active forms of, GA. In some situations different GAs have markedly different effects on flowering and stem elongation, such as in, the long-day plant Lolium temulentum (darnel ryegrass) (see, Web Topic 24.9)., These observations suggest that the regulation of flowering may be associated with specific GAs, but they do not, prove that GA is the hypothetical flowering hormone. In, fact, a certain level of GA is likely to be required for flowering in many species, but other pathways to flowering are, necessary as well. For example, a mutation in GA biosynthesis renders the quantitative LDP Arabidopsis thaliana, unable to flower in noninductive short days but has little, effect on flowering in long days, demonstrating that, endogenous GA is required for flowering in specific situations (Wilson et al. 1992)., Considerable attention has been given to the effects of, day length on GA metabolism in the plant (see Chapter 20)., For example, in the long-day plant spinach (Spinacia oleracea), the levels of gibberellins are relatively low in short, days, and the plants maintain a rosette form. After the, plants are transferred to long days, the levels of all the gibberellins of the 13-hydroxylated pathway (GA53 → GA44 →, GA19 → GA20 → GA1; see Chapter 20) increase. However,, the fivefold increase in the physiologically active gib-, , berellin, GA1, is what causes the marked stem elongation, that accompanies flowering., In addition to GAs, other growth hormones can either, inhibit or promote flowering. One commercially important, example is the striking promotion of flowering in pineapple (Ananas comosus) by ethylene and ethylene-releasing, compounds—a response that appears to be restricted to, members of the pineapple family (Bromeliaceae). Thus, as, discussed next, the floral stimulus may be composed of, many components, and these components may differ in, different groups of plants., , The Transition to Flowering Involves Multiple, Factors and Pathways, It is clear that the transition to flowering involves a complex system of interacting factors that include, among others, carbohydrates, gibberellins, cytokinins, and, in the, bromeliads, ethylene (see Web Topic 24.10). Leaf-generated, transmissible signals are required for determination of the, shoot apex in both autonomously regulated and photoperiodic species. Determining whether these transmissible, signals consist of single or multiple components is a major, challenge for the future., Recent genetic studies have established that there are, four genetically distinct developmental pathways that control flowering in the LDP Arabidopsis (Blazquez 2000). Figure 24.32 shows a simplified version of the four pathways:, 1. The photoperiodic pathway involves phytochromes and, cryptochromes. (Note that PHYA and PHYB have, contrasting effects on flowering; see Web Topic, 24.11.) The interaction of these photoreceptors with a, circadian clock initiates a pathway that eventually, results in the expression of the gene CONSTANS, (CO), which encodes a zinc-finger transcription factor, that promotes flowering. CO acts through other genes, to increase the expression of the floral meristem identity gene LEAFY (LFY)., 2. In the dual autonomous/vernalization pathway, flowering occurs either in response to internal signals—the, production of a fixed number of leaves—or to low, temperatures. In the autonomous pathway of, Arabidopsis, all of the genes associated with the pathway are expressed in the meristem. The autonomous, pathway acts by reducing the expression of the flowering repressor gene FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC),, an inhibitor of LFY (Michaels and Amasino 2000)., Vernalization also represses FLC, but perhaps by a, different mechanism (an epigenetic switch). Because, the FLC gene is a common target, the autonomous, and vernalization pathways are grouped together., 3. The carbohydrate, or sucrose, pathway reflects the metabolic state of the plant. Sucrose stimulates flowering, in Arabidopsis by increasing LFY expression, although, the genetic pathway is unknown.
Page 638 :
The Control of Flowering, , 587, , Light, Photoperiodism, , Red, , Far red, , Leaf, number, , Sucrose, , Low, temperature, , Gibberellins, , Blue, GA receptor, , PHYB, , PHYA, , CRY1, , CRY2, Vernalization, Autonomous, pathway, , CLOCK GENES, , Inhibits, flowering, , "Florigen", (phloem), , Energy, pathway, , ?, , FLOWERING LOCUS C, , Gibberellin, pathway, , ?, , AGAMOUS-LIKE 20, , CONSTANS, , Meristem, identity genes, LEAFY, , FIGURE 24.32 Four developmental path-, , ways for flowering in Arabidopsis: the, photoperiodism, autonomous/vernalization, sucrose, and gibberellin pathways., A transmissible floral stimulus (“florigen”) from leaves is only involved in the, photoperiodic pathway. (After Blazquez, 2000.), , AP1, , AP2, , AG, AP3, PI, , Sepals, , Petals, , 4. The gibberellin pathway is required for early flowering, and for flowering under noninductive short days., All four pathways converge by increasing the expression of the key floral meristem identity gene AGAMOUSLIKE 20 (AGL20). The role of AGL20, a MADS box–containing transcription factor, is to integrate the signals, coming from all four pathways into a unitary output. Obviously the strongest output signal occurs when all four pathways are activated., Figure 24.33 shows the level of AGL20 gene expression, in the shoot apical meristem of an Arabidopsis plant after, shifting from noninductive short days (8-hour day length), to inductive long days (16-hour day length). Note that an, increase in AGL20 expression can be detected as early as 18, hours after the beginning of the long-day treatment (Borner, et al. 2000). Thus it takes only 10 hours beyond an 8-hour, short day for the meristem to begin responding to the floral, stimulus from the leaves. This timing is consistent with pre-, , Stamens, , Carpels, , Floral, homeotic, genes, , Floral organs, , vious measurements of the rates of export of the floral stimulus from induced leaves (discussed earlier in the chapter)., Although many pathways feed into AGL20, there must, be some redundancy in the system because flowering is, only delayed, but not completely blocked, in agl20 mutants., Thus, one or two other genes must be able to take over the, role of AGL20 when it is mutated., Once turned on by AGL20, LFY activates the floral, homeotic genes—APETALA1 (AP1), APETALA3 (AP3),, PISTILLATA (PI), and AGAMOUS (AG)—that are required, for floral organ development. APETALA2 (AP2) is, expressed in both vegetative and floral meristems and is, therefore not affected by LFY. However, as discussed earlier in the chapter, AP2 exerts a negative effect on AG, expression (see Figure 24.6)., Besides serving as a floral homeotic gene, AP1 functions, as a meristem identity gene in Arabidopsis because it is, involved in a positive feedback loop with LFY. Conse-
Page 639 :
588, , Chapter 24, Short days to long days at time 0, , 0h, , 18 h, , 42 h, , 5d, , FIGURE 24.33 Increase in expression of the gene AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (AGL20) during floral evocation in the shoot apical meristem of Arabidopsis. The times after, shifting the plants from SDs to LDs are indicated. (From Borner et al. 2000.), , quently, once the transition to flowering has reached this, stage, flowering is irreversible., The existence of multiple flowering pathways provides, angiosperms with maximum reproductive flexibility,, enabling them to produce seeds under a wide variety of, conditions. Redundancy within the pathways ensures that, reproduction, the most crucial of all physiological functions, will be relatively insensitive to mutations and evolutionarily robust., The details of the pathways undoubtedly vary among, different species. In maize, for example, at least one of the, genes involved in the autonomous pathway is expressed, in leaves (see Web Topic 24.12). Nevertheless, the presence, of multiple flowering pathways is probably universal, among angiosperms., , SUMMARY, Flower formation occurs at the shoot apical meristem and, is a complex morphological event. The rosette plant Arabidopsis has been an important model for studies on floral, development. The four floral organs (sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels) are initiated as successive whorls. Three, classes of genes regulate floral development. The first class, contains positive regulators of the floral meristem identity., APETALA1 (AP1) and LEAFY (LFY) are the most important, Arabidopsis floral meristem identity genes., Meristem identity genes are positive regulators of, another class of genes that determine floral organ identity., There are five known floral organ identity genes in Arabidopsis: APETALA1 (AP1), APETALA2 (AP2), APETALA3, (AP3), PISTILLATA (PI), and AGAMOUS (AG). Cadastral, genes make up the third group. Cadastral genes act as spatial regulators of the floral organ identity genes by setting, boundaries for their expression., , The genes that control floral organ identity are, homeotic. Most homeotic genes in plants contain the, MADS box. Mutations in these genes alter the identity of, the floral organs produced in two adjacent whorls. The, ABC model seeks to explain how the floral homeotic genes, control organ identity through the unique combinations of, their products. Type A genes control organ identity in the, first and second whorls. Type B activity controls organ, determination in the second and third whorls. The third, and fourth whorls are controlled by type C activity., The ability to flower (i.e., to make the transition from, juvenility to maturity) is attained when the plant has, reached a certain age or size. In some plants, the transition, to flowering then occurs independently of the environment, (autonomously). Other plants require exposure to appropriate environmental conditions. The most common environmental inputs for flowering are day length and temperature., The response to day length—photoperiodism—promotes flowering at a particular time of year, and several, different categories of responses are known. The photoperiodic signal is perceived by the leaf. Exposure to low temperature—vernalization—is required for flowering in some, plants, and this requirement is often coupled with a day, length requirement. Vernalization occurs at the shoot apical meristem. Photoperiodism and vernalization interact in, several ways., Daily rhythms—circadian rhythms—can locate an event, at a particular time of day. Timekeeping in these rhythms, is based on an endogenous circadian oscillator. Keeping the, rhythm on local time depends on the phase response of the, rhythm to environmental signals. The most important signals are dawn and dusk., Short-day plants flower when a critical duration of darkness is exceeded. Long-day plants flower when the length
Page 640 :
The Control of Flowering, of the dark period is less than a critical value. Light given, at certain times in a dark period that is longer than the critical value—a night break—prevents the effect of the dark, period. Light also acts on the circadian oscillator to entrain, the photoperiodic rhythm, an effect that is important for, timekeeping in the dark. The photoperiodic mechanism, shows some variation in short-day and long-day responses,, but both appear to involve phytochrome and a circadian, oscillator., When photoperiod-responsive plants are induced to, flower by exposure to appropriate day lengths, leaves send, a chemical signal to the apex to bring about flowering. This, transmissible signal is able to cause flowering in plants of, different photoperiodic response groups. In noninductive, day lengths, a transmissible inhibitor of flowering may be, produced by the leaves of LDPs., Although physiological experiments, especially grafting, indicate the existence of a transmissible floral stimulus, and, in some cases, flowering inhibitors, the chemical identity of these factors is not known. Plant growth hormones,, especially the gibberellins, can modify flowering in many, plants., The transition to flowering is regulated by multiple signals and multiple pathways. In Arabidopsis, flowering is, controlled by four pathways: the photoperiodic,, autonomous/vernalization, sucrose, and GA pathways. All, of these pathways converge to regulate the meristem identity genes AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (AGL20) and LEAFY (LFY)., AGL20 and LFY, in turn, regulate the floral homeotic genes, to produce the floral organs. The existence of multiple, pathways for flowering provides angiosperms with the, flexibility to reproduce under a variety of environmental, conditions, thus increasing their evolutionary fitness., , 589, , 24.4, , Characteristics of the Phase-Shifting, Response in Circadian Rhythms, Petal movements in Kalenchoe have been, used to study circadian rhythms., , 24.5, , Genes That Control Flowering Time, A discussion of genes that control different, apects of flowering time is presented., , 24.6, , Support for the Role of Blue-Light, Regulation of Circadian Rhythms, The role of ELF3 in mediating the effects of, blue light on flowering time is discussed., , 24.7, , Regulation of Flowering in Canterbury Bell, by Both Photoperiod and Vernalization, Short days acting on the leaf can substitute, for vernalization at the shoot apex in, Canterbury Bell., , 24.8, , Examples of Floral Induction by, Gibberellins in Plants with Different, Environmental Requirements for Flowering, A table of the effects of gibberellins on plants, with different photoperiodic requirements., , 24.9, , The Different Effects of Two Different, Gibberellins on Flowering (Spike Length), and Elongation (Stem Length), GA1 and GA32 have different effects on flowering in Lolium., , 24.10 The Influence of Cytokinins and Polyamines, on Flowering, Other growth regulators beside gibberellins, may participate in the flowering response., , 24.11 The Contrasting Effects of Phytochromes A, , Web Material, Web Topics, 24.1, , 24.2, , 24.3, , Contrasting the Characteristics of Juvenile, and Adult Phases of English Ivy (Hedera, helix) and Maize (Zea mays), A table of juvenile vs. adult morphological, characteristics is presented., Regulation of Juvenility by the TEOPOD (TP), Genes in Maize, The genetic control of juvenility in maize is, discussed., Flowering of Juvenile Meristems Grafted to, Adult Plants, The competence of juvenile meristems to, flower can be tested in grafting experiments., , and B on Flowering, A brief discussion of the effects of phyA and, phyB on flowering in Arabidopsis and other, species., , 24.12 A Gene That Regulates the Floral Stimulus, in Maize, The INDETERMINATE 1 gene of maize regulates the transition to flowering and is, expressed in young leaves., , Chapter References, Bewley, J. D., Hempel, F. D., McCormick, S., and Zambryski, P. (2000), Reproductive Development. In: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, B. B. Buchanan, W. Gruissem, and R. L. Jones (eds.),, American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville, MD., Blazquez, M. A. (2000) Flower development pathways. J. Cell Sci. 113:, 3547–3548., Blazquez, M. A., and Weigel, D. (2000) Integration of floral inductive, signals in Arabidopsis. Nature 404: 889–892.
Page 641 :
590, , Chapter 24, , Borner, R., Kampmann, G., Chandler, J., Gleissner, R., Wisman, E.,, Apel, K., and Melzer, S. (2000) A MADS domain gene involved, in the transition to flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 24: 591–599., Bowman, J. L., Smyth, D. R., and Meyerowitz, E. M. (1989) Genes, directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1: 37–52., Bünning, E. (1960) Biological clocks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant., Biol. 15: 1–9., Clark, J. R. (1983) Age-related changes in trees. J. Arboriculture 9:, 201–205., Coen, E. S., and Carpenter, R. (1993) The metamorphosis of flowers., Plant Cell 5: 1175–1181., Coulter, M. W., and Hamner, K. C. (1964) Photoperiodic flowering, response of Biloxi soybean in 72 hour cycles. Plant Physiol. 39:, 848–856., Crawford, K., and Zambryski, P. (1999) Phylem transport: Are you, chaperoned? Curr. Biol. 9: R281–R285., Deitzer, G. (1984) Photoperiodic induction in long-day plants. In, Light and the Flowering Process, D. Vince-Prue, B. Thomas, and K., E. Cockshull eds., Academic Press, New York, pp. 51–63., Devlin, P. F., and Kay, S. A. (2000) Cryptochromes are required for, phytochrome signaling to the circadian clock but not for rhythmicity. Plant Cell 12: 2499–2509., Gasser, C. S., and Robinson-Beers, K. (1993) Pistil development. Plant, Cell 5: 1231–1239., Gisel, A., Hempel, F. D., Barella, S., and Zambryski, P. (2002) Leaf-toshoot apex movement of symplastic tracer is restricted coincident, with flowering Arabidopsis. Proc. Nat’l Acad. Sci. USA 99:, 1713–1717., Guo, H., Yang, H., Mockler, T. C., and Lin, C. (1998) Regulation of, flowering time by Arabidopsis photoreceptors. Science 279:, 1360–1363., Hamilton, A. J., and Baulcombe, D. C. (1999) A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science, 286: 950–952., Hendricks, S. B., and Siegelman, H. W. (1967) Phytochrome and photoperiodism in plants. Comp. Biochem. 27: 211–235., Lang, A. (1965) Physiology of flower initiation. In Encyclopedia of, Plant Physiology (Old Series, Vol. 15), W. Ruhland, ed., Springer,, Berlin, pp. 1380–1535., Lang, A., Chailakhyan, M. K., and Frolova, I. A. (1977) Promotion, and inhibition of flower formation in a dayneutral plant in grafts, with a short-day plant and a long-day plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 74: 2412–2416., McDaniel, C. N. (1996) Developmental physiology of floral initiation, in Nicotiana tabacum L. J. Exp. Bot. 47: 465–475., McDaniel, C. N., Hartnett, L. K., and Sangrey, K. A. (1996) Regulation of node number in day-neutral Nicotiana tabacum: A factor in, plant size. Plant J. 9: 56–61., , McDaniel, C. N., Singer, S. R., and Smith, S. M. E. (1992) Developmental states associated with the floral transition. Dev. Biol. 153:, 59–69., Michaels, S. D., and Amasino, R. M. 2000. Memories of winter: Vernalization and the competence to flower. Plant Cell Environ. 23:, 1145–1154., Millar, A. J., Carre, I. A., Strayer, C. A., Chua, N.-H., and Kay, S. A., (1995) Circadian clock mutants in Arabidopsis identified by, luciferase imaging. Science 267: 1161–1163., Papenfuss, H. D., and Salisbury, F. B. (1967) Aspects of clock resetting in flowering of Xanthium. Plant Physiol. 42: 1562–1568., Poethig, R. S. (1990) Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science 250: 923–930., Purvis, O. N., and Gregory, F. G. (1952) Studies in vernalization of, cereals. XII. The reversibility by high temperature of the vernalized condition in Petkus winter rye. Ann. Bot. 1: 569–592., Reid, J. B., Murfet, I. C., Singer, S. R., Weller, J. L., and Taylor, S.A., (1996) Physiological genetics of flowering in Pisum. Sem. Cell Dev., Biol. 7: 455–463., Saji, H., Vince-Prue, D., and Furuya, M. (1983) Studies on the photoreceptors for the promotion and inhibition of flowering in darkgrown seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy. Plant Cell Physiol. 67:, 1183–1189., Salisbury, F. B. (1963) Biological timing and hormone synthesis in, flowering of Xanthium. Planta 49: 518–524., Simon, R., Igeno, M. I., and Coupland, G. (1996) Activation of floral, meristem identity genes in Arabidopsis. Nature 384: 59–62., Vince-Prue, D. (1975) Photoperiodism in Plants. McGraw-Hill, London., Weigel, D., and Meyerowitz, E. M. (1994) The ABCs of floral, homeotic genes. Cell 78: 203–209., Wilson, R. A., Heckman, J. W., and Sommerville, C. R. (1992) Gibberellin is required for flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana under, short days. Plant Physiol. 100: 403–408., Yanovsky, M. J., and Kay. S. A. (2001) Signaling networks in the plant, circadian rhythm. Curr. Opinion in Plant Biol 4: 429–435., Yanovsky, M. J., Mazzella, M. A., Whitelam, G. C., and Casal, J. J., (2001) Resetting the circadian clock by phytochromes and cryptochromes in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Rhythms 16: 523–530., Zeevaart, J. A. D. (1976) Physiology of flower formation. Ann. Rev., Plant Physiol. 27: 321–348., Zeevaart, J. A. D. (1985) Bryophyllum. In Handbook of Flowering, Vol., II, A. H. Halevy, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 89–100., Zeevaart, J. A. D. (1986) Perilla. In Handbook of Flowering, Vol. 5, A., H. Halevy, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 239–252., Zeevaart, J. A. D., and Boyer, G. L. (1987) Photoperiodic induction, and the floral stimulus in Perilla. In Manipulation of Flowering, J., G. Atherton, ed., Butterworths, London, pp. 269–277.
Page 642 :
Chapter, , 25, , Stress Physiology, , IN BOTH NATURAL AND AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS, plants are, frequently exposed to environmental stresses. Some environmental factors, such as air temperature, can become stressful in just a few minutes;, others, such as soil water content, may take days to weeks, and factors, such as soil mineral deficiencies can take months to become stressful. It, has been estimated that because of stress resulting from climatic and soil, conditions (abiotic factors) that are suboptimal, the yield of field-grown, crops in the United States is only 22% of the genetic potential yield, (Boyer 1982)., In addition, stress plays a major role in determining how soil and climate limit the distribution of plant species. Thus, understanding the, physiological processes that underlie stress injury and the adaptation, and acclimation mechanisms of plants to environmental stress is of, immense importance to both agriculture and the environment., The concept of plant stress is often used imprecisely, and stress terminology can be confusing, so it is useful to start our discussion with, some definitions. Stress is usually defined as an external factor that, exerts a disadvantageous influence on the plant. This chapter will concern itself with environmental or abiotic factors that produce stress in, plants, although biotic factors such as weeds, pathogens, and insect predation can also produce stress. In most cases, stress is measured in relation to plant survival, crop yield, growth (biomass accumulation), or the, primary assimilation processes (CO2 and mineral uptake), which are, related to overall growth., The concept of stress is intimately associated with that of stress tolerance, which is the plant’s fitness to cope with an unfavorable environment. In the literature the term stress resistance is often used interchangeably with stress tolerance, although the latter term is preferred., Note that an environment that is stressful for one plant may not be, stressful for another. For example, pea (Pisum sativum) and soybean, (Glycine max) grow best at about 20°C and 30°C, respectively. As temperature increases, the pea shows signs of heat stress much sooner than, the soybean. Thus the soybean has greater heat stress tolerance.
Page 643 :
592, , Chapter 25, , If tolerance increases as a result of exposure to prior, stress, the plant is said to be acclimated (or hardened)., Acclimation can be distinguished from adaptation, which, usually refers to a genetically determined level of resistance, acquired by a process of selection over many generations., Unfortunately, the term adaptation is sometimes used in the, literature to indicate acclimation. And to add to the complexity, we will see later that gene expression plays an, important role in acclimation., Adaptation and acclimation to environmental stresses, result from integrated events occurring at all levels of organization, from the anatomical and morphological level to, the cellular, biochemical, and molecular level. For example,, the wilting of leaves in response to water deficit reduces, both water loss from the leaf and exposure to incident light,, thereby reducing heat stress on leaves., Cellular responses to stress include changes in the cell, cycle and cell division, changes in the endomembrane system and vacuolization of cells, and changes in cell wall, architecture, all leading to enhanced stress tolerance of, cells. At the biochemical level, plants alter metabolism in, various ways to accommodate environmental stresses,, including producing osmoregulatory compounds such as, proline and glycine betaine. The molecular events linking, the perception of a stress signal with the genomic responses, leading to tolerance have been intensively investigated in, recent years., In this chapter we will examine these principles, and the, ways in which plants adapt and acclimate to water deficit,, salinity, chilling and freezing, heat, and oxygen deficiency, in the root biosphere. Air pollution, an important source of, plant stress, is discussed in Web Essay 25.1. Although it is, convenient to examine each of these stress factors separately, most are interrelated, and a common set of cellular,, biochemical, and molecular responses accompanies many, of the individual acclimation and adaptation processes., For example, water deficit is often associated with salinity in the root biosphere and with heat stress in the leaves, (resulting from decreased evaporative cooling due to low, transpiration), and chilling and freezing lead to reductions, in water activity and osmotic stress. We will also see that, plants often display cross-tolerance—that is, tolerance to, one stress induced by acclimation to another. This behavior implies that mechanisms of resistance to several stresses, share many common features., , WATER DEFICIT AND, DROUGHT RESISTANCE, In this section we will examine some drought resistance, mechanisms, which are divided into several types. First we, can distinguish between desiccation postponement (the, ability to maintain tissue hydration) and desiccation tolerance (the ability to function while dehydrated), which are, sometimes referred to as drought tolerance at high and low, , water potentials, respectively. The older literature often, uses the term drought avoidance (instead of drought tolerance),, but this term is a misnomer because drought is a meteorological condition that is tolerated by all plants that survive, it and avoided by none. A third category, drought escape,, comprises plants that complete their life cycles during the, wet season, before the onset of drought. These are the only, true “drought avoiders.”, Among the desiccation postponers are water savers and, water spenders. Water savers use water conservatively, preserving some in the soil for use late in their life cycle; water, spenders aggressively consume water, often using prodigious, quantities. The mesquite tree (Prosopis sp.) is an example of, a water spender. This deeply rooted species has ravaged, semiarid rangelands in the southwestern United States, and, because of its prodigious water use, it has prevented the, reestablishment of grasses that have agronomic value., , Drought Resistance Strategies Vary with Climatic, or Soil Conditions, The water-limited productivity of plants (Table 25.1), depends on the total amount of water available and on the, water-use efficiency of the plant (see Chapters 4 and 9). A, plant that is capable of acquiring more water or that has, higher water-use efficiency will resist drought better. Some, plants possess adaptations, such as the C4 and CAM modes, of photosynthesis that allow them to exploit more arid, environments. In addition, plants possess acclimation, mechanisms that are activated in response to water stress., Water deficit can be defined as any water content of a, tissue or cell that is below the highest water content exhibited at the most hydrated state. When water deficit develops slowly enough to allow changes in developmental, processes, water stress has several effects on growth, one, of which is a limitation in leaf expansion. Leaf area is, important because photosynthesis is usually proportional, to it. However, rapid leaf expansion can adversely affect, water availability., , TABLE 25.1, Yields of corn and soybean crops in the United States, Crop yield (percentage of 10-year average), Year, , Corn, , 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, , 104, 87, 104, 108, 77, 101, 112, 113, 114, 80, , Soybean, , 106, 88, 100, 104, 87, 93, 113, 110, 111, 89, , Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture 1989., , Severe drought, , Severe drought, , Severe drought
Page 644 :
Stress Physiology, , 1.6, Leaf growth rate (mm h–1), GR, , If precipitation occurs only during winter and spring,, and summers are dry, accelerated early growth can lead to, large leaf areas, rapid water depletion, and too little residual soil moisture for the plant to complete its life cycle. In, this situation, only plants that have some water available, for reproduction late in the season or that complete the life, cycle quickly, before the onset of drought (exhibiting, drought escape), will produce seeds for the next generation. Either strategy will allow some reproductive success., The situation is different if summer rainfall is significant, but erratic. In this case, a plant with large leaf area, or one, capable of developing large leaf area very quickly, is better, suited to take advantage of occasional wet summers. One, acclimation strategy in these conditions is a capacity for, both vegetative growth and flowering over an extended, period. Such plants are said to be indeterminate in their, growth habit, in contrast to determinate plants, which, develop preset numbers of leaves and flower over only, very short periods., In the discussions that follow, we will examine several, acclimation strategies, including inhibited leaf expansion, leaf abscission, enhanced root growth, and stomatal, closure., , 1.2, , 593, , Plants never exposed, to water stress, GR = m(YP–Y), , 0.8, , 0.4, Y, 0, , 0.1, , 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, Turgor (MPa), YP, , Plants, grown under, continuous, water stress, 0.5, , 0.6, , FIGURE 25.1 Dependence of leaf expansion on leaf turgor., Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) plants were grown either, with ample water or with limited soil water to produce, mild water stress. After rewatering, plants of both treatment groups were stressed by the withholding of water,, and leaf growth rates (GR) and turgor (Ψp) were periodically measured. Both decreased extensibility (m) and, increased threshold turgor for growth ( Y) limit the leaf’s, capacity to grow after exposure to stress. (After Matthews, et al. 1984.), , Decreased Leaf Area Is an Early Adaptive, Response to Water Deficit, Typically, as the water content of the plant decreases, its, cells shrink and the cell walls relax (see Chapter 3). This, decrease in cell volume results in lower turgor pressure, and the subsequent concentration of solutes in the cells., The plasma membrane becomes thicker and more compressed because it covers a smaller area than before., Because turgor reduction is the earliest significant biophysical effect of water stress, turgor-dependent activities, such as leaf expansion and root elongation are the most, sensitive to water deficits (Figure 25.1)., Cell expansion is a turgor-driven process and is, extremely sensitive to water deficit. Cell expansion is, described by the relationship, GR = m(Yp – Y), , (25.1), , where GR is growth rate, Yp is turgor, Y is the yield threshold (the pressure below which the cell wall resists plastic,, or nonreversible, deformation), and m is the wall extensibility (the responsiveness of the wall to pressure)., This equation shows that a decrease in turgor causes a, decrease in growth rate. Note also that besides showing, that growth slows down when stress reduces Yp , Equation, 25.1 shows that Yp need decrease only to the value of Y,, not to zero, to eliminate expansion. In normal conditions,, Y is usually only 0.1 to 0.2 MPa less than Yp, so small, decreases in water content and turgor can slow down or, fully stop growth., Water stress not only decreases turgor, but also, decreases m and increases Y. Wall extensibility (m) is nor-, , mally greatest when the cell wall solution is slightly acidic., In part, stress decreases m because cell wall pH typically, rises during stress. The effects of stress on Y are not well, understood, but presumably they involve complex structural changes of the cell wall (see Chapter 15) that may not, be readily reversed after relief of stress. Water-deficient, plants tend to become rehydrated at night, and as a result, substantial leaf growth occurs at that time. Nonetheless,, because of changes in m and Y, the growth rate is still lower, than that of unstressed plants having the same turgor (see, Figure 25.1)., Because leaf expansion depends mostly on cell expansion, the principles that underlie the two processes are similar. Inhibition of cell expansion results in a slowing of leaf, expansion early in the development of water deficits. The, smaller leaf area transpires less water, effectively conserving a limited water supply in the soil over a longer period., Reduction in leaf area can thus be considered a first line of, defense against drought., In indeterminate plants, water stress limits not only leaf, size, but also leaf number, because it decreases both the, number and the growth rate of branches. Stem growth has, been studied less than leaf expansion, but stem growth is, probably affected by the same forces that limit leaf growth, during stress., Keep in mind, too, that cell and leaf expansion also, depend on biochemical and molecular factors beyond, those that control water flux. Much evidence supports the, view that plants change their growth rates in response to
Page 645 :
594, , Chapter 25, , stress by coordinately controlling many other important, processes such as cell wall and membrane biosynthesis, cell, division, and protein synthesis (Burssens et al. 2000)., , Water Deficit Stimulates Leaf Abscission, The total leaf area of a plant (number of leaves × surface, area of each leaf) does not remain constant after all the, leaves have matured. If plants become water stressed after, a substantial leaf area has developed, leaves will senesce, and eventually fall off (Figure 25.2). Such a leaf area adjustment is an important long-term change that improves the, plant’s fitness in a water-limited environment. Indeed,, many drought-deciduous, desert plants drop all their, leaves during a drought and sprout new ones after a rain., This cycle can occur two or more times in a single season., Abscission during water stress results largely from, enhanced synthesis of and responsiveness to the endogenous plant hormone ethylene (see Chapter 22)., , Water Deficit Enhances Root Extension into, Deeper, Moist Soil, Mild water deficits also affect the development of the root, system. Root-to-shoot biomass ratio appears to be governed by a functional balance between water uptake by the, root and photosynthesis by the shoot (see Figure 23.6). Simply stated, a shoot will grow until it is so large that water uptake, by the roots becomes limiting to further growth; conversely,, roots will grow until their demand for photosynthate from the, shoot equals the supply. This functional balance is shifted if, the water supply decreases., As discussed already, leaf expansion is affected very, early when water uptake is curtailed, but photosynthetic, activity is much less affected. Inhibition of leaf expansion, , FIGURE 25.2 The leaves of young cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) plants abscise in response to water stress. The plants, at left were watered throughout the experiment; those in, the middle and at right were subjected to moderate stress, and severe stress, respectively, before being watered again., Only a tuft of leaves at the top of the stem is left on the, severely stressed plants. (Courtesy of B. L. McMichael.), , reduces the consumption of carbon and energy, and a, greater proportion of the plant’s assimilates can be distributed to the root system, where they can support further, root growth. At the same time, the root apices in dry soil, lose turgor., All these factors lead to a preferential root growth into, the soil zones that remain moist. As water deficits progress,, the upper layers of the soil usually dry first. Thus, plants, commonly show a mainly shallow root system when all, soil layers are wetted, and a loss of shallow roots and proliferation of deep roots as water in top layers of the soil is, depleted. Deeper root growth into wet soil can be considered a second line of defense against drought., Enhanced root growth into moist soil zones during stress, requires allocation of assimilates to the growing root tips., During water deficit, assimilates are directed to the fruits, and away from the roots (see Chapter 10). For this reason, the enhanced water uptake resulting from root growth is, less pronounced in reproductive plants than in vegetative, plants. Competition for assimilates between roots and fruits, is one explanation for the fact that plants are generally more, sensitive to water stress during reproduction., , Stomata Close during Water Deficit, in Response to Abscisic Acid, The preceding sections focused on changes in plant development during slow, long-term dehydration. When the, onset of stress is more rapid or the plant has reached its full, leaf area before initiation of stress, other responses protect, the plant against immediate desiccation. Under these conditions, stomata closure reduces evaporation from the existing leaf area. Thus, stomatal closure can be considered a, third line of defense against drought., Uptake and loss of water in guard cells changes their, turgor and modulates stomatal opening and closing (see, Chapters 4 and 18). Because guard cells are located in the, leaf epidermis, they can lose turgor as a result of a direct, loss of water by evaporation to the atmosphere. The, decrease in turgor causes stomatal closure by hydropassive, closure. This closing mechanism is likely to operate in air, of low humidity, when direct water loss from the guard, cells is too rapid to be balanced by water movement into, the guard cells from adjacent epidermal cells., A second mechanism, called hydroactive closure, closes, the stomata when the whole leaf or the roots are dehydrated and depends on metabolic processes in the guard, cells. A reduction in the solute content of the guard cells, results in water loss and decreased turgor, causing the, stomata to close; thus the hydraulic mechanism of hydroactive closure is a reversal of the mechanism of stomatal, opening. However, the control of hydroactive closure differs in subtle but important ways from stomatal opening., Solute loss from guard cells can be triggered by a, decrease in the water content of the leaf, and abscisic acid, (ABA) (see Chapter 23) plays an important role in this
Page 646 :
Stress Physiology, , 595, , Sunlight, , conductance and transpiration, decrease so much that leaf water, 4. Since chloroplast, potential (Yw; see Chapters 3 and 4), 1. Light stimulates, membrane is nearly, may remain nearly constant during, –, photosynthesis and, impermeable to ABA ,, drought., +, active transport of, the charged ABA– is, H+ + ABA–, H, H+ into the grana,, largely impermeable., Chemical signals from the root, increases stroma pH., system may affect the stomatal, 2. In alkaline stroma,, responses to water stress (Davies et, ABA•H dissociates., al. 2002). Stomatal conductance is, often much more closely related to, ABA•H, soil water status than to leaf water, Grana, status, and the only plant part that, 3. ABA•H diffuses, passively from cytosol, CHLOROPLAST, can be directly affected by soil water, into stroma., status is the root system. In fact,, Stroma, ABA•H, dehydrating only part of the root, system may cause stomatal closure, ABA– + H+, even if the well-watered portion of, FIGURE 25.3 Accumulation of ABA by chloroplasts in the light. Light stimulates, the root system still delivers ample, proton uptake into the grana, making the stroma more alkaline. The increased alkawater to the shoots., linity causes the weak acid ABA•H to dissociate into H+ and the ABA– anion. The, When corn (Zea mays) plants, concentration of ABA•H in the stroma is lowered below the concentration in the, cytosol, and the concentration difference drives the passive diffusion of ABA•H, were grown with roots trained into, across the chloroplast membrane. At the same time, the concentration of ABA– in, two separate pots and water was, the stroma increases, but the chloroplast membrane is almost impermeable to the, withheld from only one of the pots,, anion (red arrows), which thus remains trapped. This process continues until the, the stomata closed partially, and the, ABA•H concentrations in the stroma and the cytosol are equal. But as long as the, leaf water potential increased, just as, stroma remains more alkaline, the total ABA concentration (ABA•H + ABA–) in the, stroma greatly exceeds the concentration in the cytosol., in the dehydration postponers, already described. These results, show that stomata can respond to, conditions sensed in the roots., process. Abscisic acid is synthesized continuously at a low, Besides ABA (Sauter et al. 2001), other signals, such as pH, rate in mesophyll cells and tends to accumulate in the, and inorganic ion redistribution, appear to play a role in, chloroplasts. When the mesophyll becomes mildly dehylong-distance signaling between the roots and the shoots, drated, two things happen:, (Davies et al. 2002)., 1. Some of the ABA stored in the chloroplasts is released, to the apoplast (the cell wall space) of the mesophyll, cell (Hartung et al. 1998). The redistribution of ABA, depends on pH gradients within the leaf, on the, weak-acid properties of the ABA molecule, and on the, permeability properties of cell membranes (Figure, 25.3). The redistribution of ABA makes it possible for, the transpiration stream to carry some of the ABA to, the guard cells., 2. ABA is synthesized at a higher rate, and more ABA, accumulates in the leaf apoplast. The higher ABA, concentrations resulting from the higher rates of ABA, synthesis appear to enhance or prolong the initial, closing effect of the stored ABA. The mechanism of, ABA-induced stomatal closure is discussed in, Chapter 23., Stomatal responses to leaf dehydration can vary widely, both within and across species. The stomata of some dehydration-postponing species, such as cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and cassava (Manihot esculenta), are unusually, responsive to decreasing water availability, and stomatal, , Water Deficit Limits Photosynthesis within the, Chloroplast, The photosynthetic rate of the leaf (expressed per unit leaf, area) is seldom as responsive to mild water stress as leaf, expansion is (Figure 25.4) because photosynthesis is much, less sensitive to turgor than is leaf expansion. However,, mild water stress does usually affect both leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. As stomata close during, early stages of water stress, water-use efficiency (see Chapters 4 and 9) may increase (i.e., more CO2 may be taken up, per unit of water transpired) because stomatal closure, inhibits transpiration more than it decreases intercellular, CO2 concentrations., As stress becomes severe, however, the dehydration of, mesophyll cells inhibits photosynthesis, mesophyll metabolism is impaired, and water-use efficiency usually, decreases. Results from many studies have shown that the, relative effect of water stress on stomatal conductance is, significantly larger than that on photosynthesis. The, response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to, water stress can be partitioned by exposure of stressed
Page 647 :
Chapter 25, , 15, , 20, , 10, Leaf, expansion, , 10, , 5, Photosynthesis, 0, 0, , –0.4, –0.8, –1.2, –1.6, Leaf water potential (MPa), , Photosynthesis rate (µmol CO2 m–2 s–1), , Leaf expansion rate, (percent increase in leaf area per 24 h), , 596, , FIGURE 25.4 Effects of water stress on photosynthesis and, leaf expansion of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). This, species is typical of many plants in which leaf expansion is, very sensitive to water stress, and it is completely inhibited, under mild stress levels that hardly affect photosynthetic, rates. (After Boyer 1970.), , leaves to air containing high concentrations of CO2. Any, effect of the stress on stomatal conductance is eliminated, by the high CO2 supply, and differences between photosynthetic rates of stressed and unstressed plants can be, directly attributed to damage from the water stress to photosynthesis., Does water stress directly affect translocation? Water, stress decreases both photosynthesis and the consumption, of assimilates in the expanding leaves. As a consequence,, water stress indirectly decreases the amount of photosynthate exported from leaves. Because phloem transport, depends on turgor (see Chapter 10), decreased water, potential in the phloem during stress may inhibit the, movement of assimilates. However, experiments have, shown that translocation is unaffected until late in the, stress period, when other processes, such as photosynthesis, have already been strongly inhibited (Figure 25.5)., This relative insensitivity of translocation to stress, allows plants to mobilize and use reserves where they are, needed (e.g., in seed growth), even when stress is, extremely severe. The ability to continue translocating, , Photosynthesis rate, (µmol 14CO2 m–2 s–1), , 40, , 35, 30, 25, , 30, Photosynthesis starts to, decline at mild stress., –1.5, , –2.0, –2.5, Leaf water potential (MPa), , 20, , Translocation rate, (percent 14C removed per hour), , Translocation is maintained, until stress is severe., , 50, , assimilates is a key factor in almost all aspects of plant, resistance to drought., , Osmotic Adjustment of Cells Helps Maintain Plant, Water Balance, As the soil dries, its matric potential (see Web Topic 3.3), becomes more negative. Plants can continue to absorb, water only as long as their water potential (Yw) is lower, (more negative) than that of the soil water. Osmotic adjustment, or accumulation of solutes by cells, is a process by, which water potential can be decreased without an accompanying decrease in turgor or decrease in cell volume., Recall Equation 3.6 from Chapter 3: Yw = Ys + Yp. The, change in cell water potential results simply from changes, in solute potential (Ys), the osmotic component of Yw., Osmotic adjustment is a net increase in solute content, per cell that is independent of the volume changes that, result from loss of water. The decrease in Ys is typically, limited to about 0.2 to 0.8 MPa, except in plants adapted to, extremely dry conditions. Most of the adjustment can usually be accounted for by increases in concentration of a, variety of common solutes, including sugars, organic acids,, amino acids, and inorganic ions (especially K+)., Cytosolic enzymes of plant cells can be severely inhibited by high concentrations of ions. The accumulation of, ions during osmotic adjustment appears to be restricted to, the vacuoles, where the ions are kept out of contact with, enzymes in the cytosol or subcellular organelles. Because, of this compartmentation of ions, other solutes must accumulate in the cytoplasm to maintain water potential equilibrium within the cell., These other solutes, called compatible solutes (or compatible osmolytes), are organic compounds that do not, interfere with enzyme functions. Commonly accumulated, compatible solutes include the amino acid proline, sugar, alcohols (e.g., sorbitol and mannitol), and a quaternary, amine called glycine betaine. Synthesis of compatible, solutes helps plants adjust to increased salinity in the rooting zone, as discussed later in this chapter., Osmotic adjustment develops slowly in response to tissue dehydration. Over a time course of several days, other, changes (such as growth or photosynthesis) are also taking, place. Thus it can be argued that osmotic adjustment is not, an independent and direct response to water deficit, but a, result of another factor, such as decreased growth rate., , FIGURE 25.5 Relative effects of water stress on photosynthesis and translocation in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)., Plants were exposed to 14CO2 for a short time interval. The, radioactivity fixed in the leaf was taken as a measure of, photosynthesis, and the loss of radioactivity after removal, of the 14CO2 source was taken as a measure of the rate of, assimilate translocation. Photosynthesis was affected by, mild stress, whereas, translocation was unaffected until, stress was severe. (After Sung and Krieg 1979.)
Page 648 :
Stress Physiology, , Carbon gained, (g per plant), , Leaf water potential, (MPa), , Nonetheless, leaves that are capable of osmotic adjustment, clearly can maintain turgor at lower water potentials than, nonadjusted leaves. Maintaining turgor enables the continuation of cell elongation and facilitates higher stomatal, conductances at lower water potentials. This suggests that, osmotic adjustment is an acclimation that enhances dehydration tolerance., How much extra water can be acquired by the plant, because of osmotic adjustment in the leaf cells? Most of the, extractable soil water is held in spaces (filled with water, and air) from which it is readily removed by roots (see, Chapter 4). As the soil dries, this water is used first, leaving behind the small amount of water that is held more, tightly in small pores., Osmotic adjustment enables the plant to extract more of, this tightly held water, but the increase in total available, water is small. Thus the cost of osmotic adjustment in the, leaf is offset by rapidly diminishing returns in terms of water, availability to the plant, as can be seen by a comparison of, the water relations of adjusting and nonadjusting species, (Figure 25.6). These results show that osmotic adjustment, promotes dehydration tolerance but does not have a major, effect on productivity (McCree and Richardson 1987)., Osmotic adjustment also occurs in roots, although the, process in roots has not been studied so extensively as in, leaves. The absolute magnitude of the adjustment is less in, roots than in leaves, but as a percentage of the original tis-, , 0, Cowpea, (osmotic nonadjuster), –1, Sugar beet, (osmotic adjuster), , –2, , 6, , Sugar beet, , 4, , 597, , sue solute potential (Ys), it can be larger in roots than in, leaves. As with leaves, these changes may in many cases, increase water extraction from the previously explored soil, only slightly. However, osmotic adjustment can occur in, the root meristems, enhancing turgor and maintaining root, growth. This is an important component of the changes in, root growth patterns as water is depleted from the soil., Does osmotic adjustment increase plant productivity?, Researchers have engineered the accumulation of osmoprotective solutes by conventional plant breeding, by physiological methods (inducing adjustment with controlled, water deficits), and through the use of transgenic plants, expressing genes for solute synthesis and accumulation., However, the engineered plants grow more slowly, and, they are only slightly more tolerant to osmotic stresses., Thus the use of osmotic adjustment to improve agricultural, performance is yet to be perfected., , Water Deficit Increases Resistance to Liquid-Phase, Water Flow, When a soil dries, its resistance to the flow of water, increases very sharply, particularly near the permanent wilting point. Recall from Chapter 4 that at the permanent wilting point (usually about –1.5 MPa), plants cannot regain, turgor pressure even if all transpiration stops (for more, details on the relationship between soil hydraulic conductivity and soil water potential, see Figure 4.2.A in Web, Topic 4.2). Because of the very large soil resistance to water, flow, water delivery to the roots at the permanent wilting, point is too slow to allow the overnight rehydration of, plants that have wilted during the day., Rehydration is further hindered by the resistance within, the plant, which has been found to be larger than the resistance within the soil over a wide range of water deficits, (Blizzard and Boyer 1980). Several factors may contribute, to the increased plant resistance to water flow during drying. As plant cells lose water, they shrink. When roots, shrink, the root surface can move away from the soil particles that hold the water, and the delicate root hairs may, be damaged. In addition, as root extension slows during, soil drying, the outer layer of the root cortex (the hypodermis) often becomes more extensively covered with suberin,, , Cowpea, 2, , FIGURE 25.6 Water loss and carbon gain by sugar beet (Beta, , Water lost, (kg per plant), , 0, 3, , Sugar beet, , 2, Cowpea, 1, , 0, , 5, 10, 15, Time after last watering (days), , 20, , vulgaris), an osmotically adjusting species, and cowpea, (Vigna unguiculata), a nonadjusting species that conserves, water during stress by stomatal closure. Plants were grown, in pots and subjected to water stress. On any given day, after the last watering, the sugar beet leaves maintained a, lower water potential than the cowpea leaves, but photosynthesis and transpiration during stress were only slightly, greater in the sugar beet. The major difference between the, two plants was the leaf water potential. These results show, that osmotic adjustment promotes dehydration tolerance, but does not have a major effect on productivity. (After, McCree and Richardson 1987.)
Page 649 :
598, , Chapter 25, , a water-impermeable lipid (see Figure 4.4), increasing the, resistance to water flow., Another important factor that increases resistance to, water flow is cavitation, or the breakage of water columns, under tension within the xylem. As we saw in Chapter 4,, transpiration from leaves “pulls” water through the plant, by creating a tension on the water column. The cohesive, forces that are required to support large tensions are present only in very narrow columns in which the water, adheres to the walls., Cavitation begins in most plants at moderate water, potentials (–1 to –2 MPa), and the largest vessels cavitate, first. For example, in trees such as oak (Quercus), the largediameter vessels that are laid down in the spring function, as a low-resistance pathway early in the growing season,, when ample water is available. As the soil dries out during, the summer, these large vessels cease functioning, leaving, the small-diameter vessels produced during the stress, period to carry the transpiration stream. This shift has longlasting consequences: Even if water becomes available, the, original low-resistance pathway remains nonfunctional,, reducing the efficiency of water flow., , Water Deficit Increases Wax Deposition on the, Leaf Surface, A common developmental response to water stress is the, production of a thicker cuticle that reduces water loss from, the epidermis (cuticular transpiration). Although waxes are, deposited in response to water deficit both on the surface, and within the cuticle inner layer, the inner layer may be, more important in controlling the rate of water loss in ways, that are more complex than by just increasing the amount, of wax present (Jenks et al. in press)., A thicker cuticle also decreases CO2 permeability, but, leaf photosynthesis remains unaffected because the epidermal cells underneath the cuticle are nonphotosynthetic., Cuticular transpiration, however, accounts for only 5 to, 10% of the total leaf transpiration, so it becomes significant, only if stress is extremely severe or if the cuticle has been, damaged (e.g., by wind-driven sand)., , Water Deficit Alters Energy Dissipation from, Leaves, Recall from Chapter 9 that evaporative heat loss lowers leaf, temperature. This cooling effect can be remarkable: In, Death Valley, California—one of the hottest places in the, world—leaf temperatures of plants with access to ample, water were measured to be 8°C below air temperatures. In, warm, dry climates, an experienced farmer can decide, whether plants need water simply by touching the leaves, because a rapidly transpiring leaf is distinctly cool to the, touch. When water stress limits transpiration, the leaf heats, up unless another process offsets the lack of cooling., Because of these effects of transpiration on leaf temperature, water stress and heat stress are closely interrelated, (see the discussion of heat stress later in this chapter)., , Maintaining a leaf temperature that is much lower than, the air temperature requires evaporation of vast quantities, of water. This is why adaptations that cool leaves by means, other than evaporation (e.g., changes in leaf size and leaf, orientation) are very effective in conserving water. When, transpiration decreases and leaf temperature becomes, warmer than the air temperature, some of the extra energy, in the leaf is dissipated as sensible heat loss (see Chapter, 9). Many arid-zone plants have very small leaves, which, minimize the resistance of the boundary layer to the transfer of heat from the leaf to the air (see Figure 9.14)., Because of their low boundary layer resistance, small, leaves tend to remain close to air temperature even when, transpiration is greatly slowed. In contrast, large leaves have, higher boundary layer resistance and dissipate less thermal, energy (per unit leaf area) by direct transfer of heat to the air., In larger leaves, leaf movement can provide additional, protection against heating during water stress. Leaves that, orient themselves away from the sun are called paraheliotropic; leaves that gain energy by orienting themselves normal (perpendicular) to the sunlight are referred to as diaheliotropic (see Chapter 9). Figure 25.7 shows the strong effect, of water stress on leaf position in soybean. Other factors that, can alter the interception of radiation include wilting, which, changes the angle of the leaf, and leaf rolling in grasses,, which minimizes the profile of tissue exposed to the sun., Absorption of energy can also be decreased by hairs on, the leaf surface or by layers of reflective wax outside the, cuticle. Leaves of some plants have a gray-white appearance because densely packed hairs reflect a large amount, of light. This hairiness, or pubescence, keeps leaves cooler, by reflecting radiation, but it also reflects the visible wavelengths that are active in photosynthesis and thus it, decreases carbon assimilation. Because of this problem,, attempts to breed pubescence into crops to improve their, water-use efficiency have been generally unsuccessful., , Osmotic Stress Induces Crassulacean Acid, Metabolism in Some Plants, Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) is a plant adaptation, in which stomata open at night and close during the day, (see Chapters 8 and 9). The leaf-to-air vapor pressure difference that drives transpiration is much reduced at night,, when both leaf and air are cool. As a result, the water-use, efficiencies of CAM plants are among the highest measured. A CAM plant may gain 1 g of dry matter for only, 125 g of water used—a ratio that is three to five times, greater than the ratio for a typical C3 plant (see Chapter 4)., CAM is very prevalent in succulent plants such as cacti., Some succulent species display facultative CAM, switching to CAM when subjected to water deficits or saline conditions (see Chapter 8). This switch in metabolism is a, remarkable adaptation to stress, involving accumulation of, the enzymes phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase (Figure 25.8), pyruvate–orthophosphate dikinase, and NADP, malic enzyme, among others.
Page 650 :
Stress Physiology, (A) Well-watered, , 599, , Orientation of leaflets of field-grown soybean, (Glycine max) plants in the normal, unstressed, position (A);, during mild water stress (B); and during severe water stress, (C). The large leaf movements induced by mild stress are, quite different from wilting, which occurs during severe, stress. Note that during mild stress (B), the terminal leaflet, has been raised, whereas the two lateral leaflets have been, lowered; each is almost vertical. (Courtesy of D. M., Oosterhuis.), , FIGURE 25.7, , Osmotic Stress Changes Gene Expression, , (B) Mild water stress, , As noted earlier, the accumulation of compatible solutes in, response to osmotic stress requires the activation of the, metabolic pathways that biosynthesize these solutes. Several genes coding for enzymes associated with osmotic, adjustment are turned on (up-regulated) by osmotic stress, and/or salinity, and cold stress. These genes encode, enzymes such as the following (Buchanan et al. 2000):, • ∆′1-Pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase, a key enzyme in, the proline biosynthetic pathway, • Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase, an enzyme, involved in glycine betaine accumulation, • myo-Inositol 6-O-methyltransferase, a rate-limiting, enzyme in the accumulation of the cyclic sugar alcohol called pinitol, , (C) Severe water stress, , Several other genes that encode well-known enzymes, are induced by osmotic stress. The expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase increases during, osmotic stress, perhaps to allow an increase of carbon flow, into organic solutes for osmotic adjustment. Enzymes, involved in lignin biosynthesis are also controlled by, osmotic stress., Reduction in the activities of key enzymes also takes, place. The accumulation of the sugar alcohol mannitol in, response to osmotic stress appears not to be brought about, by the up-regulation of genes producing enzymes involved, in mannitol biosynthesis, but rather by the down-regulation of genes associated with sucrose production and mannitol degradation. In this way mannitol accumulation is, enhanced during episodes of osmotic stress., Other genes regulated by osmotic stress encode proteins, associated with membrane transport, including ATPases, , 1, , As discussed in Chapters 8 and 9, CAM metabolism, involves many structural, physiological, and biochemical, features, including changes in carboxylation and decarboxylation patterns, transport of large quantities of malate, into and out of the vacuoles, and reversal of the periodicity of stomatal movements. Thus, CAM induction is a, remarkable adaptation to water deficit that occurs at many, levels of organization., , Days after salt stress, 2, 3, 4, 5, , 6, Increasing PEP, carboxylase, protein, , FIGURE 25.8 Increases in the content of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase in ice plant, Mesembryanthemum, crystallinum, during the salt-induced shift from C3 metabolism to CAM. Salt stress was induced by the addition of 500, mM NaCl to the irrigation water. The PEP carboxylase protein was revealed in the gels by the use of antibodies and a, stain. (After Bohnert et al. 1989.)
Page 651 :
600, , Chapter 25, , Table 25.2, The five groups of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins found in plants, Group, (family name)a, , Protein(s) in the group, , Structural characteristics, and motifs, , Functional information/, proposed function, , Group 1, (D-19 family), , Cotton D-19, Wheat Em, (early methioninelabeled protein), Sunflower Ha ds10, Barley B19, , Conformation is predominantly, random coil with some, predicted short α helices, Charged amino acids and glycine, are abundant, , Contains more water of hydration, than typical globular proteins, Overexpression confers, water deficit tolerance on, yeast cells, , Group 2, (D-11 family), (also referred to, as dehydrins), , Maize DHN1, M3, RAB17, Cotton D-11, Arabidopsis pRABAT1,, ERD10, ERD14, Craterostigma pcC 27-04,, pcC 6-19, Tomato pLE4, TAS14, Barley B8, B9, B17, Rice pRAB16A, Carrot pcEP40, , Variable structure includes α, helix–forming lysine-rich regions, The consensus sequence for group, 2 dehydrins is EKKGIMDKIKELPG, The number of times this consensus, repeats per protein varies, Often contains a poly(serine) region, Often contains regions of variable, length rich in polar residues, and either Gly or Ala., and Pro, , Often localized to the cytoplasm, or nucleus, More acidic members of the family, are associated with the plasma, membrane, May act to stabilize macromolecules at low water potential, , Group 3, (D-7 family), , Barley HVA1, (ABA-induced), Cotton D-7, Wheat pMA2005,, pMA1949, Craterostigma, pcC3-06, , Eleven amino-acid consensus, sequence motif TAQAAKEKAXE is, repeated in the protein, Contains apparent amphipathic, α helices, Dimeric protein, , Transgenic plants expressing HVA1, demonstrate enhanced water, deficit stress tolerance, D-7 is an abundant protein in, cotton embryos (estimated, concentration 0.25 mM), Each putative dimer of D-7, may bind as many as ten, inorganic phosphates and, their counterions, , Group 4, (D-95 family), , Soybean D-95, Craterostigma pcC27-45, , Slightly hydrophobic, N-terminal region is predicted, to form amphipathic α helices, , In tomato, a gene encoding a, similar protein is expressed, in response to nematode feeding, , Group 5, (D-113 family), , Tomato LE25, Sunflower Hads11, Cotton D-113, , Family members share sequence, homology at the conserved, N terminus, N-terminal region is predicted, to form α helices, C-terminal domain is predicted, to be a random coil of variable, length and sequence, Ala, Gly, and Thr are abundant, in the sequence, , Binds to membranes and/or, proteins to maintain structure, during stress, Possibly functions in ion, sequestration to protect, cytosolic metabolism, When LE25 is expressed in, yeast, it confers salt and, freezing tolerance, D-113 is abundant in, cottonseeds (up to 0.3 mM), , aThe, , protein family names are derived from the cotton seed proteins that are most similar to the family., Source: After Bray et al. 2000., , (Niu et al. 1995) and the water channel proteins, aquaporins, (see Chapter 3) (Maggio and Joly 1995). Several protease, genes are also induced by stress, and these enzymes may, degrade (remove and recycle) other proteins that are dena-, , tured by stress episodes. The protein ubiquitin tags proteins, that are targeted for proteolytic degradation. Synthesis of, the mRNA for ubiquitin increases in Arabidopsis upon desiccation stress. In addition, some heat shock proteins are
Page 652 :
Stress Physiology, osmotically induced and may protect or renature proteins, inactivated by desiccation., The sensitivity of cell expansion to osmotic stress (see, Figure 25.1) has stimulated studies of various genes that, encode proteins involved in the structural composition and, integrity of cell walls. Genes coding for enzymes such as Sadenosylmethionine synthase and peroxidases, which may, be involved in lignin biosynthesis, have been shown to be, controlled by stress., A large group of genes that are regulated by osmotic, stress was discovered by examination of naturally desiccating embryos during seed maturation. These genes code, for so-called LEA proteins (named for late embryogenesis, abundant), and they are suspected to play a role in cellular, membrane protection. Although the function of LEA proteins is not well understood (Table 25.2), they accumulate, in vegetative tissues during episodes of osmotic stress. The, proteins encoded by these genes are typically hydrophilic, and strongly bind water. Their protective role might be, associated with an ability to retain water and to prevent, crystallization of important cellular proteins and other molecules during desiccation. They might also contribute to, membrane stabilization., More recently, microarray techniques have been used to, examine the expression of whole genomes of some plants, in response to stress. Such studies have revealed that large, numbers of genes display changes in expression after, plants are exposed to stress. Stress-controlled genes reflect, up to 10% of the total number of rice genes examined, (Kawasaki et al. 2001), Osmotic stress typically leads to the accumulation of, ABA (see Chapter 23), so it is not surprising that products, of ABA-responsive genes accumulate during osmotic, stresses. Studies of ABA-insensitive and ABA-deficient, mutants have shown that numerous genes that are induced, by osmotic stress are in fact induced by the ABA accumulated during the stress episode. However, not all genes that, are up-regulated by osmotic stresses are ABA regulated. As, discussed in the next section, other mechanisms for regulating gene expression of osmotic stress–regulated genes, have been uncovered., , Stress-Responsive Genes Are Regulated by ABADependent and ABA-Independent Processes, Gene transcription is controlled through the interaction of, regulatory proteins (transcription factors) with specific regulatory sequences in the promoters of the genes they regulate (Chapter 14 on the web site discusses these processes, in detail). Different genes that are induced by the same signal (desiccation or salinity, for example) are controlled by, a signaling pathway leading to the activation of these specific transcription factors., Studies of the promoters of several stress-induced genes, have led to the identification of specific regulatory sequences, for genes involved in different stresses. For example, the, RD29 gene contains DNA sequences that can be activated by, , 601, , osmotic stress, by cold, and by ABA (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, and Shinozaki 1994; Stockinger et al. 1997)., The promoters of ABA-regulated genes contain a sixnucleotide sequence element referred to as the ABA, response element (ABRE), which probably binds transcriptional factors involved in ABA-regulated gene activation (see Chapter 23). The promoters of these genes, which, are regulated by osmotic stress in an ABA-dependent manner, contain an alternative nine-nucleotide regulatory, sequence element, the dehydration response element, (DRE) which is recognized by an alternative set of proteins, regulating transcription. Thus the genes that are regulated, by osmotic stresses appear to be regulated either by signal, transduction pathways mediated by the action of ABA, (ABA-dependent genes), or by an ABA-independent,, osmotic stress–responsive signal transduction pathway., At least two signaling pathways have been implicated, in the regulation of gene expression in an ABA-independent manner (Figure 25.9). Transacting transcription factors, (called DREB1 and DREB2) that bind to the DRE elements, in the promoters of osmotic stress–responsive genes are, apparently activated by an ABA-independent signaling, cascade. Other ABA-independent, osmotic stress–respon-, , Osmotic stress, Osmotic stress, signal receptor, , ABA, , bZIP, Protein, transcription synthesis, factor, (MYC/MYB), , Altered gene expression, , ABA independent, , MAP kinase, cascade, , DREB/CBF, , Altered gene expression, , Osmotic stress tolerance, , FIGURE 25.9 Signal transduction pathways for osmotic, stress in plant cells. Osmotic stress is perceived by an as yet, unknown receptor in the plasma membrane activating, ABA-independent and an ABA-dependent signal transduction pathways. Protein synthesis participates in one of the, ABA-dependent pathways involving MYC/MYB. The, bZIP ABA-dependent pathway involves recognition of, ABA-responsive elements in gene promoters. Two ABAindependent pathways, one involving the MAP kinase signaling cascade and the other involving DREBP/CBFrelated transcription factors have also been demonstrated., (After Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2000.)
Page 653 :
602, , Chapter 25, , sive genes appear to be directly controlled by the so-called, MAP kinase signaling cascade of protein kinases (discussed, in detail in Chapter 14 on the web site). Other changes in, gene expression appear to be mediated via other mechanisms not involving DREBs., This complexity and “cross-talk” found in signaling cascades, exemplified here by both ABA-dependent and ABAindependent pathways, is typical of eukaryotic signaling., Such complexity reflects the wealth of interaction between, gene expression and the physiological processes mediating, adaptation to osmotic stress., , HEAT STRESS AND HEAT SHOCK, Most tissues of higher plants are unable to survive, extended exposure to temperatures above 45°C. Nongrowing cells or dehydrated tissues (e.g., seeds and pollen), can survive much higher temperatures than hydrated, vegetative, growing cells (Table 25.3). Actively growing tissues, rarely survive temperatures above 45°C, but dry seeds can, endure 120°C, and pollen grains of some species can, endure 70°C. In general, only single-celled eukaryotes can, complete their life cycle at temperatures above 50°C, and, only prokaryotes can divide and grow above 60°C., Periodic brief exposure to sublethal heat stresses often, induces tolerance to otherwise lethal temperatures, a phenomenon referred to as induced thermotolerance. The, mechanisms mediating induced thermotolerance will be, discussed later in the chapter. As mentioned earlier, water, and temperature stress are interrelated; shoots of most C3, , TABLE 25.3, Heat-killing temperatures for plants, , Plant, , Nicotiana rustica (wild tobacco), Cucurbita pepo (squash), Zea mays (corn), Brassica napus (rape), Citrus aurantium (sour orange), Opuntia (cactus), Sempervivum arachnoideum, (succulent), Potato leaves, Pine and spruce seedlings, Medicago seeds (alfalfa), Grape (ripe fruit), Tomato fruit, Red pine pollen, Various mosses, Hydrated, Dehydrated, Source: After Table 11.2 in Levitt 1980., , Heat-killing, temperature Time of, (C°), exposure, , 49–51, 49–51, 49–51, 49–51, 50.5, >65, 57–61, , 10 min, 10 min, 10 min, 10 min, 15–30 min, —, —, , 42.5, 54–55, 120, 63, 45, 70, , 1 hour, 5 min, 30 min, —, —, 1 hour, , 42–51, 85–110, , —, —, , and C4 plants with access to abundant water supply are, maintained below 45°C by evaporative cooling; if water, becomes limiting, evaporative cooling decreases and tissue, temperatures increase. Emerging seedlings in moist soil, may constitute an exception to this general rule. These, seedlings may be exposed to greater heat stress than those, in drier soils because wet, bare soil is typically darker and, absorbs more solar radiation than drier soil., , High Leaf Temperature and, Water Deficit Lead to Heat Stress, Many CAM, succulent higher plants, such as Opuntia and, Sempervivum, are adapted to high temperatures and can tolerate tissue temperatures of 60 to 65°C under conditions of, intense solar radiation in summer (see Table 25.3). Because, CAM plants keep their stomata closed during the day, they, cannot cool by transpiration. Instead, they dissipate the, heat from incident solar radiation by re-emission of longwave (infrared) radiation and loss of heat by conduction, and convection (see Chapter 9)., On the other hand, typical, nonirrigated C3 and C4, plants rely on transpirational cooling to lower leaf temperature. In these plants, leaf temperature can readily rise, 4 to 5°C above ambient air temperature in bright sunlight, near midday, when soil water deficit causes partial stomatal closure or when high relative humidity reduces the, potential for evaporative cooling. The physiological consequences of these increases in tissue temperature are discussed in the next section., Increases in leaf temperature during the day can be pronounced in plants from arid and semiarid regions experiencing drought and high irradiance from sunshine. Heat, stress is also a potential danger in greenhouses, where low, air speed and high humidity decrease the rate of leaf cooling. A moderate degree of heat stress slows growth of the, whole plant. Some irrigated crops, such as cotton, use transpirational cooling to dissipate heat. In irrigated cotton,, enhanced transpirational cooling is associated with higher, agronomic yields (see Web Topic 25.1)., , At High Temperatures, Photosynthesis, Is Inhibited before Respiration, Both photosynthesis and respiration are inhibited at high, temperatures, but as temperature increases, photosynthetic, rates drop before respiratory rates (Figure 25.10A and B)., The temperature at which the amount of CO2 fixed by photosynthesis, equals the amount of CO2 released by respiration, in a given time interval is called the temperature compensation point., At temperatures above the temperature compensation, point, photosynthesis cannot replace the carbon used as a, substrate for respiration. As a result, carbohydrate reserves, decline, and fruits and vegetables lose sweetness. This imbalance between photosynthesis and respiration is one of the, main reasons for the deleterious effects of high temperatures.
Page 654 :
Stress Physiology, , (B), , CO2 evolution, CO2 uptake, (percent of unheated control), , (A), , Conductivity change, (percent/min), , (C), , T. oblongifolia, , 100, 50, , A. sabulosa, , Photosynthesis, , 0, 100, 50, , Respiration, , 0, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, , 603, , FIGURE 25.10 Response of frosted orache (Atriplex sabulosa) and, Arizona honeysweet (Tidestromia oblongifolia) to heat stress., Photosynthesis (A) and respiration (B) were measured on, attached leaves, and ion leakage (C) was measured in leaf slices, submerged in water. At the beginning of the experiment, control, rates were measured at a noninjurious 30°C. Attached leaves, were then exposed to the indicated temperatures for 15 minutes, and returned to the initial control conditions before the rates were, recorded. Arrows indicate the temperature thresholds for inhibition of photosynthesis in each of the two species. Photosynthesis,, respiration, and membrane permeability were all more sensitive, to heat damage in A. sabulosa than in T. oblongifolia. In both, species, however, photosynthesis was more sensitive to heat, stress than either of the other two processes, and photosynthesis, was completely inhibited at temperatures that were noninjurious, to respiration. (From Björkman et al. 1980.), , Ion, leakage, , 0, 35, , 40, , 45, , 50, , 55, , 60, , 65, , Pretreatment leaf temperature (ºC), , In the same plant the temperature compensation point is, usually lower for shade leaves than for sun leaves that are, exposed to light (and heat). Enhanced respiration rates relative to photosynthesis at high temperatures are more detrimental in C3 plants than in C4 or CAM plants because the, rates of both dark respiration and photorespiration are, increased in C3 plants at higher temperatures (see Chapter 8)., , Plants Adapted to Cool Temperatures Acclimate, Poorly to High Temperatures, The extent to which plants that are genetically adapted to, a given temperature range can acclimate to a contrasting, temperature range is illustrated by a comparison of the, responses of two C4 species: Atriplex sabulosa (frosted, orache, family Chenopodiaceae) and Tidestromia oblongifolia (Arizona honeysweet, family Amaranthaceae)., A. sabulosa is native to the cool climate of coastal northern California, and T. oblongifolia is native to the very hot, climate of Death Valley, California, where it grows in a temperature regime that is lethal for most plant species. When, these species were grown in a controlled environment and, their growth rates were recorded as a function of temperature, T. oblongifolia barely grew at 16°C, while A. sabulosa, was at 75% of its maximum growth rate. By contrast, the, growth rate of A. sabulosa began to decline between 25 and, 30°C, and growth ceased at 45°C, the temperature at which, T. oblongifolia growth showed a maximum (see Figure, 25.10A) (Björkman et al. 1980). Clearly, neither species, could acclimate to the temperature range of the other., , High Temperature Reduces Membrane Stability, The stability of various cellular membranes is important, during high-temperature stress, just as it is during chilling, , and freezing. Excessive fluidity of membrane lipids at high, temperatures is correlated with loss of physiological function. In oleander (Nerium oleander), acclimation to high temperatures is associated with a greater degree of saturation, of fatty acids in membrane lipids, which makes the membranes less fluid (Raison et al. 1982)., At high temperatures there is a decrease in the strength, of hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions between, polar groups of proteins within the aqueous phase of the, membrane. High temperatures thus modify membrane, composition and structure and can cause leakage of ions, (see Figure 25.10C). Membrane disruption also causes the, inhibition of processes such as photosynthesis and respiration that depend on the activity of membrane-associated, electron carriers and enzymes., Photosynthesis is especially sensitive to high temperature (see Chapter 9). In their study of Atriplex and Tidestromia, O. Björkman and colleagues (1980) found that electron, transport in photosystem II was more sensitive to high, temperature in the cold-adapted A. sabulosa than in the, heat-adapted T. oblongifolia. In these plants the enzymes, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, NADP:glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase were less stable at high temperatures in, A. sabulosa than in T. oblongifolia., However, the temperatures at which these enzymes, began to denature and lose activity were distinctly higher, than the temperatures at which photosynthesis began to, decline. These results suggest that early stages of heat, injury to photosynthesis are more directly related to, changes in membrane properties and to uncoupling of the, energy transfer mechanisms in chloroplasts than to a general denaturation of proteins., , Several Adaptations Protect Leaves against, Excessive Heating, In environments with intense solar radiation and high temperatures, plants avoid excessive heating of their leaves by, decreasing their absorption of solar radiation. This adap-
Page 655 :
604, , Chapter 25, , tation is important in warm, sunny environments in which, a transpiring leaf is near its upper limit of temperature tolerance. In these conditions, any further warming arising, from decreased evaporation of water or increased energy, absorption can damage the leaf., Both drought resistance and heat resistance depend on, the same adaptations: reflective leaf hairs and leaf waxes;, leaf rolling and vertical leaf orientation; and growth of, small, highly dissected leaves to minimize the boundary, layer thickness and thus maximize convective and conductive heat loss (see Chapters 4 and 9). Some desert, shrubs—for example, white brittlebush (Encelia farinosa,, family Compositae)—have dimorphic leaves to avoid, excessive heating: Green, nearly hairless leaves found in, the winter are replaced by white, pubescent leaves in the, summer., , At Higher Temperatures, Plants Produce Heat, Shock Proteins, In response to sudden, 5 to 10°C rises in temperature,, plants produce a unique set of proteins referred to as heat, shock proteins (HSPs). Most HSPs function to help cells, withstand heat stress by acting as molecular chaperones., Heat stress causes many cell proteins that function as, enzymes or structural components to become unfolded or, misfolded, thereby leading to loss of proper enzyme structure and activity., Such misfolded proteins often aggregate and precipitate,, creating serious problems within the cell. HSPs act as molecular chaperones and serve to attain a proper folding of, misfolded, aggregated proteins and to prevent misfolding, of proteins. This facilitates proper cell functioning at elevated, stressful temperatures., Heat shock proteins were discovered in the fruit fly, (Drosophila melanogaster) and have since been identified in, other animals, and in humans, as well as in plants, fungi,, and microorganisms. For example, when soybean, seedlings are suddenly shifted from 25 to 40°C (just below, the lethal temperature), synthesis of the set of mRNAs and, proteins commonly found in the cell is suppressed, while, transcription and translation of a set of 30 to 50 other pro-, , teins (HSPs) is enhanced. New mRNA transcripts for HSPs, can be detected 3 to 5 minutes after heat shock (Sachs and, Ho 1986)., Although plant HSPs were first identified in response to, sudden changes in temperature (25 to 40°C) that rarely, occur in nature, HSPs are also induced by more gradual, rises in temperature that are representative of the natural, environment, and they occur in plants under field conditions. Some HSPs are found in normal, unstressed cells,, and some essential cellular proteins are homologous to, HSPs but do not increase in response to thermal stress, (Vierling 1991)., Plants and most other organisms make HSPs of different sizes in response to temperature increases (Table 25.4)., The molecular masses of the HSPs range from 15 to 104, kDa (kilodaltons), and they can be grouped into five classes, based on size. Different HSPs are localized to the nucleus,, mitochondria, chloroplasts, endoplasmic reticulum, and, cytosol. Members of the HSP60, HSP70, HSP90, and, HSP100 groups act as molecular chaperones, involving, ATP-dependent stabilization and folding of proteins, and, the assembly of oligomeric proteins. Some HSPs assist in, polypeptide transport across membranes into cellular compartments. HSP90s are associated with hormone receptors, in animal cells and may be required for their activation, but, there is no comparable information for plants., Low-molecular-weight (15–30 kDa) HSPs are more, abundant in higher plants than in other organisms., Whereas plants contain five to six classes of low-molecular-weight HSPs, other eukaryotes show only one class, (Buchanan et al. 2000). The different classes of 15–30 kDa, molecular-weight HSPs (smHSPs) in plants are distributed, in the cytosol, chloroplasts, ER and mitochondria. The, function of these small HSPs is not understood., Cells that have been induced to synthesize HSPs show, improved thermal tolerance and can tolerate exposure to, temperatures that are otherwise lethal. Some of the HSPs, are not unique to high-temperature stress. They are also, induced by widely different environmental stresses or conditions, including water deficit, ABA treatment, wounding,, low temperature, and salinity. Thus, cells previously, , TABLE 25.4, The five classes of heat shock proteins found in plants, HSP class, , Size (kDa), , Examples (Arabidopsis / prokaryotic), , Cellular location, , HSP100, , 100–114, , AtHSP101 / ClpB, ClpA/C, , Cytosol, mitochondria, chloroplasts, , HSP90, , 80–94, , AtHSP90 / HtpG, , Cytosol, endoplasmic reticulum, , HSP70, , 69–71, , AtHSP70 / DnaK, , Cytosol/nucleus, mitochondria, chloroplasts, , HSP60, , 57–60, , AtTCP-1 / GroEL, GroES, , Mitochondria, chloroplasts, , smHSP, , 15–30, , Various AtHSP22, AtHSP20, AtHSP18.2,, AtHSP17.6 / IBPA/B, , Cytosol, mitochondria, chloroplasts,, endoplasmic reticulum, , Source: After Boston et al. 1996.
Page 656 :
Stress Physiology, exposed to one stress may gain cross-protection against, another stress. Such is the case with tomato fruits, in which, heat shock (48 hours at 38°C) has been observed to promote HSP accumulation and to protect cells for 21 days, from chilling at 2°C., , A Transcription Factor Mediates HSP, Accumulation in Response to Heat Shock, All cells seem to contain molecular chaperones that are, constitutively expressed and function like HSPs. These, chaperones are called heat shock cognate proteins. However, when cells are subjected to a stressful, but nonlethal, heat episode, the synthesis of HSPs dramatically increases, while the continuing translation of other proteins is dramatically lowered or ceases. This heat shock response, appears to be mediated by a specific transcription factor, (HSF) that acts on the transcription of HSP mRNAs., In the absence of heat stress, HSF exists as monomers, that are incapable of binding to DNA and directing transcription (Figure 25.11). Stress causes HSF monomers to, associate into trimers that are then able to bind to specific, sequence elements in DNA referred to as heat shock ele-, , Heat stress, , 605, , ments (HSEs). Once bound to the HSE, the trimeric HSF is, phosphorylated and promotes the transcription of HSP, mRNAs. HSP70 subsequently binds to HSF, leading to the, dissociation of the HSF/HSE complex, and the HSF is subsequently recycled to the monomeric HSF form. Thus, by, the action of HSF, HSPs accumulate until they become, abundant enough to bind to HSF, leading to the cessation, of HSP mRNA production., , HSPs Mediate Thermotolerance, Conditions that induce thermal tolerance in plants closely, match those that induce the accumulation of HSPs, but that, correlation alone does not prove that HSPs play an essential, role in acclimation to heat stress. More conclusive experiments show that expression of an activated HSF induces, constitutive synthesis of HSPs and increases the thermotolerance of Arabidopsis. Studies with Arabidopsis plants containing an antisense DNA sequence that reduces HSP70 synthesis showed that the high-temperature extreme at which, the plants could survive was reduced by 2°C compared with, controls, although the mutant plants grew normally at optimum temperatures (Lee and Schoeffl 1996)., , 3, 2, , P, , P, , 1, 5, nGaannTTCnnGAAn, Heat shock element, , DNA, 4, , HSP70, , Heat shock protein, mRNA, P, , Heat, shock, factor, (HSF), , P, , P, , 8, 7, , FIGURE 25.11 The heat shock factor (HSF) cycle activates, , the synthesis of heat shock protein mRNAs. In nonstressed, cells, HSF normally exists in a monomeric state (1) associated with HSP70 proteins. Upon the onset of an episode of, heat stress, HSP70 dissociates from HSF which subsequently trimerizes (2). Active trimers bind to heat shock, elements (HSE) in the promoter of heat shock protein (HSP), genes (3), and activate the transcription of HSP mRNAs, , 6, , Heat shock, proteins, (HSP), , leading to the translation of HSPs among which are HSP70, (4). The HSF trimers associated with the HSE are phosphorylated (5) facilitating the binding of HSP70 to the phosphorylated trimers (6). The HSP70 trimer complex (7) dissociates from the HSE and disassembles and dephosphorylates into HSF monomers (8), which subsequently bind HSP, reforming the resting HSP70/HSF complex. (After Bray et, al. 2000.)
Page 657 :
606, , Chapter 25, , Presumably failure to synthesize the entire range of, HSPs that are usually induced in the plant would lead to a, much more dramatic loss of thermotolerance. Other studies with both Arabidopsis mutants (Hong and Vierling 2000), and transgenic plants (Queitsch et al. 2000) demonstrate, that at least HSP101 is a critical component of both induced, and constitutive thermotolerance in plants., , affect the activity of proton-pumping ATPases that pump, protons from the cytosol into the apoplast or vacuoles (see, Chapter 6). This might lead to an acidification of the, cytosol, which could cause additional metabolic perturbations during stress. Cells can have metabolic acclimation, mechanisms that ameliorate these effects of heat stress on, metabolism., One of the metabolic acclimations to heat stress is the, accumulation of the nonprotein amino acid γ-aminobutyric, acid (GABA). During episodes of heat stress, GABA accumulates to levels six- to tenfold higher than in unstressed, plants. GABA is synthesized from the amino acid L-glutamate, in a single reaction catalyzed by the enzyme glutamate decarboxylase (GAD). GAD is one of several enzymes, whose activity is modulated by the calcium-activated, regulatory protein calmodulin (for details on the mode of action, of calmodulin, see Chapter 14 on the web site)., Calcium-activated calmodulin activates GAD (Figure, 25.12) and increases the biosynthesis rate of GABA (Snedden et al. 1995). In transgenic plants expressing the calcium-sensing protein aequorin, it has been shown that, , Adaptation to Heat Stress Is Mediated, by Cytosolic Calcium, Enzymes participating in metabolic pathways can have different temperature responses, and such differential thermostability may affect specific steps in metabolism before, HSPs can restore activity by their molecular chaperone, capacity. Heat stress can therefore cause changes in metabolism leading to the accumulation of some metabolites and, the reduction of others. Such changes can dramatically alter, the function of metabolic pathways and lead to imbalances, that can be difficult to correct., In addition, heat stress can alter the rate of metabolic, reactions that consume or produce protons, and it can, , Ca+, , Apoplast, pH 5.5, , Ca+, , ˜, , ACA, , Cytosol, acidification, , CaM, , ATP, , Ca+, , Ca+, , GAD, (inactive), , ADP + Pi, , Ca2+ CaM Ca2+, H+, Ca+, , Ca2+ CaM Ca2+, GAD, (active), , CAX1, CAX2, , ADP + Pi, Glutamate, + H+, , GABA, + CO2, , ADP + Pi, H+, , Ca+, , H+, , ATP, , Ca+, , Ca+, , ACA, +, , Ca, , H+, , ATP, , Vacuole, pH 5.5, , ATP, , H+, , ADP + Pi, , ˜, , H+, , 2 Pi, H+, PPi, , FIGURE 25.12 Heat stress causes a reduction in cytosolic, , pH from the normal slightly alkaline value, probably by, inhibiting proton-pumping ATPases and pyrophosphatases, that pump protons across the plasma membrane or into the, vacuole. Additionally, heat stress effects a change in calcium homeostasis inside the cell by affecting the influx of, calcium into the cytosol through either plasma membrane, or vacuolar calcium channels, or by action on efflux, , ATPases or proton cotransporters. This increase in cytosolic, calcium leads to the activation of calmodulin (CaM), which, binds to glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) converting it from, the inactive to the active form. Glutamate conversion to γ−, aminobutyric acid (GABA) is then accomplished consuming protons in the process and mediating an increase in, cytosolic pH. CAX1 and CAX2 are transport proteins, ACA:, Ca2+ ATPase.
Page 658 :
Stress Physiology, , 607, , high-temperature stress increases cytosolic levels of calcium, and that these increases lead to the calmodulin-mediated activation of GAD and the high-temperature induced, accumulation of GABA., Although GABA is an important signaling molecule in, mammalian brain tissue, there is no evidence that it functions as a signaling molecule in plants. Possible functions, of GABA in heat stress resistance are under investigation., , Freezing injury, on the other hand, occurs at temperatures below the freezing point of water. Full induction of, tolerance to freezing, as with chilling, requires a period of, acclimation at cold temperatures., In the discussion that follows we will examine how, chilling injury alters membrane properties, how ice crystals damage cells and tissues, and how ABA, gene expression, and protein synthesis mediate acclimation to freezing., , CHILLING AND FREEZING, , Membrane Properties Change in Response to, Chilling Injury, , Chilling temperatures are too low for normal growth but, not low enough for ice to form. Typically, tropical and subtropical species are susceptible to chilling injury. Among, crops, maize, Phaseolus bean, rice, tomato, cucumber, sweet, potato, and cotton are chilling sensitive. Passiflora, Coleus,, and Gloxinia are examples of susceptible ornamentals., When plants growing at relatively warm temperatures, (25 to 35°C) are cooled to 10 to 15°C, chilling injury occurs:, Growth is slowed, discoloration or lesions appear on, leaves, and the foliage looks soggy, as if soaked in water for, a long time. If roots are chilled, the plants may wilt., Species that are generally sensitive to chilling can show, appreciable variation in their response to chilling temperatures. Genetic adaptation to the colder temperatures associated with high altitude improves chilling resistance (Figure 25.13). In addition, resistance often increases if plants, are first hardened (acclimated) by exposure to cool, but, noninjurious, temperatures. Chilling damage thus can be, minimized if exposure is slow and gradual. Sudden exposure to temperatures near 0°C, called cold shock, greatly, increases the chances of injury., , Chilling resistance, (percent surviving seedlings), , 80, Seeds from, high altitudes, 60, , 40, , 20, , 0, , 1, 2, Altitude of origin (km), , 3, , FIGURE 25.13 Survival at low temperature of seedlings of, , different populations of tomato collected from different altitudes in South America. Seed was collected from wild, tomato (Lycopersicon hirsutum) and grown in the same, greenhouse at 18 to 25°C. All seedlings were then chilled, for 7 days at 0°C and then kept for 7 days in a warm, growth room, after which the number of survivors was, counted. Seedlings from seed collected from high altitudes, showed greater resistance to chilling (cold shock) than, those from seed collected from lower altitudes. (From, Patterson et al. 1978.), , Leaves from plants injured by chilling show inhibition of, photosynthesis, slower carbohydrate translocation, lower, respiration rates, inhibition of protein synthesis, and, increased degradation of existing proteins. All of these, responses appear to depend on a common primary mechanism involving loss of membrane function during chilling., For instance, solutes leak from the leaves of chillingsensitive Passiflora maliformis (conch apple) floated on, water at 0°C, but not from those of chilling-resistant Passiflora caerulea (passionflower). Loss of solutes to the water, reflects damage to the plasma membrane and possibly also, to the tonoplast. In turn, inhibition of photosynthesis and, of respiration reflects injury to chloroplast and mitochondrial membranes., Why are membranes affected by chilling? Plant membranes consist of a lipid bilayer interspersed with proteins, and sterols (see Chapters 1 and 11). The physical properties, of the lipids greatly influence the activities of the integral, membrane proteins, including H+-ATPases, carriers, and, channel-forming proteins that regulate the transport of ions, and other solutes (see Chapter 6), as well as the transport, of enzymes on which metabolism depends., In chilling-sensitive plants, the lipids in the bilayer have, a high percentage of saturated fatty acid chains, and membranes with this composition tend to solidify into a semicrystalline state at a temperature well above 0°C. Keep in, mind that saturated fatty acids that have no double bonds, and lipids containing trans-monounsaturated fatty acids, solidify at higher temperatures than do membranes composed of lipids that contain unsaturated fatty acids., As the membranes become less fluid, their protein components can no longer function normally. The result is inhibition of H+-ATPase activity, of solute transport into and, out of cells, of energy transduction (see Chapters 7 and 11),, and of enzyme-dependent metabolism. In addition, chilling-sensitive leaves exposed to high photon fluxes and, chilling temperatures are photoinhibited (see Chapter 7),, causing acute damage to the photosynthetic machinery., Membrane lipids from chilling-resistant plants often, have a greater proportion of unsaturated fatty acids than, those from chilling-sensitive plants (Table 25.5), and during acclimation to cool temperatures the activity of desaturase enzymes increases and the proportion of unsaturated, lipids rises (Williams et al. 1988; Palta et al. 1993). This, modification lowers the temperature at which the mem-
Page 659 :
608, , Chapter 25, , TABLE 25.5, Fatty acid composition of mitochondria isolated from chilling-resistant and chilling-sensitive species, Percent weight of total fatty acid content, Chilling-resistant species, Major fatty, , acidsa, , Cauliflower bud, , Palmitic (16:0), Stearic (18:0), Oleic (18:0), Linoleic (18:2), Linolenic (18:3), Ratio of unsaturated to saturated, fatty acids, , Turnip root, , Chilling-sensitive species, , Pea shoot, , Bean shoot, , Sweet potato, , Maize shoot, , 21.3, 1.9, 7.0, 16.4, 49.4, , 19.0, 1.1, 12.2, 20.6, 44.9, , 12.8, 2.9, 3.1, 61.9, 13.2, , 24.0, 2.2, 3.8, 43.6, 24.3, , 24.9, 2.6, 0.6, 50.8, 10.6, , 28.3, 1.6, 4.6, 54.6, 6.8, , 3.2, , 3.9, , 3.8, , 2.8, , 1.7, , 2.1, , a, , Shown in parentheses are the number of carbon atoms in the fatty acid chain and the number of double bonds., Source: After Lyons et al. 1964., , brane lipids begin a gradual phase change from fluid to, semicrystalline and allows membranes to remain fluid at, lower temperatures. Thus, desaturation of fatty acids provides some protection against damage from chilling., The importance of membrane lipids to tolerance of low, temperatures has been demonstrated by work with mutant, and transgenic plants in which the activity of particular, enzymes led to a specific change in membrane lipid composition independent of acclimation to low temperature., For example, Arabidopsis was transformed with a gene from, Escherichia coli that raised the proportion of high-meltingpoint (saturated) membrane lipids. This gene greatly, increased the chilling sensitivity of the transformed plants., Similarly, the fab1 mutants of Arabidopsis have increased, levels of saturated fatty acids, particularly 16:0 (see Table, 25.5, and Tables 11.3 and 11.4). During a period of 3 to 4, weeks at chilling temperatures, photosynthesis and growth, were gradually inhibited, and exposure to chilling temperature eventually destroyed the chloroplasts of this, mutant. At nonchilling temperatures, the mutant grew as, well as wild-type controls did (Wu et al. 1997). (For additional transformation examples, see Web Topic 25.2.), , Ice Crystal Formation and Protoplast, Dehydration Kill Cells, The ability to tolerate freezing temperatures under natural, conditions varies greatly among tissues. Seeds, other partly, dehydrated tissues, and fungal spores can be kept indefinitely at temperatures near absolute zero (0 K, or –273°C),, indicating that these very low temperatures are not intrinsically harmful., Fully hydrated, vegetative cells can also retain viability, if they are cooled very quickly to avoid the formation of, large, slow-growing ice crystals that would puncture and, destroy subcellular structures. Ice crystals that form during very rapid freezing are too small to cause mechanical, damage. Conversely, rapid warming of frozen tissue is, required to prevent the growth of small ice crystals into, , crystals of a damaging size, or to prevent loss of water, vapor by sublimation, both of which take place at intermediate temperatures (–100 to –10°C)., Under natural conditions, cooling of intact, multicellular plant organs is never fast enough to limit crystal formation in fully hydrated cells to only small, harmless ice, crystals. Ice usually forms first within the intercellular, spaces, and in the xylem vessels, along which the ice can, quickly propagate. This ice formation is not lethal to hardy, plants, and the tissue recovers fully if warmed. However,, when plants are exposed to freezing temperatures for an, extended period, the growth of extracellular ice crystals, results in the movement of liquid water from the protoplast, to the extracellular ice, causing excessive dehydration (for, a detailed description of this process, see Web Topic 25.3)., During rapid freezing, the protoplast, including the vacuole, supercools; that is, the cellular water remains liquid, even at temperatures several degrees below its theoretical, freezing point. Several hundred molecules are needed for, an ice crystal to begin forming. The process whereby these, hundreds of water molecules start to form a stable ice crystal is called ice nucleation, and it strongly depends on the, properties of the involved surfaces. Some large polysaccharides and proteins facilitate ice crystal formation and, are called ice nucleators., Some ice nucleation proteins made by bacteria appear, to facilitate ice nucleation by aligning water molecules, along repeated amino acid domains within the protein. In, plant cells, ice crystals begin to grow from endogenous ice, nucleators, and the resulting, relatively large intracellular, ice crystals cause extensive damage to the cell and are usually lethal., , Limitation of Ice Formation Contributes to, Freezing Tolerance, Several specialized plant proteins may help limit the, growth of ice crystals by a noncolligative mechanism—that, is, an effect that does not depend on the lowering of the
Page 660 :
Stress Physiology, freezing point of water by the presence of solutes. These, antifreeze proteins are induced by cold temperatures, and, they bind to the surfaces of ice crystals to prevent or slow, further crystal growth., In rye leaves, antifreeze proteins are localized in the epidermal cells and cells surrounding the intercellular spaces,, where they can inhibit the growth of extracellular ice., Plants and animals may use similar mechanisms to limit, ice crystals: A cold-inducible gene identified in Arabidopsis, has DNA homology to a gene that encodes the antifreeze, protein in fishes such as winter flounder. Antifreeze proteins are discussed in more detail later in the chapter., Sugars and some of the cold-induced proteins are suspected to have cryoprotective (cryo- = “cold”) effects; they, stabilize proteins and membranes during dehydration, induced by low temperature. In winter wheat, the greater, the sucrose concentration, the greater the freezing tolerance. Sucrose predominates among the soluble sugars associated with freezing tolerance that function in a colligative, fashion, but in some species raffinose, fructans, sorbitol, or, mannitol serves the same function., During cold acclimation of winter cereals, soluble sugars accumulate in the cell walls, where they may help, restrict the growth of ice. A cryoprotective glycoprotein has, been isolated from leaves of cold-acclimated cabbage (Brassica oleracea). In vitro, the protein protects thylakoids isolated from nonacclimated spinach (Spinacia oleracea) against, damage from freezing and thawing., , Some Woody Plants Can Acclimate, to Very Low Temperatures, When in a dormant state, some woody plants are, extremely resistant to low temperatures. Resistance is, determined in part by previous acclimation to cold, but, genetics plays an important role in determining the degree, of tolerance to low temperatures. Native species of Prunus, (cherry, plum, and other pit fruits) from northern cooler climates in North America are hardier after acclimation than, those from milder climates. When the species were tested, together in the laboratory, those with a northern geographic distribution showed greater ability to avoid intracellular ice formation, underscoring distinct genetic differences (Burke and Stushnoff 1979)., Under natural conditions, woody species acclimate to, cold in two distinct stages (Weiser 1970):, 1. In the first stage, hardening is induced in the early, autumn by exposure to short days and nonfreezing, chilling temperatures, both of which combine to stop, growth. A diffusible factor that promotes acclimation, (probably ABA) moves in the phloem from leaves to, overwintering stems and may be responsible for the, changes. During this period, woody species also withdraw water from the xylem vessels, thereby preventing the stem from splitting in response to the expansion of water during later freezing. Cells in this first, , 609, , stage of acclimation can survive temperatures well, below 0°C, but they are not fully hardened., 2. In the second stage, direct exposure to freezing is the, stimulus; no known translocatable factor can confer, the hardening resulting from exposure to freezing., When fully hardened, the cells can tolerate exposure, to temperatures of –50 to –100°C., , Resistance to Freezing Temperatures Involves, Supercooling and Slow Dehydration, In many species of the hardwood forests of southeastern, Canada and the eastern United States, acclimation to freezing involves the suppression of ice crystal formation at temperatures far below the theoretical freezing point (see Web, Topic 25.3 for details). This deep supercooling is seen in species, such as oak, elm, maple, beech, ash, walnut, hickory, rose,, rhododendron, apple, pear, peach, and plum (Burke and, Stushnoff 1979). Deep supercooling also takes place in the, stem and leaf tissue of tree species such as Engelmann, spruce (Picea engelmannii) and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), growing in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado., Resistance to freezing is quickly weakened once growth, has resumed in the spring (Becwar et al. 1981). Stem tissues, of subalpine fir, which undergo deep supercooling and, remain viable to below –35°C in May, lose their ability to, suppress ice formation in June and can be killed at –10°C., Cells can supercool only to about –40°C, at which temperature ice forms spontaneously. Spontaneous ice formation sets the low-temperature limit at which many alpine and, subarctic species that undergo deep supercooling can survive. It also explains why the altitude of the timberline in, mountain ranges is at or near the –40°C minimum isotherm., The cell protoplast suppresses ice nucleation when, undergoing deep supercooling. In addition, the cell wall acts, as a barrier both to the growth of ice from the intercellular, spaces into the wall, and to the loss of liquid water from the, protoplast to the extracellular ice, which is driven by a steep, vapor pressure gradient (Wisniewski and Arora 1993)., Many flower buds (e.g., grape, blueberry, peach, azalea,, and flowering dogwood) survive the winter by deep, supercooling, and serious economic losses, particularly of, peach, can result from the decline in freezing tolerance of, the flower buds in the spring. The cells then no longer, supercool, and ice crystals that form extracellularly in the, bud scales draw water from the apical meristem, killing the, floral apex by dehydration., The floral buds of apple and pear, the vegetative buds, of all temperate fruit trees, and the living cells in their bark, do not supercool, but they resist dehydration during extracellular ice formation. Resistance to cellular dehydration is, highly developed in woody species that are subject to average annual temperature minima below –40°C, particularly, species found in northern Canada, Alaska, northern, Europe, and Asia.
Page 661 :
610, , Chapter 25, , Ice formation starts at –3 to –5°C in the intercellular, spaces, where the crystals continue to grow, fed by the, gradual withdrawal of water from the protoplast, which, remains unfrozen. Resistance to freezing temperatures, depends on the capacity of the extracellular spaces to, accommodate the volume of growing ice crystals and on, the ability of the protoplast to withstand dehydration., This restriction of ice crystal formation to extracellular, spaces, accompanied by gradual protoplast dehydration,, may explain why some woody species that are resistant to, freezing are also resistant to water deficit during the growing season. For example, species of willow (Salix), white, birch (Betula papyrifera), quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), pin cherry (Prunus pensylvanica), chokecherry, (Prunus virginiana), and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) tolerate very low temperatures by limiting the formation of, ice crystals to the extracellular spaces. However, acquisition of resistance depends on slow cooling and gradual, extracellular ice formation and protoplast dehydration., Sudden exposure to very cold temperatures before full, acclimation causes intracellular freezing and cell death., , Some Bacteria That Live on Leaf Surfaces, Increase Frost Damage, When leaves are cooled to temperatures in the –3 to –5°C, range, the formation of ice crystals on the surface (frost) is, accelerated by certain bacteria that naturally inhabit the, leaf surface, such as Pseudomonas syringae and Erwinia herbicola, which act as ice nucleators. When artificially inoculated with cultures of these bacteria, leaves of frost-sensitive species freeze at warmer temperatures than leaves that, are bacteria free (Lindow et al. 1982). The surface ice, quickly spreads to the intercellular spaces within the leaf,, leading to cellular dehydration., Bacterial strains can be genetically modified so that they, lose their ice-nucleating characteristics. Such strains have, been used commercially in foliar sprays of valuable frostsensitive crops like strawberry to compete with native bacterial strains and thus minimize the number of potential ice, nucleation points., , ABA and Protein Synthesis Are Involved in, Acclimation to Freezing, In seedlings of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), tolerance to freezing at –10°C is greatly improved by previous exposure to, cold (4°C) or by treatment with exogenous ABA without, exposure to cold. These treatments cause changes in the, pattern of newly synthesized proteins that can be resolved, on two-dimensional gels. Some of the changes are unique, to the particular treatment (cold or ABA), but some of the, newly synthesized proteins induced by cold appear to be, the same as those induced by ABA (see Chapter 23) or by, mild water deficit., Protein synthesis is necessary for the development of, freezing tolerance, and several distinct proteins accumulate, , during acclimation to cold, as a result of changes in gene, expression (Guy 1999). Isolation of the genes for these proteins reveals that several of the proteins that are induced by, low temperature share homology with the RAB/LEA/DHN, (responsive to ABA, late embryo abundant, and dehydrin,, respectively) protein family. As described earlier in the section on gene regulation by osmotic stress, these proteins, accumulate in tissues exposed to different stresses, such as, osmotic stress. Their functions are under investigation., ABA appears to have a role in inducing freezing tolerance., Winter wheat, rye, spinach, and Arabidopsis thaliana are all, cold-tolerant species, and when they are hardened by water, shortages, their freezing tolerance also increases. This tolerance to freezing is increased at nonacclimating temperatures, by mild water deficit, or at low temperatures, either of which, increases endogenous ABA concentrations in leaves., Plants develop freezing tolerance at nonacclimating, temperatures when treated with exogenous ABA. Many of, the genes or proteins expressed at low temperatures or, under water deficit are also inducible by ABA under nonacclimating conditions. All these findings support a role of, ABA in tolerance to freezing., Mutants of Arabidopsis that are insensitive to ABA (abi1), or are ABA deficient (aba1) are unable to undergo low-temperature acclimation to freezing. Only in aba1, however,, does exposure to ABA restore the ability to develop freezing tolerance (Mantyla et al. 1995). On the other hand, not, all the genes induced by low temperature are ABA dependent, and it is not yet clear whether expression of ABAinduced genes is critical for the full development of freezing tolerance. For instance, research on the tolerance of rye, crowns to freezing has found that the lethal temperature, for 50% of the crowns (LT50) is –2 to –5°C for controls, grown at 25°C, –8°C for ABA-treated crowns, and –28°C, after acclimation at 2°C., Clearly exogenous ABA cannot confer the same freezing, acclimation that exposure to low temperatures does. Cell, cultures of bromegrass (Bromus inermis) show a more dramatic induction of freezing tolerance when treated with, ABA: Whereas controls grown at 25°C could survive to, –9°C, 7 days of exposure to ABA improved the freezing tolerance to –40°C (Gusta et al. 1996)., Typically, a minimum of several days of exposure to, cool temperatures is required for freezing resistance to be, induced fully. Potato requires 15 days of exposure to cold., On the other hand, when rewarmed, plants lose their freezing tolerance rapidly, and they can become susceptible to, freezing once again in 24 hours., The need for cool temperatures to induce acclimation to, chilling or freezing, and the rapid loss of acclimation upon, warming, explain the susceptibility of plants in the southern United States (and similar climatic zones with highly, variable winters) to extremes of temperature in the winter, months, when air temperature can drop from 20 to 25°C to, below 0°C in a few hours.
Page 662 :
Stress Physiology, , Numerous Genes Are Induced during, Cold Acclimation, Expression of certain genes and synthesis of specific proteins are common to both heat and cold stress, but some, aspects of cold-inducible gene expression differ from that, produced by heat stress (Thomashow 2001). Whereas during cold episodes the synthesis of “housekeeping” proteins, (proteins made in the absence of stress) is not substantially, down-regulated, during heat stress housekeeping-protein, synthesis is essentially shut down., On the other hand, the synthesis of several heat shock, proteins that can act as molecular chaperones is up-regulated under cold stress in the same way that it is during, heat stress. This suggests that protein destabilization, accompanies both heat and cold stress and that mechanisms for stabilizing protein structure during both heat and, cold episodes are important for survival., Another important class of proteins whose expression, is up-regulated by cold stress is the antifreeze proteins., Antifreeze proteins were first discovered in fishes that live, in water under the polar ice caps. As discussed earlier,, these proteins have the ability to inhibit ice crystal growth, in a noncolligative manner, thus preventing freeze damage, at intermediate freezing temperatures. Antifreeze proteins, confer to aqueous solutions the property of thermal hysteresis (transition from liquid to solid is promoted at a lower, temperature than is transition from solid to liquid), and, thus they are sometimes referred to as thermal hysteresis, proteins (THPs)., Several types of cold-induced, antifreeze proteins have, been discovered in cold-acclimated winter-hardy monocots. When the specific genes coding for these proteins, were cloned and sequenced, it was found that all antifreeze, proteins belong to a class of proteins such as endochitinases, and endoglucanases, which are induced upon infection of, different pathogens. These proteins, called pathogenesisrelated (PR) proteins are thought to protect plants against, pathogens. It thus appears that at least in monocots, the, dual role of these proteins as antifreeze and pathogenesisrelated proteins might protect plant cells against both cold, stress and pathogen attack., Another group of proteins found to be associated with, osmotic stress (see the discussion earlier in this chapter) are, also up-regulated during cold stress. This group includes, proteins involved in the synthesis of osmolytes, proteins for, membrane stabilization, and the LEA proteins. Because the, formation of extracellular ice crystals generates significant, osmotic stresses inside cells, coping with freezing stress, also requires the means to cope with osmotic stress., , A Transcription Factor Regulates Cold-Induced, Gene Expression, More than 100 genes are up-regulated by cold stress. Because, cold stress is clearly related to ABA responses and to osmotic, stress, not all the genes up-regulated by cold stress neces-, , 611, , sarily need to be associated with cold tolerance, but most, likely many of them are. Many cold stress–induced genes are, activated by transcriptional activators called C-repeat binding factors (CBF1, CBF2, CBF3; also called DREB1b,, DREB1c, and DREB1a, respectively) (Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki 2000)., CBF/DREB1-type transcription factors bind to, CRT/DRE elements (C-repeat/dehydration-responsive,, ABA-independent sequence elements) in gene promoter, sequences, which were discussed earlier in the chapter., CBF/DREB1 is involved in the coordinate transcriptional, response of numerous cold and osmotic stress–regulated, genes, all of which contain the CRT/DRE elements in their, promoters. CBF1/DREB1b is unique in that it is specifically, induced by cold stress and not by osmotic or salinity stress,, whereas the DRE-binding elements of the DREB2 type (discussed earlier in the section on osmotic stresses) are induced, only by osmotic and salinity stresses and not by cold., The expression of CBF1/DREB1b is controlled by a separate transcription factor, called ICE (inducer of CBF, expression). ICE transcription factors do not appear to be, induced by cold, and it is presumed that ICE or an associated protein is posttranscriptionally activated, permitting, activation of CBF1/DRE1b, but the precise signaling pathway(s) of cold perception, calcium signaling, and the activation of ICE are presently under investigation., Transgenic plants constitutively expressing CBF1 have, more cold–up-regulated gene transcripts than wild-type, plants have, suggesting that numerous cold–up-regulated, proteins that may be involved in cold acclimation are being, produced in the absence of cold in these CBF1 transgenic, plants. In addition, CBF1 tansgenic plants are more cold, tolerant than control plants., , SALINITY STRESS, Under natural conditions, terrestrial higher plants, encounter high concentrations of salts close to the seashore, and in estuaries where seawater and freshwater mix or, replace each other with the tides. Far inland, natural salt, seepage from geologic marine deposits can wash into, adjoining areas, rendering them unusable for agriculture., However, a much more extensive problem in agriculture is, the accumulation of salts from irrigation water., Evaporation and transpiration remove pure water (as, vapor) from the soil, and this water loss concentrates, solutes in the soil. When irrigation water contains a high, concentration of solutes and when there is no opportunity, to flush out accumulated salts to a drainage system, salts, can quickly reach levels that are injurious to salt-sensitive, species. It is estimated that about one-third of the irrigated, land on Earth is affected by salt., In this section we discuss how plant function is affected, by water and soil salinity, and we examine the processes, that assist plants in avoiding salinity stress.
Page 663 :
612, , Chapter 25, , TABLE 25.6, Properties of seawater and of good quality, irrigation water, Property, , Seawater, , Concentration of ions (mM), Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl–, SO42–, HCO3–, Osmotic potential (MPa), Total dissolved salts, (mg L–1 or ppm), , 457, 9.7, 10, 56, 536, 28, 2.3, –2.4, 32,000, , Irrigation, water, , <2.0, <1.0, 0.5–2.5, 0.25–1.0, <2.0, 0.25–2.5, <1.5, –0.039, 500, , phytes are native to saline soils and complete their life, cycles in that environment. Glycophytes (literally “sweet, plants”), or nonhalophytes, are not able to resist salts to the, same degree as halophytes. Usually there is a threshold, concentration of salt above which glycophytes begin to, show signs of growth inhibition, leaf discoloration, and loss, of dry weight., Among crops, maize, onion, citrus, pecan, lettuce, and, bean are highly sensitive to salt; cotton and barley are moderately tolerant; and sugar beet and date palms are highly, tolerant (Greenway and Munns 1980). Some species that are, highly tolerant of salt, such as Suaeda maritima (a salt marsh, plant) and Atriplex nummularia (a saltbush), show growth, stimulation at Cl– concentrations many times greater than, the lethal level for sensitive species (Figure 25.14)., , Salt Injury Involves Both Osmotic Effects and, Specific Ion Effects, Salt Accumulation in Soils Impairs, Plant Function and Soil Structure, In discussing the effects of salts in the soil, we distinguish, between high concentrations of Na+, referred to as sodicity, and high concentrations of total salts, referred to as, salinity. The two concepts are often related, but in some, areas Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO24–, as well as NaCl, can contribute substantially to salinity. The high Na+ concentration, of a sodic soil can not only injure plants directly but also, degrade the soil structure, decreasing porosity and water, permeability. A sodic clay soil known as caliche is so hard, and impermeable that dynamite is sometimes required to, dig through it!, In the field, the salinity of soil water or irrigation water, is measured in terms of its electrical conductivity or in, terms of osmotic potential. Pure water is a very poor conductor of electric current; the conductivity of a water sample is due to the ions dissolved in it. The higher the salt, concentration in water, the greater its electrical conductivity and the lower its osmotic potential (higher osmotic pressure) (Table 25.6)., The quality of irrigation water in semiarid and arid, regions is often poor. In the United States the salt content, of the headwaters of the Colorado River is only 50 mg L–1,, but about 2000 km downstream, in southern California, the, salt content of the same river reaches about 900 mg L–1,, enough to preclude growth of some salt-sensitive crops,, such as maize. Water from some wells used for irrigation, in Texas may contain as much as 2000 to 3000 mg salt L–1., An annual application of irrigation water totaling 1 m from, such wells would add 20 to 30 tons of salts per hectare, (8–12 tons per acre) to the soil. These levels of salts are, damaging to all but the most resistant crops., , Salinity Depresses Growth and Photosynthesis, in Sensitive Species, Plants can be divided into two broad groups on the basis, of their response to high concentrations of salts. Halo-, , Dissolved solutes in the rooting zone generate a low (more, negative) osmotic potential that lowers the soil water, potential. The general water balance of plants is thus, affected because leaves need to develop an even lower, water potential to maintain a “downhill” gradient of water, potential between the soil and the leaves (see Chapter 4)., This effect of dissolved solutes is similar to that of a soil, water deficit (as discussed earlier in this chapter), and most, plants respond to excessive levels of soil salinity in the, same way as described earlier for water deficit., A major difference between the low-water-potential, environments caused by salinity versus soil desiccation is, the total amount of water available. During soil desiccation a finite amount of water can be obtained from the soil, profile by the plant, causing ever decreasing water potentials. In most saline environments a large (essentially, unlimited) amount of water at a constant, low water, potential is available., Of particular importance here is the fact that most plants, can adjust osmotically when growing in saline soils. Such, adjustment prevents loss of turgor (which would slow cell, growth; see Figure 25.1) while generating a lower water, potential, but these plants often continue to grow more, slowly after this adjustment for an unknown reason that curiously is not related to insufficient turgor (Bressan et al. 1990), In addition to the plant responses to low water potential, specific ion toxicity effects also occur when injurious, concentrations of ions—particularly Na+, Cl–, or SO42–—, accumulate in cells. Under nonsaline conditions, the, cytosol of higher-plant cells contains 100 to 200 mM K+ and, 1 to 10 mM Na+, an ionic environment in which many, enzymes function optimally. An abnormally high ratio of, Na+ to K+ and high concentrations of total salts inactivate, enzymes and inhibit protein synthesis. At a high concentration, Na+ can displace Ca2+ from the plasma membrane, of cotton root hairs, resulting in a change in plasma membrane permeability that can be detected as leakage of K+, from the cells (Cramer et al. 1985).
Page 664 :
Stress Physiology, , Growth, (percent of control at low CI– external), , 140, , 613, , Group IA (halophytes) includes sea blite (Suaeda maritima) and, salt bush (Atriplex nummularia). These species show growth, stimulation with Cl– levels below 400 nM., , 120, , Group IB (halophytes) includes Townsend's cordgrass (Spartina, x townsendii ) and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris).These plants, tolerate salt, but their growth is retarded., , 100, , IA, , 80, , Group II (halophytes and nonhalophytes) includes salt-tolerant, halophytic grasses that lack salt glands, such as Festuca rubra, subsp. red fescue (littoralis) and Puccinellia peisonis, and, nonhalophytes, such as cotton (Gossypium spp.) and barley, (Hordeum vulgare). All are inhibited by high salt concentrations. Within this group, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) is, intermediate, and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and, soybean (Glycine max) are sensitive., , 60, , IB, 40, , II, 20, , III, 0, , 100, , 200, , 300, , 400, , 500, , 600, , CI– (mM) in the external medium, , 700, , The species in Group III (very salt-sensitive nonhalophytes) are, severely inhibited or killed by low salt concentrations. Included, are many fruit trees, such as citrus, avocado, and stone fruit., , FIGURE 25.14 The growth of different species subjected to salinity relative to that of, , unsalinized controls. The curves dividing the regions are based on data for different, species. Plants were grown for 1 to 6 months. (From Greenway and Munns 1980.), , Photosynthesis is inhibited when high concentrations of, Na+ and/or Cl– accumulate in chloroplasts. Since photosynthetic electron transport appears relatively insensitive to salts,, either carbon metabolism or photophosphorylation may be, affected. Enzymes extracted from salt-tolerant species are just, as sensitive to the presence of NaCl as enzymes from salt-sensitive glycophytes are. Hence the resistance of halophytes to, salts is not a consequence of salt-resistant metabolism., Instead, other mechanisms come into play to avoid salt, injury, as discussed in the following section., , Plants Use Different Strategies to Avoid Salt Injury, Plants minimize salt injury by excluding salt from meristems, particularly in the shoot, and from leaves that are, actively expanding and photosynthesizing. In plants that, are salt sensitive, resistance to moderate levels of salinity, in the soil depends in part on the ability of the roots to prevent potentially harmful ions from reaching the shoots., Recall from Chapter 4 that the Casparian strip imposes, a restriction to the movements of ions into the xylem. To, bypass the Casparian strips, ions need to move from the, apoplast to the symplastic pathway across cell membranes., This transition offers salt-resistant plants a mechanism to, partially exclude harmful ions., Sodium ions enter roots passively (by moving down an, electrochemical-potential gradient; see Chapter 6), so root, cells must use energy to extrude Na+ actively back to the, outside solution. By contrast, Cl– is excluded by negative, electric potential across the cell membrane, and the low, permeability of root plasma membranes to this ion. Movement of Na+ into leaves is further minimized by absorption, of Na+ from the transpiration stream (xylem sap) during its, movement from roots to shoots and leaves., , Some salt-resistant plants, such as salt cedar (Tamarix, sp.) and salt bush (Atriplex sp.), do not exclude ions at the, root, but instead have salt glands at the surface of the, leaves. The ions are transported to these glands, where the, salt crystallizes and is no longer harmful. In general, halophytes have a greater capacity than glycophytes for ion, accumulation in shoot cells., Although some plants, such as mangroves, grow in, saline environments with abundant water supplies, the ability to acquire that water requires that they make osmotic, adjustments to obtain water from the low-water-potential, external environment. As discussed earlier in relation to, water deficit, plant cells can adjust their water potential, (Yw) in response to osmotic stress by lowering their solute, potential (Ys). Two intracellular processes contribute to the, decrease in Ys: the accumulation of ions in the vacuole and, the synthesis of compatible solutes in the cytosol., As mentioned earlier in the chapter, compatible solutes, include glycine betaine, proline, sorbitol, mannitol, pinitol,, and sucrose. Specific plant families tend to use one or two of, these compounds in preference to others. The amount of carbon used for the synthesis of these organic solutes can be, rather large (about 10% of the plant weight). In natural vegetation this diversion of carbon to adjust water potential does, not affect survival, but in agricultural crops it can reduce, growth and therefore total biomass and harvestable yields., Many halophytes exhibit a growth optimum at moderate levels of salinity, and this optimum is correlated with, the capacity to accumulate ions in the vacuole, where they, can contribute to the cell osmotic potential without damaging the salt-sensitive enzymes. To a lesser extent, this, process also occurs in more salt-sensitive glycophytes, but, the adjustment may be slower.
Page 665 :
614, , Chapter 25, , Besides making adjustments in water potential, plants, adjusting to salinity stress undergo the other osmotic, stress–related acclimations described earlier for water, deficit. For example, plants subjected to salt stress can, reduce leaf area and or drop leaves via leaf abscission just, as during episodes of osmotic stress. In addition, changes, in gene expression associated with osmotic stress are similarly associated with salinity stress. Keep in mind, however, that in addition to acclimation to a low-water-potential environment, plants experiencing salinity stress must, cope with the toxicity of high ion concentrations associated, with salinity stress., , higher energy cost. On the other hand, high ion concentrations are toxic to many cytosolic enzymes, so ions must be, accumulated in the vacuole to minimize toxic concentrations in the cytosol., Because NaCl is the most abundant salt encountered by, plants under salinity stress, transport systems that facilitate, compartmentation of Na+ into the vacuole are critical, (Binzel et al. 1988). Both Ca2+ and K+ affect intracellular, Na+ concentrations (Zhong and Läuchli 1994). At high concentrations of Na+, K+ uptake through a high-affinity, K+–Na+ transporter, HKT1, is inhibited, and the transporter, operates as an Na+ uptake system (Figure 25.15). Calcium,, on the other hand, enhances K+/Na+ selectivity and in so, doing increases salt tolerance (Liu and Zhu 1997)., , Ion Exclusion Is Critical for Acclimation and, Adaptation to Salinity Stress, , Sodium Is Transported across the Plasma, Membrane and the Tonoplast, , In terms of metabolic energy, use of ions to balance tissue, water potential in a saline environment clearly has a lower, energy cost for the plant than use of carbohydrates or, amino acids, the production of which has a significantly, , ˜, , K+, , Na+, , H+, , Na+, , Apoplast, pH 5.5, , As discussed in Chapter 6, H+ pumps in the plasma membrane and tonoplast provide the driving force (H+ electro-, , Na+, , ˜, , Na+, , ADP, , Ca2+, , ADP, , H+, , Na+, Ca2+, , AtNHX, 1,2,5, H+, Na+, , 2+, , Ca, Ca2+, , K+, , H+, , ATP, , ACA, , ATP, , KUP1, TRH1, , H+, , CAX1, CAX2, , Ca2+, H+, , ADP, Vacuole, pH 5.5, , H+, , ˜, , K+, , H+, , ATP, , H+, , ADP, , Na+, , NSCC, , K+, , Ca2+, , H+, , Ca2+, , AKT1, , AtHKT1, , H+, , Na+, , SOS1, , Cytosol, pH 7.5, , H+, , Ca2+, , Ca+, ATP, ACA, , 2 Pi, , H+, , PPi, , Ca+, , FIGURE 25.15 Membrane transport proteins mediating, , sodium, potassium, and calcium transport during salinity, stress. SOS1, plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter; ACA,, plasma/tonoplast membrane Ca2+-ATPase; KUP1/TRH1,, high-affinity K+-H+ co-transporter; atHKT1, sodium influx, transporter; AKT1, K+in channel; NSCC, non selective, cation channel; CAX1 or 2, Ca2+/H+ antiporter; atNHX1, 2, or 5, endomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter. Also indicated in, , the figure are proteins that have been implicated in ion, homeostasis, but whose molecular identity is either not, presently known or cofirmed in plants. These include, plasma membrane and tonoplast calcium channel proteins,, and vacuolar proton-pumping ATPases and pyrophosphatases. The membrane potential difference across the, plasma membrane is typically 120 to 200 mV, negative, inside; across the tonoplast 0 to 20 mV; positive inside.
Page 666 :
Stress Physiology, chemical potential) for secondary transport of ions (see, Figure 25.15). An ATPase is primarily responsible for the, large ∆pH and membrane potential gradient found across, the plasma membrane. A vacuolar H +-ATPase generates a, ∆pH and membrane potential across the tonoplast, (Hasegawa et al. 2000)., Activity of these pumps is required for the secondary, transport of excess ions associated with plant responses to, salinity stress. This is indicated by findings showing that, the activity of these H+ pumps is increased by salinity, and, induced gene expression may account for some of this upregulation., Energy-dependent transport (efflux) of Na+ from the, cytosol of plant cells across the plasma membrane is mediated by the gene product of the SOS1 (salt overly sensitive, 1) gene that function as a Na+–H+ antiporter (Figure 25.16)., The SOS1 antiporter is regulated by the gene products of, , Na+, , at least two other genes, referred to as SOS2 and SOS3 (Shi, et al. 2000). SOS2 is a serine/threonine kinase that is apparently activated by calcium through the function of SOS3, a, calcium-regulated protein phosphatase (see Web Topic 25.4, for details on Ca2+ signaling and the SOS gene family)., Vacuolar compartmentation of Na+ results in part from, the activity of a family of Na+–H+ antiporters such as Arabidopsis AtNHX1 (see Figure 25.15). Transgenic Arabidopsis, and tomato plants overexpressing the gene that encodes, AtNHX1 exhibit enhanced salt tolerance (Apse et al. 1999;, Quintero et al. 2000). (See Web Topic 25.5 for details on, molecular studies of Na+ compartmentation.) These molecular findings are another example of the wealth of new, information emerging from studies on transgenic plants,, gene sequencing, and protein characterization (see Web, Topic 25.6 for details on work with transgenic plants for, stress studies)., , K+, , Na+, , H+, , 615, , Ca2+, , Na+, , Ca2+, , Na+, , SOS1, AtHKT1, Na+, , H+, , SOS2, , AKT1, , Na+, , SOS3, , K+, , Ca2+, H+, , Na+, , Transcription, factor, , NSCC, , AtNHX, 1,2,5, Na+, , Cytosol, pH 7.5, , ˜, , H+, , Vacuole, pH 5.5, , ˜, , Apoplast, pH 5.5, , ˜, , FIGURE 25.16 The regulation of ion homeostasis by the SOS, , signal transduction pathway, salinity stress, and calcium, levels. Red arrows indicate positive regulation of the, effected transport protein while blue arrows indicate negative regulation. Proteins shown in yellow are activated by, salinity stress. SOS1, plasma membrane Na+/H+, antiporter; SOS2, serine/threonine kinase; SOS3, Ca2+ binding protein; HKT1, sodium influx transporter; AKT1, K+in, channel; NSCC, non selective cation channel; NHX1, 2 or 5,, endomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter; shown in orange is an, undertermined calcium channel protein. Salinity stress activates a calcium channel leading to an increase in cytosolic, , calcium that activates the SOS cascade through SOS3. The, SOS cascade must negatively regulate HKT1 which in turn, secondarily regulates AKT1. At the same time, the SOS cascade increases the activity of SOS1 and AKT1. Working, through an as yet undefined transcription factor the SOS, cascade increases transcription of SOS1 while decreasing, transcription of NHX gene(s). At low calcium NSCC can, also function as an alternative sodium influx system, but, this transporter is inhibited at high calcium levels. The, membrane potential difference across the plasma membrane is typically 120 to 200 mV, negative inside, that of the, tonoplast is 0 to 20 mV, positive inside.
Page 667 :
616, , Chapter 25, , OXYGEN DEFICIENCY, Roots usually obtain sufficient oxygen (O2) for aerobic respiration (see Chapter 11) directly from the gaseous space in, the soil. Gas-filled pores in well-drained, well-structured soil, readily permit the diffusion of gaseous O2 to depths of several meters. Consequently, the O2 concentration deep in the, soil is similar to that in humid air. However, soil can become, flooded or waterlogged when it is poorly drained or when, rain or irrigation is excessive. Water then fills the pores and, blocks the diffusion of O2 in the gaseous phase. Dissolved, oxygen diffuses so slowly in stagnant water that only a few, centimeters of soil near the surface remain oxygenated., When temperatures are low and plants are dormant,, oxygen depletion is very slow and the consequences are, relatively harmless. However, when temperatures are, higher (greater than 20°C), oxygen consumption by plant, roots, and soil fauna and microorganisms, can totally, deplete the oxygen from the bulk of the soil water in as little as 24 hours., Flooding-sensitive plants are severely damaged by 24, hours of anoxia. The growth and survival of many plant, species are greatly depressed under such conditions, and, crop yields can be severely reduced. For example, garden, pea (Pisum sativum) yields can be halved by 24 hours of, flooding, making garden pea an example of a flooding-sensitive plant. Other plants, particularly species not adapted, to grow in continually wet conditions and many crop, plants, are affected by flooding in a milder way and are, considered flooding-tolerant plants. Flooding-tolerant, plants can withstand anoxia (lack of oxygen) temporarily,, but not for prolonged periods of more than a few days., On the other hand, specialized natural vegetation found, in wetlands such as marshes and swamps, and crops such, as rice, are well adapted to resist oxygen deficiency in the, root environment. Wetland plants can resist anoxia, and they, grow and survive for extended periods of up to months with, their root systems in anoxic conditions. Most of these plants, have special adaptations, which we will discuss here, that, permit oxygen available in nearby environments to reach the, tissues held in anoxic conditions. Practically all plants, require oxygen when they are engaging in rapid metabolic, activity, and plants can be classified according to the time, they can withstand anoxic conditions in their root environment without demonstrating substantial damage., In the following sections we discuss the damage caused, by anaerobiosis to roots and shoots, how wetland vegetation copes with low oxygen tensions, and different acclimations to anoxic stress that distinguish between floodingtolerant and flooding-susceptible species., , Anaerobic Microorganisms Are Active in, Water-Saturated Soils, When soil is completely depleted of molecular O2, the function of soil microbes becomes significant for plant life and, , growth. Anaerobic soil microorganisms (anaerobes) derive, their energy from the reduction of nitrate (NO3–) to nitrite, (NO2–) or to nitrous oxide (N2O) and molecular nitrogen, (N2). These gases (N2O and N2) are lost to the atmosphere, in a process called denitrification. As conditions become, more reducing, anaerobes reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+, and because, of its greater solubility, Fe2+ can rise to toxic concentrations, when some soils are anaerobic for many weeks. Other, anaerobes may reduce sulfate (SO42–) to hydrogen sulfide, (H2S), which is a respiratory poison., When anaerobes have an abundant supply of organic, substrate, bacterial metabolites such as acetic acid and, butyric acid are released into the soil water, and these acids, along with reduced sulfur compounds account for the, unpleasant odor of waterlogged soil. All of these substances made by microorganisms under anaerobic conditions are toxic to plants at high concentrations., , Roots Are Damaged in Anoxic Environments, Root respiration rate and metabolism are affected even, before O2 is completely depleted from the root environment. The critical oxygen pressure (COP) is the oxygen, pressure at which the respiration rate is first slowed by O2, deficiency. The COP for a maize root tip growing in a wellstirred nutrient solution at 25°C, is about 0.20 atmosphere, (20 kPa, or 20% O2 by volume), almost the concentration in, ambient air. At this oxygen partial pressure (for a discussion of partial pressures, see Web Topic 9.3), the rate of diffusion of dissolved O2 from the solution into the tissue and, from cell to cell barely keeps pace with the rate of O2 utilization. However, a root tip is metabolically very active,, with respiration rates and ATP turnover comparable to, those of mammalian tissue., In older zones of the root, where cells are mature and, fully vacuolated and the respiration rate is lower, the COP, is often in the range of 0.1 to 0.05 atmosphere. When O2, concentrations are below the COP, the center of the root, becomes anoxic (completely lacking oxygen) or hypoxic, (partly deficient in oxygen)., The COP is lower when respiration slows down at, cooler temperatures; it also depends on how bulky the, organ is and how tightly the cells are packed. Large, bulky, fruits are able to remain fully aerobic because of the large, intercellular spaces that readily allow gaseous diffusion., For single cells, an O2 partial pressure as low as 0.01 atmosphere (1% O2 in the gaseous phase) can be adequate, because diffusion over short distances ensures an adequate, O2 supply to mitochondria. A very low partial pressure of, O2 at the mitochondrion is sufficient to maintain oxidative, phosphorylation., The Km value (Michaelis–Menten constant; see Chapter 2, on the web site) for cytochrome oxidase is 0.1 to 1.0 µM dissolved O2, a tiny fraction of the concentration of dissolved, O2 in equilibrium with air (277 µM at 20°C). The large difference between the COP values for an organ or tissue and
Page 668 :
Stress Physiology, , 617, , H 2O, Sucrose, , Glucose + Fructose, , UDP, Fructose, UDP-glucose, , Glucose, , Glucose-1-P, , ATP, , ATP, , PPi UTP, , ADP, , ADP, Fructose-6-P, , Glucose-6-P, , Glycolysis, NADH + 2H+, , Anoxia, (–), , TCA cycle, , Pyruvate, NADH + H+, NAD, Lactate, dehydrogenase, , (–), , Reduced, pH, , H+, Pyruvate decarboxylase, CO2, , (+), Acetaldehyde, , NADH + H+, Lactate, , Alcohol, dehydrogenase, , NAD, , Ethanol, , FIGURE 25.17 During episodes of anoxia, pyruvate pro-, , duced by glycolysis is initially fermented to lactate. Proton, production by glycolysis, and other metabolic pathways,, and decreased proton translocation across the plasma membrane and tonoplast lead to a lowering of cytosolic pH. At, lower pHs, lactate dehydrogenase activity is inhibited, and, pyruvate decarboxylase is activated. This leads to an, , the O2 requirements of mitochondria is explained by the, slow diffusion of dissolved O2 in aqueous media., In the absence of O2, electron transport and oxidative, phosphorylation in mitochondria cease, the tricarboxylic acid, cycle cannot operate, and ATP can be produced only by fermentation. Thus when the supply of O2 is insufficient for aerobic respiration, roots first begin to ferment pyruvate (formed, in glycolysis; see Chapter 11) to lactate, through the action of, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (Figure 25.17). In the root tips, of maize, lactate fermentation is transient because lowered, intracellular pH quickly leads to a switch from lactate fermentation to ethanol fermentation. The shift occurs because, of the different pH optima of the cytosolic enzymes involved., At acidic pH, LDH is inhibited and pyruvate decarboxylase is activated. The net yield of ATP in fermentation, is only 2 moles of ATP per mole of hexose sugar respired, (compared with 36 moles of ATP per mole of hexose, respired in aerobic respiration). Thus, injury to root metabolism by O2 deficiency originates in part from a lack of ATP, to drive essential metabolic processes (Drew 1997)., , increase in the fermentation of ethanol and a decrease in, the fermentation of lactate at lower pHs. The pathway of, ethanol fermentation consumes more protons than does the, pathway of lactate fermentation. This increases the cytosolic pH and enhances the ability of the plant to survive the, episode of anoxia., , Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was, used to measure the intracellular pH of living maize root, tips under nondestructive conditions (Roberts et al. 1992)., In healthy cells, the vacuolar contents are more acidic (pH, 5.8) than the cytoplasm (pH 7.4). But under conditions of, extreme O2 deficiency, protons gradually leak from the vacuole into the cytoplasm, adding to the acidity generated in, the initial burst of lactic acid fermentation. These changes, in pH (cytosolic acidosis) are associated with the onset of cell, death., Apparently, active transport of H+ into the vacuole by, tonoplast ATPases is slowed by lack of ATP, and without, ATPase activity the normal pH gradient between cytosol, and vacuole cannot be maintained. Cytosolic acidosis irreversibly disrupts metabolism in the cytoplasm of higherplant cells, as it does in anoxic cells of animals. It is essentially this cytosolic acidosis that causes damage, and the, timing and degree to which it is limited are the primary, factors distinguishing flooding-sensitive from flooding-tolerant species.
Page 669 :
618, , Chapter 25, , Damaged O2-Deficient Roots Injure Shoots, Anoxic or hypoxic roots lack sufficient energy to support, physiological processes on which the shoots depend., Experiments have shown that the failure of the roots of, wheat or barley to absorb nutrient ions and transport them, to the xylem (and from there to the shoot) quickly leads to, a shortage of ions within developing and expanding tissues. Older leaves senesce prematurely because of reallocation of phloem-mobile elements (N, P, K) to younger, leaves. The lower permeability of roots to water often leads, to a decrease in leaf water potential and wilting, although, this decrease is temporary if stomata close, preventing further water loss by transpiration., Hypoxia also accelerates production of the ethylene precursor ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) in, roots (see Chapter 22). In tomato, ACC travels via the, xylem sap to the shoot, where, in contact with oxygen, it is, converted by ACC oxidase to ethylene. The upper (adaxial) surfaces of the leaf petioles of tomato and sunflower, have ethylene-responsive cells that expand more rapidly, when ethylene concentrations are high. This expansion, results in epinasty, the downward growth of the leaves, such that they appear to droop. Unlike wilting, epinasty, does not involve loss of turgor., In some species (e.g., pea and tomato), flooding induces, stomatal closure apparently without detectable changes in, leaf water potential. Oxygen shortage in roots, like water, deficit or high concentrations of salts, can stimulate abscisic, acid (ABA) production and movement of ABA to leaves., However, stomatal closure under these conditions can be, attributed mostly to the additional production of ABA by, the older, lower leaves. These leaves do wilt, and they, export their ABA to the younger turgid leaves, leading to, stomatal closure (Zhang and Zhang 1994)., , Submerged Organs Can Acquire O2 through, Specialized Structures, In contrast to flooding-sensitive and flooding-tolerant, species, wetland vegetation is well adapted to grow for, extended periods in water-saturated soil. Even when, shoots are partly submerged, they grow vigorously and, show no signs of stress., In some wetland species, such as the water lily, (Nymphoides peltata), submergence traps endogenous ethylene, and the hormone stimulates cell elongation of the, petiole, extending it quickly to the water surface so that the, leaf is able to reach the air. Internodes of deep-water (floating) rice respond similarly to trapped ethylene, so the, leaves extend above the water surface despite increases in, water depth. In the case of pondweed (Potamogeton pectinatus), an aquatic monocot, stem elongation is insensitive, to ethylene; instead elongation is promoted even under, anaerobic conditions by acidification of the surrounding, water caused by the accumulation of respiratory CO2., In most wetland plants, and in many plants that acclimate well to wet conditions, the stem and roots develop, , longitudinally interconnected, gas-filled channels that provide a low-resistance pathway for movement of oxygen, and other gases. The gases (air) enter through stomata, or, through lenticels on woody stems and roots, and travel by, molecular diffusion, or by convection driven by small pressure gradients., In many wetland plants, exemplified by rice, cells are, separated by prominent, gas-filled spaces, which form a tissue called aerenchyma, that develop in the roots independently of environmental stimuli. In a few nonwetland, plants, however, including both monocots and dicots, oxygen deficiency induces the formation of aerenchyma in the, stem base and newly developing roots (Figure 25.18)., In the root tip of maize, hypoxia stimulates the activity, of ACC synthase and ACC oxidase, thus causing ACC and, ethylene to be produced faster. The ethylene leads to the, death and disintegration of cells in the root cortex. The, spaces these cells formerly occupied provide the gas-filled, voids that facilitate movement of O2., Ethylene-signaled cell death is highly selective; cells not, destined to die in the root are unaffected. A rise in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration is thought to be part of the ethylene, signal transduction pathway leading to cell death. Chemicals that elevate cytosolic Ca2+ concentration promote cell, death under noninducing conditions; conversely, chemicals, that lower cytosolic Ca2+ concentration block cell death in, hypoxic roots that would normally form aerenchyma. Ethylene-dependent cell death in response to hypoxia is an, example of programmed cell death, which was discussed in, Chapter 16 (Drew et al. 2000)., Some plants (or parts of them) can tolerate exposure to, strictly anaerobic conditions for an extended period (weeks, or months) before developing aerenchyma. These include, the embryo and coleoptile of rice and of Echinochloa crusgalli var. oryzicola (rice grass), and rhizomes (underground, horizontal stems) of Schoenoplectus lacustris (giant bulrush),, Scirpus maritimus (salt marsh bulrush), and Typha angustifolia (narrow-leafed cattail). These rhizomes can survive for, several months and expand their leaves in an anaerobic, atmosphere., In nature, rhizomes overwinter in anaerobic mud at the, edges of lakes. In spring, once the leaves have expanded, above the mud or water surface, O2 diffuses down through, the aerenchyma into the rhizome. Metabolism then, switches from an anaerobic (fermentative) to an aerobic, mode, and roots begin to grow using the available oxygen., Likewise, during germination of paddy (wetland) rice and, of rice grass, the coleoptile breaks the water surface and, becomes a diffusion pathway (a “snorkel”) for O2 to the, rest of the plant. (Even though rice is a wetland species, its, roots are as intolerant of anoxia as maize roots are.), As the root extends into oxygen-deficient soil, the continuous formation of aerenchyma just behind the tip allows, oxygen movement within the root to supply the apical, zone. In roots of rice and other typical wetland plants,, structural barriers composed of suberized and lignified
Page 670 :
Stress Physiology, (A), , 619, , (B), , X, , X, , En, , En, , cx, gs, , Ep, Ep, , FIGURE 25.18 Scanning electron micrographs of transverse, , sections through roots of maize, showing changes in structure with oxygen supply. (150×) (A) Control root, supplied, with air, with intact cortical cells. (B) Oxygen-deficient root, growing in a nonaerated nutrient solution. Note the promi-, , cells prevent O2 diffusion outward to the soil. The O2 thus, retained supplies the apical meristem and allows growth, to proceed 50 cm or more into anaerobic soil., In contrast, roots of nonwetland species, such as maize,, leak O2, failing to conserve it to the same extent. Thus, in, the root apex of these plants, internal O2 becomes insufficient for aerobic respiration, and this lack of O2 severely, limits the depth to which such roots can extend into anaerobic soil., , Most Plant Tissues Cannot Tolerate, Anaerobic Conditions, Most tissues of higher plants cannot survive prolonged, anaerobic conditions. Root tips of maize, for example,, remain viable for only 20 to 24 hours if they are suddenly, deprived of O2. Under anoxia, some ATP is generated, slowly by fermentation, but the energy status of cells gradually declines during cytosolic acidosis. The precise combination of biochemical characteristics that allow some cells, to tolerate anoxia for long periods is not fully understood., Root tips of maize and other cereals show a modest degree, of acclimation if they first are made hypoxic, whereupon, they can survive up to 4 days of anoxia., Acclimation to an anaerobic condition is associated, with expression of the genes that encode many of the, anaerobic stress proteins (see the next section). After acclimation, the ability to carry out ethanolic fermentation, , nent gas-filled spaces (gs) in the cortex (cx), formed by, degeneration of cells. The stele (all cells interior to the, endodermis, En) and the epidermis (Ep) remain intact. X,, xylem. (Courtesy of J. L. Basq and M. C. Drew.), , under anoxia (thereby producing ATP to keep some, metabolism going) is improved, and this improvement is, accompanied by an ability to transport lactate out of the, cytosol to the external medium, thus minimizing cytosolic acidosis (Drew 1997)., The ability of organs of wetland plants to tolerate, chronic anoxia may depend on strategies similar to those, just described, but they are clearly employed to greater, effect: Critical features appear to be control of cytosolic pH,, continued generation of ATP by glycolysis and fermentation, and sufficient storage of fuel for anaerobic respiration, over extended periods. It has been suggested that synthesis of alanine, succinate, and γ-aminobutyric acid under, anoxia consumes protons and minimizes cytosolic acidosis. Evidence to this effect has been found in anoxia-tolerant shoots of rice and rice grass, but not in anoxia-sensitive, shoots of wheat and barley., Organs of species that alternate between anaerobic and, aerobic metabolism need to deal with the consequences of, the entry of O2 following anoxia. Highly reactive oxygen, species are generated during aerobic metabolism, and they, are normally detoxified by cellular defense mechanisms, that involve superoxide dismutase (SOD). This enzyme, converts superoxide radicals to hydrogen peroxide, which, is then converted to water by peroxidase., In anoxia-tolerant rhizomes of Iris pseudacorus (yellow, flag), SOD activity increases 13-fold during 28 days of
Page 671 :
620, , Chapter 25, , anoxia. This increase is not observed in rhizomes of other, Iris species that are not anoxia tolerant. In the tolerant, species, SOD may be available to cope with the influx of O2, that occurs when the leaves emerge into the air from water, or mud, so it may assist in resisting postanoxic stress., , Acclimation to O2 Deficit Involves Synthesis of, Anaerobic Stress Proteins, When maize roots are made anoxic, protein synthesis, ceases except for the continued production of about 20, polypeptides (Sachs and Ho 1986). Most of these anaerobic, stress proteins have been identified as enzymes of the glycolytic and fermentation pathways., The mechanism for sensing reduced oxygen levels, under hypoxic or anoxic conditions is not completely clear., However, one of the earliest events to occur following lowering of O2 levels is an elevation of the intracellular Ca2+., Evidence suggests that this calcium signal is involved in, the signal transduction of anoxia. Within minutes of the, onset of anoxia, a rise in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration acts, as a signal leading to increases in mRNA levels of alcohol, dehydrogenase (ADH) and sucrose synthase in maize cells, in culture., Chemicals that block a rise in intracellular Ca2+ concentration also prevent the expression of the genes for ADH, and sucrose synthase from being induced by anoxia, and, they greatly enhance the sensitivity of maize seedlings to, anoxia (Sachs et al. 1996). Further research is needed to, resolve these mechanisms and to explain how intracellular, Ca2+ concentration signals both the early survival of cells, under anoxia and the induction of cell death and, aerenchyma formation during prolonged hypoxia., The accumulation of mRNAs of the anaerobic stress, genes results from changes in the rate of transcription of, these genes. Analysis of common sequence elements in the, promoters of the ADH genes of maize and Arabidopsis and, of the other anaerobic stress genes has led to the identification of an anaerobic stress element and a G-box element, that bind cis-acting transcription factors leading to the transcriptional activation of these genes. However, the exact, details of how oxygen deficiency is sensed, how the signal, is transduced through elevations in cytosolic Ca2+ leading, to alterations in the transcription of specific genes, remains, to be determined., Note also that there is strong evidence that some type of, translational control of anaerobic stress genes is also occurring. The efficiency with which mRNAs for non-anaerobic, stress–regulated genes are translated following hypoxic, stress is dramatically lower than that of stress-regulated, genes such as ADH., , SUMMARY, Stress is usually defined as an external factor that exerts a, disadvantageous influence on the plant. Under both natural and agricultural conditions, plants are exposed to, , unfavorable environments that result in some degree of, stress. Water deficit, heat stress and heat shock, chilling and, freezing, salinity, and oxygen deficiency are major stress, factors restricting plant growth such that biomass or agronomic yields at the end of the season express only a fraction of the plant’s genetic potential., The capacity of plants to cope with unfavorable environments is known as stress resistance. Plant adaptations, that confer stress resistance, such as CAM metabolism, are, genetically determined. Acclimation improves resistance, as a result of prior exposure of a plant to stress., Drought resistance mechanisms vary with climate and, soil conditions. Indeterminate growth patterns such as that, of sorghum and soybean allow these species to take advantage of late-occurring rains; plants with a determinate, growth pattern, such as that of corn, lack that form of resistance to water stress. Inhibition of leaf expansion is one of, the earliest responses to water stress, occurring when, decreases in turgor ensuing from water deficit reduce or, eliminate the driving force for cell and leaf expansion., Additional stress resistance mechanisms in response to, water stress include leaf abscission, root extension into, deeper, wetter soil, and stomatal closure., Stress caused by water deficit leads to the expression of, sets of genes involved in acclimation and adaptation to the, stress. These genes mediate the cellular and whole-plant, responses described here. The sensing and activation of signal transduction cascades mediating these changes in gene, expression involve both an ABA-dependent pathway and, an ABA-independent pathway., Heat stress and heat shock are caused by high temperatures. Some CAM species can tolerate temperatures of 60, to 65°C, but most leaves are damaged above 45°C. The, temperature of actively transpiring leaves is usually lower, than air temperature, but water deficit curtails transpiration and causes overheating and heat stress. Heat stress, inhibits photosynthesis and impairs membrane function, and protein stability., Adaptations that confer heat resistance include, responses that decrease light absorption by the leaves, such, as leaf rolling, and a decrease in leaf size that minimizes, boundary layer resistance and increases conductive heat, loss. Heat shock proteins synthesized at high temperatures, act as molecular chaperones that promote stabilization and, correct folding of cell proteins, and biochemical responses, leading to pH and metabolic homeostasis are also associated with acclimation and adaptation to rapid rises in temperature., Chilling and freezing stress ensue from low temperatures. Chilling injury occurs at temperatures that are too, low for normal growth but are above freezing, and it is typical of species of tropical or subtropical origin exposed to, temperate climates. Chilling injuries include slow growth,, leaf lesions, and wilting. The primary cause of most chilling injuries is the loss of membrane properties ensuing, from changes in membrane fluidity. Membrane lipids of
Page 672 :
Stress Physiology, chilling-resistant plants often have a greater proportion of, unsaturated fatty acids than those of chilling-sensitive, plants., Freezing injury is associated primarily with damage, caused by ice crystals formed within cells and organs., Freezing-resistant species have mechanisms that limit the, growth of ice crystals to extracellular spaces. Mechanisms, that confer the resistance to freezing that is typical of, woody plants include dehydration and supercooling., Cold stress reduces water activity and leads to osmotic, stress within the cells. This osmotic stress effect leads to the, activation of osmotic stress–related signaling pathways,, and the accumulation of proteins involved in cold acclimation. Other cold specific, non-osmotic stress–related, genes are also activated. Transgenic plants overexpressing, cold stress–activated signaling components demonstrate, increased cold tolerance., Salinity stress results from salt accumulation in the soil., Some halophyte species are highly tolerant to salt, but, salinity depresses growth and photosynthesis in sensitive, species. Salt injury ensues from a decrease in the water, potential of the soil that makes soil water less available and, from toxicity of specific ions accumulated at injurious concentrations. Plants avoid salt injury by exclusion of excess, ions from leaves or by compartmentation of ions in vacuoles. Some of the molecular determinants of Na+ exclusion and vacuolar partitioning have been determined, and, a signaling pathway, the SOS pathway, regulating the, expression of these genes involved in ion homeostasis has, been established., Oxygen deficiency is typical of flooded or waterlogged, soils. Oxygen deficiency depresses growth and survival of, many species. On the other hand, plants of marshes and, swamps, and crops such as rice, are well adapted to resist, oxygen deficiency in the root environment. Most tissues of, higher plants cannot survive anaerobically, but some tissues, such as the embryo and coleoptiles from rice, can survive for weeks under anoxic conditions. The metabolic, pathways for resisting anoxic damage and their regulation, have been uncovered., , Web Material, Web Topics, 25.1 Stomatal Conductance and Yields of Irrigated, Crops, Stomatal conductance predicts yields of irrigated crops grown in hot environments., , 25.2 Membrane Lipids and Low Temperatures, Lipid enzymes from mutant and transgenic, plants mimic the effects of low-temperature, acclimation., , 621, , 25.3 Ice Formation in Higher-Plant Cells, Heat is released when ice forms in intercellular, spaces., , 25.4 Ca2+ Signaling and Activation of the Salt, Overly Sensitive (SOS) Signal Pathway, Three genetically linked loci control ion homeostasis and salt tolerance., , 25.5 Na+ Transport across the Plasma Membrane, and Vacuolar Compartmentation, SOS1 is an Na+–H+ antiporter that controls Na+, fluxes across the plasma membrane., , 25.6 Gene Transfer and Stress Tolerance, Transgenic plants are valuable tools for studying stress tolerance., , Web Essay, 25.1 The Effect of Air Pollution on Plants, Polluting gases inhibit stomatal conductance,, photosynthesis, and growth., , Chapter References, Apse, M. P., Aharon, G. S., Snedden, W. A., and Blumwald, E. (1999), Salt tolerance conferred by over expression of vacuolar Na+/H+, antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285: 1256–1258., Becwar, M. R., Rajashekar, C., Bristow, K. J. H., and Burke, M. J., (1981) Deep undercooling of tissue water and winter hardiness, limitations in timberline flora. Plant Physiol. 68: 111–114., Binzel, M. L., Hess, F. D., Bressan, R. A., and Hasegawa, P. M. (1988), Intracellular compartmentation of ions in salt adapted tobacco, cells. Plant Physiol. 86: 607–614., Björkman, O., Badger, M. R., and Armond, P. A. (1980) Response and, adaptation of photosynthesis to high temperatures. In Adaptation, of Plants to Water and High Temperatures Stress, N. C. Turner and, P. J. Kramer, eds., Wiley, New York, pp. 233–249., Blizzard, W. E., and Boyer, J. S. (1980) Comparative resistance of the, soil and the plant to water transport. Plant Physiol. 66: 809–814., Bohnert, H. J., Ostrem, J. A., and Schmitt, J. M. (1989) Changes in, gene expression elicited by salt stress in Mesembryanthemum, crystallinum. In Environmental Stress in Plants, J. H. Cherry, ed.,, Springer, Berlin, pp. 159–171., Boston, R. S., Viitanen, P. V., and Vierling, E. (1996) Molecular chaperones and protein folding in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 32: 191–222., Boyer, J. S. (1970) Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiol. 46: 233–235., Boyer, J. S. (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:, 443–448., Bray, E. A., Bailey-Serres J., and Weretilnyk, E. (2000) Responses to, abiotic stresses. In Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants, B., Buchanan, W. Gruissem, and R. Jones, eds., American Society of, Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, pp. 1158–1203., Bressan, R. A., Nelson, D. E., Iraki, N. M., LaRosa, P. C., Singh, N. K.,, Hasegawa, P. M., and Carpita, N. C. (1990) Reduced cell expansion and changes in cell wall of plant cells adapted to NaCl. In, Environmental Injury to Plants, F. Katterman, ed., Academic Press,, New York, pp. 137–171.
Page 673 :
622, , Chapter 25, , Buchanan, B. B., Gruissem, W., and Jones, R. eds. (2000) Biochemistry, & Molecular Biology of Plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD., Burke, M. J., and Stushnoff, C. (1979) Frost hardiness: A discussion, of possible molecular causes of injury with particular reference, to deep supercooling of water. In Stress Physiology in Crop Plants,, H. Mussell and R. C. Staples, eds., Wiley, New York, pp. 197–225., Burssens, S., Himanen, K., van de Cotte, B., Beeckman, T., Van Montagu, M., Inze, D., and Verbruggen, N. (2000) Expression of cell, cycle regulatory genes and morphological alterations in response, to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 211: 632–640., Cramer, G. R., Läuchli, A., and Polito, V. S. (1985) Displacement of, Ca2+ by Na+ from the plasmalemma of root cells. A primary, response to salt stress? Plant Physiol. 79: 207–211., Davies, W. J., Wilkinson, S., and Loveys, B. (2002) Stomatal control, by chemical signaling and the exploitation of this mechanism to, increase water-use efficiency in agriculture. New Phytol. 153:, 449–460., Drew, M. C. (1997) Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: Injury, and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia. Annu. Rev. Plant, Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 223–250., Drew, M. C., He, C. J., and Morgan P. W. (2000) Programmed cell, death and aerenchyma formation in roots. Trends in Plant Science, 5: 123–127., Greenway, H., and Munns, R. (1980) Mechanisms of salt tolerance in, nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 31:, 149–190., Gusta, L. V., Wilen, R. W., and Fu, P. (1996) Low-temperature stress, tolerance: The role of abscisic acid, sugars, and heat-stable proteins. Hort. Sci. 31: 39–46., Guy, C. L. (1999) Molecular responses of plants to cold shock and, cold acclimation. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1: 231–242., Hartung, W., Wilkinson, S., and Davies, W. J. (1998) Factors that regulate abscisic acid concentrations at the primary site of action at, the guard cell. J. Exp. Bot. 49: 361–367., Hasegawa, P. M., Bressan, R. A., Zhu, J. K., and Bohnert, H. J. (2000), Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev., Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51: 463–499., Hong, S. W., and Vierling, E. (2000) Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana, defective in the acquisition of tolerance to high temperature, stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 4392–4397., Jenks, M. A., Eigenbrode, S., and Lemeiux, B. (In press) Cuticular, waxes of Arabidopsis. In The Arabidopsis Book, C. Somerville and, E. Meyerowitz, eds., American Society of Plant Physiologists,, Rockville, MD., Kawasaki, S., Brochert, C., Deyholos, M., Wang, H., Brazille, S.,, Kawai, K., Galbraith, D. W., and Bohnert, H. J. (2001) Gene, expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice., Plant Cell 13: 889–906., Lee, J. H., and Schoeffl, F. (1996) An Hsp70 antisense gene affects the, expression of HSP70/HSC70, the regulation of HSF, and the, acquisition of thermotolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis, thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 252: 11–19., Levitt, J. (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses, Vol. 1, 2nd, ed. Academic Press, New York., Lindow, S. E., Arny, D. C., and Upper, C. D. (1982) Bacterial ice nucleation: A factor in frost injury to plants. Plant Physiol. 70:, 1084–1089., Liu, J. P., and Zhu, J. K. (1997) An Arabidopsis mutant that requires, increased calcium for potassium nutrition and salt tolerance. Proc., Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 14960–14964., Lyons, J. M., Wheaton, T. A., and Pratt, H. K. (1964) Relationship, between the physical nature of mitochondrial membranes and, chilling sensitivity in plants. Plant Physiol. 39: 262–268., Maggio, A., and Joly, R. J. (1995) Effects of mercuric chloride on the, hydraulic conductivity of tomato root systems: Evidence for a, channel-mediated water pathway. Plant Physiol. 109: 331–335., , Mantyla, E., Lang, V., and Palva, E. T. (1995) Role of abscisic acid in, drought-induced freezing tolerance, cold acclimation, and accumulation of LTI78 and RAB18 proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana., Plant Physiol. 107: 141–148., Matthews, M. A., Van Volkenburgh, E., and Boyer, J. S. (1984) Acclimation of leaf growth to low water potentials in sunflower. Plant, Cell Environ. 7: 199–206., McCree, K. J., and Richardson, S. G. (1987) Stomatal closure vs., osmotic adjustment: A comparison of stress responses. Crop Sci., 27: 539–543., Niu, X., Bressan, R. A., Hasegawa, P. M., and Pardo, J. M. (1995) Ion, homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiol. 109:, 735–742., Palta, J. P., Whitaker, B. D., and Weiss, L. S. (1993) Plasma membrane, lipids associated with genetic variability in freezing tolerance and, cold acclimation of Solanum species. Plant Physiol. 103: 793–803., Patterson, B. D., Paull, R., and Smillie, R. M. (1978) Chilling resistance in Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. & Bonpl., a wild tomato, with a wide altitudinal distribution. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5:, 609–617., Queitsch, C., Hong, S. W., Vierling, E., and Lindquist, S. (2000) Heat, shock protein 101 plays a crucial role in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12: 479–492., Quintero, F. J., Blatt, M. R., and Pardo, J. M. (2000) Functional conservation between yeast and plant endosomal Na+/H+, antiporters. FEBS Lett. 471: 224–228., Raison, J. K., Pike, C. S., and Berry, J. A. (1982) Growth temperatureinduced alterations in the thermotropic properties of Nerium oleander membrane lipids. Plant Physiol. 70: 215–218., Roberts, J. K. M., Hooks, M. A., Miaullis, A. P., Edwards, S., and Webster, C. (1992) Contribution of malate and amino acid metabolism, to cytoplasmic pH regulation in hypoxic maize root tips studied, using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Plant Physiol. 98:, 480–487., Sachs, M. M., and Ho, D. T. H. (1986) Alteration of gene expression, during environmental stress in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., Plant Mol. Biol. 37: 363–376., Sachs, M. M., Subbaiah, C. G., and Saab, I. N. (1996) Anaerobic gene, expression and flooding tolerance in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 47: 1–15., Sauter, A., Davies W. J., and Hartung W. (2001) The long distance, abscisic acid signal in the droughted plant: The fate of the hormone on its way from the root to the shoot. J. Exp. Bot. 52: 1–7., Shi, H., Ishitani, M., Kim, C., and Zhu, J. K. (2000) The Arabidopsis, thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+, antiporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 6896–6901., Shinozaki, K., and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2000) Molecular, responses to dehydration and low temperature: Differences and, cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr. Opinion, in Plant Biol. 3: 217–223., Snedden, W. A., Arazi, T., Fromm, H., and Shelp, B. J. (1995) Calcium/calmodulin activation of soybean glutamate decarboxylase. Plant Physiol. 108: 543–549., Stockinger, E. J., Gilmour, S. J., and Thomashow, M. F. (1997) Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat-DRE, a cis-acting, DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in, response to low temperature and water deficit. Proc. Natl. Acad., Sci. USA 94: 1035–1040., Sung, F. J. M., and Krieg, D. R. (1979) Relative sensitivity of photosynthetic assimilation and translocation of 14carbon to water, stress. Plant Physiol. 64: 852–856., Thomashow, M. (2001) So what’s new in the field of plant cold acclimation? Lots! Plant Physiol. 125: 89–93., U. S. Department of Agriculture (1989) Agricultural Statistics, U. S., Government Printing Office, Washington DC., Vierling, E. (1991) The roles of heat shock proteins in plants. Annu., Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 579–620.
Page 674 :
Stress Physiology, Weiser, C. J. (1970) Cold resistance and injury in woody plants. Science 169: 1269–1278., Williams, J. P., Khan, M. U., Mitchell, K., and Johnson, G. (1988) The, effect of temperature on the level and biosynthesis of unsaturated, fatty acids in diacylglycerols of Brassica napus leaves. Plant Physiol. 87: 904–910., Wisniewski, M., and Arora, R. (1993) Adaptation and response of, fruit trees to freezing temperatures. In Cytology, Histology and Histochemistry of Fruit Tree Diseases, A. Biggs, ed., CRC Press, Boca, Raton, FL, pp. 299–320., , 623, , Wu, J., Lightner, J., Warwick, N., and Browse, J. (1997) Low-temperature damage and subsequent recovery of fab1 mutant Arabidopsis exposed to 2°C. Plant Physiol. 113: 347–356., Zhang, J., and Zhang, X. (1994) Can early wilting of old leaves, account for much of the ABA accumulation in flooded pea, plants? J. Exp. Bot. 45: 1335–1342., Zhong, H., and Läuchli, A. (1994) Spacial distribution of solutes, K,, Na, Ca and their deposition rates in the growth zone of primary, cotton roots: Effects of NaCl and CaCl2. Planta 194: 34–41.
